Abstract
Background
Patients with urea cycle disorders (UCDs) have an increased risk of neurological disease manifestation.
Aims
Determining the effect of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the neurological outcome.
Methods
Evaluation of baseline, regular follow-up and emergency visits of 456 UCD patients prospectively followed between 2011 and 2015 by the E-IMD patient registry.
Results
About two-thirds of UCD patients remained asymptomatic until age 12 days [i.e. the median age at diagnosis of patients identified by newborn screening (NBS)] suggesting a potential benefit of NBS. In fact, NBS lowered the age at diagnosis in patients with late onset of symptoms (>28 days), and a trend towards improved long-term neurological outcome was found for patients with argininosuccinate synthetase and lyase deficiency as well as argininemia identified by NBS. Three to 17 different drug combinations were used for maintenance therapy, but superiority of any single drug or specific drug combination above other combinations was not demonstrated. Importantly, non-interventional variables of disease severity, such as age at disease onset and peak ammonium level of the initial hyperammonemic crisis (cut-off level: 500 μmol/L) best predicted the neurological outcome.
Conclusions
Promising results of NBS for late onset UCD patients are reported and should be re-evaluated in a larger and more advanced age group. However, non-interventional variables affect the neurological outcome of UCD patients. Available evidence-based guideline recommendations are currently heterogeneously implemented into practice, leading to a high variability of drug combinations that hamper our understanding of optimised long-term and emergency treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
UCDs are caused by inherited deficiencies of six enzymes and two transporters that are involved in irreversible detoxification of ammonium to urea: N-acetylglutamate synthase (NAGS; OMIM # 237310), carbamylphosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1; OMIM # 237300), ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC; OMIM # 311250), argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS; OMIM # 215700), argininosuccinate lyase (ASL; OMIM # 207900), arginase 1 (ARG1; OMIM # 207800), citrin or aspartate/glutamate carrier (OMIM # 603471 and # 605814) and the mitochondrial ornithine transporter 1 causing hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria syndrome (HHH syndrome; OMIM # 238970). The clinical phenotype of UCD patients is highly variable with first symptoms starting as early as the first days of life [early onset (EO): ≤ 28 days] or as late as adulthood [late onset (LO): > 28 days]. In addition, patients with atypical disease course or who have remained asymptomatic without treatment have also been reported (Summar et al 2008; Kido et al 2012; Rüegger et al 2014; Kölker et al 2015a, b).
Diagnosis is made by prenatal testing, high-risk family screening in families with a previously identified index patient, selective metabolic investigation in patients with symptoms, or newborn screening (NBS). However, UCDs are still rarely implemented in national NBS disease panels (Loeber et al 2012), and where they are, very few include screening for NAGS-, CPS1- and OTC-deficiency, since the sensitivity for these disorders is certainly low. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of UCDs have been proposed for use of single therapeutic means as well as their combinations (Häberle et al 2012). However, unlike in diseases such as glutaric aciduria type 1 (Kölker et al 2011) where the positive effect of adherence to guidelines on the neurological outcome was clearly shown (Heringer et al 2010), guideline evaluation is still lacking for UCDs.
The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate currently used diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for UCDs and their impact on the neurological outcome.
Patients and methods
Patient registry and inclusion/exclusion criteria
The European registry and network for intoxication type metabolic diseases (E-IMD) project (URL: https://www.eimd-registry.com) collects comprehensive information of patients with inherited deficiency of NAGS, CPS1, OTC, ASS, ASL, ARG1 and HHH syndrome. Asymptomatic female OTC carriers were also included in the study sample. Citrin deficiency is not included. A detailed description of the registry has been published previously (Kölker et al 2015a, b, c). Patients with other metabolic diseases, unconfirmed suspicion of an UCD, unrelated serious comorbidities (Down syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III-IV in the newborn period, birth weight below 1500 grams, kernicterus, and embryofetal disease due to maternal alcohol or drug abuse) or patients who died before 1st January 2011 (starting date of E-IMD) were excluded from the analysis. The phenotype in patients with UCD was studied by use of standardised electronic forms comprising common data elements for all patients as well as disease-specific follow-up parameters using a predefined algorithm (Kölker et al 2015a, b, c). The cut-off data for the statistical analysis was 16th March 2015.
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the coordinating centre (University Hospital Heidelberg, application no. S-525/2010), and consecutively by all contributing metabolic centres. Written informed consent was obtained from all study patients before enrolment and baseline visit in countries where this was needed by law.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics [mean, median, interquartile range (IR), range] and phi coefficients were calculated with SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0). For the following R (R Core Team 2015) was used. For recursive partitioning the method “Conditional inference trees” (Hothorn et al 2006, 2015) was applied according to previous studies (Kölker et al 2006; Garbade et al 2014). Age-adjusted and -unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were computed using Firth's bias reduced logistic regression approach with penalized profile likelihood based confidence intervals for parameter estimates to take into account the small numbers in unfavourable levels of almost all outcome variables for some groups (Heinze and Schemper 2002; Heinze et al 2013). The adjusted ORs were used when there was a significant influence of age on the outcome variable as evaluated by the penalized likelihood ratio, otherwise the unadjusted ORs were chosen (Heinze et al 2013). It was also tested if there was a significant interaction effect between mode of diagnosis and age on the outcome variable. In all other cases a model using diagnosis and age as selective predictors was used. Parameters were compared by randomised median difference tests programmed in R (Richter and McCann 2007); 100,000 permutations were chosen for these tests to ensure the stability of the probability estimates (Smucker et al 2007); p-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant, values between 0.05 and 0.1 are reported as trends.
Results
Brief description of the study population
From 1st February 2011 to 16th March 2015, a total of 456 UCD patients (229 males, 227 females) were enrolled in 36 metabolic centres in 18 countries (Suppl. Table S1). The most frequent diagnosis was OTC deficiency (56%) followed by ASS (19%) and ASL deficiency (13%). Median chronological age at the last regular visit was 11 years (IR 4.9-19.2 years, range 0.1-77 years) (Table 1, Suppl. Table S2). A detailed description of the study population has been published previously (Kölker et al 2015a, b, c).
Effect of diagnostic mode on age at diagnosis and neurological outcome
Since UCDs are rarely implemented to NBS programmes (ASL in six countries; ASS in five countries, ARG1 in four countries; citrin deficiency in two countries; Loeber et al 2012), most patients were diagnosed by selective metabolic investigation after the onset of symptoms (71%), whereas identification by high risk family screening (20%), NBS (5%) or prenatal testing (1%) was less frequent. In a small group of UCD patients (3%), diagnostic mode was not reported. In the NBS group, ASS (n=6), ASL (n=9) and ARG1 deficiency (n=4) were the most common diagnoses, whereas all other UCDs were not or sporadically (n=1) reported (Table 1, Suppl. Table S2).
Age at diagnosis was influenced by the proportion of patients with EO or LO of first symptoms and by the diagnostic mode. As expected, the overall median age at diagnosis was lower in the NBS group (median: 12 days; IR: 6-14 days) than in the LO group of patients identified after manifestation of first symptoms (median: 730 days; IR: 365-2160 days). However, this effect was only significant for ASL deficiency (p=0.036) and showed a trend for ARG1 deficiency (p=0.076). In contrast, age at diagnosis was similar or even lower in the EO group (median: 4 days; IR: 3-9 days) than in the NBS group (median: 12 days; IR: 6-14 days) highlighting that for the majority of these UCD patients a positive screening result would not have been available before the manifestation of first symptoms (Table 1, Suppl. Table S2).
Next, we calculated how many UCD patients in the E-IMD sample might have been successfully diagnosed by NBS while being asymptomatic. For this purpose, we examined the numbers of patients in the NBS and selective metabolic investigation groups who have remained asymptomatic until day 6 (i.e. Q1, age at diagnosis in the NBS group; IR: 6-14 days) and day 12 (i.e. median, age at diagnosis in the NBS group; IR: 6-14 days). Overall, 70% (day 6) and 65% (day 12) of UCD patients identified by NBS and selective metabolic investigation, respectively, have remained asymptomatic and, theoretically, the manifestation of first symptoms could have been prevented by NBS in this group (Table 2, Suppl. Table S3).
To increase the statistical power, data were aggregated across newborns identified by NBS, asymptomatic newborns diagnosed by high-risk family screening or newborns diagnosed by prenatal testing to an “early diagnosis” group. Altogether, 52% of patients identified by NBS and 50% of patients from the “early diagnosis” group have remained asymptomatic until the last reported visit, whereas all patients in the selective metabolic investigation group became symptomatic. Since the E-IMD sample includes a high proportion of LO patients, in particular male patients with OTC deficiency (Kölker et al 2015a), these numbers do not necessarily match with the case mix of single countries (Summar et al 2008, 2013; Kido et al 2012; Batshaw et al 2014; Kölker et al 2015a).
We have previously demonstrated that the manifestation of neurological symptoms such as movement disorders and intellectual disability is a common finding of UCD patients in the E-IMD sample (Jamiolkowski et al 2015; Kölker et al 2015b). We therefore wondered whether NBS could improve the neurological outcome. Only patients with ASS, ASL and ARG1 deficiency were included in this analysis due to small numbers of early diagnosed patients in other UCDs (Table 1). Overall, ORs showed a trend towards lower odds for movement disorder in the NBS and “early diagnosis” groups compared to the selective metabolic investigation group (Table 3; Suppl. Tables S4a-c). A similar result was found for delayed milestones, however, with ARG1 deficiency reaching statistical significance (Table 4; Suppl. Tables S4d-f).
Since IQ data so far have been reported only for a small number of patients in the NBS group, it remains unclear whether NBS has a beneficial effect on intellectual abilities.
Metabolic treatment: variability of current strategies
Early diagnosis is the precondition of early start of treatment aiming to reduce acute and chronic intoxication and organ damage. A combination of low protein diet with or without essential amino acid supplements, citrulline and/or arginine, oral antibiotics (metronidazole, colistin) and nitrogen scavengers (sodium benzoate, sodium and glycerol phenylbutyrate) has been recommended for the maintenance treatment. In addition, carglumic acid is licensed for NAGS deficiency. Consistent with these recommendations, the majority of UCD patients in the E-IMD sample received a calculated diet (286/456; 63%) or a protein-controlled diet (i.e. solely reduction of the intake of protein-rich food without performing calculation; 50/456; 11%), whereas some patients with a mild clinical phenotype did receive no dietary treatment at all (47/456; 10%). Detailed information on dietary treatment was not reported for 73 patients (16%). Essential amino acid supplements were most often administered to patients receiving a calculated diet (111/286; 39%). Tube feeding was used in 36 patients; the majority of them (72%) were EO patients. The underlying disease severity influenced the intensity of dietary management. Natural protein intake of EO and LO patients was often below international recommendations (World Health Organization et al 2007), however, EO patients with a calculated diet had an apparently lower natural protein and significantly higher caloric intake than LO patients (Table 5; Suppl. Table S5). Essential amino acid supplements were more frequently used in EO (62%) than in LO patients (29%). Median intakes of total protein of EO and LO patients were similar but often remained below the safe values of WHO recommendations (2007). Also LO patients often received fewer calories than recommended. Noteworthy, a different calculated diet pattern was found for symptomatic female OTC carriers. Median intakes of natural and total protein were unexpectedly higher for EO than for LO patients and were above WHO recommendations (2007) in EO patients. However, caloric intake in symptomatic female OTC carriers did not differ from the whole sample (Table 5; Suppl. Table S5).
Maintenance metabolic pharmacotherapy was specified for 296 patients and overall, up to seven different drugs have been used with numbers of different drug combinations ranging from three (NAGS deficiency) to 17 (female OTC deficiency) (Table 6). This may reflect adaptation of pharmacotherapy to individual requirements but alternatively may be interpreted as uncertainty of treating physicians. Sodium benzoate was more often used than (sodium or glycerol) phenylbutyrate; and arginine more often than citrulline. Combinations of sodium benzoate and phenylbutyrate were applied to 67 patients and those of arginine and citrulline to 28 patients. Intestinal bacterial decontamination with metronidazole or colistin was rarely used for maintenance treatment. As expected, carglumic acid was solely applied to patients with NAGS deficiency and patients with partially responsive CPS1 deficiency (off-license use). Liver transplantation was reported for 18 patients (five CPS1 deficiency, eight male OTC deficiency, three female OTC deficiency, and two ASS deficiency). They did not receive metabolic drug therapy after transplantation.
Emergency treatment is used to prevent or reverse metabolic decompensation. At present, the E-IMD registry includes detailed information on 87 emergency visits of 47 patients, the majority of them (38 emergency visits, 14 patients) are female with OTC deficiency (Suppl. Table S6). Therefore, the disease distribution is skewed and data should be regarded as preliminary. The overall pattern of emergency interventions was transient reduction or stop of protein intake and increased carbohydrate intake. Noteworthy, caloric intake was not increased within the first 24 hours. In fact, initial emergency caloric intake (Suppl. Table S6) was lower than caloric intake during maintenance treatment (Table 5) and below age-adapted recommendations indicating that carbohydrates were used as the primary if not sole energy source during the first 24 hours of emergency treatment, whereas fat was often omitted from initial emergency treatment. The median dosages of sodium benzoate, phenylbutyrate and/or arginine hydrochloride were in the range of the standard starting doses of these drugs (Häberle et al 2012). Intravenous sodium benzoate/sodium phenylacetate was sporadically used, the increased dosage indicating severe hyperammonemic crises (Suppl. Table S6). Extracorporeal detoxification during emergency treatment was used in two male patients with OTC deficiency (data not shown).
Impact of onset type, mode of diagnosis and therapy on the disease course
Since the onset type reflects the natural disease course, it was included in all further analyses as an independent variable. To investigate whether a specific intervention was more effective to improve the neurological outcome than others, we used recursive partitioning analysis. This procedure allows identifying predictors for clinical outcomes and can handle numerical, ordinal and categorical data which may even have highly skewed or multimodal distributions. Diseases with small numbers of patients and different initial and evolving phenotypic presentation—NAGS, and ARG1 deficiency as well as HHH syndrome—were excluded from this analysis. Independent variables showing high correlations were selectively excluded from the analysis to reduce co-linearity (Suppl. Table S7).
For the analysis, we used diagnostic mode (NBS, selective metabolic investigation, asymptomatic newborns diagnosed by high risk family screening, prenatal testing), diet (no diet, calculated diet), essential amino acid supplements (no, yes), UCD drugs (level 1: no metabolic pharmacotherapy; level 2: CPS1 and OTC deficiency: arginine or citrulline; ASS and ASL deficiency: arginine; level 3: CPS1 and OTC deficiency: one scavenger with or without arginine or citrulline; ASS and ASL deficiency: arginine and one scavenger; level 4: CPS1 and OTC deficiency: two scavengers with or without arginine or citrulline; ASS and ASL deficiency: arginine and two scavengers), onset type (asymptomatic, EO, LO), literature-based initial peak ammonium level (≤200 μmol/L, 201-500 μmol/L, 501-1000 μmol/L, >1000 μmol/L) and impaired consciousness at initial presentation (no, yes) as independent variables. The independent variable “sex” (male, female) was not included in the analysis because it did not correlate with any of the other variables. Furthermore, initial plasma glutamine concentrations and emergency management of the initial crisis were not included due to lack of data. Movement disorder (no, yes), abnormal fine motor development (no, yes), abnormal gross motor development (no, yes), muscular hypotonia (no, yes) and delayed milestones (no, yes) were used as dependent outcome variables. Motor abnormality (no, yes) was used as superordinate dependent variable subsuming four single motor variables because they were highly correlated (Suppl. Tables S7 and S8).
No particular diagnostic and therapeutic intervention could be identified as a significant predictor for any of the outcome variables. This does not necessarily mean that these interventions are not effective. However, an in-depth analysis of these interventions was hampered by the strong effect of the initial peak ammonium level on the outcome and by the heterogeneity of drug combinations used for the treatment of UCD patients in our sample. Recursive partitioning using single UCDs did not provide more detailed results (data not shown).
For CPS1-, OTC-, ASS- and ASL-deficient patients, initial peak ammonium level and onset type had the strongest influence on motor outcome. Initial peak ammonium levels above 500 μmol/L were associated with a higher frequency of movement disorders (dystonia, spasticity, chorea and ataxia) (Fig. 1) as well as impaired fine and gross motor development (data not shown). Early onset of symptoms was associated with the highest frequency of motor abnormalities (Fig. 2). As shown before, peak ammonium level is associated with the onset type (Kölker et al 2015a), supporting that age at and severity of the initial crisis are of utmost importance for the neurological outcome of above mentioned UCD patients.
Discussion
Analysis of comprehensive follow-up data of 456 UCD patients revealed five main results: (1) Peak plasma ammonium concentration during the initial hyperammonemic crisis (cut-off: 500 μmol/L) and age at disease onset are important predictors of the neurological outcome, both of them reflecting the disease severity. (2) NBS reduces the age at diagnosis in LO but not in EO patients. Hypothetically, two thirds of all UCD patients in the E-IMD sample could have been diagnosed by NBS until day 12 while being asymptomatic. (3) ASS-, ASL- and ARG1-deficient patients identified by NBS have an apparently reduced risk for developing movement disorders than those identified by selective metabolic investigation. However, a larger number of patients and additional outcome parameters (e.g. intellectual disability, mortality, liver disease) are required to evaluate the effect of NBS on the outcome more thoroughly. (4) The intensity of metabolic treatment correlates with the age at disease onset. (5) At present, high and unsystematic variability of drug combinations hamper the understanding of optimal metabolic treatment.
Peak plasma ammonium concentration and age at disease onset rather than interventional variables best predict the neurological outcome
Among the independent variables tested, peak plasma ammonium concentration during the initial hyperammonemic crisis and the age at disease onset best predicted the neurological disease outcome for CPS1-, OTC-, ASS- and ASL-deficient patients. Both variables should be regarded as inter-related aspects of the intrinsic disease severity with peak ammonium levels being higher in EO than LO patients with UCDs (Kölker et al 2015a). Initial peak ammonium concentrations above 500 μmol/L and disease manifestation during the newborn period were clearly associated with a poor neurological outcome. The relevance of the initial crisis for the outcome is in line with previous studies. Enns and coworkers demonstrated that UCD patients with neonatal hyperammonemic crisis, peak ammonium concentrations above 1000 μmol/L and coma on admission had the lowest survival rate, whereas highest survival rates were found in patients with symptoms starting after the newborn period and with peak ammonium levels less than 200 μmol/L (Enns et al 2007). Similar results were obtained in a longitudinal study from Japan and a questionnaire-based outcome study from Europe showing that peak plasma ammonium exceeding 350 μmol/L (Uchino et al 1998) or 480 μmol/L (Bachmann 2003a), respectively, increased the risk of severe neurological deficits and intellectual disability. Others showed that onset of first symptoms during the newborn period is associated with severe brain damage and poor neurological prognosis (Nagata et al 1991). In contrast, a recent study of male and female OTC patients was not able to demonstrate a correlation between peak ammonium levels and onset type with neurological outcome parameters (Brassier et al 2015). Although the severity of hyperammonemia-induced cerebral damage might be influenced by the developmental age of affected individuals, the interaction between plasma ammonium level and maturation needs to be further elucidated. Another study highlighted that duration of hyperammonemic coma but not peak ammonium levels predicted neuroradiological abnormalities and concurrent IQ (Msall et al 1984). In analogy, it was recently reported that duration of the initial hyperammonemic event and coma duration before start of hemodialysis predict the outcome (Picca et al 2015). The analysis of peak ammonium concentrations is a pragmatic approach, whereas the integration of plasma ammonium concentrations and duration of hyperammonemia more precisely reflect the severity of a hyperammonemic episode. However, since the start of a hyperammonemic episode usually remains vague and thus, the duration of the episode can only be estimated, this parameter is not included in the E-IMD registry.
These studies highlight that the disease severity, in particular the severity of the initial presentation, should be included as important independent variables in all studies that aim to elucidate the proposed benefit of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for UCD patients. However, for ARG1 deficiency and HHH syndrome rarely presenting with acute hyperammonemia but with chronic neurological and developmental deterioration, early diagnosis and adherence to metabolic treatment might be more important for a favourable long-term outcome (Crombez and Cederbaum 2005; Martinelli et al 2015).
The effect of early diagnosis and therapy on the neurological outcome
A relevant but so far unanswered question is whether and to what extent the natural disease course of UCD patients can be modulated by diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. NBS programmes aiming to identify patients with a high a priori risk of an unfavourable disease course may be promising, but substantial variation in national NBS panels exists (Burgard et al 2012) and UCDs are rarely included in those panels (McHugh et al 2011; Loeber et al 2012). In a previous questionnaire-based cross-sectional study, patients with ASS and ASL deficiency identified by NBS had less often clinical symptoms, episodes of hyperammonemic encephalopathy and epilepsy than those identified by selective metabolic investigation (Rüegger et al 2014). The results of our study are less convincing. In 23 patients identified by NBS, the majority of them having ASS (n=6), ASL (n=9) or ARG1 deficiency (n=4), the age at diagnosis was significantly lower in the NBS group compared to LO patients of the selective metabolic investigation group, whereas EO patients mostly presented with first symptoms before NBS results could have been available. Although not all UCD patients would thus benefit from NBS, we showed that 65% of UCD patients identified by selective metabolic investigation and 79% of those identified by NBS remained asymptomatic until day 12. The positive effect of early diagnosis, however, was not sustained in all patients over time. At latest report, 50% of patients in the early diagnosis group and 52% of patients in the NBS group have remained asymptomatic. This may reflect inappropriate long-term efficacy of current treatment strategies. Furthermore, EO patients with a fulminant disease course might die before being diagnosed correctly and thus, could be underrepresented in the E-IMD registry. Despite these shortcomings the neurological outcome of early identified and treated ASS-, ASL- and ARG1-deficient patients is better than for those identified after the manifestation of first symptoms.
To understand the impact of therapeutic interventions on the outcome, we included various therapeutic and phenotypic independent variables. Liver transplantation was not included since the number of liver transplanted patients is still small in the E-IMD sample. The analysis did not elucidate a clear-cut superiority of any of the various treatment combinations used in the study sample. This does not mean that metabolic treatment is not at all effective. The implementation of low protein diet with or without essential amino acid supplements (Adam et al 2013), alternative pathway therapy (Brusilow et al 1979; Enns et al 2007; Berry et al 2014), arginine and citrulline supplementation (Brusilow et al 1979; Brusilow and Batshaw 1979), hemodialysis and filtration (Schaefer et al 1999; Picca et al 2015), nonabsorbable antibiotics (Foster et al 2010), carglumic acid for NAGS deficiency (Schubiger et al 1991), early liver transplantation (Morioka et al 2005; Kimura et al 2013), and timely emergency and/or maintenance treatment have improved the therapeutic options and are thought to improve the survival and neurological outcome in UCD patients (Batshaw et al 2014).
However, some studies did not unequivocally confirm improved outcome in UCD patients (Bachmann 2003b; Nassogne et al 2005). In fact, a recent meta-analysis did not show improved survival of EO patients over more than 35 years including studies from the USA, Europe and Japan (Burgard et al 2015). Study cohorts and results of clinical studies must be compared with great caution, since the proportions of patients with EO and LO often differ. To avoid misinterpretation, the therapeutic benefit must be adjusted to the assumed natural disease course, particularly if the sample contains a large number of LO patients (Uchino et al 1998; Enns et al 2007; Summar et al 2008; Kido et al 2012).
The impact of the natural disease courses and the large numbers of currently used treatment combinations are a challenge for the study design and remain a bottle neck for any attempt of treatment optimisation in UCD patients. It is hoped that more evidence will provide evidence-based guidelines, harmonising diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, to reduce the current interventional variability and to improve our understanding of optimal emergency and long-term management in the future (Häberle et al 2012).
Conclusions
The major predictors of the neurological outcome in UCD patients are non-interventional parameters reflecting the underlying disease severity such as age at disease onset and initial peak ammonium level. Other variables not included in our analysis such as plasma glutamine/glutamate concentration, mode and efficacy of ammonium detoxification as well as duration of the first hyperammonemic episode may be similarly useful. NBS helps to prepone the age at diagnosis in LO patients but unlikely in EO patients. Although early diagnosis and intervention seems beneficial for many UCD patients, the long-term benefit of NBS is still unclear and requires re-evaluation in a larger sample and at a more advanced age, using additional outcome parameters. The large number of drug combinations and the correlation of disease severity with treatment intensity hamper our understanding of optimised long-term management.
Change history
12 January 2018
Due to an unfortunate error during the typesetting process, the collaborators were presented incorrectly.
Abbreviations
- ARG1:
-
Arginase 1
- ASL:
-
Argininosuccinate lyase
- ASS:
-
Argininosuccinate synthetase
- CPS1:
-
Carbamylphosphate synthetase 1
- E-IMD:
-
European registry and network for intoxication type metabolic diseases
- EO:
-
Early onset
- HHH syndrome:
-
Hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria syndrome
- IR:
-
Interquartile range
- LO:
-
Late onset
- NAGS:
-
N-acetylglutamate synthase
- NBS:
-
Newborn screening
- OR(s):
-
Odds ratio(s)
- OTC:
-
Ornithine transcarbamylase
- Q1:
-
First quartile
- Q3:
-
Third quartile
- UCD(s):
-
Urea cycle disorder(s)
References
Adam S, Almeida MF, Assoun M et al (2013) Dietary management of urea cycle disorders: European practice. Mol Genet Metab 110:439–445
Bachmann C (2003a) Outcome and survival of 88 patients with urea cycle disorders: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Pediatr 162:410–416
Bachmann C (2003b) Long-term outcome of patients with urea cycle disorders and the question of neonatal screening. Eur J Pediatr 162(Suppl 1):S29–S33
Batshaw ML, Tuchman M, Summar M, Seminara J, Members of the Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (2014) A longitudinal study of urea cycle disorders. Mol Genet Metab 113:127–130
Berry SA, Lichter-Konecki U, Diaz GA et al (2014) Glycerol phenylbutyrate treatment in children with urea cycle disorders: pooled analysis of short and long-term ammonia control and outcomes. Mol Genet Metab 112:17–24
Brassier A, Gobin S, Arnoux JB et al (2015) Long-term outcomes in ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency: a series of 90 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 10:58. doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0266-1
Brusilow SW, Batshaw ML (1979) Arginine therapy of argininosuccinate deficiency. Lancet 1:124–127
Brusilow SW, Valle DL, Batshaw M (1979) New pathways of nitrogen excretion in inborn errors of urea synthesis. Lancet 2:452–454
Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M et al (2012) Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2.From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:613–625
Burgard P, Kölker S, Haege G, Lindner M, Hoffmann GF (2015) Neonatal mortality and outcome at the end of the first year of life in early onset urea cycle disorders – review and meta-analysis of observational studies published over more than 35 years. J Inherit Metab Dis. doi:10.1007/s10545-015-9901-1
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R version 3.2.1. Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/
Crombez EA, Cederbaum SD (2005) Hyperargininemia due to liver arginase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 84:243–251
Enns GM, Berry SA, Berry BT et al (2007) Survival after treatment with phenylacetate and benzoate for urea cycle disorders. N Engl J Med 356:2282–2292
FAO (2001) Human energy requirements: report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. FAO report series, no. 1. FAO, Rome
Foster KJ, Lin S, Turck CJ (2010) Current and emerging strategies for treating hepatic encephalopathy. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 22:341–350
Garbade SF, Greenberg CR, Demirkol M et al (2014) Unravelling the complex MRI pattern in glutaric aciduria type I using statistical models-a cohort study in 180 patients. J Inherit Metab Dis 37:763–773
Häberle J, Boddaert N, Burlina A et al (2012) Suggested guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urea cycle disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis 7:32
Heinze G, Schemper M (2002) A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med 21(16):2409–2419
Heinze G, Ploner M, Dunkler D, Southworth H (2013) Logistf: firth’s bias reduced logistic regression. R package version 1.21, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=logistf
Heringer J, Boy SP, Ensenauer R et al (2010) Use of guidelines improves the neurological outcome in glutaric aciduria type I. Ann Neurol 68:743–752
Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat 15(3):651–674
Hothorn T, Hornik K, Strobl C, Zeileis A (2015) Party: a laboratory for recursive partitioning. R package version 1.0-23, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=party
Jamiolkowski D, Kölker S, Glahn EM et al (2015) Behavioural and emotional problems, intellectual impairment and health-related quality of life in patients with organic acidurias and urea cycle disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis. doi:10.1007/s10545-015-9887-8
Kido J, Nakamura K, Mitsubuchi H et al (2012) Long-term outcome and intervention of urea cycle disoerders in Japan. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:777–785
Kimura N, Kubo N, Narumi S et al (2013) Liver transplantation versus conservative treatment for adult-onset type II citrullinemia: our experience and a review of the literature. Transplant Proc 45:3432–3437
Kölker S, Garbade SF, Greenberg CR et al (2006) Natural history, outcome, and treatment efficacy in children and adults with glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Pediatr Res 59:840–847
Kölker S, Christensen E, Leonard JV et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of glutaric aciduria type I--revised recommendations. J Inherit Metab Dis 34:677–694
Kölker S, Garcia Cazorla A, Valayannopoulos V et al (2015a) The phenotypic spectrum of organic acidurias and urea cycle disorders. Part 1: the initial presentation. J Inherit Metab Dis 38:1041–1057
Kölker S, Valayannopoulos V, Burlina AB et al (2015b) The phenotypic spectrum of organic acidurias and urea cycle disorders. Part 2: the evolving clinical phenotype. J Inherit Metab Dis 38:1059–1074
Kölker S, Dobbelaere D, Häberle J et al (2015c) Networking across borders for individuals with organic acidurias and urea cycle disorders: the E-IMD consortium. JIMD Rep 22:29–38
Loeber JG, Burgard P, Cornel MC et al (2012) Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1. From blood spot to screening result. J Inherit Metab Dis 35:603–611
Martinelli D, Diodato D, Ponzi E et al (2015) The hyperornithinemia-hyperammonemia-homocitrullinuria syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 10:29
McHugh D, Cameron CA, Abdenur JE et al (2011) Clinical validation of cutoff target ranges in newborn screening of metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: a worldwide collaborative project. Genet Med 13:230–254
Morioka D, Kasahara M, Takada Y et al (2005) Current role of liver transplantation for the treatment of urea cycle disorders: a review of the worldwide English literature and 13 cases at Kyoto University. Liver Transpl 11:1332–1342
Msall M, Batshaw ML, Suss R, Brusilow SW, Mellits ED (1984) Neurologic outcome in children with inborn errors of urea synthesis. Outcome of urea-cycle enzymopathies. N Engl J Med 310:1500–1505
Nagata N, Matsuda I, Matsuura T et al (1991) Retrospective survey of urea cycle disorders. Part 2. Neurological outcome in forty-nine Japanese patients with urea cycle enzymopathies. Am J Med Genet 40:477–481
Nassogne MC, Héron B, Touati G, Rabier D, Saudubray JM (2005) Urea cycle defects: management and outcome. J Inherit Metab Dis 28:407–414
Picca S, Dionisi-Vici C, Bartuli A et al (2015) Short-term survival of hyperammonemic neonates treated with dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 30:839–847
Richter SJ, McCann MH (2007) Multiple comparison of medians using permutation tests. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 6(2):399–412
Rüegger CM, Lindner M, Ballhausen D et al (2014) Cross-sectional observational study of 208 patients with non-classical urea cycle disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis 37:21–30
Schaefer F, Straube E, Oh J, Mehls O, Mayatepek E (1999) Dialysis in neonates with inborn errors of metabolism. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:910–918
Schubiger G, Bachmann C, Barben P et al (1991) N-acetylglutamate synthetase deficiency: diagnosis, management and follow-up of a rare disorder of ammonia detoxication. Eur J Pediatr 150:353–356
Smucker MD, Allan J, Carterette B (2007) A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. CIKM’07 Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on information and knowledge management, 623-632
Summar ML, Dobbelaere D, Brusilow S, Lee B (2008) Diagnosis, symptoms, frequency and mortality of 260 patients with urea cycle disorders from a 21-year, multicenter study of acute hyperammaemic episodes. Acta Paediatr 97:1420–1425
Summar ML, Koelker S, Freedenberg D et al (2013) The incidence of urea cycle disorders. Mol Genet Metab 110:179–180
Uchino T, Endo F, Matsuda I (1998) Neurodevelopmental outcome of long-term therapy of urea cycle disorders in Japan. J Inherit Metab Dis 21(Suppl 1):151–159
World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations University (2007) Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. Report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. WHO Press, Geneva, WHO Technical Report Series, No. 935
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to all patients and their families who have been willing to contribute to this study, to share their experience on living with a rare disease, and for their trust. We are grateful for fruitful collaboration with the following clinical partners, patient support groups and industrial partners (in alphabetical order of countries): Lut de Baere, Nathalie Stroobant (Belgische Organisatie voor Kinderen en Volwassenen met een Stofwisselingsziekte VZW [BOKS], Belgium), Nela Carić (Hrvatska udruga za rijetke bolesti, Croatia), Veronika Dvorakova (Charles University and General University of Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic), Annika and Kennet Rovsing (PND – Protein Nedbrydnings Defekt Foreningen, Denmark), Samantha Parker (Orphan Europe SARL, France), EURORDIS, European Organisation for Rare Disease (France), Markus Ott, Beate Szczerbak (Nutricia Metabolics GmbH, Germany), Hubertus von Voss, Raimund Schmid (Kindernetzwerk e.V., Germany), Mandy Kretschmer (Glutarazidurie e.V., Germany), Reinhild Link (Wiesbaden, representing the SSIEM Dieticians Group), Persephone Augoustides-Savvopoulou (University A’Pediatric Department, Metabolic Laboratory, ‘Hippocration’ General Hospital of Thessaloniki), Zarifis Dimitroulis (KRIKOS ZOIS – Society for patients and friends of patients with inherited metabolic diseases), Evridiki Drogari (University of Athens, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, Unit of Metabolic Diseases, Athens), Renza Barbon Galluppi (UNIAMO FIMR, Italy), Susan Udina (COMETA ASMME – Associazione Studio Malattie Metaboliche Ereditarie – ONLUS, Italy), Hanka Meutgeert (Volwassenen en Kinderen met Stoffwisselingsziekten [VKS], Netherlands), Vanessa Ferreira (Associação Portuguesa CDG, Portugal), Miguel Macedo (Apofen, Portugal), Sérgio Braz Antão (Rarrisimas, Portugal), Sergi Faber (Catalana de Trastorns Metabòlics Hereditaris, Spain), Sofia Nordin (Svedish Orphan Biovitrium AB [SOBI], Sweden), Steven Hannigan (CLIMB, Children Living with Inherited Metabolic Diseases, National Information Centre for Metabolic Diseases, and EMDA, the European Metabolic Disorders Alliance), and Robin Lachmann (National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Charles Dent Metabolic Unit, London, United Kingdom).
This publication arises from the project “European registry and network for intoxication type metabolic diseases” (E-IMD; EAHC no 2010 12 01) which has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Health Programme. After the end of the EU funding period the E-IMD patient registry will be sustained by funding from the Kindness-for-Kids Foundation (Munich, Germany) and the Dietmar Hopp Foundation (St. Leon-Rot, Germany). M. Baumgartner and J. Häberle (Zurich, Switzerland) are supported by radiz – Rare Disease Initiative Zurich, a clinical research priority program of the University of Zurich. C. Dionisi-Vici (Rome, Italy) is supported by the association “La vita è un dono”.
Individual contributors (additional co-authors to be listed in the PubMed, in alphabetical order)
Jean-Baptiste Arnoux, Ivo Barić, Eric Bauchart, Matthias R. Baumgartner, Javier Blasco-Alonso, Maria Teresa Cardoso, Brigitte Chabrol, Maja Djordjevic, Francois Eyskens, Peter Freisinger, Florian Gleich, Wanda Gradowska, Stephanie Grünewald, Gisela Haege, Wuh-Liang Hwu, Hariklea Ioannou, Anil Jalan, Daniela Karall, Corinne de Laet, Martin Lindner, Pascale de Lonlay, Diego Martinelli, Linda de Meirleir, Karine Mention, Chris Mühlhausen, Elaine Murphy, Hélène Ogier de Baulny, Carlos Ortez, Luis Peña-Quintana, Victoria Riches, Esmeralda Rodrigues, Etienne Sokal, Nicholas Thompson, Frits A. Wijburg, Monique Williams, and Matthias Zielonka also contributed to this work.
Affiliations of all authors are listed on the first pages.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human studies (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Informed consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human studies (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legal guardians prior to study inclusion in countries where this was needed by law.
Animal rights
This article does not contain animal subjects.
Additional information
Communicated by: Bridget Wilcken
Additional individual contributors who should be regarded as co-authors are listed on acknowledgements.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-017-0117-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Posset, R., Garcia-Cazorla, A., Valayannopoulos, V. et al. Age at disease onset and peak ammonium level rather than interventional variables predict the neurological outcome in urea cycle disorders. J Inherit Metab Dis 39, 661–672 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-016-9938-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-016-9938-9