Abstract
Tropical forests account for more than half of the global carbon forest stock and much of the biological diversity on Earth. However, disturbances such as deforestation and forest degradation threaten the maintenance of these ecosystem services. This study aimed to understand how different disturbance histories affect the forest stand biomass, as well as species and functional diversity, and to what extent these differences can change the relationships between biomass and their drivers. We used data from forests with clear-cut and selectively logged disturbance histories, and from old-growth forests, situated in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Forests with logging disturbances showed significant losses in their aboveground biomass compared to those of old-growth forests (50% loss in selectively logged forests and 80% loss in clear-cut forests). Interestingly, only clear-cut secondary forests showed differences in species and functional diversity, and were dominated by species with acquisitive trait values, commonly found early in succession. Shifts in stand biomass drivers were observed in selectively logged forests. The mass-ratio hypothesis (mainly through the functional trait of maximum height) was the most important biomass driver in clear-cut secondary and old-growth forests, whereas the importance of the niche complementarity hypothesis (through functional richness and dispersion) was higher in selectively logged forests. Our study highlights that disturbance histories can affect forest aboveground biomass and its drivers. Moreover, our results reinforce the need for conservation of intact forests but highlight the importance of including degraded forests in conservation mechanisms based in carbon stocks, as these forests retain high values of species and functional diversities that are crucial to biomass and consequently carbon stock acquisition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The importance of tropical forests for worldwide biodiversity and their key role in global ecosystem services has been repeatedly highlighted by the scientific community (Alkama and Cescatti 2016), and is also reflected in global policies (UNFCCC 2015). Due to land-use activities and other environmental changes, more than half of the original tropical forest cover has been lost (FAO 2010), leading to a dramatic loss of species (Gibson et al. 2011) and high greenhouse gas emissions (Metz et al. 2007). Deforestation is the activity with the strongest human-triggered impact on these forests (Matos et al. 2017), and was responsible for an estimated net loss of 8 million ha year−1 in the tropics between 2000 and 2005 (FAO and JRC 2012). Moreover, during the same 5-year period, more than 20% of tropical forest area was degraded by some form of selective logging (Asner et al. 2009), which is currently taking place in at least 400 million ha of natural tropical forests (Blaser et al. 2011). In 2008, forest degradation was incorporated into the reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD +) mechanism (UNFCCC 2008), although the levels and the persistence of biomass loss in forests with different disturbance regimes or histories are still largely unknown (de Andrade et al. 2017).
The impact of forest degradation (e.g. selective logging) is commonly quantified as the amount of biomass lost due to the removal of large trees (with high economic value), neglecting the fact that other changes in the forest structure (e.g. stem density, basal area and canopy cover) and species diversity and composition may occur (Laurance et al. 2006; Berenguer et al. 2014). For instance, logging activities may increase plant mortality (through the damage of non-target and smaller trees) and forests gaps (thereby increasing the number of pioneer species), which can directly affect forests dynamics and light requirements for successful regeneration, contributing to further reductions in biomass and carbon stocks (Putz et al. 2008). Conversely, many deforested areas (clear-cut secondary forests) are regenerating in the tropics (Aide et al. 2013), giving rise to extensive areas of secondary forest that rapidly accumulate aboveground biomass, which may act to mitigate the impact of deforestation on tropical forest carbon stock (Poorter et al. 2016). Nevertheless, recent studies show that the annual losses from deforestation and forest degradation are still greater than the growth gains by forests regeneration (Baccini et al. 2017). New techniques, such as remote sensing, are improving the estimation of forest biomass at broad-landscape scales (Saatchi et al. 2011); however, its accuracy is strongly dependent on the knowledge of forest biomass at the community level (Grace et al. 2014).
While it has been well documented that anthropogenic disturbance histories affect aboveground biomass, it is still poorly understood how the underlying processes associated with disturbance (i.e. changes in forest structure and diversity) can also indirectly affect forests stand biomass (Magnago et al. 2015a). For instance, forests degradation may promote a gradual shift from dominance by late-successional species, with conservative trait values and high potential biomass accumulation (e.g., high wood density, high stature and large seed size) toward dominance by early-successional species, with acquisitive trait values and lower biomass storage potential (e.g., low wood density, lower stature, and small seed size). Therefore, in line with the mass-ratio hypothesis (Grime 1998), which predicts that the ecosystem processes (e.g., carbon stock) are driven by the most abundant species in the community, these changes in species composition would lead to a lower stand biomass in disturbed communities. Another impact related to disturbance is species loss, since the communities experience considerable simplification of species habitat structures (Floren and Linsenmair 2005), favouring generalist rather than specialist species (with narrow ranges of niche amplitude). Then, according to the niche complementarity hypothesis, which predicts that an increase in biodiversity would allow more efficient use of available resources by species (Tilman 1999), the biodiversity loss would lead to lower stand biomass in forests under anthropogenic disturbance.
Several studies show that both hypotheses (mass-ratio and niche complementarity) are acting simultaneously as drivers of forest stand biomass (Finegan et al. 2015; Lohbeck et al. 2015a; Poorter et al. 2017). However, their relative importance might differ among anthropogenic disturbance histories because species are experiencing different environmental filters (e.g. resources availability) and species interactions (e.g. competition) (Cardinale et al. 2007; Lohbeck et al. 2014). For instance, in old-growth forests, where light is a strong limiting resource and competition is higher (Lohbeck et al. 2015a) the relative importance of the niche complementarity hypothesis as a biomass driver should be higher, since higher number of species (and functional diversity) should improve the uptake/use of the low available resources. Conversely, in degraded and regenerating forests, resources availability is higher and competition is lower (Weiher et al. 1998) which can favour local functional convergence, e.g. species with suitable similar traits may perform better. Thus, the relative importance of the mass-ratio hypothesis as a driver of biomass should be higher, because dominance of species with short-stature and low wood density values that have less biomass and carbon stocks per stem basal area (King et al. 2006a; Chave et al. 2009; Poorter et al. 2010; Prado-Junior et al. 2016b), would strongly decrease forest stand biomass. Such knowledge allows substantial information on which mechanisms are driving ecological processes in tropical forests (Mensah et al. 2016) and, therefore, might be an important conservation tool to understand the shifts in ecological processes over succession, and to manage disturbed forests to improve their ecosystem services.
Here, we investigated how aboveground biomass, species and functional diversity metrics are related to different anthropogenic disturbance histories (old-growth, selectively logged and clear-cut secondary forests). We addressed two questions: (1) To what extent forests under different disturbance histories differ in aboveground biomass, as well as species and functional diversity metrics?; and (2) Does the relative importance of the different biomass drivers (mass-ratio and niche complementarity hypotheses) differ between different forest disturbance histories? We predict that, in addition to decrease in stand biomass, forests with some form of logging disturbance (selective logging and clear-cut) will present an increase in the abundance of species with highly acquisitive traits and a decrease in the biodiversity measures (in terms of species and functional diversity indices). Moreover, we predict that after stronger anthropogenic disturbances, the relative importance of the niche complementarity hypothesis on forest stand biomass will decrease, and the relative importance of the mass-ratio hypothesis will increase.
Materials and methods
Study sites and sampling
This study was conducted in nine tropical rainforests located between the southern region of the state of Bahia and the northern region of the state of Espírito Santo along the Atlantic Coast of Brazil (Fig. S1 and Table S1). These forests are classified as Dense Ombrophylous Lowland Forest (IBGE 2012), occur in large and flat extensions over the northeast coast of Brazil, and are commonly called “tableland forests” due the characteristics of their relief (Magnago et al. 2015b). All the sampled forests experience homogeneous climatic conditions, classified as tropical hot and humid climate (“Af” Megathermic climate of Köppen), with a mean annual rainfall of 1250 mm (ranges from 1050 to 1370 mm) and a mean temperature of 23–25 °C (Hijmans et al. 2005). The dominant soil type is Yellow Ultisol (Magnago et al. 2016).
The study forests are located in private areas within a landscape comprising mainly pastures, Eucalyptus spp. plantations, and annual croplands. Land use history of the forests was determined by interviewing local residents and from physical evidence found during our field surveys. Although chronological sequences of Landsat images were not available, physical evidence of human disturbance can remain in forests for long periods of time after their occurrence (e.g., logging debris might take up to 90 years to decompose; Harmon et al. 1995). The nine studied forests were classified into three categories of forest according with disturbance histories (three forests in each category): (a) old-growth forests, which had neither visual evidence of anthropogenic activities (e.g., logging or cattle grazing) nor a history of anthropogenic disturbance events; (b) selectively logged forests, which had evidence of silvicultural practices (e.g., tree stumps and post-harvest girdling of non-commercial trees), and (c) clear-cut secondary forests, which had a clear-cut disturbance history followed by nearly 40 years of succession. Plots were established in the core areas (i.e., ≥ 300 m from the forest edge) in each site, avoiding other possible effects (e.g. edge effect) in our results. In logged forests we established all plots close to logging signs and tree stumps. It was not possible to obtain the exact amount of timber extracted from the areas with selective logging history, nor the period and duration of these logging activities. This activity has occurred illegally in these forests and, therefore, such data was not available. It is likely that the logging is still occurring because we found signs of trees that have been recently logged.
In each forest, ten permanent plots (20 × 20 m) were established, yielding a total of 90 sample plots (3.6 ha). During sampling (which was carried out at different time periods for each forest, between 2011 and 2013), all living trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 5 cm were tagged, their diameters measured, heights estimated, and identification performed to the species level. Our plots comprised 4712 individuals, belonging to 360 species and 57 families.
Functional traits
The functional traits considered in this study are related to species standing biomass (Attri et al. 2015; Poorter et al. 2015): maximum height, wood density, and seed size. Species maximum height (Hmax, m) is an indicator of adult stature, and is potentially related to species longevity and life-history strategy (King et al. 2006b), and was calculated as the 95th-percentile of all trees of a given species. Species wood density (WD, g cm−3) represents biomass per unit wood volume constructed (Chave et al. 2009), and was obtained from the global wood density database (filtered by Tropical South America, Zanne et al. 2009). For species without available WD values, we used mean values for the WD of the genus or family. Seed size (SS), although usually related to the competitive vigor of the seedlings (Kitagima 2007), is also an important life history trait for trees (Prado-Junior et al. 2016a), and is correlated with a suite of morphological and physiological traits of pioneer species (small seeds) and shade-tolerant species (large seeds) (Poorter and Rose 2005; Osuri and Sankaran 2016). Qualitative data for species SS were obtained from herbarium specimens, and the species were classified as small seed species (seed length < 0.6 cm), medium seed species (length between 0.6 and 1.5 cm), large seed species (length between 1.6 and 3.0 cm), and very large seed species (length > 3.0 cm), following Tabarelli and Peres (2002) and Magnago et al. (2014). The information on species functional trait values can be found in supplementary material (Table S4).
Data analyses
For each individual tree with DBH ≥ 5 cm, the aboveground biomass (AGB) was calculated using the allometric formula of Chave et al. (2014) and the parameters, DBH (cm), height (H, m), and species wood density (WD, g cm−3):
For each plot, the AGB stock was calculated as the sum of AGB values for all trees.
For each sample plot, four species and functional diversity metrics were calculated: Species richness (S, number of species per plot), Shannon diversity (H′, which incorporates species abundances), functional richness (FRic, a non-abundance-weighted index) and functional dispersion (FDis, an abundance-weighted index). Functional diversity indices were calculated based on species functional traits (Hmax, WD and SS). In addition, three community-weighted mean (CWM) trait values (that represents functional composition weighted by species abundance) were calculated per plot: CWM maximum height (CWMHmax), CWM wood density (CWMWD) and CWM seed size (CWMSS). CWM trait values and functional diversity indices were calculated using the ‘FD’ package in R (Laliberté et al. 2015).
To evaluate how aboveground biomass (AGB), CWM trait values, species richness and diversity, and functional diversity indices differ among forests with different disturbance histories (old-growth forests, selectively logged forests, and clear-cut secondary forests), linear mixed models were fitted, including site as a random factor (to account for the possible lack of independence of plots within the sites). The AGB was ln transformed prior to analysis to address the normality and homoscedasticity assumptions, reduce the effect of outliers and account for possible nonlinear relationships between variables. Models were fitted using a Gaussian error distribution with identity link function (normality was tested and confirmed by the Shapiro–Wilk test). Tukey’s post hoc test was used to assess the differences in AGB and in species and functional diversity metrics among forests disturbance histories.
To evaluate the relative importance of the different biomass drivers in forests with different disturbance histories, we used AGB as the response variable and species and functional diversity metrics (S, H′, FRic and FDis) as well as CWM trait values (CWMHmax, CWMWD and CWMSS) as explanatory variables, including forests disturbance history in interaction factor with each variable. The full model is therefore:
where lnAGB is the ln transformed aboveground biomass; DH is the disturbance history (old-growth, selectively logged and clear-cut secondary forests) with interaction with all other fixed terms; S, H′ FRic and FDis are species richness, Shannon diversity index, functional richness and functional dispersion, respectively (where positive slopes support the niche complementarity hypothesis); CWMHmax, CWMWD and CWMSS are the community weighted mean trait values for species maximum height, wood density and seed size, respectively (where positive or negative significant slopes support the mass-ratio hypothesis).
Subsequently, we ran all possible subsets of the full model using different combinations of the explanatory variables and ranked them based on the Akaike Information Criterion of the Second Order (AICc). The set of best models (models equally supported) were considered as those with ΔAICc ≤ 2 (Burnham and Anderson 2002). Candidate models were excluded when they had more than ten degrees of freedom (df), taking into account that models would be overfitted by too many explanatory variables considering our sample size (90 plots), and the random effect was considered to consume one df. In explanatory studies, it is usually recommended one degree of freedom for every 10 replicates.
The relative importance of each explanatory variable (and their respective ecological hypothesis, i.e., mass ratio and niche complementary) was evaluated by summing the Akaike weights of all models that included the variable of interest (Burnham and Anderson 2002; Burnham et al. 2011) and the direction of the effect of each explanatory variable on AGB was based on the set on best models (∆AICc ≤ 2).
The analyses were performed using the platform R (R Core Team 2015) and the following packages: multcomp (Bretz et al. 2015), lme4 (Bates et al. 2014), lmerTest (Kuznetsova et al. 2016), MuMIn (Barton 2016), and ggplot2 (Wickham and Chang 2016).
Results
Forests disturbance history and AGB
The mean aboveground biomass (AGB) differed significantly among forest disturbance histories (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001, Fig. 1, Tables S2 and S3), and was 276.53 34.68 Mg ha−1 (mean standard error) for old-growth forests, 138.95 17.42 Mg ha−1 for selectively logged forests, and 65.11 8.34 Mg ha−1 for clear-cut secondary forests. These values indicated a reduction in AGB stock of around 50% for selectively logged forests and 80% for clear-cut secondary forests, in comparison with old-growth forests.
Forests disturbance history and species and functional diversity metrics
Species and functional diversity metrics differed significantly between clear-cut secondary and old-growth forests and between clear-cut secondary forests and selectively logged forests, except for CWMWD. Clear-cut secondary forests had the lowest values of CWMHmax, CWMSS, species richness, species diversity, functional richness and functional dispersion. Conversely, among the seven forests attributes evaluated, none were significantly different between the old-growth and selectively logged forests (Fig. 2 and Tables S2 and S3). These results indicate that selectively logged forests maintained species and functional diversity equivalent to those of old-growth forest, whereas clear-cut secondary forests had a strong reduction in species and functional diversity and significant shifts toward dominance by early-successional species, with acquisitive trait values and lower biomass storage potential (e.g., lower adult stature and small seed size).
Anthropogenic disturbance histories and the relative importance of biomass drivers
There was only one candidate model with ∆AICc ≤ 2 (AICc weight ≈ 23%) which contained five first-order explanatory variables and one interaction effect (between disturbance history and FDis) (Table 1). Disturbance history was an important explanatory variable related to forest AGB (relative importance value, RIV ≈ 86%, Table 1 and Fig. 4), indicating a strong reduction of AGB in selectively logged and clear-cut secondary forests compared to old-growth forests. Regardless of forests disturbance history, AGB was positively related to CWMHmax (RIV ≈ 100%) and functional richness (RIV ≈ 74%) (Figs. 3, 4). When accounting for the effect of disturbance history in the relationships between AGB and forests attributes (i.e., the interaction terms of the best model), functional dispersion was positively related to AGB in selectively logged forests (RIV ≈ 39%, Figs. 3, 4). Our results indicate that the mass-ratio hypothesis is a stronger driver of AGB stock independent of forests disturbance history (CWMHmax was present in all possible models), although the importance of the niche complementarity hypothesis was also supported by the positive coefficient of FRic (for all disturbance histories) and FDis (only in selectively logged forests).
Discussion
We examined how forests under different anthropogenic disturbance histories differ in forest stand biomass, species richness and diversity, and functional diversity metrics, and to what extent these differences can change the relationships of their biomass drivers. We found that clear-cut and selective logging have negative and significant consequences on forest aboveground biomass. However, species and functional diversity of selectively logged forests did not differ in comparison with the old-growth forests. Clear-cut secondary forests had lower values of species and functional diversity metrics, and were dominated by species with acquisitive trait values (e.g., lower adult stature and seed size). Our results suggest that the mass-ratio hypothesis plays a stronger role as driver of AGB compared to the niche complementarity hypothesis, although the importance of the niche complementarity hypothesis seems to increase in forests under intermediate disturbance intensity (selectively logged forests compared to clear-cut secondary and old-growth forests).
Loss of stand biomass in selectively logged and clear-cut secondary forests
As hypothesized, stand biomass was 50% lower in selectively logged forests and 80% lower in clear-cut secondary forests compared with old-growth forests (Fig. 1). Decrease in stand biomass of forests under selective logging activities is expected because target trees (large and with high economic value) are responsible for most of the biomass (Marshall et al. 2012). However, considering that our selectively logged forests are under low logging intensity, other additional factors might be responsible for reducing stand biomass. For example, the removal of large trees increases light incidence in the lower strata, which can increase the density of lianas and fast-growing pioneer species (with higher growth rates but lower biomass accumulation over time; Poorter et al. 2010). Moreover, the cutting, fall, and transport of trees can damage non-target trees (usually small trees), thus increasing mortality and reducing overall biomass, in addition to delaying the recovery of selectively logged forests (Putz et al. 2012).
Stand biomass in the clear-cut secondary forests reached only 20% of the value of old-growth forests biomass, even after 40 years of regeneration. In a recent study of tropical biomass resilience, Poorter et al. (2016) found that stand biomass in secondary dry forests (< 1.500 mm rainfall, comparable with our study areas) after 20 years after land abandonment was around 70 Mg ha−1, similar to our clear-cut secondary forests with twice the time of regeneration (65.11, 8.34 Mg ha−1). A potential explanation for this slow biomass recovery is that our clear-cut secondary forests are located in a non-forest matrix, i.e., surrounded by croplands and pastures, while the secondary forests evaluated by Poorter et al. (2016) were located in a landscape matrix with mean forest cover of 70% (range from 31 to 100%). Such isolated forests are more vulnerable to diffused disturbances, showing severe changes in environmental conditions, and reduced plant colonization and survival (Poorter et al. 2016). Our result is in agreement with other studies, highlighting that actual biomass and carbon losses from deforestation and forest degradation are still greater than the growth gains by forests regeneration (Baccini et al. 2017), after half a century of secondary succession.
Biodiversity in disturbed forests
As hypothesized, clear-cut secondary forests showed significant shifts in terms of composition and diversity, compared with old-growth forests (Fig. 2 and Tables S2 and S3), which confirms that biodiversity loss is commonly accompanied by losses in functional composition (Allan et al. 2015). The observed reduction in CWMHmax and CWMSS values reflects the dominance of acquisitive-trait species in the clear-cut secondary forests. The prevalence of these traits is expected in communities under intense disturbance regimes (Carreño-Rocabado et al. 2012). With shorter and more open canopies, light becomes a non-limiting resource, so tree species may invest in earlier reproduction rather than increase in height (Ruiz-Jaen and Potvin 2011), and small seed species have an advantage because they can persist longer in the soil seed bank and germinate under favourable conditions (Poorter and Rose 2005). However, the persistence of these tree life history traits, even after 40 years of regeneration, might indicate a loss of resilience, which could be induced by the lack of seed sources in the surrounding matrix (Bengtsson et al. 2003; Hooper et al. 2004), which may also explains their lower biodiversity. Clear-cut secondary forests with old-growth forests nearby tend to recover species richness and diversity faster than do isolated forests (Jakovac et al. 2015).
Our results showed that the differences in species and functional diversity between selectively logged and old-growth forests were not significant (Fig. 2 and Tables S2 and S3). This result was also found in other vegetation studies (Kariuki et al. 2006; Berry et al. 2008, 2010), and shows that even with strong reduction in some ecosystem services (e.g., carbon storage in terms of biomass), these forests can maintain high species conservation values. Especially under low selective logging intensity, i.e. without strong changes in forest structure, the new small gaps can increase light availability and allow new species less adapted to light limitation to coexist with shade-tolerant species, increasing communities species and functional diversity (Peña-Claros et al. 2008; Toledo et al. 2011; Finegan et al. 2015; Rozendaal and Chazdon 2015). Our results indicate that forests under low logging intensity can harbour high species and functional diversity, and the inclusion of degraded forests in REDD + mechanisms is crucial for the role of these forests in biodiversity conservation.
Shifts in stand biomass predictors among different disturbance histories
Regardless of disturbance history, we found significantly higher AGB in plots with a wider niche range (higher FRic) and dominated by species with high adult stature (CWMHmax) (Table 1 and Fig. 3). These results support both ecological hypotheses (mass-ratio and niche complementarity) as drivers of biomass independent of forests disturbance history, but indicate that the role of the mass-ratio hypothesis is stronger, in line with other studies in tropical forests (Finegan et al. 2015; Lohbeck et al. 2015b; Prado-Junior et al. 2016b). Increase in functional richness should increase the stand biomass because a higher diversification in species traits represents different strategies for resource use, and thus coexisting species make more efficient use of available resources (Finegan et al. 2015). Conversely, the dominance of species with conservative traits (e.g. high maximum height) plays an important role to increase stand biomass. Species with high adult stature usually have a longer life span and typically experience brighter light conditions than small-statured species throughout most of their ontogenetic stages and, therefore, can accumulate more biomass (Poorter et al. 2005; Poorter and Bongers 2006).
We hypothesized that after stronger anthropogenic disturbances, the relative importance of the mass-ratio hypothesis will increase because species experience higher resource availability and lower competition, pressure which can favour local functional convergence (Weiher et al. 1998). However, in selectively logged forests functional dispersion was positively related to higher AGB (Fig. 3), indicating that the role of the niche complementarity as biomass driver is more important in selectively logged forests (intermediate anthropogenic disturbances) than in old-growth forests. Under low logging intensity, due to artificial gaps created when trees are logged, a more heterogeneous light environment is expected (Nicotra et al. 1999; Fauset et al. 2017), allowing species with different attributes to increase performance according to their local environmental conditions. Conversely, in old-growth and clear-cut secondary forests (extremes of the disturbance history range), where usually the forest canopy is, respectively, taller and more closed or shorter and more open (also see Nicotra et al. 1999; Fauset et al. 2017), the dominance of species with traits related to high forest stand biomass should be more important, and therefore, the role of the mass-ratio hypothesis exceeds the niche complementarity in old-growth and clear-cut secondary forests.
We acknowledge that our study has some limitations; first is that we did not have the amount of timber extracted from the selectively logged forests (i.e. the effect of logging activities on the forests attributes must differ according to percentage of stem basal area removed during the logging), although we assume that the logging intensity is low. Second, we did not have data of species leaf traits (e.g., specific leaf area), which are inextricably linked to the storage of biomass (Poorter and Bongers 2006; Prado-Junior et al. 2016b) as good indicators of light interception and photosynthetic rates, and could improve our analysis of functional diversity, especially because a heterogeneous light environment is expected in forests under different disturbance histories. Third, the plot size (20 × 20 m) can be potentially too small to study stand biomass, although it is effective to evaluate biodiversity and species composition (Phillips et al. 2003) and, therefore, their relationships with stand biomass. Future studies could benefit from measuring anthropogenic disturbances (e.g. selective logging intensity) and leaf traits. Nevertheless, our results show clear trends that can be discussed in the light of current theory.
Concluding remarks and implications for conservation
This study presents three main results. First, after 40 years of regeneration, clear-cut secondary forests reached only 20% of the forest stand biomass in old-growth forests. Strong losses were observed in species and functional diversity, along with changes in species composition (i.e., dominance of early successional trait species), suggesting that clear-cut secondary forests surrounded by a non-forest matrix may take longer to recover. Second, although the selectively logged forests in this study showed similar species and functional diversity to those of old-growth forests, biomass was still only 50% of old-growth forest, probably due to the removal of large trees with high economic value. This finding highlights the need to expand protection of intact forests against unplanned and illegal selective logging because they reduce the potential value of these forests for mitigating global climate change. Finally, shifts in stand biomass drivers were found among forests with different anthropogenic disturbance histories. While the most abundant species seemed to be the main contributor to above-ground biomass (mass-ratio hypothesis), the importance of the niche complementarity (especially due to increases in functional diversity) seems to be high in forests under intermediate disturbance intensity (e.g., selectively logged forests). An increasing number of studies elsewhere have focused on the drivers of biomass, and our analysis shows that forests disturbance history must be taken into account to fully understand these relationships. Our results highlight that initiatives for biodiversity conservation are a crucial component of tropical forests ecosystem services (e.g., co-benefits between carbon stocks and biodiversity under REDD +), and are positively linked to higher biomass and carbon stocks, especially in forests under some type of anthropogenic disturbance, like most of the remaining Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
References
Aide TM, Corrada-Bravo C, Campos-Cerqueira M et al (2013) Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification. PeerJ 1:e103. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.103
Alkama R, Cescatti A (2016) Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science 351:600–604. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8083
Allan E, Manning P, Alt F et al (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18:834–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12469
Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM et al (2009) A contemporary assessment of change in humid tropical forests. Conserv Biol 23:1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01333.x
Attri V, Pant KS, Dhiman R (2015) Effect of seed size and pre-sowing treatments on growth parameters and biomass of Sapindus mukorossi (Gaertn) seedlings under nursery condition. Environ Ecol 33:46–49
Baccini A, Walker W, Carvahlo L et al (2017) Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on new measurements of gain and loss. Science 5962:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252826
Barton K (2016) Package “MuMIn.”
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B et al (2014) Package “lme4.” 1–113
Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T et al (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. AMBIO A J Hum Environ 32:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032
Berenguer E, Ferreira J, Gardner TA et al (2014) A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests. Glob Change Biol 20:3713–3726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12627
Berry NJ, Phillips OL, Ong RC et al (2008) Impacts ofselective logging on tree diversity across a rainforestlandscape: the importance of spatial scale. Landsc Ecol 23:915–929
Berry NJ, Phillips OL, Lewis SL et al (2010) The high value of logged tropical forests: lessons from northern Borneo. Biodivers Conserv 19:985–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9779-z
Blaser J, Sarre A, Poore D and Johnson S (2011) Status of tropical forest management 2011. ITTO Technical Series No 38. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan
Bretz F, Westfall P, Heiberger RM et al (2015) Package “multcomp.”
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn
Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
Cardinale BJ, Wright JP, Cadotte MW et al (2007) Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:18123–18128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709069104
Carreño-Rocabado G, Peña-Claros M, Bongers F et al (2012) Effects of disturbance intensity on species and functional diversity in a tropical forest. J Ecol 100:1453–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02015.x
Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S et al (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 12:351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x
Chave J, Réjou-Méchain M, Búrquez A et al (2014) Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629
de Andrade RB, Balch JK, Parsons AL, Armenteras D, Roman-Cuesta RM, Bulkan J (2017) Scenarios in tropical forest degradation: carbon stock trajectories for REDD+. Carbon Balance Manage 12:1–7
FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. America (NY) 147:350. ISBN: 978-92-5-106654-6
FAO and JRC (2012) Global forest land-use change 1990–2005
Fauset S, Gloor MU, Aidar MPM et al (2017) Tropical forest light regimes in a human-modified landscape. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2002
Finegan B, Peña-Claros M, de Oliveira A et al (2015) Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. J Ecol 103:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12346
Floren A, Linsenmair KE (2005) The importance of primary tropical rain forest for species diversity: an investigation using arboreal ants as an example. Ecosystems 8:559–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0272-8
Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP et al (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10425
Grace J, Mitchard E, Gloor E (2014) Perturbations in the carbon budget of the tropics. Glob Change Biol 20:3238–3255. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12600
Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:902–910. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
Harmon ME, Whigham DF, Sexton J, Olmsted I (1995) Decomposition and mass of woody detritus in the dry tropical forests of the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Biotropica 27:305–316
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Hooper ER, Legendre P, Condit RS et al (2004) Factors affecting community composition of forest regeneration in deforested, abandoned land in Panama. Ecology 85:3313–3326. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0655
IBGE (2012) Manual Técnico da Vegetação Brasileira
Jakovac CC, Peña-Claros M, Kuyper TW, Bongers F (2015) Loss of secondary-forest resilience by land-use intensification in the Amazon. J Ecol 103:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12298
Kariuki M, Kooyman RM, Smith RGB et al (2006) Regeneration changes in tree species abundance, diversity and structure in logged and unlogged subtropical rainforest over a 36-year period SO FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT LA English DT Article DE chronological clustering; functional-group compositions 236:162–176
King DA, Davies SJ, Noor NSM (2006a) Growth and mortality are related to adult tree size in a Malaysian mixed dipterocarp forest. For Ecol Manage 223:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.066
King DA, Davies SJ, Tan S, Noor NSM (2006b) The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J Ecol 94:670–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01112.x
Kitagima K (2007) Seed and seedling ecology. In: Pugnaire FI, Valladares F (eds) Functional plant ecology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York, pp 549–580
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) Package “lmerTest.”
Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2015) Measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. 1–28. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FD/FD.pdf
Laurance WF, Nascimento HEM, Laurance SG et al (2006) Rapid decay of tree-community composition in Amazonian forest fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19010–19014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609048103
Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Mart M, Rodriguez J (2014) Changing drivers of species dominance during tropical forest succession. Funct Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12240
Lohbeck M, Lebrija-Trejos E, Martínez-Ramos M et al (2015a) Functional trait strategies of trees in dry and wet tropical forests are similar but differ in their consequences for succession. PLoS ONE 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123741
Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Martinez-Ramos M, Bongers F (2015b) Biomass is the main driver of changes in ecosystem process rates during tropical forest succession. Ecology 96:1242–1252
Magnago LFS, Edwards DP, Edwards FA et al (2014) Functional attributes change but functional richness is unchanged after fragmentation of Brazilian Atlantic forests. J Ecol 102:475–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12206
Magnago LFS, Magrach A, Laurance WF et al (2015a) Would protecting tropical forest fragments provide carbon and biodiversity cobenefits under REDD + ? Glob Change Biol 21:3455–3468. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12937
Magnago LFS, Rocha MF, Meyer L et al (2015b) Microclimatic conditions at forest edges have significant impacts on vegetation structure in large Atlantic forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 24:2305–2318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0961-1
Magnago LFS, Magrach A, Barlow J, Schaefer CEGR, Laurance WF, Martins SV, Edwards DP (2016) Do fragment size and edge effects predict carbon stocks in trees and lianas in tropical forests? Funct Ecol 31:542–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12752
Marshall AR, Willcock S, Platts PJ et al (2012) Measuring and modelling above-ground carbon and tree allometry along a tropical elevation gradient. Biol Conserv 154:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.017
Matos FAR, Magnago LFS, Gastauer M et al (2017) Effects of landscape configuration and composition on phylogenetic diversity of trees in a highly fragmented tropical forest. J Ecol 105:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12661
Mensah S, Veldtman R, Assogbadjo AE et al (2016) Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance. Ecol Evol 6:7546–7557. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2525
Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P et al (2007) IPCC Climate Change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nicotra AB, Chazdon RL, Iriarte SVB (1999) Spatial heterogeneity of light and woody seedling. Ecology 80:1908–1926
Osuri AM, Sankaran M (2016) Seed size predicts community composition and carbon storage potential of tree communities in rainforest fragments in India’s Western Ghats. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12626
Peña-Claros M, Fredericksen TS, Alarcón A et al (2008) Beyond reduced-impact logging: silvicultural treatments to increase growth rates of tropical trees. For Ecol Manage 256:1458–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.013
Phillips OL, Martínez RV, Vargas PN et al (2003) Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests. J Trop Ecol 19:629–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467403006035
Poorter L, Bongers F (2006) Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. Ecology 87:1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87
Poorter L, Rose SA (2005) Light-dependent changes in the relationship between seed mass and seedling traits: a meta-analysis for rain forest tree species. Oecologia 142:378–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1732-y
Poorter L, Bongers F, Sterck FJ, Wöll H (2005) Beyond the regeneration phase: differentiation of height-light trajectories among tropical tree species. J Ecol 93:256–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00956.x
Poorter L, Mcdonald I, Alarcon A et al (2010) The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species. New Phytol 185:481–492
Poorter L, van der Sande MT, Thompson J et al (2015) Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:1314–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12364
Poorter L, Bongers F, Aide TM et al (2016) Biomass resilience of neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530:211–214. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16512
Poorter L, van der Sande MT, Arets EJMM et al (2017) Biodiversity and climate determine the functioning of Neotropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12668
Prado-Junior JA, Schiavini I, Vale SV, Raymundo D, Lopes SF, Poorter L (2016a) Functional traits shape size-dependent growth and mortality 585 rates of dry forest tree species. J Plant Ecol 10(6):895–906
Prado-Junior JA, Schiavini I, Vale VS et al (2016b) Conservative species drive biomass productivity in tropical dry forests. J Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12543
Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Pinard MA et al (2008) Improved tropical forest management for carbon retention. PLoS Biol 6:1368–1369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060166
Putz FE, Zuidema PA, Synnott T et al (2012) Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable. Conserv Lett 5:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00242.x
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Rozendaal DMA, Chazdon RL (2015) Demographic drivers of tree biomass change during secondary succession in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecol Appl 25:506–516. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0054.1
Ruiz-Jaen MC, Potvin C (2011) Can we predict carbon stocks in tropical ecosystems from tree diversity? Comparing species and functional diversity in a plantation and a natural forest. New Phytol 189:978–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03501.x
Saatchi SS, Harris NL, Brown S et al (2011) Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc Natl Acad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108
Tabarelli M, Peres Ca (2002) Abiotic and vertebrate seed dispersal in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: implications for forest regeneration. Biol Conserv 106:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00243-9
Tilman D (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80(5):1455–1474
Toledo M, Poorter L, Peña-Claros M et al (2011) Climate is a stronger driver of tree and forest growth rates than soil and disturbance. J Ecol 99:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01741.x
UNFCCC (2008) Report of the conference of the parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1*. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add1* 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.013
UNFCCC (2015) Conference of the parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum-Part two action Tak by Conf Parties 1194:1–36
Weiher E, Clarke GDP, Keddy PA et al (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81:309–322
Wickham H, Chang W (2016) Package “ggplot2.”
Zanne AE, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Coomes DA et al (2009) Global wood density data-base. Dryad. http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad.235
Acknowledgements
We thank Chong Kwek Yan and two anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the article. We also thank Érica R. Borges for assistance in map creation, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Project Numbers 446698/2014-8 and 307591/2016-6) and FAPEMIG (APQ-01309-16, and PPM-00584-16) for grants. JAAMN holds a productivity fellowship of CNPq. JAPJ was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and CNPq (Project Number 441225/2016-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Communicated by David Hawksworth.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Forest and plantation biodiversity
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyles, M.V., Prado-Junior, J.A., Magnago, L.F.S. et al. Loss of biodiversity and shifts in aboveground biomass drivers in tropical rainforests with different disturbance histories. Biodivers Conserv 27, 3215–3231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1598-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1598-7