Abstract
The encapsulation of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria has involved several methods to protect them from unfavourable environmental conditions and incompatibilities. This review encompasses different methods for the encapsulation of bacteriocins and their applications in both food and pharmaceutical fields. Based on the bibliometric analysis of publications from well-reputed journals including different available patents during the period from 1996 to 2017, 135 articles and 60 patents were collected. Continent-wise contributions to the bacteriocins encapsulation research were carried out by America (52%), Asia (29%) and Europe (19%); with the United States of America, Brazil, Thailand and Italy the countries with major contributions. Till date, different methods proposed for encapsulation have been (i) Film coatings (50%), (ii) Liposomes (23%), (iii) Nanofibers (22%) and (iv) Nanoparticles (4%). Bacteriocins encapsulation methods frequently carried out in food protection (70%); while in the pharmaceutical field, 30% of the research was conducted on multi drug resistant therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bacteriocins are antimicrobial activity (AMA) peptides produced by various bacteria including Lactic Acid Bacteria (LABs). Bacteriocins such as nisin, subtilosin, pediocins, and lactacins have demonstrated their potential applications in protection and preservation of food against pathogenic and spoilage bacteria (Cleveland et al. 2001). Currently, antibacterial peptides are one of the most promising substances to be used as antibiotics; specifically, peptides containing lanthionine (lantibiotics) due to their broad spectrum of inhibition against a variety of Gram-positive bacteria (Al-Mahrous and Upton 2011; Jamuna et al. 2005). In the past century, nisin, a FDA approved natural antimicrobial substance produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis was permitted for preservation of foods by food industries in more than 40 countries (Arevalos-Sánchez et al. 2012; de Arauz et al. 2009; Gharsallaoui et al. 2016; Khan and Oh 2016; Ross et al. 2002). On the other hand, its use as an antibiotic in health care, against multidrug resistant pathogens are still at the level of potential utilization (Breukink and de Kruijff 2006; Benmechernene et al. 2013). Even though the scientific community proposes the applications of bacteriocin in food protection, the bacteriocin activity would be affected due to proteolytic degradation within food matrixes, among other factors. To overcome the above mentioned difficulties, relatively new methodologies such as nanoencapsulation systems (metal nanoparticles, chitosan, nanofibers, and liposomes) are being considered to protect them from degradation, thereby enhancing the preservative effects.
Nanotechnology is a new generation platform for the development of nano-structured materials with antimicrobial activities in the pharmaceutical industries (Mozafari 2007; Sanguansri and Augustin 2006; Shrivastava and Dash 2009). Bacteriocin encapsulation technology has led to the development of novel antimicrobial packaging without any changes to food components (Lopes and Brandelli 2017; Sidhu and Nehra 2017). However, the ability of nanocarriers to act as protective layers must be improved to be effective over extended storage times (Fahim et al. 2017).
Scientific publication of global research on bacteriocins encapsulation methods
A database which includes 135 published articles and 60 patents concerning the encapsulation of bacteriocins from 1996 to 2017 was made from Science Direct, Scopus, Springerlink, Ingenta, Wiley and Scielo, for research papers; and from Espacenet, PatentScope, Google patents, Lens and Upsto for patents. All references were organized in a Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheet. Data were initially classified on the basis of publication year and country of origin as well as affiliation of the corresponding author. The exploration on effective encapsulation of bacteriocin in well-reputed scientific journals, showed majorly contributions during the years 2000, 2008 and 2012 (Fig. 1). Globally, America, Asia and Europe contributed with 52, 29 and 19%, respectively, to the reported research on the encapsulation of bacteriocin in the last two decades; with the United States of America, Brazil, Thailand, and Italy being the countries that majorly contributed to the research on bacteriocin encapsulation for food and pharmaceutical applications (Fig. 2). Based on our data collection, ten reputed journals published maximum number of research articles, review articles, and short communications in the percentage-wise contribution of 22.72% (Journal of Food Protection), 13.63% (International Journal of Food Microbiology), 13.63% (Food Microbiology), 10.60% (Food Control), 10.60% (Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins), 7.57% (Food Research International), 6.06% (LWT—Food Science and Technology), 6.06% (Food Microbiology and Safety), 4.54% (Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry) and 4.54% (Letters in Applied Microbiology) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, bacteriocin encapsulation was majorly carried out using antimicrobial film coatings (50%), liposomes (23.40%), nanofibers (22.34%) and nanoparticle systems (4.25%) (Fig. 4a). Moreover, the collected articles were also classified by application field: food protection and pharmaceutical field (Fig. 4b). On the other hand, the 1996–2017 period’s patent database showed two major contributions in 2000 and 2016 (Fig. 5). The granted patents on bacteriocin encapsulation processes, characterization, and constancy in situ or ex situ applications in foodstuffs or health matters, have been released mainly by the United States Patent Office (USPTO), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO/PCT), European Patent Office (EPO), and Australian Patent Office (AU) (Fig. 6a), involving applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries, mainly (Fig. 6b).
Different types of nanoencapsulation systems
According to the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) nanotechnology had a scientific archetype focused on the science of 1–100 nm elements that was manipulated to perform encapsulation. The basic advantage of nanoencapsulation of bacteriocins using nanomaterials lies in the necessity to increase its pharmacokinetics by altering physical characteristics, such as solubility, half-life and bioavailability (Reis et al. 2006; Soppimath et al. 2001; Yadav et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2010).
Metal NPs systems
Encapsulation as NPs may offer a potential solution to protect bacteriocins, improving its efficacy and stability in practical applications. Metal NPs primarily gold (Thakor et al. 2011), palladium (Coppage et al. 2013) and silver (Thio et al. 2012) were among the most commonly used in established drug delivery systems. Owing to their small size and positive charge, metal ions act as free radicals diffusing into and disrupting the cellular membranes (Lewinski et al. 2008). Magnetic nickel NPs uniformly coated with a nanolayer biofilm of polyacrylic acid was used to immobilize the AMP LL-37, against Escherichia coli (Chen et al. 2009). In addition, metal NPs moulded into different shapes and sizes were used to enhance the overall therapeutic effect. Table 1 shows some representative published articles regarding bacteriocins along with NPs for food and pharmaceutical applications.
Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN)
The lipid-based formulation systems are generally composed of a triglyceride core and a phospholipid coat with high-melting point, which is actually responsible for a solid state character, both at room and human body temperatures (Puri et al. 2009). Nisin has been incorporated into SLN carriers, exhibiting a continuous release for about 25 days, based on the pH and the salt concentration of the buffer solution (Prombutara et al. 2012).
Phytoglycogen NPs
Phytoglycogen is a high-density carbohydrate NPs used for formulating novel efficient nanoconstructs (Chen et al. 2015). According to Bi et al.(2011b) Nisin had been effectively carried by phytoglycogen particles, proved against L. monocytogenes, but the deepest activity had associated with the octenyl succinate and β-amylolysis substitutions. In a related study, phytoglycogen octenyl succinate has been successfully used to form an oil-in-water emulsion for delivering nisin against L. monocytogenes (Bi et al. 2011a).
Gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs)
Metal NPs induce oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species, with toxicity due to the accumulated free-metal ions (Seil and Webster 2012). Thirumurugan et al. (2013) tested NPs obtained from the combination of Au-NPs with nisin, obtaining higer AMA against three pathogens, compared with the components alone. In other investigation, Mossallam et al. (2014) used Lactobacillus acidophilus CH1 bacteriocins combined with Au-NPs aganist spores of the fungus Enterocytozoon bieneusi, wchich causes intestinal microsporidiosis. They obtained a reduction of both spore extrusion and the infectivity of E. bieneusi, after exposure to bacteriocins/Au-NPs complex (Mossallam et al. 2014).
Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs)
Ag-NPs were used in numerous applications, extending from coating medical devices, wound dressings, coating textile fabrics, water treatment and filtration. Ag-NPs were majorly recognized in view of the broad-spectrum AMA against certain organism of clinical importance, including drug-resistant pathogens (Lara et al. 2009; Zinjarde 2012). Specifically, enterocin-capped Ag-NPs exhibited excellent efficiency against three food pathogenic organisms, namely E. coli, L. monocytogenes and S. aureus (Sharma et al. 2012).
Chitosan system
Chitosan is a linear polysaccharide produced by the deacetylation of chitin and it has been used for fabrication of NPs (Nitta and Numata 2013). The combination of chitosan (CS) and alginate (ALG), gives a composite with better delivery behaviour than the polymers alone. Such specific combination had been effectively used to nanoencapsulate nisin, with 95% entrapment efficiency (Zohri et al. 2010). In other hand, the nisin-loaded CS-ALG NPs showed a tremendous level of AMA against L. monocytogenes and S. aureus (Zohri et al. 2013). Studying Ni-CS-ALG NPs (Bernela et al. 2014) and Ni-CS-Carageenan (Chopra et al. 2014), researchers obtained important AMA against M. luteus MTCC1809, P. aeruginosa MTCC424, S. enterica MTCC1253 and E. aerogenes MTCC2823 during 20 days; furthermore, when added this NPs in tomato juice, they observed no changes in the food quality during 6 months.
Nanofibers
Nanofibers are designed by spinning a polymer solution using high potential electric field. Nanofibers have attracted a lot of attention due to their large surface area, small pore size, huge physical stability, strong encapsulation ability, target specific delivery and sustained release of a variety of drugs (Luong-Van et al. 2006; Maretschek et al. 2008). In healthcare environments, exposed chronic wounds are extremely susceptible to nosocomial infections; in response to this problem, among the alternatives it has been recently reported the wound dressing production by bacteriocins-loaded nanofiber technology to promote wound healing with interesting results against S. aureus in a mice model (Heunis et al. 2013).
Electrospinning method
Bacteriocins have been loaded onto nanofibers in a process called electrospinning (Williams et al. 2012; Heunis and Dicks 2010). Nanofibers were investigated for bacteriocin potential uses in biomedical applications, and most studies pointed the promising relevance for the development of tissue engineering scaffolds (Pham et al. 2006). In electrospinning, a mixture of polymers and bacteriocin is dissolved in a solvent and loaded into a syringe. A high voltage is applied to electrodes in the polymer-bacteriocins solution; as a result, bacteriocins loaded polymer nanofibers are formed and collected by a metal screen collector. The resulting nanofibers have nano- to micrometer diameters and are uniformly loaded with bacteriocins. Interestingly, specifically Nisin-PEO (poly(ethylene oxide)) and PDLLA (poly(d,l-lactide)) (50:50) blend nanofibers exhibited an in vitro AMA against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) for at least 4 days (Heunis et al. 2013). Furthermore, nisin-PEO-PDLLA nanofibers enriched with 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA), decreased by 88% the MRSA biofilm formation after 24 h of exposure (Ahire and Dicks 2015). In another study, PEO-PDLLA nanofibers enriched with nisin and Ag-NPs exhibited broad AMA against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Ahire et al. 2015). Plantaricin 423 encapsulated in PEO nanofibers produced by electrospinning, exhibited AMA against E. faecium and L. sakei (Heunis et al. 2010). Table 2 presents some selected published articles on bacteriocins-loaded nanofiber applied for AMA in food and pharmaceutical applications.
Liposomes
Thin film hydration method
Liposomes are composed of one or more lipid bilayers forming vesicles. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) consists of a mixture of natural phospholipids made of a polar end formed by a choline and a phosphate group linked to the hydrophobic portion linked by ester bonds with the glycerol. Liposomes could entrap and protect different substances from undesired interactions that can affect their functionality (Sant’Anna et al. 2011). The encapsulation of bacteriocins into liposomes would be achieved by the thin film hydration method; by this technique, a preformed lipid film is hydrated with an aqueous buffer containing the bacteriocin, at a phase transition temperature of lipids. The bacteriocins entrapped into lipids composition and perhaps attributed to electrostatic and hydrophobic electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between bacteriocin and phospholipids (Were et al. 2003). Most bacteriocins are cationic amphiphilic molecules; therefore, they possibly are encapsulated in the inner aqueous phase of liposome and also immobilized into liposome membranes. Bacteriocins have been entrapped into PC nanovesicles performing the direct applications of food protection such as proteolytic degradation or interaction with food components) (da Silva Malheiros et al. 2010c). On the other hand, nisin-loaded PC nanovesicles caused no significant inhibition of target pathogens in comparison to free nisin, whereas PC:Phosphatidylglycerol (PG) (8:2 and 6:4) liposomes produced a significant inhibition, suggesting PG-containing nanovesicles to release their contents more efficient (Taylor et al. 2008). Liposomes prepared from different proliposomes (Pro-lipos® H, S, C and DUO) with lower contents of negatively charged phospholipids were less susceptible to the nisin-membrane destabilizing action in comparison with other liposomes (Laridi et al. 2003).
Reversed-phase method
Alternatively, in the reversed-phase method an aqueous solution of the bacteriocin is dropped into the lipid solution to form a water in oil emulsion, which is then, sonicated yielding a homogeneous opalescent dispersion of reverse micelles. The organic solvent was evaporated, resulting in a highly viscous organogel, which is reverted to nanovesicles after addition of ultrapure water (Teixeira et al. 2008).
These two methodologies were compared to encapsulate the nisin in PC nanovesicles, also testing both probe-type and bath-type ultrasound. Film hydration using bath-type ultrasound resulted in liposomes of smaller size and with adequate maintenance of AMA (da Silva Malheiros et al. 2010a). This nanovesicle was applied in milk as a food model, inhibiting the L. monocytogenes growth (da Silva Malheiros et al. 2010b). Nisin and BLIS (bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance) P34 were encapsulated in PC liposomes and incorporated into Minas frescal cheese (da Silva et al. 2012a). Liposome encapsulation prolonged the nisin and BLIS-P34 antilisterial activities due to gradually releasing as compared with both free nisin and BLIS-P34 (da Silva Malheiros et al. 2012b). Current study (Imran et al. 2016) released rates of fluorescently labelled nisin from liposomal nanocarriers. Interestingly, acidic pH and convenient ethanol concentrations in food-simulating liquid (FSL) improved the stability and retention capacity of loaded drug. The partition coefficient (i.e., nisin concentration in FSL/nisin concentration in nanoliposomes, at equilibrium) values were from 0.23 to 8.78, strong dependencies on nisin affinity toward encapsulating systems as well as on the surrounding FSL (i.e., phosphate-buffered saline, pH 6.8; acetic acid 0.3%, pH 2.8, or ethanol 10%, pH 7). Table 3 includes some articles about bacteriocin liposomes methods applied for antilisterial activity.
Food applications
Encapsulation technology has been exploited as an alternative to protect antimicrobials, potentially enhancing their efficacy and stability in foods (Mozafari et al. 2008). Current research focused on bacteriocin food biotechnologies delivered the antimicrobials via continuous or sustained release (Chi-Zhang et al. 2004). Controlled delivery improves the efficacy of bacteriocins by ensuring the peptides successfully overcome physiological barriers and preserve structure and functionality (Duncan 2011). Three leading approaches was involved bacteriocin in food: through the addition of purified bacteriocin to food products, the inoculation of a food with a LAB, which produces the bacteriocin itself, or the incorporation of an ingredient that was previously fermented with the bacteriocin-producer bacterium (Jones et al. 2005). Nisin encapsulated in alginate-cellulose nanocrystal beads containing 16, 31 and 63 µg/mL nisin, significantly reduced the L. monocytogenes counts by 2.65, 1.50 and 3.04 log CFU/g after 28 days of storage compared with free nisin (Huq et al. 2014). Recently, inventors claimed for a prolonged efficacy of a bacteriocin combined with carbohydrate nanoparticles against L. monocytogenes (Bhunia and Yao 2014). Other group assertion for spray dried bacteriocin lactocin 3147 that showed effective antimicrobial activity in foodstuff using conjunction with hydrostatic pressure (Ross and Hill 2004).
Antimicrobial film coatings
Nisin embedded in packaging materials or nisin adsorbed solid on surfaces such as polyvinylic or polysaccharide films allowed the for prolongation of the AMA (Cha et al. 2003; Coma et al. 2001; Hoffman et al. 2001; Natrajan and Sheldon 2000a, b). The AMA of edible hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) film was obtained by the incorporation of nisin into the fatty acid (stearic acid) film-forming solution. The effect of stearic acid was reducing the inhibitory activity of HPMC film against L. innocua and S. aureus (Coma et al. 2001). Nilsson et al. (2000) examined the synergistic model of carbon dioxide (CO2) and nisin evaluated against L. monocytogenes Scott A wild-type and nisin-resistant (Nisr) cells grown in broth at 4 °C. This synergism was examined mechanistically by CO2 enhanced nisin-induced CF (carboxyfluorescein) leakage occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane.
Bacteriocin-activated plastic films were involved in storage of milk, hamburgers (Mauriello et al. 2005) frankfurters (Ercolini et al. 2010), cold smoked salmon (Neetoo et al. 2008), etc. Among the known bacteriocins, nisin is currently allowed in food as a pure substance (Deegan et al. 2006; Galvez et al. 2007; Settanni and Corsetti 2008). Some inventors (Nauth and Lynum 2000) patented a stabilized mayonnaise spread with nisin-containing whey inhibiting the growth of a contaminating microorganism. Enterocin 416K1, a bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus casseliflavus IM 416K1, is a promising effect for nisin-alternative food packaging films (Iseppi et al. 2008). Partially purified active bacteriocin isolated from L. curvatus, lactocin 705 and lactocin AL705, were loaded onto multiple layers of packaging films exhibiting an AMA against L. innocua and L. plantarum for up to 45 days (Blanco Massani et al. 2012). Table 4 presents some published articles concerning bacteriocin coated films in food applications.
Pharmaceutical application
The efficacy of LAB-produced bacteriocins was evaluated for use in regulating oral biofilms (Zoumpopoulou et al. 2013). It is important to note that bacteriocin and bacteriocinogenic strains require generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status in order to be sold on the US market. In other hand, Tong and co-workers also studied exclusively for therapeutics treatment against oral biofilms, lantibiotic nisin, in combination with free amino acids against Steptococcus mutans biofilms. This result indicated mixtures of either the l or d-enantiomers of Glu, Asp or Cys in combination with nisin had been providing the impact of the lantibiotic against biofilms of S. mutans (Tong et al. 2014a). Another interesting study (Lobos et al. 2009) treated against oral pathogens, the combination of the bacteriocin PsVP-10, a non-lantibiotic (class II bacteriocins), with the antimicrobials substances (triclosan and chlorhexidine). In their results showed better synergistics effect against S. mutans and S. sobrinus. A recent research exhibited that nisin interacts synergistically with chloramphenicol were effectively against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius DSM21284 biofilms, though combinations of nisin I4V with penicillin were mainly potent against DSM21284 planktonic cells (Field et al. 2016a). In an additional emerged study, nisin synergy with ciprofloxacin or daptomycin was effectively used against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) biofilms (Dosler and Mataraci 2013). Tong et al. (2014a) also reported the efficacy of nisin in synergy with chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin or penicillin at controlling biofilms of the nosocomial pathogen, E. faecalis (Tong et al. 2014b).
Novel therapeutic studies suggested the combination of nisin with polymyxins or colistin against multi-drug resistant bacteria (Field et al. 2016b). Field and co-workers demonstrated that 1/4 MIC (i.e., Minimum inhibitory concentration) Nisin plus 1/2 MIC polymyxins or 1/5 MIC colistin were affective against P. aeruginosa PA-01 biofilm formation. A study confirmed that synergistic activity of class II bacteriocin, durancin 61A and the broad-spectrum antimicrobial reuterin produced FIC (fractional inhibitory concentration) indices of 0.2 against Clostridium difficile (Schaefer et al. 2010). Interestingly, durancin 61A blends with vancomycin were also displayed synergistic effect against MRSA (S. aureus ATCC 700699) with FIC values of 0.3 attained (Hanchi et al. 2017). Notably nisin were encapsulated into polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers that had antibacterial properties against strains of S. aureus (Behary et al. 2013). In other study, subtilosin was loaded onto a poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofiber that showed virucidal activity against herpes simplex virus type 1 (oral herpes) (Torres et al. 2013). Inventors had patented a pharmaceutical compositions of nisin combined with glycerol monolaurate active for treatment of H. pylori infection particularly peptic ulcer and gastric (Blackburn et al. 1998). Bacteriocin-loaded, specifically nisin and ST4STA in brushite cement bone implants (van Staden et al. 2011, 2012) displayed remarkable activity against biofilm methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Then brushite cement impregnated with bacteriocin would be an alternative for bone replacement.
Conclusion
To date, bacteriocins have exhibited a promising prospective as antimicrobial alternatives for both the food and pharmaceutical industries. Moreover, during the last two decades, the bacteriocin encapsulation has been a meaningful improvement in the applications of these natural antimicrobials in Food Science and Pharmacy, according to original research reports as well as patents. Nonetheless, the challenges are still enormous and should consider the geographical integration of research groups (i.e. intensify international collaborations) to yield a fast and potent improvement of the bacteriocin encapsulation biotechnologies, especially the nanoencapsulation, which would provide convenient alternatives for the wellness of human being.
References
Ahire JJ, Dicks LM (2015) Nisin incorporated with 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid in nanofibers inhibits biofilm formation by a methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Probiotics Antimicrob 7(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-014-9171-5
Ahire JJ, Neveling DP, Dicks LM (2015) Co-spinning of silver nanoparticles with nisin increases the antimicrobial spectrum of PDLLA: PEO nanofibers. Curr Microbiol 71(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0813-y
Al-Mahrous MM, Upton M (2011) Discovery and development of lantibiotics; antimicrobial agents that have significant potential for medical application. Expert Opin Drug Discov 6(2):155–170. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2011.545387
Arevalos-Sánchez M, Regalado C, Martin SE, Domínguez-Domínguez J, García-Almendárez BE (2012) Effect of neutral electrolyzed water and nisin on Listeria monocytogenes biofilms, and on listeriolysin O activity. Food Control 24(1–2):116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.09.012
Behary N, Kerkeni A, Perwuelz A, Chihib NE, Dhulster P (2013) Bioactivation of PETwoven fabrics using alginate biopolymer and the bacteriocin nisin. Text Res J 83(11):1120–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512471743
Benmechernene Z, Fernandez-No I, Kihal M, Bohme K, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velazquez J (2013) Recent patents on bacteriocins: food and biomedical applications. Recent Pat DNA Gene Seq 7(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.2174/1872215611307010010
Bernela M, Kaur P, Chopra M, Thakur R (2014) Synthesis, characterization of nisin loaded alginate–chitosan–pluronic composite nanoparticles and evaluation against microbes. LWT Food Sci Technol 59(2):1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.05.061
Bhunia AK, Yao Y (2014) Carbohydrate nanoparticles for prolonged efficacy of antimicrobial peptide. U.S. Patent Application 13/983,585
Bi L, Yang L, Bhunia AK, Yao Y (2011a) Carbohydrate nanoparticle-mediated colloidal assembly for prolonged efficacy of bacteriocin against food pathogen. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(7):1529–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23099
Bi L, Yang L, Narsimhan G, Bhunia AK, Yao Y (2011b) Designing carbohydrate nanoparticles for prolonged efficacy of antimicrobial peptide. J Control Release 150(2):150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.024
Blackburn P, Goldstein BP, Cook DJ (1998) Compositions with activity against helicobacter. U.S. Patent 5,804,549
Blanco Massani M, Morando PJ, Vignolo GM, Eisenberg P (2012) Characterization of a multilayer film activated with Lactobacillus curvatus CRL705 bacteriocins. J Sci Food Agric 92(6):1318–1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4703
Boualem K, Subirade M, Desjardins Y, Saucier L (2013) Development of an encapsulation system for the protection and controlled release of antimicrobial nisin at meat cooking temperature. J Food Res 2(3):36. https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v2n3p36
Breukink E, de Kruijff B (2006) Lipid II as a target for antibiotics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(4):321–332. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2004
Cao-Hoang L, Chaine A, Gregoire L, Wache Y (2010) Potential of nisin-incorporated sodium caseinate films to control Listeria in artificially contaminated cheese. Food Microbiol 27(7):940–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.025
Cha DS, Cooksey K, Chinnan MS, Park HJ (2003) Release of nisin from various heat-pressed and cast films. Lebensm-Wiss Technol 36(2):209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00209-8
Chen G, Zhou M, Chen S, Lv G, Yao J (2009) Nanolayer biofilm coated on magnetic nanoparticles by using a dielectric barrier discharge glow plasma fluidized bed for immobilizing an antimicrobial peptide. Nanotechnology 20(46):465706. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/20/46/465706
Chen H, Narsimhan G, Yao Y (2015) Particulate structure of phytoglycogen studied using beta-amylolysis. Carbohydr Polym 132:582–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.074
Chi-Zhang YD, Yam KL, Chikindas ML (2004) Effective control of Listeria monocytogenes by combination of nisin formulated and slowly released into a broth system. Int J Food Microbiol 90(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00168-5
Chopra M, Kaur P, Bernela M, Thakur R (2014) Surfactant assisted nisin loaded chitosan-carageenan nanocapsule synthesis for controlling food pathogens. Food Control 37:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.024
Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML (2001) Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 71(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00560-8
Coma V, Sebti I, Pardon P, Deschamps A, Pichavant FH (2001) Antimicrobial edible packaging based on cellulosic ethers, fatty acids, and nisin incorporation to inhibit Listeria innocua and Staphylococcus aureus. J Food Prot 64(4):470–475. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-64.4.470
Coppage R, Slocik JM, Ramezani-Dakhel H, Bedford NM, Heinz H, Naik RR, Knecht MR (2013) Exploiting localized surface binding effects to enhance the catalytic reactivity of peptide-capped nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 135(30):11048–11054. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja402215t
da Silva Malheiros P, Daroit DJ, Brandelli A (2010a) Food applications of liposome-encapsulated antimicrobial peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(6):284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.03.003
da Silva Malheiros P, Daroit DJ, da Silveira NP, Brandelli A (2010b) Effect of nanovesicle-encapsulated nisin on growth of Listeria monocytogenes in milk. Food Microbiol 27(1):175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.013
da Silva Malheiros P, Micheletto YMS, Silveira NPd, Brandelli A (2010c) Development and characterization of phosphatidylcholine nanovesicles containing the antimicrobial peptide nisin. Food Res Int 43(4):1198–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.02.015
da Silva Malheiros P, Sant’Anna V, Utpott M, Brandelli A (2012a) Antilisterial activity and stability of nanovesicle-encapsulated antimicrobial peptide P34 in milk. Food Control 23(1):42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.06.008
da Silva Malheiros P, Sant’Anna V, de Souza Barbosa M, Brandelli A, de Melo Franco BDG (2012b) Effect of liposome-encapsulated nisin and bacteriocin-like substance P34 on Listeria monocytogenes growth in minas frescal cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 156(3):272–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.04.004
de Arauz LJ, Jozala AF, Mazzola PG, Vessoni Penna TC (2009) Nisin biotechnological production and application: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 20(3–4):146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2009.01.056
de Mello MB, da silva Malheiros P, Brandelli A, Silveira NP, Jantzen MM, da Motta AD (2013) Characterization and antilisterial effect of phosphatidylcholine nanovesicles containing the antimicrobial peptide pediocin. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 5(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9125-3
Deegan LH, Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross P (2006) Bacteriocins: biological tools for bio-preservation and shelf-life extension. Int Dairy J 16(9):1058–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.026
Dheraprasart C, Rengpipat S, Supaphol P, Tattiyakul J (2009) Morphology, release characteristics, and antimicrobial effect of nisin-loaded electrospun gelatin fiber mat. J Food Prot 72(11):2293–2300. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.11.2293
Dosler S, Mataraci E (2013) In vitro pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial cationic peptides alone and in combination with antibiotics against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Peptides 49:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2013.08.008
Duncan TV (2011) Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J Colloid Interface Sci 363(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017
Ercolini D, Ferrocino I, La Storia A, Mauriello G, Gigli S, Masi P, Villani F (2010) Development of spoilage microbiota in beef stored in nisin activated packaging. Food Microbiol 27(1):137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.006
Eswaranandam S, Hettiarachchy NS, Johnson MG (2004) Antimicrobial activity of citric, lactic, malic, or tartaric acids and nisin-incorporated soy protein film against Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157: H7, and Salmonella gaminara. J Food Sci 69(3):M79–M84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13375.x
Fahim HA, El Rouby WM, El-Gendy AO, Khairalla AS, Naguib IA, Farghali AA (2017) Enhancement of the productivity of the potent bacteriocin avicin A and improvement of its stability using nanotechnology approaches. Sci Rep 7(1):10604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10157-9
Field D, O’Connor R, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2016a) In Vitro activities of nisin and nisin derivatives alone and in combination with antibiotics against Staphylococcus biofilms. Front Microbiol 7:508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00508
Field D, Seisling N, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C (2016b) Synergistic nisin-polymyxin combinations for the control of Pseudomonas biofilm formation. Front Microbiol 7:1713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01713
Galvez A, Abriouel H, Lopez RL, Omar NB (2007) Bacteriocin-based strategies for food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 120(1–2):51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.001
Gharsallaoui A, Oulahal N, Joly C, Degraeve P (2016) Nisin as a food preservative: part 1: physicochemical properties, antimicrobial activity, and main uses. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56(8):1262–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.763765
Guiga W, Swesi Y, Galland S, Peyrol E, Degraeve P, Sebti I (2010) Innovative multilayer antimicrobial films made with Nisaplin® or nisin and cellulosic ethers: physico-chemical characterization, bioactivity and nisin desorption kinetics. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 11(2):352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2010.01.008
Hanchi H, Hammami R, Gingras H, Kourda R, Bergeron MG, Ben Hamida J, Ouellette M, Fliss I (2017) Inhibition of MRSA and of Clostridium difficile by durancin 61A: synergy with bacteriocins and antibiotics. Future Microbiol 12(3):205–212. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2016-0113
Heunis TD, Dicks LM (2010) Nanofibers offer alternative ways to the treatment of skin infections. J Biomed Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/510682
Heunis TD, Botes M, Dicks LM (2010) Encapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 and its bacteriocin in nanofibers. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-009-9024-9
Heunis TD, Bshena O, Klumperman B, Dicks LM (2011) Release of bacteriocins from nanofibers prepared with combinations of Poly(D, L-lactide) (PDLLA) and Poly(Ethylene Oxide) (PEO). Int J Mol Sci 12(4):2158–2173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12042158
Heunis TD, Smith C, Dicks LM (2013) Evaluation of a nisin-eluting nanofiber scaffold to treat Staphylococcus aureus-induced skin infections in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3928–3935. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00622-13
Hoffman KL, Han IY, Dawson PL (2001) Antimicrobial effects of corn zein films impregnated with nisin, lauric acid, and EDTA. J Food Prot 64(6):885–889. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-64.6.885
Huq T, Riedl B, Bouchard J, Salmieri S, Lacroix M (2014) Microencapsulation of nisin in alginate-cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) microbeads for prolonged efficacy against Listeria monocytogenes. Cellulose 21(6):4309–4321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0432-y
Imran M, Revol-Junelles AM, Francius G, Desobry S (2016) Diffusion of fluorescently labeled bacteriocin from edible nanomaterials and embedded nano-bioactive coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(33):21618–21631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b04621
Iseppi R, Pilati F, Marini M, Toselli M, de Niederhäusern S, Guerrieri E, Messi P, Sabia C, Manicardi G, Anacarso I, Bondi M (2008) Anti-listerial activity of a polymeric film coated with hybrid coatings doped with Enterocin 416K1 for use as bioactive food packaging. Int J Food Microbiol 123(3):281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.015
Jamuna M, Babusha ST, Jeevaratnam K (2005) Inhibitory efficacy of nisin and bacteriocins from Lactobacillus isolates against food spoilage and pathogenic organisms in model and food systems. Food Microbiol 22(5):449–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2004.11.008
Jiménez-Villeda PY, Rodríguez-Hernández AI, López-Cuellar M, Franco-Fernández MJ, Chavarría-Hernández N (2018) Elaboration and characterization of pectin-gellan films added with concentrated supernatant of Streptococcus infantarius fermentations, and EDTA: effects on the growth of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in a Mexican cheese medium, and physical-mechanical properties. Food Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.32717
Jones E, Salin V, Williams GW (2005) Nisin and the market for commercial bacteriocins. Consumer and Product Research CP-01-05, Texas Agribusiness Market Research Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex, USA
Khan I, Oh DH (2016) Integration of nisin into nanoparticles for application in foods. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 34:376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.12.013
Kristo E, Koutsoumanis KP, Biliaderis CG (2008) Thermal, mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of sodium caseinate films containing antimicrobials and their inhibitory action on Listeria monocytogenes. Food Hydrocoll. 22(3):373–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.12.003
Lara HH, Ayala-Núñez NV, Turrent LD, Padilla CR (2009) Bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26(4):615–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0211-3
Laridi R, Kheadr EE, Benech RO, Vuillemard JC, Lacroix C, Fliss I (2003) Liposome encapsulated nisin Z: optimization, stability and release during milk fermentation. Int Dairy J 13(4):325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00194-2
Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R (2008) Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4(1):26–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200700595
Lopes NA, Brandelli A (2017) Nanostructures for delivery of natural antimicrobials in food. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1308915
Lobos O, Padilla A, Padilla C (2009) In vitro antimicrobial effect of bacteriocin PsVP-10 in combination with chlorhexidine and triclosan against Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus strains. Arch Oral Biol 54(3):230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.11.007
Luong-Van E, Grondahl L, Chua KN, Leong KW, Nurcombe V, Cool SM (2006) Controlled release of heparin from poly(epsilon-caprolactone) electrospun fibers. Biomaterials 27(9):2042–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.028
Maretschek S, Greiner A, Kissel T (2008) Electrospun biodegradable nanofiber nonwovens for controlled release of proteins. J Control Release 127(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.01.011
Mauriello G, De Luca E, La Storia A, Villani F, Ercolini D (2005) Antimicrobial activity of a nisin-activated plastic film for food packaging. Lett Appl Microbiol 41(6):464–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01796.x
Mossallam SF, Amer EI, Diab RG (2014) Potentiated anti-microsporidial activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus CH1 bacteriocin using gold nanoparticles. Exp Parasitol 144:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.06.002
Mozafari MR (2007) Nanomaterials and nanosystems for biomedical applications. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6289-6
Mozafari MR, Johnson C, Hatziantoniou S, Demetzos C (2008) Nanoliposomes and their applications in food nanotechnology. J Liposome Res 18(4):309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982100802465941
Natrajan N, Sheldon BW (2000a) Efficacy of nisin-coated polymer films to inactivate Salmonella typhimurium on fresh broiler skin. J Food Prot 63(9):1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.9.1189
Natrajan N, Sheldon BW (2000b) Inhibition of Salmonella on poultry skin using protein- and polysaccharide-based films containing a nisin formulation. J Food Prot 63(9):1268–1272. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.9.1268
Nauth KR, Lynum M (2000) Stabilization of mayonnaise spreads using whey from nisin-producing cultures. U.S. Patent 6,113,954
Neetoo H, Ye M, Chen H, Joerger RD, Hicks DT, Hoover DG (2008) Use of nisin-coated plastic films to control Listeria monocytogenes on vacuum-packaged cold-smoked salmon. Int J Food Microbiol 122(1–2):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.043
Nguyen VT, Gidley MJ, Dykes GA (2008) Potential of a nisin-containing bacterial cellulose film to inhibit Listeria monocytogenes on processed meats. Food Microbiol 25(3):471–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.01.004
Nilsson L, Chen Y, Chikindas ML, Huss HH, Gram L, Montville TJ (2000) Carbon dioxide and nisin act synergistically on Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Environ Microbiol 66(2):769–774. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.2.769-774.2000
Nitta SK, Numata K (2013) Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 14(1):1629–1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14011629
Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG (2006) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: a review. Tissue Eng Part C 12(5):1197–1211. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1197
Pranoto Y, Rakshit SK, Salokhe VM (2005) Enhancing antimicrobial activity of chitosan films by incorporating garlic oil, potassium sorbate and nisin. LWT Food Sci Technol 38(8):859–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2004.09.014
Prombutara P, Kulwatthanasal Y, Supaka N, Sramala I, Chareonpornwattana S (2012) Production of nisin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for sustained antimicrobial activity. Food Control 24(1–2):184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.09.025
Puri A, Loomis K, Smith B, Lee JH, Yavlovich A, Heldman E, Blumenthal R (2009) Lipid-based nanoparticles as pharmaceutical drug carriers: from concepts to clinic. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 26(6):523–580. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v26.i6.10
Reis CP, Neufeld RJ, Ribeiro AJ, Veiga F (2006) Nanoencapsulation II. Biomedical applications and current status of peptide and protein nanoparticulate delivery systems. Nanomed Nanotechnol 2(2):53–65
Ross RP, Hill C (2004) Spray-dried bacteriocin powder with anti-microbial activity. U.S. Patent 6,833,150
Ross RP, Morgan S, Hill C (2002) Preservation and fermentation: past, present and future. Int J Food Microbiol 79(1–2):3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00174-5
Salmaso S, Elvassore N, Bertucco A, Lante A, Caliceti P (2004) Nisin-loaded poly-L-lactide nano-particles produced by CO2 anti-solvent precipitation for sustained antimicrobial activity. Int J Pharm 287(1–2):163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.09.003
Sanguansri P, Augustin MA (2006) Nanoscale materials development—a food industry perspective. Trends Food Sci Technol 17(10):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.04.010
Sant’Anna V, da Silva Malheiros P, Brandelli A (2011) Liposome encapsulation protects bacteriocin-like substance P34 against inhibition by Maillard reaction products. Food Res Int 44(1):326–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.10.012
Schaefer L, Auchtung TA, Hermans KE, Whitehead D, Borhan B, Britton RA (2010) The antimicrobial compound reuterin (3-hydroxypropionaldehyde) induces oxidative stress via interaction with thiol groups. Microbiology 156(6):1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.035642-0
Seil JT, Webster TJ (2012) Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. Int J Nanomed 7:2767–2781. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S24805
Settanni L, Corsetti A (2008) Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol 121(2):123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.09.001
Sharma TK, Sapra M, Chopra A, Sharma R, Patil SD, Malik RK, Pathania R, Navani NK (2012) Interaction of bacteriocin-capped silver nanoparticles with food pathogens and their antibacterial effect. Int J Green Nanotechnol Biomed 4(2):93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19430892.2012.678757
Shrivastava S, Dash D (2009) Applying nanotechnology to human health: revolution in biomedical sciences. J Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/184702
Sidhu PK, Nehra K (2017) Bacteriocin-nanoconjugates as emerging compounds for enhancing antimicrobial activity of bacteriocins. JKSUS. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.12.007
Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Rudzinski WE (2001) Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J Control Release 70(1–2):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00339-4
Taylor TM, Bruce BD, Weiss J, Davidson PM (2008) Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157: H7 inhibition in vitro by liposome-encapsulated nisin and ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid. J Food Saf 28(2):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2008.00113.x
Teixeira ML, Santos J, Silveira NP, Brandelli A (2008) Phospholipid nanovesicles containing a bacteriocin-like substance for control of Listeria monocytogenes. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 9(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2007.05.001
Thakor AS, Jokerst J, Zavaleta C, Massoud TF, Gambhir SS (2011) Gold nanoparticles: a revival in precious metal administration to patients. Nano Lett 11(10):4029–4036. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl202559p
Thio BJ, Montes MO, Mahmoud MA, Lee DW, Zhou D, Keller AA (2012) Mobility of capped silver nanoparticles under environmentally relevant conditions. Environ Sci Technol 46(13):6985–6991. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203596w
Thirumurugan A, Ramachandran S, Shiamala Gowri A (2013) Combined effect of bacteriocin with gold nanoparticles against food spoiling bacteria—an approach for food packaging material preparation. Food Res Int 20(4):1909–1912
Tong Z, Zhang L, Ling J, Jian Y, Huang L, Deng D (2014a) An in vitro study on the effect of free amino acids alone or in combination with nisin on biofilms as well as on planktonic bacteria of Streptococcus mutans. PLoS ONE 9(6):e99513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099513
Tong Z, Zhang Y, Ling J, Ma J, Huang L, Zhang L (2014b) An in vitro study on the effects of nisin on the antibacterial activities of 18 antibiotics against Enterococcus faecalis. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089209
Torres NI, Noll KS, Xu S, Li J, Huang Q, Sinko PJ, Wachsman MB, Chikindas ML (2013) Safety, formulation and in vitro antiviral activity of the antimicrobial peptide subtilosin against Herpes simplex virus type 1. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 5(1):26–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-013-9128-0
Trejo-González L, Rodríguez-Hernández AI, López-Cuellar M, Martínez-Juárez VM, Chavarría-Hernández N (2018) Antimicrobial pectin-gellan films: effects on three foodborne pathogens in a meat medium, and selected physical-mechanical properties. CyTA J Food 16(1):469–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2017.1422278
van Staden AD, Heunis TD, Dicks LM (2011) Release of Enterococcus mundtii bacteriocin ST4SA from self- setting brushite bone cement. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 3(2):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-011-9074-7
van Staden AD, Brand AM, Dicks LM (2012) Nisin F-loaded brushite bone cement prevented the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in vivo. J Appl Microbiol 112(4):831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05241.x
Were LM, Bruce BD, Davidson PM, Weiss J (2003) Size, stability, and entrapment efficiency of phospholipid nanocapsules containing polypeptide antimicrobials. J Agric Food Chem 51(27):8073–8079. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0348368
Williams GR, Chatterton NP, Nazir T, Yu DG, Zhu LM, Branford-White CJ (2012) Electrospun nanofibers in drug delivery: recent developments and perspectives. Ther Deliv 3(4):515–533. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde.12.17
Yadav SC, Kumari A, Yadav R (2011) Development of peptide and protein nanotherapeutics by nanoencapsulation and nanobioconjugation. Peptides 32(1):173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.10.003
Zhang L, Pornpattananangkul D, Hu CM, Huang CM (2010) Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Curr Med Chem 17(6):585–594. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986710790416290
Zinjarde S (2012) Bio-inspired nanomaterials and their applications as antimicrobial agents. Chron Young Sci 3(1):74. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5186.94314
Zohri M, Alavidjeh MS, Haririan I, Ardestani MS, Ebrahimi SE, Sani HT, Sadjadi SK (2010) A comparative study between the antibacterial effect of nisin and nisin-loaded chitosan/alginate nanoparticles on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus in raw and pasteurized milk samples. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2(4):258–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-010-9047-2
Zohri M, Alavidjeh MS, Mirdamadi SS, Behmadi H, Nasr SMH, Gonbaki SE, Ardestani MS, Arabzadeh AJ (2013) Nisin-loaded chitosan/alginate nanoparticles: a hopeful hybrid biopreservative. J Food Saf 33(1):40–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12021
Zoumpopoulou G, Pepelassi E, Papaioannou W, Georgalaki M, Maragkoudakis PA, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou M, Tsakalidou E, Papadimitriou K (2013) Incidence of bacteriocins produced by food-related lactic acid bacteria active towards oral pathogens. Int J Mol Sci 14(3):4640–4654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14034640
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge GCh-Posdoctoral Fellow PRODEP-SEP 2016, DSA/103.5/16/5849; CONACyT INFRA 2014, No. 230138; CONACyT INFRA 2015, No. 254437; CONACyT INFRA 2016, No. 269805, and Red PRODEP-SEP 2016/2017 “Diseño y Caracterización de Películas Alimentarias a base de Biopolímeros y Antimicrobianos Naturales”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chandrakasan, G., Rodríguez-Hernández, AI., del Rocío López-Cuellar, M. et al. Bacteriocin encapsulation for food and pharmaceutical applications: advances in the past 20 years. Biotechnol Lett 41, 453–469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-02635-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-02635-5