Abstract
In this study, rooting rate, root number, root length, root scale, basal callus ratio, and converting to sapling properties of single bud cuttings belonging to Vitis labrusca species were investigated. Single-bud cuttings were prepared from basal to upper nodes from annual shoots containing 10 buds in March, 2021. The cuttings of ‘Concord’, ‘Rizellim’, ‘Ülkemiz’, ‘Çeliksu’, and ‘Rizessi’ cultivars were rooted in the climate room. According to node numbers, the average highest rooting rate was obtained at the 3rd node with 90.3%. On the other hand, the lowest rooting rate (68.0%), root length (1.86 cm), and basal callus rate (23.1%) were found at the 10th node. In the study, the highest root number was found at the 3rd and 4th nodes (2.9 and 3.1). The highest basal callus formation values were found in the 1st and 2nd nodes (56.9% and 61.8%). The highest average rooting rate (91.4%) and root length (3.0 cm) were obtained in the ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar, whereas the highest root numbers (2.94) and root scale values (2.15) were determined in the ‘Rizellim’ cultivar. The average rooting rate (62.0%), root number (1.60), root length (1.35 cm), root scale (0.88), and vine sapling rate (63.3%) were the lowest in the ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar. The rate of converting into saplings of cuttings in the cultivars ranged between 83.0% and 89.8%. In the study, the lowest rate of the single-bud cuttings converting to vine saplings was in the ‘Ülkemiz’ variety (63.3%). The obtained values are evaluated by the weighted-ranking method. According to the weighted-ranking method, the best cultivars were selected as ‘Rizessi’ and ‘Çeliksu’ in terms of rooting and converting to vine saplings ratios. In the research, the 4th node of the cuttings was determined as the most suitable for production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Türkiye is one of the gene centers of Vitis vinifera grapes in the world, due to its favorable climatic conditions. Türkiye has very valuable grape gene resources and more than 1500 grape varieties are grown in National Grape Gene Resources Centers (Aykas et al. 2018; Candar et al. 2020; Anonymous 2021). According to the latest statistics, Türkiye ranks sixth in the world in terms of grape production and fifth in terms of growing area, with a vineyard area of 390,221 ha and an annual grape production of 3,670,000 tons (FAOSTAT 2021). In addition to vinifera varieties, Türkiye has a rich genotype of Vitis labrusca L. species. V. labrusca L. grapes mostly grown in the Central and Eastern Black Sea Region, located in the north of the Türkiye (Cangi et al. 2006; Karabulut and Çelik 2022; Candar et al. 2021). Vitis labrusca L. grapes have a distinct aroma, a foxy flavor, a thick, slip skin and jelly-like flesh. Since the grapes has a great market value, it has widely sold as a table grape in local markets of the coastal cities in the Black Seas region (Kurt et al. 2017). V. labrusca L. grapes are consumed by local people as table grape, marmalade, grape molasses, pickle, jam or juice, depending on local needs (Çelik and Köse 2006; Çelik et al. 2005, 2009; Köse 2014; Kurt-Celebi et al. 2020). Many studies have reported that V. labrusca L. grapes are resistant to fungal diseases such as powdery mildew and downy mildew (Brown et al. 1999; Wan et al. 2007; Çelik et al. 2008; Köse 2014). The vines of this species grow by wrapping around trees, in home gardens, as a canopy as a pergola, or extended to the balconies of buildings and houses.
Grapevines belonging to the Vitaceae family are mostly propagated by cuttings and this propagation method is faster than seed propagation (Singh and Chauhan 2020). More than 60 species of Vitis have spread to Asia, America, and Europe. V. labrusca L. originate from America and they have adapted to many different climatic conditions from humid weather to dry weather and its varieties have been using breeding (Çelik et al. 2015). The vines of the V. labrusca L. species can grow stronger and reach the top of the trees (Çelik et al. 2015). Some varieties (for example, ‘Concord’ and ‘Niagara’) are grown commercially in the United States for use in making juices, jams, jellies, and wine (Nixford and Hermosín-Gutiérrez 2010; Burin et al. 2014; Lima et al. 2014; Toaldo et al. 2015; Coelho et al. 2018; da Silva et al. 2019; Güler 2022). These cultivars are hybrids of V. labrusca L. and V. vinifera L. that emerged as a result of natural hybridization and they are classified as Vitis labrusca L. Bailey (Keller 2015).
The use of cuttings, rooting, budding, layering and grafting is common in grape propagation for the establishment of new vineyards (Verdegaal 2009). Propagation of the vines with cuttings known is as the oldest and easy method. It has many advantages such as being economical (Hartmann et al. 1997), requiring limited space, preparing easily (Sabir and Kara 2004), and being quick to propagate selected clones or new varieties (Patil et al. 2001; Singh and Nair 2003; Alikhani et al. 2011). It can be produced by using different methods such as vine wood cutting, green cutting, bud cutting, grafting and layering (Çelik et al. 1998; Çelik 2007). Many studies have been carried out on the propagation of the vine by cuttings and practical benefits have been obtained from these studies (Patil et al. 2001; Verdegaal 2009; Abebe 2017; Cangi and Etker 2018; Özer 2023). Propagation with cuttings has taken place an important in the production of the grapevine. Vitis species show a great diversity in terms of adventitious root structures (Smart et al. 2002; 2006; Reinhart and Biasi 2017; Karakurt et al. 2009). In rooting of cuttings, rooting increases because lignification and carbohydrates are higher in the bottom than in the upper parts of the shoot. The region where the adventitious roots and the young roots, which are defined as the main roots, occur is the pericycle layer. Adventitious root formation in annual shoots: this is formed by the cambium, pericycle and phloem (Legué et al. 2014). Adventitious roots, which are white in the first place, then take a dark brown or brown color. Later, thin roots are formed on the adventitious roots (Çelik 2007; Bellini et al. 2014).
The quality of the shoots obtained in vine production is as important as the number (Waite et al. 2015). In many studies, researchers have expressed the quality of the annual shoot used for propagation by the value of cane width/pith, phloem+xylem/pith, xylem/pith, and bark+phloem/pith ratios (Hunter et al. 2004; Dardeniz et al. 2008; Gökdemir and Dardeniz 2014). The quality of the propagation material is determined by many parameters such as callus, root structure, and sprouting ability (Hunter et al. 2004). Dardeniz et al. (2008) found the lowest rooting rates in cuttings prepared from the nodes of 5BB and 140 Ru rootstocks in the 1st–4th nodes and 17th–20th nodes because the lignification of the shoot is low. The researchers stated that the 5th–16th node in 5BB rootstock and the 5th–12th node in 140Ru rootstock would be the most suitable region for graft of the cuttings.
In 2016, V. labrusca L. cultivars introduced by Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Türkiye. The production of rooted vine saplings in vegetative ways is of great importance in establishing new vineyards and filling the empty spaces in existing vineyards, as the demand for V. labrusca L. grape varieties increases day by day in Black Sea Region, Türkiye. This is the first time the rooting specifications of these cultivars are investigated according to node positions. Because of the heavy demand for cultivars, the aim is their rapid propagation to meet consumer demands. This study is aimed at determining the rooting and sapling rates in the nodes of single-bud cuttings because this enables a fast and cost-effective way to obtain rooted vine saplings. In the research, the rooting status of the single-bud cuttings of Türkiye’s first registered V. labrusca L. grape cultivars was evaluated according to the node position and the possibilities of use in sapling production.
Materials and Methods
This research was carried out in the climate room of Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture in 2021. In the study, ‘Rizessi’, ‘Rizellim’, ‘Çeliksu’, ‘Ülkemiz’ and ‘Concord’ grape cultivars were investigated in terms of rooting rate (%), root numbers, root length (cm), root scale (0–4), basal callus ratio (%) and converting to sapling ratio (%). These cultivars belong to V. labrusca L. and were registered by the Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture in 2016. The cultivars used in the research were 10 years old, grown on their own root and were formed according to the double-armed high training system (Fig. 1). The vines were irrigated with drip irrigation during the summer season. In total, 12 kg per acre fertilizing has been made with calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) 26% N fertilizer after pruning in March, 2021. Soil characteristics of the trial vineyard are given in Table 1.
Root Development (0–4)
Determination of root development in cuttings was carried out with the help of 0–4 scale according to Dardeniz (2001). (0: No roots, 1: one side weak root formation, 2: two-sided root formation, 3: three-sided strong root formation, 4: very strong root formation all around.)
Basal Callus Rates (%)
It was determined by the ratio of the cuttings with callus at the basal to the total number of cuttings planted. 0: No callus formation; 1: exist only callus formation (Cangi and Etker 2018).
Rooting Rate (%)
This was calculated by dividing the rooted cuttings by the total number of planted cuttings (Köse et al. 2015).
Converting to Sapling Rate (%)
This was determined by the ratio of the number of plants with healthy shoots to the total number of rooted cuttings planted 1 month after planting in the pots (Cangi and Etker 2018).
Weighted-ranking Method
In the study, in order to determine some rooting characteristics were evaluated by the modified weighted-ranking method used by Köse et al. (2015). In this method, relative and class scores of each characteristic were evaluated to obtain the best cultivar and node number in terms of rooting and converting to vine saplings (Table 2).
Rooting in Climate Room Conditions
In March, 2021, while the shoots were still dormant, annual shoots contained 10 buds of each variety were cut and brought to the laboratory. In all, 10 pieces single-bud cuttings were prepared of each shoots from basal to upper side and planted in the boxes according to their node numbers. Each node is numbered from 1 to 10 throughout the basal to upper of the shoots. The prepared single-bud cuttings were planted in 58 × 40 × 18 cm foam boxes filled with moist perlite. Before planting, the perlite surface is covered with a stretch film in order to keep the single-bud cuttings stable. The planted cuttings were kept under climate room conditions at ±26 °C, 80% humidity and 12 h photoperiod (80 W m−2) provided by cool-white fluorescent tubes (Fig. 2).
At 1 month after the planting of the cuttings, the rooted cuttings were removed and their rooting specifications were determined. Cuttings with healthy shoots and roots were planted in black polyethylene pots. At 1 month thereafter, the cuttings that remained healthy and showed growth were counted, and the rate of converting to sapling (%) was determined (Fig. 3).
Data Analysis
The study was conducted in a randomized trial design with three replications, three vines in each replication, and three shoots for each vine. In the study, nine canes containing 10 buds were used in the study. The obtained results were subjected to Duncan Multiple Comparison test in the SPSS 16.0 program (IBM, SPSS Statistics V20, Chicago, IL, USA). The results were evaluated according to P < 0.05 significance level.
Results and Discussion
Rooting rates of single-bud cuttings prepared from one to 10 nodes of each cultivar are given in Table 3. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were determined between cultivar × node interaction, cultivars and nodes in terms of rooting rate. In the cultivar × node interaction, the highest rooting values were found at the 3rd and 4th nodes (100%) in ‘Rizellim’, and at the 8th and 9th nodes (100%) in Çeliksu cultivars. On the other hand, the lowest rooting rate was found at the 10th node (33.84% and 37.78%) in ‘Ülkemiz’ and ‘Concord’ cultivars. Among the cultivars, the highest rooting rate was found to be statistically significant in ‘Çeliksu’ (91.2%), ‘Rizellim’ (89.1%), and ‘Rizessi’ (87.4%) cultivars, which were in the same group. The lowest rooting rate was found in the ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar with 62.0%. Rooting rates of the cultivars according to node numbers are given in Fig. 4. According to node number, the highest average rooting rates was determined at the 3rd node (91.2%), and the lowest rooting rates was determined at the 10th node (67.6%) (Table 3).
According to Hartmann et al. (1990), the cuttings should be prepared from 2/3 of the basal in 1‑year shoots, and that cuttings should not be taken from the tips because there is not enough carbohydrate accumulation in the upper part. Many researchers have stated that rooting and callus formation levels in grape shoot cuttings may differ according to grape cultivars (Abido et al. 2013; Somkuwar et al. 2017; Chang et al. 2022) and species as well (Castro et al. 1994; Keeley et al. 2004; Satisha et al. 2007; Shiozaki et al. 2013). Carbohydrates stored in annual shoots indicate the health and vigor of the vines (Somkuwar et al. 2011; Köse and Ateş 2017). It was determined that the number of adventitious roots increased towards the lower nodes in cuttings prepared from American rootstocks (Çelik 2007). In this subject, researchers stated that the sprouting of buds on cuttings may affect rooting of the cuttings (Smart et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2020). As a matter of fact, it has been reported that the C/N ratio of 1‑year canes is related to the rooting (Hartmann et al. 1997).
Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were obtained in the rate of callus formation in single-bud cuttings prepared from different nodes of grape cultivars, while any statistical difference was found in the cultivar × node interaction (Table 4). The highest callus formation rate in the cultivar × node interaction was determined as 86.5%, 83.8% and 73.1% in the 1st, 2nd and 5th nodes of the ‘Concord’ cultivar, respectively. Among the cultivars, the highest rate of callus formation at basal was determined as 67.3% in ‘Concord’ cultivar. ‘Concord’ cultivar was followed by ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar with a rate of 45.3%. The highest basal callus formation was also observed in cultivars with the lowest rooting (Table 4). According to the node number, the basal callus formation rates were highest in the 1st and 2nd nodes, with the rates of 57.0% and 61.8%, respectively. According to nodes, the lowest callus rate was obtained from the 10th node.
As a result of this study, the lowest rate of callus was found in the 10th node in general (Table 4). In the obtained data, it was determined that rooting was the low in the 1st and 2nd nodes, but the callus ratio was high. In general, 1‑year-old shoots are used in grape propagation with cuttings. Since the maturation status and development of these shoots are not the same on all sides, the level of callus formation is not the same. According to Dardeniz et al. (2008), the lowest rooting rates in the cuttings prepared from the same canes are maintained in the basal 1st–4th where the anatomical structure is the hardest and occurred in 17th–20th nodes when lignification is low. In this subject; Hartmann and Kester (1983) stated that the best rooting in shoots occurred in cuttings prepared from the basal part. However, it is thought that callus is necessary for root formation (Ağaoğlu 1999). As seen in the results obtained from our study, it was determined that the rate of callus formation was higher in the bottom part of the cuttings where the lignification was higher. The reason for the high rate of callus in the bottom may be due to the intense reserve carbohydrate content accumulated by the cells (Somkuwar et al. 2017). Towards the upper parts of the shoot, carbohydrate accumulation decreases and its quality decreases (Dardeniz et al. 2008). The basal section of vine cuttings (one to four buds) accumulates large amounts of carbohydrates in the cells (Somkuwar et al. 2017). Dardeniz et al. (2008) stated that upper side of the cane has less and lower quality carbohydrate reserve.
The values for the number of roots occurring in single-bud cuttings in the study are given in Table 5. Statistically significant differences were determined between cultivar × node interaction in terms of root number, cultivar and node (P < 0.05). In the cultivar × node interaction, the highest root number was obtained in the 10th node of ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar with 3.78. This was followed by the ‘Concord’ cultivar with 3.67 in the 3rd node and the ‘Rizellim’ cultivar in the 4th node with 3.58.
In the study, the lowest root number was 0.7 in ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar at the 10th node. Among the cultivars, the highest average root number was found in ‘Rizellim’ with 2.9 and ‘Çeliksu’ with 2.8. The lowest average root number was determined in ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar with 1.61. In the study, the highest root number according to the nodes of the cultivars was determined as 3.1 and 2.9 in the 3rd and 4th nodes, respectively. The average lowest root number was found 1.9 at the 2nd nodes of the cultivars.
In terms of root length, significant differences were measured between cultivars and nodes (P < 0.05). Root length in cuttings was between 0.52 cm and 3.44 cm in cultivar × node interaction. The highest root length was found in ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar as 3.44 cm in 5th node, and the lowest root length was determined at 10th node in ‘Ülkemiz’ and ‘Concord’ cultivars as 0.52 and 0.54 cm, respectively (Table 6).
When the callus development in the basal of single-bud cuttings was evaluated, it was determined that the 3rd and 4th nodes gave the best results in terms of rooting rate and the number of roots, although the amount of callus was higher in the basal of the cuttings obtained from the 1st and 2nd nodes. In the study, it was concluded that the 3rd and 4th nodes are suitable for rooting performance for using cultivars. In this regard, it has been stated that the nutrition and lignification status of the canes is quite effective in callusing and rooting (Rodoplu and Dardeniz 2015). In grapevine propagation, preferring the mid and basal nodes of shoots because of having enough carbohydrates compared to the upper sides is important. Due to the well-lignified, they show better rooting performance and sprouted earlier than the apical cuttings (Dardeniz et al. 2008).
While the average highest root length was 3.0 cm in ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar, the lowest average root length was in ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar with 1.4 cm. In terms of root length of the cultivars, ‘Rizessi’ and ‘Rizellim’ cultivars were in the same group with 2.5 cm and 2.7 cm root lengths, respectively. In this study, it was determined that the root length changed according to the nodes from which the cuttings were prepared (Table 6). In general, it was determined that the root length differs according to the cultivars. The highest average root lengths were measured between the 3rd and 5th nodes. The highest root length in the nodes was at the 5th node with 2.68 cm, and the lowest at the 10th node with 1.85 cm. The number of roots in vine sapling production is affected by similar factors such as the cultivar used (Samancı and Uslu, 1992), the rooted environment (Sivritepe and Türkben 2001) and the pots in which they are planted (Akman and Ilgın 1990; Akman et al. 1989). In our evaluation, ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar gave better results than the others in terms of root length among the cultivars. On the other hand, between three and five nodes gave the highest average root lengths in the study.
The root scale values of single-bud cuttings obtained from V. labrusca grapes are given in Table 7. In terms of root scale, the interaction of cultivar × node, statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences between cultivars and nodes were determined. The highest value in the cultivar × node interaction was obtained at the 4th node (2.71) of ‘Rizessi’, followed by the 10th node (2.60) of the ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar and the 4th node (2.52) of in the ‘Rizellim’. When we look at the values among the cultivars in terms of root scale, the highest value was found in ‘Rizellim’ (2.16), and the lowest value was found in our ‘Ülkemiz’ (0.89). The highest value in the effect of nodes on the root scale was obtained at the 4th node (2.07), followed by the 3rd node (1.91) and the 5th node (1.86).
The cuttings were removed from the perlite medium after 1 month and were planted in black polyethylene pots. The data belonging to the rates of converting to vine saplings obtained by rooting different nodes of V. labrusca grapes are given in Table 8. While the statistical differences between cultivar × node interaction and nodes were insignificant in terms of converting to sapling rate, the differences between cultivars were found to be significant (P < 0.05). In terms converting to sapling rate, the highest values in cultivar × node interaction were determined in the 4th node of ‘Rizellim’ cultivar (97.0%), in the 3rd node of ‘Rizessi’ cultivar (96.9) and in the 1st node of ‘Rizellim’ cultivar (96.7%). Considering the average of the cultivars, ‘Rizessi’ 89.8%, ‘Rizellim’ 89.6%, ‘Çeliksu’ 85.9% and ‘Concord’ 83.95% took place in the first group statistically in terms of the rate of saplings, and ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar has the lowest sapling rate with 63.3%. According to the average values obtained from the nodes, the highest sapling transformation rate was 84.6% at the 3rd node; this was 84.5% in the 4th node and 84.1% in the 8th node.
According to the weighted ranking result, the highest scores were calculated in ‘Rizessi’ as 770 point and ‘Çeliksu’ as 760 points. The results showed that ‘Rizessi’ and ‘Çeliksu’ were the best cultivars in terms of rooting and converting to grapevine saplings. On the other hand, ‘Ülkemiz’ cultivar showed the worst performance for the rooting and sampling ratio (Table 9).
When the cultivars were evaluated according to nodes numbers with weighted ranking, the highest score was obtained from 4th nodes, while the lowest scores was in 10th nodes. The results show that using the 3rd–5th node will give the best results to achieve successful rooting rate (Table 10).
Conclusion
In this study, rooting and converting to sapling ratio of single-bud cuttings prepared from basal to upper side in five different grape cultivars belonging to V. labrusca were determined. ‘Çeliksu’ cultivar in terms of average rooting rate and root length, ‘Rizellim’ for root number and root scale and ‘Concord’ for basal callus formation rate gave the best results. ‘Rizellim’ and ‘Çeliksu’ cultivars gave the the highest results in terms of sapling transformation rate. Among the nodes, the 3rd, 4th, and 5th parts were prominent in the research. According to the weighted grading method, ‘Rizessi’ and ‘Çeliksu’ cultivars and 4th node gave the best total scores in the light of the examined parameters. When preparing the cuttings for rooting, the preparation of cuttings after removing the first two to three nodes at the bottom will increase the success of rooting.
References
Abebe H (2017) Effect of cane length and rooting media on rooting and shoot growth of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) stem cuttings at raya valley, northern Ethiopia. MSc thesis. Hawassa Univ College of Agr. https://doi.org/10.15228/ANST.2021.v01.i03.p03
Abido AIA, Aly MAM, Hassanen SA, Rayan GA (2013) In vitro propagation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Muscat of Alexandria cv. for conservation of endangerment. Middle-East J Sci Res 13(3):328–337. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.3.1926
Ağaoğlu YS (1999) Scientific and applied viticulture (Vine biology). Kavaklıdere Educ Pub 1(1):205 (in turkish)
Akman I, Ilgın C (1990) The effect of pot material used in potted vine sapling production on sapling yield and quality. Manisa Viticulture Research Institute 36(4):21 (in Turkish)
Akman İ, Ilgın C, Kacar N (1989) The effects of soaking time of cuttings in water before planting and planting with paraffin and paraffin-free on sapling yield and quality. Manisa Vitic Res Inst Pub 33(1):19
Alikhani L, K Ansari, M Jamnezhad, Z Tabatabaie (2011) Effect of different media and cuttings on growth and rooting of pomegranate cuttings. Indian J Plant Physiology/Official Publication Indian Soc Plant Physiology, 1(3)199–203. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i2.1263
Anonymous (2021) Grape Field Gene Bank. Republic Of Türkiye Ministry Of Agriculture And Forestry (https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TAGEM/Belgeler/E_BULTEN/nisan%202021%20e-bu%CC%88lten.pdf). Access Date 12(2022):27
Aykas L, Kafa G, Uzun M, Doğan A, Özdemir M, Uğur R, Küçük E, Seymen T, Vurgun H, Balık Hİ, Çiçek M, Sarıçam Ş, Ayar A, Macit İ, Gültekin N, Kesgin M, Özyurt K, Uysal T, Kaya H (2018) Turkey field gene banks. J AARI 28(2):76–87
Bellini C, Pacurar DI, Perrone I (2014) Adventitious roots and lateral roots: similarities and differences. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65(1):639–666. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035645
Brown MV, Moore JN, McNew RW, Fenn P (1999) Inheritance of downy mildew resistance in table grapes. J Am Soc Horticultural Sci 124(3):262–267
Burin VM, Ferreira-Lima NE, Panceri CP, Bordignon-Luiz MT (2014) Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Vitis vinifera and Vitis labrusca grapes: Evaluation of different extraction methods. Microchem J 114:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2013.12.014
Candar S, Alço T, Ekiz M, Korkutal İ, Bahar E (2020) The effect of pruning type and abiotic factors on physiological activities in some local wine grapes selected from national collection vineyard. Ege Univ J Agric Fac İzmir Turkey. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.602806
Candar S, Uysal T, Ayaz A, Akdemir U, Korkutal I, Bahar E (2021) Viticulture tradition in Turkey. Vitic Stud 1:39–54. https://doi.org/10.52001/vis.2021.5
Cangi R, Etker M (2018) The effects of rootstock cutting thickness on final take, quality of potted grapevine saplings. Yüzüncü Yil Univ J Agric Sci 28(Special Issue):50–56
Cangi R, Çelik H, Odabas F, Islam A (2006) Determination of ampelographic characters of some natural foxy grape (Vitis labrusca L.) types grown in Northern Turkey (in Trabzon province). Asian J Plant Sci 5:373–377. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2006.373.377
Castro PRC, Melotto E, Soares FC, Passos IRS, Pommer CV (1994) Rooting stimulation in muscadine grape cuttings. Sci Agric 51(3):436–445. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-90161994000300009
Çelik S (2007) Viticulture (Ampelology), 2nd edn. vol 1. Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Tekirdağ, p 428 (in turkish)
Çelik H, Ağaoğlu YS, Fidan Y, Marasalı B, Söylemezoğlu G (1998) General viticulture. Sun Fidan Professional Books Series. 253 p (in Turkish)
Çelik H, Köse B (2006) Studies on sapling quality of some American grape varieties that can be grown in Rize. In: I. Rize Symposium 16–18 November, 2006. Rize, pp 502–506 (in Turkish)
Çelik H, Köse B, Cangi R (2008) Determination of Fox grapegenotypes (Vitis labrusca L.) grown in Northeastern Anatolia. Hortic Sci (Prague) 35(4):162–170
Çelik H, Köse B, Ates S, Karabulut B (2015) Determination of bud fertility of Foxy grape types (Vitis labrusca L.) selected from Rize province. Selcuk J Agriculture Food Sci-A 27:238–245 (in Turkish)
Çelik H, Odabaş F, Köse B (2005) Importance of foxy black grape and processing into grape juice. SS Hopa Region Tea Coop. Union Pub, p 20 (in Turkish)
Çelik H, Odabaş F, Köse B, Cangi R (2009) Determination of ampelographic characteristics of İzabella (Vitis labrusca L.) grape types grown in Samsun. In: 7th Turkey Viticulture and Technologies Symposium 5–9 October Manisa, vol 2, pp 51–56 (in Turkish)
Chang XY, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Ni P, Ma J, Liu H, Gong S, Yang GS, Bai M (2022) A simple, rapid, and quantifiable system for studying adventitious root formation in grapevine. Plant Growth Regul 98(1):117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00838-5
Coelho EM, da Silva Padilha CV, Miskinis GA, de Sá AGB, Pereira GE, de Azevêdo LC, dos Santos Lima M (2018) Simultaneous analysis of sugars and organic acids in wine and grape juices by HPLC: Method validation and characterization of products from northeast Brazil. J Food Comp Anal 66:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2017.12.017
Dardeniz A (2001). Research on the effects of different product and shoot load on grape and cane yield and quality in some grape varieties and rootstocks in vine nursery. Ege University Institute of Science Ph.D. Thesis. 167 p. Bornova—Izmir (in Turkish)
Dardeniz A, Gökbayrak Z, Müftüoğlu NM, Türkmen C, Beşer K (2008) Cane quality determination of 5BB and 140Ru grape rootstocks. Eur J Hortic Sci 73(6):254–257
FAOSTAT (2021) Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome (2021). http://www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed: 03.03.2021
Gökdemir A, Dardeniz A (2014) Determination of the internal structure parameters of Kozak Beyazi and Müşküle grape varieties canes depending on the time. COMU J Agric Fac 2(2):23–33 (in Turkish)
Güler E (2022) Polyphenols, organic acids, and their relationships in red grapes of Vitis vinifera and Isabella (Vitis labrusca) under arid conditions. Eur Food Res Technol 249:913–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04183-9
Hartman HT, Kester DE (1983) Plant propagation principles and practices. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT (1990) Plant propagation, principles and practices, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 647
Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT, Geneve RL (1997) Plant propagation principles and practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hunter JJ, Volschenk CG, Le Roux DJ, Fouché GW, Adams L (2004) Plant material quality. ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Stellenbosch, p 18
Karabulut B, Çelik H (2022) Determination of grafting success and carbohydrate distributions of foxy grape (Vitis labrusca L.) varieties grafted on different American grape rootstocks. Horticulturae 8(10):949
Karakurt H, Aslantas R, Ozkan G, Guleryuz M (2009) Effects of indol–3-butyric acid (IBA), plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and carbohydrates on rooting of hardwood cutting of MM106 Apple rootstock. Afr J Agric Res 4(2):60–64
Keeley K, Preece JE, Taylor BH, Dami IE (2004) Efects of high auxin concentrations, cold storage, and cane position on improved rooting of Vitis aestivalis Michx. Norton cuttings. Am J Enol Vitic 55(3):265–268. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2004-0887.ch012
Keller M (2015) The science of grapevines-anatomy and physiology. Academic Press, Burlington, MA
Köse B (2014) Phenology and ripening of Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis labrusca L. varieties in the maritime climate of Samsun in Turkey’s Black Sea Region. South African J Enology Viticulture 35(1):90–102
Köse B, Ateş S (2017) Seasonal changes of shoot carbohydrates and growth characteristics of ’Trakya İlkeren’grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.). Erwerbs-Obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0298-2
Köse B, Çelik H, Karabulut B (2015) Determination of callusing performance and vine sapling characteristics on different rootstocks of ‘Merzifon Karası’ grape variety (Vitis vinifera L.). Anadolu J Agric Sci 30(2):87–94. https://doi.org/10.7161/anajas.2015.30.2.87-94
Kurt A, Torun H, Çolak N, Seiler G, Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, Ayaz FA (2017) Nutrient profiles of the hybrid grape cultivar ‘Isabel’ during berry maturation and ripening. J Sci Food Agric 97:2468–2479. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.806
Kurt-Celebi A, Çolak N, Hayirlioglu-Ayaz S, Kostadinović Veličkovska S, Ilieva F, Esatbeyoglu T, Ayaz FA (2020) Accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity during Berry development in black ‘Isabel’grape (Vitis vinifera L. x Vitis labrusca L.). Molecules 25(17):3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173845
Legué V, Rigal A, Bhalerao RP (2014) Adventitious root formation in tree species: involvement of transcription factors. Physiol Plant 151(2):192–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12197
Lima MDS, Silani IDSV, Toaldo IM, Corrêa LC, Biasoto ACT, Pereira GE, Bordignon-Luiz MT, Ninow JL (2014) Phenolic compounds, organic acids and antioxidant activity of grape juices produced from new Brazilian varieties planted in the Northeast Region of Brazil. Food Chem 161:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.109
Nixdorf SL, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I (2010) Brazilian red wines made from the hybrid grape cultivar Isabel: Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity. Anal Chim Acta 659(1–2):208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.058
Özer A (2023) The effect of different rooting medium on rooting in grapevine wood cuttings. Bahçe 52(Special Issue1):61–66 (in Turkish)
Patil VN, Chauhan PS, Shivankar RS, Vilhekar SH, Waghmare VS (2001) Effect of plant growth regulators on survival and vegetative growth of grapevine cuttings. Agric Sci Dig 21(2):97–99
Reinhart V, Biasi LA (2017) Rooting and acclimatization of grapevine hybrids Vitis labrusca × Vitis rotundifolia. In: VII International Symposium on Production and Establishment of Micropropagated Plants 1224, pp 127–134
Rodoplu N, Dardeniz A (2015) Determination of crispness potentials and growth of production materials suffered by loss of different levels of relative humidity in viticulture. ÇOMU J Agric Fac 3(1):53–56
Sabir, A, Kara Z (2004) Performance and success of green grafting technique in some American grape rootstocks. Alatarim 3(1):28–32 (in Turkish)
Samancı H, Uslu İ (1992) Investigation of the variation of yield and quality in the production of grafted-rooted vine saplings according to variety rootstock combinations. Final report. Alata Hortic Res Inst (in Turkish)
Satisha J, Ramteke SD, Karibasappa GS (2007) Physiological and biochemical characterisation of grape rootstocks. S Afr J Enol Vitic 28:163–168. https://doi.org/10.21548/28-2-1470
Shiozaki S, Makibuchi M, Ogata T (2013) Indole-3-acetic acid, polyamines, and phenols in hardwood cuttings of recalcitrant-to-root wild grapes native to east asia: Vitis davidii and Vitis kiusiana. J Bot 2013:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/819531
da Silva MJR, da Silva Padilha CV, dos Santos Lima M, Pereira GE, Venturini Filho WG, Moura MF, Tecchio MA (2019) Grape juices produced from new hybrid varieties grown on Brazilian rootstocks–Bioactive compounds, organic acids and antioxidant capacity. Food Chem 289:714–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.03.060
Singh KK, Chauhan JS (2020) A review on vegetative propagation of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) through cutting. Glob J Bio-Sci Biotechnol 9(2):50–55
Singh DR, Nair SA (2003) Standardization of rooting media for cuttings of certain house plants. J Ornament Horticulture 6(1):78–79
Sivritepe N, Türkben C (2001) The effects of different rootstocks on Müşküle grape varieties on grafting success and sapling yield of different rootstocks on the Müşküle grape varieties. Uludağ Univ J Agric Fac 15:47–58 (in Turkish)
Smart DR, Kocsis L, Andrew Walker M, Stockert C (2002) Dormant buds and adventitious root formation by Vitis and other woody plants. J Plant Growth Regulation 21:296–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0001-3
Smart D, Schwass E, Lakso A, Morano L (2006) Grapevine rooting patterns: A comprehensive analysis and review. Am J Enol Vitic 57(1):89–104. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2006.57.1.89
Smart DR, Kocsis L, Andrew Walker M, Stockert C (2002) Dormant buds and adventitious root formation by Vitis and other woody plants. J Plant Growth Regul 21:296–314
Somkuwar RG, Bondage DD, Surange MS, Ramteke SD (2011) Rooting behavior, polyphenol oxidase activity, and biochemical changes in grape rootstocks at different growth stages. Turkish J Agric 35:281–287. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0911-62
Somkuwar RG, Bhange M, Sharma J, Upadhyay AK, Khan I (2017) Interaction of biochemical and nutritional status of nodal sections with rooting success in grape rootstocks. J Environ Biol 38(1):115
Toaldo IM, Cruz FA, Alves TL, de Gois JS, Borges DLG, Cunha HP, da Silva EL, Bordignon-Luiz MT (2015) Bioactive potential of Vitis labrusca L. grape juices from the Southern Region of Brazil: Phenolic and elemental composition and effect on lipid peroxidation in healthy subjects. Food Chem 173:527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.171
Verdegaal PS (2009) Vineyard propagation. Farm Advisor. San Joaquin Country, p 1
Waite H, Whitelaw Weckert M, Torley P (2015) Grapevine propagation. Principles and methods for the production of high-quality grapevine planting material. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 43(2):144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2014.978340
Wan Y, Schwaninger H, He P, Wang Y (2007) Comparison of resistance to powdery mildew and downy mildew in Chinese wild grapes. Vitis 46(3):132–136
Zhou Q, Gao B, Li WF, Mao J, Yang SJ, Li W, Ma ZH, Zhao Xin, Chen BH (2020) Effects of exogenous growth regulators and bud picking on grafting of grapevine hard branches. Scientia Horticulturae 264:109186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109186
Acknowledgements
Thanks to all colleagues for their efforts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Bülent Köse performed the statistical analysis. Yahya Uray, Kevser Bayram, Fatma Türk and Besim Karabulut conducted field, laboratory and growth room works. Bülent Köse, Yahya Uray and Hüseyin Çelik wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
B. Köse, Y. Uray, B. Karabulut, F. Türk, K. Bayram and H. Çelik declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.
About this article
Cite this article
Köse, B., Uray, Y., Karabulut, B. et al. Determination of Rooting and Vine Sapling Rates of Single-Bud Cuttings Prepared from Vitis labrusca L. Grape Cultivars. Erwerbs-Obstbau 65, 2005–2016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00894-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-023-00894-9