Abstract
Millets are nutrient-rich (nutri-rich) cereals with climate resilience attributes. However, its full productive potential is not realized due to the lack of a focused yield improvement approach, as evidenced by the available literature. Also, the lack of well-characterized genomic resources significantly limits millet improvement. But the recent availability of genomic data and advancement in omics tools has shown its enormous potential to enhance the efficiency and precision faced by conventional breeding in millet improvement. The development of high throughput genotyping platforms based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided a low-cost method for genomic information, specifically for neglected nutri-rich cereals with the availability of a limited number of reference genome sequences. NGS has created new avenues for millet biotechnological interventions such as mutation-based study, GWAS, GS, and other omics technologies. The simultaneous discovery of high-throughput markers and multiplexed genotyping platform has aggressively aided marker-assisted breeding for millet improvement. Therefore, omics technology offers excellent opportunities to explore and combine useful variations for targeted traits that could impart high nutritional value to high-yielding cultivars under changing climatic conditions. In millet improvement, an in-depth account of NGS, integrating genomics data with different biotechnology tools, is reviewed in this context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Millets are annual grasses that produce tiny seeds and can be classified into major and minor classes. Major millets include pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), whereas other millets belong to the minor millet class. Among minor millets, significant millets are finger millet (Eleusine coracana), foxtail millet (Setaria italica), little millet (Panicum sumatrense), proso millet (Panicum miliaceum), kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum), and barnyard millet (Echinochloa esculenta) (Ajeesh Krishna et al. 2022). The principal cultivated germplasm of millets is further subdivided based on panicle morphology and shapes into races and subraces. Millets have C4 physiology and belong to a subfamily of the Poaceae family, namely Panicoideae and Chloridoideae, contributing to their ability to withstand harsh climatic conditions. Therefore, millets could sustain a rainfed environment and are mainly grown for subsistence farming. For example, sorghum productivity is better than other cereals under rainfed and changing climate conditions. Similarly, pearl millet, proso millet, and kodo millets are well adapted to severe drought, high temperature, low soil fertility, saline, and even acidic soils. It shows millets’ climate resilience nature under adverse growing conditions (Das and Rakshit 2016). Millets also possess superior mineral nutrients, fibers, and excellent shelf life, making them the crop of choice in global warming scenarios (Kumar et al. 2018).
Globally, millets were produced in 89.17 million metric tonnes from an area of 74.00 million hectares. India is the largest producer of millet, with an area of 12.45 million hectares and a production of 15.53 million tonnes (Anonymous 2020). India ($29.60M) is the second largest exporter of millet after Ukraine ($46.30 M). Millets have been grown by farmers globally with a diverse geographical distribution. Pearl millet is the most widely growing millet among millets, covering around 50 % of the millet growing area globally (Kanfany et al. 2020). At the same time, it is the most important crop in arid and semi-arid regions of the world and ranks fifth among all cereals (Ananda et al. 2020). Similarly, foxtail millet is cultivated in southern Europe and Asia, is considered one of the world's oldest crops, and ranks second in total world millet production (Yang et al. 2012). Unlike many crops consumed by subsistence farmers, finger millet has maintained high socio-economic importance in the Indian and African semi-arid tropics. Interestingly, the Deccan plateau is the only part of the world where the seeds of kodo millets are harvested (Goron and Raizada 2015). Proso millet originated in China and expanded to Eurasia and North America (Bagdi et al. 2011). Most millet varieties are well known for their hardiness, withstand prolonged periods of drought and high temperature, and still produce grain and fodders. This global distribution and dependency of subsistence farmers indicate less water requirement and better agronomic and climate resilience characteristics of millets under adverse climatic conditions.
However, we need a climate-resilient crop with low input requirements to meet food and nutritional security standards in the ever-changing climatic conditions (Satyavathi et al. 2021). Therefore, millets have got the attention of the scientific community. The major challenge in millet improvement is efficiently characterizing genetic and genomic resources and exploiting trait-specific variations (Gimode et al. 2016). We can tackle these shortcomings in millet research by using crop improvement programs and by using precise, efficient, cost-effective germplasm characterization that leads to the expansion of genetic resources.
Millet improvement is conventionally governed by breeding programs based on phenotypic selection encountered with high environmental noise. Developing crop variety required an extended period (5–12 years) and was less effective for complex and low heritable traits. These crop improvement programs are often hampered by a small pool of available genetic variability and inefficient selection methodologies for a suitable variation source (Tuberosa, 2012). Which ultimately results in a gap between the precisely characterized cultivars and varieties for millet improvement. Sequencing technologies could fulfill these gaps in the availability of genomic resources for millets. However, most millets have polyploid genomes that need specific methods for their sequencing. Various millet genomes have been sequenced in recent years, and more are likely to be sequenced in the coming years. Millet species’ ploidy levels are different, with many repetitive sequences making their sequencing and genome studies more complex. In this context, different millets, ploidy levels, and genome sizes are compared and presented in Table 1.
Developing genetic and genomic resources could play a crucial role in improving the desired traits of any crop (Tuberosa 2012). The whole-genome sequencing for identifying tightly linked trait-specific markers is feasible due to reduced cost with ever-evolving technologies’. Whole-genome sequencing technologies primarily use first-generation sequencing methods such as the Maxam-Gilbert chemical cleavage and Sanger chain-termination methods. The determination of the reference genomes in Arabidopsis thaliana (Kaul et al. 2000), rice (Sasaki, 2005), maize (Schnable et al. 2009), and soybean (Schmutz et al. 2010) through Sanger sequencing were the most symbolic achievement of these methodologies. These crop genome sequencing programs enabled the analysis of genome architecture and accelerated gene characterization in other plant species. However, these methods lack automation and require time and labor. Thus, the high demand for low-cost sequencing has driven the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies that parallelize sequencing, popularly known as next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques. NGS technologies have made it possible to correlate the phenotypes with genotypes in different crop species at the nucleotide level, increasing precision in crop improvement (Chhapekar et al. 2016). NGS provides an efficient and precise methodology for identifying and tracking genetic variation within large crop populations. It also makes it possible to sequence hundreds or even thousands of related genomes to sample adequate genetic diversity within and between germplasm pools (Kilian and Graner 2012). The increasing availability of high-throughput technology at reduced costs has moved genomics from sequencing a few model species to sequencing any desired crop. The progress in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques has revolutionized the detection and gene tagging of specific traits using genetic markers (Ambawat et al. 2020). Similarly, this sequence information help in allele mining, genome editing for designing single guide RNA (SgRNA), promotor identification, functional biology phylogenetic analysis, etc. A schematic diagram of millet development through sequence information using these advanced techniques is represented in Fig. 1.
These projects open the avenues for the enormous genetic potential for millet improvement (Table 2 and Table 3). This review will explore NGS technology in crop improvement, focusing on millet improvement. Further application of NGS in genomic selection, genome-wide association studies, different omics platforms, and pangenome in millet improvement have been discussed. Hence, genotyping by sequencing and whole-genome sequencing can lead to the development of molecular markers suited to studying genetic relationships among genotypes and creating genetic maps for targeted gene and genome-wide association studies. Apart from this most frequently used to shorten the selection cycle for crop improvement and reduce the time to release varieties.
Overall, this review summarizes the work done in millet improvement through the help of modern sequencing technologies and adds to our knowledge about their future implications and applications.
NGS as a tool for developing millet genetic resources
Whole-genome sequence data in millets lead to characterizing functionally essential genes such as stress tolerance (Hittalmani et al. 2017). NGS technologies are also helpful in millet improvement by rapidly developing high throughput markers and maps (Serba and Yadav 2016). Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP ) discovery by whole-genome and targeted genome sequencing via resequencing well-characterized genomes generated enormous genetic resources that can be utilized for millet improvement (Table 4). NGS technologies also help exploit linkage and association mapping to create high and ultrahigh-density crop maps (Poland et al. 2012). Similarly, NGS has exploited allelic diversity in the fine mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for desirable traits using multi-parent populations such as nested association mapping population (NAM) (Yu et al. 2008; Sood et al. 2021) and multi-parent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) population (Kover et al., 2009). For example, a scheme for NAM and MAGIC populations was proposed to generate a fine map in Pearl millet for drought tolerance (Sood et al. 2021). Li et al. (2021a) used a genome scan approach and sequenced 312 accessions with high depth (>19 fold) to determine genomic signature and the adaptive responses of foxtail millets from different geographical regions. In another report, a landscape genomic approach investigated the impact of climate change on pearl millet cultivation in West Africa. Authors have analyzed the phenotypic and genomic diversity of 173 landraces and identified the early and late flowering varieties as the most vulnerable to climate change in West Africa (Rhoné et al., 2020). These studies suggest the potential for more millet sequencing projects harnessing the climate resilience genetic determinants and developing genetic and genomic resources for further research in the future.
High-throughput sequencing technologies have also provided access to the study of the transcriptional regulation of genes. A widely used method for whole transcriptome and RNA sequencing (Wang et al. 2009) works through direct sequencing of complementary DNAs (Severin et al. 2010). NGS technologies and RNA-seq characterize cellular RNA transcripts, identify genes/QTLs, and help understand molecular mechanisms related to defense against biotic and abiotic stresses (Table 5). For example, transcriptome sequencing and gene expression study in contrasting moisture regimes in finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) provide insights into drought tolerance, which could be used in future breeding programs (Hittalmani et al. 2017). Similarly, RNA sequencing was used to shed light on the molecular basis of drought tolerance in two pearl millet inbred lines by Illumina Hiseq. This study unraveled the differentially expressed genes and pathways involved in drought tolerance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) (Dudhate et al. 2018). NGS strategies for transcriptome analysis have evolved over the years to add a new dimension to crop improvement. These can facilitate genome editing and identify epigenetic marks and patterns to unravel epi-regulation in millet to understand their nature of climate resilience.
NGS-based informatics tools viz. trait-associated markers, cost-effective genotyping platforms, and expertise, increase pace, precision, and gene/QTLs/trait mapping efficiency in millet genome research. This section will discuss crucial genome sequencing efforts and omics interventions through NGS of specific millets.
Sequencing efforts for generating genomic resources
Foxtail millet
Several millet crops have been sequenced in the last decade and have been used to generate genomic information for different stress-related traits (Zhang et al. 2012). A draft genome (∼423 Mb) of foxtail millet was produced using Illumina Genome Analyzer II and HiSeq 2000 and annotated 38,801 genes. In the same year, a high-quality reference genome sequence was developed for foxtail millet (Setaria italica) in different cultivars and identified SNP markers for genetic mapping (Bennetzen et al. 2012). This study helped to understand the molecular basis of adaptation for drought tolerance. Authors identified six drought-associated gene clusters with significantly more gene members in drought-tolerant species (Setaria and Sorghum) than in drought-susceptible species (Maize and rice). The latest Setaria genome sequenced from xiaomi, a rapid-cycling mini foxtail millet mutant due to mutation in Phytochrome C (PHY C) gene, together with efficient transformation system, establish an ideal C4 model system (Yang et al. 2020). Sequencing information also served as a source for developing recombinant inbred lines between landrances from Japan and China Taiwan in foxtail millet (Fukunaga et al. 2022). Authors have used NGS technology to map the candidate genes responsible for morphological and agronomical traits. Similarly, comparative genomics studies through sequencing provided evolutionary clues about C3 and C4 photosynthesis. For example, a comparative analysis of essential photosynthetic genes involved in the C4 metabolic cycle in grasses like Brachypodium, sorghum, maize, and foxtail millets revealed that all the genes involved in C4 carbon fixation pathways were also present in C3 plants like rice. Interestingly, functional changes in these genes in the C3 cycle lead to the C4 pathway’s evolution (Shi et al. 2020). These studies signify the importance of sequencing projects for generating genomic resources for crop improvement in foxtail millet.
Finger millet
NGS has also solved the problems encountered in millets’ genome assembly of allopolyploid species. The allopolyploid finger millet genome was sequenced utilizing multiple hybrid assembly workflows and generated ~78.2 % genome coverage, 1.5 GB sequence data, and 62,348 protein-encoding genes. This system demonstrates the super-scaffolding and long-range homoeologous complexity in finger millet (Hatakeyama et al. 2018). Whole-genome sequencing of finger millet genotype ML-365 (drought tolerant and blast disease-resistant) was performed using Illumina and SOLiD (Sequencing by Oligonucleotide Ligation and Detection) sequencing technologies. This led to identifying about 2866 drought-responsive genes, 1766 genes as R-genes, and 330 genes involved in calcium transport and accumulation (Hittalmani et al. 2017). Similarly, in cultivated finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) genotypes KNE755 and KNE796 identified 10,327 (Simple Sequence Repeat) SSRs, and 23,285 non-homeologous SNPs by using both Roche 454 and Illumina NGS technologies. These sequencing projects on allopolyploid crops open the avenues for sequencing many more millet genomes to understand their genomics (Gimode et al. 2016). Also, the climate resilience nature of finger millet could be deployed in conventional crops through candidate gene identification for future climate-smart crops.
Sorghum
Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and improved genome assembly algorithms have facilitated the de novo assemblies of the Sorghum bicolor (Jowar) genome. Whole-genome shotgun sequencing resulted in ∼730 Mb sequence data encoding ∼27,640 genes. About 24% of genes are grass-specific, and 7% are sorghum-specific (Paterson et al. 2009). The authors also suggested recent gene and microRNA duplications may contribute to drought tolerance in sorghum. Further refinement in genome sequencing data suggested size of the genome sequence is 700 Mb (Mace et al. 2013). The sequence information help in mining sorghum genomic variation to facilitate the genetic research of complex traits. In sorghum, large-scale SNP datasets using genotyping-by-sequencing were obtained. Further, by reusing sequencing data of 10,323 sorghum genotypes total of 459,304-SNP were identified. These SNPs data were additionally used for the GWAS study, and many candidates' SNP were determined for different important traits (Hu et al. 2019). For example, Girma et al. (2019) reported a strong candidate gene for the ABORTED MICROSPORES bHLH transcription factor, which controls male fertility. Efforts in sorghum sequencing led to the identification of evolutionary variations responsible for better performance in harsh climatic conditions, which can pave the way for developing varieties sustaining climatic fluctuations.
Pearl millet
NGS technologies have also helped identify and tag genes controlling the trait of interest in millets (Serba and Yadav, 2016). Whole-genome sequencing of pearl millet generated ∼1.79 Gb draft sequence with 38,579 genes by using whole-genome shotgun (WGS) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequencing in Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform (Varshney et al. 2017). The authors reported substantial enrichment for wax biosynthesis genes, which may contribute to heat and drought tolerance in this crop. This study further revealed enrichment for wax biosynthesis, tolerance to heat, and drought stress genes in the arid zone (Varshney et al. 2017). NGS platforms and high throughput phenotyping technologies have been utilized in foxtail and pearl millet to identify marker-trait associations (Varshney et al. 2017; Jia et al. 2013). In pearl millet, resequencing data was obtained using the RAD-Seq approach to establish marker-trait associations for genomic selection, define heterotic pools, and predict hybrid performance. The information obtained using NGS technologies has been expected to facilitate genomic research at the molecular level, ultimately improving millets productivity and enhancing the bioavailability of vitamin A, iron, and zinc. These technologies also enable the population structure study by identification of SNPs. Kanfany et al. (2020) identified 54,770 high-quality SNPs markers for a population structure study in 309 inbred lines by arranging in four Ion Proton Next-Generation Sequencers (Kanfany et al. 2020). Overall, we need more sequencing efforts to identify the hidden variations in resource use efficiency and nutritional values in pearl millet. Sequencing data would undoubtedly help develop new crop varieties in less time for pearl millet in the future.
Other millets
NGS has also expedited structural and functional genomics studies in minor millet, assisted their improvement, and provided the foundation for studying exceptional stress tolerance and C4 biology in millets. To understand its genome assembly, sequencing of broomcorn millet generated ~103.4 Gb Illumina paired-end reads (150 bp) in cultivar Longmi 4. Interestingly, authors have identified 15 ABA or WDS (water-deficiency stress) responsive genes. Four genes were highly expressed across tissues/ stages in stress/stress-free conditions. This indicates stress resilience expression of stress tolerance genes in broomcorn millet that could be utilized for integration in conventional crops through transgenic or marker-assisted selection (Shi et al. 2019). Zou et al. (2019) reported about 55930 protein-coding genes and 339 microRNA genes present in the genome of broomcorn millet using Illumina short-read coupled with Pac-Bio long-read genome sequencing technology. The identified candidate genes coexisted for all three C4 subtypes of the carbon fixation mechanism. This study will help us better understand the C4 mechanism in plants and provide insight into the genetic modification of C3 plants into C4 to improve their stress tolerance capability (Zou et al. 2019).
Other efforts of the whole millet genome include sequencing teff (Eragrostis tef) cultivar Tsedey (DZ-Cr-37) by Illumina and 454 representing 87% of the genome size, 672 Mb sequence reads, and 28113 genes. This is the first allotetraploid assembled de novo and paved the way for other allotetraploid crops (Cannarozzi et al. 2014). Similarly, sequencing of Japanese Barnyard millet (Echinochloa crus-galli) cultivar STB08 by Illumina HiSeq 2000 system represented 90.7% of the predicted genome size, 1.27 Gb sequence reads, with 108,771 protein-encoding genes (Guo et al. 2017).
At present, the genomic resources available for P. miliaceum are several types of molecular markers, such as simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and expressed sequence tags (ESTs). The first genetic linkage map of proso millet using SNP markers was discovered through genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) using NGS protocols (He et al. 2014). Initially, 69,981 SNPs were identified for major and minor alleles. Further, QTL was determined for different traits using this data (Rajput et al. 2016). In other millets, such as barnyard millet and kodo millet minimal attempts have been made to discover the genomic structure and associated downstream processes due to genome complexity (Renganathan et al. 2020).
More efforts in sequencing and resequencing millet crops are required to completely utilize the potential at the genetic level to translate in field conditions for millet and conventional crops.
Omics-based millet genomic resources
Omics technologies are integrated approaches involving high throughput technologies, analytical methods, bioinformatics, and computational analysis. These technologies comprise the detailed study of genes (genomics), mRNA (transcriptomics), proteins (proteomics), metabolites (metabolomics), and epigenetics (epigenomics) that have provided insights into the molecular mechanisms for understanding the complex interactions between genes, proteins, and metabolites within the resulting phenotype of millets (Tables 5 and 6). Overview of the use of omic resources in millets improvement is represented in Fig. 2.
Transcriptomics
Transcriptome profiling provides a detailed account of genes differential expression patterns and valuable information on millet climate resilience. For example, transcriptome analysis showed differentially expressed genes for salinity in finger millet and low moisture stress tolerance in contrasting genotypes (Hittalmani et al., 2017; Rahman et al. 2014). Comparative transcriptome analysis in barnyard millet identifies candidate genes for drought tolerance, Fe and Zn accumulation (Jayakodi et al. 2019), and submergence tolerance (Nah et al. 2015). Recently, proteomics and metabolomics studies have been conducted to characterize stress-specific proteins related to post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications (Vetriventhan et al. 2020). Several investigations were conducted on finger millet in grain filling stages, identifying calcium-binding proteins (Singh et al. 2016). Transcriptomic and proteomic technologies were combined to identify genes and proteins responsible for abiotic stress tolerance. The finger millet samples were treated with drought at different stages to determine the drought response mechanism. A total of 80,602 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 3009 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified at the transcriptomic and proteomic levels, respectively. Further, it suggested that the coordination of the DEGs-DEPs was essential to the enhanced drought tolerance response in the finger millet (Li et al., 2021b). Although genome sequencing remains cumbersome and costly, NGS has significantly reduced the cost of expression studies, which could be utilized to identify the stress-related gene expression in different varieties to obtain stress tolerance.
Proteomics
Apart from this, proteomics techniques identify different proteins expressed in mechanisms such as biotic, abiotic stresses, etc. For example, the comparative proteomic analysis of foxtail millets identified 29 differentially expressed salt-tolerant responsive proteins. It provides new insights into salt stress responses in foxtail millet (Veeranagamallaiah et al. 2008). The proteomic analysis of finger millets identified EcJAZ protein that could act as the signaling hub for the JA and other phytohormone signaling pathways in response to a diverse set of stressors and developmental cues to provide survival fitness to the plant (Sen et al. 2016). The shotgun proteomics approach in pearl millet investigates differential protein expression for drought tolerance. Using this approach in pearl millet, a total of 2281 proteins were quantified, and leaf tissue showed the highest number of significant changes (120), followed by roots (25) and seeds (10). Increased levels of root proteins observed in increased root length point to impaired shoot–root communication under drought stress (Ghatak et al. 2016). Differential protein expression analysis of Zhangzagu10 and its parental lines in foxtail millet identified 4015 proteins . The cluster analysis revealed that the DEP expression profiles of Zhangzagu10 were closer to those of the male parent. The DEPs were significantly enriched in the metabolic pathways, photosynthesis, and stress response. These proteomics analyses of differential expression in hybrid millet and its parents could provide valuable information for the practical application of heterosis in breeding hybrid millet (Wang et al., 2021a). Similarly, proteomic studies in foxtail millet revealed kernel protein concentration and distribution change under drought and salinity stress (Li et al. 2019). More proteomics studies need to identify molecular chaperones governing the climate resilience nature of these nutri-cereals.
Comparative genomics
The genome sequence information of millets is not well explored. Therefore, comparative genomics is essential in identifying genes/QTLs linked to biotic and abiotic stress resistance. For example, Babu et al. 2014 identified the gene responsible for blast resistance in finger millets utilizing comparative genomics information for millets. Based on homology, a total of 47,142 genes were identified in 20,374 gene families of broomcorn millet and 11,773 in foxtail millet by comparative genomics. Further, most of these genes were also identified as candidate genes for abiotic stress tolerance (Zou et al. 2019). More such studies could also provide insight into the evolutionary relationship between grasses in changing climates.
Metabolomics
Metabolomic studies on millet could also provide insights into the metabolic functions of different metabolites for climate resilience. For example, metabolic reconstruction and multiple omics mapping were performed in foxtail millet using transcriptome, proteome, and targeted metabolome data (de Oliveira Dal'Molin et al., 2016). Authors have identified a significant abundance of metabolites that plays a role in C4 metabolism. Similarly, integrated metabolomics analysis in foxtail millet cultivar An04 and Yugu2 under salinity stress implied that lysophospholipid, phenylpropanoid, lignin, and flavonoid biosynthesis pathway play a crucial role in the seed germination stage (Pan et al. 2020). Targeted metabolomics analysis of 150 foxtail millet germplasm identified 330 annotated metabolites (Wei et al. 2021). Further, mGWAS study of the generated data identified genes for complex physiological traits. Large-scale multi omics analysis of 398 foxtail millet accessions elucidated the domestication-related genomic region along with common variants influencing the metabolite traits and having anti-inflammatory properties (Li et al. 2022). Further authors have identified the grain color affecting gene and validated it through genome editing in foxtail millet (Li et al. 2022). At the grain-filling stage total of 2014 metabolites associated with foxtail millet were identified, which suggested stage-specific metabolic properties (Wang et al. 2023). In pearl millet metabolome analysis and mGWAS of 197 inbred lines identified 738 probable candidates for further exploration (Yadav et al. 2021). Metabolomics analysis in Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) identified 2082 differential metabolites related to photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and anthocyanin production essential to drought tolerance (Cao et al. 2022). Different color proso millet varieties were subjected to metabolomics analysis, which identified 672 metabolites that brought changes in phenolic acid and flavonoid accumulation, attributing to their different grain color (Li et al., 2021c). This analysis reveals the crucial role of metabolomics in dissecting stress-related traits and their associated genes and metabolites for generating future-generation climate-smart crops (Pandey et al. 2022).
In conclusion, these omics technologies have enormous potential to generate resources that can be used for millet improvement. Integrating multi-omics technologies will provide a comprehensive framework for understanding millets’ molecular mechanism and climate resilience that can be utilized to improve these nutri-cereals.
Epigenomics
The DNA associated with histone proteins forms complex chromatin structures which are prone to undergo certain mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and small RNA-mediated methylations. Alterations of chromatin structures lead to the inaccessibility of genomic DNA to various regulatory proteins such as transcription factors ultimately modulate the gene expression. The advancement of sequencing technology provides an opportunity to study epigenetic mechanisms at the genome-wide level. Epigenomics using high-throughput technologies would widen the understanding of mechanisms as well as functions of regulatory pathways in plant genomes which will further help in manipulating these pathways using genetic and biochemical approaches. A comprehensive study of phenotype can be correlated with genotype to epigenotype and phenotype and also with methylation QTL or epiQTL are possible with high throughput NGS. It will further accelerate the breeding program of millets (Yadav et al. 2018). Genome-wide DNA demethylation induced by salt stress in foxtail millets and modulate gene expression. Hemimethylation in pearl millets has a key role in regulating defense response and also provides tolerance against SA application (Ngom et al. 2018). Different methylation patterns in two foxtail millet varieties provide novel epigenetic points of view (Zhang et al., 2012). DNA methylation and RNA sequence analysis showed that the dynamics change of DNA methylation plays a crucial role in grain development in foxtail millets (Wang et al., 2021a). As our understanding will progress to select, identify, and manipulate epigenetic factors/epialleles to lead to the discovery of novel diversity. This diversity could be used for millet breeding programs.
Application of NGS technologies for millet improvement
Recent plant breeding studies of many species have demonstrated the utility of combining molecular assessments of genetic distance into trait-linked SNP genotyping during the development of parent lines to maximize yield gains due to heterosis (Baggett et al. 2021). SSRs are the molecular marker of choice to determine genetic diversity, but the methods historically used to sequence them have been burdensome. But targeted NGS technology allowed it to validate only the most informative region influencing heterotic groups (Baggett et al. 2021). These studies suggest that the NGS technology is ultimately used to characterize gene/alleles controlling agronomic traits and will serve as a source of markers for molecular breeding in millets (Fig. 3). NGS provides high throughput genotyping of crop plants, and these genotyping data are directly used in the following techniques for improving millets.
Genome-wide association mapping (GWAS) and genotyping by sequencing (GBS)
NGS and GBS have tremendous potential to enhance breeding efficiency in millets to mitigate a changing climate effects. Quantitative traits of plants are regulated by many genes and their genotype interaction with the environment. To unravel the genetic architecture of such characters, natural variation within species can be explored by studying genotype-phenotype relationships. Linking phenotypes with single-nucleotide polymorphism has become standard for such analyses through GWAS (Scheben et al. 2017).
GBS has been used efficiently in millets to generate a vast repository of SNPs for studying genetic diversity and establishing marker-trait associations (Sehgal et al. 2012) (Table 3). GBS has enormous potential to generate many high-quality markers in orphan species like finger millet, where marker number is currently limited. Hu et al. (2015) performed a genome-wide screening to identify the role of the WRKY transcription factor in pearl millet (PgWRKY). Genome-wide association mapping and comparative genomics identify genomic regions governing grain nutrient content traits in finger millet. One hundred ninety genotypes were evaluated for minerals and protein content, implying GBS and GWAS integrated strategy to identify marker-trait associations (MTAs). Authors have identified candidate genes governing significant associations through comparative mapping with other cereals. Genotyping by sequencing (GBS) of finger millets identified 169,365 SNPs. Through GWAS identified, 418 markers linked with mineral content. A total of 18 markers showed the homology with candidate genes having putative functions in binding, remobilization, or transporting metal ions (Chanwala et al. 2020). GWAS study in sorghum was used to determine the thirty-seven putative genes associated with epicuticular wax content that might be responsible for its better adaptability to biotic and abiotic stress (Puranik et al. 2020). GWAS study was also done in minor millets, such as in proso millet, and identified 13 marker traits associated with critical agronomic and seed traits (Elango et al. 2020). In conclusion, these studies help to identify climate resilience genetic information that can be utilized for millet and other crop improvements.
Genomic selection (genomic assisted selection)
Genomic selection is a novel breeding approach for the rapid passage of superior genotypes based on genomic estimated breeding values assessed from the training population using high-density DNA markers uniformly distributed across the genome (Meuwissen et al. 2001). Genotypic characterization of a population assists in harnessing useful information for genomic-assisted breeding. Characterization of the genomic resources in light of genetic diversity and population structure is necessary to accelerate millets' genetic improvement for target traits. In this regard, 309 inbred lines were evaluated for population genomics using GBS to understand the extent of pearl millet genetic diversity for hybrid development. For achieving a higher rate of genetic gain, a world association mapping panel called the Pearl Millet inbred Germplasm Association Panel (PMiGAP) was developed at ICRISAT to map traits related to drought tolerance, grain Fe and Zn content, nitrogen use efficiency, components of endosperm starch, and grain yield (Srivastava et al. 2020). To compare three GS models (Jarquin et al. 2020) using grain yield and dense molecular marker information of pearl millet obtained from two different genotyping platforms, namely conventional GBS RAD-seq (Miller et al. 2007; Baird et al. 2008) and tunable GBS (Ott et al. 2017) to improve the selection procedure and hybrid prediction ability. Further, in sorghum, genomic prediction for grain yield and drought tolerance is enhanced by multi-traits analysis (Velazco et al., 2019). Due to the limited genomics studies and millet germplasm availability, genomic selection emerges as an essential tool for improving the genetic gain of millets and helping in their improvement.
Pan-genome reconstruction
Pan-genome refers to the collection of core and variable genes within a species. The pan-genome study provides better insight into species diversity, domestication, and breeding history and provides a complete characterization of species genes’ content diversity. Luo et al. (2016) developed a sorghum SNP database (SorGSD) with abundant SNPs and other resources related to genetics and genomics by using published sorghum genome re-sequencing data from 48 accessions (Luo et al. 2016). Further, the updated Sorghum Genome SNP Database (SorGSD) contains SNPs from 48 sorghum accessions mapped to the reference genome BTx623 (v2.1) and, with the addition of new data and new features, renamed it to Sorghum Genome Science Database (SorGSD), which contains 289 sorghum lines with both SNPs and small insertions/deletions (INDELs), which were aligned to the newly assembled and annotated sorghum genome BTx623 (v3.1) (Liu et al. 2021). Ruperao et al. (2021) produced a pan-genome for genetically diverse race-specific sorghum accessions using a reference genome, then added novel genome sequences from 176 sorghum accessions . Sorghum 13 genomes assembled to represent the cultivated and wild relatives. Authors have integrated them with three other published genomes to generate a pan-genome of 44,079 gene families with 222.60 Mb of the new sequence identified to explore genetic diversity within its primary gene pool (Tao et al. 2021). Wang et al. (2021b) constructed chromosome-level genome assemblies for two important sorghum inbred lines, Tx2783 and RTx436, consisting of 19 and 18 scaffolds, respectively, with contig N50 values of 25.60 and 20.30 Mb. Therefore, pan-genomes of sorghum represent an essential resource for millet improvement and gene discovery for various stress tolerance (Wang et al., 2021b). More studies on pan-genome certainly improve our knowledge of species diversity, domestication, and breeding to generate better crops sustaining the pressure of climate change.
Potential use of NGS for millet improvement
Various conventional breeding methods release several notable cultivars in millets, viz. mass, pure line, and pedigree selection from local landraces/cultivars. In India, 248 varieties of six millets (finger millet—121, foxtail millet—32, proso millet—24, kodo millet—33, barnyard millet—18, and little millet—20) released by conventional breeding (Ghatak et al. 2016). Hybridization followed by selection using the contact method, controlled hybridization following hand emasculation, or hot water emasculation has been a vital breeding method in minor millets. However, these emasculation techniques often constrain millet improvement through hybridization due to the small size of the flowers. Hence, advanced biotechnological tools are required to develop millet cultivars with novel traits presumed to provide a new pace in millet improvement.
Assisted selection
The advancements in DNA markers and mapping populations for traits of interest with the refinements in phenotyping and statistical analysis have led to identifying and mapping QTL associated with the critical agronomic and stress tolerance along with the tightly linked DNA markers. These resources can be employed in marker-assisted selection. MAS used in generation advanced in sorghum. Similarly, the high-density map identified the QTL and improved several agronomic traits of foxtail millets. The marker-assisted backcrossing improves biotic, abiotic, and other nutritional traits. Recently, MAS efficiently transferred drought-tolerant QTL in the most widely cultivated cultivar HHB 226 of pearl millet (Bidinger et al. 2005). Besides this, many reports show that MAS improves millet’s biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and nutrient content. These reports indicated that the genome database swift the genetic and molecular studies of the natural stress tolerance ability of millets and very quickly transfers to the desired genotype of millets.
Mutation breeding
In crop improvement programs, continuous reduction in genetic diversity results from increased focus of breeders on so-called elite cultivars. This reduction in genetic diversity can be managed by mutation breeding (Smartt and Simmonds 1995). The mutation-based methods evolved with the advancement of sequencing technology. The draft sequence of crop plants helps the breeder to screen the genomic region responsible for the variation. Traditional gene mapping is complicated, time-consuming, and requires large distribution of molecular markers. But with the emergence of resequencing technology, we can quickly map the genes with the help of bioinformatics tools (Guo et al. 2014). Application of mutation breeding earlier reported in pearl millet for delayed seedling emergence, reduced plant height, delayed maturity, and reduced seed set (Burton et al. 1974; Burton and Powell, 1966) through ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) treatment of seeds in water solution at various dosages. Similarly, finger millet mutants have been developed for delay seedling emergence (Ambavane et al. 2014) in proso millet for early maturity and high-yielding capacity (Bhave et al. 2016) and in kodo millet for high seed viability (Jency et al. 2016). Mutational breeding resulted in 13 successful small millet cultivars (finger millet 8, kodo millet 3, and little millet 2) in India (Ghatak et al. 2016). Besides this technology, NGS opens the gate to integrating many advanced biotechnological tools with mutation breeding that could accelerate the millet improvement program. These technologies include mutation-based methods (viz. MutMap, MutMap+, SHOREmap, Mutmap-Gap, QTL-Seq), GWAS (Genome-wide association study), genomic selection, genome editing, and multi-omics approaches. Such variation would be instrumental in generating genetic resources to understand the climate resilience characteristics of millets.
Transgenic approaches
Along with selection and hybridization, the genetic transformation of millets is necessary for millet improvement. The millet improvement program utilized a combination of plant tissue culture and transgenic approaches. For example, in finger millet, a transgenic variety resistant to leaf blast disease was developed using the antifungal protein (PIN) gene from prawn (Latha et al. 2005) and Chitinase11 gene (Chi11) from rice through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Antony Ceasar and Ignacimuthu, 2011). Salinity stress-tolerant finger millet was developed using the serine-rich protein (PcSrp) gene from Porteresia coarctata (Mahalakshmi et al. 2006). The Na+/H+ antiporter of Pennisetum glaucum (PgNHX1) and Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase (AVP1) was utilized to develop the salinity tolerant finger millet (Jayasudha et al. 2014). Many reports suggested using a transgenic approach in finger millet for drought, salinity stress tolerance, and high chlorophyll retention using the mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (mtlD) gene from bacteria (Hema et al. 2014). Similarly, transgenics in finger millet were developed for herbicide resistance (Bayer et al. 2014) and improved zinc concentration (Ramegowda et al. 2013). In foxtail millet, transgenics were designed for a high tolerance against drought and salinity stress. The aquaporin PgAQPs differential expressed under drought stress of pearl millet. Transgenic tobacco developed by heterogenous expression of PgPIP2;6 genes exhibited better adaptation against significant abiotic stresses such as drought, high VPD, heat, and cold stresses (Reddy et al. 2022). With the advent of advanced transformation protocols and new-generation genome editing tools, the characterization of millets will provide a better understanding of their functions at different climate adversaries.
Genome editing
Genome editing technologies are becoming user-friendly for developing crop plants exempted from GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) regulations to cope with changing climate and ensure future food security in millets (Ceasar, 2021). Sequence-specific targeted genome editing technologies viz. ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR technologies are worthy of a boon in crop improvement and can be used to achieve desired traits in the target genotype. The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been used for genome editing of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and phytoene desaturase (PDS) genes in sorghum (Liu et al. 2009). It is also reported that CRISPR/Cas9 improves the grain quality by editing Alpha-Kafirin Gene in sorghum (Li et al. 2014). There are only two successful reports of genome editing in millets, both in foxtail millet. In the first, the Phytoene desaturase gene was targeted through CRISPR-Cas 9 system, whereas in the second example, S. italica Matrilineal (SiMTL) gene was targeted for double haploid induction (Lin et al. 2018; Cheng et al. 2021). The scarcity of the application of genome editing in millets could be due to the complex genome in some millets, the non-availability of regeneration protocols for tissue culture, and the very recent sequencing of their genomes. However, these technologies’ precise editing ability and modern transformation protocols could be game-changers for millet genetic improvement programs.
Future perspectives
Millets are climate-resilient nutri-cereals necessary for food and nutritional security in developing countries. NGS technologies are breakthroughs in the millet improvement program. Two critical applications of NGS, viz. de novo sequencing and resequencing, are attractive options for studying large and complex millet genomes, pre-breeding activities, and identifying useful genomic variations in millets. As discussed, it adds a new dimension to differential gene expression analysis, identifying candidate genes for important economic traits, quality parameters, and resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses. The multi-omics application of NGS provided new information for trait-specific improvement in millet whose genomes are yet to be sequenced. The progress of sequencing technology leads to the available resequencing data of the genomes of different millets. These resequencing data could rapidly identify genes governing other traits through mutation-based techniques and advancement in data analysis tools, and many plants’ draft genomes are available. Further, NGS and other mutation methods and sequencing technologies can rapidly identify the gene responsible for any traits. Last but not least, sequence information of a genome upfront to facilitate the applications of the CRISPR/Cas toolkit in new plant or crop species. There is every reason to believe that these enormous efforts in millet sequencing will pay a considerable dividend to be essential and applied plant research in the near future.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahsan SN, Vahidy AA, Ali SI (1994) Chromosome numbers and incidence of polyploidy in Panicoideae (Poaceae) from Pakistan. Ann Mo Bot Gard 81(4):775–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399922
Ajeesh Krishna TP, Maharajan T, Ceasar SA (2022) Improvement of millets in the post-genomic era. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 28:669–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-022-01158-8
Ambavane AR, Sawardekar SV, Gokhale NB, Desai SS, Sawant SS, Bhave SG, Devmore JP (2014) Studies on mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of finger millet [Eleucina coracana (L.) Gaertn] in M1 generation and effect of gamma rays on its quantitative traits during M2 generation. Int J Agric Sci 10(2):603-607. ISSN: 0973-130X
Ambawat S, Singh S, Meena RC, Satyavathi CT (2020) Biotechnological applications for improvement of the pearl millet crop. In: Pearl Millet. CRC Press, pp 115–138 ISBN9780429331732
Ananda GK, Myrans H, Norton SL, Gleadow R, Furtado A, Henry RJ (2020) Wild sorghum as a promising resource for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 11:1108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01108
Antony Ceasar S, Ignacimuthu S (2011) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) using shoot apex explants. Plant Cell Rep 30(9):1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-011-1084-0
Babu BK, Dinesh P, Agrawal PK, Sood S, Chandrashekara C, Bhatt JC, Kumar A (2014) Comparative genomics and association mapping approaches for blast resistant genes in finger millet using SSRs. PLoS One 9(6):e99182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099182
Bagdi A, Balázs G, Schmidt J, Szatmári M, Schoenlechner R, Berghofer E, Tömösközia SJAA (2011) Protein characterization and nutrient composition of Hungarian proso millet varieties and the effect of decortication. Acta Aliment 40(1):128–141. https://doi.org/10.1556/aalim.40.2011.1.15
Baggett JP (2021) Improvements in semi-arid agriculture: Sorghum bicolor sub-population molecular marker development and mild salinity stress in Vitis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno
Baggett JP, Tillett RL, Cooper EA, Yerka MK (2021) De novo identification and targeted sequencing of SSRs efficiently fingerprints Sorghum bicolor sub-population identity. PLoS One 16(3):e0248213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248213
Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Johnson EA (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3(10):e3376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003376
Bayer GY, Yemets AI, Blume YB (2014) Obtaining the transgenic lines of finger millet Eleusine coracana (L.). with dinitroaniline resistance. Cytol Genet 48(3):139–144. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452714030025
Bennetzen JL, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifield R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli AC, Devos KM (2012) Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat Biotechnol 30(6):555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2196
Bhave KG, Dalvi VV, Thaware BL, Mahadik SG, Kasture MC, Desai SS (2016) Mutagenesis in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Int J Sci Res 5:1635–1638
Bidinger FR, Serraj R, Rizvi SMH, Howarth C, Yadav RS, Hash CT (2005) Field evaluation of drought tolerance QTL effects on phenotype and adaptation in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] topcross hybrids. Field Crop Res 94(1):14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.006
Boukail S, Macharia M, Miculan M, Masoni A, Calamai A, Palchetti E, Dell’Acqua M (2021) Genome wide association study of agronomic and seed traits in a world collection of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). BMC Plant Biol 21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03111-5
Burton GW, Powell J (1966) Morphological and cytological response of pear millet, pennisetum typhoides to thermal neutron and ethyl methane sulfonate seed treatments 1. Crop Sci 6(2):180–182. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600020021x
Burton GW, Geneticist JP, Geneticist WH (1974) Effect of recurrent mutagen seed treatments on mutation frequency and combining ability for forage yield in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum.). Radiat Bot 14(4):323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-7560(74)80024-4
Cai Z, Liu H, He Q, Pu M, Chen J, Lai J, Jin W (2014) Differential genome evolution and speciation of Coix lacryma-jobi L. and Coix aquatica Roxb. hybrid guangxi revealed by repetitive sequence analysis and fine karyotyping. BMC Genomics 15(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1025
Cannarozzi G, Plaza-Wüthrich S, Esfeld K, Larti S, Wilson YS, Girma D, Tadele Z (2014) Genome and transcriptome sequencing identifies breeding targets in the orphan crop tef (Eragrostis tef). BMC Genomics 15(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-581
Cao X, Hu Y, Song J, Feng H, Wang J, Chen L, Wang L, Diao X, Wan Y, Liu S, Qiao Z (2022) Transcriptome sequencing and metabolome analysis reveals the molecular mechanism of drought stress in millet. Int J Mol Sci 23(18):10792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810792
Ceasar A (2021) Genome-editing in millets: current knowledge and future perspectives. Mol Biol Rep 49:773–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06975-w
Chanwala J, Satpati S, Dixit A, Parida A, Giri MK, Dey N (2020) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factors in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under dehydration and salinity stress. BMC Genomics 21(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6622-0
Cheng Z, Sun Y, Yang S, Zhi H, Yin T, Ma X, Sui Y (2021) Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Plant Biotechnol J 19(6):1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13584
Chhapekar SS, Gaur R, Kumar A, Ramchiary N (2016) Reaping the benefits of next-generation sequencing technologies for crop improvement—Solanaceae. In: Next Generation Sequencing-Advances, Applications and Challenges. InTech, London, pp 247–285. https://doi.org/10.5772/61656
Clayton WD, Vorontsova MS, Harman KT, Williamson H (2016) GrassBase-the online world grass flora. GrassBase-The Online World Grass Flora
Das IK, Rakshit S (2016) Millets, their importance, and production constraints. In: Biotic stress resistance in millets. Academic Press, pp 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804549-7.00001-9
de Oliveira Dal'Molin CG, Orellana C, Gebbie L, Steen J, Hodson MP, Chrysanthopoulos P, Nielsen LK (2016) Metabolic reconstruction of Setaria italica: a systems biology approach for integrating tissue-specific omics and pathway analysis of bioenergy grasses. Front Plant Sci 7:1138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01138
De Wet JMJ, Prasada Rao KE, Brink DE (1983) Systematics and domestication of Panicum sumatrense (Graminae). Journal d'agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée 30(2):159–168
De Wet JMJ, Rao KP, Brink DE, Mengesha MH (1984) Systematics and evolution of Eleusine coracana (Gramineae). Am J Bot 71(4):550–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb12540.x
Diao X, Jia G (2017) Foxtail millet breeding in China. In: Genetics and genomics of Setaria. Springer, Cham, pp 93–113
Dudhate A, Shinde H, Tsugama D, Liu S, Takano T (2018) Transcriptomic analysis reveals the differentially expressed genes and pathways involved in drought tolerance in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br]. PloS one 13(4):e0195908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195908
Elango D, Xue W, Chopra S (2020) Genome wide association mapping of epi-cuticular wax genes in Sorghum bicolor. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26(8):1727–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00848-5
Anonymous (2020) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. FAO STAT. databases, www.fao.org
Fedenia L, Klein RR, Dykes L, Rooney WL, Klein PE (2020) Phenotypic, phytochemical, and transcriptomic analysis of black sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) pericarp in response to light quality. J Agric Food Chem 68(37):9917–9929. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02657
Fukunaga K, Abe A, Mukainari Y, Komori K, Tanaka K, Fujihara A, Kawase M (2022) Recombinant inbred lines and next-generation sequencing enable rapid identification of candidate genes involved in morphological and agronomic traits in foxtail millet. Sci Rep 12(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04012-1
Ganapathy KN, Hariprasanna K, Tonapi VA (2021) Breeding for enhanced productivity in millets. In: Millets and Pseudo Cereals. Woodhead Publishing, pp 39–63
Ghatak A, Chaturvedi P, Nagler M, Roustan V, Lyon D, Bachmann G, Weckwerth W (2016) Comprehensive tissue-specific proteome analysis of drought stress responses in Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. (Pearl millet). J Proteome 143:122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.032
Ghatak A, Chaturvedi P, Bachmann G, Valledor L, Ramšak Ž, Bazargani MM, Weckwerth W (2021) Physiological and proteomic signatures reveal mechanisms of superior drought resilience in pearl millet compared to wheat. Front Plant Sci 11:1965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.600278
Gimode D, Odeny DA, de Villiers EP, Wanyonyi S, Dida MM, Mneney EE, de Villiers SM (2016) Identification of SNP and SSR markers in finger millet using next generation sequencingtechnologies. PLoS one 11(7):e0159437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159437
Girma G, Nida H, Seyoum A, Mekonen M, Nega A, Lule D, Mengiste T (2019) A large-scale genome-wide association analyses of Ethiopian sorghum landrace collection reveal loci associated with important traits. Front Plant Sci 10:691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00691
Goron TL, Raizada MN (2015) Genetic diversity and genomic resources available for the small millet crops to accelerate a New Green Revolution. Front Plant Sci 6:157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00157
Gould FW, Soderstrom TR (1970) Chromosome numbers of some Mexican and Colombian grasses. Can J Bot 48(9):1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1139/b70-241
Gould FW, Soderstrom TR (1974) Chromosome numbers of some Ceylon grasses. Can J Bot 52(5):1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1139/b74-136
Guo L, Gao Z, Qian Q (2014) Application of resequencing to rice genomics, functional genomics and evolutionary analysis. Rice 7(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-014-0004-7
Guo L, Qiu J, Ye C, Jin G, Mao L, Zhang H, Fan L (2017) Echinochloa crus-galli genome analysis provides insight into its adaptation and invasiveness as a weed. Nat Commun 8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01067-5
Gupta S, Kumari K, Muthamilarasan M, Parida SK, Prasad M (2014) Population structure and association mapping of yield contributing agronomic traits in foxtail millet. Plant Cell Rep 33(6):881–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1564-0
Hatakeyama M, Aluri S, Balachadran MT, Sivarajan SR, Patrignani A, Grüter S, Shimizu KK (2018) Multiple hybrid de novo genome assembly of finger millet, an orphan allotetraploid crop. DNA Res 25(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsx036
He J, Zhao X, Laroche A, Lu ZX, Liu H, Li Z (2014) Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selection (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding. Front Plant Sci 5:484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00484
Hema R, Vemanna RS, Sreeramulu S, Reddy CP, Senthil-Kumar M, Udayakumar M (2014) Stable expression of mtlD gene imparts multiple stress tolerance in finger millet. PLoS One 9(6):e99110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099110
Hittalmani S, Mahesh HB, Shirke MD, Biradar H, Uday G, Aruna YR, Mohanrao A (2017) Genome and transcriptome sequence of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) provides insights into drought tolerance and nutraceutical properties. BMC Genom 18(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3850-z
Hu Z, Mbacké B, Perumal R, Guèye MC, Sy O, Bouchet S, Morris GP (2015) Population genomics of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.): comparative analysis of global accessions and Senegalese landraces. BMC Genom 16(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2255-0
Hu Z, Olatoye MO, Marla S, Morris GP (2019) An integrated genotyping-by-sequencing polymorphism map for over 10,000 sorghum genotypes. The Plant Genome 12(1):180044. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2018.06.0044
Hunt HV, Campana MG, Lawes MC, PARK YJ, Bower MA, Howe CJ, Jones MK (2011) Genetic diversity and phylogeography of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) across Eurasia. Mol Ecol 20(22):4756–4771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05318.x
Jaiswal V, Gupta S, Gahlaut V, Muthamilarasan M, Bandyopadhyay T, Ramchiary N, Prasad M (2019) Genome-wide association study of major agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) using ddRAD sequencing. Sci Rep 9(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41602-6
Jarquin D, Howard R, Liang Z, Gupta SK, Schnable JC, Crossa J (2020) Enhancing hybrid prediction in pearl millet using genomic and/or multi-environment phenotypic information of inbreds. Front Genet 10:1294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01294
Jarret RL, Ozias-Akins P, Phatak S, Nadimpalli R, Duncan R, Hiliard S (1995) DNA contents inPaspalum spp. determined by flow cytometry. Genet Resour Crop Evol 42(3):237–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02431258
Jayakodi M, Madheswaran M, Adhimoolam K, Perumal S, Manickam D, Kandasamy T, Natesan S (2019) Transcriptomes of Indian barnyard millet and barnyardgrass reveal putative genes involved in drought adaptation and micronutrient accumulation. Acta Physiol Plant 41(5):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2855-4
Jayasudha BG, Sushma AM, Hanjagi PS, Sashidhar VR (2014) An efficient in-vitro Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol for raising salinity tolerant transgenic plants in finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.]. Plant Arch 14(2):823–829
Jency JP, Ravikesavan R, Sumathi P, Raveendran M (2016) Determination of lethal dose and effect of physical mutagen on germination percentage and seedling parameters in kodomillet variety CO 3. Electron J Plant Breed 7(4):1122–1126
Jia G, Huang X, Zhi H, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Li W, Han B (2013) A haplotype map of genomic variations and genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Nat Genet 45(8):957–961. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2673
Johnson M, Deshpande S, Vetriventhan M, Upadhyaya HD, Wallace JG (2019) Genome-wide population structure analyses of three minor millets: kodo millet, little millet, and proso millet. The Plant Genome 12(3):190021. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2019.03.0021
Kanfany G, Serba DD, Rhodes D, St Amand P, Bernardo A, Gangashetty PI, Bai G (2020) Genomic diversity in pearl millet inbred lines derived from landraces and improved varieties. BMC Genom 21(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06796-4
Kanlindogbe C, Sekloka E, Kwon-Ndung EH (2020) Genetic resources and varietal environment of grown fonio millets in West Africa: challenges and perspectives. Plant Breed Biotech 8(2):77–88. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2020.8.2.77
Kaul S, Koo HL, Jenkins J, Rizzo M, Rooney T, Tallon LJ, Somerville MC (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat 408(6814):796–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/35048692
Kilian B, Graner A (2012) NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks. Brief Funct Genomics 11(1):38–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elr046
Kover PX, Valdar W, Trakalo J, Scarcelli N, Ehrenreich IM, Purugganan MD, Mott R (2009) A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 5(7):e1000551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000551
Kumar A, Sharma D, Tiwari A, Jaiswal JP, Singh NK, Sood S (2016) Genotyping-by-sequencing analysis for determining population structure of finger millet germplasm of diverse origins. The plant genome 9(2):plantgenome2015-07. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2015.07.0058
Kumar A, Tomer V, Kaur A, Kumar V, Gupta K (2018) Millets: a solution to agrarian and nutritional challenges. Agric Food Secur 7(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-018-0183-3
Latha AM, Rao KV, Reddy VD (2005) Production of transgenic plants resistant to leaf blast disease in finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.). Plant Sci 169(4):657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.05.009
Li C, Yue J, Wu X, Xu C, Yu J (2014) An ABA-responsive DRE-binding protein gene from Setaria italica, SiARDP, the target gene of SiAREB, plays a critical role under drought stress. J Exp Bot 65(18):5415–5427. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru302
Li J, Li X, Yang Q, Luo Y, Gong X, Zhang W, Feng B (2019) Proteomic changes in the grains of foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beau) under drought stress. Span J Agric Res 17(2):e0802–e0802. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2019172-14300
Li C, Wang G, Li H, Wang G, Ma J, Zhao X, Yao L (2021a) High-depth resequencing of 312 accessions reveals the local adaptation of foxtail millet. Theor Appl Genet 134(5):1303–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03760-4
Li J, Wang Y, Wang L, Zhu J, Deng J, Tang R, Chen G (2021b) Integration of transcriptomic and proteomic analyses for finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] in response to drought stress. PLoS One 16(2):e0247181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247181
Li W, Wen L, Chen Z, Zhang Z, Pang X, Deng Z, Liu T, Guo Y (2021c) Study on metabolic variation in whole grains of four proso millet varieties reveals metabolites important for antioxidant properties and quality traits. Food Chem 357:129791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129791
Li X, Gao J, Song J, Guo K, Hou S, Wang X, He Q, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Tang J (2022) Multi-omics analyses of 398 foxtail millet accessions reveal genomic regions associated with domestication, metabolite traits, and anti-inflammatory effects. Mol Plant 15(8):1367–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2022.07.003
Liang K, Liang S, Zhu H (2020) Comparative proteomics analysis of the effect of selenium treatment on the quality of foxtail millet. Lwt 131:109691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109691
Lin CS, Hsu CT, Yang LH, Lee LY, Fu JY, Cheng QW, Shih MC (2018) Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: from single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotechnol J 16(7):1295–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12870
Liu Y, Feng X, Xu Y, Yu J, Ao G, Peng Z, Zhao Q (2009) Overexpression of millet ZIP-like gene (SiPf40) affects lateral bud outgrowth in tobacco and millet. Plant Physiol Biochem 47(11-12):1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.08.007
Liu Y, Wang Z, Wu X, Zhu J, Luo H, Tian D, Jing HC (2021) SorGSD: updating and expanding the sorghum genome science database with new contents and tools. Biotechnol Biofuels 14(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02016-7
Luo H, Zhao W, Wang Y, Xia Y, Wu X, Zhang L, Jing HC (2016) SorGSD: a sorghum genome SNP database. Biotechnol Biofuels 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0415-8
Mace ES, Tai S, Gilding EK, Li Y, Prentis PJ, Bian L, Wang J (2013) Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa’s indigenous cereal crop sorghum. Nat Commun 4(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3320
Mahalakshmi S, Christopher GSB, Reddy TP, Rao KV, Reddy VD (2006) Isolation of a cDNA clone (PcSrp) encoding serine-rich-protein from Porteresia coarctata T. and its expression in yeast and finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) affording salt tolerance. Planta 224(2):347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0218-4
Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard M (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4):1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819
Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA (2007) Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res 17(2):240–248. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5681207
Nah G, Im JH, Kim JW, Park HR, Yook MJ, Yang TJ, Kim DS (2015) Uncovering the differential molecular basis of adaptive diversity in three Echinochloa leaf transcriptomes. PLoS One 10(8):e0134419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134419
National Research Council (1996) Lost crops of Africa: volume I: grains. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2305
Ngom B, Mamati E, Goudiaby MF, Kimatu J, Sarr I, Diouf D, Kane NA (2018) Methylation analysis revealed salicylic acid affects pearl millet defense through external cytosine DNA demethylation. J Plant Interact 13(1):288–293
Ott A, Liu S, Schnable JC, Yeh CTE, Wang KS, Schnable PS (2017) tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing enables reliable genotyping of heterozygous loci. Nucleic Acids Res 45(21):e178–e178. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx853
Pan J, Li Z, Wang Q, Garrell AK, Liu M, Guan Y, Liu W (2018) Comparative proteomic investigation of drought responses in foxtail millet. BMC Plant Biol 18(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1533-9
Pan J, Li Z, Dai S, Ding H, Wang Q, Li X, Liu W (2020) Integrative analyses of transcriptomics and metabolomics upon seed germination of foxtail millet in response to salinity. Sci Rep 10(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70520-1
Pandey S, Singh A, Parida SK, Prasad M (2022) Combining speed breeding with traditional and genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Plant Breed 141(3):301–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13012
Parvathi MS, Nataraja KN, Reddy YA, Naika MB, Gowda MV (2019) Transcriptome analysis of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) reveals unique drought responsive genes. J Genet 98(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-019-1087-0
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Rokhsar DS (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nat 457(7229):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07723
Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2012) Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One 7(2):e32253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032253
Puranik S, Sahu PP, Beynon S, Srivastava RK, Sehgal D, Ojulong H, Yadav R (2020) Genome-wide association mapping and comparative genomics identifies genomic regions governing grain nutritional traits in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.). Plants, People, Planet 2(6):649–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10120
Rahman H, Jagadeeshselvam N, Valarmathi R, Sachin B, Sasikala R, Senthil N, Muthurajan R (2014) Transcriptome analysis of salinity responsiveness in contrasting genotypes of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) through RNA-sequencing. Plant Mol Biol 85(4):485–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-014-0199-4
Rajput SG, Santra DK, Schnable J (2016) Mapping QTLs for morpho-agronomic traits in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Mol Breed 36(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0460-4
Ramegowda Y, Venkategowda R, Jagadish P, Govind G, Hanumanthareddy RR, Makarla U, Guligowda SA (2013) Expression of a rice Zn transporter, OsZIP1, increases Zn concentration in tobacco and finger millet transgenic plants. Plant Biotechnol Rep 7(3):309–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-012-0264-x
Reddy PS, Dhaware MG, Sivasakthi K, Divya K, Nagaraju M, Cindhuri KS, Kishor PBK, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma KK (2022) Pearl millet aquaporin gene PgPIP2; 6 improves abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Front Plant Sci 13:133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.820996
Renganathan VG, Vanniarajan C, Karthikeyan A, Ramalingam J (2020) Barnyard millet for food and nutritional security: current status and future research direction. Front Genet 11:500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00500
Rhoné B, Defrance D, Berthouly-Salazar C, Mariac C, Cubry P, Couderc M, Vigouroux Y (2020) Pearl millet genomic vulnerability to climate change in West Africa highlights the need for regional collaboration. Nat Commun 11(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19066-4
Roscoe T, Tsai YC, Wu HP, Yue-ie CH (2018) Taiwan oil millet: an oil-rich orphan cereal. In: Plant and Animal Genome XXVI Conference (January 13-17, 2018). PAG
Ruperao P, Thirunavukkarasu N, Gandham P, Selvanayagam S, Govindaraj M, Nebie B, Rathore A (2021) Sorghum pan-genome explores the functional utility for genomic-assisted breeding to accelerate the genetic gain. Front Plant Sci 12:963. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.666342
Sasaki T (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nat 436(7052):793–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03895
Satyavathi CT, Ambawat S, Khandelwal V, Srivastava RK (2021) Pearl millet: a climate-resilient nutricereal for mitigating hidden hunger and provide nutritional security. Front Plant Sci 12:659938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.659938
Scheben A, Batley J, Edwards D (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application. Plant Biotechnol J 15(2):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12645
Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Jackson SA (2010) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nat 463(7278):178–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08670
Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Presting GG (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Sci 326(5956):1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178534
Sehgal D, Rajaram V, Armstead IP, Vadez V, Yadav YP, Hash CT, Yadav RS (2012) Integration of gene-based markers in a pearl millet genetic map for identification of candidate genes underlying drought tolerance quantitative trait loci. BMC Plant Biol 12(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-9
Sen S, Kundu S, Dutta SK (2016) Proteomic analysis of JAZ interacting proteins under methyl jasmonate treatment in finger millet. Plant Physiol Biochem 108:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.033
Serba DD, Yadav RS (2016) Genomic tools in pearl millet breeding for drought tolerance: status and prospects. Front Plant Sci 7:1724. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01724
Severin AJ, Woody JL, Bolon YT, Joseph B, Diers BW, Farmer AD, Shoemaker RC (2010) RNA-Seq Atlas of Glycine max: a guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol 10(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-160
Shi J, Ma X, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Liu M, Huang L, Lai J (2019) Chromosome conformation capture resolved near complete genome assembly of broomcorn millet. Nat Commun 10(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07876-6
Shi W, Yue L, Guo J, Wang J, Yuan X, Dong S, Guo P (2020) Identification and evolution of C4 photosynthetic pathway genes in plants. BMC Plant Biol 20(1):1–5
Shinde H, Tanaka K, Dudhate A, Tsugama D, Mine Y, Kamiya T, Takano T (2018) Comparative de novo transcriptomic profiling of the salinity stress responsiveness in contrasting pearl millet lines. Environ Exp Bot 155:619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.07.008
Singh M, Metwal M, Kumar VA, Kumar A (2016) Identification and molecular characterization of 48 kDa calcium binding protein as calreticulin from finger millet (Eleusine coracana) using peptide mass fingerprinting and transcript profiling. J Sci Food Agric 96(2):672–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7139
Smartt J, Simmonds NW (1995) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical ISBN:0-582-08643-4
Sood P, Pandey S, Prasad M (2021) Biotechnological advances and advanced mutation breeding techniques for crop plants. In: Crop Improvement. CRC Press, pp 139–165 ISBN9781003099079
Srivastava RK, Singh RB, Pujarula VL, Bollam S, Pusuluri M, Chellapilla TS, Gupta R (2020) Genome-wide association studies and genomic selection in pearl millet: advances and prospects. Front Genet 10:1389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01389
Sun M, Huang D, Zhang A, Khan I, Yan H, Wang X, Huang L (2020) Transcriptome analysis of heat stress and drought stress in pearl millet based on Pacbio full-length transcriptome sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 20(1):1–15
Tamhane VA, Sant SS, Jadhav AR, War AR, Sharma HC, Jaleel A, Kashikar AS (2021) Label-free quantitative proteomics of Sorghum bicolor reveals the proteins strengthening plant defense against insect pest Chilo partellus. Proteome Sci 19(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-021-00173-z
Tao Y, Luo H, Xu J, Cruickshank A, Zhao X, Teng F, Mace E (2021) Extensive variation within the pan-genome of cultivated and wild sorghum. Nat Plants 7(6):766–773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00925-x
Tuberosa R (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era. Front Physiol 3:347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00347
Varoquaux N, Cole B, Gao C, Pierroz G, Baker CR, Patel D, Purdom E (2019) Transcriptomic analysis of field-droughted sorghum from seedling to maturity reveals biotic and metabolic responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(52):27124–27132. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907500116
Varshney RK, Shi C, Thudi M, Mariac C, Wallace J, Qi P, Xu X (2017) Pearl millet genome sequence provides a resource to improve agronomic traits in arid environments. Nat Biotechnol 35(10):969–976. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3943
Veeranagamallaiah G, Jyothsnakumari G, Thippeswamy M, Reddy PCO, Surabhi GK, Sriranganayakulu G, Sudhakar C (2008) Proteomic analysis of salt stress responses in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L. cv. Prasad) seedlings. Plant Sci 175(5):631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.06.017
Velazco JG, Jordan DR, Mace ES, Hunt CH, Malosetti M, Van Eeuwijk FA (2019) Genomic prediction of grain yield and drought-adaptation capacity in sorghum is enhanced by multi-trait analysis. Front Plant Sci 10:997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00997
Vetriventhan M, Azevedo VC, Upadhyaya HD, Nirmalakumari A, Kane-Potaka J, Anitha S, Tonapi VA (2020) Genetic and genomic resources, and breeding for accelerating improvement of small millets: current status and future interventions. Nucleus 63(3):217–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-020-00322-3
Wallace JG, Upadhyaya HD, Vetriventhan M, Buckler ES, Tom Hash C, Ramu P (2015) The genetic makeup of a global barnyard millet germplasm collection. The Plant Genome 8(1):2014–2010. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0067
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484
Wang B, Jiao Y, Chougule K, Olson A, Huang J, Llaca V, Ware (2021) Pan-genome analysis in sorghum highlights the extent of genomic variation and sugarcane aphid resistance genes. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.03.424980
Wang T, Lu Q, Song H, Hu N, Wei Y, Li P, Liu Y, Zhao Z, Liu J, Zhang B, Peng R (2021b) DNA methylation and RNA-sequencing analysis show epigenetic function during grain filling in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Front Plant Sci 12:741415
Wang T, Xing L, Song H, Wei Y, Li P, Lu Q, Hu N, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Liu J, Zhang B (2023) Large-scale metabolome analysis reveals dynamic changes of metabolites during foxtail millet grain filling. Food Res Int 165:112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112516
Wei W, Li S, Wang Y, Wang B, Fan G, Zeng Q, Zhao Z (2021) Metabolome-based genome-wide association study provides genetic insights into the natural variation of foxtail millet. Front Plant Sci 12:665530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.665530
Weng Q, Song X, Zhao Y, Yuan J, Dong Z, Zhao Z, Liu Y (2020) Proteomic profiling of foxtail millet hybrid Zhangzagu10 and its parent lines using iTRAQ-based technique. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 29(3):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-020-00551-2
Xu BQ, Gao XL, Gao JF, Jing LI, Pu Y, Feng BL (2019) Transcriptome profiling using RNA-seq to provide insights into foxtail millet seedling tolerance to short-term water deficit stress induced by PEG-6000. J Integr Agric 18(11):2457–2471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62576-1
Yadav CB, Pandey G, Muthamilarasan M, Prasad M (2018) Epigenetics and epigenomics of plants. Plant Genet Mol Biol 164:237–261
Yadav CB, Srivastava RK, Gangashetty PI, Yadav R, Mur LA, Yadav RS (2021) Metabolite diversity and metabolic genome-wide marker association studies (Mgwas) for health benefiting nutritional traits in pearl millet grains. Cells 10(11):3076. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113076
Yamaguchi H, Utano AYA, Yasuda K, Yano A, Soejima A (2005) A molecular phylogeny of wild and cultivated Echinochloa in East Asia inferred from non-coding region sequences of trnT-L-F. Weed Biol Manag 5(4):210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00185.x
Yang X, Wan Z, Perry L, Lu H, Wang Q, Zhao C, Ge Q (2012) Early millet use in northern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(10):3726–3730. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115430109
Yang Z, Zhang H, Li X, Shen H, Gao J, Hou S, Zhang B, Mayes S, Bennett M, Ma J, Wu C (2020) A mini foxtail millet with an Arabidopsis-like life cycle as a C4 model system. Nat Plants 6(9):1167–1178
Ye CY, Wu D, Mao L, Jia L, Qiu J, Lao S, Fan L (2020) The genomes of the allohexaploid Echinochloa crus-galli and its progenitors provide insights into polyploidization-driven adaptation. Mol Plant 13(9):1298–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.07.001
Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178(1):539–551. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.074245
Yue H, Wang L, Liu H, Yue W, Du X, Song W, Nie X (2016) De novo assembly and characterization of the transcriptome of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) for gene discovery and marker development. Front Plant Sci 7:1083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01083
Zhang G, Liu X, Quan Z, Cheng S, Xu X, Pan S, Wang J (2012) Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol 30(6):549–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2195
Zou C, Li L, Miki D, Li D, Tang Q, Xiao L, Zhang H (2019) The genome of broomcorn millet. Nat Commun 10(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08409-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Banshidhar: Wrote the introduction, Saurabh Pandey: Prepared the table and wrote Section 4. Priyanka Jaiswal: Prepare Table 1 and Table 2; Khem Raj Meena: Draw the figure and prepared Table 3; Satish Kumar Singh and Mithilesh Kumar Singh; edited the manuscript; and Ashutosh Singh: conceptualized and outlined, structured and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors are aware and agree to publish this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Banshidhar, Pandey, S., Singh, A. et al. The potentialities of omics resources for millet improvement. Funct Integr Genomics 23, 210 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-01149-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-023-01149-2