Abstract
The extraordinary biodiversity of tropical regions has attracted many researchers. Despite an increasing number of genome size (GS) estimations, those of tropic flora remain poorly explored. In this study, we applied the glycerol-preserved nuclei protocol for GS estimation in the field conditions of a tropical rainforest in Brunei Darussalam, northern Borneo. Samples were prepared in the field following this protocol and subjected to the flow cytometry analysis in the laboratory approximately 1 month later. The glycerol-preserved nuclei protocol enabled us to perform GS estimations of thirty taxa of Euphorbiaceae s.l. (twenty taxa of Euphorbiaceae and ten taxa of Phyllanthaceae family, respectively), all representing first estimates of GS for respective taxa. We found 5.09-fold overall variation in GS, with the lowest value in Croton sp. (2C = 0.97 pg) and the highest value in Aporosa elmeri (2C = 4.94 pg). The vast majority of species presented very small GS (77%), while 23% of the species had small GS. Using available data of Euphorbiaceae s.l. from the Plant DNA C-values database, we also tested the correlations of GS with climate (tropical vs. temperate) and growth form (woody vs. herbaceous). Tropical taxa of Euphorbiaceae s.l. (incl. Euphorbiaceae s.s. and Phyllanthaceae) have significantly smaller GS values than temperate ones. No significant difference in GS between woody and herbaceous taxa was detected.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The rise of the plant flow cytometry brings many benefits to the community of botanists and enables the expansion of its knowledge. Its development represents a huge step forward in this sense, especially due to its simplicity, speed, thriftiness to plants, accuracy and efficiency (e.g. Marie and Brown 1993; Doležel et al. 2007; Greilhuber et al. 2007; Bourge et al. 2018, and references therein). Nowadays, the FCM method is the most common way to estimation of DNA-ploidy level and nuclear genome size (GS), i.e. quantification of the DNA amount in cell nuclei (e.g. Doležel and Bartoš 2005; Doležel et al. 2007; Greilhuber et al. 2007). As a basic genome characteristic, GS associates with other biological traits of plant species. Over the years, GS variability has been shown to have significant consequences at different levels (see Leitch and Bennett 2007). For example, it may be helpful in species delimitation or hybrid identification (e.g. Mahelka et al. 2005; Prančl et al. 2018).
Although knowledge of the nuclear DNA amount of angiosperms has increased rapidly in the last decades, it remains underrepresented for tropical woody plants (cf. Leitch et al. 2019). Estimation of GS for tropical woody plants is limited mainly by the prerequisite of fresh plant material for FCM analyses (Doležel and Bartoš 2005; Greilhuber et al. 2007), consequently hindering investigation of samples from distant and remote tropical localities. Additionally, well-developed FCM facilities are concentrated mainly in temperate climatic belt of the northern hemisphere (Bennett and Leitch 2005; Kolář et al. 2012; Šmarda et al. 2019), while tropical regions that are often distant, difficult to access and with considerably less developed FCM facilities remain insufficiently explored (cf. Leitch et al. 2019). Alternative approaches to substitute fresh samples include collection of seeds and growing plants close to the FCM facility (Suda et al. 2005), use of dormant seeds for DNA content estimation (Sliwinska et al. 2005), analysis of desiccated (Suda and Trávníček 2006a, b) or frozen plant tissue (e.g. Cires et al. 2009), and preservation of plant nuclei in ice-cold buffer with glycerol (Kolář et al. 2012). However, seeds of tropical woody plants are usually unavailable or are difficult to access. Silica-dried or frozen samples stained with propidium iodide yield histograms with much lower resolution due to degradation of DNA (Nsabimana and Van Staden 2006; Suda and Trávníček 2006a; Suda et al. 2007) and freezing also reduces the number of nuclei (Nsabimana and Van Staden 2006). Therefore, glycerol-treated samples seem to be a viable option for larger analyses. This rather neglected protocol introduced by Kolář et al. (2012) allows sample preparation from leaf tissue in field conditions and storage of samples for several weeks.
The aim of this study was to apply the glycerol-preserved nuclei protocol (Kolář et al. 2012) for GS estimation of selected tropical woods in Brunei Darussalam, northern Borneo. Specifically, we focused on tree species of Euphorbiaceae s.l. because: (1) it is one of the most common families at the studied locality (Hédl et al. 2009); (2) no previous GS values were available for the majority of tropical taxa of this family (Leitch et al. 2019); (3) variation of chromosome numbers including polyploidy was observed (Hans 1973); and finally, (4) most sampled species were represented by trees of lower heights allowing ease of leaf collection. Using our data and available records from the Plant DNA C-values database (Leitch et al. 2019), we tested whether (1) tropical species of Euphorbiaceae s.l. have smaller GS than temperate ones, and (2) woody species of Euphorbiaceae s.l. have smaller GS than herbaceous ones.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Plant material was collected in the lowland mixed dipterocarp tropical rainforest in the Temburong District of Brunei Darussalam (northern Borneo, Southeast Asia) in February 2015 at Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre (KBFSC, 4° 32′ 48″ N, 115° 9′ 28″ E), a research field station of Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD). A total of 87 individuals (accessions) belonging to 34 taxa of the Euphorbiaceae and Phyllanthaceae families (21 and 13 species, respectively) were investigated (see Online Resource 3). The herbarium specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of the Palacký University in Olomouc (OL).
Flow cytometric standards (i.e., Zea mays L. ‘CE-777’, Secale cereale L. ‘Daňkovské’ and Vicia faba L. ‘Inovec’) were grown from seeds at the KBFSC. As their germination rate was rather low and the plants were rotting in hyper-humid conditions (up to 99% air humidity), Musa borneensis var. flavida (M. Hotta) Häkkinen & Meekiong growing in the area of KBFSC was also used as secondary reference standard.
Sample preparation and preservation
Samples were prepared following the simplified two-step protocol using Otto‘s buffers (Otto 1990; Doležel et al. 2007), modified for analysis of glycerol-preserved samples (Kolář et al. 2012). Briefly, ca. 0.5 cm2 of fresh leaf tissue and an appropriate amount of the internal standard were chopped with a razor blade in a Petri dish (Galbraith et al. 1983) containing 500 μl of ice-cold Otto I buffer (0.1 M citric acid, 0.5% Tween-20). Zea mays ‘CE-777’, 2C = 5.43 pg (Lysák and Doležel 1998) served as a primary standard, GS values of the other references were calibrated against Zea mays, i.e. Musa borneensis var. flavida (2C = 1.50 pg), Secale cereale ‘Daňkovské’ (2C = 15.43 pg) and Vicia faba ‘Inovec’ (2C = 25.85 pg). The solution was filtered through a 42-μm nylon mesh, mixed with 500 μl of 85% glycerol, gently shaken and stored in a freezer at approximately − 18 °C for a week (except for a 1-day transport to the Czech Republic when reusable cooling Polar Packs were used). For each accession, samples were prepared at least three times, usually with two different standards, resulting in 285 samples. For Musa, six samples were prepared with Zea mays ‘CE-777’ to calculate its GS. Before FCM analysis, samples were centrifuged for 3 min at 1090×g and after the supernatant was removed, the pellet was re-suspended in 100 μl of ice-cold Otto I buffer. After the 15 min incubation at room temperature, 1 ml of fresh Otto II buffer (0.4 M Na2HPO4·12H2O) was added. Then, the solution was supplemented with RNase and stained with propidium iodide (both at a concentration of 50 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). Finally, samples were run on the flow cytometer after 10 min of incubation at room temperature.
Genome size estimation
The absolute DNA content (genome size, GS; Greilhuber et al. 2005) was estimated by flow cytometry using a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a blue laser (488 nm, 20 mW, BD Accuri™; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). The fluorescence intensity of 5000 particles was recorded. Gates were set at positions 40,000–70,000 (of the total of 16,000,000 channels available) in all histograms to remove background noise. Genome size (2C-value; Greilhuber et al. 2005) was calculated by multiplying the 2C-value of the standard with the mean sample peak position/mean standard peak position ratio. Percentual variation between genome sizes of one accession established by FCM analysis (see above) was calculated as the (highest 2C-value–lowest 2C-value)/mean of 2C-values of all samples × 100 (Online Resource 1). The conversion from picograms (pg) to base pairs (bp) followed Doležel et al. (2003), using formula 1 pg DNA = 978 Mbp.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics of GS (i.e. mean and standard deviation of the mean) were calculated for each taxon. Because the data were not normally distributed, differences in GS between families were tested using a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. In addition, using our data supplemented with available data of Euphorbiaceae and Phyllanthaceae from the Plant DNA C-values Database (Leitch et al. 2019; Online Resource 2), differences in the variation of GS for tropical versus temperate species (based on phytogeographical affiliation of species’ primary range) and woody versus herbaceous species were also tested using a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. All analyses were performed both with and without outliers using NCSS 9 (Hintze 2013). Outliers were defined as exceeding the formula boxplot edge ± 3* interquartile range.
Results
Quality and error rate of the method
Using the protocol of glycerol-preserved nuclei (Kolář et al. 2012), flow cytometric analyses yielded histograms with distinct peaks in 79.30%, i.e. in 226 out of 285 prepared samples (Online Resource 1), therefore, we were able to determine GS values for 73 out of 87 plant individuals representing 30 out of 34 collected species. With a few exceptions, the measurement quality, as given by the coefficients of variation (CVs) of G1 peaks, was good. CV values ranged from 0.81 to 6.89% (mean 2.40 ± 0.93%, median 2.28%) and from 0.87 to 5.82% (mean 2.82 ± 1.04%, median 2.69%) for the standard and sample peak, respectively (for illustrative histograms see Fig. 1). The differences between lowest and highest flow cytometry run for one accession ranged between 0.17% in Hancea eucausta (Airy Shaw) S.E.C.Sierra, Kulju & Welzen and 7.82% in Elateriospermum tapos Blume (mean 3.59 ± 2.86%, median 3.20%). For most of the taxa (often viscous samples), it was impossible to meet a between-day fluctuation of < 2% (Doležel et al. 2007) and thus a higher between-day fluctuation threshold was considered acceptable (< 5%). However, for a few samples this threshold has been slightly exceeded (Online Resource 1).
GS estimations of Euphorbiaceae s.l.
In total, GS estimates for 73 plant individuals belonging to 30 taxa of Euphorbiaceae s.l., 20 taxa of Euphorbiaceae and 10 taxa of Phyllanthaceae, were determined (Table 1). For all sampled species, these are the first estimation of GS as no previous C-values were available.
Among the investigated species, GS varied 5.09-fold with an average of 2.46 pg (Fig. 2). The lowest GS was obtained for Croton sp. (2C = 0.97 ± 0.01 pg) and the highest one was for Aporosa elmeri Merr. (2C = 4.94 ± 0.11 pg). According to the GS categories defined by Leitch et al. (1998), 76.67% of the taxa have a very small GS (i.e. ≤ 1.4 pg/1C) and 23.33% have a small GS (i.e. ≤ 3.5 pg/1C, Table 1). No species with intermediate, large or very large GS were detected. Also, no significant difference of GS among families (χ2 = 1.716, P = 0.190; without outliers: χ2 = 2.371, P = 0.124; Fig. 2) was found. Within a species which has more individuals sampled, the GS variation fell within a narrow range (0.59–6.46%). Only in Macaranga hypoleuca (Rchb.f. & Zoll.) Müll.Arg., the variation of 14.01% was detected (see Table 1; Online Resource 1).
No GS data were obtained for four species, namely Aporosa falcifera Hook.f., Antidesma neurocarpum Miq., Antidesma sp. and Neoscortechinia kingii Pax & K.Hoffm (for more details see Online Resource 1).
Differences in GS in tropical versus temperate and woody versus herbaceous species
To test the differences in GS based on climate (tropical vs. temperate) and growth form (woody vs. herbaceous), available data from the Plant DNA C-values Database (Leitch et al. 2019) were used (see Online Resource 2). The comparison of GS between tropical and temperate species of Euphorbiaceae s.l. showed a significant difference with tropical taxa having smaller GS values (χ2 = 8.562, P = 0.003; without outliers (not significant): χ2 = 2.506, P = 0.113; Fig. 3a). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were detected in GS between woody and herbaceous species (χ2 = 2.029, P = 0.154; without outliers: χ2 = 2.300, P = 0.130; Fig. 3b). Considering the phylogeny of investigated taxa, we were able to test the variation in GS only among genera of the family Euphorbiaceae as the family Phyllanthaceae is in data set represented only by tropical, woody species (Fig. 3a, b) and no data for temperate and herbaceous taxa were available (Leitch et al. 2019). Within the Euphorbiaceae s.s., tropical taxa have significantly smaller GS (χ2 = 9.700, P = 0.002; without outliers: χ2 = 4.283, P = 0.038; Fig. 3a), whereas there is no significant difference based on growth form (χ2 = 2.417, P = 0.120; without outliers χ2 = 2.812, P = 0.094; Fig. 3b).
Discussion
Application of glycerol-preserved nuclei protocol in tropical rainforest
In this study, we investigated the GS values of selected tropical woods using the preservation of nuclear suspensions in ice-cold buffer with glycerol solution (Kolář et al. 2012). This methodological approach of sample preparation can be quite easily performed in the field and additionally, it allows long-term sample storage in the frozen state. Importantly, it provides estimates of nuclear DNA content that are highly comparable to those obtained using fresh material (Kolář et al. 2012). Although this method has been used for estimation of GS in laboratory conditions (Magauer et al. 2014; Frajman et al. 2015), it has only been field-tested by Kolář et al. (2012).
Several tropical plants from Papua New Guinea were also involved in the study of Kolář et al. (2012), including five species of the family Euphorbiaceae, with acceptable histograms using ice-cold glycerol solution in all but one species (Macaranga fallacina Pax & K.Hoffm.). In contrast, we obtained satisfactory results for all 10 Macaranga species sampled. However, several limitations of this approach for estimation of GS in the field remain. Firstly, a low temperature (− 18 °C) is required for samples in glycerol to remain as liquid (Kolář et al. 2012), which requires equipment (e.g. freezer) that is not always available in the field conditions. Second, sample preparation with internal standard requires prior knowledge about approximate GS to avoid overlapping of sample and standard peaks, and too long distance between sample and standard peaks (Doležel and Bartoš 2005; Doležel et al. 2007). Alternatively, samples can be prepared with several standards. Third, plants commonly used as internal standards in temperate belt (e.g. Doležel et al. 2007) could have considerably low germinability and growth in hyper-humid tropical climate as shown in our example. This problem can be solved by preparing a new set of standards for local non-laboratory conditions. Despite these limitations, the protocol proved to be efficient in our case and can be used for large scale studies of GS in the tropics.
Genome size and polyploidy in Euphorbiaceae s.l. from Brunei Darussalam
According to the GS categories defined by Leitch et al. (1998), all analysed species have a very small or small GS (Table 1). Similarly, very small or small GS were reported for other tropical taxa of Euphorbiaceae s.l., except of Hura crepitans L. with intermediate GS (Leitch et al. 2019; Online Resource 2). Combining our GS values together with data from the Plant C-values database (Leitch et al. 2019), we found tropical species to have significantly smaller GS than temperate ones (Fig. 3a). On the other hand, an assumed smaller GS among woody species compared to herbs were not confirmed (Fig. 3b). Generally, woody angiosperms have been predicted to possess a small GS with lower variance in comparison to herbaceous species (e.g. Ohri 2005; Beaulieu et al. 2008; Ohri 2015). Likewise, small GS varying more or less within a narrow range have been found within tropical hardwood (Ohri and Kumar 1986; Ohri 2002). In woody plants, larger GS may have a negative impact on the size of cambial cells and mechanical properties of woody tissues (Darlington 1937; Stebbins 1938, 1950) or on the size and density of stomata needed to transpiration and stomatal conductance (Beaulieu et al. 2008). Unfortunately, the knowledge of GS in woody angiosperms (and especially tropical ones) is still very sketchy (Leitch et al. 2019) and extensive studies except few (e.g. Chen et al. 2014) are almost lacking. An investigation of GS variation within the tree family Fagaceae revealed a small GS among its genera and detected larger GS within tropical groups in comparison to their temperate relatives (Chen et al. 2014) which is quite contrary to the situation we report here for Euphorbiaceae.
However, we cannot conclusively confirm the variation of GS within woody and herbaceous taxa since our results may be affected by the limited available dataset. We assume that a detailed study of the GS variation of both families (especially of the Euphorbiaceae s.s.) will lead to a better understanding of the GS evolution among various growth forms (incl. lianas, climbers or succulents) and across biotic zones. Especially for tropical, woody plants, which are not so much explored, it would greatly improve our knowledge. For example, GS study of tropical genus Dalbergia L.f. detected higher DNA amount within shrubs and woody climbers in comparison to their relative tree species (Hiremath and Nagasampige 2004).
From a global perspective, the lowest polyploid frequencies are found in the tropical and subtropical biomes (especially in tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests; Rice et al. 2019). Moreover, polyploids are considerably less frequent among perennial woods, which can be explained by different ecological and historical factors (Stebbins 1971). Nevertheless, the frequency of polyploidy among woody taxa still remains largely unknown, especially among tropical species. For example, no evidence of polyploidy was detected within the tree family Fagaceae (Chen et al. 2014). However, even among tropical woody species the occurrence of polyploidy has been documented, e.g. in Dipterocarpaceae (Ng et al. 2016), Fabaceae (Tosso et al. 2016; Donkpegan et al. 2017), Melastomataceae (Renner 1989; Almeda 1993; Brito et al. 2016) and Myrtaceae (Costa and Forni-Martins 2006).
According to our GS data, the occurrence of polyploidy can be considered in two analysed genera, Aporosa Blume and Glochidion J.R.Forst. & G.Forst., both from Phyllanthaceae family. In Aporosa, four species were analysed with one of them possessing twice as high GS value (Table 2) than the others. Unfortunately, almost no chromosomal data were published for this genus. Only chromosome counts are available for two Aporosa species from India, both with 2n = 52 (Mehra and Hans 1969; Elumalai 2013). For the family Phyllanthaceae, x = 13 appears to be the base chromosome number (e.g. Hans 1973; Webster 1994). Based on that, the published chromosome data correspond to tetraploids, which suggest the involvement of polyploidy in its evolution. Moreover, Aporosa belongs to the sister clade of the genus Bischofia Blume (Wurdack et al. 2004; Hoffmann et al. 2006), in which whole genome duplication (WGD) was discovered (Cai et al. 2017), indicating the possibility of polyploidy occurrence also in Aporosa. Similarly, in the genus Glochidion, one of the two analysed taxa possessed twice as high GS value as the other one (Table 2). For several Indian Glochidion species, chromosome numbers 2n = 52 were counted (Mehra and Hans 1969), likewise corresponding to tetraploids. Additionally, the incidence of WGD was recorded within the genus Sauropus Blume (Cai et al. 2017), the sister clade of the genus Glochidion (Wurdack et al. 2004; Hoffmann et al. 2006; Kathriarachchi et al. 2006), thus polyploidy could be more frequent among the members of the Sauropus clade. In addition, for Chinese G. puberum (L.) Hutch., 2n = 64 was reported (Hsu et al. 1994), indicating the occurrence of other chromosomal variations (aneuploidy, different basic chromosome number etc.). However, detailed study involving investigation of chromosome numbers is required for elucidation of GS evolution and possible polyploidy occurrence in Phyllanthaceae.
Based on the study of Hans (1970), polyploidy was also observed within the genus Antidesma L. belonging to the Phyllanthaceae family. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain any information about the GS of two sampled species of Antidesma, since all measurements failed.
Furthermore, the GS values for more than one species were also acquired for Baccaurea, Macaranga and Mallotus. Within the Baccaurea and Mallotus genera, only minor differences in GS (0.54 pg and 0.43 pg, respectively) were detected between sampled species, corresponding to intraspecific variation (Šmarda and Bureš 2010). In Macaranga, all species had very similar GS (mean 2C = 2.43 ± 0.20 pg; Table 1), with the exception of M. praestans Airy Shaw and M. lowii King ex Hook.f., which possessed a lower GS value (2C = 1.42 pg and 2C = 1.49 pg, respectively). These two species are the only studied taxa belonging to Macaranga sect. Pseudorottlera (Rchb.f. & Zoll. ex Zoll.) Pax & K.Hoffm., a basal sister lineage to the rest of Macaranga species (Kulju et al. 2007), suggesting the possible different base chromosome number. Unfortunately, no published chromosomal data are available for sampled taxa. Only for several Indian and one Hawaiian species, identical diploid chromosome number 2n = 22 was previously counted (Miller and Webster 1966; Mehra and Hans 1969; Devar 1981). In addition, in Macaranga hypoleuca, we detected the variation of 14% among analysed individuals, indicating the chromosome number variation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this study shows the applicability of glycerol-treated nuclear suspension (Kolář et al. 2012) for GS estimation in field conditions. For the first time, we determined GS for 20 taxa of Euphorbiaceae and 10 taxa of Phyllanthaceae family, respectively. Very small or small GS were determined in all studied taxa. Compared with the available data in Leitch et al. (2019), tropical species of Euphorbiaceae possessed smaller GS than temperate ones. No significant difference was detected between woody and herbaceous species. A comprehensive study, including a chromosome number investigation, will lead to better understanding of GS evolution of this group, and it will provide further insight into the variation of GS between various growth forms and across biomes. With a great range of life forms and almost cosmopolitan distribution (Webster 2014), the family Euphorbiaceae best fits to such kind of study. Furthermore, it will also contribute to the knowledge of GS in tropical woody angiosperms as it is abundant in tropical regions (Webster 2014).
Data availability
The data reported here are archived as supplemental material in Plant Systematics and Evolution.
References
Almeda F (1993) Pilocosta (Melastomataceae) revisited: a new species, polyploidy, and the base chromosome number of the genus. Novon 3:311–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3391374
Beaulieu JM, Leitch IJ, Patel S, Pendharkar A, Knight CA (2008) Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol 179:975–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x
Bennett MD, Leitch IJ (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: progress, problems and prospects. Ann Bot 95:45–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci003
Bourge M, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S (2018) Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genet Appl 2:1–12. https://doi.org/10.31383/ga.vol2iss2pp1-12
Brito VLG, Mori GM, Vigna BBZ, Azevedo-Silva M, Souza AM, Sazima M (2016) Genetic structure and diversity of populations of polyploid Tibouchina pulchra Cogn. (Melastomataceae) under different environmental conditions in extremes of an elevational gradient. Tree Genet Genomes 12:101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-1059-y
Cai L, Xi Z, Amorim AM, Sugumaran M, Rest JS, Liu L, Davic CC (2017) Widespread ancient whole genome duplications in Malpighiales coincide with Eocene global climatic upheaval. New Phytol 221:565–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15357
Chen S-C, Cannon CH, Kua C-S, Liu J-J, Galbraith DW (2014) Genome size variation in the Fagaceae and its implications for trees. Tree Genet Genomes 10:977–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0736-y
Cires E, Cuesta C, Peredo EL, Revilla MA, Prieto JAF (2009) Genome size variation and morphological differentiation within Ranunculus parnassifolius group (Ranunculaceae) from calcareous screes in the Northwest of Spain. Pl Syst Evol 281:193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0201-9
Costa IR, Forni-Martins ER (2006) Chromosome studies in species of Eugenia, Myrciaria and Plinia (Myrtaceae) from south-eastern Brazil. Aust J Bot 54:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT04199
Darlington CD (1937) Recent advances in cytology, 2nd edn. Churchill, London
Devar KV (1981) Reports by K. V. Devar. In Löve A (1981) Chromosome number reports LXXI. Taxon 30:506
Doležel J, Bartoš J (2005) Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot 95:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci005
Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J (2003) Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A 51:127–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10013
Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.310
Donkpegan ASL, Doucet J-L, Migliore J, Duminil J, Dainou K, Piñeiro R, Wieringa JJ, Champluvier D, Hardy OJ (2017) Evolution in African tropical trees displaying ploidy-habitat association: The genus Afzelia (Leguminosae). Molec Phylogen Evol 107:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.11.004
Elumalai R (2013) Biosystematical studies of some taxa of Euphorbiaceae. PhD Thesis, Annamalai University, Chidambarams
Frajman B, Rešetnik I, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Ehrendorfer F, Schönswetter P (2015) Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in Knautia (Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacoideae). BMC Evol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0425-y
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.1049
Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD (2005) The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot 95:255–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci019
Greilhuber J, Temsch EM, Loureiro JCM (2007) Nuclear DNA content measurement. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (eds) Flow cytometry with plant cells: analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610921.ch4
Hans AS (1970) Polyploidy in Antidesma (Euphorbiaceae). Caryologia 23:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1970.10796374
Hans AS (1973) Chromosomal conspectus of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon 22:591–636. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218637
Hédl R, Svátek M, Dančák M, Rodzay AW, Salleh MAB, Kamariah AS (2009) A new technique for inventory of permanent plots in tropical forests: a case study from lowland dipterocarp forest in Kuala Belalong, Brunei Darussalam. Blumea 54:124–130. https://doi.org/10.3767/000651909X475482
Hintze J (2013) NCSS 9. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. Available at: www.ncss.com
Hiremath SC, Nagasampige MH (2004) Genome size variation and evolution in some species of Dalbergia Linn.f. (Fabaceae). Caryologia 57:367–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2004.10589418
Hoffmann P, Kathriarachchi H, Wurdack KJ (2006) A phylogenetic classification of Phyllanthaceae (Malpighiales; Euphorbiaceae sensu lato). Kew Bull 61:37–53
Hsu P, Weng R, Siro K (1994) New chromosome counts of some dicots in the Sino-Japanese region and their systematics and evolutionary significance. J Syst Evol 32:411–418
Kathriarachchi H, Samuel R, Hoffmann P, Mlinarec J, Wurdack KJ, Ralimanana H, Stuessy TF, Chase MW (2006) Phylogenetics of tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae; Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) based on nrITS and plastid matK DNA sequence data. Amer J Bot 93:637–655. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.4.637
Kolář F, Lučanová M, Těšitel J, Loureiro J, Suda J (2012) Glycerol-treated nuclear suspensions—an efficient preservation method for flow cytometric analysis of plant samples. Chromosome Res 20:303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-012-9277-0
Kulju KK, Sierra SE, Draisma SG, Samuel R, Welzen PC (2007) Molecular phylogeny of Macaranga, Mallotus, and related genera (Euphorbiaceae s.s.): insights from plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data. Amer J Bot 94:1726–1743. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.10.1726
Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (2007) Genome size and its uses: the impact of Flow Cytometry. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (eds) Flow Cytometry with Plant Cells. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610921.ch7
Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD (1998) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot 82:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0783
Leitch IJ, Johnston E, Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Bennett MD (2019) Plant DNA C-values Database (Release 7.1). Available at: https://cvalues.science.kew.org/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020
Lysák MA, Doležel J (1998) Estimation of nuclear DNA content in Sesleria (Poaceae). Caryologia 51:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1998.10589127
Magauer M, Schönswetter P, Jang T-S, Frajman B (2014) Disentangling relationships within the disjunctly distributed Alyssum ovirense/A. wulfenianum group (Brassicaceae), including description of a novel species from the north-eastern Alps. Bot J Linn Soc 176:486–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12214
Mahelka V, Suda J, Jarolímová V, Trávníček P, Krahulec F (2005) Genome size discriminates between closely related taxa Elytrigia repens and E. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) and their hybrid. Folia Geobot 40:367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02804286
Marie D, Brown SC (1993) A cytometric exercise in Plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for 70 species. Biol Cell 78:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0248-4900(93)90113-S
Mehra PN, Hans AS (1969) Reports by P. N. Mehra and A. S. Hans. In: Löve A (ed) IOPB Chromosome number reports XXI. Taxon 18, pp 312–315
Miller KI, Webster GL (1966) Chromosome numbers in the Euphorbiaceae. Brittonia 18:372–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2805153
Ng CH, Lee SL, Tnah LH, Ng KKS, Lee CT, Madon M (2016) Genome size variation and evolution in Dipterocarpaceae. Pl Ecol Diversity 9:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2016.1267274
Nsabimana A, Van Staden J (2006) Ploidy investigation of bananas (Musa spp.) from the National Banana Germplasm Collection at Rubona-Rwanda by flow cytometry. S African J Bot 72:302–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2005.10.004
Ohri D (2002) Genome size variation in some tropical hardwoods. Biol Pl 45:455–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016290222360
Ohri D (2005) Climate and growth form: The consequences for genome size in plants. Pl Biol 7:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-865878
Ohri D (2015) How small and constrained is the genome size of angiosperm woody species. Silvae Genet 64:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2015-0002
Ohri D, Kumar A (1986) Nuclear DNA amounts in some tropical hardwoods. Caryologia 39:303–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1986.10797792
Otto F (1990) DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Crissman HA, Darzynkiewicz Z (eds) Methods in cell biology 33. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60516-6
Prančl J, Koutecký P, Trávníček P, Jarolímová V, Lučanová M, Koutecká E, Kaplan Z (2018) Cytotype variation, cryptic diversity and hybridization in Ranunculus sect. Batrachium revealed by flow cytometry and chromosome numbers. Preslia 90:195–223. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2018.195
Renner SS (1989) A survey of reproductive biology in neotropical Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 76:496–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399497
Rice A, Šmarda P, Novosolov M, Drori M, Glick L, Sabath N, Meiri S, Belmaker J, Mayrose I (2019) The global biogeography of polyploid plants. Nat Ecol Evol 3:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0787-9
Sliwinska E, Zielinska E, Jedrzejczyk I (2005) Are seeds suitable for flow cytometric estimation of plant genome size? Cytometry A 64A:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20122
Šmarda P, Bureš P (2010) Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82:41–61
Šmarda P, Knápek O, Březinová A, Horová L, Grulich V, Danihelka J, Veselý P, Šmerda J, Rotreklová O, Bureš P (2019) Genome sizes and genomic guanine + cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. Preslia 91:117–142. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2019.117
Stebbins GL (1938) Cytological characteristics Aassociated with the different growth habits in the dicotyledons. Amer J Bot 25:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1938.tb09203.x
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Stebbins GL (1971) Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London
Suda J, Trávníček P (2006a) Estimation of relative nuclear DNA content in dehydrated plant tissues by flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Cytom 38:7.30.1–7.30.14. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0730s38
Suda J, Trávníček P (2006b) Reliable DNA ploidy determination in dehydrated tissues of vascular plants by DAPI flow cytometry—new prospects for plant research. Cytometry A 69A:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20253
Suda J, Kyncl T, Jarolímová V (2005) Nuclear DNA amounts in Macaronesian angiosperms: forty percent of Canarian endemic flora completed. Pl Syst Evol 252:215–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-004-0280-6
Suda J, Kron P, Husband BC, Trávníček P (2007) Flow cytometry and ploidy: applications in plant systematics, ecology and evolutionary biology. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (eds) Flow Cytometry with Plant Cells. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, pp 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610921.ch5
Tosso F, Doucet J-L, Kaymak E, Daïnou K, Duminil J, Hardy OJ (2016) Microsatellite development for the genus Guibourtia (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae) reveals diploid and polyploid species. Appl Pl Sci 4:1600029. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600029
Webster GL (1994) Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 81:3–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399908
Webster GL (2014) Euphorbiaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed.) Flowering Plants. Eudicots. Malpighiales. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39417-1
Wurdack KJ, Hoffmann P, Samuel R, de Bruijn A, van der Bank M, Chase MW (2004) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Phyllanthaceae (Phyllanthoideae pro parte, Euphorbiaceae sensu lato) using plastid RBCL DNA sequences. Amer J Bot 91:1882–1900. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.11.1882
Acknowledgements
We thank Universiti Brunei Darussalam for permission to conduct research at the Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre, and the Biodiversity Research and Innovation Centre, Ministry of Primary Resources and Tourism for export permit. We thank staff of the Kuala Belalong Field Studies Centre for their support during our stay at KBFSC. Work of LK and MH was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of Palacký University IGA PrF-2019-004, IGA PrF-2020-003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Martin A. Lysak.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Information on electronic supplementary material
Information on electronic supplementary material
Online Resource 1. Detailed results of genome size measurements using flow-cytometry. Genome size (2C), holoploid genome size (1C), percentual intraspecific genome size variation and genome size category according to Leitch et al. (1998) of investigated taxa.
Online Resource 2. List of the data taken from the Plant C-values Database (Leitch et al. 2019) with genome size (2C), holoploid genome size (1C), and original reference cited in the C-values Database to each record and growth form and biome to each taxon.
Online Resource 3. List of localities sampled of collected plant material. Tree no. indicate exact tree in ecological plot. Herbarium specimens are deposited in the Herbarium of the Palacký University in Olomouc (OL).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kobrlová, L., Dančák, M., Sukmaria Sukri, R. et al. Application of glycerol-preserved nuclei protocol for genome size estimation in the field conditions of a tropical rainforest. Plant Syst Evol 306, 73 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01702-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01702-7