Abstract
We investigate the classical problem of the wind in the steady atmospheric Ekman layer. For three cases of eddy viscosities which are the related fractional and integer powers functions with respect to height, we construct the explicit solutions, and write the formulas for the surface deflection angle, respectively. Our results extend the corresponding results in Roberti (Appl Anal 101:5528–5536, 2022) and Guan et al. (Appl Anal, 2022).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Researches related to geophysical fluid dynamics have attracted more and more attention from scholars in recent years, such as the recent results on the general governing equations of geophysical fluid flows in the ocean [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], and in the atmosphere [8,9,10,11]. The dynamics of the atmospheric boundary-layer is very important in applications, such as weather prediction, climate studies, air pollution, dewfall, frost formation and so on.
The Ekman layer theory is of great significance for understanding the dynamics of atmospheric boundary layer, and it applies to many areas, including the bottom of the atmosphere(near the Earth’s surface and the Ocean), the bottom of the Ocean (near the Ocean flat) and surface waters (near the air-sea interface). The classic Ekman theory [12] requires a balance among the Coriolis force, the pressure gradient force and the frictional force (the dominant momentum balance for steady wind-driven currents is between the wind stress, frictional forces and the Coriolis force) [13,14,15,16]. But in equatorial areas, the Coriolis effect vanishes, the nonlinear effects have to be accounted for [17,18,19,20]. By assuming a constant vertical eddy viscosity and ignoring the nonlinear effects, the Ekman spiral solution is established. It is the first explicit solution of the Ekman model, three predictions are obtained from this solution, two of which have been confirmed by some data in non-equatorial regions. However, the other prediction of the three, in the aspect of the deflection angle of the surface flow from the wind direction, there is a big difference between the forecast and the actual data [21,22,23,24]. This difference is naturally attributed to the assumption of constant vorticity. For the past few years, there exist some results about explicit solutions for non-constant eddy viscosity, whether in the context of atmospheric flows [8,9,10, 25,26,27,28] or regarding wind-generated ocean currents [29,30,31,32,33,34].
In [10], the authors considered the atmospheric Ekman layer with height-dependent eddy viscosities which are some quadratic or rational power functions, they obtained the new solutions respectively. The authors in [33] constructed an explicit solution in the case of a piecewise-constant eddy viscosity with two distinct values, and investigated how variations in the ratio of the two values affect the deflection angle at the surface, while the author in [34] considered non-equatorial steady Ocean currents with a three-value constant eddy viscosity, an explicit solution and a formula for the surface deflection angle are constructed. In [35], the authors investigated transients in the oceanic Ekman layer, in the presence of time-varying winds, they solved the problem by means of Laplace transforms, and gave an explicit formula for the surface current. The authors in [36] discussed the atmospheric Ekman layer with two types of eddy viscosities, in the case of quadratic function, an explicit solution was constructed by using different method from [31], and in the case of piece-constant in two layers, the solution and a formula for the surface deflection angle were obtained.
In this paper, we focus on the atmospheric Ekman flows with three cases of the eddy coefficient which are the fractional and integer powers functions with respect to height, we constructed the explicit solutions and gave the formulas for the surface deflection angle, respectively. These results will be an extension of the corresponding results in [34, 36].
2 The governing equations
The Ekman layer is governed by the following equations in the non-equatorial region of the Northern Hemisphere:
which is the standard \(f-\)plane Ekman-flow for variable eddy viscosity, under adequate heat forcing [37, 38]. Here u, v are the components of the wind in the x and y directions, \(u_{g}\) and \(v_{g}\) are the corresponding constant geostrophic wind components, \(f=2\Omega \sin \theta \) is the Coriolis parameter at the fixed latitude \(\theta \) (\(\theta \in (0, \frac{\pi }{2}]\) denotes the angle of latitude in right-handed rotating spherical coordinates) and k is the eddy viscosity coefficient.
We use the following boundary conditions for (1) as
where \(z_{0}\) is called the roughness height. Let \(\Psi =(u-u_{g})+i(v-v_{g})\), and from (1), we will get
the boundary conditions (2) and (3) become
and
we can write (4) as
we integrate this equation and obtain
we denote
the Eq. (7) will become
If \(k=\)constant, we have
where \(\gamma =\sqrt{\frac{f}{2k}}.\) However, if \(k\ne \)constant, then solving (1) will be more interesting and complex, here, we consider the following cases.
3 Main results
3.1 Case (I)
We assume
then (9) can be written in the form
Thus we have the following result.
Theorem 3.1
The solution of (4) with (5) and (6) can be expressed by the following formula
here
where
and
Proof
We assume
where A and B are constants which are determined later.
From (14), we have
and
thus \(\omega (z)\) satisfied the (9), and \(\Psi (z)\) satisfied the (4) by using the definition of \(\omega (z)\).
From the conditions (5) and (6), we know that
and
by direct calculation, we complete the proof. \(\square \)
If we set
and
from Theorem 3.1, we have
using the definition of \(\Psi (z)\), we obtain
and
If we assume the geostrophic wind is purely zonal, that is \(v_{g}=0\), then we have
and
Now we set
and
We denote the angle between the wind vector at any height and the geostrophic vector by \(\beta (z)\), then we have
where
and
One can draw the graphs of \(\beta (z)\) for \(z_{0}=0.1\) m and \(z_{0}=0.2\) m, respectively, we find that \(\beta (z)\) decrease for all \(z>z_{0}\), which demonstrated on Figs. 1 and 2.
3.2 Case (II)
We consider an eddy viscosity k(z) given by
then the Eq. (9) will become
By following, the example 2.14, for the exponent \(\alpha =-\frac{12}{7}\), and the constant \(c=i\), we denote by \(q=\frac{1}{2}\alpha +1\), then we have \(q=\frac{1}{7}\), so \(\frac{1}{q}=7\) is an odd number, the general solution of (16) is the Cayley solution given by
so we have
The conditions (6) and (5) lead to
and
where
and
Thus from (18), we have
From the definition of the \(\Psi (z)\), we obtain
and
where
and
We denote the angle between the wind vector at any height and the geostrophic vector by \(\beta (z)\), that is
If we assume the geostrophic wind is purely zonal, that is \(v_{g}=0\), then we have
Now we set
and
we will get
The graphs of \(\beta (z)\) for \(z_{0}=0.2\) m and \(z_{0}=0.3\) m will be shown on Figs. 3 and 4, respectively, we find that \(\beta (z)\) decrease for all \(z>z_{0}\).
3.3 Case (III)
We consider an eddy viscosity k(z) given by
then the Eq. (9) will become
Let
and
using the chain rule, we have
and
By the direct calculation, (19) is reduced to
the general solution
is obtained for two arbitrary constants \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\). Using the definition of \(\omega (z)\) and (20), we obtain
The conditions (6) and (5) lead to
and
So we have
and
If we assume the geostrophic wind is purely zonal, that is \(v_{g}=0\), similar to the procedure discussed in Sect. 3.2, then we can obtain the formula for the angle between the wind vector at any height and the geostrophic vector by \(\beta (z)\).
Data availability
This manuscript has no associated data.
References
Miao, F., Fečkan, M., Wang, J.: Exact solution and instability for geophysical edge waves. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 21, 2447–2467 (2022)
Miao, F., Fečkan, M., Wang, J.: Constant vorticity water flows in the modified equatorial \(\beta \)-plane approximation. Monatsh. Math. 197, 517–527 (2022)
Wang, J., Fečkan, M., Zhang, W.: On the nonlocal boundary value problem of geophysical fluid flows. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 72, 1–18 (2021)
Zhang, W., Fečkan, M., Wang, J.: Positive solutions to integral boundary value problems from geophysical fluid flows. Monatsh. Math. 193, 901–925 (2020)
Chu, J., Ionescu-Kruse, D., Yang, Y.: Exact solution and instability for geophysical trapped waves at arbitrary latitude. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 39, 4399–4414 (2019)
Chu, J., Ionescu-Kruse, D., Yang, Y.: Exact solution and instability for geophysical waves with centripetal forces and at arbitrary latitude. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 21, 19 (2019)
Marynets, K.: On the modeling of the flow of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Monatsh. Math. 188, 561–565 (2019)
Marynets, K.: A Sturm-Liouville problem arising in the atmospheric boundary-layer dynamics. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 22, 41 (2020)
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: Atmospheric Ekman flows with variable eddy viscosity. Bound. Layer Meteor. 170, 395–414 (2019)
Ionescu-Kruse, D.: Analytical atmospheric Ekman-type solutions with height-dependent eddy viscosities. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 23, 18 (2021)
Lyons, T.: Variable eddy viscosities in the atmospheric boundary layer geostrophic wind-speed profiles. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 23, 43 (2021)
Ekman, V.W.: On the influence of the earth’s rotation on ocean-currents. Ark. Mat. Astron. Fys. 2, 1–52 (1905)
Holton, J.R.: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. Academic Press, New York (2004)
Marshall, J., Plumb, R.A.: Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamic, An Introduction. Academic Press, New York (2018)
Zdunkowski, W., Bott, A.: Dynamic of the Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Pedlosky, J.: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag Press, New York (1987)
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: Ekman-type solutions for shallow-water flows on a rotating sphere: a new perspective on a classical problem. Phys. Fluids 31, 021401 (2019)
Constantin, A., Ivanov, R.I.: Equatorial wave-current interactions. Comm. Math. Phys. 370, 1–48 (2019)
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: The dynamics of waves interacting with the Equatorial undercurrent. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 109, 311–358 (2015)
Ionescu-Kruse, D., Martin, C.I.: Periodic equatorial water flows from a Hamiltonian perspective. J. Differ. Equ. 262, 4451–4474 (2017)
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: On the nonlinear, three-dimensional structure of equatorial oceanic flows. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 49, 2029–2042 (2019)
Yoshikawa, Y., Masuda, A.: Seasonal variations in the speed factor and deflection angle of the wind-driven surface flow in the Tsushima Strait. J. Geophys. Res. 114, C12022 (2009)
Bressan, A., Constantin, A.: The deflection angle of surface ocean currents from the wind direction. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 7412–7420 (2019)
Grisogono, B.: The angle of the near-surface wind-turning in weakly stable boundary layers. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 700–708 (2011)
Guan, Y., Wang, J., Fečkan, M.: Explicit solution and dynamical properties of atmospheric Ekman flows with boundary conditions. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 30, 1–19 (2021)
Fečkan, M., Guan, Y., O’Regan, D., Wang, J.: Existence and uniqueness and first order approximation of solutions to atmospheric Ekman flows. Mon. Math. 193, 623–636 (2020)
Guan, Y., Fečkan, M., Wang, J.: Periodic solutions and Hyers-Ulam stablity of atmospheric Ekman flows. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 41, 1157–1176 (2021)
Wang, J., Fečkan, M., Guan, Y.: Local and global analysis for discontinuous atmospheric Ekman equations. J. Dyn. Diff. Equ. 35, 663–677 (2023)
Constantin, A.: Frictional effects in wind-driven Ocean currents. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 115, 1–14 (2021)
Constantin, A., Dritschel, D.G., Paldor, N.: The deflection angle between a wind-forced surface current and the overlying wind in an ocean with vertically varying eddy viscosity. Phys. Fluids 32, 116604 (2020)
Roberti, L.: Perturbation analysis for the surface deflection angle of Ekman-type flows with variable eddy viscosity. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 23, 57 (2021)
Madsen, O.S., Secher, O.: A realistic model of the wind-induced boundary layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 7, 248–255 (1977)
Dritschel, D.G., Paldor, N., Constantin, A.: The Ekman spiral for piecewise-uniform viscosity. Ocean Sci. 16, 1089–1093 (2020)
Roberti, L.: The Ekman spiral for piecewise-constant edyy viscosity. Appl. Anal. 101, 5528–5536 (2022)
Roberti, L.: The surface current of Ekman flows with time-dependent eddy viscosity. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 21, 2463–2477 (2022)
Guan, Y., Fečkan, M., Wang, J.: The Ekman spiral for two types of eddy viscosities. Appl. Anal. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2022.2044026
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: On the modelling of large-scale atmospheric flow. J. Differ. Equ. 285, 751–798 (2021)
Constantin, A., Johnson, R.S.: On the propagation of waves in the atmosphere. Proc. R. Soc. A 477, 20200424 (2021)
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. The authors thank the help from the editor too.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Adrian Constantin.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12161015), Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects (Qian Ke He Ji Chu-ZK[2023]yiban034), Qian Ke He Ping Tai Ren Cai-YSZ[2022]002, and Guiyang University Multidisciplinary Team Construction Projects in 2021([2021]-xk04).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guan, Y., Wang, J. Explicit solutions of atmospheric Ekman flow with some cases of eddy viscosities. Monatsh Math 203, 373–386 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-023-01854-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-023-01854-x