Abstract
The possibility of using epigenetics in forensic investigation has gradually risen over the last few years. Epigenetic changes with their dynamic nature can either be inherited or accumulated throughout a lifetime and be reversible, prompting investigation of their use across various fields. In forensic sciences, multiple applications have been proposed, such as the discrimination of monozygotic twins, identifying the source of a biological trace left at a crime scene, age prediction, determination of body fluids and tissues, human behavior association, wound healing progression, and determination of the post-mortem interval (PMI). Despite all these applications, not all the studies considered the impact of PMI and post-sampling effects on the epigenetic modifications and the tissue-specificity of the epigenetic marks.
This review aims to highlight the substantial forensic significance that epigenetics could support in various forensic investigations. First, basic concepts in epigenetics, describing the main epigenetic modifications and their functions, in particular, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA, with a particular focus on forensic applications, were covered. For each epigenetic marker, post-mortem stability and tissue-specificity, factors that should be carefully considered in the study of epigenetic biomarkers in the forensic context, have been discussed. The advantages and limitations of using post-mortem tissues have been also addressed, proposing directions for these innovative strategies to analyze forensic specimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Genetic analysis has been widely employed in the last decades on a variety of biological tissues to uncover individuals’ DNA profiles and thus to answer questions of interest to a court of law. However, in the last years, attention has grown to a new area of genetics called epigenetics. Epigenetics is the study of molecular processes that influence variable gene expression patterns on the basis of a DNA sequence that is always constant and includes DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA.
One of the most intriguing aspects is that the environment can influence the epigenetic signatures. Environmental exposures and our behaviors, including stress, lifestyle, drugs, and diet, constantly communicate signals to our cells that often shape epigenetic modifications to adapt to a specific situation, through changes in gene expression, without affecting DNA sequence. When the original process that induces the modification is over, the modifications might still accumulate throughout a lifetime and even be passed from parents to offspring, a phenomenon referred to as epigenetic inheritance. In fact, increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic information can not only be mitotically inherited but also meiotically transmitted in several organisms, including humans. However, evidence of transgenerational inheritance in humans via germline in the absence of any direct exposure to the driving external stimulus remains controversial [1]. Alternatively, epigenetic marks can be transient, and, unlike genetic variants, they can be reversible [2]. This has been particularly attractive in cancer research in the past years because the enzymes adding or removing the epigenetic tags have become targets for new drugs’ development to try to restore the original setting of the genes through epigenetic editing [3]. The evidence of epigenetic changes influencing factors, such as the environment, substance use disorders, and past life experiences [4], which in turn can affect the behavior of individuals, might be of great interest in the forensic field, given their potential impact on the judicial evaluation of the role of a criminal or a crime victim. The reversibility of epigenetic modifications, as well as their hereditary transmission, opens further areas of involvement for forensic medicine, which is destined to become increasingly interested in these issues. It also presents a wide field of research for forensic psychiatry in criminal management.
Among the most studied environmental exposures, it was largely demonstrated that compulsive drug use leading to addicted states implies altered plasticity and physiology of the brain, which can be partly driven by epigenetic phenomena. This affects the acute response to drugs and the development of addiction [5]. For example, regulation of histone marks and DNA methylation by cocaine, cannabis, methamphetamine, or morphine has been correlated with changes in gene expression in addiction models and humans [5,6,7]. Chronic stress was also demonstrated to cause long-lasting epigenetic changes, triggering mental or psychiatric disorders [8]. Adverse experiences, such as physical injury, natural disaster, bullying, and childhood maltreatment, involve long-term epigenetic modifications and highlight the complex crosstalk between the environment and our genome across development [9,10,11]. These issues always involve forensic medicine and forensic sciences, so, understandably, the future holds great research opportunities in this field.
In light of the environmental effect, forensic epigenetics, applying epigenetics techniques, might help to address a wide range of other questions of interest to a court of law, obtaining information from a crime scene stain and addressing challenges to the evidence that can be made in the court [12]. Epigenetic analyses have already been proposed for some forensic applications: differential DNA methylation among tissues and individuals, for example, has been used to determine the tissue type of a human biological trace, for the age estimation of an unknown trace donor, and to differentiate between monozygotic twins [13]. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) among which microRNA (miRNA) in post-mortem tissues seem to represent an excellent tool to evaluate the elapsed time since death or the post-mortem interval (PMI), because of their evidenced stability and tissue specificity [14, 15]. Recently, the detection of the histone mark H3K4me3 (the trimethylation at the lysine 4 in histone H3) in chromatin has been proposed to reflect transcriptional changes in cases with substance use disorders and neurological deficits [16]. Certain authors have also proposed the concept of a new research area known as behavioral epigenetics. For instance, two studies suggested that DNA methylation could potentially serve as a marker of aggressive behavior, specifically within the glucocorticoid receptor genes NR3C1 [17] and NR3C2 [18]. However, it should be recognized that the epigenome is dynamic and modulated by internal and external factors and often requires complex data interpretation. In addition, the application of epigenetic techniques for predicting decision-making processes or criminal behaviors raises significant legal and ethical considerations [19]. For this reason, experts in the field, especially forensic pathologists and legal experts, are encouraged to deepen the study of epigenetics with their rigorous methods. This will help determine which information derived from epigenetics can potentially prove valuable within the context of the justice system.
The present review aims to provide a general overview to forensic scientists or forensic pathologists, who are not familiar with epigenetics, on the role of epigenetic modifications and their possible application in forensics, trying to stimulate the interest of young scientists in this new and promising field of research. Moreover, while the number of epigenetic studies in forensic medicine is steadily increasing, it is fundamental to consider the impact of PMI and post-sampling effects on epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA. It is also important to acknowledge that epigenetic marks exhibit tissue-specific patterns of expression [20]. The role and function of epigenetic modifications have been summarized, with a particular focus on their post-mortem stability and tissue specificity, which are of primary importance to forensic scientists. This information might clarify the limitations and the advantages of epigenetic analyses in forensic research, assisting researchers in choosing the most suitable marker for their studies.
Materials and methods
Peer-reviewed articles related to the post-mortem stability and tissue-specificity of the epigenetic modifications were comprehensively selected, using terms related to forensic sciences, DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin, and non-coding RNA. The literature review was performed in the following international databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus, considering publications up to December 2022. A first screening of the articles was completed by reading their headlines and abstracts to ensure that the topic and content were relevant and of clear forensic interest. This preliminary step was conducted according to the inclusion criteria: publications in the English language only or availability of English abstract, starting biological material constituted by human samples, and range of publication time 2005–2022. Subsequently, a more in-depth screening based on inclusion criteria and quality assessment allowed to extract a series of data to build Table 1 and 2 of the present review. In detail, the data included are sample compositions and size, analyzed tissues, molecular targets, design and methods employed, data analysis and results, authors and year of publication, and PMID. Potentially relevant studies that did not appear in the main search were also identified from the References of other articles and consultation with experts in the field.
From the literature analysis, a restricted number of studies emerged related to human samples concerning epigenetic modifications stability, compared to experiments involving animals. In addition, only a few human studies on tissue specificity, which analyzed mainly DNA methylation and miRNA, considered post-mortem samples. For this reason, several studies that used body fluids from living subjects as starting material were included to represent how epigenetic modifications have been studied in the forensic field.
The term “tissues” in the text refers to any biological sources, including body fluids.
Results
Given the potential importance of epigenetics in the forensic research field, the epigenetic modifications, their functions, and potential applications in forensic science are described. The epigenetic approach might result in being superior to histological and immunological assays in certain forensic applications [21]. In addition, the literature related to confounders that should be considered in forensic epigenetic research, in particular, the post-mortem stability of the epigenetic modifications in cadaveric samples and their tissue specificity, has been analyzed. In fact, post-mortem tissues are frequently used with no clear understanding of the effect that post-mortem tissue decay could have on the epigenetic marks. Pathological antemortem conditions and the cause of death could deeply affect post-mortem changes, and they are hardly reproducible in animal experimental settings. Human post-mortem tissues offer the possibility to gain a direct understanding of the mechanisms of disease, overcoming the issues in the interpretation of the results, the reproducibility and reliability, and the lack of concordance [22, 23]. Due to the importance of working with human samples, we report some of the experiments performed to explore the stability of the epigenetic modifications in post-mortem human tissues (Table 1).
Moreover, tissue-specificity can be used to trace the tissue of origin at crime scenes. On the other hand, the tissue specificity of epigenetic marks can also be crucial in forensic pathology for analyzing cadavers to identify possible environmental exposures, diseases, causes of death, and more. However, in this context, it should be considered that epigenetic changes are tissue-specific, and tissue-specific patterns of gene expression often contribute to maintain tissue identity and function [24, 25]. Forensic scientists should be aware of these potential confounders before using epigenetic markers because they might bias the results. Studies in humans on the tissue-specificity of epigenetic modifications in post-mortem samples are lacking. We thus also described studies related to the tissue-specificity of epigenetic modifications in body fluids from living subjects (Table 2).
DNA methylation and possible applications in forensics
DNA methylation can be considered the first level of epigenetic modification. Despite it was identified back in 1948 [26], its biological role in the regulation of transcription was demonstrated only 25 years later [27]. DNA methylation is the addition of a methyl group (-CH3) to the fifth carbon of the cytosine to form 5-methylcytosine (5mC), resulting in gene expression silencing. This change occurs mainly, but not exclusively, at the CpG dinucleotides [28]. CpG dinucleotides are not uniformly distributed throughout the genome with stretches of DNA, called CpG islands or CGi, characterized by a higher CpG density [29, 30]. CGi are often localized in genes’ promoters and usually not methylated. Conversely, CGi associated with intra- or inter-genic regions can be methylated or not methylated [31, 32]. This leads to a heterogeneous epigenetic landscape.
For several years, CGi in the regulatory genes’ regions were not thought to have a tissue-specific profile; however, more recently, it has been demonstrated that tissue-specific gene silencing for some genes occurs through the promoter region’s methylation [33]. Moreover, intragenic CGi and those including the transcription start site can be differentially methylated based on the analyzed tissue [34].
In addition to its central role in transcriptional regulation, DNA methylation is extremely important for the maintenance of cellular functionality and genomic integrity, silencing cryptic promoters and cryptic splicing sites, and thus preventing the production of proteins with abnormal function [35]. DNA methylation also helps maintain in a compact chromatin state the repetitive DNA sequences, as transposable elements and satellite DNA, ensuring genomic integrity and avoiding illegitimate recombination [36]. More generally, even if the precise mechanism has not yet been clarified, methyl groups directly contribute to generating a close chromatin structure and thus in its three-dimensional modeling [37, 38].
The enzymes carrying out DNA methylation are the DNA methyltransferases (DNMT). DNMT3a and DNMT3b are de novo methyltransferases, which act on not methylated sequences and mainly in germ cells where they are recruited on chromatin by DNMT3l [28]. DNMT1 is the maintenance DNA methyltransferase that is required to methylate the hemimethylated strand after DNA replication, and its action guarantees the mitotic inheritance of the methylation patterns [39]. The methylation profile is thus preserved during mitosis, especially in the differentially methylated sequences subjected to imprinting or the ones in the inactive X chromosome in females. By contrast, the methylation profile of sequences without precise regulative functions may not be accurately reproduced [40].
In mammalian cells, DNA methylation signals are recognized by the methyl-CpG binding proteins (MBP) that in turn recruit other partners, among which many enzymes involved in histone modifications and transcription repressive molecules. They thus provide the link between modified cytosines and functional chromatin states [41].
DNA methylation, like all the other epigenetic markers, is reversible [42]. Two mechanisms can remove this signature: active DNA demethylation mediated by the ten-eleven translocation (TET) family enzymes and the passive DNA demethylation occurring during DNA replication in the absence of DNA methylation maintenance activity [43].
Forensic scientists have proposed the analysis of differentially methylated regions in multiple applications [44]. First, age prediction is particularly relevant to narrow the circle of suspects during investigations, and it is possible thanks to the fact that DNA methylation patterns change with increasing age [45]. Initially, common methylation changes were detected in cancer and aging cells [46]. Subsequent experiments support the use of a “DNA methylation clock” to estimate age with high accuracy [47, 48]. More recently, the investigation of the impact of biogeographic ancestry stands out as particularly important for DNA methylation-based age predictions, since prediction differences recently emerged comparing the Middle East and Central Europe population [49].
Different studies also developed DNA methylation–based approaches for tissue and body fluids identification. In particular, the main tissues considered are blood, urine, skin, sweat, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid, and menstrual blood. This can help in the reconstruction of a crime assist or sexual assault events [50]. Even if further investigations are needed, other applications are under consideration. Since it was shown that epigenetic differences can be detected in monozygotic twins [51], DNA methylation is emerging as relevant in monozygotic twin differentiation, which has always been a significant challenge in criminal investigations, and specific markers have been proposed [52]. In fact, personal health and lifestyle and exposure to various environments make methylation patterns unique for each individual. Moreover, in light of the monoallelic expression due to the genomic imprinting, the parental origin of an allele could be identified by analyzing regions that result differentially methylated in the maternal and paternal alleles [53]. This could be crucial in overcoming the significant limitations of STR profiling, which is only useful when individuals are genetically different.
More recently, few studies explored DNA methylation for potential smoking habit prediction, identifying CpGs correlated with daily cigarettes among smokers of varying levels [54, 55]. However, replication studies are needed to make DNA methylation analysis a routine test for assessing the smoking status of unknown individuals.
The interest in DNA methylation in forensic pathology research is sustained also by the observation that ante- and post-mortem DNA show similar methylation amounts and characteristics. Conversely, in cases of advanced decomposition, the degradation of DNA will be reasonably followed by the concomitant loss of the corresponding methylation [56].
The post-mortem stability of DNA methylation
In animal models, it was demonstrated that the post-mortem interval (PMI) may represent a confounding factor in the analyses of 5-methylcytosine; in particular, 5-methylcytosine levels were observed to increase with post-mortem time in adult rats [57]. Changes in DNA methylation were also detected in human postmortem tissues: three studies explored DNA degradation and DNA methylation at multiple time points or stages of decomposition in different genome regions and tissues. Within PMI 38–68 h in humans, DNA samples collected from blood and brain were undamaged [58]. DNA yields were found high also in buccal swabs, and post-mortem methylation was stable from 1 up to 42 days. Even though it has been observed that both degradation and methylation variance increased over time [58], DNA methylation resulted stable also in human neocortex samples up to 72 h post-mortem [59]. Given that most forensic autopsies are performed within 72 h, it can be argued that many epigenetic markers can be studied in forensics without bias linked to the time elapsed since death (PMI). For post-mortem analyses that exceed this time range, further studies are required, and therefore, caution is needed.
Distinctive DNA methylation-based signatures across tissues
Since RNA is prone to degradation by ubiquitous ribonucleases, and thus its use for forensic identification of body fluids is very challenging [6], DNA methylation has been proposed as a new molecular marker for body fluid discrimination in the field of forensics. Specific CpG sites were identified with high sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between blood, saliva, semen, and vaginal secretions [60,61,62,63,64,65].
Interestingly, in light of the environmental impact on DNA methylation and for a more comprehensive simulation of forensic conditions, some of these studies analyzing body fluids from living subjects considered endogenous and exogenous factors that might affect the stability of methylation. Differentially methylated markers were detected for the identification of specific tissues, considering multiple influencing factors, such as humidity, tumors, genetic variants in the DNA sequence [61], or even the menstrual cycle phases, against which DNA methylation profiles can vary [63].
Other studies evidence the importance of considering confounding factors that may affect the results. For example, DNA methylation has been also proposed to estimate the age at the time of death in forensic profiling [66]; however, the different cellular compositions in the analyzed tissues should be well-known, such as buccal epithelial cells and leukocytes in buccal swab samples [64]. In the body fluid identification research, having the methylation patterns age-dependent [67], markers potentially associated with aging should be excluded [60].
Specific epigenetic patterns have been thus revealed especially in living subjects where it is often necessary to select the most useful surrogate tissue for representing the brain. The levels of DNA methylation in brain-peripheral tissues were shown to vary widely for each CpG and each gene, and tools were proposed to reveal the degree of cross-tissue correlation [68]. However, few studies determined inter- and intra-individual differences in DNA methylation in post-mortem tissues too. Kozlenkov and coworkers (2016) separated neuronal nuclei from the autopsy specimens of the human prefrontal cortex, evidencing differences in the composition of DNA methylation between the two major populations of human prefrontal cortex neuron subtypes, GABAergic interneurons and glutamatergic projection neurons [69].
The identification of blood, cerebellum, and the cortex from 3 individuals was also performed using tissue-specific patterns of mitochondrial DNA methylation. Mitochondrial DNA methylation variations among pre-mortem blood, post-mortem cerebellum, and 5 different regions of the cortex were able to separate individuals. Intra-individual differences across tissue types were greater than inter-individual differences within each tissue type [70].
Conflicting results were also evidenced. The analysis of 1505 CpG loci in 11 human tissues from six autopsy cases, in particular DNA methylation of 1505 CpG promoter sites in 807 genes, revealed that similar DNA methylation levels in all organs and individuals for many CpG sites were detected among the same tissues from different individuals than between different tissues from the same individual, but in general, the patterns were very homogenous. However, these results could be affected by the high variability of periods between death and the tissue collection and the diagnosis of autopsy [71]. Another research explored the reliability of 11 tissue-specific DNA methylation sites for the identification of blood, saliva, and semen; however, tissue-specific differentially methylated regions for blood and buccal cells were not specific enough to be suggested as markers for blood and saliva [72].
Even if some studies highlighted the existence of an inter-individual variation in the methylation levels [73, 74], recent evidence reported specific methylation patterns in different cell types [75] supporting the possibility of using this signature for forensic applications.
Histone modifications and possible applications in forensics
Nuclear DNA is not naked within cells but is associated with proteins, mainly histones, to form chromatin. In 1964, it was discovered that histones might be subjected to post-translational modifications that confer important functional properties and affect the degree of chromatin condensation [76]. The most studied histone modifications are acetylation, associated with transcriptional activation, and histone methylation, associated with both transcriptional activation (H3K4) and repression (H3K9, H3K27). Many enzymes drive the addition and the removal of these modifications that are then recognized by different effector proteins [77].
It should be noted that on each histone, the coexistence of multiple signals might interfere, cooperate with, or be dependent on each other. Therefore, in each nucleosome, a huge number of combinations of different histone changes generate the histone code [78], suggesting the existence of a highly complex regulation system, still largely unknown [79]. The crosstalk takes place not only between different histone modifications but also between histone modifications and DNA methylation, which thus work together to modulate DNA accessibility through changes in the chromatin conformation [80].
The state of chromatin within a cell that swings between an open and accessible state named euchromatin and a more compact state, not accessible to the transcriptional machinery, defined as heterochromatin [81], might be modified by chromatin remodeler enzymes [82]. Chromatin remodeling is a dynamic event, not yet fully characterized, that requires ATP hydrolysis and plays a role in DNA replication, transcriptional regulation, and DNA repair through several mechanisms, such as nucleosome positioning, histone substitution, deposition of histone variant, chromatin compaction, and changes in its accessibility [82,83,84].
More recently, increasing evidence suggests that DNA is non-randomly positioned into the nucleus, with chromosomes, gene loci, and nuclear bodies referring to a specific arrangement in space and time [85]. This organization in precise sub-compartments might be the basis for regulating chromatin state and ensuring optimal transcriptional efficiency. However, how chromosome positioning could affect genomic function is not yet understood [86].
The histone modification profile has been less explored in comparison with the other epigenetic signatures in the forensic context. Few studies explored the stability of acetylation and methylation in post-mortem brain specimens, in particular H3K27Ac and H3K4me3 [16], and, investigating the genome-wide distribution of histone modifications in specific neuronal cells, the existence of distinctive patterns of the histone modifications was evidenced [87]. One of the current challenges in epigenetics is to analyze histone modifications and their differences among biological conditions and cell types. Considering the long and complex pipeline of the histone changes’ detection techniques, this analysis is currently difficult to apply in forensic practice. Improved experimental methods could reveal histones’ utility in forensic applications, as markers for the determination of the cause of death and tissue specificity. Furthermore, forensic sample handling processes typically do not preserve proteins such as histones. Despite the advancements in forensic protein science and technology in recent years [88], validation studies involving real-life applications are necessary before forensic proteomics, including histone analyses, can become a routine tool for deciphering crime scenes.
The post-mortem stability of histone modifications
Research investigated the post-mortem stability of histone modifications and related enzymes. The pattern of post-mortem degradation for H3K27 methylation and acetylation was reported in Sprague–Dawley rats, recording less stability of these modifications to histone tails over PMI, in comparison to other epigenetic signatures [89]. Huang and coworkers (2006) first evaluated chromatin degradation in post-mortem prefrontal cortex samples from 16 adult subjects, examining DNA-histone interactions with micrococcal nuclease digestion. The nucleosome DNA resulted attached to the core histones for 30 h after death, and differences in the levels of the open chromatin mark H3K4me3 and the condensed chromatin mark H3K27me3 across some genomic loci were similar to freshly prepared samples. In addition, the level of the H3 methylation seemed not highly affected by autolysis time (PMI range = 5–30 h) and pH variation (pH range = 6–6.8) [90]. The stability of H3K4me3 in the human prefrontal cortex was also confirmed up to 72 h post-mortem in another study that tested this epigenetic signature as a marker of methamphetamine use disorder in HIV-infected individuals [16]. These studies seem to point towards histone modifications as an alternative for transcriptional profiling in case of low RNA quality.
Another research highlighted that the acetyltransferase and methyltransferase activities, which are involved in the process of histone acetylation and methylation, were not modified increasing the PMI or storage duration. The same study also reported no influence of PMI of 5 h, storage, pH value, or neurochemical parameters on RNA integrity [91]. Of course, more studies exploring longer PMIs are requested to confirm the stability after death of histone modifications.
Non-coding RNA and possible applications in forensics
The term non-coding RNA (ncRNA) refers to RNA not translated into proteins; however, this does not imply they do not have a specific function or carry information. The best-known and most studied ncRNA are structural ncRNA, which include RNA transfer (tRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), and small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA). The remaining ncRNA are able to modulate gene expression and induce chromatin remodeling without affecting DNA sequence; therefore, they are considered a full-fledged epigenetic mechanism. Among these molecules, there are the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) and the small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) among which microRNA (miRNA) [92].
The lncRNA class, constituted by transcripts not translated into proteins longer than 200 base pairs (bp), is highly heterogeneous. LncRNA can have multiple functions, among which the regulation of transcription, proteins/RNA functioning, chromatin remodeling, and the genome 3D organization in the nucleus [93].
MiRNA act through RNA interference (RNAi), a process that involves the RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC) which incorporate miRNA and guide it towards a target mRNA thanks to the sequence complementarity [94]. In this way, RISC induces the mRNA degradation or its translational repression, depending on the full or partial complementarity with the miRNA sequence [95]. Although miRNA act at the post-transcriptional level and not transcriptional, they are accounted among the epigenetic mechanisms because they are involved in a complex regulatory epigenetic network. In addition, miRNA expression can be controlled by epigenetic modifications within the genome regions where they are located, and in turn, they can target epigenetic modifiers [96].
Even if miRNA biogenesis is well-known, the complex regulatory circuit underlying miRNA expression remains unclear. This landscape becomes even more complicated by the low specificity between miRNA and mRNA, which results in a variety of targets [97]. Subsequently, a single miRNA can regulate several targets, and the same targets can be co-regulated by different miRNA, originating a complex combinatorial code. More than 2600 miRNA (miRBase v.22) have been identified in humans, and they are involved in gene regulation mechanisms, metabolic pathways of development and differentiation, cellular interactions, and disease development [98].
Among the various applications of miRNA described in forensic medicine [99], there is tissue identification from a single source of body fluid, since they are less susceptible to degradation, due to their small length of 22 nucleotides on average, compared to mRNA [100]. In addition, in light of their stability, even in the face of temperature and environmental conditions changes, they have been identified as a valuable tool for estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI) [14]. Another application that should be further explored includes the determination of wound age, having miRNA involved in the wound healing progression [101]. Besides, their recognized role in myocardial infarction, due to their influence on cardiomyocyte regeneration, apoptosis, and necrosis, makes them a suitable marker for forensic studies on acute and chronic myocardial infarction, and on its timing [102].
Interestingly, studies also highlighted the potential of circular RNA (circRNA) in forensics, another class of single-stranded RNA molecules. CircRNA have been shown to regulate transcription and interact with miRNA and proteins [103]. In the forensic fields, due to their stage-specific expression patterns during development and stability, circRNA isolated from human blood were recently proposed for age prediction [104]. A preliminary model was developed to investigate potential associations between chronological age and the expression of circRNA derived from genes involved in biological metabolic processes. However, there is much to do to understand their function and mechanisms of action. For instance, although circRNA were originally classified as non-coding RNA, there is evidence of their involvement in translation processes [105]. This enhances the interest in circRNA in the context of forensic applications.
The post-mortem stability of miRNA
MiRNA are more resistant in various relevant clinical and research conditions [106] compared to longer RNA molecules, like mRNA. We already explained their role as epigenetic modulators, affecting the protein levels of the target mRNA without modifying the DNA sequences [107], and thus, we also report some studies exploring their stability after death and long-term fixation. Animal studies reported that miRNA were found highly resistant to PMI. A significant correlation was observed between miRNA expressions and time passed since death, with miR21 and miR205 stably expressed especially at 24 h PMI duration [108]. Extreme robustness across increasing PMIs, for up to 96 h, was shown for miR16, miR34a, miR124a, and miR134 [89].
Since, in forensic cases, fresh or frozen human material is not always available, studies analyzed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, highlighting sensitive forensic markers, even when signs of putrefaction were detected at autopsy. MiR21 resulted in a valid detectable molecular target in multiple post-mortem samples and putrefied organs considered at 18, 72, and 96 h of PMIs [109]. Comparing samples frozen or embedded in paraffin, the expression of miR146a, miR146b, miR125a, miR125b, miR21, and miR155 was identified as a signature of injured skin [110]; miR499a was confirmed as a promising acute myocardial infarction biomarker [111]. From those studies emerged also the importance of identifying endogenous controls for miRNA quantification, supporting the use of miRNA instead of other classes of small ncRNA to determine the appropriate controls for the post-mortem analysis [111].
The use of miRNA in forensic sciences has been widely explored in particular for PMI estimation. The duration of the corpse’s storage was reported to not affect the overall miRNA pattern of expression in different tissues; in particular, a storage time between 1 and 14 days at 4 °C has a limited influence [112]. Montanari and coworkers (2021) reported the related literature, and they suggested miRNA use mainly as target markers for longer PMI evaluation, instead of early and medium PMI. They also evidenced the lack of human data that limits the forensic application of PMI estimation based on miRNA analysis [14]. These studies suggest to better explore miRNA reliability and utility as biomarkers in post-mortem examinations.
Tissue-specific miRNA-based signature
Considering the small size of miRNA molecules, 20–25 bases in length, and their strong tissue specificity, studies explored their possible use in the forensic field for the assay of different body fluids in often degraded or compromised samples [113]. Some studies explored large sets of miRNA, while others tried to replicate the results obtained in previous studies including a restricted number of targets and improving the methods and the conditions.
A genome-wide miRNA microarray tested approximately 1700 miRNA to identify 20 body fluid samples. Eight previously unreported miRNA were detected as relevant miRNA markers because of specific expression in one body fluid and high expression levels: miR484 and miR182 for blood, miR223 and miR145 for saliva, miR2392 and miR3197 for semen, and miR1260b and miR654-5p for vaginal secretions. Among the previously reported miRNA, a good body fluid–specific expression pattern was confirmed for miR126, miR106a, miR451, miR185, miR486, and miR20a for blood, miR203 and miR205 for saliva, even if they were also expressed in the semen, and miR891a as semen-specific [114].
Another research explored 452 human miRNA in 20 human tissues using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR): nine miRNA (miR451, miR16, miR135b, miR10b, miR658, miR205, miR124a, miR372, and miR412) were differentially expressed allowing the discrimination of the body fluid origin of forensic biological stains [115].
To test a small number of specific targets, studies used RT-qPCR. One of those confirmed miR451 as a biomarker for venous blood, miR412 for menstrual blood and miR891a for semen; miR205 was shown to differentiate between saliva and semen and miR124a to differentiate between vaginal material and saliva [116].
MiR451 was also tested in 200 samples from peripheral blood, menstrual blood, saliva, semen and vaginal secretion and showed significantly higher expression in the blood samples than in the non-blood samples. The same authors even suggested the use of miR203, miR205, and miR214 to be used to distinguish between peripheral blood and menstrual blood [117]. More recently, these and other popular miRNA were tested in combinations in 605 body fluid–related samples to increase the probability of the assumptions based on their detection. MiR451a, miR144-5p/3p, miR888-5p or miR891a-5p, miR203a-3p, miR205-5p, and miR124-3p were all able to distinguish between two tissues; however, they were only partially body fluid–specific. By contrast, a four-miRNA combination (miR451a/miR891a-5p/miR144-5p/miR203a-3p) completely identified the peripheral blood, menstrual blood, and semen [118].
In two studies, miRNA were tested in post-mortem tissues, offering a real-world scenario in which fresh biopsy material is not always available for miRNA isolation. A miRNA microarray analysis including 2000 miRNA among 61 tissue biopsies of 24 different organs from 2 male bodies revealed that 143 out of all miRNA were detected in all tissues; in detail, miR1-3p was the overall most tissue-specific, and it was highly expressed in muscle and myocardium. Single tissue–specific miRNA were miR122-5p, miR7-5p, and miR205-5p expressed in the liver, pituitary gland, and skin, respectively. In addition, hierarchical clustering revealed groups of miRNA with tissue-specific expression: a muscle cluster with miR133b, miR133a-3p, miR1-3p, a brain-tissue cluster including mi338-3p, miR219a-5p, miR124-3p, miR9-5p and miR507, and miR514a-3p and miR509-5p exclusively detected in the testis samples. The study also confirmed that inter-organism variability was significantly lower than inter-organ variability [112].
More recently, it was also evidenced that the miRNA levels in the same tissue might be different because of different sampling sites. In particular, cardiac-specific microRNA levels differed in venous blood obtained from the external iliac vein, the inferior vena cava, and coronary sinus [119].
Linking epigenetic modifications to gene expression changes
It should be noted that many studies focused only on one of the epigenetic modifications, often hypothesizing connections with gene expression changes. However, epigenetics involves complex processes and thus transcriptional changes are not always linked. To avoid erroneous conclusions, changes in post-mortem gene expression should be taken into account in the experimental design. In order to analyze mRNA expression in association with the epigenetic changes identified or to use mRNA in forensic investigation, post-mortem mRNA degradation across diverse human tissues should be carefully considered. In fact, comparing fresh and post-mortem brain tissues, remarkable differences have been detected in the transcriptional levels with specific genes surprisingly stable in fresh tissues, while the results from human post-mortem brain studies were highly impacted by the PMI [120].
One research explored approximately 2000 post-mortem samples from 15 tissues of 316 donors with PMI ranging from 1 to 27 h using RNA sequencing. Different RNA degradation levels were associated with distinct PMI, different sites in the same tissue, and even different genes’ functions. This means that the time of sample collection should be always considered depending on the tissues and genes of interest [121]. However, another research, establishing high-quality RNA up to 23 years at − 80 °C, reported that PMI was not a predictor of RNA quality and suggested the RNA integrity number, the RIN value, a more critical indicator of the suitability of post-mortem tissues [122]. Other research has also encouraged the consideration of environmental conditions, such as storage temperature, before interpreting the results [123, 124]. In human experiments, these might represent confounding factors and should be reported.
Discussion
Epigenetic modifications that occur before death can provide valuable insights into vital processes. The present review reveals how understanding the “epigenetic status” of cells in post-mortem samples enables forensic scientists to record what cells were prompted to do, capturing a snapshot of their condition at the time of death. Forensic pathology has acquired an unprecedented interest in epigenetics because it acts as a crucial communication system, fostering dialogue among cells in various tissues and organs, particularly during processes like inflammation resulting from physical or hypoxic-ischemic trauma [125].
This opens new possibilities for forensic researchers in the understanding of the physiopathology of the deceased, which can provide valuable information to the forensic pathologist, contributing to the understanding of the physiopathology of the living as well. Similarly, the relative resistance towards post-mortem phenomena found in various epigenetic markers [53] paves the way for numerous studies of what happens in the human body after death. This favors the potential for fitting the PMI estimation within increasingly specific ranges. In addition, epigenetic changes are tissue-specific, and tissue-specific patterns of gene expression often contribute to maintain tissue identity and function [71]: crime scenes and body investigations can greatly benefit from the ability of identifying various biological fluids precisely and specifically. Further research might help to gain better insight into the tissue-specificity of these markers.
Forensic cases thus encompass a wide range of conditions of interest to research, also including psychological trauma and physical injuries. This helps in a better understanding of human reactions to events. However, it is important to note that this is a potential future scenario. Currently, there are still numerous obstacles to overcome in order to obtain reliable and useful results in the context of trials.
The majority of the forensic epigenetic experiments focused on miRNA expression and DNA methylation. The methods used are mainly array-based experiments for genome-wide approaches, to test simultaneously a wide range of sites, and pyrosequencing for candidate region association studies. Differentially methylated cytosines and regions [38] and specific miRNA have been demonstrated to differ between tissues and body fluids relevant in forensic analyses. A highly intriguing result is that four miRNA (miR205, miR451, miR124, and miR203) are recurrent in multiple experiments. Three of these studies included a wide range of miRNA with microarray approaches, without prior hypotheses, but the identified miRNA often showed different body fluid–specific expression patterns. For example, miR205 was identified as a marker for saliva [60, 115]; however, Ludwig and coworkers reported a highly specific expression of miR205-5p in the skin [112], and it was recently reported for the identification of vaginal secretion [118]. One notable finding from studies that have examined DNA methylation is instead that this mark is involved in the regulation of several molecular mechanisms; it is cell-specific, as showed by cell-specific differentially methylated regions identified in post-mortem brain areas [69, 126], and it is widely affected by environmental conditions throughout life. In particular, confounding factors, such as early life events [127], smoking, ethnicity, and gender [128, 129] and diseases, can modify DNA methylation levels at specific sites in the genome. Major application issues might thus arise for forensic pathologists in this case because the subjects’ history is not always known. In addition, studies also underline that part of the mechanism that causes post-mortem methylation levels to be modified or unmeasurable may involve reactive oxygen species, found increased over time [57], or post- or perimortem cellular processes or bacterial activity [56]. Even in gene expression studies, confounding factors should be taken into account, and correcting the results with knowledge about the cause and timing of death is often advisable, as ongoing changes prior to death could also play a significant role in the specific mRNA levels. Additionally, mRNA appears to be less stable and persistent compared to other markers under different environmental conditions [130].
Limitations of the studies
In general, studies reveal some weaknesses; first, often only one epigenetic mark and one type of specimen at a single time point were analyzed. To unlock the full potential of epigenetic testing for post-mortem applications, it is essential to include diverse tissues and apply diverse marker combinations at different stages of decomposition. Furthermore, due to the different identification methods, the techniques applied and normalization strategies, the results are not equivalent limiting their value for comparison. Due to the scarcity of available cases that satisfy the inclusion criteria, the studies often include an insufficient number of samples which does not allow to achieve solid conclusions. Two specific additional limitations arise from the analysis of miRNA and DNA methylation in the forensic field. First, not all the studies specified which of the mature forms of miRNA-3p and -5p were considered in the experiments, while the two forms might have different tissue specificities [112]. Second, not all the studies considered that DNA methylation is associated with aging [131]. Each experiment should subsequently exclude DNA methylation associated with aging from the analysis of tissue-specific DNA methylation candidates. As proposed by Park and coworkers (2014), the association between aging and possible DNA methylation changes in the analyzed genome sites should be investigated during the selection of these markers in forensic science [60].
Finally, it must always be noted that epigenetic modifications might play a central role in specific pathologies: specific miRNA, DNA methylation patterns, and histone changes are involved in carcinogenesis processes [132, 133] and have been found dysregulated in multiple cancers [134, 135], in neurodegenerative disorders [136, 137], in obesity and type 2 diabetes [138], and in cardiovascular disease [139]. This means that the physical and psychological conditions in which a person was prior to death might highly affect the level of expression of these molecules.
Perspectives
Despite the limitations, and while many studies are performed on samples from living individuals, there are numerous advantages to working with and researching post-mortem samples. A more comprehensive epigenetic analysis of cells in post-mortem samples can offer new opportunities for identifying markers related to injuries, age prediction, the timing of events such as myocardial infarction or cerebral contusion, or the cause of death, whether due to asphyxia or hypoxic factors. These insights are significant in the field of forensic pathology. Compared to samples taken from living patients, human post-mortem tissues also provide the advantage of allowing the collection of larger amounts of starting material.
Another aspect to work on in the future concerns the fact that combinations of different miRNA, rather than individual molecules, might enable a more precise identification of body fluids. This is because single miRNA are only partially specific to particular body fluids, and their expression levels may not remain stable for a specific type of tissue. Just as in the case of forensic human identification through DNA profiling using autosomal short tandem repeats, which relies on the analysis of multiple loci, in the future, miRNA profiling for tissue specificity should consider clusters of miRNAs, as proposed by some studies [112, 118].
It should also be noted that epigenetic marks have been explored for a wide range of applications, including the identification of biological fluids or tissues, as well as the determination of sex, age, and phenotype of donors. Epigenetic modifications have been also associated with many pathological conditions and psychiatric diseases [123, 124]. However, given the substantial influence of environmental confounders on these marks, further research is needed to fully understand how to exploit the potential of epigenetics in revealing phenotypic and behavioral traits, thus expanding our comprehension of complex forensic evidence.
To promote the innovative use of epigenetic markers in forensic practice, studies should simultaneously investigate the differential expression of epigenetic phenomena in multiple tissues and organs. Implementing a strategy of multicenter studies, where large case datasets are analyzed with consistent inclusion/exclusion criteria and methods, could address the current limitations related to comparability among studies.
Conclusions
Over the past decade, epigenetics has undergone rapid development, thus drawing attention to its potential applications in forensic investigations. In the present review, we described the limiting factors that should be taken into account in epigenetic research when applied in forensic medicine, including considerations of post-mortem stability and tissue specificity. While research in this field presents numerous potential forensic applications, it is important to exercise caution when applying these results in forensic cases. Forensic pathologists have long sought markers as incontrovertible evidence in trials [140]; however, these markers should be unquestionable and able to withstand criticism. Working synergistically on the perspectives, it may become possible to provide researchers with guidance on selecting epigenetic markers based on the available biological samples and techniques.
References
Fitz-James MH, Cavalli G (2022) Molecular mechanisms of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 23:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00438-5
John RM, Rougeulle C (2018) Developmental epigenetics: phenotype and the flexible epigenome. Front Cell Dev Biol 6:130
Ghasemi S (2020) Cancer’s epigenetic drugs: where are they in the cancer medicines? Pharmacogenomics J 20:367–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-019-0138-5
Gerra ML, Gerra MC, Tadonio L et al (2021) Early parent-child interactions and substance use disorder: an attachment perspective on a biopsychosocial entanglement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 131:560–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.052
Nestler EJ, Lüscher C (2019) The molecular basis of drug addiction: linking epigenetic to synaptic and circuit Mechanisms. Neuron 102:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.016
Gerra MC, Jayanthi S, Manfredini M et al (2018) Gene variants and educational attainment in cannabis use: mediating role of DNA methylation. Transl Psychiatry 8:23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0087-1
Cadet JL, Patel R, Jayanthi S (2019) Compulsive methamphetamine taking and abstinence in the presence of adverse consequences: epigenetic and transcriptional consequences in the rat brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 179:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2019.02.009
Lee J-E, Kwon H-J, Choi J, Han P-L (2019) Stress-induced epigenetic changes in hippocampal Mkp-1 promote persistent depressive behaviors. Mol Neurobiol 56:8537–8556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01689-4
Nöthling J, Malan-Müller S, Abrahams N et al (2020) Epigenetic alterations associated with childhood trauma and adult mental health outcomes: a systematic review. World J Biol Psychiatry 21:493–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2019.1583369
Parade SH, Huffhines L, Daniels TE et al (2021) A systematic review of childhood maltreatment and DNA methylation: candidate gene and epigenome-wide approaches. Transl Psychiatry 11:134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-021-01207-y
Pfeiffer JR, Mutesa L, Uddin M (2018) Traumatic stress epigenetics. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep 5:81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-018-0143-z
Williams G, Horn B (2020) Chapter thirty-one - forensic epigenetics methods and applications. In: Tollefsbol TBT-EM (ed) Translational epigenetics. Academic Press, pp 647–669
Vidaki A, Kayser M (2018) Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 37:180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.008
Montanari E, Giorgetti R, Busardò FP et al (2021) Suitability of miRNA assessment in postmortem interval estimation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 25:1774–1787. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202102_25069
Lv Y-H, Wang Z-Q, Lei Q et al (2021) Research progress in the estimation of postmortem interval (PMI) using non-coding RNA (ncRNA) markers. Med Sci Law 258024211064404. https://doi.org/10.1177/00258024211064404
Basova L, Lindsey A, McGovern AM et al (2021) Detection of H3K4me3 identifies NeuroHIV signatures, genomic effects of methamphetamine and addiction pathways in postmortem HIV+ brain specimens that are not amenable to transcriptome analysis. Viruses 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13040544
Liu L, Li J, Qing L et al (2021) Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) is hypermethylated in adult males with aggressive behaviour. Int J Legal Med 135:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02328-7
Qing L, Gao C, Ji A et al (2021) Association of mineralocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C2) hypermethylation in adult males with aggressive behavior. Behav Brain Res 398:112980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112980
Palumbo S, Mariotti V, Iofrida C, Pellegrini S (2018) Genes and aggressive behavior: epigenetic mechanisms underlying individual susceptibility to aversive environments. Front Behav Neurosci 12:117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00117
Miller RH, Pollard CA, Brogaard KR et al (2023) Tissue-specific DNA methylation variability and its potential clinical value. Front Genet 14:1125967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1125967
Sauer E, Extra A, Cachée P, Courts C (2017) Identification of organ tissue types and skin from forensic samples by microRNA expression analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 28:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.002
Doncheva NT, Palasca O, Yarani R et al (2021) Human pathways in animal models: possibilities and limitations. Nucleic Acids Res 49:1859–1871. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab012
Bracken MB (2009) Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. J R Soc Med 102:120–122. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k033
Zhou J, Sears RL, Xing X et al (2017) Tissue-specific DNA methylation is conserved across human, mouse, and rat, and driven by primary sequence conservation. BMC Genomics 18:724. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4115-6
Guo Z, Maki M, Ding R et al (2014) Genome-wide survey of tissue-specific microRNA and transcription factor regulatory networks in 12 tissues. Sci Rep 4:5150. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05150
HOTCHKISS RD, (1948) The quantitative separation of purines, pyrimidines, and nucleosides by paper chromatography. J Biol Chem 175:315–332
Holliday R, Pugh JE (1975) DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 187:226–232
Moore LD, Le T, Fan G (2013) DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 38:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.112
Bird A, Taggart M, Frommer M et al (1985) A fraction of the mouse genome that is derived from islands of nonmethylated, CpG-rich DNA. Cell 40:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(85)90312-5
Varriale A, Bernardi G (2010) Distribution of DNA methylation, CpGs, and CpG islands in human isochores. Genomics 95:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.09.006
Cain JA, Montibus B, Oakey RJ (2022) Intragenic CpG islands and their impact on gene regulation. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:832348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.832348
Ioshikhes IP, Zhang MQ (2000) Large-scale human promoter mapping using CpG islands. Nat Genet 26:61–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/79189
Wilkinson MF (2015) Evidence that DNA methylation engenders dynamic gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E2116
Shenker N, Flanagan JM (2012) Intragenic DNA methylation: implications of this epigenetic mechanism for cancer research. Br J Cancer 106:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.550
Feng JX, Riddle NC (2020) Epigenetics and genome stability. Mamm Genome 31:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-020-09836-2
Deniz Ö, Frost JM, Branco MR (2019) Regulation of transposable elements by DNA modifications. Nat Rev Genet 20:417–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0106-6
Chodavarapu RK, Feng S, Bernatavichute YV et al (2010) Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 466:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09147
Meng H, Cao Y, Qin J et al (2015) DNA methylation, its mediators and genome integrity. Int J Biol Sci 11:604–617. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.11218
Pradhan S, Bacolla A, Wells RD, Roberts RJ (1999) Recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. I. Expression, purification, and comparison of de novo and maintenance methylation. J Biol Chem 274:33002–33010. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.46.33002
Ming X, Zhu B, Li Y (2021) Mitotic inheritance of DNA methylation: more than just copy and paste. J Genet Genomics 48:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2021.01.006
Fournier A, Sasai N, Nakao M, Defossez P-A (2012) The role of methyl-binding proteins in chromatin organization and epigenome maintenance. Brief Funct Genomics 11:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elr040
Ramchandani S, Bhattacharya SK, Cervoni N, Szyf M (1999) DNA methylation is a reversible biological signal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:6107–6112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.6107
Kohli RM, Zhang Y (2013) TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature 502:472–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12750
Kader F, Ghai M (2017) DNA methylation-based variation between human populations. Mol Genet Genomics 292:5–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1264-2
Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME et al (2011) Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE 6:e14821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014821
Klutstein M, Nejman D, Greenfield R, Cedar H (2016) DNA methylation in cancer and aging. Cancer Res 76:3446–3450. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3278
Bell CG, Lowe R, Adams PD et al (2019) DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations. Genome Biol 20:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y
Fan H, Xie Q, Zhang Z et al (2021) Chronological age prediction: developmental evaluation of DNA methylation-based machine learning models. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:819991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.819991
Fleckhaus J, Bugert P, Al-Rashedi NAM, Rothschild MA (2023) Investigation of the impact of biogeographic ancestry on DNA methylation based age predictions comparing a Middle East and a Central European population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 67:102923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102923
Kader F, Ghai M, Olaniran AO (2020) Characterization of DNA methylation-based markers for human body fluid identification in forensics: a critical review. Int J Legal Med 134:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02181-3
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF et al (2005) Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:10604–10609. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500398102
Planterose Jiménez B, Liu F, Caliebe A et al (2021) Equivalent DNA methylation variation between monozygotic co-twins and unrelated individuals reveals universal epigenetic inter-individual dissimilarity. Genome Biol 22:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02223-9
Vidaki A, Daniel B, Court DS (2013) Forensic DNA methylation profiling–potential opportunities and challenges. Forensic Sci Int Genet 7:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.004
Wen D, Shi J, Liu Y et al (2022) DNA methylation analysis for smoking status prediction in the Chinese population based on the methylation-sensitive single-nucleotide primer extension method. Forensic Sci Int 339:111412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111412
Vidaki A, Planterose Jiménez B, Poggiali B et al (2023) Targeted DNA methylation analysis and prediction of smoking habits in blood based on massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 65:102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102878
Koop BE, Mayer F, Gündüz T et al (2021) Postmortem age estimation via DNA methylation analysis in buccal swabs from corpses in different stages of decomposition-a “proof of principle” study. Int J Legal Med 135:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02360-7
Sjöholm LK, Ransome Y, Ekström TJ, Karlsson O (2018) Evaluation of post-mortem effects on global brain DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 122:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12875
Rhein M, Hagemeier L, Klintschar M et al (2015) DNA methylation results depend on DNA integrity-role of post mortem interval. Front Genet 6:182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00182
Jarmasz JS, Stirton H, Davie JR, Del Bigio MR (2019) DNA methylation and histone post-translational modification stability in post-mortem brain tissue. Clin Epigenetics 11:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0596-7
Park J-L, Kwon O-H, Kim JH et al (2014) Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet 13:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.011
Forat S, Huettel B, Reinhardt R et al (2016) Methylation markers for the identification of body fluids and tissues from forensic trace evidence. PLoS ONE 11:e0147973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147973
Lee HY, An JH, Jung S-E et al (2015) Genome-wide methylation profiling and a multiplex construction for the identification of body fluids using epigenetic markers. Forensic Sci Int Genet 17:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.03.002
Lee HY, Jung S-E, Lee EH et al (2016) DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood. Forensic Sci Int Genet 24:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.06.007
Eipel M, Mayer F, Arent T et al (2016) Epigenetic age predictions based on buccal swabs are more precise in combination with cell type-specific DNA methylation signatures. Aging 8:1034–1048. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100972
Alghanim H, Balamurugan K, McCord B (2020) Development of DNA methylation markers for sperm, saliva and blood identification using pyrosequencing and qPCR/HRM. Anal Biochem 611:113933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2020.113933
Carlsen L, Holländer O, Danzer MF et al (2023) DNA methylation-based age estimation for adults and minors: considering sex-specific differences and non-linear correlations. Int J Legal Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-02967-6
Barfield RT, Almli LM, Kilaru V et al (2014) Accounting for population stratification in DNA methylation studies. Genet Epidemiol 38:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21789
Braun PR, Han S, Hing B et al (2019) Genome-wide DNA methylation comparison between live human brain and peripheral tissues within individuals. Transl Psychiatry 9:47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0376-y
Kozlenkov A, Wang M, Roussos P et al (2016) Substantial DNA methylation differences between two major neuronal subtypes in human brain. Nucleic Acids Res 44:2593–2612. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1304
Devall M, Smith RG, Jeffries A et al (2017) Regional differences in mitochondrial DNA methylation in human post-mortem brain tissue. Clin Epigenetics 9:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-017-0337-3
Byun H-M, Siegmund KD, Pan F et al (2009) Epigenetic profiling of somatic tissues from human autopsy specimens identifies tissue- and individual-specific DNA methylation patterns. Hum Mol Genet 18:4808–4817. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp445
Vidaki A, Giangasparo F, Syndercombe Court D (2016) Discovery of potential DNA methylation markers for forensic tissue identification using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis 37:2767–2779. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201600261
Gunasekara CJ, Scott CA, Laritsky E et al (2019) A genomic atlas of systemic interindividual epigenetic variation in humans. Genome Biol 20:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1708-1
Schröder C, Leitão E, Wallner S et al (2017) Regions of common inter-individual DNA methylation differences in human monocytes: genetic basis and potential function. Epigenetics Chromatin 10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-017-0144-2
Loyfer N, Magenheim J, Peretz A et al (2023) A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types. Nature 613:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05580-6
Allfrey VG, Faulkner R, Mirsky AE (1964) Acetylation And Methylation Of Histones And Their Possible Role In The Regulation Of RNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 51:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.51.5.786
Yun M, Wu J, Workman JL, Li B (2011) Readers of histone modifications. Cell Res 21:564–578. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.42
Strahl BD, Allis CD (2000) The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/47412
Henikoff S (2005) Histone modifications: combinatorial complexity or cumulative simplicity? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5308–5309. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501853102
Kondo Y (2009) Epigenetic cross-talk between DNA methylation and histone modifications in human cancers. Yonsei Med J 50:455–463. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.455
Kornberg RD (1974) Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184:868–871. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4139.868
Tyagi M, Imam N, Verma K, Patel AK (2016) Chromatin remodelers: we are the drivers!! Nucleus 7:388–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2016.1211217
Clapier CR, Cairns BR (2009) The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 78:273–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223
Henikoff S, Smith MM (2015) Histone variants and epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a019364. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019364
Cavalli G, Misteli T (2013) Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:290–299. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2474
Rajapakse I, Groudine M (2011) On emerging nuclear order. J Cell Biol 192:711–721. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010129
Koshi-Mano K, Mano T, Morishima M et al (2020) Neuron-specific analysis of histone modifications with post-mortem brains. Sci Rep 10:3767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60775-z
Parker GJ, McKiernan HE, Legg KM, Goecker ZC (2021) Forensic proteomics Forensic Sci Int Genet 54:102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102529
Nagy C, Maheu M, Lopez JP et al (2015) Effects of postmortem interval on biomolecule integrity in the brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 74:459–469. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000190
Huang H-S, Matevossian A, Jiang Y, Akbarian S (2006) Chromatin immunoprecipitation in postmortem brain. J Neurosci Methods 156:284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.02.018
Monoranu CM, Grünblatt E, Bartl J et al (2011) Methyl- and acetyltransferases are stable epigenetic markers postmortem. Cell Tissue Bank 12:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-010-9199-z
Hombach S, Kretz M (2016) Non-coding RNAs: classification, biology and functioning. Adv Exp Med Biol 937:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42059-2_1
Statello L, Guo C-J, Chen L-L, Huarte M (2021) Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 22:96–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9
Jinek M, Doudna JA (2009) A three-dimensional view of the molecular machinery of RNA interference. Nature 457:405–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07755
Hutvagner G, Simard MJ (2008) Argonaute proteins: key players in RNA silencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2321
Humphries B, Wang Z, Yang C (2019) MicroRNA regulation of epigenetic modifiers in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11070897
Rajewsky N (2006) microRNA target predictions in animals. Nat Genet 38(Suppl):S8-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1798
Plotnikova O, Baranova A, Skoblov M (2019) Comprehensive analysis of human microRNA-mRNA interactome. Front Genet 10:933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00933
Rocchi A, Chiti E, Maiese A et al (2020) MicroRNAs: an update of applications in forensic science. Diagnostics (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010032
Peiró-Chova L, Peña-Chilet M, López-Guerrero JA et al (2013) High stability of microRNAs in tissue samples of compromised quality. Virchows Arch 463:765–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1485-2
Soliman AM, Das S, Abd Ghafar N, Teoh SL (2018) Role of microRNA in proliferation phase of wound healing. Front Genet 9:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00038
Sun T, Dong Y-H, Du W et al (2017) The role of microRNAs in myocardial infarction: from molecular mechanism to clinical application. Int J Mol Sci 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18040745
Zhou W-Y, Cai Z-R, Liu J et al (2020) Circular RNA: metabolism, functions and interactions with proteins. Mol Cancer 19:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01286-3
Wang J, Wang C, Wei Y et al (2022) Circular RNA as a potential biomarker for forensic age prediction. Front Genet 13:825443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.825443
Pamudurti NR, Bartok O, Jens M et al (2017) Translation of CircRNAs. Mol Cell 66:9-21.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.021
Glinge C, Clauss S, Boddum K et al (2017) Stability of circulating blood-based microRNAs - pre-analytic methodological considerations. PLoS ONE 12:e0167969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167969
Yao Q, Chen Y, Zhou X (2019) The roles of microRNAs in epigenetic regulation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 51:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.01.024
Ibrahim SF, Ali MM, Basyouni H et al (2019) Histological and miRNAs postmortem changes in incisional wound. Egypt J Forensic Sci 9:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-019-0141-7
Muciaccia B, Vico C, Aromatario M et al (2015) Molecular analysis of different classes of RNA molecules from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded autoptic tissues: a pilot study. Int J Legal Med 129:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1066-1
Neri M, Fabbri M, D’Errico S et al (2019) Regulation of miRNAs as new tool for cutaneous vitality lesions demonstration in ligature marks in deaths by hanging. Sci Rep 9:20011. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56682-7
Kakimoto Y, Kamiguchi H, Ochiai E et al (2015) MicroRNA stability in postmortem FFPE tissues: quantitative analysis using autoptic samples from acute myocardial infarction patients. PLoS ONE 10:e0129338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129338
Ludwig N, Leidinger P, Becker K et al (2016) Distribution of miRNA expression across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 44:3865–3877. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw116
Dumache R, Ciocan V, Muresan C et al (2015) Circulating MicroRNAs as promising biomarkers in forensic body fluids identification. Clin Lab 61:1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150207
Park J-L, Park S-M, Kwon O-H et al (2014) Microarray screening and qRT-PCR evaluation of microRNA markers for forensic body fluid identification. Electrophoresis 35:3062–3068. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201400075
Hanson EK, Lubenow H, Ballantyne J (2009) Identification of forensically relevant body fluids using a panel of differentially expressed microRNAs. Anal Biochem 387:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.037
Leary O, KR, Glynn CL, (2018) Investigating the isolation and amplification of microRNAs for forensic body fluid identification. Microrna 7:187–194. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211536607666180430153821
He H, Ji A, Zhao Y et al (2020) A stepwise strategy to distinguish menstrual blood from peripheral blood by Fisher’s discriminant function. Int J Legal Med 134:845–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02196-w
Liu Y, He H, Xiao Z-X et al (2021) A systematic analysis of miRNA markers and classification algorithms for forensic body fluid identification. Brief Bioinform 22. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa324
Kim S-Y, Jang SJ, Jung Y-H, Na J-Y (2021) Difference in microRNA levels in the post-mortem blood from different sampling sites: a proof of concept. J Forensic Leg Med 78:102124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102124
Dachet F, Brown JB, Valyi-Nagy T et al (2021) Selective time-dependent changes in activity and cell-specific gene expression in human postmortem brain. Sci Rep 11:6078. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85801-6
Zhu Y, Wang L, Yin Y, Yang E (2017) Systematic analysis of gene expression patterns associated with postmortem interval in human tissues. Sci Rep 7:5435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05882-0
White K, Yang P, Li L et al (2018) Effect of postmortem interval and years in storage on RNA quality of tissue at a repository of the NIH NeuroBioBank. Biopreserv Biobank 16:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2017.0099
Nestler EJ, Peña CJ, Kundakovic M et al (2016) Epigenetic basis of mental illness. Neuroscientist 22:447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858415608147
Zhang L, Lu Q, Chang C (2020) Epigenetics in health and disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 1253:3–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3449-2_1
Ladd-Acosta C (2015) Epigenetic signatures as biomarkers of exposure. Curr Environ Health Rep 2:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-015-0051-2
Montaño CM, Irizarry RA, Kaufmann WE et al (2013) Measuring cell-type specific differential methylation in human brain tissue. Genome Biol 14:R94. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r94
Mitchell C, Schneper LM, Notterman DA (2016) DNA methylation, early life environment, and health outcomes. Pediatr Res 79:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.193
Zhang FF, Cardarelli R, Carroll J et al (2011) Significant differences in global genomic DNA methylation by gender and race/ethnicity in peripheral blood. Epigenetics 6:623–629. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.5.15335
Sun YV, Smith AK, Conneely KN et al (2013) Epigenomic association analysis identifies smoking-related DNA methylation sites in African Americans. Hum Genet 132:1027–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-013-1311-6
Mayes C, Houston R, Seashols-Williams S et al (2019) The stability and persistence of blood and semen mRNA and miRNA targets for body fluid identification in environmentally challenged and laundered samples. Leg Med 38:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.03.007
McClay JL, Aberg KA, Clark SL et al (2014) A methylome-wide study of aging using massively parallel sequencing of the methyl-CpG-enriched genomic fraction from blood in over 700 subjects. Hum Mol Genet 23:1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt511
Nishiyama A, Nakanishi M (2021) Navigating the DNA methylation landscape of cancer. Trends Genet 37:1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.002
Zhao Z, Shilatifard A (2019) Epigenetic modifications of histones in cancer. Genome Biol 20:245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1870-5
Bai H, Wu S (2019) miR-451: a novel biomarker and potential therapeutic target for cancer. Onco Targets Ther 12:11069–11082. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S230963
Ferrari E, Gandellini P (2020) Unveiling the ups and downs of miR-205 in physiology and cancer: transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Cell Death Dis 11:980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03192-4
Han D, Dong X, Zheng D, Nao J (2019) MiR-124 and the underlying therapeutic promise of neurodegenerative disorders. Front Pharmacol 10:1555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01555
Liu J, Shu B, Zhou Z et al (2020) Involvement of miRNA203 in the proliferation of epidermal stem cells during the process of DM chronic wound healing through Wnt signal pathways. Stem Cell Res Ther 11:348. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01829-x
Ling C, Bacos K, Rönn T (2022) Epigenetics of type 2 diabetes mellitus and weight change - a tool for precision medicine? Nat Rev Endocrinol 18:433–448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00671-w
Shi Y, Zhang H, Huang S et al (2022) Epigenetic regulation in cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7:200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01055-2
Cecchi R (2010) Estimating wound age: looking into the future. Int J Legal Med 124:523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-010-0505-x
Acknowledgements
MCG is supported by a fixed-term research assistant contract by the COMP-HUB Initiative, funded by the “Departments of Excellence” program of the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR, 2018-2022).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Parma within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no financial interests. The co-author RC is an associate editor of the present journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gerra, M.C., Dallabona, C. & Cecchi, R. Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: future and challenges. Int J Legal Med 138, 701–719 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03165-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03165-8