Abstract
Background
In this study, we reported seven cases of pediatric intracranial clear cell meningiomas (CCMs) in our institution and reviewed the relevant literature to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment options, and prognosis of these rare tumors.
Methods
From January 2005 to June 2016, we retrospectively reviewed seven pediatric intracranial CCMs in terms of their clinical data, preoperative MRI features, and prognosis. Moreover, a critical review of the English language literature was also conducted.
Results
The patients consisted of two males and five females with a median age of 10.5 years (range 6–15 years) at initial surgery. Petroclival and cerebellopontine angle area was the most common location site (5/7). Accordingly, the most common initial manifestation was hearing loss (3/7), and the mean interval from onset of symptoms to admission was 6.8 months (1.5–24 months). Gross total resection was achieved in five patients. Of the six tumors with immunohistochemical records, MIB-1 labeling index varied from 3 to 20 % (mean 8.1 %). During the follow-up period (mean 76.9 months, range 16–180 months), four patients had experienced tumor recurrences and three patients died due to recurrences.
Conclusions
Pediatric intracranial CCMs have a tendency to recur. There is a significant relationship between MIB-1 labeling index and recurrence. Gross total resection is recommended; if not available, adjuvant radiotherapy should be used to reduce the recurrent rate. In addition, postoperative MRI follow-up should be monitored at an interval time after resection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Clear cell meningioma (CCM), recognized as WHO grade II, only constitutes 0.2 % of all subtypes of meningomas [1]. These tumors have a tendency to present in younger patients and represent a therapeutic challenge due to their propensity to recur and metastasize [2]. In pediatric population, meningiomas are uncommon, accounting for only 0.4–4.1 % of the pediatric age tumors and only 1.5–1.8 % of all intracranial meningiomas [3]. Thus, pediatric intracranial CCMs are very rare and seldom encountered.
Until now, only a limited number of intracranial CCMs have been reported in pediatric patients, and most of them are from case report [1, 4–7]. A considerable confusion exists in the clinical course, the histological and radiologic characteristics, and the treatment options and prognosis of these tumors. Moreover, because many striking differences of meningiomas have been noted between adults and children, any management approaches extrapolated from the treatment of adult CCMs should be carefully validated in children [8].
In this study, we reported seven new cases of pediatric intracranial CCMs in our institution and reviewed the relevant literature to analyze the clinicohistological characteristics and prognosis and further to investigate the proper treatment of pediatric intracranial CCMs.
Materials and patients
We retrieved the medical records of pediatric patients who were diagnosed as intracranial meningiomas and underwent surgery in our department from January 2005 to June 2016. Among them, seven pediatric intracranial CCMs were identified. Their demographic data, presentation, physical examinations, surgery process, clinical course, and treatments were examined in medical and surgical reports. Simpson resection grades I and II were defined as gross total resection (GTR). In addition, Simpson resection grades III and IV were defined as subtotal resection (STR). Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining and immunohistochemistry for progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, vimentin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100, and smooth muscle actin (EMA) were performed on tumor sections.
Their radiological data were screened from PACS in our hospital. The size of the tumor was defined as the greatest diameter of the enhanced tumor on all sections of MRI. The signal intensities of tumors on T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI were categorized as either hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense relative to that of the cortical gray matter on the same MR images.
Follow-up data of the patients were obtained from our outpatient visits and telephone reviews. In this study, stereotactic radiosurgery was performed in case 1, conventionally fractionated was performed in case 4, and gamma-knife radiosurgery was performed in cases 3 and 5. All these radiotherapies were described as adjuvant radiotherapy in this study.
In addition, we performed a critical review of the English literature on pediatric intracranial CCMs on PubMed without time limit. Keywords used were as follows (single word or combination): “clear cell meningioma” and “pediatric,” “clear cell meningioma” and “children,” “clear cell meningioma” and “child,” “high-grade meningioma” and “pediatric,” “high-grade meningioma” and “children,” and “high-grade meningioma” and “child.” All the cases, series, and literature review lists were obtained and reviewed. Only those who were intracranially located and have adequate clinicopathological information pertinent to the analysis were included.
Results
Clinicopathological features and prognosis
This study included seven pediatric intracranial CCMs. Their clinical and pathological features are summarized in Table 1. The patients consisted of two males and five females with a median age of 10.5 years (range 6–15 years) at initial surgery. Petroclival and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) area was the most common location site (5/7). Accordingly, the most common initial manifestation was hearing loss (3/7), and the mean interval from onset of symptoms to admission was 6.8 months (range 1.5–24 months). GTR was achieved in five patients.
Microscopic examination and immunohistochemical findings were available in six cases (except for case 3 because her first surgery was not performed in our hospital). Light microscopic examination (H & E) revealed that sheets of polygonal or round cells filled with abundant clear cytoplasm were separated by bands of collage and hyalinized vascular stroma (Fig. 1a). The nuclei in the specimen were round or oval. The mitoses of the nuclei were not significant. Structure of vague whorls was seen in case 1 (Fig. 1b). Psammoma bodies were not found in all of these cases. Immunostaining of PR, EMA, and vimentin was positive for three cases, four cases, and all the six cases, respectively. MIB-1 labeling index (LI) varied from 3 to 20 % (mean 8.1 %).
Four patients suffered from local recurrences after the initial surgery with a mean recurrent time of 17.8 months. Notably, case 1, case 3, case 4, and case 5 experienced recurrences for four, six, two, and three times, respectively. Among them, case 3, case 4, and case 5 died due to the recurrences since 14 years, 69 months, and 48 months after their initial operation, respectively.
MRI features
Preoperative radiological data with MRI were available in five of them and are summarized in Table 2. All of these tumors were isointense on T1-weighted image (T1WI) (Fig. 2a), four out five of them were hyperintense on T2WI (Fig. 2b), and the tumors were strongly enhanced with contrast injection on T1WI (Fig. 2c, d). Two out five exhibited heterogeneous enhancement, and the other three exhibited homogeneous enhancement. Despite that dural tail sign was a significant feature for meningiomas on MRI, interestingly, all of the present cases showed no such signs.
Discussion and literature review
CCM is very rare in pediatric population. Giving its rarity, only 30 cases of pediatric intracranial CCMs were reported (Table 3). Thus, a total of 37 cases (including our cases) make up the current body of literatures. The clinical and pathological features of all these tumors are summarized in Table 4. From these data, the epidemiological factors and natural history of this tumor are becoming evident.
Clinical features
According to the previous literature review of the 18 cases of pediatric CCM (including intracranial and spinal), the mean age of the pediatric cases is 9 years [9]. In this present review, we found a higher mean age of 10.3 years in these patients. In addition, different from their female predominance, these tumors were more commonly seen in males, with a 1.5:1 male-to-female ratio, and this ratio is similar to that reported in the general pediatric meningiomas [10]. A proclivity of CCMs for the CPA area and the spinal column has been reported with almost equal frequency [11, 12]. In the present series focusing on the intracranial location, the CPA area was the most common location for pediatric CCMs (57 %, 21/37), followed by convexity location (16 %, 6/37) and posterior fossa (14 %, 5/37). The most common presentations were headache (44 %, 16/36) followed by cranial nerve symptoms (33 %, 12/36). In the cases with duration of symptoms, the time ranged from 1 week to 72 months with the mean time of 12 months.
Radiology
In line with the previous studies [13], these lesions in our five cases showed isointense on T1WIs, isointense or hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and marked enhancement on gadolinium administration on MRI. Meningiomas usually demonstrate dura-based growth, and “tail sign” could be constantly seen on MR images. The review data show a prevalence of dural tail ranging from 52 to 78 % in meningiomas [14, 15]. In addition, malignant lesions exhibit more common dural enhancement than the benign ones [16]. However, despite the relative malignant biological behavior, all of the present cases with preoperative MRI were lacking of dural tail sign, and it could be a characteristic radiographic finding on pediatric intracranial CCM.
Immunohistochemical findings
It is helpful for immunohistochemistry to diagnose CCM and differentiate them from other subtypes of meningiomas, as well as from other similar clear cell tumor entities, including ependymoma, microcystic meningioma, oligodendroglioma, and metastasis of renal clear cell carcinoma [2]. As described in the previous study, a membranous pattern of immunoreactivity for EMA and strongly reactive for vimentin just like other meningiomas could be observed in almost all CCMs, reflecting mesenchymal and epithelial properties. In addition, a tumorigenic role of nuclear progesterone receptor (PR) in meningioma has been suggested and PR staining appears in 77 % of these meningiomas [17]. Similarly, of all the pediatric CCMs in this study, vimentin, EMA, and PR staining appeared in 100 % (21/21), 86 % cases (24/28), and 57 % (4/7) cases, respectively. These results also suggested that not all the CCMs are immunoreactive to EMA staining. CCM includes more glycogen than the other meningioma subtypes, and it can be immunoreactive to GFAP, which is an atypical characteristic for meningiomas [2], but in this review, all the reported 14 cases were immunostained negative for GFAP. As a nuclear antigen, Ki-67 expresses during active phases of the cell cycle including G1, S, G2, and M phases [18]. A higher MIB-1 LI indicates shorter cell cycle times and faster tumor growth [19]. In the present series, the mean MIB-1 LI for pediatric CCM was 6.9 % (ranging from 2 to 20 %), which was intermediate between that of grade I and grade II conventional meningiomas [20]. This MIB-1 LI was lower than the reported mean of 9 % in the previous series of adult CCM [8]. It has been reported that MIB-1 LI is correlated with histological atypia and tumor recurrence, whereas other studies could not confirm the statistical significance [2, 6, 9, 17]. Among the 37 pediatric patients in our review, 21 of them had MIB-1 LI record. There was a significant relationship between MIB-1 LI and recurrence-free time (RFS) (P = 0.017, log-rank test) (Fig. 3). However, in this review, even CCM with low MIB-1 LI could recur [9].
Treatment and prognosis
CCM has a high risk of recurrence after resection compared with other meningioma subtypes. According to a previous study, the recurrence rate of CCM is as high as 61 % [17]. However, in this review, the rate was 34 % (11/32), with a recurrent mean time of 19.5 months (range 6–72 months). The reason could be the relatively shorter follow-up time. Notably, after the first recurrence, we found that as high as 78 % (7/9) of the patients would suffer the second recurrence with a recurrent mean time of 24.9 months (range 7 to 48 months) from the second surgery, which has not been reported before. Moreover, after the second recurrences, 86 % (6/7) of patients would suffer from the disappointed third recurrences. Of these recurrences, distant recurrences were described in three cases, which included the recurrence in the spinal [17, 21]. Due to the rarity, it is still unclear whether the distant recurrences are caused by the capacity of CCM to metastasize or the plantation during the surgery. Thus, MR images including the entire neuraxis should be examined at regular intervals after the tumor resection, especially for those who have recurred more than once.
All of the patients were treated surgically, and 35 of them had a description for resection degree. Eighty percent of the patients (28/35) had GTR, while 20 % of them (7/35) had subtotal resection. Of all the patients who had GTR, 29 % (8/28) suffered from recurrences. In comparison, 60 % (3/5) of the patients with subtotal resection experienced recurrences. The results suggested that the recurrence rate of GTR is obviously lower than STR. Therefore, GTR should be considered the ultimate therapeutic objective in children. However, tumor location, vascularity, and tumor size often preclude the ability to perform a GTR to avoid the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage and neurological morbidity [18]. In this situation, as suggested by Traunecker, staged multiple procedures are recommended [22].
Based on adult retrospective series, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for WHO grade II or III meningiomas, incomplete resection, or local recurrence [22–24]. In pediatric meningiomas, the clear role of radiotherapy is still not very clear because of lack of evidence [18]. In this careful review, 23 % of the patients (8/35) have adjuvant radiotherapy. Of the patients who had GTRs, two out four patients with adjuvant radiotherapy experienced recurrences, and the other two patients with adjuvant radiotherapy did not. In comparison, seven out of 24 patients who did not have adjuvant radiotherapy suffered from recurrences and the other 17 patients without adjuvant radiotherapy did not. Thus, it seems that adjuvant radiotherapy could not reduce the recurrent rate significantly in patients who had GTR. However, the current literature does not adequately explain this situation due to the small sample size. Some recurrences could also be caused by the unrecognized STR or more aggressive nature in some recurrent variants [11]. In addition, we found the patients who had STR but did not recur all had radiotherapy. Therefore, for those patients with tumor remnants, radiotherapy could be considered as an important treatment manner. However, in children whose central nervous system is more vulnerable to the damage of radiotherapy, the usage of this treatment should be balanced against the risk of late sequelae and increased incidence of secondary tumors [25–27].
In conclusion, CCM is an uncommon variant of meningioma and has a tendency to recur, especially after the recurrence for once. There is a significant relationship between MIB-1 LI and recurrence. Gross total resection is recommended; if not, STR should be followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to reduce the recurrent rate. After the resection, postoperative MR imaging follow-up should be monitored at an interval time.
Limitation
Our study has some limitations. First, despite that this is the largest reported number of patients, the total number is still small. Second, the review data were summarized from all the previously reported cases and from different institutions; thus, some assessments may not be identical (such as MIB-1 LI). Third, the follow-up time should be longer enough to validate the outcomes of these patients.
References
Juratli TA, Geiger KD, Weigel P et al (2015) A five year-old child with clear cell petro-clival meningioma: case report with clinical and histopathological long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst 31(11):1–6
Chen H, Li XM, Chen YC et al (2011) Intracranial clear cell meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 15 cases. Acta Neurochir 153(9):1769–1780
Tufan K, Dogulu F, Kurt G et al (2005) Intracranial meningiomas of childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Neurosurg 41:1–7
Li Z, Zhang Y, Wang E et al (2012) Intracranial clear cell meningioma in two children with blood relations: two case reports and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 28(12):2143–2151
Kumar R, Das KK, Jaiswal AK et al (2015) Clear cell meningioma in a child: a case report and review of literature. Asian Journal of Neurosurgery 10(1)
Ahn ES, Chin LS, Gyure KA et al (2005) Long-term control after resection and gamma knife surgery of an intracranial clear cell meningioma: case report. J Neurosurg 102(102):303–306
Sato T, Sugiyama T, Kawataki T et al (2010) Clear cell meningioma causing Castleman syndrome in a child. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5(6):622–625
Kotecha RS, Pascoe EM, Rushing EJ et al (2011) Meningiomas in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 12:1229–1239
Jain D, Sharma MC, Sarkar C et al (2007) Clear cell meningioma, an uncommon variant of meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of nine cases. J Neuro-Oncol 81(3):315–321
Rushing EJ, Olsen C, Mena H et al (2005) Central nervous system meningiomas in the first two decades of life: a clinicopathological analysis of 87 patients. J Neurosurg 103(103):489–495
Dhall SS, Tumialan LM, Brat DJ et al (2005) Spinal intradural clear cell meningioma following resection of a suprasellar clear cell meningioma. Case report and recommendations for management. J Neurosurg 103:559–563
Tong-tong W, Li-juan B, Zhi L et al (2010) Clear cell meningioma with anaplastic features: case report and review of literature. Pathol Res Pract 206:349–354
Wang XQ, Huang MZ, Zhang H et al (2014) Clear cell meningioma: clinical features, CT, and MR imaging findings in 23 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38(2):200–208
Goldsher D, Litt AW, Pinto RS et al (1990) Dural “tail” associated with meningiomas on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images: characteristics, differential diagnostic value, and possible implications for treatment. Radiology 176(2):447–450
Guermazi A, Lafitte F, Miaux Y et al (2005) The dural tail sign–beyond meningioma. Clin Radiol 60:171–188
Wen M, Jung S, Moon KS et al (2014) Immunohistochemical profile of the dural tail in intracranial meningiomas. Acta Neurochir 156(12):2263–2273
Zorludemir S, Scheithauer BW, Hirose T et al (1995) Clear cell meningioma. A clinicopathologic study of a potentially aggressive variant of meningioma. Am J Surg Pathol 19:493–505
Kotecha RS, Junckerstorff RC, Lee S et al (2011) Pediatric meningioma: current approaches and future direction. J Neuro-Oncol 104(1):1–10
Sandberg DI, Edgar MA, Resch L et al (2001) MIB-1 staining index of pediatric meningiomas. Neurosurgery 48:590–597
Hinsdale IL (2005) CBTRUS, Statistic report; primary brain tumors in United States, 1998–2002. Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States.
Küster O, Schittenhelm J, Schwartz O et al (2012) Paediatric clear cell meningioma with multiple distant recurrences after presumed intra-operative cell spread. Childs Nerv Syst 28(6):925–931
Traunecker H, Mallucci C, Grundy R et al (2008) Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG): guidelines for the management of intracranial meningioma in children and young people. Br J Neurosurg 22(1):24–25
Gondi V, Tome WA, Mehta MP (2010) Fractionated radiotherapy for intracranial meningiomas. J Neuro-Oncol 99:349–356
NICE (2006) Improving outcomes for people with brain and other CNS tumours. Guidance on Cancer Services
Wilson CB (1994) Meningiomas: genetics, malignancy, and the role of radiation in induction and treatment. J Neurosurg 81:666–675
Sadetzki S, Modan B, Chetrit A et al (2000) An iatrogenic epidemic of benign meningioma. Am J Epidemiol 151:266–272
Elbabaa SK, Gokden M, Crawford JR et al (2012) Radiation-associated meningiomas in children: clinical, pathological, and cytogenetic characteristics with a critical review of the literature. American Association of Neurological Surgeons 10(4):281–290
Shih DF, Wang JS, Pan RG et al (1996) Clear cell meningioma: a case report. Chin Med J 57(6):452–456
Teo JG, Goh KY, Rosenblum MK et al (1998) Intraparenchymal clear cell meningioma of the brainstem in a 2-year-old child. Case report and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg 28(1):27–30
Yu KB, Lim MK, Kim HJ et al (2002) Clear-cell meningioma: CT and MR imaging findings in two cases involving the spinal canal and cerebellopontine angle. Korean J Radiol 3(2):125–129
Carrà S, Drigo P, Gardiman M et al (2003) Clear cell meningioma in a 22-month-old male: update after five years. Pediatr Neurosurg 38(3):162–163
Miranda P, Simal JA, Vila M et al (2009) Posterior fossa clear cell meningioma without dural attachment in a child. Childs Nerv Syst 25(3):389–392
King J, Cusimano M, Hawkins C et al (2009) Extradural middle fossa approach to a clear cell meningioma in a child. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Le Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques 36(2):257–261
Ma L, Liu WK, Wang K et al (2009) Intracranial clear-cell meningioma. [J] Acta Neurochirurgica 151(4):373–378
Rakesh R, Shrividya S (2010) Supratentorial clear cell meningioma in a child: a rare tumor at unusual location. J Pediatr Neurosci 5(2):141–143
Burgan OT, Bahl A, Critcher V et al (2010) Clear cell meningioma of the fourth ventricle in a child: a case report and literature review. Pediatr Neurosurg 46(6):462–465
Taha H, Schirmer M (2010) Clear cell meningeoma of the brainstem in a 3.5-year-old child: case report and review of the literature. Central European Neurosurgery 71(3):148–151
Raffalli-Ebezant H, Rutherford SA, Stivaros S et al (2015) Pediatric intracranial clear cell meningioma associated with a germline mutation of SMARCE1: a novel case. Childs Nerv Syst 31(3):441–447
Gerkes EH, Fock JM, den Dunnen W et al (2016) A heritable form of SMARCE1-related meningiomas with important implications for follow-up and family screening. Neurogenetics 17(2):1–7
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Wen Wang for his assistance in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This research with approved by the research ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Zhao, M., Jiao, Y. et al. Pediatric intracranial clear cell meningioma: a clinicopathological study of seven cases and literature review. Childs Nerv Syst 33, 239–248 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3269-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3269-x