Abstract
Bacillus sp. B25 is an effective biocontrol agent against the maize pathogenic fungus Fusarium verticillioides (Fv). Previous in vitro assays have shown that B25 has protease, glucanase, and chitinase activities and siderophores production; however, specific mechanisms by which B25 controls Fv are still unknown. To determine the genetic traits involved in biocontrol, B25 genome was sequenced and analyzed. B25 genome is composed of 5,113,413 bp and 5251 coding genes. A multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA) suggests that B25 is closely related to the Bacillus cereus group and a high percentage (70–75%) of the genetic information is conserved between B25 and related strains, which include most of the genes associated to fungal antagonism. Some of these genes are shared with some biocontrol agents of the Bacillus genus and less with Pseudomonas and Serratia strains. We performed a genomic comparison between B25 and five Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas and Serratia strains. B25 contains genes involved in a wide variety of antagonistic mechanisms including chitinases, glycoside hydrolases, siderophores, antibiotics, and biofilm production that could be implicated in root colonization. Also, 24 genomic islands and 3 CRISPR sequences were identified in the B25 genome. This is the first comparative genome analysis between strains belonging to the B. cereus group and biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic fungi. These results are the starting point for further studies on B25 gene expression during its interaction with Fv.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Several members of the Bacillus cereus group, including B. thuringiensis and B. cereus, are effective in controlling important plant diseases [56, 64]. Given the importance of disease control in agriculture, efforts have been made to clarify the genetic contents of biocontrol agents by genome sequencing of Bacillus spp. [16, 35]. Pseudomonas spp. [41] and Serratia spp. [22, 49] strains identify the genes involved in antifungal activity, including antibiotics, siderophores, lytic enzymes, proteases, non-ribosomal peptides, polyketides, etc. Also, genomic information on biocontrol agents has allowed comparing between related bacteria and bacteria that perform similar functions regarding biological control [38]. For example, a comparative genomics study between Pseudomonas spp. strains reported common genes related to antagonism being P. protegens Pf-5, the strain with the highest content of biocontrol genes. A significant fraction of these genes were strain-specific. In fact, it has been reported that this group of bacteria only shares 45–52% of all the genetic information [41].
The disease control activity exerted by members of the Bacillus spp. is complex, with several mechanisms, including competition for nutrients (including iron) and space, antibiosis, mycoparasitism, and biofilm formation [51]. To date, the genetic basis of biocontrol mechanisms in members of the B. cereus group is not fully understood.
Bacillus sp. B25 is an effective control agent against the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium verticillioides (Fv) [18]. A decrease in Fusarium severity of stalk and ear rot in field trials, as well as fungal fumonisin levels in grain, were observed when this strain was inoculated [40]. Additional in vitro assays demonstrated that B25 is able to produce protease, glucanase, and chitinase activities, as well as siderophores [18], so it was presumed that this strain owns a wide range of genes reported as related to biocontrol.
B. cereus, B. thuringiensis, and B. anthracis are the main closely related species belonging to the B. cereus group [52]. Although research on them has been focused on other topics, including human pathology and industrial applications [55, 63], it is known that the first two species are effective in fungal biocontrol, with the production of chitinases and siderophores as antagonistic mechanisms [29, 50], or the production of parasporal crystal proteins that can act as insecticide [28]. Thus, strains of this group could possess coding genes for both insecticidal and antifungal activity.
To date, some mechanisms by which B25 controls Fv have been evidenced at the biochemical level; however, its effectiveness against the phytopathogenic fungus both in the field and in vitro experiments, suggests that B25 owns a wider range of mechanisms that makes it an interesting biocontrol agent. Genomic information of B25 could be shared with phylogenetically related strains and other biocontrol agents. Hence, a comprehensive knowledge of gene content of B25 would elucidate the genetic basis involved in controlling fungal activities. A genomic comparison of B25 against related species with similar functional characteristics would elucidate the shared and unique genetic components in B25. Here, we analyze the genome of the B25 strain and describe a genomic comparison of B25 against five Bacillus spp. strains, Pseudomonas protegens pf-5, and Serratia plymuthica AS9, some of them with biocontrol activities. This is the first comprehensive comparative genome analysis addressed at their genetic potential to control fungal pathogens among strains belonging to this taxonomic group and other biocontrol agents.
Materials and Methods
Genome Sequencing and Assembly
Genomic DNA isolation was achieved with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue® kit (Qiagen, CA, USA). Libraries of 550 and 1000 base pairs were prepared and sequenced in a 2 × 300 format (MiSeq platform, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Adapter trimming and paired-end filtering (with a quality of ≥25) were performed using SeqPrep [61]. Reads were assembled de novo using Newbler 3.0 [45], and SSPACE [7] was used to reduce the number of scaffolds, and gaps were closed with GapFiller [8]. To define if resulting scaffolds were part of a bacterial chromosome, they were compared to B. thuringiensis strain BMB171 (CP001903.1). The SynMap tool of the CoGe database [43] was used for aligning and orienting the scaffolds using the genome of BMB171 [27] as reference (Fig. S1). The B25 sequence was deposited in the GenBank (CP016285) as Bacillus sp. B25 (2016b).
Genome Annotation and Identification of Genes of Interest in B25
Protein-coding sequences and RNA genes were predicted by Glimmer V.3.0 [17]. Automatic assignment of functionality was carried out by the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server [2] using BMB171 genome as reference. Selection of antagonistic and housekeeping genes for phylogenetic analysis was carried out browsing the genome with the SEED-Viewer tool of the RAST server. Non-ribosomal peptide synthesis clusters were identified with antiSMASH [48], and their function was deduced according to their homology to the known antibiotics using NCBI’s conserved domain database [44]. Genomic islands (GIs) were identified using IslandPath-DIMOB in IslandViewer 4 platform [5]. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) domains were screened using CRISPR finder [24].
Phylogenetic Analysis
A multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA) was carried out using a 15 kilobase pair (kbp) concatenated sequence including 16S rRNA, gyrB, groEL, polC, rpoB, and purH genes. Gene sequences of B25 were compared with the corresponding concatenated sequences of ten strains of the B. cereus group: B. cereus strains ATCC 14579 (CP001903.1) [28], FORC 005 (CP009686.1) [31], B4264 (CP001176.1), and Q1 (CP000227.1) [63]; B. thuringiensis strains BMB171 [25], HD-29 (CP010089.1) [66], HD73 (CP004069.1) [39], Bt407 (CP003889.1), and CT-43 (CP001907.1), and B. anthracis BA1015 (CP009544.1) [60]. A genome sequence from B. bombysepticus Wang (CP007512.1) [11] closely related to this group was also included. Sequences of B. subtilis strains 168 (AL009126.3) [34], BAB-1 (CP004405.1) [25], B. amyloliquefaciens strains M27 (AMPK01000000.1) [34], and FZB42 (CP000560.1) [9] were used as outgroups. Concatenated sequences were aligned with MUSCLE [17] and MEGA 5.2 [62] was used to generate the phylogenetic analysis using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [58] and Kimura 2-parameter model for the phylogenetic tree construction (bootstrap of 1500 replicates). MLPA was supported by means of an average nucleotide identity (ANI) calculation using B25 sequences against the 11 strains related to Bacillus cereus group, using the 15 kbp concatenated sequence and also the complete genome sequence of compared strains. Both analyses were carried out using the ANI calculator [57] with the cut-off value to delimit bacterial species set to 95% [4].
Comparative Genomic Analysis
To determine conserved sequence segments between B25 in Bacillus cereus group, a whole genome alignment was carried out using MAUVE [14]. To compare the genetic content of B25 against genetically related strains (B. bombysepticus Wang, B. thuringiensis BMB17, and B. cereus Q1), at the structural and functional levels, a functional gene annotation with the subsystem feature category-based comparison of the RAST server was performed. Shared and unique genes between B25 and B. cereus group were identified using EDGAR [6]; the pan-genome and core-genome were obtained. A comparative analysis addressed at identifying genes involved in bacterial antagonism was performed using the proteomes of Bacillus sp. B25, B. bombysepticus Wang, B. thuringiensis BMB171, B. cereus Q1, B. subtilis BAB-1, B. amyloliquefaciens M27, Serratia plymuthica AS9 (CP002773.1), and Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 (CP000076.1). The complete dataset contained 33,353 protein-coding genes. An all-against-all comparison was performed using BLAST-P (E-value 1 × 10− 10) followed by clustering with OrthoMCL v1.4 [37] using a default MCL inflation parameter of 1.5.
Results
Genome Features of Bacillus sp. B25
The Bacillus sp. B25 genome contains a circular chromosome of 5,113,413 bp with a GC-content of 35.6%. It comprises 5360 genes, 5251 are coding sequences (CDS), and 109 are non-coding RNAs (Table 1 and Fig. S2). 2334 CDS (45%) were classified into 27 functional categories and 470 subsystems (Fig. S3) and a putative function was assigned to 2214 CDS (Fig. S3, Dataset S1). Besides, 18 scaffolds were not aligned with the reference genome and 17 of those showed identity to Bacillus spp. plasmids and contained 1063 CDS (Table S1). These contained 22 genes associated with sporulation, 26 genes related to transcriptional regulators, multidrug resistance, and genes related to fungal antagonism such as siderophores and 1 chitinase. Three CRISPR domains were identified in the non-assembled scaffold ppB25_2 along a 8 kbp region that contains the Cas3, Cas5d, Csd1, and Cas7 genes (Fig. S7). According to CRISPR finder, other “questionable” CRISPR sequences were identified in the B25, Wang, BMB171, and Q1 chromosomes. Furthermore, no Cas proteins were identified close to these repeats.
Phylogenetic Analysis
The B25 strain was previously identified as Bacillus cereus sensu lato [18] based only on the 16S rRNA gene sequence. Here an MLPA was performed and clustered B25 close to B. thuringiensis (BMB171, HD-29, and HD73), B. cereus (ATCC 14579, FORC 005, B4264) all related to the Bacillus cereus group, and B. bombysepticus Wang (Fig. S4). This was also confirmed with ANI values obtained using both whole genome and concatenated sequences analysis (Table S2).
Genome Properties of the Bacillus cereus Group
The genome size and number of predicted genes of B25 is slightly lower but similar to BMB171, Q1, and Wang and all strains have similar GC-content percentage (35–36% GC) (Table S3). All compared strains have a large proportion of CDS (9.8–10.5%) related to responses against phytopathogens including the subsystems carbohydrates, virulence, disease and defense, stress response, regulation and cell signaling, iron acquisition and metabolism, as well as dormancy and sporulation (Fig. S5, Dataset S2).
Pan- and core-genome analysis (Fig. 1; Dataset S3) revealed that the four strains shared 3964 CDS, corresponding to approximately 70–75% of all CDS in these genomes. Genes that code for virulence factors and those involved with antifungal activity are allocated here. A total of 387 CDS integrate the list of single genes in B25, including transporter genes, mobile elements, phages, transcriptional regulators, membrane proteins, motility, and lytic enzymes. Interestingly, two chitinases and one chitin-binding protein were specific for B25 (Dataset S3).
All compared chromosomes presented high collinearity among their sequences (Fig. S6). Q1 was the strain with more translocations in its genome sequence. 15 GIs were identified in the B25 chromosome (Fig. S2) and only 7 GIs were well conserved along the Wang, BMB171, and Q1 chromosomes (Table S4). These GI regions include genes related to mobile element proteins, phages, transcription/translation factors, sporulation, multidrug resistance, and lytic enzymes (chitinase and chitosanase). Also 11 GIs are distributed in 8 of the 17 sequences similar to plasmids (Table S5).
Genes Involved in Antagonism
To compare the genetic information related to antagonism between B25 and the Bacillus cereus group strains (BMB171 and Q1), B. bombysepticus Wang and the biocontrol agents B. amyloliquefaciens M27, B. subtilis BAB-1, Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5, and Serratia plymuthica AS9, their proteomes were compared. The comparison was then focused on 36 genes related to biofilm production, siderophores (bacillibactin and petrobactin), extracellular enzymes (glycoside hydrolase, chitinase, and chitosanase) and antibiotics (surfactin, fengycin, and iturin) (Table 2). All strains share genes involved in bacillibactin production except Pf-5, which lacks two of the five genes comprising this operon. B25, Wang, and BMB171 also contain all genes related to petrobactin production. M27 and AS9 contain only one and two genes involved in petrobactin production, respectively (Table 2). Regarding lytic activity, the B. cereus group strains, B. bombysepticus Wang and S. plymuthica AS9 share chitinases. The B. cereus group, including the Wang strain share a chitosanase, excluding Q1. B25, BMB171, and B. subtilis BAB-1 that contain a possible endoglucanase, with a domain of glycoside hydrolase family 1 (GH1) (Table 2).
B25, Wang, BMB171 and B. amyloliquefaciens M27 own the complete operon for surfactin production (SrfAABCD). Pf-5 and BMB-1 presented only one and two out of the four genes for surfactin production. Despite that fengycin and iturin are common in Bacillus sp., genes for these antibiotics were not identified in any other strain. M27 was the only strain with all genes for production of the antibiotics surfactin, iturin, and fengycin (Table 2). B25, BMB171 and Q1 have all the genes of the operon for biofilm formation sipW-TasA, Wang genome lacks an hypothetical protein, and BAB-1 and M27 have only SipW, TasA-like 2, and SinR, whereas strains Pf-5 and AS9 lack all biofilm formation genes (Table 2).
Discussion
B25 Genome Properties and Phylogeny
The complete genome of Bacillus sp. B25 provided new insights into the potential metabolites that it can produce related to biocontrol activity. The genome size, gene and GC-content are consistent with those of previously published Bacillus spp. genomes. Based on the performed phylogenetic analysis, B25 is part of the B. cereus group, located close to B. thuringiensis (BMB171, HD-29, and HD73) and B. cereus (ATCC 14579, FORC 005, and B4264), and also to the B. bombysepticus Wang strain. A significant synteny between B25, BMB171, and Wang and non-significant synteny with Q1 was found. Although synteny has been demonstrated among the B. cereus group, some studies have evidenced differences in gene order, chromosomal rearrangements, and nucleotide variations [54]. B. bombysepticus has not been included in the B. cereus group but our MLPA and genome comparison results suggest that Wang is close to the B. cereus group, but this requires further confirmation.
Despite their phenotype and particular properties, strains of the B. cereus group share a considerable amount of genetic information [23, 52]. In this work, B25 shares 70–75% of its genome with B. thuringiensis, B. cereus, and B. bombysepticus Wang, a high percentage compared to other bacteria [41], so their differences could be based only on a few genes.
Unique genes from B25, including transcriptional regulators, membrane proteins, and motility, as well as those genes involved in lytic enzymes activity, should be analyzed further to determine their differential role in biocontrol activity. These are allocated in the GIs (Table S4) along with integrative and conjugative elements, transposons, multidrug resistance and some phage-related genes [30]. Those are commonly acquired by horizontal gene transfer encoding adaptative traits that may be beneficial under certain growth or environmental conditions [59].
Type I CRISPR-Cas system is considered as a unique defense mechanism against foreign DNA and in bacterial stress responses and virulence [42, 46]. The presence of three CRISPR elements in B25 confirms the importance of resistance to exogenous DNA in this strain. It remains to learn if the CRISPR spacers play a role in controlling horizontal gene transfer of plasmids and prophages found in B25 genome. The fact that the other strains do not contain a CRISPR-Cas system suggest that B25 could represent a separated phylogenetic sub-lineage within B. cereus group.
Genes Associated with Fungal Antagonism
We identified common and specific genes related to biocontrol activities in B25. At the genetic level, the most conserved mechanisms among all Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Serratia strains were bacillibactin, some lytic enzymes, surfactin, and biofilm formation. Siderophores such as bacillibactin play a key role for antagonism and have been reported in several species [12] including B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [36]. The siderophore petrobactin has also been considered as vital for iron acquisition and virulence in B. anthracis [32]. The fact that B25 has 11 genes involved in siderophore synthesis suggests that this antagonistic mechanism may be of importance against fungal pathogens in B25.
Most bacteria produce lytic enzymes that can hydrolyze a wide variety of polymeric compounds, including chitin, proteins, cellulose, lipids, and glucans, the major components of the fungal cell wall [1], and the presence of these enzymes is expected to suppress phytopathogen growth [33]. B25 possesses two complete genes coding for chitinases, which may be playing a key role in fungal growth inhibition [15]. B25 chitinase genes transcript levels are induced in response to the addition of chitin and Fv fungal lysates [19] confirming a potential role for these genes to control this plant fungal pathogen. In parallel, B25 could also degrade the fungal cell wall with the help of a chitosanase gene. Orthologous chitosanase sequences have been reported as involved in biocontrol against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani [21, 47]. Considering that B25 also has a putative endoglucanase, and the reported effectiveness of this lytic enzyme against a wide range of fungi [53], it is possible that B25 possesses a strong mechanism based on cell wall degradation to control the fungal development through chitinase, chitosanase, and glucanase activity. Further analyses are necessary to investigate the role of these genes in lytic enzyme activity.
Antibiotic production seems to be the less conserved biocontrol mechanism among compared strains. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens M27 is the only strain that has the necessary genes for the surfactin, iturin, and fengycin biosynthesis. B25, Wang, and BMB171 have the necessary genes for surfactin biosynthesis. Surfactin synthesis requires the expression of four structural genes present in the operon SrfAABCD and is a key biocontrol mechanism of B. amyloliquefaciens SQR9 [36]. The activity of the biocontrol agent B. subtilis SG6 against F. graminearum has been associated with the co-production of chitinase, fengycin, and surfactin [65]. Even though fengycin is not present in B25, the activity of chitinase and surfactin could be an important complement for B25 exerting fungal antagonism. Bacillibactin, surfactin, and other non-ribosomal peptides also require the presence and expression of the sfp gene (a phosphopantetheinyl transferase) [36]. Sfp was identified in B25 (Table 2), and its role in bacillibactin production in this strain remains to be known.
Biofilm formation is the first step of endophytic bacteria to colonize roots [20] and it can help to mediate plant protection against environmental factors [26] and plant diseases [3, 10]. In B25, the identified sipW-tasA operon and regulatory genes sinR and sinI could be determinant for Fv biocontrol mechanisms involving cell–cell communication via quorum sensing and production of antifungal metabolites [13]. Once B. subtilis colonizes roots, it forms a stable and extensive biofilm and produces surfactin, which could protect the plant from pathogenic organisms [3]. Hence, the discovery of genes related to biofilm formation in B25 is crucial to understand its role as an effective biocontrol agent.
As far as we know, this work is the first comparative genome analysis between strains belonging to the Bacillus cereus group and other biocontrol agents. The data here reported demonstrate that B25 contains the genes necessary for controlling the growth of phytopathogenic fungus, including competence for nutrients, mycoparasitism, antibiosis, and biofilm formation. Despite its genera and species, these mechanisms are ubiquitous among biocontrol strains. The B25 genomic analysis provides the basis for further studies on gene expression of B25 during its interaction with Fv, as well as to analyze the activity of the genes identified here to elucidate the mechanisms that B25 uses to control Fv.
References
Adams DJ (2004) Fungal cell wall chitinases and glucanases. Microbiology 150(Pt 7):2029–2035. doi:10.1099/mic.0.26980-0
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O (2008) The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9(1):75. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
Bais HP (2004) Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin sroduction. Plant Physiol 134(1):307–319. doi:10.1104/pp.103.028712
Beaz-Hidalgo R, Hossain MJ, Liles MR, Figueras MJ (2015) Strategies to avoid wrongly labelled genomes using as example the detected wrong taxonomic affiliation for Aeromonas genomes in the GenBank database. PLoS ONE 10(1):e0115813. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115813
Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Lau BY, Hoad G, Winsor GL, Brinkman FSL (2017) IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W30–W35. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx343
Blom J, Albaum SP, Doppmeier D, Puhler A, Vorholter FJ, Zakrzewski M, Goesmann A (2009) EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinform 10:154. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-154
Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W (2011) Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27(4):578–579
Boetzer M, Pirovano W (2012) Toward almost closed genomes with GapFiller. Genome Biol 13:R16
Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, Schneider K, Vater J, Süssmuth R, Piel J, Borriss R (2009) Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J Biotechnol 140(1–2):27–37
Chen Y, Yan F, Chai Y, Liu H, Kolter R, Losick R, Guo J (2013) Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by Bacillus subtilis isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation. Environ Microbiol 15(3):848–864. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02860.x
Cheng T, Lin P, Jin S, Wu Y, Fu B, Long R, Liu D, Guo Y, Peng L, Xia Q (2014) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus bombysepticus, a pathogen leading to Bombyx mori black chest septicemia. Genome Announc 2(3):e00312–e00314. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00312-14
Chu BC, Garcia-Herrero A, Johanson TH, Krewulak KD, Lau CK, Peacock RS (2010) Siderophore uptake in bacteria and the battle for iron with the host; a bird’s eye view. Biometals 23:601–611
Danhorn T, Fuqua C (2007) Biofilm formation by plant-associated bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 61:401–422
Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT (2010) progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011147
Downing KJ, Leslie G, Thomson JA (2000) Biocontrol of the sugarcane borer Eldana saccharina by expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac7 and Serratia marcescens chiA genes in sugarcane-associated bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2808–2810
Dunlap CA, Schisler DA, Bowman MJ, Rooney AP (2015) Genomic analysis of Bacillus subtilis OH 131.1 and co-culturing with Cryptococcus flavescens for control of Fusarium head blight. Plant Gene 2:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.plgene.2015.03.002
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5):1792–1797. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
Figueroa-López AM, Cordero-Ramírez JD, Martínez-Álvarez JC, López-Meyer M, Lizárraga-Sánchez GJ, Félix-Gastélum R, Castro-Martínez C, Maldonado-Mendoza IE (2016) Rhizospheric bacteria of maize with potential for biocontrol of Fusarium verticillioides. Springer Plus 5 (1):330. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1780-x
Figueroa-López AM, Leyva-Madrigal KY, Cervantes-Gámez RG, Beltrán-Arredondo LI, Douriet-Gámez ND, Castro-Martínez C, Maldonado-Mendoza IE (2017) Induction of Bacillus cereus chitinases as a response to lysates of Fusarium verticillioides. Rom Biotechnol Lett 22 (4)
Gao T, Foulston L, Chai Y, Wang Q, Losick R (2015) Alternative modes of biofilm formation by plant-associated Bacillus cereus. Microbiol Open 4(3):452–464. doi:10.1002/mbo3.251
Gao X-A, Ju W-T, Jung W-J, Park R-D (2008) Purification and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus cereus D-11. Carbohyd Polym 72:513–520
Garbeva P, van Elsas JD, de Boer W (2012) Draft genome sequence of the antagonistic rhizosphere bacterium Serratia plymuthica strain PRI-2C. J Bacteriol 194(15):4119–4120. doi:10.1128/jb.00679-12
Gohar M, Gilois N, Graveline R, Garreau C, Sanchis V, Lereclus D (2005) A comparative study of Bacillus cereus. Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus anthracis extracellular proteomes. Proteomics 5(14):3696–3711. doi:10.1002/pmic.200401225
Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C (2007) CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W52–W57. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm360
Guo Q, Li S, Lu X, Zhang X, Wang P, Ma P (2014) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis BAB-1, a biocontrol agent for suppression of tomato gray mold. Genome Announc 2(4):e00744. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00744-14 doi
Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2004) Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2(2):95–108
He J, Shao X, Zheng H, Li M, Wang J, Zhang Q, Li L, Liu Z, Sun M, Wang S, Yu Z (2010) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis mutant strain BMB171. J Bacteriol 192(15):4074–4075. doi:10.1128/jb.00562-10
Höfte H, Whiteley HR (1989) Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacilllus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53(2):242–255
Hollensteiner J, Wemheuer F, Harting R, Kolarzyk AM, Diaz Valerio SM, Poehlein A, Brzuszkiewicz EB, Nesemann K, Braus-Stromeyer SA, Braus GH, Daniel R, Liesegang H (2017) Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus weihenstephanensis inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic Verticillium species. Front Microbiol 7(2171). doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.02171
Juhas M, van der Meer JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW (2009) Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. Fems Microbiol Rev 33(2):376–393. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00136.x
Lee D-H, Kim HR, Chung HY, Lim JG, Kim S, Kim SK, Ku H-J, Kim H, Ryu S, Choi SH, Lee J-H (2015) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus cereus FORC_005, a food-borne pathogen from the soy sauce braised fish-cake with quail-egg. Stand Genom Sci 10:(97)
Lee JY, Passalacqua KD, Hanna PC, Sherman DH (2011) Regulation of petrobactin and bacillibactin biosynthesis in Bacillus anthracis under iron and oxygen variation. PLoS ONE 6(6):e20777. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020777
Lee KJ, Oh BT, Seralathan KK (2013) Advances in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for biological control of plant diseases. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33639-3_1
Lee YS, Kim BY, Ahn JH, Song J, Seol YJ, Kim WG, Weon HY (2012) Draft genome sequence of the biocontrol bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain M27. J Bacteriol 194(24):6934–6935
Lefort F, Calmin G, Pelleteret P, Farinelli L, Osteras M, Crovadore J (2014) Whole-genome shotgun sequence of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain UASWS BA1, a bacterium antagonistic to plant pathogenic fungi. Genome Announc 2(1):e00016-00014. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00016-14 doi
Li B, Li Q, Xu Z, Zhang N, Shen Q, Zhang R (2014) Responses of beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to different soilborne fungal pathogens through the alteration of antifungal compounds production. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00636
Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos D-S (2003) OrthoMCL: Identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13(9):2178–2189
Li P, Kwok AHY, Jiang JW, Ran T, Xu D, Wang W, Leung FC (2015) Comparative genome analyses of Serratia marcescens FS14 reveals its high antagonistic potential. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0123061. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123061
Liu G, Song L, Shu C, Wang P, Deng C, Peng Q, Lereclus D, Wang X, Huang D, Zhang J, Song F (2013) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Strain HD73. Genome Announc 1(2):e00080-00013
Lizárraga-Sánchez GJ, Leyva-Madrigal KY, Sánchez-Peña P, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Maldonado-Mendoza IE (2015) Bacillus cereus sensu lato strain B25 controls maize stalk and ear rot in Sinaloa, Mexico. Field Crops Res 176:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.015
Loper JE, Hassan KA, Mavrodi DV, Davis EW, Lim CK, Shaffer BT, Elbourne LDH, Stockwell VO, Hartney SL, Breakwell K, Henkels MD, Tetu SG, Rangel LI, Kidarsa TA, Wilson NL, van de Mortel JE, Song C, Blumhagen R, Radune D, Hostetler JB, Brinkac LM, Durkin AS, Kluepfel DA, Wechter WP, Anderson AJ, Kim YC, Pierson LS, Pierson EA, Lindow SE, Kobayashi DY, Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM, Thomashow LS, Allen AE, Paulsen IT (2012) Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: insights into diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLoS Genet 8(7):e1002784. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002784
Louwen R, Staals RHJ, Endtz HP, van Baarlen P, van der Oost J (2014) The role of CRISPR-Cas systems in virulence of pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78(1):74–88. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00039-13
Lyons E, Freeling M (2008) How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences. Plant J 53:661–673
Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Geer LY, Bryant SH (2017) CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 45(Database issue):D200–D203
Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Goodwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer MLI, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM (2005) Genome sequencing in open microfabricated high density picoliter reactors. Nature 437(7057):376–380. doi:10.1038/nature03959
Marraffini LA (2015) CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes. Nature 526(7571):55–61. doi:10.1038/nature15386 doi
Matsuda Y, Iida Y, Shinogi T, Kakutani K, Nonomura T, Toyoda H (2001) In vitro suppression of mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum by extracellular chitosanase of Sphingobacterium multivorum and cloning of the chitosanase gene csnSM1. J Gen Plant Pathol 67:318–324
Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, Weber T, Takano E, Breitling R (2011) antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 39(suppl):W339–W346. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr466
Neupane S, Finlay RD, Kyrpides NC, Goodwin L, Alström S, Lucas S, Land M, Han J, Lapidus A, Cheng JF, Bruce D, Pitluck S, Peters L, Ovchinnikova G, Held B, Han C, Detter JC, Tapia R, Hauser L, Ivanova N, Pagani I, Woyke T, Klenk HP, Högberg N (2012) Complete genome sequence of the plant-associated Serratia plymuthica strain AS13. Stand Genomic Sci 7(1):22–30. doi:10.4056/sigs.2966299
Ni H, Zeng S, Qin X, Sun X, Zhang S, Zhao X, Yu Z, Li L (2015) Molecular docking and site-directed mutagenesis of Bacillus thuringiensis chitinase to improve chitinolytic, synergistic lepidopteran-larvicidal and nematicidal activities. Int J Biol Sci 11(3):304–315. doi:10.7150/ijbs.10632
Pal KK, McSpadden GB (2006) Biological control of plant pathogens. Plant Health Instruct. doi:10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02
Priest FG, Barker M, Baillie LWJ, Holmes EC, Maiden MCJ (2004) Population structure and evolution of the Bacillus cereus group. J Bacteriol 186(23):7959–7970. doi:10.1128/jb.186.23.7959-7970.2004
Rahman MM, Hossain DM, Suzuki K, Shiiya A, Suzuki K, Dey TK, Nonaka M, Harada N (2016) Suppressive effects of Bacillus spp. on mycelia, apothecia and sclerotia formation of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and potential as biological control of white mold on mustard. Australasian Plant Pathol 45(1):103–117. doi:10.1007/s13313-016-0397-4
Rasko A, Altherr MR, Han CS, Ravel J (2005) Genomics of the Bacillus group or organisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29(1):303–329. doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005
Reiter L, Tourasse NJ, Fouet A, Loll R, Davison S, Okstad OA, Piehler AP, Kolsto AB (2011) Evolutionary history and functional characterization of three large genes involved in sporulation in Bacillus cereus group bacteria. J Bacteriol 193(19):5420–5430. doi:10.1128/jb.05309-11
Reyes-Ramírez A, Escudero-Abarca BI, Aguilar-Uscanga G, Hayward-Jones PM, Barboza-Corona JE (2004) Antifungal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis chitinase and its potential for the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi in soybean seeds. J Food Sci 69(5):M131-M134. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb10721.x
Rodriguez -R. LM, Konstantinidis KT (2016) The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. Peer J Preprints 4:e1900v1. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406–425
Schmidt H, Hensel M (2004) Pathogenicity islands in bacterial pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(1):14–56. doi:10.1128/CMR.17.1.14-56.2004
Sheppard AE, Poehlein A, Rosenstiel P, Liesegang H, Schulenburg H (2013) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis strain 407 Cry. Genome Announc 1(1):e00158
St John J (2016) SeqPrep. https://github.com/jstjohn/SeqPrep
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731–2739. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121
Xiong Z, Jiang Y, Qi D, Lu H, Yang F, Yang J, Chen L, Sun L, Xu X, Xue Y, Zhu Y, Jin Q (2009) Complete genome sequence of the extremophilic Bacillus cereus strain Q1 with industrial applications. J Bacteriol 191(3):1120–1121. doi:10.1128/jb.01629-08
Xu YB, Chen M, Zhang Y, Wang M, Wang Y, Huang Q, Wang X, Wang G (2014) The phosphotransferase system gene ptsI in the endophytic bacterium Bacillus cereus is required for biofilm formation, colonization, and biocontrol against wheat sharp eyespot. FEMS Microbiol Lett 354(2):142–152. doi:10.1111/1574-6968.12438
Zhao Y, Selvaraj JN, Xing F, Zhou L, Wang Y, Song H, Tan X, Sun L, Sangare L, Elodie FY, Liu Y (2014) Antagonistic action of Bacillus subtilis strain SG6 on Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 9(3):e92486
Zhu L, Tian LJ, Zheng J, Gao QL, Wang YY, Peng DH, Ruan LF, Sun M (2015) Complete genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar galleriae strain HD-29, a typical strain of commercial biopesticide. J Biotechnol 195:108–109. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.12.021
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the Fundación Produce Sinaloa (2009–2013) and SIP-IPN (SIP 20144103, SIP 20144021, SIP 20150118). NRDG received Ph.D. fellowships from CONACyT and SIP-IPN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douriet-Gámez, N.R., Maldonado-Mendoza, I.E., Ibarra-Laclette, E. et al. Genomic Analysis of Bacillus sp. Strain B25, a Biocontrol Agent of Maize Pathogen Fusarium verticillioides . Curr Microbiol 75, 247–255 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1372-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1372-1