Abstract
Purpose
Due to improved prosthesis designs and surgical techniques, indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA) now include younger and more active patients. Preserving bone stock and soft tissue in these patients is paramount to allow for future revision. Designed for anatomical reconstruction, short femoral stems have the potential to reduce adaptive bone loss and stress shielding. To confirm this, we evaluated bone remodeling around a short femoral stem and the accuracy of hip joint reconstruction.
Methods
This prospective observational study involved 46 patients with short-stem THA for clinical and radiographic analysis. We evaluated bone remodeling by Gruen zone using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 45 patients and assessed the accuracy of hip joint reconstruction using caput-collum-diaphyseal angles. Additionally, we reported functional scores and pain.
Results
Patients were followed for a mean of 24.1 (SD 2.2) months. Bone mineral density increased mainly in the lateral region (Gruen zones 2 and 3) and in the distal-medial region (Gruen zone 5), suggestive of lateral loading. Most caput-collum-diaphyseal angles remained stable after surgery, especially in patients with varus hips. Harris Hip Scores improved significantly, from 57.2 (SD 20.0) pre-operatively to 97.2 (SD 4.0) at 24 months post-operatively (P < 0.0001). Finally, we encountered one peri-operative dislocation but no post-operative complications.
Conclusion
Short femoral stems successfully limited stress shielding and minimized periprosthetic bone loss without compromising primary stability. We were able to accurately reconstruct anatomical relationships in most patients. Finally, excellent clinical outcomes and low complication rates confirmed the favourable results of short-stem THA.
Trial registration: DRKS00017076
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In its beginnings, total hip arthroplasty (THA) was mainly used in geriatric patients with low demands. However, thanks to improved prosthesis designs and surgical techniques, indications for THA now include younger and more active patients with higher demands. Because these patients are likely to undergo future revision [1], preserving bone stock and soft tissue during the initial surgery is paramount.
Short femoral stems have the potential to preserve more bone stock and soft tissue than conventional stems, since their metaphyseal fixation requires less resection, rendering the implantation less invasive [2, 3]. Owing to their metaphyseal fixation, short femoral stems are thought to provide better physiological load transfer with proximal strain distribution. While normal loading patterns of the proximal femur maintain bone structure, nonphysiological loading can induce adaptive bone changes [2, 4, 5]. In this regard, short femoral stems may reduce adaptive proximal bone loss and stress shielding when compared with conventional femoral stems with distal load transmission [6, 7]. Furthermore, short-stem fixation has the potential to reduce the incidence of nonanatomical reconstruction, periprosthetic fractures, and bone defects [8,9,10].
Nevertheless, some uncertainty remains concerning the primary stability of uncemented short-stem fixation. Insufficient diaphyseal stabilization and the smaller bone-implant interface pose a challenge to the primary stability necessary for osseointegration of the prosthesis [9]. Moreover, different short femoral stem designs may result in varying bone remodeling patterns. Consequently, each design requires separate assessment to determine the adaptive bone changes induced.
In this prospective observational study, we therefore evaluated bone remodeling around a calcar-guided short femoral stem using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). We also investigated the accuracy of hip joint reconstruction by measuring the caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle. We hypothesized that the prosthesis would limit stress shielding and minimize periprosthetic bone loss while allowing accurate varus/valgus positioning, thus adapting well to the patient’s original joint anatomy. Finally, we assessed functional outcomes and complications.
Materials and methods
Study setup
This was a prospective observational study carried out at a single institution in Austria. The indication for short-stem THA was primary osteoarthritis. We excluded patients who had undergone previous surgery of the affected hip, had received arthroplasty for other joints of the lower limbs, required bilateral THA, suffered from relevant comorbidities, or were either unable or unwilling to participate in the study.
Patients were enrolled from November 2014 to August 2015 and examined clinically and radiographically before surgery and three, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Complications were recorded until the final follow-up examination.
Surgical technique and post-operative rehabilitation
All patients were placed in a supine position and received spinal or general anaesthesia. Five senior orthopaedic surgeons performed the procedures. They used an anterolateral muscle–preserving approach between the tensor fasciae latae and gluteus medius muscles in all cases.
All patients underwent uncemented short-stem THA. They received a calcar-guided femoral short-stem prosthesis with a titanium plasma spray and calcium phosphate coating (optimys stem; Mathys Ltd. Bettlach, Switzerland). This monobloc femoral stem has an osteoinductive coating and is available in 12 sizes with a standard or lateral neck. On the acetabular side, patients received a press-fit, monobloc acetabular cup (RM Pressfit vitamys; Mathys Ltd. Bettlach, Switzerland) made of vitamin E–infused, highly cross-linked polyethylene.
Full weight–bearing under the supervision of a physiotherapist was initiated on the first post-operative day. Patients were allowed to move the joint actively and passively restricting flexion initially. We prescribed rehabilitation for most patients and referred those unable to provide self-care to an inpatient rehabilitation program.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
We measured the bone mineral density (BMD) around the prosthesis before surgery to establish a baseline and at three, 12, and 24 months after surgery using the bone densitometer Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI, USA). We focused on the 7 Gruen zones adapted for femoral short stems (Fig. 1) [11] and recorded the absolute BMD. Additionally, we calculated the BMD change in each Gruen zone by dividing the measured BMD by the baseline value and expressed the ratio as a percentage. Finally, we calculated the correlation between post-operative CCD angles and DEXA measurements grouped by Gruen zone at 24 months.
For the DEXA scans, we placed the patients in the supine position and secured the operated leg at 20° of internal rotation, which allowed us to prevent measurement errors [12]. One investigator, blinded to the clinical outcome, analyzed all DEXA measurements. This investigator was not involved in the surgery or aftercare of the patients and did not have access to study data.
Radiographic evaluation
Pre-operative and directly post-operative radiographic examinations included a standing anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis and an axial radiograph of the affected hip; the follow-up examinations consisted of anteroposterior and axial radiographs of the affected hip only. To locate periprosthetic abnormalities and bone loss, we used standardized templates as described by Charnley-Delee et al. and Gruen et al. [13, 14].
CCD angles were measured pre- and postoperatively in the anteroposterior radiographs and organized into five categories: A (less than 125°), B (125° to 130°), C (130° to 135°), D (135° to 140°), and E (more than 140°).
Clinical outcomes
We used the Harris Hip Score (HHS) to evaluate pain, functionality, and range of motion. The questionnaire included a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 to assess pain at rest and under load. We also asked the patients to indicate their overall satisfaction on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 representing the highest patient satisfaction.
Statistics
The power analysis predicted that relative mean differences of the DEXA value of 17.4% or more would be detectable in a paired t test with a power of 99.7% when including 45 patients.
Descriptive statistics included means, medians, standard deviations, 25% and 75% percentiles, and ranges. We compared between-group differences, such as in Gruen zones and CCD categories, with respect to DEXA values using nonparametric tests: the Wilcoxon rank-sum test in the case of two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test in the case of more than two groups. We used chi-square tests to evaluate association between discrete variables and paired t tests to evaluate differences to baseline. The level of significance was set at 0.05 (two-sided) for all tests. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Study participants
Forty-seven patients were enrolled consecutively over the study period. Of these, one patient did not attend follow-up examinations and was lost, leaving 46 patients for the clinical and radiographic analysis. The DEXA analysis was based on 45 patients, censoring one outlier due to a very low baseline BMD. Lastly, one patient missed the 24-month follow-up examination due to terminal illness; this patient was included for all other follow-up time points.
Patients were followed for a mean of 24.1 (SD 2.2) months. They had a mean age of 65.7 (SD 9.3) years and a male-to-female ratio of 21:25.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
We found a significant increase in BMD in Gruen zones 2, 3, and 5 (P < 0.0001), where the mean absolute and relative differences from baseline were 1.3 g/cm2 (12.1%), 2.3 g/cm2 (25.5%), and 2.3 g/cm2 (17.6%), respectively (Table 1). On the other hand, the BMD of Gruen zones 4, 6, and 7 remained relatively stable and did not change significantly from baseline (P > 0.05).
We further observed that Gruen zone 3 had the most pronounced BMD increase at every given time point, followed by Gruen zones 5 and 2 (Fig. 2). Additionally, we found a slight positive correlation between CCD angles and DEXA measurements averaged over all Gruen zones (P = 0.046).
Radiographic evaluation
Comparing pre- and postoperative CCD categories, we found most outcomes in or around the diagonal row, while CCD category A was restored in all cases (Table 2). This indicates that the categories remained stable after surgery, especially in patients with a low pre-operative CCD angle.
Clinical outcomes
The mean HHS improved significantly: from 57.2 (SD 20.0) pre-operatively to 97.2 (SD 4.0) at 24 months post-operatively (P < 0.0001) (Table 3). At the final follow-up examination, all other scores had also significantly improved compared with the baseline. The mean VAS for pain at rest decreased by 4.3 points (P < 0.0001), the mean VAS for pain under load decreased by 6.8 points (P < 0.0001), and the VAS for satisfaction increased by 7.7 points (P < 0.0001).
Complications
One patient experienced a peri-operative dislocation during relocation from the operating table. The dislocation was treated with closed reduction immediately. No post-operative complications were reported during the observation period, and no revision surgery was required.
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated bone remodeling around a short femoral stem and the accuracy of hip joint reconstruction. We hypothesized that the prosthesis used would limit stress shielding and minimize periprosthetic bone loss and that it would allow accurate varus/valgus positioning. Indeed, we observed favorable adaptive changes during the follow-up period. While BMDs remained statistically unchanged in Gruen zones 4, 6, and 7, Gruen zones 2, 3, and 5 evolved positively with mean BMD increases of 12.1 to 25.5% after 24 months of follow-up.
Similar results were reported by Chen et al. who found significant relative BMD increases of 9% in Gruen zone 2 and of 21% in Gruen zone 3 at a mean follow-up of close to six years after THA with a metaphyseally fixed femoral short stem [5]. Other studies with different short femoral stems mostly reported decreased BMD values [9, 11, 15] or mixed patterns of BMD increases and decreases in the different Gruen zones [16]. Additionally, comparative studies showed that conventional femoral stems induced more pronounced bone loss than short femoral stems [9, 15]. With uncemented conventional stems, bone loss was found to be most prominent in the proximal region (Gruen zones 1 and 7) after 24 months of follow-up [17,18,19]. Specifically, one study reported a BMD loss of 18% in Gruen zone 1 [18], while another study found a loss of 8.5% in Gruen zone 7 [17]. In addition, stem size has been associated with proximal bone loss, with larger stems leading to higher proximal bone loss [19].
In contrast to uncemented conventional stems, we found more stable BMDs in the proximal periprosthetic region (Gruen zones 1 and 7) and saw increasing BMDs in the lateral and distal-medial regions (Gruen zones 2, 3, and 5). Although the increases suggest loads transferred mainly to the lateral region and to a lesser extent to the distal-medial region, we did not observe proximal bone loss suggestive of stress shielding. To our knowledge, this is the first study where BMD was preserved in the proximal region, which is known to be prone to stress shielding [2, 20,21,22].
Brinkman et al. suspected lateral loading to be a consequence of the stem design on the one hand and stem positioning on the other. According to them, valgus positioning of the stem may lead to increased lateral loading and influence bone remodeling patterns [16]. In fact, we found a similar remodeling pattern with increased BMD in the lateral regions (Gruen zones 2 and 3), suggestive of lateral loading. We believe, however, that valgus implantations lead to higher BMD and varus implantations to lower BMD on the lateral side. Therefore, radiographic results of short-stem THA from different studies cannot be compared when the CCD angles are unknown.
Our DEXA results confirmed that the short femoral stem we used limited stress shielding and minimized bone loss. Given this and the fact that short stems require less bone resection in the first place, we believe that short femoral stems are more successful in preserving bone stock than conventional femoral stems. This preservation of bone stock would be especially advantageous for THA in young patients, who are likely to undergo revision surgery later in life [23].
Looking at CCD angles, we accurately reconstructed the varus/valgus positioning, and thereby the anatomical relationship of the hip joint. In most cases, the pre-operative CCD angle was retained after surgery, confirming a stable implant position. While reconstruction of varus hips is known to be challenging with conventional stems [24], varus hips (CCD category A) were restored accurately in all cases in this study. These data support the fact that the prosthesis used in this series adapts well to the patient’s original joint anatomy.
Brinkmann et al. suggested that bone remodeling could be affected by prosthesis positioning [16]. Since we suspected that the accuracy of hip joint reconstruction would influence bone remodeling, we investigated the relationship between post-operative CCD angles and DEXA measurements grouped by Gruen zone. This revealed a slight positive correlation between the post-operative CCD angle and BMD of moderate significance (P = 0.05); however, the clinical impact of this finding was not found in the literature.
In terms of clinical results, functional outcomes evaluated by the HHS improved substantially over the first three months and remained favorable during the follow-up period. With a mean HHS of 97.2, our results compare well to those of other authors reporting clinical outcomes of short femoral stems in the short and midterm [9, 15, 16, 25] and to studies reporting clinical outcomes of uncemented conventional stems [17, 18]. Finally, we observed no complications apart from one peri-operative dislocation. Specifically, there were no cases of aseptic loosening, post-operative dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture, all commonly encountered after conventional uncemented THA [26, 27]. Short-stem THA has therefore the potential to reduce prosthesis-related complications while achieving excellent clinical outcomes.
Our study had several strengths. Its prospective design provided us with an uninterrupted and complete dataset. Additionally, DEXA measurements have proven to be reliable and not prone to subjective bias, which allowed us to compare our results with other studies and generalize our findings [28]. Furthermore, we reported post-operative CCD angles, which are known to affect DEXA results [16], to ensure that our findings are comparable with other studies.
Nevertheless, our study did have some limitations. Patients were followed for only two years. Despite adaptive bone remodeling having been described as occurring primarily during the first three to six months post-operatively and lessening after the first year [28, 29], longer follow-up periods may have provided a more complete picture. Additionally, our study lacked a control group. Direct comparison with patients receiving a conventional femoral stem may have provided a more detailed clinical profile of the short-stem prosthesis use.
In conclusion, the short femoral stem used in our study successfully limited stress shielding and minimized periprosthetic bone loss without compromising primary stability. In particular, the proximal zones, which are prone to stress shielding, remained stable over the follow-up period, while the lateral zones even showed increased BMD. Furthermore, we were able to accurately reconstruct the anatomical relationships of the hip in most patients, confirming that the prosthesis used in this series adapts well to the patient’s original joint anatomy. Finally, we saw excellent clinical outcomes and encountered few prosthesis-related complications, supporting the favorable short-term results of short-stem THA.
References
Kärrholm J, Mohaddes M, Odin D, Vinblad J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O (2018) Annual report 2017. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
Bieger R, Ignatius A, Decking R, Claes L, Reichel H, Durselen L (2012) Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(2):158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.004
Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G, Favetti F, Barresi C (2008) Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-008-0105-4
Karachalios T, Palaiochorlidis E, Komnos G (2019) Clinical relevance of bone remodelling around conventional and conservative (short-stem) total hip arthroplasty implants. Hip Int 29(1):4–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018810846
Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP (2009) Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplast 24(6):945–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.014
Bieger R, Ignatius A, Reichel H, Durselen L (2013) Biomechanics of a short stem: in vitro primary stability and stress shielding of a conservative cementless hip stem. J Orthop Res 31(8):1180–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22349
Gronewold J, Berner S, Olender G, Hurschler C, Windhagen H, von Lewinski G, Floerkemeier T (2014) Changes in strain patterns after implantation of a short stem with metaphyseal anchorage compared to a standard stem: an experimental study in synthetic bone. Orthop Rev 6(1):5211. https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2014.5211
Freeman MA, Plante-Bordeneuve P (1994) Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 76(3):432–438
Salemyr M, Muren O, Ahl T, Boden H, Eisler T, Stark A, Skoldenberg O (2015) Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 86(6):659–666. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1067087
Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38(6):651–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.048
Lerch M, von der Haar-Tran A, Windhagen H, Behrens BA, Wefstaedt P, Stukenborg-Colsman CM (2012) Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. Int Orthop 36(3):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0
Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD (1996) Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:269–274
DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27
Freitag T, Hein MA, Wernerus D, Reichel H, Bieger R (2016) Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(1):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2370-z
Brinkmann V, Radetzki F, Delank KS, Wohlrab D, Zeh A (2015) A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses. J Orthop Traumatol 16(3):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0335-1
Lerch M, Kurtz A, Windhagen H, Bouguecha A, Behrens BA, Wefstaedt P, Stukenborg-Colsman CM (2012) The cementless Bicontact stem in a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. Int Orthop 36(11):2211–2217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1616-4
Lindalen E, Dahl J, Nordsletten L, Snorrason F, Hovik O, Rohrl S (2012) Reverse hybrid and cemented hip replacement compared using radiostereometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: 43 hips followed for 2 years in a prospective trial. Acta Orthop 83(6):592–598. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.742393
Parchi PD, Cervi V, Piolanti N, Ciapini G, Andreani L, Castellini I, Poggetti A, Lisanti M (2014) Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling. Clin Cases Mineral Bone Metab 11(3):226–231
Jacobs JJ, Sumner DR, Galante JO (1993) Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 24(4):583–590
Leichtle UG, Leichtle CI, Schmidt B, Martini F (2006) Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Brit 88(4):467–471. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b4.16613
Ang KC, Das De S, Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K (1997) Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. J Bone Joint Surg Brit 79(4):675–679
Gulow J, Scholz R, Freiherr von Salis-Soglio G (2007) Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Der Orthopade 36(4):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-007-1071-x
Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN (2016) Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(1 Suppl):S9–S20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.11.001
Gombar C, Janositz G, Friebert G, Sisak K (2019) The DePuy Proxima short stem for total hip arthroplasty - excellent outcome at a minimum of 7 years. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 27(2):2309499019838668. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019838668
Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA (2012) Hip arthroplasty. Lancet (London, England) 380(9855):1768–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60607-2
Pospula W, Abu Noor T, Roshdy T, Al Mukaimi A (2008) Cemented and cementless total hip replacement. Critical analysis and comparison of clinical and radiological results of 182 cases operated in Al Razi Hospital, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 17(3):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1159/000117799
Roth A, Richartz G, Sander K, Sachse A, Fuhrmann R, Wagner A, Venbrocks RA (2005) Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration. Der Orthopade 34(4):334–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-005-0773-1
Boden HS, Skoldenberg OG, Salemyr MO, Lundberg HJ, Adolphson PY (2006) Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA. Acta Orthop 77(6):877–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013169
Acknowledgments
Medical Minds GmbH provided medical writing and editorial support. Dominik Pfluger carried out the statistical analysis.
Funding
The work was partially supported by Mathys Ltd. Bettlach. Funds sponsored statistical analysis through an independent consultant as well as medical writing and editorial support from a medical writing agency. No other external sources were involved.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The local ethics committee reviewed and approved the study protocol; the institutional review board also approved the study (ethics approval registration number: EK 19/14; issue date: 16 June 2014). Additionally, the study was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (clinical trial registration number: DRKS00017076). We conducted the study in accordance with the study protocol, the latest Helsinki Declaration, and good clinical practice guidelines.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hochreiter, J., Mattiassich, G., Ortmaier, R. et al. Femoral bone remodeling after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a prospective densitometric study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 753–759 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04486-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04486-0