Abstract
Japanese cedar pollinosis is a seasonal allergic disease caused by two major pollen allergens: Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 antigens. To develop an oral vaccine to treat pollinosis, we constructed recombinant Lactococcus lactis harboring the gene encoding fused T cell epitopes from the Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 antigens. The recombinant T cell epitope peptide was designed to contain the fused cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant and a FLAG tag at the C-terminus. An expression plasmid was constructed by inserting the T cell epitope peptide gene into the multiple cloning sites of plasmid pNZ8148, an Escherichia coli-L. lactis shuttle vector. The constructed plasmid was transformed into L. lactis NZ9000 for expression induced by nisin, an antibacterial peptide from L. lactis. The expression of the epitope peptide was induced with 10–40 ng/mL nisin, and the expressed T cell epitope peptide was detected by western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG antibody and an antibody against the T cell epitopes. The concentration of the epitope peptide was estimated to be ~ 22 mg/L of culture in the presence of 40 ng/mL nisin, although it varied depending on the nisin concentration, the culture time, and the bacterial concentration when nisin was added. The expression of the recombinant epitope peptide in L. lactis, an organism generally recognized as safe, as demonstrated in this study, may contribute to the development of an oral vaccine for the treatment of pollinosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pollinosis, caused by Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen, is a common allergic disease that is prevalent in Japan from February to April each year (Saito 2014). Pollinosis has been shown to be induced by Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 antigens, two major allergens in Japanese cedar pollen (Yasueda et al. 1983; Sone et al. 1994; Sakaguchi et al. 1990; Komiyama et al. 1994; Namba et al. 1994). Although approximately 27% of the population in Japan has suffered from this disease for decades (Saito 2014), causal therapies for pollinosis have only recently become available. One such treatment is repeated sublingual administration of the pollen extract containing the Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 antigens, which has been shown to ameliorate the symptoms of pollinosis by inducing immunological desensitization (Okamoto et al. 2015; Sakashita et al. 2015). However, careful administration is necessary to avoid anaphylaxis because the Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 antigens contain epitopes that react with IgE antibodies in addition to the T cell epitopes for immunotherapy. To overcome this problem, recombinant antigen vaccines that contain only T cell epitopes have been designed and expressed in Escherichia coli, rice seed, and other organisms (Hoang et al. 2015; Takagi and Takaiwa 2016; Takaiwa and Yang 2014; Kawabe et al. 2012).
In a previous study, we successfully constructed recombinant E. coli that expressed a peptide containing multiple T cell epitopes from Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 (Hoang et al. 2015). Four epitopes from Cry j 1 and six from Cry j 2 identified by Sone et al. (1998) were selected to ensure that the epitopes were presented by various MHC (HLA) class II types and, therefore, applicable to a large population of patients. However, it is essential to express the peptide in an organism generally recognized as safe (GRAS) if the whole organisms are to be used as an oral vaccine to cure pollinosis. In the present study, we constructed recombinant Lactococcus lactis that contained the gene encoding the T cell epitope peptide, using a plasmid in which expression of the inserted gene is induced with nisin, an antibacterial peptide from L. lactis used as a preservative in food. Nisin activates the two-component system in L. lactis, which is composed of a sensor protein and a response regulator, thereby inducing transcription from the nisin promoter. Therefore, the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) described by Mierau and coworkers (Mierau et al. 2005; Mierau and Kleerebezem 2005) is proposed to be an excellent tool for the production of oral vaccines. Here, we investigate the properties required for optimal expression of the recombinant T cell epitope peptide in L. lactis for potential future vaccine production.
Materials and methods
Plasmids and bacterial strains
E. coli-L. lactis shuttle vector pNZ8148, E. coli MC1061 for the construction of an expression vector, and L. lactis NZ9000 for the expression of the recombinant peptide were purchased from MoBiTec (Gӧttingen, Germany). The plasmid pET28a-BamHI-ctb-linker-cry j 1 epi-cry j 2 epi-flag-HindIII constructed in the previous study (Hoang et al. 2015), containing the cholera toxin B subunit gene (ctb) fused with the cry j 1 and cry j 2 epitope genes and the FLAG tag sequence located at the 3′-end, was used as a source of the recombinant T cell epitope peptide gene. E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring this recombinant plasmid has been deposited in the NITE Biological Resource Center (NBRC) and assigned accession number NBRC 112070. The DNA sequence of the insert in this plasmid has been deposited in the DDBJ database under accession number AB978369.
PCR amplification of the recombinant epitope gene
The recombinant T cell epitope gene was amplified by PCR using the plasmid pET28a-BamHI-ctb-linker-cry j 1 epi-cry j 2 epi-flag-HindIII as a template for the first round of PCR. PCR was conducted using forward primer His-CTB-F (5′-CATCATCATCATCATCATACACCTCAAAATATTACTGA-3′) and reverse primer HindIII-FLAG-R (5′-CGCAAGCTTCTTGTCATCGTCGTCTTTGTA-3′) to add a histidine tag to the 5′-end. The resultant PCR product was used as a template for the second round of PCR conducted using forward primer NcoI-add-His-CTB-F (5′-GCGCCATGGGTCATCATCATCATCATCATAC-3′) and reverse primer HindIII-FLAG-R to add a NcoI restriction site at the 5′-end and insert nucleotides (add) to maintain the correct reading frame. The purified PCR product (NcoI-add-his-ctb-linker-cry j 1 epi-cry j 2 epi-flag-HindIII) was used in the construction of an expression vector, as described below. All PCRs were performed using high fidelity KOD-Plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan).
Construction of the expression vector
The recombinant T cell epitope gene, amplified as described above, and a shuttle vector pNZ8148 were separately digested with restriction enzymes, NcoI and HindIII, and then ligated using a DNA ligation kit (Mighty Mix) purchased from Takara Bio (Kusatsu, Japan).
Electroporation of the recombinant pNZ8148 plasmid into E. coli MC1061 was conducted in a 2-mm-width electro-cuvette at a voltage of 2.0 kV and 186 Ω. E. coli cells containing the plasmid were selected on an agar plate containing chloramphenicol (10 μg/mL), and colonies were checked for the presence of the recombinant T cell epitope gene by colony PCR using forward primer pNZ8148-F (5′-AACGCGAGCATAATAAACGGCTCTG-3′) and reverse primer pNZ8148-R (5′-GCTTTTTGGCTATCAATCAAAGCAACAC-3′). The DNA sequence of the plasmid insert (Fig. 1) was determined using the dye terminator method by Bio Matrix Research (Nagareyama, Japan).
Electroporation of the purified recombinant plasmid into L. lactis NZ9000 was conducted by the method described above. Transformants were selected on agar plates containing chloramphenicol and further examined for the presence of the recombinant plasmid by colony PCR as described above (Fig. 2).
Expression of the recombinant peptide
A single colony of L. lactis containing the recombinant plasmid was selected and pre-cultured at 30 °C overnight in 10 mL of G-M17B broth. Four milliliters of the culture was then inoculated into 100 mL of G-M17B broth and incubated at 30 °C until the OD600 reached ~ 0.4. Then, nisin at 5 to 160 ng/mL was added to 11 mL aliquots of the culture in 50-mL tubes and further incubated for 2–10 h at 30 °C, with shaking at 130 rpm to maintain constant culture conditions by preventing cell precipitation.
Western blot analysis
The recombinant L. lactis cells harvested by centrifugation from 10 mL of the culture were mixed with 500 μL xTractor buffer (Takara Bio) and sonicated briefly to disperse the cells. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min with 30 μg/mL DNase I and 550 μg/mL lysozyme, the cell lysate was mixed with 4× SDS sample buffer at a ratio of 3:1 and then heated at 95 °C for 5 min. The supernatant after centrifugation (12 μL) was subjected to SDS-PAGE on a commercial 12.5% polyacrylamide gel (Atto, Tokyo, Japan), and then, proteins were electroblotted onto a Hybond polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (GE Healthcare Japan, Hino, Japan). After blocking with skim milk powder, the membrane was incubated at 4 °C overnight with rabbit anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan) or rabbit anti-Cry j epi antibody that was raised against the partial amino acid sequence (LQKNTIGTGSRAEV) in the epitope region of the recombinant peptide and prepared by Eurofins Genomics (Tokyo, Japan). The membrane was then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Japan, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature for 1 h. Can Get Signal Immunoreaction Enhancer Solutions 1 and 2 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) were added to the incubations with primary and the secondary antibodies, respectively. Affinity-purified T cell epitope peptide from the recombinant E. coli was prepared according to the method of Hoang and coworkers (2015) and was used as a standard in western blot analysis.
Detection of the signal was carried out using an ECL Select Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare Japan), Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare), and a chemical luminescence imaging device Fusion FX7 (Vilber Lourmat, Marne-la-Valée, France).
Results
Construction of recombinant L. lactis
E. coli-L. lactis shuttle vector pNZ8148 and L. lactis NZ9000 were used for expression of the recombinant peptide containing four T cell epitopes from Cry j 1 and six from Cry j 2. The gene encoding the recombinant peptide was amplified by PCR from pET28a(+) plasmid containing the epitope peptide gene constructed in the previous study (Hoang et al. 2015). The PCR-amplified gene was inserted into the multiple cloning sites of pNZ8148, and then, E. coli MC1061 was transformed with the recombinant plasmid. The DNA sequence of the insert in the purified pNZ8148 plasmid was determined to be correct. Figure 1 shows the structure of the T cell epitope gene in plasmid pNZ8148. The cholera toxin B subunit gene (ctb) was fused with the cry j 1 and cry j 2 epitope genes, and the FLAG tag sequence was located at the 3′-end.
The recombinant pNZ8148 purified from E. coli was used to transform L. lactis NZ9000. Transformants were examined for the correct insert by colony PCR with primers flanking the open reading frame (Fig. 2). DNA bands corresponding to the expected size (1036 bp) were confirmed on an agarose gel (lanes 5–10, Fig. 2).
Nisin-induced expression of the recombinant T cell epitope peptide
The recombinant peptide expressed by L. lactis NZ9000 in the presence of nisin was detected by western blotting using two types of antibodies, anti-FLAG antibody and anti-Cry j epi antibody against the partial amino acid sequence in the epitope region of the recombinant peptide. The purified T cell epitope peptide produced by recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3) was used as a control. As shown in Fig. 3, both of the peptides from recombinant E. coli and L. lactis were detected by anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 3a) or anti-Cry j epi antibody (Fig. 3b). The apparent size of the peptide from L. lactis on a polyacrylamide gel was ~ 29 kDa, corresponding to the molecular mass of the peptide (31 kDa) calculated from its deduced amino acid sequence. The peptide from E. coli was larger than that from L. lactis due to the different length of the open reading frames of the E. coli peptide (948 bp) and the L. lactis peptide (852 bp). The peptide from E. coli had additional amino acids encoded by the nucleotide sequence in pET28a(+).
Effects of nisin concentration on the expression of recombinant peptide
The epitope peptide expressed by L. lactis was successfully detected by western blotting. Then, the optimal conditions for expression by the recombinant L. lactis were examined. Firstly, the effects of nisin concentration on the expression were studied. Expression was induced by adding various concentrations of nisin (5–160 ng/mL) to the culture of L. lactis that had been pre-cultured until the OD600 reached ~ 0.4. After 2–4 h of culture at 30 °C for expression, the cells were harvested and the cell lysate was subjected to western blotting using an anti-FLAG antibody. As shown in the left lane of Fig. 4a, no peptide was detected in the absence of nisin, indicating that the anti-FLAG antibody used as a primary antibody did not cross-react with bacterial protein in the absence of nisin. The expression of the peptide increased dependent on the concentration of nisin, reaching a maximum after 2 h at a nisin concentration of 40 ng/mL (Fig. 4a). Maximal expression was achieved with 40 ng/mL nisin (Fig. 4b) when the bacteria were cultured for 4 h, with the expression slightly decreasing at higher concentrations of nisin. We also noticed that higher concentrations of nisin prevented bacterial growth. The OD600 after 4-h culture without nisin was 1.8, whereas it was 1.6 with 160 ng/mL nisin.
Time course of nisin-induced expression
The time course of nisin-induced expression during culturing for 0–10 h was monitored in the presence of 10 or 40 ng/mL nisin. The left lanes in Fig. 5a, b, which represent a culture time of 0 h, show no cross-reaction of the anti-FLAG antibody with bacterial protein, indicating that the anti-FLAG antibody is effectively specific to the expressed peptide. Maximal expression of the epitope peptide was achieved 2 h after nisin addition with both 10 and 40 ng/mL nisin (Fig. 5). Expression with 10 ng/mL nisin was stable up to 7 h but decreased at 10 h. In the presence of 40 ng/mL nisin, expression clearly decreased after 4 h, suggesting decomposition of the peptide in L. lactis cells.
Effect of the timing of nisin addition
In Figs. 4 and 5, nisin was added to the bacterial cells that had been cultured to an OD600 of ~ 0.4. However, it is well known that the physiological conditions can affect bacterial expression of recombinant peptides. Therefore, we studied the effects of bacterial concentration at the time of nisin addition on the expression of the recombinant peptide. Figure 6a shows the time course of bacterial growth, indicating that at an OD600 of 0.4 L. lactis is in logarithmic growth phase. In Fig. 6b, c, 10 or 40 ng/mL nisin was added to the culture at an OD600 of 0.2–1.8, and the expressed recombinant peptide was detected with anti-FLAG antibody. Maximal expression of the recombinant peptide induced with 10 ng/mL nisin was achieved at an initial OD600 of 0.2, and the expression remarkably decreased as the OD600 increased (Fig. 6b). However, in the presence of 40 ng/mL nisin, the expression of the peptide was stable and observed over a wide range of OD600 values from 0.2 to 1.2 (Fig. 6c), although low expression was observed at an OD600 of 1.8. Therefore, compared with 10 ng/mL nisin, 40 ng/mL nisin was suitable for stable expression of the peptide over a wide range of OD600 values.
Estimation of the amount of expressed epitope peptide
The amount of expressed T cell epitope peptide was estimated by western blotting followed by quantification using a chemiluminescence imaging device. Affinity-purified epitope peptide from the recombinant E. coli was used as a standard. Figure 7 shows the purified E. coli recombinant peptide and the peptide expressed by L. lactis in this study. By measuring the strength of chemiluminescence from the recombinant peptides in a chemical luminescence imaging device, the ratio of chemiluminescence for 0.65 μg of E. coli peptide, 0.32 μg of E. coli peptide, and the expressed amount of L. lactis peptide was determined to be 1:051:082. Based on these results, the peptide concentration in the culture of L. lactis was estimated to be ~ 22 mg/L.
Discussion
In the present study, we successfully constructed recombinant L. lactis that expresses the T cell epitope peptide of Japanese cedar pollen allergens upon exposure to nisin. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are GRAS organisms and have therefore attracted attention as potential delivery vehicles for various vaccines (Pontes et al. 2011; Tarahomjoo 2012). In particular, LAB are useful for the induction of mucosal immunity against pathogens that infect through the mucosal membranes of the host (Wells 2011; Bermúdes-Humarán et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2016). Therefore, vaccination using recombinant LAB is usually conducted by oral or nasal administration of the recombinant bacteria.
Among LAB, L. lactis has been most widely used because introduction of the NICE system into L. lactis allowed for efficient control of target gene expression by nisin. Many studies on nisin-induced expression of vaccine antigens have been reported, including antigens against Helicobacter pylori (Zhang et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2016), influenza virus (Joan et al. 2016), E. coli O157:H7 (Ahmed et al. 2014), hepatitis A virus (Zhang et al. 2011; Berlec et al. 2013), Brucella abortus (Ribeiro et al. 2002), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Medina et al. 2008). However, to the best of our knowledge, there has only been one previous report on the expression of Japanese cedar pollen allergens in LAB (Ohkouchi et al. 2012), in which Cry j 1 was expressed in Lactobacillus plantarum.
In the present study, the recombinant T cell epitope peptide expressed in L. lactis was confirmed to be immunogenic because it was recognized by anti-FLAG antibody and an antibody raised against a sequence present in the epitope peptide. The amount of epitope peptide expressed was dependent on the nisin concentration, culture time in the presence of nisin, and the bacterial concentration at the time of nisin addition. Similar properties of nisin-induced expression of antigens have been reported by Zhang et al. (2009). The optimal peptide expression conditions determined by this study are a culture time of 2 h in the presence of 40 ng/mL nisin, added at bacterial concentrations of OD600 0.2–1.2.
When the recombinant T cell epitope peptide expression was induced for 4 h in the presence of higher nisin concentrations (80–160 ng/mL), the expression was slightly inhibited (Fig. 4b). The inhibitory effect of nisin was clearly apparent when the culture was continued for 10 h in the presence of 40 ng/mL nisin (Fig. 5b), although the inhibition was only slight at a nisin concentration of 10 ng/mL (Fig. 5a). These results indicate that exposure to high concentrations of nisin induces metabolic inhibition in L. lactis. This is not surprising because nisin is known to have antibacterial activity; to prevent this issue, amounts of nisin in the nanograms per milliliter range, which is subtoxic, are used for nisin-induced expression (Mierau et al. 2005).
Anti-FLAG antibody used as a primary antibody did not cross-react with L. lactis proteins in the absence of nisin (Fig. 4a). However, after peptide expression was induced by nisin, faint bands were detected by the anti-FLAG antibody in the upper and lower regions of the bands corresponding to the expressed peptide. Given that the density of these faint bands increased as the peptide expression progressed, these faint bands are likely to be products related to the expressed antigen peptide. Although the origin of these bands was not definitively confirmed, we speculate that the bands in the upper region are a dimer or an aggregate of the expressed peptide and the bands in the lower region are decomposed fragments of the peptide.
The yield of the epitope peptide in the present study was ~ 22 mg/L of culture medium, which was comparable with previously reported antigen yields of 27.26 mg/L (Zhang et al. 2009), 12.9 mg/L (Chen et al. 2011), and 8 mg/L (Ribeiro et al. 2002) in L. lactis. However, the epitope peptide yield in L. lactis was much smaller compared with the previously reported yield of ~ 120 mg/mL in E. coli (Hoang et al. 2015). Based on these results, we propose that the recombinant L. lactis constructed here is a potential candidate for vaccination against pollinosis. The efficacy of the epitope peptide will be elucidated in future clinical studies.
References
Ahmed B, Loos M, Vanrompay D, Cox E (2014) Oral immunization with Lactococcus lactis-expressing EspB induces protective immune responses against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a murine model of colonization. Vaccine 32:3909–3916
Berlec A, Malovrh T, Zadravec P, Steyer A, Ravnikar M, Sabotič J, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Štrukelj B (2013) Expression of a hepatitis A virus antigen in Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli and evaluation of its immunogenicity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:4333–4342
Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Aubry C, Motta JP, Deraison C, Steidler L, Vergnolle N, Chatel JM, Langella P (2013) Engineering lactococci and lactobacilli for human health. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:278–283
Chen S, Zhang R, Duan G, Shi J (2011) Food-grade expression of Helicobacter pylori ureB subunit in Lactococcus lactis and its immunoreactivity. Curr Microbiol 62:1726–1731
Hoang VV, Zou Y, Kurata K, Enomoto K (2015) Expression of recombinant T-cell epitopes of major Japanese cedar pollen allergens fused with cholera toxin B subunit in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 109:62–69
Joan SS, Pui-Fong J, Song AA, Chang LY, Yusoff K, AbuBakar S, Rahim RA (2016) Oral vaccine of Lactococcus lactis harbouring pandemic H1N1 2009 haemagglutinin 1 and nisP anchor fusion protein elevates anti-HA1 sIgA levels in mice. Biotechnol Lett 38:793–799
Kawabe Y, Hayashida Y, Numata K, Harada S, Hayashida Y, Ito A, Kamihira M (2012) Oral immunotherapy for pollen allergy using T-cell epitope-containing egg white derived from genetically manipulated chickens. PLoS One 7:e48512
Komiyama N, Sone T, Shimizu K, Morikubo K, Kino K (1994) cDNA cloning and expression of Cry j II the second major allergen of Japanese cedar pollen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 201:1021–1028
Medina M, Villena J, Vintiñi E, Hebert EM, Raya R, Alvarez S (2008) Nasal immunization with Lactococcus lactis expressing the pneumococcal protective protein A induces protective immunity in mice. Infect Immun 76:2696–2705
Mierau I, Kleerebezem M (2005) 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:705–717
Mierau I, Olieman K, Mond J, Smid EJ (2005) Optimization of the Lactococcus lactis nisin-controlled gene expression system NICE for industrial applications. Microb Cell Factories 4:16
Namba M, Kurose M, Torigoe K, Hino K, Taniguchi Y, Fukuda S, Usui M, Kurimoto M (1994) Molecular cloning of the second major allergen, Cry j II, from Japanese cedar pollen. FEBS Lett 353:124–128
Ohkouchi K, Kawamoto S, Tatsugawa K, Yoshikawa N, Takaoka Y, Miyauchi S, Aki T, Yamashita M, Murooka Y, Ono K (2012) Prophylactic effect of Lactobacillus oral vaccine expressing a Japanese cedar pollen allergen. J Biosci Bioeng 113:536–541
Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Yonekura S, Hashiguchi K, Goto M, Otsuka T, Murata T, Nakao Y, Kanazawa C, Nagakura H, Okawa T, Nakano K, Hisamitsu M, Kaneko S, Konno A (2015) Efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy for two seasons in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 166:177–188
Pontes DS, de Azevedo MS, Chatel JM, Langella P, Azevedo V, Miyoshi A (2011) Lactococcus lactis as a live vector: heterologous protein production and DNA delivery systems. Protein Expr Purif 79:165–175
Ribeiro LA, Azevedo V, Loir YL, Olivera SC, Dieye Y, Piard JC, Gruss A, Langella P (2002) Production and targeting of the Brucella abortus antigen L7/L12 in Lactococcus lactis: a first step towards food-grade live vaccines against brucellosis. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:910–916
Saito Y (2014) Japanese cedar pollinosis: discovery, nomenclature, and epidemiological trends. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 90:203–210
Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Taniai M, Ando S, Usui M, Matuhasi T (1990) Identification of the second major allergen of Japanese cedar pollen. Allergy 45:309–312
Sakashita M, Yamada T, Imoto Y, Hirota T, Tamari M, Ito Y, Kubo S, Osawa Y, Takahashi N, Fujieda S (2015) Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis and the levels of IL-17A and complement components 3a and 5a. Cytokine 75:181–185
Sone T, Komiyama N, Shimizu K, Kusakabe T, Morikubo K, Kino K (1994) Cloning and sequencing of cDNA coding for Cry j I, a major allergen of Japanese cedar pollen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 199:619–625
Sone T, Morikubo K, Miyahara M, Komiyama N, Shimizu K, Tsunoo H, Kino K (1998) T cell epitopes in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen allergens: choice of major T cell epitopes in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 toward design of the peptide-based immunotherapeutics for the management of Japanese cedar pollinosis. J Immunol 161:448–457
Takagi H, Takaiwa F (2016) Production of rice seed-based allergy vaccines. Methods Mol Biol 1403:713–721
Takaiwa F, Yang L (2014) Development of a rice-based peptide vaccine for Japanese cedar and cypress pollen allergies. Transgenic Res 23:573–584
Tarahomjoo S (2012) Development of vaccine delivery vehicles based on lactic acid bacteria. Mol Biotechnol 51:183–199
Wang M, Gao Z, Zhang Y, Pan L (2016) Lactic acid bacteria as mucosal delivery vehicles: a realistic therapeutic option. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5691–5701
Wells J (2011) Mucosal vaccination and therapy with genetically modified lactic acid bacteria. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2:423–425
Yasueda H, Yui Y, Shimizu T, Shida T (1983) Isolation and partial characterization of the major allergen from Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 71:77–86
Zhang XJ, Duan G, Zhang R, Fan Q (2009) Optimized expression of Helicobacter pylori ureB gene in the Lactococcus lactis nisin-controlled gene expression (NICE) system and experimental study of its immunoreactivity. Curr Microbiol 58:308–314
Zhang Q, Zhong J, Huan L (2011) Expression of hepatitis B virus surface antigen determinants in Lactococcus lactis for oral vaccination. Microbiol Res 166:111–120
Zhang XJ, Feng SY, Li ZT, Feng YM (2015) Expression of Helicobacter pylori hspA gene in Lactococcus lactis NICE system and experimental study on its immunoreactivity. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:750932
Zhang R, Duan G, Shi Q, Chen S, Fan Q, Sun N, Xi Y (2016) Construction of a recombinant Lactococcus lactis strain expressing a fusion protein of Omp22 and HpaA from Helicobacter pylori for oral vaccine development. Biotechnol Lett 38:1911–1916
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Shuichi Yada, Dr. Yanshuang Zou, Dr. Meimei Han, Ms. Kyoko Isogai, and Ms. Yoshie Yasuoka for their excellent assistance and useful discussions on this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Hoang, V., Ochi, T., Kurata, K. et al. Nisin-induced expression of recombinant T cell epitopes of major Japanese cedar pollen allergens in Lactococcus lactis . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102, 261–268 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8579-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8579-8