Introduction

Inflammation is a basic pathophysiological process that enables the body to remove pathogens and repair damaged tissues following infection or injury (Tang et al. 2018). In physiological conditions, the inflammatory response allows the body to remove harmful stimuli and maintain homeostasis, thus promoting the repair and healing of damaged tissues (Shabbir et al. 2018). However, chronic inflammation caused by acute unresolved inflammation or persistent irritation can lead to the occurrence of many severe refractory diseases (Gilroy and De Maeyer 2015), such as bronchial asthma, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Presently, there are two main classes of drugs for the treatment of inflammation: non-steroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Cui et al. 2019). However, both drug classes have multiple side effects; therefore, new anti-inflammatory drugs with better efficacy and fewer side effects need to be developed.

Schisandra chinensis is a traditional Chinese medicine, listed in Chinese Pharmacopeia, and is used to treat a wide variety of diseases (Panossian and Wikman 2008; Liang et al. 2014). Modern pharmacological studies show that Schisandra chinensis has anti-inflammatory actions (Song et al. 2019), is hepato-protective (Park et al. 2014), sedation and hypnosis, lowering of the blood sugar (Xu et al. 2015), anti-oxidant effects (Jang et al. 2014), enhanced immunity, and has anti-cancer effects. The main components of Schisandra chinensis are lignans, volatile oils, triterpenes, polysaccharides, and flavonoids, among which, lignans are the main characteristic active components. Schisandrin A (Sch A) is one of the main active constituents of lignans in Schisandra chinensis (Qiu et al. 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated that Sch A also possesses anti-inflammatory effects. In vitro, Sch A can inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in macrophages (Kwon et al. 2018). Additionally, Sch A has also been shown to suppress lipopolysaccharide-induced neuronal damage in microglial cells (Li et al. 2018). In vivo, Sch A can attenuate dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis (Zhang et al. 2016). In addition, Sch A can protect against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (Zhou et al. 2019). However, the role of Sch A in ear edema is still unclear. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of Sch A in the paw edema has also not been investigated. This study aimed to determine the anti-inflammatory effect of Sch A in xylene-induced ear edema and the anti-inflammatory mechanism of Sch A in carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice. This study provides an important theoretical basis for the development and utilization of Sch A. Meanwhile, the study also provides new directions for researchers to produce novel and more effective anti-inflammatory drugs by modifying the structure of Sch A.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male Kunming mice (body weight 20–25 g) were procured from the Jinan Pengyue Animal Center. All mice were kept in at a temperature of 20–24 °C, with standard 12-h light-dark cycles, and at a relative humidity of 54–59%. The mice were allowed to eat and drink ad libitum. The Ethics Committee of Jining Medical University approved the experimental protocols (Serial number: JNMC-2019-DW-002).

Chemicals

Sch A (purity > 98%) extracted and purified as previously described (Caichompoo et al. 2009) was purchased from Daosifu Biotechnology co., LTD. (Nanjing, China). Carrageenan was supplied by Bomei biotechnology (Hefei, China). All antibodies used in this research were provided by Bioworld Technology (MN, USA).

Xylene-induced ear edema

The mice were divided into four groups (n = 10): control, indomethacin (5 mg/kg), Sch A (25 mg/kg), and Sch A (50 mg/kg). The control group was provided with distilled water (10 ml/kg). The doses of Sch A were determined according to the reference (Zhou et al. 2019). All groups received treatment orally for seven consecutive days. One hour after the last administration, xylene (50 μL) was evenly applied to the front and back surface of the left ears, and the right ears were wiped with normal saline (as control). After 30 min, the mice were sacrificed and both ears were immediately excised. A section of each ear was sampled using an 8-mm perforator and then weighed. The degree of ear edema was calculated according to the following formula (Gong et al. 2019):

$$ \mathrm{Ear}\ \mathrm{edema}\ \mathrm{degree}=\left(\mathrm{weight}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{left}\ \mathrm{ear}-\mathrm{weight}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{right}\ \mathrm{ear}\right) $$

Carrageenan-induced paw edema

The mice were randomly divided into control, carrageenan, indomethacin (5 mg/kg), Sch A (25 mg/kg), and Sch A (50 mg/kg) groups, with 10 mice in each group. The control and carrageenan groups were treated with distilled water (10 ml/kg). All groups received treatment orally for seven consecutive days. One hour after the last administration, acute inflammation was induced in all groups except the control group using an intraplantar injection of 30 μL of 1% carrageenan in the left hind paw. The measurements were performed at 0, 1, 3, and 5 h after carrageenan injection using a PV-200 instrument (PV-200, TaiMeng Technology, Chengdu, China). Edema rate was calculated as previously described, using the following equation (Ma et al. 2013):

$$ \mathrm{Edema}\ \left(\%\right)=\left({\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{d}}-{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{b}}/{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{b}}\right)\times 100\%\left({\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{d}}\ \mathrm{is}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{paw}\ \mathrm{volume}\ \mathrm{at}\ \mathrm{different}\ \mathrm{times};{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{b}}\ \mathrm{is}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{paw}\ \mathrm{volume}\ \mathrm{before}\ \mathrm{inflammation}\ \mathrm{was}\ \mathrm{induced}.\right) $$

Histopathology analysis

The mice were sacrificed 5 h after the carrageenan was injected and the paw volumes were recorded. The paw tissues were then collected, fixed with 10% formaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Four micron slices were cut from the paraffin, and then stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). The histological changes of the paw were observed using an electron microscope.

ELISA detection

Paw tissues were homogenized and the homogenates were centrifuged as previously described (Wilches et al. 2019). The supernatants were collected to detect levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, according to the instructions of the ELISA kit (Kejing Biological Technology, Jiangsu, China).

Immunohistochemical analysis

The paw tissues of the mice in each group were embedded and sectioned following a standard protocol. The expression of NF-κB/p65 was detected using standard immunohistochemical staining, as previously described (El-Sheakh et al. 2015). The sections were incubated with the primary antibody (anti-NF-κB/p65), and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-polymer was used as the secondary antibody. The sections were then colored with diaminobenzidine (DAB) and counterstained with methyl green.

Western blot analysis

Protein was extracted from the paw tissues using radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. The proteins were separated using sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked using 5% skim milk and incubated with primary antibodies for TLR4 (Bioworld Technology; BS3489; 1:750), p-p65 (Bioworld Technology; BS4137; 1:750), IκBα (Bioworld Technology; BS3601; 1:750), p-IκBα (Bioworld Technology; BS4105; 1:750), β-actin (Bioworld Technology; AP0060; 1:750), and secondary antibodies (Bioworld Technology; BS13278; 1:10000), according to the standard western blot procedure. Finally, the bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Band intensities were measured using the ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

The values are presented as mean ± SD. The differences were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test. All analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 20.0). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Effect of Sch A on ear edema

In the control group, the left ears showed a marked inflammatory response, including redness and edema, which was confirmed by calculating the degree of edema. Treatment with Sch A resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in xylene-induced ear edema in the mice (Fig. 1b). Meanwhile, there was an obvious reduction of redness on the left ears (Fig. 1a). The effect of Sch A (50 mg/kg) was comparable to the effect of indomethacin (5 mg/kg).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of Sch A on ear edema. a Xylene-induced visible redness of the left ear. b Ear edema degree (calculated as left ear weight − right ear weight). Data represented as mean ± SD **P < 0.01 vs. control group. Indo, indomethacin

Carrageenan-induced mice paw edema

Carrageenan administration triggered a significant increase in the paw volume of the carrageenan group. Pretreatment with Sch A (25 and 50 mg/kg) markedly decreased paw edema at 1, 3, and 5 h after inflammation induction, indicating that Sch A (25 and 50 mg/kg) protected against paw edema induced by carrageenan (Fig. 2). Sch A (50 mg/kg) was comparable to indomethacin at the 5th hour after the inflammation was induced.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of Sch A on carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice. a Sch A reduced the edema rate in the paw. b Pictures of paw edema extent taken 5 h after carrageenan injection. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. control group. Indo, indomethacin

Effects of Sch A on carrageenan-induced paw edema: histopathological changes

The effects of Sch A on paw histopathological changes were evaluated by HE staining. In the carrageenan-induced paw edema animal model, the inflammatory cell was mainly neutrophils. Compared with the control group, the neutrophil infiltration was easily observed in the carrageen group (Fig. 1b). However, pretreatment with Sch A clearly diminished the carrageenan-induced histopathological changes (Fig. 3d and e).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Sch A attenuated carrageenan-induced histopathological changes in the paw (magnification × 200). a Control. b Carrageenan. c Indomethacin. d, e Sch A (25, 50 mg/kg). The arrows refer to inflammatory cell infiltration in the edema paw tissue

Effects of Sch A on MPO activity

Compared with the control group, MPO activity obviously increased after carrageenan injection. In contrast, pretreatment with Sch A clearly inhibited MPO activity (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of Sch A on MPO activity. Data represented as mean ± SD ##P < 0.01 vs. control group. **P < 0.01 vs. carrageenan group. Indo, indomethacin

Effects of Sch A on TNF-α and IL-1β levels

The levels of TNF-α and IL-1β remained low in the control group. However, levels of both TNF-α and IL-1β were significantly elevated in the carrageenan group. Pretreatment with Sch A significantly reduced the production of TNF-α and IL-1β in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of Sch A on levels of a TNF-α and b IL-1β. Data represented as mean ± SD ##P < 0.01 vs. control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. carrageenan group. Indo, indomethacin

Effects of Sch A on TLR4 expression and NF-κB activation

The expression of TLR4 increased after carrageenan stimulation. Sch A treatment restored TLR4 expression to normal levels. Meanwhile, the injection of carrageenan resulted in increased levels of NF-κB and increased phosphorylation of IκBα and p65. Sch A treatment significantly attenuated these alterations (Figs. 6 and 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of Sch A on TLR4 expression and NF-κB activation. a Expression of TLR4, p-p65, and p-IκBα by western blot. bd Western blot analyses of TLR4, p-p65, and p-IκBα. Data represented as mean ± SD ##P < 0.01 vs. control group, **P < 0.01 vs. Carr group. Indo, indomethacin; Carr, carrageenan

Fig. 7
figure 7

Representative NF-κB p65 immunohistochemistry in the paw tissue (magnification × 400). Paw sections from the control group (a) showed a small degree of immunostaining for NF-κB p65. On the other hand, induction with carrageenan significantly increased the immunohistochemical expression of NF-κB p65 in the carrageenan group (b). Pretreatment with indomethacin and Sch A markedly reduced positive nucleus staining for NF-κB p65 (c, d, e). The arrows indicate positive staining for NF-κB p65

Discussion

In this study, the anti-inflammatory bioactivity of Sch A was evaluated using xylene- and carrageenan-induced edema models, two classic animal models of acute inflammation.

In order to develop a preliminary understanding of the anti-inflammatory effects of Sch A, we used a mouse model of xylene-induced acute inflammatory ear edema. This model mainly causes the release of histamine, bradykinin, and other inflammatory mediators, resulting in local vasodilation, increased capillary permeability, inflammatory cell infiltration, and acute exudative inflammatory edema in the ear (Lee et al. 2019). In this study, pretreatment with Sch A markedly suppressed xylene-induced acute inflammation in the ear, as demonstrated by the decreasing degree of ear edema degree and reduced degree of ear redness, suggesting that Sch A possesses potent anti-inflammatory effects.

After obtaining preliminary evidence demonstrating the anti-inflammatory effects of Sch A, we used a model of paw edema to further explore the anti-inflammatory effects of Sch A and its mechanisms. The carrageenan-induced paw edema animal model is used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of drugs in a multitude of studies (Yonathan et al. 2006). Previous studies have shown that Sch A can suppress carrageenan-induced paw edema in comparison with Sch A and Schisandra B in the anti-inflammatory effect of the difference. Sch A produced an inhibition on carrageenan-induced paw edema in both long-term and acute treatment, while Schisandra B that was another important ingredient in Schisandra chinensis had the effect of inhibiting paw edema only during long-term treatment (Leong et al. 2016). The results obtained in our study indicate that Sch A markedly inhibited the carrageenan-induced edema and histopathological changes in the paw tissues. These results confirmed the anti-inflammatory properties of Sch A.

The adhesion and infiltration of white blood cells, especially neutrophils (PMN), are important features of acute inflammation (Sadeghi et al. 2013). MPO is the most reliable index used to evaluate the degree of infiltration of PMN aggregation. The aggregation and degree of infiltration of PMN can be quantified by determining MPO activity in local tissues (Loria et al. 2008). In this study, we found that MPO activity significantly increased in acute inflammatory mice paw edema tissues, suggesting that carrageenan-induced inflammation resulted in PMN aggregation and infiltration in inflammatory sites. Sch A markedly reduced MPO activity, indicating that Sch A can inhibit the aggregation and infiltration of neutrophils in inflammatory sites and play an anti-inflammatory role. These findings are consistent with the pathological results and the histological test results. IL-1β and TNF-α are important indicators of inflammation. Under physiological conditions, their concentrations are maintained at a low level. However, their levels significantly increase under inflammatory conditions (Hu et al. 2019). In this study, a considerable rise of IL-1β and TNF-α was detected in edema tissues. Pre-treatment with Sch A visibly inhibited the increase of IL-1β and TNF-α levels, indicating that Sch A may reduce the degree of inflammation by inhibiting the release of inflammatory cytokines.

NF-κB is a nuclear transcription factor that is closely related to inflammation in the body (Hayden and Ghosh 2011). In its resting state, NF-κB has no biological activity. However, when stimulated by cytokines, endotoxins, and other factors, NF-κB can initiate the transcription of target genes and promote the release of inflammatory factors (Liang et al. 2018). Previous studies have demonstrated that Sch A is able to modulate inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB pathways. However, it is still uncertain whether the anti-inflammatory effect of Sch A is related to the upstream protein of NF-κB. TLRs are pattern-recognition receptors that play a pivotal role in the immune system (Yang et al. 2016). They can induce the release of various cytokines involved in the inflammatory response through activating the NF-κB signal transduction pathway. TLR4 is an important component of the TLRs/NF-κB signaling pathway that mediates inflammation. After stimulation of the tissues, TLR4 in the cell membrane recognizes the corresponding ligand and activates NF-κB, thereby inducing the continuous inflammatory response (Qi et al. 2019). In this study, the results demonstrated that the expression of TLR4 and downstream proteins, including p-IκBα and p-p65, were considerably upregulated after carrageenan induction. Simultaneously, there was visible immunostaining for NF-κB p65 in the carrageenan group. Pretreatment with Sch A noticeably reduced the expression of TLR4, p-IκBα, p-p65, and positive staining for NF-κB p65, indicating that Sch A may decrease inflammation by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway (Fig. 8). These results are similar to those of previous studies (Shalini et al. 2015; Kwon et al. 2018; Rai et al. 2018). Previous studies have also demonstrated that the mechanism of Sch A was related to inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K/Akt) signal pathways (Kwon et al. 2018). However, we did not explore the anti-inflammatory effect of Sch A on other inflammatory pathways. Therefore, future studies should be conducted to determine whether Sch A can regulate other inflammatory pathways.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The schematic diagram of anti-inflammatory mechanism of Sch A. Carrageenan induction activates TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, which leads to the the release of inflammatory factors. Nevertheless, Sch A can suppress the activation of TLR4/NFκB signaling pathway to play an anti-inflammatory role

In summary, the evidence obtained from this study demonstrated that Sch A protects against xylene- and carrageenan-induced edema. The underlying mechanism might be downregulation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway.