Abstract
Voltage-gated sodium channels are crucially involved in the transduction and transmission of nociceptive signals and pathological pain states. In the past decades, a lot of effort has been spent examining and characterizing biophysical properties of the different sodium channels and their role in signaling pathways. Several gains of function mutations of the sodium channels Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are associated with pain disorders. Due to their critical role in nociceptive pathways voltage-gated sodium channels are regarded interesting targets for pharmacological pain treatment. However we still need to fill the gap that exists in the translation of efficacy in preclinical in vitro experiments and in models of pain into the clinic. This review summarizes biological and electrophysiological properties of voltage-gated sodium channels and aims to discuss limitations and promising pharmacological strategies in sodium channel research in the context of pain therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Over the last decades, a great amount of effort has been made to develop new pharmacological treatment strategies for pain management. There is urgent need for improved analgesic drugs since about 50% of patients with chronic pain show little or no response to current analgesic drug treatment (Breivik et al. 2006).
Voltage-gated sodium channels are important determinants of electrical excitability and have been extensively studied in the past three decades. So far more than 300 reviews have been published referring to the broad field of sodium channel research. Numerous preclinical studies demonstrate the involvement of voltage-gated sodium channels in the pathophysiology of pain states. Missense mutations of the sodium channels Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 cause alterations in sodium channel function which result in enhanced repetitive firing and decreased action potential threshold thereby promoting hyperexcitability of nociceptive neurons (Waxman et al. 2014).
This review gives an overview of structural and functional features of voltage-gated sodium channels and emphasizes the need for improved translational pain models.
Structure and classification of voltage-gated sodium channels
The alpha subunit represents the primary functional element of the sodium channel macromolecule consisting of approximately 1800 amino acids which are arranged in four homologous domains (Fig. 1). Each of the domains contains six alpha helical transmembrane segments. The alpha subunit harbors the voltage-sensor and the channel pore including the sodium selectivity filter. Most of the known pharmacological binding sites are located within the alpha subunit (Sula et al. 2017). Adjacent to the alpha subunit smaller (respectively 30–40 kDa) associated beta subunits encoded by the genes SCN1B–SCN4B modulate the channel’s gating properties and contribute to stabilizing the channel protein within the plasma membrane (Namadurai et al. 2014). Due to their function as cell adhesion molecules, they are involved in cell migration during physiological processes such as the postnatal development of the CNS as well as pathological conditions like cancer metastasis (Brackenbury and Isom 2008).
Voltage-gated sodium channels can be pharmacologically classified as TTX-sensitive and TTX-“resistant”: Due to the presence of the amino acids serine (Nav1.8 and Nav1.9) and cysteine (Nav1.5) within the linker between segments (S) 5 and S 6 the channels Nav1.5, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are not blocked by nanomolar, but more than 1 μM concentrations of tetrodotoxin (TTX) (thus named “TTX-resistant”) while the other TTX-sensitive voltage-gated sodium channels harbor amino acid residues with an aromatic ring in the respective linker and are inhibited by low nanomolar concentrations of TTX (Cohen and Strichartz 1977; Yu and Catterall 2003; Leffler et al. 2005).
Nine identified genes (SCN1A–SCN5A and SCN8A–SCN11A) encode different voltage-gated sodium channels with a characteristic distribution throughout the body. Although the nine channels show about 50% homology regarding their primary sequence, their gating properties differ. The individual biophysical properties of the nine sodium channels and their varying expression among excitable membranes characterize the patterns of electrical activity in different tissues.
Due to their crucial role in pain pathophysiology, the biological and functional features of the voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are described in detail hereinafter:
Nav1.7
Nav1.7 is abundantly expressed in nociceptive neurons and is also found in visceral and in olfactory sensory neurons; hypothalamic, sympathetic, and myenteric neurons; and in smooth muscle (Waxman 2007). By amplification of subthreshold depolarizations, Nav1.7 can trigger the generation of action potentials. Activation and inactivation of Nav1.7 show a fast kinetic while its recovery from fast inactivation is slow (Cummins et al. 1998). Several pain disorders such as inherited erythromelalgia (IEM), paroxysmal extreme pain disorder (PEPD), and idiopathic small fiber neuropathies are linked to Nav1.7 mutations (Cummins et al. 2004; Choi et al. 2011). PEPD mutations compromise inactivation of Nav1.7 while IEM mutations alter voltage dependence of activation resulting in channel activation at more hyperpolarized potentials. Nav1.7 has gained special interest since loss of function mutations of this channel induce a loss of pain perception denoted “congenital indifference to pain” (CIP) (Cox et al. 2006). Besides the inability to perceive pain and an impaired sense of smell or a complete anosmia, patients with CIP show no abnormal organic function (Goldberg et al. 2007; Weiss et al. 2011). Therefore, Nav1.7 is regarded a promising target for the development of sodium channel blockers which selectively modulate pain without exhibiting effects on other organs.
Nav1.8
Nav1.8 is highly expressed in small and medium nociceptive neurons as well as in myelinated afferent type A fibers and in cranial sensory ganglia (Shields et al. 2012). It is also present in intracardiac ganglia where its functional role needs to be further explored (Verkerk et al. 2012). It represents the main inward current during the upstroke of the action potential in dorsal root ganglion neurons and is a key determinant for transmission of (noxious) thermal, mechanical, and inflammatory stimuli (Akopian et al. 1999; Jarvis et al. 2007; Patrick Harty and Waxman 2007; Zimmermann et al. 2007). Its kinetic properties, among others, its rather fast recovery from inactivation, support high frequency discharges (Han et al. 2015).
Nav1.9
This channel is predominantly expressed in DRG-neurons with a diameter smaller than 30 μm, in trigeminal neurons and in intrinsic neurons of the myenteric plexus (Dib-Hajj et al. 2002). Seven mutations of the gene SCN11A which encodes the Nav1.9 alpha subunit were found to cause peripheral neuropathy syndromes (Huang et al. 2014). Nav1.9 already activates at hyperpolarized potentials (around − 60 mV) (Herzog et al. 2001). Due to its slow and incomplete inactivation, it generates a persistent sodium current enabling plateau potentials and repetitive depolarizations (Coste et al. 2004). With a homology of about 45%, the primary structure of the alpha subunit of the Nav1.9 channel differs the most compared to the other eight voltage-gated sodium channels (Dib-Hajj et al. 1998; Dib-Hajj et al. 2015). The less conserved structure can be a favorable condition to develop Nav1.9-selective blockers.
To examine Nav1.9 currents in vitro is challenging due to difficulties in expression of Nav1.9 channels in heterologous systems and a rundown of Nav1.9 current in the course of electrophysiological experiments (Leffler et al. 2005; Goral et al. 2015). Protein engineering approaches like the use of voltage-activated potassium channels into which isolated voltage-sensing paddle motifs of the Nav1.9 alpha subunit are “transplanted” help to bridge these obstacles. It needs to be further evaluated to what degree the functional properties of Nav1.9 channels can be characterized by such chimeric constructs (Bosmans et al. 2011).
Modification of voltage-gated sodium channels
Sodium channels are macromolecular complexes which are modulated by several pathways of cellular signal transduction and interact with numerous other proteins (Wood et al. 2004; Laedermann et al. 2015). Sodium channel function, expression, and distribution patterns are altered in the course of pathological processes like inflammation, metabolic disorders, or nerve injury resulting in characteristic changes in membrane excitability. Nociceptive and inflammatory mediators such as bradykinin, serotonin, adenosine, histamine, prostaglandin E2, epinephrine, endothelin-1, and nerve growth factor induce either changes in sodium channel gating and/or channel trafficking (Woolf et al. 1994; Rush and Waxman 2004; Vanoye et al. 2013; Leo et al. 2015). Different enzymes, among others protein kinase A, B, and C, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II induce posttranslational modifications of voltage-gated sodium channels culminating in short- and long-term alteration of sodium inward currents (Fig. 1) (Laedermann et al. 2015). Several pathways of posttranslational modification are discussed to contribute to pathological pain states and the transition from acute to chronic pain (for further review see Scheuer 2011; Laedermann et al. 2015). It is not yet fully resolved to what degree these modifications translate to actual changes in excitability (Bhave and Gereau 4th 2004).
Furthermore, epigenetic modifications contribute to long-term alterations of sodium channel expression. miR-7a downregulation has been demonstrated to increase sodium channel β2 subunit protein expression and was associated with increased pain in the late phase of a rat model of neuropathic pain (Sakai et al. 2013). Manipulating selected miRNA proved successful in alleviating pain in preclinical studies. Using the chronic constriction injury model, miR-96 mRNA expression in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons was downregulated after sciatic nerve ligation while expression of the Nav1.3 channels increased. During daily intrathecal injections of miR-96, the mRNA and protein level of Nav1.3 could be restored. These alterations where accompanied by a reduction of tactile hypersensitivity/allodynia (Chen et al. 2014). Further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical impact of epigenetic modifications of voltage-gated sodium channels on chronic pain.
Another yet not completely understood aspect which might further be taken into account is the correlation between channel gating and an intrinsic property termed long-term memory. The sequence of channel opening and closing can influence channel behavior similar to a regulatory self-tuning feedback loop (Liebovitch and Todorov 1996; Wawrzkiewicz et al. 2012; Qin 2014; Law and Levin 2015). The influence of this bioelectric process in pathological conditions such as chronic pain has not yet been examined. One challenge of future research is to establish methodological approaches by which the influence of-long term dynamic changes of sodium channel kinetics on neuronal plasticity can be analyzed in detail.
Preferential inhibition of pathological electrical activity
Changes in membrane potential induce complex conformational changes of sodium channels which have not yet been completely understood in detail. Upon depolarization, the channels open within a fraction of a millisecond. Within a few milliseconds, a rapid/fast inactivation occurs which limits current flow and thereby terminates the depolarizing phase of the action potential. Prolonged or recurrent depolarizations induce other non-conducting states subsumed under the term slow inactivation. The detailed kinetic properties of slow inactivation are still under investigation. Slow inactivation is involved in physiological processes such as neuronal plasticity and pathological conditions, for example, periodic paralysis (Silva 2014).
Among the many sodium channel modulating agents, each compound has characteristic binding affinities for the different conformational states of the channel. As an example, mexiletine preferentially blocks the open state of the channel while tetrodotoxin and also saxitoxin bind to different conformational states with almost the same affinity (Pal and Gangopadhyay 2015). Even structurally very similar compounds show different patterns in terms of modulation of the various conformational states (Haeseler et al. 2001; King et al. 2012). A functional selectivity can be given by a different affinity of a sodium channel modulator to the diverse channel states. As a characteristic local anesthetic like molecular action, a great number of nonselective sodium channel blockers exert membrane stabilizing effects by preferential inhibition of inactivated channels (Nau and Wang 2004). Drugs which selectively block hyperexcitable nerves/ectopic activity while leaving physiological nerve conduction unchanged would be ideal candidates in terms of an improved therapeutic utility. The functional selectivity, i.e., the state-and frequency dependent block of voltage-gated sodium channels by a number of non-selective sodium channel inhibitors such as several anticonvulsants and antidepressants is regarded to reduce adverse effects.
Another pharmacological strategy for a differentiated inhibition of pain pathways is the targeted application of molecules—such as QX-314, a membrane-impermeable lidocaine derivative (Binshtok et al. 2009)—to selectively modulate ion channel signaling in nociceptive neurons. A deeper understanding of the interplay of voltage-gated sodium channels and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels can facilitate the development of further molecular approaches for targeted inhibition of pathological electrical activity (Stueber et al. 2016).
Besides the regular transient sodium current in a subset of central and peripheral neurons characteristic, sodium inward currents are present which can promote repetitive action potential firing in neurons (Enomoto et al. 2018). The function and role of current components such as the resurgent current or persistent current have not yet been fully examined. Resurgent currents as well as persistent currents are involved in several pathological conditions such as epileptic disorders and syndromes associated with genetically driven sodium channelopathies like paramyotonia congenita and the paroxysmal extreme pain disorder (Kiss 2008; Lewis and Raman 2014; Jarecki et al. 2010). Resurgent currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons are enhanced by inflammatory mediators (Tan et al. 2014). Persistent and resurgent currents are interesting targets for the development of new analgesic sodium channel blockers. Particularly in the field of development of antiarrhythmic agents, several molecules have been identified as potent blockers of persistent currents (Camm 2017). However, the knowledge about the clinical effectiveness of selective inhibitors of the persistent sodium current is still limited (Heijman et al. 2017).
Resurgent currents are suppressed by low micromolar concentrations of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide (Theile and Cummins 2011) and the synthetic cannabinoid ajulemic acid (AJA) (Fig. 2) (Foadi et al. 2014). The molecular determinants of selective suppression of resurgent currents need to be further explored. Further insights into the interaction of the onset of resurgent current and the process of channel inactivation might provide a molecular basis for the development of selective resurgent current inhibitors. In this context, cannabinoids like anandamide and AJA might be promising lead compounds.
From the methodological point of view, progress in developing high-throughput electrophysiology platforms helped to accelerate the detection of potent sodium channel blocking molecules (Castle et al. 2009). Suitable electrophysiological protocols are needed for example to differentiate slow inactivation from slow unbinding of a drug from (fast) inactivated channels (Jo and Bean 2017). Besides, it is challenging to investigate the impact of drug binding on channel gating. Advancements of techniques of single channel patch clamp recording and of thermodynamic models can be useful to depict these multifactorial interactions (Armstrong 2006; Pal and Gangopadhyay 2015). But what is still missing is the analysis of clinical significance of investigated electrophysiological alterations. Up to now, we can hardly assess which in vitro methods can predict the clinical benefit of an investigated sodium channel blocker. Thus, more emphasis should be put on the development of experimental models which help to improve the predictive value of basic research results (Bagal et al. 2015).
The future challenge: bridging basic and clinical pain research
Drug promiscuity entails that almost every fourth pharmaceutical compound exerts a prominent inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels in addition to having several other mechanisms of action (Lenkey et al. 2010). Although plenty of preclinical studies discovered potent sodium channel blockers whose molecular characteristics classified them as drugs with a promising antinociceptive profile, in relative terms rather few sodium channel modulators have been reported to have entered clinical trials, and in several clinical studies sodium channel blockers failed to reproduce robust analgesic effects (Bagal et al. 2015).
Coanalgetics like anticonvulsants and antidepressants are used in chronic pain states for several decades. Though several studies demonstrated sodium channel modulating effects of these drugs, the impact of sodium channel block on clinical analgesia has not yet been systematically analyzed. There is not enough evidence to what degree the pharmacological block of sodium channels translates to a clinical analgesic effect. Amitriptyline, for example, is recommended as a first line treatment for neuropathic pain (Moore et al. 2015). A number of preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate antinociceptive effects of amitriptyline. Similar to many other potent sodium channel blockers, the pharmacological actions of amitriptyline include a broad range of molecular targets such as the inhibition of norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake, modulation of sodium, calcium, and potassium channels (Mika et al. 2013). Our understanding of the interactions contributing to its therapeutic profile is still limited. Analgesic effects due to topical application of amitriptyline in animal models of pain and in preliminary clinical studies implicate that sodium channel block might have a clinically relevant impact on the antinociceptive profile of amitriptyline (Khan et al. 2002; Moghadamnia et al. 2009). But in the case of neuropathic pain, controlled clinical trials could not demonstrate a robust analgesic action of topical amitriptyline as depicted by a systematic review (Thompson and Brooks 2015). As highlighted below, there is need for improved experimental models to fill the translational gap between preclinical results and clinical therapeutic efficacy.
A number of aspects can limit the reliability of preclinical pain models: Challenging inconsistent results can arise from methodological and species-related differences. For instance the expression of Nav1.7 differs between mouse and human dorsal root ganglion neurons (Chang et al. 2017). As another example in a rat model of spinal contusion injury, antisense knockdown of Nav1.3 has been shown to be associated with an alleviation of hyperexcitability and decreased pain-related behavior (Hains et al. 2003). However Nav1.3 knock-out mice developed characteristic patterns of neuropathic pain and an unaltered pain behavior after spinal nerve ligation (Nassar et al. 2006). Neuroanatomical differences between rats, mice, and humans, for example, regarding the pathway to the forebrain that is crucial for pain sensation in humans (Craig et al. 2002), can cause different outcomes in pain end points. In experimental models of pain, it is difficult to reliably capture alterations which show temporal dynamic, for example, most of the animal pain models focus on acute inflammatory states (Tan et al. 2014) or do not make allowance for spontaneous pain, which in humans is a very prominent symptom, especially of neuropathic pain (Krishnan et al. 2009). In several studies on animal pain models, withdrawal reflexes were assessed as sole outcome measure which does not suit the complexity of pain states in humans (Rice et al. 2008).
Research around voltage-gated sodium channels impressively demonstrates the translational gap and the challenging aspects of pain research: Insensitivity to pain has been regarded a phenotypic attribute of human Nav1.7 null subjects. But still affected humans as well as Nav1.7 knock-out mice can develop neuropathic pain (Nassar et al. 2004; Wheeler et al. 2015). It has been shown that in order to gain the hypoalgesic phenotype of Nav1.7 null subjects, a 100% antagonism of Nav1.7 channels is needed which is hardly possible to achieve by one compound (Emery et al. 2016). The monoclonal antibody SVmab, a selective Nav1.7 inhibitor, exhibits analgesic and anti-pruritic effects in different mouse models of nociception (Lee et al. 2014). Its recombinant analog, rSVmab, has a much lower binding affinity for Nav1.7 in human embryonic kidney cells, human nerve tissue, and mouse DRG neurons compared to Svmab, but still rSVmab exerts analgesic effects in the murine paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain model (Bang et al. 2018). The molecular mechanisms of this action yet remain unclear.
Recent studies provided a deeper understanding of the relation of sodium inward currents to other signaling pathways: Minett et al. elucidated, that the precursor of met-enkephalin, an endogenous opioid peptide, is upregulated in human Nav1.7 null subjects and in Nav1.7 knock-out mice. Thus, sodium seems to represent a second messenger which modifies the expression of endogenous opioid peptides (Minett et al. 2015). This is accompanied by a decrease in pronociceptive serotonergic signals in Nav1.7 knock-out mice (Isensee et al. 2017).
Progress is underway regarding promising experimental models which help to bridge the translational gap (Bulmer and Grundy 2011). Among others, the conversion of pluripotent stem cells into nociceptors (Chambers et al. 2012), the development of human neuron-glia test systems (Luongo et al. 2014), and improved human pain models (Lötsch et al. 2014) are examples for translational approaches to shed further light on the complex, and still not clearly revealed pathomechanisms of pain states.
Conclusion
Sodium channels constitute relevant pharmacological targets. Sodium channel blocking agents are used in the treatment of pain states, arrhythmias, epileptic syndromes, and neurodegenerative diseases. Studies investigating the interaction of sodium channel function with different players of the molecular “pain network” using translational approaches can broaden our knowledge regarding the influence of sodium channel modulation on clinical analgesia. Future research should give more emphasis to establish preclinical pain models which provide superior predictive validity. This would improve the efficacy of screening of novel sodium channel modulators. In parallel with the use of advanced translational techniques, an increased systematical interchange and cooperation of basic and clinical researchers can be helpful to reduce gaps between in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies.
References
Akopian AN, Souslova V, England S, Okuse K, Ogata N, Ure J, Smith A, Kerr BJ, McMahon SB, Boyce S, Hill R, Stanfa LC, Dickenson AH, Wood JN (1999) The tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel SNS has a specialized function in pain pathways. Nat Neurosci 2(6):541–548
Armstrong CM (2006) Na channel inactivation from open and closed states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17991–17996
Bagal SK, Marron BE, Owen RM, Storer RI, Swain NA (2015) Voltage gated sodium channels as drug discovery targets. Channels (Austin) 9(6):360–366
Bang S, Yoo J, Gong X, Liu D, Han Q, Luo X, Chang W, Chen G, Im ST, Kim YH, Strong JA, Zhang MZ, Zhang JM, Lee SY, Ji RR (2018) Differential inhibition of Nav1.7 and neuropathic pain by hybridoma-produced and recombinant monoclonal antibodies that target Nav1.7: differential activities of Nav1.7-targeting monoclonal antibodies. Neurosci Bull 34(1):22–41
Bhave G, Gereau RW 4th (2004) Posttranslational mechanisms of peripheral sensitization. J Neurobiol 61(1):88–106
Binshtok AM, Gerner P, Oh SB, Puopolo M, Suzuki S, Roberson DP, Herbert T, Wang CF, Kim D, Chung G, Mitani AA, Wang GK, Bean BP, Woolf CJ (2009) Coapplication of lidocaine and the permanently charged sodium channel blocker QX-314 produces a long-lasting nociceptive blockade in rodents. Anesthesiology 111(1):127–137
Bosmans F, Puopolo M, Martin-Eauclaire MF, Bean BP, Swartz KJ (2011) Functional properties and toxin pharmacology of a dorsal root ganglion sodium channel viewed through its voltage sensors. J Gen Physiol 138(1):59–72
Brackenbury WJ, Isom LL (2008) Voltage-gated Na+ channels: potential for beta subunits as therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets 12(9):1191–1203
Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D (2006) Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 10(4):287–333
Bulmer DC, Grundy D (2011) Achieving translation in models of visceral pain. Curr Opin Pharmacol 11(6):575–581
Camm AJ (2017) Hopes and disappointments with antiarrhythmic drugs. Int J Cardiol 237:71–74
Castle N, Printzenhoff D, Zellmer S, Antonio B, Wickenden A, Silvia C (2009) Sodium channel inhibitor drug discovery using automated high throughput electrophysiology platforms. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 12(1):107–122
Chambers SM, Qi Y, Mica Y, Lee G, Zhang XJ, Niu L, Bilsland J, Cao L, Stevens E, Whiting P, Shi SH, Studer L (2012) Combined small-molecule inhibition accelerates developmental timing and converts human pluripotent stem cells into nociceptors. Nat Biotechnol 30(7):715–720
Chang W, Berta T, Kim YH, Lee S, Lee SY, Ji RR (2017) Expression and role of voltage-gated sodium channels in human dorsal root ganglion neurons with special focus on Nav1.7, species differences, and regulation by paclitaxel. Neurosci Bull 34(1):4–12
Chen HP, Zhou W, Kang LM, Yan H, Zhang L, Xu BH, Cai WH (2014) Intrathecal miR-96 inhibits Nav1.3 expression and alleviates neuropathic pain in rat following chronic construction injury. Neurochem Res 39(1):76–83
Choi JS, Boralevi F, Brissaud O, Sánchez-Martín J, Te Morsche RH, Dib-Hajj SD, Drenth JP, Waxman SG (2011) Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder: a molecular lesion of peripheral neurons. Nat Rev Neurol 7(1):51–55
Cohen IS, Strichartz GR (1977) On the voltage-dependent action of tetrodotoxin. Biophys J 17(3):275–279
Coste B, Osorio N, Padilla F, Crest M, Delmas P (2004) Gating and modulation of presumptive NaV1.9 channels in enteric and spinal sensory neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 26:123–134
Cox JJ, Reimann F, Nicholas AK, Thornton G, Roberts E, Springell K, Karbani G, Jafri H, Mannan J, Raashid Y, al-Gazali L, Hamamy H, Valente EM, Gorman S, Williams R, McHale DP, Wood JN, Gribble FM, Woods CG (2006) An SCN9A channelopathy causes congenital inability to experience pain. Nature 444:894–898
Craig AD, Bushnell MC, Zhang ET, Blomqvist A (2002) Association of spinothalamic lamina I neurons and their ascending axons with calbindin-immunoreactivity in monkey and human. Pain 97:105–115
Cummins TR, Howe JR, Waxman SG (1998) Slow closed-state inactivation: a novel mechanism underlying ramp currents in cells expressing the hNE/PN1 sodium channel. J Neurosci 18(23):9607–9619
Cummins TR, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG (2004) Electrophysiological properties of mutant Nav1.7 sodium channels in a painful inherited neuropathy. J Neurosci 24(38):8232–8236
Dib-Hajj SD, Tyrrell L, Black JA, Waxman SG (1998) NaN, a novel voltage-gated Na channel, is expressed preferentially in peripheral sensory neurons and down-regulated after axotomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(15):8963–8968
Dib-Hajj SD, Black JA, Cummins TR, Waxman SG (2002) NaN/Nav1.9: a sodium channel with unique properties. Trends Neurosci 25:253–259
Dib-Hajj SD, Black JA, Waxman SG (2015) NaV1.9: a sodium channel linked to human pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 16(9):511–519
Emery EC, Luiz AP, Wood JN (2016) Nav1.7 and other voltage-gated sodium channels as drug targets for pain relief. Expert Opin Ther Targets 20:975–983
Enomoto A, Seki S, Tanaka S, Ishihama K, Yamanishi T, Kogo M, Hamada S (2018) Development of resurgent and persistent sodium currents in mesencephalic trigeminal neurons. J Neurosci Res 96(2):305–312
Foadi N, Berger C, Pilawski I, Stoetzer C, Karst M, Haeseler G, Wegner F, Leffler A, Ahrens J (2014) Inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels by the synthetic cannabinoid ajulemic acid. Anesth Analg 118(6):1238–1245
Goldberg YP, MacFarlane J, MacDonald ML, Thompson J, Dube MP, Mattice M, Fraser R, Young C, Hossain S, Pape T, Payne B, Radomski C, Donaldson G, Ives E, Cox J, Younghusband HB, Green R, Duff A, Boltshauser E, Grinspan GA, Dimon JH, Sibley BG, Andria G, Toscano E, Kerdraon J, Bowsher D, Pimstone SN, Samuels ME, Sherrington R, Hayden MR (2007) Loss-of-function mutations in the Nav1.7 gene underlie congenital indifference to pain in multiple human populations. Clin Genet 71(4):311–319
Goral RO, Leipold E, Nematian-Ardestani E, Heinemann SH (2015) Heterologous expression of NaV1.9 chimeras in various cell systems. Pflugers Arch 467(12):2423–2435
Haeseler G, Piepenbrink A, Bufler J, Dengler R, Aronson JK, Piepenbrock S, Leuwer M (2001) Structural requirements for voltage-dependent block of muscle sodium channels by phenol derivatives. Br J Pharmacol 132(8):1916–1924
Hains BC, Klein JP, Saab CY, Craner MJ, Black JA, Waxman SG (2003) Upregulation of sodium channel NaV1.3 and functional involvement in neuronal hyperexcitability associated with central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 26:8881–8892
Han C, Estacion M, Huang J (2015) Human Nav1.8 enhanced persistent and ramp currents contribute to distinct firing properties of human DRG neurons. J Neurophysiol 113:3172–3185
Heijman J, Ghezelbash S, Dobrev D (2017) Investigational antiarrhythmic agents: promising drugs in early clinical development. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 26(8):897–907
Herzog RI, Cummins TR, Waxman SG (2001) Persistent TTX-resistant Na+ current affects resting potential and response to depolarization in simulated spinal sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol 86(3):1351–1364
Huang J, Han C, Estacion M, Vasylyev D, Hoeijmakers JG, Gerrits MM, Tyrrell L, Lauria G, Faber CG, Dib-Hajj SD, Merkies IS, Waxman SG, PROPANE Study Group (2014) Gain-of-function mutations in sodium channel Na(v)1.9 in painful neuropathy. Brain 137(6):1627–1642
Isensee J, Krahé L, Moeller K, Pereira V, Sexton JE, Sun X, Emery E, Wood JN, Hucho T (2017) Synergistic regulation of serotonin and opioid signaling contributes to pain insensitivity in Nav1.7 knockout mice. Sci Signal 10(461):eaah4874
Jarecki BW, Piekarz AD, Jackson JO 2nd, Cummins TR (2010) Human voltage-gated sodium channel mutations that cause inherited neuronal and muscle channelopathies increase resurgent sodium currents. J Clin Invest 120:369–378
Jarvis MF, Honore P, Shieh CC, Chapman M, Joshi S, Zhang XF, Kort M, Carroll W, Marron B, Atkinson R, Thomas J, Liu D, Krambis M, Liu Y, McGaraughty S, Chu K, Roeloffs R, Zhong C, Mikusa JP, Hernandez G, Gauvin D, Wade C, Zhu C, Pai M, Scanio M, Shi L, Drizin I, Gregg R, Matulenko M, Hakeem A, Gross M, Johnson M, Marsh K, Wagoner PK, Sullivan JP, Faltynek CR, Krafte DS (2007) A-803467, a potent and selective Nav1.8 sodium channel blocker, attenuates neuropathic and inflammatory pain in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(20):8520–8525
Jo S, Bean BP (2017) Lacosamide inhibition of Nav1.7 voltage-gated sodium channels: slow binding to fast-inactivated states. Mol Pharmacol 91(4):277–286
Khan MA, Gerner P, Kuo Wang G (2002) Amitriptyline for prolonged cutaneous analgesia in the rat. Anesthesiology 96:109–116
King AM, Yang XF, Wang Y, Dustrude ET, Barbosa C, Due MR, Piekarz AD, Wilson SM, White FA, Salomé C, Cummins TR, Khanna R, Kohn H (2012) Identification of the benzyloxyphenyl pharmacophore: a structural unit that promotes sodium channel slow inactivation. ACS Chem Neurosci 3(12):1037–1049
Kiss T (2008) Persistent Na-channels: origin and function. A review. Acta Biol Hung 59(Suppl):1–12
Krishnan AV, Lin CS, Park SB, Kiernan MC (2009) Axonal ion channels from bench to bedside: a translational neuroscience perspective. Prog Neurobiol 89(3):288–313
Laedermann CJ, Abriel H, Decosterd I (2015) Post-translational modifications of voltage-gated sodium channels in chronic pain syndromes. Front Pharmacol 6:263
Law R, Levin M (2015) Bioelectric memory: modeling resting potential bistability in amphibian embryos and mammalian cells. Theor Biol Med Model 12:22
Lee JH, Park CK, Chen G, Han Q, Xie RG, Liu T, Ji RR, Lee SY (2014) A monoclonal antibody that targets a NaV1.7 channel voltage sensor for pain and itch relief. Cell 157(6):1393–1404
Leffler A, Herzog RI, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG, Cummins TR (2005) Pharmacological properties of neuronal TTX-resistant sodium channels and the role of a critical serine pore residue. Pflugers Arch 451(3):454–463
Lenkey N, Karoly R, Lukacs P, Vizi ES, Sunesen M, Fodor L, Mike A (2010) Classification of drugs based on properties of sodium channel inhibition: a comparative automated patch-clamp study. PLoS One 5(12):e15568
Leo M, Argalski S, Schäfers M, Hagenacker T (2015) Modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels by activation of tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in small DRG neurons of rats. Mediat Inflamm 2015:124942
Lewis AH, Raman IM (2014) Resurgent current of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. J Physiol 592(22):4825–4838
Liebovitch LS, Todorov AT (1996) Using fractals and nonlinear dynamics to determine the physical properties of ion channel proteins. Crit Rev Neurobiol 10(2):169–187
Lötsch J, Oertel BG, Ultsch A (2014) Human models of pain for the prediction of clinical analgesia. Pain 155(10):2014–2021
Luongo L, Maione S, Di Marzo V (2014) Endocannabinoids and neuropathic pain: focus on neuron-glia and endocannabinoid-neurotrophin interactions. Eur J Neurosci 39(3):401–408
Mika J, Zychowska M, Makuch W, Rojewska E, Przewlocka B (2013) Neuronal and immunological basis of action of antidepressants in chronic pain - clinical and experimental studies. Pharmacol Rep 65(6):1611–1621
Minett MS, Pereira V, Sikandar S, Matsuyama A, Lolignier S, Kanellopoulos AH, Mancini F, Iannetti GD, Bogdanov YD, Santana-Varela S, Millet Q, Baskozos G, MacAllister R, Cox JJ, Zhao J, Wood JN (2015) Endogenous opioids contribute to insensitivity to pain in humans and mice lacking sodium channel Nav1.7. Nat Commun 6:8967
Moghadamnia AA, Partovi M, Mohammadianfar I, Madani Z, Zabihi E, Hamidi MR, Baradaran M (2009) Evaluation of the effect of locally administered amitriptyline gel as adjunct to local anesthetics in irreversible pulpitis pain. Indian J Dent Res 20(1):3–6
Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, Cole P, Wiffen PJ (2015) Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD008242
Namadurai S, Balasuriya D, Rajappa R, Wiemhöfer M, Stott K, Klingauf J, Edwardson JM, Chirgadze DY, Jackson AP (2014) Crystal structure and molecular imaging of the Nav channel β3 subunit indicates a trimeric assembly. J Biol Chem 289(15):10797–10811
Nassar MA, Stirling LC, Forlani G, Baker MD, Matthews EA, Dickenson AH, Wood JN (2004) Nociceptor-specific gene deletion reveals a major role for Nav1.7 (PN1) in acute and inflammatory pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(34):12706–12711
Nassar MA, Baker MD, Levato A, Ingram R, Mallucci G, McMahon SB, Wood JN (2006) Nerve injury induces robust allodynia and ectopic discharges in Nav1.3 null mutant mice. Mol Pain 2:33
Nau C, Wang GK (2004) Interactions of local anesthetics with voltage-gated Na+ channels. J Membr Biol 201(1):1–8
Pal K, Gangopadhyay G (2015) Probing kinetic drug binding mechanism in voltage-gated sodium ion channel: open state versus inactive state blockers. Channels (Austin) 9(5):307–316
Patrick Harty T, Waxman SG (2007) Inactivation properties of sodium channel Nav1.8 maintain action potential amplitude in small DRG neurons in the context of depolarization. Mol Pain 3:12
Qin F (2014) Principles of single-channel kinetic analysis. Methods Mol Biol 1183:371–399
Rice AS, Cimino-Brown D, Eisenach JC, Kontinen VK, Lacroix-Fralish ML, Machin I, Preclinical Pain Consortium, Mogil JS, Stöhr T (2008) Animal models and the prediction of efficacy in clinical trials of analgesic drugs: a critical appraisal and call for uniform reporting standards. Pain 139(2):243–247
Rush AM, Waxman SG (2004) PGE2 increases the tetrodotoxin-resistant Nav1.9 sodium current in mouse DRG neurons via G-proteins. Brain Res 1023(2):264–271
Sakai A, Saitow F, Miyake N, Miyake K, Shimada T, Suzuki H (2013) miR-7a alleviates the maintenance of neuropathic pain through regulation of neuronal excitability. Brain 136(Pt 9):2738–2750
Scheuer T (2011) Regulation of sodium channel activity by phosphorylation. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22(2):160–165
Shields SD, Ahn HS, Yang Y, Han C, Seal RP, Wood JN, Waxman SG, Dib-Hajj SD (2012) Nav1.8 expression is not restricted to nociceptors in mouse peripheral nervous system. Pain 153:2017–2030
Silva J (2014) Slow inactivation of Na(+) channels. Handb Exp Pharmacol 221:33–49
Stueber T, Eberhardt MJ, Hadamitzky C, Jangra A, Schenk S, Dick F, Stoetzer C, Kistner K, Reeh PW, Binshtok AM, Leffler A (2016) Quaternary lidocaine derivative QX-314 activates and permeates human TRPV1 and TRPA1 to produce inhibition of sodium channels and cytotoxicity. Anesthesiology 124(5):1153–1165
Sula A, Booker J, Ng LC, Naylor CE, DeCaen PG, Wallace BA (2017) The complete structure of an activated open sodium channel. Nat Commun 8:14205
Tan ZY, Piekarz AD, Priest BT, Knopp KL, Krajewski JL, McDermott JS, Nisenbaum ES, Cummins TR (2014) Tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels in sensory neurons generate slow resurgent currents that are enhanced by inflammatory mediators. J Neurosci 34(21):7190–7197
Theile JW, Cummins TR (2011) Inhibition of Navβ4 peptide-mediated resurgent sodium currents in Nav1.7 channels by carbamazepine, riluzole, and anandamide. Mol Pharmacol 80(4):724–734
Thompson DF, Brooks KG (2015) Systematic review of topical amitriptyline for the treatment of neuropathic pain. J Clin Pharm Ther 40(5):496–503
Vanoye CG, Kunic JD, Ehring GR, George AL Jr (2013) Mechanism of sodium channel NaV1.9 potentiation by G-protein signaling. J Gen Physiol 141(2):193–202
Verkerk AO, Remme CA, Schumacher CA, Scicluna BP, Wolswinkel R, De Jonge B, Bezzina CR, Veldkamp MW (2012) Functional NaV1.8 channels in intracardiac neurons: the link between SCN10A and cardiac electrophysiology. Circ Res 111:333–343
Wawrzkiewicz A, Pawelek K, Borys P, Dworakowska B, Grzywna ZJ (2012) On the simple random-walk models of ion-channel gate dynamics reflecting long-term memory. Eur Biophys J 41(6):505–526
Waxman SG (2007) Nav1.7, its mutations, and the syndromes that they cause. Neurology 69(6):505–507
Waxman SG, Merkies ISJ, Gerrits MM, Dib-Hajj SD, Lauria G, Cox JJ, Wood JN, Woods CG, Drenth JP, Faber CG (2014) Sodium channel genes in pain-related disorders: phenotype–genotype associations and recommendations for clinical use. Lancet Neurol 13:1152–1160
Weiss J, Pyrski M, Jacobi E, Bufe B, Willnecker V, Schick B, Zizzari P, Gossage SJ, Greer CA, Leinders-Zufall T, Woods CG, Wood JN, Zufall F (2011) Loss-of-function mutations in sodium channel Nav1.7 cause anosmia. Nature 472(7342):186–190
Wheeler DW, Lee MC, Harrison EK, Menon DK, Woods CG (2015) Case report: neuropathic pain in a patient with congenital insensitivity to pain [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Res 3(135):135
Wood JN, Boorman JP, Okuse K, Baker MD (2004) Voltage-gated sodium channels and pain pathways. J Neurobiol 61(1):55–71
Woolf CJ, Safieh-Garabedian B, Ma QP, Crilly P, Winter J (1994) Nerve growth factor contributes to the generation of inflammatory sensory hypersensitivity. Neuroscience 62(2):327–331
Yu FH, Catterall WA (2003) Overview of the voltage-gated sodium channel family. Genome Biol 4(3):207
Zimmermann K, Leffler A, Babes A, Cendan CM, Carr RW, Kobayashi J, Nau C, Wood JN, Reeh PW (2007) Sensory neuron sodium channel Nav1.8 is essential for pain at low temperatures. Nature 447(7146):855–858
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foadi, N. Modulation of sodium channels as pharmacological tool for pain therapy—highlights and gaps. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 391, 481–488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-018-1487-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-018-1487-3