Arsenic (As), a well-known carcinogen, is ubiquitous in the environment and considered to be a major environmental pollutant (Smith et al. 2002; Mondal et al. 2006). Millions of people all over the world, especially in South-East Asia, have suffered As poisoning from consumption of As-contaminated water or foods (Nordstrom 2002; Xia and Liu 2004; Yu et al. 2017).

Submerged plants are those that grow fully immersed in the water. They get their nutrients directly from the water through their roots, stems and leaves and play a vital role in aquatic systems. Some species of submerged plants could be used for As phytoremediation because of their high As hyperaccumulating ability, such as Vallisneria neotropicalis (Lafabrie et al. 2011), Hydrilla verticillata (L.f) Royle (Xue and Yan 2011) and Callitriche lusitanica (Favas et al. 2012). Therefore, it is urgent to understand the mechanism of arsenic accumulation and detoxification in submerged plants for As phytoremediation.

Sulfur (S) is one of the essential elements for all living organisms because it forms part of important life sustaining molecules such as cysteine, thioredoxin, metallothionein, enzymes and vitamins (Hell 1997; Saito 2000). These compounds can improve plant tolerance to heavy metals through complexation and/or sequestration into vacuoles (Oliveira et al. 2014). For example, Zhang et al. (2011) reported that low sulfate-pretreated rice accumulated less arsenite than high sulfate pretreated plants, but the arsenite concentrations in shoots of low sulfate pretreated rice were higher than those of high sulfate pretreated. Sulfur deprivation in rice increased the translocation of arsenic from roots to shoots; Oliveira et al. (2014) examined the effects of S on arsenic uptake by Pteris vittata (L.) and found that addition of sulfate enhanced As uptake and translocation by 26%–28%.

Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara, a widely distributed submerged aquatic plant, is a promising plant species for phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated water (Chen et al. 2015). The objectives of this study were to determine the influences and mechanism of sulfur on the arsenic accumulation by V. natans and provide a way to improve arsenic removal from contaminated water.

Materials and Methods

Vallisneria natans were obtained from the Xiangjiang River, China. Then the plants were planted in a greenhouse pond until new shoots and roots had developed. After pre-culture, three replicates of four equally-sized plants (30 g total weight) were transferred to 10 L pots and exposed to 0.2 mg/L As and different levels of S (0, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg/L). As and S were added as Na2HAsO4 and MgSO4. Plants were harvested at 7 d and rinsed repeatedly with de-ionized water. Half of the plant samples were oven dried to constant weight at 60°C for 72 h, the remaining half were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for analysis of thiol compounds and malondialdehyde (MDA).

The oven-dried plant samples were ground with a stainless steel plant mill. Then, 0.5 g plant materials were digested with HNO3–H2O2 on a heating block at 150°C until the digest had cleared. Finally, the concentrations of total As and As(III) were measured by an atomic fluorescence atomic absorption spectrometry coupled with a hydride generation system (Agilent 240FS, USA) following the method of Chen et al. (2015). The detection limit of this method was 0.5 μg/L. At 1.0 μg/L the relative standard deviation of this method was 2.4%–6.8%. The recovery of the added standards was 92%–106%. Analytical reagents and deionized water were used throughout.

The thiols and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of the plants were estimated according to Rama Devi and Prasad (1998). About 0.5 g fresh frond of plants from each treatment was homogenized in 4 mL ice-cold 0.5% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 15 min at 4°C. Thiols and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured at 560 and 600 nm with a fluorescence spectrophotometer using the method of Rama Devi and Prasad (1998).

Data are presented as mean(s) ± standard deviation (SD). One-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the significant differences between treatments using windows-based SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were determined to reveal potential correlations between As concentrations and thiol levels in the plant after exposure to different sulfur treatments.

Results and Discussion

To understand the influences of sulfur on As uptake by V. natans, the interactions between the uptake of As(V) and S were investigated. The effects of sulfur on As uptake by plants are summarized in Fig. 1, different letters indicate significant differences between treatments. After exposure to 0.2 mg/L As without sulfur addition (Control) for 7 d, the total arsenic concentration in V. natans was 70.7 mg/kg (DW). Increasing S nutrient supply increased the As concentration in the plant significantly at low S levels (<20 mg/L). If sulfur levels were above 20 mg/L, the As concentration in the plant did not increase further. Compared with the control, addition of 20 or 40 mg/L S enhanced As uptake by 197% and 203%, respectively. Results indicated that As concentrations in V. natans were influenced by sulfur addition. Increasing S nutrient supply enhanced As accumulation in the plant significantly at low S levels (<20 mg/L).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Total As concentrations in V. natans after exposure to 0.2 mg/L As and different levels of S (0, 5, 10, 20, 40 mg/L) for 7 d

As(III) is the dominant species of arsenic in the plant, regardless of whether As is supplied as As(V) or As(III) (Wang et al. 2002). This is in consistent with our results that more than 75% of As in V. natans was As(III) under different treatments (Fig. 2). Figure 2 showed that the percentages of As(III) were also influenced by sulfur addition and had the same trend as the total As concentrations in the plant.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The percentage of As species in V. natans after exposure to 0.2 mg/L As and different levels of sulfur for 7 d

As(III) may be detoxified by chelation with thiol (SH)-containing compounds (Raab et al. 2005). Thiols, including phytochelatins (PCs) and glutathione (GSH), can function as non-enzymatic antioxidants. Reduction of As(V) to As(III) and complexation of As(III) with glutathione and phytochelatins, followed by sequestration of these complexes in vacuoles, is a major strategy for As detoxification in plants (Bleeker et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2010). Phytochelatins are synthesized from reduced glutathione by the enzyme phytochelatin synthase under the stress of arsenic or heavy metals (Clemens et al. 1999). Reduced glutathione is not only a substrate for PCs synthesis but also a reductant for enzymatic or nonenzymatic reduction of As(V) to As(III) (Bleeker et al. 2006; Dhankher et al. 2006). Increased synthesis of GSH under As stress has been observed in hypertolerant (Hartley-Whitaker et al. 2001), hyperaccumulator (Zhao et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2004) and non-hyperaccumulator plants (Srivastava et al. 2007). Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis showed that As(V) can be reduced to As(III) by glutathione (Delnomdedieu et al. 1994). Pickering et al. (2000) found that nearly 100% of arsenic was bound to thiols in Brassica juncea roots and shoots by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The results of Raab et al. (2005) showed that up to 40% of As was arsenic-phytochelatin compound present in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) after 3 h. High S treatment resulted in the increase of As accumulation, likely due to As complexation through enhanced synthesis of thiolic ligands, such as non-protein thiols and phytochelatins (Dixit et al. 2015).

However, synthesis of thiol compounds lead to a growing demand for sulfur (McMahon and Anderson 1998). In our study, at low S levels (<20 mg/L), the concentrations of thiols in the plant increased with increasing S nutrient supply (Fig. 3). Treatments indicated by different letters are significantly different. At the same time, the total As concentrations and percentage of As(III) increased in the plant (Fig. 2), It is likely that the accumulated arsenic reduced to As(III) and combined with thiols which improve As accumulation capacity of V. natans. However, increasing sulfur concentration in the nutrient solution (from 20 to 40 mg/L), did not increase the synthesis of thiols further. This may be because the ability for synthesis was already maximal. Similarly, the concentration of arsenic and percentage of As(III) in the plant didn’t increase any more. There was a significant positive correlation between thiols and arsenic uptake by plant (r = 0.89). Therefore, increasing the use of sulfur fertilizer stimulate the synthesis of thiols that could be considered as an important mechanism for As bioaccumulation and detoxification in submerged plants.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Thiol levels of V. natans after exposure to different sulfur levels

The accumulation of metals in various parts of plants is often accompanied by oxidative stress and cell damage, which is directly connected with the metal tolerance capacity of the plants (Rama Devi and Prasad 1998). Usually, cell membrane is the primary site of injury by heavy metals (Kärenlampi et al. 2000). MDA can be used as an indicator for evaluating the degree of injury (Rama Devi and Prasad 1998). The variation of MDA in V. natans showed that increasing S nutrient supply reduced oxidative stress significantly. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Fig. 4). It may be because that higher sulfur concentration in solution stimulated the synthesis of thiols which can combine with As(III). Thus, subsequent sequestration of As in vacuoles can reduce As stress. Of course, if the ability for synthesis was already maximal, the function of alleviating As stress didn’t increase any more.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in V. natans after exposure to different sulfur levels

In conclusion, increasing sulfate nutrient supply (<20 mg/L) significantly increased the arsenic bioaccumulation and detoxification in Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara, an arsenic hyperaccumulating plant, possibly by stimulating the synthesis of thiols and complexation of arsenite-phytochelatins. Sulfur plays an important role in the arsenic translocation and detoxification. Elucidation of the detailed mechanism needs further study, but it indeed provides a potentially useful way to improve the removal of arsenic from contaminated water.