Abstract
Future hadron colliders will have a remarkable capacity to discover massive new particles, but their capabilities for precision measurements of couplings that can reveal underlying mechanisms have received less study. In this work we study the capability of future hadron colliders to shed light on a precise, focused question: is the higgs mass of 125 GeV explained by the MSSM? If supersymmetry is realized near the TeV scale, a future hadron collider could produce huge numbers of gluinos and electroweakinos. We explore whether precision measurements of their properties could allow inference of the scalar masses and tan β with sufficient accuracy to test whether physics beyond the MSSM is needed to explain the higgs mass. We also discuss dark matter direct detection and precision higgs physics as complementary probes of tan β. For concreteness, we focus on the mini-split regime of MSSM parameter space at a 100 TeV pp collider, with scalar masses ranging from 10s to about 1000 TeV.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Avetisyan et al., Methods and Results for Standard Model Event Generation at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 14 TeV, 33 TeV and 100 TeV Proton Colliders (A Snowmass Whitepaper), in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29 - August 6, 2013, FERMILAB-FN-0965-T [arXiv:1308.1636] [INSPIRE].
B. Richter, High Energy Colliding Beams; What Is Their Future?, Rev. Accel. Sci. Tech. 7 (2014) 1 [arXiv:1409.1196] [INSPIRE].
T.G. Rizzo, Mass Reach Scaling for Future Hadron Colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 161 [arXiv:1501.05583] [INSPIRE].
B. Benedikt, B. Goddard, D. Schulte, F. Zimmermann and M.J. Syphers, FCC-hh Hadron Collider — Parameter Scenarios and Staging Options, in proceedings of the 6th International Particle Accelerator Conference 2015 (IPAC 2015), Richmond, Virginia, U.S.A., May 3-8, 2015, IPAC-2015-TUPTY062. [INSPIRE].
J. Tang et al., Concept for a Future Super Proton-Proton Collider, arXiv:1507.03224 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Han, M. Mangano and L.-T. Wang, Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton-proton collider, Phys. Rept. 652 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1511.06495] [INSPIRE].
CEPC-SPPC Study Group collaboration, CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report. 1. Physics and Detector, http://cepc.ihep.ac.cn/preCDR/main preCDR.pdf [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Standard Model processes, arXiv:1607.01831 [INSPIRE].
T. Golling et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: beyond the Standard Model phenomena, [arXiv:1606.00947] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies, arXiv:1606.09408 [INSPIRE].
C. Borschensky et al., Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13, 14, 33 and 100 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3174 [arXiv:1407.5066] [INSPIRE].
D. Stolarski, Reach in All Hadronic Stop Decays: A Snowmass White Paper, in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29 - August 6, 2013, arXiv:1309.1514 [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen et al., SUSY Simplified Models at 14, 33 and 100 TeV Proton Colliders, JHEP 04 (2014) 117 [arXiv:1311.6480] [INSPIRE].
S. Jung and J.D. Wells, Gaugino physics of split supersymmetry spectra at the LHC and future proton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075004 [arXiv:1312.1802] [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, R.T. D’Agnolo, M. Hance, H.K. Lou and J.G. Wacker, Boosting Stop Searches with a 100 TeV Proton Collider, JHEP 11 (2014) 021 [arXiv:1406.4512] [INSPIRE].
A. Fowlie and M. Raidal, Prospects for constrained supersymmetry at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 33 TeV and \( \sqrt{s} \) = 100 TeV proton-proton super-colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2948 [arXiv:1402.5419] [INSPIRE].
S.A.R. Ellis and B. Zheng, Reaching for squarks and gauginos at a 100 TeV p-p collider, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075034 [arXiv:1506.02644] [INSPIRE].
G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy and A.J. Powell, Dirac vs Majorana gauginos at a 100 TeV collider, JHEP 08 (2016) 014 [arXiv:1606.07090] [INSPIRE].
M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV, JHEP 08 (2014) 161 [arXiv:1404.0682] [INSPIRE].
S. Gori, S. Jung, L.-T. Wang and J.D. Wells, Prospects for Electroweakino Discovery at a 100 TeV Hadron Collider, JHEP 12 (2014) 108 [arXiv:1410.6287] [INSPIRE].
J. Bramante et al., Relic Neutralino Surface at a 100 TeV Collider, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 054015 [arXiv:1412.4789] [INSPIRE].
J. Bramante, N. Desai, P. Fox, A. Martin, B. Ostdiek and T. Plehn, Towards the Final Word on Neutralino Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 063525 [arXiv:1510.03460] [INSPIRE].
A. Ismail, E. Izaguirre and B. Shuve, Illuminating New Electroweak States at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 015001 [arXiv:1605.00658] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, R. Contino, G. Panico and M. Son, Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs boson production via gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1502.00539] [INSPIRE].
W. Yao, Studies of measuring Higgs self-coupling with \( HH\to b\overline{b}\gamma \gamma \) at the future hadron colliders, in proceedings of Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29 - August 6, 2013, arXiv:1308.6302 [INSPIRE].
A.J. Barr, M.J. Dolan, C. Englert, D.E. Ferreira de Lima and M. Spannowsky, Higgs Self-Coupling Measurements at a 100 TeV Hadron Collider, JHEP 02 (2015) 016 [arXiv:1412.7154] [INSPIRE].
H.-J. He, J. Ren and W. Yao, Probing new physics of cubic Higgs boson interaction via Higgs pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 015003 [arXiv:1506.03302] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu, Testing Electroweak Baryogenesis with Future Colliders, JHEP 11 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1409.0005] [INSPIRE].
K. Assamagan et al., The Higgs Portal and Cosmology, arXiv:1604.05324 [INSPIRE].
A. Hook and A. Katz, Unbroken SU(2) at a 100 TeV collider, JHEP 09 (2014) 175 [arXiv:1407.2607] [INSPIRE].
J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, SusyHD: Higgs mass Determination in Supersymmetry, JHEP 07 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1504.05200] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, M. Frigeni and F. Caravaglios, The supersymmetric Higgs for heavy superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 167 [INSPIRE].
Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yanagida, Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85 (1991) 1 [INSPIRE].
H.E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric model be larger than m(Z)?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1815 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, On radiative corrections to supersymmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches, Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 477 [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, J.R. Espinosa, M. Quirós and C.E.M. Wagner, Analytical expressions for radiatively corrected Higgs masses and couplings in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 355 (1995) 209 [hep-ph/9504316] [INSPIRE].
M. Carena, M. Quirós and C.E.M. Wagner, Effective potential methods and the Higgs mass spectrum in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 407 [hep-ph/9508343] [INSPIRE].
H.E. Haber, R. Hempfling and A.H. Hoang, Approximating the radiatively corrected Higgs mass in the minimal supersymmetric model, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 539 [hep-ph/9609331] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa, M. Quirós and A. Riotto, The lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 436 (1995) 3 [Erratum ibid. B 439 (1995) 466] [hep-ph/9407389] [INSPIRE].
W. Beenakker, M. Klasen, M. Krämer, T. Plehn, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, The production of charginos/neutralinos and sleptons at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3780 [Erratum ibid. 100 (2008) 029901] [hep-ph/9906298] [INSPIRE].
P. Draper, G. Lee and C.E.M. Wagner, Precise estimates of the Higgs mass in heavy supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 055023 [arXiv:1312.5743] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak and G. Weiglein, High-Precision Predictions for the Light CP -Even Higgs Boson Mass of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 141801 [arXiv:1312.4937] [INSPIRE].
E. Bagnaschi, G.F. Giudice, P. Slavich and A. Strumia, Higgs Mass and Unnatural Supersymmetry, JHEP 09 (2014) 092 [arXiv:1407.4081] [INSPIRE].
P. Draper and H. Rzehak, A Review of Higgs Mass Calculations in Supersymmetric Models, Phys. Rept. 619 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1601.01890] [INSPIRE].
M. Perelstein and C. Spethmann, A collider signature of the supersymmetric golden region, JHEP 04 (2007) 070 [hep-ph/0702038] [INSPIRE].
M. Blanke, D. Curtin and M. Perelstein, SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035020 [arXiv:1004.5350] [INSPIRE].
A. Pierce and B. Shakya, Implications of a Stop Sector Signal at the LHC, arXiv:1611.00771 [INSPIRE].
G.D. Coughlan, W. Fischler, E.W. Kolb, S. Raby and G.G. Ross, Cosmological Problems for the Polonyi Potential, Phys. Lett. B 131 (1983) 59 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, D.V. Nanopoulos and M. Quirós, On the Axion, Dilaton, Polonyi, Gravitino and Shadow Matter Problems in Supergravity and Superstring Models, Phys. Lett. B 174 (1986) 176 [INSPIRE].
B. de Carlos, J.A. Casas, F. Quevedo and E. Roulet, Model independent properties and cosmological implications of the dilaton and moduli sectors of 4-D strings, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 447 [hep-ph/9308325] [INSPIRE].
T. Moroi, Effects of the gravitino on the inflationary universe, hep-ph/9503210 [INSPIRE].
G. Kane, K. Sinha and S. Watson, Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) 1530022 [arXiv:1502.07746] [INSPIRE].
L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Out of this world supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 557 (1999) 79 [hep-th/9810155] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP 12 (1998) 027 [hep-ph/9810442] [INSPIRE].
J.D. Wells, Implications of supersymmetry breaking with a little hierarchy between gauginos and scalars, in proceedings of the 11 th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions (Susy 2003), Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003 hep-ph/0306127 [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, A. Falkowski, H.P. Nilles and M. Olechowski, Soft supersymmetry breaking in KKLT flux compactification, Nucl. Phys. B 718 (2005) 113 [hep-th/0503216] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, K.S. Jeong, T. Kobayashi and K.-i. Okumura, Little SUSY hierarchy in mixed modulus-anomaly mediation, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 355 [hep-ph/0508029] [INSPIRE].
B.S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G.L. Kane, P. Kumar and J. Shao, Explaining the Electroweak Scale and Stabilizing Moduli in M-theory, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 126010 [hep-th/0701034] [INSPIRE].
B.S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, G.L. Kane, J. Shao and P. Kumar, The G 2 -MSSM: An M-theory motivated model of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065038 [arXiv:0801.0478] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, J.P. Conlon, S. Krippendorf, S. Moster and F. Quevedo, SUSY Breaking in Local String/F-Theory Models, JHEP 09 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0906.3297] [INSPIRE].
L. Aparicio, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, F. Muia and F. Quevedo, Sequestered de Sitter String Scenarios: Soft-terms, JHEP 11 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1409.1931] [INSPIRE].
M. Reece and W. Xue, SUSY’s Ladder: reframing sequestering at Large Volume, JHEP 04 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1512.04941] [INSPIRE].
E. Cremmer, S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas and D.V. Nanopoulos, Naturally Vanishing Cosmological Constant in N = 1 Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 133 (1983) 61 [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, A.B. Lahanas, D.V. Nanopoulos and K. Tamvakis, No-Scale Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Lett. 134B (1984) 429 [INSPIRE].
V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications, JHEP 03 (2005) 007 [hep-th/0502058] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz, Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 08 (2005) 007 [hep-th/0505076] [INSPIRE].
J. Fan, D. Krohn, P. Mosteiro, A.M. Thalapillil and L.-T. Wang, Heavy Squarks at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2011) 077 [arXiv:1102.0302] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2005) 073 [hep-th/0405159] [INSPIRE].
A. Arvanitaki, N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and G. Villadoro, Mini-Split, JHEP 02 (2013) 126 [arXiv:1210.0555] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Gupta, D.E. Kaplan, N. Weiner and T. Zorawski, Simply Unnatural Supersymmetry, arXiv:1212.6971 [INSPIRE].
R. Sato, S. Shirai and K. Tobioka, Gluino Decay as a Probe of High Scale Supersymmetry Breaking, JHEP 11 (2012) 041 [arXiv:1207.3608] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Barr and C.G. Lester, A review of the Mass Measurement Techniques proposed for the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 123001 [arXiv:1004.2732] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Barr et al., Guide to transverse projections and mass-constraining variables, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095031 [arXiv:1105.2977] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, C. Kilic, C. White and J.-H. Yu, Improved mass measurement using the boundary of many-body phase space, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015021 [arXiv:1308.6560] [INSPIRE].
D. Debnath, J.S. Gainer, C. Kilic, D. Kim, K.T. Matchev and Y.-P. Yang, Detecting kinematic boundary surfaces in phase space: particle mass measurements in SUSY-like events, arXiv:1611.04487 [INSPIRE].
M. Toharia and J.D. Wells, Gluino decays with heavier scalar superpartners, JHEP 02 (2006) 015 [hep-ph/0503175] [INSPIRE].
P. Gambino, G.F. Giudice and P. Slavich, Gluino decays in split supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005) 35 [hep-ph/0506214] [INSPIRE].
S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Diaz and P. Fileviez Perez, Can we distinguish between h(SM) and h0 in split supersymmetry?, J. Phys. G 31 (2005) 563 [hep-ph/0412066] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [INSPIRE].
M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein, M.B. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-Energy Theorems for Higgs Boson Couplings to Photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711 [Yad. Fiz. 30 (1979) 1368] [INSPIRE].
TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First Look at the Physics Case of TLEP, JHEP 01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Physics at a High-Luminosity LHC with ATLAS, in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29-August 6, 2013, arXiv:1307.7292 [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin, Estimation of LHC and ILC Capabilities for Precision Higgs Boson Coupling Measurements, in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29-August 6, 2013, arXiv:1312.4974 [INSPIRE].
T. Gherghetta, G.F. Giudice and J.D. Wells, Phenomenological consequences of supersymmetry with anomaly induced masses, Nucl. Phys. B 559 (1999) 27 [hep-ph/9904378] [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and R. Sato, Mass Splitting between Charged and Neutral Winos at Two-Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 252 [arXiv:1212.5989] [INSPIRE].
C.H. Chen, M. Drees and J.F. Gunion, Searching for invisible and almost invisible particles at e + e − colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 2002 [Erratum ibid. 82 (1999) 3192] [hep-ph/9512230] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, T. Moroi, L. Randall, M. Strassler and S.-f. Su, Discovering supersymmetry at the Tevatron in wino LSP scenarios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1731 [hep-ph/9904250] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 112006 [arXiv:1310.3675] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, JHEP 01 (2015) 096 [arXiv:1411.6006] [INSPIRE].
T. Han, F. Kling, S. Su and Y. Wu, Unblinding the dark matter blind spots, JHEP 02 (2017) 057 [arXiv:1612.02387] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakai and M. Reece, Electric Dipole Moments in Natural Supersymmetry, arXiv:1612.08090 [INSPIRE].
G. Kane, R. Lu and B. Zheng, Discovering Gluino Events at LHC-8 via Disappearing Chargino Tracks, arXiv:1202.4448 [INSPIRE].
H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, The Search for Supersymmetry: Probing Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 117 (1985) 75 [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, Direct Detection of Non-Chiral Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 015004 [arXiv:0710.1668] [INSPIRE].
N. Nagata and S. Shirai, Higgsino Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2015) 029 [arXiv:1410.4549] [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, D.J. Phalen and A. Pierce, On the Correlation Between the Spin-Independent and Spin-Dependent Direct Detection of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 116001 [arXiv:1001.3408] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, Prospects and Blind Spots for Neutralino Dark Matter, JHEP 05 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1211.4873] [INSPIRE].
A. Basirnia, S. Macaluso and D. Shih, Dark Matter and the Higgs in Natural SUSY, JHEP 03 (2017) 073 [arXiv:1605.08442] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 3 : A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].
J. Bovy and S. Tremaine, On the local dark matter density, Astrophys. J. 756 (2012) 89 [arXiv:1205.4033] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [arXiv:1608.07648] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, A. Tan et al., Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121303 [arXiv:1607.07400] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, M.G. Aartsen et al., Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry, JCAP 04 (2016)022 [arXiv:1601.00653] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, C. Fu et al., Spin-Dependent Weakly-Interacting-Massive-Particle-Nucleon Cross section Limits from First Data of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071301 [arXiv:1611.06553] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, E. Aprile et al., First Dark Matter Search Results from the XENON1T Experiment, arXiv:1705.06655 [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, arXiv:1705.03380 [INSPIRE].
P. Cushman et al., Working Group Report: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection, in 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., July 29 - August 6, 2013, arXiv:1310.8327 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for production of supersymmetric particles in final states with missing transverse momentum and multiple b-jets at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2017-021 [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, arXiv:1704.07781 [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
A. Djouadi, M.M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Decays of supersymmetric particles: The program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-HDECAY-InTerface), Acta Phys. Polon. B 38 (2007) 635 [hep-ph/0609292] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP 03 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1212.3460] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions, Eur. Phys. J. C 53 (2008) 473 [arXiv:0706.2569] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3 myth for the k t jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-k(t) jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
M. Burns, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, Using Subsystem MT2 for Complete Mass Determinations in Decay Chains with Missing Energy at Hadron Colliders, JHEP 03 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0810.5576] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester and D.J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 99 [hep-ph/9906349] [INSPIRE].
Y. Kats, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, The Status of GMSB After 1/fb at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2012) 115 [arXiv:1110.6444] [INSPIRE].
C. Kilic and B. Tweedie, Cornering Light Stops with Dileptonic mT2, JHEP 04 (2013) 110 [arXiv:1211.6106] [INSPIRE].
C.G. Lester and B. Nachman, Bisection-based asymmetric M T 2 computation: a higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods, JHEP 03 (2015) 100 [arXiv:1411.4312] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1702.05484
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, P., Fan, J., Reece, M. et al. Deciphering the MSSM Higgs mass at future hadron colliders. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)027
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)027