Abstract
Heavy metals are naturally present in earth’s crust, and some of them are essential to living organisms for carrying out life processes. Due to their high persistence and nonbiodegradable nature, heavy metal accumulation beyond recommended concentrations may lead to hazardous effect on various life forms and environment. Contamination of water bodies may be due to natural and anthropogenic sources. Unchecked discharge from industrial sites and agricultural runoff in to adjoining water bodies makes the water unfit for human consumption. Escalating levels of these pollutants pose a threat to aquatic life forms and surrounding environment. Heavy metals can execute various health problems that may range from mild to severe. They can be toxic to living organisms at very low levels of exposure. Excessive usage of heavy metals has raised concerns over time, and consequently, their impact on the overall environment is being studied by researchers extensively. To safeguard human health and environment, proper management and greener technologies for removal of heavy metal from water bodies is required. This chapter will discuss the source, toxicity, and permitted concentrations of some of the major heavy metals in water bodies. Remediation approaches for mitigation of these toxic compounds have also been described. Physical and chemical remediation processes for heavy metal cleanup are highly expensive and sometimes generate a significant amount of secondary pollutants; therefore, the focus has now shifted toward eco-friendly approaches such as bioremediation and phytoremediation. Further research needs to be carried out to maximize the applicability of the existing techniques and developing highly efficient technologies for heavy metal removal from water bodies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
8.1 Introduction
Metals are elements with high atomic weight and density ranging from 3.5 to 7 g cm−3. These are found to be deposited on earth’s crust naturally as minerals in the form of sulfates, phosphates, oxides, etc. (Singh et al. 2022). In aquatic system, these are naturally present in low amounts, but a variety of natural and anthropogenic activities have unavoidably escalated metal concentrations in water bodies (Ansari et al. 2003). Expansion of industries that extensively utilize metals and metalloids, mining operations, improper e-waste disposal, transportation, and fossil fuel burning are some major human activities that significantly increase concentration of heavy metals in aquatic systems. Animals and plants use some heavy metals such as Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn at low concentrations for carrying out their physiological processes, but they become hazardous at higher concentrations (Pratush et al. 2018). Some of them are important for activity of enzymes as cofactors and also help to maintain osmotic balance. However, their accumulation over time can harm human health and other life forms. Escalating levels of heavy metals in aquatic systems is one of the most serious global concerns. About 40% of the world’s lakes and rivers have been contaminated with heavy metals (Zhou et al. 2020; Bhatt et al. 2022).
Due to their toxic nature, heavy metals are considered as potent pollutants in water bodies and soil (Duffus 2002). Drinking water contaminated with heavy metals is a potential threat to public health. Consumption of polluted water may lead to cardiovascular disorders and renal failure and in severe cases may also lead to life-threatening disease like Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer (Singh et al. 2022). These metals come into touch with human bodies via digestion and respiration. People who work or live close to industrial regions associated with these heavy metals and their equivalent compounds have a significant risk of exposure and cause increased mortality rates globally (Rehman et al. 2018). Biodiversity in aquatic ecosystem is also hampered due to toxic effects of these metals, and reports indicate their accumulation and deposition within tissues of fishes and other aquatic life forms.
With increasing industrialization, generation of heavy metals also increases, and thus, their disposal is of paramount importance. Unlike organic pollutants, inorganic metal ions are resistant to degradation. Their persistence in environment and bio-accumulation in different organisms through food chain is major problem associated with heavy metals (Wuana and Okieimen 2011). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and their toxicity level in food chain increases with time as their separation and purification is not easy. Although metal ions are resistant to degradation, their bioavailability and chemical forms can be changed. Heavy metals can easily run into water bodies via industrial effluents, agriculture runoff, and household, but there are many technologies and strategies that are employed to remediate heavy metals. Treatment of heavy metal-laden wastewater is an arduous job. The prominent strategies that are employed include thermal treatment, chlorination, electrokinetic, bioleaching, precipitation and coagulation, ion exchange, membrane filtration, bioremediation, heterogenous photocatalyst, and adsorption and are some commonly used methods for heavy metal removal from wastewater (Selvi et al. 2019). However, most of these methods have certain disadvantages and sometimes may generate toxic compounds; therefore, integrated approaches and safer technologies need to be introduced. This chapter highlights toxicity and remediation strategies for heavy metal removal from water bodies.
8.2 Sources of Heavy Metal Pollution in Water Bodies
In water bodies, main source of heavy metal contamination includes landfill leaches, petrochemical spillage, urban runoff, industrial and mining wastewaters particularly from the electronic, metal finishing, and electroplating industries (Khan et al. 2008). Mining and metallurgical operations are prominent cause of increased concentration of these hazardous metals. Heavy metals often reach the aquatic environment through natural physical sources such as volcanic eruptions, air deposition, forest fire, runoffs, and geological matrix erosion. Occurrence of metals in lakes, rivers, and ponds is related to the type of soil and waterflow through sewage and surface runoffs from soils. Additional natural sources of heavy metal contamination of water include the wet and dry deposition of atmospheric salts, water-rock contact, and water-soil interaction (Gautam et al. 2014).
Anthropogenic activities account for vast accumulation of heavy metals in water. Rapid urbanization and industrialization are the main anthropogenic factors that pollute water. The primary causes are mining, metallurgical activities, coal and oil combustion, and agricultural runoff entering waterways (Wang et al. 2004). Other anthropogenic sources include alloy production, atmospheric deposition, battery production, coating, explosive manufacturing, improper stacking of industrial solid waste, leather tanning, mining, pesticides, phosphate fertilizer, photographic materials, printing pigments, sewage, smelting, steel and electroplating industries, textiles, and dyes and wood preservation (Dixit et al. 2015). Untreated wastewater from municipal, domestic sewage, and industry directly discharged into the natural water system leads to water contamination, industrial effluents, water tank leakages, dumping beside water bodies, and atmospheric deposition, which are some major sources through which these heavy metals entry into aquatic ecosystem. Electroplating is a major contributor to pollution because it releases heavy metals via water, air emissions, and solid waste in an environment that has been reported to contain high levels of heavy metals such as nickel, iron, lead, zinc, chromium, cadmium, and copper (Baby et al. 2010). Mining and ore processing are important sources of heavy metal contamination in the soil, and the recovery of ecosystems from mining operations might take decades. These activities generated a vast number of piles and dumps, which are usually discarded without treatment, and these abandoned mines contaminate water system through chemical runoff (Adler et al. 2007). Pesticide overuse and misuse in response to rising food demand have resulted in greater pollutant burdens in the environment, including rivers, lakes, aquifers, and coastal waterways. Anthropogenic sources of heavy metal have been observed to be more ahead than natural sources. Besides, lack of awareness for proper disposal of metal waste and failure of implementation of strict government policies and not following the recommended guidelines also contribute to the problem. Table 8.1 enlist major sources of some common heavy metal pollutants.
8.3 Potential Risks Associated with Heavy Metals
Heavy metals generally have negative impact on the ecosystem and aquatic life, and even trace amounts of heavy metals in water can be hazardous to aquatic life and human health. Ayangbenro and Babalola (2017) defined toxicity of metal as its capability to cause undesirable effects on organisms. Metal toxicity is determined by the environmental factors such as pH, temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen, the presence of other toxicants, the condition of the test organism, the kinetics of toxic reactions, etc. (Ansari et al. 2003). Metal ions frequently penetrate cells, get accumulated and interact with various elements of cells, and target molecules (Chiarelli and Roccheri 2014). Heavy metals have a negative impact on the health of humans and other living organisms in both the terrestrial and aquatic environments (Das et al. 2013). Toxicity of metal ions on any living system depends upon the duration of exposure and its dose. These cause oxidative damage to biological macromolecules and may end up in damaging DNA and even halt metabolic machinery of exposed life forms. High toxicity of heavy metals can be seen in fetus and newborn babies of industrial workers that are constantly exposed to its high concentrations. Metal ion exposure in newborn babies can harm brain memory and central nervous system, disrupt the function of red blood cells, and cause physiological and behavioral problems, and its severe toxicity may cause cancer. Plants exposed to heavy metals may undergo morphological and physiological changes, which can reduce the photosynthesis rate and may trigger mutagenic changes in several plant species. Heavy metal exposures also obstruct the microbial growth (Wase and Forster 1997). Presence of these heavy metals even at low concentration is toxic for humans and animals, for example, Pb exposure to human cause dysfunction in nervous system, reproductive system and kidneys. Cd is another heavy metals that get accumulated in aquatic environment from metal ore refining, alloy decomposition, and fertilizer input, which causes renal dysfunction, bone degenerations, and liver damage in humans (Dojlido and Best 1993). Cd is also associated with itai-itai disease in Japan. Hg is also one of common heavy metals that is associated with many human dysfunctions like Minamata disease. Hg toxicity has also been reported to cause abortion and physiological stress. The high concentration of even Fe and Mn in water bodies also reported to effect animal system although both of these metals are required by the body in consistent amount but in case of water contamination level of these metals tend to get increase, which poses threat to human health. Countries rapidly undergoing industrialization are found to have a high number of heavy metal-related disorders (Esslemont 1998). A correlation between historical events and the metal toxicity along with responsible metal is presented in Table 8.2.
Toxic effects of some heavy metals have been discussed under this section in brief.
8.3.1 Cadmium
Cadmium is considered to be one of the most toxic heavy metals. Its minute concentrations in food chain has been found to cause itai-itai disease. Cadmium is not an essential element for biological system unlike other heavy metals. Cadmium metal is used in the manufacturing of plastics, pigments, and nickel-cadmium batteries. It enters into the environment mostly through waste dumping and phosphate fertilizers. Due to its potential to be hazardous for both humans and animals even at minute concentrations, there is an increased concern over the function and toxicity of cadmium in the environment. The Restriction of Hazardous Chemicals (RoHS) directive of the European Union forbids the use of six substances, including cadmium, in electrical and electronic equipment, while allowing for some exceptions and exclusions from the rule (European Commission 2006). Numerous disorders, such as early atherosclerosis, hypertension, osteomalacia, cardiovascular conditions, and renal dysfunction, are all linked to cadmium exposure, including lung cancer (ARL: Cadmium toxicity 2016; Medinews direct 2009). In the 1950s, a large population near the Jinzu River in Japan is found to have kidney dysfunction and osteomalacia, resulting in deformed and fragile bones, which is caused by the ingestion of Cd for a long time. This disease is called as itai-itai named after the excruciating pain that people who had consumed Cd-contaminated rice had experienced. Klaassen et al. (2009) reported Cd to be a metallothioneins (metal-binding proteins) interfering metal that disrupts the homeostasis of an organism. Once ingested by an organism, Cd shows high bio-persistence without biomagnifying properties (Wuana and Okieimen 2011; Kumar et al. 2019).
8.3.2 Chromium
Chromium is a highly toxic metal that poses varying levels of harm to the ecosystem. Cr is mainly introduced to the environment through discharge of untreated or inadequately treated residues from tanning and leather industries, rubber manufacturing, and pulp and paper industries (Chiarelli and Roccheri 2014). Among various oxidation states of Cr, only +3 and +6 are chemically and biologically stable (Ducros 1992). Hexavalent Cr is the most toxic form of chromium for animal and human health, which is considered to be mutagenic and carcinogenic (Chiarelli and Roccheri 2014). High exposure to Cr may cause liver, kidney, and central nervous system damage. Hematological problems can be observed in fishes of freshwater contaminated with Cr.
8.3.3 Copper
Copper enters the water bodies mostly via mining, dumping of sewage sludge, and use of Cu-based pesticides in agriculture. Cu has been used by human civilization since pre-historic times. It is well known that Cu is an essential element for all living organisms. However, its high concentration may cause toxic effects (Bielmyer-Fraser et al. 2018). Excess Cu may alter enzyme functions, acid/base balance, iono-regulation, and endocrine disruption in aquatic organisms (Rieuwerts 2015). Cu shows bioaccumulation in organisms like plankton and oysters but does not magnify in the food chain (Rieuwerts 2015). At higher concentrations in human, it may damage kidney and stomach and cause diarrhea, vomiting, and loss of strength.
8.3.4 Lead
Leaded gasoline had been a significant contributor to the environmental dispersion of Pb. Tetraethyl lead was added in gasoline to boost its octane levels since the 1920s (ATSDR 2017). However, lead use has been banned in gasoline in the United States since January 1996, and USEPA has encouraged all the countries to do so (EPA 2017). Pb is a nonessential element that could be hazardous to most of the living forms. Lead can be present in water bodies in four different forms: ionic (mobile and bioavailable), organic complex (bound with limited mobility and bioavailability), strongly bound (attached to solid particles like iron oxides with limited mobility), and very strongly bound (attached to clay, dead remains, or solid particle with very low mobility) (ILA 2018). Exposure of high concentrations of Pb to human may cause severe toxicity to the central nervous system, damage the fetus, alter hemoglobin synthesis, and harm kidney and reproductive system. Poisoning of agricultural food may be caused by airborne Pb by its deposition on soils, water, and fruits (WHO 1984). Bio-magnification of Pb has not been observed in the food chain (De Pooter 2013).
8.3.5 Mercury
Mercury (Hg) is a nonessential, persistent and highly toxic element, which is present in the environment in elemental, organic, and inorganic forms that are all interconvertible and toxic (Jaishankar et al. 2014). Elemental Hg0 is a volatile liquid at room temperature, inorganic Hg is present in mercuric (Hg2+: HgS, HgCl2) and mercurous (Hg1+: Hg2Cl2) forms, and organic Hg is present in the form of methylated Hg (mono and dimethyl mercury) and phenyl mercury. Toxic effects related to Hg gained global attention due to the outbreak of Minamata disease in Japan in the year 1956 (Ye et al. 2016). Methylmercury containing waste from a fertilizer industry as a byproduct of acetaldehyde discharged into the Minamata Bay for a long time polluted the marine ecosystem harming organisms. Contaminated seafood consumption caused injury to the nervous system, brain, heart, eyes, kidney, and lungs. Methylmercury also shows bio-magnification, and it dissolves well in water and can persist fatty tissues by crossing biological membrane (Solomon 2008).
8.3.6 Nickel
Opencast mining for the extraction of nickel (Ni) ore Ni laterite leads to major landscape alteration and increased soil erosion rates (Gillmore et al. 2020). This can cause entering of Ni into water bodies such as rivers, later contaminating the sea (Clark 2001). Ni is an essential element that plays an important role in the synthesis of red blood cells. Trace amounts of nickel do not harm cells but at higher concentrations may damage liver and heart and decrease body weight. Nickel at very high concentrations may cause nervous system damage, reduced cell growth, and cancer (WHO 1984). Ni does not have bio-magnification properties and considered to be moderately toxic metal.
8.3.7 Zinc
Zinc (Zn) is found in earth’s crust and an essential element for living organisms as it acts as a cofactor in more than 300 enzymes and contributes to the metabolism (Morel et al. 1994). Excessive introduction of Zn into water bodies from rubber, plastic, cosmetic, and pesticide industries may cause phytoxicity in plants, anemia, lack of muscular coordination, and abdominal pain in humans. Bioaccumulation of Zn is not observed, but higher concentrations in environmental may lead to its bioaccumulation in organisms (De Pooter 2013).
8.3.8 Arsenic
Arsenic (As) has been considered to be one of the most concerning environmental pollutants around the globe (Kaur et al. 2011; Dash et al. 2021). Insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and other pesticides are the largest source of As pollution in water bodies (El-Sorogy et al. 2016). Marine organisms are mostly contaminated with highly stable pentavalent form of As which is nontoxic and metabolically inert but may get bio-accumulated in some fishes and algae. Water contaminated with As may cause toxicity to blood and central nervous system, breathing problems, nausea, and lung and skin cancer. As is a geogenic issue that affects everyone, but man-made sources such as pesticide manufacturing and metal processing raise the environmental As content.
8.3.9 Silver
Silver (Ag) is a rare but naturally occurring metal that has been used by human civilization for a long time. Ag is extremely toxic in its +1 oxidation state (Ag1+) to plankton and invertebrates (Luoma et al. 1995). Increasing use of Ag as a biocide in recent years raises concerns about its potential as a pollutant (Purcell and Peters 1998). Since Ag+ ion can be taken up by cell via cell membrane ion transporters, its high concentrations may bio-accumulate in some fish, algae, and shrimps (Clark 2001).
8.3.10 Iron
Iron (Fe) and phosphorus (P) along with some other trace elements act as a limiting nutrient for nitrogen fixation (Mills et al. 2004). As nitrogen-fixing organisms require higher concentrations of Fe, sometimes due to this higher concentration, microbes in remote waters may produce more dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and organic carbon, which in turn may have an impact on the radiative forcing in the atmosphere.
8.3.11 Manganese
Manganese being the 12th most abundant element in earth’s crust is a broadly distributed metal in nature (Pinsino et al. 2012). Although low level of manganese intake is necessary for human health, exposure to high Mn concentrations is toxic. Excessive exposure to high levels of Mn for a long period may lead to neurological disorders (Manganism: a disease starting from feeling of weakness and lethargy and leading to speech disturbances, clumsy gait and a masklike face) and respiratory and reproductive problems. The individual metals determine the method by which heavy metals impact human bodies, but eventually, all metals create reactive oxygen radicals, which cause a variety of illnesses in living things. Therefore, setting a threshold at which harmful substances were deemed was crucial (Mahurpawar 2015).
8.4 Permissible Limits of Some Common Heavy Metals
The regulatory limits of heavy metals are defined by several well-known organizations based on their toxicities. Given that humans directly consume water, the residential water supply is regarded as the most significant use of water. The National Water Policy has prioritized drinking as the best use of water resources. Drinking water standards have been developed in India by organizations like the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Table 8.3 lists the drinking water requirements for hazardous and trace metals according to BIS code 10500-2012 (Hussain and Rao 2018). All water delivery systems must adhere to these restrictions. Some heavy metals are regularly present in naturally occurring water (both surface and groundwater) at concentrations 100 or 1000 times higher than the MCL standards. Additionally, drinking water standards have been established by the USA Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and World Health Organization (WHO), which are regarded as global standards. Table 8.4 contains some harmful heavy metal ions that have maximum allowable levels in surface waters in accordance to WHO and USEPA. These heavy metals are important resources for various industrial uses; thus, their removal, recovery, and recycling are more crucial than ever. Regulatory authorities have developed drinking water standards in line with toxicity data gathered from human clinical examinations and numerous other research, such as animal tests. A succinct overview is provided in Table 8.5 in which various international regulatory bodies standards are mentioned.
8.5 Remediation Strategies
Different methods such as membrane filtration, adsorption, ion exchange, chemical precipitation, etc. are some of the most commonly used methods to eliminate heavy metals from wastewaters (Türkmen et al. 2022). Presently, many researchers are working on the remediation of heavy metals from water, soil, and air by natural methods rather than chemical methods. Remediation is the method of removing toxic compounds from environmental media or replacing them with less toxicones. The strategies used to reduce or remove pollutants from soil and other environmental mediums use both in situ and ex situ procedures. The three major categories of remediation techniques are (1) physical approaches, (2) chemical ways, and (3) biological methods (Fig. 8.1).
8.5.1 8.5.1 Physicochemical Methods
These methods involve electrodialysis, chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, evaporation recovery, physical adsorption, ion exchange, etc. (Qasem et al. 2021). Some of these techniques have been described in Table 8.6. Although these conventional physicochemical methods can remove heavy metal ions, there are certain environmental considerations associated with them. These processes generate some secondary waste products that contaminate the environment (Diep et al. 2018). Besides, certain methods such as chemical precipitation and electrochemical treatment are not effective when concentration of heavy metals is low. Techniques that use membrane, activated carbon, nanoadsorbents, and ion exchange technologies are expensive (Dhankhar and Hooda 2011).
8.5.2 Phytoremediation Technique
Phytoremediation is a technique in which plants act as filters to remove contaminants from soil, water, and air. It is precisely a collection of plant-based technologies that cause removal of contaminants from environment by the use of plants and weeds (Ali et al. 2013). This technique is very cheap and alternative to present treatment methods. In several years, phytoremediation technique is gaining attention due to its cost-effectiveness, eco-friendly nature, and wide acceptance across the globe. Plants accumulate the toxic metals or contaminants from the environment through their body parts (shoots, roots, and stem). Phytoremediation is also identified by different names such as agro-remediation, green remediation, vegetative remediation, green technology, and botano remediation. It is very cheap method that requires technical strategy, knowledge of plants species and cultivars for particular contaminants, and regions. With the help of phytoremediation techniques, a variety of wastewater can be treated as municipal wastewater, industrial water, landfill leachate, paper industry, mine drainage, contaminated lands, and groundwater. This technique reduces the organic and inorganic pollutants from industrial wastewater by using plants. The performance of plants seems to be good in lowering the concentration of pollutants. Phytoremediation techniques follow different mechanisms such as phytoextraction, phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation, and rhizo-filtration during the uptake of heavy metals in the plant (Fig. 8.2). The summary of the phytoremediation techniques and mechanisms is shown in Fig. 8.2 and Table 8.7.
8.5.2.1 Bioremediation
Bioremediation is a technique of converting environmental pollutants into less hazardous forms using living organisms, primarily bacteria. It uses plants, naturally existing bacteria, and fungi to break down or detoxify pollutants that are harmful to the environment or to human health. This technique is advantageous over physicochemical methods due to their eco-friendly nature (Gunatilake 2015). The basis of removal and transportation of wastes for treatment basically is the two methods, namely, biosorption and bioaccumulation (Diep et al. 2018). Biological methods are sustainable and cost-effective in comparison to other methods. Figure 8.2 demonstrates bioremediation strategies commonly used for heavy metal removal.
8.5.2.2 Biosorption
This technique involves a rapid and passive adsorption mechanism. In this method, both living and dead biomass may be present for biosorption process. The biomass is derived from algae, fungi, plants, and bacteria (Ali Redha 2020). This strategy is inexpensive because it is possible to repeatedly renew and repurpose the biomass obtained from industrial waste. Various low-cost adsorbents are those derived from by-products of industry and agriculture such as rice husk, coconut shell, maize cob, etc. Biosorption involves two components: one is solid (biosorbent), and the other is liquid phase that contains an aqueous solution of contaminants such as heavy metals (Abbas Ali et al. 2016). Functional groups present on the solid phase are the major determinants for removal of a particular heavy metal.
8.5.2.3 Bioaccumulation
Bioaccumulation is a natural process by which microorganisms uptake metal ions using specific proteins from their surroundings (Diep et al. 2018). Researchers have also engineered some microorganisms to enhance their bioaccumulation process by introducing metal uptake proteins in their cell envelopes (Ueda 2016). Bioaccumulation utilizes live microorganisms in their metabolically active state, and major concerns associated with this process is the toxicity of wastewater to the organism, expression level of metal sequestering proteins, and exhaustive screening for selection of organism with high bioaccumulative potential. Genetic engineering helps to enhance the bioaccumulative potential of microorganism numerous folds and thus helps in efficient cleanup of water bodies contaminated with heavy metals (Fig. 8.3).
8.6 Conclusion
Heavy metals become noxious when their concentrations exceed certain level. Increasing concerns regarding their toxicity and hazardous effect on aquatic as well as terrestrial life forms requires extensive study to better understand basic chemistry, toxicity, and selection of appropriate remedial options in order to restore environmental health. To choose an appropriate technique, it is important to consider the type of contaminant, degree of contamination, and cost-effectiveness of the strategy. Besides, efforts to improve their commercialization in developing countries considering environmental sustainability are also important. Implementation of biotechnological aspects and integrated approaches is gaining interest these days. Future research needs to focus on evaluation methods for assessing remediation effectiveness while developing new remediation technologies in future research.
References
Abbas Ali A, Mohamed Sihabudeen M, Zahir Hussain A (2016) Biosorption of heavy metals by Pseudomonas bacteria. Int Res J Eng Technol 3(8):1446–1450
Adler RA, Claassen M, Godfrey L, Turton AR (2007) Water, mining, and waste: an historical and economic perspective on conflict management in South Africa. Econ Peace Secur J 2(2):33–41. https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.33
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2017) Lead toxicity. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov
Ahmad R, Tehsin Z, Malik ST, Asad SA, Shahzad M, Bilal M et al (2015) Phytoremediation potential of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.): identification and characterization of heavy metals responsive genes. CLEAN Soil Air Water 44:195–201
Ali Redha A (2020) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous media by biosorption. Arab J Basic Appl Sci 27(1):183–193
Ali H, Khan E, Sajad MA (2013) Phytoremediation of heavy metals—concepts and applications. Chemosphere 91(7):869–881
Andrades-Moreno L, Cambrollé J, Figueroa ME, Mateos-Naranjo E (2013) Growth and survival, 739 of Halimione portulacoides stem cuttings in heavy metal contaminated soils. Mar Pollut Bull 75(1–2):28–32
Ansari TM, Marr IL, Tariq N (2003) Heavy metals in marine pollution perspective—a mini review. J Appl Sci 4(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2004.1.20
ARL: Cadmium toxicity (2016) Archived from the original on 9 September 2019. http://www.arltma.com
Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO (2017) A new strategy for heavy metal polluted environments: a review of microbial biosorbents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(1):94
Baby J, Raj JS, Biby ET, Sankarganesh P, Jeevitha MV, Ajisha SU, Rajan SS (2010) Toxic effect of heavy metals on aquatic environment. Int J Biol Chem Sci 4(4):939–952
Baghour M, Moreno DA, Hernández J, Castilla N, Romero L (2001) Influence of root temperature on phytoaccumulation of As, Ag, Cr, and Sb in potato plants. J Environ Sci Health Part A 36(7):1389–1401
Bennicelli R, Stepniewska Z, Banach A, Szajnocha K, Ostrowski J (2004) The ability of Azolla caroliniana to remove heavy metals (Hg (II), Cr (III), Cr (VI)) from municipal waste water. Chemosphere 55(1):141–146
Bhatt K, Suyal DC, Kumar S, Singh K, Goswami P (2022) New insights into engineered plant-microbe interactions for pesticide removal. Chemosphere 309(2):136635
Bielicka A, Bojanowska I, Wisniewski A (2005) Two faces of chromium-pollutant and bioelement. Pol J Environ Stud 14(1):5–10
Bielmyer-Fraser GK, Patel P, Capo T, Grosell M (2018) Physiological responses of corals to oceanacidification and copper exposure. Mar Pollut Bull 133:781–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.048
Brown CJ, Eaton RA (2001) Toxicity of chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood to non-target marine fouling communities in Langstone Harbour, Portsmouth, UK. Mar Pollut Bull 42(4):310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-326x(00)00156-9
Cempel M, Nikel GJPJS (2006) Nickel: a review of its sources and environmental toxicology. Pol J Environ Stud 15(3):375–382
Chai M, Shi F, Li R, Qiu G, Liu F, Liu L (2014) Growth and physiological responses to copper stress in a halophyte Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae). Acta Physiol Plant 36(3):745–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1452-1
Chehregani A, Malayeri BE (2007) Removal of heavy metals by native accumulator plants. Int J Agric Biol 9:462–465
Chiarelli R, Roccheri MC (2014) Marine invertebrates as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution. Open J Metal 4(4):93–106. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmetal.2014.44011
Clark RB (2001) Marine pollution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Conesa HM, Faz A, Arnaldos R (2007) Initial studies for the phytostabilization of a mine tailing from the Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain). Chemosphere 66(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.041
Das S, Patnaik SC, Sahu HK, Chakraborty A, Sudarshan M, Thatoi HN (2013) Heavy metal contamination, physio-chemical and microbial evaluation of water samples collected from chromite mine environment of Sukinda, India. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 23(2):484–493
Dash B, Sahu N, Singh AK, Gupta SB, Soni R (2021) Arsenic efflux in Enterobacter cloacae RSN3 isolated from arsenic-rich soil. Folia Microbiol 66:189–196
De Pooter D (2013) Heavy metals. http://www.coastalwiki.org/wiki/Heavy_metals
Dhankhar R, Hooda A (2011) Fungal biosorption–an alternative to meet the challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Environ Technol 32(5):467–491
Diep P, Mahadevan R, Yakunin AF (2018) Heavy metal removal by bioaccumulation using genetically engineered microorganisms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6:157
Dinh N, van der Ent A, Mulligan DR, Nguyen AV (2018) Zinc and lead accumulation characteristics and in vivo distribution of Zn2+ in the hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens elucidated with fluorescent probes and laser confocal microscopy. Environ Exp Bot 147:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.008
Dixit R, Wasiullah, Malaviya D, Pandiyan K, Singh U et al (2015) Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 7(2):2189–2212. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7022189
Dojlido J, Best GA (1993) Chemistry of water and water pollution. Ellis Horwood Limited
Duan L, Song J, Li X, Yuan H, Xu S (2012) Dissolved inorganic tin sources and its coupling with eco-environments in Bohai Bay. Environ Monit Assess 184(3):1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2044-4
Ducros V (1992) Chromium metabolism, a literature review. Biol Trace Elem Res 32:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784589
Duffus JH (2002) “Heavy metals” a meaningless term? (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 74(5):793–807
El-Sorogy AS, Youssef M, Al-Kahtany K, Al-Otaiby N (2016) Assessment of arsenic in coastalsediments, seawaters and molluscs in the Tarut Island, Arabian Gulf, Saudi Arabia. J Afr Earth Sci 113:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.10.001
Environmental Protection Agency (2017). https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/clean-airact-text
Esslemont G (1998) Heavy metals in the tissues and skeleton of scleractiniancorals. PhD thesis, Southern Cross University, Australia, p 257
European Commission (2006) Decision of 12 October 2006 amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards exemptions for applications of lead and cadmium (notified under document number C (2006) 4790). (October 14, 2006). J Eur Union
Gautam RK, Sharma SK, Mahiya S, Chattopadhyaya MC (2014) Contamination of heavy metals in aquatic media: transport, toxicity and technologies for remediation. In: Heavy metals in water: presence, removal and safety. Royal Society of Chemistry, London
Geisler CD, Schmidt D (1991) An overview of chromium in the marine environment. Deutsche Hydrographische Zeitschrift 44(4):185–196
Ghosh M, Singh SP (2005) A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of it’s by products. Asian J Energy Environ 6:18
Giga W (2009) The Rhine red, the fish dead-the 1986 Schweizerhalle disaster, a retrospect and long-term impact assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 16(Suppl 1):S98–S111
Gillmore ML, Gissi F, Golding LA, Stauber JL, Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Severati A et al (2020) Effects of dissolved nickel and nickel-contaminated suspended sediment on the scleractinian coral, Acropora muricata. Mar Pollut Bull 152:110886
Gunatilake SK (2015) Methods of removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Methods 1(1):14
Gupta DC (1999) Environmental aspects of selected trace elements associated with coal and natural waters of Pench Valley coalfield of India and their impact on human health. Int J Coal Geol 40(2–3):133–149
Harada M (1995) Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol 25(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408449509089885
Hattingh WHJ (1977) Reclaimed water: a health hazard? Water SA 3(2):104–112
Hegazy AK, Abdel-Ghani NT, El-Chaghaby GA (2011) Phytoremediation of industrial wastewater potentiality by Typha domingensis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(3):639–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326249
Huang JC, Suárez MC, Yang SI, Lin Z-Q, Terry N (2013) Development of a constructed wetland water treatment system for selenium removal: incorporation of an algal treatment component. Environ Sci Technol 47(18):10518–10525
Hussain J, Rao NP (2018) Status of trace and toxic metals in Indian Rivers. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, river data Compilation-2, vol 110066. Directorate Planning and Development Organization, New Delhi
ILA: International Lead Association (2018) Lead in aquatic environments: understanding the science. https://www.ila-lead.org/responsibility/lead-in-aquatic-environments–understanding-the-science
Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN (2014) Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol 7(2):60–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009
Kalve S, Sarangi BK, Pandey RA, Chakrabarti T (2011) Arsenic and chromium hyperaccumulation by an ecotype of Pteris vittata–prospective for phytoextraction from contaminated water and soil. Curr Sci:888–894
Kaur S, Kamli MR, Ali A (2011) Role of arsenic and its resistance in nature. Can J Microbiol 57(10):769–774. https://doi.org/10.1139/w11-062
Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 152(3):686–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.056
Klaassen CD, Liu J, Diwan BA (2009) Metallothionein protection of cadmium toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 238(3):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.03.026
Koptsik GN (2014) Problems and prospects concerning the phytoremediation of heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Eurasian Soil Sci 47(9):923–939. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314090075
Kumar P, Gupta SB, Anurag, Soni R (2019) Bioremediation of cadmium by mixed indigenous isolates Serratia liquefaciens BSWC3 and Klebsiella pneumoniae RpSWC3 isolated from industrial and mining affected water samples. Pollution 5(2):351–360
LeDuc DL, Terry N (2005) Phytoremediation of toxic trace elements in soil and water. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 32(11–12):514–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0227-0
Lefèvre I, Marchal G, Edmond GM, Correal E, Lutts S (2010) Cadmium has contrasting effects on polyethylene glycol – sensitive and resistant cell lines in the Mediterranean halophyte species. Atriplex halimus L. J Plant Physiol 167(5):365–374
Lenntech (2006) Heavy metals. http://www.lenntech.com/heavy-metals.htm
Llugany M, Miralles R, Corrales I, Barceló J, Poschenrieder C (2012) Cynara cardunculus a potentially useful plant for remediation of soils polluted with cadmium or arsenic. J Geochem Explor 123:122–127
Luoma SN, Ho YB, Bryan GW (1995) Fate, bioavailability and toxicity of silver in estuarine environments. Mar Pollut Bull 31(1–3):44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(95)00081-W
Mahurpawar M (2015) Effects of heavy metals on human health. Int J Res GRANTHAALAYAH 3(9SE): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v3.i9SE.2015.3282
Mains D, Craw D, Rufaut CG, Smith CM (2006) Phytostabilization of gold mine tailings, New Zealand. Part 1: plant establishment in alkaline saline substrate. Int J Phytoremediation 8(2):131–147
Medinews direct (2009) Cadmium exposure can induce early atherosclerotic changes archived 15 March 2012 at the wayback machine
Mills MM, Ridame C, Davey M, La Roche J, Geider RJ (2004) Iron and phosphorous co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern topical North Atlantic. Nature 429(6989):292–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02550
Mirza N, Pervez A, Mahmood Q, Shah MM, Shafqat MN (2011) Ecological restoration of arsenic contaminated soil by Arundo donax L. Ecol Eng 37(12):1949–1956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole
Molisani MM, Rocha R, Machado W, Barreto RC, Lacerda LD (2006) Mercury contents in aquatic macrophytes from two reservoirs in the Paraíba do Sul: Guandú river system, SE Brazil. Braz J Biol 66:101–107
Morel FMM, Reinfelder JR, Roberts SB, Chamberlain CP, Lee JG, Yee D (1994) Zinc and carbon co-limitation of marine phytoplankton. Nature 369(6483):740–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/369740a0
Nunes da Silva M, Mucha AP, Rocha AC, Silva C, Carli C, Gomes CR, Almeida CMR (2014) Evaluation of the ability of two plants for the phytoremediation of Cd in salt marshes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 141:78–84
Pastor J, Gutiérrez-Ginés MJ, Hernández AJ (2015) Heavy-metal phytostabilizing potential of Agrostis castellana Boiss and reuter. Int J Phytoremediation 17:988–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2014.1003786
Pedro CA, Santos MSS, Ferreira SMF, Gonçalves SC (2013) The influence of cadmium, 1051contamination and salinity on the survival, growth and phytoremediation capacity of the saltmarsh plant Salicornia ramosissima. Mar Environ Res 92:197–205
Pinsino A, Matranga V, Roccheri MC (2012) Manganese: a new emerging contaminant in the environment. In: Srivastava J (ed) Environmental contamination. InTechOpen, London. http://www.intechopen.com/books/environmentalcontamination/manganesea-new-emerging-contaminant-in-the-environment. ISBN: 978-953-51- 0120-8
Pratush A, Kumar A, Hu Z (2018) Adverse effect of heavy metals (As, Pb, Hg, and Cr) on health and their bioremediation strategies: a review. Int Microbiol 21(3):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-018-0012-3
Purcell TW, Peters JJ (1998) Sources of silver in the environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(4):539–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620170404
Qasem NA, Mohammed RH, Lawal DU (2021) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review. Npj Clean Water 4(1):36
Rai PK (2008) Phytoremediation of Hg and Cd from industrial effluents using an aquatic free floating macrophyte Azolla pinnata. Int J Phytoremediation 10(5):430–439
Raiswell R, Canfield DE (2012) The iron biogeochemical cycle past and present. Geochem Perspect 1(1):1–220
Rajakaruna N, Tompkins KM, Pavicevic PG (2006) Phytoremediation: an affordable green technology for the clean-up of metal contaminated sites in Sri Lanka. Cey J Sci 35:25–39
Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Andrades-Moreno L (2010) Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of cadmium in a halophytic Cd-hyperaccumulator, Arthrocnemum macrostachyum. J Hazard Mater 184(1–3):299–307
Reichelt-Brushett A (2012) Risk assessment and ecotoxicology: limitations and recommendations for ocean disposal of mine waste in the coral triangle. Oceanography 25(4):40–51. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.66
Rehman K, Fatima F, Waheed I, Akash MSH (2018) Prevalence of exposure of heavy metals and their impact on health consequences. J Cell Biochem 119(1):157–184
Rieuwerts J (2015) The elements of environmental pollution (1st ed). Routledge, New York
Rizzi L, Petruzzelli G, Poggio G, Guidi GV (2004) Soil physical changes and plant availability of Zn and Pb in a treatability test of phytostabilization. Chemosphere 57(9):1039–1046
Sakakibara M, Ohmori Y, Ha NTH, Sano S, Sera K (2011) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated water and sediment by Eleocharis acicularis. CLEAN Soil Air Water 39(8):735–741
Salazar MJ, Pignata ML (2014) Lead accumulation in plants grown in polluted soils. Screening of native species for phytoremediation. J Geochem Explor 137:29–36
Selvi A, Rajasekar A, Theerthagiri J, Ananthaselvam A, Sathishkumar K, Madhavan J, Rahman PK (2019) Integrated remediation processes toward heavy metal removal/recovery from various environments-a review. Front Environ Sci 7:66
Shah SB (2021) Heavy metals in scleractinian corals. Springer International Publishing, Berlin
Shahandeh H, Hossner LR (2000) Plant screening for chromium phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation 2(1):31–51
Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P (2009) Phytomining: a review. Miner Eng 22(12):1007–1019
Singh A, Sharma A, Verma RK, Chopade RL, Pandit PP, Nagar V et al (2022) Heavy metal contamination of water and their toxic effect on living organisms. In: Dorta D, De Oliveira DP (eds) The toxicity of environmental pollutants. IntechOpen, London
Solomon F (2008) Impacts of heavy metals on aquatic systems and human health. Mining.com. http://www.infomine.com/library/publications/docs/mining.com/Apr2008c.pdf
Soudek P, Petrová Š, Vaněk T (2012) Phytostabilization or accumulation of heavy metals by using of energy crop Sorghum sp. In: 3rd international conference on biology, environment and chemistry IPCBEE. IACSIT Press, Singapore
Subhasini V, Swamy AVVS (2014) Phytoremediation of cadmium and chromium contaminated soils by Cyperus rotundus L. Am Int J Res Sci Technol J Eng Math 6:97–101
Türkmen D, Bakhshpour M, Akgönüllü S, Aşır S, Denizli A (2022) Heavy metal ions removal from wastewater using cryogels: a review. Front Sustain 3:765592
Ueda M (2016) Establishment of cell surface engineering and its development. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80(7):1243–1253
Un Nisa W, Rashid A (2015) Potential of vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides L.) grass in removing selected PAHs from diesel contaminated soil. Pak J Bot 47:291–296
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2013) Global mercury assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environmental transport. UN Environmental Program Chemicals Branch, Geneva
Varun M, Souza RD, Pratas J et al (2011) Evaluation of phytostabilization, a green technology to remove heavy metals from industrial sludge using Typha latifolia L. experimental design. Biotechnol Bioinformatics Bioeng 1:137–145
Veselý T, Trakal L, Neuberg M, Száková J, Drábek O, Tejnecký V et al (2012) Removal of Al, Fe and Mn by Pistia stratiotes L. and its stress response. Open Life Sci 7(6):1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0099-z
Wang H, Zhong G (2011) Effect of organic ligands on accumulation of copper in hyperaccumulator and nonaccumulator Commelina communis. Biol Trace Elem Res 143(1):489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8850-7
Wang Q, Kim D, Dionysiou DD, Sorial GA, Timberlake D (2004) Sources and remediation for mercury contamination in aquatic systems—a literature review. Environ Pollut 131(2):323–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.01.010
Wang R, Balkanski Y, Boucher O, Bopp L, Chappell A, Ciais P, Tao S (2015) Sources, transport and deposition of iron in the global atmosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 15(11):6247–6270. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6247-2015
Wase J, Forster C (1997) Biosorbents for metal ions. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London
Wells ML, Price NM, Bruland KW (1995) Iron chemistry in seawater and its relationship to phytoplankton: a workshop report. Mar Chem 48(2):157–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(94)00055-I
World Health Organization (1984) Guidelines for drinking, water quality. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (2017) Lead poisoning and health. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs379/en/
Wu H, Liu X, Zhao J, Yu J (2013) Regulation of metabolites, gene expression, and antioxidant enzymes to environmentally relevant lead and zinc in the halophyte Suaeda salsa. J Plant Growth Regul 32(2):353–361
Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. Int Sch Res Netw Ecol 2011:402647, 20 pp
Xu J, Yin HX, Liu X, Li X (2010) Salt affects plant Cd-stress responses by modulating growth and Cd accumulation. Planta 231(2):449–459
Xue H, Li J, Xie H, Wang Y (2018) Review of drug repositioning approaches and resources. Int J Biol Sci 14(10):1232–1244
Ye BJ, Kim BG, Jeon MJ, Kim SY, Kim HC, Jang TW et al (2016) Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury in toxication. Ann Occup Environ Med 28:5
Zhou Q, Yang N, Li Y, Ren B, Ding X, Bian H, Yao X (2020) Total concentrations and sources of heavy metal pollution in global river and lake water bodies from 1972 to 2017. Global Ecol Conserv 22:e00925
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maithani, D. et al. (2023). Heavy Metal Pollution in Water: Cause and Remediation Strategies. In: Soni, R., Suyal, D.C., Morales-Oyervides, L., Sungh Chauhan, J. (eds) Current Status of Fresh Water Microbiology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5018-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5018-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5017-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5018-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)