Abstract
The mandate for energy has upsurged with the increase in population worldwide. Exploiting fossil fuels for energy has directed the exhaustion of fossil fuel assets. Thus, substitute sources of energy are required. Biomass is a renewable source and an alternative feedstock for providing eco-friendly and sustainable energy. Biofuels obtained from different biomass are grouped into three distinct groups: first-generation biofuels (obtained from wheat, sugarcane, barley, potato, soybean, corn, coconut, and sunflower), second-generation biofuels (produced from lignocellulosic materials like cassava, switchgrass, Jatropha, straw, and wood), third-generation biofuels (obtained from algae). The biofuel produced with the help of first-generation energy crops poses threat to biodiversity and food supply. But the use of lignocellulose as a biofuel does not contend with that of food production as it is nondigestible for humans. The principle advantage of algal biomass is higher oil production and it can convert all of the feedstock energy into various kinds of biofuels. Apart from this, it is useful for amputation of CO2 from the industrial chimney (algae bio-fixation), food products, animal feed, and energy cogeneration after extraction of oil and treatment of wastewater. Thus, it is one of the world’s most valuable, renewable, and sustainable source of the fuel which also helps in controlling environmental pollution. Thus, bioenergy crops and biofuels are considered as sustainable sources of energy production as waste products such as forest waste and agricultural residues, manures, industrial waste, and municipal solid waste are used for producing biofuels and bioenergy.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
3.1 Introduction
The world has seen an increase in energy demand due to unceasing rise in the global population. The accomplishment of energy petition is typically done by ignition of fossil gases. But the use of these fuels poses many environmental hazards as the concentration of harmful gases (nitrogen oxide, greenhouse gases, and carbon dioxide) increases. For instance, greenhouse gases such as sulfur-containing compounds, particulate soot, and carbon dioxide are produced due to coal burning which results in acidification of the soil. Moreover, the energy which is produced from nuclear fission needs huge infrastructure and it also leads to hazardous effects on the environment in addition to human health (Gresshoff et al. 2017). Many long-term effects on the environment are related to the use of fossil fuels which include desertification and degradation of fertile soil (Karp and Shield 2008). The consequences of increased usage of fossil fuels are noticeable as diseases associated environmental pollution and drastic changes in climate such as torrential rains.
In addition to this, there has been increasing concern of depleting crude oil resources all over the world. As per the report of the renewable energy policy network (Mohr 2013), it was found that nearly 78% of the energy all over the world comes from fossil fuels, 3% is obtained from nuclear energy while another energy comes from resources which are renewable, i.e., hydrothermal, wind, biomass, and solar. At present, about 85 million barrels of oil from fossil fuels are refined each year. At the current rate, about 116 million barrels of crude oil will be needed every year by 2030. This increase in energy demand may lead to the exhaustion of fossil fuel assets. Thus, there is a need for substitute sources of energy (Lee and Lavoie 2013).
Due to increased concern about climate change all over the world, there is a need to evaluate the crops which are capable of producing higher biomass for the generation of energy (Lemus and Lal 2007). Biofuels and bioenergy crops are sustainable sources for the reason that these decrease carbon releases and dependency on fossil fuels along with providing habitat and ecosystem services (Fargione et al. 2010; Searchinger et al. 2008). Hence, the production of bioenergy will increase globally in near future (OECD-FAO (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Food and Agriculture Organization) 2017).
Biomass is a renewable source and an alternative feedstock for providing eco-friendly and sustainable energy. Waste products such as forest waste and agricultural residues, manures, industrial waste, and municipal solid waste are used for producing biofuels and bioenergy. Different kinds of bioenergy can be produced from biomass. However, it is not competitive with respect to cost in comparison to petro fuels and other sources of renewable energy. Biofuels obtained from different biomass are grouped into three distinct groups. The first-generation biofuels are obtained from edible food crops like wheat, sugarcane, barley, potato, soybean, corn, coconut, and sunflower. While the second-generation biofuels are those which are obtained from lignocellulosic substances like cassava, switchgrass, Jatropha, straw, and wood. The third-generation biofuels are attained from algae produces huge quantities of lipids that are appropriate for the production of biodiesel.
Bioenergy crops provide several advantages over traditional fuels such as decrease in the level of greenhouse gases and emission of CO2, reduction in soil erosion along with increased transpiration and content of soil carbon (Adler et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013). Resultantly, attention of scientific community is being continuously drawn towards the use of bioenergy crops because they are eco-friendly and renewable. However, the use of bioenergy crops results in an increased race for nutrient requirement, agricultural land, and water resources with food crops. Apart from this, the use of bioenergy crops can result in more dispersal of dominant plant species and destruction of wildlife habitat (Dipti and Priyanka 2013). So, in this chapter various kinds of bioenergy crops in addition to their features are discussed in detail (Fig. 3.1).
3.2 First-Generation Biofuels
Biofuel generation was started with first-generation bioenergy crops that are crops of global or local source (Yadav et al. 2019). They are made of starch, vegetable oil, and sugar. Fuels such as propanol, ethanol, and butanol are obtained biologically due to the action of enzymes and microorganisms by the fermentation of cellulose, starch, or sugar.
Production of ethanol is done primarily from cane sugar or corn starch. In 2014, nearly 14 billion gallons of ethanol from corn starch were produced in the US. In the US, around 40% of the corn crop is used for the production of ethanol. Higher than 90% of the world’s ethanol supply is made by the US and Brazil (Renewable Fuels Association 2015).
Rice straw is an abundant lignocellulosic biomass having the potential for use as a feedstock for the production of bioethanol. Enzymatic hydrolysis is important to make ethanol from biomass for degradation of straw of rice into sugars like xylose and glucose. Since each biomass has diverse enzyme going-on therefore enzyme substances appropriate for all biomasses essential should be carefully chosen. Ethanol production can be done from treated straw through the process of simultaneous fermentation and saccharification (SSF) in the presence of xylose-fermenting fungus (Mucor circinelloides) and an optimized enzyme cocktail (Takano and Hoshino 2018).
Apart from this, biodiesel is also used as an alternative. Eventhough the cost of biodiesel production is higher, it is a copious source of renewable energy as it is eco-friendly. Producing biodiesel from coconut oil is more in comparison to rapeseed and soybean. Lubrication properties of coconut oil are much better compared to other biofuels (Hossain et al. 2012) (Fig. 3.2).
Coconut shell is most commonly used as a source for making charcoal. By using the traditional pit method, nearly 25–30 of charcoal can be produced from dry shells. Calorific value of coconut shell is higher (20.8 MJ/kg) and it is used for the production of biochar, energy-rich gases, bio-oil, steam, etc. Due to high volatile matter content, low content of ash, and cheap cost, coconut shell is more suitable for pyrolysis process. It can be collected easily from the places where coconut meat is used for food processing. Other crops which are used for the production of first-generation biofuels include Corn, Sugarcane, Vegetable oils, Soybean, rapeseed, wheat, peanuts, and sugar beet (Table 3.1).
3.3 Second-Generation Biofuels
The second-generation biofuels, recognized as unconventional biofuels, refer to those biofuels which are formed from lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose. Such kind of biofuels are either merged with petroleum-based fuels, ignited in the current engines, or can be used in slightly adapted vehicles such as vehicles for dimethyl ether. These biofuels are used because first-generation biofuels have certain limitations. With the help of first-generation biofuels, enough biofuel cannot be produced without posing threat to biodiversity and food supply. Also, such biofuels are less cost-competitive when compared with the prevailing fossil fuels (Anonymous 2021) (Fig. 3.3).
3.3.1 Characterization of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Components and Structure
Lignocellulose is the most copious natural biomasses in the world with 200 billion tons yield (Zhang and Percival 2008). It is stored in the plant’s cell wall and it constitutes 60–80% of the woody tissues in plant stems, 15–30% in plant leaves, and 30–60% in the herbal stems (Moller et al. 2007). Use of lignocellulose as biofuels do not contend with that of food production (as in first-generation biofuels) because it is nondigestible for humans. Lignocellulose is made up of three polymeric compounds that are lignin, cellulose, and non-cellulosic carbohydrates (mainly hemicellulose).
Cellulose is a long chain homo-polymer that consists of a unit of glucose with a repeat unit of cellobiose (Zhang et al. 2019). It has 500–1,000,000 D-glucose units linked to β-1,4-glycosidic bonds (Volynets and Dahman 2011). In cellulose, a semi-crystalline structure is created due to interchain H-bonds present between hydroxyl groups (glucose residues) in the radial position and hydrogen atoms (aliphatic) in the axial position. This structure makes cellulose unaffected by enzymatic hydrolysis and the weaker interactions (hydrophobic) between the cellulose sheets promote the formation of a layer of water near the surface which results in production from acid hydrolysis (Bessou et al. 2011). The chemical structure of cellulose built from different plants is identical. However, cellulose molecules derived from different plants differ from each other in interconnections with other biomass molecules and crystalline structure.
Hemicellulose belongs to polysaccharide groups containing chains which are branched and shorter. As hemicellulose accounts for 35% of the biomass weight, these are considered important for biofuel production (Limayem and Ricke 2012). Hemicellulose are not chemically homogenous like cellulose and the chemical structure depends upon the kind of material as the hardwood mainly consists of xylans while the softwood constitutes glucomannans (Agbor et al. 2011; Vidal et al. 2011).
Lignin is an amorphous hetero polymer which constitutes three phenolic monomers—phenyl propionic alcohols, sinapylalcohol, p-coumaryl, and coniferyl. Covalent cross-linking (lignin with cellulose and hemicellulose) forms a strong matrix which provides protection to the polysaccharide from microbial degradation, thwarts its extraction with aqueous solvents which are neutral, and makes it oxidative stress resistant (Vidal et al. 2011). The highest lignin is present in forest biomass (30–60% in softwoods and 30–55% in hardwoods) while it is present in lesser quantity in agricultural residues (3–15%) and grasses (10–30%) (Limayem and Ricke 2012).
3.3.2 Lignocellulosic Biomass for Liquid Fuels by Thermochemical Conversion
The controlled oxidation or heating of the feedstock for the purpose of generating heat and energy products is defined as thermochemical conversion (Wang et al. 2021). With the help of thermochemical conversion, there is an acceleration of deoxygenation reactions in lignolytic biomass. The basic hypothesis behind thermoregulation is that these reactions can lead to the rearrangement of the fundamental structure of lignocellulosic biomass for producing high-grade biofuels in comparison to petroleum fuels (Jiang et al. 2015). It constitutes several techniques such as
The process of heating biomass in anaerobic conditions so that the chemical compounds like lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose that make the material decompose thermally into charcoal and combustible gases is called pyrolysis. When it is performed in the aerobic condition, then gasification takes place at a higher temperature ensuing formation of gaseous fuel along with solid residue termed as ash. Higher temperature during gasification prevents the formation as well as condensation of the liquid products (Wang et al. 2021) (Fig. 3.4).
During gasification, carbon monoxide, methane, carbon dioxide, and syngas are produced. As compared to pyrolysis, it requires lesser posttreatment. Gasification takes place in three stages that are drying (up to the temperature of 120 °C), devolatization, i.e., removal of volatile matter, and creation of char followed by gasification (at the temperature above 350 °C). For complete gasification, a temperature above 500 °C is required (Kuzhiyil et al. 2012). The gases formed throughout gasification are used for the indirect production of liquid fuel. This process differs from pyrolysis as they are performed at the higher pressure of hydrogen gas in the presence of a catalyst. Liquefaction is the process of direct creation of liquid fuel from solid or gas. It takes place at a high temperature (200–370 °C) and pressure of 4–20 MPa (Fig. 3.5).
3.4 Third-Generation Biofuels
The third-generation biofuels are the fuels that are formed from algal biomass (Brennana and Owendea 2010; Chen et al. 2011). These biofuels are advanced renewable fuels which are obtained from algae through various processes. Algal biomass is rich in oils which are attributed to its ability to photosynthesize abundantly (Anonymous 2014). Algae is an aquatic species with nearly 3000 breeds. Algae possess greater diversity in comparison to land plants because of their ability to reproduce at a faster rate (Suganya et al. 2016). Algae obtain CO2 from the atmosphere during photosynthesis and convert it into oxygen (Laamanen et al. 2016). Oil from algae is extracted by breakage of the cell structure (Hallenbeck et al. 2016). The principle advantage of algal biomass other than higher oil production is that it can convert nearly all of the feedstock energy into various kinds of biofuels (Suganya et al. 2016). Apart from this, it is useful for the removal of carbon dioxide from the industrial chimney; the process known as algae bio-fixation, animal feed, food products, energy cogeneration after extraction of oil, and treatment of wastewater. Freshwater, brackish water, or even wastewater can be used to grow algae. They can grow at a rapid rate and do not require many nutrients for growth (Guiry 2012) (Fig. 3.6).
Using algae biomass for biofuel production offers several advantages which include:
-
(a)
More tolerance to higher content of carbon dioxide
-
(b)
Lesser consumption of water
-
(c)
No use of pesticides or herbicides for the cultivation of algae
-
(d)
Can be grown throughout the year
-
(e)
Can be grown under adverse environmental conditions such as coastal seawater, saline, or brackish water
-
(f)
Grown in wastewater (Spolaore et al. 2006, ‘Dismukes et al. 2008, Dragone et al. 2010).
On the contrary, algae cultivation has many demerits like more cost of cultivation in contrast to conventional fuel crops. Also, for the making of algal biomass, there is the obligation of more energy which constitutes nearly 20–30% of the cost of production. Various methods are used for concentrating the algal biomass which include flocculation, sedimentation, filtration, centrifugation, and floatation (Demirbas 2010a, b; Ho et al. 2011) (Fig. 3.7).
Growth rate of algae varies under different growing conditions such as temperature, nutrients, and acidity. Many products can be obtained from algal biomass which includes jet fuel, syngas, bio-oil, butanol, ethanol, and natural fertilizers (Joshi and Nookaraju 2012). Although the conversion methods of algal biofuel production (fermentation, transesterification, and hydrotreatment) are expensive and complex in comparison to fossil fuels and biofuels of other generations. However, there is a potential basis for optimism with regard to this biofuel due to its sustainability and ability to produce more products because of its diversity (EIA 2016). From all the positive features of the algal biomass, it is found that it is one of the world’s most valuable, renewable, and sustainable source of fuel which also helps in controlling environmental pollution (Suganya et al. 2016).
3.4.1 Classification of Algae
Algae is the group having eight divisions, which can be unicellular or multicellular termed as microalgae (microphytes) and macroalgae (seaweeds), respectively (Suganya et al. 2016). Roots, leaves, and stems are absent in microphytes. It can be grown upto hundreds of micrometers and is found in fresh as well as marine water bodies (Lee and Lee 2016). However, macroalgae has body-like structure. It is found near the sea beds and grows upto hundreds of meters (Suganya et al. 2016). Structure of macroalgae is in such a way as to store and convert the energy without development outside their cells. The easiness in the growth, as well as development of algae, has made them a sustainable source of energy in comparison to any other renewable source of energy (Kandiyoti et al. 2017). Various environmental conditions for the growth of algae is as shown in the figure (Fig. 3.8).
3.4.1.1 Technique of Algal Oil Extraction
For energy production, oil can be produced from algal biomass or these can be transformed into biofuels directly. Oil is usually extracted via various methods which include mechanical and solvent removal (Demirbas 2010a, b). Algae can be converted to biofuel through various options which include change of algal biomass to energy goods, extraction of metabolites, and processing of algal secretions (Ganguly et al. 2021). Steps tangled in the manufacture of biofuels are harvesting followed by dewatering, then extraction, and finally dispensation to energy goods and co-products (Lardon et al. 2009).
3.4.1.2 Harvesting and Drying of Algal Biomass
The cell wall of unicellular microalgae contains fatty acids and lipids that are higher plants and animals. Before mechanical and solvent extraction, harvesting and drying algal biomass is an important step. The harvesting of macroalgae is done with nets which needs lesser energy but for the harvesting of microalgae, conventional methods are used which include flocculation, centrifugation, filtration, foam fractionation (Liu et al. 2013; Prochazkova et al. 2013; Heasman et al. 2008; Csordas and Wang 2004; Rossignol et al. 1999), ultrasonic separation (Bosma et al. 2003), froth floatation, and sedimentation. Type of harvesting methods depends upon the species of algae.
For the extension of algal shelf life, drying is an important method as it prevents postharvest decay (Munir et al. 2013). For drying of microalgae, various approaches are considered to be efficient such as freeze drying (lyophilization), drum-drying, sun-drying, and spray drying (Richmond 2004; Leach et al. 1998; Williams and Laurens 2010). Due to the presence of a higher amount of water, sun-drying is not an effective method (Mata et al. 2010). Furthermore, the effectiveness of drying method is contingent upon temperature during the extraction of lipids from algal biomass (Widjaja et al. 2009).
3.4.2 Production of Biodiesel
Biodiesel is mono alkyl esters of the long chain fatty acids, which is extracted from biomass and renewable lipid feedstocks (Demirbas 2009; Clark and Deswarte 2008,). Extraction of lipid (diatoms) has been initially done by German scientist during second World War (Cohen et al. 1995). Since the yield of oil from algal biomass is higher in comparison to oilseeds, it can be economically converted into biodiesel with the help of various techniques. Various species of microalgae are used for the manufacture of biodiesel which includes Ankistrodesmus fusiformis, Ankistrodesmus falcatus, Chlamydocapsa bacillus, and Kirchneriella lunaris (Nascimento et al. 2013). The content of oil from microalgae is quite high which usually exceeds 80% by weight of the dry biomass. From an acre nearly 5000–15,000 gal of biodiesel can be produced annually from algae thus reflecting its potentiality for use as biofuel (Spolaore et al. 2006; Chisti 2007) (Tables 3.4 and 3.5).
3.4.3 Production of Bioethanol
Production of bioethanol from algal biomass has been reported by many researchers. Algae are considered to be more appropriate for the manufacture of bioethanol due to the lower content of lignin and hemicellulose in algae as compared to lignocellulosic biomass (Chen et al. 2013). Numerous species of algae are used for the manufacture of bioethanol which includes Gelidium amansii, Laminaria sp., Spirogyra sp., Sargassum sp., Gracilaria sp., and Prymnesium parvum (Eshaq et al. 2011; Rajkumar et al. 2014) (Fig. 3.9; Tables 3.6 and 3.7).
3.4.4 Production of Biogas
As there is a presence of high polysaccharides in algal along with lower content of cellulose and zero lignin, the production of biogas from algal biomass can be done through the process of anaerobic digestion (Yen and Brune 2007; Ras et al. 2011; Zhong et al. 2012; Saqib et al. 2013).
However, for biofuel extraction from algae, there is a requirement of energy-efficient and cost-effective techniques. Use of standard harvesting techniques, design of photobioreactor, biorefinery concept, and other technologies are required which will further decrease the cost of biofuel production from algae.
3.5 Conclusion
Usage of bioenergy crops for energy production can help in employing these alternative sources of renewable energy. Commercial production of these fuels could make us sovereign for fossil transportation fuels using existing engine technologies. The most sustainable sources of energy production are bioenergy crops and biofuels. With the help of first-generation biofuels, enough biofuel cannot be produced without posing threat to biodiversity and food supply. But the use of lignocellulose as a biofuel does not contest with that of food production as these are nondigestible for humans. Also, such biofuels are cheaper than existing fossil fuels. For energy production, oil can be mined from the algal biomass or these can be converted into biofuels directly. Also, algae can convert nearly all of the feedstock energy into various kinds of biofuels. Apart from this, it is useful for the removal of carbon dioxide from the industrial chimney (algae bio-fixation), food products, animal feed, energy cogeneration after extraction of oil, and treatment of wastewater. Hence, it is one of the world’s most valuable, renewable, and sustainable source of fuel which also helps in controlling environmental pollution. Thus, bioenergy crops and biofuels are considered to be sustainable sources of energy production as waste products such as forest waste and agricultural residues, manures, industrial waste, and municipal solid waste are used for producing biofuels and bioenergy.
References
Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17:675–691. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-2018
Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, Berlin A, Levin DB (2011) Biomass pre-treatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005
Anonymous (2014) International Council on Clean Transportation. EU energy council draft directive on land use change, p 1–8. https://theicct.org/publications/eu-energy-council-draft-directive-indirect-land-use-change
Anonymous (2021). https://sites.google.com/site/biotechbiofuels4/first-generation-vs-second-generation
Awolu OO, Layokun SK (2013) Optimization of two-step transesterification production of biodiesel from neem (Azadirachta indica) oil. Int J Energy Environ 4:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-39
Balat M (2011) Production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic materials via the biochemical pathway: a review. Energy Convers Manag 52:858–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.08.013
Behera S, Mohanty RC, Ray RC (2014) Batch ethanol production from cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) flour using Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilized in calcium alginate. Ann Microbiol 65:779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-0918-8
Behera S, Richa S, Singh R, Arora R, Sharma NK, Shukla M, Kumar S (2015) Scope of algae as 3rd generation biofuels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00090
Bessou C, Ferchaud F, Gabrielle B, Mary B (2011) Biofuels, greenhouse gases and climate change. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 31(1):1–79. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/article/10.1051/agro/2009039
Bosma R, Van Spronsen WA, Tramper J, Wijffels RH (2003) Ultrasound, a new separation technique to harvest microalgae. J Appl Phycol 15:143–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023807011027
Brennana L, Owendea P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and coproducts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:554–579. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.2566&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Champagne P, Li C (2009) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic municipal wastewater treatment process residuals as feedstocks for the recovery of simple sugars. Bioresour Technol 100(4):5700–5706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.051
Chen CY, Yeh KL, Aisyah R, Lee J, Chang JS (2011) Cultivation, photobioreactor design, and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 102:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.159
Chen CY, Zhao XQ, Yen HW, Ho SH, Cheng CL, Bai F (2013) Microalgae-based carbohydrates for biofuel production. Biochem Eng J 78:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.03.006
Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001
Clark J, Deswarte F (2008) Introduction to chemicals from biomass. Wiley series in renewable resources. Wiley, Hoboken
Cohen Z, Norman HA, Heimer YM (1995) Microalgae as a source of x-3 fatty acids. World Rev Nutr Diet 77:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.1996.tb00073.x
Csordas A, Wang J (2004) An integrated photobioreactor and foam fractionation unit for growth and harvest of Chaetoceros sp in open systems. Aquac Eng 30:15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2003.07.001
Demirbas A (2009) Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energy Convers Manag 50:14–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.001
Demirbas A (2010a) Use of algae as biofuel sources. Energ Convers Manag 51:2738–2749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.010
Demirbas A (2010b) Use of algae as biofuel sources. Energy Convers Manag 51:2738–2749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.010
Dipti, Priyanka (2013) Bioenergy crops an alternative energy. Int J Environ Eng Manag 4:265–272
Dismukes GC, Carrieri D, Bennette N, Ananyev GM, Posewitz MC (2008) Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.007
Dragone G, Fernandes B, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA (2010) Third generation biofuels from microalgae. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Current research, technology and education, Applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology. Formatex, Madrid, pp 1315–66
EIA (2016) International energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040. Energy outlook 2016. U.S. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
Elsayed M, Abomohra A, Ai P, Jin K, Fan Q, Zhang Y (2019) Acetogenesis and methanogenesis liquid digestates for pretreatment of rice straw: a holistic approach for efficient biomethane production and nutrient recycling. Energy Convers Manag 135(11):447–456
Eshaq FS, Ali MN, Mohd MK (2010) Spirogyra biomass a renewable source for biofuel (bioethanol) production. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2:7045–7054. https://www.academia.edu/19167749/_Spirogyra_biomass_a_renewable_source_for_biofuel_bioethanol_Production_
Eshaq FS, Ali MN, Mohd MK (2011) Production of bioethanol from next generation feed-stock alga Spirogyra species. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3:1749–1755. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/50406997_Production_of_Bioethanol_from_next_generation_feed-stock_alga_Spirogyra_species
Fargione J, Plevin R, Hill J, Futuyma D, Shafer H, Simberloff D (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:351–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144720
Ganguly P, Sarkhel R, Das P (2021) The second- and third-generation biofuel technologies: comparative perspectives. In: Sustainable fuel technologies handbook. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822989-7.00002-0
García-Cubero T, Gonzáles-Benito G, Indacoechea I, Coca M, Bolado S (2009) Effect of ozonolysis pretreatment on enzymatic digestibility of wheat and rye straw. Bioresour Technol 100:608–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.012
Ghadge SV, Raheman H (2005) Biodiesel production from mahua (Madhuca indica) oil having high free fatty acids. Biomass Bioenergy 28:601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.009
Gresshoff PM, Rangan L, Indrasumunar A, Scott PT (2017) A new bioenergy crop based on oil-rich seeds from the legume tree Pongamia pinnata. Energy Emission Control Technol 5:19–26. https://doi.org/10.2147/EECT.S69854
Guiry M (2012) How many species of algae are there? J Phycol 48(5):1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x
Hallenbeck PC, Grogger M, Mraz M, Veverka D (2016) Solar biofuels production with microalgae. Appl Energy 179:136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.024
Harun R, Danquah MK, Forde-Gareth M (2011) Microalgal biomass as a fermentation feedstock for bioethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2287
Heasman M, Diemar JO, Connor W, Shushames T, Foulkes L, Nell J (2008) Development of extended shelf-life microalgae concentrate diets harvested by centrifugation for bivalve molluscs—a summary. Aquac Res 31:637–659. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.318492.x
Ho SH, Chen CY, Lee DJ, Chang JS (2011) Perspectives on microalgal Co2-emission mitigation systems-a review. Biotechnol Adv 29:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.001
Hossain MA, Chowdhury SM, Rekhu Y, Faraz KS, Islam MU (2012) Biodiesel from coconut oil: a renewable alternative fuel for diesel engine. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 68:1289–1293. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1057937
Jiang J, Junming XU, Song Z (2015) Review of the direct thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass for liquid fuels. Front Agric Sci Eng 2(1):13–27. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2015050
Joshi C, Nookaraju A (2012) New avenues of bioenergy production from plants: green alternatives to petroleum. J Petrol Environ Biotechnol 3(7). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7463.1000134
Kandiyoti R, Herod A, Bartle K, Morgan T (2017) Fossil fuels and renewables. Solid fuels and heavy hydrocarbon liquids, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–9. https://www.elsevier.com/books/solid-fuels-andheavy-hydrocarbon-liquids/kandiyoti/978-0-08-100784-6
Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 179(1):15–32
Kaur A, Chander R (2019) Valorization of rice straw for ethanol production and lignin recovery using combined acid-alkali pre-treatment. Bioenergy Res 12:570–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-09988-3
Kim HK, Parajuli PB, To SF (2013) Assessing impacts of bioenergy crops and climate change on hydrometeorology in the Yazoo River Basin, Mississippi. Agric Meteorol 169:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.007
Kim GV, Choi WY, Kang DH, Lee SY, Lee HY (2014) Enhancement of biodiesel production from marine alga, Scenedesmus sp. through in situ transesterification process associated with acidic catalyst. Biomed Res Int 2014:391542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/391542
Kumar S, Dheeran P, Singh SP, Mishra IM, Adhikari DK (2014) Bioprocessing for bagasse hydrolysate for ethanol and xylitol production using thermotolerant yeast. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1241-2
Kuzhiyil N, Dalluge BX, Kim KM, Brown RC (2012) Pyrolytic sugars from cellulosic biomass. ChemSusChem 5:2228–2236. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201200341
Laamanen CA, Ross GM, Scott JA (2016) Flotation harvesting of microalgae. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.293
Lardon L, Hélias A, Sialve B, Steyer JB, Bernard O (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6475–6481. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900705j
Leach G, Oliveira G, Morais R (1998) Spray-drying of Dunaliella salina to produce a b-carotene rich powder. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 20:82–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900485
Lee R, Lavoie JM (2013) From first- to third-generation biofuels: challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Anim Front 3:6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0010
Lee OK, Lee EY (2016) Sustainable production of bioethanol from renewable brown algae biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 92:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.038
Lemus R, Lal R (2007) Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910393
Li Y, Huang G (2010) Modeling municipal solid waste management system under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60(4):439–453
Limayem A, Ricke SC (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Progr Energy Combust Sci 38:449–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2012.03.002
Liu J, Zhu Y, Tao Y, Zhang Y, Li A, Li T (2013) Freshwater microalgae harvested via flocculation induced by pH decrease. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-98
Mamilla VR, Mallikarjun MV, Rao GLN (2011) Preparation of biodiesel from Karanja oil. Int J Energy Eng 1:94–100. https://doi.org/10.5963/IJEE0102008
Martin M, Pires RF, Alves MJ, Hori CE, Reis MHM, Cardoso VL (2013) Transesterification of soybean oil for biodiesel production using hydrotalcite as basic catalyst. Chem Eng Trans 32:817–822. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1332137
Mata TM, Martins A, Caetano NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020
McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3
Mohr SR (2013) Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second-generation biofuels. Energy Policy 63:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.033
Moller R, Toonen M, Van Beilen J, Salentijn E, Clayton D (2007) Crop platforms for cell wall biorefining: lignocellulose feedstocks, outputs from the EPOBIO project. CPL Press Science Publishers. https://Crop-Platforms-for-cell-wall-biorefining-lignocellulose-feedstocks.pdf
Munir N, Sharif N, Naz S, Saleem F, Manzoor F (2013) Harvesting and processing of microalgae biomass fractions for biodiesel production (a review). Sci Technol Dev 32:235–243. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259570048_Harvesting_and_processing_of_microalgae_biomass_fractions_for_biodiesel_production_a_review
Muthukumar A, Elayaraja S, Ajithkumar TT, Kumaresan S, Balasubramanian T (2012) Biodiesel production from marine microalgae Chlorella marina and Nannochloropsis salina. J Petrol Technol Altern Fuels 3:58–62. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPTAF12.010
Nascimento IA, Marques SSI, Cabanelas ITD, Pereira SA, Druzian JI, de Souza CO, Vich DV, deCarvalho GC, Nascimento MA (2013) Screening microalgae strains for biodiesel production: lipid productivity and estimation of fuel quality based on fatty acids profiles as selective criteria. Bioenergy Res 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9222-2
Nautiyal P, Subramanian KA, Dastidar MG (2014) Kinetic and thermodynamic studies on biodiesel production from Spirulina platensis algae biomass using single stage extraction-transesterification process. Fuel 135:228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.063
OECD-FAO (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Food and Agriculture Organization) (2017) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2017–2016. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.fao.org/3/I7465e/I7465e.pdf
Peng L, Chen Y (2011) Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1600–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.059
Prochazkova G, Safarik I, Branyik T (2013) Harvesting microalgae with microwave synthesized magnetic microparticles. Bioresour Technol 130:472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.060
Rajkumar R, Yaakob Z, Takriff MS (2014) Potential of the micro and macro algae for biofuel production: a brief review. Bioresources 9:1606–1633. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.1
Ras M, Lardon L, Bruno S, Bernet N, Steyer JP (2011) Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresour Technol 102:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146
Renewable Fuels Association (2015) Going global 2015 ethanol industry outlook, pp 1–5. https://ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ethanol-Industry-Outlook-2015.pdf
Richmond A (2004) Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology. Blackwell Science Ltd, Osney Mead
Rios-Badran IM, Luzardo-Ocampo I, Garcia-Trejo JF, Santos J, Gutierrez-Antonio C (2020) Production and characterization of fuel pellets from rice husk and wheat straw. Renew Energy 145:500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.048
Rossignol N, Vandanjon L, Jaoue P, Quemeneur F (1999) Membrane technology for the continuous separation of microalgae/culture medium: compared performances of cross-flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration. Aquac Eng 20:191–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8609(99)00018-7
Saha BC (2003) Hemicellulose bioconversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-003-0049-x
Saqib A, Tabbssum MR, Rashid U, Ibrahim M, Gill SS, Mehmood MA (2013) Marine macroalgae Ulva: a potential feed-stock for bioethanol and biogas production. Asian J Agric Biol 1:155–163. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256836825_Marine_macro_algae_Ulva_A_potential_feed-stock_for_bio-ethanol_and_biogas_production
Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K (2012) Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew Energy 37:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.045
Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong FX, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu TH (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861
Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.87
Suganya T, Varman M, Masjuki HH, Renganathan S (2016) Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: a biorefinery approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:909–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026
Sukumaran RK, Singhania R, Mathew GM, Pandey A (2008) Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renew Energy 34:421–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.008
Susilaningsih D, Djohan AC, Widyaningrum DN, Anam K (2009) Biodiesel from indigenous Indonesian marine microalgae Nanochloropsis sp. J Biotechnol Res Trop Reg 2:1–4. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dwi-Susilaningsih/publication/242763540_Biodiesel_from_indigenous_Indonesian_marine_microalgae_Nanochloropsis_sp/links/568c812908aeb488ea2fd892/Biodiesel-from-indigenous-Indonesian-marine-microalgae-Nanochloropsis-sp.pdf
Takano M, Hoshino K (2018) Bioethanol production from rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with statistical optimized cellulase cocktail and fermenting fungus. Bioresour Bioprocess 5:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-018-0203-y
Tsegaye B, Balomajumder C, Roy P (2019) Alkali delignification and Bacillus sp. BMP01 hydrolysis of rice straw for enhancing biofuel yields. Bull Natl Res Cent 43:136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0175-x
Van Dyk JS, Pletschke BI (2012) A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergist cooperation between enzymes—factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol Adv 30:1458–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.002
Vidal BC, Dien BS, Ting KC, Singh V (2011) Influence of feedstock particle size on lignocellulose conversion—a review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 164(8):1405–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.002
Volynets B, Dahman Y (2011) Assessment of pretreatments and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw as a sugar source for bioprocess industry. Int J Energy Environ 2(3):427–446. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49619467_Assessment_of_pretreatments_and_enzymatic_hydrolysis_of_wheat_straw_as_a_sugar_source_for_bioprocess_industry
Wang L, Sharifzadeh M, Templer R, Murphy RJ (2012) Technology performance and economic feasibility of bioethanol production from various waste papers. Energy Environ Sci 5:5717–5730. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee02935a
Wang F, Ouyanga D, Zhou Z, Page SJ, Liu D, Zhao X (2021) Lignocellulosic biomass as sustainable feedstock and materials for power generation and energy storage. J Energy Chem 57:247–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.060
Widjaja A, Chien CC, Ju YH (2009) Study of increasing lipid production from fresh water microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 40:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2008.07.007
Williams PJLB, Laurens LML (2010) Microalgae as biodiesel and biomass feedstocks: review and analysis of the biochemistry, energetics and economics. Energy Environ Sci 3:554–590. https://doi.org/10.1039/b924978h
Yadav P, Priyanka P, Kumar D, Yadav K (2019) Bioenergy crops: recent advances and future outlook. In: Rastegari AA, et al. (ed) Prospects of renewable bioprocessing in future energy systems, biofuel and biorefinery technologies, pp 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14463-0_12
Yamashita Y, Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Nakamura Y (2008) Ethanol production from paper sludge by immobilized Zymomonas mobilis. Biochem Eng J 42:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2008.07.013
Yen HW, Brune DE (2007) Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresour Technol 98:130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.010
Zhang Y, Percival H (2008) Reviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6
Zhang J, Cai D, Qin Y, Liu D, Zhao X (2019) High value-added monomer chemicals and functional bio-based materials derived from polymeric components of lignocellulose by organosolv fractionation. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 14(1867):371–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2057
Zhong W, Zhang Z, Luo Y, Qiao W, Xiao M, Zhang M (2012) Biogas productivity by co-digesting Taihu blue algae with corn straw as an external carbon source. Bioresour Technol 114:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anand, S., Kaur, J., Sarao, L.K., Singh, A. (2023). Agricultural Residues and Manures into Bioenergy. In: Srivastava, N., Verma, B., Mishra, P. (eds) Agroindustrial Waste for Green Fuel Application. Clean Energy Production Technologies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6230-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6230-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-6229-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-6230-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)