Abstract
In the twenty-first century, the growing demands of a modernized and growing population have led to the rapid expansion of agricultural and industrial sectors around the world. This expansion leads to produce a massive amount of biomass materials and various organic and inorganic pollutants. Biochar has promising potential in tackling such global concerns and can serve as a low-cost adsorbent for accomplishing sustainable development goals (SDGs). Biochar, a carbon-rich solid product, can be obtained by slow pyrolysis of biomass under an oxygen-limited atmosphere. Produced biochar can be used as an adsorbent to remove organic and in-organic pollutants from groundwater and industrial wastewater. However, biochar has a lower surface area and limited surface functional groups, which results in lower adsorption capacity. Hence, activation is required. Apart from adsorbent biochar is also used as a soil additive to sequestrate carbon to mitigate climate change and enhance its fertility and water retention capability hence lowering the frequency of irrigation in the field. In this chapter, the fundamentals of slow pyrolysis, its process parameters, product yield distribution, and various application of biochar will be discussed in detail.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
8.1 Introduction
The world’s food, water, and energy demand are increasing rapidly as the global population increases. Large amounts of biomass waste (crop residues, forest residues, organic) are generated daily due to high living standards and economic development. Globally, the approximately 140 Gigaton biomass waste generated and managing such a huge amount of waste is a great challenge. Most of the biomass waste is discarded and open burning in the field, which negatively impacts the environment (Tripathi et al. 2019; Goswami et al. 2020a; Agrawal and Verma 2022). The conversion of biomass waste to biochar through pyrolysis is a feasible solution and creates value addition in society.
Biochar is a “carbon-rich solid product” formed by pyrolyzing biomass at high temperatures (300–600 °C) in an inert environment (Sakhiya et al. 2020; Goswami et al. 2020b, 2021). Biochar can be used for a variety of energy and environmental purposes, including clean solid fuel, fuel cells, catalysts, soil amendments, composting additives, groundwater and wastewater purification, air purification, carbon sequestration, hydrogen storage, etc. (Dillon and Heben 2001; Sakhiya et al. 2021a, b; Baghel et al. 2022). The pyrolysis product yield distribution is influenced by a variety of factors, including pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, residence time, and particle size. Presently, biochar is used as an economical adsorbent for removing organic (PAHs, pesticides, dye, surfactants, pharmaceutical) and inorganic (heavy metals such as As, Ni, Pb, Zn, and Cu) contaminants from groundwater and wastewater (Cha et al. 2016). Moreover, biochar has a good water holding capacity and nutrient retention capacity, improving agriculture sustainability and product yield. Biochar produced from agricultural waste and used in the soil can return the nutrients and develop a circular economy (Zhou et al. 2021).
However, there are certain limitations to using biochar as an adsorbent and other environmental application due to cation exchange capacity, limited surface functional groups, low porosity, and surface area. The activation is a process that improves the physicochemical properties of biochar using different activation agents and heating in the temperature range of 500–900 °C. According to the report “Global Activated Carbon Market Forecast & Opportunities 2017,” demand for activated carbon is predicted to grow at a rate of higher than 10% per year for the next half-decade, reaching a market value of 3 billion dollars by 2025 (Park et al. 2013). The sustainable utilization of biomass to produce bioenergy and activated charcoal would not only assist in alleviating the environmental issues due to coal mining but also cuts down the price of producing efficient sorbents.
This chapter describes the biochar production through the pyrolysis, types of pyrolysis process, parameters influencing the pyrolysis. Activation of biochar via physical and chemical activation is also discussed in detail. Additionally, biochar has a wide array of uses such as solid fuel, catalyst, the adsorbent in water purification, additives in composting, and hydrogen storage were described in detail.
8.2 Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis is a thermochemical conversion technology in which biomass is thermally heated at elevated temperature and produced three different products: biochar, bio-oil, and gas. In addition to its efficacy, pyrolysis produces multi-products compared to other thermochemical conversion processes (Tripathi et al. 2016).
8.2.1 Physics of Pyrolysis
In the pyrolysis process, organic material is thermally decomposed under an oxygen-limited environment. It’s a particularly complicated process with a lot of various reactions in the reacting zone. Biomass contains three major constitutes, including hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin (Kumar and Verma 2021a, b). The heating of biomass, biomolecules of hemicellulose, and cellulose break down in the form of volatile matter and produce bio-oil by condensation. The heating of biomass under an oxygen-limited environment allows a rise in temperature greater than its limit thermal stability and produces a more stable solid product called biochar.
The pyrolysis process mainly consists of two steps, i.e., primary and secondary pyrolysis. During primary pyrolysis, heat causes biomass molecules to cleave and devolatilize, forming numerous functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and carbonyl. The process of devolatilization takes place by dehydration of biomass, followed by decarboxylation and dehydrogenation. Secondary pyrolysis begins after the completion of the primary pyrolysis process in which heavy hydrocarbon breakdown into condensable (bio-oil) and non-condensable gases (CO, CO2, H2, and CH4). The cracking of heavy hydrocarbon compounds can be presented by the following reaction (Tripathi et al. 2016):
Where the initial part of the products in the reaction represents the non-condensable gases, the later part represents the mixture of condensable gases, and the last part is the char yield.
8.2.2 Types of the Pyrolysis Process
The process parameters help in classifying the pyrolysis process into four categories: slow, fast, flash, and intermediate. Each type has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The basic characteristics of each type of pyrolysis and the operating parameters are discussed in the following section. Table 8.1 represents the types of pyrolysis processes based on operating conditions.
8.2.2.1 Slow Pyrolysis
It is a conventional method and widely used to produce charcoal in history and characterized by a modest heating rate and a prolonged residence time. It is generally carried out from 400–600 °C to get higher biochar yield with a small amount of condensed bio-oil and non-condensable gases such as CO2, CO, CH4, and hydrocarbons (C1–C2) (Al Arni 2018). The slow pyrolysis is characterized by longer residence time (>60 min), lower heating rate (0.1–1.0 °C/min), a particle size of 5–50 mm, and performed at ambient pressure. The longer residence time provides an appropriate atmosphere and time to complete the secondary pyrolysis reaction. Additionally, a longer vapor residence time permits vapors formed during the secondary reaction to be evacuated, which results in higher biochar yield. Biomass with larger particle size, high lignin content, and lower ash content is best suited for the production of biochar (Demirbas 2004).
8.2.2.2 Fast Pyrolysis
Fast pyrolysis is mainly used to produce the bio-oil (yield >50%). Biochar and gas yields are overshadowed by bio-oil production. It has a high heating rate as compared to slow pyrolysis. Fast pyrolysis is mainly performed within the temperature of 850–1200 °C, with a heating rate ranging from 10–200 °C/min, the particle size of <1 mm, and residence time less than 10 s (Greenhalf et al. 2013). Different reactor designs are utilized for fast pyrolysis, including rotating cones, bubbling fluidized beds, circulating beds, ablative reactors, etc. The main objective of fast pyrolysis is to raise the temperature of the feedstock to a point where thermal cracking takes place while decreasing the exposure time, which promotes biochar formation. The bio-oil produced through fast pyrolysis is corrosive because of its low pH value. Moreover, bio-oil contains a high amount of water fraction, which lowers its heating value. As a result, before using bio-oil, it must be upgraded (Xu and Etcheverry 2008).
8.2.2.3 Flash Pyrolysis
Flash or rapid pyrolysis is a modified variant of fast pyrolysis and is characterized by a high heating rate, shorter residence time, and extreme reaction temperature. Rapid is carried out at a heating rate > 1000 °C/min and a short residence time of 1–10 s (Demirbaş and Arin 2002). Such an extreme condition is arranged in flash pyrolysis to obtain a high bio-oil yield with lower water fraction and biomass conversion efficiency of up to 70%. In flash pyrolysis, heat and mass transfer processes, chemical-reactions kinetics, and biomass transition phase behavior play a significant role in product yield distribution.
The most difficult aspect of implementing this pyrolysis on a large scale is designing a reactor in which the input biomass can be heated at an extreme heating rate for a short residence time. A major issue is the stability and quality of the bio-oil as it is heavily influenced by the presence of biochar in the product. The presence of biochar in bio-oil leads to catalysis of the polymerization reaction, resulting in a higher viscosity of bio-oil (Tripathi et al. 2016).
8.2.2.4 Intermediate Pyrolysis
Intermediate pyrolysis is usually carried out to achieve the balance of product yield between fast pyrolysis and slow pyrolysis. It has a decent product yield distribution, and therefore, it can be used in the co-production of biochar, bio-oil, and gas. The process conditions of this pyrolysis lie between fast and slow pyrolysis. The pyrolysis is carried out in the temperature range of 400–650 °C with a heating rate of 1–10 °C/min and residence time of 15–20 min. The advantages of the conditions in intermediate pyrolysis are that they prevent the development of high molecular tar compounds with excellent quality bio-oil and generate dry biochar which is appropriate for soil amendment and bio-energy production (Kazawadi et al. 2021). The bio-oil produced through this pyrolysis can be used in engines and boilers directly because it does not have a high amount of reactive tar. This is a significant benefit of intermediate pyrolysis over fast pyrolysis (Mahmood et al. 2013).
8.3 Effects of Process Parameters
8.3.1 Process Temperature
Temperature is the most crucial element to control the reaction process, and it directly influences the biochar physicochemical properties and yield. The increment in pyrolysis temperature negatively impacts biochar yield because it facilitates the thermal cracking of heavy hydrocarbon compounds leading to a rise in liquid and gas yield (Ahmad et al. 2014). Biochar developed in the primary pyrolysis reaction takes part in the secondary reactions and enhances the bio-oil and gas yield at the expense of biochar. Hence, a lower pyrolysis temperature is suitable for higher biochar yield. Moreover, biochar has a graphene-like structure when it is produced above the 300 °C temperature. Graphene holds a flat-polyaromatic and monolayer carbon structure, high electrical conductivity, and stability index. Additionally, biochar produced at higher temperatures enhances physicochemical properties such as pH, surface functional groups, and BET surface area (Wu et al. 2012). Biochar produced at higher temperatures can also have high aromaticity and recalcitrant carbon fractions in biochar which improves the stability.
8.3.2 Heating Rate
In biomass pyrolysis, the heating rate affects the product yield and physicochemical properties to some extent. The pyrolysis process is mainly classified based on the heating rates. The process with a lower heating rate can minimize the secondary pyrolysis reaction and hence, it confirms that no thermal cracking arises, resulting in higher biochar yield. In contrast, higher heating rates promote the fragmentation of feedstock and increased the bio-oil and gas yield by restraining the possibility of char formation. The higher heating rate also enhances the depolymerization of lignocellulosic constitutes into primary volatile compounds, which reduces the biochar yield (Tripathi et al. 2016).
Dilek Angin performed the pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake for biochar production by altering the heating rates (10–50 °C/min) (Angin 2013). It was noticed that as the heating rate increased the biochar yield decreased. Similar results were observed in the literature (Ateş et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2017; Zhao et al. 2018).
8.3.3 Residence Time
Residence time has a crucial part in the minimalism of the product yield distribution, product properties, reaction mechanism, and product quality. The biochar production can be carried out at various scales of residence time ranging from a few minutes to several days. Low temperature combined with longer solid residence time is suitable for char production (Cha et al. 2016). The higher residence time supports the depolymerization of lignocellulose composition by offering them adequate reaction time. In contrast, lower residence time in the pyrolysis process minimizes the depolymerization reaction, which results in lower biochar yield (Park et al. 2008).
Residence time influences the char yield and the characteristic and physicochemical properties of biochar such as surface area, micro- and macropore development, and surface functional groups. It was reported that longer residence time in biomass pyrolysis enlarged the pore size (Tay et al. 2009). Pyrolysis temperature, particle size, heating rate, and other variables frequently govern the influence of holding time. This makes it difficult to give a clear picture of the role of residence time in the development of biochar.
8.3.4 Particle Size
Particle size is also one of the essential factors in the biomass pyrolysis process as it controls the reaction rate and heat transfer rate. The heat transfer rate of input feedstock decreased from the outer surface to the core of the material by increasing the particle size, which results in higher biochar yield (Encinar et al. 2000). Additionally, when particle size increases, the vapor released during the thermal breakdown of feedstock travels a greater distance inside the biochar layer, which triggers secondary pyrolysis and leads to an increase in biochar yield.
Hong et al. (2020) studied the effect of temperature and particle size on biochar yield using various agriculture waste. The biochar yield increased with increasing the particle size (Hong et al. 2020). Demirbas also studied the influence of particle size on char yield through pyrolysis of agriculture waste. It was observed that char yield improved from 19.3 to 35.7% for olive husk and 5.6–16.7% for corncob by rising particle size from 0.5 mm to 2.2 mm (Ayhan Demirbas 2004).
8.4 Biochar Activation
8.4.1 Physical Activation
In physical activation, biochar produced thermochemically from biomass is processed with activities such as steam, CO2, and air/O2 at a temperature range of 700–900 °C. Biochar porosity increases in an oxidizing environment at an elevated temperature during the activation process. Activation increases the surface area and pore size of biochar, which improves its adsorption capacities. The oxidizing agents penetrate the biochar layers and gasify the carbon atoms, causing inaccessible pores to expand and open (Tripathi et al. 2016). Unlike air activation, steam and carbon interaction is an endothermic reaction, making it simpler to curb (Demirbas 2009). Activation temperature, degree of activation, biomass feedstock, and activation agent strongly controls the physical activation. The generic trendline observed in the literature shows that with the increase in process temperature and time, porosity growth enhances. Moreover, this leads to an increase in pore size distribution. Using the air as an activation agent shifts the reaction in the direction of combustion because of the synergistic effect of air and biochar. An unregulated reaction can cause excessive ash formation and reduced activated carbon yield (Dawson et al. 2003). Tables 8.2 and 8.3 show the mechanism of the activation agent and the effect of the activation agent on biochar BET surface area, respectively.
8.4.2 Chemical Activation
The biochar is doped with a different chemical agent to improve its physicochemical characteristics including surface area, pore volume, and fictional groups. The functional group, pore volume, and the surface area are changed according to the impregnation ratio of the chemical agent. The chemical activation of biochar generally takes place within the temperature range of 450–900 °C (Sakhiya et al. 2020). This activation of biochar is broadly classified into two categories: single-step and multi-step chemical activation. The chemical activation mechanism is ambiguous in comparison to physical activation. Mainly two types of reactions occurred on the surface of biochar during the chemical activation, i.e., dehydration and oxidation. The main advantages of chemical activation in comparison to physical activation are greater carbon yield, low temperature, high surface area, high porosity structure, and high efficiency. Chemical agents also suppress tar formation. Over a long period, the corrosion and depletion of equipment take place due to the corrosive nature of chemical agents, which is the major limitation of chemical activation. Even at high temperature, the corrosion increases and more rapidly harm the equipment. After chemical completion of activation, washing of biochar is mandatory which makes the process costlier as compared to physical activation.
There are different types of chemical activation methods available in the literature according to the desired application. If oxidation of surface functional group required acidic chemical agents were used (nitric, hydrochloric, phosphoric acids, hydrogen peroxide). Similarly, if basic modification is required NaOH and KOH agents are used for activation. Different modifications of biochar such as sulfonation, amination, and impregnation of various metals (FeCl3, ZnCl2, MgO, CaO, ZnO, etc.) were also used (Sajjadi et al. 2019). Among the above listed chemical agents, the KOH is more suitable for activation due to lower process temperature, higher surface area (up to 3000 m2/g), high product yield, and superior microporous structure (Li et al. 2020). The CH3COOK is a non-toxic chemical agent and can be used for biochar activation. Sakhiya et al. (2021b) studied the comparative study of steam and CH3COOK-activated biochar for heavy metal adsorption. Results indicated that CH3COOK-activated biochar had a higher surface area and adsorption capacity in comparison to the steam-activated biochar (Sakhiya et al. 2021b).
8.5 Biochar Applications
Biochar, a low-cost carbonaceous material has a stable carbon matrix capable of retaining materials such as water, air, organic compounds, and metals. Biochar has specific thermal and electrical properties that are still being investigated. With so many different characteristics, biochar is an efficient, eco-friendly, cost-effective alternative with a wide range of applications (Schmidt and Wilson 2014). Figure 8.1 shows the various applications where biochar can be used as a substantial alternative.
8.5.1 Biochar as an Absorbent
Biochar has emerged as a cost-effective alternative to other carbonaceous materials for removing various inorganic and organic pollutants from gaseous, aqueous, and solid phases, including heavy metals, aromatic dyes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phenols, and antibiotics (Oliveira et al. 2017).
8.5.1.1 Biochar for Wastewater Treatment
Large volumes of wastewater effluent containing hazardous chemicals are generated by industries and are routinely deposited into adjoining environmental water sources, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, effluents must be treated before discharge to remove contaminants in order to safeguard the aquatic ecosystem and human health (Singh et al. 2020a, b). The global population is rising by 80 million citizens each year, causing a need for safe drinking water of around 64 billion cubic meters; the world must focus on creating methods for a safe water supply (Alam et al. 2014).
Some traditional wastewater treatment techniques necessitate the use of dangerous chemicals, which are both expensive and harmful to the environment (Khin et al. 2012). These processes often affect the environment by producing toxic and non-eco-friendly end products with considerable initial and ongoing capital costs (Singh et al. 2020a, b). The most used wastewater treatment processes are adsorption, reverse osmosis (RO), and membrane filtering. These processes have drawbacks such as membrane deformation, high operational costs, complex instrument handling, the development of undesirable sludge, and other disposal issues. As a result, an alternative, improved, substantial, and cost-efficient wastewater treatment technique is required.
Economically and environmentally sustainable wastewater remediation setups are based on biomass’s highly efficient and ecologically sustainable materials. Biochar has specific characteristics such as high porosity, large surface area, and holding water for a longer time making it a suitable substitute for wastewater treatment (Yargicoglu et al. 2015). This section of the chapter emphasizes biochar’s potential to remove undesired and hazardous species such as organic contaminants and heavy metals from wastewater. Figure 8.2 demonstrates the adsorption mechanism of heavy metals and organic compounds onto biochar’s surface.
8.5.1.1.1 Biochar for Heavy Metal Removal
Heavy metals in wastewater have the ability to cause damage to the environment. Even at minor concentrations, long-term exposure to heavy metals can cause major health concerns. (Ahmed et al. 2016; Sakhiya et al. 2022). According to recent research, biochar generated from plant wastes and animal manure can effectively absorb heavy metals from waste and drinking water (Dai et al. 2017; Higashikawa et al. 2016; Tan et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2017).
The functional groups such as OH and −COOH on the surface of biochar show a strong affinity towards heavy metals. The π conjugate aromatic structure of biochar allows it to change negative charge in π-orbital, resulting in losing electrons of a functional group more efficiently, and adsorption becomes more significant (Wang et al. 2018). Samsuri et al. (2014) showed that the polarity index, functional groups containing oxygen or O/C molar ratio has an important role in the heavy metal adsorption process (Samsuri et al. 2014).
Arsenic is found in both wastewater and drinking water and is highly toxic. Van Vinh et al. (2015) impregnated Zn(NO3)2 over biochar, and the results revealed an increase in adsorption capacity of As3+ from 5.7 to 7.0 mg/g (Van Vinh et al. 2015). Furthermore, fresh and dehydrated banana peels biochar was used to remove Pb2+ from wastewater, removal efficiencies obtained were of 359 mg/g and 193 mg/g, respectively (Zhou et al. 2017). Higashikawa et al. (2016) studied the effect of pyrolysis temperature on Cd2+ adsorption using a mixture of biochar derived from rice husk, sugarcane straw, chicken manure, and sawdust. Rising the pyrolysis temperature from 350 to 650 °C increases the percentage of Cd2+ removed (Higashikawa et al. 2016).
8.5.1.1.2 Removal of Organic Pollutants
Organic contaminants are widespread in wastewater. Dyes, phenols, PAHs, and antibiotics have recently gained high attention due to their complex aromatic structure, high toxicity, and biodegradable resistances in the environment.
Globally, the textile sector is estimated to be worth $1 trillion, accounting for approximately 7% of total global exports and engaging roughly 35 million people (Desore and Narula 2018). The water pollution caused by the textile industry has a significant impact on the environment. According to the literature, biochar application can be an economical and environment-friendly solution to remove dyes from the aqueous solutions with more than 80% efficiency (Srivatsav et al. 2020). Various operational factors (such as temperature, solution’s pH, biochar dosage, and concentration of dye) have a critical role in altering the adsorption of dye using biochar (Chu et al. 2020; Mahmoud et al. 2020; Park et al. 2019). Experiments were conducted to determine the threshold pH values, and the findings revealed that biochar could withstand pH levels as low as 2 and as high as 11. Despite this, removal efficiencies were higher than 80% (Srivatsav et al. 2020). Fan et al. (2017) used BC prepared from municipal sludge to extract methylene blue (MB), accurately represented by a pseudo-second-order model, and had a removal efficiency of up to 100% (Fan et al. 2017).
Furthermore, after three cycles, the clearance rate of MB has remained at 60%. The adsorption capacity increased with increasing pH throughout the adsorption phase is attributed to electrostatic interaction. Furthermore, Si–O–Si on BC can offer adsorption sites and interact with MB’s functional group containing nitrogen. Moreover, MB can create a hydrogen bond with BC’s hydrogen. Kelm et al. (2019) studied the performance of biochar derived from wood residues for adsorption of Indosol Black NF1200 dye and results indicated that at low pH values, biochar could be an efficient adsorbent for azo dyes removal from textile industries (Kelm et al. 2019).
Phenols are being widely used at an industrial scale, which leads to the release of phenolic pollutants in industrial wastewater (Mohammadi et al. 2015). PAHs are also released from various industries and are toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and persistent. Phenols and PAHs have a complex aromatic structure, making them biodegradation resistant (Busca et al. 2008), thus emerging the need to remove these pollutants before moving into the aquatic system. Biochar is used to remove PAHs and phenols from aqueous solutions due to its high adsorptive ability. Various factors such as surface area, adsorbent and adsorbate concentrations, pore-volume, and size affect the adsorption of phenols and PAHs on biochar.
Recently, Chandola et al. (2021) conducted a study for removing phenols from aqueous solutions using biochar produced at different temperatures from Araucaria columnaris bark (ACB), 100% phenol removal was achieved with the biochar produced at a temperature of 500 °C (Chandola et al. 2021). A study showed that 57% of PAHs dissolved in sewage sludge can be removed using biochar (Oleszczuk et al. 2012). A review by Lamichhane et al. (2016) stated that more than 98% adsorption capacity could be achieved using biochar as adsorbent for PAHs removal (Lamichhane et al. 2016).
Antibiotic contamination and the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms are significant environmental concerns across the world. Given the rising use of antibiotics, reducing their presence in the environment is critical (Krasucka et al. 2021).
Peng et al. (2016) studied the use of biochar for the adsorption of seven antibiotics in an environmental concentration of aqueous solutions. A significant amount of antibiotics were removed, and the adsorption energy increased significantly using the density functional theory (DFT) as the number of rings increased, showing the relevance of π–π interactions in the adsorption process (Peng et al. 2016). Peiris et al. (2017) studied the removal of Sulfonamides (SA) and Tetracycline (TC) using biochar and investigated the adsorption mechanism in detail. Electron donor–acceptor interactions of electron-withdrawing compounds with surface aromatic rings are the most common adsorption mechanism (Peiris et al. 2017). Fan et al. (2017) pyrolyzed rice straw at different temperatures to examine if BC could remove common antibiotics like TC. Due to its wide specific surface area and porosity, BC produced at a higher temperature showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 50.72 mg/g (Fan et al. 2017). Table 8.4 shows literature on biochar applications for removing heavy metals, PAHs, phenols, dyes, antibiotic pollutants.
8.5.1.2 Biochar for Air Purification
When gaseous chemical pollutants are released into the atmosphere, they cause serious human health and environmental threats; hence, we need to prevent their emissions. Fabric filters, electrostatic precipitators, and activated carbon injections are the few techniques used to reduce the emission of toxic gaseous contaminants in the environment (Yang et al. 2018). The high maintenance and installation costs of these techniques limit their application on a large scale. According to recent research, biochar can also remediate gaseous pollutants (Bamdad et al. 2018). Biochar derived from palm kernel, eucalyptus wood, cotton stalk, and pine efficiently removed CO2 with adsorption capacity ranging from 3.22 mmol/g to 7.32 mmol/g (Chatterjee et al. 2018; Heidari et al. 2014; Nasri et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2014). Similarly, the H2S removal efficiency of more than 95% was achieved using biochar derived from various feedstocks (Bhandari et al. 2014; Das et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2017). Alkali medium is favorable for achieving high H2S adsorption. The interaction with biochar’s surface functional groups COOH and OH is responsible for H2S adsorption (Shang et al. 2013). Table 8.5 shows the various recent studies which used biochar for removing toxic gaseous contaminants removal.
Biochar is also used as an adsorbent for the remediation of pollutants from soil. Since it is a very vast application, it has been reviewed in detail in the next section.
8.5.2 Biochar as a Soil Amendment
Various studies have recommended biochar as an efficient soil additive in agricultural soils. Biochar application improves soil aggregate stability and enhances its capacity to hold water for a more extended period by improving its pore characteristics, surface area, particle, and bulk density. The kind of soil and its texture also plays an important role. Biochar amendment effects are more noticeable in soil having high sand-sized particles than in soil rich in clay (Blanco-Canqui 2017; Kavitha et al. 2018).
Biochar addition to soil affects its physicochemical parameters such as surface area, tensile strength, pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and water-holding capacity, which have a direct impact on plant growth (Chan et al. 2008; Lehmann and Rondon 2006; Zong et al. 2014). Various studies showed that biochar addition improves plant growth by facilitating the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) biochemical cycle (Chan et al. 2008; Gul and Whalen 2016) and influencing soil microbial activities. The elements such as carbon (C), hydrogen (H), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), N, P, and K present in biochar (Zhang et al. 2015) supply nutrients to plants for sustainable growth. Biochar decomposes slowly in soil due to its long residence life of about 3000 years. Yuan and Xu showed that factors such as biochar’s alkalinity, functional groups present on its surface, and strong pH buffering capacity help to regulate soil acidity (Yuan and Xu 2011).
Biochar amendment improves the nutrient cycle of a plant. A review by Tesfaye et al. (2021) showed a significant impact of biochar soil amendment (BSA) on plant P uptake and soil available P by 55% and 65%, respectively (Tesfaye et al. 2021). Scheifele et al. (2017) reported an increase in nodule dry matter and biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) by 1.8 and 1.2 folds, respectively, in soybean plants with the amendment of maize and wood biochar (Scheifele et al. 2017).
Biochar having a large surface area and pore volume has been an excellent means to remove heavy metals present in polluted soil (Ahmad et al. 2018). The soil amendment using biochar improves soil pore fraction, which provides more space for microorganisms to grow, and N, P, Ca, and K present in biochar provides nutrients for plant growth (Sakhiya et al. 2020). On the other hand, Warnock et al. (2007) examined the effect of BSA on microorganisms present in the soil. BSA results in a reduction in overall microbial biomass (Warnock et al. 2007). Few recent studies of remediations of various contaminants from soil using biochar have been mentioned in Table 8.6.
8.5.3 Biochar as a Catalyst
Biochar having high surface area and specific surface functional groups can be prepared by functionalization or activation. Biochar has plenty of potentials to be utilized as a flexible catalyst or catalytic assist in various chemical processes because of its unique chemical structure. Biochar can be utilized as a catalyst in biogas upgrading, biodiesel production, improved syngas production, biomass conversion to chemicals and biofuels, de-NOx processes, and microbial fuel cell electrodes (Cao et al. 2017; Lee et al. 2017). The biochar properties are enhanced by activation or functionalization procedure for being used as a catalyst. The biochar’s physicochemical characteristics, mainly its specific surface area, pore-volume, and pore size distribution, can be enhanced to various degrees depending on the activation techniques used (Cao et al. 2017). According to a study by Do Minh et al. (2020), the electrical and chemical configuration of biochar, when correctly controlled, makes it a great photo-, electro-, and chemo-catalyst that might even be used in modern applications. Biochar can be used in combined catalysis with other phases due to its unique characteristics of semiconductivity (Do Minh et al. 2020).
Zhu et al. (2015) prepared chemically and physically activated biochar from rice husk. The evaluation of the biochar characteristics indicated that it could be employed as catalytic support. In methane catalysis, the activated biochar-assisted Ru (Ru/ABC) catalyst excelled or was equivalent to the standard AC-assisted Ru catalyst. Under the optimum reaction conditions, 98% of CH4 selectivity was achieved and 100% CO conversion (Zhu et al. 2015).
8.5.4 Biochar as an Alternative to Fuel
Biomass has enormous potential as a fuel source and a source of both thermal and electrical energy. Because of the limited reserves of conventional energy resources, lignocellulosic biomass is becoming the central focus of the modern period, which does not need any energy storage systems (Kumar et al. 2020b, c). Biochar is typically high in carbon and can be a pollution-free solid biofuel (Kane et al. 2016).
The high moisture content, bulkiness, low energy density, hygroscopic nature, and high transportation cost in various cases are certain drawbacks of raw biomass when utilized as a fuel (Abdullah and Wu 2009; Tsai et al. 2007), making it unsuitable for a variety of industrial applications. On the other hand, because of their biodegradability, environmental friendliness, and long-term viability, these organic materials have emerged as a leading contender for biofuels and bioenergy production. Pyrolyzing biomass at high temperatures to various value-added and energy-rich products is a preferable solution. Biochar, which has entirely different characteristics than the respective feedstock, has the potential to make significant and long-term improvements in guaranteeing a future supply of green energy and turning bioenergy into a carbon-negative sector (Kwapinski et al. 2010). Many studies have been carried out on producing biochar from various agro-residues for being used in fuel applications. Biochar’s heating value (16–35 MJ/kg) is equivalent to, or nearly twice the raw biomass and many low-grade coals heating value for any given feedstock (Mullen et al. 2010; Sukiran et al. 2011). Around three billion people worldwide rely on conventional stoves, for example, three stone and open fires, to meet their cooking needs. These cookstoves emit hazardous fumes and are responsible for four million fatalities per year (Sakhiya et al. 2020). Biochar-fired cookstoves can minimize carbon and few other hazardous gas emissions in cookstoves when used for heat and cooking (Birzer et al. 2014). Compared to an open cooking fire, biochar stoves lowered particulate matter emissions by 92% and carbon monoxide emissions by 87% in laboratory tests (Schultz 2013).
8.5.5 Biochar as an Additive
8.5.5.1 Biochar Used as an Additive in the Construction Sector
In recent years, the spread of industry and urbanization has heightened the need for concrete for building purposes. The building industry, especially the cement industry, has been identified as one of the significant contributors to CO2 emissions, accounting for around 7% of all GHG emitted into the atmosphere (Andrew 2018; Benhelal et al. 2013; Gupta et al. 2018). As a result, rising importance for developing greener solutions to decrease the company’s carbon footprint and raw material usage (Miller et al. 2018). Several researchers have utilized biochar as an eco-friendly filler in cement manufacture and cement-based construction products to reduce carbon emissions. Biochar has poor heat conductivity, excellent chemical stability, low flammability, and conductivity, making it a suitable candidate for construction material and a filler in cement mortar products (Gupta and Kua 2017). Suarez-Riera et al. (2020) utilized biochar microparticles as a filler and a replacement for cement powder in cement paste and mortar composites. The results indicated that 2 wt% biochar fragments are adequate to improve the strength and resilience of cement and mortar mixtures. When used instead of cement, mechanical properties equivalent to the reference samples were achieved (Suarez-Riera et al. 2020). Another research uses biochar made from wood, food waste, and rice as a carbon-sequestering additive in mortar, attaining comparable mechanical strength results by adding 1–2 wt% biochar to the control mix.
Gupta and Kua (2019) also discovered that adding finer biochar particles at the start guarantees an increment in early strength and water tightness when utilized in cement mortar fusions. It was reported that timber waste biochar can be utilized as a filler material in concrete structures to improve strength and moisture resistance (Gupta and Kua 2019).
Poor thermal conductivity, directly impacted by the availability of broad arrays of pores on biochar, depends mainly on the process temperature and biochar’s feedstock (Brewer et al. 2014). Extraction of oxygen functional group from the biochar’s surface reduces the energy sites, forming the biochar to cause less hazardous reactions when blended with concrete mixes (Cross and Sohi 2013).
8.5.5.2 Biochar as an Additive in Composting
The swift development of humans and lifestyle changes have caused high waste creation. Furthermore, the animal farm business is expanding, posing its own set of problems. Biochar production involves transforming biodegradable carbon (biomass) into aromatic carbon (biochar), which is less degradable. Therefore, along with waste management, biochar production has an additional quirk of being an atmospheric carbon sequestration technique. Composting also promotes a more orderly breakdown of organic waste materials biologically and physicochemically. An integrated technique employing biochar in composting reduces ecological concern throughout the waste treatment process by decreasing harmful chemical leaching and emission (e.g., heavy metals, H2S, NH3) as well as pathogen levels (Antonangelo et al. 2021).
Biochar has several advantages as a compost addition, including boosting composting and humification performance, promoting microbiological activities, lowering GHG and NH4 emissions, and immobilizing heavy metals and organic contaminants (Guo et al. 2020). Various studies showed that biochar helps reduce nitrogen losses (Awasthi et al. 2018), as compounds like NH3 and NH4 are adsorbed by biochar (Janczak et al. 2017). The temperature goes up quicker in the course of the composting process in the presence of biochar, and the thermophilic phase lasts longer. When biochar is added at the beginning of the composting process, it enhances the water holding capacity (WHC), assuring that most composts have the required moisture content of 50–60% w/w. The carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratios of various feedstock-derived biochar and composts vary, which has a direct impact on the rate of organic matter (OM) breakdown (Godlewska et al. 2017). Biochar has a high specific surface area (SSA) and a highly porous structure, providing nutrients for soil microorganisms to grow. Various functional groups on the biochar surface result in high cation exchange capacity (CEC), which acts as an electron carrier, making it easier to transfer and transport electrons (Antonangelo et al. 2019). Biochar application rates to compost have ranged from 5 to 10% (mass basis) to 50% or more (Jindo et al. 2012). A dose of more than 20–30% biochar (mass basis) is not encouraged since an excessive quantity of biochar compared to the composting material might obstruct biodegradation. Biochar has been proven to speed up the composting process when used in sufficient amounts, primarily by enhancing the consistency and structure of the mix and boosting microbial activity in the composting mixture. This enhanced activity results in higher temperatures and shorter compost development time (Camps and Tomlinson 2015). Table 8.7 shows the impact of biochar addition to compost in various other studies.
8.5.6 Other Modern Applications
Besides the above-discussed applications, biochar can be used in energy storage gadgets such as supercapacitors, lithium, and sodium-ion batteries etc. Biochar is used as electrode material in supercapacitors. Biochar activation was done to increase its specific surface area, resulting in an increased capacitive performance of biochar (Tan et al. 2017). For supercapacitor fabrication, Jin et al. (2014) prepared biochar from corn stover using microwave-assisted slow pyrolysis coupled with KOH activation. At a current density of 0.1 Ag−1, the biochar had a specific capacitance of 246 F g−1 (Jin et al. 2014). Biochar is a carbon-rich material, highly porous and conductive, which makes it a suitable material to be used for sulfur-carbon (S/C) cathode composite for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries (Vivekanandhan 2018). The activation process enhances biochar characteristics such as surface area, carbon content, surface functional groups, porosity, and pore volume, which improves metal encapsulation. Sajib et al. (2017) used KOH-activated biochar derived from canola meal as cathode composite. At the 0.05 °C rate (83.75 mA/g), the biochar cathode composite showed a high initial discharge capacity of 1507 mAh/g (Sajib 2017). Further, biochar is gaining a huge interest for fuel cell applications. Biochar can be used as a fuel in the electrolyte, as the chemical energy accumulated in biochar is a source for electricity generation, in direct carbon fuel cell (DCFC) (Huggins et al. 2016). Table 8.8 shows the application of biochar in various energy storage devices.
Altogether, enhancing biochar’s physical and chemical properties through activation has many applications, such as energy storage devices. Utilizing biochar is a sustainable approach; therefore, we can expect exponential growth in its usage in the coming years.
8.6 Conclusion
The world’s population is increasing at an alarming rate (approx. 80 million people annually), leading to the increased demand for food, energy, safe water supply, etc. Agricultural production has been increased around 50% in the last two decades, resulting in the generation of a massive amount of biomass waste daily. The majority of biomass waste is thrown or burned openly in the field, which has a severe influence on the ecology and public health. Biochar is a cost-effective and sustainable option to address the above-mentioned problems. This chapter reviewed different types of pyrolysis processes for biochar production and the factors affecting the biomass pyrolysis process.
The chapter also discussed the different biochar applications such as adsorbent in water purification, air purification, soil amendment, additives in composting and construction sector, an alternative to fuel, catalyst in various processes such as syngas production, biogas upgradation, and biodiesel production. Moreover, there are certain modern applications including, electrodes and electrolytes in supercapacitors, anode, cathode composites in lithium and sodium-ion batteries, and hydrogen storage. The application of biochar is highly dependent on its physicochemical characteristics such as porosity, specific surface area, and surface functional groups. These properties of biochar are enhanced using various types of activation processes: physical and chemical. Worldwide biochar gets attention due to its desired physicochemical properties which can be useful in different types of applications to generate the circular economy.
Abbreviations
- ACB:
-
Araucaria columnaris bark
- BSA:
-
Biochar soil amendment
- CEC:
-
Cation exchange capacity
- DCFC:
-
Direct carbon fuel cell
- DFT:
-
Density functional theory
- dw:
-
dry weight basis
- fw:
-
Fresh weight basis
- GRSB:
-
Granular Rice Straw biochar
- JPB:
-
Jujube pit biochar
- MB:
-
Methylene blue
- MBC:
-
Magnetically modified rice husk biochar
- OM:
-
Organic matter
- PAHs:
-
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- PBB:
-
Powdered bamboo biochar
- PRSB:
-
Powdered Rice Straw biochar
- RE:
-
Removal efficiency
- RO:
-
Reverse osmosis
- SA:
-
Sulfonamides
- SPS:
-
Spent P. ostreatus substrate
- SSS:
-
Spent shiitake substrate
- TC:
-
Tetracycline
- TPH:
-
Total petroleum hydrocarbons
- WHC:
-
Water holding capacity
References
Abbaspour A, Zohrabi F, Dorostkar V, Faz A, Acosta JA (2020) Remediation of an oil-contaminated soil by two native plants treated with biochar and mycorrhizae. J Environ Manag 254:109755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109755
Abdullah H, Wu H (2009) Biochar as a fuel: 1. Properties and grindability of biochars produced from the pyrolysis of mallee wood under slow-heating conditions. Energy Fuels 23(8):4174–4181. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900494t
Agrawal K, Verma P (2022) An overview of various algal biomolecules and its applications. In: Shah M, Rodriguez-Couto S, La Cruz CBV, Biswas J (eds) An integration of phycoremediation processes in wastewater treatment. Elsevier Inc., pp 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823499-0.00006-7
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071
Ahmad Z, Gao B, Mosa A, Yu H, Yin X, Bashir A, Ghoveisi H, Wang S (2018) Removal of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions from aqueous solutions by biochars derived from potassium-rich biomass. J Clean Prod 180(Ii):437–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.133
Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chen M (2016) Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour Technol 214:836–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.057
Al Arni S (2018) Comparison of slow and fast pyrolysis for converting biomass into fuel. Renew Energy 124:197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.04.060
Alam MM, Alothman ZA, Naushad M, Aouak T (2014) Evaluation of heavy metal kinetics through pyridine based Th(IV) phosphate composite cation exchanger using particle diffusion controlled ion exchange phenomenon. J Ind Eng Chem 20(2):705–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.05.036
Andrew RM (2018) Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst Sci Data 10(1):195–217. https://doi.org/10.5194/ESSD-10-195-2018
Angin D (2013) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresour Technol 128:593–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.150
Antonangelo JA, Zhang H, Sun X, Kumar A (2019) Physicochemical properties and morphology of biochars as affected by feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperatures. Biochar 1(3):325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00028-z
Antonangelo JA, Sun X, Zhang H (2021) The roles of co-composted biochar (COMBI) in improving soil quality, crop productivity, and toxic metal amelioration. J Environ Manag 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111443
Ateş F, Pütün E, Pütün AE (2004) Fast pyrolysis of sesame stalk: yields and structural analysis of bio-oil. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 71(2):779–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2003.11.001
Awasthi MK, Wang Q, Chen H, Wang M, Awasthi SK, Ren X, Cai H, Li R, Zhang Z (2018) In-vessel co-composting of biosolid: focusing on mitigation of greenhouse gases emissions and nutrients conservation. Renew Energy 129:814–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.068
Aworn A, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W (2008) Preparation and characteristics of agricultural waste activated carbon by physical activation having micro- and mesopores. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 82(2):279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2008.04.007
Azargohar R, Dalai AK (2008) Steam and KOH activation of biochar: experimental and modeling studies. Micropor Mesopor Mater 110(2–3):413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.06.047
Baghel P, Sakhiya AK, Kaushal P (2022) Influence of temperature on slow pyrolysis of Prosopis Juliflora: an experimental and thermodynamic approach. Renew Energy 185:538–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.053
Bahng MK, Mukarakate C, Robichaud DJ, Nimlos MR (2009) Current technologies for analysis of biomass thermochemical processing: a review. Anal Chim Acta 651(2):117–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.08.016
Bamdad H, Hawboldt K, MacQuarrie S (2018) A review on common adsorbents for acid gases removal: focus on biochar. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1705–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.261
Belaroui K, Seghier A, Hadjel M (2014) Synthesis of activated carbon based on apricot stones for wastewater treatment. New Pub: Balaban 52(7–9):1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.789404
Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A (2013) Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J Clean Prod 51:142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.10.049
Benítez A, González-Tejero M, Caballero Á, Morales J (2018) Almond shell as a microporous carbon source for sustainable cathodes in lithium-sulfur batteries. Materials 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081428
Betancur M, Martínez JD, Murillo R (2009) Production of activated carbon by waste tire thermochemical degradation with CO2. J Hazard Mater 168(2–3):882–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2009.02.167
Bhandari PN, Kumar A, Huhnke RL (2014) Simultaneous removal of toluene (model tar), NH3, and H 2S, from biomass-generated producer gas using biochar-based and mixed-metal oxide catalysts. Energy Fuels 28(3):1918–1925. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef4016872
Birzer C, Medwell P, MacFarlane G, Read M, Wilkey J, Higgins M, West T (2014) A biochar-producing, dung-burning cookstove for humanitarian purposes. Procedia Eng 78:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.063
Blanco-Canqui H (2017) Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 81(4):687–711. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017
Braghiroli FL, Bouafif H, Koubaa A (2019) Enhanced SO2 adsorption and desorption on chemically and physically activated biochar made from wood residues. Ind Crop Prod 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.06.019
Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenergy 66:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.059
Busca G, Berardinelli S, Resini C, Arrighi L (2008) Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. J Hazard Mater 160(2–3):265–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.045
Camps M, Tomlinson T (2015) The use of biochar in composting. Int Biochar Initiative:1–4
Cao X, Sun S, Sun R (2017) Application of biochar-based catalysts in biomass upgrading: a review. RSC Adv 7(77):48793–48805. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra09307a
Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C, Ryu C, Jeon J-K, Shin M-C, Park Y-K (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002
Chan KYABLVZ, Meszaros IA, Downie AC, Joseph SD (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust J Soil Res 46(2003):437–444
Chandola D, Thathola P, Bisht A (2021) Removal of phenol from aqueous solution using biochar produced from Araucaria columnaris Bark 51(Supplement), S-92
Chatterjee R, Sajjadi B, Mattern DL, Chen WY, Zubatiuk T, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J, Egiebor NO, Hammer N (2018) Ultrasound cavitation intensified amine functionalization: a feasible strategy for enhancing CO2 capture capacity of biochar. Fuel 225:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.145
Chen H, Yuan X, Xiong T, Jiang L, Wang H, Wu Z (2020) Biochar facilitated hydroxyapatite/calcium silicate hydrate for remediation of heavy metals contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 231(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4425-1
Chu JH, Kang JK, Park SJ, Lee CG (2020) Application of magnetic biochar derived from food waste in heterogeneous sono-Fenton-like process for removal of organic dyes from aqueous solution. J Water Process Eng 37:101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101455
Contescu C, Adhikari S, Gallego N, Evans N, Biss B (2018) Activated carbons derived from high-temperature pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. C 4(3):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/c4030051
Cross A, Sohi SP (2013) A method for screening the relative long-term stability of biochar. GCB Bioenergy 5(2):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12035
Dai L, Fan L, Liu Y, Ruan R, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Yu Z (2017) Production of bio-oil and biochar from soapstock via microwave-assisted co-catalytic fast pyrolysis. In: Bioresource technology, vol 225. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.017
Damodar D, Ghosh S, Usha Rani M, Martha SK, Deshpande AS (2019) Hard carbon derived from sepals of Palmyra palm fruit calyx as an anode for sodium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 438:227008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227008
Das J, Rene ER, Dupont C, Dufourny A, Blin J, van Hullebusch ED (2019) Performance of a compost and biochar packed biofilter for gas-phase hydrogen sulfide removal. Bioresour Technol 273:581–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.052
Dawson EA, Parkes GMB, Barnes PA, Chinn MJ (2003) An investigation of the porosity of carbons prepared by constant rate activation in air. Carbon 41(3):571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00366-4
Demirbas A (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 72(2):243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2004.07.003
Demirbas A (2009) Global renewable energy projections. Energy Sources, Part B: Econ Plan and Policy 4(2):212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240701620499
Demirbaş A, Arin G (2002) An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Sources 24(5):471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310252889979
Desore A, Narula SA (2018) An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry. Environ Dev Sustain 20(4):1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9949-1
Dias BO, Silva CA, Higashikawa FS, Roig A, Sánchez-Monedero MA (2010) Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: effect on organic matter degradation and humification. Bioresour Technol 101(4):1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2009.09.024
Dillon AC, Heben MJ (2001) Hydrogen storage using carbon adsorbents: past, present and future. Appl Phys Mater Sci Process 72(2):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390100788
Do Minh T, Song J, Deb A, Cha L, Srivastava V, Sillanpää M (2020) Biochar based catalysts for the abatement of emerging pollutants: a review. Chem Eng J 394:124856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.124856
Du YD, Zhang XQ, Shu L, Feng Y, Lv C, Liu HQ et al (2021) Safety evaluation and ibuprofen removal via an Alternanthera philoxeroides-based biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(30):40568–40586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09714-z
Encinar JM, González JF, González J (2000) Fixed-bed pyrolysis of Cynara cardunculus L. product yields and compositions. Fuel Process Technol 68(3):209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00125-9
Fan S, Wang Y, Wang Z, Tang J, Tang J, Li X (2017) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism. J Environ Chem Eng 5(1):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019
Gao J, Liu Y, Li X, Yang M, Wang J, Chen Y (2020) A promising and cost-effective biochar adsorbent derived from jujube pit for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Sci Rep 10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64191-1
Godlewska P, Schmidt HP, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P (2017) Biochar for composting improvement and contaminants reduction. A review. Bioresource Technology 246:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.095
Goswami RK, Agrawal K, Mehariya S, Molino A, Musmarra D, Verma P (2020a) Microalgae-based biorefinery for utilization of carbon dioxide for production of valuable bioproducts. In: Kumar A, Sharma S (eds) Chemo-biological systems for CO2 utilization. CRC Press, pp 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429317187-11
Goswami RK, Mehariya S, Verma P, Lavecchia R, Zuorro A (2020b) Microalgae-based biorefineries for sustainable resource recovery from wastewater. J Water Process Eng 40:101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101747
Goswami RK, Agrawal K, Verma P (2021) Microalgae-based biofuel-integrated biorefinery approach as sustainable feedstock for resolving energy crisis. In: Srivastava M, Srivastava N, Singh R (eds) Bioenergy research: commercial opportunities & challenges. Springer, pp 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1190-2_9
Greenhalf CE, Nowakowski DJ, Harms AB, Titiloye JO, Bridgwater AV (2013) A comparative study of straw, perennial grasses and hardwoods in terms of fast pyrolysis products. Fuel 108:216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.075
Gul S, Whalen JK (2016) Biochemical cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 103:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.001
Guo W, Ai Y, Men B, Wang S (2017) Adsorption of phenanthrene and pyrene by biochar produced from the excess sludge: experimental studies and theoretical analysis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14(9):1889–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1272-8
Guo W, Wang S, Wang Y, Lu S, Gao Y (2018) Sorptive removal of phenanthrene from aqueous solutions using magnetic and non-magnetic rice husk-derived biochars. Royal Society Open. Science 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172382
Guo XX, Liu HT, Zhang J (2020) The role of biochar in organic waste composting and soil improvement: a review. Waste Manag 102:884–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.003
Gupta S, Kua HW (2017) Factors determining the potential of biochar as a carbon capturing and sequestering construction material: critical review. J Mater Civ Eng 29(9):04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001924
Gupta S, Kua HW (2019) Carbonaceous micro-filler for cement: effect of particle size and dosage of biochar on fresh and hardened properties of cement mortar. Sci Total Environ 662:952–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.01.269
Gupta S, Kua HW, Koh HJ (2018) Application of biochar from food and wood waste as green admixture for cement mortar. Sci Total Environ 619–620:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.044
Han T, Zhao Z, Bartlam M, Wang Y (2016) Combination of biochar amendment and phytoremediation for hydrocarbon removal in petroleum-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(21):21219–21228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7236-6
He X, Chen L, Han L, Liu N, Cui R, Yin H, Huang G (2017) Evaluation of biochar powder on oxygen supply efficiency and global warming potential during mainstream large-scale aerobic composting. Bioresour Technol 245:309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.076
He X, Yin H, Han L, Cui R, Fang C, Huang G (2019) Effects of biochar size and type on gaseous emissions during pig manure/wheat straw aerobic composting: Insights into multivariate-microscale characterization and microbial mechanism. Bioresour Technol 271:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.104
Heidari A, Younesi H, Rashidi A, Ghoreyshi AA (2014) Evaluation of CO2 adsorption with eucalyptus wood based activated carbon modified by ammonia solution through heat treatment. Chem Eng J 254:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2014.06.004
Heras F, Alonso N, Gilarranz MÁ, Rodriguez JJ (2009) Activation of waste tire char upon cyclic oxygen chemisorption-desorption. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(10):4664–4670. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE801764X
Higashikawa FS, Conz RF, Colzato M, Cerri CEP, Alleoni LRF (2016) Effects of feedstock type and slow pyrolysis temperature in the production of biochars on the removal of cadmium and nickel from water. J Clean Prod 137:965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.205
Hong Z, Zhong F, Niu W, Zhang K, Su J, Liu J, Li L, Wu F (2020) Effects of temperature and particle size on the compositions, energy conversions and structural characteristics of pyrolysis products from different crop residues. Energy 190:116413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116413
Hoslett J, Ghazal H, Ahmad D, Jouhara H (2019) Removal of copper ions from aqueous solution using low temperature biochar derived from the pyrolysis of municipal solid waste. Sci Total Environ 673:777–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.04.085
Hu E, Shang S, Wang N, Nan X, Zhong S, Yuan Z (2019) Influence of the pyrolytic temperature and feedstock on the characteristics and naphthalene adsorption of crop straw-derived biochars. Bioresources 14(2):2885–2902. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.2.2885-2902
Huang YF, Cheng PH, Te Chiueh P, Lo SL (2017) Leucaena biochar produced by microwave torrefaction: fuel properties and energy efficiency. Appl Energy 204:1018–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.007
Huggins TM, Latorre A, Biffinger JC, Ren ZJ (2016) Biochar based microbial fuel cell for enhanced wastewater treatment and nutrient recovery. Sustainability 8(2):169. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU8020169
Jain A, Tripathi SK (2014) Fabrication and characterization of energy storing supercapacitor devices using coconut shell based activated charcoal electrode. Mater Sci Eng B: Solid-State Mater Adv Technol 183(1):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2013.12.004
Janczak D, Malińska K, Czekała W, Cáceres R, Lewicki A, Dach J (2017) Biochar to reduce ammonia emissions in gaseous and liquid phase during composting of poultry manure with wheat straw. Waste Manag 66:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.033
Jiang Y-F, Hu X-F, Yves U (2014) Effectiveness and mechanisms of naphthalene adsorption by biochar pyrolyzed from wheat straw. Adv Civ Environ Mater Res Busan Korea
Jin H, Wang X, Shen Y, Gu Z (2014) A high-performance carbon derived from corn stover via microwave and slow pyrolysis for supercapacitors. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2014.07.010
Jindo K, Suto K, Matsumoto K, García C, Sonoki T, Sanchez-Monedero MA (2012) Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar-blended composts prepared from poultry manure. Bioresour Technol 110:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.01.120
Jung C, Oh J, Yoon Y (2015) Removal of acetaminophen and naproxen by combined coagulation and adsorption using biochar: influence of combined sewer overflow components. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(13):10058–10069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4191-6
Kane SN, Mishra A, Dutta AK (2016) Preface: International Conference on Recent Trends IN Physics (ICRTP 2016). J Phys Conf Ser 755(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Kavitha B, Reddy PVL, Kim B, Lee SS, Pandey SK, Kim KH (2018) Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: a review. J Environ Manag 227:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.082
Kazawadi D, Ntalikwa J, Kombe G (2021) A review of intermediate pyrolysis as a technology of biomass conversion for coproduction of biooil and adsorption biochar. J Renew Energ 2021:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5533780
Kebelmann K, Hornung A, Karsten U, Griffiths G (2013) Intermediate pyrolysis and product identification by TGA and Py-GC/MS of green microalgae and their extracted protein and lipid components. Biomass Bioenergy 49:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.006
Kelm MAP, da Silva Júnior MJ, de Barros Holanda SH, de Araujo CMB, de Assis Filho RB, Freitas EJ, dos Santos DR, da Motta Sobrinho MA (2019) Removal of azo dye from water via adsorption on biochar produced by the gasification of wood wastes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(28):28558–28573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3833-x
Khin MM, Nair AS, Babu VJ, Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2012) A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 5(8):8075–8109. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21818f
Krasucka P, Pan B, Sik Ok Y, Mohan D, Sarkar B, Oleszczuk P (2021) Engineered biochar—a sustainable solution for the removal of antibiotics from water. Chem Eng J 405:126926. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.126926
Kumar A, Singh E, Khapre A, Bordoloi N, Kumar S (2020a) Sorption of volatile organic compounds on non-activated biochar. Bioresour Technol 297:122469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122469
Kumar B, Verma P (2021a) Life cycle assessment: blazing a trail for bioresources management. Energy Convers Manag X 10:100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100063
Kumar B, Verma P (2021b) Biomass-based biorefineries: an important architype towards a circular economy. Fuel 288:119622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119622
Kumar B, Bhardwaj N, Agrawal K, Verma P (2020b) Bioethanol production: generation-based comparative status measurements. In: Srivastava N, Srivastava M, Mishra P, Gupta V (eds) Biofuel production technologies: critical Analysis for Sustainability. Clean Energy Production Technologies. Springer, Singapore, pp 155–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8637-4_7
Kumar B, Bhardwaj N, Agrawal K, Chaturvedi V, Verma P (2020c) Current perspective on pretreatment technologies using lignocellulosic biomass: an emerging biorefinery concept. Fuel Process Technol 199:106244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106244
Kwapinski W, Byrne CMP, Kryachko E, Wolfram P, Adley C, Leahy JJ, Novotny EH, Hayes MHB (2010) Biochar from biomass and waste. Waste Biomass Valorization 1(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9024-8
Kyi PP, Quansah JO, Lee C, Moon J, Park S-J (2020) The removal of crystal violet from textile wastewater using palm kernel shell-derived biochar. Appl Sci 10(7):2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072251
Lamichhane S, Bal Krishna KC, Sarukkalige R (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal by sorption: a review. Chemosphere 148:336–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.036
Lee J, Kim KH, Kwon EE (2017) Biochar as a catalyst. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.04.002
Lehmann J, Rondon M (2006) Soils in the humid tropics. Management. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420017113.ch36
Li Q, Tang L, Hu J, Jiang M, Shi X, Zhang T, Li Y, Pan X (2018) Removal of toxic metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from long-root Eichhornia crassipes. R Soc Open Sci 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180966
Li S, Song X, Wang X, Xu C, Cao Y, Xiao Z, Qi C, Wu M, Yang Z, Fu L, Ma X, Gao J (2020) One-step construction of hierarchically porous carbon nanorods with extraordinary capacitive behavior. Carbon 160:176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBON.2020.01.025
Liu C, Yin Z, Hu D, Mo F, Chu R, Zhu L, Hu C (2021b) Biochar derived from chicken manure as a green adsorbent for naphthalene removal. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(27):36585–36597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13286-x
Liu D, Ding Z, Ali EF, Kheir AMS, Eissa MA, Ibrahim OHM (2021a) Biochar and compost enhance soil quality and growth of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) under saline conditions. Sci Rep 11(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88293-6
Mahmood ASN, Brammer JG, Hornung A, Steele A, Poulston S (2013) The intermediate pyrolysis and catalytic steam reforming of Brewers spent grain. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 103:328–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.09.009
Mahmoud ME, Abdelfattah AM, Tharwat RM, Nabil GM (2020) Adsorption of negatively charged food tartrazine and sunset yellow dyes onto positively charged triethylenetetramine biochar: optimization, kinetics and thermodynamic study. J Mol Liq 318:114297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLLIQ.2020.114297
Mayakaduwa SS, Herath I, Ok YS, Mohan D, Vithanage M (2017) Insights into aqueous carbofuran removal by modified and non-modified rice husk biochars. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(29):22755–22763. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-016-7430-6
Mendoza-Carrasco R, Cuerda-Correa EM, Alexandre-Franco MF, Fernández-González C, Gómez-Serrano V (2016) Preparation of high-quality activated carbon from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle waste. Its use in the removal of pollutants in aqueous solution. J Environ Manag 181:522–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2016.06.070
Miller SA, John VM, Pacca SA, Horvath A (2018) Carbon dioxide reduction potential in the global cement industry by 2050. Cem Concr Res 114:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.08.026
Mohammadi S, Kargari A, Sanaeepur H, Abbassian K, Najafi A, Mofarrah E (2015) Phenol removal from industrial wastewaters: a short review. Desalin Water Treat 53(8):2215–2234. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.883327
Mohammed NAS, Abu-Zurayk RA, Hamadneh I, Al-Dujaili AH (2018) Phenol adsorption on biochar prepared from the pine fruit shells: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics studies. J Environ Manag 226:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.033
Mullen CA, Boateng AA, Goldberg NM, Lima IM, Laird DA, Hicks KB (2010) Bio-oil and bio-char production from corn cobs and stover by fast pyrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 34(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.09.012
Nasri NS, Hamza UD, Ismail SN, Ahmed MM, Mohsin R (2014) Assessment of porous carbons derived from sustainable palm solid waste for carbon dioxide capture. J Clean Prod 71:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2013.11.053
Oleszczuk P, Hale SE, Lehmann J, Cornelissen G (2012) Activated carbon and biochar amendments decrease pore-water concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 111:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.030
Oliveira FR, Patel AK, Jaisi DP, Adhikari S, Lu H, Khanal SK (2017) Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol 246:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.08.122
Ou J, Yang L, Xi X (2016) Biomass inspired nitrogen doped porous carbon anode with high performance for lithium ion batteries. Chin J Chem 34(7):727–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.201600095
Park HJ, Park YK, Kim JS (2008) Influence of reaction conditions and the char separation system on the production of bio-oil from radiata pine sawdust by fast pyrolysis. Fuel Process Technol 89(8):797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.01.003
Park JH, Ok YS, Kim SH, Cho JS, Heo JS, Delaune RD, Seo DC (2016) Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto sesame straw biochar in aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 142:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.093
Park JH, Wang JJ, Meng Y, Wei Z, DeLaune RD, Seo DC (2019) Adsorption/desorption behavior of cationic and anionic dyes by biochars prepared at normal and high pyrolysis temperatures. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 572:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.04.029
Park J, Hung I, Gan Z, Rojas OJ, Lim KH, Park S (2013) Activated carbon from biochar: Influence of its physicochemical properties on the sorption characteristics of phenanthrene. Bioresour Technol 149:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.085
Peiris C, Gunatilake SR, Mlsna TE, Mohan D, Vithanage M (2017) Biochar based removal of antibiotic sulfonamides and tetracyclines in aquatic environments: A critical review. Bioresour Technol 246:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.07.150
Peng B, Chen L, Que C, Yang K, Deng F, Deng X, Shi G, Xu G, Wu M (2016) Adsorption of Antibiotics on Graphene and Biochar in Aqueous Solutions Induced by π-π Interactions. Scientific Reports 2016 6:1 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31920
Puppa LD, Ducousso M, Batisse N, Dubois M, Verney V, Xavier V, Delor-Jestin F (2020) Poplar wood and tea biochars for trichloroethylene remediation in pure water and contaminated groundwater. Environmental Challenges 1:100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2020.100003
Qin G, Gong D, Fan MY (2013) Bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil by biostimulation amended with biochar. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 85:150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.07.004
Sajib SK (2017) Preparation and characterization of activated biochar for lithium-sulfur battery application. https://etd.auburn.edu//handle/10415/5946
Sajjadi B, Zubatiuk T, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J, Chen WY (2019) Chemical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications: a comprehensive review. Rev Chem Eng 35(7):777–815. https://doi.org/10.1515/REVCE-2018-0003
Sakhiya AK, Anand A, Aier I, Baghel P, Vijay VK, Kaushal P (2021a) Sustainable utilization of rice straw to mitigate climate change: a bioenergy approach. Mater Today: Proc 46:5366–5371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.795
Sakhiya AK, Anand A, Kaushal P (2020) Production, activation, and applications of biochar in recent times. In Biochar (Vol. 2, Issue 3). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00047-1
Sakhiya AK, Baghel P, Anand A, Vijay VK, Kaushal P (2021b) A comparative study of physical and chemical activation of rice straw derived biochar to enhance Zn + 2 adsorption. Bioresource Technology Reports 15:100774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100774
Sakhiya AK, Vijay VK, Kaushal P (2022) Efficacy of rice straw derived biochar for removal of Pb+2 and Zn+2 from aqueous: adsorption, thermodynamic and cost analysis. Bioresource Technology Reports 17:100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2021.100920
Samsuri AW, Sadegh-Zadeh F, Seh-Bardan BJ (2014) Characterization of biochars produced from oil palm and rice husks and their adsorption capacities for heavy metals. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(4):967–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0291-3
Scheifele M, Hobi A, Buegger F, Gattinger A, Schulin R, Boller T, Mäder P (2017) Impact of pyrochar and hydrochar on soybean (Glycine max L.) root nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation. Zeitschrift Fur Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkunde 180(2):199–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600419
Schmidt HP, Wilson K (2014) The 55 uses of biochar. The Biochar Journal 120:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2018.11.007)
Schultz, S. (2013) Biochar Clean Cookstoves Boost Health for People and Crops. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC NEWS. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/130129-biochar-clean-cookstoves
Senthil C, Lee CW (2021) Biomass-derived biochar materials as sustainable energy sources for electrochemical energy storage devices. Renew Sust Energ Rev 137:110464. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110464
Shang G, Shen G, Liu L, Chen Q, Xu Z (2013) Kinetics and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by biochars. Bioresour Technol 133:495–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.114
Shim T, Yoo J, Ryu C, Park YK, Jung J (2015) Effect of steam activation of biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus on copper sorption and toxicity. Bioresour Technol 197:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.055
Singh KP, Malik A, Sinha S, Ojha P (2008) Liquid-phase adsorption of phenols using activated carbons derived from agricultural waste material. J Hazard Mater 150(3):626–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2007.05.017
Singh P, Yadav SK, Kuddus M (2020b) Green nanomaterials for wastewater treatment. In Advanced Structured Materials 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3560-4_9
Singh R, Naik DV, Dutta RK, Kanaujia PK (2020a) Biochars for the removal of naphthenic acids from water: A prospective approach towards remediation of petroleum refinery wastewater. J Clean Prod 266:121986. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121986
Srivatsav P, Bhargav BS, Shanmugasundaram V, Arun J, Gopinath KP, Bhatnagar A (2020) Biochar as an eco-friendly and economical adsorbent for the removal of colorants (Dyes) from aqueous environment: A review. Water (Switzerland) 12(12):1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123561
Suarez-Riera D, Restuccia L, Ferro GA (2020) The use of Biochar to reduce the carbon footprint of cement-based materials. Procedia Struct Integr 26(2019):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.023
Sukiran MA, Kheang LS, Bakar NA, May CY (2011) Production and characterization of bio-char from the pyrolysis of empty fruit bunches. Am J Appl Sci 8(10):984–988. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2011.984.988
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Modification of biochar surface by air oxidation: Role of pyrolysis temperature. Biomass Bioenergy 85:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2015.11.030
Sun Y, Yang G, Zhang L, Sun Z (2017) Preparation of high performance H2S removal biochar by direct fluidized bed carbonization using potato peel waste. Process Saf Environ Prot 107:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.02.018
Tan XF, Liu YG, Gu YL, Xu Y, Zeng GM, Hu XJ, Liu SB, Wang X, Liu SM, Li J (2016) Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of wastewater: a review. Bioresour Technol 212:318–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093
Tang J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Ren L, Zhou Y, Zheng Y, Luo L, Yang Y, Huang H, Chen A (2020) Physicochemical features, metal availability and enzyme activity in heavy metal-polluted soil remediated by biochar and compost. Sci Total Environ 701:134751. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.134751
Tay T, Ucar S, Karagöz S (2009) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from waste biomass. J Hazard Mater 165(1–3):481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.011
Tesfaye F, Liu X, Zheng J, Cheng K, Bian R, Zhang X, Li L, Drosos M, Joseph S, Pan G (2021) Could biochar amendment be a tool to improve soil availability and plant uptake of phosphorus? A meta-analysis of published experiments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(26):34108–34120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14119-7
Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:467–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.10.122
Tripathi N, Hills CD, Singh RS, Atkinson CJ (2019) Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential resource. Npj Climate and Atmospheric. Science 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41612-019-0093-5
Tsai WT, Lee MK, Chang YM (2007) Fast pyrolysis of rice husk: product yields and compositions. Bioresour Technol 98(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.005
Van Vinh N, Zafar M, Behera SK, Park HS (2015) Arsenic(III) removal from aqueous solution by raw and zinc-loaded pine cone biochar: equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamics studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(4):1283–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0507-1
Veksha A, Pandya P, Hill JM (2015) The removal of methyl orange from aqueous solution by biochar and activated carbon under microwave irradiation and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. J Environ Chem Eng 3(3):1452–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2015.05.003
Vivekanandhan S (2018) Biochar supercapacitors: recent developments in the materials and methods. Green Sustain Adv Mater: Applications 2:223–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119528463.ch10
Wang C, Lu H, Dong D, Deng H, Strong PJ, Wang H, Wu W (2013) Insight into the effects of biochar on manure composting: evidence supporting the relationship between N2O emission and denitrifying community. Environ Sci Technol 47(13):7341–7349. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305293h
Wang S, Xiao C, Xing Y, Xu H, Zhang S (2015) Carbon nanofibers/nanosheets hybrid derived from cornstalks as a sustainable anode for Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 3(13):6742–6746. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta00050e
Wang S, Xu Y, Norbu N, Wang Z (2018) Remediation of biochar on heavy metal polluted soils. IOP Conference Ser: Earth and Environ Sci 108(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042113
Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC (2007) Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil - concepts and mechanisms. Plant Soil 300(1–2):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5
Wu Q, Xian Y, He Z, Zhang Q, Wu J, Yang G, Zhang X, Qi H, Ma J, Xiao Y, Long L (2019) Adsorption characteristics of Pb(II) using biochar derived from spent mushroom substrate. Scientific Rep 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52554-2
Wu W, Yang M, Feng Q, McGrouther K, Wang H, Lu H, Chen Y (2012) Chemical characterization of rice straw-derived biochar for soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy 47:268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.034
Tan XF, Liu SB, Liu YG, Gu YL, Zeng GM, Hu XJ, Wang X, Liu SH, Jiang LH (2017) Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour Technol 227:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.12.083
Xiao F, Pignatello JJ (2016) Effects of post-pyrolysis air oxidation of biomass chars on adsorption of neutral and ionizable compounds. Environ Sci Technol 50(12):6276–6283. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.6B00362
Xu C, Etcheverry T (2008) Hydro-liquefaction of woody biomass in sub- and super-critical ethanol with iron-based catalysts. Fuel 87(3):335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.05.013
Xu X, Gao J, Tian Q, Zhai X, Liu Y (2017) Walnut shell derived porous carbon for a symmetric all-solid-state supercapacitor. Appl Surf Sci 411:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.124
Xu X, Zheng Y, Gao B, Cao X (2019) N-doped biochar synthesized by a facile ball-milling method for enhanced sorption of CO2 and reactive red. Chem Eng J 368:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.165
Xu Y, Deng F, Pang Q, He S, Xu Y, Luo G, Yao H (2018) Development of waste-derived sorbents from biomass and brominated flame retarded plastic for elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas. Chem Eng J 350:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.055
Yang K, Ta Y, Tian W, Qian W, Zhu L, Yang C (2016) Biomass-derived porous carbon with micropores and small mesopores for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem A Eur J Commun. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201504672
Yang X, Yi H, Tang X, Zhao S, Yang Z, Ma Y, Feng T, Cui X (2018) Behaviors and kinetics of toluene adsorption-desorption on activated carbons with varying pore structure. J Environ Sci (China) 67:104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.06.032
Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.029
Yi Y, Li C, Zhao L, Du X, Gao L, Chen J, Zhai Y, Zeng G (2018) The synthetic evaluation of CuO-MnOx-modified pinecone biochar for simultaneous removal formaldehyde and elemental mercury from simulated flue gas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4761–4775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0855-8
Ying Z, Chen X, Li H, Liu X, Zhang C, Zhang J, Yi G (2021) Efficient adsorption of methylene blue by porous biochar derived from soybean dreg using a one-pot synthesis method. Molecules 26(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26030661
Yuan JH, Xu RK (2011) The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use Manag 27(1):110–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00317.x
Yuan Y, Chen H, Yuan W, Williams D, Walker JT, Shi W (2017) Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation? Soil Biol Biochem 113:14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2017.05.025
Zhang G, He L, Guo X, Han Z, Ji L, He Q, Han L, Sun K (2020) Mechanism of biochar as a biostimulation strategy to remove polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from heavily contaminated soil in a coking plant. Geoderma 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114497
Zhang H, Voroney RP, Price GW (2015) Effects of temperature and processing conditions on biochar chemical properties and their influence on soil C and N transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 83:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.006
Zhang L, Xu CC, Champagne P (2010) Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass. Energy Convers Manag 51(5):969–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.038
Zhang T, Mao J, Liu X, Xuan M, Bi K, Zhang XL, Hu J, Fan J, Chen S, Shao G (2017) Pinecone biomass-derived hard carbon anodes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. RSC Adv 7(66):41504–41511. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07231g
Zhang X, Zhang S, Yang H, Feng Y, Chen Y, Wang X, Chen H (2014) Nitrogen enriched biochar modified by high temperature CO2-ammonia treatment: characterization and adsorption of CO2. Chem Eng J 257:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.024
Zhao B, O’Connor D, Zhang J, Peng T, Shen Z, Tsang DCW, Hou D (2018) Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar. J Clean Prod 174:977–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.013
Zhou L, Richard C, Ferronato C, Chovelon JM, Sleiman M (2018) Investigating the performance of biomass-derived biochars for the removal of gaseous ozone, adsorbed nitrate and aqueous bisphenol A. Chem Eng J 334:2098–2104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.145
Zhou N, Chen H, Xi J, Yao D, Zhou Z, Tian Y, Lu X (2017) Biochars with excellent Pb(II) adsorption property produced from fresh and dehydrated banana peels via hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 232(Ii):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.074
Zhou Y, Qin S, Verma S, Sar T, Sarsaiya S, Ravindran B, Liu T, Sindhu R, Patel AK, Binod P, Varjani S, Rani Singhnia R, Zhang Z, Awasthi MK (2021) Production and beneficial impact of biochar for environmental application: a comprehensive review. Bioresour Technol 337:125451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125451
Zhu L, Yin S, Yin Q, Wang H, Wang S (2015) Biochar: A new promising catalyst support using methanation as a probe reaction. Energy Sci Eng 3(2):126–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.58
Zhu Z, Liang F, Zhou Z, Zeng X, Wang D, Dong P, Zhao J, Sun S, Zhang Y, Li X (2018) Expanded biomass-derived hard carbon with ultra-stable performance in sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 6(4):1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta07951f
Zong Y, Chen D, Lu S (2014) Impact of biochars on swell-shrinkage behavior, mechanical strength, and surface cracking of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177(6):920–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300596
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this chapter.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pathak, S., Sakhiya, A.K., Kaushal, P. (2022). Biomass Pyrolysis and its Multiple Applications. In: Verma, P. (eds) Thermochemical and Catalytic Conversion Technologies for Future Biorefineries. Clean Energy Production Technologies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4312-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4312-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4311-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4312-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)