Abstract
Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing fish farming venture in the world. With the intensification of culture practices, different methods and technologies have developed simultaneously. Usage of different chemical additives, antibiotics, prophylactics, medicines, etc. has become more widespread for reducing disease risk and to increase production for commercial benefit. Some of this methods, technologies, and substances may bring commercial benefits for producers; but, over the year, adverse health effect of these substances for consumption has become a great concern. The probiotic application instead of other chemotherapeutic drug is more safely, eco-friendly because it is nonantibiotic and alternative source of antibiotic. It fights against different infectious disease by increasing the population of beneficial bacteria. It accelerates the growth, increases immune response, improves the digestibility, and also improves the water quality. The probiotic helps fish to fights against different types of pathogens and improves the anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and anti-fungal properties. To identify probiotic supplements use in aquaculture, their current condition and future perspective different journal and scientific paper are reviewed. The probiotics use in aquaculture is recent trend. But it has not been studied extensively in the field of aquatic environment. This review study provides recent knowledge of the use of probiotic supplements in aquaculture with the latest developments and future prospects.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
16.1 Introduction
In recent year, aquaculture has developed worldwide rapidly for meeting the increasing demand of fish as a food. The vastly increasing population is the cause of overfishing from wild stock. It increases the pressure in wild water resources. To mitigate this problem, aquaculture plays a significant role. Aquaculture increases not only the fisheries production but also the economic condition of the country. Nowadays, disease outbreak in aquaculture is causing great loss to the farmers. Different chemical additives and medicines have been used indiscriminately worldwide to reduce risk of disease outbreak as a preventive and curative method, and Bangladesh has been no exemption. The widespread use of antibiotics and different prophylactics has created a great concern due to antibiotic resistance of some bacterial species. Use of different chemical substances may also have a harmful effect on the consumer. Aquaculture provides 56.72% of total fish production in Bangladesh (DoF 2019), which is more than half and its’ contribution in total fish production can’t be neglected. So the use of such harmful substances is needed to be controlled and reduced concerning consumer health. Different probiotic substances can be used as a replacement as these substances doesn’t have any adverse health effect and increase fish growth and improves immune response against any pathogenic substance. Different probiotic substances are already in use in aquaculture and their effect on fish health and against any virulent pathogen needed to be tested in order to avoid any adverse effect on fish. Probiotics are screened by fish gut assessment by testing the effect of bacteria and other substances in vivo and in vitro simultaneously.
The probiotics are live microorganisms, which are competent to adapt, colonize, and produce within the gut of the host and develop a constructive stability of microorganisms to advance animals’ health (Cruz et al. 2012). The numerous benefits of probiotics for growth, defense, and intestinal health of the host were revealed, and broader use of probiotics in aquaculture could prevent diseases, promote growth, and reduce the extensive use of antibiotics (Austin and Austin 2016). Probiotics retard or completely inhibit the development of pathogenic bacteria following a competitive elimination, also boost up the resistance and secretion of mucosal enzymes to stimulate host growth, and they do not cause secondary pollution difficulties (Xia et al. 2020).
To control and compete with pathogenic bacteria and to promote the growth of the cultured organisms, probiotics can be introduced as “bio-friendly agents” into the cultural environment (Farzanfar 2006). Some contemporary studies have clearly validated the beneficial effects of probiotics on immune system modulation, stress tolerance and growth rate of cultivated fishes, African catfish (Al-Dohail et al. 2009), Nile tilapia (Lara-Flores and Olvera-Novoa 2013), Japanese flounder (Taoka et al. 2006), and also increasing interest in south-east Asian aquaculture (El-Haroun et al. 2006).
16.2 Probiotics, Types, Quality, and Function
The word “probiotic” is a modified word of probiotika (Lilly and Stillwell 1965). Probiotics is a term originates from Greek word “Pro” and “Bios” (Schrezenmeir and de Vrese 2001). According to Parker (1974), “Organisms and substances that exert beneficial effects on the host by balancing its intestinal microbes.” Fuller (1989) defined probiotic as “live microbial food supplement that benefits the host (human or animal) by improving the microbial balance of the body” and in extreme range of temperatures and salinity variations of probiotics would be performed effectively. It is also found that probiotics are live microorganisms, which, if consumed in acceptable amounts, confer health benefits to the host (Guarner and Schaafsma 1998). It is also defined as “microbial cells administered in a certain way, which reaches the gastrointestinal tract and remain alive with the aim of improving health” (Gatesoupe 1999). Different types of microorganisms are comprised in probiotics. Those are unicellular algae, beneficial bacteria, fungi, yeast, and bacteriophages. The probiotics would be defined for aquaculture as “a probiotic organism can be regarded as a live, dead or component of a microbial cell, which is administered via the feed or to the rearing water, benefiting the host by improving disease resistance, health status, growth performance, feed utilization, stress response, which is achieved at least in part via improving the hosts microbial balance or the microbial balance of the ambient environment” (Merrifield et al. 2010).
On the basis of the mode of application, probiotics are classified as feed and pond probiotics. The feed probiotic is used through the feed supplements. By this method, the probiotic directly finds their way to gut or gastointestine and helps in beneficial microbiota growth to fight against the pathogen. It can be mixed with the feed supplements in two ways: (1) preparing the artificial feed by using probiotics such as pellets, granules, crumbles, flakes, and microencapsulated diets and (2) the natural live organisms, which reared in probiotics used as feed. Live organisms reared in probiotics enrich media as a result it encapsulated by probiotics. This procedure is called bioencapsulation (Nayak 2010b). The pond probiotic is used in water to improve the water environment for unusual stress condition of fish and other aquatic biota. The deteriorate condition is created by low dissolved oxygen, accumulation of dissolved ammonia, nitrite, and also the hydrogen sulfide in the pond sediments. In this case, probiotics create the antagonistic properties and eliminate the pathogenic organisms from waterbody by bio-control process. The probiotics also increase the beneficial bacteria into the waterbody, which are responsible for the breakdown of complex organic matter into simpler form. It helps in bioremediation by controlling or reducing the biochemical or chemical oxygen demands. The oxidizing capacity reduces the toxic elements like ammonia and nitrite and make them harmless (Nayak 2010b). Probiotics work in different ways in aquaculture systems as presented in the Fig. 16.1.
16.2.1 Significance of Probiotics
Probiotic amplify the growth of desirable benignant microbiota in the intestinal tract of fishes. The digestible compounds are breakdown by different process during food consumption. It produces vitamins and detoxification of the diet, which helps animate the dearth and improving nutrient, and all those are cause by the help of probiotics (Irianto and Austin 2002). It makes the favorable condition by increasing the production and immune response in fishes, thereby reducing risk of disease (Fig. 16.1). It also helps in maintaining water quality by reducing organic pollutants. According to Mamun et al. (2018), probiotics helps the host by:
-
Increasing length of the villus
-
Natural killer cells
-
Antibodies
-
Protease enzyme
-
Antioxidant enzyme
-
Cytokines
-
Complements
The Bacillus species reduces metabolic waste in water. Among them, some helps to control the bacterial pathogen, some improves growth, some provides nutrients, some bacteria shows antiviral activity, and some helps to improve fecundity. The combination of different bacteria together can be more beneficial than single species. It was found that reduction in the outbreak of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) can possibly by combination of Pediococcus, Staphylococcus, and Haemolyticus pentosaceus (Leyva-Madrigal et al. 2011). Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus combination could increase the hematocrit values and also serum bactericidal activity in Oreochromis niloticus (Aly et al. 2008). The live probiotics provide more advantage than inactivated ones.
16.2.2 Selection Criteria and Selection Process for Probiotics
The probiotic selection is a fecund issue. It must identify by maintaining certain qualities (Merrifield et al. 2010; Pandya 2016), which are as follows:
-
1.
Probiotics must help the fish to fight against different pathogenic bacteria. It also should have the fruitful effect on growth, developmental ability, and protectoral criteria.
-
2.
The selection criteria of the probiotic are less harmful for host organisms.
-
3.
It should not show the resistance power and maintain the hereditary traits.
-
4.
It should be efficient for feed, exhibits acid bile tolerance and resistance to gastric juice, and also have the adherence ability to the digestive tract.
-
5.
Probiotic should show the decent sensorial things, have fermented accomplishment, have tolerance to freeze drying, and have great viability during storage and packaging period.
Selection of microorganisms for probiotics is very important and useful because it is important to identify the efficient probiotic organism by isolating the organism, characterization, testing, and lastly certification of the organisms for its probiotic efficiency (Fig. 16.2).
16.2.3 Application of Probiotics
The probiotics can be used in three ways, but mixing with feed additives has been the most common method used in aquaculture (Hai et al. 2009). In aquaculture system, there are different ways by which probiotic application is conducted. It can be applied via dietary supplements or direct application to the water as a form of live feed supplements such as Artemia, Rotifer, pellet feed, etc. (Fig. 16.3):
-
1.
Can be directly used as feed additives
-
2.
Can be administered through oral
-
3.
By mixing with water
Considering on broad aspect, probiotics are distributed into two categories: (a) gut probiotics, which managed by oral to the fish along with food to increase the gut associated beneficial microbial flora (Table 16.1), and (b) water probiotics, the probiotics provided into the water, which helps to excluding of the harmful pathogenic bacteria from the waterbody by using essential nutrients and make the pathogenic bacteria to die in starving condition (Table 16.2).
16.2.4 Probiotic Use as Supplements in Aquaculture
In aquaculture sector, the probiotics are currently most usable agents to increase the growth of the fish with less negative impact (Nicolas et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2008). In fish farming, the probiotics are used to emphasize on fish species, fish size, and condition of the feed adaptation. Nowadays, the commonest probiotics are the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Enterococcus sp., Lactobacillus sp., and Bacillus sp.; all lactic acid bacteria are used in aquaculture industry (Rahiman et al. 2010). The modification of the gut microflora and replacing the destructive microorganisms from the gut by the use of sufficient quantities of beneficial microbes in feed of the host might fulfill the result. Intestinal balance is enlightening in the animal during bacterial colonization in gut, and furthermore extraordinary bacterial strains by utilizing live microbial feed added substance, emphatically affecting the creature, which help battle against the dangerous microorganisms and affecting the organic entities’ exhibition (Martínez Cruz et al. 2012). Understanding the development, the increase of the respectable probiotic microbial strains multiplies the stomach-related compounds such as activities of lipases, proteases, and amylases in the gut (Boonthai et al. 2011; Roberfroid 2007). However, the actions of probiotics are as following aspects:
-
1.
Probiotic produce different types of antibacterial compounds; those are bacteriocin, antibiotics, lysozymes, siderophores, proteases, organic acids, and also hydrogen peroxide, which cause sudden shock to pathogenic bacteria (Fuller 1989).
-
2.
Probiotic shows the competitively excluding characters. It competes with the pathogenic bacteria by introducing inhibitory compound and also compete for the space, oxygen, and for nutrients (Fuller 1989).
-
3.
The probiotics make the colony into the fish gut and those colonization followed to the gut wall of fish, which highly show the preventive and inhibitory characters for the pathogenic bacteria to adhere to the gastrointestinal tract.
-
4.
The probiotics produce the potential nutrients, which increase the nutrient in the culture animals.
-
5.
Probiotics compete for the oxygen so that they reduce the availability of the oxygen to the pathogenic bacteria.
-
6.
The probiotics animated the humoral or cellular immune response (Fuller 1989).
-
7.
Probiotics help in increasing or decreasing of the relevant enzyme that’s why the microbial metabolism is altered (Fuller 1989).
-
8.
It boosts the lactose utilization, which helps in cancer inhibition. The lactic acid forming bacteria helps to control serum cholesterol.
-
9.
Probiotics detoxify the metabolites, which is produced by the pathogenic bacteria in the intestine.
16.3 Latest Development of Probiotics in Aquaculture
Advancement of probiotics for business use in aquaculture is a multidisciplinary interaction requiring both observational and key examination, full-scale preliminary, and a monetary appraisal of its employments. Probiotics application in aquaculture is of incredible advantage to the host fish, fish farmer, or fish consumer severally. Significantly, probiotics settle the microbial populace of the fish’s GI plot through the end of pathogenic microorganisms and expanded edibility and bioavailability of supplements needed for ideal development and great well-being. Farmers should be urged to include probiotics for feed to appreciate the relating benefits it presents. There are several benefits of probiotic in aquaculture, which are described below:
16.3.1 Probiotics as Potential Candidates
Application of probiotics in aquaculture sector is becoming popular for their better and nonpathogenic performance. There are different types of bacteria selected for probiotics, but among them the lactic acid forming bacteria (LAB), Bifidobacterium and streptococcus, are mostly popular (Giri et al. 2013). At present, there are different types of bacteria such as Aeromonas media, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus helveticus, Enterococcus faecium, and Carnobacterium inhibens are vastly used as probiotics. Those bacteria are meaningfully effective against pathogenic bacteria. On the other hand, it is found that there are some gram-negative facultative symbiotic anaerobic bacteria that also play a significant role, such as Vibrio, Pseudomonas, Plesiomonas, and Aeromonas. Those bacteria are found in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of fish and shellfish. Apart from these discussed laboratory-based probiotics, various experimentally approved commercial probiotics are also available in the market, which is also effective in aquaculture (Verschuere et al. 2000) (Table 16.3).
16.3.2 Probiotics for Sustainable Aquaculture
Maintenance of the sustainable aquaculture is very important, but the disease outbreak increases the risk of this sector, which makes the burning concern develop research to mitigate this problem. People use antibiotics, but this creates more problems in this sector. The application of probiotics is safer than antibiotics. According to FAO recommendation, probiotic application is beneficial. It helps to improvement in the aquatic environment and reduces the mortality (Subasinghe 2005). It also increases the resistant against pathogenic bacteria (Irianto and Austin 2002). The favorable effect of the probiotics depends on the application time (Verschuere et al. 2000).
16.3.3 Maintenance of Water Quality
Probiotics have significant capabilities to convert the organic nutrient in the field of the aquaculture, which helps to improve the water environment for fish culture (Wang et al. 2007; Wang and Wang 2008). The nitrogenous compound such as ammonium and ammonia (NH3) are toxic and main concern for fish culture. Paradigm of this concern the cat fish rearing into the pond (Sahu et al. 2008). The maintenance of water environment probiotics is used in the recent period of time. It is use to mitigate hazardous condition of the water environment and balancing the water quality (NH3/NO2/NO3). But the candidates for probiotics is limited (Wang et al. 2007) (Fig. 16.4).
Different photosynthetic bacteria such as Bacillus, nitrifiers, and denitrifiers are combined together because of their strong tendency of combination. There are different species of fish culture in diverse condition treated with the probiotics, which sometimes labeled as multifunctional activities (Wang and Wang 2008). Probiotics play a significant role to transforming the organic CO2, which helps in the maintaining higher production reducing the load of organic carbon and increase the better health of the fish (Fig. 16.4).
16.3.4 Enhancement of Growth and Survival
To improve the growth of different cultivated fish species in the aquaculture sector, probiotics play a great role. For example, Puntius gonionotus showed the significant weight gain when Enterococcus faecalis causes supplemented with feed at the amount of 107 and 109 cfu per gram (Allameh et al. 2016). Probiotics combined and colonized into the gastrointestinal gut wall of the fish for long-time application duration. It colonizes because of higher multiplication capacities into the gut wall. Continuous application of probiotics into the aquaculture sector enhances the immunological factors, which helps in reduction of pathogen load into the fish gut mucus layer by increasing the microbial load into the gut (Banerjee and Ray 2017). Probiotics enhance the nutrient of the host body (Hamdan et al. 2016). Probiotics increase the crude lipid and protein and also increase the body weight of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) treated with Lactobacillus sp. into the supplemented feed (Hamdan et al. 2016). Alongside the probiotic-treated feed supplement, different components act a critical part in development improvement of fish, for example, water quality hydrobionts species, protein level, and furthermore the hereditary opposition (Tan et al. 2016).
The species such as Xiphophorus helleri, Xiphophorus maculates, and Poecilia reticulata showed the increased growth and survival rate when it treated with Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces sp. with the feed supplement. The growth performance and the hematological parameters showed the best result of the aquarium reared O. niloticus treated with higher amount of probiotics 0.2% dietary supplements into the basal feed of this fish (Hasan et al. 2021). A previous study on the O. niloticus showed the highest weight gain at 0.2% probiotic supplemented feed, which was differed from the control group (Chowdhury et al. 2020). The 0.2% inclusion of probiotics dietary supplement increases the growth and increases the production rate and survival rate of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in floodplain cage culture (Chowdhury and Roy 2020).
16.3.5 Upliftment of Nutrient Utilization
The probiotic microorganism influences the gastrointestinal tract of the aquatic animal, which helps in the processing of dietary supplements and produces the energy. The most common probiotics used for gastrointestinal influence are lactic acid forming bacteria (Ringø et al. 2018). The nutrient digestibility increases because of higher amount of digestive enzyme (protease, amylase, cellulose, phytase, etc.). Those enzymes are produced by the influence of probiotics, which alter the gut associated microorganism community of the host (Banerjee et al. 2017; Ghosh et al. 2017). The probiotics Lactobacillus brevis and the Bacillus subtilis produce digestive enzyme phytase. Some microorganism of the probiotics contributes to produce the fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, and essential amino acids (Nayak 2010a; Newaj-Fyzul et al. 2014).
16.3.6 Role of Probiotics on Bacteriostatic Effects
The bacterial population of probiotics secretes different substances, which have the bactericidal or bacteriostatic impact on both the gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. The probiotics produce inhibitory substances, for example, proteinceous substance (lysozyme and various sorts of proteases), and compound substances, for example, (hydrogen peroxide) and iron chelating sideropheres (Giri et al. 2013). The LAB-based compound bacteriocins alter between populace relationship impacting by the competition for energy and substance (Kesarcodi-Watson et al. 2008; Ringø et al. 2018).
16.3.7 Prolongation in the Immune System
The probiotics help the aquatic animal by stimulating the immune system. It protects the animal by reducing the disease and pathogen entrance (Dawood and Koshio 2016; Hai 2015). Probiotics increase the immune response, which makes the species disease resistance and also reduces the malfunction of the carp species (Wu et al. 2015). The probiotic supplement feed containing 10 cfu/g diet and continued for 2 weeks increases the immune impact by combining the microbial related molecular pattern to the pathogen arrangement recognition receptors to immunogenic cells and trigger intracellular action against viral and inflammatory pathogens (Balcázar et al. 2006) (Fig. 16.3). Probiotics also boost up the secretion of the mucosal enzymes and the immune response, which helps in the host growth and prevention from the secondary pollution problems (Xia et al. 2020).
16.3.8 Influence of Probiotics in a Viral Pathogen
The probiotics life forms like Pseudomonas sp. and Vibrios sp. showed the critical impact on the irresistible hematopoietic putrefaction infection (Sahu et al. 2008). The lymphocytes disease virus also assistant by using probiotics like sporolact (Lactobacillus sp.) with the feed supplement of the Paralichthys olivaceus (Harikrishnan et al. 2010).
16.3.9 Probiotics Effects on Reproduction
Probiotics perform a significant character in the field of disease resistant, which is well documented, but the role of probiotic into the reproduction is not well established (Fig. 16.3). There are few research studies on this purpose to demonstrate the role of probiotics in the reproduction of the aquatic animal (Abasali and Mohammad 2011; Ghosh et al. 2008). They used different strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus, B. subtilis, and Lactobacillus casei to demonstrate the probiotics performance on the reproduction. The probiotics play a significant role in the reproduction of the aquatic animal. It influences the reproduction by fertilization, fecundity, gonadosomatic index, and production of the spawn in the female (Abasali and Mohammad 2011). The present studies documented that the probiotics help to increase the daily egg ovulation number compared to control. It increases the hatching rate and faster the embryonic development of the zebrafish (Gioacchini et al. 2013).
16.3.10 Additional Activities of Probiotics
Presently, it is tracked down that the probiotics assist with lessening the pressure chemical focus like cortisol and furthermore actuate the counter oxidative proteins (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase) articulation, which assists with expanding the pressure resilience of the host (Zolotukhin et al. 2018), which are likewise fundamental for the better multiplication execution (Hasan and Banerjee 2020; Hasan et al. 2014) (Fig. 16.4).
16.3.11 Relation Between Probiotics and Food in Aquaculture
The aquaculture supplemented feed is balanced by the probiotics. This is the common practice in the commercial aquaculture. The feed provides the farmers and the consumers to improve the growth performance, production rate, flesh quality, fish immune response, and protein quantity, carcass quality, intestinal health, and also reduce the malformation of the fish (Hai 2015). But large numbers of farmers belong to low income; they are not able to provide this commercial feed. So they face in great loss. They rely on the natural feed so that the growth performance, production rate, and flesh quality is reduced and increased the mortality rate. There are many research proved that the aquaculture sector can increase the profit by using probiotic supplemented diet in the early stage of the fish. It protects the larvae from disease. But probiotic application in this early stage is difficult. There are many researchers that are found to work on this field (Table 16.4).
16.4 Future Perspectives
Nowadays, the probiotic application is becoming popular in the field of aquaculture. In the aquaculture, the probiotics are used to confer different advantages. The application of probiotics is conducted for increasing the growth, stimulates the immune system for better performance, and increases the feed efficiency and also the water quality improvement. There is necessary for the farther studies to understand the proper application and mechanisms of the probiotics in the aquaculture sector. It is important to understand the suitable stage of the probiotic application in early or adult stage by further study. The study of environmental condition and amount of probiotic application in the feed supplement is also very important. The larval stage is more exposed to the environment. So it is important to identify the effect of probiotics on that condition, which amount makes it more appropriate because they grow in different microbial flora in the intestine of the larvae.
Reducing the production cost of probiotics is vital. So that it will be affordable for both poor and middle scale farmer. This is the main concern for future technological developments of probiotics in Bangladesh. Bangladesh is lacking in assessment of screening potential probiotics from gut of different fish species that can help in developing probiotic technologies for certain commercial fish species. Development in this site can be one of the main focuses for future studies of probiotics in Bangladesh. Negative effect of different probiotic substances used in aquaculture in Bangladesh needed to be identified. This is important to identify the solution for making the probiotic viable and stable in to the new food environment that’s why it is important to have future studies on new technologies and innovations (Mattila-Sandholm et al. 2002).
The study of the recent development of probiotic extraction technology, formulation, and encapsulation is also very important. By this study, we can identify the better extraction method and identify the biological carrier and barrier, material, and ingredients for making better performance of probiotics. Recent research must be carried out to identify the ingredients by treating there tradition, physical, and enzymatic way to overcome the challenges in probiotics preparation and increasing the potentiality of the probiotic-treated feed supplements. It is important to identify the specific technology for identification of the food ingredients, which is appropriately incorporating with the probiotics.
The probiotic application into the water body must be investigated specifically. It is important to identify the relationship among the quality and quantity of the probiotics used for controlling the complex compound ammonia and nitrogen from the environment of the water body (Skjermo et al. 2015). The yeast plays a significant role as probiotic, but there is lack of information regarding their use in finfish aquaculture. The probiotics play a significant role in the biofloc technology, and it showed the great result in the field of shrimp culture (Hostins et al. 2017; Widanarni et al. 2010). There are different biotechnological tools used for the determination of the immune response of the fish. But there is limited study on the technological tools used for the probiotics impact on the immune system fish (Gupta et al. 2016; Murray et al. 2010; Reyes-López et al. 2015). It is necessary to focus on the study of the probiotic administration through water and obtain the result of the efficiency of probiotics.
The probiotics used in the field of aquaculture mostly collected from the gastrointestinal tract, and after that, it applied to the host body. In the present time, the probiotics are commercially produced by different commercial company for better production of the aquaculture sector. To making the appropriate and beneficial probiotics for the field of the aquaculture, it is very important to identify the appropriate bacterial strains. Otherwise, the probiotic strains may have mutation problem or they are expensive. Sometimes act as pathogen towards the host and creates stress. There are various studies of the probiotic effectiveness that was studied by different researchers. The result showed efficiency of probiotics in the fields of the aquaculture. More study is needed to specify the effectiveness in aquaculture field. It is very much important to study the quality control of the probiotics, applications, validations, and evaluation methods. It will help to increase the better performance, quality, and functional properties of the probiotics.
16.5 Limitations in the Use of Probiotics
-
The treated host or animal may not found the proper dosages of the probiotics due to leaching. So it is important to maintain the proper required dosages in the supplemented feed.
-
The probiotic strains, which contain different types of bacteria, may not able to survive in the supplemented feed, because there is extreme temperature and pressure during the preparation of the feed in the extruder.
-
Sometimes, there are high organic loads found in the sediments that’s why the probiotic loss its efficiency in this condition.
-
The exact quantity of the dosage must be calculated according to the water sediment status and for each condition (Nayak 2010b).
16.6 Conclusions
Aquaculture has undergone rapid advancement in the last few years. The main reasons for the increased interest and development of fish farming are due to the recent advances of fish culture techniques. Recently, the use of probiotics for promoting fish well-being, survival, and growth performance increased feed efficacy and enhanced immunity, and disease prevention has gained considerable attention for environment friendly aquaculture (Munir et al. 2016). It is also considered valid option to the prophylactic use of chemicals in aquaculture practices (Merrifield et al. 2010).
The use of different chemicals and antibiotics for controlling disease and increasing production has always been a matter of concern for their residual effect, drug resistance, and immune suppressants and for the adverse effect of residues in the environment. Accumulation of antibiotics and chemical residues in soil and waterbodies is degrading the environment and causing risk for wild populations. Use of a more environment friendly method can avoid these problems and benefit both the consumer and producers. Probiotics are always considered as a natural supplement of fish food that reducing production cost, while avoiding any adverse effect and ensuring consumer health. The European Union has controlled the utilization of anti-infection agents in organic entities for human utilization. As of now, customers request normal items, which staying liberated from anti-microbial and counterfeit added substances. Accordingly, the utilization of probiotics is a practical option for the hindrance of microorganisms and infectious prevention just as development speed increase in in aquaculture species. The present study will be the educational arrangement of the attractive attributes of probiotics, their method of activity, and valuable impacts on fishes, which can help to culture this fish species more commercially to focus on benefit of aquaculture production and farmers livelihood.
References
Abareethan M, Amsath A (2015) Characterization and evaluation of probiotic fish feed. Int J Pure Appl Zool 3(2):148–153
Abasali H, Mohammad S (2011) Dietary prebiotic immunogen supplementation in reproductive performance of platy (Xiphophorus maculatus). Vet Res 4:66–70. https://doi.org/10.3923/vr.2011.66.70
Al-Dohail MA, Hashim R, Aliyu-Paiko M (2009) Effects of the probiotic, Lactobacillus acidophilus, on the growth performance, haematology parameters and immunoglobulin concentration in African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell 1822) fingerling. Aquacult Res 40(14):1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02265.x
Allameh SK, Yusoff FM, Ringø E, Daud HM, Saad CR (2016) Effects of dietary mono-and multiprobiotic strains on growth performance, gut bacteria and body composition of Javanese carp (Puntius gonionotus, Bleeker 1850). Aquacult Nutr 22(2):367–373
Aly SM, Ahmed YAG, Ghareeb AA-A, Mohamed MF (2008) Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of Tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol 25(1–2):128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.013
Asaduzzaman M, Peiiehata S, Akter S, Kader MA, Ghosh SK, Khan N, A. &.-M. (2018) Effects of host gut-derived probiotic bacteria on gut morphology, microbiota composition and volatile short chain fatty acids production of Malaysian Mahseer Tor tambroides. Aquacult Rep 9:53–61
Austin B, Austin DA (2016) Bacterial fish pathogens, 6th edn. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32674-0
de Azevedo RV, Brag LGT (2012) Use of probiotics in aquaculture. In: Rigobelo EC (ed) Probiotic in animals. InTech, London, pp 103–118. https://doi.org/10.5772/50056
Balcázar JL, de Blas I, Ruiz-zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz J (2006) The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol 114(3–4):173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009
Banerjee G, Ray AK (2017) The advancement of probiotics research and its application in fish farming industries. Res Vet Sci 115:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.01.016
Banerjee G, Nandi A, Ray AK (2017) Assessment of hemolytic activity, enzyme production and bacteriocin characterization of Bacillus subtilis LR1 isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of fish. Arch Microbiol 199(1):115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1283-8
Boonthai T, Vuthiphandchai V, Nimrat S (2011) Probiotic bacteria effects on growth and bacterial composition of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Aquacult Nutr 17(6):634–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00865.x
Carnevali O, Zamponi MC, Sulpizio R, Rollo A, Nardi M, Orpianesi C et al (2004) Administration of probiotic strain to improve sea bream wellness during development. Aquacult Int 12(4/5):377–386. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AQUI.0000042141.85977.bb
Chowdhury MA, Roy NC (2020) Probiotic supplementation for enhanced growth of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) in cages. Aquacult Rep 18:100504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100504
Chowdhury G, Hossain MS, Dey T, Akhtar S, Jinia MA, Das B et al (2020) Effects of dietary probiotics on the growth, blood chemistry and stress response of pabda catfish (Ompok pabda) juveniles. AACL Bioflux 13(3):1595–1605
Cruz PM, Ibáñez AL, Hermosillo OAM, Saad HCR (2012) Use of probiotics in aquaculture. ISRN Microbiol 2012:1–13. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/916845
D’Alvise PW, Lillebø S, Prol-Garcia MJ, Wergeland HI, Nielsen KF, Bergh Ø, Gram L (2012) Phaeobacter gallaeciensis reduces Vibrio anguillarum in cultures of microalgae and rotifers, and prevents vibriosis in cod larvae. PLoS One 7(8):e43996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043996
Dawood MAO, Koshio S (2016) Recent advances in the role of probiotics and prebiotics in carp aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture 454:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.033
Dey A, Ghosh K, Hazra N (2018) Effects of probiotics-encapsulated live feed on growth and survival of juvenile Clarias batrachus (Linnaeus, 1758) after differential exposure to pathogenic bacteria. SAARC J Agric 16(1):105–113. https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v16i1.37427
DoF (2019) Yearbook of fisheries statistics of Bangladesh, 2018-19. Fisheries Resources Survey System (FRSS), vol 36. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Bangladesh, 135p
El-Haroun ER, Goda AMA-S, Kabir Chowdhury MA (2006) Effect of dietary probiotic Biogen supplementation as a growth promoter on growth performance and feed utilization of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquacult Res 37(14):1473–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01584.x
Farzanfar A (2006) The use of probiotics in shrimp aquaculture. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 48:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00116.x
Fuller R (1989) Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66(5):365–378. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2666378.
Gatesoupe F-J (1997) Siderophore production and probiotic effect of Vibrio sp. associated with turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus. Aquat Living Resour 10(4):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:1997026
Gatesoupe F (1999) The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture 180(1–2):147–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00187-8
Ghosh S, Sinha A, Sahu C (2008) Dietary probiotic supplementation in growth and health of live-bearing ornamental fishes. Aquacult Nutr 14(4):289–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00529.x
Ghosh K, Banerjee S, Moon UM, Khan HA, Dutta D (2017) Evaluation of gut associated extracellular enzyme-producing and pathogen inhibitory microbial community as potential probiotics in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Int J Aquacult 7(23):143–158. https://doi.org/10.5376/ija.2017.07.0023
Gioacchini G, Valle LD, Benato F, Fimia GM, Nardacci R, Ciccosanti F et al (2013) Interplay between autophagy and apoptosis in the development of Danio rerio follicles and the effects of a probiotic. Reprod Fertil Dev 25(8):1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD12187
Giri SS, Sukumaran V, Oviya M (2013) Potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum VSG3 improves the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of tropical freshwater fish, Labeo rohita. Fish Shellfish Immunol 34(2):660–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.008
Guarner F, Schaafsma GJ (1998) Probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 39(3):237–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)00136-0
Gupta A, Gupta P, Dhawan A (2016) Paenibacillus polymyxa as a water additive improved immune response of Cyprinus carpio and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquacult Rep 4:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2016.07.002
Hai NV (2015) The use of probiotics in aquaculture. J Appl Microbiol 119(4):917–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12886
Hai NV, Buller N, Fotedar R (2009) Effects of probiotics (Pseudomonas synxantha and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on the growth, survival and immune parameters of juvenile western king prawns (Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896). Aquacult Res 40(5):590–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02135.x
Hamdan AM, El-Sayed AFM, Mahmoud MM (2016) Effects of a novel marine probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum AH 78, on growth performance and immune response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J Appl Microbiol 120(4):1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13081
Harikrishnan R, Balasundaram C, Heo M-S (2010) Effect of probiotics enriched diet on Paralichthys olivaceus infected with lymphocystis disease virus (LCDV). Fish Shellfish Immunol 29(5):868–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2010.07.031
Hasan KN, Banerjee G (2020) Recent studies on probiotics as beneficial mediator in aquaculture: a review. J Basic Appl Zool 81(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-020-00190-y
Hasan KN, Moniruzzaman M, Maitra SK (2014) Melatonin concentrations in relation to oxidative status and oocyte dynamics in the ovary during different reproductive phases of an annual cycle in carp Catla catla. Theriogenology 82(8):1173–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.08.001
Hasan R, Hossain MA, Islam M, Iqbal M (2021) Does commercial probiotics improve the performence and hemetological parameters of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquat Res 4(2):160–168
He S, Ran C, Qin C, Li S, Zhang H, de Vos WM et al (2017) Anti-infective effect of adhesive probiotic Lactobacillus in fish is correlated with their spatial distribution in the intestinal tissue. Sci Rep 7(1):13195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13466-1
Hostins B, Lara G, Decamp O, Cesar DE, Wasielesky W (2017) Efficacy and variations in bacterial density in the gut of Litopenaeus vannamei reared in a BFT system and in clear water supplemented with a commercial probiotic mixture. Aquaculture 480:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.07.036
Irianto A, Austin B (2002) Probiotics in aquaculture. J Fish Dis 25(11):633–642. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00422.x
Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Jing Y, Liao M, Rong XH (2018) Effects of probiotic on microfloral structure of live feed used in larvalbreeding of turbot Scophthalmus maximus. J Oceanol Limnol 36(3):1002–1012
Kesarcodi-Watson A, Kaspar H, Lategan MJ, Gibson L (2008) Probiotics in aquaculture: the need, principles and mechanisms of action and screening processes. Aquaculture 274(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.11.019
Lara-Flores M, Olvera-Novoa MA (2013) The use of lactic acid bacteria isolated from intestinal tract of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), as growth promoters in fish fed low protein diets. Latin Am J Aquat Res 41(3):490–497. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol41-issue3-fulltext-12
Leyva-Madrigal KY, Luna-González A, Escobedo-Bonilla CM, Fierro-Coronado JA, Maldonado-Mendoza IE (2011) Screening for potential probiotic bacteria to reduce prevalence of WSSV and IHHNV in whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) under experimental conditions. Aquaculture 322–323:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.033
Lilly DM, Stillwell RH (1965) Probiotics: growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science 147(3659):747–748. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3659.747
Lukwambe B, Qiuqian L, Wu J, Zhang D, Wang K, Zheng Z (2015) The effects of commercial microbial agents (probiotics) on phytoplankton community structure in intensive white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) aquaculture ponds. Aquacult Int 23(6):1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9895-6
Mamun M, Al A, Nasren S, Bari SM (2018) Role of probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future guidelines. J Bangladesh Acad Sci 42(1):105–109. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v42i1.37837
Martínez Cruz P, Ibáñez AL, Monroy Hermosillo OA, Ramírez Saad HC (2012) Use of probiotics in aquaculture. ISRN Microbiol 2012:916845. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/916845
Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllärinen P, Crittenden R, Mogensen G, Fondén R, Saarela M (2002) Technological challenges for future probiotic foods. Int Dairy J 12(2–3):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00099-1
Melgar Valdes CE, Barba Macías E, Alvarez-González CA, Tovilla Hernández C, Sánchez AJ (2013) Microorganisms effect with probiotic potential in water quality and growth of the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Decapoda: Penaeidae) in intensive culture. Rev Biol Trop 61(3):1215–1228. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24027919.
Merrifield DL, Dimitroglou A, Foey A, Davies SJ, Baker RTM, Bøgwald J et al (2010) The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for salmonids. Aquaculture 302(1–2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.02.007
Moriarty DJ (1998) Control of luminous Vibrio species in penaeid aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture 164(1–4):351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00199-9
Munir MB, Hashim R, Chai YH, Marsh TL, Nor SAM (2016) Dietary prebiotics and probiotics influence growth performance, nutrient digestibility and the expression of immune regulatory genes in snakehead (Channa striata) fingerlings. Aquaculture 460:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.041
Munirasu S, Ramasubramanian V, Arunkumar P (2017) Effect of probiotics diet on growth and biochemical performance of freshwater fish Labeo rohita fingerlings. J Entomol Zool Stud 5(3):1374–1379
Murray HM, Lall SP, Rajaselvam R, Boutilier LA, Blanchard B, Flight RM et al (2010) A nutrigenomic analysis of intestinal response to partial soybean meal replacement in diets for juvenile Atlantic halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus, L. Aquaculture 298(3–4):282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.11.001
Nandi A, Banerjee G, Dan SK, Ghosh, K. &. (2018) Evaluation of in vivo probiotic efficiency of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in Labeo rohita challenged by pathogenic strain of Aeromonas hydrophila MTCC 1739. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 10(2):391–398
Nayak SK (2010a) Probiotics and immunity: a fish perspective. Fish Shellfish Immunol 29(1):2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.017
Nayak SK (2010b) Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish. Aquacult Res 41(11):1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02546.x
Newaj-Fyzul A, Al-Harbi AH, Austin B (2014) Review: developments in the use of probiotics for disease control in aquaculture. Aquaculture 431:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.08.026
Nicolas JL, Gatesoupe FJ, Frouel S, Bachere E, Gueguen Y (2007) Quelles stratégies alternatives aux antibiotiques en aquaculture ? INRAE Prod Anim 20(3):253–258. https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2007.20.3.3465
Nikoskelainen S, Ouwehand AC, Bylund G, Salminen S, Lilius E-M (2003) Immune enhancement in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus rhamnosus). Fish Shellfish Immunol 15(5):443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-4648(03)00023-8
Padmavathi P, Sunitha K, Veeraiah K (2012) Efficacy of probiotics in improving water quality and bacterial flora in fish ponds. Afr J Microbiol Res 6(49):7471–7478
Pandya D (2016) Benefits of probiotics in oral cavity: a detailed review. Ann Int Med Dent Res 2(5):1–17
Panigrahi A, Kiron V, Satoh S, Watanabe T (2010) Probiotic bacteria Lactobacillus rhamnosus influences the blood profile in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Fish Physiol Biochem 36(4):969–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-009-9375-x
Parker RB (1974) Probiotics, the other half of the antibiotic story. Anim Nutr Health 29:4–8
Porubcan RS (1991) Reduction of ammonia nitrogen and nitrite in tanks of Penaeus monodon using floating biofilters containing processed diatomaceous earth media pre-inoculated with nitrifying bacteria. In: Proceedings of the program and 22nd annual conference and exposition. World Aquaculture Society, Puerto Rico, pp 16–20
Rahiman KMM, Jesmi Y, Thomas AP, Mohamed Hatha AA (2010) Probiotic effect of Bacillus NL110 and Vibrio NE17 on the survival, growth performance and immune response of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Aquacult Res 41(9):e120–e134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02473.x
Rahman M, Khatun A, Kholil M, Hossain M (2017) Aqua drugs and chemicals used in fish farms of Comilla regions. J Entomol Zool Stud 5(6):2462–2473
Reyes-López FE, Romeo JS, Vallejos-Vidal E, Reyes-Cerpa S, Sandino AM, Tort L et al (2015) Differential immune gene expression profiles in susceptible and resistant full-sibling families of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) challenged with infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV). Dev Comp Immunol 53(1):210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2015.06.017
Ringø E, Hoseinifar SH, Ghosh K, Van Doan H, Beck BR, Song SK (2018) Lactic acid bacteria in finfish—an update. Front Microbiol 9:1818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818
Roberfroid M (2007) Prebiotics: the concept revisited. J Nutr 137(3):830S–837S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.3.830S
Ruangsri J, Lokesh J, Fernandes JMO, Kiron V (2014) Transcriptional regulation of antimicrobial peptides in mucosal tissues of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua L. in response to different stimuli. Aquacult Res 45(12):1893–1905. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12136
Sahu MK, Swarnakumar NS, Sivakumar K, Thangaradjou T, Kannan L (2008) Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives. Indian J Microbiol 48(3):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-008-0024-3
Sanchez Ortiz AC, Luna Gonzalez A, Campa Cordova AI, Escamilla Montes R, del C Flores Miranda M, Mazon Suastegui JM (2015) Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic bacteria from pustulose ark (Anadara tuberculosa) suitable for shrimp farming. Lat Am J Aquat Res 43(1):123–136. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol43-issue1-fulltext-11
Sayes C, Leyton Y, Riquelme C (2018) Probiotic bacteria as a healthy alternative for fish aquaculture. In: Savic S (ed) Antibiotics use in animals. InTech Publishers, Rijeka
Schrezenmeir J, de Vrese M (2001) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—approaching a definition. Am J Clin Nutr 73(2):361s–364s. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.361s
Skjermo J, Vadstein O (1999) Techniques for microbial control in the intensive rearing of marine larvae. Aquaculture 177(1–4):333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00096-4
Skjermo J, Bakke I, Dahle SW, Vadstein O (2015) Probiotic strains introduced through live feed and rearing water have low colonizing success in developing Atlantic cod larvae. Aquaculture 438:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.12.027
Subasinghe RP (2005) Epidemiological approach to aquatic animal health management: opportunities and challenges for developing countries to increase aquatic production through aquaculture. Prev Vet Med 67(2–3):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.11.004
Sunitha K, Krishna PV (2016) Efficacy of probiotics in water quality and bacterial biochemical characterisation of fish ponds. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5(9):30–37. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.509.004
Talpur AD, Memon AJ, Khan MI, Ikhwanuddin M, Abdullah MDD, Bolong A-MA (2013) Gut Lactobacillus sp. bacteria as probiotics for Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) larviculture: effects on survival, digestive enzyme activities and water quality. Invertebr Reprod Dev 57(3):173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2012.714406
Tan LT-H, Chan K-G, Lee L-H, Goh B-H (2016) Streptomyces bacteria as potential probiotics in aquaculture. Front Microbiol 7(79). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00079
Taoka Y, Maeda H, Jo J-Y, Jeon M-J, Bai SC, Lee W-J et al (2006) Growth, stress tolerance and non-specific immune response of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus to probiotics in a closed recirculating system. Fish Sci 72(2):310–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2006.01152.x
Taoka Y, Yuge K, Maeda H, Koshio S (2008) The efficiency of Lactobacillus plantarum in diet for juvenile japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus reared in a closed recirculating system. Aquacult Sci 56(2):193–202
Tarnecki AM, Wafapoor M, Phillips RN (2019) Benefits of a Bacillus probiotic to larval fish survival and transport stress resistance. Sci Rep 9(1):1–11
Verschuere L, Rombaut G, Sorgeloos P, Verstraete W (2000) Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64(4):655–671. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.4.655-671.2000
Wang Y-M, Wang Y-G (2008) Advance in the mechanisms and application of microecologics in aquaculture. Prog Veter Med 29:72–75
Wang AL, Zheng GL, Liao SA, Huang HH, Sun RY (2007) Diversity analysis of bacteria capable of removing nitrate/nitrite in a shrimp pond. Acta Ecol Sin 27(5):1937–1943
Wang Y-B, Li J-R, Lin J (2008) Probiotics in aquaculture: challenges and outlook. Aquaculture 281:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.002
Widanarni W, Yuniasari D, Sukenda S, Ekasari J (2010) Nursery culture performance of Litopenaeus vannamei with probiotics addition and different C/N ratio under laboratory condition. Hayati J Biosci 17(3):115–119. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.17.3.115
Wu Z-Q, Jiang C, Ling F, Wang G-X (2015) Effects of dietary supplementation of intestinal autochthonous bacteria on the innate immunity and disease resistance of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Aquaculture 438:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.12.041
Xia Y, Wang M, Gao F, Lu M a (2020) Effects of dietary probiotic supplementation on the growth,gut health and disease resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Anim Nutr 6(1):69–79
Zolotukhin PV, Prazdnova EV, Chistyakov VA (2018) Methods to assess the antioxidative properties of probiotics. Probiot Antimicrob Proteins 10(3):589–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9375-6
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge partial financial support from BANBEIS (Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information & Statistics), Ministry of Education, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roy, N.C., Munni, M.J., Chowdhury, M.A., Akther, K.R. (2021). Probiotic Supplements in Aquaculture: Latest Developments and Future Trends. In: Gupta, S.K., Giri, S.S. (eds) Biotechnological Advances in Aquaculture Health Management . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5195-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5195-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5194-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5195-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)