Abstract
During embryonic development, the central nervous system forms as the neural plate and then rolls into a tube in a complex morphogenetic process known as neurulation. Neural tube defects (NTDs) occur when neurulation fails and are among the most common structural birth defects in humans. The frequency of NTDs varies greatly anywhere from 0.5 to 10 in 1000 live births, depending on the genetic background of the population, as well as a variety of environmental factors. The prognosis varies depending on the size and placement of the lesion and ranges from death to severe or moderate disability, and some NTDs are asymptomatic. This chapter reviews how mouse models have contributed to the elucidation of the genetic, molecular, and cellular basis of neural tube closure, as well as to our understanding of the causes and prevention of this devastating birth defect.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
2.1 Overview
During embryonic development, the central nervous system forms as the neural plate and then rolls into a tube in a complex morphogenetic process known as neurulation. Neural tube defects (NTDs) occur when neurulation fails and are among the most common structural birth defects in humans. The frequency of NTDs varies greatly anywhere from 0.5 to 10 in 1000 live births, depending on the genetic background of the population, as well as a variety of environmental factors [1,2,3]. The prognosis varies depending on the size and placement of the lesion and ranges from death to severe or moderate disability, and some NTDs are asymptomatic. This chapter reviews how mouse models have contributed to the elucidation of the genetic, molecular, and cellular basis of neural tube closure, as well as to our understanding of the causes and prevention of this devastating birth defect.
2.2 Types of NTDs
The neural tube initially forms as a flat epithelial plate that must roll into a tube to form the brain and spinal cord. Defects in this process result in NTDs, a constellation of malformations of the central nervous system (Fig. 2.1). The most common NTD in humans is spina bifida, which results from failure of closure in the spinal region. The consequence of spina bifida varies greatly, depending on the size and placement of the lesion, the involvement of the spinal nerves and meninges, as well as the presence of associated conditions such as hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, genitourinary, and gastrointestinal disorders. Spina bifida can manifest as myelomeningocele, meningocele, or spina bifida occulta. Myelomeningocele is the most common and severe form of spina bifida and involves protrusion of the meninges and spinal cord through an opening in the vertebrae. Meningocele occurs when the meninges but not the spinal cord protrude. Spina bifida occulta can be asymptomatic and occurs when the dorsal part of vertebrae does not properly form. More severe open NTDs include craniorachischisis and anencephaly. Craniorachischisis is the most serious NTD, resulting from failure of neural tube closure along the entire neural plate. Exencephaly (the embryonic precursor to anencephaly) occurs when closure fails in the anterior neural plate or future brain. Anencephaly and craniorachischisis are fatal, resulting in the prenatal death or demise of the newborn shortly after birth. Spina bifida occulta and multiple abnormalities are classified clinically as NTDs; however, the developmental origins of these malformations are not due to failure of neural tube closure. Closed NTDs include encephalocele, iniencephaly, hydrocephalus, microcephaly, and holoprosencephaly. Encephalocele occurs when the cranial vault fails to form properly around a closed neural tube, leading to protrusion of the brain and meninges through an opening in the skull, whereas other NTDs such as iniencephaly, hydrocephalus, microcephaly, and holoprosencephaly result from improper growth of the closed neural tube.
2.3 Diagnosis and Treatment of NTDs
Most NTDs are diagnosed before birth by standard prenatal screening tests. High levels of alpha fetal protein (AFP) in maternal serum or in amniotic fluid are correlated with NTDs and signal the need for further testing. Most NTDs can be identified by ultrasound during the routine anatomy scan between 18 and 22 weeks. Babies with spina bifida are typically delivered by cesarean section, and the lesion is surgically corrected either in utero or shortly after birth [4, 5]. However, secondary defects frequently occur with spina bifida, including Arnold-Chiari malformations with hindbrain herniation, hydrocephalus requiring placement of a shunt, and tethering of the spinal cord leading to progressive pain, incontinence, and weakness of the lower extremities, as well as spinal deformities [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Nerve damage can result in neurogenic bladder and bowel or paralysis of lower extremities requiring the need to use a wheelchair, braces, or crutches [5]. Because of reduced sensation to lower extremities, patients are susceptible to unrealized infections, which may necessitate amputation of damaged limbs. Other complications include learning disabilities, social issues, and latex allergies [5]. In spite of these complications, with improvements in care, the majority of patients survive well into adulthood [5, 8].
2.4 The Etiology of NTDs
While the cause of individual cases of NTDs are rarely known, the vast majority of NTDs are due to complex interactions of multiple genetic and environmental factors with an estimated 60–70% of NTDs having a genetic contribution [12,13,14]. Evidence for the genetic causes of NTDs comes from the finding that chromosomal abnormalities are often present in NTD-affected fetuses, and NTDs are noted in spontaneous abortions with abnormal karyotypes [15,16,17,18]. NTDs also occur at higher rates in certain genetic syndromes, including Meckel-Gruber, Waardenburg, and 22q11.2 deletion syndromes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Finally, twin studies indicate a 5% concordance rate, and NTD risk is significantly increased in NTD patients or individuals with a previously affected pregnancy [18, 34,35,36,37]. In spite of a clear genetic component, few causative genes have been identified. This is in part due to complex etiology of the malformation, the number of genes that could cause the defect, as well as the existence of few multiplex families for genetic studies. While thus far a handful of genes associated with NTDs were identified in small cohorts of patients, few definitive causative genes are known [38]. Interestingly, the majority of variants identified to date are linked to the noncanonical Wnt pathway that controls planar cell polarity or to folic acid metabolism, implicating these as key pathways driving NTDs in humans [39, 40]. This chapter will focus on Wnt signaling and folic acid metabolism to illustrate how the study of mouse models has been essential in elucidating the central role of these pathways in neurulation.
In addition to the large number of genes that could cause NTDs, another complicating factor in finding the genetic causes of NTDs in humans is the complex etiology of these defects. The majority of genetic mutations involved in NTDs do not likely cause a defect unless combined with other genetic or environmental factors. The multifactorial threshold model (Fig. 2.2) is proposed to account for the pattern of NTD inheritance observed in humans where multiple factors of small effect interact to cause a disease [41, 42]. This model postulates that neural tube closure is a threshold event that occurs either successfully or not, resulting in either normal neural tube closure or defects. A single genetic insult or environmental exposure might not cross the threshold to cause NTDs, but one or more factors in combination result in failure of neural tube closure. The mouse model is a tractable experimental system in which to test the multifactorial threshold model and test gene–gene, gene–environment, and environment–environment interactions [41, 43]. Digenic inheritance can be modeled in mouse in compound mutants, or modifier variants do not cause NTDs themselves but increase the penetrance and/or severity of defects in combination [42, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Gene–environment interactions are also tractable in the mouse model. For example, the impact of alterations of either macro- or micronutrients on the incidence and severity of NTDs can be studied in models [51]. Varying macronutrients such as dietary protein, fat, and carbohydrate composition of the mouse chow can influence NTD risk [51,52,53,54]. Micronutrient supplementation with folic acid, inositol, retinoic acid, iron, as well as nutrients that feed into the folate pathway, including vitamin B12, choline, methionine, formate, and glycine, can also impact NTDs in a variety of mutant mouse models [51, 55,56,57,58,59]. Studies of mouse models of diabetes provide novel insight as to the genes and pathways that interact with hyperglycemia to cause NTDs [51, 60, 61]. Exposure to teratogens, including medications (e.g., valproic acid), arsenic, the mycotoxin fumonisin, or hyperthermia, as a result of hot tub usage or maternal fever can induce NTDs in mouse models [62,63,64,65].
2.5 NTDs Result from Failure of Neural Tube Closure
Primary neurulation is a complex morphogenetic process that results in the transformation of the flat neural plate into the neural tube (Fig. 2.3). Neural tube formation involves the coordinated growth and morphogenesis of multiple tissues. Forces that drive neural tube closure arise from the neural tissue itself (intrinsic forces), as well as from the adjacent surface ectoderm and underlying mesoderm (extrinsic forces; [66]). Primary neurulation begins after gastrulation as the neuroepithelium is induced from the embryonic ectoderm. Following induction, the neural plate forms as individual neuroepithelial cells elongate, resulting in a thickening of the ectoderm on the dorsal side of the embryo. Two coordinated morphogenetic movements intrinsic to the neural plate drive elevation of the neural folds by facilitating the rolling of the plate into a tube. Convergent extension (CE) movements drive lengthening and narrowing of the neural plate and direct formation of hinge points around which the neural plate bends. A single hinge point forms in the midline of the neural plate (medial hinge point (MHP)), followed by the formation of paired dorsal lateral hinge points (DLHPs) in lateral regions. Extrinsic forces from the surface epithelium and surrounding mesenchyme also promote elevation of the neural folds. As the paired neural folds meet in the dorsal midline, they fuse and the neural and surface epithelium remodels to form two separate epithelial sheets.
Broadly speaking, two mechanisms of neurulation are employed to form a neural tube, primary and secondary neurulation. Primary neurulation is when a flat neural plate rolls into a tube, whereas secondary neurulation occurs when mesenchymal cells coalesce into a tube. In amniotes, the majority of the central nervous system is formed by primary neurulation, whereas the most posterior portion of the spine caudal to the sacral vertebrae forms by secondary neurulation [67,68,69]. In primary neurulation, the neural plate does not roll into a tube all at once; rather, closure is initiated at discrete points, followed by “zipping” to fuse the neural folds together (Fig. 2.1; [70]). Closure 1 initiates at the hindbrain/spinal cord boundary and extends in both anterior and posterior directions. This is followed by the formation of closure points in the cranial region: Closure 2 at the midbrain/forebrain boundary and Closure 3 at the anterior aspect of the forebrain. The position of Closure 2 is variable between mouse strains, and its position is correlated with strain-specific susceptibility to exencephaly [71, 72]. Closure 2 may also be variable during human neurulation, as it has been identified in some but not other human embryo samples [73]. Another closure point then forms at the caudal end of the spine as closure of the posterior neuropore becomes imminent [74]. As primary neurulation ceases, there is a transition zone where the dorsal portion of the neural tube undergoes elevation and folding, whereas cells of the ventral neural tube delaminate and then integrate into the neural tube [75]. As neurulation proceeds further, this transition zone gives way to purely secondary neurulation where neuromesodermal progenitors undergo mesenchymal to epithelial transitions to incorporate into the forming neural tube [76]. Disruptions in any of these processes can result in NTDs. The remainder of this chapter will review the molecular and cellular basis of these processes, illustrating how studies in animal models reveal their integration to provide a basis for the interaction of genetic lesion impacting these processes in human NTDs.
2.6 Mouse Models Have Been Instrumental in Elucidating the Mechanics of Neural Tube Closure
While multiple animal models are used to study neurulation, the mouse has several advantages. First of all, as opposed to that in frogs (African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis) and fish (zebrafish, Danio rerio), neural tube closure in chickens and mice is most similar to that in humans, where primary neurulation occurs in the majority of the neural tube. In contrast, zebrafish employs a modified secondary neurulation process along the entire neural axis in which deep and superficial mesenchymal cells converge toward the midline and coalesce into a neural keel intermediate. Deep and superficial cells then undergo radial intercalation to form an epithelial tube [77]. The Xenopus neural plate is also stratified into deep and superficial layers [78], and apical constriction occurs in the superficial layers to drive neural fold elevation [79]. Once the folds fuse in the dorsal midline, deep and superficial cells undergo radial intercalation to form a pseudostratified epithelium. While the pathways that control cell shape changes, such as convergent extension and apical constriction are conserved between these animal models, overall difference in morphogenesis between these models makes the mouse and chicken most broadly relevant for understanding human neural tube closure.
The mouse also has the advantage of being amenable to genetic approaches to study the genes required for neural tube closure. The availability of numerous mouse mutants with NTDs provides a rich source of diverse models for study to elucidate the genes and pathways required for neural tube closure [42, 44, 45, 59]. However, because the mouse embryo develops in utero, examination of the cell behaviors that underlie neurulation presents significant challenges compared to models that develop exteriorly. Thus, historically most of what is known about the dynamic cell movements and behaviors that drive neurulation comes from studies in the frog, fish, and chicken. Yet recent advances in live-imaging approaches combined with improved ex utero culture conditions are beginning to overcome these hurdles, providing new insight as to the cell and tissue movements that underlie neural tube formation in the mouse and how genetic mutations disrupt this process [74, 80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90].
2.7 Convergent Extension Movements and the Planar Cell Polarity Pathway
Following a thickening of the neuroepithelium, the neural plate undergoes convergent extension movements, resulting in lengthening and narrowing along the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes. Polarized cell behaviors that mediate convergent extension movements are controlled by the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway [91,92,93]. PCP was first described in Drosophila, where it controls the polarity of cells within an epithelium and the positioning of asymmetrically localized structures such as wing hairs [94]. The PCP pathway is conserved in vertebrates and is controlled by the noncanonical Wnt pathway leading to asymmetrical distribution of protein complexes within an epithelium (Fig. 2.4). During neurulation, PCP regulates the polarization of mediolateral protrusions that drive convergent extension movements [95]. Best studied in the Looptail (Lp) mouse line with mutation of Van Gogh like-2 (Vangl2), defective convergent extension leads to craniorachischisis, where the neural tube fails to close along the entire anterior-posterior axis accompanied by shortening of the embryo and a wider midline and floorplate [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Interestingly, human embryos with craniorachischisis are short with a broad floorplate [105], suggesting that similar mechanisms may underlie craniorachischisis in humans. Vangl2 is necessary for convergent extension movements in the notochord and neural plate [98], and mutations in other PCP pathway genes also result in NTDs in the mouse. For example, compound mutants for the vertebrate homologues of Disheveled or Frizzled receptors show craniorachischisis [106,107,108], as do targeted knockouts of other PCP pathway components such as Celsr1, Wnt5a, and Ptk7 [109,110,111,112]. Mutations of PCP genes can also result in spina bifida and exencephaly [106, 113,114,115,116,117].
Consistent with the multifactorial threshold model for NTDs, a number of genes can interact with Vangl2Lp heterozygotes, resulting in NTDs in compound mutants. For example, Vangl2Lp can genetically interact with other PCP genes, including Wnt5a, Vangl1, Dvl2, Dvl3, Celsr1, Fz1, Fz2, Daam1, and Protein tyrosine kinase-7 (Ptk7) in compound mutants to cause NTDs [76, 97, 107,108,109,110,111,112, 118,119,120,121]. Additionally, Vangl2Lp can genetically interact with mutations in genes not previously identified as regulating PCP pathways to give NTDs. These include Grhl3, Bardet-Biedl syndrome-1 (BBS1), BBS4, BBS6, cordon bleu (cobl) and Scribble (Scrbl), Syndecan 4 (Sdc4), and Sec24b [121,122,123,124,125,126,127]. Interestingly, heterozygous Vangl2Lp/+ embryos show a slightly wider and shorter midline and delayed neural tube closure [98], providing the basis for the development of NTDs in heterozygous embryos and in genetic interaction experiments.
PCP genes are also associated with NTDs in humans. Thus far, multiple mutations in a variety of PCP-related genes are associated with NTDs in humans, including predicted and/or proven deleterious mutations in CELSR1, CELSR3, FZD6, PRICKLE1, VANGL1, VANGL2, FUZ, SCRIB, PTK7, and DACT1 [40, 128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148]. The deleterious nature of a handful of these sequence variants has been verified in a variety of assays to test the ability to rescue PCP phenotypes in zebrafish, binding to known interacting proteins or altered localization in polarized epithelium [129, 134, 136, 137, 139, 140]. Remarkably, digenic inheritance has also been found involving PCP genes in human patients [40, 141, 142, 145, 148].
2.8 Hinge Point Formation
The medial point in the spinal cord is formed as cells of the neural epithelium become wedge shaped eliciting bending of the neural plate around these hinge points (Fig. 2.5). The pseudostratified neuroepithelium is comprised of bipolar neural progenitors with a nucleus that moves between apical and basal positions dependent upon the phase of the cell cycle. During mitosis, the nucleus is localized at the apical surface, and during other phases of the cell cycle, it is positioned more basally. As hinge points form, the cell cycle is prolonged, resulting in greater numbers of cells in the hinge point in nonmitotic phases and nuclei localized in basal positions [149,150,151,152]. The majority of cells in the MHP have basally positioned nuclei, resulting in multiple wedge-shaped cells that contribute to the bending of the epithelium. This in combination with local destabilization of adherens and tight junctions at the hinge points allows bending of the rigid neural plate at the hinge points [149,150,151]. The rigidity of the neural plate is maintained by apical constriction involving nonmuscle myosin that contracts the circumferential actomyosin cables anchored at the adherens junction [153, 154].
In the cranial region, coordinated apical constriction of the neural epithelium also contributes to hinge point formation and bending of the neural plate [149, 153]. The contractile force needed for apical constriction is also generated by myosin contracting the actin filaments, a process involving the small GTPase RhoA, ROCK, and myosin light chain kinase [155,156,157,158]. Inhibition of this kinase cascade or mutation of actin-binding proteins disrupts neural tube closure [159,160,161,162,163,164]. One of the best studied regulators of apical constriction in the cranial region is Shroom3 [155, 156, 158, 165, 166]. Importantly, putative loss of function sequence variants in SHROOM3 are associated with NTDs in humans [167,168,169].
2.9 Apical Constriction Is Coordinated with PCP Activation in the Neural Plate
Dynamic integration of PCP and apical constriction pathways drives simultaneous convergent extension and bending of the neural plate [158, 170,171,172,173]. Asymmetrical enrichment of PCP components with apical constriction pathways at the mediolateral facing edge of neuroepithelial cells results in the tightening of actomyosin cables preferentially along the mediolateral axis to allow for the rolling of the neural plate [170]. Narrowing and lengthening of the neural plate also involves the coordination of PCP and apical constriction as epithelial rosettes resolve in a preferred direction [174, 175]. This complex and intimate link between the dynamic localization of core PCP proteins, actomyosin assembly, and polarized junction shrinking during cell intercalation is key for neural tube closure [176]. This interaction also provides a basis for genetic interaction of the basal-lateral Scribble and the core PCP protein Vangl2, which results in craniorachischisis in Vangl2Lp/+;ScrblCcr/+ compound mutants [122].
2.10 Formation of Hinge Points Is Regulated by Shh and BMPs
The relative contribution of the MHP and DLHPs to neurulation differs along the anterior-posterior axis of the spinal cord (Fig. 2.5; [177]). In the anterior spinal cord, MHPs are most prominent and DLHPs fail to form, resulting in the neural plate folding over the MHP and the neural folds meeting in the dorsal midline. This pattern of neurulation is referred to as “Mode 1.” In more caudal regions, both the MHP and paired DLHPs are prominent and the neural plate rolls around these hinge points. This is referred to as “Mode 2” neurulation. In the posterior spinal cord, “Mode 3” neurulation predominates where a prominent MHP does not form and the neural folds roll around the DLHP. In the cranial region, both MHP and DLHPs form and DLHP formation is a dynamic process, as evident in live-imaging experiments where DLHPs form, disappear, and then reform as the neural folds elevate [81].
The dynamic activity of Shh and BMPs along the anterior-posterior axis of the spinal cord influences the mode of neurulation (Fig. 2.5; [178]). Shh is expressed at highest levels in the anterior regions of the spinal cord and is almost nonexistent in the most caudal regions [178]. Moreover, Shh and BMPs inhibit formation of the DLHPs [178, 179]. BMPs are secreted from the surface ectoderm, and their expression remains essentially constant along the spinal neural plate. However, the BMP antagonist Noggin is expressed in middle and posterior regions, where it promotes DLHP formation by inhibiting BMPs and destabilizing adherens and tight junctions [149,150,151]. While disruption of BMP signaling results in NTDs [180,181,182,183,184,185,186], loss of Shh signaling results in exaggerated hinge points, and the neural tube still closes. On the other hand, activation of Shh signaling by loss of negative regulators results in failure of DLHP formation and neural tube closure in regions of the neural tube where DLHPs are critical [187]. Importantly, sequence variants in negative regulators of Shh signaling, including SUFU, PTCH1, PKA, and GPR161, are associated with spina bifida in humans [188,189,190,191].
2.11 PCP, Ciliogenesis, and Shh Signaling
PCP signaling also influences the positioning of cilia on the cell [192]. Many of the genes that interact with Vangl2Lp to cause NTDs in mouse models are involved in cilia, including BBS (Bardet–Biedl syndrome) proteins. While NTDs are not commonly described as features of BBS, mouse mutants in some of the genes that cause BBS show a low penetrance of NTDs or interact with other genes to cause NTDs [126, 193]. Similarly other ciliopathies, such as Meckel-Gruber (MKS) and Joubert syndromes are also associated with NTDs in mouse models but not the human syndrome [194,195,196]. Mutations of the PCP effector proteins Fuzzy and Inturned result in defects in cilia and Shh signaling and neural tube closure [115,116,117]. Because cilia play an essential role in the transduction of Shh signaling [197, 198], the PCP pathway can potentially interact with Shh signaling to cause NTDs.
2.12 Role of the Nonneural Ectoderm in Neural Fold Elevation and Fusion
The nonneural ectoderm is required for neural tube closure by providing an inductive signal for DLHP formation, a driving force for the elevation of the neural folds and participating in the fusion of the neural folds [199,200,201,202,203]. In chicken embryos, removal of the surface epithelium results in failure of DLHP formation and neural fold elevation [202]. This could reflect either an inductive or a mechanical role in DLHP formation and elevation of the neural folds. In support of an inductive role, removal of all but a small strip of surface epithelium is sufficient to induce DLHPs [202]. BMP and Noggin are expressed in the surface ectoderm, and culture with a Noggin-coated bead will induce DLHPs [179]. On the other hand, oriented cell divisions in the epidermis of the chicken embryo drive medial-lateral expansion of the tissue [204], and the surface epithelium in Xenopus migrates medially during neural tube closure [203], potentially providing a mechanical force for neural fold elevation. The surface ectoderm differentially contacts the neural tube along the anterior posterior neural axis and it is likely that the role of the surface ectoderm changes as well [173].
Grhl2 and Grhl3 are expressed almost exclusively in the surface ectoderm during neurulation and are required for the proper development of the epidermis and neural tube closure [205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212]. Grhl3 is also expressed in the hindgut epithelium, and mutation of Grhl3ct in a hypomorphic mouse line creates an imbalance in proliferation between the posterior neural tube and the underlying hindgut epithelium resulting in spina bifida [213]. Grhl3 and Grhl2 null mouse mutants show defects in more anterior regions of the spinal cord and failure of DLHP formation in spite of normal expression of epidermally derived factors involved in DLHP formation, such as BMP2 and Noggin [205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212]. Importantly, GRHL genes are implicated in human NTDs [167, 168, 214].
During fusion of the neural folds, cells extend finger-like projections that contact protrusions on the opposing neural folds, intercalate, draw the folds closer, and fasten them together [81, 82]. The neural folds are comprised of neural and nonneural ectoderm, which extend different projections in regionally distinct areas of the neural tube [85, 90, 153]. Live-imaging experiments in the mouse suggest that closure in the hindbrain/midbrain region does not occur by “zipping” but rather formation of multiple intermediate closure points that “button up” the folds together [82, 89]. The tissue layer that makes initial contact differs based on the anterior-posterior level. Between closure points 1 and 2, fusion is initiated by cells of the nonneural ectoderm, followed by cells of the neural ectoderm [82, 215]. Between closure points 2 and 3, both layers contact at the same time while initiation at closure 3 is mediated by the neural ectoderm [215]. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that protrusions are predominantly filopodia during early stages of spinal neurulation, then replaced by membrane ruffles and filopodia [90, 153]. The PCP pathway is also required for directional protrusive activity of the neural epithelium during fusion [76]. Grhl2 is also required for neural fold fusion evident in live-imaging experiments where elevation and apposition of the neural folds can occur but fusion fails [208]. As the neural folds meet in the midline, extensive tissue remodeling separates the neural and nonneural ectoderm joining the opposing folds. Molecularly, GRHL transcription factors influence expression of multiple proteins that can influence neural fold fusion, including adherens junctions, as well as proteins that suppress EMT to reinforce the epithelial properties of the nonneural ectoderm during tissue remodeling [86].
2.13 Prevention of NTDs by Micronutrient Supplementation
Maternal diet is a key environmental factor influencing the incidence of NTDs, and by the 1960s, folic acid emerged as a key micronutrient with reports that women with NTD-affected pregnancies had reduced intake of folate, as well as lower folate levels in blood, than in normal pregnancies [216, 217]. This led to a series of clinical trials to test if folic acid supplementation could prevent NTDs [218,219,220,221,222,223]. In 1991, results of a double-blind randomized trial demonstrated a 72% reduction of NTDs in a large trial involving women with previous NTD-affected pregnancies [224]. Further trials to determine if folic acid supplementation could prevent NTDs in women of average risk demonstrated that improvement is greater depending on the initial NTD rate of the population [225]. For example, in Northern China, where the NTD rate is very high (48 in 10,000 live births), the incidence was reduced to 7 in 10,000 with supplementation. But in Southern China, the NTD rate was rather low (10 in 10,000) and was only reduced to 6 in 10,000 [226]. Many countries now fortify grains and cereals with folic acid, and in the United States, studies show that fortification results in increased folate status of the population, and an estimated 30% reduction in the incidence of NTDs [227,228,229]. The MTHFR gene encodes methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, which is essential for the conversion of homocysteine to methionine, a key reaction in the folate pathway. Common polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene that reduce enzyme function are associated with increased risk of NTDs [230]. For example, 40% of the general population is heterozygous and 10% homozygous for the hypomorphic MTHFR 667C>T allele. Another common mechanism impacting folate metabolism is the production of function-blocking autoantibodies against the folate receptor, which are found at higher levels in maternal serum from NTD-affected pregnancies [231,232,233,234]. Folic acid supplementation can overcome the increased risk associated with MTHFR 667C>T polymorphism or the presence of folic acid receptor autoantibodies [235, 236]. However, folic acid supplementation does not prevent all NTDs in humans, and supplementation typically only reduces the incidence to 5–7 per 10,000 live births [225].
Folic acid supplementation can also prevent NTDs in mouse models, including lines with deletion of Folbp1, Rfc1, Cart1, and Gcn5 or mutation in Lrp6Cd and Pax32H [237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246]. The maternal genotype also impacts the risk of NTDs and response to supplementation. For example, NTDs in the Lrp2 mouse model are prevented by the injection of folic acid but not dietary folic acid [247]. Since Lrp2 plays an important role in folate uptake with folate deficiency [248], this result highlights the impact of the maternal genotype on folate status. This is echoed in human data where mothers who are heterozygous for the MTHFR 667C>T allele have a slightly increased risk of having an NTD-affected pregnancy, whereas the risk increases to 60% for homozygous mothers and to 90% for homozygous females from homozygous mothers [230].
Similar to NTDs in humans, many mutant mouse lines are not rescued by folic acid supplementation [181, 210, 249,250,251,252]. Interestingly, this may be influenced by the impact of the particular mutant allele rather than the gene involved. For example, NTDs in the Lrp6cd mouse line are prevented by supplementation with folic acid, whereas supplementation in the Lrp6null mouse line results in more severe NTDs and embryo loss [253]. In fact, folic acid supplementation results in the early loss of mutant embryos in some mouse lines [253, 254]. Furthermore, high levels of dietary folic acid intake results in activation of negative feedback loops, leading to overrepression of folic acid metabolism [255, 256]. The adverse effects of folic acid supplementation are cumulative, with long-term but not short-term supplementation being detrimental [254].
Importantly, folic acid deficiency is not sufficient to induce NTDs in humans or mouse models [257,258,259,260,261,262,263]. Rather, gene–environment interactions (e.g., suboptimal folate status plus a genetic predisposition) likely combine to result in NTDs. For example, folate deficiency increased the frequency of NTDs in Pax3Sp mutants and other susceptible mouse background strains [259, 260]. Similarly, mutation of a gene required for folate metabolism (Shmt1) does not result in NTDs, but with folate deficiency, NTDs occur [257, 264]. Altered folate metabolism has been documented in cell lines derived from NTD-affected human fetuses, as well the Pax3Sp and Lrp6Cd mouse models of NTDs [243, 265, 266]. Finally, Pax3Sp/+;Shmt1−/+ compound mutants show increased penetrance and severity of NTDs, indicating an interaction of Pax3 mutation with the folate pathway [264]. This may be relevant to human NTDs as spina bifida and anencephaly are associated with PAX3 mutations in the autosomal dominant Waardenburg syndrome, as well as in nonsyndromic NTDs [22, 32, 167, 267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277].
2.14 Mechanisms by Which Folic Acid Prevents NTDs
In spite of the clear benefit for folic acid supplementation, it is not clear how folic acid prevents NTDs [230]. Folates are not synthesized by the body and need to be included in the diet. Folic acid feeds into the folate one carbon metabolism pathway (Fig. 2.6), a network of interlinked reactions that generates key metabolites required for several cellular processes, including the synthesis of nucleic and amino acids; the production of methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) used for methylation of histones, proteins, lipids, and DNA; as well as influencing homocysteine production [278,279,280]. These outputs can directly impact apical constriction and the cytoskeletal dynamics necessary for neural fold elevation, as well as cilia formation [281,282,283]. The emerging picture is that a variety of functional outputs of folate metabolism are required for normal development. Impaired flux of metabolites through these reactions may be the key factor responsible for NTDs with deficiency and prevention with supplementation. The specific metabolites required are likely due to individual metabolic need based on how flux through the pathway is perturbed by genetic mutations and environmental factors.
2.15 Folate is a Cofactor Required for Synthesis of DNA, Amino Acid and Methyl Donors
The Pax3Sp2H mutant mouse strain, which has a metabolic deficiency in the supply of folate for the biosynthesis of pyrimidine, is susceptible to NTDs with folate deficiency, and NTDs in this strain are prevented by folate supplementation [243, 264]. Either Folic acid supplementation or deficiency have measurable effects on DNA methylation impacting gene expression [284, 285]. Importantly, both global DNA hypomethylation and hypomethylation at specific genes are associated with an increased risk for NTDs [286]. One of these genes is Pax3, which exhibits reduced expression and altered methylation with exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, as well as oxidative stress in diabetic pregnancy that induces NTDs [287, 288]. Similar to the Pax3 mutant models, supplementation of diabetic mice with folic acid can prevent NTDs [289]. The greater susceptibility of females to NTDs and prevention by folic acid supplementation suggests an epigenetic requirement for folate metabolism to provide methyl donor groups. Data from both humans and mouse demonstrate that anencephaly affects more females than males, and NTDs in females are reduced to a greater extent with folic acid supplementation [290]. Epigenetic inactivation of the X chromosome is proposed to act as a sink for methyl donors, resulting in less methyl donor groups available for other functions. Folic acid supplementation potentially increases available methyl groups and preferentially rescue NTDs in females [290,291,292].
2.16 Folate and Homocysteine
Another possible mechanism by which folic acid supplementation might prevent NTDs is by reducing homocysteine levels [293]. Elevated maternal homocysteine during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for NTDs [294]. Homocysteine accumulation leads to homocysteinylation of a slew of proteins increasing their antigenicity. Folate deficiency in a mouse model increases homocysteine levels and expression of autoantibodies against homocysteinylated proteins that was reversible with folate supplementation [295]. In humans, genotypes associated with reduced folate uptake or metabolism result in elevated antifolate receptor autoantibodies further impacting folate status of the mother [296]. Furthermore, homocysteinylated H3K79 was increased in brain tissue from NTD cases along with alterations in gene expression [297].
2.17 Studies in Mice Suggest Supplementation with Inositol or Formate May Prevent Folate-Resistant NTDs
Aside from MTHFR, other enzymes in the folate one carbon metabolism pathway have not consistently been associated with NTDs in human populations or in mouse models [39]. On the other hand, the glycine cleavage branch of the pathway that links folate one carbon metabolism in the mitochondria with reactions in the cytoplasm through the transfer of formate is emerging as key for NTD susceptibility in both mouse models and humans [148, 298,299,300]. In human populations, sequence variants in either the mitochondrial methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFD1L) or the mitochondrial inner membrane folate transporter (SLC25A32) are associated with increased risk for NTDs [298, 299, 301, 302]. Mutation of mouse homologues of these genes also results in NTDs [299, 300, 302,303,304,305,306]. Importantly, NTDs in many of these models are prevented by supplementation with formate but not folate. These findings provide important preclinical data suggesting that formate supplementation in conjunction with folate should be considered in the prevention of folate-insensitive NTDs in humans.
Another supplement with a promise to prevent folate-resistant NTDs is inositol, a simple carbohydrate naturally found in many foods [307]. Inositol acts as an insulin-sensitizing agent, and supplementation improves glucose and lipid profiles with positive effects on fertility in assisted reproduction and in women with polycystic ovary syndrome [308]. Hyperglycemia results in inositol depletion, and inositol supplementation suppresses diabetes-induced NTDs in mouse models [309, 310]. Mouse embryos grown in culture and Grhl3ct mutants, in particular, develop NTDs with reduced inositol in the growth media, and the incidence of NTDs in Grhl3ct mutants is reduced by inositol but not folic acid supplementation [311,312,313,314,315]. Additionally, mutation of genes involved in inositol metabolism results in NTDs [316, 317]. Studies in humans also provide support for inositol in the prevention of NTDs. Low serum concentrations of inositol are associated with increased NTD risk and are also found in children with spina bifida. Preliminary trials where dual supplementation of inositol and folate is given to women with previous NTD-affected pregnancies suggest that this treatment is highly effective as no NTDs have occurred in the dual supplementation group, whereas some NTDs did occur with folate supplementation alone. However, the sample size of these studies is still too low to draw definitive conclusions [318,319,320,321,322,323].
2.18 Future Directions
In recent years, next-generation sequencing approaches such as whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing, as well as targeted sequencing of extensive panels of candidate genes in large NTD patient cohorts, have been employed to identify the genes responsible for NTDs in humans [38, 141, 142, 145, 324,325,326]. These approaches have the potential to identify new candidate genes, as well as multiple sequence variants, in a single individual that might contribute to NTD in a multifactorial fashion. In fact, a recent whole-genome sequencing study concluded that the genetic basis for NTD is omnigenic involving genes spread across almost the entire genome [326]. Furthermore, this study concluded that predicted loss of function variants in almost all genes had some minor impact on NTD risk, and NTD risk was associated with increased numbers of rare loss of function variants. Surprisingly, there was no significant enrichment of damaging variants in human orthologs of the 249 mouse NTD-associated genes previously implicated in NTDs [42, 44,45,46, 59, 327]. These findings indicate that previous efforts using targeted genomic screens that rely heavily on the candidate genes identified in animal models represent only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the genes that contribute to NTDs. As new candidate genes are identified in these human screens, the mouse model will be essential for modeling the complex interaction of variants leading to NTDs.
References
Gu X, Lin L, Zheng X, Zhang T, Song X, Wang J, et al. High prevalence of NTDs in Shanxi Province: a combined epidemiological approach. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007;79(10):702–7.
Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, Rickard R, Wang Y, Meyer RE, et al. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(12):1008–16.
Copp AJ, Stanier P, Greene ND. Neural tube defects: recent advances, unsolved questions, and controversies. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(8):799–810.
Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW III, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):993–1004.
Thompson DN. Postnatal management and outcome for neural tube defects including spina bifida and encephalocoeles. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(4):412–9.
Oakeshott P, Hunt GM. Long-term outcome in open spina bifida. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(493):632–6.
Dias MS, McLone DG. Hydrocephalus in the child with dysraphism. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1993;4(4):715–26.
Adzick NS, Walsh DS. Myelomeningocele: prenatal diagnosis, pathophysiology and management. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2003;12(3):168–74.
Hertzler DA II, DePowell JJ, Stevenson CB, Mangano FT. Tethered cord syndrome: a review of the literature from embryology to adult presentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(1):E1.
Yamada S, Won DJ, Siddiqi J, Yamada SM. Tethered cord syndrome: overview of diagnosis and treatment. Neurol Res. 2004;26(7):719–21.
Hudgins RJ, Gilreath CL. Tethered spinal cord following repair of myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16(2):E7.
Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, Fletcher JM, Holmbeck GN, Shaw GM. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15007.
Bassuk AG, Kibar Z. Genetic basis of neural tube defects. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2009;16(3):101–10.
Lupo PJ, Agopian AJ, Castillo H, Castillo J, Clayton GH, Dosa NP, et al. Genetic epidemiology of neural tube defects. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(3–4):189–94.
Chen CP. Chromosomal abnormalities associated with neural tube defects (II): partial aneuploidy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(4):336–51.
Chen CP. Chromosomal abnormalities associated with neural tube defects (I): full aneuploidy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(4):325–35.
Chen CP. Prenatal sonographic features of fetuses in trisomy 13 pregnancies (II). Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(3):218–24.
Detrait ER, George TM, Etchevers HC, Gilbert JR, Vekemans M, Speer MC. Human neural tube defects: developmental biology, epidemiology, and genetics. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;27(3):515–24.
Kinoshita H, Kokudo T, Ide T, Kondo Y, Mori T, Homma Y, et al. A patient with DiGeorge syndrome with spina bifida and sacral myelomeningocele, who developed both hypocalcemia-induced seizure and epilepsy. Seizure. 2010;19(5):303–5.
Chen CP. Meckel syndrome: genetics, perinatal findings, and differential diagnosis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;46(1):9–14.
Chen CP. Syndromes, disorders and maternal risk factors associated with neural tube defects (III). Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(2):131–40.
Baldwin CT, Lipsky NR, Hoth CF, Cohen T, Mamuya W, Milunsky A. Mutations in PAX3 associated with Waardenburg syndrome type I. Hum Mutat. 1994;3(3):205–11.
Canda MT, Demir N, Bal FU, Doganay L, Sezer O. Prenatal diagnosis of a 22q11 deletion in a second-trimester fetus with conotruncal anomaly, absent thymus and meningomyelocele: Kousseff syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(4):737–40.
Forrester S, Kovach MJ, Smith RE, Rimer L, Wesson M, Kimonis VE. Kousseff syndrome caused by deletion of chromosome 22q11-13. Am J Med Genet. 2002;112(4):338–42.
Kousseff BG. Sacral meningocele with conotruncal heart defects: a possible autosomal recessive trait. Pediatrics. 1984;74(3):395–8.
Logan CV, Abdel-Hamed Z, Johnson CA. Molecular genetics and pathogenic mechanisms for the severe ciliopathies: insights into neurodevelopment and pathogenesis of neural tube defects. Mol Neurobiol. 2011;43(1):12–26.
Maclean K, Field MJ, Colley AS, Mowat DR, Sparrow DB, Dunwoodie SL, et al. Kousseff syndrome: a causally heterogeneous disorder. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;124A(3):307–12.
Nickel RE, Magenis RE. Neural tube defects and deletions of 22q11. Am J Med Genet. 1996;66(1):25–7.
Nickel RE, Pillers DA, Merkens M, Magenis RE, Driscoll DA, Emanuel BS, et al. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome and DiGeorge sequence with meningomyelocele and deletions of the 22q11 region. Am J Med Genet. 1994;52(4):445–9.
Seller MJ, Mohammed S, Russell J, Ogilvie C. Microdeletion 22q11.2, Kousseff syndrome and spina bifida. Clin Dysmorphol. 2002;11(2):113–5.
Toriello HV, Sharda JK, Beaumont EJ. Autosomal recessive syndrome of sacral and conotruncal developmental field defects (Kousseff syndrome). Am J Med Genet. 1985;22(2):357–60.
Nye JS, Balkin N, Lucas H, Knepper PA, McLone DG, Charrow J. Myelomeningocele and Waardenburg syndrome (type 3) in patients with interstitial deletions of 2q35 and the PAX3 gene: possible digenic inheritance of a neural tube defect. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75(4):401–8.
Hart J, Miriyala K. Neural tube defects in Waardenburg syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(9):2472–7.
Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;46(2):242–53.
Risch N. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;46(2):229–41.
Mitchell LE. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2005;135C(1):88–94.
Mitchell LE, Adzick NS, Melchionne J, Pasquariello PS, Sutton LN, Whitehead AS. Spina bifida. Lancet. 2004;364(9448):1885–95.
Au KS, Ashley-Koch A, Northrup H. Epidemiologic and genetic aspects of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16(1):6–15.
Greene ND, Stanier P, Copp AJ. Genetics of human neural tube defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(R2):R113–29.
De Marco P, Merello E, Piatelli G, Cama A, Kibar Z, Capra V. Planar cell polarity gene mutations contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects in our population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014;100(8):633–41.
Zohn IE, Sarkar AA. Modeling neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;84:1–35.
Harris MJ, Juriloff DM. Mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and their role in understanding human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007;79(3):187–210.
Zohn IE. Mouse as a model for multifactorial inheritance of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2012;96(2):193–205.
Harris MJ, Juriloff DM. An update to the list of mouse mutants with neural tube closure defects and advances toward a complete genetic perspective of neural tube closure. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(8):653–69.
Juriloff DM, Harris MJ. A consideration of the evidence that genetic defects in planar cell polarity contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(10):824–40.
Juriloff DM, Harris MJ. Insights into the etiology of mammalian neural tube closure defects from developmental, genetic and evolutionary studies. J Dev Biol. 2018;6(3):22.
Kooistra MK, Leduc RY, Dawe CE, Fairbridge NA, Rasmussen J, Man JH, et al. Strain-specific modifier genes of Cecr2-associated exencephaly in mice: genetic analysis and identification of differentially expressed candidate genes. Physiol Genomics. 2012;44(1):35–46.
Korstanje R, Desai J, Lazar G, King B, Rollins J, Spurr M, et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic variation in the vacuolated lens mouse mutant, a multigenic mouse model of neural tube defects. Physiol Genomics. 2008;35(3):296–304.
Letts VA, Schork NJ, Copp AJ, Bernfield M, Frankel WN. A curly-tail modifier locus, mct1, on mouse chromosome 17. Genomics. 1995;29(3):719–24.
Neumann PE, Frankel WN, Letts VA, Coffin JM, Copp AJ, Bernfield M. Multifactorial inheritance of neural tube defects: localization of the major gene and recognition of modifiers in ct mutant mice. Nat Genet. 1994;6(4):357–62.
Kappen C. Modeling anterior development in mice: diet as modulator of risk for neural tube defects. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C(4):333–56.
Harris MJ, Juriloff DM. Maternal diet alters exencephaly frequency in SELH/Bc strain mouse embryos. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005;73(8):532–40.
Juriloff DM, Macdonald KB, Harris MJ. Genetic analysis of the cause of exencephaly in the SELH/Bc mouse stock. Teratology. 1989;40(4):395–405.
Bentham J, Michell AC, Lockstone H, Andrew D, Schneider JE, Brown NA, et al. Maternal high-fat diet interacts with embryonic Cited2 genotype to reduce Pitx2c expression and enhance penetrance of left-right patterning defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(17):3394–401.
Greene ND, Copp AJ. Mouse models of neural tube defects: investigating preventive mechanisms. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2005;135C(1):31–41.
Zohn IE, Sarkar AA. The visceral yolk sac endoderm provides for absorption of nutrients to the embryo during neurulation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(8):593–600.
Zeisel SH. Importance of methyl donors during reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(2):673S–7S.
Gray JD, Ross ME. Mechanistic insights into folate supplementation from Crooked tail and other NTD-prone mutant mice. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(4):314–21.
Harris MJ. Insights into prevention of human neural tube defects by folic acid arising from consideration of mouse mutants. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85(4):331–9.
Reece EA. Diabetes-induced birth defects: what do we know? What can we do? Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12(1):24–32.
Zabihi S, Loeken MR. Understanding diabetic teratogenesis: where are we now and where are we going? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(10):779–90.
Cabrera RM, Hill DS, Etheredge AJ, Finnell RH. Investigations into the etiology of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2004;72(4):330–44.
Lammer EJ, Sever LE, Oakley GP Jr. Teratogen update: valproic acid. Teratology. 1987;35(3):465–73.
Gelineau-van Waes J, Voss KA, Stevens VL, Speer MC, Riley RT. Maternal fumonisin exposure as a risk factor for neural tube defects. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009;56:145–81.
Wang A, Holladay SD, Wolf DC, Ahmed SA, Robertson JL. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of arsenic in rodents: a review. Int J Toxicol. 2006;25(5):319–31.
Colas JF, Schoenwolf GC. Towards a cellular and molecular understanding of neurulation. Dev Dyn. 2001;221(2):117–45.
Morriss-Kay G, Wood H, Chen WH. Normal neurulation in mammals. Ciba Found Symp. 1994;181:51–63; discussion 63–9.
Schoenwolf GC. Histological and ultrastructural studies of secondary neurulation in mouse embryos. Am J Anat. 1984;169(4):361–76.
Schoenwolf GC, Delongo J. Ultrastructure of secondary neurulation in the chick embryo. Am J Anat. 1980;158(1):43–63.
Copp AJ, Greene ND, Murdoch JN. The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(10):784–93.
Fleming A, Copp AJ. A genetic risk factor for mouse neural tube defects: defining the embryonic basis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(4):575–81.
Juriloff DM, Harris MJ, Tom C, MacDonald KB. Normal mouse strains differ in the site of initiation of closure of the cranial neural tube. Teratology. 1991;44(2):225–33.
Greene ND, Copp AJ. Development of the vertebrate central nervous system: formation of the neural tube. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29(4):303–11.
Galea GL, Cho YJ, Galea G, Mole MA, Rolo A, Savery D, et al. Biomechanical coupling facilitates spinal neural tube closure in mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(26):E5177–E86.
Dady A, Havis E, Escriou V, Catala M, Duband JL. Junctional neurulation: a unique developmental program shaping a discrete region of the spinal cord highly susceptible to neural tube defects. J Neurosci. 2014;34(39):13208–21.
Lopez-Escobar B, Caro-Vega JM, Vijayraghavan DS, Plageman TF, Sanchez-Alcazar JA, Moreno RC, et al. The non-canonical Wnt-PCP pathway shapes the mouse caudal neural plate. Development. 2018;145(9).
Harrington MJ, Chalasani K, Brewster R. Cellular mechanisms of posterior neural tube morphogenesis in the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(3):747–62.
Davidson LA, Keller RE. Neural tube closure in Xenopus laevis involves medial migration, directed protrusive activity, cell intercalation and convergent extension. Development. 1999;126(20):4547–56.
Schroeder TE. Neurulation in Xenopus laevis. An analysis and model based upon light and electron microscopy. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1970;23(2):427–62.
Jones EA, Crotty D, Kulesa PM, Waters CW, Baron MH, Fraser SE, et al. Dynamic in vivo imaging of postimplantation mammalian embryos using whole embryo culture. Genesis. 2002;34(4):228–35.
Massarwa R, Niswander L. In toto live imaging of mouse morphogenesis and new insights into neural tube closure. Development. 2013;140(1):226–36.
Pyrgaki C, Trainor P, Hadjantonakis AK, Niswander L. Dynamic imaging of mammalian neural tube closure. Dev Biol. 2010;344(2):941–7.
Yamaguchi Y, Shinotsuka N, Nonomura K, Takemoto K, Kuida K, Yosida H, et al. Live imaging of apoptosis in a novel transgenic mouse highlights its role in neural tube closure. J Cell Biol. 2011;195(6):1047–60.
McDole K, Guignard L, Amat F, Berger A, Malandain G, Royer LA, et al. In toto imaging and reconstruction of post-implantation mouse development at the single-cell level. Cell. 2018;175(3):859–76.e33.
Ray HJ, Niswander LA. Dynamic behaviors of the non-neural ectoderm during mammalian cranial neural tube closure. Dev Biol. 2016;416(2):279–85.
Ray HJ, Niswander LA. Grainyhead-like 2 downstream targets act to suppress epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition during neural tube closure. Development. 2016;143(7):1192–204.
Massarwa R, Ray HJ, Niswander L. Morphogenetic movements in the neural plate and neural tube: mouse. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2014;3(1):59–68.
Galea GL, Nychyk O, Mole MA, Moulding D, Savery D, Nikolopoulou E, et al. Vangl2 disruption alters the biomechanics of late spinal neurulation leading to spina bifida in mouse embryos. Dis Model Mech. 2018;11(3).
Wang S, Garcia MD, Lopez AL III, Overbeek PA, Larin KV, Larina IV. Dynamic imaging and quantitative analysis of cranial neural tube closure in the mouse embryo using optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8(1):407–19.
Rolo A, Savery D, Escuin S, de Castro SC, Armer HE, Munro PM, et al. Regulation of cell protrusions by small GTPases during fusion of the neural folds. Elife. 2016;5:e13273.
Heisenberg CP, Tada M, Rauch GJ, Saude L, Concha ML, Geisler R, et al. Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 2000;405(6782):76–81.
Tada M, Smith JC. Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway. Development. 2000;127(10):2227–38.
Wallingford JB, Rowning BA, Vogeli KM, Rothbacher U, Fraser SE, Harland RM. Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation. Nature. 2000;405(6782):81–5.
Vladar EK, Antic D, Axelrod JD. Planar cell polarity signaling: the developing cell’s compass. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1(3):a002964.
Wallingford JB. Planar cell polarity and the developmental control of cell behavior in vertebrate embryos. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:627–53.
Wallingford JB, Harland RM. Neural tube closure requires Dishevelled-dependent convergent extension of the midline. Development. 2002;129(24):5815–25.
Wang J, Hamblet NS, Mark S, Dickinson ME, Brinkman BC, Segil N, et al. Dishevelled genes mediate a conserved mammalian PCP pathway to regulate convergent extension during neurulation. Development. 2006;133(9):1767–78.
Ybot-Gonzalez P, Savery D, Gerrelli D, Signore M, Mitchell CE, Faux CH, et al. Convergent extension, planar-cell-polarity signalling and initiation of mouse neural tube closure. Development. 2007;134(4):789–99.
Kibar Z, Vogan KJ, Groulx N, Justice MJ, Underhill DA, Gros P. Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant Loop-tail. Nat Genet. 2001;28(3):251–5.
Murdoch JN, Doudney K, Paternotte C, Copp AJ, Stanier P. Severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail mouse result from mutation of Lpp1, a novel gene involved in floor plate specification. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(22):2593–601.
Wilson DB, Wyatt DP. Analysis of neurulation in a mouse model for neural dysraphism. Exp Neurol. 1994;127(1):154–8.
Smith LJ, Stein KF. Axial elongation in the mouse and its retardation in homozygous looptail mice. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1962;10:73–87.
Gerrelli D, Copp AJ. Failure of neural tube closure in the loop-tail (Lp) mutant mouse: analysis of the embryonic mechanism. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1997;102(2):217–24.
Greene ND, Gerrelli D, Van Straaten HW, Copp AJ. Abnormalities of floor plate, notochord and somite differentiation in the loop-tail (Lp) mouse: a model of severe neural tube defects. Mech Dev. 1998;73(1):59–72.
Kirillova I, Novikova I, Auge J, Audollent S, Esnault D, Encha-Razavi F, et al. Expression of the sonic hedgehog gene in human embryos with neural tube defects. Teratology. 2000;61(5):347–54.
Hamblet NS, Lijam N, Ruiz-Lozano P, Wang J, Yang Y, Luo Z, et al. Dishevelled 2 is essential for cardiac outflow tract development, somite segmentation and neural tube closure. Development. 2002;129(24):5827–38.
Etheridge SL, Ray S, Li S, Hamblet NS, Lijam N, Tsang M, et al. Murine dishevelled 3 functions in redundant pathways with dishevelled 1 and 2 in normal cardiac outflow tract, cochlea, and neural tube development. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(11):e1000259.
Wang Y, Guo N, Nathans J. The role of Frizzled3 and Frizzled6 in neural tube closure and in the planar polarity of inner-ear sensory hair cells. J Neurosci. 2006;26(8):2147–56.
Curtin JA, Quint E, Tsipouri V, Arkell RM, Cattanach B, Copp AJ, et al. Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr Biol. 2003;13(13):1129–33.
Qian D, Jones C, Rzadzinska A, Mark S, Zhang X, Steel KP, et al. Wnt5a functions in planar cell polarity regulation in mice. Dev Biol. 2007;306(1):121–33.
Lu X, Borchers AG, Jolicoeur C, Rayburn H, Baker JC, Tessier-Lavigne M. PTK7/CCK-4 is a novel regulator of planar cell polarity in vertebrates. Nature. 2004;430(6995):93–8.
Paudyal A, Damrau C, Patterson VL, Ermakov A, Formstone C, Lalanne Z, et al. The novel mouse mutant, chuzhoi, has disruption of Ptk7 protein and exhibits defects in neural tube, heart and lung development and abnormal planar cell polarity in the ear. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:87.
Gray RS, Abitua PB, Wlodarczyk BJ, Szabo-Rogers HL, Blanchard O, Lee I, et al. The planar cell polarity effector Fuz is essential for targeted membrane trafficking, ciliogenesis and mouse embryonic development. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(10):1225–32.
Copp AJ, Checiu I, Henson JN. Developmental basis of severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail (Lp) mutant mouse: use of microsatellite DNA markers to identify embryonic genotype. Dev Biol. 1994;165(1):20–9.
Heydeck W, Liu A. PCP effector proteins inturned and fuzzy play nonredundant roles in the patterning but not convergent extension of mammalian neural tube. Dev Dyn. 2011;240(8):1938–48.
Heydeck W, Zeng H, Liu A. Planar cell polarity effector gene Fuzzy regulates cilia formation and Hedgehog signal transduction in mouse. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(12):3035–42.
Zeng H, Hoover AN, Liu A. PCP effector gene Inturned is an important regulator of cilia formation and embryonic development in mammals. Dev Biol. 2010;339(2):418–28.
Yu H, Smallwood PM, Wang Y, Vidaltamayo R, Reed R, Nathans J. Frizzled 1 and frizzled 2 genes function in palate, ventricular septum and neural tube closure: general implications for tissue fusion processes. Development. 2010;137(21):3707–17.
Torban E, Patenaude AM, Leclerc S, Rakowiecki S, Gauthier S, Andelfinger G, et al. Genetic interaction between members of the Vangl family causes neural tube defects in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(9):3449–54.
Murdoch JN, Damrau C, Paudyal A, Bogani D, Wells S, Greene ND, et al. Genetic interactions between planar cell polarity genes cause diverse neural tube defects in mice. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(10):1153–63.
De Castro SCP, Gustavsson P, Marshall AR, Gordon WM, Galea G, Nikolopoulou E, et al. Overexpression of Grainyhead-like 3 causes spina bifida and interacts genetically with mutant alleles of Grhl2 and Vangl2 in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(24):4218–30.
Murdoch JN, Henderson DJ, Doudney K, Gaston-Massuet C, Phillips HM, Paternotte C, et al. Disruption of scribble (Scrb1) causes severe neural tube defects in the circletail mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(2):87–98.
Carroll EA, Gerrelli D, Gasca S, Berg E, Beier DR, Copp AJ, et al. Cordon-bleu is a conserved gene involved in neural tube formation. Dev Biol. 2003;262(1):16–31.
Caddy J, Wilanowski T, Darido C, Dworkin S, Ting SB, Zhao Q, et al. Epidermal wound repair is regulated by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway. Dev Cell. 2010;19(1):138–47.
Merte J, Jensen D, Wright K, Sarsfield S, Wang Y, Schekman R, et al. Sec24b selectively sorts Vangl2 to regulate planar cell polarity during neural tube closure. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(1):41–6; sup pp 1–8.
Ross AJ, May-Simera H, Eichers ER, Kai M, Hill J, Jagger DJ, et al. Disruption of Bardet-Biedl syndrome ciliary proteins perturbs planar cell polarity in vertebrates. Nat Genet. 2005;37(10):1135–40.
Escobedo N, Contreras O, Munoz R, Farias M, Carrasco H, Hill C, et al. Syndecan 4 interacts genetically with Vangl2 to regulate neural tube closure and planar cell polarity. Development. 2013;140(14):3008–17.
Shi Y, Ding Y, Lei YP, Yang XY, Xie GM, Wen J, et al. Identification of novel rare mutations of DACT1 in human neural tube defects. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(10):1450–5.
Bosoi CM, Capra V, Allache R, Trinh VQ, De Marco P, Merello E, et al. Identification and characterization of novel rare mutations in the planar cell polarity gene PRICKLE1 in human neural tube defects. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(12):1371–5.
Allache R, De Marco P, Merello E, Capra V, Kibar Z. Role of the planar cell polarity gene CELSR1 in neural tube defects and caudal agenesis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(3):176–81.
De Marco P, Merello E, Rossi A, Piatelli G, Cama A, Kibar Z, et al. FZD6 is a novel gene for human neural tube defects. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(2):384–90.
Doudney K, Ybot-Gonzalez P, Paternotte C, Stevenson RE, Greene ND, Moore GE, et al. Analysis of the planar cell polarity gene Vangl2 and its co-expressed paralogue Vangl1 in neural tube defect patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;136(1):90–2.
Kibar Z, Salem S, Bosoi CM, Pauwels E, De Marco P, Merello E, et al. Contribution of VANGL2 mutations to isolated neural tube defects. Clin Genet. 2011;80(1):76–82.
Kibar Z, Torban E, McDearmid JR, Reynolds A, Berghout J, Mathieu M, et al. Mutations in VANGL1 associated with neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(14):1432–7.
Lei YP, Zhang T, Li H, Wu BL, Jin L, Wang HY. VANGL2 mutations in human cranial neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(23):2232–5.
Robinson A, Escuin S, Doudney K, Vekemans M, Stevenson RE, Greene ND, et al. Mutations in the planar cell polarity genes CELSR1 and SCRIB are associated with the severe neural tube defect craniorachischisis. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(2):440–7.
Seo JH, Zilber Y, Babayeva S, Liu J, Kyriakopoulos P, De Marco P, et al. Mutations in the planar cell polarity gene, Fuzzy, are associated with neural tube defects in humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(22):4324–33.
Lei Y, Zhu H, Duhon C, Yang W, Ross ME, Shaw GM, et al. Mutations in planar cell polarity gene SCRIB are associated with spina bifida. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69262.
Reynolds A, McDearmid JR, Lachance S, De Marco P, Merello E, Capra V, et al. VANGL1 rare variants associated with neural tube defects affect convergent extension in zebrafish. Mech Dev. 2010;127(7-8):385–92.
Kharfallah F, Guyot MC, El Hassan AR, Allache R, Merello E, De Marco P, et al. Scribble1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of neural tube defects through its mediating effect of Par-3 and Vangl1/2 localization. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(12):2307–20.
Chen Z, Lei Y, Cao X, Zheng Y, Wang F, Bao Y, et al. Genetic analysis of Wnt/PCP genes in neural tube defects. BMC Med Genomics. 2018;11(1):38.
Beaumont M, Akloul L, Carre W, Quelin C, Journel H, Pasquier L, et al. Targeted panel sequencing establishes the implication of planar cell polarity pathway and involves new candidate genes in neural tube defect disorders. Hum Genet. 2019;138(4):363–74.
Lei Y, Zhu H, Yang W, Ross ME, Shaw GM, Finnell RH. Identification of novel CELSR1 mutations in spina bifida. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92207.
Shi OY, Yang HY, Shen YM, Sun W, Cai CY, Cai CQ. Polymorphisms in FZD3 and FZD6 genes and risk of neural tube defects in a northern Han Chinese population. Neurol Sci. 2014;35(11):1701–6.
Wang L, Xiao Y, Tian T, Jin L, Lei Y, Finnell RH, et al. Digenic variants of planar cell polarity genes in human neural tube defect patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018;124(1):94–100.
Wang M, De Marco P, Merello E, Drapeau P, Capra V, Kibar Z. Role of the planar cell polarity gene Protein tyrosine kinase 7 in neural tube defects in humans. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2015;103(12):1021–7.
Lei Y, Kim SE, Chen Z, Cao X, Zhu H, Yang W, et al. Variants identified in PTK7 associated with neural tube defects. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7:e584.
Ishida M, Cullup T, Boustred C, James C, Docker J, English C, et al. A targeted sequencing panel identifies rare damaging variants in multiple genes in the cranial neural tube defect, anencephaly. Clin Genet. 2018;93(4):870–9.
Eom DS, Amarnath S, Agarwala S. Apicobasal polarity and neural tube closure. Dev Growth Differ. 2013;55(1):164–72.
Eom DS, Amarnath S, Fogel JL, Agarwala S. Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate hinge point formation during neural tube closure by dynamic modulation of apicobasal polarity. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(10):804–16.
Eom DS, Amarnath S, Fogel JL, Agarwala S. Bone morphogenetic proteins regulate neural tube closure by interacting with the apicobasal polarity pathway. Development. 2011;138(15):3179–88.
Smith JL, Schoenwolf GC. Cell cycle and neuroepithelial cell shape during bending of the chick neural plate. Anat Rec. 1987;218(2):196–206.
Rolo A, Escuin S, Greene NDE, Copp AJ. Rho GTPases in mammalian spinal neural tube closure. Small GTPases. 2018;9(4):283–9.
Escuin S, Vernay B, Savery D, Gurniak CB, Witke W, Greene ND, et al. Rho-kinase-dependent actin turnover and actomyosin disassembly are necessary for mouse spinal neural tube closure. J Cell Sci. 2015;128(14):2468–81.
Haigo SL, Hildebrand JD, Harland RM, Wallingford JB. Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure. Curr Biol. 2003;13(24):2125–37.
Hildebrand JD, Soriano P. Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell. 1999;99(5):485–97.
Lee JD, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Tepass U, McGlade CJ, Anderson KV. The FERM protein Epb4.1l5 is required for organization of the neural plate and for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition at the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Development. 2007;134(11):2007–16.
Nishimura T, Takeichi M. Shroom3-mediated recruitment of Rho kinases to the apical cell junctions regulates epithelial and neuroepithelial planar remodeling. Development. 2008;135(8):1493–502.
Kinoshita N, Sasai N, Misaki K, Yonemura S. Apical accumulation of Rho in the neural plate is important for neural plate cell shape change and neural tube formation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(5):2289–99.
Rolo A, Skoglund P, Keller R. Morphogenetic movements driving neural tube closure in Xenopus require myosin IIB. Dev Biol. 2009;327(2):327–38.
Gray J, Ross ME. Neural tube closure in mouse whole embryo culture. J Vis Exp. 2011;(56).
Gray JD, Kholmanskikh S, Castaldo BS, Hansler A, Chung H, Klotz B, et al. LRP6 exerts non-canonical effects on Wnt signaling during neural tube closure. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(21):4267–81.
Lanier LM, Gates MA, Witke W, Menzies AS, Wehman AM, Macklis JD, et al. Mena is required for neurulation and commissure formation. Neuron. 1999;22(2):313–25.
Menzies AS, Aszodi A, Williams SE, Pfeifer A, Wehman AM, Goh KL, et al. Mena and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein are required for multiple actin-dependent processes that shape the vertebrate nervous system. J Neurosci. 2004;24(37):8029–38.
Plageman TF Jr, Chauhan BK, Yang C, Jaudon F, Shang X, Zheng Y, et al. A Trio-RhoA-Shroom3 pathway is required for apical constriction and epithelial invagination. Development. 2011;138(23):5177–88.
Plageman TF Jr, Chung MI, Lou M, Smith AN, Hildebrand JD, Wallingford JB, et al. Pax6-dependent Shroom3 expression regulates apical constriction during lens placode invagination. Development. 2010;137(3):405–15.
Lemay P, De Marco P, Traverso M, Merello E, Dionne-Laporte A, Spiegelman D, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies novel predisposing genes in neural tube defects. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019;7(1):e00467.
Lemay P, Guyot MC, Tremblay E, Dionne-Laporte A, Spiegelman D, Henrion E, et al. Loss-of-function de novo mutations play an important role in severe human neural tube defects. J Med Genet. 2015;52(7):493–7.
Chen Z, Kuang L, Finnell RH, Wang H. Genetic and functional analysis of SHROOM1-4 in a Chinese neural tube defect cohort. Hum Genet. 2018;137(3):195–202.
Nishimura T, Honda H, Takeichi M. Planar cell polarity links axes of spatial dynamics in neural-tube closure. Cell. 2012;149(5):1084–97.
Mahaffey JP, Grego-Bessa J, Liem KF Jr, Anderson KV. Cofilin and Vangl2 cooperate in the initiation of planar cell polarity in the mouse embryo. Development. 2013;140(6):1262–71.
McGreevy EM, Vijayraghavan D, Davidson LA, Hildebrand JD. Shroom3 functions downstream of planar cell polarity to regulate myosin II distribution and cellular organization during neural tube closure. Biol Open. 2015;4(2):186–96.
Nikolopoulou E, Galea GL, Rolo A, Greene ND, Copp AJ. Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms. Development. 2017;144(4):552–66.
Sutherland AE. Tissue morphodynamics shaping the early mouse embryo. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016;55:89–98.
Williams M, Yen W, Lu X, Sutherland A. Distinct apical and basolateral mechanisms drive planar cell polarity-dependent convergent extension of the mouse neural plate. Dev Cell. 2014;29(1):34–46.
Butler MT, Wallingford JB. Spatial and temporal analysis of PCP protein dynamics during neural tube closure. Elife. 2018;7.
Shum AS, Copp AJ. Regional differences in morphogenesis of the neuroepithelium suggest multiple mechanisms of spinal neurulation in the mouse. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1996;194(1):65–73.
Ybot-Gonzalez P, Cogram P, Gerrelli D, Copp AJ. Sonic hedgehog and the molecular regulation of mouse neural tube closure. Development. 2002;129(10):2507–17.
Ybot-Gonzalez P, Gaston-Massuet C, Girdler G, Klingensmith J, Arkell R, Greene ND, et al. Neural plate morphogenesis during mouse neurulation is regulated by antagonism of Bmp signalling. Development. 2007;134(17):3203–11.
Panchision DM, Pickel JM, Studer L, Lee SH, Turner PA, Hazel TG, et al. Sequential actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell production and fate. Genes Dev. 2001;15(16):2094–110.
Stottmann RW, Berrong M, Matta K, Choi M, Klingensmith J. The BMP antagonist Noggin promotes cranial and spinal neurulation by distinct mechanisms. Dev Biol. 2006;295(2):647–63.
McMahon JA, Takada S, Zimmerman LB, Fan CM, Harland RM, McMahon AP. Noggin-mediated antagonism of BMP signaling is required for growth and patterning of the neural tube and somite. Genes Dev. 1998;12(10):1438–52.
Chang H, Huylebroeck D, Verschueren K, Guo Q, Matzuk MM, Zwijsen A. Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects. Development. 1999;126(8):1631–42.
Solloway MJ, Robertson EJ. Early embryonic lethality in Bmp5;Bmp7 double mutant mice suggests functional redundancy within the 60A subgroup. Development. 1999;126(8):1753–68.
Castranio T, Mishina Y. Bmp2 is required for cephalic neural tube closure in the mouse. Dev Dyn. 2009;238(1):110–22.
Stottmann RW, Klingensmith J. Bone morphogenetic protein signaling is required in the dorsal neural folds before neurulation for the induction of spinal neural crest cells and dorsal neurons. Dev Dyn. 2011;240(4):755–65.
Murdoch JN, Copp AJ. The relationship between sonic Hedgehog signaling, cilia, and neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(8):633–52.
Wang Z, Wang L, Shangguan S, Lu X, Chang S, Wang J, et al. Association between PTCH1 polymorphisms and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(6):409–15.
Wang Z, Shangguan S, Lu X, Chang S, Li R, Wu L, et al. Association of SMO polymorphisms and neural tube defects in the Chinese population from Shanxi Province. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(10):960–6.
Wu J, Lu X, Wang Z, Shangguan S, Chang S, Li R, et al. Association between PKA gene polymorphism and NTDs in high risk Chinese population in Shanxi. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6(12):2968–74.
Kim SE, Lei Y, Hwang SH, Wlodarczyk BJ, Mukhopadhyay S, Shaw GM, et al. Dominant negative GPR161 rare variants are risk factors of human spina bifida. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(2):200–8.
Wallingford JB, Mitchell B. Strange as it may seem: the many links between Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, and cilia. Genes Dev. 2011;25(3):201–13.
Eichers ER, Abd-El-Barr MM, Paylor R, Lewis RA, Bi W, Lin X, et al. Phenotypic characterization of Bbs4 null mice reveals age-dependent penetrance and variable expressivity. Hum Genet. 2006;120(2):211–26.
Caspary T, Larkins CE, Anderson KV. The graded response to Sonic Hedgehog depends on cilia architecture. Dev Cell. 2007;12(5):767–78.
Abdelhamed ZA, Wheway G, Szymanska K, Natarajan S, Toomes C, Inglehearn C, et al. Variable expressivity of ciliopathy neurological phenotypes that encompass Meckel-Gruber syndrome and Joubert syndrome is caused by complex de-regulated ciliogenesis, Shh and Wnt signalling defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(7):1358–72.
Weatherbee SD, Niswander LA, Anderson KV. A mouse model for Meckel syndrome reveals Mks1 is required for ciliogenesis and Hedgehog signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(23):4565–75.
Bay SN, Caspary T. What are those cilia doing in the neural tube? Cilia. 2012;1(1):19.
Briscoe J, Therond PP. The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(7):416–29.
Hackett DA, Smith JL, Schoenwolf GC. Epidermal ectoderm is required for full elevation and for convergence during bending of the avian neural plate. Dev Dyn. 1997;210(4):397–406.
Alvarez IS, Schoenwolf GC. Expansion of surface epithelium provides the major extrinsic force for bending of the neural plate. J Exp Zool. 1992;261(3):340–8.
Jacobson AG, Moury JD. Tissue boundaries and cell behavior during neurulation. Dev Biol. 1995;171(1):98–110.
Moury JD, Schoenwolf GC. Cooperative model of epithelial shaping and bending during avian neurulation: autonomous movements of the neural plate, autonomous movements of the epidermis, and interactions in the neural plate/epidermis transition zone. Dev Dyn. 1995;204(3):323–37.
Morita H, Kajiura-Kobayashi H, Takagi C, Yamamoto TS, Nonaka S, Ueno N. Cell movements of the deep layer of non-neural ectoderm underlie complete neural tube closure in Xenopus. Development. 2012;139(8):1417–26.
Sausedo RA, Smith JL, Schoenwolf GC. Role of nonrandomly oriented cell division in shaping and bending of the neural plate. J Comp Neurol. 1997;381(4):473–88.
Brouns MR, De Castro SC, Terwindt-Rouwenhorst EA, Massa V, Hekking JW, Hirst CS, et al. Over-expression of Grhl2 causes spina bifida in the axial defects mutant mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(8):1536–46.
Auden A, Caddy J, Wilanowski T, Ting SB, Cunningham JM, Jane SM. Spatial and temporal expression of the Grainyhead-like transcription factor family during murine development. Gene Expr Patterns. 2006;6(8):964–70.
Gustavsson P, Greene ND, Lad D, Pauws E, de Castro SC, Stanier P, et al. Increased expression of Grainyhead-like-3 rescues spina bifida in a folate-resistant mouse model. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16(21):2640–6.
Pyrgaki C, Liu A, Niswander L. Grainyhead-like 2 regulates neural tube closure and adhesion molecule expression during neural fold fusion. Dev Biol. 2011;353(1):38–49.
Rifat Y, Parekh V, Wilanowski T, Hislop NR, Auden A, Ting SB, et al. Regional neural tube closure defined by the Grainy head-like transcription factors. Dev Biol. 2010;345(2):237–45.
Ting SB, Wilanowski T, Auden A, Hall M, Voss AK, Thomas T, et al. Inositol- and folate-resistant neural tube defects in mice lacking the epithelial-specific factor Grhl-3. Nat Med. 2003;9(12):1513–9.
Werth M, Walentin K, Aue A, Schonheit J, Wuebken A, Pode-Shakked N, et al. The transcription factor grainyhead-like 2 regulates the molecular composition of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Development. 2010;137(22):3835–45.
Yu Z, Lin KK, Bhandari A, Spencer JA, Xu X, Wang N, et al. The Grainyhead-like epithelial transactivator Get-1/Grhl3 regulates epidermal terminal differentiation and interacts functionally with LMO4. Dev Biol. 2006;299(1):122–36.
Copp AJ, Brook FA, Roberts HJ. A cell-type-specific abnormality of cell proliferation in mutant (curly tail) mouse embryos developing spinal neural tube defects. Development. 1988;104(2):285–95.
Lemay P, De Marco P, Emond A, Spiegelman D, Dionne-Laporte A, Laurent S, et al. Rare deleterious variants in GRHL3 are associated with human spina bifida. Hum Mutat. 2017;38(6):716–24.
Geelen JA, Langman J. Ultrastructural observations on closure of the neural tube in the mouse. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1979;156(1):73–88.
Smithells RW, Sheppard S, Schorah CJ. Vitamin dificiencies and neural tube defects. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51(12):944–50.
Laurence KM, Carter CO, David PA. Major central nervous system malformations in South Wales. II. Pregnancy factors, seasonal variation, and social class effects. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1968;22(4):212–22.
Holmes-Siedle M, Lindenbaum RH, Galliard A. Recurrence of neural tube defect in a group of at risk women: a 10 year study of Pregnavite Forte F. J Med Genet. 1992;29(2):134–5.
Laurence KM, James N, Miller MH, Tennant GB, Campbell H. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of folate treatment before conception to prevent recurrence of neural-tube defects. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981;282(6275):1509–11.
Seller MJ, Nevin NC. Periconceptional vitamin supplementation and the prevention of neural tube defects in south-east England and Northern Ireland. J Med Genet. 1984;21(5):325–30.
Smithells RW, Sheppard S, Schorah CJ, Seller MJ, Nevin NC, Harris R, et al. Possible prevention of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. Lancet. 1980;1(8164):339–40.
Smithells RW, Sheppard S, Schorah CJ, Seller MJ, Nevin NC, Harris R, et al. Apparent prevention of neural tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. Arch Dis Child. 1981;56(12):911–8.
Vergel RG, Sanchez LR, Heredero BL, Rodriguez PL, Martinez AJ. Primary prevention of neural tube defects with folic acid supplementation: Cuban experience. Prenat Diagn. 1990;10(3):149–52.
Wald N, Sneddon J, Densem J, Frost C, Stone R, Group MVSR. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet. 1991;338(8760):131–7.
Heseker HB, Mason JB, Selhub J, Rosenberg IH, Jacques PF. Not all cases of neural-tube defect can be prevented by increasing the intake of folic acid. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(2):173–80.
Berry RJ, Li Z, Erickson JD, Li S, Moore CA, Wang H, et al. Prevention of neural-tube defects with folic acid in China. China-U.S. Collaborative Project for Neural Tube Defect Prevention. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(20):1485–90.
Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, Erickson JD, Wong LY. Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 2001;285(23):2981–6.
Williams J, Mai CT, Mulinare J, Isenburg J, Flood TJ, Ethen M, et al. Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic acid fortification—United States, 1995-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(1):1–5.
Mosley BS, Cleves MA, Siega-Riz AM, Shaw GM, Canfield MA, Waller DK, et al. Neural tube defects and maternal folate intake among pregnancies conceived after folic acid fortification in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(1):9–17.
Blom HJ, Shaw GM, den Heijer M, Finnell RH. Neural tube defects and folate: case far from closed. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(9):724–31.
Rothenberg SP, da Costa MP, Sequeira JM, Cracco J, Roberts JL, Weedon J, et al. Autoantibodies against folate receptors in women with a pregnancy complicated by a neural-tube defect. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(2):134–42.
Cabrera RM, Shaw GM, Ballard JL, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Lammer EJ, et al. Autoantibodies to folate receptor during pregnancy and neural tube defect risk. J Reprod Immunol. 2008;79(1):85–92.
Boyles AL, Ballard JL, Gorman EB, McConnaughey DR, Cabrera RM, Wilcox AJ, et al. Association between inhibited binding of folic acid to folate receptor alpha in maternal serum and folate-related birth defects in Norway. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(8):2232–8.
Yang N, Wang L, Finnell RH, Li Z, Jin L, Zhang L, et al. Levels of folate receptor autoantibodies in maternal and cord blood and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106(8):685–95.
van der Linden IJ, Afman LA, Heil SG, Blom HJ. Genetic variation in genes of folate metabolism and neural-tube defect risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65(2):204–15.
Denny KJ, Jeanes A, Fathe K, Finnell RH, Taylor SM, Woodruff TM. Neural tube defects, folate, and immune modulation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(9):602–9.
Piedrahita JA, Oetama B, Bennett GD, van Waes J, Kamen BA, Richardson J, et al. Mice lacking the folic acid-binding protein Folbp1 are defective in early embryonic development. Nat Genet. 1999;23(2):228–32.
Gelineau-van Waes J, Heller S, Bauer LK, Wilberding J, Maddox JR, Aleman F, et al. Embryonic development in the reduced folate carrier knockout mouse is modulated by maternal folate supplementation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(7):494–507.
Zhao R, Russell RG, Wang Y, Liu L, Gao F, Kneitz B, et al. Rescue of embryonic lethality in reduced folate carrier-deficient mice by maternal folic acid supplementation reveals early neonatal failure of hematopoietic organs. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(13):10224–8.
Spiegelstein O, Mitchell LE, Merriweather MY, Wicker NJ, Zhang Q, Lammer EJ, et al. Embryonic development of folate binding protein-1 (Folbp1) knockout mice: effects of the chemical form, dose, and timing of maternal folate supplementation. Dev Dyn. 2004;231(1):221–31.
Zhao Q, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B. Prenatal folic acid treatment suppresses acrania and meroanencephaly in mice mutant for the Cart1 homeobox gene. Nat Genet. 1996;13(3):275–83.
Lin W, Zhang Z, Srajer G, Chen YC, Huang M, Phan HM, et al. Proper expression of the Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase is required for neural tube closure in mouse embryos. Dev Dyn. 2008;237(4):928–40.
Fleming A, Copp AJ. Embryonic folate metabolism and mouse neural tube defects. Science. 1998;280(5372):2107–9.
Barbera JP, Rodriguez TA, Greene ND, Weninger WJ, Simeone A, Copp AJ, et al. Folic acid prevents exencephaly in Cited2 deficient mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(3):283–93.
Carter M, Chen X, Slowinska B, Minnerath S, Glickstein S, Shi L, et al. Crooked tail (Cd) model of human folate-responsive neural tube defects is mutated in Wnt coreceptor lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(36):12843–8.
Wlodarczyk BJ, Tang LS, Triplett A, Aleman F, Finnell RH. Spontaneous neural tube defects in splotch mice supplemented with selected micronutrients. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;213(1):55–63.
Sabatino JA, Stokes BA, Zohn IE. Prevention of neural tube defects in Lrp2 mutant mouse embryos by folic acid supplementation. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(1):16–26.
Birn H, Spiegelstein O, Christensen EI, Finnell RH. Renal tubular reabsorption of folate mediated by folate binding protein 1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(3):608–15.
Essien FB, Wannberg SL. Methionine but not folinic acid or vitamin B-12 alters the frequency of neural tube defects in Axd mutant mice. J Nutr. 1993;123(1):27–34.
Seller MJ. Vitamins, folic acid and the cause and prevention of neural tube defects. Ciba Found Symp. 1994;181:161–73; discussion 73–9.
Wong RL, Wlodarczyk BJ, Min KS, Scott ML, Kartiko S, Yu W, et al. Mouse Fkbp8 activity is required to inhibit cell death and establish dorso-ventral patterning in the posterior neural tube. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(4):587–601.
Chi H, Sarkisian MR, Rakic P, Flavell RA. Loss of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4 (MEKK4) results in enhanced apoptosis and defective neural tube development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(10):3846–51.
Gray JD, Nakouzi G, Slowinska-Castaldo B, Dazard JE, Rao JS, Nadeau JH, et al. Functional interactions between the LRP6 WNT co-receptor and folate supplementation. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(23):4560–72.
Marean A, Graf A, Zhang Y, Niswander L. Folic acid supplementation can adversely affect murine neural tube closure and embryonic survival. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(18):3678–83.
Christensen KE, Mikael LG, Leung KY, Levesque N, Deng L, Wu Q, et al. High folic acid consumption leads to pseudo-MTHFR deficiency, altered lipid metabolism, and liver injury in mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(3):646–58.
Bahous RH, Jadavji NM, Deng L, Cosin-Tomas M, Lu J, Malysheva O, et al. High dietary folate in pregnant mice leads to pseudo-MTHFR deficiency and altered methyl metabolism, with embryonic growth delay and short-term memory impairment in offspring. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(5):888–900.
Beaudin AE, Abarinov EV, Malysheva O, Perry CA, Caudill M, Stover PJ. Dietary folate, but not choline, modifies neural tube defect risk in Shmt1 knockout mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(1):109–14.
Burgoon JM, Selhub J, Nadeau M, Sadler TW. Investigation of the effects of folate deficiency on embryonic development through the establishment of a folate deficient mouse model. Teratology. 2002;65(5):219–27.
Burren KA, Savery D, Massa V, Kok RM, Scott JM, Blom HJ, et al. Gene-environment interactions in the causation of neural tube defects: folate deficiency increases susceptibility conferred by loss of Pax3 function. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(23):3675–85.
Burren KA, Scott JM, Copp AJ, Greene ND. The genetic background of the curly tail strain confers susceptibility to folate-deficiency-induced exencephaly. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(2):76–83.
De Castro SC, Leung KY, Savery D, Burren K, Rozen R, Copp AJ, et al. Neural tube defects induced by folate deficiency in mutant curly tail (Grhl3) embryos are associated with alteration in folate one-carbon metabolism but are unlikely to result from diminished methylation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(8):612–8.
Heid MK, Bills ND, Hinrichs SH, Clifford AJ. Folate deficiency alone does not produce neural tube defects in mice. J Nutr. 1992;122(4):888–94.
Kirke PN, Molloy AM, Daly LE, Burke H, Weir DG, Scott JM. Maternal plasma folate and vitamin B12 are independent risk factors for neural tube defects. Q J Med. 1993;86(11):703–8.
Beaudin AE, Abarinov EV, Noden DM, Perry CA, Chu S, Stabler SP, et al. Shmt1 and de novo thymidylate biosynthesis underlie folate-responsive neural tube defects in mice. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(4):789–98.
Dunlevy LP, Chitty LS, Burren KA, Doudney K, Stojilkovic-Mikic T, Stanier P, et al. Abnormal folate metabolism in foetuses affected by neural tube defects. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 4):1043–9.
Ernest S, Carter M, Shao H, Hosack A, Lerner N, Colmenares C, et al. Parallel changes in metabolite and expression profiles in crooked-tail mutant and folate-reduced wild-type mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(23):3387–93.
Carezani-Gavin M, Clarren SK, Steege T. Waardenburg syndrome associated with meningomyelocele. Am J Med Genet. 1992;42(1):135–6.
Begleiter ML, Harris DJ. Waardenburg syndrome and meningocele. Am J Med Genet. 1992;44(4):541.
Chatkupt S, Chatkupt S, Johnson WG. Waardenburg syndrome and myelomeningocele in a family. J Med Genet. 1993;30(1):83–4.
da-Silva EO. Waardenburg I syndrome: a clinical and genetic study of two large Brazilian kindreds, and literature review. Am J Med Genet. 1991;40(1):65–74.
de Saxe M, Kromberg JG, Jenkins T. Waardenburg syndrome in South Africa. Part I. An evaluation of the clinical findings in 11 families. S Afr Med J. 1984;66(7):256–61.
Hol FA, Hamel BC, Geurds MP, Mullaart RA, Barr FG, Macina RA, et al. A frameshift mutation in the gene for PAX3 in a girl with spina bifida and mild signs of Waardenburg syndrome. J Med Genet. 1995;32(1):52–6.
Hoth CF, Milunsky A, Lipsky N, Sheffer R, Clarren SK, Baldwin CT. Mutations in the paired domain of the human PAX3 gene cause Klein-Waardenburg syndrome (WS-III) as well as Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS-I). Am J Hum Genet. 1993;52(3):455–62.
Kujat A, Veith VP, Faber R, Froster UG. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling in a case of spina bifida in a family with Waardenburg syndrome type I. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22(2):155–8.
Moline ML, Sandlin C. Waardenburg syndrome and meningomyelocele. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47(1):126.
Pantke OA, Cohen MM Jr. The Waardenburg syndrome. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1971;7(7):147–52.
Shim SH, Wyandt HE, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EZ, Milunsky A. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements of chromosome 2q in a patient with Waardenburg’s syndrome and other congenital defects. Clin Genet. 2004;66(1):46–52.
Beaudin AE, Stover PJ. Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism and neural tube defects: balancing genome synthesis and gene expression. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2007;81(3):183–203.
Tibbetts AS, Appling DR. Compartmentalization of mammalian folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2010;30:57–81.
Ducker GS, Rabinowitz JD. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017;25(1):27–42.
Martin JB, Muccioli M, Herman K, Finnell RH, Plageman TF Jr. Folic acid modifies the shape of epithelial cells during morphogenesis via a Folr1 and MLCK dependent mechanism. Biol Open. 2019;8(1).
Balashova OA, Visina O, Borodinsky LN. Folate receptor 1 is necessary for neural plate cell apical constriction during Xenopus neural tube formation. Development. 2017;144(8):1518–30.
Toriyama M, Toriyama M, Wallingford JB, Finnell RH. Folate-dependent methylation of septins governs ciliogenesis during neural tube closure. FASEB J. 2017;31(8):3622–35.
Li H, Niswander L. Does DNA methylation provide a link between folate and neural tube closure? Epigenomics. 2018;10(10):1263–5.
Alata Jimenez N, Torres Perez SA, Sanchez-Vasquez E, Fernandino JI, Strobl-Mazzulla PH. Folate deficiency prevents neural crest fate by disturbing the epigenetic Sox2 repression on the dorsal neural tube. Dev Biol. 2018;444(Suppl 1):S193–201.
Finnell RH, Blom HJ, Shaw GM. Does global hypomethylation contribute to susceptibility to neural tube defects? Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(5):1153–4.
Lin S, Ren A, Wang L, Huang Y, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. Oxidative stress and apoptosis in benzo[a]pyrene-induced neural tube defects. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;116:149–58.
Wei D, Loeken MR. Increased DNA methyltransferase 3b (Dnmt3b)-mediated CpG island methylation stimulated by oxidative stress inhibits expression of a gene required for neural tube and neural crest development in diabetic pregnancy. Diabetes. 2014;63(10):3512–22.
Oyama K, Sugimura Y, Murase T, Uchida A, Hayasaka S, Oiso Y, et al. Folic acid prevents congenital malformations in the offspring of diabetic mice. Endocr J. 2009;56(1):29–37.
Juriloff DM, Harris MJ. Hypothesis: the female excess in cranial neural tube defects reflects an epigenetic drag of the inactivating X chromosome on the molecular mechanisms of neural fold elevation. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(10):849–55.
Poletta FA, Rittler M, Saleme C, Campana H, Gili JA, Pawluk MS, et al. Neural tube defects: sex ratio changes after fortification with folic acid. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193127.
Evans JA. Comment on changes in sex ratio in neural tube defects since food fortification with folic acid: re “hypothesis: the female excess in cranial neural tube defects reflects an epigenetic drag of the inactivating X chromosome on the molecular mechanisms of neural tube fold elevation”. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(11):958.
Taparia S, Gelineau-van Waes J, Rosenquist TH, Finnell RH. Importance of folate-homocysteine homeostasis during early embryonic development. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(12):1717–27.
Yang M, Li W, Wan Z, Du Y. Elevated homocysteine levels in mothers with neural tube defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(17):2051–7.
Denny KJ, Kelly CF, Kumar V, Witham KL, Cabrera RM, Finnell RH, et al. Autoantibodies against homocysteinylated protein in a mouse model of folate deficiency-induced neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106(3):201–7.
Dong Y, Wang L, Lei Y, Yang N, Cabrera RM, Finnell RH, et al. Gene variants in the folate pathway are associated with increased levels of folate receptor autoantibodies. Birth Defects Res. 2018;110(12):973–81.
Zhang Q, Bai B, Mei X, Wan C, Cao H, Dan L, et al. Elevated H3K79 homocysteinylation causes abnormal gene expression during neural development and subsequent neural tube defects. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3436.
Shah RH, Northrup H, Hixson JE, Morrison AC, Au KS. Genetic association of the glycine cleavage system genes and myelomeningocele. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106(10):847–53.
Narisawa A, Komatsuzaki S, Kikuchi A, Niihori T, Aoki Y, Fujiwara K, et al. Mutations in genes encoding the glycine cleavage system predispose to neural tube defects in mice and humans. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(7):1496–503.
Pai YJ, Leung KY, Savery D, Hutchin T, Prunty H, Heales S, et al. Glycine decarboxylase deficiency causes neural tube defects and features of non-ketotic hyperglycinemia in mice. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6388.
Parle-McDermott A, Pangilinan F, O’Brien KK, Mills JL, Magee AM, Troendle J, et al. A common variant in MTHFD1L is associated with neural tube defects and mRNA splicing efficiency. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(12):1650–6.
Kim J, Lei Y, Guo J, Kim SE, Wlodarczyk BJ, Cabrera RM, et al. Formate rescues neural tube defects caused by mutations in Slc25a32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(18):4690–5.
Martiniova L, Field MS, Finkelstein JL, Perry CA, Stover PJ. Maternal dietary uridine causes, and deoxyuridine prevents, neural tube closure defects in a mouse model of folate-responsive neural tube defects. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;101(4):860–9.
Momb J, Lewandowski JP, Bryant JD, Fitch R, Surman DR, Vokes SA, et al. Deletion of Mthfd1l causes embryonic lethality and neural tube and craniofacial defects in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(2):549–54.
Sudiwala S, De Castro SC, Leung KY, Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME, Mills K, et al. Formate supplementation enhances folate-dependent nucleotide biosynthesis and prevents spina bifida in a mouse model of folic acid-resistant neural tube defects. Biochimie. 2016;126:63–70.
Bryant JD, Sweeney SR, Sentandreu E, Shin M, Ipas H, Xhemalce B, et al. Deletion of the neural tube defect-associated gene Mthfd1l disrupts one-carbon and central energy metabolism in mouse embryos. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(16):5821–33.
Greene ND, Leung KY, Copp AJ. Inositol, neural tube closure and the prevention of neural tube defects. Birth Defects Res. 2017;109(2):68–80.
Noventa M, Vitagliano A, Quaranta M, Borgato S, Abdulrahim B, Gizzo S. Preventive and therapeutic role of dietary inositol supplementation in periconceptional period and during pregnancy: a summary of evidences and future applications. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(3):278–88.
Khandelwal M, Reece EA, Wu YK, Borenstein M. Dietary myo-inositol therapy in hyperglycemia-induced embryopathy. Teratology. 1998;57(2):79–84.
Reece EA, Khandelwal M, Wu YK, Borenstein M. Dietary intake of myo-inositol and neural tube defects in offspring of diabetic rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(3):536–9.
Greene ND, Copp AJ. Inositol prevents folate-resistant neural tube defects in the mouse. Nat Med. 1997;3(1):60–6.
van Straaten HW, Copp AJ. Curly tail: a 50-year history of the mouse spina bifida model. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2001;203(4):225–37.
Cockroft DL. Changes with gestational age in the nutritional requirements of postimplantation rat embryos in culture. Teratology. 1988;38(3):281–90.
Cockroft DL, Brook FA, Copp AJ. Inositol deficiency increases the susceptibility to neural tube defects of genetically predisposed (curly tail) mouse embryos in vitro. Teratology. 1992;45(2):223–32.
Cogram P, Tesh S, Tesh J, Wade A, Allan G, Greene ND, et al. D-chiro-inositol is more effective than myo-inositol in preventing folate-resistant mouse neural tube defects. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2451–8.
Wang Y, Lian L, Golden JA, Morrisey EE, Abrams CS. PIP5KI gamma is required for cardiovascular and neuronal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(28):11748–53.
Wilson MP, Hugge C, Bielinska M, Nicholas P, Majerus PW, Wilson DB. Neural tube defects in mice with reduced levels of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(24):9831–5.
Cavalli P, Copp AJ. Inositol and folate resistant neural tube defects. J Med Genet. 2002;39(2):E5.
Cavalli P, Tedoldi S, Riboli B. Inositol supplementation in pregnancies at risk of apparently folate-resistant NTDs. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2008;82(7):540–2.
Cavalli P, Tonni G, Grosso E, Poggiani C. Effects of inositol supplementation in a cohort of mothers at risk of producing an NTD pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91(11):962–5.
Cavalli P, Ronda E. Myoinositol: the bridge (PONTI) to reach a healthy pregnancy. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:5846286.
Greene ND, Leung KY, Gay V, Burren K, Mills K, Chitty LS, et al. Inositol for the prevention of neural tube defects: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2016;115(6):974–83.
Groenen PM, Peer PG, Wevers RA, Swinkels DW, Franke B, Mariman EC, et al. Maternal myo-inositol, glucose, and zinc status is associated with the risk of offspring with spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1713–9.
Lei Y, Finnell RH. New techniques for the study of neural tube defects. Adv Tech Biol Med. 2016;4(1).
Bassuk AG, Muthuswamy LB, Boland R, Smith TL, Hulstrand AM, Northrup H, et al. Copy number variation analysis implicates the cell polarity gene glypican 5 as a human spina bifida candidate gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(6):1097–111.
Chen Z, Lei Y, Zheng Y, Aguiar-Pulido V, Ross ME, Peng R, et al. Threshold for neural tube defect risk by accumulated singleton loss-of-function variants. Cell Res. 2018;28(10):1039–41.
Wilde JJ, Petersen JR, Niswander L. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental contributions to neural tube closure. Annu Rev Genet. 2014;48:583–611.
Van Allen MI, Kalousek DK, Chernoff GF, Juriloff D, Harris M, McGillivray BC, et al. Evidence for multi-site closure of the neural tube in humans. Am J Med Genet. 1993;47(5):723–43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zohn, I.E. (2020). Mouse Models of Neural Tube Defects. In: Liu, A. (eds) Animal Models of Human Birth Defects. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1236. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2389-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2389-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2388-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2389-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)