Abstract
The Lithium-ion battery is one of the most common batteries used in Electric Vehicles (EVs) due to the specific features of high energy density, power density, long life span and environment friendly. With the development of lithium-ion battery technology, different materials have been adopted in the design of the cathodes and anodes in order to gain a better performance. \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\), \(LiNiMnCoO_{2}\), \(LiNiCoAlO_{2}\), \(LiFePO_{4}\) and \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) are five common lithium-ion batteries adopted in commercial EVs nowadays. The characteristics of these five lithium-ion batteries are reviewed and compared in the aspects of electrochemical performance and their practical applications.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Due to the concerns on the pollutant emissions and the climate change due to large consumption of fossil fuels to support a variety of anthropogenic activities, electrification of the transport sector has been included as one of the national strategies by many countries. As an alternative to the internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle, Electric Vehicle (EV) has become increasingly popular in recent years due to the improvement of performance in acceleration and endurance. Comparing to the ICE vehicles, the advantages of EVs can be summarised as following aspects:
-
(1)
Higher efficiency: Generally, the average Tank-to-wheel efficiency of ICE cars are around 30% and even lower than 15% if stop-and-start behaviour occurs frequently [1, 2]. However, ICEs do not work in high-efficiency region in most cases, especially when the vehicles are running at a low speed in urban areas. In contrast, the average battery-to-wheel efficiency of EVs can be up to 87% which is much higher than ICE based vehicles [1].
-
(2)
Environmentally friendly: A Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) is fully powered by the batteries, thus there is no emission produced when an EV is running on the road. Moreover, the emissions of a gasoline Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) is around 30% less than an gasoline ICE based vehicle due to the high efficiency benefit [2].
-
(3)
Less noise pollution: EVs produce less noise pollution (especially at low speed driving mode) due to the result of using electric motors to replace ICEs [3]. An EV eliminates at least 25% and 10% of noise compared to an ICE vehicle at operation speed of 10 km/h and 5 km/h respectively [3, 4].
-
(4)
Government support: The promotion of EVs has become a national strategy for many countries today, sales of new petrol and diesel vehicles will be banned for the coming decades in many countries. Many government policies have been proposed in order to increase the competitiveness of EVs in the automotive market, such as lower taxes, free charging facilities and free parking, etc.
As the power source of the electric motor and other electric systems, battery plays an very important role to ensure the EVs can operate effectively and reliably. Several popular types of batteries are used in EVs, such as lead acid, nickel-cadmium, nickel-metal hybrid and Lithium-ion battery. Table 1 presents the key characteristics of these batteries [5,6,7,8,9].
Lithium-ion battery is one of the most popular rechargeable batteries which is widely adopted in EVs and HEVs nowadays due to its noticeable advantages, such as high energy and power density, low self discharge rate, no memory effect, low self-discharge rate and longer life span, etc. [10, 11].
Due to the different materials used in the design of the cathodes and anodes, lithium-ion batteries can be subdivided into different categories. Some lithium-ion batteries have been applied in EVs successfully, such as \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) (LMO) battery, \(LiNiMnCoO_{2}\) (NMC) battery, \(LiNiCoAlO_{2}\) (NCA) battery, \(LiFePO_{4}\) (LFP) battery and \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) (LTO) battery. These five types of lithium-ion battery have their unique advantages. As the power source of EVs, the battery must meet the specific safety and performance requirements with an appropriate cost. This paper presents a review and comparisons of these five lithium ion batteries over two aspects, namely the electrochemical performance and their applications in EVs.
2 Electrochemical Performance
These five types of lithium-ion battery have various electrochemical performances due to the adoption of different chemical materials. In this section, the comparisons of their structure, nominal voltage, energy density, high current rate capability, thermal stability, cyclabilty and safety performance are presented.
2.1 Structure
LMO has a three dimensional spinel structure which improves the diffusion of lithium ions [12,13,14]. The electrochemical reactions are associated with the insertion and extraction of lithium ions between the cathode (\(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\)) and the anode (lithium) [15,16,17]. NMC battery is one of the most successful lithium-ion batteries which balances the specific features of Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO) battery and LMO battery. NMC contains a layered structure and the battery cathode is compounded by three chemical elements (Nickel, Manganese and Cobalt) with a certain ratio. The difference ratios of these three chemical elements lead to variant battery performances [18,19,20,21]. In order to balance the electrochemical performance, stability and cost, NMC-111 (the ratio of Nickel:Manganese:Cobalt equals to 1:1:1) battery has been developed and widely adopted in EVs. NCA battery has similarities with NMC battery, which replaces manganese with aluminium in order to improve specific energy and life span [22, 23]. LFP battery has an ordered olivine structure, the \(FeO_{6}\) octahedras share the common corners [24]. Unlike the lithium-ion batteries with graphite anode, LTO battery adopts Li-titanate as the anode to offer a zero-strain spinel structure [25].
2.2 Specific Energy and Capability at High Current Rate
In order to increase the mileage of EVs after one charge, the battery of the EVs should offer high energy at a safety level. Increasing the operational voltage is one of the methods that can be applied to enhance battery specific energy. A typical \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) battery offers an average working voltage of 3.7 V, the theoretical gravimetric capacity and energy density are 148 mAh/g [12, 26, 27]. Unfortunately, the highest gravimetric capacity of \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) battery has been attained is around 130 mAh/g (at the small current rate) [27, 28]. A LMO battery has no reversible capacity change when operates at 1 C charge or discharge current rate; when the charge current remains 1 C and discharge current increases to 50 C, the reversible capacity decreases to 78% of its initial capacity; when the charge and discharge current both change to 20 C, the reversible capacity still remains 58% of its initial capacity [29]. These experimental results strongly suggest that LMO battery has low cell resistance and excellent capability at high current rate.
In order to improve the energy density, some researchers doped other chemical materials, such as Ni in LMO battery cathode to form a doped spinel, and the doped spinel battery can provide a higher theoretical gravimetric capacity of 150–160 mAh/g [30,31,32,33,34]. However, some high energy derivatives of \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) have not been adopted in large-scale in EVs yet due to the limitation of thermal stability and cyclability.
As a possible alternative of \(LiCoO_2\) battery, NMC battery offers an average working voltage of 3.6 V and a theoretical gravimetric capacity of 280 mAh/g [35]. However, the actual commercial gravimetric capacity in commercial cells is around 170 mAh/g [35]. The reversible capacity of a NMC-111 battery decreases to 78–80% of initial capacity at 4 C discharge current rate [36, 37] and the capacity decreases to 73–74% of initial capacity at 8 C discharge current rate [38, 39]. This indicates that NMC battery contains high specific energy and good capability at high current rate.
NCA battery and NMC battery have relatively similar electrochemical performance. A typical NCA (\(LiNi_{0.8}Co_{0.15}Al_{0.05}O_{2}\)) battery offers an average operation voltage of 3.7 V, and theoretical gravimetric capacity of 279 mAh/g [35]. The actual gravimetric capacity in commercial cells is around 200 mAh/g [35]. The capacity of a NCA battery decreases to 93.3% of the initial capacity at the discharge current rate at 0.5 C, and there is no extra capacity loss when the discharge current rate increases to 3 C [40]. It obviously can be found that both NCA and MNC batteries have high specific energy and can provide satisfactory performance at high current rate.
LFP has low electrical conductivity (10\(^{-9}\) to 10\(^{-10}\) S/cm ) due to its ordered olivine structure [24, 41,42,43,44]. A typical LFP battery offers an average operational voltage of 3.3 V [9] and a theoretical gravimetric capacity of 170 mAh/g [24]. The capacity of a LFP battery decreases to 96% of its initial capacity at a discharge current rate of 1 C; the capacity decreases to 82% and 76% at discharge current rate of 3 C and 5 C respectively [45]. The specific energy of LFP battery is lower than the above three lithium-ion batteries. The capacity fades significantly at high current rate.
Unlike the four types of lithium-ion batteries above, LTO battery replaces the graphite in the anode with \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) to form a zero-strain spinel structure [25]. As an anode, the operation voltage is 1.5 V for Li/\(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) battery cell [46]. When the \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) anode couples with cathodes like LMO, NMC, NCA, the operating voltage is 2.1–2.5 V [47]. The theoretical gravimetric capacity of \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) anode battery is 175 mAh/g [25]. Although the specific energy of LTO battery is low, it has an excellent capability when operates at high current rate, the capacity decreases to 87% of the initial capacity at 11.4 C charge/discharge current rate [48].
However, it should be noted that in the production process of commercial batteries, the theoretical energy densities are very difficult to achieve due to safety, cost and technology limitation reasons. Table 2 shows the average energy densities for commercial products of these five types of lithium-ion battery [49].
Comparing the operational voltage and energy density of these five lithium ion batteries, it can be found that LMO, NMC and NCA batteries enable the EVs to gain a longer mileage on single charge due to the higher energy density. LFP and LTO batteries have low energy density which means the EVs need to bring more battery cells to achieve the energy requirement. However, this results the increasing of vehicle weight, the mileage one a single charge still cannot be improved in essence. On the other hand, more batteries are adopted in EVs leads the Battery Management System (BMS) to face greater challenges.
2.3 Thermal Stability and Safety
Apart to the energy and power requirements, safety is another important issue in EV management. Many factors may cause battery failures, such as over voltage, under voltage, short circuit, over charge/discharge, overheat and collision, etc., and a few accidents due to battery failures have been reported in the public media. However, the most common factor is the generation of heat and gas [5, 10, 50]. Thus, to have desirable thermal stability is another important aspect in assessing the battery quality. Good thermal stability of a battery enables an EV to operate in a wider temperature range, and reduces the difficulty of the thermal management in an EV.
Thermal stability is a key that directly determines the safety of the battery operation. A typical LMO battery can operate safely at 55 \(^{\circ }\)C, but the capacity decreases to 75% of its initial capacity [26]. The main reason of the capacity fading of a LMO battery during cycling is the Mn dissolution into the electrolyte [51]. The Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) breaks at 90.5 \(^{\circ }\)C and the thermal runaway occurs at 250 \(^{\circ }\)C, then \(O_{2}\) is released due to the decomposition of \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) [52].
A typical NMC battery loses 7.5% capacity at 85 \(^{\circ }\)C after 26 cycles (0.29% capacity loss per cycle) and loses 22% capacity at 120 \(^{\circ }\)C after 29 cycles [53]. At 80 \(^{\circ }\)C, the SEI has no obvious change but it becomes thicker and forms spherical particles at 120 \(^{\circ }\)C [53]. Flammable and toxic gas (\(H_{2}\) and CO) are released when the temperature reaches 170 \(^{\circ }\)C and the thermal runaway occurs at 220 \(^{\circ }\)C [54].
For a typical NCA battery, the anodic reactions occur at 90 \(^{\circ }\)C and the SEI film breaks at 120 \(^{\circ }\)C; the cathodic reactions occur at 140 \(^{\circ }\)C and the thermal runaway occurs when the temperature reaches 180 \(^{\circ }\)C [55]. Moreover, thermal runaway could occur at 65 \(^{\circ }\)C if the NCA battery is overcharged. [56]. NCA battery has a drastic behaviour when the temperature reaches thermal runaway, a large amount of gas (317mmol) are released [56]. Oxygen gas is released when \(Ni^{4+}\) is reduced to \(Ni^{2+}\), and the thermal runaway may be caused by the reaction of oxygen and flammable electrolyte [57, 58]. As a Ni-rich cathode, NCA battery has higher specific energy than NMC-111 battery but lower thermal stability [59].
A typical LFP battery reaches its maximum capacity in a temperature range of 20 \(^{\circ }\)C–30 \(^{\circ }\)C and the capacity decreases to 95% when the temperature reduces from 20 \(^{\circ }\)C to 10 \(^{\circ }\)C [60]. The discharge capacity measured at −10 \(^{\circ }\)C shows that 25.8% loss after 600 cycles but 1.9% gain after 300 cycles from the initial capacity [61]. When the temperature reaches 45 \(^{\circ }\)C, the capacity decreases to 92.7% after 300 cycles and decreases to 85.7% after 600 cycles [61]. When the temperature reaches to 60 \(^{\circ }\)C, 37% of the initial capacity loss after 100 cycles and 45% of initial capacity loss after 110 cycles [62]. The thermal runaway occurs at 260 \(^{\circ }\)C [63] and the thermal runaway occurs at 140 \(^{\circ }\)C for an overcharged LFP battery [56]. The amount of gas is released of a LFP battery at thermal runaway temperature is 61mmol, which is much less than NCA battery [56].
The capacity of a typical LTO battery decreases to 91.3% after 280 cycles (0.25% capacity loss per cycle) at 60 \(^{\circ }\)C, the thermal runaway occurs when the temperature exceeds 260 \(^{\circ }\)C [64]. The research [47] shows that graphite anode produces large amount of \(C_{2}H_{6}\) and \(C_{2}H_{4}\) at 100 \(^{\circ }\)C, but there is no generation of gaseous decomposition products of LTO anode.
Therefore, the thermal stability and safety level of these five types lithium-ion batteries can be summarised in Table 3.
3 Applications
All of these five types of lithium-ion battery have been widely adopted in EVs due to their own specific advantages. The application examples of these five types of lithium-ion battery in EVs are provided in Table 4 based on the information available in the public domain.
Apart from the electrochemical performance of the batteries, cost and market trend are another two important factors which determine the battery application capability in EVs. In this section, the application capability of these five types of lithium-ion battery are reviewed and compared from the aspects of cost and market trend.
3.1 Cost
The cost of a lithium-ion battery contains the following components: materials of cathode and anode, electrolyte, separator, assembly of cell and module, labour, etc. [65]. Due to the different raw materials adopted and the manufacturing processes, the cost of the mentioned five types of Li-ion battery are also different. Table 5 compares the key properties and cost of the several popular types of lithium-ion used in EVs. [65,66,67,68].
Due to the high cost of Co and Ti raw materials and the complex process of manufacturing, the cost of NMC, NCA and LTO batteries are much higher than LMO and LFP batteries. It also should be noted that when LTO is selected as the anode material, the cathode material may be chosen from NMC or NCA, the cost of NMC/LTO or NCA/LTO battery will be much higher. Even though the cost of LTO battery is high, the battery replacement frequency can be reduced for the EVs which require to be recharged often. In contrast, although LMO battery has a lower cost, the drawback of poor cyclability and thermal stability, the total operation cost may increase for the EVs to be recharged frequently. Sometimes LMO battery and NMC battery are combined to power an EV in order to enhance the performance and also decreases the battery cost. LMO can be used to improve the acceleration performance with the benefit of high current boost, and the NMC brings good cyclability and thermal stability to the entire power system. LTO battery is generally applied to the price-insensitive and low energy requirement vehicles. Due to the properties of high safety, long life and fast-charge, LTO batteries are favoured by electric buses.
3.2 Market Trend
According to the estimation results in [69], the market share of NMC, NCA and LTO batteries in 2025 will increase substantially, the expected market growth (from 2015 to 2025) are 4.8 times, 2.9 times and 26.7 times respectively [70]. Figure 1 summarises the market share of lithium-ion battery in 2015 and 2025 respectively [70]. It indicates that NMC, NCA and LTO batteries have a huge potential market in the next few years. Moreover, although the market share of LFP and LMO may decrease, the total market volume is showing a climbing trend [70].
4 Conclusion
\(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\), \(LiNiMnCoO_{2}\), \(LiNiCoAlO_{2}\), \(LiFePO_{4}\) and \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) batteries have been adopted in EVs successfully with their specific features. \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) battery has low resistance due to the spinel structure, this allows \(LiMn_{2}O_{4}\) battery to offer an excellent performance at high current rate in applications. The extremely low cost makes it highly favoured by the market. Poor performance at high temperature and limited cyclability are the downsides. \(LiNiMnCoO_{2}\) battery has a satisfactory overall performance especially for the high specific energy. A variety of derivatives of \(LiNiMnCoO_{2}\) enable this type lithium-ion battery to face different applications. The extremely high specific energy and moderate life span allows \(LiNiCoAlO_{2}\) to be a good candidate for EVs. High cost and low level of safety are the negatives. The key benefits of \(LiFePO_{4}\) battery are the long life span and low cost. It has good thermal stability when it operates at high temperature but the capacity is greatly attenuated at low temperature. Low specific energy and elevated self-discharge are the main disadvantages. \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) battery has the best thermal stability, cyclability and safety performance among these five lithium-ion batteries. No lithium plating at high current rate supports \(Li_{4}Ti_{5}O_{12}\) battery for fast charging. However, the low specific energy and extremely high cost are the major disadvantages.
References
Campanari, S., Manzolini, G., Garcia De la Iglesia, F.: Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations. J. Power Sour. 186(2), 464–477 (2009)
Williamson, S.S., Emadi, A.: Comparative assessment of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicles based on comprehensive well-to-wheels efficiency analysis. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 54(3), 856–862 (2005)
Sandberg, U., Goubert, L., Mioduszewski, P.: Are vehicles driven in electric mode so quiet that they need acoustic warning signals. In 20th International Congress on Acoustics (2010)
Japan JASIC. A study on approach warning systems for hybrid vehicle in motor mode. Informal document No. GRB-49-10, 49th GRB (2009)
Wang, Q., Jiang, B., Li, B., Yan, Y.: A critical review of thermal management models and solutions of lithium-ion batteries for the development of pure electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 64, 106–128 (2016)
Hua, A.C.C., Syue, B.Z.W.: Charge and discharge characteristics of lead-acid battery and LiFePO4 battery. In: 2010 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC), pp. 1478–1483. IEEE (2010)
Ruetschi, P.: Review on the lead-acid battery science and technology. J. Power Sources 2(1), 3–120 (1977)
Hadjipaschalis, I., Poullikkas, A., Efthimiou, V.: Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13(6–7), 1513–1522 (2009)
Hannan, M.A., Lipu, M.S.H., Hussain, A., Mohamed, A.: A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: challenges and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 78, 834–854 (2017)
Languang, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J., Ouyang, M.: A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 226, 272–288 (2013)
Etacheri, V., Marom, R., Elazari, R., Salitra, G., Aurbach, D.: Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(9), 3243–3262 (2011)
Thackeray, M.M., Johnson, P.J., De Picciotto, L.A., Bruce, P.G., Goodenough, J.B.: Electrochemical extraction of lithium from LiMn2O4. Mater. Res. Bull. 19(2), 179–187 (1984)
Thackeray, M.M., David, W.I.F., Bruce, P.G., Goodenough, J.B.: Lithium insertion into manganese spinels. Mater. Res. Bull. 18(4), 461–472 (1983)
Choa, J., Thackeray, M.M.: Structural changes of LiMn2O4 spinel electrodes during electrochemical cycling. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146(10), 3577–3581 (1999)
Lazzari, M., Scrosati, B.: A cyclable lithium organic electrolyte cell based on two intercalation electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 127(3), 773–774 (1980)
Guo, D., et al.: Synthesis and electrochemical properties of high performance polyhedron sphere like lithium manganese oxide for lithium ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 632, 222–228 (2015)
Ouyang, C.Y., Shi, S.Q., Wang, Z.X., Li, H., Huang, X.J., Chen, L.Q.: Ab initio molecular-dynamics studies on LixMn2O4 as cathode material for lithium secondary batteries. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 67(1), 28 (2004)
Li, D.-C., Muta, T., Zhang, L.-Q., Yoshio, M., Noguchi, H.: Effect of synthesis method on the electrochemical performance of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2. J. Power Sources 132(1–2), 150–155 (2004)
Dolotko, O., Senyshyn, A., Mühlbauer, M.J., Nikolowski, K., Ehrenberg, H.: Understanding structural changes in NMC Li-ion cells by in situ neutron diffraction. J. Power Sources 255, 197–203 (2014)
Choi, J., Manthiram, A.: Role of chemical and structural stabilities on the electrochemical properties of layered LiNi1/ 3Mn1/ 3Co1/ 3O2 cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152(9), A1714–A1718 (2005)
Ohzuku, T., Makimura, Y.: Layered lithium insertion material of LiNi1/2Mn1/2O2: a possible alternative to LiCoO2 for advanced lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Lett. 30(8), 744–745 (2001)
Tran, H.Y., Greco, G., Täubert, C., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Haselrieder, W., Kwade, A.: Influence of electrode preparation on the electrochemical performance of LiNi0. 8Co0. 15Al0. 05O2 composite electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 210, 276–285 (2012)
Kim, G.-Y., Dahn, J.R.: Effects of electrode density on the safety of NCA positive electrode for Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160(8), A1108–A1111 (2013)
Padhi, A.K., Nanjundaswamy, K.S., Goodenough, J.B.: Phospho-olivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144(4), 1188–1194 (1997)
Ohzuku, T., Ueda, A., Yamamoto, N.: Zero-strain insertion material of Li [Li1/3Ti5/3] o 4 for rechargeable lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142(5), 1431–1435 (1995)
Guyomard, D., Tarascon, J.M.: Li metal-free rechargeable LiMn2O4/carbon cells: their understanding and optimization. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139(4), 937–948 (1992)
Potapenko, A.V., Kirillov, S.A.: Lithium manganese spinel materials for high-rate electrochemical applications. J. Energy Chem. 23(5), 543–558 (2014)
Tu, J., Zhao, X.B., Zhuang, D.G., Cao, G.S., Zhu, T.J., Tu, J.P.: Studies of cycleability of LiMn2O4 and LiLa0. 01Mn1. 99O4 as cathode materials for Li-ion battery. Physica B: Condens. Matter 382(1–2), 129–134 (2006)
Tang, W., et al.: Nano LiMn2O4 as cathode material of high rate capability for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 198, 308–311 (2012)
Amine, K., Tukamoto, H., Yasuda, H., Fujita, Y.: A new three-volt spinel Li1+ x Mn1. 5Ni0. 5 O 4 for secondary lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 143(5), 1607–1613 (1996)
Strobel, P., Palos, A.I., Anne, M., Le Cras, F.: Structural, magnetic and lithium insertion properties of spinel-type Li2Mn3MO8 oxides (m= Mg, Co, Ni, Cu). J. Mater. Chem. 10(2), 429–436 (2000)
Morales, J., Sánchez, L., Tirado, J.L.: New doped Li-M-Mn-O (M= Al, Fe, Ni) spinels as cathodes for rechargeable 3 V lithium batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2(6), 420–426 (1998)
Wagemaker, M., Ooms, F.G.B., Kelder, E.M., Schoonman, J., Mulder, F.M.: Extensive migration of Ni and Mn by lithiation of ordered LiMg0. 1Ni0. 4Mn1. 5O4 spinel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126(41), 13526–13533 (2004)
Liu, G.Q., Wen, L., Liu, Y.M.: Spinel LiNi\(_{0.5}\)Mn\(_{1.5}\)O\(_{4}\) and its derivatives as cathodes for high-voltage Li-ion batteries. J. Solid State Electrochem. 14(12), 2191–2202 (2010)
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J.T., Yushin, G.: Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Mater. Today 18(5), 252–264 (2015)
Park, S.H., Yoon, C.S., Kang, S.G., Kim, H.-S., Moon, S.-I., Sun, Y.-K.: Synthesis and structural characterization of layered Li [Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3] O2 cathode materials by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis method. Electrochimica Acta 49(4), 557–563 (2004)
Sun, Y., Ouyang, C., Wang, Z., Huang, X., Chen, L.: Effect of co content on rate performance of limn0. 5- x Co2x Ni0. 5- x O 2 cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151(4), A504–A508 (2004)
Santhanam, R., Rambabu, B.: Improved high rate cycling of Li-rich Li1. 10Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode for lithium batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 4(12), 1770–1778 (2009)
Yabuuchi, N., Ohzuku, T.: Novel lithium insertion material of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 for advanced lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 119, 171–174 (2003)
Myung, S.T., Cho, M.H., Hong, H.T., Kang, T.H., Kim, C.S.: Electrochemical evaluation of mixed oxide electrode for Li-ion secondary batteries: Li1. 1Mn1. 9O4 and Lini0. 8Co0. 15Al0. 05O2. J. Power Sources 146(1–2), 222–225 (2005)
Takahashi, M., Tobishima, S., Takei, K., Sakurai, Y.: Characterization of LiFePO4 as the cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 97, 508–511 (2001)
Andersson, A.S., Kalska, B., Häggström, L., Thomas, J.O.: Lithium extraction/insertion in LiFePO4: an x-ray diffraction and mössbauer spectroscopy study. Solid State Ionics 130(1–2), 41–52 (2000)
Barker, J., Saidi, M.Y., Swoyer, J.L.: Lithium iron (ii) phospho-olivines prepared by a novel carbothermal reduction method. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 6(3), A53–A55 (2003)
Shin, H.C., Cho, W.I., Jang, H.: Electrochemical properties of the carbon-coated LiFePO4 as a cathode material for lithium-ion secondary batteries. J. Power Sources 159(2), 1383–1388 (2006)
Huang, Y., Ren, H., Yin, S., Wang, Y., Peng, Z., Zhou, Y.: Synthesis of LiFePO4/C composite with high-rate performance by starch sol assisted rheological phase method. J. Power Sources 195(2), 610–613 (2010)
Ferg, E., Gummow, R.J., De Kock, A., Thackeray, M.M.: Spinel anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 141(11), L147–L150 (1994)
Belharouak, I., Koenig Jr., G.M., Amine, K.: Electrochemistry and safety of Li4Ti5O12 and graphite anodes paired with LiMn2O4 for hybrid electric vehicle Li-ion battery applications. J. Power Sources 196(23), 10344–10350 (2011)
Lai, C., Dou, Y.Y., Li, X., Gao, X.P.: Improvement of the high rate capability of hierarchical structured Li4Ti5O12 induced by the pseudocapacitive effect. J. Power Sources 195(11), 3676–3679 (2010)
Battery Universtiy. Bu-205: Types of lithium-ion. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/types_of_lithium_ion. Accessed 01 Apr 2018
Levy, S.C., Bro, P.: Battery hazards and accident prevention of cell components with the thermal behavior of a complete cell (1994)
Xia, Y., Zhou, Y., Yoshio, M.: Capacity fading on cycling of 4 V Li/LiMn2 O 4 cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144(8), 2593–2600 (1997)
Wang, Q., Sun, J., Chen, C.: Thermal stability of delithiated LiMn2O4 with electrolyte for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154(4), A263–A267 (2007)
Bodenes, L., et al.: Lithium secondary batteries working at very high temperature: capacity fade and understanding of aging mechanisms. J. Power Sources 236, 265–275 (2013)
Golubkov, A.W., et al.: Thermal-runaway experiments on consumer li-ion batteries with metal-oxide and olivin-type cathodes. RSC. Adv. 4(7), 3633–3642 (2014)
Wen, J., Yan, Y., Chen, C.: A review on lithium-ion batteries safety issues: existing problems and possible solutions. Mater. Express 2(3), 197–212 (2012)
Andrey, W., et al.: Thermal runaway of commercial 18650 Li-ion batteries with LFP and NCA cathodes-impact of state of charge and overcharge. RSC. Adv. 5(70), 57171–57186 (2015)
Belharouak, I., Wenquan, L., Vissers, D., Amine, K.: Safety characteristics of Li (Ni0. 8Co0. 15Al0. 05) O2 and Li (Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3) O2. Electrochem. Commun. 8(2), 329–335 (2006)
Yoon, W.S., Chung, K.Y., McBreen, J., Yang, X.Q.: A comparative study on structural changes of LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2 and LiNi0. 8Co0. 15Al0. 05O2 during first charge using in situ XRD. Electrochem. Commun. 8(8), 1257–1262 (2006)
Bak, S.M., et al.: Structural changes and thermal stability of charged lini x Mn y Co z O2 cathode materials studied by combined in situ time-resolved XRD and mass spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(24), 22594–22601 (2014)
Chen, K., Li, X.: Accurate determination of battery discharge characteristics-a comparison between two battery temperature control methods. J. Power Sources 247, 961–966 (2014)
Zhang, Y., Wang, C.-Y., Tang, X.: Cycling degradation of an automotive LiFePO4 lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources 196(3), 1513–1520 (2011)
Dubarry, M., et al.: Identifying battery aging mechanisms in large format Li ion cells. J. Power Sources 196(7), 3420–3425 (2011)
Mayza, A.B., et al.: Thermal characterization of LiFepO4 cathode in lithium ion cells. ECS Trans. 35(34), 177–183 (2011)
Huang, P., et al.: Experimental and modeling analysis of thermal runaway propagation over the large format energy storage battery module with Li4Ti5O12 anode. Appl. Energy 183, 659–673 (2016)
Berckmans, G., Messagie, M., Smekens, J., Omar, N., Vanhaverbeke, L., Van Mierlo, J.: Cost projection of state of the art lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles up to 2030. Energies 10(9), 1314 (2017)
Deng, D.: Li-ion batteries: basics, progress, and challenges. Energy Sci. Eng. 3(5), 385–418 (2015)
Mekonnen, Y., Sundararajan, A., Sarwat, A.I.: A review of cathode and anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. In: SoutheastCon, 2016, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)
Smekens, J., et al.: Influence of electrode density on the performance of Li-ion batteries: experimental and simulation results. Energies 9(2), 104 (2016)
Pillot, C.: The rechargeable battery market and main trends 2014–2025. In: 31st International Battery Seminar & Exhibit (2015)
Lebedeva, N., De Periso, F., Boon-Brett, L.: Lithium ion battery value chain and related opportunities for europe. European Commission, Petten (2016)
Acknowledgements
Xuan Liu would like to thank The Department for the Economy Northern Ireland and W-Tec Centre, Queen’s University Belfast for sponsoring his research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, X., Li, K., Li, X. (2018). The Electrochemical Performance and Applications of Several Popular Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles - A Review. In: Li, K., Zhang, J., Chen, M., Yang, Z., Niu, Q. (eds) Advances in Green Energy Systems and Smart Grid. ICSEE IMIOT 2018 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 925. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2381-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2381-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2380-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2381-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)