Abstract
Plastics have become an indispensable part of the society. Lightweight, easy handling, durability, flexibility, resistance to water, and other microbial attacks have made them ubiquitously popular. The extensive use of the long-lived polymer has confronted the environment with a challenging plastic pollution problem. Plastics are the product of coal, natural gas, crude oil, cellulose, and salt manufactured through energy-intensive technology. From cradle to grave, plastics affect the environment in a multifaceted way. The hazardous and ecologically (terrestrial and marine) damaging threats necessitate its removal from the environment. Incineration, landfilling, recycling, and degradation are the four most available options to manage the plastic waste. However, to avoid long-term environmental damage, degradation of plastic is the most preferred option among the management options. Plastic degradation is carried out by photodegradation, thermooxidative degradation, hydrolytic degradation, and biodegradation. Among them, microbial degradation using bacteria and fungi is an emerging strategy to manage plastic waste. Hence, this chapter highlights the benefits, concerns, and threats surrounding the use of plastics. The different perspectives covered in this chapter include plastic production and plastic waste generation, environmental and health effects of plastic pollution, plastic waste management options, biodegradation of plastic polymers and the mechanism involved, biodegradable plastics, and challenges and constraints of plastic waste biodegradation.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
6.1 Introduction
Plastic is one of the commonly used, versatile substances of the twentieth century. The term “plastic” was coined by Baekeland in 1909. It is derived from the Greek word where 'Plastikos' means fit for molding and ‘Plastics’ means molded. They are synthetic or semisynthetic amorphous substances prepared from fossil fuel resources. They resemble the natural resins obtained from the trees and plants. Since its invention, it has replaced wood, glass, and metal. Though the history of plastics dates back to 100 years, the development of modern polymers started 50 years back. Plastics have almost invaded all the industries, namely, food, clothing, construction, shelter, medical, transportation, sports, and many more. The wide application of the plastics was due to its multiple properties: durability, stability, low cost, lightweight, and unbreakable nature. Plastics are a long chain of monomers prepared by polymerization through addition and condensation process. The process is energy intensive and requires a huge amount of fossil fuels for production. The versatility of the polymer has resulted in the generation of huge amount of plastic waste. The buoyant nature of plastics spreads them to a huge area for a long distance. Moreover, the material from which they are made of resists them from degrading in the environment. Resistance and nonbiodegradability make plastic waste management very critical. The plastics remain in perpetuity when disposed of in landfills or open dumps.
Plastic waste has started attracting public attention due to the various environmental and health hazards. They are hazardous to terrestrial and aquatic life. The marine environment is largely affected by the plastics. The persistent organic pollutants that are coated on the plastics might enter into the food chain and cause harm to the animals and human beings. Animals also die due to indigestion and stomach bloating problems when plastic was consumed along with food. Marine animals die of suffocation when they get tangled with plastics. Dioxins released during the burning of plastics lead to cancer. The deterioration caused by the plastic pollution necessitates its removal from the environment. Microbial degradation can be one best option for its removal from the environment. Plastics are complex organic compounds and can be mineralized by microorganisms, unlike heavy metals. Henceforth, studies on plastic degradation using bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes have generated a lot of interest among researchers.
Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes isolated from varied source, namely, soil, wastewater, sludge, mangrove soil, landfill soil, and plastic-accumulated soil, were efficient in degrading the natural and synthetic polymers. The microorganisms use intracellular and extracellular enzymes to cleave the polymer chain to oligomers, subsequent to which they are mineralized by aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Weight loss, change in the structure of the polymers, and cracks in the polymers indicated the efficiency of microorganisms in degrading the polymers. However, the process of biodegradation was limited and challenged by factors such as polymer structure, composition, chemical bonding, stress, and environmental conditions (pH, temperature). Pretreatment of polymer with light, heat, oxygen, and UV enhances the biodegradation of polymers. This chapter will through light on plastic production, plastic waste generation, and its environmental and health effects. Biodegradation of plastic waste, factors influencing its degradation, and the various challenges associated are also discussed.
6.2 Plastic Production
Plastics are polymers that are manufactured chemically by polymerization of monomers of various synthetic and semisynthetic organic compounds. Monomers are a group of atoms that constitute unit cells. The monomers are made of elements such as carbon, hydrogen, sulfur, silicon, nitrogen, and chlorine. According to the type of polymers, the composition of monomers shall vary. For, example, polyethylene polymer consists of repeated units of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Other monomers include ethylene (ethene), propylene (propene), butene, and others. The monomers possess a double bond between carbon atoms such that it can react to form polymers. Polymerization of monomers occurs through two mechanisms: addition reaction and condensation. A catalyst is used to link one monomer to the other in an addition reaction, while in condensation reaction, the catalyst is used to fuse all monomers to adjacent monomers. This results in the formation of dimers and a by-product. The by-product has to be removed to avoid the release of environmental contaminants (American Chemistry Council 2005).
At the industrial level, the production of plastic began in the1940s. Presently, huge quantity of plastics is manufactured annually due to their application in the household, packing, agriculture, toys, and many more (Al-Salem et al. 2009). In the 1950s, the annual production of plastics was 1.5 million tones which have increased dramatically to 299 million tons in 2013 (Plastics Europe 2015). Natural products such as cellulose, natural gas, salt, coal, and petroleum derived from crude oil are used as polymers for the synthesis of plastics. Today, around 4% of crude oil is used as a feedstock for manufacturing plastics, and additional 4% of petrochemical products are used in energy-intensive process for plastic prototype or refined goods (Wu et al. 2013). During the distillation process of crude oil, different hydrocarbon products get separated into different fractions. One of such fraction includes naphtha which is a very crucial element for the production of plastics (Kalia et al. 2000). The most abundant plastic polymers produced include high-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), polystyrene (PS), expanded polystyrene (EPS), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (Li et al. 2016). In order to improve the performance of plastics, various additives along with polymer resins are mixed during polymerization of plastic polymers. These include inorganic fillers, phthalate plasticizers, bisphenol A (BPA), thermal and UV stabilizers, colorings, carbon, silica, and flame retardants which provide various range of plastic products (Thompson et al. 2009). Generally, plastics are divided into two basic categories: (i) thermo-softening plastics and (ii) thermosetting plastics. Thermo-softening plastics are those which can be recycled and remolded into different shapes, whereas thermosetting plastics cannot be recycled and remolded (Singh et al. 2017). The polymers are processed into finished products through a different process. Extrusion, blow molding, film blowing, calendaring, expanded bead blowing, injection and rotational molding, casting, thermoforming, and compression folding are finishing steps in plastic production (American Chemistry Council 2005).
6.3 Plastic Waste Generation
Rapid growth and urbanization have led to the increased demand for plastics around the globe due to its multiple advantages such as lightweight, strength, durability, and low cost. Plastic waste generation depends on increasing population, lifestyle, socioeconomic background, and developmental activities. Since 1990 the demand for plastics has increased at an annual rate of 5% (Kunwar et al. 2016). Increase in plastic production leads to higher consumption which in turn results in more plastic waste generation. Plastic is used widely in various sectors such as household, agriculture, packaging, and industrial areas. So, the plastic waste generated can be categorized into municipal and industrial plastic waste. Industrial waste is homogenous which get generated during manufacturing of plastic products, packaging, and processing. Municipal waste is heterogeneous waste which includes plastic bags, wrappers, toys, wires, vending cups, CD, disposable cups, and few more. They are discarded as household waste (Panda et al. 2010). Some plastics products are prepared for single use which gets disposed off. According to Indian government’s Plastic Waste Management Rules (2016), it is estimated that everyday approximately 15,000 tons of plastic waste is generated, out of which 60% is collected. Globally, around 32 billion tons of plastic waste is generated every day, out of which 65% of total plastic waste generated ends life in landfills. As mentioned earlier, plastics are categorized into two types: thermoset plastics and thermoplastics. Thermoplastics are recyclable plastics and they constitute 80% of plastic waste. The resins produced for the preparation of varied types of plastics are summarized in Table 6.1. Plastic waste does not degrade unlike other municipal wastes such as paper, organic waste, etc. because it accumulates and remains there for longer periods of time (Sarker et al. 2011). Moreover, lack of awareness and unavailability of effective collection mechanism plastic waste generation are increasing day by day. In India, the per capita plastic waste generation is estimated as 5.7 kg/annum.
Recycling is the only means by which plastic waste generation is reduced or minimized. According to reports, the generation of plastic waste in India is comparatively lesser than the rest of the world (Table 6.2). Moreover, the recycling rate is also higher in India (60%) than the rest of the world (15–20%). The recycling is done only for a specific group of plastic. The mechanical recycling is done only for plastic bottles and PVCs. Polythene bag recycling is still facing issues. Segregation and cleaning are other factors that affect recycling.
6.4 Environmental Hazards of Plastic Waste
Plastics are extensively scattered in the general public and the environment due to their diverse chemical composition, properties, and applications. The higher the utilization, the more will be the generation of waste, and in case of plastics which are persistent in nature, the waste generation would be much higher (Thompson et al. 2009). Aesthetic problems get originated due to plastic debris. Plastics are very hazardous for both terrestrial and marine life. Conventional plastics are non-biodegradable and require very long time for degradation. They also show high resistance to aging, get converted to smaller debris, and accumulate in the environment (O’Brine and Thompson 2010). Hazardous by-products or unbound monomers from plastics get released into the aquatic environment through the migration of plastic waste and landfill leachate to both freshwater and marine waters (Huang et al. 2012). In mid-oceans, plastic bags resemble prey to fishes. Fishes, mammals, turtles, and other sea animals consume these plastics along with their food, which gets accumulated in the gut of the sea animals. The plastics in the gut damage the inner lining of the stomach, block the digestive tract, and minimize the feed drive of animals (Laist 1987). Moore (2008) reported that around 267 marine species including mammals, fishes, turtles, seabirds, and invertebrates are affected by plastic waste. Marine animals get tangled in floating plastic debris which inhibits or limits their movement resulting in their drowning. Evidence of plastic debris in the guts of fishes have been reported by many researchers. Fragments of plastic enter the filter feeding organisms through which it enters the food chain and bioaccumulates in higher marine organisms. Plastics also destroy the habitat by acting as transportation agent for invasive species (Fergusson 1974). Microorganisms and other diatoms start growing over the plastics and create biofouling over the plastic material. Biofouling makes the plastic heavy and they eventually sink to the floor of the water body. Due to the buildup of plastic waste on the sea floor, hypoxia conditions may develop due to inhibition of gas exchange between pore waters of accumulated plastic debris and overlying waters. Hypoxia condition results in improper functioning of the normal marine ecosystem (Derraik 2002). Plastics floating in water suffocate marine animals to death. Plastic ingestion could increase the buoyancy of fish making it difficult for mesopelagic fish to return to deeper waters (Boerger et al. 2010).
A number of chemicals used for the manufacturing of plastics, unbounded monomers, additives, and their degradation products may get released into the environment during the lifecycle of plastic product which may have hazardous properties for biological life and environment. Bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, polyhalogenated flame retardants, polyfluorinated compounds, nonylphenol, and antibacterial compounds such as triclosan pose serious threats to human health and other organisms (Halden 2010). Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) used in electrical and some non-electrical plastics as fire retardants are persistent in nature. In May 2009, Stockholm convention declared penta- and octa-BDE as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The United States and the European Union have banned the use of these PBDEs (Tang et al. 2014). Bisphenol A and phthalates are of major concern due to their biological effects in humans as well as animals.
6.4.1 Bisphenol A (BPA)
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer chemical that is used for the manufacturing of polycarbonate plastics and PVC and can leach into the environment (Schecter et al. 2010). During polymerization, some of the monomers remain unbound which get released and are commonly found in the leachate of the landfill where plastic waste is dumped (Halden 2010). It potentially results in ecosystem disruption of the region receiving leachates. Each year about 100 tons of BPA is released into the environment during synthesis alone (Vandenberg et al. 2009). BPA is of great concern because it poses some serious threats to humans. It has been recognized as potential endocrine disruptor which disrupts the normal hormonal functioning. Various other health effects associated with BPA are cardiovascular disease, heart attacks, male sexual dysfunction, and angina (Schecter et al. 2010).
6.4.2 Phthalates
Phthalates are diesters of phthalic acid used for flexibility of PVC, pliability, softening, and elasticity of rigid plastics. More than 25 different phthalate esters are used in plastic manufacturing. Phthalates do not bound covalently to polymer matrix due to which these are more prone to leaching into the environment (Halden 2010). Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is associated with various health concerns for humans. On entering human body, DEHP is converted to mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) by lipases and gets absorbed by the body (Singh and Li 2012). Dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), di-isononyl phthalate (DINP), etc. are other important phthalate additives. Dibutyl phthalate and benzyl butyl phthalate produce toxic metabolite mono-butyl phthalate (Sathyanarayana 2008; Latini 2005). Adverse health effects of phthalates include hormone disruption, asthma, genital malformations, development of some cancers, and developmental and reproductive problems (Singh and Li 2012).
6.4.3 Land Pollution
The plastics when dumped in the open areas or landfills affect the aesthetics of the location. The wind carries the plastics and spreads them over a wide area. Improper segregation of plastics from other food wastes results in consumption of plastic by street animals. The animals die due to bloating of stomach and indigestion problems. In many places, especially in open dumpsites and landfills, the rag pickers set afire in the waste piles to segregate the materials. This results in burning of plastics along with other materials. According to NEERI (2010), burning of plastics results in the emission of 10,000 g of dioxins/furans every year to the atmosphere. Incomplete combustion of plastics results in the release of carbon monoxide (CO), dioxins, furans, polychlorinated biphenyls, soot, carbon black, aromatics (pyrene and chrysene), and heavy metals (chromium, copper, cobalt, selenium, lead, and cadmium). The burning of plastic waste causes headache, nausea, heart diseases, respiratory illness like asthma and emphysema, and neurological, respiratory, and reproductive diseases. It also damages the lungs, thyroid gland, eyes, and mucous membrane. Dioxins and its intermediate 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) are categorized under carcinogens and mutagens. Heavy metals released during burning interfere with plant process and accumulate in the tissues of organisms. Chlorine released from polyvinyl chlorides forms hydrochloric acid. Hydrochloric acid increases the acidity of the soil in addition to respiratory diseases (Verma et al. 2016).
6.5 Plastic Waste Management
Natural degradation or decomposition of plastics is very slow and takes about hundreds of years to get mineralized. Slow degradation has increased or necessitated the management of plastic waste throughout the world (Puncochar et al. 2012). Integrated waste management approaches should be followed effectively for better plastic waste management. Conventional approaches along with new technological methods are being used for better management of plastic waste which includes landfilling, incineration, recycling, and degradation (Panda et al. 2010). The conventional and most common method for managing waste is landfill. But there are certain long-term problems associated with this method of plastic waste management such as breakdown products of plastics, and leachate produced during degradation may pollute soil and groundwater (Hopewell et al. 2009). Plastic has high volume to weight ratio and, therefore, requires more space. Nowadays constructing a suitable landfill is costly, and space scarcity for landfill site is a major concern due to which other unconventional methods of plastic waste management are required to reduce the ultimate volume of plastic waste reaching landfill (Panda et al. 2010). In order to effectively manage or reduce plastic waste quantity, three Rs, reduce, reuse, and recycle, strategy should be opted (Hopewell et al. 2009). Reusing plastics is the best approach for managing plastic waste as it requires less energy. Plastic waste recycling is the process of recovering plastics. Recycling of plastic waste can be categorized into four major types: re-extrusion, mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, and energy recovery (Al-Salem et al. 2009). Re-extrusion or primary recycling is the use of plastic scrap for the manufacturing of new product both having similar features. Mechanical recycling is the process of recovering plastic waste that has been used in the manufacturing of new plastic products. Mechanical recycling involves various treatment and preparation steps such as shredding or cutting, floating, milling, washing, drying, etc. to yield high-quality end products (Singh et al. 2017). Heterogeneous plastic waste recycling is very difficult or cannot be performed in mechanical recycling which limits its usage to only homogenous or single polymer plastic waste. Chemical recycling also is known as tertiary recycling, where the plastics are depolymerized into smaller polymers due to alteration in the chemical structure of plastics. They are further used as feedstock for manufacturing of new plastics (Arena and Mastellone 1999). Chemical recycling is attained by three main approaches: depolymerization, partial oxidation, and cracking. Cracking is further categorized into thermal cracking, catalytic cracking, and hydrocracking (Panda et al. 2010). Energy recovery or quaternary recycling includes thermal decomposition, pyrolysis, gasification, and incineration of plastic waste. Cost-effective and adequate infrastructure is required for the plastic waste collection, makeover to new product, and marketing of recycled goods for the success of plastic waste recycling (Rebeiz and Craft 1995). Incineration is another way of managing plastic waste which significantly reduces the need for landfilling of plastics. In this process the waste material is exposed to high temperatures (900–2000 °C) which leads to controlled and complete combustion of plastics and energy recovery, thereby reducing the volume by 80–90% (Sharholy et al. 2008). Generation of greenhouse gases and other toxic gases such as polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans during incineration has led to its restriction in many countries especially for plastic waste (Panda et al. 2010).
Other than the conventional processes, some new technologies such as liquid fuel, plasma pyrolysis, coprocessing in cement kiln, and polymer-blended bitumen roads are being efficiently used in plastic waste management (Siddique et al. 2008). Thermal decomposition of plastics is done to convert plastics into liquid fuel produced through condensation of volatile liquid vapors, carbonized char, and synthetic gas. This thermal cracking or pyrolysis of plastic waste is done at 2700–3000 °C temperature by both non-catalytic and catalytic methods (Almeida and Marques 2016; Kumar and Singh 2013). Few studies have reported the thermal decomposition of polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl methacrylate, polyurethane, and polystyrene to liquid fuel. Gasoline-range liquid fuels having low octane value have been produced through thermal decomposition. The fuel produced requires further refining for usage which adds extra cost (Panda et al. 2010). Plasma pyrolysis technology is a fresh innovative technology that has been used to transform waste into valuable high calorific synthetic gas (syngas). In plasma pyrolysis, the high calorific plastic waste is exposed to very high temperature under oxygen-deficient conditions. High temperature decomposes plastics into syngas, which is used for energy production. Tar is produced along with syngas which is composed of CO, H2, and low concentration of hydrocarbons, but the syngas produced in plasma pyrolysis has high heating value and low tar content in comparison with simple pyrolysis of plastic waste (Puncochar et al. 2012; Nema and Ganeshprasad 2002). Tang et al. (2003) used nitrogen plasma reactor for decomposition of polypropylene, which resulted in 96% of solid decomposition and 2160 mL/g of syngas production. Coprocessing means the use of waste material as a source of energy along with primary fuel. Plastic waste is used as alternative fuel in kilns to reduce the consumption of fossil fuel used in cement industry. Plastics used as fuel in coprocessing are known as an alternative fuel. Reduction in plastic waste volume along with energy recovery took place in coprocessing (De Queiroz Lamas et al. 2013). Another technology that has gained popularity in plastic waste management is polymer-based bitumen roads. In this, the plastic waste shredded into small pieces was blended with bitumen and used as alternative road material (Gawande et al. 2012). In Bangalore, India, the bitumen blended with shredded plastic waste was used for laying of the road (Khullar 2009).
Degradation is the best way of managing plastic waste as it provides a solution for longer periods of time. Any alteration in the chemical structure of a plastic polymer due to a physical, chemical, or biological constituent that leads to transformation is degradation of plastics. Physical, mechanical, and chemical properties of plastics get changed due to degradation (Pospisil and Nespurek 1997). Photo, thermal, and biological factors contribute to the degradation of plastics. Plastics absorb UV radiations from the sun which leads to photodegradation and further thermo-degradation of plastics. Degradations begin with the integration of oxygen atom to plastic polymers. Both the processes make polymer delicate and break into smaller pieces until microbes start metabolizing. Microbes such as bacteria and fungi first transform low molecular weight polymers to monomers, and then microbial cells transform monomers to minerals. Four methods, photodegradation, thermooxidative degradation, hydrolytic degradation, and biodegradation by microorganisms, lead to complete degradation of plastics in sequence (Shah et al. 2008a, b; Singh and Sharma 2008). Biodegradation of plastics is far better than other plastic waste management processes as it is environment-friendly and completely mineralizes or transforms plastic waste, thus providing a sustainable solution to plastic waste.
6.6 Biodegradation of Natural and Synthetic Plastics
Bioremediation is the use of living organisms such as bacteria and plants or their enzymes to degrade and detoxify the environmental contaminants for environmental safety and public health protection (Saxena et al. 2018; Bharagava et al. 2017a, b; Saxena and Bharagava 2016, 2017; Chandra et al. 2015). In an environment, depending on the factors, plastic undergoes either abiotic or biotic degradation. Biotic degradation or biodegradation is a process by which the microorganisms bring about a change in the physical or chemical structure of the material (Paco et al. 2017). Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes are involved in the degradation of the polymers. Biodegradation results in the decomposition products such as carbon dioxide, methane, water, and inorganic compounds (nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus). The microorganisms can perform degradation under both aerobic and anaerobic condition (Alshehrei 2017). The degree of degradation by the microorganisms depends on the molecular weight of the polymers. The higher the molecular weight, the lesser the solubility of the polymers. The microorganisms find it difficult to attack, break down, and metabolize the polymers of increased thickness. Precisely, the mechanism the microorganism follows to degrade the polymers includes the following:
-
1.
The microorganisms secrete extracellular enzymes to breakdown the complex polymers into small oligomers, dimers, or monomers. This process is also termed as depolymerization. If the polymer is hydrophilic, then the microorganism attaches itself to the polymer, secretes the enzyme, and cleaves the polymers via hydrolysis (Schink et al. 1992). During hydrolysis, a nucleophilic attack occurs on the carbonyl carbon atom. The cleavage occurs at ester, peptide linkage, and glycosidic bonds.
-
2.
The degraded substance is water soluble and can easily pass through the semipermeable cell membrane.
-
3.
The monomers on entering into the cell are used as a source of carbon and energy. The biodegradation process is favored by three processes such as hydrolysis, photooxidation, and physical disintegration. These processes weaken the surface of the polymer and decrease the molecular weight of the polymer (Muthukumar and Veerappapillai 2015).
6.6.1 Biodegradation of Plastics by Bacteria
Numerous bacteria have shown the ability to degrade natural and synthetic polymers (Table 6.3). In addition to degradation, bacteria also synthesize natural biopolymers. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), a natural polymer, are synthesized during bacterial fermentation. Under starvation or nutrient-limited conditions, the PHAs are metabolized and degraded. Another important natural polymer that is produced from the low-cost feedstock is polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria isolated from different sources, namely, activated sludge, soil, anaerobic sludge, and seawater, were used for natural polymer degradation. Pseudomonas lemoignei, Comamonas spp., Variovorax paradoxus, Streptoverticillium kashmeriense AF1, Bacillus megaterium AF3, and Ilyobacter delafieldii are some of the strains reported for PHA and PHB degradation (Lee 1996a, b; Shah et al. 2007). Molitoris et al. (1996) and Sang et al. (2002) observed grooves and erosion pits on the polymer subjected to bacterial degradation.
Biodegradation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been widely studied due to multiple reasons such as huge application, long biodegradation time, fear of entry into the environment, water solubility, and availability in different molecular weights (200–50000 Åg/mol). Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria have been used for PEG degradation. Inoculum such as aerobic and anaerobic sludge, seawater, municipal sewage, and wetland sediments was used for PEG degradation. However, seawater showed just 40% PEG degradation. The degradation pathway followed by the bacteria to degrade PEG differed with the environment. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans DG2, Bacteroides sp., Pseudonocardia sp. strain K1, Sphingomonas, Acetobacterium, and Pseudomonas sp. were among those bacteria reported for PEG degradation (Kawai et al. 1978; Dwyer and Tiedje 1983; Zgola-Grzeskowiak et al. 2006). According to Kawai et al. (1978), PEG degradation was better when the synergistic mixed culture of Flavobacterium and Pseudomonas sp. was used. PEGs pretreated with ozone showed accelerated degradation (Suzuki et al. 1978).
Recently, a novel bacteria Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 isolated from the debris of PET bottle recycling site were used to degrade poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) polymer popularly used in the manufacturing of bottles. The bacteria degraded 75% of PET film at 30 °C within 6 weeks of incubation. Carbon dioxide evolution was observed during degradation which indicated the mineralization of the polymer (Yoshida et al. 2016). Polythene bags and plastic cups were buried in mangrove soil to assess in situ degradation. It was observed that in a span of 9 months, polythene bags and plastic cups showed 4.21% and 0.25% degradation. The inoculum showed the presence of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The species that were predominant were Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus (Gram-positive), Moraxella, and Pseudomonas (Gram-negative). Bacillus, Listeria, and Vibrio are bacteria observed in mangrove soil of Fiji in addition to the abovementioned bacteria. The bacteria generated hydrolytic enzymes such as amylases, lipases, and gelatinases for high-density and low-density polythene (Kumar et al. 2007). Garbage and garden soil, when used as an inoculum, showed 13.6% weight loss of polythene. Staphylococcus arlettae that was responsible for the weight loss altered the chemical properties of the polythene (Divyalakshmi and Subhashini 2016). Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa also showed polythene and plastic degradation when incubated for a period of 1 month (Kannahi and Sudha 2013).
Synthetic polymers such as polyester, polycaprolactone, and polyurethane were also degraded by bacteria isolated from soil, activated sludge, and other sources. The bacteria utilized polymer as carbon and nitrogen source. Comamonas acidovorans and Alcaligenes faecalis degraded polyester polyurethane and polycaprolactone (Nakajima-Kambe et al. 1999; Oda et al. 1997). Alcaligenes faecalis produced polycaprolactone depolymerase enzyme to degrade polycaprolactone.
6.6.2 Biodegradation of Plastics by Fungi
Fungi like other microorganism have gained huge attention among researchers due to its biodegradation potential. The degradation ability of fungi is attributed to the enzymes they produce. Moreover, the hyphal structure of fungi through which it can penetrate into the contaminated sites has made it more advantageous for bacteria. Fungi are explored for the degradation of different types of natural and synthetic polymers such as low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane, polyolefins, poly(vinyl alcohol), and polyhydroxyalkanoates (Table 6.4). Irrespective of the type of polymer, genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Phanerochaete are popularly reported for plastic degradation. Polyvinyl chloride is a strong plastic used in pipes and fittings, flooring material, synthetic leathers, insulation wires, textiles, shoes, etc. It has low moisture and resists biodegradation. However, thermal and photodegradation are effective for PVC degradation. In fact, they serve as pretreatment, thereby facilitating better biodegradation by fungi. White rot fungi can degrade low molecular weight PVCs. According to Kirbas et al. (1999), Kitamoto (2008), and Ali et al. (2014), Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Lentinus spp., Aspergillus niger, Penicillium janthinellum, and Doratomyces spp. can degrade PVC. Many yeast strains, namely, Rhodotorula aurantiaca and Kluyveromyces spp., and other fungi Aureobasidium pullulans also degraded PVCs (Webb et al. 2000).
Four fungal species, namely, Curvularia senegalensis, Fusarium solani, Aureobasidium pullulans, and Cladosporium sp., are soil fungi with potential to degrade ester-based polyurethane. These fungi produce extracellular enzymes such as ureases, proteases, and esterases in the presence of polyurethane. The release of ammonia is indicated in the degradation of polyurethane (Pathirana and Seal 1985; Howard et al. 2012). According to Cosgrove et al. (2007), Geomyces pannorum and Phoma species dominated the soil involved in polyurethane degradation.
Polyethylene is hydrophobic high molecular weight polymers which are difficult to degrade by fungi. The low-density polyethylene is degraded by genus Penicillium, Aspergillus, Chaetomium, Pullularia, and Gliocladium. Likewise, the high-density polymers are degraded by Trametes versicolor and Phanerochaete chrysosporium using lignocellulosic enzymes (Iiyoshi et al. (1998). Around 0.2% loss in weight of polymers was observed in 10 years. To facilitate better degradation, the high molecular weight polyethylene is pretreated with UV light and nitric acid. Pretreatment weakens the structure of polymers making it easy for fungi to act on the polymers. The biodegradation of polymers can be confirmed by the presence of oxidation products. The structural changes can be confirmed with an electron microscope and FTIR (Hasan et al. 2007). According to Friedrich et al. (2007), polyamide-6 also termed as nylon-6 is also degraded by white rot fungi and other species (Fusarium spp., Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., Cladosporium spp., Ulocladium spp., Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium roseum, Pithomyces chartarum, Trichothecium roseum, and Mucor hiemalis). Aliphatic polyester resin Bionolle and aliphatic-aromatic co-polyester Ecoflex (BASF) degradation were also assessed. No significant weight loss was observed in the polymer except for structural changes (279). Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Talaromyces wortmannii are also reported to degrade natural polymer poly(hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate) which is a biodegradable and biocompatible thermoplastic (Coelho et al. 2008). Polyhydroxyalkanoates are another natural polymer that showed 93% weight loss when inoculated with Aspergillus fumigatus (Bhatt et al. 2008). Other natural polymers that were degraded by fungi strains include poly(caprolactone) (PCL), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene succinate and adipate) (PBSA), and poly(lactide) (PLA), poly(butylene succinate), and poly(alkaline succinate). The hydrolytic degradation products obtained during polymer degradation did not affect the diversity of other organisms in the soil. Incidence of marine and mangrove bacteria accumulating polyhydroxyalkanoates on the mid-west coast of India has been reported by Rawte et al. (2002).
6.6.3 Biodegradation of Plastics by Actinomycetes
Actinomycetes are organisms that possess characteristics of a bacteria and fungi. These unicellular organisms with nonseptate mycelium possess the ability to degrade plastics. Table 6.5 summarizes the various actinomycetes species involved in plastic biodegradation. Species of genera Streptomyces and Acinetobacter are popularly reported to degrade polyethylene, polyurethane, plastic films, and LPDE powder. Other genera such as Actinoplanes, Pseudonocardia, and Sporichthya are also used in plastic degradation. Similar to bacteria, the actinomycetes too attacked the polymers using enzymes. The change in the polymer structure and weight confirms the polymer degradation by actinomycetes.
6.6.4 Factors Affecting Biodegradation of Plastics
The process of biodegradation is associated to certain drawbacks and is influenced by various factors. Some of them are discussed below.
6.6.4.1 Anaerobic/Aerobic Condition
The process of biodegradation is greatly influenced by the presence or absence of oxygen. Aerobic condition is more favorable and efficient than anaerobic condition. The biodegradation under aerobic condition was found to be faster than anaerobic condition. Moreover, the aerobic process released only CO2, while anaerobic process produced more harmful CH4 and CO2. Microbial degradation of plastics is carried anaerobically in the landfills and results in the generation of methane having global warming potential of 56 in 20 years. According to Kumar et al. (2011), aerobic condition is elemental for the biodegradation of plastics by fungi.
6.6.4.2 Chemical Composition of the Plastics
The chemical composition of plastics is crucial in deciding the fate of plastic degradation. The microbes decomposing the plastics feed and thrive on it by consuming it as nutrient source; therefore, starch-based polymers are preferred by the microbes as the hydrolytic enzymes released by them act on the polymer matrix and hence reduce plastic into simpler form. The polymers derived from flax fibers or starch is inclined to relatively easy biodegradation. Polymers based on petroleum such as polyolefins are photodegraded by microbes (Sen and Raut 2015). Molecular weight of the polymers is one of the important factors which determine the biodegradation. Low molecular weight is suitable for biodegradation as the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis is rapid in case of smaller molecular weight (Tokiwa and Suzuki 1977). The melting point of the polymer too influences the enzymatic biodegradability. A polymer with higher melting temperature tends to have lower biodegradability. The enzymatic activity is also observed to decrease with time.
6.6.4.3 Pretreatment
Nowadays, during manufacturing or processing of polymers/biopolymers, some additives such as benzophenone are used to avoid or minimize the photodegradation of the plastics. These additives affect the thermal sensitivity and UV absorption capacity of the polymer. It is observed that chemically/thermally sensitive polymers have better biodegradation rate. The thermal exposure prior to subjecting microbes to the plastics leads to the breakdown of the polymer into simpler form on which bacteria can easily attack. An alkaline substance known as nodax is also added to alter the chemical structure of the polymer to make it available for the microbes (Augusta et al. 1993). According to Moore (2008), the natural conditions such as the hydrolytic properties of sea water, atmosphere’s oxidative properties and solar radiation help in breaking polymers into fragile and simpler substrate for the microbes.
6.6.4.4 Intrinsic Parameters
Factors such as temperature, pH, humidity, sunlight, water stress, culture conditions, and sunlight predominantly affect microbial community and enzymatic activity for polymer degradation (Gu 2003). Soil bacteria are known to reduce plastics in the presence of optimal water and temperature. Fungus when grown at lowest pH showed maximum CO2 evolution and efficient lignolytic activity (Glass and Swift 1990).
6.6.4.5 Microbial Population
The quality and quantity of microbial population determine the efficiency of biodegradation. Irrespective of the source, many bacteria have shown their potential in plastic degradation. Bacteria, algae, and fungi isolated from various resources such as plastic and soil at the dumping sites, rhizosphere soil of mangroves, marine water, polythene buried in the soil have been reported to degrade plastics (Rutkowska et al. 2002). Low density polythene was found to be effectively degraded using Mucor circinelloides and Aspergillus flavus isolated from municipal landfill area (Pramila and Vijaya Ramesh 2011). The microbial population use the plastics as a source of energy and carbon. Fuhs in 1961 reported several microorganisms that fed on paraffin as a carbon source. Jen-hou and Schwartz (1961) showed bacteria consumed polyethylene as carbon source.
6.7 Alternate to Plastics
6.7.1 Biodegradable Plastics
The invention of plastic has been a boon to the population to lead a sophisticated life. Excessive usage, improper disposal, and poor management practices have necessitated the synthesis of alternate, eco-friendly biodegradable or bio-based plastics (BDPs) that should possess properties of conventional plastic with a high degree of biodegradability. Such plastics are known as bioplastics which are synthesized from the polymers derived from renewable carbon sources. According to the literature, bioplastics consist of either biodegradable plastics (i.e., synthesized using fossil materials) or bio-based plastics (i.e., plastics synthesized from renewable resources or biomass) (Tokiwa et al. 2009). Biodegradable plastics or bioplastics are nonpersistent in the environment and get degraded naturally on exposure to sunlight, air, and microorganisms. Under aerobic conditions, they are degraded to CO2, inorganic compounds, and H2O and under anaerobic conditions to CH4, CO2, and H2O (Lee 1996a, b). The principal mechanism involved in degradation of bioplastics includes the enzymatic action of microorganisms. Renewable raw materials such as agricultural/animal resources like cellulose, starch, collagen, casein, soy protein polyesters, and triglycerides are used for the production of bioplastics. The composition of the final product and the chemical structure of the material used decide the biodegradability of plastics. The bioplastics are manufactured using natural or synthetic resins. Natural biodegradable plastics can be naturally created or either synthesized from renewable resources. Synthetic biodegradable plastics are a petroleum-based nonrenewable resource. Naturally biodegradable plastics are unified with synthetic polymers to produce plastics to meet the properties of the conventional plastics (Demirbas 2007).
The different types of biodegradable or bioplastics are listed below. Some of the polymers used as bioplastics include polylactic acid (PLA), poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid (PHB), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA). They are produced using natural polymers, polymers derived from microbes, and conventional chemical or fermentation process for bio-based monomer polymerization (Harding et al. 2007; Kalia et al. 2000).
Plant-based bioplastics: Bioplastics are derived from plant raw materials such as corn, soy, and potato starch. They are degraded by composting and more than 60% of it gets degraded within 180 days. Biodegradation of these plastics requires water, air, and sunlight. These plastics meet the American society for testing and material standards. The biggest disadvantage of the plant-based bioplastics is that they are not economical and cannot be recycled. Spudware is one example of plant-based bioplastics prepared from potato starch and used in the manufacturing of spoons, forks, and plates.
Oil-based bioplastics: They are manufactured from nonrenewable sources such as crude oil. Oil-based bioplastics are produced using energy-intensive techniques.
Thermal-based film: These are bioplastics with a specific additive which helps the plastic to degrade when exposed to high temperature. They include two types of film plastics, namely, oxo- and hydro-biodegradable. The medium of destruction differentiates oxo- and hydro-biodegradable plastics. The former requires oxygen for degradation and the latter requires moisture. Hydro-biodegradable plastics degrade much faster than oxo-degradable plastics. Oxo-biodegradable plastics are less expensive. The major disadvantage of these plastics is they start to degrade when stored in hot place.
Additive-based film combo: It is another type of film with additives. During degradation, they convert into humus and then to carbon dioxide and water. The advantage of these types of plastic is they can degrade with and without oxygen, can be recycled, and possess a long expiration date, for example, green film.
BAK is a 100% biodegradable polyester amide plastic that is developed by Bayers. They are recyclable and possess excellent properties. According to reports, these degrade at a temperature as low as 0.5 °C. Moisture is another important factor for degradation of BAK. Preservation is required for BAK which is the major drawback of the product.
Degradable polyethylene: These plastics are manufactured with the purpose of degrading them within 60 days to 5 years of incubation according to the requirement. They are degraded by light and moisture. Within 55 days of incubation, it gets converted to mulch. The additive used in the plastic is less toxic and can be safely disposed off in landfills.
The waste management option for the bioplastics or biodegradable plastics is domestic and municipal composting (Davis and Song 2006). Anaerobic digestion is also popularly used in bioplastic degradation (Murphy and Bartle 2004). Under mesophilic conditions, the material gets degraded within a maximum period of 24 months (Briassoulis and Dejean 2010). The advantage of biodegradable plastics over conventional plastics is that carbon emissions are eight times lesser for biodegradable plastics. Conventional plastic manufacturing process requires more energy in comparison with bioplastics. Bioplastics can be decomposed by composting on a regular basis, and the compost can be used as valuable soil additive (Song et al. 2009).
6.7.2 Compostable Plastics
Compostable plastics are new generation plastics that are degraded by composting. Cornstarch, potato starch, cellulose, and soy resin are the polymers used for the production of compostable plastics. They possess most of the properties of conventional plastics such as tensile strength, oxygen barrier, and resistance to heat and impact or shock. Compostable plastics are degraded in a composting facility within 90–180 days. However, the thickness and composition of the compostable plastics determine the degradation efficiency and time. A compostable plastic should possess three characteristics, namely, biodegradability, disintegration, and toxicity. The compostable plastic should not produce any toxic intermediates.
6.8 Challenges in Plastic Degradation
Most of the polymers are biologically inert and recalcitrant due to high molecular weight, hydrophobic nature, and absence of functional groups which are compatible with the microbial enzymatic system. Degradation of the polymer is characterized by discoloration, phase separation, cracking, erosion, and delamination. One of the biggest challenges remains high molecular weight of the synthetic polymers as the rate of biodegradability is directly dependent on the molecular weight of the polymer. The other limiting factors which need to be explored are breakage of bonds, transformation due to chemicals, and synthesis of new functional groups which are responsible for the variation in the structure of the polymer to make it easy for degradation. Moreover, since biodegradation involves microorganisms, the type and nature of organisms, availability, size of the inoculum, and environmental conditions are also important challenges that need more attention in polymer biodegradation. The challenges of the polymer biodegradation are discussed below in detail:
-
(a)
Chemical composition: The chemical composition of the polymers plays a crucial role in polymer degradation. The long carbon chain in the thermoplastic makes the polymers resistant to biodegradation. The strength of the polymer chain is affected by assimilation with heterogroups such as O2. Unsaturated portions and amorphous regions are susceptible to oxidation. The rate of oxidation depends on the reactivity of the peroxy radicals formed and on the dissociation energies of available carbon-hydrogen bonds in the polymer substrate.
-
(b)
Molecular weight: Molecular weight determines the rate of degradation of plastics. The higher the molecular weight, the lower the rate of degradation. It has been reported that some microorganisms utilize polyolefins with low molecular weight faster as compared to high molecular weight polyolefins. Lower molecular weight polymers support the growth of microorganisms.
-
(c)
Hydrophobicity: Hydrophobicity interferes with the formation of microbial biofilm, and hence degradation gets limited.
-
(d)
Size of the molecules: Degradation (mechanical, thermal, and biological) is influenced by the size of the molecules. The smaller the size of the molecule, the higher the rate of degradation.
-
(e)
Introduction of functionality: Addition of carbonyl groups or chromophores to the polymers increases its photodegradation capacity. This might be due to the availability of more sites to absorb photons to initiate degradation. The carbonyl chromophore absorbs near-UV radiation and forms radicals by the Norrish Types I and II and H-abstraction processes for photochemical degradation. Reagents based on sulfuric acid help in slow sulfonation and oxidative degradation of polyolefins. In certain cases, starch is used to modify the polymer. Addition of starch helps in bacterial and fungal degradations in the soil.
-
(f)
Additives: Addition of fillers, pigments, photostabilizers, and other polymerization catalysts makes the polymer susceptible to degradation. Lignocellulosic fillers and metals decrease the thermal stability of the polymer. Heating in the presence of oxygen changes the properties of the polymer via oxidation. The extent of oxidation determines the structure and chemical properties of the polymer.
-
(g)
Chemical bonding: Linkage between the monomer units determines the resistance of the plastics. During polymerization, the head-to-head addition of monomer units and the tail-to-tail addition of monomer units create weaker portions of the polymer favoring degradation. Likewise branching increases degradation, and cross-linking reduces the rate of degradation. Cross-linking locks the polymer structure and prevents lamellar unfolding.
-
(h)
Methods of synthesis: Polymer preparation method too determines the rate of biodegradation.
-
(i)
Effect of substituents: The addition of substituents in the polymer backbone influences the stability of the plastics. For example, hydrogen, phenyl group, and hydrochloric acid affect the thermal stability, while fluorine and aromatic compounds increase the stability of polymers.
-
(j)
Effect of stress: Polymers face two types of stress, namely, tensile and compressional stress. The former favors degradation and the latter retards it. A structural or morphological change is observed in the polymers exposed to stress. Stressed polymers are more susceptible to degradation. During stress, polymer strains are straightened, stretched, and cleaved by light.
-
(k)
Environmental conditions: Polymer biodegradation depends upon environmental conditions such as moisture, temperature, oxygen, and a suitable population of microorganisms. In warm climates when the relative humidity exceeds above 70%, the rate of polymer degradation by the microorganisms increases. High temperature and high humidity enhance hydrolytic degradation of the polymers. Moisture and temperature do some primary degradation and weaken the polymer, thereby facilitating the microbial attack. Briefly, the photostabilizers become active when exposed to light and leach out of the polymer matrix in the presence of moisture. After a preliminary breakage in the polymer chain, it is easy for the microorganisms to attack the polymer chain. Tropical regions are more favorable for degradation. It is a general rule that at an increase of temperature by 10 °C, the rate of the reaction doubles. Oxygen in the air due to its scavenging property also facilitates polymer attack at ambient temperature.
6.9 Conclusion
Plastics are ubiquitous due to their multiple advantages. They are part of our day today’s life. Improper management and disposal practices have ended up in the accumulation of plastic waste in the terrestrial and aquatic environment. The harmful effects caused by plastic waste accretion are drastically increasing day by day. Henceforth, their removal from the environment is very vital. Among thermal, photooxidative, ozone-induced, mechanochemical, and catalytic degradation methods, biodegradation is considered as the best option for plastic waste degradation due to low cost and eco-friendly nature. Also, they do not release any secondary pollutants. The microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) degrade the polymers through secretion of extracellular and intracellular enzymes. The complexity of the polymer limited the degradation by the microorganisms. Polymer pretreatment enhanced the biodegradation efficiency of the microorganisms. Henceforth, plastic biodegradation can be successful when biodegradation is combined with pretreatment. Further, bioprospecting of the isolated microorganism is essential to obtain efficient plastic-degrading bacteria. Although biodegradation can be one of the solutions, still more research is required to develop biodegradable alternate plastics that can degrade naturally without causing any harm to the environment.
6.10 Future Outlook
As mentioned earlier, plastics have become an indispensable part of our society. It is highly impossible to ban it from the society. Henceforth, to minimize the problems of conventional plastics, it is vital for us to focus on the preparation of polymers from natural sources. Further, the modifications or additives used in synthetic polymers to strengthen them can be minimized or replaced with alternate sources that can cause minimum damage to the environment. In recent times, the focus is also shifted to the preparation of bioplastics from waste materials such as organic wastes, agricultural wastes, paper wastes, and many more. Reusability can be another best option for minimizing plastic pollution. Hence, more research should be focused on the preparation of durable materials that can be reused again and again.
References
Abrusci C, Pablos JL, Corrales T, López-Marín J, Marín I, Catalina F (2011) Biodegradation of photo-degraded mulching films based on polyethylenes and  stearates of calcium and iron as pro-oxidant additives. Int Biodeter Biodegr 65(3):451–459
Akutsu Y, Nakajima-Kambe T, Nomura N, Nakahara T (1998) Purification and properties of a polyester polyurethane-degrading enzyme from Comamonas acidovorans TB-35. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:62–67
Akutsu-Shigeno Y, Adachi Y, Yamada C, Toyoshima K, Nomura N, Uchiyama H, Nakajima-Kambe T (2006) Isolation of a bacterium that degrades urethane compounds and characterization of its urethane hydrolase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70(4):422–429
Ali MI, Ahmed S, Robson G, Javed I, Ali N, Atiq N, Hameed A (2014) Isolation and molecular characterization of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic degrading fungal isolates. J Basic Microbiol 54(1):18–27
Almeida D, Marques MDF (2016) Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste. Polímeros 26(1):44–51
Alshehrei F (2017) Biodegradation of synthetic and natural plastic by microorganisms. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 5:8–19
Al-Salem SM, Lettieri P, Baeyens J (2009) Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. Waste Manag 29(10):2625–2643
American Chemistry Council (2005) Plastics industry producer statistics group
Arena U, Mastellone ML (1999) Particle agglomeration during energy recovery from plastic wastes by means of fluidized bed reactors (No. CONF-990534--). Univ. Federico II of Naples, Napoli
Ashwin Kumar A, Karthick K, Arumugam KP (2011) Biodegradable polymers and its applications. Int J Biosci Biochem Bioinformatics 1(3):173–176
Association of Plastic Manufacturers Europe (2015) An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. European Association of Plastics Recycling and Recovery Organisations, Belgium, pp 1–32
Aswale P (2010) Studies on bio-degradation of polythene. PhD thesis, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, India
Aswale P, Ade A (2008) Assessment of the biodegradation of polythene. Bioinfolet 5:239–245
Aswale PN, Ade AB (2009) Effect of pH on biodegradation of polythene by Serretia marscence. The Ecotech 1:152–153
Atulesh (2017) http://www.wealthywaste.com/plastic-consumption-in-india
Augusta J, Müller R-J, Widdecke H (1993) A rapid evaluation plate-test for the biodegradability of plastics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39(4–5):673–678
Auta HS, Emenike CU, Fauziah SH (2017) Screening of Bacillus strains isolated from mangrove ecosystems in peninsular Malaysia for microplastic degradation. Environ Pollut 231:1552–1559
Awasthi S, Srivastava N, Singh T, Tiwary D, Mishra PK (2017) Biodegradation of thermally treated low density polyethylene by fungus Rhizopus oryzae NS 5. 3 Biotech 7(1)
Balasubramanian V, Natarajan K, Hemambika B, Ramesh N, Sumathi CS, Kottaimuthu R, Rajesh Kannan V (2010) High-density polyethylene (HDPE)-degrading potential bacteria from marine ecosystem of gulf of Mannar, India. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:205–211
Balasubramanian S, Maruthamuthu S, Alika K, Palanisamy N, Muralidharan VS, Ragunathan R, Kannan M, Navaneetha Pandiyaraj K (2011) Influence of thermal oxidation on surface and thermo-mechanical properties of polyethylene. J Polym Res 18(6):2175–2184
Balasubramanian V, Natarajan K, Rajesh Kannan V, Perumal P (2014) Enhancement of in vitro high-density polyethylene (HDPE) degradation by physical, chemical and biological treatments. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12,549–12,562
Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Chowdhary P (2017a) Constructed wetlands: an emerging phytotechnology for degradation and detoxification of industrial wastewaters. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-15
Bharagava RN, Chowdhary P, Saxena G (2017b) Bioremediation: an ecosustainable green technology: its applications and limitations. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-2
Bhatt R, Panchal B, Patel K, Sinha VK, Trivedi U (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and biodegradation of carboxymethylchitosan-g-medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Appl Polym Sci 110(2):975–982
Blake RC, Howard GT (1998) Adhesion and growth of a Bacillus sp. on a polyesterurethane. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 42:63–73
Boerger CM, Lattin GL, Moore SL, Moore CJ (2010) Plastic ingestion by planktivorous fishes in the North Pacific Central Gyre. Mar Pollut Bull 60(12):2275–2278
Bonhomme S, Cuer A, Delort A-M, Lemaire J, Sancelme M, Scott G (2003) Environmental biodegradation of polyethylene. Polym Degrad Stab 81(3):441–452
Boubendir A (1993) Purification and biochemical evaluation of polyurethane degrading enzymes of fungal origin. Dissertation Abstract International 53:4632
Briassoulis D, Dejean C (2010) Critical review of norms and standards for biodegradable agricultural plastics part Ι biodegradation in soil. J Polym Environ 18:384–400
Cacciari I, Quatrini P, Zirletta G, Mincione E, Vinciguerra V, Lupatelli P, Sermanni GG (1993) Isotactic polypropylene biodegradation by a microbial community: physicochemical characterization of metabolites produced. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(11):3695–3700
Central Pollution Control Board (2011) Annual report on plastic waste management. http://cpcb.nic.in/displaypdf
Chandra R, Rustgi R (1997) Biodegradation of maleated linear low-density polyethylene and starch blends. Polym Degrad Stab 56(2):185–202
Chandra R, Saxena G, Kumar V (2015) Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants: an eco-sustainable green technology to environmental management. In: Chandra R (ed) Advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18218-2
Chatterjee S, Roy B, Roy D, Banerjee R (2010) Enzyme-mediated biodegradation of heat treated commercial polyethylene by staphylococcal species. Polym Degrad Stab 95(2):195–200
Coelho NS, Almeida Y, Vinhas GM (2008) The biodegradation of polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate/amphiprotic starch in the presence of microorganisms. Polímeros 18(3):270–276
Cosgrove L, McGeechan PL, Robson GD, Handley PS (2007) Fungal communities associated with degradation of polyester polyurethane in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(18):5817–5824
Crabbe JR, Campbell JR, Thompson L, Walz SL, Schultz WW (1994) Biodegradation of a colloidal ester-based polyurethane by soil fungi. Int Biodeter Biodegr 33(2):103–113
Davis G, Song JH (2006) Biodegradable packaging based on raw materials from crops and their impact on waste management. Ind Crop Prod 23(2):147–161
De Queiroz Lamas W, Palau JCF, de Camargo JR (2013) Waste materials co-processing in cement industry: ecological efficiency of waste reuse. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19:200–207
Demirbas A (2007) Biodegradable plastics from renewable resources. Energy Sources, Part A 29(5):419–424
Derraik JG (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 44(9):842–852
Devi RS, Kannan VR, Natarajan K, Nivas D, Kannan K, Chandru S, Antony AR (2016) The role of microbes in plastic degradation. In: Environmental waste management. Taylor and francis publication, Boca Raton
Divyalakshmi S, Subhashini A (2016) Screening and isolation of polyethylene degrading bacteria from various soil environments. IOSR J Environ Sci Toxicol Food Technol 10(12):1–7
Dussud C, Ghiglione JF (2014) Bacterial degradation of synthetic plastics. In CIESM Workshop Monogr (No. 46)
Dwyer DF, Tiedje JM (1983) Degradation of ethylene glycol and polyethylene glycols by methanogenic consortia. Appl Environ Microbiol 46(1):185–190
El-Shafei HA, Abd El-Nasser NH, Kansoh AL, Ali AM (1998) Biodegradation of disposable polyethylene by fungi and Streptomyces species. Polym Degrad Stab 62(2):361–365
Fergusson WC (1974) Summary. In: Staudinger JJP (ed) Plastics and the environment. Hutchinson and Co, London, p 2
Fontanella S, Bonhomme S, Koutny M, Husarova L, Brusson JM, Courdavault JP, Pitteri S et al (2009) Comparison of the biodegradability of various polyethylene films containing pro-oxidant additives. Polym Degrad Stab 95:1011–1021
Friedrich J, Zalar P, Mohorčič M, Klun U, Kržan A (2007) Ability of fungi to degrade synthetic polymer nylon-6. Chemosphere 67(10):2089–2095
Gawande A, Zamare G, Renge VC, Tayde S, Bharsakale G (2012) An overview on waste plastic utilization in asphalting of roads. J Eng Res Stud 3(2):1–5
Gilan I, Hadar Y, Sivan A (2004) Colonization, biofilm formation and biodegradation of polyethylene by a strain of Rhodococcus ruber. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:97–104
Glass JE, Swift G (1990) Agricultural and Synthetic Polymers, Biodegradation and Utilization, ACS Symposium Series No. 433. ACS, Washington, pp. xi + 323
Hadad D, Geresh S, Sivan A (2005) Biodegradation of polyethylene by the thermophilic bacterium Brevibacillus borstelensis. J Appl Microbiol 98(5):1093–1100
Halden RU (2010) Plastics and health risks. Annu Rev Public Health 31:179–194
Halim A, El-Sayed MM, Mahmoud WM, Davis EM, Coughlin RW (1996) Biodegradation of polyurethane coatings by hydrocarbondegrading bacteria. Int Biodeter Biodegr 37(1–2):69–79
Harding KG, Dennis JS, Von Blottnitz H, Harrison STL (2007) Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis. J Biotechnol 130(1):57–66
Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2007) Synergistic effect of photo and chemical treatment on the rate of biodegradation of low density polyethylene by fusarium sp. AF4. J Appl Polym Sci 105(3):1466–1470
Hopewell J, Dvorak R, Kosior E (2009) Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 364(1526):2115–2126
Howard GT, Blake RC (1999) Growth of Pseudomonas fluorescens on a polyester-polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase-protease enzyme. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 42:213–220
Howard GT, Hilliard NP (1999) Use of Coomassie blue-polyurethane interaction inscreening of polyurethanase proteins and polyurethanolytic bacteria. Int Biodeter Biodegr 43(1–2):23–30
Howard GT, Norton WN, Burks T (2012) Growth of Acinetobacter gerneri P7 on polyurethane and the purification and characterization of a polyurethanase enzyme. Biodegradation 23(4):561–573
Huang YQ, Wong CKC, Zheng JS, Bouwman H, Barra R, Wahlström B, Wong MH (2012) Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: a review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ Int 42:91–99
Iiyoshi Y, Tsutsumi Y, Nishida T (1998) Polyethylene degradation by lignin-degrading fungi and manganese peroxidase. J Wood Sci 44(3):222–229
Janczak K, Hrynkiewicz K, Znajewska Z, Dąbrowska G (2018) Use of rhizosphere microorganisms in the biodegradation of PLA and PET polymers in compost soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 130:65–75
Jarerat A, Tokiwa Y (2001) Degradation of poly(tetramethylene succinate) by thermophilic actinomycetes. Biotechnol Lett 23(8):647–651
Jen-hou L, Schwartz A (1961) Zum Verhalten von bakteriengemischen gegentiber polyfithylen verschiedenen mittleren Molekulargewichts. Kunststoffe 51:317–320
Ji-Dong G (2003) Microbiological deterioration and degradation of synthetic polymeric materials: recent research advances. Int Biodeter Biodegr 52(2):69–91
Kalia VC, Raizada N, Sonakya V (2000) Bioplastics. J Sci Ind Res 59:433–445
Kannahi M, Sudha P (2013) Screening of polythene and plastic degrading microbes from Muthupet mangrove soil. J Chem Pharm Res 5(8):122–127
Kathiresan K (2003) Polythene and plastics-degrading microbes from the mangrove soil. Rev Biol Trop 51(3–4):629–633
Kawai F, Kimura T, Fukaya M, Tani Y, Ogata K, Ueno T, Fukami H (1978) Bacterial oxidation of polyethylene glycol. Appl Environ Microbiol 35(4):679–684
Kay MJ, Morton LHG, Prince EL (1991) Bacterial degradation of polyester polyurethane. Int Biodeterior 27(2):205–222
Khullar M (2009) Plastic roads offer greener way to travel in India. The New York Times 13
Kırbaş Z, Keskin N, Güner A (1999) Biodegradation of polyvinylchloride (PVC) by white rot fungi. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 63(3):335–342
Kitamoto H (2008) Where are biodegradable plastic-degrading microorganisms? BRAIN Technol News 129:1–6
Konduri MKR, Anupam KS, Vivek JS, Kumar RDB, Narasu ML (2010) Synergistic effect of chemical and photo treatment on the rate of biodegradation of high density polyethylene by indigenous fungal isolates. International Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry 6:157–174
Konduri MKR, Koteswarareddy G, Kumar DBR, Reddy BV, Narasu ML (2011) Effect of prooxidants on biodegradation of polyethylene (LDPE) by indigenous fungal isolate, Aspergillus oryzae. J Appl Polym Sci 120:3536–3545
Korawit Chaisu (2016). Study of plastic degrading bacteria by Aneurinibacillus migulanus, Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon), MIT-209 - MIT-212, IEEE Conferences
Kumar S, Singh RK (2013) Thermolysis of high-density polyethylene to petroleum products. J Pet Eng 2013:987568
Kumar S, Hatha AAM, Christi KS (2007) Diversity and effectiveness of tropical mangrove soil microflora on the degradation of polythene carry bags. Rev Biol Trop 55(3–4):777–786
Kumar S, Das M, Jeyanthi Rebecca L, Sharmila S (2013) Isolation and identification of LDPE degrading fungi from municipal solid waste. J Chem Pharm Res 5(3):78–81
Kunwar B, Cheng HN, Chandrashekaran SR, Sharma BK (2016) Plastics to fuel: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:421–428
Kyaw BM, Champakalakshmi R, Sakharkar MK, Lim CS, Sakharkar KR (2012) Biodegradation of low density polythene (LDPE) by Pseudomonas species. Indian J Microbiol 52(3):411–419
Laist DW (1987) Overview of the biological effects of lost and discarded plastic debris in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 18(6):319–326
Latini G (2005) Monitoring phthalate exposure in humans. Clin Chim Acta 361(1):20–29
Lee SY (1996a) Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnol Bioeng 49(1):1–14
Lee SY (1996b) Plastic bacteria? Progress and prospects for polyhydroxyalkanoate production in bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 14(11):431–438
Lee B, Pometto AL, Fratzke A, Bailey TB (1991) Biodegradation of degradable plastic polyethylene by Phanerochaete and Streptomyces species. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:678–685
Li WC, Tse HF, Fok L (2016) Plastic waste in the marine environment: a review of sources, occurrence and effects. Sci Total Environ 566:333–349
Liyoshi Y, Tsutsumi Y, Nishida T (1998) Polyethylene degradation by lignin-degrading fungi and manganese peroxidase. J Wood Sci 44:222–229
Madhuri JR (2015) Biodegradation of low density polyethylene by micro-organisms from garbage soil. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 3(1):15–21
Mehmood CT, Qazi IA, Hashmi I, Bhargava S, Deepa S (2016) Biodegradation of low density polyethylene (LDPE) modified with dye sensitized titania and starch blend using Stenotrophomonas pavanii. Int Biodeter Biodegr 113:276–286
Méndez CR, Vergaray G, Vilma R, Karina B, Cárdenas J (2007) Isolation and characterization of polyethylene-biodegrading mycromycetes. Rev Peru Biol 13(3):203–205
Molitoris HP, Moss ST, De Koning GJM, Jendrossek D (1996) Scanning electron microscopy of polyhydroxyalkanoate degradation by bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 46(5):570–579
Moore CJ (2008) Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environ Res 108(2):131–139
Murphy, R, Bartle, I (2004) Summary Report, Biodegradable Polymers and Sustainability: Insight from Life-cycle Assessment. National Non Food Crops Centre, UK. (PDF) Compostable packaging based on fibrous natural materials and bioplastics. Preliminary results. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318361044_Compostable_packaging_based_on_fibrous_natural_materials_and_bioplastics_Preliminary_results. Accessed Aug 27 2018
Muthukumar A, Veerappapillai S (2015) Biodegradation of plastics – a brief review. Int J Pharm Sci Res 3(2):204–209
Nair S, Kumar P (2007) Molecular characterization of a lipase-producing Bacillus pumilus strain (NMSN1d) utilizing colloidal water-dispersible polyurethane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1441–1449
Nakajima-Kambe T, Onuma F, Kimpara N, Nakahara T (1995) Isolation and characterization of a bacterium which utilizes polyester polyurethane as a sole carbon and nitrogen source. FEMS Microbiol Lett 129(1):39–42
Nakajima-Kambe T, Shigeno-Akutsu Y, Nomura N, Onuma F, Nakahara T (1999) Microbial degradation of polyurethane, polyester polyurethanes and polyether polyurethanes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51(2):134–140
Nakkabi A, Sadiki M, Fahim M, Ittobane N, Ibnsouda Koraichi S, Barkai H, El abed S (2015) Biodegradation of poly(ester urethane)s by Bacillus subtilis. Int J Environ Res 9(1):157–162
Nanda S, Sahu SS (2010) Biodegradability of polyethylene by Brevibacillus, Pseudomonas, and Rhodococcus spp. N Y Sci J 3(7):95–98
Nanda S, Sahu S, Abraham J (2010) Studies on the biodegradation of natural and synthetic polyethylene by Pseudomonas spp. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 14(2)
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, NEERI (2010) Air quality assessment. Emissions Inventory and Source Apportionment Studies, Mumbai
Nema SK, Ganeshprasad KS (2002) Plasma pyrolysis of medical waste. Curr Sci 83:271–278
Novotný Č, Erbanová P, Sezimová H, Malachová K, Rybková Z, Malinová L, Brožek J (2015) Biodegradation of aromatic-aliphatic copolyesters and polyesteramides by esterase activity-producing microorganisms. Int Biodeter Biodegr 97:25–30
Obidi OF, Nwachukwu SCU, Aboaba OO (2010) Possible prevention of environmental health Hazard of Lead-based paints. Res J Microbiol 5(7):595–606
Oceguera-Cervantes A, Carrillo-García A, López N, Bolaños-Nuñez S, Cruz-Gómez MJ, Wacher C, Loza-Tavera H (2007) Characterization of the polyurethanolytic activity of two Alicycliphilus sp. strains able to degrade polyurethane and N-methylpyrrolidone. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(19):6214–6223
Odusanya SA, Nkwogu JV, Alu N, Etuk Udo GA, Ajao JA, Osinkolu GA, Uzomah AC (2013) Preliminary studies on microbial degradation of plastics used in packaging potable water in Nigeria. Nigerian Food Journal 31(2):63–72
O’Brine T, Thompson RC (2010) Degradation of plastic carrier bags in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 60(12):2279–2283
Oda Y, Oida N, Urakami T, Tonomura K (1997) Polycaprolactone depolymerase produced by the bacterium Alcaligenes faecalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 152(2):339–343
Ojha N, Pradhan N, Singh S, Barla A, Shrivastava A, Khatua P, Rai V, Bose S (2017) Evaluation of HDPE and LDPE degradation by fungus, implemented by statistical optimization. Sci Rep 7(1)
Paço A, Duarte K, da Costa JP, Santos PSM, Pereira R, Pereira ME, Freitas AC, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TAP (2017) Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fungus Zalerion maritimum. Sci Total Environ 586:10–15
Panda AK, Singh RK, Mishra DK (2010) Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: a suitable method for plastic waste management and manufacture of value added products-a world prospective. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(1):233–248
Vinay Mohan Pathak, Navneet (2017) Review on the current status of polymer degradation: a microbial approach. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 4 (1)
Pathirana RA, Seal KJ (1985) Studies on polyurethane deteriorating fungi: IV: a note on the spectro-chemical changes during fungal deterioration. Int Biodeterior 21(2):123–125
Peciulyte D (2002) Microbial colonization and biodeterioration of plasticized polyvinyl chloride plastics. Ekologija 4:7–15
Peng Y-H, Shih Y-h, Lai Y-C, Liu Y-Z, Liu Y-T, Lin N-C (2014) Degradation of polyurethane by bacterium isolated from soil and assessment of polyurethanolytic activity of a Pseudomonas putida strain. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(16):9529–9537
Plastic Waste Management Rules (2016), Ministry of Environment forest and climate change notification http://www.moef.gov.in/sites/default/files/PWM%20Rules,%202016_0.pdf
Pometto AL III, Lee BT, Johnson KE (1992) Production of an extracellular polyethylene degrading enzyme(s) by Streptomyces species. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:731–733
Pospíšil J, Nešpůrek S (1997) Highlights in chemistry and physics of polymer stabilization. Macromol Symp 115(1):143–163
Pramila R, Vijaya Ramesh K (2011) Biodegradation of low density polyethylene (LDPE) by fungi isolated from municipal landfill area. J Microbiol Biotech Res 1(4):131–136
Priyanka N, Archana T (2011) Biodegradability of polythene and plastic by the help of microorganism: a way for brighter future. J Environ Anal Toxicol 01(02)
Punčochář M, Ruj B, Chatterj PK (2012) Development of process for disposal of plastic waste using plasma pyrolysis technology and option for energy recovery. Procedia Eng 42:420–430
Raaman N, Rajitha N, Jayshree A, Jegadeesh R (2012) Biodegradation of plastic by aspergillus spp. isolated from polythene polluted sites around Chennai. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research 1(6):313–316
Rawte T, Padte M, Mavinkurve S (2002) Incidence of marine and mangrove bacteria accumulating polyhydroxyalkanoates on the mid-west coast of India. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:655–659
Rebeiz KS, Craft AP (1995) Plastic waste management in construction: technological and institutional issues. Resour Conserv Recycl 15(3–4):245–257
Reddy RM (2008) Impact of soil composting using municipal solid waste on biodegradation of plastics. Indian J Biotechnol 7:235–239
Rutkowska M, Heimowska A, Krasowska K, Janik H (2002) Biodegradability of polyethylene starch blends in sea water. Pol J Environ Stud 11:267–274
Sachin SS, Mishra RL (2013) Screening and identification of soil fungi with potential of plastic degrading ability. Indian Journal of Applied Research 3(11):34–36
Saminathan P, Sripriya A, Nalini K, Sivakumar T, Thangapandian V (2014) Biodegradation of plastics by Pseudomonas putida isolated from garden soil samples. J of Advanced Botany and Zoology Vol 1(3):1–4
Sang BI, Hori K, Tanji Y, Unno H (2002) Fungal contribution to in situ biodegradation of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) film in soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58(2):241–247
Sarker M, Rashid MM, Molla M (2011) Waste plastic conversion into chemical product like naphtha. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl 1:110101
Sathya R, Ushadevi T, Panneerselvam A (2012) Plastic degrading actinomycetes isolated from mangrove sediments. International Journal of Current Research 4(10):001–003
Sathyanarayana S (2008) Phthalates and children’s health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Car 38(2):34–49
Savoldelli J, Tomback D, Savoldelli H (2017) Breaking down polystyrene through the application of a two-step thermal degradation and bacterial method to produce usable byproducts. Waste Manag 60:123–126
Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2016) Ram Chandra: advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste. Clean Techn Environ Policy 18:979–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1084-9
Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2017) Organic and inorganic pollutants in industrial wastes, their ecotoxicological effects, health hazards and bioremediation approaches. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-3
Saxena G, Purchase D, Mulla SI, Saratale GD, Bharagava RN (2018) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated sites: environmental considerations, field studies, sustainability and future prospects. J Environ Manag
Schecter A, Malik N, Haffner D, Smith S, Harris TR, Paepke O, Birnbaum L (2010) Bisphenol a (BPA) in US food. Environ Sci Technol 44(24):9425–9430
Schink B, Janssen PH, Frings J (1992) Microbial degradation of natural and of new synthetic polymers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 103(2–4):311–316
Sen SK, Raut S (2015) Microbial degradation of low density polyethylene (LDPE): a review. J Environ Chem Eng 3(1):462–473
Seneviratne G, Tennkoon NS, Weerasekara MLMAW, Nandasena KA (2006) Polythene biodegradation by a developed Penicillium- Bacillus biofilm. Curr Sci 90:20–21
Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2007) Isolation and characterization of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) degrading bacteria and purification of PHBV depolymerase from newly isolated Bacillus sp. AF3. Int Biodeter Biodegr 60(2):109–115
Shah AA, Hasan F, Akhter JI, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2008a) Degradation of polyurethane by novel bacterial consortium isolated from soil. Ann Microbiol 58(3):381–386
Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2008b) Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 26(3):246–265
Shah AA, Hasan F, Akhter J, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2009) Isolation of fusarium sp. AF4 from sewage sludge, with the ability to adhere the surface of polyethylene. Afr J Microbiol Res 3:658–663
Shah Z, Hasan F, Lee K, Atkas D, Shah AA (2013) Degradation of polyester polyurethane by newly isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain MZA-85 and analysis of degradation products by GC-MS. Int Biodeter Biodegr 79:105
Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC (2008) Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities–a review. Waste Manag 28(2):459–467
Sharma A, Sharma A (2004) Degradation assessment of low density polythene (LDPE) and polythene (PP) by an indigenous isolate of Pseudomonas stutzeri. J Sci Ind Res 63:293–296
Siddique R, Khatib J, Kaur I (2008) Use of recycled plastic in concrete: a review. Waste Manag 28(10):1835–1852
Singh S, Li SSL (2012) Epigenetic effects of environmental chemicals bisphenol a and phthalates. Int J Mol Sci 13(8):10143–10153
Singh B, Sharma N (2008) Mechanistic implications of plastic degradation. Polym Degrad Stab 93(3):561–584
Singh G, Singh AK, Bhatt K (2016) BIODEGRADATION OF POLYTHENES BY BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM SOIL. Int J Res Dev Pharm Life Sci 5(2):2056–2062
Singh N, Hui D, Singh R, Ahuja IPS, Feo L, Fraternali F (2017) Recycling of plastic solid waste: a state of art review and future applications. Compos Part B 115:409–422
Sinosh S, Megha M, Kini MN, Mukund KM, Rizvi A, Vasist K (2015) Selection and screening of microbial consortia for efficient and ecofriendly degradation of plastic garbage collected from urban and rural areas of Bangalore, India. Environ Monit Assess 187(1)
Sivan A, Szanto M, Pavlov V (2006) Biofilm development of the polyethylene-degrading bacterium Rhodococcus ruber. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):346–352
Skariyachan S, Patil AA, Shankar A, Manjunath M, Bachappanavar N, Kiran S (2018) Enhanced polymer degradation of polyethylene and polypropylene by novel thermophilic consortia of Brevibacillus sps. And Aneurinibacillus sp. screened from waste management landfills and sewage treatment plants. Polym Degrad Stab 149:52–68
Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GBH (2009) Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos Trans R Soc B 364(1526):2127–2139
Sowmya HV, Ramalingappa Krishnappa M (2014) Environ Monit Assess 186:65–77
Suzuki J, Hukushima K, Suzuki S (1978) Effect of ozone treatment upon biodegradability of water-soluble polymers. Environ Sci Technol 12(10):1180–1183
Tang L, Huang H, Zhao Z, Wu CZ, Chen Y (2003) Pyrolysis of polypropylene in a nitrogen plasma reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(6):1145–1150
Tang Z, Huang Q, Cheng J, Yang Y, Yang J, Guo W, Jin L (2014) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in soils, sediments, and human hair in a plastic waste recycling area: a neglected heavily polluted area. Environ Sci Technol 48(3):1508–1516
Thompson RC, Moore CJ, Vom Saal FS, Swan SH (2009) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 364(1526):2153–2166
Tokiwa Y, Suzuki T (1977) Hydrolysis of polyesters by lipases. Nature 270(5632):76–78
Tokiwa Y, Calabia B, Ugwu C, Aiba S (2009) Biodegradability of plastics. Int J Mol Sci 10(9):3722–3742
Usha R, Sangeetha T, Palaniswamy M (2011) Screening of polyethylene degrading microorganisms from garbage soil. Libyan Agricultural Research Center Journal International 2:200–204
Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM (2009) Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev 30(1):75–95
Varesche MB, Zaiat M, Vieira LGT, Vazoller RF, Foresti E (1997) Microbial colonization of polyurethane foam matrices in horizontal-flow anaerobic immobilized-sludge reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48(4):534–538
Verma R, Vinoda KS, Papireddy M, Gowda ANS (2016) Toxic pollutants from plastic waste-a review. Procedia Environ Sci 35:701–708
Vimala PP, Mathew L (2016) Biodegradation of polyethylene using Bacillus Subtilis. Procedia Technology 24:232–239
Volke-Sepulveda T, Saucedo-Castaneda G, Gutierrez-Rojas M, Manzur A, Favela-Torres E (2002) Thermally treated low density polyethylene biodegradation by Penicillium pinophilum and Aspergillus niger. J Appl Polym Sci 83:305–314
Webb JS, Nixon M, Eastwood IM, Greenhalgh M, Robson GD, Handley PS (2000) Fungal colonization and biodeterioration of plasticized polyvinyl chloride. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(8):3194–3200
Wu G, Li J, Xu Z (2013) Triboelectrostatic separation for granular plastic waste recycling: a review. Waste Manag 33(3):585–597
Yamada-Onodera K, Mukumoto H, Katsuyaya Y, Saiganji A, Tani Y (2001) Degradation of polyethylene by a fungus, Penicillium simplicissimum YK. Polym Degrad Stab 72(2):323–327
Yoshida S, Hiraga K, Takehana T, Taniguchi I, Yamaji H, Maeda Y, Oda K (2016) A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly (ethylene terephthalate). Science 351(6278):1196–1199
Zgoła-Grześkowiak A, Grześkowiak T, Zembrzuska J, Łukaszewski Z (2006) Comparison of biodegradation of poly(ethylene glycol)s and poly(propylene glycol)s. Chemosphere 64(5):803–809
Zheng Y, Yanful EK, Bassi AS (2005) A review of plastic waste biodegradation. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:243–250
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yogalakshmi, K.N., Singh, S. (2020). Plastic Waste: Environmental Hazards, Its Biodegradation, and Challenges. In: Saxena, G., Bharagava, R. (eds) Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1891-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1891-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1890-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1891-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)