Abstract
This chapter describes the functional physiology and biomechanics of the menisci, starting with a description of the structures’ morphology. The mechanical properties of meniscus tissue are then discussed, with the differences between compressive and tensile strength highlighted. The various meniscal ligaments are then explained, leading into the functional biomechanics of the menisci: what purpose do they serve and how do they achieve that. Finally, injury and repair of the menisci are described.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Introduction
The menisci are two crescent-shaped fibrocartilagenous structures found in the medial and lateral compartments of the tibiofemoral joint of the knee. Once thought of as useless “remnant vestiges” [3], they are now well understood to play a critical role in knee joint stability and load distribution, protecting the smooth hyaline cartilage on both the distal femur and proximal tibia. These functional attributes are achieved via a combination of geometry, material properties, and ligamentous attachments of the menisci to the bones. They are also thought to play roles in knee joint lubrication and nutrient distribution [33] as well as proprioception [22]. With very poor self-healing capabilities and with injuries shown to speed up the progression of osteoarthritis, achieving effective repair or replacement of the menisci is an ongoing and important research aim.
2 Morphology
The lateral and medial menisci are both “c” shaped when viewed from above, although the medial meniscus is larger and more like a capital letter “C” (Fig. 4.1). They are wedge shaped in cross section when cut radially and are attached to the joint capsule via their peripheral rim and also to the tibia anteriorly and posteriorly by insertional ligaments. They partially cover the tibiofemoral joint surface (Fig. 4.2). In the sagittal plane, the lateral compartment has a more convex tibial plateau than the concave medial compartment and the menisci conform to the tibial and femoral bony geometry (Figs. 4.3 and 4.4).
The various meniscal dimensions were measured as part of a study on meniscal allograft sizing [30]. Eighty-eight menisci (medial and lateral) were examined from 22 pairs of dissected cadaveric knees, and the dimensions described in Fig. 4.5 were determined using digital Vernier callipers. The results are given in Table 4.1. These results are of interest, as they demonstrate the wide variation in meniscal sizes that exists across different knees and are relevant because of the critical importance of accurate meniscal allograft and synthetic graft sizing [23, 41].
3 Material Properties of Meniscal Tissue
The microstructure (discussed in Chap. 3) of the meniscal tissue, as in all materials, principally defines the material properties and thus the mechanical behaviour of the tissue. The meniscal behaviour in both tension and compression is directly related to the predominantly circumferential orientation of the meniscal collagen fibres [4, 37, 38].
3.1 Tensile Material Properties
There are quite a few studies in the literature that have tested meniscal tissue in tension [13, 14, 26, 27, 45]. Because of the non-uniform nature of the shape of the menisci and their microstructure, uniformly shaped (rectangular or “dumbbell”) specimens are harvested from whole menisci to be tested in tension. These samples are either taken in the radial or circumferential direction and can be cut either parallel or perpendicular to the bottom surface of the meniscus (Fig. 4.6). As well as this, the specimens are often classified by their location in the meniscus, in the horizontal plane: either anterior, central or posterior third (Fig. 4.6). It has been shown that circumferentially, the meniscus is about ten times stronger than it is radially (around 100 MPa compared to 10 MPa; Table 4.2), in keeping with the microstructure of the tissue, which may explain why the meniscus is more prone to circumferential tears, rather than radial ones. A corollary of the difference between radial and circumferential strength is that a radial tear is relatively uncommon and must break the collagen fibres, and so it defunctions the meniscus and is also hard to repair (due to sutures pulling out along the fibre direction and the tissue working at a high stress in the circumferential direction, across the radial tear). The opposite is true for circumferential tears, which occur easily because the tissue is weak when pulled apart radially, yet that also implies low stresses across the tear and hence it is relatively easy for sutures to hold it together. Lechner et al. [26] found that the cross-sectional area of their tensile testing specimens had an inverse effect on the tensile modulus, possibly a result of the thicker specimens having a greater water to collagen ratio than the thinner ones (Table 4.2). The results from these studies also suggest that the posterior third of the meniscus is less strong in tension in the circumferential direction, although there is no histological data explaining this difference.
3.2 Compressive Material Properties
There are three different types of compression tests that have been performed on the human meniscus: unconfined compression, confined compression, and indentation [8, 21, 32, 42, 44]. A combination of these test methods can give us knowledge about the non-linear and viscoelastic behaviour of the meniscus via the aggregate modulus (how stiff the material is under compression; H A), the equilibrium modulus (how stiff the material is when fluid flow has ceased; E eq), the hydraulic permeability (how easily fluid flows through the tissue; k), and Poisson’s ratio (the ratio of transverse to axial strain; ν). Values in the literature vary considerably (Table 4.3) which may be due to differing experimental methods and interpretation of data. Nevertheless, it is clear that the meniscus is considerable less stiff in compression than it is in tension (less than 1 MPa). This allows the cross section of the meniscus to conform to the condylar geometry when the knee is moving and may go some way to explain the loss of function and extrusion of the meniscus that can be observable in the older patient, particularly in the posterior medial meniscus in deep flexion, where it is squeezed against the rim of the tibial plateau, causing large deformation of the cross section of the meniscus.
4 Ligaments
Investigating the biomechanical function of the menisci is complex in nature, partly due to the many ligaments that are attached to them. There are 12 ligaments connected to the medial and lateral menisci and allograft transplantation should try and consider the functional contribution of these structures; there will most likely be functional limitations post-implantation because not all of the ligaments will be adequately replaced during surgery.
4.1 Meniscotibial Ligaments
There are two types of ligaments that connect the menisci to the tibia: the coronary ligaments and the tibial insertional ligaments.
The coronary ligaments resemble a “skirt” connecting the peripheral circumference of the menisci to the proximal tibia. These have not been investigated much in the literature and their exact function isn’t clear. From their appearance it would be sensible to assume that they do have some kind of effect on meniscal movement and possibly also on knee stability.
The tibial insertional ligaments (or meniscotibial ligaments) connect the 4 horns of the menisci to the bone beneath the tibial plateau. These ligaments are extensions of the collagen fibres that run circumferentially through the bulk of the menisci. Data in the literature suggest that the pullout strength of these insertional ligaments is independent of location, though there is some variability between studies (Table 4.4). In studies that have examined the repair strength of various fixation methods used for meniscal root rupture, it has been concluded that none of the repair methods restore the pull-out strength of the insertions to the pre-injured state [12, 24], highlighting the importance of adequate fixation of allografts and implants.
4.2 Meniscofemoral Ligaments
There are two meniscofemoral ligaments: anterior (also known as the ligament of Humphry) and posterior (also known as the ligament of Wrisberg). Neither appear in all people, although the rate of incidence varies considerably in the literature [2, 17, 40]. If they are present, they act as a secondary restraint to posterior translation of the tibia up to 90° flexion and in deeper flexion, and they provide some resistance to external rotation [16].
4.3 The Deep Medial Collateral Ligament (dMCL)
As the dMCL passes from the tibia to the femur, it connects to the outer rim of the medial meniscus. It is thought to control the motion of the medial meniscus, although this has not been investigated in the literature. The ligament itself provides rotatory stability to the tibia as well as resisting valgus moments.
4.4 The Anterior Inter-meniscal Ligament
The anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIL; also called the transverse geniculate ligament or anterior transverse ligament) connects the medial and lateral menisci, via their anterior horns (Fig. 4.1). Its anatomy has been described [15, 34], but its exact function remains unclear. One anatomical study suggests that in a quarter of knees, the AIL acts as the primary connection between the medial meniscus and the tibial plateau, in the absence of an anterior medial horn or in cases where the horn is very fine [34]. This suggests that the AIL should not be compromised during surgical procedures, such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
5 Functional Biomechanics of the Menisci
5.1 Load Distribution
The force transmission role of the menisci is well established; during activities of daily living (ADLs), the knee joint is subject to axial compression, leading to contact stresses in the articular cartilage. The menisci help to make the contact between the femur and tibia more congruent, increasing the contact area of the tibiofemoral joint, thus reducing the contact stresses. The medial compartment is more congruent than the lateral one, because the medial side of the tibial plateau is more concave (Fig. 4.3). The lateral compartment is flatter and almost convex in some parts (Fig. 4.4). It has been shown that in meniscectomised knees, the contact area in that compartment goes down and the contact pressures therefore go up (Fig. 4.7), which is demonstrated by increased cartilage damage in meniscectomised knees (Fig. 4.8) and may partly explain the increased rate of incidence of osteoarthritis (OA) in people who have had partial or total meniscectomies [9].
Because the lateral meniscus covers a greater percentage of its compartment than its medial counterpart, combined with the fact that the lateral compartment is less congruent with its femoral condyle, it is implied that lateral meniscectomy would present a greater risk of OA development than medial. However, the clinical results are mixed, with some reporting worse outcomes with lateral meniscectomy [19, 20, 31] and others finding no difference between the two procedures [5, 28, 36]. In cadaveric experiments, contact areas and pressures change by similar amounts on the medial and lateral sides after simulated meniscal injuries (Fig. 4.9; [25, 35]). Although the lateral compartment is less congruent than the medial, the forces during gait are concentrated onto the medial aspect by the knee adduction moment which occurs during weight bearing.
5.2 Stability
Because the menisci are attached to both the tibia and femur, they have a stabilising effect on the knee joint in certain degrees of freedom, at certain flexion angles. The medial meniscus in particular has been shown to be a secondary restraint to anterior translation of the tibia [1, 43] and the menisci also restrain tibial rotation and the pivot-shift mechanism [7, 39].
5.3 Meniscal Motion During Knee Flexion
The load-bearing role of the menisci is able to occur throughout the whole range of knee joint flexion (up to 160°) because the menisci are mainly attached to the tibia by insertional ligaments at their horns, which are mobile, allowing displacement in all directions. There have been several studies that have examined this movement in both cadaver and clinical settings, but only one has measured meniscal translation in vivo, under weight-bearing conditions, using open MRI.
Vedi et al. [46] described meniscal motion in the normal knee (Fig. 4.10). They observed that both menisci moved posteriorly as the knee flexed. The anterior horns were also noted to be more mobile than the posterior horns and the lateral meniscus was noted to be more mobile than the medial. The posterior horn of the medial meniscus was found to be the least mobile. The lateral meniscus was shown to be more mobile than the medial meniscus, partly due to the dMCL’s attachment to the medial side but also because the concave medial tibial plateau, with secure attachment of the capsule to its rim, does not allow the posterior horn of the medial meniscus to displace off the joint posteriorly in deep flexion, whereas the convex posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau does allow this to occur to the lateral meniscus.
These observations may explain the increased frequency of medial meniscal tears compared to lateral meniscal tears, which happen twice as often [6]. They may also explain the observations of medial meniscal tears being located more frequently in the posterior horn of the meniscus [10].
6 Conclusion
The menisci of the knee and their associated ligaments in combination are a highly complex construct. Their function is inextricably linked to their structure and morphology and the interactions between the menisci, their ligaments and the proximal tibia and distal femur. The importance of the menisci is now well understood and meniscal preservation is practised routinely during surgery, if it is possible to do so and there are many different repair options available. However, structures such as the coronary, meniscofemoral and intermeniscal ligaments are often ignored during meniscal allograft procedures, and the tibial insertional ligaments are not adequately restored. Allografts have many contraindications for use and mixed results in long-term follow-up, but it has been shown to be possible to restore intact joint contact stresses at time zero in vitro [29]. There needs to be a better understanding of the relevance of the detailed anatomical features of the menisci in order to develop more accurate modelling of this tissue, in order to be able to manufacture or grow appropriate artificial scaffolds or tissue-engineered replacement tissue and to enhance the meniscal repair techniques.
References
Arno S, Hadley S, Campbell KA, Bell CP, Hall M, Beltran LS, Recht MP, Sherman OH, Walker PS (2013) The effect of arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy on tibiofemoral stability. Am J Sports Med 41(1):73–79. doi:10.1177/0363546512464482
Bintoudi A, Natsis K, Tsitouridis I (2012) Anterior and posterior meniscofemoral ligaments: MRI evaluation. Anat Res Int. doi:10.1155/2012/839724
Bland-Sutton J (1897) Ligaments. Their nature and morphology, 2nd edn. H.K. Lewis, London
Bullough PG, Munuera L, Murphy J, Weinstein AM (1970) The strength of the menisci of the knee as it relates to their fine structure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52(3):564–570
Burks RT, Metcalf MH, Metcalf RW (1997) Fifteen-year follow-up of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Arthroscopy 13(6):673–679
Campbell SE, Sanders TG, Morrison WB (2001) MR imaging of meniscal cysts. Am J Roentgenol 177(2):409–413. doi:10.2214/ajr.177.2.1770409
Chen L, Linde-Rosen M, Hwang S, Zhou J, Xie Q, Smolinski P, Fu F (2015) The effect of medial meniscal horn injury on knee stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):126–131. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3241-9
Chia HN, Hull M (2008) Compressive moduli of the human medial meniscus in the axial and radial directions at equilibrium and at a physiological strain rate. J Orthop Res 26(7):951–956. doi:10.1002/jor.20573
Claes S, Hermie L, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Verdonk P (2012) Is osteoarthritis an inevitable consequence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(9):1967–1976. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2251-8
Drosos G, Pozo J (2004) The causes and mechanisms of meniscal injuries in the sporting and non-sporting environment in an unselected population. Knee 11(2):143–149
Ellman MB, LaPrade CM, Smith SD, Rasmussen MT, Engebretsen L, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF (2014) Structural properties of the meniscal roots. Am J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/0363546514531730
Feucht MJ, Grande E, Brunhuber J, Burgkart R, Imhoff AB, Braun S (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of different suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears. Am J Sports Med 41(12):2784–2790. doi:10.1177/0363546513502464
Fischenich KM, Lewis J, Kindsfater KA, Bailey TS, Haut Donahue TL (2015) Effects of degeneration on the compressive and tensile properties of human meniscus. J Biomech 48(8):1407–1411. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.042
Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC (1990) Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res 252(Issue):19–31
Gray H (2008) Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of clinical practice, 14th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Gupte CM, Bull AM, Thomas RD, Amis AA (2003) The meniscofemoral ligaments: secondary restraints to the posterior drawer. Analysis of anteroposterior and rotary laxity in the intact and posterior-cruciate-deficient knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(5):765–773. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.85B5.13771
Gupte CM, Smith A, McDermott ID, Bull AM, Thomas RD, Amis AA (2002) Meniscofemoral ligaments revisited. Anatomical study, age correlation and clinical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(6):846–851
Halewood C, Nawabi DH, Amis AA (2012) Development of a novel test method for intra-articular fatigue and wear testing of meniscal reconstructions. In: 15th ESSKA Congress, Geneva, May 2012
Hede A, Larsen E, Sandberg H (1992) The long term outcome of open total and partial meniscectomy related to the quantity and site of the meniscus removed. Int Orthop 16(2):122–125
Jorgensen U, Sonne-Holm S, Lauridsen F, Rosenklint A (1987) Long-term follow-up of meniscectomy in athletes. A prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):80–83
Joshi MD, Suh J-K, Marui T, Woo SLY (1995) Interspecies variation of compressive biomechanical properties of the meniscus. J Biomed Mater Res 29(7):823–828. doi:10.1002/jbm.820290706
Karahan M, Kocaoglu B, Cabukoglu C, Akgun U, Nuran R (2010) Effect of partial medial meniscectomy on the proprioceptive function of the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(3):427–431. doi:10.1007/s00402-009-1018-2
Khoshgoftar M, Vrancken AC, van Tienen TG, Buma P, Janssen D, Verdonschot N (2015) The sensitivity of cartilage contact pressures in the knee joint to the size and shape of an anatomically shaped meniscal implant. J Biomech 48(8):1427–1435. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.034
Kopf S, Colvin AC, Muriuki M, Zhang X, Harner CD (2011) Meniscal root suturing techniques implications for root fixation. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2141–2146. doi:10.1177/0363546511413250
LaPrade CM, Jansson KS, Dornan G, Smith SD, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF (2014) Altered tibiofemoral contact mechanics due to lateral meniscus posterior horn root avulsions and radial tears can be restored with in situ pull-out suture repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(6):471–479. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01252
Lechner K, Hull ML, Howell SM (2000) Is the circumferential tensile modulus within a human medial meniscus affected by the test sample location and cross-sectional area? J Orthop Res 18(6):945–951. doi:10.1002/jor.1100180614
LeRoux MA, Setton LA (2002) Experimental and biphasic FEM determinations of the material properties and hydraulic permeability of the meniscus in tension. J Biomech Eng 124(3):315–321. doi:10.1115/1.1468868
Maletius W, Messner K (1996) The effect of partial meniscectomy on the long-term prognosis of knees with localized, severe chondral damage a twelve-to fifteen-year followup. Am J Sports Med 24(3):258–262
McDermott ID, Lie DTT, Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2008) The effects of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation techniques on tibiofemoral contact pressures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:553–560
McDermott ID, Sharifi F, Bull AM, Gupte CM, Thomas RW, Amis AA (2004) An anatomical study of meniscal allograft sizing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(2):130–135. doi:10.1007/s00167-003-0366-7
McNicholas M, Rowley D, McGurty D, Adalberth T, Abdon P, Lindstrand A, Lohmander L (2000) Total meniscectomy in adolescence a thirty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(2):217–221
Moyer JT, Abraham AC, Donahue TLH (2012) Nanoindentation of human meniscal surfaces. J Biomech 45(13):2230–2235. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.017
Musumeci G, Loreto C, Carnazza ML, Cardile V, Leonardi R (2013) Acute injury affects lubricin expression in knee menisci: an immunohistochemical study. Ann Anat 195(2):151–158. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2012.07.010
Nelson EW, LaPrade RF (2000) The anterior intermeniscal ligament of the knee: an anatomic study. Am J Sports Med 28(1):74–76
Padalecki JR, Jansson KS, Smith SD, Dornan GJ, Pierce CM, Wijdicks CA, LaPrade RF (2014) Biomechanical consequences of a complete radial tear adjacent to the medial meniscus posterior root attachment site: in situ pull-out repair restores derangement of joint mechanics. Am J Sports Med 42(3):699–707. doi:10.1177/0363546513499314
Pengas IP, Assiotis A, Nash W, Hatcher J, Banks J, McNicholas MJ (2012) Total meniscectomy in adolescents: a 40-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B(12):1649–1654. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.94b12.30562
Petersen W, Tillmann B (1995) Age-related blood and lymph supply of the knee menisci: a cadaver study. Acta Orthop 66(4):308–312
Petersen W, Tillmann B (1998) Collagenous fibril texture of the human knee joint menisci. Anat Embryol 197(4):317–324. doi:10.1007/s004290050141
Petrigliano F, Musahl V, Suero E, Citak M, Pearle A (2011) Effect of meniscal loss on knee stability after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(1):86–93. doi:10.1007/s00167-011-1537-6
Poynton AR, Javadpour SM, Finegan PJ, O’Brien M (1997) The meniscofemoral ligaments of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79-B(2):327–330
Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Taylor DC, Rill B, Lock T, Moutzouros V, Kolowich P (2015) Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 1: systematic review of graft biology, graft shrinkage, graft extrusion, graft sizing, and graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(1):310–322. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3334-5
Seitz AM, Galbusera F, Krais C, Ignatius A, Dürselen L (2013) Stress-relaxation response of human menisci under confined compression conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 26:68–80. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.027
Stephen J, Halewood C, Kittl C, Bollen S, Williams A, Amis AA (2016) Posteromedial meniscocapsular lesions increase tibiofemoral joint laxity with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, and their repair reduces laxity. Am J Sports Med 44(2):400–408. doi:10.1177/0363546515617454
Sweigart MA, Zhu CF, Burt DM, deHoll PD, Agrawal CM, Clanton TO, Athanasiou KA (2004) Intraspecies and interspecies comparison of the compressive properties of the medial meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng 32(11):1569–1579. doi:10.1114/B:ABME.0000049040.70767.5c
Tissakht M, Ahmed A (1995) Tensile stress-strain characteristics of the human meniscal material. J Biomech 28(4):411–422
Vedi V, Spouse E, Williams A, Tennant SJ, Hunt DM, Gedroyc WMW (1999) Meniscal movement: an in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81-B(1):37–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 ESSKA
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halewood, C., Amis, A.A. (2016). Physiology: Biomechanics. In: Hulet, C., Pereira, H., Peretti, G., Denti, M. (eds) Surgery of the Meniscus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49188-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49188-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49186-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49188-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)