Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing Perceived Lack-Of-Fit: Promoting Women’s Success by Training Stereotype-Proof Selection Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte

  • 14k Accesses

Abstract

In order to reduce women’s underrepresentation in leadership positions, a wide range of diversity trainings has emerged. However, these trainings have been criticized for targeting aspiring women but not personnel decision makers and for only raising awareness about gender stereotypes without suggesting concrete measures to act against them. To address these limitations of previous diversity trainings, we integrate the literature on gender stereotypes and personnel selection and compile a comprehensive model of stereotype-proof personnel selection measures. Moreover, we translate this model into a diversity training concept that combines raising awareness for stereotypes with teaching personnel decision makers how to create organizational structures that prevent stereotypes from influencing decisions. Our evaluation data show that this training concept is able to improve participants’ attitudes toward stereotype-proof selection measures. In addition, it enhances participants’ use of structured interviews—a measure identified as effectively reducing the influence of stereotypes in the selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltes, B. B., Bauer, C. B., & Frensch, P. A. (2007). Does a structured free recall intervention reduce the effect of stereotypes on performance ratings and by what cognitive mechanism? Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blind spot: Hidden biases of good people. New York: Random House LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, C. C., & Baltes, B. B. (2002). Reducing the effects of gender stereotypes on performance evaluations. Sex Roles, 47(9), 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blickle, G. (2011a). Anforderungsanalyse. In F. W. Nerdinger, G. Blickle, & N. Schaper (Eds.), Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie (pp. 195–208). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Blickle, G. (2011b). Personalauswahl. In F. W. Nerdinger, G. Blickle, & N. Schaper (Eds.), Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie (pp. 225–252). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bragger, J. D. N., Kutcher, E., Morgan, J., & Firth, P. (2002). The effects of the structured interview on reducing biases against pregnant job applicants. Sex Roles, 46(7), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brtek, M. D., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Effects of procedure and outcome accountability on interview validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, L. A., & Baldwin, T. T. (1999). Workforce training transfer: A study of the effect of relapse prevention training and transfer climate. Human Resource Management, 38(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burke, L. A., & Rau, B. (2010). The research-teaching gap in management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 132–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 655–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cann, A., Siegfried, W. D., & Pearce, L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications: Impact on physical attractiveness and sex of applicant biases. Personnel Psychology, 34(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Catalyst. (2013). 2013 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women board directors. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2013-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  17. Curtis, E. F., & Dreachslin, J. L. (2008). Integrative literature review: Diversity management interventions and organizational performance: A synthesis of current literature. Human Resource Development Review, 7(1), 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Demos, T. (2006). Beyond the bottom line: Our second annual ranking of global 500 companies. Fortune Magazine. http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/10/30/8391850/index.htm. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  19. Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 3(9), 1072–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Stewart, T. L., Esses, V., ten Vergert, M., & Hodson, G. (2004). From intervention to outcome: Processes in the reduction of bias. In W. G. Stephan & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 243–265). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dychtwald, K., Erickson, T. J., & Morison, R. (2013). Workforce crisis: How to beat the coming shortage of skills and talent. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. European Commission. (2013). Women and men in leadership positions in the European Union, 2013. A review of the situation and recent progress. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/document/index_en.htm#h2–5. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  27. Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 115–135). Mahwah: Larry Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldin, C., & Rouse, C. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of ‘blind’ auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 715–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Golembiewski, R. T. (1986). Contours in social change: Elemental graphics and a surrogate variable for gamma change. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 550–566.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heilman, M. E. (1980). The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26(3), 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Heilman, M. E. (2015). Gender stereotypes: Impediments to women’s career progress. In I. M. Welpe, P. Brosi, L. Ritzenhöfer, & T. Schwarzmüller (Eds.), Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte: Perspektiven aus Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft, Medien und Politik. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 905–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. (2013). Have perceptions of women and men changed? Gender stereotypes and self-ratings of men and women. Presentation at the Society of Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hewlett, S. A., Peraino, K., Sherbin, L., & Sumberg, K. (2010). The sponsor effect: Breaking through the last glass ceiling. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Highhouse, S. (2008). Stubborn reliance on intuition and subjectivity in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hill, M. E., & Augoustinos, M. (2001). Stereotype change and prejudice reduction: Short-and long-term evaluation of a cross-cultural awareness programme. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 11(4), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Horvath, L. K. (2015). Gender-fair language in the context of recruiting and evaluating leaders. In I. M. Welpe, P. Brosi, L. Ritzenhöfer, & T. Schwarzmüller (Eds.), Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte: Perspektiven aus Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft, Medien und Politik. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015a). How to make leadership positions more attractive: The impact of gender-fair language in job advertisements. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015b). Reducing the lack of fit for women in leadership: Can gender-fair language bring more women to the top? Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Johnston, L. C., & Macrae, C. N. (1994). Changing social stereotypes: The case of the information seeker. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(5), 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Joshi, A., Son, J., & Roh, H. (2014). When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Academy of Management Journal,

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele-Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(8), 1076–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kauffeld, S., Brennecke, J., & Strack, M. (2009). Erfolge sichtbar machen: Das Maßnahmen-Erfolgs-Inventar (MEI) zur Bewertung von Trainings. In S. Kauffeld, S. Grote, & E. Frieling (Eds.), Handbuch Kompetenzentwicklung (pp. 55–78). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1976). Evaluation of training. In R. L. Craig (Ed.), Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development (pp. 301–319). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Koch, A., D’Mello, S., & Sackett, P. (2014). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Krause, D. E., & Gebert, D. (2003). A comparison of assessment center practices in organizations in German-speaking regions and the United States. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4), 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008). Common goals and golden opportunities: Evaluations of diversity education in academic and organizational settings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(3), 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kulik, C. T., Perry, E. L., & Bourhis, A. C. (2000). Ironic evaluation processes: Effects of thought suppression on evaluations of older job applicants. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 689–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lance, C. E., Lambert, T. A., Gewin, A. G., Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2004). Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lindstädt, H., Wolff, M., & Fehre, K. (2011). Frauen in Führungspositionen—Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenserfolg. http://www.ibu.kit.edu/rd_download/BMFSFJ_Performance.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  65. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 777–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Macan, T. (2009). The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 19(3), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Macrae, C. N., Hewstone, M., & Griffiths, R. J. (1993). Processing load and memory for stereotype-based information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mallon, M., & Cassell, C. (1999). What do women want? The perceived development needs of women managers. Journal of Management Development, 18(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Martell, R. F., Lane, D. M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51(2), 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. McCarthy, J. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Campion, M. A. (2010). Are highly structured job interviews resistant to demographic similarity effects? Personnel Psychology, 63(2), 325–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. McKinsey. (2012). Women matter 2012. Making the breakthrough. http://www.mckinsey.com/features/women_matter. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  72. McKinsey. (2013). Women matter 2013. Gender diversity in top management. Moving corporate culture, moving boundaries. http://www.mckinsey.com/features/women_matter. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  73. McKinsey Global Institute. (2012). The world at work: Jobs, pay, and skills for 3.5 billion people. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/employment_and_growth/the_world_at_work. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  74. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Noe, R. A., Sears, J., & Fullenkamp, A. M. (1990). Relapse training: Does it influence trainees’ post training behavior and cognitive strategies? Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(3), 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Pepper, M. B. (2009). Individual and environmental factors influencing the use of transfer strategies after diversity training. Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Tan, R. Y. (2013). Effective diversity training. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 341–365). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  80. Rogelberg, S. G., Conway, J. M., Sederburg, M. E., Spitzmüller, C., Aziz, S., & Knight, W. E. (2003). Profiling active and passive nonrespondents to an organizational survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1104–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Sanchez, J. I., & Medkik, N. (2004). The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group & Organization Management, 29(4), 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Schleicher, D. J., Day, D. V., Mayes, B. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sczesny, S., & Kühnen, U. (2004). Meta-cognition about biological sex and gender-stereotypic physical appearance: Consequences for the assessment of leadership competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sitzmann, T., Brown, K. G., Casper, W. J., Ely, K., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2008). A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 280–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(7), 778–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16(6), 474–480.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Wentling, R. M., & Palma-Rivas, N. (1998). Current status and future trends of diversity initiatives in the workplace: Diversity experts’ perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9(3), 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Strategie und Organisation, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Dipl.-Psych. Tanja Schwarzmüller, Dr. Prisca Brosi & Prof. Dr. Isabell M. Welpe

Authors
  1. Dipl.-Psych. Tanja Schwarzmüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Prisca Brosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. Isabell M. Welpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Schwarzmüller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Isabell M. Welpe

  2. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Prisca Brosi

  3. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Lisa Ritzenhöfer

  4. Technische Universität München, München, Germany

    Tanja Schwarzmüller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Welpe, I. (2015). Reducing Perceived Lack-Of-Fit: Promoting Women’s Success by Training Stereotype-Proof Selection Procedures. In: Welpe, I., Brosi, P., Ritzenhöfer, L., Schwarzmüller, T. (eds) Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-09468-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09469-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation