Abstract
Fusarium species are casual filamentous fungi, including opportunistic pathogens infecting plants worldwide, but also able to grow as saprotrophs in a range of climatic zones. The genus is extremely variable in terms of genetics, biology, ecology, and, consequently, secondary metabolism, which directly relates to ecological conditions and niches occupied by individual species. Fungal secondary metabolites are the main “weapon” of the pathogenic species before, during, and after the infection process, allowing for the communication with the organism that is being attacked. Many of secondary metabolites are common for diverse fungal microorganisms, and their mode of action is similar for various plant-pathogen systems. Fusaria are able to produce a range of quite specific metabolites, some of which have yet unknown biological functions. Nevertheless, genetic and biochemical pathways responsible for their biosynthesis remain under strong selection pressure, which keeps their structures and functions relatively stable, regardless of the producing organism. Here, we summarize the data available in recent literature reports on genetic and biochemical diversity occurring in the studies of main secondary metabolites produced by Fusarium species differing in origin and ecology.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Secondary metabolites (SMs) are universal messengers between plants and pathogens, of which the most widespread are filamentous fungi. SMs are responsible for pathogen recognition by the plant host and for pathogen actions during host infection. They belong to multiple classes concerning their chemical structures and influence diverse biochemical processes exhibiting signaling, toxic, eliciting, priming, growth-promoting, or defense response-inducing actions [1]. The ability to produce the SMs is often governed by the presence and activity of the specific gene clusters present in fungal genomes, which usually contain several enzyme-encoding genes devoted exclusively to biosynthesize specific group of compounds [2, 3]. The distribution of these gene clusters among fungal taxa generally resembles their phylogenetic relationships but sometimes may serve as the evidence of the past horizontal gene transfer events, since the same biosynthetic pathways may be found in species that not share close relationship [4, 5]. Moreover, it seems that SM biosynthetic gene clusters not only undergo common regulation and expression patterns but also share evolutionary fate, which often depends strongly on the genomic context and differs from main primary metabolism (PM) regions. Many SMs are universal for diverse fungal microorganisms, and their actions are similar for various plant-pathogen systems; nevertheless, significant level of specificity may be observed in comparative metabolomic analyses of pathogenic fungi.
Fusarium genus consists of a large number of diverse species of different lifestyles. Many of them are opportunistic pathogens infecting multiple plant species in a range of climatic zones (e.g., F. graminearum species complex (FGSC), F. fujikuroi species complex (FFSC), F. equiseti species complex (FESC), F. avenaceum, and F. culmorum), and some are more typical soil-borne pathogens and are more likely isolated from the rhizosphere of plants (mainly F. oxysporum species complex (FOSC) and F. solani species complex (FSSC)).
Fusaria are extremely variable in terms of genetics, biology, and ecology; thus, they produce also very diverse repertoire of SMs. This divergence relates partially to the ecological niches occupied by individual species but also seems to play some, yet unknown role in the organism ecological flexibility. On the other hand, closely related species may vary in biosynthetic potentials. Fumonisins may serve as an example. F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum are the main producers of fumonisins, both capable of infecting maize as the typical host. Yet, the sequence divergence of the FUM biosynthetic cluster responsible for fumonisin biosynthetic ability reaches 20% when those two species are compared [2, 6,7,8]; in F. oxysporum, FUM cluster has been found and characterized for just one strain O-1890 [9], and another maize pathogens from the FFSC – F. subglutinans and F. temperatum – are essentially fumonisin nonproducers [10, 11].
Genes inside the clusters responsible for the SMs’ biosynthesis remain under strong selection pressure, exerted by ecological factors (environment, competitive organisms, host availability, and resistance) which keep the structures and functions of encoded enzymes relatively stable. Still, even intraspecific polymorphism can be observed for some of the pathways, like FUM cluster divergence in populations of F. proliferatum [12, 13]. Similar examples of discrepancies in phylogenetic relationships between closely related taxa and their SM biosynthetic abilities are frequent in Fusarium genus and are presented and discussed in this chapter. Main Fusarium-produced mycotoxin pathways were reviewed in terms of genetic divergence and biochemical and chemotypic population shifts. We also summarized the data on genetic and biochemical diversity occurring in the studies of main secondary metabolites produced by Fusaria differing in origin and ecology .
2 Fusarium: Clades and Species
First description of Fusarium was reported in 1809 by Link and since than more than a thousand species have been identified, of which 70 is well-known. The first taxonomic classifications have been created based on morphological characters of species and test crosses [14]. Later, thanks to the genetic and bioinformatic tools, species became classified using phylogenetic analyses. Aoki et al. in 2014 divided Fusarium species into four complexes based on RNA polymerase II subunit gene sequences (Fusarium fujikuroi species complex (FFSC), Fusarium graminearum species complex (FGSC), Fusarium oxysporum species complex (FOSC), and Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC)), but some well-known species were not assigned to any of these [15]. In 2011, Watanabe et al. used maximum likelihood method for reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships using the following genetic markers: rDNA cluster region, β-tubulin (β-tub), translation elongation factor 1α (EF-1α), and aminoadipate reductase (lys2). Based on the resulting phylogenetic tree, they proposed a new classification divided into seven clades (Table 1) [16].
Obviously, this classification contained some flaws, related to the limited number of strains used, but mainly followed earlier dividing Fusarium into “sections” which is no longer used. More detailed studies allowed to discriminate closely related species inside the clades, and currently, many reports describing new species or chemotypes are becoming available, particularly concerning trichothecene producers from the FGSC and fumonisin producers from the FFSC.
3 Ecological Niches: From Saprotrophs to Human Pathogens
As a worldwide occurring genus, Fusaria are adapted to survive and spread in a wide spectrum of environmental conditions. The genus is known at best as a plant pathogen that causes yearly huge economic losses in yields of almost all crops cultivated all over the world. Spores of Fusarium infect plants and then develop hyphae within plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems, seeds, flowers, roots) which cause changes in host cells’ metabolism, tissue destruction, and, eventually, the development of numerous diseases.
Some Fusarium species complexes are still classified as specialized groups within the species, so-called formae specialis (f.sp.) based on specific host that they are able to infect. F. oxysporum is the species with the largest number of formae specialis. For instance, F. oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici causes wilt in tomato, while F. oxysporum f.sp. cubense causes Panama disease on banana. Other specific examples of Fusarium plant diseases (also called fusiariosis) are ear rot of maize (F. verticillioides), Fusarium head blight of wheat and barley (F. avenaceum, F. culmorum, F. graminearum), and root rot of soybean (F. solani) [17].
Species belonging to Fusarium genus are generally saprotrophic, and necrotrophs, being potentially pathogenic, are not obligatory pathogens, like biotrophic Puccinia spp. causing rusts in small grain cereals (mainly wheat, barley, and triticale). After the harvest, fragments of infected tissues get into the soil, where the fungi develop feeding on decayed organic matter and can survive unfavorable environmental conditions. Some of the species can form fruiting bodies which can remain viable for a very long time and then germinate at the appearance of appropriate conditions to infect plant roots. This process is a part of the vegetative development of some Fusaria, for example, F. culmorum, F. oxysporum, and F. graminearum [18,19,20,21].
Animal and human fusariosis are not as common as plant fusariosis. Human fusariosis usually occur in people with tissue breakdown or patients with impaired immune system. The symptoms of these diseases are usually keratitis and onychomycosis which are caused by F. verticillioides, F. oxysporum, and F. solani [22]. Mycotoxicoses occur more often than fusariosis and are the effects of ingestion of toxic fungal secondary metabolites. Exposure to mycotoxins occurs mainly through the consumption of contaminated food, but inhalation with the air is also possible. Many of these compounds do not degrade during technological processes even under high temperature and pressure conditions. Mycotoxins are biosynthesized by fungi and secreted into host tissues where they are accumulated and transferred into food and feedstuffs. Exposure to mycotoxins may also occur through the consumption of contaminated animal products such as meat, milk, or eggs because some compounds pass from plant-derived materials to animal tissues and may be excreted with milk (e.g., aflatoxins). Numerous reports on diseases caused by Fusarium mycotoxins are available. Fumonisins B1 and B2 causing equine encephalomalacia, deoxynivalenol causing vomiting as well as diarrhea, and zearalenone causing breast cancer are among the most frequent ones [1, 23, 24].
4 Phylogeny and New Species Discovery
Exact taxonomic positioning of the Fusarium genotype studied is one of the most basic questions faced by researchers interested in Fusarium research, because mistake at this stage may have serious consequences. During last decades, three kinds of species concepts were proposed to identify Fusarium species:
-
Morphological species concept (defined by the morphological characters of pure fungal cultures on standardized laboratory media)
-
Biological species concept (using sexual crosses, aggressiveness tests)
-
Phylogenetical species concept (molecular analyses defining similarities between related strains)
Sometimes, the combination of two or three of these species’ concepts can be found [25,26,27]. Nevertheless, the use of morphological species concept for identifying species requires a skilled and experienced researcher with wide knowledge of classical taxonomy, which is nowadays more and more difficult to find. Additional problem bears in overlapping morphological characters among closely related species and new species described practically each year.
The biological characteristics based on sexual compatibility show numerous problems, such as environmental factors suppressing sexual reproduction, unequal frequencies of mating-type alleles in different populations, or failure of compatible isolates to reproduce due to male or female dominance. Moreover, the environmental conditions and genetics of the host may play significant roles in aggressiveness tests on specific host plant [28]. According to Moretti (2009), it is a great challenge to determine the taxonomic status of Fusarium species on the basic of their phenotypic characteristics alone, including pathogenicity and toxigenicity [29].
After the year 2000, most scientists have utilized the molecular phylogenetic approaches to ascertain the taxonomy of Fusarium species and have proposed new taxonomic systems based on the phylogenetic species concept [3, 7, 10, 12, 30,31,32,33,34,35]. This was a requirement that arose from the fact that several of the “traditional” species based on morphological identification are now considered to be species complexes composed of many species [33, 36, 37].
Phylogenetic analyses of Fusarium isolates are being performed based on numerous diagnostic marker sequences. Among them the most common are calmodulin (cmd) [38], histone 3 (HIS3), Tri101 [39], mating-type (MAT) locus [36], internally transcribed spacer regions in the ribosomal repeat region (ITS1 and ITS2) [40, 41], the intergenic spacer region (IGS) [42], the nuclear ribosomal RNA large subunit (28S or LSU rDNA), and the mitochondrial small subunit (mtSSU rDNA) [27]. Protein-coding genes are also in use, such as RNA polymerase (RPB2), β-tubulin (tub2) [43], translation elongation factor (EF-1α) [43,44,45], and ATP citrate lyase (ACL1) [46]. Notably, not all of these sequences work equally well showing significant polymorphism for all Fusarium species. For instance, the ITS regions have shown its limited usefulness within many Fusarium species, such as F. avenaceum, F. arthrosporioides/F. tricinctum, F. sporotrichioides/F. langsethiae, and the lineages of F. graminearum species complex, due to the occurrence of non-orthologous copies [25, 38]. Correspondingly, β-tubulin gene is not discriminative for genotypes from the Fusarium solani species complex [47]. Nevertheless, EF-1α, RPB1, and/or RPB2 gene fragments have gained the most of the researcher’s interest for the following reasons: (i) highly informative at the species level, (ii) non-orthologous copies, (iii) amplified from all species of the genus using single pairs of universal primers, and (iv) sequences from these three genes are well represented in the reference database (i.e., FUSARIUM-ID, Fusarium MLST, and NCBI GenBank) [48,49,50].
Phylogenetical characterization based on genealogical concordance (GCPSR), a robust method for determined species boundaries [31], has shown the severe limitations of morphological and biological species identification in Fusarium and accelerated species discovery inside the genus. To date, approximately two-thirds of the 300 phylogenetically distinct species-level Fusaria were discovered using GCPSR-based studies [51]. Moreover, continuous research investments have provided tremendous insight into evolutionary relationships within the Fusarium genus inferred from partial RPB1 and RPB2 sequences. The study determined 20 monophyletic species complexes and 9 monotypic lineages, which were named informally to facilitate the communication of an isolate’s clade membership and genetic diversity [24, 52]. Based on newly discovered species, two of these monotypic lineages are currently considered as species complexes [24, 53, 54].
5 Secondary Metabolism Biosynthetic Pathways
Recently, it appeared that genomic regions involved in secondary metabolism present similarly useful or sometimes better targets for designing phylogenetic markers and their analysis [3]. The weak side of such approach is that only some of Fusarium species may possess the gene cluster of interest but the resolution of the genotypes obtained with SM biosynthetic sequences may be higher than that of PM ones. Therefore, each of the clusters should be carefully and individually checked for its usefulness in the species studied.
5.1 Mycotoxins
Mycotoxins are SMs produced by vast majority of filamentous fungi, mostly under favorable environmental conditions. Fusarium species have the genetic potential to produce hundreds of structurally diverse SMs, most of which have poorly understood or completely unknown ecological functions [24, 55,56,57]. These substances are usually produced in complex biochemical processes, including polyketide, terpenoid, and amino acid metabolic pathways, and can be accumulated in crop plants. Thereby, they pose a health risk to human and livestock [4, 58,59,60]. Many known mycotoxins are the virulence factors related to plant disease development [61], or they might play a role in improvement of the survival of the spores and, consequently, influence the development of the producing organism by enhancing the fitness of a given community/species [59].
Throughout the past two decades, numerous studies have been made to better understand the molecular mechanisms of mycotoxin biosynthesis and the direct and indirect regulatory agents and patterns controlling these processes. Mycotoxin biosynthetic pathways involve several coordinately regulated and functionally related genes physically grouped into clusters that can be co-expressed under specified conditions. Generally, these genes can be identified through the presence of four classes of enzymes: terpene cyclases (TCs), dimethylallyltryptophan synthases (DMATSs), polyketide synthases (PKSs), and nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) [55, 62, 63], which catalyze the condensation or rearrangement of simple molecules to form more complex structures. Typically, the clusters contain also the core genes responsible for structural modifications of the initial metabolite, transporters for metabolite transport, and transcription factors for coordinated transcriptional regulation of genes in the cluster. These chemical products undergo multiple enzymatic modifications to form biologically active SMs and are transported to their site of activity [64, 65].
The release of the full genomic sequences of F. fujikuroi [62] and closely related Fusarium species, such as F. verticillioides [66], F. mangiferae, and F. proliferatum [63], revealed that the species have the genetic capacity of producing even more SMs than previously thought. Before the publication of the first Fusarium genomic sequence, the members of the entire genus were believed to produce about 40 structurally distinct families of SMs, while some groups, for instance, fumonisins and trichothecenes, contain tens of different analogs [67, 68]. Regardless of this metabolic diversity within the genus, single species and isolates were reported to produce a relatively low number of metabolites, e.g., there is some evidence showing that F. graminearum produced eight secondary metabolite families, such as aurofusarin, butenolide, fusarins, trichothecenes, culmorin, cyclonerodiol, chlamydosporol, and zearalenones. However, the study of the F. graminearum genome sequence identified 16 PKSs, 19 NRPSs, and 8 TSs, which suggests that a single species has the genetic potential to produce about the equal number of the SMs to that earlier claimed for the entire genus [65].
The in silico analyses of genomic sequences of a wide range of Fusarium species revealed surprisingly high level of differences in the distribution of secondary metabolite biosynthetic genes and, therefore, differences in the genetic potential of individual species to produce SMs [52, 66, 69]. Namely, the PKS gene PGL1, which is necessary for the production of a blackish perithecial pigment and a family of reddish mycelial pigments (fusarubins), was occurring in all Fusaria examined in multiple studies [52, 64, 70, 71]. Moreover, there are some reports indicating that the SM’s biosynthetic gene clusters are well-conserved among organisms. From the evolutionary point of view, their maintenance could only be beneficial for the fungus if the final product would confer any advance to the producing organism, even if the effect of their action is subtle or not directly obvious [59, 60]. This statement applies for mycotoxins, like the narrowly distributed fumonisin and gibberellin gene clusters that are exhibited in only some species of the F. fujikuroi and F. oxysporum species complexes [72, 73]. Additionally, the fusarin biosynthetic genes, which are extensively spread in Fusarium, are occurring in all F. oxysporum isolates that have been analyzed [52].
5.1.1 Trichothecenes
Trichothecenes are the major group of mycotoxins produced by various Fusarium plant pathogens [61, 64, 74]. Due to their toxicity and economic significance, trichothecenes are among the best characterized mycotoxins. Structurally, they are sesquiterpenoid compounds with a tricyclic 12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-ene ring that can be chemically substituted at several positions, which result in multiple derivatives [75, 76].
There are over 200 trichothecene derivatives which can be grouped into four main groups: types A, B, C, and D. Type A trichothecenes characterized by hydroxyl, or ester substitution at C-8, contain diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS), T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, and neosolaniol, and T-2 toxin is the most toxic trichothecene in animals. Recently, a new chemotype has been discovered among type A trichothecenes and designed NX-2. Surprisingly, it can be produced by F. graminearum, which is a typical type B trichothecene producer [77, 78]. The most important producers of type A trichothecenes are F. sporotrichioides, F. langsethiae, F. poae, F. sambucinum, F. armeniacum, and F. venenatum. They may develop on variety of cereal grains especially in cold climate regions or during storage conditions [76, 79]. Type B trichothecenes contain a C-8 keto group and are produced by various Fusarium species, particularly from the Fusarium graminearum species complex: F. graminearum sensu lato, F. culmorum, F. pseudograminearum, and F. cerealis. The most common type B trichothecenes are deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol (NIV), and the DON-acetylated derivatives AcDONs. Type C trichothecenes are a minor group of toxins produces by several other genera of fungi, and type D includes compounds produced by Stachybotrys species that are considered as important indoor mold hazards [17, 74, 80].
Alongside this major metabolite, type B trichothecenes are among the most toxic mycotoxin compounds and best-studied virulence factors. The mechanism of action of this mycotoxin is based on the inhibition of protein synthesis in eukaryotes. Trichothecenes interact with peptidyl transferase enzyme binding the 60S ribosomal subunit, thus causing the inhibition of translation. Alternative mechanism of action involves the activation of numerous mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [60]. Humans and animals that have consumed trichothecene mycotoxins present various symptoms, such as vomiting, dizziness, diarrhea, and spontaneous abortion [81]. Moreover, the potential of trichothecenes to act as virulence factors in plant-fungal interactions and elicit plant defense responses has been investigated [82]. While trichothecene production is not required for Fusarium to develop on the host and penetrate its tissues, they still are essential compounds for the exposure of the pathogen after initial colonization [60, 83].
The trichothecene biosynthetic (TRI) gene cluster is responsible for trichothecene biosynthesis and was first characterized in F. graminearum and F. sporotrichioides [84,85,86]. Trichothecene biosynthetic enzymes and direct regulatory proteins are encoded by 15 genes which are located at three different loci on different chromosomes: a 12-gene core TRI cluster [80, 87]; the two-gene locus, TRI1 which encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase and TRI16 which encodes an acyl transferase; and a single acyl transferase gene TRI101 locus that is responsible for esterification of acetate to the hydroxyl function at carbon atom 3 (C-3) of trichothecenes [88]. In F. sporotrichioides, the TRI1 enzyme catalyzes the hydroxylation of trichothecenes at C-8, and the TRI16 enzyme catalyzes esterification of a five-carbon carboxylic acid, isovalerate, to the C-8 oxygen [89, 90]. Analysis of the TRI loci in 16 species of Fusarium exposed that TRI1 and TRI101 are in the core TRI cluster in four species of Fusarium that are members of the F. incarnatum-equiseti species complex [91, 92]. It was shown that TRI16 and TRI10 are major transcriptional regulators of TRI expression [93].
The trichothecenes have a skeleton resulting from the farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) [94, 95]. The first step in the biosynthesis pathway is the conversion of FPP to trichodiene. This reaction is governed by TRI5-encoded trichodiene synthase [96]. Subsequently nine reactions follow, catalyzed by the enzymes encoded by TRI4, TRI101, TRI11, and TRI3, correspondingly, and leading to the formation of calonectrin [80]. All these steps are common for type A trichothecenes (T-2 toxin) and type B trichothecenes (NIV and DON) producing Fusaria [76, 80].
A comparative study showed that similar genes are functioning in F. graminearum and F. sporotrichioides [85]. For instance, TRI7 and TRI13 are functional only in F. sporotrichioides and in F. cerealis as well as in the strains of F. graminearum and F. culmorum producing NIV [86]. In F. graminearum DON producers, FgTri7 and FgTri13 are not functioning [86]; therefore, the biosynthesis continues directly from calonectrin with the products of FgTri1 and FgTri8 and leads to the formation of either 3AcDON or 15AcDON followed by DON [97]. In contrast, in NIV producers, the pathway proceeds with the product of FgTri1 to generate 4AcNIV and the last step with FgTri8 product giving NIV [76]. Alexander et al. (2011) demonstrated that polymorphisms of TRI8 resulted in the chemotype of AcDON [98]. Moreover, in F. sporotrichioides, which is a T-2 toxin producer, the biosynthesis pathway proceeds with the products FsTri1, FsTri16, and FsTri8 [89, 97]. In most F. graminearum strains, TRI1 is responsible for trichothecene oxygenation at both C-7 and C-8, which leads to the formation of variants like DON or NIV [99]. Nevertheless, in some F. graminearum strains, TRI1 adds a hydroxyl group at C-7 only, leading to the formation of the T-2 toxin [77].
5.1.2 Fumonisins
Fumonisins are a group of mycotoxins primarily produced by F. verticillioides, F. fujikuroi, and F. proliferatum, worldwide pathogens of rice and maize but also found on a wide range of other agro-food crops [4, 12, 60]. Other species from the F. fujikuroi species complex also produce fumonisins, but they are of minor importance. Interestingly, there are also species that are fumonisin nonproducers, and for some the status is ambiguous, as at least some strains were found to produce fumonisins for F. oxysporum, F. temperatum, or F. subglutinans [4, 7, 8]. The synthesis of FBs in association with disease symptoms differs markedly depending on the host conditions and infected tissue type [100]. It has been shown that fumonisins produced by F. verticillioides have a slight impact on maize ear rot development and significant effect on maize seedling blight. The successful transformation of the fumonisin-producing genes into an endophytic, fumonisin-nonproducing F. verticillioides strain has converted this endophyte into a pathogen that causes seedling blight disease in maize [101, 102], strongly supporting the hypothesis that fumonisin is a pathogenicity factor during maize seedling infection [102].
At least 28 different analogs of fumonisins were described and divided into four main categories: A, B, C, and P series [103, 104]. The most important group are the B fumonisins, B1, B2, B3, and B4, mainly due to their toxicity to humans and animals. Fumonisin B1 is also, apart from Aspergilli-produced aflatoxins, the most abundant and important contaminant of maize and maize-derived products. The structures of FBs were first described in 1988 and 1989 by the researchers in South Africa, New Caledonia, and France [105, 106]. The B series fumonisins have a 20-carbon polyketide backbone with terminal amine residue, several hydroxyl groups, and two propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylate esters at various positions. The A and P series fumonisins differ due to alteration or replacement of the terminal amine group, while the C series fumonisins have a 19-carbon backbone [1, 2, 17]. Fumonisins that are characterized by an unsubstituted primary amino group at the C-2, and structurally close to sphingolipids, actually can disturb the sphingolipid metabolism by inhibiting the enzyme ceramide synthase and consequently lead to the degeneration of the sphingolipid-rich tissues and disruption of cell membrane integrity [107].
Fumonisin biosynthetic (FUM) gene cluster has been first described in F. verticillioides belonging to the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex (FFSC), containing 17 genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes, a transcription factor, and an ABC transporter [4, 80, 103, 108]. The FUM1 gene encodes a polyketide synthase that catalyzes the synthesis of a linear polyketide that forms the backbone structure of fumonisins. Additionally, the FUM8 gene runs the condensation of the linear polyketide with alanine to produce fumonisins [9], and FUM21 encodes a Zn(II)2Cys6 DNA-binding transcription factor that positively regulates FUM expression [108]. The cluster also encodes an ABC transporter (FUM19) that provides a sort of self-protection by exporting the toxin from the cell and reducing its cellular concentration. The number, order, and orientation of genes within FUM cluster were specified to be similar for closely related F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum but also for F. oxysporum; however, only one fumonisin-producing strain O-1890 has been described in detail [6, 9, 103]. Nevertheless, the sequences flanking the FUM cluster seem to alter in F. verticillioides, F. proliferatum, and F. oxysporum, showing different genomic contexts of the FUM cluster in these three species and, possibly, also in other producers, like F. nygamai [7]. Proctor et al. (2003) determined the genomic context of the FUM cluster by the sequence analysis of the DNA regions flanking each side of the cluster. The analysis shows five different genomic context or genetic environments (GE), namely, GC1, GC2, GC3a, GC3b, and GC4. The one designed GC1 is devoted to the full FUM cluster in F. verticillioides [103] and for FUM cluster remnant in F. musae [109], where ORF20 and ORF21 represent pseudogenes, most likely the homologs of the F. graminearum gene FGSG_00274, and are flanking the FUM21 side, whereas ZBD1 and ZNF1 are flanking the FUM19 side. The GC2 was detected in all African clade species examined, where ANK1 and GAT1 are flanking the FUM19 side and ZBD1 and MFS1 are flanking the FUM21 side. The GC3a and GC3b were shown in American-clade species F. anthophilum and F. bulbicola, respectively. They have a similar structure with three genes (CPM1, MF2, and DOX1) flanking the FUM19 side, differing in the FUM21-flanking region: in the GC3a, FUM21 is flanked by CPM2 and TSP1, while in the GC3b, there was no evidence for these genes. The GC4 was observed in F. oxysporum (FRC O-1890 strain), where there was no full-length gene within the Σ2800 bp region upstream of FUM21 and a homolog of CPM1 was flanking the FUM19 side [59].
The fumonisin biosynthesis starts when the FUM1 product catalyzes the condensation of nine acetate and two methyl units to form a linear, 18-carbon-long polyketide. The polyketide should be identical or similar in structure to 10,14-dimethyl octadecanoic acid. However, it is possible that the polyketide does not exist as a free acid but remains covalently attached to the phosphopantetheinyl cofactor of the PKS instead [110]. In the second step, the FUM8-encoded protein Fum8p catalyzes the condensation of the linear polyketide and alanine to yield a linear molecule that is 20 carbons long and has an amine at C-2, a carbonyl at C-3, and methyl residues at the C-12 and C-16 [9, 111, 112]. A third step of the pathway is catalyzed by the FUM6-encoded Fum6p protein and consists of the hydroxylation of the polyketide-amino acid condensation product at the C-14 and C-15 [9, 113]. The fourth, fifth, and sixth steps are the following reactions: C-3 carbonyl reduction, C-10 hydroxylation, and C-14/C-15 esterification, respectively. Metabolic profiling of numerous F. verticillioides mutants indicated that each of these reactions can occur independently from the others. The C-3 carbonyl reduction is catalyzed by Fum13p [114], fumonisin C-10 hydroxylation is most likely catalyzed by Fum2p [2], and esterification of the tricarballylic moieties to the hydroxyls at C-14 and C-15 of fumonisins is catalyzed by Fum14p [115]. Although Fum14p catalyzes the C-14/C-15 esterification, analysis of gene deletion mutants indicated that Fum7p, Fum10p, and Fum11p also contribute to the formation of the tricarballylic esters [116]. The final step in the fumonisin biosynthesis is the Fum3p-catalyzed hydroxylation of the fumonisin backbone at the C-5. Fum3p is predicted to encode a dioxygenase, and its role in fumonisin biosynthesis was confirmed using enzyme assay in which the purified protein catalyzed the C-5 hydroxylation [117].
Phylogenetic discord of the FUM gene-based and primary metabolism gene genealogies was demonstrated, and it coincides with the differences in the FUM cluster genomic context, whereas it was not compatible with fumonisin chemotype differences [59]. Proctor et al. (2013) proposed that combination of a variety of dynamic processes, such as cluster duplication and loss, balancing selection, shifts in functional contrast, translation, and horizontal transfers, has shaped the evolution and distribution of some secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene cluster, as well as contributed to the metabolic diversity in fungi [59, 87, 118,119,120,121].
5.1.3 Zearalenone
Zearalenone (ZEA) is a phenolic resorcylic acid lactone mycotoxin with low acute toxicity that does not cause fatal toxicosis. It is associated mainly with maize but also occur in wheat, barley, and sorghum. Moreover, it can cause reproductive problems in farm animals, particularly in pigs. Zearalenone was first purified from a culture of F. graminearum and originally was designated as fermentation estrogenic substance F-2. Then, it was structurally characterized and named zearalenone [122]. ZEA is produced by several Fusarium species that usually also produce type B trichothecenes, and therefore it is found together with DON and NIV. Fungi belonging to the F. graminearum species complex are the most significant ZEA producers; however, there are other species that have been reported to produce ZEA, such as F. culmorum [123] and F. cerealis [124]. Fungi from the F. oxysporum, F. solani, and F. fujikuroi species complexes are not able to produce ZEA [1]. F. equiseti-incarnatum species complex is an exception here, as these fungi are able to produce ZEA but produce type A trichothecenes instead of type B [45, 125].
ZEA may undergo various modifications in the organisms of plants, fungi, and animals by phase I and phase II metabolism. Modified forms of ZEA found in animal feed include its reduced phase I metabolites (e.g., α-zearalenol, β-zearalenol, α-zearalanol, β-zearalanol) and its phase II conjugate forms with glucose, sulfate, and/or glucuronic acid [60]. Early chemical studies have proposed that ZEA is derived from the acetate through the polyketide synthesis pathway [126]. More recent research contributed to the development of the zearalenone biosynthetic gene cluster with two polyketide synthases, PKS4 and PKS13, which have been characterized later [123, 127]. Despite the fact that biological functions of these genes have still been relatively poorly understood and some strains do not produce ZEA while still carry at least one of the genes, some evidence has been reported that the PKS genes have accumulated enough intraspecific polymorphisms to be explored as promising targets for phylogenetic studies [3, 125].
5.1.4 Enniatins and Beauvericins
Enniatins (ENNs) and beauvericin (BEA) belong to a structurally and genetically related group of nonribosomal cyclic hexadepsipeptides consisting of alternating D-2-hydroxyisovaleric (d-HIV) acid and N-methyl-l-amino acids. The subunits are linked by peptide bonds and intramolecular ester (lactone) bonds, forming a cyclic depsipeptide [128, 129]. In the type A and B enniatins, these building blocks are typically either aliphatic N-methyl-valine, N-methyl-isoleucine, or a mixture of these amino acids [130]. In canonical beauvericin molecule, the three amino acid substituents are all aromatic N-methyl-phenylalanines instead of aliphatic residues [129, 131]. Also the identified three analogs of beauvericin (A, B, C) contain one, two, or three groups of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HMP) instead of HIV group, respectively [132].
To date, 29 naturally occurring enniatin analogs have been identified. The most frequent variants detected in foods and feeds, especially in cereals, are enniatin A, A1 (ENN A1), B (ENN B), B1 (ENN B1), and B4 (ENN B4), together with smaller amounts of enniatins C, D, E, and F [128]. Enniatins are of high interest, because of their wide range of biological activities. Structural differences related to the N-methyl-L-amino acid are responsible for the different bioactivities of these mycotoxins. A mixture of ENNs can cause cytotoxic effects of various severities at low concentrations and on different types of cells [133]. Affected cells frequently include human cancer cells, implicating the potential use of ENNs as anticancer drugs [134]. In particular, ENNs A1 and B1 induce apoptotic cell death and disrupt the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase’s (ERK) activity associated with cell proliferation. This bioactivity has long been assumed to be associated with their ionophoric properties [135]. Today, the depsipeptides are known to incorporate into cell membranes and form pores with a high affinity for K+, Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ [136]. ENNs also exhibit different biological properties, such as insecticidal and antibiotic activity against Mycobacterium sp. and Plasmodium falciparum. Of particular interest is the proven action of identified ENNs as inhibitors of major drug efflux pumps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [137,138,139,140].
The chemical properties of depsipeptide compounds allow for their application in pharmaceutical products with anti-inflammatory and antibiotic properties in targeted treatment of diseases of the upper respiratory tract [141]. A mixture of enniatins was shown by Gaumann et al. (1960) to act synergistically as complex phytotoxin in causing wilt and necrosis to leaves of plants affected by Fusarium [142]. Pertinently, enniatins are often found in cereal grain at high concentrations, as a result of fungal infection. This fact has yet unknown implications for human and animal health, which leads to depsipeptide perception as emerging mycotoxins [143, 144].
Beauvericin (BEA) is a cyclodepsipeptide ionophore transporting monovalent cations across membranes as a free carrier uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation. BEA displays a diverse array of biological activities in vitro [145] and is one of the most potent cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitors of microbial origin. It shows moderate antibiotic and antifungal activities; the combined use of beauvericin with ketoconazole (an antifungal drug) was found to enhance the antifungal effect, suggesting the potential use of beauvericin as a co-drug for antifungal infections in human [146, 147]. BEA has shown strong cytotoxicity to various human cancer cell lines and induced the apoptosis of some cancer cell lines by activating calcium-sensitive cell apoptotic pathways [148]. It also inhibits the directional cell motility (haptotaxis) of cancer cells at subcytotoxic concentrations [147].
ENN production is catalyzed by large multidomain protein (M = 347 kDa) – the nonribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS), known as enniatin synthetase (abbreviated as Esyn1) [149]. As a family of related enzymes, the fungal NRPSs are all modularly organized multienzyme complexes in which each module, located on the same protein chain, is responsible for the initiation, elongation, and termination of growing polypeptide (in this case – by ring closure). Each module of the NRPS system is composed of distinctly folded catalytic domains with highly conserved core motifs, important for their catalytic activities. A minimal (inexactly) repeated unit consists of three core domains in succession: an adenylation (A) domain which recognizes and activates the substrate via adenylation with ATP and a thiolation/transferase (T) or peptidyl carrier protein (PCP) domain which binds the activated substrate to a 4′-phosphopantetheine (PP) cofactor via a thioester bond and transfers the substrate to a condensation (C) domain which catalyzes peptide bond formation between adjacent substrates on the megasynthase complex. Several other specialized C-terminal domains involved in chain termination and release of the final peptide product have also been identified. Optional domains include methyltransferase (M), epimerization (E), heterocyclization (Cy), and oxidation (Ox) domains, which may alter the enzyme-bound precursors or growing peptide intermediates at various stages of the process. The full-length NRPS product is normally released by a thioesterase (TE) domain giving rise to free acids, lactones, or lactams. Eukaryotic NRPSs that synthesize cyclooligomer peptides assemble oligopeptide monomer intermediates by the programmed iterative reuse of their modules, which differs from the classical NRPS paradigm described in bacteria, and the resultant monomers are frequently employed in further recursive oligomerization and cyclization process [129, 150,151,152].
The Esyn1-encoded protein was previously purified and characterized by Zocher and co-workers (1982) from Fusarium oxysporum [153]. Biosynthesis proceeds through the condensation of three dipeptidol units followed by ring closure. The ENNs are synthesized from their primary precursors, i.e., valine, leucine, or isoleucine, D-2-hydroxyisovaleric acid, and S-adenosylmethionine. The NRPS domain architecture is composed of three functional modules: C-A-T-M (C, condensation domain; A, adenylation domain; T, thiolation/transferase domain; M, methyltransferase domain). The two adenylation domains are responsible for the specific activation of the primary substrates D-2-hydroxyisovaleric acid and l-amino acid as acyl adenylate intermediates [153,154,155,156,157,158].
A genomic locus containing the gene cluster related to beauvericin (BEA) biosynthesis in the entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana, has also been cloned. Beauvericin synthetase (bbBEAS) consists of a single polypeptide chain with a molecular mass of about 351 kD [159]. Similar to enniatin biosynthesis, beauvericin is also produced by a thiol template mechanism [160, 161]. However, the two depsipeptide synthetases differ in their substrate selectiveness. Beauvericin synthetase preferably accepts N-methyl-l-phenylalanine and some other aliphatic hydrophobic amino acids. The efficiency of incorporation into the cyclodepsipeptide framework decreases with the length of the side chain: N-methyl-l-phenylalanine was easily replaced by ortho-, meta-, and para-fluoro-substituted phenylalanine derivatives, as well as by N-methyl-l-leucine, N-methyl-l-norleucine, and N-methyl-l-isoleucine residues [149]. Consequently, significant sequence homologies to some of the Fusarium enzymes were found [150], establishing a common genetic background to depsipeptide biosynthesis. Previously, some Fusarium species like Fusarium poae have been reported to produce ENNs and BEA simultaneously [162, 163], which is justified by the fact that both mycotoxins share a common metabolic pathway and the co-occurrence of ENNs and BEA in field samples infected by Fusarium spp. has been observed [164, 165]. Previous works demonstrate high probability that even a single PCR-based esyn1-specific marker can detect potential producers of both toxins among Fusarium isolates originating from contaminated plant material [130, 163].
5.1.5 Fusaric Acid
Fusaric acid (FA) is a picolinic acid derivative which was isolated for the first time from Fusarium heterosporum strains. Further research have proven that other Fusarium species, e.g., F. verticillioides, F. fujikuroi, and F. oxysporum, are also able to produce this mycotoxin [166, 167]. FA shows moderate impact on mammalian health, but its high toxicity to plants is documented. It is responsible for “fusarium wilt” development through the lipid peroxidation, increase of reactive oxygen species, and, finally, host cells’ death [168]. FA also causes bakanae disease in rice seedlings and has a strong antimicrobial activity, inhibiting quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria [169, 170].
Biosynthetic pathway of fusaric acid remains largely unexplored; however, the gene cluster responsible for encoding of proteins involved in this process has been identified in F. verticillioides. Initially, only 5 genes were described in fusaric acid biosynthetic (FUB) gene cluster, but just a few years later, additional 7 contiguous genes were located 14.6 kb upstream of the previous five genes identified [171, 172]. These genes are conserved in genomes of all FA-producing Fusarium strains, and no significant differences in cluster organization between the species have been found [167]. Functions of all 12 FUB genes were predicted using BLAST analysis (Table 2) [172, 173].
Fusaric acid synthase encoded by FUB1 is responsible for the synthesis of six-carbon polyketide chain using three acetyl-CoA molecules. Fusion of polyketide chain, oxaloacetate, and amino group is catalyzed by amino acid kinase (FUB3). Hydrolase encoded by FUB4 transform the product of this reaction to fusarate [171]. FUB1 gene (designed also as PKS21 according to the nomenclature proposed by Hansen et al. [55]) plays a significant role in FA biosynthesis. Orthologs of this gene were found in F. fujikuroi, F. verticillioides, F. oxysporum, F. circinatum, and F. mangiferae [171, 173]. Deletions of FUB1, as well as FUB4, cause complete cessation of FA biosynthesis, while FUB3 and FUB5 silencing results in 20 to 40% drop in FA production [171, 174]. Although the processes related to FA biosynthesis are still not sufficiently understood, it is known that FUB6, FUB7, and FUB8 genes are also crucial for the process [173].
FUB gene cluster contains two genes (FUB10 and FUB12) responsible for the expression of Zn(II)2Cys6-pathway-specific transcription factors (TFs) which control the FA biosynthesis. The FUB10 TF is directly linked to FA production, while FUB12 TF is involved in effective FA conversion into fusarinolic acid and dehydrofusaric acid. Deletion of any of the TF genes results in decreased production of FA and its derivatives [171, 173, 174]. This process is also controlled by the global regulators, which build up complex regulatory network controlling life processes including SM biosynthesis [175]. For instance, culture medium of pH = 8 acts like a positive regulator of FUB1 [PacC regulator], while copper, zinc and iron are negative regulators [176]. FA belongs to the nitrogen-induced SMs. High nitrogen concentrations affect the GATA-type TFs (AreA and AreB) which cause FUB1 overexpression and, hence, increase in FA production [177]. The Sge1 gene is another global regulator important in nitrogen-dependent FA biosynthesis. The function of Sge1 differs between Fusarium species, for example, FoSge1 regulates the conidiation and pathogenicity of F. oxysporum, while F. fujikuroi FfSge1 is required for SM biosynthesis [178, 179]. ΔSge1 mutants show reduced FA production [173, 175, 180]. Fusarium velvet-like complex is also involved in the regulation of the differentiation as well as the pathogens’ virulence and FA biosynthesis. Vel1, Vel2, and Lae1 genes are primary components of this complex. In ΔVel1 and ΔLae1 mutants, FA production was significantly lower than in the wild-type strains [180, 181]. Some reports suggest the epigenetic modifications like histone acetylation to influence these processes. Deletions in Hda1 and Hda2 genes, which are responsible for the expression of histone deacetylases, cause reduced FA biosynthesis in F. fujikuroi [180, 183].
5.1.6 Fusarins
Fusarins A, C, and D are a group of SMs built of a polyene chain linked to the 2-pyrrolidone ring. Additionally, fusarin C contains an epoxide group on the pyrrolidone ring, unlike fusarins A and D. First report on fusarin C produced by maize pathogen F. moniliforme (now F. verticillioides) has been published in 1981 in North America [184]. These mycotoxins are also produced by other Fusaria, e.g., F. fujikuroi, F. graminearum, and F. venenatum [167, 171, 185, 186]. Toxicity of fusarin C was not very widely investigated, but it was recognized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possible carcinogenic for human [187, 188]. Its mutagenic effect is probably related to the interaction of the epoxide group with DNA [189].
Enzymes involved in fusarin C biosynthesis are encoded by nine genes included in the FUS cluster . There are two versions of the FUS cluster organization. The first scheme is represented by F. fujikuroi, F. verticillioides, and F. graminearum, where the FUS1-FUS9 genes are arranged one after another. The second one occurs in F. solani and in F. circinatum (which does not produce fusarins), where the genes FUS9-FUS6 and FUS2-FUS5 are separated by FUS1 [167]. Predicted gene functions were presented in Table 3.
Fusarin C gene cluster consists of nine genes, but only four (FUS1, FUS2, FUS8, and FUS9) are essential for fusarin C biosynthesis [182]. FUSS was the first gene participating in fusarin biosynthesis identified, and it was described in F. venenatum and F. verticillioides. Its orthologs, GzFUS1 and fusA, were identified in F. graminearum and F. fujikuroi, respectively [167, 171]. The FUSS-encoded protein is a combination of the polyketide synthase (PKS) and nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS), an enzyme which plays a key role in fusarin biosynthetic pathway. The PKS-NRPS uses malonyl-CoA, six moieties of acetyl-CoA, and homoserine as substrates which are transformed into prefusarin [190]. Subsequently, prefusarin is oxidized by monooxygenase (FUS8) to form 20-hydroxy-prefusarin which undergoes epoxidation by α-/β-hydrolase (FUS2) to 20-hydroxy-fusarin. This product also undergoes oxidation by monooxygenase to the 20-carboxy-fusarin. Methyltransferase encoded by FUS9 is responsible for the last substrate methylation and obtaining final product – fusarin C [167, 182].
So far, no fusarin pathway-specific transcriptional factors have been identified, but the impact of some global regulators on fusarin biosynthesis has been well-established [180]. The expression of the FUS genes is pH-dependent and is upregulated in acidic conditions, but PacC TF is not involved in this process. FUS expression is also nitrogen-dependent. The expression of the velvet-like complex is increased in response to high nitrogen concentrations. Δvel1, Δvel2, and Δlae1 mutants produce significantly lower amounts of fusarins compared to the wild-type strain. The deletion of a glutamine synthetase transcriptional factor gln1 dramatically decreases FUS genes’ expression [182]. On the other hand, the epigenetic modifications of histones like acetylation positively influence the expression of FUS gene cluster [182].
5.1.7 Moniliformin
In 1973, Cole and co-workers have isolated a compound from F. moniliforme cultures (later properly identified as F. proliferatum) which they called moniliformin (MON) [191]. MON has a very simple chemical structure (3-hydroxycyclobut-3-ene-1,2-dione) and is biosynthesized also by other Fusarium species, e.g., F. avenaceum, F. oxysporum, F. fujikuroi, and F. subglutinans [192, 193]. This SM shows moderate toxicity toward plants and animals [144]. Moniliformin biosynthesis is a very short and simple process. Condensation of two units of acetate leads to the formation of cyclobutadione moiety, which after oxidation and dehydration results in MON synthesis [194]. Presumably due to the uncomplicated biosynthetic pathway, until now all attempts to identify specific gene cluster devoted to MON biosynthesis, as well as the pathway-specific regulators, have failed.
5.2 Pigments
Fusaria produce a wide range of pigments, with the colors from pink, through carmine red, to purple, but some species may also produce yellow and brown pigments. Pigments can be best seen during the incubation of the fungus on rich microbiological media on the plate reverse. Colors of fungal pigmentation depend on the applied medium, its composition and pH.
Most of the Fusarium-produced pigments are naphthoquinones and javanicin, anhydrojavanicin, fusarubin, anhydrofusarubin, bikaverin, bostricoidin, novarubin, and naphthoquinone dimer – aurofusarin belong to this group. Many of these compounds have antifungal and antibacterial properties which sometimes inhibit the development of laboratory cell lines (e.g., HeLa). In this section we present the most common Fusarium-produced pigments with known gene clusters: carotenoids, bikaverin, and fusarubin [195].
5.2.1 Carotenoids
Carotenoids are characteristic yellow and orange pigments produced by plants, algae, bacteria, and fungi including Fusaria. These pigments are tetraterpenoids and play a role in photosynthesis, photoprotection, and plant signaling, but no other significant function besides pigmentation has been found in fungi. Carotenoids were identified for the first time in cultures of F. aquaeductum but later also in F. fujikuroi and F. oxysporum. Fusarium species are able to produce β-carotene, lycopene, and neurosporaxanthin thanks to the car gene cluster encoding enzymes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis [196, 197].
Carotenoid biosynthesis is basically a continuation of the mevalonic acid biosynthesis because of the use of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) as a first substrate. carRA and carB were the first genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis that were discovered [196]. The cyclase encoded by carRA catalyzes the transformation of two GGPP units into 15-cis-phytoene which is converted into neurosporene by desaturase encoded by carB. Then, this compound serves as a substrate for the γ-carotene formation. Two intermediate products of this reaction are possible, and the outcome depends on which enzyme (cyclase or desaturase) acts first. If desaturase is the first acting enzyme, the intermediate product will be lycopene, and β-zeacarotene is a product of the cyclase. Carotenoidogenesis may diverge into two ways at this point. Using the first, cyclase converts γ-carotene into β-carotene which can be transformed by oxygenase (encoded by carX) into two retinol units. Using the second route, γ-carotene is desaturated into torulene by the first oxygenase (encoded by carT) into β-apo-4′-carotenol which is finally converted into neurosporaxanthine thanks to the oxygenase action (encoded by carD) [196, 197]. The summary of the car gene cluster and their predicted functions is presented in Table 4.
In carotenoidogenesis light-dependent and light-independent regulators can participate. Long-lasting exposure to light stimulates expression of carRA, carB, carO, carX, and carT and led to pigment accumulation, while carD gene is insensitive to photoinduction. In turn, high nitrogen conditions repress carotenoids biosynthesis. There seems to be a significant impact of carS on nitrogen-dependent regulation. ΔcarS mutants produce higher amounts of carotenoids than wild-type in media containing high amounts of nitrogen, but this mechanism is yet not clear [197] .
5.2.2 Bikaverin
Bikaverin is a red pigment of polyketide structure produced by a number of Fusarium species (F. oxysporum, F. solani, F. fujikuroi, F. proliferatum, and F. verticillioides), and F. oxysporum was the first species from which bikaverin was isolated. As with most pigments, it acts as a stress protection, for example, against UV light. Bikaverin gene cluster has been found and characterized for F. fujikuroi [198]. It consists of six genes, among which only three are essential for bikaverin biosynthesis. Acetyl-CoA units are condensed into prebikaverin by multifunctional polyketide synthase encoded by bik1. Transformation of this compound into nor-bikaverin is catalyzed by FAD-dependent monooxygenase and O-methyltransferase. Rework of O-methyltransferase leads to the final product – bikaverin. The bik cluster contains a gene bik4 responsible for the expression of pathway-specific NmrA-like transcription factor [198, 199]. The organization of the bik cluster was presented in Table 5.
Bikaverin biosynthetic pathway is another one regulated in a nitrogen-dependent way. During nitrogen starvation, the bikaverin biosynthesis is stimulated at first, but after a few days, this process is abolished. Experiments with ΔareA and ΔpacC mutants deficient in these global regulators did not show any significant effect on the bikaverin biosynthesis in F. fujikuroi, suggesting the existence of other regulatory mechanisms for this process [198, 199].
5.2.3 Fusarubins
Red pigments fusarubins are produced by F. verticillioides, F. graminearum, F. fujikuroi as well as other Fusaria. Few works on fusarubin are available, and only biosynthesis of 8-O-methylfusarubin is clear [71]. The other compounds synthesized in the course of this biosynthetic pathway include 8-O-methylnectriafurone, 8-O-methyl-13-hydroxynorjavanicin, 8-O-methylanhydrofusarubinlactol, and 13-hydroxynorjavanicin and require extensive further research.
Fusarubin gene cluster contains six genes among which fsr1–fsr3 play essential roles in 8-O-methylfusarubin biosynthesis. The condensation of seven acetyl-CoA units results in the formation of a heptaketide which is transformed into 6-O-demethylfusarubinaldehyde. These reactions are catalyzed by a polyketide synthase encoded by fsr1. The resulting substrate undergoes further transformation to 8-O-methylfusarubin by FAD-dependent monooxygenase. Unfortunately, molecular mechanisms of fusarubin biosynthesis regulation remain unrevealed. It is only known that this process is stimulated under alkaline pH and nitrogen limitation conditions [71]. Fsr cluster genes were presented in Table 6.
5.3 Antimicrobials and Hormones
Fusarium SMs affect plant, animal, and human health. They very often show antimicrobial properties as well (both antifungal and antibacterial), for example, DAS, DON, and T-2 toxin. Some mycotoxins have only antibacterial effect. Beauvericin, enniatins, and fusaric acid belong to this group [200]. The role, biosynthetic pathways, and gene clusters of the abovementioned mycotoxins have been described in previous subsections. Similarly, naphthoquinones such as bikaverin and fusarubins and their derivatives having antimicrobial activities were discussed previously. Javanicin and anhydrofusarubin are antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria, e.g., S. aureus and Corynebacterium poinsettiae. Gram-negative bacteria and filamentous fungi are resistant to naphthoquinones [201, 202]. Chemical properties and biosynthesis of these pigments were described in previous subsection. Its antibacterial properties probably are caused by electron-releasing group substitution at 2 or 3 position of the moiety [202]. Here, other metabolites with antibacterial activities were considered: antibiotic Y, equisetin, and gibberellins.
5.3.1 Antibiotic Y
Unfortunately only few reports from 1980s about the antibiotic Y are available. Antibiotic Y was isolated from F. avenaceum, and, hence, also avenacein Y is known [203]. The activity of antibiotic Y was investigated toward Bacillus subtilis and Erwinia carotovora, and the results show very strong antibacterial activity especially at slightly acidic pH = 6.2. This activity was even stronger than the activity of streptomycin against Staphylococcus aureus [204]. Notably, only minor inhibition of other fungal genera, like Alternaria, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Botrytis was reported [205].
5.3.2 Equisetin
Equisetin has been isolated for the first time from F. equiseti which gave rise to its name. This mycotoxin with antimicrobial properties inhibits the development of Gram-positive bacteria [206]. So far, equisetin was also found in cultures of F. solani and F. heterosporum. Equisetin is a phytotoxin causing seed deterioration, which simultaneously has an important pharmacological importance for human [207]. The interest in this compound increased dramatically because of its ability to inhibit the enzyme responsible for human DNA infection by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) [208, 209].
Equisetin is a tetramic acid composed of octaketide linked with serine moiety. In 2005, Sims and colleagues described eqx gene cluster responsible for equisetin biosynthesis [210]. Eight units of malonyl-CoA are condensed and transformed by the eqxC-encoded enoylreductase and PKS-NRPS hybrid, encoded by eqxS gene. Heptaketide formed in these reactions undergoes a Diels-Alder cyclization carried out by eqx3-expressed protein. Further conversions are accomplished by PKS-NRPS and lead to the formation of trichosetin, which after N-methylation becomes equisetin [210,211,212]. Ten years after the results of Sims et al. were published [210], Kato et al. reported equisetin as an intermediate substrate in fusarisetin production and proposed new genes’ designations [213]. As in other examples of PKS-NRPS-dependent biosynthetic pathways, also in this case, PKS-NRPS hybrid plays a key role for equisetin production, as ΔeqxS mutants completely lose their ability to produce equisetin [210, 212]. Unfortunately, there are no reports on detailed data on the regulation of eqx cluster are available. Eqx genes and their names according to the eqx gene cluster as well as genes’ predicted functions were presented in Table 7.
5.3.3 Gibberellins
Gibberellins (GAs) are a group of well-known growth-promoting phytohormones, which are also secondary metabolites produced by some bacteria and filamentous fungi including Fusarium. GAs are tetracyclic diterpene acids containing 20 or 19 carbons in the cases where lactone bridge is present. Despite the fact that gibberellins are essentially plant hormones, for the first time, they were identified in Gibberella fujikuroi (F. fujikuroi), and this is where their name came from. Other Fusarium species have also the capacity to synthesize GAs, for instance, F. circinatum, F. mangiferae, and F. oxysporum produce abundant amounts of GAs. From the economical point of view, the most important gibberellins are GA1, GA3, GA7, and GA14, all produced by F. fujikuroi – the strain used most frequently in biotechnological production of GAs [62, 73, 214].
GA biosynthetic gene cluster was identified in F. fujikuroi, and it consists of seven genes (Table 8). The presence of this cluster was explained as a horizontal gene transfer from host plant to the pathogen [73, 215, 216]. Gibberellin biosynthesis starts from farnesyl pyrophosphate arising from the mevalonic acid biosynthetic pathway. This compound is transformed into geranylgeranyl diphosphate and then into ent-kaurenoic acid. These reactions are catalyzed by the enzymes encoded by GGS2 as well as bifunctional CPS/KS and P450-4 genes, accordingly. GA14 synthase leads to the formation of GA14 which is a substrate for C-20 oxidase, which forms GA4. In turn, GA4 may be further transformed into two ways. The first reaction is catalyzed by 13-hydroxylase and results in GA1 production. The second one is catalyzed by desaturase and optionally followed by 13-hydroxylase, which leads to the formation of GA7 and GA3, respectively [73, 179, 214]. GA gene clusters of Fusarium species differ from each other. F. fujikuroi, F. circinatum, and F. mangiferae have the whole GA cluster consisting of all seven genes. Some strains of F. oxysporum contain also complete cluster, while in others some genes have been deleted (e.g., P450-2, GGS2, CPS/KS, and P450-3 in II5 strain) or pseudogenes are present (P450-2 pseudogene in PHW815 strain) [62].
Gibberellin biosynthesis is regulated in many ways. High nitrogen concentrations repress the production of GAs through decreased expression of nitrogen-dependent global regulators areA, nmr, and meaB [177]. Global regulator Lae1 belonging to the velvet-like complex is essential for GA biosynthesis. Δlae1 mutant has abolished GA production, but, interestingly, the overexpression of histone acetyltransferase gene HAT1 restores the GA biosynthesis in Δlae1 mutants [180, 181]. Additional research is needed to explain this issue.
6 Population and Chemotype Shifts
Combined analyses of multilocus genotyping and neutral molecular markers permit a large-scale analysis of the diversity, mycotoxigenic potential, and population structure among Fusarium species [217,218,219,220,221,222,223]. For instance, such analyses have exposed two dominant populations of F. graminearum in North America – NA1 and NA2 populations. The NA1 population is genetically diverse and comprises of native isolates which typically represent the 15-AcDON chemotype, whereas the NA2 population characterizes an invasive population that has undergone a bottleneck and is related with the 3-AcDON chemotype [24]. Recently, isolates possessing a novel NX-2 chemotype have been found in F. graminearum populations in southern Europe and in the north of the USA, which are sympatric with the NA1 and NA2 populations [77, 78, 223]. F. graminearum with NX-2 chemotype has undergone toxin diversification in response to the variations in selection pressure acting on the cytochrome P450 enzyme which is encoded by TRI1 [24]. Kelly et al. (2016) suggested that adaptive constrains on the molecular evolution of trichothecene biosynthetic genes might be population- or niche-specific and, moreover, have shown that the variation of particular mycotoxins might be significant in niche adaptation [78].
Extensive research has provided tremendous insight into the genetic basis of the chemotype variation among Fusarium strains. On one hand, chemotype variation relates to the differences in the presence and/or absence of biosynthetic genes. For example, TRI16 is present and functional in T-2 toxin-producing Fusarium species (F. sporotrichioides Sherb.), whereas it is not occurring or pseudogenized in the species producing NIV or DON. Similarly, the presence or absence of a functional TRI13 is responsible for the DON and NIV chemotype polymorphism observed in F. graminearum and associated species [85, 86]. However, on the other hand, trichothecene chemotype variation results from the differences in function of allelic variants of the same TRI1 gene [77]. In some F. graminearum strains, TRI1 adds a hydroxyl group both at C-7 and C-8, resulting in the formation of DON and NIV [99], whereas in F. sporotrichioides, TRI11 adds a hydroxyl group at C-8 only, leading to the formation of the T-2 toxin [89, 90].
The particular mycotoxin variant (chemotype) produced by an unknown isolate or a novel Fusarium species can readily be inferred using DNA-based methods. For instance, the TRI5 gene which encodes trichodiene synthase [74] was one of the first ones to be used in designing the “generic trichothecene” marker [224]. Based on this knowledge, gene-specific markers were designed for identifying the particular chemotype variants of F. culmorum, F. cerealis, and F. graminearum. TRI3, TRI7, and TRI13 genes were the targets in designing chemotype-specific markers which are helpful in detecting the DON, 3-AcDON, 15-AcDON, and NIV chemotypes, as well as the TRI5 and TRI4 for the discriminating type A versus type B trichothecene producers [224,225,226,227,228]. Moreover, the zearalenone chemotype has been detected in F. culmorum and F. equiseti populations using PKS4 and PKS13 genes from the ZEA gene cluster [125, 229, 230]. Additionally, the fumonisin chemotype was identified based on FUM1 and FUM8 gene-based markers among F. verticillioides, F. anthophilum, F. fujikuroi, and F. proliferatum species [2, 7, 12, 102, 231]. The FRC O-1890 F. oxysporum strain has been used for the cloning and sequencing of the FUM gene cluster [9], although it is supposed to be the only strain of the species proven to produce fumonisins. Generally, F. oxysporum genotypes are regarded as able to produce fumonisins in low amounts [232, 233]; nevertheless, Stępień et al. [7] indicated that it was not possible to confirm the presence of FUM genes in any of the strains originating from natural F. oxysporum populations.
7 Conclusions
Fusarium genus appears to be very diverse, flexible, and dynamic group of fungi, able to grow and spread to new environments which includes infecting new hosts. Moreover, when climatic changes are taken into account, the population shifts and colonizing new areas become even more obvious. This unique ability depends often on the secondary metabolites produced by the fungi under specific conditions. Although the ecological roles of many of the SMs are still blurred or completely unknown, more and more researchers show their interest in revealing these issues. Apart from pure scientific curiosity, one has to keep in mind the possible use of the SMs in biotechnology, pharmacy, and medicine.
The SM biosynthetic gene clusters are an excellent model for evolutionary studies. Numerous reports on the divergence of the main pathways (e.g., trichothecenes, fumonisins, zearalenone) show that their history may be quite independent of the primary metabolic processes, implicating horizontal transfers, functional differentiations, and other rearrangements in adapting the microorganism to changing external conditions. Also, the discovery of new mycotoxin analogs is a proof for the dynamics that drives the Fusarium populations to develop and spread. Finally, the regulatory mechanisms of the SMs’ biosynthesis are becoming much clearer each year, improving our understanding of fungal biology and biochemistry, which is particularly important in the context of the host-pathogen interactions on genetic and molecular levels. All this aspects make the future research of fungal secondary metabolism even more exciting and promising.
Abbreviations
- AcDON:
-
Acetylated DON derivatives
- BEA:
-
Beauvericin
- bik :
-
Bikaverin biosynthetic gene cluster
- car:
-
Carotenoid biosynthetic gene cluster
- DAS:
-
Diacetoxyscirpenol
- DMATS:
-
Dimethylallyltryptophan synthase
- DON:
-
Deoxynivalenol
- ENN:
-
Enniatin
- eqx :
-
Equisetin biosynthetic gene cluster
- FA:
-
Fusaric acid
- FB:
-
Fumonisin B
- FESC:
-
F. equiseti species complex
- FFSC:
-
F. fujikuroi species complex
- FGSC:
-
F. graminearum species complex
- FOSC:
-
F. oxysporum species complex
- FPP:
-
Farnesyl pyrophosphate
- Fsr :
-
Fusarubin biosynthetic gene cluster
- FSSC:
-
F. solani species complex
- FUB :
-
Fusaric acid biosynthetic gene cluster
- FUM :
-
Fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster
- FUS :
-
Fusarin C biosynthetic gene cluster
- GA:
-
Gibberellins
- GGPP:
-
Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate
- MAPK:
-
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MON:
-
Moniliformin
- NIV:
-
Nivalenol
- NRPS:
-
Nonribosomal peptide synthetase
- PKS:
-
Polyketide synthase
- PM:
-
Primary metabolism
- SM:
-
Secondary metabolite
- TC:
-
Terpene cyclase
- TF:
-
Transcription factor
- TRI :
-
Trichothecene biosynthetic gene cluster
- ZEA:
-
Zearalenone
References
Desjardins AE (2006) Fusarium, mycotoxins, chemistry, genetics and biology. APS Press, St. Paul
Proctor RH, Plattner RD, Desjardins AE et al (2006) Fumonisin production in the maize pathogen Fusarium verticillioides: genetic basis of naturally occurring chemical variation. J Agric Food Chem 54:2424–2430
Stępień Ł (2014) The use of Fusarium secondary metabolite biosynthetic genes in chemotypic and phylogenetic studies. Crit Rev Microbiol 40:176–185
Proctor RH, Van Hove F, Susca A et al (2013) Birth, death and horizontal transfer of the fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster during the evolutionary diversification of Fusarium. Mol Microbiol 90:290–306
Koczyk G, Dawidziuk A, Popiel D (2015) The distant siblings – a phylogenomic roadmap illuminates the origins of extant diversity in fungal aromatic polyketide biosynthesis. Genome Biol Evol 7:3132–3154
Waalwijk C, van der Lee T, de Vries I et al (2004) Synteny in toxigenic Fusarium species: the fumonisin gene cluster and the mating type region as examples. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:533–544
Stępień Ł, Koczyk G, Waśkiewicz A (2011a) FUM cluster divergence in fumonisins-producing Fusarium species. Fungal Biol 115:112–123
Stępień Ł, Koczyk G, Waśkiewicz A (2013) Diversity of Fusarium species and mycotoxins contaminating pineapple. J Appl Genet 54:367–380
Proctor RH, Busman M, Seo J-A et al (2008) A fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster in Fusarium oxysporum strain O-1890 and the genetic basis for B versus C fumonisin production. Fungal Genet Biol 45:1016–1026
Scauflaire J, Gourgue M, Callebaut A, Munaut F (2012) Fusarium temperatum, a mycotoxin-producing pathogen of maize. Eur J Plant Pathol 133:911–922
Waśkiewicz A Stępień Ł (2012) Mycotoxins biosynthesized by plant-derived Fusarium isolates. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 63:437–444
Stępień Ł, Koczyk G, Waśkiewicz A (2011b) Genetic and phenotypic variation of Fusarium proliferatum isolates from different host species. J Appl Genet 52:487–496
Stępień Ł, Waśkiewicz A, Wilman K (2015) Host extract modulates metabolism and fumonisin biosynthesis by the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium proliferatum. Int J Food Microbiol 193:74–81
Leslie JF, Summerell BA (2006) The Fusarium laboratory manual. Blackwell Publishing, Ames
Aoki T, O’Donnell K, Geiser DM (2014) Systematics of key phytopathogenic Fusarium species: current status and future challenges. J Gen Plant Pathol 80:189–201
Watanabe M, Yonezawa T, Lee K et al (2011) Molecular phylogeny of the higher and lower taxonomy of the Fusarium genus and differences in the evolutionary histories of multiple genes. BMC Evol Biol 11:322
Munkvold GP (2017) Fusarium species and their associated mycotoxins. In: Moretti A, Susca A (eds) Mycotoxigenic fungi: methods and protocols. Springer, New York
Garcia-Romera I, Garcia-Garrido JM, Martin J et al (1998) Interactions between Saprotrophic Fusarium strains and arbuscular mycorrhizas of soybean plants. Symbiosis 24:235–246
Roncero MIG, Hera C, Ruiz-Rubio M et al (2003) Fusarium as a model for studying virulence in soilborne plant pathogens. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 62:87–98
Leplat J, Friberg H, Abid M et al (2013) Survival of Fusarium graminearum, the causal agent of Fusarium head blight. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:97
Dweba C, Figlan S, Shimelis H et al (2016) Fusarium head blight of wheat: pathogenesis and control strategies. Crop Prot 91:114–122
Dignani MC, Anaissie E (2004) Human fusariosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:67–75
Antonissen G, Martel A, Pasmans F et al (2014) The impact of Fusarium mycotoxins on human and animal host susceptibility to infectious diseases. Toxins 6:430–452
Bakker MG, Brown DW, Kelly AC et al (2018) Fusarium mycotoxins: a trans-disciplinary overview. Can J Plant Pathol 40:161–171
Yli-Mattila T, Paavanen-Huhtala S, Bulat SA et al (2002) Molecular, morphological and phylogenetic analysis of the Fusarium avenaceum/F. arthrosporioides/F. tricinctum species complex a polyphasic approach. Mycol Res 106:655–669
Cai L, Giraud T, Zhang N et al (2011) The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Divers 50:121–133
Choi H-W, Hong SK, Lee YK et al (2018) Taxonomy of Fusarium fujikuroi species complex associated with bakanae on rice in Korea. Australasian Plant Pathol 47:23–34
Šišić A, Baćanović-Šišić J, Al-Hatmi AMS et al (2018) The ‘forma specialis’ issue in Fusarium: a case study in Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi. Sci Rep 8:1252
Moretti ANM (2009) Taxonomy of Fusarium genus: a continuous fight between lumpers and splitters. Proc Nat Sci Matica Srpska Novi Sad 117:7–13
Aoki T, O’Donnell K (1999) Morphological and molecular characterization of Fusarium pseudograminearum sp.nov., formerly recognized as the group 1 population of F. graminearum. Mycologia 91:597–609
Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S et al (2000) Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 31:21–32
Marasas WF, Rheeder JP, Lamprecht SC et al (2001) Fusarium andiyazi sp.nov., a new species from sorghum. Mycologia 93:1203–1210
Zeller KA, Summerell BA, Bullock S, Leslie JF (2003) Gibberella konza (Fusarium konzum) sp.nov. from prairie grasses, a new species in the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 95:943–954
Kulik T (2008) Detection of Fusarium tricinctum from cereal grain using PCR assay. J Appl Genet 49:305–311
Jurado M, Marin P, Callejas C et al (2010) Genetic variability and fumonisin production by Fusarium proliferatum. Food Microbiol 27:50–57
O’Donnell K, Ward TJ, Geiser DM et al (2004) Genealogical concordance between the mating type locus and seven other nuclear genes supports formal recognition of nine phylogenetically distinct species within the Fusarium graminearum clade. Fungal Genet Biol 41:600–623
Summerell BA, Leslie JF (2011) Fifty years of Fusarium: how could nine species have ever been enough? Fungal Divers 50:135–144
O’Donnell K, Nirenberg HI, Aoki T, Cigelnik E (2000) A multigene phylogeny of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: detection of additional phylogenetically distinct species. Mycoscience 41:61–78
Mule G, Gonzalez-Jaen MT, Hornok L et al (2005) Advances in molecular diagnosis of toxigenic Fusarium species: a review. Food Addit Contam 22:316–323
Waalwijk C, de Koning JRA, Baayen RP, Gams W (1996) Discordant groupings of Fusarium spp. from sections Elegans, Liseola and Dlaminia based on ribosomal ITS1 and ITS2 sequences. Mycologia 88:361–368
O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:103–116
Yli-Mattila T, Gagkaeva T (2010) Molecular chemotyping of Fusarium gramineaum, F. culmorum and F. cerealis isolates from Finland and Russia. In: Gherbawy Y, Voigt K (eds) Molecular identification of fungi. Springer, Berlin
O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E, Nirenberg HI (1998) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90:465–493
Wulff EG, Sørensen JS, Lübeck M et al (2010) Fusarium spp. associated with rice Bakanae: ecology, genetic diversity, pathogenicity and toxigenicity. Environ Microbiol 12:649–657
Stępień Ł, Waśkiewicz A, Urbaniak M (2016) Wildly growing asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) hosts pathogenic Fusarium species and accumulates their mycotoxins. Microbial Ecol 71:927–937
Gräfenhan T, Schroers H-J, Nirenberg HI, Seifert KA (2011) An overview of the taxonomy, phylogeny, and typification of nectriaceous fungi in Cosmospora, Acremonium, Fusarium, Stilbella, and Volutella. Stud Mycol 68:79–113
Sampietro DA, Marín P, Iglesias J et al (2010) A molecular based strategy for rapid diagnosis of toxigenic Fusarium species associated to cereal grains from Argentina. Fungal Biol 114:74–81
Geiser DM, del Mar J-GM, Kang S et al (2004) FUSARIUM ID v.1.0: a DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:473–479
O’Donnell K, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG et al (2010) An Internet-accessible DNA sequence database for identifying fusaria from human and animal infections. J Clin Microbiol 48:3708–3718
O’Donnell K, Ward TJ, Robert VARG et al (2015) DNA sequence-based identification of Fusarium: current status and future directions. Phytoparasitica 43:583–595
Waalwijk C, Taga M, Zheng S-L et al (2018) Karyotype evolution in Fusarium. Ima Fungus 9:13–26
O’Donnell K, Rooney AP, Proctor RH et al (2013) Phylogenetic analyses of RPB1 and RPB2 support a middle Cretaceous origin for a clade comprising all agriculturally and medically important fusaria. Fungal Genet Biol 52:20–31
Laurence MH, Summerell BA, Burgess LW, Liew ECY (2011) Fusarium burgessii sp.nov. representing a novel lineage in the genus Fusarium. Fungal Divers 49:101–112
Zhou X, O’Donnell K, Aoki T et al (2016) Two novel Fusarium species that cause canker disease of prickly ash (Zanthoxylum bungeanum) in northern China form a novel clade with Fusarium torreyae. Mycologia 108:668–681
Hansen FT, Gardiner DM, Lysøe E et al (2015) An update to polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal synthetase genes and nomenclature in Fusarium. Fungal Genet Biol 75:20–29
Brown DW, Proctor RH (2016) Insights into natural products biosynthesis from analysis of 490 polyketide synthases from Fusarium. Fungal Genet Biol 89:37–51
Kim H-S, Proctor RH, Brown DW (2017) Comparative genomic analyses of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in 207 isolates of Fusarium. In: 29th fungal genetics conference. Genetics Society of America, Pacific Grove
Pestka JJ (2010) Deoxynivalenol: mechanisms of action, human exposure, and toxicological relevance. Arch Toxicol 84:663–679
Susca A, Moretti A, Logrieco AF (2017) Mycotoxin biosynthetic pathways: a window on the evolutionary relationships among toxigenic fungi. In: Varma A, Sharma A (eds) Modern tools and techniques to understand microbes. Springer, Cham
Bertero A, Spicer LJ, Caloni F (2018) Fusarium mycotoxins and in vitro species-specific approach with porcine intestinal and brain in vitro barriers: a review. Food Chem Toxicol 121:666–675
Proctor RH, Hohn TM, McCormick SP (1995) Reduced virulence of Gibberella zeae caused by disruption of a trichothecene toxin biosynthetic gene. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 8:593–601
Wiemann P, Sieber CMK, von Bargen KW et al (2013) Deciphering the cryptic genome: genome-wide analyses of the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi reveal complex regulation of secondary metabolism and novel metabolites. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003475
Niehaus EM, Munsterkotter M, Proctor RH et al (2016) Comparative “omics” of the Fusarium fujikuroi species complex highlights differences in genetic potential and metabolite synthesis. Genome Biol Evol 8:3574–3599
Ma L-J, Geiser DM, Proctor RH et al (2013) Fusarium pathogenomics. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:399–416
Zhang Y, Ma L-J (2017) Deciphering pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum from a phylogenomics perspective. Adv Genet 100:179–209
Ma L-J, van der Does HC, Borkovich KA et al (2010) Comparative genomics reveals mobile pathogenicity chromosomes in Fusarium. Nature 464:367–373
Vesonder RF, Goliński P (1989) Metabolites of Fusarium. In: Chełkowski J (ed) Fusarium mycotoxins: taxonomy and pathogenicity. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Cole RJ, Schweikert MA (2003) Handbook of secondary fungal metabolites, vol I. Academic, San Diego
Hansen FT, Sørensen JL, Giese H et al (2012) Quick guide to polyketide synthase and nonribosomal synthetase genes in Fusarium. Int J Food Microbiol 155:128–136
Proctor RH, Butchko RAE, Brown DW, Moretti A (2007) Functional characterization, sequence comparisons and distribution of a polyketide synthase gene required for perithecial pigmentation in some Fusarium species. Food Addit Contam 24:1076–1087
Studt L, Wiemann P, Kleigrewe K et al (2012) Biosynthesis of fusarubins accounts for pigmentation of Fusarium fujikuroi perithecia. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4468–4480
Proctor RH, Plattner RD, Brown DW et al (2004) Discontinuous distribution of fumonisin biosynthetic genes in the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycol Res 108:815–822
Bömke C, Tudzynski B (2009) Diversity, regulation, and evolution of the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway in fungi compared to plants and bacteria. Phytochemistry 70:1876–1893
Kimura M, Tokai T, Takahashi-Ando N et al (2007) Molecular and genetic studies of Fusarium trichothecene biosynthesis: pathways, genes and evolution. Biosci Biotech Biochem 71:2105–2123
McCormick SP, Stanley AM, Stover NA, Alexander NJ (2011) Trichothecenes from simple to complex mycotoxins. Toxins 3:802–814
Merhey J, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C (2011) Regulation of trichothecene biosynthesis in fusarium recent advances and new insights. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:519–528
Varga E, Wiesenberger G, Hametner C et al (2015) New tricks of an old enemy: isolates of Fusarium graminearum produce a type A trichothecene mycotoxin. Environ Microbiol 17:2588–2600
Kelly AC, Proctor RH, Belzile F et al (2016) The geographic distribution and complex evolutionary history of the NX-2 trichothecene chemotype from Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol 95:39–48
Strub C, Pocaznoi D, Lebrihi A et al (2010) Influence of barley matling operating parameters on T-2 and HT-2 toxinogenesis of Fusarium langsethiae, a worrying contaminant of malting barley in Europe. Food Addit Contam 27:1247–1252
Alexander NJ, Proctor RH, McCormick SP (2009) Genes, gene clusters, and biosynthesis of trichothecenes and fumonisins in Fusarium. Toxin Rev 28:198–215
Rocha O, Ansari K, Doohan FM (2005) Effects of trichothecene mycotoxins on eukaryotic cells: a review. Food Addit Contam 22:369–378
Goswami RS, Kistler HC (2005) Pathogenicity and in planta mycotoxin accumulation among members of the Fusarium graminearum species complex on wheat and rice. Phytopathology 95:1397–1404
Boenisch MJ, Schӓfer W (2011) Fusarium graminearum forms mycotoxin producing infection structures on wheat. BMC Plant Biol 11:110
Brown DW, McCormick SP, Alexander NJ et al (2001) A genetic and biochemical approach to study trichothecene diversity in Fusarium sporotrichioides and Fusarium graminearum. Fungal Genet Biol 32:121–133
Brown DW, McCormick SP, Alexander NJ et al (2002) Inactivation of a cytochrome P-450 is a determinant of trichothecene diversity in Fusarium species. Fungal Genet Biol 36:224–233
Lee T, Han Y-K, Kim K-H et al (2002) Tri13 and Tri7 determine deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-producing chemotypes of Gibberella zeae. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2148–2154
Ward TJ, Bielawski JP, Kistler HC et al (2002) Ancestral polymorphism and adaptive evolution in the trichothecene mycotoxin gene cluster of phytopathogenic Fusarium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9278–9283
McCormick SP, Alexander NJ, Trapp SC, Hohn TM (1999) Disruption of TRI101, the gene encoding trichothecene 3-O-acetyltransferase, from Fusarium sporotrichioides. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5252–5256
Brown DW, Proctor RH, Dyer RB, Plattner RD (2003) Characterization of a Fusarium 2-gene cluster involved in trichothecene C-8 modification. J Agric Food Chem 51:7936–7944
Meek IB, Peplow AW, Ake C et al (2003) Tri1 encodes the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase for C-8 hydroxylation during trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium sporotrichioides and resides upstream of another new Tri gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1607–1613
O’Donnell K, Sutton DA, Rinaldi MG et al (2009) A novel multi-locus sequence typing scheme reveals high genetic diversity of human pathogenic members of the Fusarium incarnatum-F. equiseti and F. chlamydosporum species complexes within the US. J Clin Microbiol 47:3851–3861
Proctor RH, McCormick SP, Alexander NJ, Desjardins AE (2009) Evidence that a secondary metabolic biosynthetic gene cluster has grown by gene relocation during evolution of the filamentous fungus Fusarium. Mol Microbiol 74:1128–1142
Seong KY, Pasquali M, Zhou X et al (2009) Global gene regulation by Fusarium transcription factors Tri6 and Tri10 reveals adaptations for toxin biosynthesis. Mol Microbiol 72:354–367
Achilladelis B, Hanson JR (1968) Studies in terpenoid biosynthesis I. The biosynthesis of metabolites of Trichothecium roseum. Phytochemistry 7:589–594
Grünler J, Ericsson J, Dallner G (1994) Branch-point reactions in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, dolichol, ubiquinone and prenylated proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1212:259–277
Hohn TM, Beremand PD (1989) Isolation and nucleotide sequence of a sesquiterpene cyclase gene from the trichothecene-producing fungus Fusarium sporotrichioides. Gene 79:131–138
McCormick SP, Alexander NJ (2002) Fusarium Tri8 encodes a trichothecene C-3 esterase. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2959–2964
Alexander NJ, McCormick SP, Waalwijk C et al (2011) The genetic basis for 3-ADON and 15-ADON trichothecene chemotypes in Fusarium. Fungal Genet Biol 48:485–495
McCormick SP, Harris LJ, Alexander NJ et al (2004) Tri1 in Fusarium graminearum encodes a P450 oxygenase. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:2044–2051
Stockmann-Juvala H, Savolainen K (2008) A review of the toxic effects and mechanisms of action of fumonisin B1. Human Exp Toxicol 27:799–809
Glenn AE, Zitomer NC, Zimeri AM et al (2008) Transformation-mediated complementation of a FUM gene cluster deletion in Fusarium verticillioides restores both fumonisin production and pathogenicity on maize seedlings. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:87–97
Zhang L, Wang J, Zhang C, Wang Q (2012) Analysis of potential fumonisin-producing Fusarium species in corn products from three main maize-producing areas in eastern China. J Sci Food Agric 93:693–701
Proctor RH, Brown DW, Plattner RD, Desjardins AE (2003) Co-expression of 15 contiguous genes delineates a fumonisin biosynthetic gene cluster in Gibberella moniliformis. Fungal Genet Biol 38:237–249
Ahangarkani F, Rouhi S, Azizi IG (2014) A review on incidence and toxicity of fumonisins. Toxin Rev 33:95–100
Bezuidenhout SC, Gelderblom WCA, Gorst-Allman CP et al (1988) Structure elucidation of the fumonisins, mycotoxins from Fusarium moniliforme. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 11:743–745
Laurent D, Platzer N, Kohler F et al (1989) Macrofusine et micromoniline: duex nouvelles mycotoxines isolées de maïs infesté par Fusarium moniliforme. Microbiol Alim Nutr 7:9–16
Domijan AM (2012) Fumonisin B1: a neurotoxic mycotoxin. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 63:531–544
Brown DW, Butchko RA, Busman M, Proctor RH (2007) The Fusarium verticillioides FUM gene cluster encodes a Zn(II)2Cys6 protein that affects FUM gene expression and fumonisin production. Eukaryot Cell 6:1210–1218
Van Hove F, Waalwijk C, Logrieco A et al (2011) Gibberella musae (Fusarium musae) sp.nov.: a new species from banana is sister to F. verticillioides. Mycologia 103:570–585
Gerber R, Lou L, Du L (2009) A PLP-dependent polyketide chain releasing mechanism in the biosynthesis of mycotoxin fumonisins in Fusarium verticillioides. J Am Chem Soc 131:3148–3149
Seo J-A, Proctor RH, Plattner RD (2001) Characterization of four clustered and coregulated genes associated with fumonisin biosynthesis in Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genet Biol 34:155–165
Du L, Zhu X, Gerber R, Huffman J et al (2008) Biosynthesis of sphinganine-analog mycotoxins. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:455–464
Bojja RS, Cerny RL, Proctor RH, Du L (2004) Determining the biosynthetic sequence in the early steps of the fumonisin pathway by use of three gene-disruption mutants of Fusarium verticillioides. J Agric Food Chem 52:2855–2860
Butchko RAE, Plattner RD, Proctor RH (2003b) FUM9 is required for C-5 hydroxylation of fumonisins and complements the meiotically defined Fum3 locus in Gibberella moniliformis. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6935–6937
Zaleta-Rivera K, Xu C, Yu F et al (2006) A bi-domain non-ribosomal peptide synthetase encoded by FUM14 catalyzes the formation of tricarballylic esters in the biosynthesis of fumonisins. Biochemistry 45:2561–2569
Butchko RAE, Plattner RD, Proctor RH (2003a) FUM13 encodes a short chain dehydrogenase/reductase required for C-3 carbonyl reduction during fumonisin biosynthesis in Gibberella moniliformis. J Agric Food Chem 51:3000–3006
Ding Y, Bojja RS, Du L (2004) Fum3p, a 2-ketoglutarate- dependent dioxygenase required for C-5 hydroxylation of fumonisins in Fusarium verticillioides. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1931–1934
Carbone I, Ramirez-Prado JH, Jakobek JL, Horn BW (2007) Gene duplication, modularity and adaptation in the evolution of the aflatoxin gene cluster. BMC Evol Biol 7:111
Khaldi N, Collemare J, Lebrun M-H, Wolf KH (2008) Evidence for horizontal transfer of a secondary metabolite gene cluster between fungi. Genome Biol 9:R18.1–R18.10
Khaldi N, Wolfe KH (2011) Evolutionary origins of the fumonisin secondary metabolite gene cluster in Fusarium verticillioides and Aspergillus niger. Int J Evol Biol 2011:423821
Slot JC, Rokas A (2011) Horizontal transfer of a large and highly toxic secondary metabolic gene cluster between fungi. Curr Biol 21:134–139
Urry WH, Wehrmeister HL, Hodge EB, Hidy PH (1966) The structure of zearalenone. Tetrahedron Lett 7:3109–3114
Lysøe E, Bone KR, Klemsdal SS (2008) Identification of up-regulated genes during zearalenone biosynthesis in Fusarium. Eur J Plant Pathol 122:505–516
Vesonder RF, Goliński P, Plattner R, Zietkiewicz DL (1991) Mycotoxin formation by different geographic isolates of Fusarium crookwellense. Mycopathologia 113:11
Stępień Ł, Gromadzka K, Chełkowski J (2012) Polymorphism of mycotoxin biosynthetic genes among Fusarium equiseti isolates from Italy and Poland. J Appl Genet 53:227–236
Hagler WM, Dankó G, Horváth L et al (1980) Transmission of zearalenone and its metabolite into ruminant milk. Acta Vet Acad Sci Hung 28:209–216
Gaffoor I, Trail F (2006) Characterization of two polyketide synthase genes involved in zearalenone biosynthesis in Gibberella zeae. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1793–1799
Ivanova L, Skjerve E, Eriksen GS, Uhlig S (2006) Cytotoxicity of enniatins A, A1, B, B1, B2 and B3 from Fusarium avenaceum. Toxicon 47:868–876
Liuzzi VC, Mirabelli V, Cimmarusti MT et al (2017) Enniatin and beauvericin biosynthesis in Fusarium species: production profiles and structural determinant prediction. Toxins 9:45
Stępień Ł, Waśkiewicz A (2013) Sequence divergence of the enniatin synthase gene in relation to production of beauvericin and enniatins in Fusarium species. Toxins 5:537–555
Xu Y, Zhan J, Wijeratne EM et al (2007) Cytotoxic and antihaptotactic beauvericin analogues from precursor-directed biosynthesis with the insect pathogen Beauveria bassiana ATCC 7159. J Nat Prod 70:1467–1471
Nilanonta C, Isaka M, Kittakoop P et al (2002) Precursor-directed biosynthesis of beauvericin analogs by the insect pathogenic fungus BCC 1614. Tetrahedron 58:3355–3360
Shin CG, An DG, Song HH, Lee C (2009) Beauvericin and enniatins H, I and MK1688 are new potent inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 integrase. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 62:687–690
Dornetshuber R, Heffeter P, Kamyar MR et al (2007) Enniatin exerts p53-dependent cytostatic and p53-independent cytotoxic activities against human cancer cells. Chem Res Toxicol 20:465–473
Wätjen W, Debbab A, Hohlfeld A et al (2009) Enniatins A1, B and B1 from an endophytic strain of Fusarium tricinctum induce apoptotic cell death in H4IIE hepatoma cells accompanied by inhibition of ERK phosphorylation. Mol Nutr Food Res 53:431–440
Kamyar M, Rawnduzi P, Studenik CR et al (2004) Investigation of the electrophysiological properties of enniatins. Arch Biochem Biophys 429:215–223
Nilanonta C, Isaka M, Kittakoop P et al (2000) Antimycobacterial and antiplasmodial cyclodepsipeptides from the insect pathogenic fungus Paecilomyces tenuipes BCC 1614. Planta Med 66:756–758
Supothina S, Isaka M, Kirtikara K et al (2004) Enniatin production by the entomopathogenic fungus Verticillium hemipterigenum BCC 1449. J Antibiot 57:732–738
Hiraga K, Yamamoto S, Fakuda H et al (2005) Enniatin has a new function as an inhibitor of Pdr-5p one of the ABC transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 328:1119–1125
Xu LJ, Liu YS, Zhou LG, Wu JY (2009) Enhanced beauvericin production with in situ adsorption in mycelial liquid culture of Fusarium redolens Dzf2. Process Biochem 44:1063–1067
Kroslak M (2002) Efficacy, and acceptability of fusafungine, a local treatment for both nose and throat infections, in adult patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Curr Med Res Opin 18:194–200
Gaumann E, Naef-Roth S, Kern H (1960) Zurphytotoxischen wirksamkeit der enniatine. J Phytopathol 40:45–51
Uhlig S, Jestoi M, Parikka P (2007) Fusarium avenaceum – the North European situation. Int J Food Microbiol 119:17–24
Jestoi M (2008) Emerging Fusarium-Mycotoxins fusaproliferin, beauvericin, enniatins, and moniliformin – a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48:21–49
Steinrauf LK (1985) Beauvericin and the other enniatins. Met Ions Biol Syst 19:139–171
Hamill RL, Higgens CE, Boaz ME, Gorman M (1969) The structure of beauvericin, a new depsipeptide antibiotic toxic to Artemia salina. Tetrahedron Lett 10:4255–4258
Zhang L, Yan K, Zhang Y et al (2007) High-throughput synergy screening identifies microbial metabolites as combination agents for the treatment of fungal infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:4606–4611
Jow GM, Chou CJ, Chen BF, Tsai JH (2004) Beauvericin induces cytotoxic effects in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells through cytochrome c release, caspase 3 activation: the causative role of calcium. Cancer Lett 216:165–173
Sivanathan S, Scherkenbeck J (2014) Cyclodepsipeptides: a rich source of biologically active compounds for drug research. Molecules 19:12368–12420
Xu Y, Orozco R, Wijeratne EM et al (2008) Biosynthesis of the cyclooligomer depsipeptide beauvericin, a virulence factor of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Chem Biol 15:898–907
Bushley KE, Turgeon BG (2010) Phylogenomics reveals subfamilies of fungal nonribosomal peptide synthetases and their evolutionary relationships. BMC Evol Biol 10:26
Zhang T, Zhuo Y, Jia X et al (2013) Cloning and characterization of the gene cluster required for beauvericin biosynthesis in Fusarium proliferatum. Science China Life Sci 56:628–637
Zocher R, Keller U, Kleinkauf H (1982) Enniatin synthetase, a novel type of multifunctional enzyme catalyzing depsipeptide synthesis in Fusarium oxysporum. Biochemistry 21:43–48
Zocher R, Keller U, Kleinkauf H (1983) Mechanism of depsipeptide formation catalyzed by enniatin synthetase. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 110:292–299
Zocher R, Keller U (1997) Thiol template peptide synthesis systems in bacteria and fungi. Adv Microbial Physiol 38:85–131
Billich A, Zocher R (1987) N-Methyltransferase function of the multifunctional enzyme enniatin synthetase. Biochemistry 26:8417–8423
Glinski M, Urbanke C, Hornbogen T, Zocher R (2002) Enniatin synthetase is a monomer with extended structure: evidence for an intramolecular reaction mechanism. Arch Microbiol 178:267–273
Hornbogen T, Glinski M, Zocher R (2002) Biosynthesis of depsipeptide mycotoxins in Fusarium. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:713
Matthes D, Richter L, Müller J et al (2012) In vitro chemoenzymatic and in vivo biocatalytic synthesis of new beauvericin analogues. Chem Comm 48:5674–5676
Peeters H, Zocher R, Madry N et al (1983) Cell-free synthesis of the depsipeptide beauvericin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 36:1762–1766
Peeters H, Zocher R, Kleinkauf H (1988) Synthesis of beauvericin by a multifunctional enzyme. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 41:352–359
Chełkowski J, Ritieni A, Wiśniewska H et al (2007) Occurrence of toxic hexadepsipeptides in preharvest maize ear rot infected by Fusarium poae in Poland. J Phytopathol 155:8–12
Kulik T, Pszczółkowska A, Fordoński G, Olszewski J (2007) PCR approach based on the esyn1 gene for the detection of potential enniatin-producing Fusarium species. Int J Food Microbiol 116:319–324
Logrieco A, Rizzo A, Ferracane R, Ritieni A (2002) Occurrence of beauvericin and enniatins in wheat affected by Fusarium avenaceum head blight. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:82–85
Jestoi M, Rokka M, Yli-Mattila T et al (2004) Presence and concentrations of the Fusarium-related mycotoxins beauvericin, enniatins and moniliformin in Finnish grain samples. Food Addit Contam 21:794–802
Bacon CW, Porter JK, Norred WP, Leslie JF (1996) Production of fusaric acid by Fusarium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4039–4043
Niehaus E-M, Díaz-Sánchez V, von Bargen KW et al (2014a) Fusarins and fusaric acid in Fusaria. In: Biosynthesis and molecular genetics of fungal secondary metabolites. Springer, New York, pp 239–262
Singh VK, Singh HB, Upadhyay RS (2017) Role of fusaric acid in the development of “Fusarium wilt” symptoms in tomato: physiological, biochemical and proteomic perspectives. Plant Physiol Biochem 118:320–332
May HD, Wu Q, Blake CK (2000) Effects of the Fusarium spp. mycotoxins fusaric acid and deoxynivalenol on the growth of Ruminococcus albus and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium. Can J Microbiol 46:692–699
Tung TT, Jakobsen TH, Dao TT et al (2017) Fusaric acid and analogues as Gram-negative bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors. Eur J Medicinal Chem 126:1011–1020
Brown DW, Butchko RAE, Busman M, Proctor RH (2012) Identification of gene clusters associated with fusaric acid, fusarin, and perithecial pigment production in Fusarium verticillioides. Fungal Genet Biol 49:521–532
Brown DW, Lee SH, Kim LH et al (2015) Identification of a 12-gene fusaric acid biosynthetic gene cluster in Fusarium species through comparative and functional genomics. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 28:319–332
Studt L, Janevska S, Niehaus E-M et al (2016) Two separate key enzymes and two pathway-specific transcription factors are involved in fusaric acid biosynthesis in Fusarium fujikuroi. Environ Microbiol 18:936–956
Niehaus E-M, von Bargen KW, Espino JJ et al (2014) Characterization of the fusaric acid gene cluster in Fusarium fujikuroi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:1749–1762
Michielse CB, Studt L, Janevska S et al (2015) The global regulator FfSge1 is required for expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters but not for pathogenicity in Fusarium fujikuroi. Environ Microbiol 17:2690–2708
López-Díaz C, Rahjoo V, Sulyok M et al (2017) Fusaric acid contributes to virulence of Fusarium oxysporum on plant and mammalian hosts. Mol Plant Pathol 19:440–453
Pfannmüller A, Leufken J, Studt L et al (2017) Comparative transcriptome and proteome analysis reveals a global impact of the nitrogen regulators AreA and AreB on secondary metabolism in Fusarium fujikuroi. PLoS One 12:e0176194
Michielse CB, van Wijk R, Reijnen L et al (2009) The nuclear protein Sge1 of Fusarium oxysporum is required for parasitic growth. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000637
Hou X, An B, Wang Q et al (2018) SGE1 is involved in conidiation and pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense. Can J Microbiol 64:349–357
Janevska S, Tudzynski B (2017) Secondary metabolism in Fusarium fujikuroi: strategies to unravel the function of biosynthetic pathways. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:615–630
Wiemann P, Brown DW, Kleigrewe K et al (2010) FfVel1 and FfLae1, components of a velvet-like complex in Fusarium fujikuroi, affect differentiation, secondary metabolism and virulence. Mol Microbiol 77:972–994
Niehaus E-M, Kleigrewe K, Wiemann P et al (2013) Genetic manipulation of the Fusarium fujikuroi fusarin gene cluster yields insight into the complex regulation and fusarin biosynthetic pathway. Chem Biol 20:1055–1066
Studt L, Humpf H-U, Tudzynski B (2013) Signaling governed by G proteins and cAMP is crucial for growth, secondary metabolism and sexual development in Fusarium fujikuroi. PLoS One 8:e58185
Wiebe LA, Bjeldanes LF (1981) Fusarin C, a mutagen from Fusarium moniliforme grown on corn. J Food Sci 46:1424–1426
Song Z, Cox RJ, Lazarus CM, Simpson TJ (2004) Fusarin C biosynthesis in Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium venenatum. Chembiochem 5:1196–1203
Han Z, Tangni EK, Huybrechts B et al (2014) Screening survey of co-production of fusaric acid, fusarin C, and fumonisins B1, B2 and B3 by Fusarium strains grown in maize grains. Mycotox Res 30:231–240
Jaskiewicz K, van Rensburg SJ, Marasas WFO et al (1987) Carcinogenicity of Fusarium moniliforme culture material in rats. J Nat Cancer Inst 78:321–325
Sondergaard TE, Hansen FT, Purup S et al (2011) Fusarin C acts like an estrogenic agonist and stimulates breast cancer cells in vitro. Toxicol Lett 205:116–121
Bever RJ Jr, Couch LH, Sutherland JB et al (2000) DNA adduct formation by Fusarium culture extracts: lack of role of fusarin C. Chemico-Biol Interact 128:141–157
Steyn PS, Vleggaar R (1985) Mechanistic studies on the biosynthesis of the aurovertins using 18O-labelled precursors. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 24:1796–1798
Cole RJ, Kirksey JW, Cutler HG et al (1973) Toxin from Fusarium moniliforme: effects on plants and animals. Science 179:1324–1326
Schütt F, Nirenberg HI, Deml G (1998) Moniliformin production in the genus Fusarium. Mycotox Res 14:35–40
Fotso J, Leslie JF, Smith JS (2002) Production of beauvericin, moniliformin, fusaproliferin and fumonisins B1, B2 and B3 by fifteen ex-type strains of Fusarium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5195–5197
Franck B, Breipohl G (1984) Biosynthesis of moniliformin, a fungal toxin with cyclobutanedione structure. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 23:996–998
Trisuwan K, Khamthong N, Rukachaisirikul V et al (2010) Anthraquinone, cyclopentanone, and naphthoquinone derivatives from the sea fan-derived fungi Fusarium spp. PSU-F14 and PSU-F135. J Nat Prod 73:1507–1511
Linnemannstöns P, Prado M, Fernández-Martín R et al (2002) A carotenoid biosynthesis gene cluster in Fusarium fujikuroi: the genes carB and carRA. Mol Genet Genomics 267:593–602
Avalos J, Pardo-Medina J, Parra-Rivero O et al (2017) Carotenoid biosynthesis in Fusarium. J Fungi 3:39
Wiemann P, Willmann A, Straeten M et al (2009) Biosynthesis of the red pigment bikaverin in Fusarium fujikuroi: genes, their function and regulation. Mol Microbiol 72:931–946
Arndt B, Studt L, Wiemann P et al (2015) Genetic engineering, high resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy elucidate the bikaverin biosynthetic pathway in Fusarium fujikuroi. Fungal Genet Biol 84:26–36
Sondergaard T, Fredborg M, Oppenhagen Christensen A-M et al (2016) Fast screening of antibacterial compounds from Fusaria. Toxins 8:355
Baker RA, Tatum JH, Nemec S (1990) Antimicrobial activity of naphthoquinones from Fusaria. Mycopathologia 111:9–15
Kumar KP, Javvaji K, Poornachandra Y et al (2017) Antimicrobial, anti-plasmodial and cytotoxicity properties of bioactive compounds from Fusarium sp. USNPF102. J Microbiol Res 7:23–30
Lysøe E, Harris LJ, Walkowiak S et al (2014) The genome of the generalist plant pathogen Fusarium avenaceum is enriched with genes involved in redox, signaling and secondary metabolism. PLoS One 9:e112703
Goliński P, Wnuk S, Chełkowski J et al (1986) Antibiotic Y: biosynthesis by Fusarium avenaceum (Corda ex Fries) Sacc., isolation, and some physicochemical and biological properties. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:743–745
Goliński P, Wnuk S, Chełkowski J, Schollenberger M (1987) Formation of avenacein Y by Fusarium avenaceum Fries Sacc. isolates from Poland and biological properties of the compound. Mycotox Res 3(S1):49–52
Ratnaweera PB, de Silva ED, Williams DE, Andersen RJ (2015) Antimicrobial activities of endophytic fungi obtained from the arid zone invasive plant Opuntia dillenii and the isolation of equisetin, from endophytic Fusarium sp. BMC Complement Altern Med 15:220
Wheeler MH, Stipanovic RD, Puckhaber LS (1999) Phytotoxicity of equisetin and epi-equisetin isolated from Fusarium equiseti and F. pallidoroseum. Mycol Res 103:967–973
Singh SB, Zink DL, Goetz MA et al (1998) Equisetin and a novel opposite stereochemical homolog phomasetin, two fungal metabolites as inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase. Tetrahedron Lett 39:2243–2246
Hazuda D, Blau CU, Felock P et al (1999) Isolation and characterization of novel human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitors from fungal metabolites. Antivir Chem Chemother 10:63–70
Sims JW, Fillmore JP, Warner DD, Schmidt EW (2005) Equisetin biosynthesis in Fusarium heterosporum. Chem Comm 2:186
Fisch KM (2013) Biosynthesis of natural products by microbial iterative hybrid PKS–NRPS. RSC Adv 3:18228–18247
Kakule TB, Sardar D, Lin Z, Schmidt EW (2013) Two related pyrrolidinedione synthetase loci in Fusarium heterosporum ATCC 74349 produce divergent metabolites. ACS Chem Biol 8:1549–1557
Kato N, Nogawa T, Hirota H et al (2015) A new enzyme involved in the control of the stereochemistry in the decalin formation during equisetin biosynthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 460:210–215
Salazar-Cerezo S, Martínez-Montiel N, García-Sánchez J et al (2018) Gibberellin biosynthesis and metabolism: a convergent route for plants, fungi and bacteria. Microbiol Res 208:85–98
Tudzynski B, Holter K (1998) Gibberellin biosynthetic pathway in Gibberella fujikuroi: evidence for a gene cluster. Fungal Genet Biol 25:157–170
Tudzynski B, Mihlan M, Rojas MC et al (2003) Characterization of the final two genes of the gibberellin biosynthesis gene cluster of Gibberella fujikuroi: des and P450-3 encode GA4 desaturase and the 13-hydroxylase, respectively. J Biol Chem 278:28635–28643
Gale LR, Ward TJ, Balmas V, Kistler HC (2007) Population subdivision of Fusarium graminearum sensu stricto in the upper Midwestern United States. Phytopathology 97:1434–1439
Ward TJ, Clear RM, Rooney AP et al (2008) An adaptive evolutionary shift in Fusarium head blight pathogen populations is driving the rapid spread of more toxigenic Fusarium graminearum in North America. Fungal Genet Biol 45:473–484
Gale LR, Harrison SA, Ward TJ et al (2011) Nivalenol-type populations of Fusarium graminearum and F. asiaticum are prevalent on wheat in southern Louisiana. Phytopathology 101:124–134
Bec S, Ward TJ, Farman M et al (2014) Characterization of Fusarium strains recovered from wheat with symptoms of head blight in Kentucky. Plant Dis 99:1622–1632
Liang JM, Xayamongkhon H, Broz K et al (2014) Temporal dynamics and population genetic structure of Fusarium graminearum in the upper Midwestern United States. Fungal Genet Biol 73:83–92
Kelly AC, Clear RM, O’Donnell K et al (2015) Diversity of Fusarium head blight populations and trichothecene toxin types reveals regional differences in pathogen composition and temporal dynamics. Fungal Genet Biol 82:22–31
Liang J, Lofgren L, Ma Z et al (2015) Population subdivision of Fusarium graminearum from barley and wheat in the upper Midwestern United States at the turn of the century. Phytopathology 105:1466–1474
Niessen L, Vogel RF (1998) Group specific PCR-detection of potential trichothecene-producing Fusarium species in pure cultures and cereal samples. System Appl Microbiol 21:618–631
Bakan B, Giraud-Delville C, Pinson L et al (2002) Identification by PCR of Fusarium culmorum strains producing large and small amounts of deoxynivalenol. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5472–5479
Nicholson P, Simpson DR, Wilson AH et al (2004) Detection and differentiation of trichothecene and enniatin-producing Fusarium species on small-grain cereals. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:503–514
Niessen L, Schmidt H, Vogel RF (2004) The use of tri5 gene sequences for PCR detection and taxonomy of trichothecene-producing species in the Fusarium section Sporotrichiella. Int J Food Microbiol 95:305–319
Quarta A, Mita G, Haidukowski M et al (2005) Assessment of trichothecene chemotypes of Fusarium culmorum occurring in Europe. Food Addit Contamin 22:309–315
Kim Y-T, Lee Y-R, Jin J et al (2005) Two different polyketide synthase genes are required for synthesis of zearalenone in Gibberella zeae. Mol Microbiol 58:1102–1113
Baturo-Cieśniewska A, Suchorzyńska M (2011) Verification of the effectiveness of SCAR (sequence characterized amplified region) primers for the identification of Polish strains of Fusarium culmorum and their potential ability to produce B-trichothecenes and zearalenone. Int J Food Microbiol 148:168–176
González-Jaén T, Mirete S, Patiño B et al (2004) Genetic markers for the analysis of variability and for production of specific diagnostic sequences in fumonisin-producing strains of Fusarium verticillioides. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:525–532
Waśkiewicz A, Irzykowska L, Karolewski Z et al (2009) Mycotoxins biosynthesis by Fusarium oxysporum and F. proliferatum isolates of asparagus origin. J Plant Protect Res 49:369–372
Irzykowska L, Bocianowski J, Waśkiewicz A et al (2012) Genetic variation of Fusarium oxysporum isolates forming fumonisin B1 and moniliformin. J Appl Genet 53:237–247
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Polish National Science Centre grants: 2014/15/B/NZ9/01544 and 2015/17/B/NZ9/03577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Stępień, Ł., Lalak-Kańczugowska, J., Witaszak, N., Urbaniak, M. (2020). Fusarium Secondary Metabolism Biosynthetic Pathways: So Close but So Far Away. In: Mérillon, JM., Ramawat, K. (eds) Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96397-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96397-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96396-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96397-6
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics