Abstract
Public and political debates assume that refugees should be granted access and protection by states, which respect the concept of human rights. These debates presume a clear distinction between refugees and other groups of migrants. However, migration research has shown that the political and legal category of refugee works with restrictive and highly problematic assumptions about the legitimate causes and reasons of flight. Based on a case study about Roma, who migrated from the Balkans to Germany, it will be demonstrated that this leads to a refusal of protection and exposes Roma to poverty and ongoing discrimination. Against this background, it will be argued that the dominant interpretation of the concept of “refugee” has to be revised toward a broader understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For the year 2015, for example, the UNHCR reports a funding gap of 49% in regard to its needs (UNHCR 2015, p. 20). This paper will not discuss the various means of states to inhibit the immigration of migrants through border security and international agreements. For the situation in Europe, see http://bordermonitoring.eu/.
- 2.
The most important steps were the inclusion of the right to asylum in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the adoption of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees from 1951 as well as the additional protocol to the Geneva Convention from 1967.
- 3.
Further down, it will be explained in detail that especially Roma are affected by this regulation, whose situation, however, is characterized by a cumulative discrimination that would allow for a legal recognition as refugees.
- 4.
Regarding this observation’s political implications, see Crépeau (2015).
References
Anderson, M. (1996). Frontiers: Territory and State formation in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Behabib, S. (2011). Dignity in adversity: Human rights in troubled times. Cambridge: Wiley.
Betts, A. (2013). Survival migration: Failed governance and the crisis of displacement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bommes, M. (2011). Nationale Paradigmen der Migrationsforschung. IMIS-Beiträge, 28, 15–52.
Carens, J. (2013). The ethics of immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37(1), 13–34.
Castles, S. (2005). Warum Migrationspolitiken scheitern. Peripherie. Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie in der Dritten Welt, 25(97/98), 10–34.
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration. International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chimni, B. S. (2009). The birth of a ‘Discipline’: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(1), 11–29.
Commissioner for Protection of Equality. (2012). Regular Annual Report for 2011. Belgrade.
Crépeau, F. (2015). From enforced closure to regulated mobility: The need for a paradigm shift in migration policies. RCIS Working Papers, Toronto. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://www.ryrson.ca/rcis/publications/rcisworkingpapers/
De Genova, N., & Peutz, N. M. (Eds.). (2010). The deportation regime. Durham: Duke University Press.
Deutsches Komitee für UNICEF. (2010). Zur Situation von Kindern kosovarischer Roma, Ashkali und Ägypter in Deutschland und nach ihrer Rückführung in den Kosovo. Köln: UNICEF.
Ellermann, A. (2009). States against migrants. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 104, 962–1023.
European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions- The social and economic integration of the Roma in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
Fassbender, B. (2009). Menschenrechteerklärung. Munich: European Law Publishers.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., Loescher, G., Long, K., & Sigona, N. (2014). Introduction: Refugee and forced migration studies in transition. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Sigona (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gatrell, P. (2013). The making of the modern refugee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gibney, M. J. (2013). Is deportation a form of forced migration? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 32(2), 116–129.
Jacobsen, K., & Landau, L. B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27(3), 185–206.
Marx, R. (2016). Diskriminierungen im Zuwanderungs- und Flüchtlingsrecht. In A. Scherr, A. El-Mafaalani, & G. Yüksel (Eds.), Handbuch Diskriminierungsforschung (pp. 321–336). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Mau, S., Laube, L., Roos, C., & Wrobel, S. (2008). Grenzen in der globalisierten Welt. Selektivität, Internationalisierung, Exterrorialisierung. Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, 36, 123–148.
Müller, S., & Jovanovic, Z. (2010). Pathways to Progress? The European Union and Roma Inclusion in the Western Balkans. A report commissioned by OSI Roma Initiatives. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Münkler, H. (2014). Die gefährliche Kluft zwischen Schein und Tun. Auf die Interessen kommt es an! Review 2014 – Außenpolitik weiter denken. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from http://www.aussenpolitik-weiter-denken.de/
Offe, C. (2011). From migration in geographic space to migration in biographic time: Views from Europe. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 19(3), 5–19.
Open Society Institute. (2010). Roma children in “special education” in Serbia: overrepresentation, underachievement, and impact on life. Budapest.
Parkin, F. (1979). Marxism and class theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pogge, T. (2010). Politics as usual: What lies behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pro Asyl. (2014). Einstufung von Serbien, Mazedonien, Bosnien und Herzegowina als “sichere Herkunftsländer”? Stellungnahme zum “Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einstufung weiterer Staaten als sichere Herkunftsstaaten. Frankfurt: Pro Asyl.
Scherr, A. (2013). “Offene Grenzen? Migrationsregime und die Schwierigkeiten einer Kritik des Nationalismus”. PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft, 171, 335–349.
Scherr, A. (2015). Wer soll deportiert werden? Wie die folgenreiche Unterscheidung zwischen den “wirklichen” Flüchtlingen, den zu Duldenden und den Abzuschiebenden hergestellt wird. Soziale Probleme. Zeitschrift für soziale Probleme und soziale Kontrolle, 2(2015), 151–170.
Shacknove, A. E. (1985). Who is a refugee. Ethics, 95(2), 274–284.
Stepputat, F., & Nyberg Sorensen, N. (2014). Sociology and forced migration. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Sigona (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (pp. 86–98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stichweh, R. (2000). Die Weltgesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Tiedemann, P. (2015). Flüchtlingsrecht. Heidelberg: Springer.
Tmava, M., & Beha, A. (2009). Helplessness. Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian Forced Returnees in Kosovo. Pristina: RAD Centre.
Turton, D. (1996). Migrants and refugees. In T. Allen (Ed.), In search of cool ground: War, flight, and homecoming in Northeast Africa (pp. 96–110). Trenton: Africa World Press.
UNHCR. (1992). Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. Geneva: UNHCR.
UNHCR. (2011). The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocoll. Geneva: UNHCR.
UNHCR. (2015). Funding UNHCR. Retrieved May 8, 2015, from http://www.unhcr.org/574ed5574.html
Waringo, K. (2013a). Die Lebensbedingungen der Roma werden zunehmend unerträglich. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/proasyl/Unertraegliche_Lebensbedingungen_fuer_Roma_Chachipe_Vortrag_Dezember_2012.pdf
Waringo, K. (2013b). Serbien – ein sicherer Herkunftsstaat von Asylsuchenden in Deutschland? Retrieved May 18, 2017, from http://www.proasyl.de/fileadmin/proasyl/Serbien_kein_sicherer_Herkunftsstaat.pdf
Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–192.
Zetter, R. (2014a). Schutz für Vertriebene. Konzepte, Herausforderungen und neue Wege. Eidgenössische Kommission für Migrationsfragen EKM. Retrieved February 1, 2016, from https://www.ekm.admin.ch/dam/data/ekm/dokumentation/materialien/mat_schutz_d.pdf
Zetter, R. (2014b). Schutz für Vertriebene. Konzepte, Herausforderungen und neue Wege, Bern. Retrieved May 18, 2017, from www.bundespublikationen.admin.ch
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scherr, A. (2018). Who Can Claim Protection as a Refugee? A Sociological Critique of the Distinction Between Refugees and Migrants. In: Kury, H., Redo, S. (eds) Refugees and Migrants in Law and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72159-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72159-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72158-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72159-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)