Abstract
Emerging MOOC platforms capture huge amounts of learner data. This paper presents our MOOClm platform, for transforming data from MOOCs into independent learner models that can drive personalisation and support reuse of the learner model, for example in an Open Learner Model (OLM). We describe the MOOClm architecture and demonstrate how we have used it to build OLMs.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACM Joint Task Force. Computer science curricula 2013: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science. Technical report, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) IEEE Computer Society (2013)
Apted, T., Kay, J., Lum, A.: Supporting metadata creation with an ontology built from an extensible dictionary. In: De Bra, P.M.E., Nejdl, W. (eds.) AH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3137, pp. 4–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., Seaton, D.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment 8, 13–25 (2013)
Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., Shcherbinina, O.: User modeling in a distributed E-learning architecture. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 387–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bull, S.: Preferred Features of Open Learner Models for University Students. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 411–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Student models that invite the learner in: The smili:() open learner modelling framework. Intl Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17(2), 89–120 (2007)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, chapter 15: Open learner models, pp. 301–322. Springer (2010)
Bull, S., Kay, J.: Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In: Intl Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, pp. 349–365. Springer (2013)
Bull, S., Mabbott, A., Gardner, P.H., Jackson, T., Lancaster, M.J., Quigley, S.F., Childs, P.A.: Supporting interaction preferences and recognition of misconceptions with independent open learner models. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 62–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Conejo, R., Trella, M., Cruces, I., Garcia, R.: INGRID: a web service tool for hierarchical open learner model visualization. In: Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T. (eds.) UMAP Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 7138, pp. 406–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Fox, A.: From MOOCs to SPOCs. Commun. ACM 56(12), 38–40 (2013)
Gluga, R., Kay, J., Lister, R.: Progoss: mastering the curriculum. In: Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference) (2012)
Gluga, R., Kay, J., Lister, R., Kleitman, S.: Mastering cognitive development theory in computer science education. Comput. Sci. Educ. 23(1), 24–57 (2013)
Jacobs, H.H.: Mapping the Big Picture. Integrating Curriculum & Assessment K-12. ERIC (1997)
Jacobs, H.H.: Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping. ERIC (2004)
Kay, J.: Lifelong learner modeling for lifelong personalized pervasive learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1(4), 215–228 (2008)
Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B., Lauder, P.: Personis: a server for user models. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) AH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2347, pp. 203–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E., Kummerfeld, B.: MOOCs: So many learners, so much potential. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(3), 70–77 (2013)
Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Intl Conference on LAK, pp. 170–179 (2013)
Mitrović, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) AH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2347, pp. 296–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Mueller, N., Dikke, D., Dahrendorf, D.: Experience API vs SCORM-how xAPI benefits technology-enhanced learning. In: EDULEARN14 Proc., pp. 1276–1284 (2014)
Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Ruipérez, J.A., Sanz Moreno, J.L., Delgado Kloos, C.: Assessment activities in MOOCs (2015)
Pardos, Z.A., Kao, K.: moocrp: An open-source analytics platform. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, L@S 2015, pp. 103–110. ACM, New York (2015)
Thompson, C.: How khan academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, vol. 126 (2011)
Veeramachaneni, K., Dernoncourt, F., Taylor, C., Pardos, Z., O’Reilly, U.-M.: MOOCdb: developing data standards for MOOC data science. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on MOOCs at the 16th Annual Conference on AIED (2013)
Waldrop, M.M.: Massive open online courses, aka MOOCs, transform higher education and science (2014)
Williams, J.J., Li, N., Kim, J., Whitehill, J., Maldonado, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Chu, L., Heffernan, N.: The MOOClet framework: Improving online education through experimentation and personalization of modules. Social Science Research Network, November 12, 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cook, R., Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B. (2015). MOOClm: User Modelling for MOOCs. In: Ricci, F., Bontcheva, K., Conlan, O., Lawless, S. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. UMAP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20267-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20266-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20267-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)