Abstract
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic progressive cholestatic disease characterized by inflammatory destruction and fibrosis of both intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts. Seen primarily in patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease who have an increased risk of colorectal cancer, the most feared biliary complication of PSC is cholangiocarcinoma. Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a very useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of PSC and cholangiocarcinoma.
In this chapter we review our current understanding of this complex biliary disorder, which includes the risk factors, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, overlap syndromes, complications including cholangiocarcinoma, the role of ERCP in the diagnosis and management of complications related to PSC/cholangiocarcinoma, and the role of other noninvasive techniques such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the diagnosis of PSC.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- PSC
- Cholangiocarcinoma
- Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography
- ERCP
- Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- MRCP
- Secondary sclerosing cholangitis
- Autoimmune disease
- Cholestatic liver disease
- Inflammatory bowel disease
Introduction
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), first described in the mid 1850s, is a chronic, progressive, and cholestatic disease resulting in multifocal bile duct strictures that can affect the entire biliary tree [1]. Recurrent episodes of bacterial cholangitis, formation of bile duct stones, and development of abscesses in the liver proximal to strictures are common complications of PSC. The lifetime risk for developing cholangiocarcinoma is 10–20 % for patients with PSC [2].
Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of PSC, used to confirm the diagnosis, to perform dilation of dominant biliary strictures, and to obtain endobiliary biopsy specimens and brush cytology for suspected cholangiocarcinoma [3, 4].
Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Pathogenesis of PSC
In the United States, the estimated overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence of PSC is 0.9 per 100,000 population with a prevalence of 13.6 per 100,000 population [5, 6]. As a recent systematic review with meta-analysis of the incidence studies of PSC has noted, the incidence of PSC is similar in North American and European countries, with an overall increase in the incidence over time [7]. Approximately 60–80 % of the patients with PSC have associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [6]. Of the patients with PSC, 62–70 % are males and the median age at the time of diagnosis ranges between 35 and 47 years [5–12]. The estimated median survival of patients with PSC was 9.6 years from the time of diagnosis to death or time of liver transplant [13]. No clear clinical or environmental risk factors have been identified for the development of PSC [6]. The pathogenesis of PSC continues to be elusive and it is believed to be a complex immune mediated disease. The most commonly accepted theory is an initial insult to cholangiocytes through environmental exposure to toxins or infection such as bacterial translocation across a leaky gut (e.g., IBD patients), which then results in persistent immune mediated damage with progressive destruction and fibrosis of the bile ducts in genetically predisposed individuals [6]. Genome-wide association studies have shown strong associations of HLA haplotypes, particularly HLA-B8 (B*0801) and HLA-DR3 (DR B1*0301), in PSC [14]. The genetic predisposition to PSC is supported by studies that have shown almost 100-fold increased risk of PSC in first-degree relatives of the patients with PSC [15]. Several non-HLA type genetic polymorphisms (e.g., genes encoding tumor necrosis factor [16], matrix metalloproteinase [17], and intracellular adhesion molecule [18]) have also shown to influence the susceptibility to PSC. However, most of these genetic associations are weak and difficult to reproduce [6].
Complications of PSC
The majority of patients with PSC develop liver cirrhosis, with 10–15 % harboring or developing cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) [19, 20]. PSC has strong association with IBD, with ulcerative colitis being the most common type (48–86 %) followed by Crohn’s disease (13–25 %) [6]. PSC is an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer in patients with IBD. It has been estimated that about 10 % of the patients who have IBD associated with PSC will develop colon cancer, hence recommendations to begin screening at the time of initial diagnosis in patients with both IBD and PSC [21]. Patients with PSC can suffer recurrent episodes of bacterial cholangitis, development of abscesses in the liver, and formation of bile duct stones proximal to strictures (Fig. 22.1) [19]. About 40–60 % of the patients with PSC develop pruritus with significant impairment of quality of life [22]. PSC patients with liver cirrhosis can develop portal hypertension and related complications such as variceal bleeding, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy [6]. Increased risk for metabolic bone diseases (osteoporosis 10–15 %, osteopenia 30 %), fat soluble vitamin deficiencies (50–85 %), and gall bladder neoplasia (estimated prevalence 3–14 % compared to 0.35 % in general population) are also noted in patients with PSC [6]. At early stages of the disease, ursodeoxycholic acid at moderate doses may improve the surrogate markers of the disease progression. However, the only curative therapy available to date is orthoptic liver transplantation [23].
Diagnosis of PSC
The discovery of PSC increasingly is based on the investigations of abnormal liver tests and incidental finding of intrahepatic biliary ductal dilatation on cross-sectional imaging as the majority (44–56 %) of the PSC patients are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis [5, 6, 13]. A multicenter retrospective Italian study has found up to 17 % of asymptomatic PSC patients may have cirrhosis on liver biopsy at the time of diagnosis [6, 24].
Fatigue and pruritus are the initial presenting symptoms for symptomatic patients with PSC. The patients tend to develop jaundice, abdominal pain and weight loss with disease progression. Bacterial cholangitis is uncommon at presentation in the absence of dominant biliary stricture(s) or biliary intervention [6, 25].
ERCP and transhepatic cholangiography were once thought to be the reference standard for PSC diagnosis [26] before the era of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) [27]. The characteristic findings of cholangiography (Fig. 22.2) include short, multifocal, annular strictures alternating with normal or slightly dilated intervening segments called “beads on a string” [28]. A small case series (n = 10) has noted retraction of the major papilla into the duodenal wall in 70 % of the PSC patients (7 out of 10) with typical cholangiogram features [29]. In a recent prospective pilot study, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has also proved to be a valuable tool for accurately predicting extrahepatic disease in suspected PSC [30].
In the presence of typical cholangiogram findings, a routine liver biopsy is not required to confirm the diagnosis of PSC. However, a liver biopsy may be required to diagnose small duct PSC and suspected overlapping syndromes such as PSC with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and PSC with immunoglobulin G4 associated sclerosing cholangitis [25].
A wide range of auto-antibodies can be detected in the serum of patients with PSC (e.g., anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, anti-nuclear antibody, anti-smooth muscle, anti-endothelial cell antibody, anti-cardiolipin antibody, thyroperoxidase, thyroglobulin, rheumatoid factor). However, these antibodies have no routine role in the diagnosis of PSC [25].
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography (MRCP) Versus ERCP
ERCP is an invasive procedure and can be associated with complications such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation (Fig. 22.3), and aspiration [27]. One large multicenter prospective study noted that among 942 diagnostic ERCPs performed there were 13 major complications (1.3 %) and 2 deaths (0.21 %). ERCP may be associated with post-procedural hospitalization in up to 10 % of patients [31]. In contrast to ERCP, MRCP is a non-invasive, complication-free technique, which has the advantages of not using contrast media or ionizing radiation and a relatively shorter time for the examination [32]. Blinded case control, comparative studies have shown, despite an overall better depiction of the biliary tree by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), both ERC and magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) are comparable in diagnosing PSC [33, 34].
Endoscopic Therapy for Symptomatic PSC
With the improvement in the ability of MRCP in diagnosing PSC, the role of ERCP has changed from diagnostic to therapeutic intervention (Figs. 22.1, 22.4, Video 22.1). A large retrospective study from a tertiary center clinically followed 117 patients with PSC for a mean period of 8 years (range 2–20 years), of which 72 % (n = 84) of the patients with PSC required at least one therapeutic ERCP for symptomatic disease [19]. Of the 84 patients who underwent therapeutic interventions, 70 % (n = 59) had balloon dilation of biliary strictures, 51 % (n = 43) had stone extraction, and 51 % (n = 43) had biliary prosthesis placed to facilitate drainage of infected bile ducts and to improve the bile duct patency on one or more occasions. The overall complication rate was 7.2 % following therapeutic ERCP but there were no procedure-related deaths.
During the course of PSC, dominant (high grade) strictures (Fig. 22.1) may develop in approximately 36–56 % of the patients. These patients have increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma [13, 35, 36] (Fig. 22.5).
Biochemical and clinical improvements have been reported with endoscopic therapy with stenting and/or balloon dilation of dominant strictures [36]. Moreover, there is some evidence to support that secondary liver fibrosis can be reversed by relieving biliary obstruction [37]. Finally, endoscopic therapy has been suggested to improve survival in patients with PSC. A retrospective study of 63 consecutive PSC patients, with a median follow-up of 34 months, noted that the observed survival rate over 5 years following endoscopic therapy (mostly balloon dilation of biliary strictures) was significantly higher than the predicted 5-year survival rate based on the Mayo clinic survival model (83 % vs. 65 %, p = 0.027) [38].
Several non-randomized studies have also noted PSC patients with dominant strictures benefiting from endoscopic intervention, including 81–94 % 5-year liver transplantation free survival rates [35, 38, 39]. Chapman and colleagues, in a large retrospective study, compared long-term outcomes (mean follow-up 9.8 years) of multiple endoscopic interventions (stent alone 46 %, dilation alone 20 %, both stent and dilation 17 %, failed interventions 17 %) in patients with dominant strictures (n = 80) and without dominant biliary strictures (n = 48). Patients with dominant strictures had more interventions (median of 3 [range 0–34]) compared to the patients without dominant strictures (median of 0 [range 0–7]; p <0.001). The major complication rate for ERCP was low at 1 %. Although repeat endoscopic therapies were found to be safe in this study, the overall survival was found to be worse for the patients with dominant strictures (mean survival 13.7 years) compared to the patients without dominant strictures (mean survival 23 years). Much of this survival difference was related to a 26 % risk of cholangiocarcinoma developing only in the patients with dominant strictures [36].
Predictors of Successful Outcome
Published series and case control studies have documented 53–76 % successful clinical outcomes of therapeutic ERCP in patients with PSC [40–43]. A large retrospective study (204 total ERCPs performed on n = 148 patients with PSC) noted clinical improvement in 70 % of patients with PSC following therapeutic ERCP (p = 0.0001). Of the patients with PSC, 53 % had resolution of their presenting complaints and maintained it at 3–6 months, which met the study criteria for clinical success. Endoscopic therapy (OR =4.23, 95 % CI 2.15–8.34) was found to be an independent predictor of the clinical success. Patients who had high bilirubin levels, dominant biliary strictures compared with those without (OR =3.73, 95 % CI 1.95–7.13), common bile duct strictures versus those who had strictures in other locations (OR =2.47, 95 % CI 1.27–4.81) were all more likely to have successful clinical and laboratory outcomes [44].
Complications of ERCP in PSC Versus Non-PSC
Endoscopic therapy for patients with PSC and dominant strictures has been undertaken for more than 20 years, but there are concerns about the risks versus anticipated benefits in instrumenting a sclerotic biliary tree. A large retrospective study (n = 291 therapeutic ERCPs, and n = 26 diagnostic ERCPs) found that the most common complication following ERCP in patients with PSC was pancreatitis (12 %), followed by cholangitis exacerbation (3 %), sepsis (3 %), duct perforation (2 %), post sphincterotomy bleeding (2 %) and liver abscess (1 %) [19]. A single-center retrospective cohort study comparing consecutive ERCP outcomes in patients with PSC (n = 30, total 85 ERCPs) and those with other biliary strictures (n = 45, total 70 ERCPs) over a 2-year period found no significant difference in the complication rates on a patient-based analysis (PSC 26.7 % [8/30]) versus non-PSC 13.3 % (6/45, p = 0.23) and on a per procedure base analysis (PSC 12.9 % [11/85]) versus non-PSC 8.6 % (6/70, P = .45). However, PSC patients with acute symptoms had a higher rate of complications than those whose procedures were done electively. There was a possible trend toward a higher incidence of cholangitis after therapeutic ERCP in PSC compared to non-PSC patients (7.8 % [5/64] versus 1.4 % [1/69], P = 0.11), despite a significantly higher rate of post-procedure antibiotic usage in the PSC cohort (P = .001) [4].
A retrospective study from Mayo clinic noted that the overall ERCP-related complications in patients with PSC (11 %; 18/168 patients) were not significantly different when compared to non-PSC patients (8 %;76/981; p = 0.2). The duration of hospitalization, complications such as perforation, pancreatitis, and bleeding were not different between PSC and non-PSC groups. However, the incidence of cholangitis was higher in PSC patients (4 %) compared to non-PSC patients (0.2 %), p < 0.0002 despite routine use of antibiotics. Compared to the non-PSC group (n = 981), the PSC group (n = 168) had a longer procedure duration (51 min ± 29 vs. 86 min ± 28, P = 0.02), a higher prevalence of portal hypertension (4 % vs. 31.5 %, p < 0.0001), underwent more biopsies (15 % vs. 39 %, p < 0.0001), had more brushings (8 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.001), underwent more balloon dilatations (15 % vs. 48 %, p < 0.0001) and had more intra-ductal ultrasounds (5 % vs. 11 %, p = 0.007) [31].
Predictors of ERCP Complications
A large multivariate analysis of 11,497 ERCP procedures done over a period of 12 years noted a total of 462 complications (4 %), of which 42 were severe (0.36 %) and 7 were fatal (0.06 %). Post-ERCP pancreatitis risk of 2.6 % and bleeding risk of 0.3 % were identified. Overall complications following ERCP were higher among individuals after a biliary sphincterotomy (odds ratio [OR] 1.32). Patients who had a history of chronic pancreatitis and those who received prophylactic pancreatic stenting had fewer complications (OR of 0.78 and 0.69 respectively). Bleeding risk was high after biliary sphincterotomy (OR 4.71]). Severe or fatal complications following ERCP were associated with severe (OR 2.38) and incapacitating (OR 7.65) systemic disease, obesity (OR 5.18), known or suspected bile duct stones (OR 4.08) and complex (grade-3) procedures (OR 2.86) [45].
Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP) in PSC
A retrospective study from Finland has noted an overall complication rate of 9 % (PEP 7 %, cholangitis 1.4 %, perforation 0.6 %, bleeding or death 0 %) in n = 389 consecutive PSC patients who underwent 441 total ERCP procedures with the guidewire cannulation technique. For patients with an intact papilla, the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate was higher compared to those who had previous sphincterotomies (9.2 vs. 2.7 %; p = 0.01). Female sex (OR 2.6, p = 0.015), guide wire insertion into the pancreatic duct (OR 8.2, p < 0.01), and difficulties with cannulation were all associated with PEP. The incidence of PEP was 2.6 % when the pancreatic duct remained untouched compared to 20 % and 31.6 % incidence when the guide wire was inserted into the pancreatic duct twice or five times, respectively. The incidence of PEP was only 1.4 % if cannulation was performed without sphincterotomy. However the risk for PEP increased to 6.8 % with biliary sphincterotomy, 27 % with dual (pancreatic and biliary) sphincterotomies and up to 55.6 % with precut dual sphincterotomies [46].
Differential Diagnosis
Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Secondary sclerosing cholangitis is also characterized by a similar multifocal biliary stricturing process due to identifiable causes (Table 22.1) that can mimic PSC in the both clinical and cholangiographic findings [25].
Small Duct Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Population-based studies have noted that small duct PSC represents approximately 11–17 % of all patients with PSC [5, 9]. Small duct PSC patients have clinical, biochemical and histological features of PSC in the setting of a normal cholangiogram, although subtle changes can sometimes be seen in the small branches. The majority of patients with small duct PSC (>80 %) are noted to have associated IBD. Long-term follow-up studies have shown approximately 23 % of small duct PSC can progress to large duct PSC over time. Cholangiocarcinoma does not seem to occur in patients with small duct PSC, in the absence of progression to large duct PSC. Overall small duct PSC has a better long-term prognosis compared to large duct PSC [47].
PSC-AIH Overlap Syndrome
PSC-AIH (autoimmune hepatitis) overlap syndrome is most commonly diagnosed in young adults and children. The term “autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis” (ASC) has been proposed given the typical cholangiography finding of sclerosing cholangitis overlapping with the clinical, biochemical and histological features characteristic of autoimmune hepatitis [48].
This variant of PSC is diagnosed in 1.4–17 % of patients with PSC [49, 50]. Liver biopsy should be considered for the patients with disproportionately elevated aminotransferases (5- to 10-fold increase), increased level of serum auto-antibodies and/or hypogammaglobulinemia, with typical cholangiographic findings of PSC to diagnose or exclude overlap syndrome [6, 25]. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been used in combination with immunosuppressive drugs in the treatment of AIH-PSC overlap syndrome, and the long-term course has been considered favorable [50].
Immunoglobulin G4-Associated Cholangitis and PSC
Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) or IgG4-related cholangitis (IRSC) represents the biliary manifestation of a corticosteroid responsive systemic disease entity: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). IgG4-RD could affect multiple organs, and is most often associated with increased serum IgG4 levels and characterized by IgG4 positive plasmacellular tissue infiltrates [51].
IAC affects mostly men (85 %) above middle age (mean age, 62 years), frequently presents with painless jaundice (77 %) and patients are less likely to have associated IBD. IAC has been noted to be associated with autoimmune pancreatitis (92 %), abundant IgG4-positive cells in bile duct biopsy specimens (88 %) and increased serum IgG4 levels (74 %) [52].
The current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guidelines recommend measurement of serum IgG4 in all PSC patients. If serum IgG4 is elevated, then evaluation for IAC for which a trial of steroid therapy is recommended [25]. Although IAC is usually responsive to corticosteroids, relapse is not uncommon after steroid withdrawal, particularly for patients with proximal bile duct strictures [6].
The interpretation of elevated serum IgG4 can be challenging considering that previous case-series have shown elevated IgG4 in 9–27 % of PSC patients without IAC or IRSC [53, 54]. A recent study from Europe noted that applying four times the upper limit of normal (4 × ULN) cut-off value for serum IgG4 (i.e., serum IgG4 > 5.6 g/L), was associated with the highest specificity and positive predictive value (100 %) for IAC, although sensitivity was low at 42 % (95 % CI 31–55) [51].
Cholangiocarcinoma
PSC should be considered a premalignant condition that warrants close surveillance given the risk of cholangiocarcinoma, which is 160-fold that of the general population [55–57].
A large retrospective study noted the median time from the diagnosis of PSC (n = 128) to cholangiocarcinoma (n = 26) was 26 months (range 0 months to 20.5 years). Forty-eight percent of the cases (n = 10) presented within 4 months of the diagnosis of PSC [36].
Based on the anatomic locations, cholangiocarcinoma can be divided into three subtypes: (1) intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), when located within the hepatic parenchyma; (2) perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), when located proximal to the cystic duct; and (3) distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), when located distal to the cystic duct [58]. The most common subtype is pCCA. In a large case series of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, 50 % had pCCA, 42 % had dCCA (42 %) and 8 % had iCCA [59].
The most commonly used staging system, the Bismuth-Corlette classification stratifies pCCA on the basis of bile duct involvement but it lacks crucial information such as vascular involvement or distant metastasis. Therefore this classification system was recently extended to also take into account vascular involvement (arterial/venous) and distal metastasis [60].
Cholangiocarcinoma often occurs at the site of dominant strictures in PSC patients [36, 61]. Dominant strictures are defined as stenosis ≤1.5 mm diameter in the common bile duct or ≤1 mm in a hepatic duct [25]. Therefore endoscopic brush cytology of a dominant stricture is advocated to diagnose cholangiocarcinoma (Fig. 22.6). However, the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma can be challenging because of its paucicellular nature, anatomic location and also because of the myriad of benign diseases that have clinical features suggestive of malignancy such as jaundice, abdominal pain, sudden change in liver biochemical tests and weight loss [58, 62]. Several studies have documented that positive cytology is highly predictive of presence of malignancy [63–67]. Unfortunately conventional brush cytology has a very low sensitivity (4 %–20 %) and low positive predictive value (≤60 %) despite its high specificity and high negative predictive values [19, 68]. The Mayo Clinic has reported that equivocal cytology results (atypical or suspicious) are much more common (approximately 40 %) than unequivocal positive cytology (<20 %) in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma from their clinical experience [62]. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and detecting aneuploidy using digital image analysis (DIA) are two advanced cytologic techniques that can increase the sensitivity of conventional cytology in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma. FISH has been shown to increase the sensitivity up to 35–60 % while preserving specificity of cytology when assessing for polysomy (chromosomal gain). The sensitivity and specificity of DIA is intermediate compared with routine cytology and FISH but can have additive value when used along with FISH [62]. A small series, single center study has reported that in expert hands ERCP with probe-based confocal endomicroscopy had 100 % sensitivity (95 % CI 19.3–100 %) and 100 % negative predictive value (95 % CI 71.3.3–100 %) in excluding neoplasia. The specificity and positive predictive values were 61.1 % (95 % CI 35.8–82.6 %) and 22.2 % (95 % CI 3.5–59.9 %) respectively for this study [69]. Another recent, small single center prospective study has reported that cholangioscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI) did not improve the dysplasia detection rate compared to white light imaging despite increasing the biopsies (48 %) of suspicious lesions for patients with PSC [70]. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may aid in the diagnosis of iCCA but liver biopsy is required for a definite diagnosis [58]. A diagnostic cut-off value of 130 U/ml for serum carbohydrate antigen (CA 19–9) tumor marker has a sensitivity and specificity of 79 % and 98 % respectively for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma. However, CA 19–9 has a limited diagnostic use because it can also be increased in patients with bacterial cholangitis, significant intrahepatic cholestasis, and is virtually undetectable for those who are negative for Lewis antigen, which includes 7 % of the normal population.
For cholangiocarcinoma surveillance, most experts recommended annual imaging (MRI/MRCP or ultrasound) and serum CA 19–9 level measurement for patients with PSC. For those patients noted to have abnormalities with either one of these tests, further invasive testing with ERCP using conventional brush cytology and FISH is recommended [6, 56]. Recent publications suggest that direct cholangioscopy may play a role in directed tissue acquisition and differentiation of benign from malignant strictures in PSC (Fig. 22.4) [71]. Currently, use of cholangioscopy in PSC is not considered the standard of care. Likewise, the use of confocal endomicroscopy systems (Cellvizio, Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France) to differentiate benign from malignant PSC strictures (Video 22.2) should be considered investigational at this time.
Conclusion
Anatomic evaluation of the biliary tree is essential in the diagnosis of PSC. With the improvement in image qualities, MRCP has largely replaced ERCP in diagnosing PSC. Currently, ERCP is largely used as a therapeutic tool in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis, to improve biliary drainage and to perform biliary brushings/biopsies for suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Establishing biliary drainage with endotherapy in patients with PSC has been shown to improve survival. Liver biopsies are not routinely required to confirm the diagnosis of PSC but should be considered for suspected small duct PSC or overlap syndromes. Cholangiocarcinoma often occurs at the site of dominant strictures in patients with PSC. Because of the increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC, annual surveillance with MRI/MRCP and serum CA 19–9 is recommended for any concerning findings; ERCP with biopsies should be considered.
References
Eaton JE, Talwalkar JA, Lazaridis KN, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis and advances in diagnosis and management. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(3):521–36.
Gossard AA, Lindor KD. A 42-year-old woman with a new diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(6):593–7.
Majoie CB, Reeders JW, Sanders JB, Huibregtse K, Jansen PL. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a modified classification of cholangiographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(3):495–7.
Etzel JP, Eng SC, Ko CW, Lee SD, Saunders MD, Tung BY, Kimmey MB, Kowdley KV. Complications after ERCP in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(4):643–8.
Bambha K, Kim WR, Talwalkar J, Torgerson H, Benson JT, Therneau TM, Loftus Jr EV, Yawn BP, Dickson ER, Melton 3rd LJ. Incidence, clinical spectrum, and outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis in a United States community. Gastroenterology. 2003;125(5):1364–9.
Singh S, Talwalkar JA. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(8):898–907.
Molodecky NA, Kareemi H, Parab R, Barkema HW, Quan H, Myers RP, Kaplan GG. Incidence of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;53(5):1590–9.
Farrant JM, Hayllar KM, Wilkinson ML, Karani J, Portmann BC, Westaby D, Williams R. Natural history and prognostic variables in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 1991;100(6):1710–7.
Kaplan GG, Laupland KB, Butzner D, Urbanski SJ, Lee SS. The burden of large and small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis in adults and children: a population-based analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(5):1042–9.
Kingham JG, Kochar N, Gravenor MB. Incidence, clinical patterns, and outcomes of primary sclerosing cholangitis in South Wales, United Kingdom. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(7):1929–30.
Boberg KM, Aadland E, Jahnsen J, Raknerud N, Stiris M, Bell H. Incidence and prevalence of primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis in a Norwegian population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(1):99–103.
Wiesner RH, Grambsch PM, Dickson ER, Ludwig J, MacCarty RL, Hunter EB, Fleming TR, Fisher LD, Beaver SJ, LaRusso NF. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: natural history, prognostic factors and survival analysis. Hepatology. 1989;10(4):430–6.
Tischendorf JJ, Hecker H, Krüger M, Manns MP, Meier PN. Characterization, outcome, and prognosis in 273 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a single center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(1):107–14.
Karlsen TH, Franke A, Melum E, Kaser A, Hov JR, Balschun T, Lie BA, Bergquist A, et al. Genome-wide association analysis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):1102–11.
Bergquist A, Lindberg G, Saarinen S, Broomé U. Increased prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis among first-degree relatives. J Hepatol. 2005;42(2):252–6.
Mitchell SA, Grove J, Spurkland A, Boberg KM, Fleming KA, Day CP, Schrumpf E, Chapman RW, European Study Group of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis. Association of the tumour necrosis factor alpha −308 but not the interleukin 10–627 promoter polymorphism with genetic susceptibility to primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut. 2001;49(2):288–94.
Satsangi J, Chapman RW, Haldar N, Donaldson P, Mitchell S, Simmons J, Norris S, Marshall SE, Bell JI, Jewell DP, Welsh KI. A functional polymorphism of the stromelysin gene (MMP-3) influences susceptibility to primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(1):124–30.
Yang X, Cullen SN, Li JH, Chapman RW, Jewell DP. Susceptibility to primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with polymorphisms of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Hepatol. 2004;40(3):375–9.
Gluck M, Cantone NR, Brandabur JJ, Patterson DJ, Bredfeldt JE, Kozarek RA. A twenty-year experience with endoscopic therapy for symptomatic primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42(9):1032–9.
Rosen CB, Nagorney DM, Wiesner RH, Coffey Jr RJ, LaRusso NF. Cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ann Surg. 1991;213(1):21–5.
Vera A, Gunson BK, Ussatoff V, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Transplantation. 2003;75:1983–8.
Talwalkar JA, Lindor KD. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11(1):62–72.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2009;51(2):237–67.
Okolicsanyi L, Fabris L, Viaggi S, Carulli N, Podda M, Ricci G. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: clinical presentation, natural history and prognostic variables: an Italian multicentre study. The Italian PSC study group. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8(7):685–91.
Chapman R, Fevery J, Kalloo A, Nagorney DM, Boberg KM, Shneider B, Gores GJ, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Diagnosis and management of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2010;51(2):660–78.
Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(14):924–33.
Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48(1):1–10.
MacCarty RL, LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, Ludwig J. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: findings on cholangiography and pancreatography. Radiology. 1983;149(1):39–44.
Parlak E, Ciçek B, Dişibeyaz S, Köksal AS, Sahin B. An endoscopic finding in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: retraction of the main duodenal papilla into the duodenum wall. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(3):532–6.
Lutz HH, Wasmuth HE, Streetz K, Tacke F, Koch A, Luedde T, Trautwein C, Tischendorf JJ. Endoscopic ultrasound as an early diagnostic tool for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy. 2012;44(10):934–9.
Bangarulingam SY, Gossard AA, Petersen BT, Ott BJ, Lindor KD. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(4):855–60.
Hossary SH, Zytoon AA, Eid M, Hamed A, Sharaan M, Ebrahim AA. MR cholangiopancreatography of the pancreas and biliary system: a review of the current applications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014;43(1):1–13.
Rossi G, Sciveres M, Maruzzelli L, Curcio G, Riva S, Traina M, Tuzzolino F, Luca A, Gridelli B, Maggiore G. Diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis in children: blinded, comparative study of magnetic resonance versus endoscopic cholangiography. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37(6):596–601.
Moff SL, Kamel IR, Eustace J, Lawler LP, Kantsevoy S, Kalloo AN, Thuluvath PJ. Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(2):219–23.
Gotthardt DN, Rudolph G, Klöters-Plachky P, Kulaksiz H, Stiehl A. Endoscopic dilation of dominant stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis: outcome after long-term treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(3):527–34.
Chapman MH, Webster GJ, Bannoo S, Johnson GJ, Wittmann J, Pereira SP. Cholangiocarcinoma and dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 25-year single-centre experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(9):1051–8.
Hammel P, Couvelard A, O'Toole D, Ratouis A, Sauvanet A, Fléjou JF, Degott C, Belghiti J, Bernades P, Valla D, Ruszniewski P, Lévy P. Regression of liver fibrosis after biliary drainage in patients with chronic pancreatitis and stenosis of the common bile duct. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(6):418–23.
Baluyut AR, Sherman S, Lehman GA, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Impact of endoscopic therapy on the survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(3):308–12.
Stiehl A, Rudolph G, Klöters-Plachky P, Sauer P, Walker S. Development of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid: outcome after endoscopic treatment. J Hepatol. 2002;36(2):151–6.
van Milligen de Wit AW, van Bracht J, Rauws EA, Jones EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic stent therapy for dominant extrahepatic bile duct strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44((3):293–9.
Gaing AA, Geders JM, Cohen SA, Siegel JH. Endoscopic management of primary sclerosing cholangitis: review, and report of an open series. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(12):2000–8.
Lee JG, Schutz SM, England RE, Leung JW, Cotton PB. Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1995;21(3):661–7.
Wagner S, Gebel M, Meier P, Trautwein C, Bleck J, Nashan B, Manns MP. Endoscopic management of biliary tract strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 1996;28(7):546–51.
Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Baillie J. Predictors of successful clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17(4):243–8.
Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(1):80–8.
Ismail S, Kylänpää L, Mustonen H, Halttunen J, Lindström O, Jokelainen K, Udd M, Färkkilä M. Risk factors for complications of ERCP in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Endoscopy. 2012;44(12):1133–8.
Björnsson E, Olsson R, Bergquist A, Lindgren S, Braden B, Chapman RW, Boberg KM, Angulo P. The natural history of small-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):975–80.
Gregorio GV, Portmann B, Karani J, Harrison P, Donaldson PT, Vergani D, Mieli-Vergani G. Autoimmune hepatitis/sclerosing cholangitis overlap syndrome in childhood: a 16-year prospective study. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(21):3368–73.
Kaya M, Angulo P, Lindor KD. Overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: an evaluation of a modified scoring system. J Hepatol. 1999;31(5):929–38.
Rust C, Beuers U. Overlap syndromes among autoimmune liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(21):3368–73.
Boonstra K, Culver EL, de Buy Wenniger LM, van Heerde MJ, van Erpecum KJ, Poen AC, van Nieuwkerk CM, Spanier BW, Witteman BJ, Tuynman HA, van Geloven N, van Buuren H, Chapman RW, Barnes E, Beuers U, Ponsioen CY. Serum IgG4 and IgG1 for distinguishing IgG4-associated cholangitis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2013;21.
Ghazale A, Chari ST, Zhang L, Smyrk TC, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Clain JE, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Vege SS, Lindor K, Farnell MB. Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis: clinical profile and response to therapy. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(3):706–15.
Mendes FD, Jorgensen R, Keach J, Katzmann JA, Smyrk T, Donlinger J, Chari S, Lindor KD. Elevated serum IgG4 concentration in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(9):2070–5.
Parhizkar B, Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Asadzadeh Aghdaee H, Malekpour H, Entezari AH. Primary sclerosing cholangitis associated with elevated immunoglobulin-g4: a preliminary study. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012;2012:325743.
Kornfeld D, Ekbom A, Ihre T. Survival and risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. A population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(10):1042–5.
Razumilava N, Gores GJ, Lindor KD. Cancer surveillance in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2011;54(5):1842–52.
Burak K, Angulo P, Pasha TM, Egan K, Petz J, Lindor KD. Incidence and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(3):523–6.
Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(6):1215–29.
DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Kamangar F, Winter JM, Lillemoe KD, Choti MA, Yeo CJ, Schulick RD. Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):755–62.
Deoliveira ML, Schulick RD, Nimura Y, Rosen C, Gores G, Neuhaus P, Clavien PA. New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology. 2011;53(4):1363–71.
Bergquist A, Ekbom A, Olsson R, Kornfeldt D, Lööf L, Danielsson A, Hultcrantz R, Lindgren S, Prytz H, Sandberg-Gertzén H, Almer S, Granath F, Broomé U. Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2002;36(3):321–7.
Barr Fritcher EG, Voss JS, Jenkins SM, Lingineni RK, Clayton AC, Roberts LR, Halling KC, Talwalkar JA, Gores GJ, Kipp BR. Primary sclerosing cholangitis with equivocal cytology: fluorescence in situ hybridization and serum CA 19–9 predict risk of malignancy. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(12):708–17.
Govil H, Reddy V, Kluskens L, Treaba D, Massarani-Wafai R, Selvaggi S, Gattuso P. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002;26:273–7.
Harewood GC, Baron TH, Stadheim LM, Kipp BR, Sebo TJ, Salomao DR. Prospective, blinded assessment of factors influencing the accuracy of biliary cytology interpretation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1464–9.
Furmanczyk PS, Grieco VS, Agoff SN. Biliary brush cytology and the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation of specific cytomorphologic features and CA19-9 levels. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124(3):355–60.
Lee JG. Brush cytology and the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:78–80.
Mahmoudi N, Enns R, Amar J, AlAli J, Lam E, Telford J. Biliary brush cytology: factors associated with positive yields on biliary brush cytology. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:569–73.
Moreno Luna LE, Kipp B, Halling KC, Sebo TJ, Kremers WK, Roberts LR, Barr Fritcher EG, Levy MJ, Gores GJ. Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology. 2006;131(4):1064–72.
Heif M, Yen RD, Shah RJ. ERCP with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the evaluation of dominant biliary stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(7):2068–74.
Azeem N, Gostout CJ, Knipschield M, Baron TH. Cholangioscopy with narrow-band imaging in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;79(5):773–9 e2.
Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, Hawes RH, Pleskow DK, Slivka A, Haluszka O, Petersen BT, Sherman S, Devière J, Meisner S, Stevens PD, Costamagna G, Ponchon T, Peetermans JA, Neuhaus H. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(4):805–14.
Karlsen TH, Boberg KM. Update on primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013;59(3):571–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Video 22.1
This 51-year-old patient has inactive chronic ulcerative colitis and progressive cholestasis from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Diagnostic ERCP demonstrates multiple intra- and extra-hepatic strictures and stones treated with a small biliary sphincterotomy, stricture dilation, stone extraction, brush cytology, and placement of short-term right and left hepatic duct stents. Bilirubin fell from 14 mg/dL to 1.0 and alkaline phosphatase levels decreased threefold for >1 year post-endoscopic treatment. (WMV 18638 kb)
Reticular pattern of biliary epithelium manifest by thick dark bands and clumps in a patient with cholangicarcinoma as visualized with confocal endomicroscopy (Cellvizio, Mauna Kea Technologies, Paris, France). Thick white bands are vessels. Image courtesy of Ian Gan MD, Virginia Mason Medical Center. (WMV 18638 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Srinivasan, N., Kozarek, R. (2015). Diagnosis and Treatment: ERCP in PSC. In: Kozarek, R., Chiorean, M., Wallace, M. (eds) Endoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11077-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11077-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11076-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11077-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)