Abstract
The global production of sewage sludge (SS) has accompanied population growth and the expansion of global sewage treatment rates. Sewage sludge is a solid waste rich in nutrients, mainly N, P, Ca, Mg, and Zn. However, SS can also have high contaminating potential. Pyrolysis is an effective technological alternative to transform SS into an agricultural input. The solid product of SS pyrolysis is called SS biochar. In this chapter, we present the state of the-art of SS use in agriculture, highlighting benefits, limitations, and perspectives. Furthermore, we review innovative approaches to render SS biochar production and applicability more efficient and socially acceptable. Such approaches include: (a) SS biochar enrichment technologies; (b) SS biochar for plant disease control; and, (c) SS biochar for soil carbon sequestration. The risks of contamination with heavy metals from SS biochar were also discussed. Finally, recommendations were elaborated for improving the multiple uses of SS biochar in agriculture.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Sewage sludge (SS) is an urban waste generated during wastewater treatment. Globally an estimated 9.5 million m3 of human sewage and 900 million m3 of municipal wastewater are produced every day (Mateo-Sagasta et al. 2015). Several alternatives have been used to transform SS into a suitable product to be applied in agriculture. Among them, thermal treatments such as incineration, gasification, hydrothermal carbonation, and pyrolysis belong among the suitable solutions of SS disposal (Racek et al. 2020).
Thermal processing of SS by pyrolysis represents an important alternative to allow for agricultural use of this residue and presents advantages such as reduction of volume and transport costs in addition to the elimination of undesirable microorganisms (Paz-Ferreiro et al. 2018). Biochar is a solid, carbon rich product obtained by heating biomass under limited oxygenation conditions, in a process known as pyrolysis (Sohi 2012). Despite increasing the concentration of total heavy metals in relation to the raw material, pyrolysis reduces the bioavailability of several metals (Figueiredo et al. 2019a, b; Chagas et al. 2021a). In addition, the application of biochar to the soil has an alkalinizing effect (Hossain et al. 2011), increases the accumulation of total carbon (C) and soil organic matter pools (Chagas et al. 2022), and can reduce phosphorus (P) adsorption (Cui et al. 2011).
Although few studies have been performed in tropical regions (Sousa and Figueiredo 2016; Faria et al. 2018; Figueiredo et al. 2018a, b, 2020), the benefits of SS biochar are already clear with regard to the supply of multiple plant nutrients for several crops (Sousa and Figueiredo 2016; Faria et al. 2018). Recently, studies have shown positive effects of SS biochar on the control of plant pathogens (de Araujo et al. 2019a) and in increasing the use efficiency of N from mineral fertilizers (Figueiredo et al. 2020).
There is still a significant shortage of information on the advantages and limitations of using biochar from sewage sludge on agricultural land. Therefore, this chapter summarizes the main approaches applied to the SS biochar as a soil amendment, including advantages, limitations, and perspectives.
2 State of the Art
2.1 Sewage Sludge in Agriculture: Benefits and Limitations
As biomass rich in carbon and nutrients, SS can be used for different purposes, emphasizing disposal in agricultural areas, land reclamation, landscaping, forestry, industrial processes, power generation, civil construction, and biochar production. Furthermore, SS may be destined for incineration or landfill (Fig. 8.1). In agriculture, SS can be used as a fertilizer or as a soil conditioner. It is estimated that the municipal wastewater produced globally contains enough nutrients to replace 25% of the nitrogen currently used to fertilize agricultural land in the form of synthetic fertilizers, and 15% of the phosphorus (Andersson et al. 2016). Alternatives such as prolonged alkaline stabilization, adopted in the state of Paraná, Brazil, have been successful among farmers, despite a limited adoption (Souza et al. 2008). In this process, the pH of the sludge is raised to 12 by adding large amounts of lime. The monitoring of pollutants in the sludge and in the soil is required, in addition to complications which include logistics of transporting the sludge, uneven demand over the year (concentrated in two growing seasons), and the high number of rainy days, which present challenges for practical application.
Despite the advances in research and government actions in recent decades, the use of SS worldwide is still very limited, particularly in developing countries that lack efficient sewage treatment systems (Andersson et al. 2016). As a result of the precautionary principle, legislation dealing with the use of SS imposes several restrictions on the agricultural use of this waste. Figure 8.1 shows the main pollutants present in SS, such as organic compounds, inorganic and biological components. Several types of organic chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) may be found in treated SS (Paz-Ferreiro et al. 2018).
The presence of these contaminants with values above the limits established in specific legislation makes SS unfit for use in agricultural areas because of its high potential for contamination of the environment and the food chain (Collivignarelli et al. 2019). As a consequence of restrictions for their use, large amounts of SS accumulate in drying yards or are disposed of in dumps and water courses. With the lack of planning for the sustainable use of SS, major sanitary and environmental problems have been witnessed in many cities around the world.
Among the alternatives to make use of SS in agriculture feasible, thermal processing by pyrolysis has received much attention from researchers in the last decade (Paz-Ferreiro et al. 2018; Patel et al. 2020; Chagas et al. 2021a). Pyrolysis produces a solid material called biochar that can be used in agriculture, as well as biogas and bio-oil that can be used as an alternative energy source (Patel et al. 2020). In the specific case of SS the pyrolysis transformation eliminates pathogens and degrades potentially damaging organic compounds (Devi and Saroha 2013), thus permitting that SS be used for nutrient cycling and C accumulation in the soil.
2.2 Pyrolysis as a Sustainable Alternative to Enable the Disposal of Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Soil
2.2.1 Chemical Characteristics of Sewage Sludge Biochar
Compared with other urban wastes, SS biochars present high levels of nutrients such as P, N, Ca, and Mg (Figueiredo et al. 2018b), and when applied to tropical soils they are able to substitute soluble chemical fertilizers used in the production of different crops (Sousa and Figueiredo 2016; Faria et al. 2018; Fachini et al. 2021a, b; Chagas et al. 2021b).
The concentration of nutrients in the SS biochar is dependent on factors such as the type of treatment applied to the sewage and pyrolysis conditions such as temperature and residence time. Sludge that undergoes tertiary treatment, using methods for precipitation of N and P, is rich in these nutrients and poor in those that are removed together with water, such as potassium.
Figure 8.2 shows the macronutrient contents of sewage sludges and biochars produced at 300 and 500 °C. Overall, the pyrolysis of SS enriches the macronutrients in the biochars. The significant increase in phosphorus content with the pyrolysis temperature is a good characteristic considering that soils from tropical regions usually have a very low content of this nutrient. Despite increasing nitrogen contents up to 300 °C with decreases at higher temperatures, generally pyrolysis reduced the concentrations of nitrate and ammonium from the feedstock (Figueiredo et al. 2018b). This decrease may be a result of nitrogen transformation to pyridine and pyrrols during pyrolysis, especially above 300 °C. Nevertheless, the concentration of ammonium in BC300 is 30 times higher than those normally found in acid soils from tropical regions (Nascente et al. 2012). As the pyrolysis temperature increases the biochar becomes more alkaline highlighting its function to act as a soil acidic neutralizer.
2.2.2 Sewage Sludge Biochar as Soil Amendment
Sewage sludge biochar can act as a soil amendment improving the chemical, physical, and biological properties (Fig. 8.3). Among the nutrients provided by SS biochar obtained after tertiary treatment, P was highlighted by its great availability in the soil and high absorption by the crops (Faria et al. 2018; Figueiredo et al. 2021). It is currently well known that SS biochar is a source of P, potentially replacing soluble mineral fertilizers. However, studies on the dynamics of P and the microbiota related to its cycling in the soil under application of SS biochar are incipient (Figueiredo et al. 2019b) and this represents an important scientific gap, since the efficiency of phosphate fertilization in tropical soils with high capacity of P adsorption is very low.
Sewage sludge biochar may also indirectly improve nutrient use efficiency by plants. For example, the beneficial effect of the interaction of biochar with plant growth-promoting microorganisms such as mycorrhizal fungi has been demonstrated. Hammer et al. (2014) concluded that hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can access biochar micropores that are too small for the penetration of most plant roots (<10 μm) and may therefore mediate plant uptake of P present in the biochar. Thus, the functions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar can contribute to the sustainability of weathered soils, deficient in available P under natural conditions, such as those that predominate in tropical soils.
The exclusive application of SS biochar or combined application with chemical fertilizer (NPK) increased corn productivity for two consecutive harvests in tropical soils (Faria et al. 2018). According to these authors, with the exception of potassium, the 15 Mg ha−1 dose of biochar was able to provide all nutrients in sufficient quantity to promote corn yields of 10 Mg ha−1 in tropical acid soil from the central region of Brazil. Residual effects of SS biochar on soil nutrient contents remained up to 3 years after stopping biochar application (Chagas et al. 2021b).
2.2.3 Sewage Sludge Biochar for Plant Disease Control
Studies on the use of biochar to control plant diseases have grown in recent years (Kumar et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2019; de Araujo et al. 2019a; Jaiswal et al. 2020). Biochars are able to control plant diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, or viruses (Jaiswal et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2017a, b; Wang et al. 2018). However, most studies have focused on the effects of biochar on the control of fungal diseases (Wu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2019; Kolton et al. 2017). Among the phytopathogenic fungi evaluated, the genus Fusarium stands out (Jaiswal et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2019). The diseases caused by this genus were the most suppressed by biochar application (Jaiswal et al. 2018; Rogovska et al. 2017).
Biochar has direct and indirect effects on the pathogen or disease. The most often reported effects are: reduced disease rate (Wang et al. 2020); inhibition of mycelial growth (Wu et al. 2020); reduced pathogen virulence (Wu et al. 2020); delay in the spread of the disease (Sabes et al. 2020); pathogen suppression (Wang et al. 2019); reduced plant susceptibility to disease (Kolton et al. 2017); greater plant resistance to the disease (Dai et al. 2017); reduction of root infection rate; and reduced disease severity (Rogovska et al. 2017).
Feedstocks commonly used to produce biochar suitable for plant diseases control are: wood and its derivatives (wood chips/barks, sawdust) (Jaiswal et al. 2019; Heck et al. 2019), vegetable residues used in the greenhouse (Jaiswal et al. 2020), and rice straw/husk (Wu et al. 2020; Sabes et al. 2020). A wide range of pyrolysis temperatures can be used for this purpose (300–1000 °C) (Marra et al. 2018; Atucha and Litus 2015). However, the highest plant disease control rates were obtained with biochar produced at pyrolysis temperatures ranging from 350 to 600 °C (Jaiswal et al. 2018; Lu et al. 2016a, b).
The dose of biochar is also an important factor for effective disease control. The best results were obtained when biochars were applied at doses ranging from 0 to 5% (de Araujo et al. 2019a). Furthermore, there is a certain specificity between the type and dose of biochar and the type of pathogen. Thus, each material can have an optimal dose with greater impact on the disease (Liu et al. 2019).
Recent studies have indicated that biochar from SS is also capable of controlling soilborne pathogenic fungi that infect various types of crops (de Araujo et al. 2019a, b). As a consequence of disease control, SS biochar promoted higher productivity of crops such as beans (de Araujo et al. 2019a) and soybeans (de Araujo et al. 2019b). These studies also indicated a synergistic effect between SS biochar and beneficial microorganisms such as Trichoderma spp. to control pathogenic fungi and increase crop productivity. Despite this potential, the use of SS biochar to control pathogens still needs to be better studied under field conditions and with a wide variety of pathogens and host plants.
2.2.4 Biochar Enrichment
Biochar enrichment techniques have allowed to obtain biochar-based fertilizers, with great potential to improve soil fertility (Lustosa Filho et al. 2020). According to Ndoung et al. (2021), there are three methods to enrich biochar with nutrients: (i) direct treatment method, (ii) pre-treatment method, and (iii) post-treatment method. In the direct treatment method, nutrient-rich feedstocks are submitted to slow pyrolysis (Ndoung et al. 2021). In the pre-treatment method, the feedstock is treated with nutrient-rich materials before undergoing pyrolysis. In this method, feedstocks may be enriched with chemical fertilizers, organic wastes, or agro-industrial residues. In the post-treatment method, several products can be used to composite enriched biochar after the pyrolysis process. In this process, biochars are mixed with a nutrient-rich source, including chemical fertilizers, clays, ground rock, composts, wastewater, etc.
Biochar enrichment may be produced from a wide variety of possibilities and combinations (Ndoung et al. 2021). Significant success has been obtained by enriching biochar with nutrients such as P (Lustosa Filho et al. 2020; Carneiro et al. 2021), N from urea (Shi et al. 2020), sulfur (Zhang et al. 2017a, b), and iron (Dad et al. 2021). Among the post-treatment (post-pyrolysis) methods, the granulation and pelleting processes of biochar are the most commonly used for nutrient enrichment (Ndoung et al. 2021). They have been used to minimize the risk of dust and respiratory problems caused by the application of biochar in powder form (Vincevica-Gaile et al. 2019). Specific characteristics of feedstock should be considered in biochar enrichment. For sewage sludge biochar, for example, an interesting strategy is enrichment with potassium, since this nutrient is present in low concentration in SS and, consequently, in the biochar. Furthermore, the high adsorptive capacity of biochar can retain K (Fachini et al. 2021b), acting as a slow-release fertilizer, thus reducing the loss of this nutrient through leaching. Figure 8.4 shows an alternative technological process to produce K-enriched SS biochar in the form of granules and pellets.
Enriched biochars can improve soil chemical and biological properties, nutrient use efficiency and increase crop productivity compared to mineral fertilizers and biochars applied separately (Ndoung et al. 2021). According to these authors, the application of a P-enriched biochar increased soil P and N contents. In addition to increasing the concentration of P, the application of P-enriched biochar also increased soil chemical properties such as pH and CEC (Carneiro et al. 2021). The main mechanism that explains the greater efficiency of a biochar-based fertilizer is the way in which the enriched nutrient is released. Biochar-based fertilizers differ from other fertilizers in their ability to gradually release nutrients into the soil, acting as a slow-release fertilizer (Lustosa Filho et al. 2020), increasing efficiency by reducing losses due to leaching or volatilization (Gwenzi et al. 2016).
2.2.5 Sewage Sludge Biochar and Carbon Sequestration in the Soil
The nutritional performance of biochar produced from several feedstocks is widely known. According to Zimmerman et al. (2011), biochar is also capable of increasing soil C stocks mainly in stable forms of organic compounds. This is possible since pyrolysis alters the feedstock promoting C buildup in the final biochar (Novotny et al. 2015). Therefore, when used as a soil amendment, biochar can sequester C in the soil (Figueiredo et al. 2018a; Chagas et al. 2022) and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities (Chagas et al. 2022; Plaza et al. 2016). According to Woolf et al. (2010), adopting biochar technology could compensate up to 12% of global CO2 emissions into the atmosphere.
In general, biochars obtained at lower temperatures around 300 °C have fewer aromatic structures than those obtained at higher temperatures (≥500 °C) (Al-Wabel et al. 2013; Figueiredo et al. 2018a). This difference in the organic matrix of the biochars exerts a strong influence on the nutrient mineralization rate and on the long-term accumulation of C (Al-Wabel et al. 2013). Recently, Chagas et al. (2022), using results from a global meta-analysis, concluded that biochar increases several types of SOM fractions. Among these fractions, the most labile and active fractions such as microbial biomass, labile C, and easily oxidizable C are most sensitive to the changes promoted by crops (Cambardella and Elliott 1992). On the other hand, the stable fractions such as humic substances represent more recalcitrant forms of SOM, whose changes occur over a longer period of time (Figueiredo et al. 2018b).
Despite substantial advances in biochar knowledge in recent years, there are still many questions regarding its real short- and long-term impacts and how it acts on the soil (Cernansky 2015). Of the few works performed under field conditions with SS biochar application for consecutive years, Figueiredo et al. (2018a) concluded that the pyrolysis temperature is the driving factor in the function of biochar to increase organic C in the soil. In general, biochar produced at lower temperatures (around 300 °C) can increase labile fractions. On the other hand, when made at higher temperatures (≥500 °C), biochars increase recalcitrant SOM pools.
2.2.6 Sewage Sludge Biochar and the Risks of Contamination with Heavy Metals
Sewage sludge has heavy metal (HM) contents that vary depending on the origin (industrial, urban, or mixed) and the treatment that the sewage receives (Fytili and Zabaniotou 2008). Wang et al. (2008) reported that the application of SS from mixed-source sewage treatment (urban, commercial, and industrial) in China increased the concentration of heavy metals in the soil at all doses utilized (15–150 Mg ha−1).
Chemical composition of the biomass used in pyrolysis is directly related to the HM concentration in the biochar obtained. Biochar produced from several feedstocks (e.g., wood, rice straw, animal manure) generally shows low levels of heavy metals, since these are not part of their natural composition (Park et al. 2011; Bian et al. 2014; Lucchini et al. 2014). However, in the case of SS the presence of HMs in the biochar is dependent on the type of sewage that makes up the sludge (domestic, industrial, or mixed). This dependence results in SS biochars with distinct HMs concentrations (Chagas et al. 2021a, b). For example, the municipal SS biochar submitted to secondary treatment showed a HM content suitable for agricultural use according to the local regulations of Guiyang, China (Liu et al. 2014). However, Van Wesenbeeck et al. (2014) observed that even on Oahu, a small island located in Hawaii, the HM contents in SS varied significantly between communities and over the years.
During pyrolysis, most metals including Pb, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Cr are retained in the biochar (solid fraction), since they present boiling points higher than the temperature normally used in pyrolysis (Van Wesenbeeck et al. 2014; Lu et al. 2016a, b). Thus, pyrolysis concentrates total HMs in the biochar (Lu et al. 2016a, b; Kameyama et al. 2017; Figueiredo et al. 2019a, b), and depending on the HM contents present in the SS may make its use unviable for agricultural purposes (Chagas et al. 2021a, b). The higher the pyrolysis temperature used, the higher the concentration of total HMs in the biochar (Yuan et al. 2015; Lu et al. 2016a, b). However, when using temperatures >600 °C, some heavy metals such as Cd volatilize and leave the reactor together with the produced gases. Below 600 °C the small heavy metal losses observed are mainly due to the escape of charged fine metal particles carried in the gas outflow (Kistler et al. 1987).
Even when there is an increase in the concentration of HMs during pyrolysis, it is observed that when applied to the soil, biochar affects the behavior of these metals, reducing their solubility, availability, transport, and spatial distribution (Zhou et al. 2017). Thus, with the application of SS biochar there is a reduction of the HM levels available in the soil, with values lower than those present with the use of sewage sludge (Figueiredo et al. 2019a, b; Chagas et al. 2021a, b).
Table 8.1 summarizes the effects of SS biochar on total and available HM in the soil and plant. Even when applying SS biochar with total HM contents below the local regulated limits, all studies shown in Table 8.1 that assessed the HM content in soils after SS biochar application reported accumulation of at least one of the analyzed HMs in the soil. In general, SS biochar increases the total HM content but decreases the available HM in the soil and the rate of HM uptake by plants.
In the specific case of SS biochar of predominantly domestic origin, in the central region of Brazil, Figueiredo et al. (2019a, b) concluded that with the increase in pyrolysis temperature there is reduced availability of these HMs, with values below 5.2% in relation to the total contents. Even with the application of 15 Mg ha−1 of SS biochar, the total and available contents in the soil were similar to the control treatment, without biochar application, 1 year after its application. Recently, Chagas et al. (2021a, b) proved that this low HM contents in soil amended with SS biochar may remain for at least 5 years.
3 Recommendations
Despite the potential benefits of SS biochar as an agricultural input, some aspects still need to be considered in future studies. Further information from long-term experiments is crucial. Production or co-production of biochar in combination with other feedstocks/materials such as soil remineralizers and organomineral fertilizers should be studied. Furthermore, identify additional benefits of biochar (plant disease and pest management/control) should be improved. Finally, studies on the energy efficiency of the SS pyrolysis process need to be broad.
References
Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, Nadeem M, Usman ARA (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 131:374–379
Andersson K, Rosemarin A, Lamizana B, Kvarnström E, Mcconville J, Seidu R, Dickin S, Trimmer C (2016) Sanitation, wastewater management and sustainability: from waste disposal to resource recovery. United Nations Environment Programme and Stockholm Environment Institute, Nairobi and Stockholm
Atucha A, Litus G (2015) Effect of biochar amendments on peach replant disease. HortScience 50:863–868
Bian R, Joseph S, Cui L, Pan G, Li L, Liu X, Zhang A, Rutlidge H, Wong S, Chia C, Marjo C, Gong B, Munroe P, Donne S (2014) A three-year experiment confirms continuous immobilization of cadmium and lead in contaminated paddy field with biochar amendment. J Hazard Mater 272:121–128
Cambardella CA, Elliott ET (1992) Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:777–783
Carneiro JSS, Ribeiro ICA, Nardis BO, Barbosa CF, Lustosa Filho JF, Melo LCA (2021) Long-term effect of biochar-based fertilizers application in tropical soil: agronomic efficiency and phosphorus availability. Sci Total Environ 760:143955
Cernansky R (2015) Agriculture: state-of-the-art soil. Nature 517:258–260
Chagas JKM, Figueiredo CC, Silva J, Shah K, Paz-Ferreiro J (2021a) Long term effects of sewage sludge derived biochar on the accumulation and availability of trace elements in a tropical soil. J Environ Qual 50:264–277
Chagas JKM, Figueiredo CC, Silva J, Paz-Ferreiro J (2021b) Sewage sludge biochars effects on corn response and nutrition and on soil properties in a 5-yr field experiment. Geoderma 401:115323
Chagas JKM, Figueiredo CC, Ramos MLG (2022) Biochar increases soil carbon pools: evidence from a global meta-analysis. J Environ Manag 305:114403
Collivignarelli MC, Canato M, Abba A, Miino MC (2019) Biosolids: what are the different types of reuse? J Clean Prod 238:117844
Cui HJ, Wang MK, Fu M-L, Ci E (2011) Enhancing phosphorus availability in phosphorus-fertilized zones by reducing phosphate adsorbed on ferrihydrite using rice straw-derived biochar. J Soils Sediments 11:1135
Dad FP, Khan W, Tanveer M, Ramzani PMA, Shaukat R, Muktadir A (2021) Influence of iron-enriched biochar on Cd sorption, its ionic concentration and redox regulation of radish under cadmium toxicity. Agriculture 11:1
Dai L, Fan J, Feng L, Xu M, Wang H (2017) Genetically engineered nitrifier cooperated with biochar improves disease resistance of tobacco through regulation of NPIR-induced SIPK/WIPK pathway. Biomedical Research, Special Section: Health Science and Bio Convergence Technology, pp 414–422
de Araujo AS, Blum LEB, Figueiredo CC (2019a) The synergistic effect of sewage sludge biochar and Trichoderma harzianum on soybean yield. Aust J Crop Sci 13:1183–1187
de Araujo AS, Blum LEB, Figueiredo CC (2019b) Biochar and Trichoderma harzianum for the control of Macrophomina phaseolina. Braz Arch Biol Technol 62:e19180259
Devi P, Saroha AK (2013) Effect of temperature on biochar properties during paper mill sludge pyrolysis. Int J Chem Technol Res 5:682–687
Fachini J, Coser TR, Araujo AS, Vale AT, Jindo K, Figueiredo CC (2021a) One year residual effect of sewage sludge biochar as a soil amendment for maize in a Brazilian Oxisol. Sustainability 13:2226
Fachini J, Figueiredo CC, Frazão JJ, Rosa SD, Silva J, Vale AT (2021b) Novel K-enriched organomineral fertilizer from sewage sludge-biochar: chemical, physical and mineralogical characterization. Waste Manag 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.027
Faria WM, De Figueiredo CC, Coser TR, Vale AT, Schneider BG (2018) Is sewage sludge biochar capable of replacing inorganic fertilizers for corn production? Evidence from a two-year field experiment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:505–519
Figueiredo CC, Farias WM, Melo BA, Chagas JKM, Vale AT, Coser TR (2018a) Labile and stable pools of organic matter in soil amended with sewage sludge biochar. Arch Agron Soil Sci 65:770–781
Figueiredo C, Lopes H, Coser T, Vale A, Busato J, Aguiar N, Novotny E, Canellas L (2018b) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and physical properties of biochar from sewage sludge. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:881–889
Figueiredo CC, Chagas JKM, Silva J, Paz-Ferreiro J (2019a) Short-term effects of a sewage sludge biochar amendment on total and available heavy metal content of a tropical soil. Geoderma 344:31–39
Figueiredo CC, Farias WM, Coser TR, Paula AM, Silva MRS, Paz-Ferreiro J (2019b) Sewage sludge biochar alters root colonization of mycorrhizal fungi in a soil cultivated with corn. Eur J Soil Biol 93:103092
Figueiredo CC, Pinheiro TD, Zacanaro de Oliveira LE, Araujo AS, Coser TR, Paz-Ferreiro J (2020) Direct and residual effect of biochar derived from biosolids on soil phosphorus pools: a four-year field assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2020:739
Figueiredo CC, Reis ASPJ, Araujo AS, Blum LEB, Shah K, Paz-Ferreiro J (2021) Assessing the potential of sewage sludge-derived biochar as a novel phosphorus fertilizer: influence of extractant solutions and pyrolysis temperatures. Waste Manag 124:144–153
Fytili D, Zabaniotou A (2008) Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12:116–140
Gonzaga MIS et al (2018) Assessing biochar applications and repeated Brassica juncea L. production cycles to remediate Cu contaminated soil. Chemosphere 201:278–285
Gwenzi W, Muzava M, Mapanda F, Tauro TP (2016) Comparative short-term effects of sewage sludge and its biochar on soil properties, maize growth and uptake of nutrients on a tropical clay soil in Zimbabwe. J Integr Agric 15:1395–1406
Hammer EC, Balogh-Brunstad Z, Jakobsen I, Olsson PA, Stipp SLS, Rillig MC (2014) A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces. Soil Biol Biochem 77:252–260
Heck DW, Ghini R, Bettiol W (2019) Deciphering the suppressiveness of banana fusarium wilt with organic residues. Appl Soil Ecol 138:47–60
Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manag 92:223–228
Huang Z, Lu Q, Wang J, Chen X, Mao X, He Z (2017) Inhibition of the bioavailability of heavy metals in sewage sludge biochar by adding two stabilizers. PLoS One 12:e0183617
Ibrahim M, Li G, Khan S, Chi Q, Xu Y (2017) Biochars mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and bioaccumulation of potentially toxic elements and arsenic speciation in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:19524–19534
Jafari Tarf O, Akça MO, Donar YO, Bilge S, Turgay OC, Sinag A (2021) The short-term effects of pyro-and hydrochars derived from different organic wastes on some soil properties. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01282-7
Jaiswal AK, Frenkel O, Tsechansky L, Elad Y, Graber ER (2018) Immobilization and deactivation of pathogenic enzymes and toxic metabolites by biochar: a possible mechanism involved in soilborne disease suppression. Soil Biol Biochem 121:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.03.001
Jaiswal AK, Graber ER, Elad Y, Frenkel O (2019) Biochar as a management tool for soilborne diseases affecting early stage nursery seedling production. Crop Prot 120:34–42
Jaiswal AK, Alkan N, Elad Y, Sela N, Philosoph AM, Graber ER, Frenkel O (2020) Molecular insights into biochar-mediated plant growth promotion and systemic resistance in tomato against fusarium crown and root rot disease. Sci Rep 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70882-6
Kameyama K, Iwata Y, Miyamoto T (2017) Biochar amendment of soils according to their physicochemical properties. Jpn Agric Res Q 51:117–127
Khan S, Chao C, Waqas M, Arp HPH, Zhu YG (2013) Sewage sludge biochar influence upon rice (Oryza sativa L) yield, metal bioaccumulation and greenhouse gas emissions from acidic paddy soil. Environ Sci Technol 47:8624–8632. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400554x
Khan S et al (2015) The influence of various biochars on the bioaccessibility and bioaccumulation of PAHs and potentially toxic elements to turnips (Brassica rapa L.). J Hazard Mater 300:243–253
Khanmohammadi Z, Afyuni M, Mosaddeghi MR (2015) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and physical properties of sewage sludge biochar. Waste Manag Res 33:275–283
Khanmohammadi Z, Afyuni M, Mosaddeghi MR (2017) Effect of sewage sludge and its biochar on chemical properties of two calcareous soils and maize shoot yield. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1210787
Kistler RC, Widmer F, Brunner PH (1987) Behavior of chromium, nickel, copper, zinc, cadmium, mercury, and lead during the pyrolysis of sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 21:704–708
Kolton M, Graber ER, Tsehansky L, Elad Y, Cytryn E (2017) Biochar-stimulated plant performance is strongly linked to microbial diversity and metabolic potential in the rhizosphere. New Phytol 213:1393–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14253
Kumar A, Elad Y, Tsechansky L, Abrol V, Lew B, Offenbach R, Graber ER (2018) Biochar potential in intensive cultivation of Capsicum annuum L. (sweet pepper): crop yield and plant protection. J Sci Food Agric. 98:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8486
Liu T, Liu B, Zhang W (2014) Nutrients and heavy metals in biochar produced by sewage sludge pyrolysis: its application in soil amendment. Pol J Environ Stud 23:271–275
Liu L, Liu C, Shen G, Yang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Li X (2019) Control of fusarium stalk rot of corn by addition of biochars. Int J Agric Biol 22:510–516
Lu T, Yuan H, Wang Y, Huang H, Chen Y (2016a) Characteristic of heavy metals in biochar derived from sewage sludge. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:725–733
Lu Y, Rao S, Huang F, Cai Y, Wang G, Cai K (2016b) Effects of biochar amendment on tomato bacterial wilt resistance and soil microbial amount and activity. Int J Agron 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2938282
Lucchini P, Quilliam RS, Deluca TH, Vamerali T, Jones DL (2014) Does biochar application alter heavy metal dynamics in agricultural soil? Agric Ecosyst Environ 184:149–157
Lustosa Filho JF, Carneiro JSC, Barbosa CF, Lima KP, Leite AA, Melo LCA (2020) Aging of biochar-based fertilizers in soil: effects on phosphorus pools and availability to Urochloa brizantha grass. Sci Total Environ 709:136028
Marra R, Vinale F, Cesarano G, Lombardi N, D’errico G, Crasto A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A, Incerti G, Woo SL, Scala F, Bonanomi G, Paz-Ferreiro J (2018) Biochars from olive mill waste have contrasting effects on plants, fungi and phytoparasitic nematodes. PLoS One 13(e0198728):1–24
Mateo-Sagasta J, Raschid-Sally L, Thebo A (2015) Global wastewater and sludge production, treatment and use. In: Drechsel P, Qadir M, Wichelns D (eds) Wastewater: economic asset in an urbanizing world. Springer, London
Méndez A, Gómez A, Paz-Ferreiro J, Gascó G (2012) Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere 89:1354–1359
Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Baran A, Bajda T (2018) Sewage sludge biochars management - ecotoxicity, mobility of heavy metals, and soil microbial biomass. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:1197–1207
Nascente AS, Crusciol CAC, Cobucci T (2012) Ammonium and nitrate in soil and upland rice yield as affected by cover crops and their desiccation time. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 47:1699–1706
Ndoung OCN, Figueiredo, CC, Ramos MLG (2021) A scoping review on biochar-based fertilizers: enrichmenttechniques and agro-environmental application. Heliyon 7:e08473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08473
Novotny EH, Maia CMBF, Carvalho MTM, Madari BE (2015) Biochar: pyrogenic carbon for agricultural use: a critical review. Rev Bras Ci Solo 39:321–344
Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T (2011) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348:439–451
Patel S, Kundu S, Halder P, Ratnnayake N, Marzbali MH, Aktar S, Selezneva E, Paz-Ferreiro J, Surapaneni A, Figueiredo CC, Sharma A, Megharaj M, Shah K (2020) A critical literature review on biosolids to biochar: an alternative biosolids management option. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 2020:1–35
Paz-Ferreiro J, Nieto A, Méndez A, Askeland M, Gascó G (2018) Biochar from biosolids pyrolysis: a review. Int J Environ Res Pub He 15:956
Plaza C, Gianetta B, Fernández JM, López-De-Sá EG, Polo A, Gascó G, Méndez A, Zaccone C (2016) Response of different soil organic matter pools to biochar and organic fertilizers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:150–159
Racek J, Sevcik J, Chorazy T, Kucerik J, Hlavinek P (2020) Biochar – recovery material from pyrolysis of sewage sludge: a review. Waste Biomass Valorization 11:3677–3709
Rogovska N, Laird D, Leandro L, Aller D (2017) Biochar effect on severity of soybean root disease caused by fusarium virguliforme. Plant Soil 413:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3086-8
Sabes PP, Lon MM, Peter MA, Maruyama J, Koyama S, Watanabe T, Koizumi S (2020) Effect of increased silicon content of paddy rice on sheath blight development through carbonized rice husk application. Jpn Int Res Center Agric Sci 54:145–151
Shao Q, Ju Y, Guo W, Xia X, Bian R, Li L, Pan G (2019) Pyrolyzed municipal sewage sludge ensured safe grain production while reduced C emissions in a paddy soil under rice and wheat rotation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:9244–9256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04417-6
Shi W, Ju Y, Bian R, Li L, Joseph S, Mitchell DRG, Munroe P, Taherymoosavi S, Pan G (2020) Biochar bound urea boosts plant growth and reduces nitrogen leaching. Sci Total Environ 701:134424
Sohi SP (2012) Carbon storage with benefits. Science 338:1034–1035
Sousa AATC, Figueiredo CC (2016) Sewage sludge biochar: effects on soil fertility and growth of radish. Biol Agric Hortic 32:127–138
Souza MLP, Ribeiro AN, Andreoli CV, Souza LCP, Bittencourt S (2008) Aptidão das terras do Estado do Paraná para disposição final de lodo de esgoto (Suitability of land in Paraná state for final disposal of sewage sludge). Rev DAE 56:20–29. https://doi.org/10.4322/dae.2014.012
Tian Y, Cui L, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2019) The sewage sludge biochar at low pyrolysis temperature had better improvement in urban soil and turf grass. Agronomy 9:156
Van Wesenbeeck S, Prins W, Ronsse F, Antal MJ (2014) Sewage sludge carbonization for biochar applications. Fate of heavy metals. Energy Fuel 28:5318–5326
Vincevica-Gaile Z, Stankevica K, Irtiseva K, Shishkin A, Obuka V, Celma S, Ozolins J, Klavins M (2019) Granulation of fly ash and biochar with organic lake sediments - a way to sustainable utilization of waste from bioenergy production. Biomass Bioenergy 125:23–33
Wang X, Chen T, Ge Y, Jia Y (2008) Studies on land application of sewage sludge and its limiting factors. J Hazard Mater 160:554–558
Wang Q, Ma L, Li Y (2018) Effect of cover crops and soil amendments on tomato yield and incidence of disease. Proc Florida State Hort Soc 131:144–147
Wang Y, Ma Z, Wang X, Sun Q, Dong H, Wang G, Chen X, Yin C, Han Z, Mao Z (2019) Effects of biochar on the growth of apple seedlings, soil enzyme activities and fungal communities in replant disease soil. Sci Hortic 256:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108641
Wang G, Ma Y, Chenia HY, Govinden R, Luo J, Ren G (2020) Biochar-mediated control of phytophthora blight of pepper is closely related to the improvement of the rhizosphere fungal community. Front Microbiol 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01427
Waqas M, Khan S, Qing H, Reid BJ, Chao C (2014) The effects of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar on PAHs and potentially toxic element bioaccumulation in Cucumis sativa L. Chemosphere 105:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.064
Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun 1:56
Wu H, Qin X, Wu H, Li F, Wu J, Zheng L, Wang J, Chen J, Zhao Y, Lin S, Lin W (2020) Biochar mediates microbial communities and their metabolic characteristics under continuous monoculture. Chemosphere 246(125835). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125835
Yuan H, Lu T, Zhao D, Huang H, Noriyuki K, Chen Y (2013) Influence of temperature on product distribution and biochar properties by municipal sludge pyrolysis. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 2013:1–5
Yuan H, Lu T, Huang H, Zhao D, Kobayashi N, Chen Y (2015) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 112:284–289
Yue Y, Cui L, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2017) Efficiency of sewage sludge biochar in improving urban soil properties and promoting grass growth. Chemosphere 173:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.096
Zhang J, Lu F, Zhang H, Shao L, Chen D, He P (2015) Multiscale visualization of the structural and characteristic changes of sewage sludge biochar oriented towards potential agronomic and environmental implication. Sci Rep 5:9406
Zhang C, Lin Y, Tian X, Xu Q, Chen Z, Lin W (2017a) Tobacco bacterial wilt suppression with biochar soil addition associates to improved soil physiochemical properties and increased rhizosphere bacteria abundance. Appl Soil Ecol 112:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.12.005
Zhang H, Voroney RP, Price GW, White AJ (2017b) Sulfur-enriched biochar as a potential soil amendment and fertilizer. Soil Res 55:93–99
Zhou D, Liu D, Gao F, Li M, Luo X (2017) Effects of biochar-derived sewage sludge on heavy metal adsorption and immobilization in soils. Int J Environ Res Pub He 14:681
Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn M-Y (2011) Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar - amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1169–1179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Figueiredo, C.C., Fachini, J., de Araujo, A.S., Chagas, J.K.M., Paz-Ferreiro, J. (2022). Sewage Sludge Biochar. In: Jacob-Lopes, E., Queiroz Zepka, L., Costa Deprá, M. (eds) Handbook of Waste Biorefinery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06562-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06562-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06561-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06562-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)