1 Introduction

Economically, current world faces a variety of issues related to energy production and its usage. Global oil supplies and demands continue to rise with the dramatically increase in the prices of Oil [1]. Environmentally, the global apprehensions of the rising impact of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide and the other carbon products is a prime concern. Politically, the lack of energy supplies will directly influence the poorer countries. Such issues claim the requirement of additional energy harvesting technologies. For the same purpose, several green-energy based modern vehicle engines, transmissions, and related technologies are in progress to improve the performance of the vehicle transportation.

Still, the absence of one of these crucial problems from the modern-day technologies is quite appealing: most of the energy consumption would still generate unusable heat in the exhaust or cooling systems of the vehicles and other appliances. This waste in the form of heat is equal to two-thirds of the available power reserves of electric plants or the other industrial entities. So, thermoelectric (TE) materials provide a means of transforming this low-grade waste heat energy into electrical energy via the Seebeck effect which was discovered in 1821 [2, 3]. Similarly, a voltage gradient through the junction of a thermoelectric material generates a temperature gradient through the Peltier effect [4]. These categories of materials have been developed into numerous solid-state thermoelectric systems. Due to the significant advantages of thermoelectric harvesting energy systems: no moving parts, long service life, zero emissions, accurate temperature control and the ability to work in the extreme environment [5,6,7], the expectation of thermoelectric technologies is outstanding, particularly for power production and cooling systems. For power production, energy is collected from waste, environmental, or mechanical/hydraulic supplies and transformed into an exhaustible form — electricity by means of thermoelectric devices [7,8,9,10]. Thermoelectric materials are also capable of producing energy via solar radiations to generate a temperature difference throughout the installed thermoelectric materials [11, 12]. Nuclear reactors as well as radioisotope thermoelectric generators are used for propulsion and power supply in spacecrafts [14,15,16,17].

In refrigeration modes, air conditioner or micro thermoelectric cooling devices can be mounted in the integrated circuit to resolve the problem of heat dissipation. However flexible thermoelectric materials can be designed in uniforms or clothes of people who are employed in the extreme environment to operate as a wearable climate control system [18].

TE devices efficiency depends on the overall figure of merit (ZT) of the n & p-types thermoelectrics which is defined as [11, 12]:

(1)

where (S) represents the Seebeck coefficient, σ as well as κ are the electrical and thermal conductivities, respectively, T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin, ρ is the electrical resistivity, whereas the thermal conductivity (κ) consists of two parts: lattice thermal conductivity (κL) and electronic thermal conductivity (κe).

In the power generation mode, the efficiency (ε) can be calculated for both the components of the thermoelectric module (n & p-type) as follows:

$$\upvarepsilon =\frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}{-\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{c}}}{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}}\frac{\sqrt{1+\mathrm{ZT}}-1}{\sqrt{1+\mathrm{ZT}}+\frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{c}}}{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}}}$$
(2)

For the cooling/refrigerator devices, the coefficient of performance (COP) is given by:

$$\mathrm{COP}=\frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}}{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}-{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{c}}}\frac{\sqrt{1+\mathrm{ZT}}-\frac{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{c}}}{{\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{h}}}}{\sqrt{1+\mathrm{ZT}}+1}$$
(3)

where, Th and Tc are the temperatures of hot and cold surfaces of the TE components, respectively. Also, ZT is occasionally known as the modified dimensionless value of figure of merit of TE devices while considering simultaneously the thermoelectric ability of p-type and n-type components from the materials involved in thermoelectric modules. So ZT may be described as:

$${\text{ZT}} = \frac{{\left( {{\text{S}}_{{\text{p}}} - {\text{S}}_{{{\text{n}} }} } \right)^{2} \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{\text{T}}}}{{(\sqrt {{\uprho }_{{{\text{p}} }} {\upkappa }_{{\text{p}}} } + \sqrt {{\uprho }_{{{\text{n}} }} {\upkappa }_{{\text{n}}} } )^{2} }}$$
(4)

where, \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{\text{T}}\) is the average temperature gradient between the hot & cold faces of TE device. The subscripts n and p used to define both the types of the semiconductors p and n-type, respectively, after the geometrical shape optimization for the TE legs is achieved.

Nanostructured PbTe based compounds and alloys have the highest power generation efficiency = 20% with ZT = 2.2 by converting the thermal dissipations to electricity which is 30–40% smaller than the conventional systems [19].

There are limitations in the progression of thermoelectric materials despite the current achievements. The low values of ZT (≤1) of the commercial TE and the efficiency is around 5% as shown in Fig. 1b. So, the competition to make large-scale thermoelectric devices with a high-power efficiency and higher ZT is demanded [20, 21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Figure of merit (ZT) temperature and year dependent data reveals the important achievements of thermoelectric materials taken from Ref. [20] for the available bulk and nano-thermoelectric materials; b The energy conversion of TE against ZT at Tc = 300 K [20]

To improve the thermoelectric properties of conventional materials, lot more efforts were made, seeking to improve ZT, especially the creation of the nanostructured materials, such as nanocomposite, superlattices, nanowires, and quantum dots. This has been revealed in Fig. 1a, which represents the remarkable progress accomplished for ZT through the past several decades. To promote thermoelectric practical devices and applications, ZT of the synthesized TE must be quite large.

Countless efforts in TE materials research have been evolved in improving the Seebeck coefficient and reducing the thermal conductivity (κ). Numerous reviews have studied the basic theory of nanostructured TE [21, 22] and the developments in bulk materials [23], nanoscale [24,25,26], or bulk nanostructured TE materials [1, 27, 28]. The impact of interfaces in low dimension TEs such as 1D nanowires or nanotubes [29,30,31,32,33], 2D superlattices (for example, the superlattices of Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 and SiGe/Si, the quantum dot superlattices of PbSe0.98Te0.02/PbTe) [1, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40] and 3D nanograins [29, 41] can improve ZT by scattering the phonons at the interfaces, which in turn diminishes the thermal conductivity. The size of nanoscale materials results in quantum confinement and interface effects as well as significant changes in the density of state of the charge carriers. Quantum confinement impacts are being used to increase ZT by reducing the transport pathways inside the material. Because of the size of the material lower than the mean free path of the phonon, then it is restricted and no longer contributes to thermal conductivity and hence decreases reasonably. The main goal is to improve ZT and thermoelectric performance as well [42]. On the other hand, the grain size has a curial effect on thermal conductivity where the reduction in the grain size may decrease it to 1/3, at the same time Seebeck coefficient S and the electrical conductivity are not affected compared to the single crystal materials [43]. Thus, nanostructured TE’s have a great impact on ZT: In Bi2Te3 nanograins ZT increased by 40%, in case of n-type semiconductor Si-Ge alloys ZT reduced by 40% [44], where P-type Si-Ge alloys 90% increase in ZT [45], 50% higher for both p-type half-Heuslers [46] and In4Se3−x (n-type) [47], and by around 4 times larger in MgAgSb composites equal to 1.4 [48].

1.1 Nanocomposites and ZT Improvements

To maximize ZT, lot more attempts have been made and its value stayed stagnant around 1 over 50 years for all the temperature range. So, it became important to make advancements in the usage of new materials like alloys, thin films, bulk materials …etc. In the 1990s, the most common two analogous methods were anticipated for ZT augmentation of thermoelectric materials: i) the first approach was based on new categories of superior bulk materials [49,50,51] called as ratters in which the crystal structures contain weakly bound atoms or molecules with large vibrational amplitudes at partially filled structural sites acting as effective phonon scattering centers. The concept of phonon glass-electron crystal (PGEC) formulated by Glen Slack [52] has also been beneficial in guiding efforts in this direction. Material structures such as skutterudites (e.g., CoSb3) [53,54,55], Clathrates (e.g., Ba8Ga16Ge30) [56,57,58] and Zintl phases [60] fall within this group. ii) The second approach involves the use of low-dimensional materials (including quantum structures-wells/wires/dots) [60, 61] which would end up in the advancement of ZT via two strategies: i) nanoscale characteristics that endorse confinement effects resulting in an increase in the power factor S2σ, and (ii) the existence of several interfaces in nanocrystals to increase phonon scattering rather than their counterparts (electrons) and thus reduce thermal conductivity without altering the electrical conductivity [29, 62].

The added value of this approach to the present research guidelines promotes the special design and synthesizing of the nanocomposite materials for improved TE performance. The three parameters S, σ and κ for the 3D-bulk materials are dependent and connected in somehow that restricted to controlling them indecently to enhance the overall ZT of the material. That is because, for example, S increase (by reducing carrier concentration) consequences in a frequent reduction in σ, where any increase in σ usually produce a rise in the electronic part of κ, owing to the Wiedemann–Franz relation. Conversely, if the dimensions of the material are reduced, the nano-scale lengths manage the properties of the material in the form of new effective variable. It is also conceivable to generate vivid changes in the density of states, permitting new prospects or chances to make S, σ, and κ vary in a quasi-independent fashion. One of the other effects of small dimensionality (e.g., less than ~100) is the appearance of quantum-confinement effects with respect to the decrease in number density of atoms in any of the 3D (x, y, or z) directions.

Also, the tunable dimensionality from 3D crystals to 2D (quantum wells) or to 1D (quantum wires) and lastly to 0D (quantum dots) leads to the new material properties like metal–semiconductor transition (as introduced for Bi nanowire composites) accomplish the new projections to alter S, σ, and κ individually. In addition, the existence of various interfaces, scattering the phonons more efficiently than the electrons and the energy barriers filter the low-energy electrons, making the nano-sized materials appropriate for TE applications and devices with enhanced ZT’s [29].

From the last few decades, theoreticians and experimentalists by wide use of quantum wells [61] and quantum wires [62] demonstrate the improvement of ZT. In this respect, PbTe superlattices grown by Harman et al. achieved a high ZT of ~1.7 (at 300 K) and 3.5 (at 570 K) [64]. Contrarily, the lattice thermal conductivity κl in the superlattices reduced to ~0.33 W/mK, being 6 times less than bulk PbTe (~2.4 W/mK). Further, the intensive experiments demonstrated that the ZT is actually increased by reducing the thermal conductivity and the augmentation in Seebeck coefficient makes no sense. Also, the exhibition of band alignment in these low dimensional materials (in Na-doped PbTeSe compound) elevates the ZT to 1.8.

p-type superlattices of Bi2Te3- Sb2Te3 have been utilized by Venkatasubramanian et al. using the molecular beam epitaxy technique [36]. Now it became obvious that it is possible to improve the ZT of materials much beyond 1 by designing the thin films as proposed by the early works or by nanostructures. Besides, nanostructuring effectively raised ZT for Bi2Te3, PbTe, and GeSe to over 1 near room temperature [20, 45]. However, SnTe nanocomposites are lead-free and ecofriendly thermoelectrics with ZT ≥ 1.2 due to the exhibition of band convergence and introduction of nanoprecipitates [69,70,71,72,73]. On the other hand, SnSe nanocomposites and its doped forms (Na-doped materials) achieved ZT ≈ 2.6 attracted the attention of the researchers [75,76,77,78].

1.2 The Basic Theory for ZT Enhancement

As mentioned previously, high ZT material/compound needs to have some features such as a high S, low carrier concentrations which existed in the semiconductors or insulators. However, a low electrical resistivity or a high electrical conductivity in metals is due to the plenty of carriers. So, the thermoelectric power factor could be maximized somewhere between the carrier concentrations of metals and semiconductors, as shown in Fig. 2 [25]. Particularly, the mathematical relation of Seebeck coefficient and carriers concentrations is given by:

$${\text{S}} = \frac{{8{\uppi }^{2} {\text{K}}_{{\text{B}}}^{2} }}{{3{\text{eh}}^{2} }}{\text{m}}^{*} {\text{T}}\left( {\frac{{\uppi }}{{3{\text{n}}}}} \right)^{{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{$2$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$3$}}}}$$
(5)
Fig. 2
figure 2

The Seebeck coefficient(S), the electrical conductivity(s), the power factor (S2σ), the electronic thermal conductivity (κe), and the lattice (κl) thermal conductivity variations on the charge carrier concentration n, for a bulk material

where kB is the Boltzmann constant, e is the charge carrier, h is Planck’s constant, m* is the effective mass of the charge carrier, and n is the carrier concentration. The relationship between electrical conductivity and carrier concentration can be defined as

(6)

where, μ is the mobility of the carrier. Usually, the good TE’s are the heavily doped semiconductor materials that have carrier concentrations up to 1019–1021 cm−3 [25]. A single type of carrier (n-type or p-type) is preferable to maximize the Seebeck coefficient, because the mixed n-type/p-type charge carriers would produce the opposite Seebeck effect, lowering the thermopower. To accomplish a single type of carrier, it is crucial to choose materials with proper energy band gaps and fitted doping, wherein n-type and p-type ranges can be well defined. Therefore, efficient TE’s are semiconductors (heavily doped) with energy band gap lower than 1 eV to achieve both single carrier type as well as sufficiently high carrier mobility. The decoupling of both the thermal and electronic terms control the ZT and hence, counting the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient has been the key methodology to raise ZT.

The low thermal conductivity is also needed for more efficient TE materials. Whereas the two parts of the thermal conductivity are: κl, that represents the transported heat from phonons itinerant through the crystal lattice and κe results from the heat carried by the charge carriers (such as electrons or holes) traveling through the crystal lattice. According to the Wiedemann–Franz Law

$${\upkappa }_{\mathrm{e}}=\mathrm{L\sigma T}$$
(7)

where L is the Lorenz number, as shown in Fig. 2, It is found that the electronic thermal conductivity (κe) is proportional to the electrical conductivity (σ). Consequently, to diminish the electronic part of the thermal conductivity for TEs is not always the best option, while it will inversely impinge on the electrical conductivity and has slight or no enhancement of ZT. Lattice thermal conductivity can be defined by

$${\upkappa }_{{\text{l}}} = {\raise0.7ex\hbox{$1$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$3$}}\left( {{\text{C}}_{{\upupsilon }} {\upupsilon }_{{\text{s}}} {\uplambda }_{{{\text{ph}}}} } \right)$$
(8)

where \({\mathrm{C}}_{\upupsilon }\) is heat capacity, \({\upupsilon }_{\mathrm{s}}\) is the velocity of sound, and \({\uplambda }_{\mathrm{ph}}\) is mean free path of the phonon. It can be concluded that lattice thermal conductivity is the electronic structure independent parameter so that the improvement of ZT can be obtained by lattice thermal conductivity minimization.

The operational TE materials with a high ZT are the PGEC being the best practicable material with complex crystal structures, which contains voids (vacancies) and rattlers where the heavy element atoms, sited in the voids, could act as scattering centers to the phonons and hence lowering the lattice thermal conductivity (\({\upkappa }_{\mathrm{l}}\)) notably. Also, the nanoscale materials were recommended to achieve large ZT because the structural arrangement of nanostructured materials foster the density of states (DOS) nearby Fermi level by quantum confinement effect and upsurge the thermopower, which grants a technique to decouple thermopower and electrical conductivity [26, 29].

Furthermore, nanostructuring is used to establish a wide density of interfaces wherein phonons can be more effectively and preferentially scattered over a large mean free path range than electrons, as demonstrated in Fig. 3. Thus, significantly lowers the thermal conductivity of the lattice while retaining carrier mobility and electronic conductivity. This can be accomplished by designing the nanostructures with reducing dimensions less than the mean free path of the phonons, but still longer than those of the charge carriers.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Illustration of phonons scattering mechanisms and electronic transport of hot and cold electrons within TE materials [20]

1.3 Thermoelectric Nano-Structuring Methodologies

TE nanocomposites are typically produced by bottom-up strategies where the nanoparticles are fabricated first and then compacted into nanostructured bulk materials. The thermoelectric nanoparticles can be synthesized by several bottom-up methods (such as hydrothermal techniques, wet chemical reaction, and melt spinning method), and/or top-down methodologies (such as ball-milling). Amongst these approaches, ball-milling of high-energy type is an efficient and dominant processing strategy for nanoparticles in short times especially for the production of large quantities. Here the common strategies of ball-milling approach for nanoparticle fabrications will be discussed and reviewed.

1.3.1 Ball-Milles/Mechanical Attrition

Ball-Milling or Mechanical attritions are classified as one of the best common synthesis techniques for nanocomposites from bulk raw materials because they are more convenient, demand minimum specifications, less requirements of advanced equipments and flexibility in terms of the number of various categories of solid materials can be achieved by using this method.

Micro-sized TE particles were traditionally prepared by an old method of ball-milling in early 60s. It was found that the gradual reduction in the size of TE particles reached to micrometers in low energy environments. The final product of TE particles were packed in and ZTs were found to be enhanced slightly. SiGe composites have been prepared and used later in radioisotope thermoelectric generators (TEG).

The progress of the high-energy ball-milling technique was launched in the 70s and the mid of 80s to carry out the synthesis of variety of materials, including superalloys, homogeneous composition ball-milled powders, amorphous alloys and severely deformed alloys. Till date, numerous types of high-energy ball mills were utilized to produce nanocomposites, for example, the shaker mills, the planetary mills, or the attrition mills.

The most popular types of ball mills differ in their specifications and the mechanisms used in the grinding media as the products of many companies. Figure 4 shows SPEX 8000 mixer/mill and the typical planetary ball mill.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a SPEX 8000 mixer/mill, b the vial and the balls, c planetary ball mill, and d the principle of the working of the planetary ball mill

Also, Table 1 describes the three types of high-energy ball mills with the calculations of ball velocities, the usage Kinetic energies for each impact; power and shock frequencies are reported as well. For instance, the ball mills from high-energy type have a high impact velocities as well as the impact frequencies especially for producing nanocrystalline materials for different grinding media. The used time for milling process relies on the energy and the frequency of impact of the mill balls. For instance, Just 20 min SPEX shaker milling is the counterpart to nearly 20 h of milling in the other types of low-energy mills like Invicat BX920/2. Also, it was known that the process of milling within SPEX shaker in few minutes is equivalent to hours in attritors and some days in a traditional low-energy mill. Although the usage of this technique in preparing TE materials is common but, there are some challenges such as the effectiveness of the reduction of the particle size is 0.1% in the traditional ball mills and <1% in high-energy ball milling. The balls may cause some contaminations in the product due to the difficulty in cleaning the balls. The destruction of the long-range ordered structure or even amorphous materials of different nanoparticles could be generated during this process.

Table 1 Three types of high-energy ball mills parameters

1.3.2 Ball Milling/Attritions TE Nanocomposites

Milling or Mechanical attrition used in fabricating TE nanocrystals by transferring the structural decomposition of the raw materials of coarse grains into finer or smaller structures due to the plastic deformation achieved at room temperature. This procedure can be accomplished by any type of Ball milling route such as high-energy mills, the type of centrifugal, including vibratory mills types, or even by low energy tumbling mills. The ranging of the nanoparticle size achieved by attritors, horizontal mills or even the vibratory mills are in the range from 150 till 5–10 nm. The sensitivity of this procedure to the contamination and other infections from the milling environment urges the usage of a nicely atmospheric control and is vital in preserving the material purity, especially to avoid oxidation. Therefore, Ar and N gases are the most popular atmospheric gases employed in the fabrication of thermoelectrics. Another method for producing new phases in nanoscale is Mechanical alloying but it usually needs double-time more than the ordinary milling process to reach the nanoscale requirements.

Since 2008, mechanical attrition and high energy ball milling techniques have been employed widely in the fabrication of Fe-Si nanopowders, Si-Ge based alloys [45], PbTe, PbSbTe alloys, SnTe, Bi2S3, BiSbTe alloys [97], MgSiSn, CoSb3, Bi2Te3 nanoparticles [45, 102, 103], Zn4Sb3, MgAgSb, AgPb18SbSe20 (LAST), YbAgCu4, half-Heuslers, In4Se3, skutterudites [113,114,115], including La3−xTe4 which display a challenge to be fabricated by the conventional approaches.

Table 2 records some conventional TE nanoparticles fabricated by the ball-milling route. The obtained crystallite sizes from ball-milling, power factor (PF), and the figure of merit (ZT) are also tabulated. Some of the TE nanoparticles were achieved by the mechanical milling technique where other TE’s were produced through the mechanical alloying route.

Table 2 Some conventional TE nanoparticles fabricated by ball-milling route

Both of single-crystalline nanoparticles (such as Bi2Te3 and Zn4Sb3 nanoparticles with particle size 20 nm) as well as polycrystalline nanopowders can be obtained by the mechanical milling process. TE ingots are prepared and then exposed to grinding process via ball-milling to fabricate TE nanocomposites which have finally the same chemical compositions. The ductile TE materials like half-Heuslers fragments can be grinded down to achieve polycrystalline nanoparticles by high-energy milling. Besides, Fig. 5 (a, b) illustrates bright-field transmission electron microscopic (BF-TEM) pictures of ball-milled Bi2Te3 and Zn4Sb3 nanosized particles, respectively. Figure 5c illustrates the images of TEM of ductile half- Heusler particles with nano-crystallites ranging from 50–100 nm.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The ball-milled nanosized particles of images for: a p-type Bi2Te3. b Zn4Sb3. c Half-Heuslers. The circle region is represented by SAED and HRTEM the right view

It should be noted that the previous research pointed out that the speed and the time of milling are notably influencing on the achieved the crystal size of nanoparticles. Figure 6 illustrates how the crystalline size of Cu2Te ball-milled nanoparticles changes at various ball-milling times. The nanoparticles of Cu2Te were basically elemental powders of Cu and Te mechanically alloyed via the planetary milling at the room temperature. It was studied that the grain size estimated from XRD diffractograms decreased drastically at first while changing the time of ball-milling and then finally becomes constant with milling time.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Crystalline size of mechanical alloyed Cu2Te nanoparticles

The better and powerful technique used to identify the nanoparticle size accurately is TEM but also could be characterized by SEM where it usually gives the geometrical size not the crystalline size of the nanoparticles. Also, XRD may give better information for the nanoparticle grain size or crystalline size of any range by observing the changes in the peak positions and cell parameters. The grain size can be calculated utilizing the Rietveld method or by the traditional methods from Scherrer and Williamson–Hall equations to calculate both the grain size and the strain from The Full-width at Half Maximum (FWHM).

Also, the modified Scherrer equation is given below [43]:

$${\text{B}} = \frac{{0.9{\uplambda }}}{{{\text{d}}\;{\text{cos}}\;{\uptheta }}} + {\upeta }\;\tan \;{\uptheta }$$
(9)

The used parameters were d, λ, η that represent the crystallite size, the used wavelength of XRD beam and the strain, respectively, also B is the width at FWHM, and θ is the Bragg’s angle. Thus, the procedure to calculate d and η, first plot B cos θ against sinθ, from the obtained straight line, the slope is equal to η and 0.9 = λ/d is the intercept. So, d as well as η can be experimentally calculated from XRD diffractograms.

It should be noted that the agglomeration of the nanoparticles to compose several smaller particles usually happens significantly with ball–milled processing. Besides, each particle may perhaps consist of quite a few sub-particles identified as consistently diffracting grains/domains. So, it takes into consideration the careful determination of precise crystalline size/grain size from SEM techniques.

One of the observations of the obtained nanoparticles from ball-milling processing is the production of high density grain boundaries in TE nanoparticles. The various defects especially the grain boundaries can strongly scatter the phonons more than the other charge carriers that reduce the thermal conductivity and improve the ZT of the nanocomposites. The TE nanocomposite fabrication methods will be discussed in the next section.

1.3.3 Wet Chemistry Synthesis

One of the outstanding techniques for nanocomposite fabrications in different shapes is the wet chemistry procedure. The solvo-thermal method (counting hydrothermal route) fabricates the nanostructures using the appropriate solvents of inorganic powders and precursors above the critical point/temperature of the solvent depending upon the self-formed pressures in an autoclave after the crystallization of the dissolved materials from the solution. In Comparison to other preparation techniques carried out at atmospheric pressure, increase of both the reaction temperature and the time in the solvothermal method may accelerate the crystal growth of the prepared compounds which come up with a smaller particle size distributions and improved crystallinity. One more benefit from this technique is that the nanocrystals may have different morphologies and shapes like, nanopowders, nanorods, nanoplates, multilateral nanosheets or nanoparticles, sheet-rods, etc. Also, the solubility of most of the materials in the different solvents by heat or pressure beyond the critical point makes this technique promising for synthesizing nanocomposites of numerous solid materials.

Hydrothermal method was used widely in the preparation of nanostructured TE materials such as Bi2Te3 based compounds, doped-Sb2Te3, PbX (X = S, Se, Te), CoSb3, half-Heuslers, and Cu2CdSnSe4 etc. On the other hand, the tuning in the preparation conditions like temperature, PH, time, the usage of different surfactants is the powerful tool in the fabrication of nanostructure particles within different shapes throughout an anisotropic growth process. Figure 5 illustrates different nanostructured forms of Bi2X3 (X = Se,Te), and Sb2Te3 that have the same layered rhombohedral crystal structure with D53d (R3m) space group. The most common structure synthesized from the solvothermal technique is the hexagonal nanoplates where Fig. 7a shows a typical hexagonal nano-plate of Sb2Te3. Here, the effect of the surfactant ethylenediaminetetraacetic disodium salt (EDTA) was added to the precursors through the usage of the hydrothermal processing. Bi2Te3 nano-capsules were obtained from polyhedral shell formations as illustrated in Fig. 7b. Contrarily, with the support of some polymer additive, nanowires can be developed by employing the same solvothermal process. Yu et al. articulated a synthesis technique of Te nanowires from the high-temperature decomposition of TeCl4 in polydecene by the assistance of trioctyphosphine oxide in the form of surfactant. Tellurium nanowires act as a guide for the Bi2Te3 nanowire productions by making the reaction with Bi[N(SiMe3)2]3 or BiPh3. Bi2Te3 nanowires are displayed in Fig. 7c. PbTe is one of the classic TE materials but it has a cubic lattice structure. There are numerous chemical method synthesis procedures to grow the nanocomposites of PbTe that have been extensively studied. Figures 7d–f represents the different nanostructured forms, cuboctahedral nanoparticles, nanoboxes, and nanowires respectively, where they have been obtained by the assistance of solvothermal approaches. Chemical routes show well-defined nano shapes, for each particle and were supposed to have fewer defects than those obtained from the ball-milled technique and also have a high mobility carrier.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Bi2Te3 TEM images with different nanoparticles shape: a nanoplates, b nanocapsules, c nanowires, and d represents PbTe nanoparticles; e nanoboxes, f and nanowires, the Figures were adapted from [157, 159]

The final product materials bulk prepared from the different chemical routes may have different atomic defects at the grain boundaries. Small amounts of light elements, such as C, N, and O are residing at these boundaries contribute in producing little thermal conductivity.

Conversely, it is very unfavorable to the transportation of charge carriers in some systems. For instance, the carbons as well as the oxygen atoms, have been confirmed experimentally to have a considerable reduction in the mobility carriers of p-type Bi-Te system where oxygen atoms can be easily introduced during the production of Bi2Te3 nanoparticles via the chemical approaches. This makes the carrier concentrations to improve and the Seebeck coefficient (S) to reduce in n-type Bi-Te systems.

So far, the mechanism to transform the high-quality nanoparticles prepared by chemical routes with extraordinary characteristics for TE application is still a challenge and not an easy task.

1.3.4 Electrochemical Deposition

One of facile and effective methods to obtain nanostructured metal alloys is the electrochemical deposition technique [161]. First time the high-quality Bi2Te3 nanowires were obtained by Stacy’s and co-researchers via the template-assisted (porous anodic alumina (PAA)) electrodeposition processing. This approach has the promotion in fabrication of nanowire arrays, such as doped n-type Bi2Te3, doped p-type Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, CoSb3, PbTe based compounds, etc. [164, 165]. This technique has an advantage in controlling the diameter and the length of the nanowires. The obtained diameter was ranging from 20–300 nm for as-prepared nanowires and is pore size dependent, whereas the length is directly proportional to electrodeposition time.

Also, the composition of the alloys is controlled by changing the electrolyte solution concentration. The arrays of nanowire orientations can be adjusted by varying the deposition potentials or via pulsed electrodeposition procedure. The electroplating can be used to develop a uniform growth of the arrays at low temperatures. Moreover, novel hollow TE nanocrystals can be realized within some special electrodeposition conditions. Li’s group articulated the successful production of nanotube arrays of Bi. Zhu’s et al. synthesized Bi2Te3 and its derived nanotubes arrays. In contrast, 1D chime like Bi-Sb nanocomposites were obtained by Li et al. without the support of templates. Xiao et al. exemplified the PbTe cube shapes to be instantly deposited on a gold substrate with the polycrystalline structure. By the assistance of the cyclic electrodeposition or so-called stripping method, notable yields of long polycrystalline nanowires from Bi-Te were deposited wisely on the highly oriented surface of pyrolytic graphite (HOPG).

Heterostructures nano-materials can also be obtained by using the electrodeposition technique. The deposition potential is a crucial parameter when template-assisted pulsed electrodeposition is used in the preparation of TE materials. Wang and his group presented a detailed investigation of Bi-Sb–Te and efficiently controlled the growth of Bi2Te3/Sb nanosystems in a very low time. The minimum period of as-synthesized Bi2Te3/Sb heterostructures achieved low dimensions nearby 10 nm as depicted in (Fig. 8). On the other hand, they also prepared Bi2Te3/Te heterostructure nanowire arrays by using the precipitation method to obtain a nano-confined structure

Fig. 8
figure 8

a and b illustrate the TEM images of multilayered Bi2Te3/Sb nanowires deposited in various conditions where c and d represent the corresponding highly magnified TEM images

1.3.5 Inert Gas Condensation Method

The inert-gas condensation (IGC) processing contains some important parameters such as evaporating, sputtering, or ablating materials that are inside of an evacuated chamber kept at a pressure of about 10–8 mbar and a low-pressure inert gas like helium is back-filled to the machine.

This route depends on the collision between the material atoms and the gas atoms inside the evacuated chamber, where they are losing their kinetic energy (K.E) and thereby finally condense in the form of small particles. The inert gas condensation approach generates equiaxed crystallites. The crystallite size of the powder obtained from this method ranges in nanometer scale and the size distribution is reduced. The inert gas pressure as well as the temperature, the evaporation/the sputtering or the ablation rate, and the gas type play a vital role in the crystal size formations.

IGC is an effective tool used today for obtaining experimental amounts of metallic nanocrystal and intermetallic powders as well. The best feature of this technique is the ability to generate non-agglomerated nano-powders, especially at low temperatures. First, an evaporative source produces the powder particles, and then the product is convectively carried out and collected on a cold substrate. The nanoparticles acquire in a thermalizing area just above the evaporative source, because of the interactions between the hot vapor species and the much colder inert gas atoms in the chamber typically at 1–20 mbar pressure. Lately, this technique has been accommodated for fabricating Si-Ge nanocomposites. Also, Magnetite (Fe2O3) thin films are promising TE’s used for thermoelectric applications that were deposited on the surface of SiO2/Si substrates using Pulsed laser deposition PLD at 300 °C.

1.3.6 Nanoprecipitation/Phase Separation Approach

The technique of nanoprecipitation is a successful solid-state route in the process of the fabrication of nanostructured bulk materials throughout the nano-inclusion. For example, PbTe-based nanocrystals including AgPbmSbTe2+m (LAST-m) can be simply produced by this approach [184,185,186,187,188]. Throughout the cooling procedure of the molten material, nano-inclusions are obtained inside the matrix by phase separation or spinodal decomposition. Nevertheless, it is hard to manipulate the carriers from sample to sample due to the striving nature of the system and its phase diagram. So, the accuracy in controlling the temperature is a crucial point in this method of preparation. This technique is having the ability to fabricate a nanoscale lamellae structure. For systems like Sb2Te3/PbTe and Pb2Sb6Te11, the decomposing of the phase near the eutectic happened in PbTe and Sb2Te3, where lamellae of nanostructured Sb2Te3 and PbTe are produced during the fast cooling process. The benefit of this approach is the one-stage method where nanoscale attachments or lamellae are produced simply by thermal treatment. Also, this technique is favorable for electronic transport because it presents coherent or semi-coherent interfaces.

Other chalcogenide materials not related to this shortcoming method are still being surveyed because it is outstanding in situ approach to prepare TE nanocomposites.

1.3.7 Spark Erosion Technique

One of the adjusted methods to fabricate TE nanoparticles with a particularly high synthesis yield is the spark erosion technique. It was initiated for producing fine powders of metals, alloys, and compositions on a micro-scale. Figure 9 schematically illustrates the components of this technique. The two electrodes in the left diagram are immersed into a dielectric liquid connected to a pulsed power supply on the upper side of the cell.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Schematic diagram of the spark erosion technique for obtaining nanoparticles of a TE alloy

To generate a spark the applied field strength needs to be adequately high in the gap. The initiated spark may be generated from the breakdown inside the dielectric fluid, as described in the reaction zone in the magnified graph on the right side of Fig. 9. If the electric field is proposed to be improved to a high level, electrons can be released substantially and emitted from the cathode. These electrons plus the others in the gap collect the energy from the electric field, ionize the molecules of the dielectric fluid, and produce more ionized electrons and ions. In almost 10 ns of the electric field application, a very small diameter from plasma is established and temperature must be high (it may exceed 10,000 K).

The plasma column has a high temperature so it must be enveloped by a sheath of vaporized dielectric fluid which is controlled by the assistance of incompressible liquid as shown in Fig. 9. Besides, the kinetic energy states are transferred to the electrons and the ions into the anode and the cathode, respectively, which improves the temperature at the electrodes. Due to the much higher electron mobility than that of the ions; short spark times favor anode wear. Consequently, the applied pressure by the plasma channel enhances locally on the electrodes, the temperature of these heated local sections is increased higher than that of the boiling point of the metal. A quick reduction of the pressure takes place at the end of the voltage pulse producing a spark falls, the superheated sections may be boiled violently producing molten droplets and vapor also inside the dielectric liquid as well as liquid nitrogen (N), liquid argon (Ar), water, etc. The erosion process may be enhanced by the violent boiling of superheated regions or other mechanisms. For thermoelectric materials, spark erosion was used to fabricate Bi-Te nano-grained alloys by two different: (1) the development of nanoparticles ranging from 20–30 in nm size, and (2) the establishment of micro-sized particles ranging from (0.1–10 m) containing nano-grains as illustrated in Fig. 8.

Generally, the spark erosion method often produces a mixture of these two types of particles. For example, the spark-eroded nanocomposite Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 exhibits a high ZT value of 1.36 at 360 and the ZT values are analogous to those alloys synthesized by other top-down approaches. Spark erosion has a lot of benefits and advantages, especially the production of nano-particles, the rate of processing efficiency, and the scale-up potential K (see Fig. 10). Besides, the spark erosion method does not require crucible and the product has no contamination issues. Finally, oxygen-free preparation conditions are easily achieved.

Fig. 10
figure 10

SEM image Bi-Sb–Te nanoparticles prepared by spark erosion

1.4 Current Accomplishments in Bulk and Nanocomposite Thermoelectrics

Because of the interplay of the coefficients, and their strong dependence on temperature any TE material is limited to operate over the suitable temperature range. For the thermoelectric industry and applications, the classic inorganic and organic TEs are the most commonly used materials. So we will focus on the below discussion on the recent progress of the inorganic and organic TEs temperature range dependant.

1.4.1 Bismuth Telluride (Bi2Te3)

One of the most significant TE materials is Bi2Te3 based alloys & compounds which commonly used in the TE industry for enormous applications since1960. They have a rhombohedral crystal structure composed of five thick lamellae, (Te1-Bi-Te2-Bi-Te1) where they are also called quintuple layers (QL). The QL layers pack along the c-axis via van der Waals interactions, whereas the Te2 atoms are hybridized (sp3d2) to six Bi-atoms as illustrated in Fig. 11. At room temperature, the unit cell parameters take the values a = 4.345 Å and c = 30.483 Å. Moreover, the narrow semiconducting gap at room temperature is equal to Eg ~ 0.13 eV makes these compounds beneficial for various TE applications. The excitations of the charge carriers are easier to excite into conduction band with increasing temperatures consequently, in the valence band an equivalent number of holes stay behind. These electron–hole pairs will play a part in the total heat conduction which may reduce the Seebeck coefficient (S). So, the usage of this material in high-temperature applications may enhance the energy gap also (Fig. 12).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Bi2Te3 Crystal structure showing van der Waals gaps (vdW) and the quintuple layers

Fig. 12
figure 12

Promising Bi2Te3 alloys displaying a ultra-low κT and b improved ZT values temperature dependence

The doping process results in a crucial outcome on Bi2Te3 starting from the type of the tuning and chaining the ZT values. The doping with Sb makes the Bi2Te3 alloys p-type semiconductor and the polycrystalline p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 nanocomposites in bulk (ZT = 1.2 at 300 K & ZT = 1.4 at 373 K, respectively see Fig. 13). Also, the size reduction significantly condensed the thermal conductivity to 1.0 Wm−1 K−1 in the nanomaterials from 1.3 Wm−1 K−1 in the bulk ingots for the same materials, even though the electrical conductivity reduced slightly in the nano-composite. Finally, the achieved nanoscale materials enhance the ZT by 30% higher than that of bulk ingots. To characterize the grain structure of the nanocomposite, Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is illustrated in Fig. 8(a,c). From TEM data, it can be seen that the complex polygonal grain structures of few microns to a few nanometers size. At the same time, nanodots from Sb-rich ranged from 2 to 10 nm in diameter and a pure precipitate from Te with a diameter in the range 5–30 nm were also detected. The importance of these nanostructures could successfully scatter phonons with a wide wavelength, which improves the thermoelectric characteristics of the nanostructured Bi2Te3 composites. The more recent studies show other nanocomposites of p-type Bi2Te3-based compounds enhance the ZT to 1.3 and 1.4 at 75 K and 373 K, respectively, but the figure of merit displays a value of nearly 1.04 at 398 K in n-type Bi2Te3 nanocomposites.

Fig. 13
figure 13

High magnification TEM images of the hot-pressed BixSb2−xTe3 nanostructured materials: a showing the nanosize, high crystallinity, random orientation, and clean grain boundaries. b Nanodots without grain boundaries. c Thermal conductivity and d ZT of the BixSb2−xTe3 nanocomposites reproduced from Ref. Here white squares represent state-of-the-art p-type BiSbTe ingots and black squares display hot pressed bulk samples

Different studies on the characteristics of Bi2Te3-based nanocomposites display a wide variation in ZT values (0.4−1.7) at different temperatures. Such as a maxima in ZT equal to 1.5 at 390 K was obtained in p-type (Bi,Sb)2Te3 nanocomposites when single elements of Bi, Sb, and Te are melt-spun simultaneously and further pursued by the spark plasma sintering technique. Values like ZT(1.47) and ZT(1.56) were accomplished in nanostructures synthesized by the hot-pressing method of Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 powders at nanoscale range with diameters less than 20 nm and p-type Bi0.52Sb1.48Te3 nanocomposite with the diameter ranging from 5–15 nm precipitates.

Also, Sharma and his group achieved the highest ZT value at 700 K equal to 2.42 for Bi2Te3 (p-type) samples, whereas Bi2Te3 alloys in n-type form show large κT due to small Eg as well as minority carriers (electrons). Various studies have been put forward to improve Eg and simultaneously decrease κT of n-type Bi2Te3 by the different methods such as doping, alloying, nanostructuring, nanocomposites, nanoplates, quantum dots and twin boundary engineering are the most common routes.

Furthermore, Shalaby et al. synthesized a sulfur-doped Bi2Te2.85Se0.15 nano composites from n-type semiconductors with achieved Eg of 0.14 eV. On the other hand, Bi2Te3 n-type nanocomposites were fabricated with the help of (NaOH) and the obtained Eg was 4.8 eV which was much higher than that of the pure Bi2Te3 (0.13 eV). The defects and other impurities like the existence of dislocations at the grain boundaries play a curial and non-invasive role in κT reduction by scattering the minority carriers and preventing them from contributing to the electronic transport properties.

On the other hand, a liquid-phase compaction method was used by Kim and his group to enhance dislocation arrays at grain boundaries having low-energy (see Fig. 13). The major purpose of this approach is to scatter and diffuse the phonons with medium frequency so that the phonon thermal conductivity (κl) reduces. They also pronounced the κl reduction to 0.33 Wm−1 K−1 and an improvement of ZT = 1.86 at 320 K. Moreover, Yang and his co-workers fabricated n-type Bi2Te3 nanocomposites with ultra-low κl of around 0.2 Wm−1 K−1 by creating high-density grain boundaries through dislocations. Additionally, the composite of Bi0.36Sb1.64Te3 loaded with reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) displayed a small κl of 0.63 Wm−1 K−1.

Hydrothermal/solvothermal technique has also been used to fabricate Bi2Te3 nanostructures. Ni and his coworkers prepared nanopowders of Bi2Te3 using this approach and the hot-pressed method with zone-melted Alloy has been used with a ratio of 10:90. They found that the reduction in the size of powders to nanoscale decreases the thermal conductivity robustly than the electrical conductivity, which results in the improvement of ZT (0.83). Moreover, the possibility of the achievement of ZT of the nanocomposites materialized because of the usage of the suitable dopants and the structural optimization of the base alloys. Other Bi2Te3- based nanocomposites demonstrate similar TE characteristics as that of pristine bulk Bi2Te3, whereas some in contrast displayed poor performances. In conclusion, TE operations are related strongly to the structural and compositional characteristics of nanocomposites.

1.4.2 PbTe Based Nanocomposites

Lead telluride (PbTe) being one of the promising TE materials works at medium temperatures ranging from (450–800 K). Recently, The ZT of these compounds was almost doubled to 1.5 at 773 K for Th doped PbTe via the improvement of the Seebeck coefficient (S). High ZT Th-doped PbTe nanostructured materials were observed and the density of PbTe nanocomposites was 95% as that of theoretical predictions. Such samples were fabricated by spark plasma sintering technique with nanoparticles ranging from 100–150 nm. The figure of merit of these nanocomposites was around 0.1 at room temperature. Doping elements such as potassium were observed to affect the structural and thermoelectric properties of PbTe nanocomposites.

Experimentally at room temperature, when the Potassium content increases the electrical conductivity was slightly enhanced also but at higher temperatures no effects have been indicated, where all samples exhibited a reduction with temperature. Also, it was found that all samples have nearly the same thermal diffusivity. A slight change in Seebeck coefficients for all samples has probably remarked a consequence of hole contributions w.r.t high carrier concentration. Figure 14a illustrates that the PF was enhanced by the increase in potassium content and registered a peak at 500 K. The maximum ZT value for K0.015Pb0.985Te reached 1.3 at 673 K (Fig. 14b), in comparison to that of the Sodium-doped PbTe at the same temperature.

Fig. 14
figure 14

The temperature dependence of: a power factor (PF) and b ZT of KxPb1−xTe nanocomposite (x = 0.01, 0.0125, 0.015, 0.02)

The ball-milling technique followed by a hot-pressed process was used in AlxPbTe nanocomposites fabrication as depicted in Fig. 15a. In addition, the Aluminum doped PbTe nanocomposites show n-type semiconductor behavior with Seebeck parameter in the range –100 to –200 V/K and the electrical conductivity values of 3.6–18 × 104 S/m at 300 K, and the highest ZT of 1.2 is achieved for the Al0.03PbTe nanocomposites at 770 K. SEM image of a cracked surface of Al-doped PbTe nanocomposite is shown in Fig. 10b. The temperature dependence of the thermoelectric properties at different doping levels of Cr in Cr-doped PbTe nanocomposites is depicted in Fig. 15. It was found that Cr doping increased the power factor dramatically around the room temperature in contrast to the other n-type PbTe alloys. Also, the thermal conductivity reduces to 1.3 W/m/K (at 773 K) from 2.6 W/m/K at 300 K.

Fig. 15
figure 15

The taken data for AlxPbTe samples (x = 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03, 0.04). a Temperature versus ZT and b SEM images

Figure 16 illustrates the thermoelectric properties at various temperatures for Cr0.01Pb0.99Te1−xSex (x = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.85) systems. It was found that the nanocomposites make a reduction in electrical conductivity values with the increasing temperatures which is a characteristic of degenerate semiconductors. With enhancing Se content at a level of doping content into Cr site with 1 atomic %, the achieved Seebeck coefficient (S) reduced from 211 to 157 mV/K at room temperature. At higher temperatures, it was remarked that nanocomposites materials lower the Seebeck Coefficient because of the production of the bipolar effect. Generally, this effect shows a stronger behavior in samples with abundant Te concentration but it is still smaller in quantity than Se-rich samples. On the other hand, the increase of Se content to 75 atomic percent may enhance the electrical conductivity to the optimum because it drastically decreases when Se concentration was above 75 atomic %.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Temperature-dependent thermoelectric parameters of CrxPb1−xTe nanocomposites (x = 0.01, 0.015, 0.025, 0.03) a Seebeck coefficient (S), b electrical conductivity, c power factor (PF), d thermal diffusivity, e total thermal conductivity (κ) and lattice thermal conductivity (κL), and f ZT

Se- rich- Cr0.01Pb0.99Te0.25Se0.75 sample revealed a high electrical conductivity and power factor throughout the temperature range. The enhancement was happened for the electrical conductivity due to the increase in the carrier concentrations to (8.12 × 1018 cm−3) at room temperature proved from Hall measurements. This results show a remarkable drop in the thermal conductivity (κ), owing to the role of the defects resulting from alloying in phonon scattering, in comparison with the observed data from the Cr-doped PbTe nanocrystals.

At equal content of Te and Se in Cr0.01Pb0.99Te0.5Se0.5 nanomaterials, the thermal conductivity condensed to 0.8 W/m/K at 573 K. This was lower than 72% of the thermal conductivity achieved on PbTe for the same Cr doping level with 1% as depicted into Fig. 16. This decrease was expected theoretically and experimentally it was found to happen due to mass fluctuations when lattice distortion occurs. But the thermal conductivity at higher temperatures was registered and associated with the contribution of the heat transport from the minority carriers (holes). The highest figure of merit ZT for Se-rich Cr0.01Pb0.99Te0.25Se0.75 is 1 within the range of 573 K to 673 K. The maximum peak in ZT increased with increasing Se content.

It was found that Te-rich Cr0.015Pb0.985Te0.75Se0.25 nanocrystal has a maximum (ZT = 0.6) at room temperature due to the improvement of the thermoelectric performance by lowering κ, increasing (S = 220 mV/K) and the Hall mobility to 1120 cm2/V/s that improves the power factor. The figure of merit of Se-rich Cr0.01Pb0.99Te0.25Se0.75 samples was reported 0.5 at 573 and 1 at 673 K, respectively.

Besides, Sie and coworkers used Na2Te as a doping material in PbTe alloy where a high S (−112 μVK−1), σ (53.52 Scm−1) and ZT of 0.81 were obtained. Also, Jood and his research group obtained a high ZT (~1.9) for the combinations (p-type Pb0.953Na0.040Ge0.007Te) and (n-type PbTe0.9964I0.0036) legs by using between the dopants and the nanostructure of PbTe at ~805 K. Furthermore, Xiao et al. articulated the mix of Se with Sn and alloyed them into PbTe, where Se diminished the κT to ~1.21 from ~3 Wm−1 K−1 but Sn improved both the carrier concentration (n) and the mobility (μ) of PbTe. They achieved the ZT of 1.2 at 673 K as well as the PF of ~14.6 μWcm−1 K−1 at 300 K in their work. Consequently, the key point to enhance ZT to the highest values for PbTe alloys is striking to improve DOS to obtain a high thermoelectric power coefficient (S), and the reduction of κl value is also demanded with less effect on the electronic transport properties of these alloys.

1.4.3 Tin Selenide (SnSe) and Copper Selenide (Cu2Se) Materials

Among the inorganic TE materials feasible in a medium temperature range with high performance and efficiency, SnSe based compounds are an asset. It reveals excellent features such as i) the long-range thermal stability, ii) simplistic nature or constitutes earth-abundant elements, iii) intrinsically ultralow lattice thermal conductivity κT, and iv) less toxicity. For crystal structure properties, SnSe takes NaCl structure and comprises a layered orthorhombic space group Pnma (Fig. 17a), and its unit cell dimensions are a = 11.501 Å, b = 4.153 Å, and c = 4.445 Å. On the other, it has a low indirect band gap of 0.86 eV with p-type conduction (i.e. hole concentration ~1017–1018 cm−3) and very high resistivity (ρ) (~101–105 Ωcm) at 300 K. Consequently, one of the important issues is that the polycrystalline structure of SnSe material cannot be used for TE applications due to its very high room-temperature resistivity. The increase in temperature ~750–800 K results in a remarkable phase change to Cmcm structure producing a further decrease in the energy gap to Eg ~ 0.39 eV and in lattice parameters to (a = 4.31 Å, b = 11.70 Å, and c = 4.31 Å) as shown in Fig. 16b. Polycrystalline SnSe usually displays low (μ) and thus shows low ZT value. The methods used to improve the performance of SnSe compounds are concluded to be suitable dopants as well as the low dimension scale or nanostructuring. For example, Chandra and his group used Ge doping elements to improve the n and diminish κT and their (Sn0.97Ge0.03Se nanoplates) morphology is presented in Fig. 17c. They pronounced a very low κT (≈0.18 Wm−1 K−1) and high ZT (≈2.1) at 873 K. Under similar conditions, Shi et al. revealed ~1.7 for ZT value of Sn0.948Cd0.023Se micro-plates (Fig. 17d). In addition, Liu et al. employed simultaneous techniques of doping and nanostructuring to improve PF (5.43 μWcm−1 K−2) and reduce κl (0.13 Wm−1 K−1). SnSe nanocomposite was substituted by Pb and Zn atoms to form Sn0.98Pb0.01Zn0.01Se and maximum ZT (2.2) was recorded at 873 K. Due to the anisotropic transport characteristics of SnSe crystal system, mid-range TE performance was at its best. For example, a large ZT of 2.6 (at 923 K) and the ultralow thermal conductivities κT and κl with values ~0.35 and 0.23 Wm−1 K−1 at 973 K, respectively were obtained for the SnSe single crystals within the orthorhombic unit cell. At 800 K, Chang and his group attained an exceptional ZT value of 2 by improving the important two factors μ and S with the help of Br dopants in SnSe (a-axis). Although the very good TE properties were achieved from single phase SnSe systems such as the ultralow κT and outstanding ZT values there were some unwanted properties such as i) the poor mechanical properties, ii) the inflexible crystal growth nature, and iii) the high fabrication cost which in aggregate made it unfavorable for large-scale production.

Fig. 17
figure 17

SnSe Crystal structure with the common space groups a Pnma and b Cmcm, c Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) image of Sn0.97Ge0.03Se nanoplates and d SEM and optical image (right top view) of prepared Sn0.948Cd0.023Se microplates

From the first principle study, Anish et al. discussed the SnSe as p-type material with indirect band gap Eg of 0.66 eV, where a phase separation occurred and n-type character with negligible indirect band gap Eg of 0.064 eV was entertained. They also revealed the existence of SnSe2 as a minority phase, whereas the possibility of Cu2Se as a secondary phase is negligible because of its higher formation energy. Cu2Se system is similar to SnSe with a potential application as TE materials due to its abundance and pollution-free nature. It has two crystal structures viz., α and β-phase. The Cu2Se α-phase comprises a monoclinic structure with reasonably less symmetry at low temperatures. At 400 K, a remarkable structural change to a cubic system (β-phase within Fm-3 m space group) is observed, where Se atoms and Cu ions are redistributed on different interstitial sites and take up the simple face-centered cubic structure. The TE characteristics of Cu2Se (β-phase) exhibits larger ZT value than that of α-phase because of the improvement of S, σ, PF, and decrease in κT. Even though the improvement of n raised σ decreases S and vice versa, which is not favorable for PF of TE materials. Metallic Cu2Se β-phase reveals an outstanding PF (2.3 Wm−1 K-2) as well as ultra-high ZT value at 400 K. The doping and the nanostructuring strategies are widely used to elevate the TE performance of Cu2Se. Liu et al. for example used iodine (I) as a dopant to control the transition temperature of Cu2Se system and thus large ZT value of 2.3 was achieved at 400 K. At the same time, Hu and his group used alkaline metal (Li) in the doping process to increase S where they articulated ZT of 2.14 for Cu1.98Li0.02Se at 973 K. On the other hand, Yang and his coworkers used a nanostructuring strategy to minimize the κl up to ~0.2 Wm−1 K−1, which in turn shoots the ZT value to1.82 at 850 K. Carbon-based alloys used in Cu2Se to enhance the thermoelectric power (S) and lower the κT for more efficient TE performances have been lately introduced. Such as, Hu et al. doped carbon nanodots into the Cu2Se system that improved S to ~290 μVK−1 and diminished κT to 0.45 Wm−1 K−1 which resulted in ZT equal to 1.98 at 973 K. Also, Li and his group used nanoparticles of carbon-coated boron in Cu2Se system which displayed ZT ~2.23 at 1000 K. Likewise, Li et al. engineered graphene nanoplates inside a Cu2Se matrix which drastically reduced κT to ~0.4 Wm−1 K−1 and hence the ZT ~2.44 at 873 K was obtained. All these considerable improvements indicate the benefits of both SnSe and Cu2Se systems as strong candidates for TE applications.

1.4.4 Skutterudites Nanocomposites

Skutterudites being extensively studied for potential thermoelectric processing are considered as promising choices for next-generation TE materials and applications especially for power generation used in both solar source and waste heat managements. The significant characteristic of this kind of TE material is the open cage-like structure where the filled atoms act as rattlers for phonons. The “rattling” of these doped atoms scatter the phonons effectively and significantly decreases the thermal conductivity (κ).

Generally, the common chemical formula of Skutterudites was established by Oftedal and take (MX3) formula, where (M) is a transition element (Co, Rh, Ir…) and (X) imply Pnictogen (P/As/Sb) atoms. Binary Skutterudites consists of an open casing structure with an Im3 space group in a cubic body-centered unit cell structure, whereas the void is produced by eight atoms surrounding octahedrally as depicted in Fig. 17a. Moreover, the unit cell is repositioned by (1/4) distance diagonally across the body. On the other hand, the structure of Skutterudite composites contains two filled voids in each unit cell where the filler atoms are electropositive for example Yb, In, and Ti. An icosahedral cage-like structure surrounds these filler atoms taking the shape of pnicogen octahedral atoms (X). Moreover, the transition metal atoms (T) like Co, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd are centered in this structure which takes the form of EPyT4X12, depicted in Fig. 17b. This is called a “filled Skutterudite” and was first experimentally synthesized in 1977 by Jeitschko et al. (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18
figure 18

The representative figures of a Binary Skutterudites structure with metal atoms (M), pnictogen atoms (X), and b general structure of filled (EPyT4X12) Skutterudite

It is well known that most of the binary skutterudite TE materials exhibit high μ and n as mentioned in ref. [260]. For example, the CoSb3 compound achieved a very high μ and n of 3445 cm2V−1 s−1 and 4 × 1017 cm−3, respectively. On the other hand, the undoped p-type CoSb3 exhibits a ZT value of about 0.2, and the doping in n-type crystals attains ZT = 0.52 at 600 K. The achieved figure of merit value in (Ni, Co)4Sb12 nanocomposites is 0.7 without rattlers. Also, Khovaylo and his group achieved an ultra-low κT close to 1.25 and a high ZT value of ~1.5 at 725 K with the help of indium filler atoms embedded in skutterudite Co4Sb12 composition. Typically, the improvements in ZT were obtained with various kinds of atoms (such as Ce, La, Ca, Ba, Yb) to fill the cages structures. For instance, Yb-filled n-type Yb0.19Co4Sb12 composition recorded a ZT peak close to 1 at 373 °C and ZT was about 0.7 value at 400 °C for n-type Yb0.15Co4Sb12. While using the ball-milling and hot-pressing approach, the peak of ZT for YbxCo4Sb12 nanocomposites increased to 1.2. More categories of doped Co4Sb12 nanocrystals have been articulated, like SnyFe3Co5Sb24, FeCo3Sb12 as well as the rare-earth filled Fe4Sb12 Skutterudite nanocomposites. Zhou and his group studied the p-type skutterudite nanocomposites Co0.9Fe0.1Sb3 with FeSb2 nano-inclusions. Generally, FeSb2 is a chemically stable compound found as a secondary phase p-type skutterudite. For instance, the nanocomposite samples of Co0.9Fe0.1+xSb3+2× with x = 0.05, 0.1, and 0.02.

The lower Sb content is very sensitive in the constriction of FeSb2 so rapid solidification was used to facilitate this process in the skutterudite stoichiometry. FESEM images on the fractured surface of the bulk Co0.9Fe0.1+xSb3+2× nanocomposites are depicted in Fig. 19. Figure (19a) illustrates the zoomed-in examination of the circle region where nano-sized particles can be seen. It appears that the nanoparticles can be found in Fig. 19 (a−c) with different nominal (x) content where Fig. 19 (d) represents the parent sample Co0.75Fe0.25Sb3 which is having the same Fe/Co ratio as x = 0.2 content and has the normal skutterudite composition MX3. It has appeared from Fig. 19d that the grain boundaries are much cleaner due to the Fe substations and shared in FeSb2 skutterudites nanoparticles and it was found to be grown to the micron size. Even though the Skutterudites reveal high κT, but most of the Skutterudites give high ZT ≥ 1 so it offers a strong potential for using them in high-efficiency TE applications.

Fig. 19
figure 19

FESEM images on fractured surface of Co0.9Fe0.1Sb3+xFeSb2 nanocomposites and reference sample Co0.75Fe0.25Sb3. a x = 0.05, the circular region represents the nano-sized particles; b x = 0.1; c x = 0.2; d Co0.75Fe0.25Sb3

1.4.5 Mg2Si-Based Nanocomposites

Mg2Si-Based Nanomaterials are considered as TE materials due to the exhibition of high ZT, abundant, non-toxic, and light elemental compositions e.g. Mg2(Si, Sn), and become more attractive. A large ZT value of ~1.1 was achieved at 800 K for doped Mg2(Si, Sn) typically in MgSi0.4Sn0.6 solid solutions, which is analogous to PbTe and filled skutterudite type materials. Zhang and his co-workers carried out the full microstructure study and thermoelectric properties of high ZT Mg2Si0.4-xSn0.6Sbx alloys. The obtained value of the lattice thermal conductivity κl was in the range 1.5–2.1 W/mK at 300 K which is quite small when compared to undoped-Mg2Si (7.9 W/mK) and 5.9 W/mK of Mg2Sn composites. One of the important remarks on the synthesis procedure is the observation of the in situ formed nanodots by phase separation approach. So, it is proposed that the formations of the nanoscale compositional or the structural modulations are the reasons behind the reduction of thermal conductivity in these samples.

On other hand, Mg2Si/Si nanocomposites were prepared by Yalei Huang and his group and the compositions comprise Si nanosheet bundles. Also, the Mg2Si deposited and formed on the Si nano-sheet bundles was prepared by the thermal annealing of CaSi2 powders in MgCl2 vapor. Figure 20 (a,b) illustrates the morphology obtained from SEM and TEM images of the Mg2Si/Si composites synthesized on the Si (111) substrate. The nanosheets were obtained with a thickness of several tens and up to one hundred nanometers and the stacked nanosheets also appeared with a small void space to form the bundles. Figure 20 (c,d) displays the cross-sectional and plan-view for HRTEM images with FFT patterns of the synthesized composites scratched off the substrate. Recently, Souda et al. carried out the modulation doping in Si–Mg2Si system, where Mg2Si was considered heavily doped phase and Si the undoped phase. Also, the Si–Mg2Si nanocomposite ribbons were obtained by a melt spinning technique. The thermoelectric properties of the prepared samples are determined with a large power factor value equal to 2.7 mW m−1 K−2 at 773 K for these ribbons within the optimized structure and chemical compositions.

Fig. 20
figure 20

A schematic diagrams for a Plan-view SEM image, b TEM image, c cross-sectional and d Plan view HRTEM images with an FFT pattern of the nano-sheet synthesized from CaSi2 micro-walls on a Si (111) substrate by the thermal treatment approach at 600 °C

1.4.6 Si-Ge Nanocomposites

Alloys and nanocomposites of Si and Ge describe the solid solution SixGe1−x thermoelectric materials operating at temperatures more than 1000 K. For instance, SiGe based alloys are being used in radio-isotope TE generators (RTG) for various space missions because of their ability to convert radio-isotope heat into electricity at large temperatures [52]. Generally, SiGe alloys possess potential applications in thermoelectric generators (TEG) to regain waste heat. Si and Ge in Si-Ge alloys crystallize in the diamond-like structure with the Fd-3 m space group which takes the face-centered cubic (FCC) Bravais lattice. SiGe composites have two well-known characteristics; viz the melting point is very high ~1300 K and outstanding stability at high temperatures. Also, SixGe1−x solid solutions have good chemical stability at high temperatures, specifically against the oxidation process. A high figure of merit (<~1) entitles the fundamentals of TE use at a high-temperature range (1000–1200 K). Owing to their rigid and symmetric crystal structure, they display extremely small room temperature thermal conductivity (κ) (150 and 63 W/mK, respectively) to become promising thermoelectric materials. Nevertheless, the thermal conductivity has been decreased to nearly 5–10 W/mK due to the formation of a solid solution alloying. Recently, a lot of theoretical and experimental groups put forward massive efforts and achieved some success in improving the ZT of Si-Ge alloys. Nanostructuring using ball milling and other techniques is one of these efforts by which the thermal conductivity is reduced in comparison to the bulk alloys. The peak of ZT for both p-type and n-type Si-Ge alloys has been achieved [44, 45]. Particularly the figure of merit ZT of n-type Si-Ge nanocomposite has gone beyond 1 (at 1100 K). Figure 21 exhibits the power factor (PF) as well as the thermal conductivity (κ) of the Si80Ge20 systems synthesized by ball milling and hot-pressing approach. On the other hand, the Nanostructuring impact appears when the interfacial phonon scattering and the low dimensionality (nanoscale size) make the SiGe superlattices nanowires furnish a low κT. For example, Usenko and his research group synthesized the bulk sample of n-type Si-Ge nanostructures employing ball-milling and spark plasma sintering techniques. The obtained sample showed a little κT of about 2.47 Wm−1 K−1 at 300 K and an enhanced ZT value of 1.1 at 1073 K.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Schematic diagrams for p-type Si80Ge20 nanocomposites: on the left) the power factor results, and on the right) thermal conductivity results of the samples prepared with the assistance of ball milling, hot pressing, and annealing approach

Various studies showed that the figure of merit (ZT) for n-type Si-Ge alloys (1 at 900–950 °C) is higher than p-type SiGe (0.65 at 900 °C) due to the large κT value and maximum n. In some cases, the ZT obtained for n-type Si-Ge alloy was about 1.3 with κT equal to 2.8 Wm−1 K−1 recorded at 1173 K, whereas p-type Si-Ge has reached a ZT value ~0.5. Another effort has been endeavored to minimize κT and boost the ZT of Si-Ge alloys via doping. Typically, dopants have achieved a reasonable ZT value and lowered the κT values as well. Usenko et al. used boron as a dopant in Si80Ge20 via the spark plasma approach. They obtained a low κT value (~2.9 Wm−1 K−1) for the prepared samples and achieved a high ZT value of 0.72 at 1073 K. Later, Peng et al. exhibited a boron-doped Si-Ge thin film. They articulated an enhancement in S to 850 μVK−1 at 473 K but lowered the ρ to 1.3 × 10−5 Ωm where the PF improved to 5.6 × 10−2 Wm−1 K−2. Also, the high-energy ball milling technique was used to obtain single-phase p-type (boron-doped) Si80Ge20 nanoparticles from elements [45]. (Fig. 22a) illustrates the single-phase synthesized Si80Ge20Bx alloys. The crystalline nature of the mechanically alloyed Si-Ge nanocrystals differs from that of the ball-milled Bi2Te3 nanocrystals where Fig. 22(d) showed the polycrystalline nature of Si80Ge20Bx nanoparticles. It appears that the mechanically alloyed Si-Ge is consisting of several sub-nanograins as depicted in (Fig. 22d). HRTEM image in Fig. 22(d) reveals the existence of a lot of defects inside the individual sub-grain since the formation of the nanograins was developed by a low temperature mechanical alloying technique rather than the melting and solidification method at higher temperatures.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Schematic diagrams for p-type Si80Ge20Bx nanoparticles: a XRD pattern, b BF-TEM image, c medium magnification TEM image, d HRTEM image. The inset on the right of c is SAED of an individual grain revealing the polycrystalline structure of the grain [45]

Alternatively, the obtained n-type Si80Ge20P2 samples prepared via mechanical alloy technique gave a single-phase nanoparticle shown in Fig. 23 (a). The particle size of the as-prepared nanopowders was ranging from 30–200 nm as depicted in Fig. 23 (b,c). These nanoparticles are like p-type mechanically alloyed Si-Ge nanoparticles where sun-grains from small crystals were visualized. The obtained sub-nanograins range from 5–15 nm as depicted in Fig. 23 (d). The main goal for thermoelectrics is to reduce κl. So one of the interesting perspectives of Si-Ge alloy is the reduction of (κl) via different composites and preparation methods. For instance, Kikuchi and his coworkers used 10 nm diameter SiNWs to be embedded into SiGe0.3. Bio-template masking and neutral beam etching methods were used to achieve SiNWs and then deposited via chemical vapor deposition route thermally.

Fig. 23
figure 23

Schematic diagrams of n-type Bi80Ge20P2 nanoparticles as follow: a XRD diffractogram, b BF-TEM image, c BF-TEM image at medium magnification, and d HRTEM image. The inset on the right of c represents a SAED diagram of an individual nanoparticle [44]

They obtained from SiNW-SiGe0.3 composite film a thickness of 100 nm, κT value of 3.5 ± 0.3 Wm−1 K−1 in the temperature range 300 to 350 K. Furthermore, they observed the S and σ values at 873 K to be 4.8 × 103 μVK−1 and 4.4 × 103 Sm−1, respectively. Usenko et al. fabricated the n-type Si0.9Ge0.1-Mg2Si composites. At 1073 K, they achieved a reduction in κl up to 1.4 Wm−1 K−1 and observed an average value for ZT of ~0.8.

1.4.7 Zintl Phases

The Zintl phases named after their discovery by a German chemist called Eduard Zintl and then were identified by Laves in the early 40s of the last century. A unified class of electropositive cations, mostly group I or II elements, reflect the Zintl phases. The second partner, which is a subset of inter-metallic compounds, was composed of post-transition metals or metal alloys from XIII, XIV, XV, XVI. Even though the application of Zintl phases as outstanding thermoelectrics is quite evident, their structure and chemical bonding details were fully investigated recently. Zintl phases may be widely used as TE materials due to the exhibition of the high thermoelectric power (S). For example, Yb2−xEuxCdSb2, Mg3Pb0.2Sb1.8 and Yb14MgSb11 compositions registered the highest S values as follows 269 μVK−1, ~280 μVK−1 and 279 μVK−1, respectively.

Additionally, the best advantage of these materials is the flexibility to work in wide temperature ranges. p-type and n-type of Zintl(1-2-2) phases exhibit outstanding characteristics among Zintl compounds in the low till the middle-temperature ranges wherein the range 975−1275 K demonstrates an improvement in the other p-type Zintl(14-1-1) families. One of the promising Zintl phases is of kind A14MPn11, where (A) element labels alkaline-earth or rare-earth metal, (M) element describes transition or main group metal, and (Pn) defines a pnictogen, respectively. For instance, Yb14MnSb11 is the most superior TE material for high-temperature applications. Al, Zn and La- Yb14MnSb11 have attained a ZT = 1.1 at 1275 K, 1.3 at 1223 K and 1.15 at 1150 K, respectively. Moreover, Snyder et al. articulated that Yb14Mn0.67Zn0.33Sb11 and Yb14Mn0.8Al0.2Sb11 compounds show the highest ZT among the other doped Yb14MnSb11 phases at 1200 K with values 1.7 and 1.76, respectively. Furthermore, there are numerous Zintl compounds like: n-type of KSnSb (with ZT = 2.2 at 800 K and 0.6 at 300 K), Ca0.5Yb0.5Mg2Bi2 (Zt = 1 at 873 K), Mg2.985Ag0.015Sb2 records 0.15 at 725 K, EuZn2Sb2 and Yb- doped EuZn2Sb2 have ZT equal to 0.9 at 713 K and 0.68 at 773 K, ZnInSb compounds provide high ZT values of 1.4 at 700 K and are commonly used for high-temperature applications. Lately, Mg3Sb2 based Zintl compositions with ZT value 0.6 at 773 K are very desirable for TE applications due to less toxicity, environment-friendly and earth-abundance characteristics.

More research has been carried out to study the possibility of transformation of p-type into n-type Mg3Sb2 compounds by terminating Mg vacancies and enhancing the number of carriers (n) to improve the TE performance of Mg3Sb2. Li and his coworkers theoretically studied the electronic structure of n-type Mg3Sb2 via density functional theory (DFT) and reached a very high value of ZT with 3.1 at 725 K. Later in another example within the same DFT constraints, they touched a ZT value of 2.75 [305]. However, no experimental works or results have yet been achieved to reproduce the ZT value of more than 2 in such compounds. Figure 24 shows the (HRTEM) images and EDX obtained data of the nanostructured Mg3Sb2 and Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 alloys [306] which generally exhibits the nanoscale characteristics and represents the uniform microstructures with nanoscale crystallites, together with some microstructure defects (Fig. 24 b−e) resulting from the long hours of the ball-milling procedure [306].

Fig. 24
figure 24

Schematic diagrams nanostructured Mg3Sb2 and Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 alloys: a TEM image of Mg3Sb2 sample; b nanostructured Mg3Sb2 lattice scale image with several orientations of the crystallographic planes; c EDAX-TEM designs for nanostructured Mg3Sb2 sample; d Obtaining data of bright field electron micrograph nanostructured Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 sample; e The HRTEM of nanostructured Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2, showing distorted lattices; f The EDAX-TEM patterns obtained from the nanostructured Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 specimen with the exact elemental analysis

Bhardwaj et al. demonstrated that the nanostructured Mg3Sb2 and Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 prepared via high energy ball milling and then followed by spark plasma sintering approach yield a ZT of ∼0.4 and ∼0.94 at 773 K, respectively. These are 54% to 56%, higher than that of bulk specimens. The observed ZT values for the Mg3Sb1.8Bi0.2 nanocrystals w.r.t temperature are depicted in Fig. 25.

Fig. 25
figure 25

The obtained data for the temperature dependence of the thermoelectric figure of merit of bulk Mg3Sb2−xBix (x = 0 & 0.2) samples

1.4.8 Heusler Materials

Heusler Alloys have long been discovered by F. Heusler in 1903. These alloys are broadly distributed in three categories according to the number of atoms in their unit cells. First, the Half-Heusler alloys having XYZ formula and are found in F-43 m space group. Here, the lattice positions are: X(0,0,0), Y(0.5,0.5,0.5) and Z(0.25,0.25,0.25). Second are the X2YZ type Full Heusler alloys with L21 structure (space group: Fm-3 m) and the atomic coordinates are X(0.75,0.75,0.75) and (0.25,0.25,0.25); Y(0,0,0) and Z(0.5,0.5,0.5). This class can be found in another stereotype called the inverse Heusler alloys with space group F-43 m but the position of X and Y atoms vary as: X(0,0,0) and (0.75,0.75,0.75), Y (0.5,0.5,0.5) and Z (0.25,0.25,0.25) depicted in Fig. 26. And the third one is the recent most category known as Quaternary Heusler Alloys with XX′YZ formula and these can be found in F-43 m structure within type-I, type-II and type-III; where X, X′, Y and Z locations vary as given in Fig. 25. Here, the X, X′, Y are mainly transition metal elements but can be a rare-earth also and Z atom is generally a p-block element.

Fig. 26
figure 26

Schematic representation of the half- and full-Heusler compounds’ various structures. Note also that the lattice would simply be the b.c.c. if all atoms were identical

However, these materials lately flourished in various technological applications due to the exhibition of magnificent properties ranging from half-metallic ferromagnetism to superconductivity, large Curie temperature, semiconductor or topological behavior, robust spin polarization, and shape memory effects, etc., They found applications in tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) devices, spin injectors or magnetic tunnel junctions and magnetic read heads. At the same time, the potential application in thermoelectric power generation has been the eminent among all such properties. In view of the electronic structure, this huge class of materials consist of magnetic, nonmagnetic, semiconductors, half-metals, semimetals (spin-gapless semiconductors, Dirac or Weyl semimetals, spin semimetals), etc. Non-magnetism and semiconducting properties in Heusler alloys are preferably defined by Slater-Pauling rule (M = Nv-24 or 28 or 18); where the valence electron count (Nv) is linked to the total magnetic moment (M) of the crystal. The rigorous degenerate valence bands and fully compensated spins in 12 or 8 bands create the possible semiconducting electronic structure of these alloys. However, in some cases, the crystal symmetry or d-electron splitting leads to spin semi-metallic or spin gapless nature also.

Thermoelectric resourcefulness of Heusler materials have been precedented by the recent discovery of ZT = 5 or 6 in a metastable Fe2V0.8W0.2Al Heusler thin film are illustrated into Fig. 27. It was supposed that the large differential density of states and a Weyl-like dispersion of electrons present around the Fermi level initiates a high mobility of charge carriers [316]. Experimentally found Ti/Sn doped NbFeSb [317] and TaFeSb [318] Heuslers achieved a ZT equal to 1.1 and 0.5, respectively. Also, the p-type alloys including Fe(V,Nb)Sb [319], TiPdSn [320] and XCoSb (X = Ti, Zr, Hf) and n-type XNiSn with quite high ZTs are among the few to note down here.

Fig. 27
figure 27

Thin-film Fe2V0.8W0.2Al and its temperature-dependent thermoelectric properties. a, b, the Seebeck coefficient a and the electrical resistivity b of the entire composite (layer, interface and substrate), along with the Fe2V0.8W0.2Al thin-film. S(1) layer and S(2) layer are the Seebeck data with and without Fe2Si as the interface, respectively. c, d, The power factor versus temperature c and the average merit figure d. ZTappr is evaluated to a first approximation using the room-temperature (25 °C) thermal conductivity (λdiffRT = 2.70 Wm−1 K−1; λeffRT = 3.02 Wm−1 K−1 and keeping λph constant). Open diamonds indicate the respective ZTappr data

However, different strategic criteria and alterations are meticulously put forward to shape the maximum efficient Heusler materials to exhibit the augmentation of electricity from waste heat. Since then a huge database of Heusler thermoelectrics has been scrutinized and maintained but more research is yet needed to improve the efficiency of these new materials.

2 Conclusive Remarks

In this review, we have tried to highlight the advancements in thermoelectric materials and possible strategies to improve the thermoelectric efficiency of the traditional and newly designed TE materials. Further investigations are carried out on higher ZT enhancement of TE coefficients like S, σ at the same time the κ must be kept low values. The later has been found to be ultra-low in some 2D materials yet to be realized experimentally. It opens the window for the researchers to design the new strategies for practically synthesizable nanostructure materials. Hence, novel techniques to stabilize higher ZT in nanostructured metastable alloys like Fe2V0.8W0.2Al Heusler thin film and the TE application demands practically need to be acquired at elevated temperature for broader scope of this technology. Upcoming TE devices developed from these nanomaterials sought to be extensively used in cooling/refrigeration/air-conditioning applications at large scale and to launch a consistent, well-organized, eco-friendly energy consumption on our planet earth.