Abstract
In recent decades, many researchers have been working on the effectiveness of peer assessment in higher education. Being a useful teaching tool, peer assessment enables students to actively participate in learning and create a student-centered learning environment. Many studies focused on the influence of peer assessment on student learning, however, few studies have explored indicators that teachers can use to identify potential problems regarding students’ attitudes towards students’ feedback and peer review process. Thus, this is an exploratory study, trying to understand indicators for success and problems regarding students’ peer feedback process. We had 93 international students performing three peer-feedback assignments (each assignment of around 2000 words and each review of at least 250 words) on the topics of digital transformation, design thinking, and leadership in an Innovation and Entrepreneurship Basic course. For each of the tasks, students completed questionnaires about their attitudes towards peer assessment in general, providing peer assessment and the usefulness of the received peer assessment. We investigate the correlation between students’ performance, students’ assignment lengths, and students’ reviews lengths and attitude questionnaire items and we present the correlations we observed. These correlations can serve as first indicators to teachers to detect potential problems with peer assessment and get insights into student’s perceptions of the peer assessment process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cassidy, S.: Developing employability skills: peer assessment in higher education. Educ.+ Train. 48, 508–517 (2006)
Chen, I.C., Hwang, G.J., Lai, C.L., Wang, W.C.: From design to reflection: effects of peer-scoring and comments on students’ behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in musical theater performance. Comput. Educ. 150, 103856 (2020)
Cheng, W., Warren, M.: Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Stud. High. Educ. 22(2), 233–239 (1997)
Cho, K., Schunn, C.D., Wilson, R.W.: Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. J. Educ. Psychol. 98(4), 891 (2006)
Dijks, M.A., Brummer, L., Kostons, D.: The anonymous reviewer: the relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 43(8), 1258–1271 (2018)
Falchikov, N.: Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innov. Educ. Train. Int. 32(2), 175–187 (1995)
Gan, J.: The effects of prompts and explicit coaching on peer feedback quality. Ph.D. thesis, ResearchSpace@ Auckland (2011)
van Gennip, N.A., Segers, M.S., Tillema, H.H.: Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: the influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educ. Res. Rev. 4(1), 41–54 (2009)
Gómez-Galán, J.: Media education in the ICT era: theoretical structure for innovative teaching styles. Information 11(5), 276 (2020)
Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., Van Den Broek, P.: Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 43(6), 955–968 (2018)
Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., Van Den Broek, P.: A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 57, 1–11 (2019)
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, M.S.: Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(4), 349 (1979)
Kobrin, J.L., Deng, H., Shaw, E.J.: Does quantity equal quality? The relationship between length of response and scores on the sat essay. J. Appl. Test. Technol. 8(1), 1–16 (2007)
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C.V., Guo, X., Tywoniw, R.: Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 45(2), 193–211 (2020)
Lonka, K., Mikkonen, V.: Why does the length of an essay-type answer contribute to examination marks? Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 59(2), 220–231 (1989)
McGarr, O., Clifford, A.M.: ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. High. Educ. 65(6), 677–693 (2013)
Nelson, M.M., Schunn, C.D.: The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instr. Sci. 37(4), 375–401 (2009)
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., Breslin, C.: Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 39(1), 102–122 (2014)
Pisoni, G.: Strategies for pan-European implementation of blended learning for innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) education. Educ. Sci. 9(2), 124 (2019)
Pisoni, G.: Lessons learned from implementing blended learning for classes of different size. In: Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (2020)
Pisoni, G., Gaio, L., Rossi, A.: Investigating soft skills development through peer reviews assessments in an entrepreneurship course. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), pp. 291–2915. IEEE (2019)
Prins, F.J., Sluijsmans, D.M., Kirschner, P.A., Strijbos, J.W.: Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 30(4), 417–444 (2005)
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., Cunillera, T.: The different impact of a structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates’ initial writing skills. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 44(5), 653–663 (2019)
van Rooyen, S., Black, N., Godlee, F.: Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 52(7), 625–629 (1999)
Roskams, T.: Chinese EFL students’ attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pairwork setting. RELC J. 30(1), 79–123 (1999)
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Estrada, E., Schellens, T.: How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in relation to its social nature? A survey study in Flanders. Stud. Educ. Eval. 53, 29–40 (2017)
Strijbos, J.W., Narciss, S., Dünnebier, K.: Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learn. Instr. 20(4), 291–303 (2010)
Sullivan, M.E., Hitchcock, M.A., Dunnington, G.L.: Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. Am. J. Surg. 177(3), 266–269 (1999)
Tai, J.H., Haines, T.P., Canny, B.J., Molloy, E.K.: A study of medical students’ peer learning on clinical placements: what they have taught themselves to do. J. Peer Learn. 7(1), 57–80 (2014)
Tollefson, N., Tracy, D.: Test length and quality in grading of essay responses. Education 101(1), 63 (1980)
Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson, I., Elliot, A.: Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 25(2), 149–169 (2000)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the students involved in the peer review and subsequent survey task and the instructors who granted access to class activities, thus making this work possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, HC., Pisoni, G., Gijlers, H. (2021). An Exploratory Study into Graduate Students’ Attitudes Towards Peer Assessment. In: Auer, M.E., Rüütmann, T. (eds) Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1329. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68200-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68201-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)