Abstract
Tumor microenvironment (TME) is the local environment of tumor, composed of tumor cells and blood vessels, extracellular matrix (ECM), immune cells, and metabolic and signaling molecules. Chemokines and their receptors play a fundamental role in the crosstalk between tumor cells and TME, regulating tumor-related angiogenesis, specific leukocyte infiltration, and activation of the immune response and directly influencing tumor cell growth, invasion, and cancer progression. The chemokine CXCL12 is a homeostatic chemokine that regulates physiological and pathological process such as inflammation, cell proliferation, and specific migration. CXCL12 activates CXCR4 and CXCR7 chemokine receptors, and the entire axis has been shown to be dysregulated in more than 20 different tumors. CXCL12 binding to CXCR4 triggers multiple signal transduction pathways that regulate intracellular calcium flux, chemotaxis, transcription, and cell survival. CXCR7 binds with high-affinity CXCL12 and with lower-affinity CXCL11, which binds also CXCR3. Although CXCR7 acts as a CXCL12 scavenger through ligand internalization and degradation, it transduces the signal mainly through β-arrestin with a pivotal role in endothelial and neural cells. Recent studies demonstrate that TME rich in CXCL12 leads to resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy and that CXCL12 axis inhibitors sensitize resistant tumors to ICI effect. Thus targeting the CXCL12-mediated axis may control tumor and tumor microenvironment exerting an antitumor dual action. Herein CXCL12 physiology, role in cancer biology and in composite TME, prognostic role, and the relative inhibitors are addressed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Cancer
- Chemokines
- Tumor microenvironment
- Chemokine receptors
- CXCL12
- CXCR4
- CXCR7
- CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7 axis
- Metastasis
- Tumor progression
- Angiogenesis
- Immunotherapy
- Checkpoint inhibitors
- CXCL12 antagonist
- Antitumor immune response
5.1 Introduction
Tumor microenvironment (TME) is the local environment of tumorigenesis and tumor growth, a dynamic space that determines cancer fate. It is composed of tumor and surrounding cells such as bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, fibroblasts, pericytes, and immune cells [1, 2]. TME components support tumors, angiogenesis, and growth and represent the site of critical interactions mostly promoting tumor initiation, resistance, metastasis, and recurrence [3]. Chemokines, or chemotactic cytokines, are small chemoattractant secreted molecules regulating directed cell migration, proliferation, and survival with a role in physiological and pathological processes including cancer [4]. Structurally chemokines are classified on the basis of a specific cysteine motif at the N-terminal into CC, CXC, XC, and CX3C subfamilies: the CC chemokines have two adjacent conserved cysteine residues, XC chemokines have only one N-terminal cysteine residue, whereas CXC and CX3C chemokines have one or three other amino acids in between their conserved N-terminal cysteine residue; they accordingly bind to their respective chemokine receptor subfamilies CCR, CXCR, XCR, and CX3CR [5] (Fig. 5.1). Chemokines can be divided into inflammatory and homeostatic based on their prominent functions: mainly inflammatory chemokines, that are expressed during inflammatory processes, are CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL7, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CXCL14. On the other hand, homeostatic chemokines such as CCL14, CCL19, CCL20, CCL21, CCL25, CCL27, CXCL12, and CXCL13 are constitutively expressed and regulate homeostatic leukocyte trafficking [6]. The chemokine system is complex with several chemokines that bind the same receptor with similar affinities and receptors that bind the same ligand. Nevertheless, the system is not redundant as cells dynamically express receptors at the cell membrane simultaneously or during different stages of their life [7]. Chemokines are expressed by neurons, glia, and neural progenitor cells, the major cell types of the nervous system, and are induced by neuroinflammatory responses [8]. Combined with the normal and/or pathological nervous system expression of chemokine receptors, chemokines potentially initiate a cascade of events leading to neuroinflammation [9]. The chemokines generated in association with neuroinflammation are crucial for the migration of leukocytes into inflamed neural tissue, just as in other parts of the body [10]. Chemokines also regulate the migration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to tumor sites where they promote tumor development and differentiate to tumor-promoting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Moreover, chemokines expressed in metastatic sites are key players in attracting tumor cells that express the corresponding receptors [11].
Twenty-three human chemokine receptors and about 50 chemokines [12] have been identified. Chemokine receptors are G protein-coupled/seven-transmembrane domain receptors. A new family of chemokine receptors named atypical chemokine receptors (ACKR) has recently emerged as important regulators of chemokine functions. The ACKRs are unable to trigger the canonical G protein-mediated signaling. Four chemokine receptors belong to ACKR: 1. ACKR1, previously called Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC); 2. ACKR2, also known as D6; 3. ACKR3, also called CXC-chemokine receptor 7 (CXCR7); and 4. ACKR4, previously called CC chemokine receptor-like 1 (CCRL1) [13]. In the TME chemokines can be expressed by tumor, immune, and stromal cells such as leukocytes, fibroblasts, pericytes, and endothelial cells crucial for tumor vascularization and metastatic spread [14].
CXCL12 is a homeostatic chemokine that binds CXCR4 and CXCR7 receptors and physiologically functions in hematopoiesis, leucocyte trafficking, cardiogenesis, and neurogenesis. CXCR4 (352 amino acids, 48 kDa) [15,16,17] is a G protein-coupled chemokine receptor encoded on chromosome 2.1 in human. CXCL12 binding to CXCR4 triggers multiple signal transduction pathways that regulate intracellular calcium flux, chemotaxis, transcription, and cell survival [18]. CXCR7 binds with high-affinity CXCL12 and with lower-affinity CXCL11, which binds also CXCR3 [19]. Although CXCR7 acts as a CXCL12 scavenger through ligand internalization and degradation [20], it transduces the signal mainly through β-arrestin with a pivotal role in endothelial and neural cells.
5.2 The CXCR4-CXCL12-CXCR7 Axis
5.2.1 CXCL12
Initially known as stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1 α) or pre B-cell growth-stimulating factor (PBSF), CXCL12 is the most studied member of the chemokine family [21, 22]. CXCL12 gene in human is located on chromosome 10 (10q11.21) and recognizes seven isoforms deriving from alternative gene splicing (α, β, γ, δ, ε, θ) with α and β being the most studied [23] and three (CXCL12α to γ) in mice [24, 25] (Fig. 5.2). CXCL12α (89aa, 10 kDa) is the most common isoform produced in lymph nodes (LNs), brain, liver, colon, kidney, testis, lung, pancreas, skin, and placenta and by different cell types including stromal cells, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, dendritic cells, and monocytes, among others. CXCL12 is the major chemokine produced in the bone marrow (BM) , where it regulates quiescence, retention, and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) [26]. CXCL12 half life is approximately 26 minutes. CXCL12 is then degraded at the N-terminal by enzymes matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 (MMP-2/9) crucial to extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. CXCL12 is described classically as a homing chemokine as it exhibits chemoattraction of tumoral cells toward the target tissues [27]. CXCL12, although being homeostatic in classification, also takes inflammatory activities [28]. CXCL12 binds to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) exposed on the surface of endothelial cells through a cluster of basic residues—the BBXB motif (B for basic amino acid and X any amino acid) generating its chemotactic gradients and promoting leukocyte/cancer cell migration [29,30,31]. CXCL12-α is not present in blood due to enzymatic degradation [23], but it is expressed in adult BM, where it accounts for progenitor cell retention and chemotaxis of leukemia cells [32]. Unlike CXCL12α, CXCL12β (93aa, 10.6 kDa) promotes angiogenesis [33], while CXCL12γ (119aa, 13.6 kDa) is highly expressed in less vascularized organs, such as the heart and brain [34]. CXCL12γ is poor chemotactic in vitro but the most active in vivo [35] and, due to a stable binding interaction, produces a powerful inflammatory reaction in in vivo mouse models [23]. Recently CXCL12γ has been found to interact with CXCR4 inducing cancer stem cell (CSCs), with neuroendocrine phenotypes and development of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [36].
5.2.2 CXCL12 Signaling
CXCL12 binds the seven α-helical transmembrane domains (7TM) G protein-coupled (GPCR) conventional receptor CXCR4, and the atypical receptor CXCR7 (also known as ACKR3) and plays a key role in physiological and pathological processes, including embryogenesis, hematopoiesis, angiogenesis, and inflammation, regulating the migration of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells, endothelial cells, and leukocytes [7, 37, 38] (Fig. 5.3). CXCL12 main receptor, CXCR4 , also binds macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a cytokine involved in the regulation of innate immunity [39]. MIF binds to the N-terminal tail of CXCR4 and to the exterior side of TM helices, but not inside the TM pocket [39, 40]. MIF also binds to other receptors, including CXCR2, CD74/CD44, and ACKR3 [41]. CXCL12 can also activate CXCR4 through heterodimers like HMGB1-CXCL12. High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is the archetypal damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) released from dead or severely stressed cells to alert their microenvironment and the innate immune system. However, the conformational rearrangements of CXCR4 differ when triggered by CXCL12 alone or by HMGB1•CXCL12, and the complex is extremely more potent than CXCL12 alone in inducing cell migration [42]. Extracellular ubiquitin (eUb) , also considered a DAMP, is a CXCL12 antagonist [41] that binds to CXCR4 inside the cavity delimited by TMs [43], but makes contact to CXCR4 residues that are not contributing to CXCL12 binding [44]. Beta-defensin-3 (HBD3) also competes with CXCL12 for CXCR4 binding and promotes CXCR4 internalization without inducing calcium flux, ERK phosphorylation, or chemotaxis. CXCL12-CXCR4 forms a complex with the Gαi subunit G protein, inhibiting the adenylyl cyclase-mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and promoting mobilization of intracellular calcium. Dissociation of the Gαi subunit from Gβγ leads to activation of multiple downstream targets, including protein kinase B (Akt), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 (ERK1/2) effectors [45]. In addition, Gα subunit activates Ras and Rac/Rho pathways, leading to the phosphorylation of ERK and P38 proteins, respectively [46]. CXCR4 homodimerization results in G protein-independent activation of the JAK/STAT pathway that, in conjunction with other signaling pathways, promotes polarization and chemotactic responses [47]. Recent evidence has shown CXCR4-dependent mTOR signaling in pancreatic, renal, and gastric cancer and T cell leukemia cells [18, 48]. CXCR7 homo- and heterodimerizes with CXCR4, and overall, the signaling properties of CXCR7 seem to be multifaceted and may be cell context-dependent. CXCR4-CXCR7 heterodimers regulate the subcellular distribution of CXCR4, recruit β-arrestins, and modify CXCL12-driven responses through CXCR4 [49]. Emerging evidence suggests that CXCR7 internalizes its ligands and is activated by CXCL12 to induce intracellular signaling and in particular Akt, MAPkinase (MAPK), and Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT3) through β-arrestin [19] or in heterodimers with CXCR4 [50, 51]. β-arrestin recruitment to the CXCR4/CXCR7 complex enhances downstream cell signaling (ERK1/2, p38, SAPK/JNK), which induces cell migration in response to CXCL12 [19]. CXCR4 is expressed by migrating cells, and CXCR7 acts by sequestrating CXCL12 from non-target areas, allowing the correct cell migration [20]. In the absence of CXCR7, migrating cells still respond to CXCL12, but their movement ends in undesirable sites due to the lack of a CXCL12 gradient required for a directional migration [67]. Continuous CXCL12 stimulation desensitizes CXCR4-expressing cells promoting CXCR4 endocytosis, as uncoupling from G proteins by GPCR kinase (GRK)-dependent phosphorylation and subsequent interaction of CXCR4 with β-arrestin, which mediates internalization of the receptor that is ubiquitinated and degraded in lysosomes [52, 53]. Activated YY1, a transcription factor, can inhibit CXCR4 expression favoring C-terminal phosphorylation of Src kinase in breast cancer cells [54, 55]. The histone deacetylase CREB3 and the Kruppel-like factor 2 can inactivate CXCR4 [56, 57]. The oncogene Her2 can block CXCR4 ubiquitination and degradation after CXCL12 binding in breast cancer cells [58, 59]. CXCL12 is considered a key molecule for normal development as 50% of the CXCL12-/- knockout mice die before birth around day 18.5 of embryogenesis and neonates die within an hour. CXCL12-/- mice show severely reduced B cell progenitors in fetal liver and bone marrow and myeloid progenitors virtually absent in the bone marrow. In addition, the mutants have a cardiac ventricular septal defect [60]. Similar defect was reported for CXCR4-/- mice suggesting a strong relationship between CXCR4 and CXCL12 [61]; moreover, in the CXCR4-/- mice, nervous system defects were also observed with the cerebellum characterized by an irregular external granule cell layer, ectopically located Purkinje cells, and numerous chromophilic cell clumps of abnormally migrated granule cells within the cerebellar anlage [61]. CXCR4-/+ knockout mice presents few mature B and T cells within the peripheral lymphoid organs, impaired vascularization in various organs such as the intestines, stomach, and heart, and ventricular septal defect that occurs during embryogenesis [62]. CXCR7 has a role in the development of the central nervous system [50], angiogenesis [63], neurogenesis [64], and cardiogenesis [65], while CXCR4 is involved in vascularization, homing of immune cells in the bone marrow [62], and neurogenesis [66]. CXCR7-/- knockout mice die perinatally due to semilunar heart valve malformation and ventricular septal defects and show furthermore disrupted lymph angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte hyperplasia, while their hematopoiesis remains normal.
5.3 The CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in Cancer
The expression of CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 axis is mostly reported in aggressive tumors [68] and correlates with tumor recurrence [69, 70], poor prognosis and patient survival [16, 71, 72]. CXCR4 is overexpressed in a wide range of tumors comprising prostate, brain, breast, lung, liver, gastric, colon, ovary, and pancreas [73,74,75,76]. CXCL12 confers several advantage to CXCR4-expressing cancer cells including a chemo-resistant phenotype via crosstalk with several pathways of survival, proliferation, tumorigenesis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), and acquisition/maintenance of stem-like proprieties [36, 77,78,79,80,81,82]. In addition, CXCL12 hypermethylation was reported in gastric cancer [83], breast cancer [84, 85], colon cancer [86], lung cancer [87], as well as prostate cancer [88]. Within the TME, CXCL12/CXCR4 regulates trafficking of immune and tumor cells promoting tumor-related inflammation and metastasis [47, 89, 90]. In addition, endothelial cells express both CXCR4/CXCR7 and CXCL12 that facilitates intravasation and extravasation of cancer and immune cells as well as tumor angiogenesis [91]. CXCR4 facilitates angiogenesis by recruitment of endothelial progenitor cells or BM-derived accessory cells, while VEGF promotes sprouting angiogenesis by inducing tip cell filopodia and serving as an attraction cue [92]; the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis stimulates tip cells and migration in neovascular sprouting [93]. CXCR7 is highly expressed by most tumor-associated blood vessels of human breast and lung cancers as well as melanoma, but not by normal vasculature [49]. Overexpression of CXCR7 and its activation in the vascular endothelium enhance invasive and migratory ability toward breast, prostate, and lung cancer [94]. In ovarian cancer , estrogen induces CXCR7 expression that favors tumor cell migration and invasion through CXCL11 [95], while CXCL12-stimulated EMT depends on CXCR4 [70]. Although CXCR7 is not considered a chemotactic receptor, addition of CXCL12 enhances CXCR4+/CXCR7+ cancer cell trans-endothelial migration toward CCL19 and CXCL13, chemokines expressed by endothelial cells inside the lymph nodes [96]. Moreover, in ovarian cancer CXCL12 stimulation reduced the expression of ARH-GAP10, a member of Rho GTPase-activating proteins considered a tumor suppressor gene [97].
MicroRNAs have been reported to play critical roles in regulating tumor progression through CXCL12/CXCR4 axis [98]. MiR-302a decreased the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells by reducing CXCR4 production [99]. MiR-9 reduced the proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by the inhibition of CXCR4 via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [100]. MiR-146a down-modulated CXCR4 production in target cells [101]. CXCR4 was inhibited upon miR-451 treatment in lung cancer cells [102]. MiR-204-5p may function as an inhibitory RNA molecule in oral squamous cell carcinoma by targeting CXCR4 [103]. Artificial microRNA was demonstrated to effectively block invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells by targeting CXCR4 [104]. MiR-126 may also act as a tumor suppressor by inactivating RhoA signaling via CXCR4 in colon cancer [105]. In addition, miR-101 was recently discovered to directly target CXCL12 in lung cancer cells [106].
CXCL12-CXCR4 axis mediates also chemotherapy-induced transition toward a mesenchymal/stem cell phenotype. Cisplatin induces upregulation of both CXCR4 and CXCL12 expression in NSCLC cells. In colon cancer , chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy induces CXCR4 expression as part of a mesenchymal transition [107]. Chemotherapy- induced cytokines also have a direct effect on tumor cells. In vivo CXCL12 or S1p/S1PR1 inhibition prevented chemotherapy-enhanced metastasis in tumor-bearing mice. In glioblastoma (GMB) CXCR4 inhibition through Pep R impairs the metabolic activity and tumor growth of GMB cells in vitro and reduced tumor cellularity, promoted M1 features of TAMs and astrogliosis, and hindered intratumor vasculature in orthotopic GMB model [108].
5.4 CXCL12 as Prognostic Factor in Cancer
In a meta-analysis of 38 studies involving 5807 patients, high CXCL12 expression was associated with reduced overall survival in patients with esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, ovarian, and lung cancer, while in breast cancer patients, high CXCL12 expression conferred an overall survival advantage [109]. In esophageal cancer patients’ meta-analysis, high expression of CXCL12 and its receptors (CXCR4 and CXCR7), CXCL8 and its receptor (CXCR2), CCL21 and its receptor (CCR7), or CCL20 was associated with worse prognosis [110]. CXCL12γ was detected only in breast cancers from patients with advanced disease suggesting CXCL12γ as a prognostic marker for breast cancer [34]. CXCL12γ, mostly expressed by carcinoma-associated fibroblasts, confers to CXCR4-positive breast cancer cells the ability to metastasize to the bone marrow through the expression of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL) [33]. High levels of CXCL12 and CXCR4 were reported in sinusoidal endothelial cells in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) specimens, breast tumors, metastatic lung cancer, bladder cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, glioblastoma, and pancreatic tumors [17, 100, 108, 111,112,113,114,115]. In metastatic germ cell tumors, CXCL12 is almost exclusively expressed in non-seminoma [116]. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is centrally involved in ovarian cancer progression since CXCL12 induces ovarian cancer cell migration and invasion and was reported as prognostic factor in ovarian cancer [117]. In lung cancer patients, CXCL12 protein and mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in metastatic lymph nodes than in primary site. CXCL12 high expression in metastatic lymph nodes was associated with poor overall survival [118]. In another study on 63 patients undergoing surgical resection for lung adenocarcinoma, CXCL12 overexpression was a significant poor prognostic factor in patients with surgical resected lung adenocarcinoma. In a study including 596 patients, CXCL12 and relative CXCL12-CXCR4 expression was independent prognostic factors for 5-year DFS in TNM stage III colon cancer [119]. In renal cancer (RCC) patients with high expression of CXCR4, CXCR7, and CXCL12 had shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival than those with low expression [120]. Moreover, CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression, alone and in combination, was prognostic in RCC [121]. Even if CXCL12 was not prognostic, CXCR4 and CXCR7 correlate with poor prognosis in melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) [122,123,124,125].
5.5 The CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in the Tumor Microenvironment
Tumor microenvironment is the tumor local environment composed of immune cells, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, blood and lymphatic vessels, metabolites, chemokines, and cytokines [1, 126]. TME is defined “hot” when it is highly infiltrated by T cell lymphocyte generating “inflamed” TME; in contrast, lack of T cells infiltrating the tumor characterizes “non-inflamed” or “cold tumors” in which other immune populations, like myeloid cells (mostly immunosuppressive), prevail. Tregs (regulatory T cells) and MDSC (myeloid-derived suppressor cells) prevail. Tregs and MDSCs (myeloid-derived suppressor cells) prevail in a COLD TME; moreover, there are few TH1, NK, and CD8+ T cells and few functional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and it is enriched in immunosuppressive cytokines. Hot TME displays high PDL1 expression and is enriched in TH1-type chemokines, effector immune cells (TH1 cells, NK cells, and CD8+ T cells), and functional APCs [1, 126, 127]. Recent evidence showed that the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis can regulate the recruitment of specific immune cell populations within the TME (facilitating the access of immune cells with suppressive function and repelling immune effector cells) and drive the polarization of CXCR4-expressing immune cells toward an immunosuppressive phenotype (Fig. 5.4). CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling mediates plasmacytoid DC trafficking into tumors and Treg cells homing to the bone marrow microenvironment [128]; moreover it has an anti-inflammatory role by mediating T cell polarization toward Tregs [129, 130] and generating poorly functional DCs to stimulate antigen-specific T lymphocyte and macrophages expressing proangiogenic factors [131]. Cytokines produced by stromal cells such as TGF-β elicit epithelial CXCR4 expression that, activated by stromal CXCL12, mediates the activation of the Akt pathway in the epithelial cells promoting malignant progression [132]. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling is central to the retention of neutrophils in the BM, mobilization from the bone marrow, and the homing back of senescent neutrophils [133]. Mice carrying a myeloid-specific deletion of CXCR4 (myeloid-specific knockout (MKO) mice) display a marked redistribution of neutrophils from the bone marrow to the blood and spleen [134]. In a melanoma mice model, disruption of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in myeloid cells via genetic knockout of CXCR4 inhibits the outgrowth of circulating B16 melanoma cells in the lung and inhibits tumor growth in an inducible BrafV600E/PTEN null melanoma mouse model as IL18 overexpression activates NK cells and enhances antitumor immunity [135]. BMDCs attracted at the tumor site produce CXCL12 that interacts with DC cells in an autocrine manner to promote DC maturation and survival [136, 137]. High numbers of plasmacytoid DCs have been observed in human ovarian carcinoma due to CXCL12 in malignant ascites that attracts DCs into the TME [138]. Intratumoral DC plays an important role in stimulating cytotoxic T cells and driving antitumor immunity. In metastatic ovarian tumor model, locoregional delivery of the CXCR4-antagonist-armed virus reduced the tumor load and the immunosuppressive network in the TME, leading to infiltration of CD103+ DC capable of phagocytic clearance of cellular material from virally infected cancer cells [139]. As natural and synthetic amines inhibit DC activation, CXCR4 has been identified as receptor used by amines to inhibit DCs [140]. Thus, CXCR4 was described as a potential “on-off” switch of DC activity with therapeutic potential [140]. Tregs are recruited at the tumor site by chemokines such as CXCL12 [141] and CXCR4 overexpression by Tregs is reported in advanced cervical cancers [142], malignant pleural mesothelioma [143], ovarian [144] and renal cell carcinoma [145]. The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 reduced intratumoral Treg by conversion of Treg cells into T-helper-like cells conferring survival advantage to the ovarian tumor [144]. In ovarian cancer CXCR4 antagonism potentiates the PD-1 blocking antibody activity impairing the recruitment of immunosuppressive cell components and increasing tumor-specific cell-mediated immune responses [146]. AMD3100 alone and in combination with a mesothelin-targeted, immune-activating fusion protein VIC-008 modulated immunosuppression in tumors inhibiting PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells and promoting the conversion of Tregs into CD4+CD25–Foxp3+IL2+CD40L+ helper-like cells [147]. Ex vivo treatment with the new developed CXCR4 antagonist R29 suppresses Treg function and restores T effector cell proliferation without affecting Treg viability in RCC patients [145]. Nomura et. al demonstrated that transducing CXCL12 into two murine immunogenic tumor cells (fibrosarcoma and ovarian cancer, Meth A and HM-1) increased infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and antitumor immune responses [148, 149]. However, CXCL12-overexpressing melanoma mice model (B16/OVA cells engineered to overexpress CXCL12) demonstrated that CXCL12 has a bimodal effect on CXCR4-expressing T effector cell migration attracting them at low concentrations and repelling them at higher concentrations of the chemokine [150]. This mechanism is termed chemorepulsion or fugetaxis [150,151,152] and contributes to the physiological process of T cell migration from the thymus, while repelling T effector cells inside the TME may represent a mechanism by which high CXCL12-expressing tumors evade the immune system [150,151,152].
Interestingly, recent studies are investigating the role of a novel component of TME: nerves. Nerves are gaining attention for their role in cancer as their presence in the TME correlates to cancer metastasis and poor prognosis [153]. Cancer-nerve crosstalk is based on perineural invasion (PNI, cancer cells invading and migrating along the perineurium) and tumor innervation (nerve fibers recruited by neoplastic tissues); both mechanisms cause pain, poor prognosis, and higher risk for recurrence and depend on the chemokine network [153]. In a PNI-associated pancreatic cancer model, in vitro and in vivo analyses revealed that the CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling axis can promote PNI, which can be inhibited by AMD3100 or CXCR4 short hairpin RNA [154].
5.6 Targeting the CXCL12-CXCR4/CXCR7 Axis in Combination Therapy
Different CXCL12/CXCR4 antagonists have been developed and validated (Table 5.1), showing promising anti-cancer activities in several tumor types and can be divided in five major classes: (1) small modified peptides, including BKT140 [155], FC131 [156], T140 [157], and POL6326 [158]; (2) small molecules, including the bicyclam AMD070 [159], AMD3100 [160], AMD11070 [161], MSX-122 [162], GSK812397 [163], and KRH-3955 [164]; (3) antibodies, such as MDX-1338/BMS 93656 [165]; (4) modified agonists and antagonists for CXCL12 such as CTCE-9908 [166]; and (5) microRNAs, such as miR-302a [98], miR-9 [100], miR-204-5p [103], and miR-126 [105].
CTCE-9908 is a CXCL12 analogue which actually received the orphan drug status for osteogenic sarcoma treatment [166]; CTCE-9908 showed in vivo and in vitro antitumor activity in different tumor models such as osteosarcoma, prostate, esophageal, and breast cancer [167,168,169,170,171]. NOX-A12 (OLA-PEG) is a high-affinity anti-CXCL12 Spiegelmer which binds CXCL12 blocking its interaction with both CXCR4 and CXCR7. OLA-PEG antitumor activity has been evaluated in multiple myeloma, leukemia, colorectal cancer, and glioma and in association with immune checkpoint inhibitors in pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer (NCT03168139, NCT01521533, NCT01486797, NCT04121455) [172,173,174,175]. Combinations of OLA-PEG with other chemotherapeutic agents were investigated [176]. Peptide R and Peptide R54 are CXCR4 inhibitors generated by rational design. Peptide R inhibits CXCL12-induced cell migration and lung metastasis development [177,178,179,180] and potentiates standard/immune therapy in colorectal cancer models in vivo [107, 181].
Several evidence showed that combinatorial blockade of CXCR4 and PD-1 greatly reduces specific cellular and functional elements within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and augments tumor-specific cell-mediated immune responses . Combined treatment with the Pep R and anti-PD-1 reduced tumor progression in two syngeneic murine models, anti-PD-1 sensitive and resistant, increasing Granzyme+ and inhibiting Foxp3+ cell tumor infiltration. In addition Pep R54, a Peptide R derivative [182], synergizes with nivolumab in inhibiting the growth of the PD-1 expressing human PES43 melanoma xenograft [181]. Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP)-positive CAF are the major source of CXCL12 in TME that regulates TME exclusion of T cells. The conditional depletion of the FAP+ CAF permits immune control effects of both anti-PD-L1and anti-CTLA-4; administering AMD3100 induced rapid T cell accumulation in this autochthonous model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) [183, 184]. Moreover, CXCL12 upregulation in HCC models increased hypoxia and the recruitment of immunosuppressive cells, PD-L1, regulatory T cells, and M2-type macrophages after treatment of sorafenib. PD-1 blockade combined with CXCR4 inhibition and sorafenib decreased HCC growth [185]. NOX-A12 in colon cancer spheroid increased numbers of T and NK infiltrating cells and reduces tumor growth in combination with anti-PD-1 compared with anti-PD-1 alone [172].
5.7 Future Trends or Directions
CXCL12 has two main interaction partners, specifically CXCR4 and CXCR7. CXCL12 is a crossroad molecule that modulates crucial mechanisms such as proliferation and migration of tumor and tumor microenvironment cells. CXCL12 targeting affects tumor primary growth, mesenchymal transition, and migration but also shapes the TME toward immunoresponsive TME, potentiates the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors targeting drugs, and interferes in building distant pre-metastatic niches. CXCL12-CXCR4 antagonists, although suboptimal, need deeper evaluation in terms of patient’s selection, schedule, and combination therapies.
References
Junttila MR, de Sauvage FJ (2013) Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature 501(7467):346–354. PMID:24048067
Quail DF, Joyce JA (2013) Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19(11):1423–1437. PMID:24202395
Najafi M, Goradel NH, Farhood B, Salehi E, Solhjoo S, Toolee H et al (2019) Tumor microenvironment: Interactions and therapy. J Cell Physiol 234(5):5700–5721. PMID:30378106
Zlotnik A, Yoshie O (2012) The chemokine superfamily revisited. Immunity 36(5):705–716. PMID:22633458
Choi J, Selmi C, Leung PS, Kenny TP, Roskams T, Gershwin ME (2016) Chemokine and chemokine receptors in autoimmunity: the case of primary biliary cholangitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 12(6):661–672. PMID:26821815
Marcuzzi E, Angioni R, Molon B, Calì B (2019) Correction: Marcuzzi, E., et al. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: orchestrating tumor metastasization. Int J Mol Sci 20:96. PMID:31146450
Meng W, Xue S, Chen Y (2018) The role of CXCL12 in tumor microenvironment. Gene 641:105–110. PMID:29017963
Cartier L, Hartley O, Dubois-Dauphin M, Krause KH (2005) Chemokine receptors in the central nervous system: role in brain inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48(1):16–42. PMID:15708626
Watkins LR, Maier SF (2002) Beyond neurons: evidence that immune and glial cells contribute to pathological pain states. Physiol Rev 82(4):981–1011. PMID:12270950
Ransohoff RM (2002) The chemokine system in neuroinflammation: an update. J Infect Dis 186(Suppl 2):S152–S156. PMID:12424691
Do HTT, Lee CH, Cho J (2020) Chemokines and their receptors: Multifaceted roles in cancer progression and potential value as cancer prognostic markers. Cancers (Basel) 12(2):287. PMID:31991604
Sanchez J, Lane JR, Canals M, Stone MJ (2019) Influence of chemokine N-terminal modification on biased agonism at the chemokine receptor CCR1. Int J Mol Sci 20(10):1–15. PMID:31096719
Bonecchi R, Graham GJ (2016) Atypical chemokine receptors and their roles in the resolution of the inflammatory response. Front Immunol 7:224. PMID:27375622
Salazar N, Zabel BA (2019) Support of tumor endothelial cells by chemokine receptors. Front Immunol 10:147. PMID:30800123
Liu XQ, Fourel L, Dalonneau F, Sadir R, Leal S, Lortat-Jacob H et al (2017) Biomaterial-enabled delivery of SDF-1alpha at the ventral side of breast cancer cells reveals a crosstalk between cell receptors to promote the invasive phenotype. Biomaterials 127:61–74. PMID:28279922
Yang J, Zhang L, Jiang Z, Ge C, Zhao F, Jiang J et al (2019) TCF12 promotes the tumorigenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via upregulation of CXCR4 expression. Theranostics 9(20):5810–5827. PMID:31534521
Ding Y, Du Y (2019) Clinicopathological significance and prognostic role of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a meta-analysis and literature review. Int J Surg 65:32–38. PMID:30902754
Scala S (2015) Molecular pathways: targeting the CXCR4-CXCL12 Axis – untapped potential in the tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 21(19):4278–4285. PMID:26199389
Singh AK, Arya RK, Trivedi AK, Sanyal S, Baral R, Dormond O et al (2013) Chemokine receptor trio: CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 crosstalk via CXCL11 and CXCL12. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 24(1):41–49. PMID:22989616
Graham GJ, Locati M, Mantovani A, Rot A, Thelen M (2012) The biochemistry and biology of the atypical chemokine receptors. Immunol Lett 145(1-2):30–38. PMID:22698181
Nagasawa T, Kikutani H, Kishimoto T (1994) Molecular cloning and structure of a pre-B-cell growth-stimulating factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91(6):2305–2309. PMID:8134392
Bleul CC, Fuhlbrigge RC, Casasnovas JM, Aiuti A, Springer TA (1996) A highly efficacious lymphocyte chemoattractant, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1). J Exp Med 184(3):1101–1109. PMID:9064327
Janowski M (2009) Functional diversity of SDF-1 splicing variants. Cell Adh Migr 3(3):243–249. PMID:19287206
Shirozu M, Nakano T, Inazawa J, Tashiro K, Tada H, Shinohara T et al (1995) Structure and chromosomal localization of the human stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF1) gene. Genomics 28(3):495–500. PMID:7490086
Yu L, Cecil J, Peng SB, Schrementi J, Kovacevic S, Paul D et al (2006) Identification and expression of novel isoforms of human stromal cell-derived factor 1. Gene 374:174–179. PMID:16626895
Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T (2006) Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity 25(6):977–988. PMID:17174120
Hu TH, Yao Y, Yu S, Han LL, Wang WJ, Guo H et al (2014) SDF-1/CXCR4 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and progression of colorectal cancer by activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Cancer Lett 354(2):417–426. PMID:25150783
Janssens R, Struyf S, Proost P (2018) The unique structural and functional features of CXCL12. Cell Mol Immunol 15(4):299–311. PMID:29082918
Sadir R, Imberty A, Baleux F, Lortat-Jacob H (2004) Heparan sulfate/heparin oligosaccharides protect stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1)/CXCL12 against proteolysis induced by CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. J Biol Chem 279(42):43854–43860. PMID:15292258
Hughes CE, Nibbs RJB (2018) A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J 285:2944–2971. PMID:29637711
Kufareva I, Salanga CL, Handel TM (2015) Chemokine and chemokine receptor structure and interactions: implications for therapeutic strategies. Immunol Cell Biol 93(4):372–383. PMID:25708536
Teixido J, Martinez-Moreno M, Diaz-Martinez M, Sevilla-Movilla S (2018) The good and bad faces of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 95:121–131. PMID:29288743
Ray P, Stacer AC, Fenner J, Cavnar SP, Meguiar K, Brown M et al (2015) CXCL12-gamma in primary tumors drives breast cancer metastasis. Oncogene 34(16):2043–2051. PMID:24909174
Cavnar SP, Ray P, Moudgil P, Chang SL, Luker KE, Linderman JJ et al (2014) Microfluidic source-sink model reveals effects of biophysically distinct CXCL12 isoforms in breast cancer chemotaxis. Integr Biol (Camb) 6(5):564–576. PMID:24675873
Janssens R, Struyf S, Proost P (2018) Pathological roles of the homeostatic chemokine CXCL12. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 44:51–68. PMID:30396776
Jung Y, Cackowski FC, Yumoto K, Decker AM, Wang J, Kim JK et al (2018) CXCL12γ promotes metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by inducing cancer stem cell and neuroendocrine phenotypes. Cancer Res 78(8):2026–2039. PMID:29431639
Righetti A, Giulietti M, Sabanovic B, Occhipinti G, Principato G, Piva F (2019) CXCL12 and Its isoforms: different roles in pancreatic cancer? J Oncol 2019:9681698. PMID:31275385
Oberlin E, Amara A, Bachelerie F, Bessia C, Virelizier JL, Arenzana-Seisdedos F et al (1996) The CXC chemokine SDF-1 is the ligand for LESTR/fusin and prevents infection by T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1. Nature 382(6594):833–835. PMID:8752281
Rajasekaran D, Groning S, Schmitz C, Zierow S, Drucker N, Bakou M et al (2016) Macrophage migration inhibitory factor-CXCR4 receptor interactions: evidence for partial allosteric agonism in comparison with CXCL12 chemokine. J Biol Chem 291(30):15881–15895. PMID:27226569
Lacy M, Kontos C, Brandhofer M, Hille K, Groning S, Sinitski D et al (2018) Identification of an Arg-Leu-Arg tripeptide that contributes to the binding interface between the cytokine MIF and the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Sci Rep 8(1):5171. PMID:29581527
Saini V, Marchese A, Majetschak M (2010) CXC chemokine receptor 4 is a cell surface receptor for extracellular ubiquitin. J Biol Chem 285(20):15566–15576. PMID:20228059
Schiraldi M, Raucci A, Munoz LM, Livoti E, Celona B, Venereau E et al (2012) HMGB1 promotes recruitment of inflammatory cells to damaged tissues by forming a complex with CXCL12 and signaling via CXCR4. J Exp Med 209(3):551–563. PMID:22370717
Tripathi A, Saini V, Marchese A, Volkman BF, Tang WJ, Majetschak M (2013) Modulation of the CXC chemokine receptor 4 agonist activity of ubiquitin through C-terminal protein modification. Biochemistry 52(24):4184–4192. PMID:23697661
Scofield SLC, Daniels CR, Dalal S, Millard JA, Singh M, Singh K (2018) Extracellular ubiquitin modulates cardiac fibroblast phenotype and function via its interaction with CXCR4. Life Sci 211:8–16. PMID:30195032
Teicher BA, Fricker SP (2010) CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4 pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(11):2927–2931. PMID:20484021
Vlahakis SR, Villasis-Keever A, Gomez T, Vanegas M, Vlahakis N, Paya CV (2002) G protein-coupled chemokine receptors induce both survival and apoptotic signaling pathways. J Immunol 169(10):5546–5554. PMID:12421931
Chatterjee S, Behnam Azad B, Nimmagadda S (2014) The intricate role of CXCR4 in cancer. Adv Cancer Res 124:31–82. PMID:25287686
Ierano C, Santagata S, Napolitano M, Guardia F, Grimaldi A, Antignani E et al (2014) CXCR4 and CXCR7 transduce through mTOR in human renal cancer cells. Cell Death Dis 5:e1310. PMID:24991762
Sánchez-Martín L, Sánchez-Mateos P, Cabañas C (2013) CXCR7 impact on CXCL12 biology and disease. Trends Mol Med 19(1):12–22. PMID:23153575
Wang Y, Li G, Stanco A, Long JE, Crawford D, Potter GB et al (2011) CXCR4 and CXCR7 have distinct functions in regulating interneuron migration. Neuron 69(1):61–76. PMID:21220099
Hattermann K, Mentlein R (2013) An infernal trio: the chemokine CXCL12 and its receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 in tumor biology. Ann Anat 195(2):103–110. PMID:23279723.
Marchese A (2014) Endocytic trafficking of chemokine receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 27:72–77. PMID:24680433
Marchese A, Raiborg C, Santini F, Keen JH, Stenmark H, Benovic JL (2003) The E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 mediates ubiquitination and sorting of the G protein-coupled receptor CXCR4. Dev Cell 5(5):709–722. PMID:14602072
Begon DY, Delacroix L, Vernimmen D, Jackers P, Winkler R (2005) Yin Yang 1 cooperates with activator protein 2 to stimulate ERBB2 gene expression in mammary cancer cells. J Biol Chem 280(26):24428–24434. PMID:15870067
Lee BC, Lee TH, Zagozdzon R, Avraham S, Usheva A, Avraham HK (2005) Carboxyl-terminal Src kinase homologous kinase negatively regulates the chemokine receptor CXCR4 through YY1 and impairs CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF-1alpha)-mediated breast cancer cell migration. Cancer Res 65(7):2840–2845. PMID:15805285
Kim HC, Choi KC, Choi HK, Kang HB, Kim MJ, Lee YH et al (2010) HDAC3 selectively represses CREB3-mediated transcription and migration of metastatic breast cancer cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(20):3499–3510. PMID:20473547
Uchida D, Onoue T, Begum NM, Kuribayashi N, Tomizuka Y, Tamatani T et al (2009) Vesnarinone downregulates CXCR4 expression via upregulation of Kruppel-like factor 2 in oral cancer cells. Mol Cancer 8:62. PMID:19671192
Li YM, Pan Y, Wei Y, Cheng X, Zhou BP, Tan M et al (2004) Upregulation of CXCR4 is essential for HER2-mediated tumor metastasis. Cancer Cell 6(5):459–469. PMID:15542430
Luker KE, Luker GD (2006) Functions of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 238(1):30–41. PMID:16046252
Nagasawa T, Hirota S, Tachibana K, Takakura N, Nishikawa S, Kitamura Y et al (1996) Defects of B-cell lymphopoiesis and bone-marrow myelopoiesis in mice lacking the CXC chemokine PBSF/SDF-1. Nature 382(6592):635–638. PMID:8757135
Ma Q, Jones D, Borghesani PR, Segal RA, Nagasawa T, Kishimoto T et al (1998) Impaired B-lymphopoiesis, myelopoiesis, and derailed cerebellar neuron migration in CXCR4- and SDF-1-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(16):9448–9453. PMID:9689100
Kawaguchi N, Zhang TT, Nakanishi T (2019) Involvement of CXCR4 in Normal and Abnormal Development. Cell 8(2):11. PMID:30791675
Zhang M, Qiu L, Zhang Y, Xu D, Zheng JC, Jiang L (2017) CXCL12 enhances angiogenesis through CXCR7 activation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Sci Rep 7(1):8289. PMID:28811579
Kremer D, Cui QL, Göttle P, Kuhlmann T, Hartung HP, Antel J et al (2016) CXCR7 is involved in human oligodendroglial precursor cell maturation. PLoS One 11(1):e0146503. PMID:26741980
Ceholski DK, Turnbull IC, Pothula V, Lecce L, Jarrah AA, Kho C et al (2017) CXCR4 and CXCR7 play distinct roles in cardiac lineage specification and pharmacologic β-adrenergic response. Stem Cell Res 23:77–86. PMID:28711757
Cheng X, Wang H, Zhang X, Zhao S, Zhou Z, Mu X et al (2017) The role of SDF-1/CXCR4/CXCR7 in neuronal regeneration after cerebral ischemia. Front Neurosci 11:590. PMID:29123467
Cubedo N, Cerdan E, Sapede D, Rossel M (2009) CXCR4 and CXCR7 cooperate during tangential migration of facial motoneurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 40(4):474–484. PMID:19340934
Liu XQ, Fourel L, Dalonneau F, Sadir R, Leal S, Lortat-Jacob H et al (2017) Biomaterial-enabled delivery of SDF-1α at the ventral side of breast cancer cells reveals a crosstalk between cell receptors to promote the invasive phenotype. Biomaterials 127:61–74. PMID:28279922
Wald O (2018) CXCR4 based therapeutics for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Med 7(10):303. PMID:30257500
Zheng N, Liu W, Chen J, Li B, Liu J, Wang J et al (2019) CXCR7 is not obligatory for CXCL12-CXCR4-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog 58(1):144–155. PMID:30259564
Shanmugam MK, Ahn KS, Hsu A, Woo CC, Yuan Y, Tan KHB et al (2018) Thymoquinone inhibits bone metastasis of breast cancer cells through abrogation of the CXCR4 signaling axis. Front Pharmacol 9:1294. PMID:30564115
Coniglio SJ (2018) Role of tumor-derived chemokines in osteolytic bone metastasis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9:313. PMID:29930538
Li M, Lu Y, Xu Y, Wang J, Zhang C, Du Y et al (2018) Horizontal transfer of exosomal CXCR4 promotes murine hepatocarcinoma cell migration, invasion and lymphangiogenesis. Gene 676:101–109. PMID:30010038
Perrot-Applanat M, Vacher S, Pimpie C, Chemlali W, Derieux S, Pocard M et al (2019) Differential gene expression in growth factors, epithelial mesenchymal transition and chemotaxis in the diffuse type compared with the intestinal type of gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 18(1):674–686. PMID:31289541
Truong D, Fiorelli R, Barrientos ES, Melendez EL, Sanai N, Mehta S et al (2019) A three-dimensional (3D) organotypic microfluidic model for glioma stem cells – vascular interactions. Biomaterials 198:63–77. PMID:30098794
Mushtaq M, Jensen L, Davidsson S, Grygoruk OV, Andrén O, Kashuba V et al (2018) The MRPS18-2 protein levels correlate with prostate tumor progression and it induces CXCR4-dependent migration of cancer cells. Sci Rep 8(1):2268. PMID:29396484
Aversa I, Zolea F, Ieranò C, Bulotta S, Trotta AM, Faniello MC et al (2017) Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in FHC-silenced cells: the role of CXCR4/CXCL12 axis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 36(1):104. PMID:28774348
Yu X, Shi W, Zhang Y, Wang X, Sun S, Song Z et al (2017) CXCL12/CXCR4 axis induced miR-125b promotes invasion and confers 5-fluorouracil resistance through enhancing autophagy in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 7:42226. PMID:28176874
Hu TH, Yao Y, Yu S, Han LL, Wang WJ, Guo H et al (2014) SDF-1/CXCR4 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and progression of colorectal cancer by activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Cancer Lett 354(2):417–426. PMID:25150783
Jung MJ, Rho JK, Kim YM, Jung JE, Jin YB, Ko YG et al (2013) Upregulation of CXCR4 is functionally crucial for maintenance of stemness in drug-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncogene 32(2):209–221. PMID:22370645
Bertolini G, D’Amico L, Moro M, Landoni E, Perego P, Miceli R et al (2015) Microenvironment-modulated metastatic CD133+/CXCR4+/EpCAM- lung cancer-initiating cells sustain tumor dissemination and correlate with poor prognosis. Cancer Res 75(17):3636–3649. PMID:26141860
Cioffi M, D’Alterio C, Camerlingo R, Tirino V, Consales C, Riccio A et al (2015) Identification of a distinct population of CD133(+)CXCR4(+) cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep 5:10357. PMID:26020117
Zhi Y, Chen J, Zhang S, Chang X, Ma J, Dai D (2012) Down-regulation of CXCL12 by DNA hypermethylation and its involvement in gastric cancer metastatic progression. Dig Dis Sci 57(3):650–659. PMID:21960286
Fridrichova I, Smolkova B, Kajabova V, Zmetakova I, Krivulcik T, Mego M et al (2015) CXCL12 and ADAM23 hypermethylation are associated with advanced breast cancers. Transl Res 165(6):717–730. PMID:25620615
Zmetakova I, Danihel L, Smolkova B, Mego M, Kajabova V, Krivulcik T et al (2013) Evaluation of protein expression and DNA methylation profiles detected by pyrosequencing in invasive breast cancer. Neoplasma 60(6):635–646. PMID:23906298
Wendt MK, Johanesen PA, Kang-Decker N, Binion DG, Shah V, Dwinell MB (2006) Silencing of epithelial CXCL12 expression by DNA hypermethylation promotes colonic carcinoma metastasis. Oncogene 25(36):4986–4997. PMID:16568088
Suzuki M, Mohamed S, Nakajima T, Kubo R, Tian L, Fujiwara T et al (2008) Aberrant methylation of CXCL12 in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Int J Oncol 33(1):113–119. PMID:18575756
Goltz D, Holmes EE, Gevensleben H, Sailer V, Dietrich J, Jung M et al (2016) CXCL12 promoter methylation and PD-L1 expression as prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer patients. Oncotarget 7(33):53309–53320. PMID:27462860
Bai R, Jie X, Sun J, Liang Z, Yoon Y, Feng A et al (2019) Development of CXCR4 modulators based on the lead compound RB-108. Eur J Med Chem 173:32–43. PMID:30981691
Lecavalier-Barsoum M, Chaudary N, Han K, Pintilie M, Hill RP, Milosevic M (2019) Targeting CXCL12/CXCR4 and myeloid cells to improve the therapeutic ratio in patient-derived cervical cancer models treated with radio-chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 121(3):249–256. PMID:31239542
Herbert SP, Stainier DY (2011) Molecular control of endothelial cell behaviour during blood vessel morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12(9):551–564. PMID:21860391
Grunewald M, Avraham I, Dor Y, Bachar-Lustig E, Itin A, Jung S et al (2006) VEGF-induced adult neovascularization: recruitment, retention, and role of accessory cells. Cell 124(1):175–189. PMID:16413490
Butler JM, Guthrie SM, Koc M, Afzal A, Caballero S, Brooks HL et al (2005) SDF-1 is both necessary and sufficient to promote proliferative retinopathy. J Clin Invest 115(1):86–93. PMID:15630447
Zhao K, Yao Y, Luo X, Lin B, Huang Y, Zhou Y et al (2018) LYG-202 inhibits activation of endothelial cells and angiogenesis through CXCL12/CXCR7 pathway in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 39(4):588–600. PMID:29390073
Benhadjeba S, Edjekouane L, Sauvé K, Carmona E, Tremblay A (2018) Feedback control of the CXCR7/CXCL11 chemokine axis by estrogen receptor α in ovarian cancer. Mol Oncol 12(10):1689–1705. PMID:30051594
Zabel BA, Lewén S, Berahovich RD, Jaén JC, Schall TJ (2011) The novel chemokine receptor CXCR7 regulates trans-endothelial migration of cancer cells. Mol Cancer 10:73. PMID:21672222
Luo N, Chen DD, Liu L, Li L, Cheng ZP (2019) CXCL12 promotes human ovarian cancer cell invasion through suppressing ARHGAP10 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 518(3):416–422. PMID:31445707
Koga C, Kobayashi S, Nagano H, Tomimaru Y, Hama N, Wada H et al (2014) Reprogramming using microRNA-302 improves drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Ann Surg Oncol 21(Suppl 4):S591–S600. PMID:24740829
Liang Z, Bian X, Shim H (2014) Inhibition of breast cancer metastasis with microRNA-302a by downregulation of CXCR4 expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(3):535–542. PMID:25030358
Yu T, Liu K, Wu Y, Fan J, Chen J, Li C et al (2014) MicroRNA-9 inhibits the proliferation of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by suppressing expression of CXCR4 via the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Oncogene 33(42):5017–5027. PMID:24141785
Labbaye C, Spinello I, Quaranta MT, Pelosi E, Pasquini L, Petrucci E et al (2008) A three-step pathway comprising PLZF/miR-146a/CXCR4 controls megakaryopoiesis. Nat Cell Biol 10(7):788–801. PMID:18568019
Yin P, Peng R, Peng H, Yao L, Sun Y, Wen L et al (2015) MiR-451 suppresses cell proliferation and metastasis in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol Biotechnol 57(1):1–11. PMID:25150396
Wang X, Li F, Zhou X (2016) miR-204-5p regulates cell proliferation and metastasis through inhibiting CXCR4 expression in OSCC. Biomed Pharmacother 82:202–207. PMID:27470356
Liang Z, Wu H, Reddy S, Zhu A, Wang S, Blevins D et al (2007) Blockade of invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells via targeting CXCR4 with an artificial microRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363(3):542–546. PMID:17889832
Yuan W, Guo YQ, Li XY, Deng MZ, Shen ZH, Bo CB et al (2016) MicroRNA-126 inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting the chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 and Ras homolog gene family, member A, signaling pathway. Oncotarget 7(37):60230–60244. PMID:27517626
Zhang J, Liu J, Liu Y, Wu W, Li X, Wu Y et al (2015) miR-101 represses lung cancer by inhibiting interaction of fibroblasts and cancer cells by down-regulating CXCL12. Biomed Pharmacother 74:215–221. PMID:26349988
D’Alterio C, Zannetti A, Trotta AM, Ierano C, Napolitano M, Rea G et al (2020) New CXCR4 antagonist Peptide R (Pep R) improves standard therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12(7):952. PMID:32708431
Mercurio L, Ajmone-Cat MA, Cecchetti S, Ricci A, Bozzuto G, Molinari A et al (2016) Targeting CXCR4 by a selective peptide antagonist modulates tumor microenvironment and microglia reactivity in a human glioblastoma model. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 35(1):55. PMID:27015814
Samarendra H, Jones K, Petrinic T, Silva MA, Reddy S, Soonawalla Z et al (2017) A meta-analysis of CXCL12 expression for cancer prognosis. Br J Cancer 117(1):124–135. PMID:28535157
Goto M, Liu M (2020) Chemokines and their receptors as biomarkers in esophageal cancer. Esophagus 17(2):113–121. PMID:31773415
Li N, Guo W, Shi J, Xue J, Hu H, Xie D et al (2010) Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in human hepatocellular carcinoma and its role in portal vein tumor thrombus. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29:156. PMID:21110890
Salvucci O, Bouchard A, Baccarelli A, Deschenes J, Sauter G, Simon R et al (2006) The role of CXCR4 receptor expression in breast cancer: a large tissue microarray study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 97(3):275–283. PMID:16344916
Wagner PL, Hyjek E, Vazquez MF, Meherally D, Liu YF, Chadwick PA et al (2009) CXCL12 and CXCR4 in adenocarcinoma of the lung: association with metastasis and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(3):615–621. PMID:19258077
Thomas RP, Nagpal S, Iv M, Soltys SG, Bertrand S, Pelpola JS et al (2018) CXCR4 blockade at the end of irradiation to improve local control of glioblastoma (GBM). J Clin Oncol 36(15_suppl):1419–1427
Clatot F, Cornic M, Berghian A, Marchand V, Choussy O, El Ouakif F et al (2015) CXCL12 and CXCR4, but not CXCR7, are primarily expressed by the stroma in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pathology 47(1):45–50. PMID:25474514
Fankhauser CD, Roth L, Grossmann NC, Kranzbuhler B, Eberli D, Sulser T et al (2019) CXCL12 expression is an adverse predictor for disease recurrence in patients with metastatic non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors. BMC Cancer 19(1):802. PMID:31412792
Gil M, Komorowski MP, Seshadri M, Rokita H, McGray AJ, Opyrchal M et al (2014) CXCL12/CXCR4 blockade by oncolytic virotherapy inhibits ovarian cancer growth by decreasing immunosuppression and targeting cancer-initiating cells. J Immunol 193(10):5327–5337. PMID:25320277
Katsura M, Shoji F, Okamoto T, Shimamatsu S, Hirai F, Toyokawa G et al (2018) Correlation between CXCR4/CXCR7/CXCL12 chemokine axis expression and prognosis in lymph-node-positive lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci 109(1):154–165. PMID:29032612
Stanisavljevic L, Assmus J, Storli KE, Leh SM, Dahl O, Myklebust MP (2016) CXCR4, CXCL12 and the relative CXCL12-CXCR4 expression as prognostic factors in colon cancer. Tumour Biol 37(6):7441–7452. PMID:26678887
Wang L, Chen W, Gao L, Yang Q, Liu B, Wu Z et al (2012) High expression of CXCR4, CXCR7 and SDF-1 predicts poor survival in renal cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 10:212. PMID:23039915
D’Alterio C, Consales C, Polimeno M, Franco R, Cindolo L, Portella L et al (2010) Concomitant CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression predicts poor prognosis in renal cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 10(7):772–781. PMID:20578990
Scala S, Giuliano P, Ascierto PA, Ierano C, Franco R, Napolitano M et al (2006) Human melanoma metastases express functional CXCR4. Clin Cancer Res 12(8):2427–2433. PMID:16638848
Scala S, Ottaiano A, Ascierto PA, Cavalli M, Simeone E, Giuliano P et al (2005) Expression of CXCR4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 11(5):1835–1841. PMID:15756007
Ottaiano A, Franco R, Aiello Talamanca A, Liguori G, Tatangelo F, Delrio P et al (2006) Overexpression of both CXC chemokine receptor 4 and vascular endothelial growth factor proteins predicts early distant relapse in stage II-III colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 12(9):2795–2803. PMID:16675573
Neve Polimeno M, Ierano C, D’Alterio C, Losito NS, Napolitano M, Portella L et al (2015) CXCR4 expression affects overall survival of HCC patients whereas CXCR7 expression does not. Cell Mol Immunol 12(4):474–482
Wu T, Dai Y (2017) Tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response. Cancer Lett 387:61–68. PMID:26845449
Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M et al (2018) Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med 24(5):541–550. PMID:29686425
Nagarsheth N, Wicha MS, Zou W (2017) Chemokines in the cancer microenvironment and their relevance in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 17(9):559–572. PMID:28555670
Karin N (2010) The multiple faces of CXCL12 (SDF-1alpha) in the regulation of immunity during health and disease. J Leukoc Biol 88(3):463–473. PMID:20501749
Meiron M, Zohar Y, Anunu R, Wildbaum G, Karin N (2008) CXCL12 (SDF-1alpha) suppresses ongoing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by selecting antigen-specific regulatory T cells. J Exp Med 205(11):2643–2655. PMID:18852294
Sanchez-Alcaniz JA, Haege S, Mueller W, Pla R, Mackay F, Schulz S et al (2011) Cxcr7 controls neuronal migration by regulating chemokine responsiveness. Neuron 69(1):77–90. PMID:21220100
Ao M, Franco OE, Park D, Raman D, Williams K, Hayward SW (2007) Cross-talk between paracrine-acting cytokine and chemokine pathways promotes malignancy in benign human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res 67(9):4244–4253. PMID:17483336
De Filippo K, Rankin SM (2018) CXCR4, the master regulator of neutrophil trafficking in homeostasis and disease. Eur J Clin Invest 48(Suppl 2):e12949. PMID:29734477
Eash KJ, Means JM, White DW, Link DC (2009) CXCR4 is a key regulator of neutrophil release from the bone marrow under basal and stress granulopoiesis conditions. Blood 113(19):4711–4719. PMID:19264920
Yang J, Kumar A, Vilgelm AE, Chen SC, Ayers GD, Novitskiy SV et al (2018) Loss of CXCR4 in myeloid cells enhances antitumor immunity and reduces melanoma growth through NK Cell and FASL mechanisms. Cancer Immunol Res 6(10):1186–1198. PMID:30108045
Kabashima K, Sugita K, Shiraishi N, Tamamura H, Fujii N, Tokura Y (2007) CXCR4 engagement promotes dendritic cell survival and maturation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 361(4):1012–1016. PMID:17679142
Pablos JL, Amara A, Bouloc A, Santiago B, Caruz A, Galindo M et al (1999) Stromal-cell derived factor is expressed by dendritic cells and endothelium in human skin. Am J Pathol 155(5):1577–1586. PMID:10550315
Curiel TJ, Cheng P, Mottram P, Alvarez X, Moons L, Evdemon-Hogan M et al (2004) Dendritic cell subsets differentially regulate angiogenesis in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 64(16):5535–5538. PMID:15313886
Mistarz A, Komorowski MP, Graczyk MA, Gil M, Jiang A, Opyrchal M et al (2019) Recruitment of intratumoral CD103(+) dendritic cells by a CXCR4 antagonist-armed virotherapy enhances antitumor immunity. Mol Ther Oncolytics 14:233–245. PMID:31384667
Smith N, Pietrancosta N, Davidson S, Dutrieux J, Chauveau L, Cutolo P et al (2017) Natural amines inhibit activation of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells through CXCR4 engagement. Nat Commun 8:14253. PMID:28181493
Yan M, Jene N, Byrne D, Millar EK, O’Toole SA, McNeil CM et al (2011) Recruitment of regulatory T cells is correlated with hypoxia-induced CXCR4 expression, and is associated with poor prognosis in basal-like breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 13(2):R47. PMID:21521526
Gliwiński M, Piotrowska M, Iwaszkiewicz-Grześ D, Urban-Wójciuk Z, Trzonkowski P (2019) Therapy with CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells – should we be afraid of cancer? Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 23(1):1–6. PMID:31061630
Shimizu Y, Dobashi K, Imai H, Sunaga N, Ono A, Sano T et al (2009) CXCR4+FOXP3+CD25+ lymphocytes accumulate in CXCL12-expressing malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 22(1):43–51. PMID:19309551
Righi E, Kashiwagi S, Yuan J, Santosuosso M, Leblanc P, Ingraham R et al (2011) CXCL12/CXCR4 blockade induces multimodal antitumor effects that prolong survival in an immunocompetent mouse model of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 71(16):5522–5534. PMID:21742774
Santagata S, Napolitano M, D’Alterio C, Desicato S, Di Maro S, Marinelli L et al (2017) Targeting CXCR4 reverts the suppressive activity of T-regulatory cells in renal cancer. Oncotarget 8:77110–77120
Zeng Y, Li B, Liang Y, Reeves PM, Qu X, Ran C et al (2019) Dual blockade of CXCL12-CXCR4 and PD-1-PD-L1 pathways prolongs survival of ovarian tumor-bearing mice by prevention of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. FASEB J 33(5):6596–6608. PMID:30802149
Li B, Zeng Y, Reeves PM, Ran C, Liu Q, Qu X et al (2018) AMD3100 augments the efficacy of mesothelin-targeted, immune-activating VIC-008 in mesothelioma by modulating intratumoral immunosuppression. Cancer Immunol Res 6(5):539–551. PMID:29511032
Nomura T, Hasegawa H, Kohno M, Sasaki M, Fujita S (2001) Enhancement of anti-tumor immunity by tumor cells transfected with the secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine EBI-1-ligand chemokine and stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha chemokine genes. Int J Cancer 91(5):597–606. PMID:11267967
Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, Zuberek K, Runyon K, Hawley RG, Wong A, Erickson J et al (2002) Efficacious immunomodulatory activity of the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1): local secretion of SDF-1 at the tumor site serves as T-cell chemoattractant and mediates T-cell-dependent antitumor responses. Blood 100(5):1551–1558. PMID:12176869
Vianello F, Papeta N, Chen T, Kraft P, White N, Hart WK et al (2006) Murine B16 melanomas expressing high levels of the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1/CXCL12 induce tumor-specific T cell chemorepulsion and escape from immune control. J Immunol 176(5):2902–2914. PMID:16493048
Poznansky MC, Olszak IT, Foxall R, Evans RH, Luster AD, Scadden DT (2000) Active movement of T cells away from a chemokine. Nat Med 6(5):543–548. PMID:10802710
Vianello F, Olszak IT, Poznansky MC (2005) Fugetaxis: active movement of leukocytes away from a chemokinetic agent. J Mol Med (Berl) 83(10):752–763. PMID:16142473
Gregory E, Dugan R, David G, Song YH (1874) The biology and engineered modeling strategies of cancer-nerve crosstalk. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2020(2):188406. PMID:32827578
Xu Q, Wang Z, Chen X, Duan W, Lei J, Zong L et al (2015) Stromal-derived factor-1alpha/CXCL12-CXCR4 chemotactic pathway promotes perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 6(7):4717–4732. PMID:25605248
Fahham D, Weiss ID, Abraham M, Beider K, Hanna W, Shlomai Z et al (2012) In vitro and in vivo therapeutic efficacy of CXCR4 antagonist BKT140 against human non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(5):1167–75 e1. PMID:22925564
Yoshikawa Y, Kobayashi K, Oishi S, Fujii N, Furuya T (2012) Molecular modeling study of cyclic pentapeptide CXCR4 antagonists: new insight into CXCR4-FC131 interactions. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22(6):2146–2150. PMID:22365757
Tamamura H, Hori A, Kanzaki N, Hiramatsu K, Mizumoto M, Nakashima H et al (2003) T140 analogs as CXCR4 antagonists identified as anti-metastatic agents in the treatment of breast cancer. FEBS Lett 550(1-3):79–83. PMID:12935890
de Nigris F, Schiano C, Infante T, Napoli C (2012) CXCR4 inhibitors: tumor vasculature and therapeutic challenges. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 7(3):251–264. PMID:22376154
Stone ND, Dunaway SB, Flexner C, Tierney C, Calandra GB, Becker S et al (2007) Multiple-dose escalation study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of oral AMD070, a selective CXCR4 receptor inhibitor, in human subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51(7):2351–2358. PMID:17452489
De Clercq E (2009) The AMD3100 story: the path to the discovery of a stem cell mobilizer (Mozobil). Biochem Pharmacol 77(11):1655–1664. PMID:19161986
O’Boyle G, Swidenbank I, Marshall H, Barker CE, Armstrong J, White SA et al (2013) Inhibition of CXCR4-CXCL12 chemotaxis in melanoma by AMD11070. Br J Cancer 108(8):1634–1640. PMID:23538388
Liang Z, Zhan W, Zhu A, Yoon Y, Lin S, Sasaki M et al (2012) Development of a unique small molecule modulator of CXCR4. PLoS One 7(4):e34038. PMID:22485156
Planesas JM, Perez-Nueno VI, Borrell JI, Teixido J (2015) Studying the binding interactions of allosteric agonists and antagonists of the CXCR4 receptor. J Mol Graph Model 60:1–14. PMID:26080355
Murakami T, Kumakura S, Yamazaki T, Tanaka R, Hamatake M, Okuma K et al (2009) The novel CXCR4 antagonist KRH-3955 is an orally bioavailable and extremely potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection: comparative studies with AMD3100. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(7):2940–2948. PMID:19451305
Kuhne MR, Mulvey T, Belanger B, Chen S, Pan C, Chong C et al (2013) BMS-936564/MDX-1338: a fully human anti-CXCR4 antibody induces apoptosis in vitro and shows antitumor activity in vivo in hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 19(2):357–366. PMID:23213054
Kim SY, Lee CH, Midura BV, Yeung C, Mendoza A, Hong SH et al (2008) Inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemokine pathway reduces the development of murine pulmonary metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 25(3):201–211. PMID:18071913
Drenckhan A, Kurschat N, Dohrmann T, Raabe N, Koenig AM, Reichelt U et al (2013) Effective inhibition of metastases and primary tumor growth with CTCE-9908 in esophageal cancer. J Surg Res 182(2):250–256. PMID:23117118
Hassan S, Buchanan M, Jahan K, Aguilar-Mahecha A, Gaboury L, Muller WJ et al (2011) CXCR4 peptide antagonist inhibits primary breast tumor growth, metastasis and enhances the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment or docetaxel in a transgenic mouse model. Int J Cancer 129(1):225–232. PMID:20830712
Hotte SJ, Hirte HW, Moretto P, Iacobucci A, Wong D, Korz W et al (2008) Final results of a Phase I/II study of CTCE-9908, a novel anticancer agent that inhibits CXCR4, in patients with advanced solid cancers. Proceeding of the 20th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, October 8; Geneva. European Journal of Cancer Supplements. p 127.
Richert MM, Vaidya KS, Mills CN, Wong D, Korz W, Hurst DR et al (2009) Inhibition of CXCR4 by CTCE-9908 inhibits breast cancer metastasis to lung and bone. Oncol Rep 21(3):761–767. PMID:19212637
Wong D, Kandagatla P, Korz W, Chinni SR (2014) Targeting CXCR4 with CTCE-9908 inhibits prostate tumor metastasis. BMC Urol 14:12. PMID:24472670
Zboralski D, Hoehlig K, Eulberg D, Fromming A, Vater A (2017) Increasing tumor-infiltrating T cells through inhibition of CXCL12 with NOX-A12 synergizes with PD-1 blockade. Cancer Immunol Res 5(11):950–956. PMID:28963140
Hoellenriegel J, Zboralski D, Maasch C, Rosin NY, Wierda WG, Keating MJ et al (2014) The Spiegelmer NOX-A12, a novel CXCL12 inhibitor, interferes with chronic lymphocytic leukemia cell motility and causes chemosensitization. Blood 123(7):1032–1039. PMID:24277076
Liu SC, Alomran R, Chernikova SB, Lartey F, Stafford J, Jang T et al (2014) Blockade of SDF-1 after irradiation inhibits tumor recurrences of autochthonous brain tumors in rats. Neuro Oncol 16(1):21–28. PMID:24335554
Waldschmidt JM, Simon A, Wider D, Muller SJ, Follo M, Ihorst G et al (2017) CXCL12 and CXCR7 are relevant targets to reverse cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 179(1):36–49. PMID:28670693
Roccaro AM, Sacco A, Purschke WG, Moschetta M, Buchner K, Maasch C et al (2014) SDF-1 inhibition targets the bone marrow niche for cancer therapy. Cell Rep 9(1):118–128. PMID:25263552
Portella L, Vitale R, De Luca S, D’Alterio C, Ierano C, Napolitano M et al (2013) Preclinical development of a novel class of CXCR4 antagonist impairing solid tumors growth and metastases. PLoS One 8(9):e74548. PMID:24058588
Fontanella R, Pelagalli A, Nardelli A, D’Alterio C, Ierano C, Cerchia L et al (2016) A novel antagonist of CXCR4 prevents bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell-mediated osteosarcoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration and invasion. Cancer Lett 370(1):100–107. PMID:26517945
Santagata S, Portella L, Napolitano M, Greco A, D’Alterio C, Barone MV et al (2017) A novel CXCR4-targeted near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probe (Peptide R-NIR750) specifically detects CXCR4 expressing tumors. Sci Rep 7(1):2554. PMID:28566721
Ierano C, Portella L, Lusa S, Salzano G, D’Alterio C, Napolitano M et al (2016) CXCR4-antagonist Peptide R-liposomes for combined therapy against lung metastasis. Nanoscale 8(14):7562–7571. PMID:26983756
D’Alterio C, Buoncervello M, Ierano C, Napolitano M, Portella L, Rea G et al (2019) Targeting CXCR4 potentiates anti-PD-1 efficacy modifying the tumor microenvironment and inhibiting neoplastic PD-1. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38(1):432. PMID:31661001
Di Maro S, Di Leva FS, Trotta AM, Brancaccio D, Portella L, Aurilio M et al (2017) Structure-activity relationships and biological characterization of a novel, potent, and serum stable C-X-C chemokine receptor Type 4 (CXCR4) antagonist. J Med Chem 60(23):9641–9652. PMID:29125295
Hingorani SR, Wang L, Multani AS, Combs C, Deramaudt TB, Hruban RH et al (2005) Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7(5):469–483. PMID:15894267
Feig C, Jones JO, Kraman M, Wells RJ, Deonarine A, Chan DS et al (2013) Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(50):20212–20217. PMID:24277834
Chen Y, Ramjiawan RR, Reiberger T, Ng MR, Hato T, Huang Y et al (2015) CXCR4 inhibition in tumor microenvironment facilitates anti-programmed death receptor-1 immunotherapy in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. Hepatology 61(5):1591–1602. PMID:25529917
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Portella, L., Bello, A.M., Scala, S. (2021). CXCL12 Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. In: Birbrair, A. (eds) Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1302. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62658-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62658-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62657-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62658-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)