Abstract
The pineal region is one of the most surgically challenging areas of the brain as it is surrounded by important structures, such as the third ventricle, the corpus callosum, the thalamus, the quadrigeminal plate of the midbrain, the cerebellum, the deep venous system, and the choroidal arteries. Pineal region tumors account for approximately 1% of intracranial tumors in the general population, and 2.5–8.5% of pediatric intracranial tumors. Among them, the most frequent histological types of pineal tumors are the following: germ cell tumors (GCTs), pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs), gliomas and meningiomas.
Over the years, various approaches have been developed for dealing with pineal lesions, all aimed at providing safe access to the region while minimizing neurovascular manipulation. The role of surgical resection of pineal tumors has largely increased in the last decades due to the value of accurate tissue diagnosis combined with improvement in microsurgical techniques. Radiologically, pineal tumors show similar characteristics among their different histological types; therefore requiring a proper histological diagnosis for optimal treatment planning.
Currently, management of pineal tumors incorporates surgical resection in the majority of cases providing proper tumor tissue diagnosis for adequate tailoring of co-adjuvant therapies, prognosis and follow-up plans. Strategies available for patients with pineal region lesions include: 1) confirmation of diagnosis, 2) management of associated symptoms like hydrocephalus or mass effect, and 3) cytoreduction or tumor debulking. However, these treatment strategies should be tailored according to the patients’ clinical condition, tumor markers, dissemination, age, and general clinical condition.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Pineal tumors
- Pineal gland
- Pineal neoplasm
- Pineal parenchymal tumors
- Management
- Microneurosurgery
- Radiology
-
Pineal region tumors account for around 1% of intracranial tumors in the general population.
-
The most frequent histological types of pineal region tumors are germ cell tumors, pineal parenchymal tumors, gliomas, and meningiomas.
-
No specific MRI feature helps to differentiate a single pineal tumor.
-
The clinical outcome in pineal region tumors heavily depend on the tumor entity and extent of surgical resection.
-
Radiochemotherapy protocols for pineal tumors are in constant evolution and should be properly delivered.
25.1 Introduction
The pineal region (quadrigeminal cistern or posterior incisural space) is one of the most surgically challenging areas of the brain as it is surrounded by important structures such as the third ventricle , the corpus callosum , the thalamus, the quadrigeminal plate of the midbrain, the cerebellum , the deep venous system , and the choroidal arteries [1, 2]. Pineal region tumors account for around 1% of intracranial tumors in the general population, and 2.5–8.5% of pediatric intracranial tumors [3, 4]. The prevalence of pineal region tumors varies between geographical regions . Germ cell tumors (GCTs) are frequent lesions in Asian and American countries, while pineal parenchymal tumors (PPTs) seem more frequent in some European countries [3, 5,6,7,8]. PPTs, GCTs, gliomas, and meningiomas of the pineal region comprise most of pineal region tumors. However, hemangioblastomas, solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytomas, ependymomas , epidermoid tumors, choroid plexus papillomas, metastatic tumors, among others, are also present in this region [9].
Over the years, various approaches have been developed for dealing with pineal lesions, all aimed at providing safe access to the region while minimizing neurovascular manipulation [1, 2, 10, 11]. After the first palliative operations in hopeless cases, using bitemporal or occipital decompression [12,13,14], a direct exposure of pineal lesions was reported by various authors (such as Horsley, Brunner, Schloffer, and Puusep) through infratentorial, supratentorial transcallosal, and temporal routes, but with quite unfavorable outcomes [1, 2].
In 1913, Oppenheim and Krause described the first successful removal of a pineal region tumor via the supracerebellar infratentorial route [15]. In 1921, Dandy published the first clinical experiences with the interhemispheric transcallosal approach to the pineal region that became the most used route, thanks to the good post-operative results [16, 17].
In 1931, Van Wagenen proposed a more invasive transcortical transventricular approach for pineal region lesion [18], that was subsequently used in a series of 19 cases by Suzuki and Iwabuchi [19]. In 1966, Poppen presented a modification of the occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach, initially described by Horrax in 1937 [20, 21]. Later, with the introduction of the operating microscope, this approach was refined by Yasargil for dealing with vein of Galen malformations [22, 23].
Indeed, the introduction of the microsurgical technique, as well as advancements in neuroanesthesia, resulted in a marked improvement of postoperative results. Stein refined the Krause’s infratentorial supracerebellar approach [24, 25], which was later employed by Konovalov and Pitskhelauri for the resection of third ventricle colloid cysts [6].
Yasargil described the paramedian supracerebellar approach for dealing with superior cerebellar artery aneurysms [26]. Van den Bergh reported the lateral-paramedian infratentorial route for pineal lesions [27], which was refined by Ogata and Yonekawa for approaching upper brainstem and peduncular lesions [28].
A purely endoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal region arachnoid cysts using a supracerebellar infratentorial corridor was first described by Ruge in 1996 [29], while Gore, in 2008, reported the first purely endoscopic pineal cyst removal through the same route [30,31,32].
Nowadays, a complete microsurgical removal still represents the mainstay for the treatment of benign pineal tumors. Moreover, in most of the cases, an extensive resection with an accurate histologic diagnosis also plays a key-role when dealing with malignant tumors for planning adjuvant therapies and, ultimately, for determining the final prognosis [3, 5, 7, 8, 33,34,35].
25.2 Anatomic Consideration
25.2.1 Pineal Gland Physiology
The primary function of the pineal gland is the synthesis and secretion of the hormone melatonin, which takes place in all vertebrates, investigated to date, during nighttime only [36, 37]. This rhythm in melatonin production is directed by efferent signals from the circadian master clock , residing in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). SCN signals reach the pineal gland by a multisynaptic pathway (Fig. 25.1), involving the paraventricular nucleus and intermediolateral cell column of the thoracic spinal cord, harboring the perikaria of postganglionic sympathetic fibres in the superior cervical ganglia, the so-called nervi coronarii, that project to the pineal gland [36, 37]. Central mediators of this pineal stimulation at nighttime are norepinephrine and neuropeptide-Y [38]. Activation of α1 and β1 adrenergic receptors in the pineal gland increases cAMP and Ca2+ concentrations in pinealocytes and activates the rate-limiting enzyme for melatonin synthesis, the aralkylamine N-acetyltransferase [39]. Elevated melatonin synthesis is readily inhibited by light during nighttime [40]. A notable feature exclusive to the human pineal gland is that it becomes calcified with age (acervulus, see Fig. 25.2) [41]. This process begins around the age of 16; its effects on function or developmental mechanisms are not well understood. Pineal calcification does not markedly interfere with the capacity of melatonin production, but it remains a prominent landmark in imaging techniques used to investigate the human brain [42].
25.2.2 Cellular Composition of the Pineal Gland
The pineal gland isnext to glial cells, predominantly composed of neuroendocrine cells, the pinealocytes sensu strictu. Thus, pineal tumors derive mainly from three cell types, namely from germ cells (most frequent tumor examples include germinoma, teratoma, choriocarcinoma, yolk sac tumor), pineal cells sensu strictu (pineocytoma, pineoblastoma, pineal tumor of intermediate differentiation) and differentiated astrocytes (rare e.g. astrocytoma) [33, 43]. Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) derive from ependymal cells of the subcommissural organ [44]. In addition, to these types the pineal gland contains small populations of other cell types including interstitial cells, perivascular phagocytes and endothelial cells [42].
25.2.3 Pineal Region and Vascular Relationships
Rhoton et al. performed an excellent summary of surgical interventional approache s to the pineal region [45,46,47]. The pineal region is surrounded by a roof, a floor as well as anterior and lateral walls (Fig. 25.3) [37]. The roof is formed by the lower surface of the splenium, the terminal part of the crura of the fornices and the hippocampal commissure . The floor consists of the vermian culmen medially and the cerebellar lobules laterally . The anterior wall is shaped by the pineal body superiorly, the quadrigeminal plate centrally and the vermian lingula and cerebellar peduncles inferiorly. The posterior portion of the third ventricle and the cerebral aqueduct run ventral to the anterior wall of the pineal region.
Particularly, the survey of the dense vasculature surrounding the pineal gland underscores the neuroendocrine function of this structure, readily releasing melatonin upon synthesis into the blood stream, rather than storing the hormone. The quadrigeminal cistern contains the neuro vascular structures of the pineal region, of which main arterial structures are formed by the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) and the superior cerebellar artery (SCA). The P3 segment of the PCA crosses the pineal region to bifurcate into the calcarine and parietooccipital arteries, whereas medial posterior choroidal arteries run aside the pineal body to enter the velum interpositum to supply the choroid plexus. The lateral posterior choroidal arteries pass around the posteromedial surface of the pulvinar to enter the choroidal fissure . Lastly, the SCA runs into the pineal region in the cerebello-mesencephalic fissure to supply the superior cerebellar surface. A separate entity is formed by the tentorial arteries: The arteries of Bernasconi and Cassinari from the meningohypophyseal trunk, the marginal tentorial artery from the inferolateral trunk, which runs laterally to the abducens nerve and then superior-posteriorly to the trochlear nerve prior to terminating in the tentorial edge. The meningeal branch of the SCA and the tentorial branch of the proximal PCA arising as a long, circumflex artery and running around the brainstem to access the tentorium at is apex complete the group of tentorial arteries [48]. Venous structures of the pineal region include the internal cerebral veins, the basal veins, the vein of Galen, the precentral and vermian veins, and the internal occipital veins. These vessels drain the pineal body into the straight sinus. After the internal cerebral veins exit the velum interpositum and the basal veins exit the ambient cistern, they receive flow from the occipital veins draining the medial surfaces of the occipital lobes as well as the precentral and vermian veins and small tributaries from the pineal region walls .
25.3 Surgical Indications of Pineal Region Tumors
The role of surgical resection of pineal tumors has largely increased in the last decades due to the value of accurate tissue diagnosis combined with the improvement in microsurgical techniques [2, 6, 9, 49]. The pineal region is one of the most complex areas of the brain regarding pathological types. Therefore, requiring proper histological diagnosis for planning of further optimal treatment.
Previously during the pre-microsurgical era, a non-surgical conservative management with empiric radiation was favored, this was mainly due to the high radiotherapy response of some tumors and due to the relative high morbidity after surgical resection [50]. However, this approach of “empiric and blind radiation” led to unnecessary and potentially harmful radiation exposure to patients harboring benign or radiation-resistant tumors. Currently, management of pineal tumors incorporates surgical resection in the majority of cases with data supporting better outcomes after resection [2, 6, 9, 51,52,53]. Moreover, treatment strategies require tumor tissue for adequate tailoring of co-adjuvant therapies, prognosis and follow-up plans.
Strategies available for patients with pineal region lesions include: 1) confirm diagnosis, 2) manage associated symptoms like hydrocephalus or mass effect, and 3) cytoreduction or tumor debulking. These treatment strategies should be tailored according to patients’ clinical condition, tumor markers, dissemination, age and general clinical condition [49, 54,55,56]. An important aspect for the surgical management of pineal regions lesions is to rule out the presence of pineal cysts, since these lesions are benign, normal variants of the gland and generally asymptomatic and do not require treatment unless clear surgical indications [57, 58].
25.3.1 Biomarkers for Pineal Region Tumors
The presence of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), and placental alkaline phosphatase measurable in CSF or serum is pathognomonic of malignant germ cells elements and it precludes the needs of surgical resection [4, 59,60,61]. These three clinical tumor markers are helpful to neurosurgeons while establishing a postoperative baseline for further follow-up and tumor recurrence detection. More importantly, they reliably indicate the presence of a GCT, allowing the patients primary radiation and chemotherapy. No available biomarkers currently exist for the management of pineal parenchymal tumors. However, melatonin tests may be useful for monitoring response to treatment [43].
25.3.2 Hydrocephalus in Pineal Region Tumors
Patients suffering of obstructive hydrocephalus can be managed in several ways: a) Mildly asymptomatic or slowly progressive hydrocephalus often resolves without requiring CSF diversion procedures following resection of the pineal mass and the aqueductal compression is relieved, since the third ventricle communicates with the fourth ventricle through the cerebral aqueduct. The aqueductal compression is relieved; b) Slightly symptomatic patients in whose total gross resection is anticipated, would benefit of placing an external ventricular drainage during the surgical resection [4, 49]. Acute symptomatic hydrocephalus may require CSF diversion procedures such as: endoscopic third ventriculostomy or placement of a shunt. An endoscopic third ventriculostomy is preferred in this group of patients, since it reduces the risk of shunt-associated complications such as infection , peritoneal seeding, or over shunting among others [4, 56].
25.3.3 Surgical Removal of Pineal Region Tumors
As mentioned before, tissue diagnosis is necessary to optimize a treatment plan given the histological diversity of this region [4, 62]. Tissue diagnosis can be obtained through biopsy or open surgical resection. Surgeons should take careful considerations of patient’s clinical condition, tumor radiological characteristics and surgical experience with lesions around this area while considering one procedure or another.
Patients with known primary systemic tumors , multiple lesions, and presence of previous diseases which would increase surgical risks are good candidates for stereotactic biopsy [4, 49]. Stereotactic biopsy has the advantages of short surgical time, minimal risk of complications, minimal anesthesia and less complexity procedures. However, the risk of bleeding remains high after injury of the deep venous system or presence of highly vascularized tumors [63]. Lately, neuroendoscopic biopsy has become an alternative option to stereotactic biopsy, with flexible endoscopes available for biopsy and third ventriculostomies [55, 56, 64]. Open microsurgical resection has the advantages of providing larger amounts of tissue sample and to achieve further cytoreduction or tumor debulking. Surgical resection is usually complete and curative for tumors that are benign. Patients with malignant tumors benefit for a more radical resection when possible to enhance the response adjuvant therapy [6, 52, 53].
25.4 Imaging Features
The high variation of pineal region tumors contrasts with the low predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Currently, no specific MRI feature helps to differentiate a single pineal tumor [65,66,67,68].
25.4.1 Pineal Parenchyma Lesions
25.4.1.1 Pineocytomas
Pineocytomas are composed of well-differentiated pineocytes and are considered slow-growing tumors (Grade I) based on the WHO classification [62]. Due to the well-differentiated nature, pineocytomas are difficult to distinguish from the normal pineal gland parenchyma. They are well circumscribed and unencapsulated tumors that arise and expand from the normal pineal gland. Additionally, these lesions show the characteristic “explosion” of the pineal calcifications towards the periphery [69]. On MRI, pineocytomas show low to intermediate signal on TI-weighted images (TIWI), and high to intermediate signal on T2-weitgthed images (T2WI) (Fig. 25.4) [70]. Pineocytomas typically express prominent contrast enhancement , and occasionally , cystic components demonstrating internal or nodular wall enhancement on post-contrast imaging [71].
25.4.1.2 Pineal Parenchyma Tumour of Intermediate Differentiation
Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTIDs) have similar characteristics as pineocytomas or pineoblastomas , since they contain diffuse sheets or lobules of cells. Additionally, the cells show mild to moderate nuclear atypia and low to moderate mitotic activity [62]. PPTIDs often show intermediate to high signal on T2WI, typically show contrast enhancement and may contain cystic areas, however, no specific MRI findings distinguish PPTIDs from pineocytomas or pineoblastomas (Fig. 25.5) [62, 70, 71].
25.4.1.3 Pineoblastomas
On MRI, pineoblastomas usually appear as large, lobulated and enhanced lesions [71]. Pineoblastomas show low to intermediate signal on T1WI and intermediate to high signal on T2WI (Fig. 25.6) [72]. Due to their aggressive and malignant nature, it is not uncommon to find hemorrhage or necrosis inside the lesion. A helpful aspect to differentiate pineoblastomas among other pineal region neoplasms is the occasional infiltration into adjacent structures with CSF seeding and dissemination into the subarachnoid space [69]. Additionally, these tumors have restricted diffusion on diffusion-weighted images and low minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). On magnetic resonance spectroscopy , pineoblastomas show elevated choline and decreased N-acetylaspartate values, as well as slightly elevated glutamate and taurine peaks [70].
25.4.2 Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region
The PTPR is the most recently identified type of pineal tumor [62]. Histologically , PTPRs contain epithelial-like growth patterns and fibrovascular papillae associated with a well-defined secretory function [33, 44]. PTPRs present as well-circumscribed lesions and tend to be larger than other pineal tumors. On MRI, they show variable signal intensities on T1WI and T2WI with heterogenous contrast enhancement . PTPRs can contain single or multiple cysts, as well as show hyperintense foci on T1WI due to the inclusion of proteins (Fig. 25.7). MRI spectroscopy findings have not been yet standardized , however, in two case reports, increased choline and N-acetyl-aspartate , and a discrete lactate peak have been identified [44, 73].
25.4.3 Germ Cell Tumors
25.4.3.1 Germinomas
Germinomas are malignant tumors that are composed of undifferentiated large germ cells and resemble primordial germinal elements [62]. Germinomas can appear on MRI as solid masses with intermediate to high signal compare to brain parenchyma on T1WI and T2WI. These tumors tend to present contrast enhancement (Fig. 25.8). Approximately 20–52% of germinomas present cystic components on MRI and when the region of interest shows both solid and cystic components ADC values are higher than those of the more densely cellular pineal cell tumours such as pineoblastomas. To differentiate germinomas among other pineal regions tumors, several authors described the following radiographic features: a) Butterfly sign (sensitivity 43%), b) Bi-thalamic extension of the tumor (76% sensitivity) , and c) cardioid -shape (100% specificity) [6, 74, 75].
25.4.3.2 Teratomas
Teratomas are tumors derived from pluri-potential cells from at least two embryological layers (endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm) [62, 69]. On MRI, teratomas are seen as multi-loculated and lobulated lesions with mixed signal , including regions of high-signal intensity in T1WI due to the presence of fat, and areas of low-signal intensity from calcifications (Fig. 25.9). Teratomas tend to be hypo or isointense compare to brain parenchyma on T2WI. Moreover, soft tissue inside teratomas can show postcontrast enhancement [69].
25.4.4 Pineal Region Meningioma
Pineal meningiomas arise from cells within the tela choroidea, velum interpositum or falcotentorial junction. Meningiomas show vivid enhancement on postcontrast MRI images. Moreover , meningiomas express low to intermediate signal on T1WI and intermediate to slight-high signal on T2WI (Fig. 25.10) [76].
25.4.5 Gliomas of the Pineal Region
Pineal region gliomas share similar MRI features than their hemispheric counterpart. However, the wide imaging variation among low- and high-grade gliomas remains a limitation for the predictive value of MRI in clinical practice [77]. Figure 25.11 represents the MRI features of a pilocytic astrocytoma of the pineal region.
25.5 Pineal Region Microneurosurgery
Pineal region surgery comprises pre-microsurgical and microsurgical stages, both of them following an adequate protocol of anesthesia . The pre-microsurgical stage comprises of positioning, prepping, draping, and an effective approach to the pineal region, all of them allowing an optimal microneurosurgery .
In most of high specialized centers, the sitting position and the supracerebellar infratentorial approach are common procedures for pineal region surgery [7, 9, 10, 78, 79]. General exclusion criteria for the sitting position include history of cerebral ischemia, old age patients, patent foramen ovale, right atrial pressure greater than left atrial pressure, severe congestive heart failure, uncontrolled previous hypertension, and ventriculoatrial shunt [78, 80]. Prone, concorde, park bench, and three quarter prone positions are also employed in pineal region surgery [81].
A modified sitting praying position developed by Hernesniemi et al. offers an ergonomic position for the surgeon, allows gravity effect on posterior fossa structures, and reduces the risk of severe venous air embolism [78,79,80, 82, 83]. The ergonomic position of the patient, the use of antigravity trousers, optimal anesthetic considerations, and a proper team work are essential variables for a correct management of pineal region surgery in sitting position [78, 79]. In the following sections, we describe the microsurgical style developed by professor Hernesniemi .
25.5.1 Anesthetic Considerations
The main objective of neuroanesthesia is to maintain optimal perfusion and oxygen delivery to the central nervous system during the treatment. Anesthetic considerations for pineal region surgery in sitting position involve: a) conventional use of fentanyl, thiopental propofol and rocuronium or vecuronium; b) intravenous delivery of Ringer’s acetate or hydroxyethyl starch before the positioning of the patient; c) target mean arterial pressure in adults at minimum of 60 mmHg with minimal systolic arterial pressure of 100 mmHg; d) placement of a precordial Doppler ultrasonography; e) normoventilation with 100% inspired oxygen without positive end-expiratory pressure [target PaCO2 = 4.4–5.0 kPa (33.0–37.5 mmHg)]; and g) regular assessment of arterial blood gases. Peripheral venous access instead of central venous access, a urinary catheter, G-suit trousers—tied elastic bandages in kids—are set before positioning of the patient [78,79,80].
The G-suit trousers (Trousers ANTIG, NATO No 8475991300180, Beaufort, Belfast, UK) maintain a proper preload of the patient in the sitting position. Thus, elevation of the lower limbs of the patient is unnecessary. Thanks to their side zippers, G-suit trousers easily allow the lower limbs of the patient to be inflated up to a pressure of 40 mmHg. Potential injuries of peripheral nerves and/or blood vessels are prevented by the anatomic configuration of the trousers and by the flexible positioning of lower extremities’ joints. However, effective blood gas testing, hemodynamic monitoring, and precordial Doppler ultrasound are mandatory [78, 80, 84].
25.5.2 Prepping and Draping of the Patient
Adequate prepping and draping of the patient must provide the anesthesiologist free access to compress both jugular veins in case of VAE. The incision site is shaved with an electric razor before being finished with a fine manual razor shaving. The hair is combed back away. Antisepsis of the operative field is performed repeatedly using swabs soaked in 80% alcohol. The incision is drawn with aseptic markers and the wound is infiltrated with 20 ml of a vasoactive solution of ropivacaine and lidocaine with adrenaline. The incision area is isolated by large abdominal swabs. The prepping is attached to the Mayfield head frame by a large adhesive film to prevent the surgical dress from sliding over the surgical field during the surgery. The surgical draping of the patient has also a systematic sequence in which the adhesive borders of a light single-use “Leg U” surgical drape are attached to the prepping. Then, both elements—including drainage bag—are fixed with multiple adhesive films [79].
25.5.3 Protocol for a Praying-Sitting Positioning
Preliminary evaluation of the microscope (balance, optics, and mouthpiece) and the preoperative images is imperative before the procedure starts. Under deep anesthesia, the surgeon fixes the Mayfield-Kees head clamp (Integra lifesciences, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA) and stays holding the patient’s head through the head frame throughout the procedure . The patient´s hips are located at the level of the surgical table-flexing place with some pillows below the knees, and the shoulders are placed 10–15 cm from the cranial edge of the table. The table and the upper torso of the patient are bent around 90°–100°. The neck and the head of the patient are slightly flexed 20°–30° beyond the projection of the anterior wall of the thorax preserving a distance between the chin and sternum . The Mayfield head frame is fixed to the surgical table with a special system called trapeze. The patient´s head maintains slight flexion with or without minimal lateral rotation. Thus, an optimal surgical access without cervical cord damage is ensured. Three elements: a safety belt around the pelvis, a suction cushion wrapping the patient, and a flat board against the feet will prevent any accidental movement of the patient when the table position is changed forwards during the surgery. The arms are supported by pillows over the patient´s legs. Precordial doppler and the endotracheal tube are secured. Finally, the correct positioning of the head is once more revised. The surgical table keeps parallel to the floor as low as possible and will be modified by the anesthesiologist according to the neurosurgeon (Fig. 25.12).
25.5.4 Surgical Approach to the Pineal Region
Surgical approaches to the pineal region may be classified as anterior approaches, posterior supracerebellar approaches, posterior infratentorial approaches, and posterior combined approaches. Among all of them, the occipital interhemispheric and the supracerebellar infratentorial approaches are the most frequent ones [20, 26, 85, 86]. The experience of the neurosurgeon associated with the proper analysis of the preoperative imaging determines the best approach to the pineal region. Tumors with large supratentorial components above and behind the deep venous structures are more suitable for supracerebellar interhemispheric approaches. Infratentorial components running under the deep venous system are better accessed by the infratentorial approach. Large lateral tumors with ventricular extension and hydrocephalus are suitable for transcortical transventricular approaches. Large pineal tumors with inferior extension to the fourth ventricle may require telovelar approaches. Finally, tumors with anterior extension to the third ventricle may require posterior or anterior transcallosal approaches [9, 81].
The supracerebellar infratentorial paramedian approach is a safer and more efficient variant of the midline infratentorial approach. A simplified one burr-hole paramedian supracerebellar infratentorial approach was developed by Hernesniemi et al. and successfully used in pineal surgery (Fig. 25.13). A single layer skin-muscle incision and a one burr-hole craniotomy are followed by a lateral opening of the dura under the microscope to access the lateral recess of the quadrigeminal cistern. Complete microsurgical resection of the tumor is performed with minimal manipulation of the deep venous structures [10, 26, 28, 87].
25.5.5 Microsurgical Technique
A careful evaluation of the preoperative imaging helps to determine some cleavage plane between the tumor and surrounding structures for adequate microsurgical dissection. Opposite to diffuse infiltrative gliomas, most of the pineal region tumors prevent aggressive microscopic infiltration of the surrounding parenchymal structures. Thus, allowing a safe complete removal . Once the craniotomy is performed, the dura may require a transverse sinus-based opening or a superior sagittal sinus-based opening according to the selected infratentorial or interhemispheric approach . Strong retraction of the dura provides optimal microscopic view. Along the access CSF is constantly released. Thin lateral bridging veins may be coagulated and cut during the supracerebellar access. However, large bridging veins are always preserved. Preoperative spinal catheter or opening of the cisterna magna are often unnecessary, and occipital ventriculostomy might rarely performed. The quadrigeminal cistern is often recognized as a dark tight membrane at the end of the supracerebellar access. On the other hand, the occipital interhemispheric approach may allow to recognize directly the pineal tumor following the falx towards the splenium. During the intradural stage, it is essential to recognize the deeply located veins from the dark blue-colored cisterns [2, 9, 33,34,35].
Initially, an immediate sample tissue is obtained for immediate and definitive histological study. Medium size and large tumors deserve internal decompression with bipolar forceps or ring microforceps under thumb regulated aspiration. Ultrasound aspiration is difficult to apply into this deep surgical location following less invasive approaches. Lateral dissection through the cleavage plane requires conventional microsurgical technique with soft and continuous traction, water dissection and cotton dissection. The inferior pole, which is usually hidden under conventional microscopy deserves special care since small bleedings occlude the cerebral aqueduct with serious consequences. Endoscopic vision or the use of a microsurgical mirror help to discover residual tumors in this hidden area [88,89,90,91,92,93,94].
Tumor attachment to the deep venous system especially to the internal cerebral veins should be carefully dissected aiming to prevent immediate or delayed complications. Often, some adherence and infiltration of the tumor into external layers of the veins is observed. Water dissection technique , cotton dissection, microscissors, and bipolar microforceps are useful in these instances [9, 35]. Meningiomas of the pineal region requires extreme cautious dissection from the surrounding arterial and venous vessels. Accurate hemostasis under continuous saline irrigation and a patient prevent postoperative hemorrhagic events.
Four positive aspects are related with the wound closure under the microscope: such a closure a) looks beneficial for a better hemostasis; b) allows a precise wound margin approximation; c) permits an atraumatic handling of tissues; and d) helps to improve the surgical dexterity. The dura is tightly closed with running suture, and a synthetic dural graft might be rarely used in case of a large dural defect. The bone flap is firmly fixed with titanium clamp systems. The suboccipital muscles and the epicranial aponeurosis are tightly and properly sutured in multiple layers [95].
25.7 Complications: Resolve and Avoid
A careful hemostasis in pineal region surgery is paramount, in particular with highly vascular lesion, in order to avoid intra- or post-operative hemorrhage, that may also present before surgery (“pineal apoplexy”) or following stereotactic biopsy [10, 11, 96, 97].
The risks of severe venous air embolism and hypotension while operating in the sitting position may be efficiently prevented by some essential anesthetic considerations in order to maintain stable hemodynamics, the use of antigravity trousers, precordial Doppler ultrasonography and end-tidal carbon dioxide levels monitoring, as well as by a skillful neurosurgery and an imperative proper teamwork [10, 78,79,80, 82, 98,99,100,101].
When hydrocephalus is present, the incidence of cortical collapse following tumor removal and consequent subdural hygromas may be lowered by pre-operative ventricular drainage or third ventriculostomy. Nonetheless, post-operative subdural hygromas gradually resolve without clinical sequelae, and extremely rarely a subdural shunting is required [6, 8, 10, 79].
An adequate brain relaxation (by the opening of subarachnoid cisterns for drainage of cerebrospinal fluid or by osmotic agents), together with a gentle support of the cerebral parenchyma, may be helpful to reduce retraction injuries, which are reported more frequently with the interhemispheric approach (transient contralateral sensory or stereognostic deficits due to parietal lobe retraction) than with the occipital transtentorial approach (visual field deficits caused by occipital lobe retraction) [6, 8, 10, 11, 96]. Moreover, the retraction of cerebral lobes may determine hemiparesis, which are usually transient. This complication has been also associated with bridging vein injuries [6, 8, 10]. In this regard, the squeeze maneuver may be useful to regain the blood flow of stretched and/or occluded veins [10, 102]. When performing a supracerebellar infratentorial approach, a paramedian route, as compared to the classic median one, may decrease the need for venous sacrifice of bridging veins and of vein of Galen tributaries, and demand less cerebellar retraction [10, 103].
Most of the patients experience some post-operative extraocular movements deficits, in particular of upward gaze and convergence, as well as pupillary impairments with difficulty focusing. Their improvement rates and magnitude are directly linked to their extent preoperatively and, ultimately, to the degree of quadrigeminal region invasion [5,6,7,8].
Manipulation of the walls of the third ventricle may jeopardize different cerebral functions, such as memory, visual acuity, and level of consciousness [6, 11]. Cognitive impairment, as well as akinetic mutism may be determined by brainstem manipulation [6, 8]. Disconnection syndromes have been rarely reported with corpus callosum incisions [6, 8]. Postoperative ataxia, when present, usually resolves in few days [6, 8].
Previous radiation therapy, progressively worsening pre-operative symptoms, and invasive tumors are associated with a greater risk and severity of post-operative deficits [6, 8].
Shunt or third ventriculostomy malfunction is reported in about 20% of the cases at the follow-up [5, 8].
25.8 Advances in Technologies
Pineal region tumors are a heterogeneous group of a wide range of histological tumor entities. The management of pineal these tumors is challenging because of their critical location and often-aggressive nature of the tumor . The standard diagnostic tools include clinical neurological evaluation, serum and CSF biomarker and cranial contrast enhanced MRI scan. Stereotactic or endoscopic biopsy (with ETV in case of hydrocephalus) are established methods for the tissue diagnostic. The traditional management of these tumors includes open surgical resection followed by a fractionated radiation and chemotherapy in selected cases. Here, we discuss recent advances in diagnostic and treatment of pineal region tumors.
25.8.1 Advances in Diagnostics
Workup of a pineal mass currently entails imaging with MRI scan followed by serum and CSF laboratory workup for germ cell tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein, β-hCG, and placental alkaline phosphatase. These tumor markers are helpful for diagnosis, but they are more useful for monitoring response to treatment . A pineal mass that is negative for all three markers may be a germ cell tumor that is negative for markers or a pineal parenchymal cell tumor. There are no established biomarkers for pineal parenchymal tumors for clinical use. Reduced melatonin in pineal parenchymal tumors is not specific enough for clinical use. Elevated serum or CSF levels of synaptophysin and chromogranin in pineoblastoma still need further validation [104].
25.8.2 Advances in Radiosurgery
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat pineal region tumors has been reported in a limited number of cases. However, due to rarity of these tumors, the level of evidence to treat with stereotactic radiosurgery is low. The existing limited data suggest that SRS seems to be a safe option, but its effectiveness heavily depends on the tumor entity and histological grade. SRS could be a possible alternative to surgery in pineocytomas and papillary pineal tumors. In case of germ cell tumors and pineoblastomas SRS can be used in recurrent cases or as a boost allowing the reduction of dose of fractionated radiation [105].
25.8.3 Advances in Surgical Techniques
Microscopic microsurgical tumor removal through supracerebellar infratentorial approach in prone, sitting or semi-sitting position is the established procedure in most of the neurosurgical centers. This technique is time consuming and has some morbidity. Moreover, the approach is narrow through the culmen limiting the exposure of the posterior tentorium incisura, and deep for debulking large tumors which raise into the supratentorial space. Recently, endoscope has been introduced in the pineal region surgery that provide excellent possibility to perform the surgery through ventricular or supracerebellar infratentorial route using a single burr hole or very small craniotomy . Prone or lateral oblique position are the preferable positions for endoscopic pineal region surgery [106, 107]. These positions reduce the risk of air embolism compared to sitting position. In addition to reduction in surgical trauma, endoscope aid visualization of hidden remnants and deep neurovascular structures and surrounding tissue adequately. However, there are still some limitations including limited and a predefined small surgical corridor, difficult intraoperative orientation and insufficiency of available micro-instruments [107]. Utilization of operating microscope in sitting position is uncomfortable due to its long focal distance and the surgeon has to operate on with arms outstretched. This difficult and awkward position leads to fatigue surgeon that may affect negatively on the surgical outcome.
Any technology or device that provide high magnification and illumination of operative field but also allows surgeon a comfortable position could be beneficial. Taking the surgeon’s comfort into account, two-dimensional and three-dimensional exoscopes (Fig. 25.14) [108] have been introduced in cranial surgery. However, only few cases of pineal region tumors operated with exoscope have been reported [108,109,110]. Exoscope provides excellent magnification and illumination of the surgical field in the pineal region and it is more comfortable for the surgeon to operate on with the exoscope . However, depth perception especially with 2D exoscope is lower than a standard microscope. Hence, intensive training to adopt the exoscope is necessary before its clinical use .
25.9 Surgical Decision-Making Algorithm
Figure 25.15 represents the first- and second-line treatment modalities for the different pineal region tumors. First line treatment of diffuse grade II-IV gliomas is still not well established since microsurgical resection seems not to offer benefit in the long term outcome [9, 111]. Figure 25.16 was developed for the doctoral thesis (in press) of the first author J.CH. It summarizes a decision-making algorithm for the management of pineal region tumors [9].
25.10 Conclusion
Pineal region lesions are very heterogeneous , ranging from pineal cysts to pineal gliomas. These tumors are challenging to treat surgically due to their deep location surrounded by important microvascular and brain structures. Tissue biopsy and tumor markers including β-HCG and AFP help to decide the treatment modality. Surgery is the preferred treatment modality in β-HCG/AFP negative tumors. The surgical approach depends on the tumor size and location in relation to tentorium . Most preferred approaches are the supracerebellar infratentorial or interhemispheric in the sitting or semi sitting position. The clinical outcome in pineal region tumors heavily depend on the tumor entity and extent of surgery.
References
Zülch KJ. Reflections on the surgery of the pineal gland (a glimpse into the past). Gleanings from medical history. Neurosurg Rev. 1981;4(3):159–63.
Hernesniemi J, Romani R, Albayrak BS, et al. Microsurgical management of pineal region lesions: personal experience with 119 patients. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(6):576–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.07.019.
Al-Hussaini M, Sultan I, Abuirmileh N, Jaradat I, Qaddoumi I. Pineal gland tumors: experience from the SEER database. J Neuro-oncol. 2009;94(3):351–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9881-9.
Zaazoue MA, Goumnerova LC. Pineal region tumors: a simplified management scheme. Child’s Nerv Syst ChNS. 2016;32(11):2041–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3157-4.
Shibui S, Nomura K. Statistical analysis of pineal tumors based on the data of Brain Tumor Registry of Japan. Prog Neurol Surg. 2009;23:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000210049.
Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI. Principles of treatment of the pineal region tumors. Surg Neurol. 2003;59(4):250–68.
Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, Rezai Jahromi B, et al. Extent of resection and long-term survival of pineal region tumors in Helsinki Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;131:e379–91.
Mottolese C, Beuriat PA, Szathmari A. Pineal tumours: experience of the French National Register and the Lyon School, results and considerations. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(2-3):223–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.02.006.
Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves J, Jahromi BR, et al. Extent of resection and long-term survival of pineal region tumors in Helsinki Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2019.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Resendiz-Nieves JC, et al. Supracerebellar infratentorial paramedian approach in Helsinki neurosurgery: cornerstones of a safe and effective route to the pineal region. World Neurosurg. 2017;105:534–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.007.
Iacoangeli M, Colasanti R, Esposito D, et al. Supraorbital subfrontal trans-laminar endoscope-assisted approach for tumors of the posterior third ventricle. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(4):645–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3117-0.
Cushing H. The establishment of cerebral hernia as a decompressive measure for inaccessible brain tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1905;1:297–314.
Pappenheimer AM. Über Geschwülste des Corpus pineale. Virchows Arch Path Anat. 1910;200(1):122–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01949541.
Bailey P, Jelliffe SE. TUMORS OF THE PINEAL BODY: WITH AN ACCOUNT OF THE PINEAL SYNDROME, THE REPORT OF A CASE OF TERATOMA OF THE PINEAL AND ABSTRACTS OF ALL PREVIOUSLY RECORDED CASES OF PINEAL TUMORS. Arch Intern Med (Chic). 1911;VIII(6):851–80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1911.00060120137007.
Oppenheim H, Krause F. Operative Erfloge bei Geschwulsten der Sehh ugel-und Vierhugelgeggend. Berl Klin Wochenschr. 1913;50:2316–22.
Dandy WE. An operation for the removal of pineal tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;33:113–9.
Dandy WE. Operative experience in cases of pineal tumor. Arch Surg. 1936;33:19–46.
Van Wagenen WP. A surgical approach for the removal of certain pineal tumors. Report of a case. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1931;53:216–20.
Suzuki J, Iwabuchi T. Surgical removal of pineal tumors (pinealomas and teratomas). Experience in a series of 19 cases. J Neurosurg. 1965;23(6):565–71. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1965.23.6.0565.
Poppen JL. The right occipital approach to a pinealoma. J Neurosurg. 1966;25(6):706–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1966.25.6.0706.
Horrax G. Extirpation of a huge pinealoma from a patient with pubertas praecox. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1937;37:385–97.
Yasargil MG, Antic J, Laciga R, Jain KK, Boone SC. Arteriovenous malformations of vein of Galen: microsurgical treatment. Surg Neurol. 1976;3:195–200.
Yaşargil MG. Pineal area tumors. In: Microneurosurgery IV B. Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag; 1988. p. 339–42.
Stein BM. Surgical treatment of pineal tumors. Clin Neurosurg. 1979;26:490–510.
Stein BM, Bruce JN. Surgical management of pineal region tumors (honored guest lecture). Clin Neurosurg. 1992;39:509–32.
Yasargil MG. Paramedian supracerebellar approach. In: Microneurosurgery, vol. I. New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1984. p. 242.
Van den Bergh R. Lateral-paramedian infratentorial approach in lateral decubitus for pineal tumours. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1990;92(4):311–6.
Ogata N, Yonekawa Y. Paramedian supracerebellar approach to the upper brain stem and peduncular lesions. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(1):101–4; discussion 104–105.
Ruge JR, Johnson RF, Bauer J. Burr hole neuroendoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal cistern arachnoid cyst: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(4):830–7.
Gore PA, Gonzalez LF, Rekate HL, Nakaji P. Endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial approach for pineal cyst resection: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3 Suppl 1):108–9; discussion 109. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000317380.60938.79.
Choque-Velasquez J, Miranda-Solis F, Colasanti R, Ccahuantico-Choquevilca LA, Hernesniemi J. Modified pure endoscopic approach to pineal region: proof of concept of efficient and inexpensive surgical model based on laboratory dissections. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:195–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.080.
Choque-Velasquez J, Miranda-Solis F, Colasanti R, Hernesniemi J. Modified pure endoscopic approach (MAPEnd) in neurosurgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:4. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_293_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Resendiz-Nieves J, et al. Papillary tumor of the pineal region in children: presentation of a case and comprehensive literature review. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:144–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.020.
Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, Jahromi BR, et al. Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: a long-term follow-up study in Helsinki neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e729–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.128.
Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, Jahromi BR, et al. Pineoblastomas: a long-term follow up study of three cases in Helsinki Neurosurgery. Interdiscipl Neurosurg. 2019;18:100477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2019.100477.
Maronde E, Stehle JH. The mammalian pineal gland: known facts, unknown facets. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2007.03.001.
Stehle JH, Saade A, Rawashdeh O, et al. A survey of molecular details in the human pineal gland in the light of phylogeny, structure, function and chronobiological diseases. J Pineal Res. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00856.x.
Reuss S, Moore RY. Neuropeptide Y-containing neurons in the rat superior cervical ganglion: projections to the pineal gland. J Pineal Res. 1989; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.1989.tb00426.x.
Vanecek J, Sugden D, Weller JL, Klein DC. See-saw signal processing in pinealocytes involves reciprocal changes in the α1-adrenergic component of the cyclic GMP response and the β-adrenergic component of the cyclic AMP response. J Neurochem. 1986; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1986.tb00665.x.
Klein DC, Coon SL, Roseboom PH, et al. The melatonin rhythm-generating enzyme: molecular regulation of serotonin N-acetyltransferase in the pineal gland. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1997.
Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. Age-related incidence of pineal calcification detected by computed tomography. Radiology. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.142.3.7063680.
Endocrinology: Adult and Pediatric. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-1-03052-4.
Carr C, O’Neill BE, Hochhalter CB, Strong MJ, Ware ML. Biomarkers of pineal region tumors: a review. Ochsner J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.18.0110.
Yamaki VN, Solla DJF, Ribeiro RR, Silva SA da, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG. Papillary tumor of the pineal region: systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Neurosurgery. 2019.
Yamamoto I, Rhoton AL, Peace DA. Microsurgery of the third ventricle: Part I. Microsurg Anat Neurosurg. 1981; https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198103000-00006.
Rhoton J. Tentorial incisura. Neurosurgery. 2000.
Kawashima M, Rhoton AL, Matsushima T, et al. Comparison of posterior approaches to the posterior incisural space: microsurgical anatomy and proposal of a new method, the occipital bi-transtentorial/falcine approach. Neurosurgery. 2002; https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200211000-00017.
Harris FS, Jr AR, Rhoton AL. Anatomy of the cavernous sinus: a microsurgical study. J Neurosurg. 1976; https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1976.45.2.0169.
Bruce JN, Stein BM. Surgical management of pineal region tumors. Acta Neurochir. 1995;134(3–4):130–5.
Shibamoto Y, Abe M, Yamashita J, et al. Treatment results of intracranial germinoma as a function of the irradiated volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;15(2):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)90006-2.
Oliveira J, Cerejo A, Silva PS, Polonia P, Pereira J, Vaz R. The infratentorial supracerebellar approach in surgery of lesions of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:154. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.122504.
Vaquero J, Ramiro J, Martinez R, Bravo G. Neurosurgical experience with tumours of the pineal region at Clinica Puerta de Hierro. Acta Neurochir. 1992;116(1):23–32.
Fedorko S, Zweckberger K, Unterberg AW. Quality of life following surgical treatment of lesions within the pineal region. J Neurosurg. 2018;February:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.JNS17260.
Abbassy M, Aref K, Farhoud A, Hekal A. Outcome of single-trajectory rigid endoscopic third ventriculostomy and biopsy in the management algorithm of pineal region tumors: a case series and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(7):1335–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-3840-8.
Ahmed AI, Zaben MJ, Mathad NV, Sparrow OCE. Endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy for the management of pineal region tumors. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(4):543–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.11.013.
Zhang Z, Wang H, Cheng H, et al. Management of hydrocephalus secondary to pineal region tumors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(9):1809–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.05.009.
Pitskhelauri DI, Konovalov AN, Abramov IT, et al. Pineal cyst-related aqueductal stenosis as cause of intractable headaches in nonhydrocephalic patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;123:e147–55.
Choque-Velasquez J, Resendiz-Nieves JC, Rezai Jahromi B, et al. The microsurgical management of benign pineal cysts: Helsinki experience in 60 cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:103. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI-180-2019.
Huang X, Zhang R, Mao Y, Zhou LF, Zhang C. Recent advances in molecular biology and treatment strategies for intracranial germ cell tumors. World J Pediat. 2016;12(3):275–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-016-0021-2.
Matsutani M, Group JPBTS. Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for CNS germ cell tumors–the Japanese experience. J Neuro-Oncol. 2001;54(3):311–6.
Baranzelli MC, Kramar A, Bouffet E, et al. Prognostic factors in children with localized malignant nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(4):1212. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1212.
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.
Pecker J, Scarabin JM, Vallee B, Brucher JM. Treatment in tumours of the pineal region: value of sterotaxic biopsy. Surg Neurol. 1979;12(4):341–8.
Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Makiese O, et al. Neuroendoscopic management of posterior third ventricle and pineal region tumors: technique, limitation, and possible complication avoidance. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(3):331–8; discussion 338–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-011-0370-1.
Gokce E, Beyhan M. Evaluation of pineal cysts with magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol. 2018;10(7):65–77. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i7.65.
Engel U, Gottschalk S, Niehaus L, et al. Cystic lesions of the pineal region–MRI and pathology. Neuroradiology. 2000;42(6):399–402.
de Jong MC, Moll AC, Goricke S, et al. From a suspicious cystic pineal gland to pineoblastoma in a patient with familial unilateral retinoblastoma. Ophthal Genet. 2016;37(1):116–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810.2014.929717.
Sugiyama K, Arita K, Okamura T, et al. Detection of a pineoblastoma with large central cyst in a young child. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2002;18(3–4):157–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-002-0569-0.
Smith AB, Rushing EJ, Smirniotopoulos JG. From the archives of the AFIP: lesions of the pineal region: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010;30(7):2001–20. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.307105131.
Fang AS, Meyers SP. Magnetic resonance imaging of pineal region tumours. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(3):369–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0248-6.
Solomou AG. Magnetic resonance imaging of pineal tumors and drop metastases: a review approach. Rare Tumors. 2017;9(3):6715. https://doi.org/10.4081/rt.2017.6715.
Tian Y, Liu R, Qin J, et al. Retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, therapeutic aspects, and prognostic factors of 18 cases of childhood pineoblastoma. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e162–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.135.
Poulgrain K, Gurgo R, Winter C, Ong B, Lau Q. Papillary tumour of the pineal region. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(8):1007–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.12.027.
Inoue A, Ohnishi T, Kohno S, et al. Identification of characteristic features of pineal germinoma that enhance accuracy of preoperative differentiation in pineal region tumors: its significance on optimum surgical treatment. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0835-y.
Awa R, Campos F, Arita K, et al. Neuroimaging diagnosis of pineal region tumors-quest for pathognomonic finding of germinoma. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(7):525–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1369-4.
Yamazaki T, Takahashi S, Ishii K, et al. Meningioma in the pineal region: preoperative diagnosis with CT, MRI, and angiography. Radiat Med. 1991;9(1):22–5.
Upadhyay N, Waldman AD. Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(2):S107–11. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/65711810.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Resendiz-Nieves JC, et al. Venous air embolisms and sitting position in Helsinki pineal region surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:160. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_128_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Resendiz-Nieves JC, et al. Praying sitting position for pineal region surgery: an efficient variant of a classic position in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2018;113:e604–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.107.
Lindroos A-C, Niiya T, Randell T, Romani R, Hernesniemi J, Niemi T. Sitting position for removal of pineal region lesions: the Helsinki experience. World Neurosurg. 2010;74(4-5):505–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.026.
Yamamoto I. Pineal region tumor: surgical anatomy and approach. J Neuro-Oncol. 2001;54(3):263–75.
Luostarinen T, Lindroos AC, Niiya T, et al. Prone versus sitting position in neurosurgery-differences in patients’ hemodynamic management. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:261–6.
Lindroos AC, Niiya T, Silvasti-Lundell M, Randell T, Hernesniemi J, Niemi TT. Stroke volume-directed administration of hydroxyethyl starch or Ringer’s acetate in sitting position during craniotomy. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2013;57(6):729–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12105.
Dohn DF, Gardner WJ. The antigravity suit (G-suit) in surgery; control of blood pressure in the sitting position and in hypotensive anesthesia. J Am Med Assoc. 1956;162(4):274–6.
Stein BM. The infratentorial supracerebellar approach to pineal lesions. J Neurosurg. 1971;35(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1971.35.2.0197.
Krause F. Operative Frielegung der Vierhugel, nebst Beobachtungen uber Hirndruck und Dekompression. Zentrabl Chir. 1926;53:2812–9.
Choque-Velasquez J, Raj R, Hernesniemi J. One burr-hole craniotomy: supracerebellar infratentorial paramedian approach in Helsinki Neurosurgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:162. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_164_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a high-grade pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:248. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_353_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:235. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_350_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a solitary fibrous tumor of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:232. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_264_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a large recurrent papillary tumor of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:234. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_347_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a pineal region neuroepithelial cyst. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:27. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_351_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a mixed germ cell tumor of the pineal region. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:262. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_357_18.
Choque-Velasquez J, Hernesniemi J. Unedited microneurosurgery of a pineal region ependymoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:260. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_355_18.
Kivelev J, Hernesniemi J. Four-fold benefit of wound closure under high magnification. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:115. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.118171.
Velasquez JC, Lau J, Kozyrev D, et al. Clean, fast and preserving normal anatomy: “the Helsinki revolution” in microneurosurgery. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(1):44–53.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Jahromi BR, Rafei A, Sharafeddin F, Hernesniemi J. Short-burst bipolar coagulation for repairing partially damaged brain arteries preserving their flow: Technical note. World Neurosurg. 2016;93:324–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.06.013.
Ammirati M, Theeb Lamki T, Brian Shaw A, Forde B, Nakano I, Mani M. A streamlined protocol for the use of the semi-sitting position in neurosurgery: a report on 48 consecutive procedures. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(1):32–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.037.
Feigl GC, Decker K, Wurms M, et al. Neurosurgical procedures in the semisitting position: evaluation of the risk of paradoxical venous air embolism in patients with a patent foramen ovale. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(1):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.003.
Jadik S, Wissing H, Friedrich K, Beck J, Seifert V, Raabe A. A standardized protocol for the prevention of clinically relevant venous air embolism during neurosurgical interventions in the semisitting position. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3):533–8; discussion 538–539. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000338432.55235.D3.
Lindroos A-CB, Niiya T, Silvasti-Lundell M, Randell T, Hernesniemi J, Niemi TT. Stroke volume-directed administration of hydroxyethyl starch or Ringer’s acetate in sitting position during craniotomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(6):729–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12105.
Choque-Velasquez J, Colasanti R, Jahromi BR, Hernesniemi J. “Squeeze Maneuver” assisted by indocyanine green videoangiography: simple technique to “Resuscitate” partially occluded bridging veins during microneurosurgical operations. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.107.
Matsuo S, Baydin S, Güngör A, et al. Midline and off-midline infratentorial supracerebellar approaches to the pineal gland. J Neurosurg. 2016:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.JNS16277.
Carr C, O’Neill BE, Hochhalter CB, Strong MJ, Ware ML. Biomarkers of pineal region tumors: a review. Ochsner J. 2019;19(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.18.0110.
Mathieu D, Iorio-Morin C. Stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal region tumors. Prog Neurol Surg. 2019;34:173–83. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493062.
Gu Y, Hu F, Zhang X. Purely endoscopic resection of pineal region tumors using infratentorial supracerebellar approach: how I do it. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158(11):2155–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2895-0.
Thaher F, Kurucz P, Fuellbier L, Bittl M, Hopf NJ. Endoscopic surgery for tumors of the pineal region via a paramedian infratentorial supracerebellar keyhole approach (PISKA). Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37(4):677–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-014-0567-1.
Muhammad S, Lehecka M, Niemela M. Preliminary experience with a digital robotic exoscope in cranial and spinal surgery: a review of the Synaptive Modus V system. Acta Neurochir. May 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03953-x.
Birch K, Drazin D, Black KL, Williams J, Berci G, Mamelak AN. Clinical experience with a high definition exoscope system for surgery of pineal region lesions. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(7):1245–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.10.026.
Mamelak AN, Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Black KL, Berci G. Infratentorial supracerebellar resection of a pineal tumor using a high definition video exoscope (VITOM(R)). J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(2):306–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.07.014.
Stowe HB, Miller CR, Wu J, Randazzo DM, Ju AW. Pineal region glioblastoma, a case report and literature review. Front Oncol. 2017;7:123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choque-Velasquez, J. et al. (2021). Management of Pineal Region Tumors. In: Monroy-Sosa, A., Chakravarthi, S.S., de la Garza-Salazar, J.G., Meneses Garcia, A., Kassam, A.B. (eds) Principles of Neuro-Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54879-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54879-7_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54878-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54879-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)