Abstract
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) belongs to the family Cucurbitaceae. The crop is grown commercially in regions with extended warm, frost-free months. Watermelon is cultivated for its colorful, tender, juicy, and sweet fruit. They are generally consumed fresh and make an excellent and delicious dessert, particularly during the summer months. Because of its smaller genome and large number of gene mutations, watermelon is a suitable crop species for genetic research. Watermelon’s genome has 424 million base pairs. DNA sequencing found significant conservation, which is relevant for comparative genomics within Cucurbitaceae and other species. There exists a huge genetic variability in the fruit quality characteristics of watermelon with respect to seed traits, fruit shape, fruit size, skin color, skin pattern, flesh color and sugar/acid composition, fruit bitterness, and many more. This chapter serves as a guide to show the prospects and advances made in the genetics of fruit qualitative traits in watermelon breeding programs depending on profitability and consumer preferences.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. and Nakai var. lanatus; 2n = 2x = 22) belonging to the family Cucurbitaceae is primarily cultivated for its fresh and nutritious fruit. Citrullus lanatus var. citroides, C. naudinianus, C. mucosospermus, C. rehmii, C. ecirrhosus, and C. colocynthis are the species of the genus Citrullus (Chomicki and Renner 2015). Most Citrullus species have their origins and genetic diversity in continental Africa (Dane and Lang 2004). One theory claims that it came from a species of Citrullus lanatus that is a common wild plant in central Africa, while another believes that it was domesticated from the perennial Citrullus colocynthis that is a common plant in ancient sites. Watermelons have been grown in Africa for over 4000 years. Watermelons were commonly planted in the Nile valley region prior to 2000 BCE, according to seeds and plant pieces found in Egyptian tombs. They were transported from Africa to India in the year 800 CE and to China in the year 900 CE, after which they expanded to other continents in the year 1500s. Annual watermelon plants have lobed leaves, long, angular vines that trail, branching tendrils, and solitary male and female flowers. Watermelon of various shapes like round, oval, or elongated can weigh anywhere between 1.5 kg and 15 kg. The rind varies in color from light to dark green and has different striped patterns. Despite the fact that the flesh may be white, green, yellow, orange, or red, customers favor inner qualities like sweetness and texture and colors like deep red, pink, or dazzling yellow. Fruit types and cultivars differ widely in size and form, and the outside skin is smooth, sutured, or netted, with a white, green, or yellow tone. Normal colors for the flesh (mesocarp) are green or orange; however, pink and white are also found. Fig. 1 is a panel displaying the variety in morphology of watermelon fruits. A small genetic background of sweet watermelon has resulted from modern breeding practices that have mostly focused on fruit quality characteristics including sugar content, flesh color, and rind pattern (Levi et al. 2017). It is uncertain how phenotypic alterations brought about by human and natural choices affected the watermelon genome. For the creation and marketing of new products, sweet watermelon fruit characteristics are essential. The pharmaceutical industry, the processing industry, and the fresh market will all profit from the novel and value-added genotypes. Pickles, jam, fruit puree, popsicles, and watermelon juice are a few examples of items with added value that are made from recently created cultivars with superior qualities. The new cultivars ought to have a range of bioactive substances that are both nutritive and therapeutic in nature (Mashilo et al. 2022). A viable and alternate method for hastening the creation and release of watermelon varieties with sufficient agronomic and quality traits to meet the crop’s value chains is nonconventional breeding using gene-editing technology. For instance, changing watermelon genes associated with agronomic traits using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR/Cas9) allowed the development of novel cultivars (Wang et al. 2021). The development of superior cultivars with higher nutritional contents, market-preferred traits, and a longer shelf life will be aided by the information on the genetic control of fruit qualities in watermelons that will be possible by gene-editing and related technologies. The goal of this chapter is to illustrate the prospects and developments made in the genetic study of fruit quality characteristics in watermelon as a guide for quality breeding based on economic and end-user qualities, taking into account the aforementioned context.
2 Organic Acids and Sugar
Sugars and organic acids have a substantial influence on organoleptic fruit quality and are key components in fruit flavor development. Contrary to staple food crops, where production is the ultimate breeding goal, watermelon places greater emphasis on flavor and aroma, both of which are influenced by the metabolite composition of the fruit. During development, watermelon fruits go through a variety of biochemical changes, including as adjustments to sugar metabolism, an increase in organic acid and color, fruit softening, flavor, and volatile aromatic compounds (Zhu et al. 2017). In one study, researchers examined the coexpression patterns of gene networks linked to sugar and organic acid metabolism using transcriptome profiles. They found three gene networks or modules comprising 2443 genes that were substantially associated with organic acids and carbohydrates. Seven more genes involved in the metabolism of organic acids and carbohydrates were found. SWEET, EDR6, and STP were recognized as sugar transporters (Cla97C01G000640, Cla97C05G087120, and Cla97C01G018840, r 2 = 0.83 with glucose content), while Cla97C03G064990 (Cla97C03G064990, r 2 = 0.92 with sucrose concentration) was identified as a sucrose synthase. Cla97C07G128420, Cla97C03G068240, and Cla97C01G008870 were identified as malate and citrate transporters, respectively, since they displayed strong associations with malic acid (r 2 = 0.75) and citric acid (r 2 = 0.85) (ALMT7, CS, and ICDH) (Umer et al. 2020a). The two enzymes that regulate sugar metabolism in watermelon most crucially are sucrose synthase and sucrose phosphate synthase (Guo et al. 2015). The expression of gene clusters involved in sugar biosynthesis, including a-galactosidase, invertase, and urease diphosphate (UDP)-galactose/glucose pyrophosphorylase (UDP-Gal/Glc PPase), rises as the watermelon fruit ripens. The Cla013902 gene reportedly affects how sugar is metabolized in watermelons (Guo et al. 2015). There are nine a-galactosidase genes in the watermelon genome. The nine genes are reportedly involved in the hydrolysis of stachyose and raffinose, according to studies (Guo et al. 2013). Additionally, the buildup of sugar in watermelon is influenced by five genes for insoluble acid invertase (IAI) (Guo et al. 2015). The watermelon fruit’s extracellular sucrose degeneration, which permits fructose and glucose transfer and intercellular sugar accumulation, is linked to the IAI gene Cla020872 (Guo et al. 2015). Recent research has identified ClAGA2, an alkaline a-galactosidase gene expressed in the vascular bundle, as a critical regulator of the hydrolysis of stachyose and raffinose in watermelon. ClAGA2 controls fruit raffinose hydrolysis and reduces the amount of sugar in fully grown watermelon fruits (Ren et al. 2021). Tonoplast sugar transporter (ClTST2) and sugar transporter 3 (ClSWEET3) genes control sugar storage and transfer in watermelon fruit cell vacuoles (Ren et al. 2021). Several important genes involved in sugar production and translocation that are up- or downregulated throughout developmental processes have been found by several researches. Differentially expressed genes such NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase (NAD-cyt MDH), aluminum-activated malate transporter (ALMT), and citrate synthase (CS) affect the accumulation of organic acids in watermelon (Gao et al. 2018). The reversible conversion of malate to oxaloacetate is catalyzed by the NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase (NAD-cyt MDH) gene (OAA) (Yao et al. 2011), whereas citrate synthase (CS) gene controls citric acid production. Malate dehydrogenase genes and aluminum-triggered malate transporters control the regulation and breakdown of malates (Umer et al. 2020a). It is believed that the genes for citrate synthase (Cla97C03G068240) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (Cla97C01G008870) are involved in the generation and breakdown, respectively, of citric acid (Umer et al. 2020b). Malic and citric acid accumulation are linked to higher expression of the genes for malate dehydrogenases (Cla008235 and Cla011268) and citrate synthases (Cla013500) (Gao et al. 2018). From the sweet and sweet-and-sour genotypes, Cla97C01G000640 (SWEET), Cla97C05G087120 (EDR6), and Cla97C01G018840 were shown to control glucose biosynthesis, whereas Cla97C03G064990 controls sucrose production in watermelon (Umer et al. 2020b). ClVST1, a gene for a vacuolar sugar transporter, was shown to be highly expressed during the ripening of watermelon fruit and was connected to the accumulation of sucrose (Ren et al. 2021).
3 Amino Acid Compositions
The amino acid citrulline is the most abundant in ripe watermelon fruit (Joshi et al. 2019). Citrulline is a nonessential amino acid which is generated throughout the urea cycle as a metabolic intermediate (Bahri et al. 2013). This amino acid serves as a precursor to arginine, another essential amino acid contained in watermelon fruit (Joshi et al. 2019). Watermelon has many genes that are involved in citrulline metabolism. Citrulline biosynthesis in watermelon is associated with ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OTC; ClCG05G018820), N-acetylornithine aminotransferase (N-AOA; ClCG09G003180), N-acetylornithine-glutamate acetyltransferase (N-AOGA), CPS-1 (ClCG11G013120) and CPS-2 (ClCG09G021680), N-acetylornithine deacetylase (AOD-1), N-acetylornithine deacetylase (AOD-3), and nitric-oxide synthase gene (ClCG01G004960) (Joshi et al. 2019). Citrulline catabolism is also connected to ASS, 1,2,3-argininosuccinate synthase; ASL, 1,2-argininosuccinate lyase; ARG, arginase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; and ADC, arginine decarboxylase (Joshi et al. 2019). Citrulline biosynthesis is mediated by the genes argininosuccinate lyase, N-acetylglutamate kinase, and ornithine decarboxylase, whereas arginine biosynthesis and accumulation is mediated by the genes ornithine carbamoyltransferase (Fall et al. 2019).
4 Fruit Bitterness
Watermelons in the wild create bitter cucurbitacin molecules, a kind of highly oxygenated tetracyclic triterpene that repels pests. Cucurbitacin B (CuB), cucurbitacin C (CuC), cucurbitacin E (CuE), and cucurbitacin E-2-O-glucoside are all found in Citrullus fruits, leaves, roots, and stems (CuE-Glu) (Kim et al. 2018). The principal bitter ingredient in Citrullus fruit is CuE, commonly known as elaterinide (Matsuo et al. 1999). Despite the fact that these protective chemicals evolved in plants millions of years ago, humans have bred them to make them more appealing to our taste buds. In domesticated varieties of watermelon, a single point mutation in a transcription factor results in a faulty protein and diminished bitter compounds (Everts 2016). The genetic basis of two watermelon fruit traits were studied in a backcross generation arising from the hybridization of an interspecific F, hybrid of Citrullus lanatus and C. colocynthis with the domesticated parent Citrullus lanatus. Bitterness of the fruit, which distinguishes wild C. colocynthis, was revealed to be governed by a single dominant gene (Bi) that was linked to the isozyme marker Pgm-1 at a distance of 11.3 cm (Navot et al. 1990). In one study, it was shown that Cla011508 (located on chromosome 1) regulates the bitterness of watermelon fruit, and the crucial mutation locus in this gene provided molecular insights for marker-assisted breeding of target characteristic (Gong et al. 2022). The dominant Bi gene regulates cucurbitacin production, which is responsible for bitterness in Citrullus fruits, whereas the recessive su (bitterness suppressor) gene regulates the presence or absence of bitterness in watermelon fruit. The Bi gene has been identified as an oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC; Cla007080) gene on watermelon chromosome 6 (Chambliss et al. 1968; Robinson et al. 1976; Navot et al. 1990; Lu et al. 2016). Furthermore, one watermelon fruit bitterness gene on chromosome 1 was found; the significant locus with the highest LOD score (58.361) was designated qbt-c1-1, and it explained 82.927% of phenotypic variation with a negative additive effect of −0.465 (Li et al. 2018). Watermelon breeders looking to improve their carotenoid profiles should hunt for progenies with genes that condition the carotenoid synthesis pathway.
5 Fruit Shape and Size
Fruit form and size are important horticultural sector traits that exhibit a large range of phenotypic variation, emphasizing their importance in breeding programs. The shape of watermelon fruits was assumed to be controlled by an incompletely dominant gene, resulting in elongate (OO), oval (Oo), and spherical (oo) fruits (Guner and Wehner 2004). It was also shown that a single gene regulates both spherical (Os) and oval (O+) watermelon fruits, exhibiting partial dominance when a spherical fruit inbred line crosses with an oval fruit inbred line (Tanaka et al. 1995). The similar pattern of inheritance was seen in F2 populations of ‘Peerless’, ‘Baby Delight’, ‘Northern Sweet’, and ‘Dove’ (Poole and Grimball 1945). For the dominant elongate fruit, allele ObE was proposed; for the recessive oblong fruit, allele Ob; and for the round fruit, allele ObR (not the same as the o gene for round) (Lou and Wehner 2016). Segregation analysis in F2 and BC1 populations derived from a cross between two inbred lines ‘Duan125’ (elongate fruit) and ‘Zhengzhouzigua’ (spherical fruit) revealed that watermelon fruit shape is controlled by a single locus and that elongate fruit (OO) is only partially dominant to spherical fruit (oo), with the heterozygote (Oo) being oval fruit and a 159 bp deletion (Dou et al. 2018). The SUN gene, a member of the IQ domain (IQD) family, has long been recognized to influence tomato fruit elongation early in fruit development, following pollination and fertilization (Van Der Knaap and Tanksley 2001). Several QTLs linked with FD (and fruit weight) and FL (fruit length) have been found in diverse genetic backgrounds; however, the genes underlying these QTLs remain unknown.
6 Flesh Color
There are many different fruit flesh colors in watermelons (Fig. 1); fruit flesh color is a key feature that influences nutritional value, customer choice, and breeder selection. The composition of chlorophyll and carotenoids in the flesh determines its color. Watermelon flesh colors have been classified as scarlet red, red, pink, orange, canary yellow, pale yellow, and white based on carotenoid levels. Watermelons with red flesh (including flaming red and pink) are high in lycopene (Sun et al. 2018). Prolycopene and carotene concentrations are considerably higher in watermelons with orange flesh (Branham et al. 2017). Watermelons with yellow flesh (canary yellow and light yellow) contain a high concentration of neoxanthin, followed by neochrome and violaxanthin (Fang et al. 2020). Watermelons with white flesh have very little violaxanthin and lutein in them (Lv et al. 2015). The idea of genetic variability in the color of watermelon fruit flesh is supported by the existence of separate mechanisms regulating carotenoid metabolism. Understanding the process of carotenoid inheritance enables for the development of cultivars with improved phytochemical component compositions. The genetics of skin color are extremely complex, with numerous genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) influencing carotenoid production. Genes involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis and metabolism pathway’s genome-wide comparative expression study showed complex gene expression and regulatory networks that led to the accumulation of different carotenoids in watermelon fruit (Fang et al. 2020; Mashilo et al. 2022). Based on genotyping data, two Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) markers were created for the candidate gene Cla97C10G185970, which was annotated as plastid lipid-associated protein and showed a strong connection between pale green and non-pale green meat fruits (Pei et al. 2021). During fruit ripening, the carotenoid profiles of four watermelon cultivars – red-fleshed ‘CN66’, pink-fleshed ‘CN62’, yellow-fleshed ‘ZXG381’, and white-fleshed ‘ZXG507’ – were examined. It was revealed that the amounts of violaxanthin and lutein in yellow fruit were positively correlated with CHYB and ZEP transcription levels (Lv et al. 2015). ClPAPs, Cla006670, Cla010946, Cla008831, Cla014416, Cla021506, Cla003468, and Cla003198 are plastid lipid-associated genes that are thought to be involved in the development of plastoglobules and globular and crystalloid chromoplasts (Fang et al. 2020).
7 Rind Pattern
The most common rind (or skin) colors in watermelon are solid green (dark, medium, and light), striped (narrow, medium, and large dark green stripes on a light green background), and grey. Gray is also written grey, although the names of watermelons have been standardized to the grey spelling. The expression of genes responsible for rind color and pattern does not appear to be uniform across different genetic backgrounds. Furthermore, the inheritance of gray or medium green rind colors has not been recorded, despite the fact that they have been two of the most prevalent rind colors in watermelon breeding during the previous century. ClCG08G017810 (ClCGMenG), a protein encoding a 2-phytyl-1,4-beta-naphthoquinone methyltransferase, is linked to the production of dark green rind vs light green rind in watermelon (Li et al. 2018). For the ‘0901’, ‘10909’, ‘109905’, and ‘90509’ rind trait-segregating F2 populations, genotyping analyses were done using subsets of 188, 273, 287, and 113 probes, respectively. For the ‘0901’, ‘10909’, ‘109905’, and ‘90509’ populations, 26, 34, 30, and 15 linkage groups containing 175, 254, 269, and 79 probes were created, respectively. The genetic order of the probes is mainly collinear with the physical order on the reference genome, with a few exceptions on chromosomes 1, 3, and 11. S, D, and Dgo, together with chr4 150/chr4 249 on chromosome 4 and chr6 25767 on chromosome 6, were identified nearby (Park et al. 2016). As a consequence of genetic investigations, a team of researchers found three unique genes in watermelon. In comparison to Angeleno Black Seeded, the type line for the hue of watermelon red flesh, scarlet red flesh (Scr) gave more vivid red color in Dixielee and Red-N-Sweet. They suggest calling the original red skin color coral red in order to distinguish it from scarlet red. As a single dominant gene, Scr is inherited. A single dominant gene called Yellow Belly (Yb) was identified as the cause of Black Diamond’s ground spot’s transition from creamy white to dark yellow. A single recessive gene called intermittent stripes (ins), with the dominant allele, was found to be responsible for the difference between continuous and intermittent stripes on the rind of Navajo Sweet (Gusmini and Wehner 2006).
8 Flesh Firmness
The firmness of the flesh determines the texture and quality of watermelon fruit. Multigenes control flesh firmness as a qualitative attribute. For watermelon genetic breeding, it is crucial to identify the regulatory elements that most significantly affect the firmness of the fruit’s flesh. According to localization interval transcriptome analysis, Cla012507 (MADS-box transcription factor) may be involved in the control of fruit ripening and affect the hardness of watermelon fruit. Cla016033 (DUF579 family member), which may impact the cell wall component contents to alter the flesh firmness in watermelon fruit, was distinct in W1-1 and PI186490 (Sun et al. 2020). The hardness of watermelon flesh is controlled by phytohormone levels, particularly ABA (Wang et al. 2017). Cla009779 (NCED), Cla005404 (NCED), Cla020673 (CYP707A), Cla006655 (UGT), and Cla020180 (SnRK2) are implicated in ABA biosynthesis in watermelon (Wang et al. 2017). Cla009779, Cla005404, and Cla005457 were the most effective at increasing ABA accumulation. On chromosome 6 of the watermelon genome here is a significant QTL (Qffi6.1) for flesh firmness from C. amarus (Gao et al. 2016). The putative candidate gene for Qffi6.1 is Cla018816, a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) gene that is variably expressed across firm- and soft-bodied near-isogenic lines (Anees et al. 2021). Another XTH gene (Cla006648), cellulose synthase (Cla012351), galactosyltransferase (Cla006648), pectinesterase gene (Cla004251), ethylene response element transcription factor 1 (Cla004120), and ethylene response element transcription factor 2a (Cla007092) all played important roles in watermelon flesh firmness, according to transcriptome analysis (Anees et al. 2021).
9 Rind Thickness and Toughness
Watermelon fruit rind breaking not only facilitates disease invasion and reduces yield, but it also degrades the fruit’s exterior aesthetic value. One of the simplest methods for gauging consumer acceptance during commercial purchases is the rind of a watermelon. After crossing 97103 and PI296341, a biparental F2 population was produced. Using RAPD and SSR markers, QTL analysis showed that there were a total of two rind thickness QTLs and three fruit weight QTLs (Fan et al. 2000). Additionally, a watermelon backcross (BC) generation was developed for measuring rind hardness, and a QTL location controlling rind hardness was found on chromosome 4 (Hashizume et al. 2003). Watermelon rind hardness is correlated with the ethylene clerf4 transcription factor genes, according to the genotyping of 349-F2 individuals from 32 germplasm. The genotyping indicated a significant ascending allelic pattern of aa (hard) bb (soft) and substantial QTL region on chromosome 10 (Liao et al. 2020). Another recent study combined the hard-fleshed and soft-fleshed watermelon lines ‘PI186490’ and ‘W1–1’, and preliminary mapping in 175-F2 individuals identified the key genes on chromosomes 2 and 8 controlling central flesh hardness using BSAseq and CAPS marker-based QTL analysis (Sun et al. 2020). Using a combinatory genomic map and bulk segregant analysis, it was possible to link variations in rind hardness to the ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4 (ClERF4) (BSA). The ClERF4 gene on chromosome 10 also has an 11-bp InDel and a neighboring SNP, which confers cracking resistance in F2 populations with different rind hardness (Liao et al. 2020). A transcriptome study demonstrated the molecular pathways involved in the enhancement of fruit attributes including greater rind toughness by watermelon and bottle gourd grafting (Garcia-Lozano et al. 2019).
10 Ethylene and Ripening in Watermelon
A microarray and quantitative real-time PCR-based investigation was conducted to better understand the sequence of events linked to fruit growth and ripening in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus [Thunb.] Matsum. and Nakai var. lanatus). This study found several of the ESTs with potential roles in the growth and ripening of watermelon fruits, particularly those involving the vascular system and ethylene (Wechter et al. 2008). The researchers noted differential expression of homologs of genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis (ACC oxidase) and signal transduction (ethylene receptor Cm-ETR1, ethylene insensitive [EIN3/EIL]-like transcription factor, ethylene-responsive binding protein [EREBP], and ethylene response factor [ERF]) in the same study. Fruit rind plays a major role in reducing moisture loss and disease, as well as cracking resistance, ease of transport, and storage stability quality of watermelon; an ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4 (ClERF4) linked with variation in rind hardness was discovered using a combinatory genetic map and bulk segregant analysis (BSA) (Liao et al. 2020). The ethylene biosynthesis and signaling pathway genes, such as ACC oxidase, ethylene receptor, and ethylene-responsive factor, showed highly ripening-associated expression patterns in the watermelon, a non-climacteric fruit, according to a comparative transcriptome profiling analysis of the cultivated watermelon 97103 and wild watermelon PI296341-FR. This suggests that ethylene may play a role in the development and ripening of the fruit (Guo et al. 2015). XTH gene (Cla006648), cellulose synthase (Cla012351), galactosyltransferase (Cla006648), pectinesterase gene (Cla004251), ethylene response element transcription factor 1 (Cla004120), and ethylene response element transcription factor 2a (Cla007092) all played important roles in watermelon flesh firmness, according to transcriptome analysis (Anees et al. 2021).
11 Conclusion
Watermelon fruit qualitative characters like seed color, seed size, fruit shape, skin color, rind pattern, flesh color and sugar/acid composition, fruit bitterness, and many more exhibit significant genetic diversity. With the advancement of genomics and availability of watermelon genome sequences, it has become possible to identify genes critical to valuable fruit quality traits. As the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms behind these characteristics improves, more effective and focused selection will enhance the efficiency of breeding of this important crop.
References
Anees M, Gao L, Umer MJ, Yuan P, Zhu H, Lu X, He N, Gong C, Kaseb MO, Zhao S, Liu W (2021) Identification of key gene networks associated with cell wall components leading to flesh firmness in watermelon. Front Plant Sci 12:1164. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2021.630243/BIBTEX
Bahri S, Zerrouk N, Aussel C, Moinard C, Crenn P, Curis E, Chaumeil J-C, Cynober L, Sfar S (2013) Citrulline: from metabolism to therapeutic use. Nutrition 29:479–484
Branham S, Vexler L, Meir A, Tzuri G, Frieman Z, Levi A, Wechter WP, Tadmor Y, Gur A (2017) Genetic mapping of a major codominant QTL associated with β-carotene accumulation in watermelon. Mol Breed 37:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11032-017-0747-0
Chambliss OL, Erickson HT, Jones CM (1968) Genetic control of bitterness in watermelon fruits. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science. American Society for Horticultural Science, Alexandria, VA, USA, pp 539–546
Chomicki G, Renner SS (2015) Watermelon origin solved with molecular phylogenetics including Linnaean material: another example of museomics. New Phytol 205:526–532
Dane F, Lang P (2004) Comparative analysis of cpDNA variability in wild and cultivated Citrullus species: implications for evolution of watermelon. Am J Bot 91:1922–1929
Dou J, Zhao S, Lu X, He N, Zhang L, Ali A, Kuang H, Liu W (2018) Genetic mapping reveals a candidate gene (ClFS1) for fruit shape in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Theor Appl Genet 131:947–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00122-018-3050-5
Everts S (2016) Bitterness in wild cucumber, melon, and watermelon. Chem Eng News 94(48):10–11
Fall LA, Perkins-Veazie P, Ma G, McGregor C (2019) QTLs associated with flesh quality traits in an elite× elite watermelon population. Euphytica 215:1–14
Fan M, Xu Y, Zhang HY, Ren HZ, Kang GB, Wang YJ, Chen H (2000) Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with fruit traits in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Mansf] and analysis of their genetic effects. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 27:902–910
Fang X, Liu S, Gao P, Liu H, Wang X, Luan F, Zhang Q, Dai Z (2020) Expression of ClPAP and ClPSY1 in watermelon correlates with chromoplast differentiation, carotenoid accumulation, and flesh color formation. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 270:109437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2020.109437
Gao L, Zhao SJ, Lu XQ, He N, Zhu HJ, Dou JL (2016) Linkage analysis on flesh firmness of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Mansf.] by SSR molecular marker. J Plant Genet Resour 17:866–870
Gao L, Zhao S, Lu X, He N, Liu W (2018) ‘SW’, a new watermelon cultivar with a sweet and sour flavor. HortScience 53:895–896
Garcia-Lozano M, Dutta SK, Natarajan P, Tomason YR, Lopez C, Katam R, Levi A, Nimmakayala P, Reddy UK (2019) Transcriptome changes in reciprocal grafts involving watermelon and bottle gourd reveal molecular mechanisms involved in increase of the fruit size, rind toughness and soluble solids. Plant Mol Biol 102:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11103-019-00942-7
Gong C, Li B, Anees M, Zhu H, Zhao S, He N, Lu X, Liu W (2022) Fine-mapping reveals that the bHLH gene Cla011508 regulates the bitterness of watermelon fruit. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 292:110626. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2021.110626
Guner N, Wehner TC (2004) The genes of watermelon. HortScience 39:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1175
Guo S, Zhang J, Sun H, Salse J, Lucas WJ, Zhang H, Zheng Y, Mao L, Ren Y, Wang Z (2013) The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nat Genet 45:51–58
Guo S, Sun H, Zhang H, Liu J, Ren Y, Gong G, Jiao C, Zheng Y, Yang W, Fei Z, Xu Y (2015) Comparative transcriptome analysis of cultivated and wild watermelon during fruit development. PLoS One 10:e0130267. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0130267
Gusmini G, Wehner TC (2006) Qualitative inheritance of rind pattern and flesh color in watermelon. J Hered 97:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/JHERED/ESJ023
Hashizume T, Shimamoto I, Hirai M (2003) Construction of a linkage map and QTL analysis of horticultural traits for watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (THUNB.) MATSUM & NAKAI] using RAPD, RFLP and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:779–785
Joshi V, Joshi M, Silwal D, Noonan K, Rodriguez S, Penalosa A (2019) Systematized biosynthesis and catabolism regulate citrulline accumulation in watermelon. Phytochemistry 162:129–140
Kim YC, Choi D, Zhang C, Liu H-f, Lee S (2018) Profiling cucurbitacins from diverse watermelons (Citrullus spp.). Hortic Environ Biotechnol 59:557–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13580-018-0066-3
Levi A, Jarret R, Kousik S, Patrick Wechter W, Nimmakayala P, Reddy UK (2017) Genetic resources of watermelon. In: Genetics and genomics of Cucurbitaceae. Springer, Cham, pp 87–110
Li B, Lu X, Dou J, Aslam A, Gao L, Zhao S, He N, Liu W (2018) Construction of a high-density genetic map and mapping of fruit traits in watermelon (Citrullus Lanatus L.) based on whole-genome resequencing. Int J Mol Sci 19:3268. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS19103268
Liao N, Hu Z, Li Y, Hao J, Chen S, Xue Q, Ma Y, Zhang K, Mahmoud A, Ali A, Malangisha GK, Lyu X, Yang J, Zhang M (2020) Ethylene-responsive factor 4 is associated with the desirable rind hardness trait conferring cracking resistance in fresh fruits of watermelon. Plant Biotechnol J 18:1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/PBI.13276
Lou L, Wehner TC (2016) Qualitative inheritance of external fruit traits in watermelon. HortScience 51:487–496
Lu BY, Zhou HW, Chen X, Luan FS, Wang XZ, Jiang Y (2016) QTL analysis of fruit traits in watermelon. J Fruit Sci 33:1206–1218
Lv P, Li N, Liu H, Gu H, Zhao WE (2015) Changes in carotenoid profiles and in the expression pattern of the genes in carotenoid metabolisms during fruit development and ripening in four watermelon cultivars. Food Chem 174:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2014.11.022
Mashilo J, Shimelis H, Ngwepe RM, Thungo Z (2022) Genetic analysis of fruit quality traits in sweet watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus): a review. Front Plant Sci 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2022.834696
Matsuo K, DeMilo AB, Schroder RFW, Martin PAW (1999) Rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method to quantitate elaterinide in juice and reconstituted residues from a bitter mutant of Hawkesbury watermelon. J Agric Food Chem 47:2755–2759. https://doi.org/10.1021/JF9811572
Navot N, Sarfatti M, Zamir D (1990) Linkage relationships of genes affecting bitterness and flesh color in watermelon. J Hered 81:162–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JHERED.A110952
Park S-w, Kim KT, Kang SC, Yang HB (2016) Rapid and practical molecular marker development for rind traits in watermelon. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13580-016-0005-0
Pei S, Liu Z, Wang X, Luan F, Dai Z, Yang Z, Zhang Q, Liu S (2021) Quantitative trait loci and candidate genes responsible for pale green flesh colour in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Plant Breed 140:349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/PBR.12908
Poole CF, Grimball PC (1945) Interaction of sex, shape, and weight genes in watermelon. J Agric Res 71:533–552
Ren Y, Li M, Guo S, Sun H, Zhao J, Zhang J, Liu G, He H, Tian S, Yu Y (2021) Evolutionary gain of oligosaccharide hydrolysis and sugar transport enhanced carbohydrate partitioning in sweet watermelon fruits. Plant Cell 33:1554–1573
Robinson RW, Munger HM, Whitaker TW, Bohn GW (1976) Genes of the Cucurbitaceae. Hortic Sci 11:554–568
Sun T, Yuan H, Cao H, Yazdani M, Tadmor Y, Li L (2018) Carotenoid metabolism in plants: the role of plastids. Mol Plant 11:58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLP.2017.09.010
Sun L, Zhang Y, Cui H, Zhang L, Sha T, Wang C, Fan C, Luan F, Wang X (2020) Linkage mapping and comparative transcriptome analysis of firmness in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Front Plant Sci 11:831. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2020.00831/BIBTEX
Tanaka T, Wimol S, Mizutani T (1995) Inheritance of fruit shape and seed size of watermelon. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 64:543–548. https://doi.org/10.2503/JJSHS.64.543
Umer MJ, Bin Safdar L, Gebremeskel H, Zhao S, Yuan P, Zhu H, Kaseb MO, Anees M, Lu X, He N, Gong C, Liu W (2020a) Identification of key gene networks controlling organic acid and sugar metabolism during watermelon fruit development by integrating metabolic phenotypes and gene expression profiles. Hortic Res 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41438-020-00416-8/41991606/41438_2020_ARTICLE_416.PDF
Umer MJ, Gao L, Gebremeskel H, Bin SL, Yuan P, Zhao S, Xuqiang L, Nan H, Hongju Z, Liu W (2020b) Expression pattern of sugars and organic acids regulatory genes during watermelon fruit development. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 265:109102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109102
Van Der Knaap E, Tanksley SD (2001) Identification and characterization of a novel locus controlling early fruit development in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 103:353–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/S001220100623
Wang Y, Guo S, Tian S, Zhang J, Ren Y, Sun H, Gong G, Zhang H, Xu Y (2017) Abscisic acid pathway involved in the regulation of watermelon fruit ripening and quality trait evolution. PLoS One 12:e0179944. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0179944
Wang Y, Wang J, Guo S, Tian S, Zhang J, Ren Y, Li M, Gong G, Zhang H, Xu Y (2021) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of ClBG1 decreased seed size and promoted seed germination in watermelon. Hortic Res 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41438-021-00506-1/42043543/41438_2021_ARTICLE_506.PDF
Wechter WP, Levi A, Harris KR, Davis AR, Fei Z, Katzir N, Giovannoni JJ, Salman-Minkov A, Hernandez A, Thimmapuram J, Tadmor Y, Portnoy V, Trebitsh T (2008) Gene expression in developing watermelon fruit. BMC Genomics 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-275/FIGURES/5
Yao Y-X, Li M, Zhai H, You C-X, Hao Y-J (2011) Isolation and characterization of an apple cytosolic malate dehydrogenase gene reveal its function in malate synthesis. J Plant Physiol 168:474–480
Zhu Q, Gao P, Liu S, Zhu Z, Amanullah S, Davis AR, Luan F (2017) Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting watermelon genotypes during fruit development and ripening. BMC Genomics 18:1–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dutta, S.K., Nimmakayala, P., Reddy, U.K. (2023). Watermelon: Advances in Genetics of Fruit Qualitative Traits. In: Kole, C. (eds) Compendium of Crop Genome Designing for Nutraceuticals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4169-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4169-6_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4168-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4169-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences