Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets

The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Human Sciences

Abstract

The Austrian school of economics emerged as a distinct research program in the 1870s in opposition to the German Historical School. In its early days, it was part of the neoclassical mainstream. The origin of several enduring concepts, such as marginal utility, opportunity cost, and subjective preferences, can be traced to early Austrian contributions. Austrian economists such as Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk and Ludwig von Mises were also among the earliest critics of Marxist economics and central planning, arguing that Marx’s labor of theory of value is erroneous and that a socialist economy is impossible. In the 1930s, the Austrian school diverged from mainstream economics. The new rift was between the Austrian approach, which analyzes markets as institutionally channeled entrepreneurial discovery processes, and the mainstream approach with its focus on models of market equilibria. Within the Austrian school, there was also a deepening of its underlying subjectivism to encompass not only consumer preferences, but also the subjectivity of knowledge and expectations. In the twenty-first century, Austrian concepts and theories remain influential in social theories that emphasize the role of institutions in human development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aligica PD, Boettke PJ, Tarko V (2019) Public governance and the classical-liberal perspective: political economy foundations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson DE, Taylor JA (2012) Institutions, agglomeration economies and interstate migration. In: Andersson DE (ed) The spatial market process. Emerald, Bingley, pp 233–263

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (2010) Complexity, the Santa Fe approach, and non-equilibrium economics. Hist Econ Ideas 18(2):149–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell RL (2016) Hayek enriched by complexity enriched by Hayek☆. In: Boettke PJ, Storr V (eds) Revisiting Hayek’s political economy. Emerald, Bingley, pp 63–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse R (2000) Austrian economics and the mainstream: view from the boundary. Q J Austrian Econ 3(2):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel Y (1989) Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M (2003) The formalist revolution of the 1950s. J Hist Econ Thought 25(2):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ (1996) What is wrong with neoclassical economics (and what is still wrong with Austrian economics). In: Foldvary F (ed) Beyond neoclassical economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ (2019) What is right about Austrian economics? In: D’Amico DJ, Martin AG (eds) Assessing Austrian economics. Emerald, Bingley, pp 125–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ, Lopez EJ (2002) Austrian economics and public choice. Review of Austrian Economics 15(2–3):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ, Coyne CJ, Leeson PT (2007) Saving government failure theory from itself: recasting political economy from an Austrian perspective. Constitutional Political Economy, 18, 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke PJ, Prychitko DL (eds) (1994) The market process. Edward Elgar, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Kirman A, Sethi R (2017) Retrospectives: Friedrich Hayek and the market algorithm. J Econ Perspect 31(3):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butos WN (1994) The Hayek-Keynes macro debate. In: Boettke PJ (ed) The Elgar companion to Austrian economics. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 471–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Bylund PL (2015) The problem of production: a new theory of the firm. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell BJ (1982) Beyond positivism: economic methodology in the twentieth century. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Candela RA, Geloso VJ (2018) The lightship in economics. Public Choice 176(3–4):479–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan B (1999) The Austrian search for realistic foundations. South Econ J 65(4):823–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright E (2008) The structure of social capital: an Austrian perspective on its nature and development. Rev Polit Econ 20(1):41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne CJ (2008) After war: the political economy of exporting democracy. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1959) The theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker E (2016) The Viennese students of civilization: the meaning and context of Austrian economics reconsidered. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • diZerega G (1989) Democracy as a spontaneous order. Crit Rev 3(2):206–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobb M (1933) Economic theory and the problems of a socialist economy. Econ J 43(172):588–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A ([1767] 1995) An essay on the history of civil society. In: Oz-Salzberger, F (ed), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (1994) The theory of the firm: the Austrians as precursors and critics of contemporary theory. Review of Austrian Economics 7(1):31–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ (2019) Austrian economics: a tale of lost opportunities. In: D’Amico DJ, Martin AG (eds) Assessing Austrian economics. Emerald, Bingley, pp 111–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Klein PG (2012) Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: a new approach to the firm. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frantz R, Leeson R (eds) (2013) Hayek and behavioral economics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison RW (2001) Time and money: the macroeconomics of capital structure. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Polit Econ 94(4):691–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1976) Information and competitive price systems. Am Econ Rev 66(2):246–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1937) Economics and knowledge. Economica 4(13):33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1941) The pure theory of capital. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1948) Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1952) The counter-revolution of science: studies in the abuse of reason. Collier-Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1955) Degrees of explanation. Br J Philos Sci 6(23):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA ([1955] 1964) The counter-revolution of science: studies on the abuse of reason. The Free Press of Glencoe, Collier-Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1967) The theory of complex phenomena. In: Hayek FA (ed) Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1968) Economic thought VI: the Austrian school of economics. In: Sills DL, Merton RK (eds) International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York, Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1979) Law, legislation and liberty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA (1988) The fatal conceit: the errors of socialism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek FA ([1968] 2002) Competition as a discovery procedure. Q J Austiran Econ 5(3): 9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2019) Austrian economics is still not institutional enough. In: D’Amico DJ, Martin AG (eds) Assessing Austrian economics. Emerald, Bingley, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz S (2000) Microfoundations and macroeconomics: an Austrian perspective. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hudík M (2011) Why economics is not a science of behaviour. J Econ Methodol 18(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudik M (2015) Mises and Hayek mathematized: towards mathematical Austrian economics. In: Bylund P, Howden D (eds) The next generation of Austrian economics: essays in honor of Joseph T. Salerno. Mises Institute, Auburn, pp 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudik M (2018) Equilibrium analysis: two Austrian views. Cosmos+Taxis 6(1–2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudik M (2020) Equilibrium as compatibility of plans. Theor Decis 89(3):349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudik M, Bylund PL (2021) Let’s do it Frank’s way: general principles and historical specificity in the study of entrepreneurship. J Inst Econ:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000205

  • Huerta de Soto J (2008) The Austrian school: market order and entrepreneurial creativity. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz L (1969) On the concept and possibility of informational decentralization. Am Econ Rev 59(2):513–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda S (1990) Market process theory and “dynamic theories” of the market. South Econ J 57(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner IM (1973) Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl R (2010) Some epistemological implications of economic complexity. J Econ Behav Organ 76(3):859–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppl R, Whitman DG (2004) Rational-choice hermeneutics. J Econ Behav Organ 55(3):295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann LM (1957) Capital and its structure. Sheed, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann LM (1971) The legacy of max weber. The Glendessary Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann LM (1977) Capital, expectations, and the market process: essays on the theory of the market economy. Sheed, Andrews, and McMeel, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange O (1936) On the economic theory of socialism: part one. Rev Econ Stud 4(1):53–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie D (2011) The interpretive dimension of economics: science, hermeneutics, and praxeology. Rev Austrian Econ 24(2):91–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT (2007) An-arrgh-chy: the law and economics of pirate organization. J Polit Econ 115(6):1049–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT (2011) Government, clubs, and constitutions. J Econ Behav Organ 80(2):301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT (2014) Anarchy unbound: why self-governance works better than you think. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT (2020) Economics is not statistics (and vice versa). J Inst Econ 16(4):423–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson PT, Boettke PJ (2006) Was Mises right? Rev Soc Econ 64(2):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner AP (1934) Economic theory and socialist economy. Rev Econ Stud 2(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin P (1994) Knowledge, expectations and capital. The economics of Ludwig M. Lachman: attempting a new perspective. Adv Austrian Econ 1:233–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin P (1999) Capital in Disequilibrium: the role of Capital in a Changing World. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsbichler A (2017) Was Ludwig von Mises a conventionalist? A new analysis of the epistemology of the Austrian School of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild S, Owen G (1980) An Austrian model of the entrepreneurial market process. J Econ Theory 23(3):361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loasby B (1999) Knowledge, institutions and evolution in economics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1955) The problem of verification in economics. South Econ J 22(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1958) Equilibrium and disequilibrium: misplaced concreteness and disguised politics. Econ J 68(269):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1961) Are the social sciences really inferior? South Econ J 27(3):173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1967) Theories of the firm: Marginalist, behavioral, managerial. Am Econ Rev 57(1):1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1970) Homo Oeconomicus and his class mates. In: Natanson M (ed) Phenomenology and social reality. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 122–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Machlup F (1973) The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Machovec FM (1995) Perfect competition and the transformation of economics. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty P (1967) A note on the history of perfect competition. J Polit Econ 75(August):395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menger C (1871) Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Wilhelm Braumüller, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengers C ([1883] 2009) Investigations into the method of the social sciences, with special reference to economics. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger C (1892) On the origin of money. Econ J 2(6):239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroni S (2014) Two different theories of two distinct spontaneous phenomena: orders of actions and evolution of institutions in Hayek. Cosmos + Taxis: Studies in Emergent Order and Organization 1(2):9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll G (1977) Economics as a coordination problem: the contributions of Friedrich a. Hayek. Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Persky J (1991) Retrospectives: Lange and von Mises, large-scale enterprises, and the economic case for socialism. J Econ Perspect 5(4):229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piano EE (2019) State capacity and public choice: a critical survey. Public Choice 178(1):289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1(1):54–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell B (2014) Out of poverty: sweatshops in the global economy. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko DL (1994) Ludwig Lachman and the interpretative turn in economics: a critical inquiry into the hermeneutice of the plan. Adv Austrian Econ 1:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo MJ, Whitman G (2019) Escaping paternalism: rationality, behavioral economics, and public policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins LC (1932) An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscher W (1874) Geschichte der National-Oekonomik in Deutschland. R. Oldenbourg, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser JB Jr (2012) Emergence and complexity in Austrian economics. J Econ Behav Organ 81(1):122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1956) Toward a reconstruction of utility and welfare economics. In: Sennholz M (ed) On freedom and free Enterprise. D. Van Nostrand, Princeton, pp 224–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1957) In defense of “extreme Apriorism”. Southern Econ J 23(3):314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN ([1962] 1970) Man, economy, and state: a treatise on economic principles. Nash, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1970) Power and Market: Government and the Market. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1973) Praxeology as the method of the social sciences. In: Natanson M (ed) Phenomenology and the social sciences, vol 2. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, pp 311–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1976) Praxeology: the methodology of Austrian economics. In: Dolan EG (ed) The foundations of modern Austrian economics. Sheed Andrews, Kansas City, pp 19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard MN (1987) Breaking out of the Walrasian box: the cases of Schumpeter and Hansen. Rev Austrian Econ 1(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salerno JT (2002) The rebirth of Austrian economics – in the light of Austrian economics. Q J Austrian Econ 5(4):111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle GLS (1952) Expectation in economics. The University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sima J (2019) Austrian school identity and unavoidable trade-offs in its long-term progress. In: D’Amico DJ, Martin AG (eds) Assessing Austrian economics. Emerald, Bingley, pp 61–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skarbek D (2014) The social order of the underworld: how prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith VL (2007) Rationality in economics: constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1957) Perfect competition, historically contemplated. J Polit Econ 65(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storr VH (2019a) Ludwig Lachmann’s peculiar status within Austrian economics. Rev Austrian Econ 32(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storr VH (2019b) On the status of Austrian economics. In: D’Amico DJ, Martin AG (eds) Assessing Austrian economics. Emerald, Bingley, pp 81–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen E (1992) Knowledge and prices: a market-process perspective. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Böhm-Bawerk E ([1884] 1890) Capital and interest: a critical history of economic theory. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Böhm-Bawerk E ([1896] 1898) Karl Marx and the close of his system: a criticism. T. Fisher Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L ([1912] 1980) The theory of money and credit. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L ([1933] 1981) Epistemological problems in economics. New York University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L ([1935] 1975) Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. In Hayek, F. A. (ed), Collectivist economic planning, Kelley Publishing, Clifton, pp 87–130

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L (1949) Human action: a treatise on economics. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L ([1957] 1985) Theory and history: an interpretation of social and economic evolution. The Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn/Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises L ([1962] 1978) The ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: an essay on method. Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wieser F (1914) Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriend NJ (2002) Was Hayek an ace? South Econ J 68(4):811–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub ER (2002) How economics became a mathematical science. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whately R (1832) Introductory lectures on political economy. B. Fellowes, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBMBA Program, College of Management, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

    David Emanuel Andersson

  2. Faculty of Business Administration, Prague University of Economics and Business; Center for Theoretical Study, Charles University, Staré Město, Czechia

    Marek Hudik

Authors
  1. David Emanuel Andersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Hudik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Emanuel Andersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    David McCallum

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Sociology, Universitat Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria

    Dieter Boegenhold

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Andersson, D.E., Hudik, M. (2021). The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets. In: McCallum, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Human Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4106-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4106-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets
    Published:
    19 November 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_6-2

  2. Original

    The Austrian School and the Theory of Markets
    Published:
    14 October 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4106-3_6-1

Search

Navigation