Abstract
Researchers employ creativity in their studies when designing, conducting, and presenting their data; in this way creativity is central to academic practice. Within this more general sense of being creative, “creative methods,” as presented in this chapter, refer to creativity in the literal sense, where researchers and participants are involved in producing visual images, artefacts, or other representations, through a range of arts-based or performative techniques. This creative and novel “making” is often associated with the field of creative methods in visual studies, particularly in relation to photography and film. The recognizability of people and places in these photographic modes has invoked tensions between revealing and concealing the visual images we produce in social research, in relation to confidentiality and anonymity. This becomes more problematic in a climate where the burgeoning use of new technologies means that images are more easily shared, disseminated, and distorted. Accordingly, once a visual image is created, it becomes very difficult to control its use or remove it from public view if participants decide that they no longer want to be represented in a fixed visual trope for time immemorial or if they decide to withdraw their data from a study.
Arguments around anonymity and participant visibility are most closely related to photographs and film. However, it remains important to explore the ethical issues around other creative practices where researchers and participants make something new and understand that such issues can also be contentious. This chapter focuses on techniques of data production, including drawing, collaging, and sandboxing, where participants are involved in creating some form of artefact to represent aspects of their lives and experiences. It examines how these creative approaches generate a number of uncertainties around voice, confidentiality, informed consent, avoidance of harm, and future use. The chapter also explores the opportunities that creative approaches, which produce novel outputs, can offer in re-representing and revisualizing research data, engaging audiences in nontraditional formats, and increasing the impact of research studies. In this way, the chapter offers an insight into the ethical risks and potentialities of creative methods as tools of both data production and dissemination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed S (2010) Foreword. In: Ryan-Flood R, Gill R (eds) Secrecy and silence in the research process. Routledge, London, pp 1–12
Alexandra D (2015) Are we listening yet? Participatory knowledge production through media practice: encounters of political listening. In: Gubrium A, Harper K, Otaṅez M (eds) Participatory visual and digital research in action. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, pp 41–56
Awan F (2007) Young people identity and the media: a study of conceptions of self-identity among youth in southern England. PhD Thesis. Bournemouth University
Batsleer J (2008) Informal learning in youth work. Sage, London
Becker HS (2007) Telling about society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Belin R (2005) Photo-elicitation and the agricultural landscape: “seeing” and “telling” about farming, community and place. Vis Stud 20(1):56–68
Blum-Ross A, Livingstone S (2017) ‘Sharenting’, parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Pop Commun 15(2):110–125
Brady G, Brown G (2013) Rewarding but let’s talk about the challenges: using arts based methods in research with young mothers. Methodol Innov Online 8(1):99–112
Burnard P (2018) Arts-based research methods: a brief overview. Presented at Creative Research Methods Symposium, 2 July 2018, University of Derby
Cain P (2011) Evolution of the practitioner. Intellect, Bristol
Clark A (in press) Visual ethics beyond the crossroads, in L. Pauwels and D. Mannay (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. (2nd Ed) London: Sage, pp. xx–xx
Coffey A (1999) The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. Sage, London
Darbyshire P, MacDougall C, Schiller W (2005) Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qual Res 5(4):417–436
Edwards V (2019) How might we work more ethically with children and young people: the case of ethics. http://www.exchangewales.org/single-post/2019/05/15/How-might-we-work-more-Ethically-with-Children-and-Young-People-The-%E2%80%98Case-of-Ethics%E2%80%99
Ehn B, Löfgren O (2007) Emotions in academia. In: Wulff H (ed) The emotions: a cultural reader. Berg, Oxford, pp 101–117
Fink J (2018) Foreword. In: Loughran T, Mannay D (eds) Emotion and the researcher: sites, subjectivities and relationships. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, vol 16. Emerald, Bingley, pp xix–xxi
Gabb J (2008) Researching intimacy in families. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Gauntlett D (2007) Creative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. London: Routledge.
Gubrium A, Hill H, Flicker S (2014) A situated practice of ethics for visual and digital methods in public health research ad practice: a focus on digital story-telling. Am J Public Health 104(9):1606–1614
Hannes K, Parylo O (2014) Let’s play it safe: ethical consideration from participants in a photovoice research project. Int J Qual Methods 13(1):255–274
Hernandez-Albujar Y (2007) The symbolism of video: exploring migrant mothers’ experiences. In: Stanczak GC (ed) Visual research methods: image, society and representation. Sage, London, pp 281–386
Kara H (2018) Research ethics in the real world: euro-western and indigenous perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press
Lindgren A, Sparrman A (2014) Blogging family-like relations when visiting theme and amusement parks. Cult Unbound 6:997–1013
Lomax H (2015) Seen and heard? Ethics and agency in participatory visual research with children, young people and families. Fam, Relatsh Soc 4(3):493–502
Lomax H, Fink J, Singh N, High C (2011) The politics of performance: methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video. Int J Soc Res Methodol 14(3):231–243
Loughran T, Mannay D (2018) Introduction: why emotion matters. In: Loughran T, Mannay D (eds) Emotion and the researcher: sites, subjectivities, and relationships. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, vol 16. Emerald, Bingley, pp 1–18
Lowenfeld M (1950) The nature and use of the Lowenfeld world technique in work with children and adults. J Psychol 30(2):325–331
Lyon P (in press) Using drawing in visual research: materializing the invisible. In: Pauwels L, Mannay D (eds) The sage handbook of visual methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London, pp xx–xx
Lyon P, Turland M (2016) Manual drawing in clinical communication: understanding the role of clinical mark-making. Vis Methodol J 5(1):39–44
Mannay D (2010) Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qual Res 10(1):91–111
Mannay D (2013) ‘I like rough pubs’: exploring places of safety and danger in violent and abusive relationships. Fam Relatsh Soc 2(1):131–137
Mannay D (2014) Storytelling beyond the academy: exploring roles, responsibilities and regulations in the open access dissemination of research outputs and visual data. J Corp Citizenship 54:109–116
Mannay D (2016) Visual, narrative and creative research methods: application, reflection and ethics. Routledge, Abingdon
Mannay D, Turney C (in press) Sandboxing: a creative approach to qualitative research in education. In: Delamont S, Ward M (eds) Handbook of qualitative research in education. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp xx–xx
Mannay D, Staples E, Edwards V (2017a) Visual methodologies, sand and psychoanalysis: employing creative participatory techniques to explore the educational experiences of mature students and children in care. Vis Stud 32(4):345–358
Mannay D, Creaghan J, Gallagher D, Marzella R, Mason S, Morgan M, Grant A (2017b) Negotiating closed doors and constraining deadlines: the potential of visual ethnography to effectually explore private and public spaces of motherhood and parenting. J Contemp Ethnogr. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241617744858
Mannay D, Evans R, Staples E, Hallett S, Roberts L, Rees A, Andrews D (2017c) The consequences of being labelled ‘looked-after’: exploring the educational experiences of looked-after children and young people in Wales. Br J Educ Res 43(4):683–699
Mannay D, Roberts L, Staples E, Ministry of Life (2019) Lights, camera, action: translating research findings into policy and practice impacts with music, film and artwork. In: Mannay D, Rees A, Roberts L (eds) Children and young people ‘looked after’? Education, intervention and the everyday culture of care in Wales. University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp 210–244
Mitchell LM (2006) Child centered? Thinking critically about children’s drawings as a visual research method. Vis Anthropol Rev 22(1):60–73
Prosser J (2000) The moral maze of image ethics. In: Simons H, Usher R (eds) Situated ethics in education research. Routledge, London, pp 116–132
REF (2011) Assessment framework and guidance on submissions. REF 02.2011 www.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-02/. Accessed 16 Aug 2018
Richardson M (2015a) Embodied intergenerational: family position, place and masculinity. Gend Place Cult 22(2):157–171
Richardson MJ (2015b) Theatre as safe space? Performing intergenerational narratives with men of Irish descent. Soc Cult Geogr 16(6):615–633
Rose G (2001) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage.
Ross NJ (2005) Children’s space. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 14(4):336–341
Ryan-Flood R, Gill R (eds) (2010) Secrecy and silence in the research process. Routledge, Abingdon
Scott C (2018) Elucidating perceptions of ageing through participatory drawing: A phenomenographic approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Brighton
Staples E, Roberts L, Lyttleton-Smith J, Hallett S, CASCADE Voices (2019) Enabling care experienced young people’s participation in research: CASCADE voices. In: Mannay D, Rees A, Roberts L (eds) Children and young people ‘looked after’? Education, intervention and the everyday culture of care in Wales. University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp. 196–209
Timmins F (2015) Disseminating nursing research. Nurs Stand 29(48):34–39
Tonks A, Lyons AC, Goodwin I (2015) Researching online visual displays on social networking sites: methodologies and meanings. Qual Res Psychol 12(3):26–339
Uimonen P (2016) I’m a picture girl: mobile photography in Tanzania. In: Gomez Cruz E, Lehmuskallio A (eds) Digital photography and everyday life: empirical studies on material visual practices. Routledge, London, pp 19–34
Weinrib EL (2004) Images of the self: the sandplay therapy process. Temenos, Cloverdale
Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clarke A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E (2008) Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper NCRM/011. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2018
Wiles R, Clark A, Prosser J (2011) Visual ethics at the crossroads. In: Pauwels L, Margolis E (eds) Sage handbook of visual research methods, 1st edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 685–706
Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinsons J, Heath S (2012) Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. Int J Soc Res Methodol 15:41–53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mannay, D. (2019). Creative Methods. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_21-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_21-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities