Abstract
The use of images in social research can be traced to the mid-twentieth-century sociological inquiry of John Collier and Pierre Bourdieu and the anthropological film and photography of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson who sought to understand culture by making it visible. More recently, rapid developments in digital technology have extended the range of visual methodologies and the diversity of visual material available for research. Contemporary visual methods encompassing participatory video, collaborative cellphilms, photo-voice, and photo-elicitation reflect an increasingly dynamic digital visual culture and offer new possibilities for researchers to illuminate social issues. However, alongside the potential of these, new visual methods and technologies have arisen a number of ethical challenges. Rapid transformations in the ways in which images are produced, communicated, and consumed within a new digital visual and media landscape have outpaced developments in research governance and codes of practice. Moreover, the democratization of research in which research participants share in the production of research troubles traditional research hierarchies and decision-making about what gets seen and shared while the potential of digitized images to circulate beyond the immediate temporal and spatial confines of research calls into question the appropriateness of formalized ethical frameworks based on principles of anonymity and confidentiality.
This chapter sets out an alternative approach based on a feminist ethics of care, which seeks to know well and know responsibly. This relational approach marks a departure from ethical decision-making founded on absolutist principles which may undermine participants moral rights such as the right to be acknowledged in research. In considering ethical decision-making as a form of responsible knowing, care-based ethics foregrounds the contextual, emergent nature of ethical decision-making in which the potential harms and benefits are considered within the context of each unique research relationship framed by an understanding of the wider social and political landscape. Examples from contemporary research are drawn upon to illustrate how researchers might navigate the specific challenges engendered by visual research in which the boundaries, for example, about what could and should be revealed in the generation and dissemination of research, are being rapidly redrawn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Back L (2009) Portrayal and betrayal: Bourdieu, photography and sociological life. Sociol Rev 57(3):471–490
Banks M, Zeitlyn D (2015) Visual methods in social research, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Beer D, Burrows R (2013) Popular culture, digital archives and the new social life of data. Theory Cult Soc 30(4):47–71
Bourdieu P (1990 [1965]) Photography: a middle-brow art. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Boyd D, Marwick A (2011) Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. Proceedings of a decade in Internet time, OII Symposium on the dynamics of the Internet and society, University of Oxford, 1–29
Brady G, Brown G (2013) Rewarding but let’s talk about the challenges: using arts-based methods in research with young mothers. Methodol Innov Online 8(1):99–112
British Educational Research Association [BERA] (2018) Ethical guidelines for educational research, fourth edition, London. https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethicalguidelines-for-educational-research-2018. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
British Sociological Research Association (2017) Statement of Ethical Practice https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24310/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice.pdf
Collier J (1957) Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. Am Anthropol 59(5):843–859
Davies K (2008) Photo elicitation and informed consent: reflections from the Living Resemblances project. In: Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clark A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E (eds) Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, Southampton, National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Durham MG (2018) Resignifying Alan Kurdi: news photographs, memes, and the ethics of embodied vulnerability. Crit Stud Media Commun 35(3):240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1408958
Edwards V (2019) How might we work more ethically with children and young people: the ‘case of ethics’. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Escott H, Pahl K (2019) ‘Being in the bin’: affective understandings of prescriptivism and spelling in video narratives co-produced with children in a post-industrial area of the UK. Linguist Educ 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100754
Fink J (2012) Walking the neighbourhood, seeing the small details of community life: reflections from a photography walking tour. Crit Soc Policy 32(1):31–50
Fink J, Lomax H (2016) Sharing images, spoiling meanings? Class, gender & ethics in visual research with girls. Girlhood Stud 9(3):20–36
Gabb J (2010) Home truths: ethical issues in family research. Qual Res 10:461–478
Guillemin M, Gillam L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qual Inq 10(2):261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
Haaken J, O’Neill M (2014) Moving images: psychoanalytically-informed visual methods in documenting the lives of women migrants and asylum-seekers. J Health Psychol 19(1):79–89
Hall M, Pahl K, Pool S (2015) Visual digital methodologies with children and young people: perspectives from the field. In: Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (eds) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Hand M (2017) Visuality in social media: researching images, circulations and practices images. In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage, London, pp 215–231
Heng T (2017) Visual methods in the field: photograph for the social sciences. Routledge, Oxford
Henwood K, Dicks B, Housley W (2019) QR in reflexive mode: the participatory turn and interpretive social science. Qual Res 19(3):241–246
Iphofen R (2011) Ethical decision making in qualitative research. Qual Res 11(4):443–446
Larsen J, Sandbye M (eds) (2014) Digital snaps: the new face of photography. IB Tauris, London
Leurs K (2017) Feminist data studies: using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research. Fem Rev 115:130–154
Lie R, Witteveen L (2017) Visual informed consent: informed consent without forms. Int J Soc Res Methodol 20(1):63–75
Lomax H (2012) Shifting the focus: Children’s image making practices & their implications for analysis. Int J Res Method Educ 35(2):227–234
Lomax H (2015) Seen & heard? Ethics & agency in participatory visual research with children, young people & families. Fam Relatsh Soc 4(3):493–502
Lomax H, Fink J (2019) Understanding online images: content, Context & Circulation as analytic foci. In: Pauwels L, Mannay D (eds) Sage handbook of visual methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Lomax H, Fink J, Singh N, High C (2011) The politics of performance: methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video. Int J Soc Res Methodol 14(3):231–243
Luttrell W, Restler V, Fontaine C (2012) Youth video-making: selves and identities in dialogue. In: Milne EJ, Mitchell C, de Lange N (eds) Participatory video handbook. AltaMira Press, Latham, pp 164–177
Mandrona A (2016) Visual culture, aesthetics and the ethics of cellphilming. In: MacEntee K, Burkholder C, Schwab-Cartas J (eds) What’s a Cellphilm? Integrating Mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism. Sense publishers, Rotterdam, pp 183–198
Mannay D (2010) Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qual Res 10(1):91–111
Mannay D (2013) ‘Who put that on there … why why why?’ Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production. Vis Stud 28(2):136–146
Mannay D (2016) Visual, narrative and creative research methods: application, reflection and ethics. Routledge, Abingdon
Mannay D, Staples E (2019) Sandboxes, stickers and superheroes: employing creative techniques to explore the aspirations and experiences of children and young people who are looked after. In: Mannay D, Rees A, Roberts L (eds) Children and young people ‘looked after’? Education, intervention and the everyday culture of care in Wales. University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp 169–182
Mannay D, Lomax H, Fink J (2015) Scissors, sand and the cutting room floor: employing visual and creative methods ethically with marginalised communities. Paper presented at the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Glasgow, 15–17 April 2015
Markham A (2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Inf Commun Soc 15(3):334–353
Marsh JA (2017) The internet of toys: a posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teach Coll Rec 119:120305. ISSN 0161-4681
Mielczarek N (2018) The dead Syrian refugee boy goes viral: funerary Aylan Kurdi memes as tools of mourning and visual reparation in remix culture. Vis Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218797366
Miller T, Birch M, Mauthner M, Jessop J (2012) Ethics in qualitative research. Sage, London
Mills CW (1957) The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mitchell C (2017) “The girl should just clean up the mess”: on studying audiences in understanding the meaningful engagement of young people in policy-making. Int J Qual Methods 16:1–9
Mok TM, Cornish F, Tarr J (2015) Too Much Information: Visual Research Ethics in the Age of Wearable Cameras, Integr Psych Behav 49:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9289-8
Nutbrown C (2010) Naked by the Pool? Blurring the image? Ethical issues in the portrayal of young children in arts-based educational research. Qual Inq 17(1):3–14
O’Connor D (2013) The apomediated world: regulating research when social media has changed research. J Law Med Ethics 41(2):470–483
O’Neill M, Roberts B (2020) Walking methods: research on the move. Routledge, Oxford
Pauwels L (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The Sage handbook of visual research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–23
Pilcher K, Martin W, Williams V (2016) Issues of collaboration, representation, meaning and emotions: utilising participant-led visual diaries to capture the everyday lives of people in mid to later life. Int J Soc Res Methodol 19(6):677–692
Pink S (2013) Doing visual ethnography. Sage, London
Prosser J, Loxley A (2008) Introducing Visual Methods. Discussion Paper. National Centre for Research Methods http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/. Accessed 30 Oct 19
Rose G (2016) Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials, 4th edn. Sage, London
Ruiz-Casares M, Thompson J (2016) Obtaining meaningful informed consent: preliminary results of a study to develop visual informed consent forms with children. Chil Geograph 14(1):35–45
Saunders B, Kitzinger J, Kitzinger C (2015) Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12(2):125–137
Schultheis F, Bourdieu P (2001) Pictures from Algeria: an interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Camera Austria, Graz
Sontag S (2014) Regarding the pain of others. Penguin, London
Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (2015) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Sweetman P (2009) Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition. In: Gillett J (ed) Just anybody. Fotonet/The Winchester Gallery, Winchester, pp 7–9
Trachtenberg A (1989) Reading American photographs: images as history-Mathew Brady to Walker Evans. Hill and Wang, New York
Tronto J (1993) Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, London
Van Dijck J (2008) Digital photography: communication, identity, Memory. Vis Commun 71(1):57–76
Van House NA (2011) Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Vis Stud 26(2):125–134
Vannini P, Stewart LM (2017) The GoPro gaze. Cult Geogr 24(1):149–155
Watson C, Barnabas S, Tomaselli K (2016) Smaller lens, bigger picture: exploring self-generated cellphilms in participatory research. In: MacEntee K, Burkholder C, Schwab-Cartas J (eds) What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism. Sense publishers, Rotterdam
Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clark A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E (2008) Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, Southampton, National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 19
Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinson J, Heath S (2012) Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(1):41–53
Williams M, Burnapp P, Sloan L (2017) Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation. Sociology 51(6):1149–1168
Wood E (2015) Ethics, voices and visual methods. In: Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (eds) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Yang KH (2015) Voice, authenticity and ethical challenges: the participatory dissemination of youth-generated visual data over social media. Vis Stud 30(3):309–318
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lomax, H. (2020). Consuming Images, Ethics, and Integrity in Visual Social Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16758-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16759-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities