Abstract
The pediatric electrocardiogram is the cornerstone of evaluation for all arrhythmia conditions and acute arrhythmia analysis and treatment. In the presence of an arrhythmia, additional modalities are available for capturing a paroxysmal rhythm disorder. The interpretation of the electrocardiogram is dependent on understanding the evolution of the electrocardiogram as the child ages. Electrocardiographic abnormalities that occur in children include Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, supraventricular tachycardia, complete heart block, junctional ectopic tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, and myocardial ischemic changes in patients with anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. The indications for invasive intracardiac electrophysiology studies include the risk assessment of patients with ventricular or supraventricular tachycardia, the assessment of anti-arrhythmia drug efficacy, and the evaluation of unexplained syncope.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- ALCAPA
- Anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery
- Arrhythmias
- Atrial fibrillation
- Atrial flutter
- Atrial wire ECG
- Brugada syndrome
- Cardiac testing
- Complete heart block
- ECG
- Electrocardiography
- Event monitor
- Holter monitor
- Implantable loop monitor
- Invasive electrophysiology
- Junctional ectopic tachycardia
- Long QT syndrome
- Loop monitor
- Myocardial ischemia
- Paroxysmal rhythm disorder
- Supraventricular tachycardia
- Syncope
- Telemetry
- Ventricular tachycardia
- Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Basics of Electrocardiography and Invasive Electrophysiology
Evaluation of the electrophysiology of pediatric cardiac patients is an integral part of the complete evaluation of any heart problem. Though supplanted by imaging modalities such as angiography, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of cardiac anatomy in the pediatric patient, the basic 12- or 15-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) remains the cornerstone of evaluation for all arrhythmia conditions and acute arrhythmia analysis and treatment. Though stated over 50 years ago, Nadas’ comments regarding the ECG’s central role as part of the “tripod” upon which rests clinical diagnosis in pediatric cardiology remain as true today as then [1].
Based upon the work of many prior investigators, Einthoven described the first string galvanometer which is commonly viewed as the true predecessor of the modern day ECG machine [2]. Improvements in electrocardiographic recording technology have allowed for miniaturization of the recording device. This has allowed for ECG recording in various hospital and out-of-hospital settings. The various forms of electrocardiographic recording include the basic ECG, 24-h ambulatory ECG recording (“Holter” monitoring), “event” recorders of various types, and, finally, telemetry [3–5].
By allowing for multiple (limb and parasternal) leads of simultaneous electrocardiographic recording, the ECG allows the clinician the ability to view both electrical depolarization and repolarization of the heart from various angles. The multiple angles of “electrical visualization” allow for various determinations such as rhythm assessment, hypertrophy, and axis determination of both the atria and ventricles as well as allow for greater accuracy when diagnosing arrhythmia conditions such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), long QT syndrome, or Brugada syndrome, to name but a few. There are many conditions or clinical situations in which there is simply no noninvasive or invasive substitute for the basic ECG in assessing the heart.
However, because of the ephemeral or intermittent nature of various cardiovascular arrhythmias or symptoms, the basic 12- or 15-lead ECG is, at times, simply impractical for the capture of various different arrhythmia conditions. For this reason, electrocardiographic surrogates have arisen. These typically provide between one and three leads of the ECG with the thought that capturing even a single lead of ECG during an intermittent event is superior to no tracing. There are an increasing number of these devices and they will be briefly described below (Table 20.1).
Holter Monitor
The simplest such device is the 24- or 48-h ambulatory ECG, or “Holter monitor” [6]. This device can typically record up to 3 leads of the basic ECG for 1 or 2 days continuously. The device will also allow for heart rate variability analysis [7–11]. For patients in whom there are daily symptoms, this form of monitoring is useful for capturing frequent sensations or arrhythmias [12, 13]. Typically, patients are given a “diary” which is usually a single sheet of paper on which daily activities and symptoms can be recorded and then double checked with the timed electrocardiographic tracings. Because it is continuously recording the entire time period, the onset and offset of arrhythmias can often be documented which can, in certain situations, be useful in determining arrhythmia mechanism.
Event Monitor
When symptoms are less frequent than daily, there are a virtual plethora of options for the cardiologist to use to try capture the event electrocardiographically. [14–19] The first of these is the so-called event recorder. These devices, which can be as small as a typical credit card, allow for the recording of any arrhythmia or sensation by placing the device directly to the chest and then pressing a button to record. The devices typically can record a few episodes of 30–60 s duration. Once recorded, the device can then be taken to a telephone, and the recording downloaded to a “central station” where the ECG tracing is generated. The main advantage of this form of recording is ease of use. The device is not affixed to the patient continuously and only needs to be applied at the time of symptoms. There are, however, several disadvantages of such a device. It is often challenging for the patient to carry the device continuously for 3–4 weeks, and when symptoms are very brief, such a device may not be practical to capture an episode, even if the device is immediately adjacent to the patient. These devices can also only record a single ECG lead, thus limiting the interpretation of the tracing compared to a typical 12-lead or 15-lead ECG.
Loop Monitor
The “loop recorder” was designed to address some of the disadvantages of the event recorder [20, 21]. This device is similar to the event recorder, but the patient typically wears ECG electrodes that are attached via cables to the device that is worn 24 h per day for a 3–4-week period. The device continuously records a period of time (typically 1–3 min of “looping”) and also continuously erases this period of recording with new recording. When the patient has the sensation for which the recording is performed, a button can be pressed which will typically command the device to record the prior 30 or 45 s as well as the subsequent 30 or 45 s. This recording can then be sent, in similar fashion to the event recorder, over the phone, to a “central station” for conversion to an ECG tracing. Two newer variations of the loop recorder have become more common. So-called “automated” recorders can be programmed to work similarly to the “loop recorder” with the primary difference being that the device will also automatically record anything that it believes is an arrhythmia, typically using algorithms that are based upon heart rate ranges [22]. Thus, this sort of recorder will automatically record any pre-programmed activity that may represent an arrhythmia while also allowing the patient to override the system and record any symptoms that they may be feeling. This feature is particularly useful in young or incapacitated patients that are unable to press the button or for complaints such as syncope where the patient may be unable to press the button during an episode. Finally, newer technology allows for the device to automatically send the data to a central station using cell phone technology without the need for uploading by the patient.
Ambulatory Telemetry
More recently, with the advent of cellular phone technology, a newer technology that is often referred to as “ambulatory telemetry” allows for complete and total recording of a patient’s heart rhythm with near “full disclosure” [23–26]. This allows the cardiologist to view not only device- and patient-commanded arrhythmias but the entire daily rhythm as well as rhythm and heart rate trends in similar fashion to a 24-h ambulatory “Holter” device, though for multiple days. There are some data to suggest that this form of arrhythmia monitoring may be superior in rhythm sensitivity for various different arrhythmia conditions [25, 26].
Implantable Loop Monitor
The final form of ambulatory monitoring is the so-called implantable loop recorder/ILR [27–32]. This device, which is a few inches in size, can be implanted beneath the skin in the left parasternal area in a minor surgical procedure. The device allows for single ECG lead recordings and can record data that can then be downloaded either in the physician office or over the telephone/Internet. The device can automatically record either bradycardias or tachycardias as defined by the physician and can also be patient activated. The indications for their usage are largely the same as for any of the ambulatory systems previously discussed above with the main advantage being that they require essentially no patient cooperation. As a general rule, these are best reserved for patients in whom the above modes of monitoring have failed or in patients who are highly noncompliant [33].
Atrial Wire Postoperative Studies
Following open heart surgery, any sort of arrhythmia may be potentially hemodynamically embarrassing. As a result, rapid and accurate diagnosis followed by treatment is imperative in the postoperative setting. The most important “test” for assessing postoperative arrhythmias is undoubtedly the 12- or 15-lead ECG as described above. However, there are situations in which it is challenging to accurately assess the relationship of atrial to ventricular depolarizations on the surface ECG alone. For this reason, atrial wire studies are often conducted, in addition to the 12-lead ECG, to help the clinician better assess this relationship and therefore better understand the nature of the arrhythmia.
At the time of surgery, it is common for a congenital heart surgeon to place one or two wires on the surface of the atrium and ventricle [34]. As these are directly touching the atrial myocardium, intracardiac recordings can be made at the bedside. Typically, a precordial lead (e.g., V1–V6) is used in addition to the standard limb leads. The precordial lead is usually attached to the metal atrial lead using an “alligator clip,” resulting in a large atrial electrogram deflection on the ECG. By running the standard surface leads simultaneously, the relationship of the atrial depolarization to ventricular depolarization (as inscribed by the surface QRS) can be easily determined. Examples of rhythms in which atrial wire tracings can be useful would be JET or ventricular tachycardia in which the ventricular rate often exceeds the atrial rate. Incorporation of an atrial electrogram tracing in concert with the surface ECG (plus the response to pacing of the atrium or ventricle) is often all that is necessary to make accurate postoperative rhythm determinations.
Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram in Children
The basic approach to reading a pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) should be systematic and consistent. There is no one “right way,” but a methodical approach should be used in order to avoid missing any abnormalities. We would advocate a “12-step” approach with attention to the following details and findings (Table 20.2). There are published tables on the normal pediatric ECG values for heart rate, PR intervals, QRS axis, etc. based on patient age (Fig. 20.1), but perhaps the most important consideration in reading an ECG in a pediatric patient is the understanding of the evolution of the ECG from infancy to adulthood [35–38].
The Evolution of the Electrocardiogram Throughout Childhood
The 15-lead ECG changes significantly throughout childhood. [35–38] Caregivers therefore cannot interpret the electrocardiogram of a pediatric patient without knowing the age of the patient. Understanding the changes seen on ECG throughout childhood is best done by understanding the evolution of cardiac physiology from fetus to adulthood, as the changes in the ECG reflect the changing physiology from the fetus, to the newborn, to the young child, and to the adult. The ECG thus evolves from primarily prominent right ventricular (RV) forces in the newborn period to primarily left ventricular (LV) dominant forces seen in late adolescence and adulthood. In the fetus, the right ventricle is the primary output for systemic blood flow, pumping roughly 65 % of the cardiac output to the body as the pulmonary resistance is elevated and blood flows from right to left through the patent ductus arteriosus [39]. This is reflected in the electrocardiogram of the newborn with prominent RV forces and a rightward QRS axis. As pulmonary resistances drop over the first few weeks of life, the RV forces on the ECG gradually diminish and this continues over the first few years of life. Left ventricular dominance predominates in later childhood and adolescence, ultimately taking the form of the typical adult ECG. The changes on the ECG during childhood are thus reflected in the QRS axis, the T wave patterns, and the prominence of RV and LV forces as illustrated below. In addition, the “normal” values for heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QTc interval, and amplitudes of the R and S waves in the right and anterolateral precordial leads also change with age.
Newborn
The ECG in the newborn reflects the importance of the RV in fetal life and shows prominent RV forces (Fig. 20.2). The QRS axis is usually rightward, between 30 and 180°. The prominent RV forces are demonstrated by tall R waves noted in V1 and the right precordial leads, V3R and V4R, with a relatively small S wave. The T waves are usually upright in V1, V3R, and V4R. In V6 there is often a small R wave with a more prominent S wave. The notable exception to this typical newborn ECG is in the ECG of a premature infant. The pulmonary vascular resistance of the neonate is typical lower than a full-term neonate, and the premature infant does not demonstrate the prominence of RV forces that are usually seen in the typical full-term newborn. The ECG of the premature neonate is perhaps more similar to that of an adolescent or adult pattern, with a more leftward QRS axis, minimal RV forces, and prominent LV forces.
Two Weeks
By 2 weeks of age, pulmonary vascular resistance has usually diminished and the RV pressures have started to decrease. This is reflected on the ECG with a change in the T wave morphology in V1, V3R, and V4R (Fig. 20.3). While upright in the newborn, the T wave now becomes inverted in V1, V3R, and V4R. This T wave pattern, with inversion in V1/V3R/V4R, should persist throughout childhood into late adolescence. If the T wave were to remain upright in the newborn after 2 weeks of age, it would indicate possible right ventricular hypertrophy or RV hypertension.
One Year of Age
By 1 year of age, the RV forces are beginning to diminish with more prominent LV forces noted (Fig. 20.4). The QRS axis is usually slightly less rightward. The T waves remain inverted in V1/V3R/V4R. There is usually slightly more LV forces, with a slightly smaller R wave and slightly larger S wave in V1 and usually less S wave in V6.
Four Years of Age
By 4 years of age, the QRS axis has usually normalized (between 0 and 110°). There is again less RV prominence in the right precordial leads, with a more balanced R/S ratio in V1 (Fig. 20.5). The T wave in V1 has remained inverted. There should be little to no S wave in V6 with a predominant R wave in V6.
Note that the predominant change compared to the 1-year-old ECG is the more balanced R/S ratio in V1.
Twelve Years of Age
The ECG in a 12-year-old is similar to the adult, with the exception of the immature (“infantile”) T wave pattern that is usually still present in V1, V3R, and V4R. The QRS axis should be predominantly leftward (between −15 and 110°). There is usually a small R wave and deep S wave with good R wave progression from a prominent S wave in V1 to a pure R wave in V6. The T waves are usually still inverted in V1 with upright T waves in V5/V6 (Fig. 20.6).
Late Adolescence: 18 Years of Age
By late adolescence the ECG takes the pattern of the normal adult (Fig. 20.7). The QRS axis is usually normal (−15 to 110°). The T wave now becomes upright in the right precordial leads though may remain inverted in V1. There is usually only a small R wave in V1 with a small S wave. Through the precordial leads there is progression from a deep S wave in V1 to a pure R wave in V6, so-called good R wave progression.
“Top 10” ECG Abnormalities
Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW), or ventricular preexcitation, was first described in 1914 with the combined findings of a short PR interval, slurring of the initial upstroke of the QRS complex (delta wave), and a wide QRS associated with paroxysmal tachycardia (Fig. 20.8) [40]. The initial authors did not recognize that the etiology of WPW was the presence of an accessory pathway or extra electrical connection in the heart connecting the atrium and ventricle.
WPW occurs in approximately 0.1 % of the population and is slightly more common in males [41]. The main clinical problem in patients with WPW is the occurrence of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), primarily AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT). The most common form of SVT in patients with WPW is typically orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (ORT), with antegrade conduction down the AV node and retrograde conduction via the accessory pathway leading to a narrow complex tachycardia. A rarer form of tachycardia in patients with WPW is antidromic reciprocating tachycardia (ART), with antegrade conduction down the accessory pathway and retrograde conduction through the AV node causing a wide complex tachycardia. Both types of SVT can be terminated with vagal maneuvers, administration of IV adenosine, or anti-arrhythmic medications. Current treatment options for patients with WPW include the use of vagal maneuvers to terminate paroxysmal tachycardia, use of chronic anti-arrhythmic medications to prevent episodes of tachycardia, or invasive electrophysiology (EP) testing and ablation of the accessory pathway to permanently destroy the accessory pathway and cure patients of their condition. Ablation is a catheterization procedure performed via access in the femoral and occasionally internal jugular veins with a low risk of complications (1 % of less) and high success rate (88–97 %) [42].
In addition to the risk of developing SVT, patients with WPW have a small risk of sudden cardiac death, estimated to be 0.015 per patient year, or 0.1 % annual risk [41, 43]. Sudden death is believed to be secondary to atrial fibrillation with rapid conduction via the accessory pathway leading to ventricular fibrillation [44, 45]. Invasive EP testing can help determine if a patient with WPW is at higher risk of sudden death. During testing atrial fibrillation is induced, and if the accessory pathway can conduct faster than 250 ms, this would place a patient in a higher-risk group [44]. Recent guidelines recommend exercise stress testing in patients over 8 years of age, and if there is no loss of ventricular preexcitation during the exercise test, invasive EP testing should be considered to determine if the accessory pathway was a “high-risk” pathway, with consideration of ablation in those high-risk patients or those with inducible SVT [12].
Complete Heart Block
Complete heart block (CHB), or third-degree AV block, is the failure of any atrial electrical impulses to be conducted to the ventricles (Fig. 20.9). While the SA node continues to fire regularly, there is no atrioventricular conduction with the result of an atrial rate that typically exceeds the ventricular rate. Patients may be able to maintain cardiac output and systemic blood flow via escape rhythms from within the His-Purkinje system, resulting in a narrow complex escape rhythm, or from within the ventricles, resulting in a wide complex escape rhythm [46].
In children, the most common etiology of CHB is secondary to damage to the AV node and conduction system during surgery for repair or palliation of congenital heart disease (postsurgical CHB) [47]. Other forms of congenital heart disease also have a risk of patients developing heart block, such as heterotaxy syndrome and congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels (L-TGA), which carries a 1–2 % annual risk or roughly 30 % lifetime risk of developing CHB [48, 49]. Additional acquired causes include infectious diseases such as Lyme disease and other forms of myocarditis, infiltrative diseases such as Hunter’s or Hurler’s syndromes, thyroid dysfunction, and cardiomyopathies [50–52]. In neonates, the most common cause of CHB is congenital AV block secondary to maternal lupus. Maternal anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies cross the placenta and lead to damage of the conduction system in utero [53, 54].
Treatment of AV block depends on the heart rate, associated factors (such as presence of congenital heart disease), and escape rhythm. In older patients (teenagers and adults), treatment is placement of a permanent pacemaker. In those with postoperative CHB, a period of waiting of 7–10 days should be observed prior to placement of a permanent pacemaker, as roughly 65 % of patients can recover atrioventricular conduction during this time [46, 55]. In neonates and young children, in the presence of a narrow complex escape rhythm and an adequate heart rate (>55 bpm), placement of a permanent pacemaker can often be delayed until the early teenage years, when the risk of syncope and sudden cardiac death increase.
Junctional Ectopic Tachycardia
Junctional ectopic tachycardia, commonly referred to as JET, is a tachycardia arising from the AV node or His-Purkinje system (Fig. 20.10) [56, 57]. The rhythm is characterized by a QRS complex that is identical to that seen in sinus rhythm, and there is a ventricular rate that is faster than the atrial rate (though in children with preserved AV nodal conduction properties there can be 1:1 retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction).
JET most commonly occurs in children following open heart surgery for congenital heart disease [56–58]. It can cause hemodynamic embarrassment with associated acidosis and poor urine output. Cardiac lesions more commonly associated with JET include ventricular septal defects (VSD), tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), atrioventricular canal repair (AVC), and other lesions that can lead to postsurgical trauma and edema to the His-Purkinje system [56–58].
JET is usually a self-limited disorder in the postoperative period and resolves after 48–72 h. Acute treatment usually involves sedation and pain control, careful cooling and temperature control, electrolyte repletion, minimizing exogenous catecholamines (including IV dopamine, epinephrine, and others), and atrial pacing at a rate faster than the JET rate to improve hemodynamics by providing AV synchrony [59, 60]. Failure of these techniques to resolve or control JET can then lead to treatment with an anti-arrhythmic medication such as IV procainamide or IV amiodarone [61–63].
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a wide complex tachycardia arising from the ventricles (Fig. 20.11). Electrocardiographic clues to the diagnosis of VT include AV dissociation, a superior QRS axis, fusion beats, and a markedly wide QRS complex (>140 to 160 ms). Though the differential diagnosis for a wide complex tachycardia include ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia with aberration, antidromic tachycardia (in a patient with WPW), a paced rhythm, and sinus tachycardia with electrolyte abnormalities or an underlying bundle branch block, it is generally recommended to presume that a wide complex rhythm is ventricular tachycardia until proven otherwise.
Treatment of VT depends in large part to the hemodynamic status of the patient. The hemodynamically stable patient can be given IV lidocaine, procainamide, or amiodarone. The VT could also be terminated with synchronized cardioversion using 2–4 J/kg. The hemodynamically embarrassed patient would require urgent cardioversion.
Supraventricular Tachycardia
Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a regular, narrow complex tachycardia (Fig. 20.12) [64]. The most common cause of SVT in neonates and young children is AVRT mediated by an accessory pathway [64, 65]. In adolescence, the etiology begins to shift to the more common adult form of SVT, AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) [65]. If the electrocardiogram is carefully scrutinized, and it can sometimes clue the reader into the diagnosis. In AVRT, there are often retrograde P waves, while in AVNRT the VA time in tachycardia is usually less than 70 ms and there are no discernible retrograde P waves [66]. SVT can often be distinguished from sinus tachycardia by the fixed rate, absence of discernible P waves or P waves with an abnormal axis, and rapid rate greater than 220 bpm. It is not uncommon for SVT rates in neonates to exceed 280–300 bpm.
Acute treatment of hemodynamically stable SVT involves the use of vagal maneuvers, such as ice to the face in neonates, exhalation against a closed glottis, or forcible exhalation. Rapid administration of IV adenosine (0.1 mg/kg) through a large bore IV that is as close to the heart as possible with a 3-way stopcock and a large flush will often terminate SVT [67]. Other anti-arrhythmic options include calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, digoxin, procainamide, or Class III agents (amiodarone or sotalol) [68–70]. Anti-arrhythmic failure or hemodynamic instability should prompt synchronized cardioversion with 0.5–1 J per kilogram. Long-term treatment can involve one of three different treatment strategies: (1) use of vagal maneuvers to terminate tachycardia, (2) use of medications (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, flecainide, or sotalol) to prevent episodes of tachycardia, or (3) EP study and ablation to prevent any future episodes of SVT [70].
Atrial Flutter
Atrial flutter, or intra-atrial reentry tachycardia (IART), is caused by areas of slowed conduction in the atria leading to a reentrant loop or propagation of atrial activation. The ECG typically demonstrates a sawtooth, regular pattern of atrial activation with an atrial rate of 200–400 beats per minute with constant or variable ventricular activation (Fig. 20.13). Atrial flutter is rare in children, though more common in those patients with repaired or palliated congenital heart disease, especially single-ventricle patients after Fontan palliation and patients who have undergone atrial switch procedures for transposition of the great vessels (e.g., Mustard or Senning procedures) [71–74].
Treatment of atrial flutter often depends on the patient presentation and the duration of the tachycardia. Atrial reentry for periods of greater than 24–48 h can be associated with the risk of development of an atrial thrombus and possible stroke. Patients with tachycardia that has clearly been present for less than 24–48 h have a low risk of thrombus formation and stroke and can undergo synchronized cardioversion with 0.5–1 J per kilogram [75]. Medical cardioversion with anti-arrhythmic agents such as Class IC agents (flecainide) or amiodarone could also be attempted [76]. With an unknown duration of tachycardia or tachycardia present for longer than 48 h, treatment options include performing a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to rule out an atrial thrombus followed by immediate synchronized cardioversion or alternatively rate control with beta-blockers, digoxin, and/or calcium channel blockers, anticoagulation, and cardioversion in 6 weeks. Long-term treatment could involve anti-arrhythmic medications or possible curative treatment via catheter or surgical ablation.
Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common arrhythmia seen in adults, but is rare in the pediatric population. AFib is characterized by rapid and disorganized atrial activation with no clear, regular discernible P waves and an irregularly irregular QRS response (Fig. 20.14). In children, AFib is more commonly seen in patients with underlying congenital heart disease or a cardiomyopathy, though can rarely occur in children with structurally normal hearts, a condition known as lone AFib [77]. The management and treatment is similar to that of atrial flutter.
Long QT Syndrome
Long QT syndrome is a cardiac channelopathy leading to abnormal ventricular repolarization and ECG findings of prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc). These patients are at increased risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias (e.g., torsades de pointes). In general a QTc greater than 450–460 ms is considered abnormal (Fig. 20.15). Additional ECG findings that can help in the diagnosis of long QT syndrome include T wave abnormalities (e.g., tall or peaked T waves, bifid T waves, long ST segments with late T wave development), bradycardia, and T wave alternans. A prolongation of the QTc on ECG can be caused by a true channelopathy or via an acquired cause, such as medications or electrolyte disturbance.
The clinical presentation in children and adolescents with long QT can vary from syncope and seizures to sudden cardiac death. Treatment usually entails use of a beta-blocker which has been demonstrated to decrease the risk of sudden cardiac death, avoidance of medications that prolong the QTc, and possible placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) [78, 79]. Specific genotype and long QT subtype therapy may include exercise restriction, avoidance of specific triggers, anti-arrhythmic therapy (Na channel blockers), and stellate ganglionectomy [80, 81].
Brugada Syndrome
Brugada syndrome was first described as a finding in patients surviving cardiac arrest in the late 1980s and early 1990s [82, 83]. The ECG findings in Brugada syndrome involve ST elevation in V1 through V3 with an RSR or RBBB pattern (Fig. 20.16). The syndrome is a heritable channelopathy that can lead to sudden death and most commonly occurring during sleep. The syndrome is one of the most common causes of sudden death in Southeast Asian populations.
Treatment options are limited in patients with Brugada syndrome. Avoidance of fever is a mainstay of treatment, as fever may precipitate malignant ventricular arrhythmias. ICDs may be indicated in certain patients to prevent sudden cardiac death from ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Anomalous Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery
An anomalous left coronary artery arising from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) is a rare congenital anomaly [84]. As pulmonary resistance falls over the first several weeks of life, there is a steal phenomenon whereby coronary blood flow preferentially flows away from ventricular myocardium to the pulmonary artery, leading to myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction [84]. Affected infants often present in the first 4–6 weeks of life with irritability, sweating or tachypnea, and with feeding and respiratory difficulties. The ECG in these infants often reflects a pattern consistent with an infarct of the left ventricle with deep Q waves in the lateral leads (I and AVL), diffuse ST/T wave changes, and LV enlargement (Fig. 20.17) [85]. Infants with ALCAPA require surgical repair, and the poor ventricular function, LV enlargement, and mitral regurgitation that frequently occur as a result of the LV infarct usually resolve over a period of months to years [86–89].
Basic Notions of Electrophysiology: Intracardiac Electrophysiology
Introduction
Though once viewed as an investigational pediatric procedure reserved either for research purposes or evaluation of arrhythmias that were not decipherable using noninvasive methods, the intracardiac electrophysiology study (EPS) has developed in the past two decades into a commonly performed study for both diagnostic and interventional purposes. [65, 90, 91] The rise of the EPS has been closely linked to the increasing ubiquity of catheter ablation, which has now become the treatment of choice for the management or cure of serious arrhythmias in children and adults [92–94]. When used in concert with noninvasive assessment techniques, it is rare that a patient’s arrhythmia mechanism cannot be fully elucidated by the pediatric electrophysiologist, thus leading to more properly tailored arrhythmia therapies.
Indications
The intracardiac EPS has evolved from a procedure that was initially exclusively diagnostic in nature to one that is more commonly used for therapeutic purposes. With the advent of catheter ablation and the comprehensive array of noninvasive electrophysiologic monitors, it is increasingly uncommon for EPS to be performed for exclusively diagnostic purposes. However, despite this trend, the EPS is perhaps still the best means of providing certain diagnostic electrophysiologic data to the clinician. The most common diagnostic indications for EPS are shown in Table 20.3.
As the diagnostic indications for EPS have receded over the recent two decades, the therapeutic indications have widened and broadened. The reason for this is that the types of arrhythmias amenable to transcatheter ablation have grown and the general safety of ablation for the pediatric patient has improved for children of increasingly younger age. [95, 96] Though once viewed as a procedure for only the most recalcitrant or dangerous of arrhythmias, ablation has now become, for many common pediatric arrhythmia substrates, the treatment of choice. Indications for ablation in children are listed in Table 20.4.
Technical Aspects
Invasive EP procedures are typically performed in a cardiac catheterization laboratory and, in children, are usually performed with sedation or general anesthesia. Patients must be properly assessed prior to catheterization in order to evaluate suitability for an invasive procedure including anesthesia. This assessment must include a complete history and physical examination to rule out noncardiac conditions that might increase the risk of any invasive procedure. Unless an EP study is planned to test anti-arrhythmic drug efficacy, anti-arrhythmic drugs should be discontinued at least 5 half-lives prior to the procedure. Those patients with life-threatening arrhythmias may require hospitalization prior to ablation when anti-arrhythmic therapies are discontinued temporarily.
Assessment of the patient undergoing electrophysiologic study must be made by the anesthesiologist providing sedation prior to the procedure. Careful choice of anesthetic technique is imperative as certain agents are either pro-arrhythmic or may potentially reduce arrhythmia inducibility [92, 97, 98]. Additionally, it is often useful to have copies of a patient’s resting surface ECG as well as tachycardia tracings in the laboratory in order to have them as a means of comparison during the procedure.
Once in the catheterization laboratory, extensive monitoring and safety precautions are taken. Radiolucent defibrillation pads are affixed prior to catheterization to allow for rapid cardioversion or defibrillation. Blood pressure monitoring, oxygen saturation monitoring, and full 12-lead ECG monitoring are standard for these procedures. Some laboratories will monitor blood pressure continuously with placement of a small catheter either centrally (e.g., femoral artery) or peripherally (e.g., radial artery).
Proper laboratory staffing is essential to ensure patient safety during EP testing and ablation. Typically, most laboratories will have a trained electrophysiology nurse as well as laboratory technologist in addition to one or two electrophysiologists. Many laboratories prefer having 2 electrophysiologists with one operator at the table moving catheters and the other analyzing signals as well as conducting pacing maneuvers. As already noted, proper anesthesiology personnel who are knowledgeable about the management of cardiovascular arrhythmias are preferred.
After induction of anesthesia, catheters are typically placed using modified Seldinger technique in the femoral veins as well as the internal jugular or subclavian vein. The number of diagnostic catheters used can vary depending upon the type of invasive electrophysiologic study planned. For diagnostic studies, the operator typically uses one or two catheters which can be positioned in different locales in the heart during the procedure. For ablation procedures, it is routine to place between 4 and 5 multipole electrical catheters in the heart. The catheters are typically advanced to the heart and placed in standard locations. These include the right atrium, right ventricular apex, HIS position, and coronary sinus. The final catheter is usually the ablation catheter (Fig. 20.18). Fluoroscopy is most commonly used to position catheters in the heart during EP study and ablation. Recently, use of adjuncts such as three-dimensional mapping systems and intravascular echocardiography has been advocated by some groups to the reduce radiation dose associated with these procedures [99]. Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems (e.g., CARTO Biosense Webster) are also useful when mapping complex arrhythmias such as atrial reentry or ventricular arrhythmias of any sort.
Central to all electrophysiologic testing is a programmable stimulator and electrophysiologic recording system. Programmable stimulators allow for provocative pacing maneuvers which can be used to induce arrhythmias as well as assess conduction characteristics of the atrium, ventricle, AV node, and accessory pathways. Most such devices should allow for programmable characteristics such as pulse width, current, and cycle length. By convention, most pacing in the heart is performed at two times the diastolic pacing threshold. The electrophysiologic recording system should be capable of recording multiple channels of information simultaneously. These would include the surface ECG as well as electrograms recorded from all of the intracardiac catheters. Optimally, the computer should allow for recording and display of all signals at varying paper speeds from 25 mm/s to 400 mm/s. Standard filtering should allow for filtering of all waveforms below 30 Hz and above 500 Hz in order to properly remove electrical “noise” from recordings.
The final critical device for invasive EP procedures is an ablation generator for either radiofrequency (RF) energy or cryoenergy. Most laboratories have the ability to do either, as RF current and cryoenergy have distinct and separate indications, and these are typically based upon specific patient and arrhythmia characteristics.
Interpretation
Interpretation of complex intracardiac tracings is beyond the scope of this chapter. However, basic concepts are important and relevant. After placing catheters as noted above, baseline resting intracardiac conduction time intervals are recorded. This includes recording of the surface ECG as well. These are often useful in helping make an initial diagnosis of preexcitation as well as providing a baseline as a means of comparison following ablation and catheter manipulation within the heart. The most important two intracardiac measurements are the AH and HV intervals (Fig. 20.19).
The AH interval allows the electrophysiologist to assess AV nodal function and is the measurement from the low right atrial electrogram to the earliest onset of the rapid His deflection in that same electrical pair. As the AV node is electrically silent and as the AV node conducts the electrical impulse from the low right atrium to the bundle of His, the AH interval is used as a surrogate of AV nodal function. A normal AH interval in children is between 50 and 100 ms. It is typically lengthened in patients with AV nodal injury (“first-degree heart block”) and also as a result of certain drugs (e.g., digoxin). The second important intracardiac measurement is the HV interval which measures conduction from the proximal His to ventricular myocardium via the Purkinje system. It is measured from the rapid His deflection to the earliest ventricular activation in any lead on the recording system, including surface or intracardiac. A normal HV interval in children is typically between 30 and 50 ms. HV intervals can be prolonged in patients with conduction disorders such as infiltrative myopathies or in patients who have undergone congenital heart surgery and sustained injury. The interval can be shortened in preexcitation conditions such as WPW.
Assessment of the pattern of conduction (both antegrade and retrograde) can be made in sinus rhythm and with ventricular pacing. When conduction is deemed “concentric,” the conduction proceeds both antegrade and retrograde earliest in the His catheter pairs, suggesting that the conduction is either via the AV node or an accessory pathway located near to the AV node (Fig. 20.20). If, however, the conduction is “eccentric,” the earliest signals can be seen in a location other than the “central” His catheter. If earliest in the coronary sinus pairs, the possibility of a left-sided accessory pathway would be raised. If earliest in the proximal coronary sinus or in a catheter placed on the tricuspid annulus away from the atrial septum, the possibility of a right-sided accessory pathway would be raised (Fig. 20.21).
Once the above measurements and observations have been made, provocative testing is typically conducted. This includes determination of refractory periods of the atrium, AV node, accessory pathways (if present), and ventricle. Additionally, refractory periods of the ventricle, AV node, and accessory pathways (if present) are also routinely measured and recorded.
Following the above maneuvers, mapping of the arrhythmia substrate is performed (Fig. 20.22). Following mapping and ablation, it is routine to test for at least 20–60 min to confirm that the ablation was successful and there are no other mechanisms for tachycardia. If these two criteria have been established, catheters and vascular sheaths are removed and the patient awakened from anesthesia/sedation.
Overview of Therapies
Over the past 25 years, pediatric cardiac electrophysiology has markedly evolved from a predominantly diagnostic specialty to an interventional one. With the advent of catheter ablation, it is now possible to permanently cure most non-channelopathy-induced arrhythmias that previously required lifelong drug therapy. Ablation has become the treatment of choice for most supraventricular arrhythmias in children above the age of 5–8 years, and the technology has even been applied safely and effectively to younger and smaller patients [93, 94, 100–102]. The understanding of channelopathies has blossomed in recent decades, and the possibility for personalized, gene-directed therapies is no longer the stuff of fiction [103, 104]. It is anticipated that continued work in the molecular genetics of channelopathies will continue to yield new therapies aimed at the source of arrhythmias in these patients.
From the perspective of device-based therapy, the technological advances in pacemakers and implantable defibrillators have allowed for expansion of their use in even the smallest patients [105, 106]. Additionally, newer data are helping refine which patients are most appropriate to receive these devices [107, 108]. Newer, less invasive technology is allowing further expansion of device therapy to patients who were not previously considered candidates, but further studies will be needed to demonstrate if this anticipated expansion in therapies will be justified or appropriate [109–111].
References
As N (1957) Electrocardiography. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
Rivera-Ruiz M, Cajavilca C, Varon J (2008) Einthoven’s string galvanometer: the first electrocardiograph. Tex Heart Inst J 35(2):174–178
Brown AP, Dawkins KD, Davies JG (1987) Detection of arrhythmias: use of a patient-activated ambulatory electrocardiogram device with a solid-state memory loop. Br Heart J 58(3):251–253
Reiffel JA, Schulhof E, Joseph B, Severance E, Wyndus P, McNamara A (1991) Optimum duration of transtelephonic ECG monitoring when used for transient symptomatic event detection. J Electrocardiol 24(2):165–168
Holter NJ, Generelli JA (1949) Remote recording of physiological data by radio. Rocky Mt Med J 46(9):747–751
Holter NJ (1980) The development of Holter electrocardiography. Clin Eng 8(6):65–67
Zhou Y, Xie G, Wang J, Yang S (2012) Cardiovascular risk factors significantly correlate with autonomic nervous system activity in children. Can J Cardiol 28(4):477–482
Rodriguez FH, Moodie DS, Neeland M, Adams GJ, Snyder CS (2012) Identifying arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease by 24-h ambulatory electrocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol 33(4):591–595
Silvilairat S, Wongsathikun J, Sittiwangkul R, Pongprot Y, Chattipakorn N (2011) Heart rate variability and exercise capacity of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr Cardiol 32(8):1158–1163
Mauriello DA, Johnson JN, Ackerman MJ (2011) Holter monitoring in the evaluation of congenital long QT syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34(9):1100–1104
Pasquali SK, Marino BS, Kaltman JR et al (2008) Rhythm and conduction disturbances at midterm follow-up after the ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults. Ann Thorac Surg 85(6):2072–2078
Czosek RJ, Anderson J, Khoury PR, Knilans TK, Spar DS, Marino BS (2013) Utility of ambulatory monitoring in patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 111(5):723–730
Rosenberg MA, Samuel M, Thosani A, Zimetbaum PJ (2013) Use of a noninvasive continuous monitoring device in the management of atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36(3):328–333
Saarel EV, Stefanelli CB, Fischbach PS, Serwer GA, Rosenthal A, Dick M 2nd (2004) Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitors for evaluation of children and adolescents with suspected arrhythmias. Pediatrics 113(2):248–251
Houyel L, Fournier A, Centazzo S, Davignon A (1992) Use of transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring in children with suspected arrhythmias. Can J Cardiol 8(7):741–744
Fyfe DA, Holmes DR Jr, Neubauer SA, Feldt RH (1984) Transtelephonic monitoring in pediatric patients with clinically suspected arrhythmias. Clin Pediatr 23(3):139–143
Goldstein MA, Hesslein P, Dunnigan A (1990) Efficacy of transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring in pediatric patients. Am J Dis Child 144(2):178–182
Kinlay S, Leitch JW, Neil A, Chapman BL, Hardy DB, Fletcher PJ (1996) Cardiac event recorders yield more diagnoses and are more cost-effective than 48-h Holter monitoring in patients with palpitations. A controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 124(1 Pt 1):16–20
Celiker A, Tokel K, Medikoglu M, Ozme S (1997) Transtelephonic ECG versus electrophysiologic study in children with recurrent palpitation attacks. Turk J Pediatr 39(1):45–50
Rajagopalan K, Potts JE, Sanatani S (2006) Minimally invasive approach to the child with palpitations. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 4(5):681–693
Schuchert A, Maas R, Kretzschmar C, Behrens G, Kratzmann I, Meinertz T (2003) Diagnostic yield of external electrocardiographic loop recorders in patients with recurrent syncope and negative tilt table test. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26(9):1837–1840
Reiffel JA, Schwarzberg R, Murry M (2005) Comparison of autotriggered memory loop recorders versus standard loop recorders versus 24-h Holter monitors for arrhythmia detection. Am J Cardiol 95(9):1055–1059
Piumelli R, Nassi N, Liccioli G, Ernst CM, Donzelli G (2012) Telemonitoring for infants at risk of apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia: transmission of data improves the family compliance during home monitoring. J Telemed Telecare 18(6):344–347
Doliwa PS, Rosenqvist M, Frykman V (2012) Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with silent episodes: intermittent versus continuous monitoring. Scand Cardiovasc J 46(3):144–148
Mittal S, Movsowitz C, Steinberg JS (2011) Ambulatory external electrocardiographic monitoring: focus on atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(17):1741–1749
Rothman SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J et al (2007) The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comparing mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18(3):241–247
Brignole M, Bellardine Black CL, Thomsen PE et al (2008) Improved arrhythmia detection in implantable loop recorders. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 19(9):928–934
Al Dhahri KN, Potts JE, Chiu CC, Hamilton RM, Sanatani S (2009) Are implantable loop recorders useful in detecting arrhythmias in children with unexplained syncope? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(11):1422–1427
Rossano J, Bloemers B, Sreeram N, Balaji S, Shah MJ (2003) Efficacy of implantable loop recorders in establishing symptom-rhythm correlation in young patients with syncope and palpitations. Pediatrics 112(3 Pt 1):e228–e233
Frangini PA, Cecchin F, Jordao L et al (2008) How revealing are insertable loop recorders in pediatrics? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 31(3):338–343
Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Skanes AC, Yee R (2003) Use of the implantable loop recorder in evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14(Suppl 9):S70–S73
Yeung B, McLeod K (2008) The implantable loop recorder in children. Heart 94(7):888–891
Pass RH, Liberman L (2008) The implantable loop recorder in children: searching for indications. Heart 94(7):832–833
Ceresnak SR, Pass RH, Starc TJ et al (2011) Predictors for hemodynamic improvement with temporary pacing after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(1):183–187
Park MKG, Warren G (2006) How to read pediatric ECGs, 4th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia
Davigno A (1980) ECG standards for children. Pediatr Cardiol 1(2):133–152
Davignon ARP, Boisselle E, Soumis F, Mégélas M, Choquette A (1980) Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol 1(2):123–131
Tschudy MMA, Kristin M (2012) The Harriet lane handbook: a manual for pediatric house officers, Nineteenthth edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Rudolph AM (2009) Congenital diseases of the heart: clinical-physiological considerations, Thirdth edn. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex
Wolff L, Parkinson J, White PD (1930) Bundle-branch block with short P-R interval in healthy young people prone to paroxysmal tachycardia. Am Heart J 5(6):685–704
Munger TM, Packer DL, Hammill SC et al (1993) A population study of the natural history of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1953–1989. Circulation 87(3):866–873
Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D et al (2004) Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15(7):759–770
Klein GJ, Prystowsky EN, Yee R, Sharma AD, Laupacis A (1989) Asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White. Should we intervene? Circulation 80(6):1902–1905
Klein GJ, Bashore TM, Sellers TD, Pritchett EL, Smith WM, Gallagher JJ (1979) Ventricular fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. N Engl J Med 301(20):1080–1085
Montoya PT, Brugada P, Smeets J et al (1991) Ventricular fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Eur Heart J 12(2):144–150
Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D et al (2013) 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(3):e6–e75
Anderson JB, Czosek RJ, Knilans TK, Meganathan K, Heaton P (2012) Postoperative heart block in children with common forms of congenital heart disease: results from the KID database. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 23(12):1349–1354
Friedberg DZ, Nadas AS (1970) Clinical profile of patients with congenital corrected transposition of the great arteries. A study of 60 cases. N Engl J Med 282(19):1053–1059
Daliento L, Corrado D, Buja G, John N, Nava A, Thiene G (1986) Rhythm and conduction disturbances in isolated, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 58(3):314–318
Batra AS, Epstein D, Silka MJ (2003) The clinical course of acquired complete heart block in children with acute myocarditis. Pediatr Cardiol 24(5):495–497
Costello JM, Alexander ME, Greco KM, Perez-Atayde AR, Laussen PC (2009) Lyme carditis in children: presentation, predictive factors, and clinical course. Pediatrics 123(5):e835–e841
Ozcan KS, Osmonov D, Erdinler I et al (2012) Atrioventricular block in patients with thyroid dysfunction: prognosis after treatment with hormone supplementation or antithyroid medication. J Cardiol 60(4):327–332
Askanase AD, Friedman DM, Copel J et al (2002) Spectrum and progression of conduction abnormalities in infants born to mothers with anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies. Lupus 11(3):145–151
Dorner T, Chaoui R, Feist E, Goldner B, Yamamoto K, Hiepe F (1995) Significantly increased maternal and fetal IgG autoantibody levels to 52 kD Ro (SS-A) and La(SS-B) in complete congenital heart block. J Autoimmun 8(5):675–684
Weindling SN, Saul JP, Gamble WJ, Mayer JE, Wessel D, Walsh EP (1998) Duration of complete atrioventricular block after congenital heart disease surgery. Am J Cardiol 82(4):525–527
Andreasen JB, Johnsen SP, Ravn HB (2008) Junctional ectopic tachycardia after surgery for congenital heart disease in children. Intensive Care Med 34(5):895–902
Mildh L, Hiippala A, Rautiainen P, Pettila V, Sairanen H, Happonen J-M (2011) Junctional ectopic tachycardia after surgery for congenital heart disease: incidence, risk factors and outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39(1):75–80
Hoffman TM, Bush DM, Wernovsky G et al (2002) Postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia in children: incidence, risk factors, and treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 74(5):1607–1611
Walsh EP, Saul JP, Sholler GF et al (1997) Evaluation of a staged treatment protocol for rapid automatic junctional tachycardia after operation for congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 29(5):1046–1053
Till JA, Rowland E (1991) Atrial pacing as an adjunct to the management of post-surgical His bundle tachycardia. Br Heart J 66(3):225–229
Mandapati R, Byrum CJ, Kavey RE et al (2000) Procainamide for rate control of postsurgical junctional tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 21(2):123–128
Raja P, Hawker RE, Chaikitpinyo A et al (1994) Amiodarone management of junctional ectopic tachycardia after cardiac surgery in children. Br Heart J 72(3):261–265
Saul JP, Scott WA, Brown S et al (2005) Intravenous amiodarone for incessant tachyarrhythmias in children: a randomized, double-blind, antiarrhythmic drug trial. Circulation 112(22):3470–3477
Gillette PC (1976) The mechanisms of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Circulation 54(1):133–139
Ko JK, Deal BJ, Strasburger JF, Benson DW Jr (1992) Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms and their age distribution in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 69(12):1028–1032
Jaeggi ET, Gilljam T, Bauersfeld U, Chiu C, Gow R (2003) Electrocardiographic differentiation of typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia mediated by concealed accessory pathway in children. Am J Cardiol 91(9):1084–1089
Clarke B, Till J, Rowland E, Ward DE, Barnes PJ, Shinebourne EA (1987) Rapid and safe termination of supraventricular tachycardia in children by adenosine. Lancet 1(8528):299–301
Musto B, D’Onofrio A, Cavallaro C, Musto A, Greco R (1988) Electrophysiologic effects and clinical efficacy of flecainide in children with recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 62(4):229–233
Shahar E, Barzilay Z, Frand M, Feigl A (1983) Amiodarone in control of sustained tachyarrhythmias in children with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Pediatrics 72(6):813–816
Strieper M, Leong T, Bajaj T, Huckaby J, Frias P, Campbell R (2010) Does ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children with a structurally normal heart improve quality of life? Congenit Heart Dis 5(6):587–593
Garson A Jr, Bink-Boelkens M, Hesslein PS et al (1985) Atrial flutter in the young: a collaborative study of 380 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol 6(4):871–878
Gelatt M, Hamilton RM, McCrindle BW et al (1997) Arrhythmia and mortality after the Mustard procedure: a 30-year single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 29(1):194–201
Puley G, Siu S, Connelly M et al (1999) Arrhythmia and survival in patients >18 years of age after the mustard procedure for complete transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 83(7):1080–1084
Roos-Hesselink J, Perlroth MG, McGhie J, Spitaels S (1995) Atrial arrhythmias in adults after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Correlations with clinical, exercise, and echocardiographic findings. Circulation 91(8):2214–2219
Texter KM, Kertesz NJ, Friedman RA, Fenrich AL Jr (2006) Atrial flutter in infants. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(5):1040–1046
Garson A Jr, Gillette PC, McVey P et al (1984) Amiodarone treatment of critical arrhythmias in children and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 4(4):749–755
Ceresnak SR, Liberman L, Silver ES, et al. (2013) Lone atrial fibrillation in the young – perhaps not so “Lone”? J Pediatr 162(4):827–831
Monnig G, Kobe J, Loher A et al (2005) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome: a long-term follow-up. Heart Rhythm 2(5):497–504
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ et al (2000) Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation 101(6):616–623
Ildarova R, Shkolnikova MA, Kharlap M, Bereznitskaya V, Kalinin L (2012) Sodium-channel blockers might contribute to the prevention of ventricular tachycardia in patients with long QT syndrome type 2: a description of 4 cases. J Electrocardiol 45(3):237–243
Li C, Hu D, Shang L et al (2005) Surgical left cardiac sympathetic denervation for long QT syndrome: effects on QT interval and heart rate. Heart Vessels 20(4):137–141
Martini B, Nava A, Thiene G et al (1989) Ventricular fibrillation without apparent heart disease: description of six cases. Am Heart J 118(6):1203–1209
Brugada P, Brugada J (1992) Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol 20(6):1391–1396
Zheng J, Ding W, Xiao Y et al (2011) Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in children: 15 years experience. Pediatr Cardiol 32(1):24–31
Chang RR, Allada V (2001) Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features that distinguish anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from pulmonary artery from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Pediatr Cardiol 22(1):3–10
Ben Ali W, Metton O, Roubertie F et al (2009) Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery: late results with special attention to the mitral valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36(2):244–248; discussion 248–249
Fratz S, Hager A, Schreiber C, Schwaiger M, Hess J, Stern HC (2011) Long-term myocardial scarring after operation for anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 92(5):1761–1765
Huddleston CB, Balzer DT, Mendeloff EN (2001) Repair of anomalous left main coronary artery arising from the pulmonary artery in infants: long-term impact on the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg 71(6):1985–1988; discussion 1988–1989
Lange R, Vogt M, Horer J et al (2007) Long-term results of repair of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 83(4):1463–1471
Blaufox AD, Warsy I, D’Souza M, Kanter R (2011) Transesophageal electrophysiological evaluation of children with a history of supraventricular tachycardia in infancy. Pediatr Cardiol 32(8):1110–1114
Etheridge SP, Judd VE (1999) Supraventricular tachycardia in infancy: evaluation, management, and follow-up. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 153(3):267–271
Lavoie J, Walsh EP, Burrows FA, Laussen P, Lulu JA, Hansen DD (1995) Effects of propofol or isoflurane anesthesia on cardiac conduction in children undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachydysrhythmias. Anesthesiology 82(4):884–887
Van Hare GF (2009) Pediatric electrophysiology series–catheter ablation in children. Heart Rhythm 6(3):423–425
Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D et al (2004) Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: recurrence at 1 year after initially successful ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 1(2):188–196
Blaufox AD, Paul T, Saul JP (2004) Radiofrequency catheter ablation in small children: relationship of complications to application dose. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27(2):224–229
LaPage MJ, Reed JH, Collins KK et al (2011) Safety and results of cryoablation in patients <5 years old and/or <15 kilograms. Am J Cardiol 108(4):565–571
Niksch A, Liberman L, Clapcich A, Schwarzenberger JC, Silver ES, Pass RH (2010) Effects of remifentanil anesthesia on cardiac electrophysiologic properties in children undergoing catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 31(7):1079–1082
Fujii K, Iranami H, Nakamura Y, Hatano Y (2009) Fentanyl added to propofol anesthesia elongates sinus node recovery time in pediatric patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Anesth Analg 108(2):456–460
Miyake CY, Mah DY, Atallah J et al (2011) Nonfluoroscopic imaging systems reduce radiation exposure in children undergoing ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 8(4):519–525
Collins KK, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, McDaniel GM, Van Hare GF (2006) Cryoablation in pediatric atrioventricular nodal reentry: electrophysiologic effects on atrioventricular nodal conduction. Heart Rhythm 3(5):557–563
Khairy P, Van Hare GF (2009) Catheter ablation in transposition of the great arteries with Mustard or Senning baffles. Heart Rhythm 6(2):283–289
Tanel RE, Walsh EP, Triedman JK, Epstein MR, Bergau DM, Saul JP (1997) Five-year experience with radiofrequency catheter ablation: implications for management of arrhythmias in pediatric and young adult patients. J Pediatr 131(6):878–887
Terrenoire C, Wang K, Chan Tung KW et al (2013) Induced pluripotent stem cells used to reveal drug actions in a long QT syndrome family with complex genetics. J Gen Physiol 141(1):61–72
Bankston JR, Yue M, Chung W et al (2007) A novel and lethal de novo LQT-3 mutation in a newborn with distinct molecular pharmacology and therapeutic response. PLoS One 2(12):e1258
Silver ES, Liberman L, Chung WK et al (2009) Long QT syndrome due to a novel mutation in SCN5A: treatment with ICD placement at 1 month and left cardiac sympathetic denervation at 3 months of age. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 26(1):41–45
Sachweh JS, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Schondube FA et al (2000) Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: epicardial and transvenous stimulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17(4):455–461
Maron BJ, Haas TS, Ahluwalia A, Rutten-Ramos SC (2012) Incidence of cardiovascular sudden deaths in Minnesota high school athletes. Heart Rhythm
Maron BJ, Maron MS (2013) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in childhood: the gradient is not the disease. Excessive use of experimental invasive interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 61(2):210–211
Della Bella P, Vergara P (2013) The Subcutaneous ICD: A Niche Indication or the Next Contender of the Transvenous ICD? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24(1):83–85
Olde Nordkamp LR, Dabiri Abkenari L, Boersma LV et al (2012) The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: initial clinical experience in a large Dutch cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(19):1933–1939
Kobe J, Reinke F, Meyer C et al (2013) Implantation and follow-up of totally subcutaneous versus conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a multicenter case–control study. Heart Rhythm 10(1):29–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pass, R.H., Ceresnak, S.R. (2014). Basics of Pediatric Electrocardiography and Invasive Electrophysiology: Principles of Cardiac Testing. In: Da Cruz, E., Ivy, D., Jaggers, J. (eds) Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Intensive Care. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4619-3_221
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4619-3_221
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4618-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4619-3
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine