Abstract
Clinical epidemiological research in genetic diseases entails assessment of phenotypes, the burden and etiology of disease, and the efficacy of preventive measures or treatments in populations. In all areas, the main focus is to describe the relationship between exposure and outcome and to determine one of the following: prevalence, incidence, cause, prognosis, or effect of treatment. The accuracy of these conclusions is determined by the validity of the study. Validity is determined by addressing potential biases and possible confounders that may be responsible for the observed association. Therefore, it is important to understand the types of bias that exist and also to be able to assess their impact on the magnitude and direction of the observed effect. The following chapter reviews the epidemiological concepts of selection bias, information bias, and confounding and discusses ways in which these sources of bias can be minimized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young JM, Solomon MJ (2003) Improving the evidence base in surgery: sources of bias in surgical studies. ANZ J Surg 73:504–506
Jepsen P, Johnsen SP, Gillman MW, Sorensen HT (2004) Interpretation of observational studies. Heart 90:956–960
Blackmore CC, Cummings P (2004) Observational studies in radiology. AJR 183:1203–1208
Barnett ML, Hyman JJ (2006) Challenges in interpreting study results: the conflict between appearance and reality. JADA 137:32S–36S
Stuckless S, Parfrey PS, Woods MO, Cox J, Fitzgerald GW, Green JS, Green RC (2007) The phenotypic expression of three MSH2 mutations in large Newfoundland families with Lynch Syndrome. Fam Cancer 6:1–12
Dicks E, Ravani P, Langman D, Davidson WS, Pei Y, Parfrey PS (2006) Incident renal events and risk factors in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a population and family based cohort followed for 22 years. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:710–717
Moore SJ, Green JS, Fan Y, Bhogal AK, Dicks E, Fernandez BF, Stefanelli M, Murphy C, Cramer BC, Dean JCS, Beales PL, Katsanis N, Bassett A, Davidson WS, Parfrey PS (2005) Clinical and genetic epidemiology of Bardet-Biedl syndrome in Newfoundland: a 22-year prospective, population-based cohort study. Am J Med Genet 132A:352–360
Hodgkinson KA, Parfrey PS, Bassett AS, Kupprion C, Drenckhahn J, Norman MW, Thierfelder L, Stuckless SN, Dicks EL, McKenna WJ, Connors SP (2005) The impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy on survival in autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVD5). J Am Coll Cardiol 45:400–408
Sica GT (2006) Bias in research studies. Radiology 238:780–789
Zaccai JH (2004) How to assess epidemiological studies. Postgrad Med J 80:140–147
Moles DR, dos Santos Silva I (2000) Causes, associations and evaluating evidence; can we trust what we read? Evid Base Dent 2:75–78
Dore DD, Larrat EP, Vogenberg FR (2006) Principles of epidemiology for clinical and formulary management professionals. P&T 31:218–226
Hartman JM, Forsen JW, Wallace MS, Neely JG (2002) Tutorials in clinical research: part IV: recognizing and controlling bias. Laryngoscope 112:23–31
Sitthi-amorn C, Poshyachinda V (1993) Bias. Lancet 342:286–288
Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 359:248–52
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Llorca J (2004) Bias. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:635–641
Major types of research study bias. http://www.umdnj.edu/idsweb/shared/biases.htm
Clancy MJ (2002) Overview of research designs. Emerg Med J 19:546–549
Bayona M, Olsen C (2004) Observational studies and bias in epidemiology. YES—The Young Epidemiology Scholars Program; Copyright 2004. http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/yes/4297_MODULE_19.pdf
World Health Organization (2nd ed.) (2001) Health research methodology: A guide for training in research methods. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/F334320C-2B19_4F38-A358-27E84FF3BC0F/0/contents.pdf
Hammal DM, Bell CL (2002) Confounding and bias in epidemiological investigations. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 19:375–381
Carayol J, Khlat M, Maccario J, Bonaiti-Pellie C (2002) Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: current risks of colorectal cancer largely overestimated. J Med Genet 39:335–339
Satagopan JM, Ben-Porat L, Berwick M, Robson M, Kutler D, Auerbach AD (2004) A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. Br J Cancer 91:1229–1235
Wang PP, Dicks E, Gong X, Buehler S, Zhao J, Squires J, Younghusband B, McLaughlin JR, Parfrey PS (2009) Validity of random-digit-dialing in recruiting controls in a case—control study. Am J Health Behav 33:513–20
Manolio TA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Collins FS (2006) Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies. Nat Rev Genet 7:812–820
Sackett DL (1979) Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 32:51–63
Dorak MT (2012) Bias and confounding. http://www.dorak.info/epi/bc.html
EBM Definitions (2014) Clinical epidemiology definitions. http://www.fammed.ouhsc.edu/robhamm/UsersGuide/define.htm
Vineis P, McMichael AJ (1998) Bias and confounding in molecular epidemiological studies: special considerations. Carcinogenesis 19:2063–2067
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods (2014) Chapter 13: Common pitfalls. http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/tropej/online/ce_ch13.pdf
Okasha M (2001) Interpreting epidemiological findings. Student BMJ 9:324–325
Ravani P, Parfrey PS, Dicks E, Barrett BJ (2007) Clinical research of kidney diseases II: problems of study design. Nephrol Dial Transpl 22:2785–2794
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Stuckless, S., Parfrey, P.S. (2015). Clinical Genetic Research 1: Bias. In: Parfrey, P., Barrett, B. (eds) Clinical Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1281. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2427-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2428-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols