Abstract
Atomic-level computer simulations are a very useful tool for describing the structure and dynamics of complex biomolecules such as DNA and for providing detail at a resolution where experimental techniques cannot arrive. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of mechanically distorted DNA caused by agents like supercoiling and protein binding are computationally challenging due to the large size of the associated systems and timescales. However, nowadays they are achievable thanks to the efficient usage of GPU and to the improvements of continuum solvation models. This together with the concurrent improvements in the resolution of single-molecule experiments, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM), makes possible the convergence between the two. Here we present detailed protocols for doing so: for performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of DNA adopting complex three-dimensional arrangements and for comparing the outcome of the calculations with single-molecule experimental data with a lower resolution than atomic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Noy A, Sutthibutpong T, Harris SA (2016) Protein/DNA interactions in complex DNA topologies: expect the unexpected. Biophys Rev 8:145–155
Fogg JM, Randall GL, Pettitt BM et al (2012) Bullied no more: when and how DNA shoves proteins around. Q Rev Biophys 45:257–299
Pyne ALB, Noy A, Main KHS et al (2021) Base-pair resolution analysis of the effect of supercoiling on DNA flexibility and major groove recognition by triplex-forming oligonucleotides. Nat Commun 12:1–12
Noy A, Maxwell A, Harris SA (2017) Interference between triplex and protein binding to distal sites on supercoiled DNA. Biophys J 112:523–531
D’Annessa I, Coletta A, Sutthibutpong T et al (2014) Simulations of DNA topoisomerase 1B bound to supercoiled DNA reveal changes in the flexibility pattern of the enzyme and a secondary protein-DNA binding site. Nucleic Acids Res 42:9304–9312
Dorman CJ (2019) DNA supercoiling and transcription in bacteria: a two-way street. BMC Mol Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12860-019-0211-6
Lebrun A, Shakked Z, Lavery R (1997) Local DNA stretching mimics the distortion caused by the TATA box-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:2993–2998
Chen Z, Yang H, Pavletich NP (2008) Mechanism of homologous recombination from the RecA-ssDNA/dsDNA structures. Nature 453:489–494
Shepherd JW, Greenall RJ, Probert MIJ et al (2020) The emergence of sequence-dependent structural motifs in stretched, torsionally constrained DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 48:1748–1763
King GA, Gross P, Bockelmann U et al (2013) Revealing the competition between peeled ssDNA, melting bubbles, and S-DNA during DNA overstretching using fluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:3859–3864
Zechiedrich EL, Khodursky AB, Bachellier S et al (2000) Roles of topoisomerases in maintaining steady-state DNA supercoiling in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 275:8103–8113
Sutthibutpong T, Matek C, Benham C et al (2016) Long-range correlations in the mechanics of small DNA circles under topological stress revealed by multi-scale simulation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:9121–9130
Irobalieva RN, Fogg JM, Catanese DJ et al (2015) Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA. Nat Commun 6:8440
Matek C, Ouldridge TE, Doye JPK et al (2015) Plectoneme tip bubbles: coupled denaturation and writhing in supercoiled DNA. Sci Rep 5:7655
Yoshua S, Watson G, Howard J, et al (2020) A nucleoid-associated protein bends and bridges DNA in a multiplicity of topological states with varying specificity. bioRxiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.047076
Sridhar A, Farr SE, Portella G et al (2020) Emergence of chromatin hierarchical loops from protein disorder and nucleosome asymmetry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:7216–7224
Buckwalter JM, Norouzi D, Harutyunyan A et al (2017) Regulation of chromatin folding by conformational variations of nucleosome linker DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 45:9372–9387
Connolly M, Arra A, Zvoda V et al (2018) Static kinks or flexible hinges: multiple conformations of bent DNA bound to integration host factor revealed by fluorescence lifetime measurements. J Phys Chem B 122:11,519–11,534
Jalal ASB, Tran NT, Stevenson CE et al (2020) Diversification of DNA-binding specificity by permissive and specificity-switching mutations in the ParB/Noc protein family. Cell Rep 32:107928
Doye JPK, Ouldridge TE, Louis AA, et al (2013) Coarse-graining DNA for simulations of DNA nanotechnology. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2013/cp/c3cp53545b
Fogg JM, Kolmakova N, Rees I et al (2006) Exploring writhe in supercoiled minicircle DNA. J Phys Condens Matter 18:S145–S159
Shlyakhtenko LS, Potaman VN, Sinden RR et al (1998) Structure and dynamics of supercoil-stabilized DNA cruciforms. J Mol Biol 280:61–72
Schmatko T, Muller P, Maaloum M (2014) Surface charge effects on the 2D conformation of supercoiled DNA. Soft Matter 10:2520–2529
Lionberger TA, Demurtas D, Witz G et al (2011) Cooperative kinking at distant sites in mechanically stressed DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 39:9820–9832
Bednar J, Furrer P, Stasiak A et al (1994) The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. J Mol Biol 235:825–847
Amzallag A, Vaillant C, Jacob M et al (2006) 3D reconstruction and comparison of shapes of DNA minicircles observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 34:e125–e125
Sutthibutpong T, Noy A, Harris S (2016) Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of DNA minicircle topoisomers: a practical guide to setup, performance, And analysis. Methods Mol Biol 1431:195–219
Nguyen H, Pérez A, Bermeo S et al (2015) Refinement of generalized born implicit solvation parameters for nucleic acids and their complexes with proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3714–3728
Perez A, MacCallum JL, Brini E et al (2015) Grid-based backbone correction to the ff12SB protein force field for implicit-solvent simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 11:4770–4779
Nguyen H, Maier J, Huang H et al (2014) Folding simulations for proteins with diverse topologies are accessible in days with a physics-based force field and implicit solvent. J Am Chem Soc 136:13,959–13,962
Sutthibutpong T, Harris SA, Noy A (2015) Comparison of molecular contours for measuring writhe in atomistic supercoiled DNA. J Chem Theory Comput 11:2768–2775
Velasco-Berrelleza V, Burman M, Shepherd JW et al (2020) SerraNA: a program to determine nucleic acids elasticity from simulation data. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22:19,254–19,266
Chen J, Brooks CL (2008) Implicit modeling of nonpolar solvation for simulating protein folding and conformational transitions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:471–481
Gray A, Harlen OG, Harris SA et al (2015) In pursuit of an accurate spatial and temporal model of biomolecules at the atomistic level: a perspective on computer simulation. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 71:162–172
Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T et al (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668–1688
Pronk S, Páll S, Schulz R et al (2013) GROMACS 45: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29:845–854
Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W et al (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26:1781–1802
Pérez A, Marchán I, Svozil D et al (2007) Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: improving the description of α/γ conformers. Biophys J 92:3817–3829
Krepl M, Zgarbová M, Stadlbauer P et al (2012) Reference simulations of noncanonical nucleic acids with different χ variants of the AMBER FORCE field: Quadruplex DNA, quadruplex RNA, and Z-DNA. J Chem Theory Comput 8:2506–2520
Zgarbová M, Luque FJ, Šponer J et al (2013) Toward improved description of DNA backbone: revisiting epsilon and zeta torsion force field parameters. J Chem Theory Comput 9:2339–2354
Ivani I, Dans PD, Noy A et al (2015) Parmbsc1: a refined force field for DNA simulations. Nat Methods 13:55–58
Galindo-Murillo R, Robertson JC, Zgarbová M et al (2016) Assessing the current state of Amber force field modifications for DNA. J Chem Theory Comput 12:4114–4127
Roe DR, Cheatham TE (2013) PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J Chem Theory Comput 9:3084–3095
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38
Lavery R, Moakher M, Maddocks JH et al (2009) Conformational analysis of nucleic acids revisited: Curves+. Nucleic Acids Res 37:5917–5929
Lu XJ, Olson WK (2008) 3DNA: a versatile, integrated software system for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic-acid structures. Nat Protoc 3:1213–1227
Noy A, Golestanian R (2012) Length scale dependence of DNA mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett 109:228101
Tsui V, Case DA (2000) Theory and applications of the generalized born solvation model in macromolecular simulations. Biopolymers 56:275–291
Case DA, Betz RM, Cerutti DS, et al (2016) AMBER 2016. http://ambermd.org/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Watson, G., Velasco-Berrelleza, V., Noy, A. (2022). Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA in Complex 3D Arrangements for Comparison with Lower Resolution Structural Experiments. In: Leake, M.C. (eds) Chromosome Architecture. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2476. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2221-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2221-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2220-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2221-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols