Abstract
Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disease caused by mutations in the MEFV (MEditerranean FeVer) gene that affects people originating from the Mediterranean Sea. The high variability in severity and clinical manifestations observed not only between ethnic groups but also between and within families is mainly related to MEFV allelic heterogeneity and to some modifying genes. In addition to the genetic factors underlying FMF, the environment plays a significant role in the development and manifestation of this disease through various epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs. Indeed, epigenetic events have been identified as an important pathophysiological determinant of FMF and co-factors shaping the clinical picture and outcome of the disease. Therefore, it is essential to better understand the contribution of epigenetic factors to autoinflammatory diseases, namely, FMF, to improve disease prognosis and potentially develop effective targeted therapies. In this review, we highlight the latest updates on the role of epigenetics in FMF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The first proper description of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) was coined in 1945 by Siegel as ‘benign paroxysmal peritonitis’. However, it was not until a decade later that Heller provided the universal name ‘Familial Mediterranean Fever’, which has since been in use [1]. FMF is a disease that mainly affects certain populations originating from the Eastern Mediterranean, such as Arabs, Armenians, and Turks [2]; however, due to increased immigration, FMF has become prevalent worldwide [3], with hundreds of Japanese, North American, and European people reporting cases of FMF [2]. Among the populations affected by FMF, Turks rank first, with a prevalence ranging between 1:150 and 1:1,000, followed by Armenians, with a prevalence reported to be 1:500 [4]. In addition, there are a significant number of FMF cases in Arabic countries such as Lebanon and Jordan; however, exact statistics have not yet been reported [5].
FMF is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the MEFV (MEditerranean FeVer) gene, which is present on the short arm of chromosome 16 (16p13.3) and is made of 10 exons [6, 7]. According to the "Infevers" database, there are currently 396 variants of the MEFV gene. Most of these variants are located in exons 2 and 10, and approximately 96% of them are substitutions. These variants are classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, likely benign, or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) [8]. The most common mutations in the MEFV gene are M680I, M694V, M694I, and V726A, which are located in exon 10, along with the E148Q variant located in exon 2 [6, 7]. These variants are responsible for 85% of FMF patients worldwide [9]. Although M694V is considered to be the most common mutation worldwide [10, 11], the mutation frequency varies among countries, regions, and ethnic groups.
FMF is commonly inherited in an autosomal recessive manner [12]. Therefore, to be genetically diagnosed with FMF, a patient should present two mutations in the MEFV gene. However, another pattern of FMF inheritance, pseudodominance, was reported, particularly in countries where consanguineous marriages are common [13]. Furthermore, true autosomal dominant inheritance also occurs in some rare cases. In the study conducted by Booth et al. (2000), the MEFV gene was screened in five families whose inheritance seemed to be autosomal dominant [14]. Interestingly, three of these mutations were proven to be true dominant, and the patients were heterozygous for the delta M694 variant or compound heterozygous E148Q/M694I [14]. Similarly, Rowczenio et al. (2020) reported a novel MEFV variant, p.P373L, which was identified in four generations of a British family and showed a dominant transmission pattern with amyloidosis complications [15].
The clinical manifestations of FMF are broad and range in severity; the most common manifestations include fever, abdominal pain, arthritis, and thoracic pain. Some patients may develop amyloidosis at later stages, which is the most severe complication of FMF [16]. The clinical variability of the disease is mainly related to the allelic heterogeneity of the MEFV gene, with M694V exhibiting the highest penetrance and being associated with the most severe phenotype of the disease. In contrast, the clinical significance of E148Q has still not been determined. While some researchers support the idea that E148Q is a pathogenic variant with low penetrance, others tend to consider it a benign polymorphism [13]. Other factors contributing to the variable expressivity of the disease include modifying genes such as IL-1β [17, 18] and serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) [19]. Interestingly, numerous studies have recently shown that along with genetic susceptibility, epigenetic events are important pathophysiological factors contributing to the clinical manifestations of this disease in patients [20]. These epigenetic mechanisms can be affected by various environmental factors, such as stress, diet, and physical activity [21].
The MEFV gene encodes a 95 kDa protein composed of 781 amino acids and is named pyrin or marenostrin [22]. This protein is expressed mainly in immune cells, such as granulocytes, eosinophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells [22]. It is composed of five distinct domains: the pyrin domain (PYD), bZIP transcription factor domain, B-box zinc finger domain, α-helical coiled-coil domain, and B30.2 domain [22]. The B30.2 domain, located at the C-terminus, is the most important domain of the pyrin protein because it harbors the most frequent and pathogenic FMF-associated mutations [7]. Pyrin, along with pro-caspase-1 and apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC), is part of a multiprotein complex called inflammasome. Upon MEFV mutations, the pyrin inflammasome is assembled, leading to the activation of caspase-1 which in turn activates the cleavage of pro-IL-1β and secretion of mature IL-1β [23, 24]. Increased IL-1β production results in a subclinical inflammation in FMF patients even during asymptomatic periods [24, 25] (Fig. 1). Therefore, although colchicine has been used as the gold standard treatment for FMF since the 1970s [26], colchicine-resistant patients are administered IL-1β inhibitors such as anakinra (an IL-1 receptor antagonist) and canakinumab (a human monoclonal anti-IL-1β antibody) [27, 28].
With so many factors contributing to the pathogenesis of the disease, we can conclude that FMF is not a simple monogenic disease with a straightforward genotype‒phenotype correlation. In addition, pyrin activity is affected not only by MEFV mutations but also by epigenetic factors.
Epigenetics
For a long time, it was thought that the only way to possibly achieve phenotypic variation was by modifying the DNA sequence. However, in 1942, Waddington introduced the term “epigenetics” [29], which currently refers to the study of changes that occur in the functions of genes that can be passed on to future generations without any direct changes in the DNA sequence itself [30].
Studying epigenetics aids in identifying different disease biomarkers, allowing researchers and health professionals to detect a certain disease, depending on the epigenetic mechanism linked to it, at an early stage before it has progressed or manifested. This approach helps in developing specific treatment or prevention plans for possible patients [31].
Multiple epigenetic mechanisms have been studied, with DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs, mainly microRNAs (miRNAs), being the most intensively investigated in the context of inflammatory diseases [32]. For this purpose, this review will focus on the role of these three mechanisms in FMF pathogenesis.
DNA methylation
DNA methylation is the most common epigenetic mechanism. This process involves the addition of a methyl group from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) to the fifth position of a cytosine to form 5-methylcytosine (5mC) [33], thus leading to changes in function without directly manipulating the DNA sequence itself. Most DNA methylation occurs in regions known as CpG islands, which are located mainly within promoters of different genes, hence leading to a decrease in the expression levels of the respective genes [34]. Upon the methylation of CG regions, the DNA adopts a packed conformation, which typically manifests as chromatin remodeling [35]. This prevents the transcriptional machinery from binding to promoters, thus preventing the expression of genes and decreasing their respective protein levels.
The MEFV gene has a 998-base pair (bp) CpG island that covers a part of the first intron and the entire exon 2 of the gene [36]. In this respect, it is expected that methylation of the MEFV gene might lead to phenotypic variability, and patients with a methylated variant of MEFV exon 2 may exhibit a more severe form of FMF [33]. However, this hypothesis was not confirmed due to inconsistencies in findings linking MEFV methylation and disease severity. For instance, a study conducted by Ulum et al. (2015) on Turkish children diagnosed with FMF revealed that there is no correlation between the methylation of the MEFV gene and the clinical symptoms presented by the patients [37]. The same research showed that patients homozygous for the M694V mutation had lower MEFV gene expression than patients heterozygous for the same mutation, thus suggesting the involvement of other epigenetic factors in the clinical picture of FMF. In another study performed in Turkey, pediatric FMF patients exhibited significantly lower levels of MEFV expression as compared to controls, but no correlation was found between MEFV methylation and MEFV expression [38]. These findings contrast with those of Kirectepe and colleagues (2011), who showed that methylation of the MEFV gene decreases its expression [36]. These differences in results might be attributed to the study design, sample size, and patient characteristics. Moreover, it is important to note that the mechanism of alternative splicing was investigated in the study conducted by Kirectepe et al. (2011) but not by Doğan et al. (2019). Indeed, Kirectepe et al. (2011) observed higher levels of splicing and methylation of exon 2 in FMF patients than in healthy controls, suggesting a link between these events and a decrease in gene expression. The methylation of exon 2 was associated with increased spliced transcripts of exon 2 (MEFV-d2) and abnormal localization of the d-2 pyrin protein in the nucleus instead of the cytoplasm, where the full-length pyrin protein is normally found. This disrupted function may contribute to the pathogenesis of FMF [39]. Additionally, FMF patients exhibited higher levels of d-2 pyrin compared to healthy individuals, providing further evidence of its potential role in FMF pathogenesis [36, 39].
Given the involvement of pyrin in the inflammasome complex and the established connection between the NLRP13 inflammasome and the MEFV gene, researchers were intrigued to compare NLRP13 gene expression and methylation between FMF patients in crisis and healthy controls. Interestingly, the results revealed that the NRLP13 inflammasome is epigenetically regulated in FMF patients. In fact, the presence of amyloidosis was associated with hypermethylation of the NRLP13 gene, hence resulting in its silencing and subsequently in the inhibition of inflammasome assembly. This discovery unveiled a new epigenetic mechanism contributing to the development of FMF [40]. The NLRP3 inflammasome was also found to be significantly demethylated in monocytes derived from FMF patients and associated with increased expression of IL-1β [41].
DNA methylation might also be involved in patients’ response to colchicine treatment. In a study conducted in 2023, the role of epigenetic modifications was investigated in a cohort of 63 FMF patients divided according to their responsiveness to colchicine and 19 healthy individuals. While the results showed that the colchicine nonresponders had a greater methylation level of exon 2 of the MEFV gene than did the colchicine responders, these results were deemed to be nonsignificant. As such, it was difficult to reach a conclusion regarding the effectiveness of colchicine in patients suffering from methylation, and additional studies need to be conducted to confirm this observation [33].
Histone modification
Histone modification is another key epigenetic mechanism. Interestingly, DNA methylation and histone modification are highly interrelated within the context of chromatin modulation, and they affect each other throughout growth. While histone methylation mediates proper DNA methylation patterns, histone modification patterns are recreated using DNA methylation as a template after DNA replication [42].
Histone modifications include methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation. They regulate gene expression either directly through altering chromatin structure or via protein adaptors termed effectors [43].
Like DNA methylation, histone methylation requires histone methyltransferases (HMTs) to transfer a methyl group from the SAM to the lysine and arginine groups of the histone [43]. Histone methylation is commonly linked to transcriptional repression; however, the outcome of gene expression can vary based on the specific methylation of lysine or arginine residues, leading to either gene activation or repression. For example, the methylation of H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20 leads to the repression of gene expression, while the methylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79 is associated with the activation of gene transcription [44].
Histone acetylation has an opposite effect to histone methylation. It activates gene expression by neutralizing the positive charge of lysine residues, thus decreasing the affinity of histones for binding to DNA and allowing the DNA to remain accessible to the transcriptional machinery [45]. On the other hand, histone phosphorylation is mediated by protein kinases and occurs on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues. It is most commonly associated with DNA repair and generally results in the activation of gene expression, similarly to acetylation [45].
Histone ubiquitination is performed via histone ubiquitination ligases, while histone deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are responsible for reversing ubiquitination. Histone ubiquitination can lead to either the activation or repression of gene expression. The monoubiquitylation of H2A and H2B yielded the clearest results regarding the transcriptional outcome of genes. For example, the monoubiquitylation of H2A leads mainly to the repression of gene expression, while that of H2B results in the activation of gene expression (45). Finally, SUMOylation, which involves the covalent addition of a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) to a specific lysine, is generally associated with transcriptional repression [46].
Histone modifications have been found to play a role in the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequently in the manifestation of multiple autoimmune and autoinflammatory disorders, such as systemic lupus erythematosus [47], rheumatoid arthritis [48], Behçet disease (BD) [49], atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease [50]. Nevertheless, to date, no study has investigated the role of histone modifications in FMF, despite the relevant implication of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of this disease.
Histone acetylation dynamics play a major role in the regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. For instance, in a murine model of painful neuropathy, the acetylation of histones H3K9 and H4 in the promoter region of NLRP3 increased its expression levels and activated the inflammasome [51]. Similarly, histone demethylation was shown to regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Specifically, KDM4B, a histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase, was found to demethylate H3K9me3 in the NLRP3 promoter region, upregulating NLRP3 gene expression and promoting the inflammatory response [52].
BD shares many genetic and inflammatory features with FMF. In fact, BD and FMF might occur in the same individual more commonly than expected [53]. Additionally, MEFV mutations, particularly M694V, which activate the inflammasome complex, have been shown to increase the risk of BD in regions where both FMF and BD are prevalent [54, 55]. Therefore, it will be of particular interest to review and understand how histone modifications might affect BD manifestation. In vitro activation of Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), which is a histone deacetylase, in normal human and ocular BD donor PBMCs suppressed T-cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine production [56]. Similarly, Xie and Yang (2021) observed a decrease in SIRT1 expression in CD4 + T cells obtained from patients diagnosed with active ocular BD. Interestingly, the activation of SIRT1 inhibited Th17 and Th22 cell proliferation and significantly suppressed the secretion of IL-17 and IL-22 [57]. Accordingly, it was suggested that the regulation of histone acetylation, especially the activation of SIRT1, is a potential treatment for BD-related uveitis.
Ubiquitination and SUMOylation have also been studied in the context of BD. For instance, the ubiquitination-related genes UBAC2 and UBASH3B were found to be associated with susceptibility to BD in many populations [58, 59]. On the other hand, the genetic association between SUMO4 polymorphisms and BD was first reported among Chinese Han patients [60]. The results were replicated in Tunisian and Korean cohorts, in which specific polymorphisms were linked to BD severity and the development of skin lesions [61, 62]. Although the functions of the proteins encoded by UBAC2 and UBASH3B are still unclear, SUMO4 is believed to participate in BD pathogenesis via the regulation of NF-ĸB signaling pathways and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines.
Given the shared pathophysiological features between FMF and BD, exploring similar mechanisms in different experimental models of FMF can help us gain more insights into the role of epigenetics in disease expression and manifestation [63].
miRNAs
Another common process by which gene expression is modified without directly affecting sequence is through miRNAs. miRNAs are small noncoding RNA molecules with an average length of 18–25 nucleotides that regulate gene expression through RNA interference mechanisms such as mRNA chopping, mRNA deadenylation, and translation inhibition [64]. They can also promote gene expression by activating translation and regulating transcription. The affinity of miRNA‒mRNA interactions, the abundance of miRNAs and target mRNAs, and the subcellular localization of miRNAs are only few of the variables that affect how miRNAs interact with their target genes to regulate gene expression (64).
In addition to their intracellular role, miRNAs can be secreted into extracellular fluids and delivered to target cells by attaching to proteins or vesicles, such as exosomes, being transported without vesicles, or being carried by high-density lipoprotein in peripheral blood [65]. These extracellular miRNAs serve as chemical messengers that facilitate communication between cells [66]. In humans, approximately 2600 mature miRNAs have been reported in the MiRbase (release 22.1) [67, 68] to control the expression of approximately 60% of protein-coding genes [69]. It is important to highlight that hundreds of mRNAs can be the targets of one miRNA; hence, simultaneously, a single miRNA affects the expression of many genes that tend to be engaged in interacting pathways [70].
Gene regulation by miRNAs begins in the cytoplasm once they bind to mRNAs. Upon binding, miRNAs reduce gene expression by suppressing mRNA translation, after which mRNAs are either degraded or recycled or can be saved for later translation. In addition to translation repression, miRNA can reduce gene expression by mRNA deadenylation and decapping upon binding to a specific sequence in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) [71, 72]. However, the binding of a miRNA to its target mRNA is not restricted to this region. Several studies have recognized sequences in the 5' UTR and within the promoter as binding sites for miRNAs as well [73]. Like in the 3’UTR, miRNA binding to the 5’ UTR sequence causes gene silencing [74, 75], while binding to the promoter region seems to promote transcription and gene expression [76].
miRNAs are known to be important modulators of inflammation [77]. A number of immune response mechanisms, including the growth and differentiation of B and T cells, the expansion of monocytes and neutrophils, the activation of antibodies, and the release of inflammatory regulators, have been linked to miRNAs [78]. In fact, the involvement of miRNAs in inflammation is broad and complex. miRNAs regulate both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes. For instance, hsa-let-7d-5p inhibits the proliferation of Th1 cells and interferon (IFN)-γ secretion [79]. In contrast, miR-23a promotes inflammation and proinflammatory cytokine synthesis by activating the NF-ĸB signaling pathway and inhibiting the anti-inflammatory JAK1/STAT6 pathway [80]. In turn, the expression of miRNAs may be upregulated by inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IFN-γ.
On the other hand, several studies have proposed a role for miRNAs in regulating inflammasome activation in two ways. The first is by directly targeting inflammasome components. For example, many studies have reported that miR-223 is considered to be the direct target of NLRP3 [81,82,83], while miR-142 is the target of ASC [84] and that miR-446 is the direct target of pro-IL-1β [85]. The other way may be through monitoring the function of inflammasome regulators. In fact, miR-146a [75] and miR-96 [86] are associated with NF-ĸB pathway regulation, miR-33 targets reactive oxygen species (ROS) [87], and miR-17 [88] and miR-20a [89] are involved in thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) production [90].
The role of miRNAs in FMF has received increasing attention, and there is a growing body of evidence on the role of miRNAs in different mechanisms involved in FMF pathogenesis, such as apoptosis, inflammation, and autophagy [91, 92]. In 2018, Amarilyo et al. evaluated the expression levels of miRNAs in the PBMCs of 10 FMF patients homozygous for the M694V mutation, in remission, and under colchicine treatment, and 10 healthy subjects [93]. The study revealed that 7 miRNAs were differentially expressed in FMF patients; miR-144-3p, miR-21-5p, miR-4454, and miR-451 had higher expression levels in patients than in controls; and miR-107, let-7d-5p, and miR-148b-3p were downregulated in patients compared to controls [93]. However, Wada et al. (2017) reported no significant difference in the expression of these miRNAs, with the exception of miR-451a, which was also found to be downregulated in the serum of FMF patients [94]. Such variations may be due to differences in sample size and characteristics, biological samples tested, and quantification methods.
Interestingly, all the miRNAs studied by Amarilyo et al. (2018) are involved in immune processes. In fact, miR-148-3p, which was shown to be downregulated in FMF patients [93], is known to have an anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting the production of the cytokines IL-12, IL-6, and TNF-α [95]. On the other hand, miR-144-3p is upregulated in FMF patients in remission [93] and is known to have a proinflammatory effect, as it was found to be positively associated with IL-1β levels in lung cancer patients [96]. These results support the findings of Ibrahim et al. (2014), who highlighted the presence of ongoing subclinical inflammation even in asymptomatic periods, particularly among M694V homozygous patients [17].
Another study conducted by Kahraman et al. in 2021 aimed to evaluate the role of a subset of 13 miRNAs in relation to immune functions in 28 diagnosed FMF patients and 28 controls from Turkey [97]. The results revealed the overexpression of miR-34a-5p, miR-142-3p, miR-216a-5p, miR-340-5p, miR-429, and miR-582-5p and the downregulation of miR-107, miR-569, and miR-1304-5p in FMF patients compared to those in controls. Furthermore, significantly lower expression levels of miR-107 were detected in patients homozygous for the M694V mutation than in patients carrying other mutations. Accordingly, the authors suggested a possible association between miR-107 and the M694V genotype and the potential use of this particular miRNA as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool for FMF [97].
Koga et al. (2017) analyzed the serum of Japanese FMF patients in the quiescent and attack phases and revealed that miR-204-3p was downregulated in patients during attacks compared to controls and patients in remission [98]. Similar findings were observed in the study of Demir et al. (2020) involving 30 FMF children from Turkey and 30 healthy children, in which a significant 6.5-fold reduction in miR-204 expression was detected in patients’ plasma during crises in comparison to controls and to children during remission periods [99]. miR-204-3p was shown to target the phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma (PI3Kγ) pathway, which usually promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12p40 and IL-6 [98]. Hence, researchers proposed the use of miR-204-3p as a potential therapeutic tool to inhibit the PI3Kγ pathway in FMF patients and reduce inflammation [98] (Fig. 2).
Moreover, the microarray results of Latsoudis et al. (2017) revealed higher expression levels of miR-4520a in 9 FMF patients from Crete than in healthy individuals. In addition, they reported an increase in the expression of miR-4520a in a human premonocytic cell line (THP-1) lacking the MEFV gene and showed that miR-4520a targets RHEB, which activates the mTOR pathway involved in autophagy [100] (Fig. 2). Therefore, the authors suggested that autophagy is involved in FMF pathogenesis through the deregulation of miR-4520 expression dependent on the presence of MEFV mutations [100].
In 2017, Akkaya-Ulum et al. revealed that several miRNAs involved in inflammatory pathways are differentially expressed in FMF patients harboring one or two MEFV mutations compared to controls and healthy carriers; moreover, miR-20a-5p and miR-197-3p were overexpressed and downregulated, respectively, in homozygous patients, and let-7d-3p and miR-574-3p expression levels were increased in heterozygotes [91]. In silico analyses revealed that all four miRNAs interfered with the TGF-β (Transforming growth factor beta) signaling pathway, the TLR (Toll-like receptor) and NLR (NOD-like receptor) signaling pathways, apoptosis, and actin cytoskeleton regulation [91]. Interestingly, it was noted that miR-197-3p expression levels varied with regard to patient treatment; all homozygous patients were receiving biologic drugs such as anakinra and canakinumab; however, heterozygous patients were treated with colchicine [91]. This distinct miRNA profile may help to better understand the phenotypic variability observed among FMF patients.
In 2021, the same group of researchers thought to further detail the role of miR-197-3p in FMF [101]. By transfecting THP1 cells with pre-miR-197, miR-197-3p was proven to have an anti-inflammatory effect because the overexpression of miR-197-3p led to a decrease in the expression of the IL-1β, TNF-α, and TGF-β genes. Moreover, using a 3’UTR luciferase activity assay, it was demonstrated that miR-197-3p targets IL-1R1. miR-197-3p represses IL-1R1 expression on the membrane, which leads to a decrease in the activation of the NF-ĸB signal transduction pathway and a reduction in the expression of the IL-1β precursor (Fig. 2). In this respect, the authors suggested that increasing miR-197-3p expression in FMF patients, would be an interesting approach to treat FMF patients, especially those who are refractory to colchicine [101].
On the other hand, 15 miRNAs known to be involved in autoinflammatory diseases and immune responses were evaluated in FMF patients treated with colchicine [102]. After observing reduced expression levels of miR-125a, miR-15a, miR-132, miR-155, miR-146a, miR-26a, miR-16, miR-223, miR-181a, miR-21, and miR-34a in patients in comparison to controls, the authors compared the levels between treated and untreated patients. Interestingly, FMF patients treated with colchicine had significantly greater levels of miR-132, miR-15a, miR-181a, miR-23b, and miR-26a than did untreated patients, suggesting a potential correlation between colchicine and the expression of these miRNAs [102]. The exact mechanism of action of the majority of these miRNAs has not yet been elucidated; however, it has been reported that mir-155 plays an anti-inflammatory role by inhibiting molecules, including matrix metalloproteinases, protein phosphatase 2A, TLR ligands, and IL-2 [103]. Similarly, like NF-κB kinase inhibitors, mir-223, mir-16, and mir-15a have been shown to decrease inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway [104].
In addition to being involved in inflammation, miRNAs were suggested to play a role in FMF progression by affecting apoptotic pathways. In fact, a 2021 study conducted by Karpuzoglu and colleagues analyzed 33 miRNAs involved in apoptosis in 191 FMF children and 31 controls from Turkey. Researchers have shown that 26 miRNAs are differentially expressed in FMF children, with 19 miRNAs being upregulated and seven downregulated [105]. The correlation between apoptosis and FMF pathogenesis is not straightforward. For instance, miR-16-5p and miR-195-5p, which are upregulated in FMF patients, are suggested to activate caspases 3 and 9, which promote apoptosis [106, 107]. Moreover, miR-181b-5p, which was found to be overexpressed in FMF patients, represses apoptosis by affecting the MEK/ERK/p21 pathway [108] (Fig. 2).
Finally, the use of miRNAs as biomarkers was investigated recently by Abdelkawy et al. in 2021 [109]. This study was conducted on 50 FMF patients receiving colchicine treatment and 25 controls from Egypt to assess the plasma expression levels of miR-181a and miR-125a and the levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and IL-17. Compared with healthy controls, FMF patients expressed higher levels of IL-17 and IFN-γ and lower levels of miR-181a and miR-125a. However, there was no significant association between cytokine levels and the expression of the studied miRNAs. miR-181a is known to be involved in the differentiation and activation of T cells [110]. Indeed, Abdelkawy et al. (2021) [109], Li et al. (2007) [111], and Schaffert et al. (2015) [112] reported a positive correlation between miR-181a and lymphocyte percentage. Moreover, miR-125a has been shown to have an anti-inflammatory role in inflammatory diseases, mainly rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease [113, 114], by decreasing the levels of the IL-10 receptor α, the IL-2 receptor β, and IFN-γ [109]. The anti-inflammatory role of miR-125a was further supported by the findings of Abdelkawy and colleagues who showed a negative correlation between miR-125a and C-reactive protein in FMF patients [109]. Therefore, various miRNAs, particularly miR-181a and miR-125a, may be used as biomarkers of inflammation in FMF patients.
Table 1 summarizes the different miRNAs involved in FMF and their possible mechanisms of action in immunity.
Conclusion
There is a growing body of evidence indicating that FMF is not a simple monogenic disease and that epigenetics play an important role in the manifestation of this disease. Despite being a recent topic that is currently under deep investigation, epigenetic research has revealed the important role of DNA methylation in FMF and the contributions of several miRNAs to various mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of the disease, mainly inflammation, apoptosis, and autophagy. These findings suggest the use of epigenetic variations, particularly of miRNAs, in FMF patients as biomarkers and therapeutic tools that may open the door to personalized medicine. However, these studies were performed at very early stages and are associated with various limitations despite their added value. First, the role of histone modifications has not yet been studied in FMF; hence, additional research that focuses on the role of this particular epigenetic mechanism in FMF pathogenesis is needed. Second, most of the studies were restricted by small sample sizes in which participants had similar genotypes, were in the quiescent phase, or were receiving colchicine treatment. Indeed, in future research, a larger and more heterogeneous sample, including patients with different genotypes and during crises, is needed to better understand the inflammatory process underlying FMF. Finally, functional studies exploring the effects and mechanisms of action of colchicine on the different epigenetic mechanisms involved in FMF are essential.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Ozdogan H, Ugurlu S. Familial mediterranean fever. La Presse Médicale. 2019;48(12):e61-76.
Tufan A, Lachmann HJ. Familial Mediterranean fever, from pathogenesis to treatment: a contemporary review. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(7):1591–610.
Dundar M, Emirogullari EF, Kiraz A, Taheri S, Baskol M. Common familial mediterranean fever gene mutations in a Turkish cohort. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(8):5065–9.
Sarı İ, Birlik M, Kasifoğlu T. Familial Mediterranean fever: an updated review. Eur J Rheumatol. 2014;1(1):21–33.
Assouad E, El Hage S, Safi S, El Kareh A, Mokled E, Salameh P. Familial Mediterranean fever research activity in the Arab world: the need for regional and international collaborations. East Mediterr Health J. 2021;27(10):984–92.
Consortium TIF. Ancient missense mutations in a new member of the roret gene family are likely to cause familial mediterranean fever. Cell. 1997;90(4):797–807.
The French FMF Consortium, Bernot A, Clepet C, Dasilva C, Devaud C, Petit JL, et al. A candidate gene for familial Mediterranean fever. Nat Genet. 1997;17(1):25–31.
Infevers - Tabular list [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 3]. https://infevers.umai-montpellier.fr/web/search.php?n=1
Ben-Chetrit E, Levy M. Familial mediterranean fever. Lancet. 1998;351(9103):659–64.
Yasar Bilge NS, Sari I, Solmaz D, Senel S, Emmungil H, Kilic L, et al. Comparison of early versus late onset familial Mediterranean fever. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(4):880–4.
Sarkisian T, Hayrapetyan H, Beglaryan A, Shahsuvaryan G, Yeghiazaryan A. Molecular diagnosis of familial mediterranean fever in armenians. 2007;
Rogers DB, Shohat M, Petersen GM, Bickal J, Congleton J, Schwabe AD, et al. Familial mediterranean fever in Armenians: autosomal recessive inheritance with high gene frequency. Am J Med Genet. 1989;34(2):168–72.
El Roz A, Ghssein G, Khalaf B, Fardoun T, Ibrahim JN. Spectrum of MEFV variants and genotypes among clinically diagnosed FMF patients from Southern Lebanon. Med Sci (Basel). 2020;8(3):35.
Booth DR, Gillmore JD, Lachmann HJ, Booth SE, Bybee A, Soytürk M, et al. The genetic basis of autosomal dominant familial mediterranean fever. QJM Int J Med. 2000;93(4):217–21.
Rowczenio DM, Youngstein T, Trojer H, Omoyinmi E, Baginska A, Brogan P, et al. British kindred with dominant FMF associated with high incidence of AA amyloidosis caused by novel MEFV variant, and a review of the literature. Rheumatology. 2020;59(3):554–8.
Maggio MC, Corsello G. FMF is not always “fever”: from clinical presentation to “treat to target.” Ital J Pediatr. 2020;15(46):7.
Ibrahim JN, Jounblat R, Delwail A, Abou-Ghoch J, Salem N, Chouery E, et al. Ex vivo PBMC cytokine profile in familial Mediterranean fever patients: Involvement of IL-1β, IL-1α and Th17-associated cytokines and decrease of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Cytokine. 2014;69(2):248–54.
Ibrahim JN, Chouery E, Lecron JC, Mégarbané A, Medlej-Hashim M. Study of the association of IL-1β and IL-1RA gene polymorphisms with occurrence and severity of Familial Mediterranean fever. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58(12):668–73.
Cazeneuve C, Ajrapetyan H, Papin S, Roudot-Thoraval F, Geneviève D, Mndjoyan E, et al. Identification of MEFV-independent modifying genetic factors for familial mediterranean fever. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67(5):1136–43.
Surace AEA, Hedrich CM. The role of epigenetics in autoimmune/inflammatory disease. Front Immunol. 2019;4(10):1525.
Alegría-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics. 2011;3(3):267–77.
Schnappauf O, Chae JJ, Kastner DL, Aksentijevich I. The pyrin inflammasome in health and disease. Front Immunol. 2019;7(10):1745.
Chae JJ, Wood G, Masters SL, Richard K, Park G, Smith BJ, et al. The B302 domain of pyrin, the familial Mediterranean fever protein, interacts directly with caspase-1 to modulate IL-1β production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(26):9982–7.
Ibrahim JN, Jéru I, Lecron JC, Medlej-Hashim M. Cytokine signatures in hereditary fever syndromes (HFS). Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;33:19–34.
Ibrahim JN, Jounblat R, Jalkh N, Abou Ghoch J, Al Hageh C, Chouery E, et al. RAC1 expression and role in IL-1β production and oxidative stress generation in familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2018;29(4):127–35.
El Hasbani G, Jawad A, Uthman I. Update on the management of colchicine resistant Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;15(14):224.
Erdem Gürsoy D, Gezer HH, Öz N, Özer A, Acer Kasman S, Duruöz MT. Colchicine resistance: associated factors and its effect on health-related quality of life in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022;25(11):1239–45.
Soriano A, Verecchia E, Afeltra A, Landolfi R, Manna R. IL-1β biological treatment of familial mediterranean fever. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 2013;45(1):117–30.
Waddington CH. The epigenotype. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):10–3.
Dupont C, Armant DR, Brenner CA. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med. 2009;27(5):351–7.
Lotfy R, Ali O, Zarouk W, El-Bassyouni H, Nour El-Din G. Epigenetics and familial mediterranean fever. Azhar Int J Pharm Med Sci. 2021;1(2):1–12.
Zhang L, Lu Q, Chang C. Epigenetics in health and disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1253:3–55.
Zekry ME, Sallam AAM, AbdelHamid SG, Zarouk WA, El-Bassyouni HT, El-Mesallamy HO. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of MEFV gene and their impact on clinical outcome in auto-inflammatory familial mediterranean fever patients. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(1):721–37.
Lim WJ, Kim KH, Kim JY, Jeong S, Kim N. Identification of DNA-methylated CpG islands associated with gene silencing in the adult body tissues of the ogye chicken using RNA-seq and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Front Genet. 2019;16(10):346.
Li S, Peng Y, Panchenko AR. DNA methylation: precise modulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2022;1(75): 102430.
Kirectepe AK, Kasapcopur O, Arisoy N, Celikyapi Erdem G, Hatemi G, Ozdogan H, et al. Analysis of MEFV exon methylation and expression patterns in familial Mediterranean fever. BMC Med Genet. 2011;7(12):105.
Ulum YA, Peynircioglu BB, Batu E, Guler C, Karadag O, Ertenli A, et al. MEFV gene methylation pattern analysis in familial Mediterranean fever patients with altered expression levels. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2015;13(1):P113.
Doğan E, Gürsoy S, Bozkaya G, Çamlar SA, Kılıçarslan ÖA, Soylu A, et al. The effects of epigenetic regulation on phenotypic expressivity in Turkish patients with familial mediterranean fever. Indian J Rheumatol. 2019;14(4):297.
Erdem GC, Erdemir S, Abaci I, Aydin AKK, Everest E, Turanli ET. Alternatively spliced MEFV transcript lacking exon 2 and its protein isoform pyrin-2d implies an epigenetic regulation of the gene in inflammatory cell culture models. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40(3):688–97.
Caldiran FY, Deveci K, Cacan E. NLRP13 inflammasome complex is hypermethylated in familial Mediterranean fever and global methylation correlates with the disease severity. Ann Hum Genet. 2023;87(3):115–24.
Vento-Tormo R, Álvarez-Errico D, Garcia-Gomez A, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Buján S, Basagaña M, et al. DNA demethylation of inflammasome-associated genes is enhanced in patients with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):202-211.e6.
Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(5):295–304.
Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–95.
Fellous A, Le Franc L, Jouaux A, Goux D, Favrel P, Rivière G. Histone methylation participates in gene expression control during the early development of the pacific oyster crassostrea gigas. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(9):695.
Alaskhar Alhamwe B, Khalaila R, Wolf J, von Bülow V, Harb H, Alhamdan F, et al. Histone modifications and their role in epigenetics of atopy and allergic diseases. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;23(14):39.
Ryu HY, Hochstrasser M. Histone sumoylation and chromatin dynamics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(11):6043–52.
Gkoutsias A, Makis A. The role of epigenetics in childhood autoimmune diseases with hematological manifestations. Pediatr Investig. 2022;6(1):36–46.
Araki Y, Mimura T. The histone modification code in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:2608605.
Ma X, Wang X, Zheng G, Tan G, Zhou F, Wei W, et al. Critical role of gut microbiota and epigenetic factors in the pathogenesis of behçet’s disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 719235.
Lin Y, Qiu T, Wei G, Que Y, Wang W, Kong Y, et al. Role of histone post-translational modifications in inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 852272.
Liu CC, Huang ZX, Li X, Shen KF, Liu M, Ouyang HD, et al. Upregulation of NLRP3 via STAT3-dependent histone acetylation contributes to painful neuropathy induced by bortezomib. Exp Neurol. 2018;1(302):104–11.
Zhao W, Tong L, Song H, Qin D, Li Q, Fu Y, et al. Histone demethylase KDM4B epigenetically controls NLRP3 expression to enhance inflammatory response. 2023.
Güler T, Garip Y, Dörtbaş F, Karcı AA, Çifçi N. Coexistence of familial Mediterranean fever and Behçet’s disease: a case report. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;63(2):174–7.
Touitou I, Magne X, Molinari N, Navarro A, Quellec AL, Picco P, et al. MEFV mutations in Behçet’s disease. Hum Mutat. 2000;16(3):271–2.
Atagunduz P, Ergun T, Direskeneli H. MEFV mutations are increased in Behçet’s disease (BD) and are associated with vascular involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21(4 Suppl 30):S35-37.
Gardner PJ, Joshi L, Lee RWJ, Dick AD, Adamson P, Calder VL. SIRT1 activation protects against autoimmune T cell-driven retinal disease in mice via inhibition of IL-2/Stat5 signaling. J Autoimmun. 2013;1(42):117–29.
Xie M, Yang Y. Decreased expression of sirt1 contributes to ocular Behçet’s disease progression via Th17 and Th22 response. Ophthalmic Res. 2020;64(4):554–60.
Sawalha AH, Hughes T, Nadig A, Yılmaz V, Aksu K, Keser G, et al. A putative functional variant within the UBAC2 gene is associated with increased risk of Behçet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(11):3607–12.
Fei Y, Webb R, Cobb BL, Direskeneli H, Saruhan-Direskeneli G, Sawalha AH. Identification of novel genetic susceptibility loci for Behçet’s disease using a genome-wide association study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):R66.
Hou S, Yang P, Du L, Zhou H, Lin X, Liu X, et al. SUMO4 gene polymorphisms in Chinese Han patients with Behcet’s disease. Clin Immunol. 2008;129(1):170–5.
Kamoun M, Ben Dhifallah I, Karray E, Zakraoui L, Hamzaoui K. Association of small ubiquitin-like modifier 4 (SUMO4) polymorphisms in a Tunisian population with Behçet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(4 Suppl 60):S45-49.
Park G, Kim HS, Choe JY, Kim SK. SUMO4 C438T polymorphism is associated with papulopustular skin lesion in Korean patients with Behçet’s disease. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(10):3031–7.
Mezher N, Mroweh O, Karam L, Ibrahim JN, Kobeissy PH. Experimental models in Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF): insights into pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. Exp Mol Pathol. 2024;1(135): 104883.
O’Brien J, Hayder H, Zayed Y, Peng C. Overview of MicroRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:402.
Okuyan HM, Begen MA. miRNAs as attractive diagnostic and therapeutic targets for Familial Mediterranean Fever. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31(5):949–59.
Hayes J, Peruzzi PP, Lawler S. MicroRNAs in cancer: biomarkers, functions and therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(8):460–9.
miRBase [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 9]. https://www.mirbase.org/
Kozomara A, Birgaoanu M, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D155–62.
Kumar M, Nath S, Prasad HK, Sharma GD, Li Y. MicroRNAs: a new ray of hope for diabetes mellitus. Protein Cell. 2012;3(10):726–38.
Garzon R, Marcucci G, Croce CM. Targeting microRNAs in cancer: rationale, strategies and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(10):775–89.
Huntzinger E, Izaurralde E. Gene silencing by microRNAs: contributions of translational repression and mRNA decay. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(2):99–110.
Ipsaro JJ, Joshua-Tor L. From guide to target: molecular insights into eukaryotic RNA-interference machinery. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(1):20–8.
Xu W, San Lucas A, Wang Z, Liu Y. Identifying microRNA targets in different gene regions. BMC Bioinf. 2014;15(Suppl 7):S4.
Forman JJ, Legesse-Miller A, Coller HA. A search for conserved sequences in coding regions reveals that the let-7 microRNA targets Dicer within its coding sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(39):14879–84.
Zhang J, Zhou W, Liu Y, Liu T, Li C, Wang L. Oncogenic role of microRNA-532-5p in human colorectal cancer via targeting of the 5’UTR of RUNX3. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):7215–20.
Dharap A, Pokrzywa C, Murali S, Pandi G, Vemuganti R. MicroRNA miR-324-3p induces promoter-mediated expression of RelA gene. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e79467.
Marques-Rocha JL, Samblas M, Milagro FI, Bressan J, Martínez JA, Marti A. Noncoding RNAs, cytokines, and inflammation-related diseases. FASEB J. 2015;29(9):3595–611.
Lindsay MA. microRNAs and the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(7):343–51.
Okoye IS, Coomes SM, Pelly VS, Czieso S, Papayannopoulos V, Tolmachova T, et al. MicroRNA-containing T-regulatory-cell-derived exosomes suppress pathogenic T helper 1 cells. Immunity. 2014;41(1):89–103.
Ma S, Liu M, Xu Z, Li Y, Guo H, Ge Y, et al. A double feedback loop mediated by microRNA-23a/27a/24-2 regulates M1 versus M2 macrophage polarization and thus regulates cancer progression. Oncotarget. 2015;7(12):13502–19.
Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan Y, He Y. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: an overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3328.
Bauernfeind F, Rieger A, Schildberg FA, Knolle PA, Schmid-Burgk JL, Hornung V. NLRP3 inflammasome activity is negatively controlled by miR-223. J Immunol. 2012;189(8):4175–81.
Haneklaus M, Gerlic M, Kurowska-Stolarska M, Rainey AA, Pich D, McInnes IB, et al. Cutting edge: miR-223 and EBV miR-BART15 regulate the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β production. J Immunol. 2012;189(8):3795–9.
Zhang D, Lee H, Wang X, Groot M, Sharma L, Dela Cruz CS, et al. A potential role of microvesicle-containing miR-223/142 in lung inflammation. Thorax. 2019;74(9):865–74.
Shikano S, Gon Y, Maruoka S, Shimizu T, Kozu Y, Iida Y, et al. Increased extracellular vesicle miRNA-466 family in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as a precipitating factor of ARDS. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19(1):110.
Zhou L, Li P, Zhang M, Han B, Chu C, Su X, et al. Carbon black nanoparticles induce pulmonary fibrosis through NLRP3 inflammasome pathway modulated by miR-96 targeted FOXO3a. Chemosphere. 2020;1(241): 125075.
Xie Q, Wei M, Zhang B, Kang X, Liu D, Zheng W, et al. MicroRNA-33 regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway in macrophages. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(2):3318–27.
Liu Y, Lou G, Li A, Zhang T, Qi J, Ye D, et al. AMSC-derived exosomes alleviate lipopolysaccharide/d-galactosamine-induced acute liver failure by miR-17-mediated reduction of TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. EBioMedicine. 2018;36:140–50.
Li XF, Shen WW, Sun YY, Li WX, Sun ZH, Liu YH, et al. MicroRNA-20a negatively regulates expression of NLRP3-inflammasome by targeting TXNIP in adjuvant-induced arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83(6):695–700.
Heo MJ, Kim TH, You JS, Blaya D, Sancho-Bru P, Kim SG. Alcohol dysregulates miR-148a in hepatocytes through FoxO1, facilitating pyroptosis via TXNIP overexpression. Gut. 2019;68(4):708–20.
Akkaya-Ulum YZ, Balci-Peynircioglu B, Karadag O, Eroglu FK, Kalyoncu U, Kiraz S, et al. Alteration of the microRNA expression profile in familial mediterranean fever patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35 Suppl 108(6):90–4.
Balci-Peynircioglu B, Akkaya-Ulum YZ, Akbaba TH, Tavukcuoglu Z. Potential of miRNAs to predict and treat inflammation from the perspective of Familial Mediterranean Fever. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(11):905–13.
Amarilyo G, Pillar N, Ben-Zvi I, Weissglas-Volkov D, Zalcman J, Harel L, et al. Analysis of microRNAs in familial Mediterranean fever. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5): e0197829.
Wada T, Toma T, Matsuda Y, Yachie A, Itami S, Taguchi YH, et al. Microarray analysis of circulating microRNAs in familial Mediterranean fever. Mod Rheumatol. 2017;27(6):1040–6.
Liu X, Zhan Z, Xu L, Ma F, Li D, Guo Z, et al. MicroRNA-148/152 impair innate response and antigen presentation of TLR-triggered dendritic cells by targeting CaMKIIα. J Immunol. 2010;185(12):7244–51.
Wu C, Xu B, Zhou Y, Ji M, Zhang D, Jiang J, et al. Correlation between serum IL-1β and miR-144-3p as well as their prognostic values in LUAD and LUSC patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7(52):85876–87.
Kahraman CY, Egin ME, Tatar A, Turkez H, Mardinoglu A. The assessment of selected miRNA profile in familial mediterranean fever. Biomed Res Int. 2021;13(2021):6495700.
Koga T, Migita K, Sato T, Sato S, Umeda M, Nonaka F, et al. MicroRNA-204-3p inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokines in familial Mediterranean fever via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ pathway. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(4):718–26.
Demir F, Çebi AH, Kalyoncu M. Assessment of circulating microribonucleic acids in patients with familial mediterranean fever. Arch Rheumatol. 2019;35(1):52–9.
Latsoudis H, Mashreghi MF, Grün JR, Chang HD, Stuhlmüller B, Repa A, et al. Differential expression of miR-4520a associated with pyrin mutations in familial mediterranean fever (FMF). J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(6):1326–36.
Akkaya-Ulum YZ, Akbaba TH, Tavukcuoglu Z, Chae JJ, Yilmaz E, Ozen S, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever-related miR-197-3p targets IL1R1 gene and modulates inflammation in monocytes and synovial fibroblasts. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):685.
Hortu HO, Karaca E, Sozeri B, Gulez N, Makay B, Gunduz C, et al. Evaluation of the effects of miRNAs in familial Mediterranean fever. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38(3):635–43.
Faraoni I, Antonetti FR, Cardone J, Bonmassar E. miR-155 gene: a typical multifunctional microRNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(6):497–505.
Li T, Morgan MJ, Choksi S, Zhang Y, Kim YS, Liu Z. MicroRNAs modulate the noncanonical NF-κB pathway by regulating IKKα expression during macrophage differentiation. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(9):799–805.
Karpuzoglu EM, Kisla Ekinci RM, Balci S, Bisgin A, Yilmaz M. Altered expression of apoptosis-related, circulating cell-free miRNAs in children with familial Mediterranean fever: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41(1):103–11.
Zheng C, Zheng Z, Sun J, Zhang Y, Wei C, Ke X, et al. MiR-16-5p mediates a positive feedback loop in EV71-induced apoptosis and suppresses virus replication. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16422.
Zhao DL, Wu QL. Effect of inhibition to Yes-related proteins-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway through miR-195-5p on apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(15):6486–96.
Liu B, Guo Z, Gao W. miR-181b-5p promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of hypertrophic scar fibroblasts through regulating the MEK/ERK/p21 pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(3):1537–44.
Abdelkawy RFM, Kholoussi S, Eissa E, Hamed K, Raouf HA, El-Bassyouni HT. Differential expression of micro RNAs and their association with the inflammatory markers in familial mediterranean fever patients. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2021;14(3):1351–8.
Saki N, Abroun S, Soleimani M, Hajizamani S, Shahjahani M, Kast RE, et al. Involvement of MicroRNA in T-cell differentiation and malignancy. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2015;9(1):33–49.
Li QJ, Chau J, Ebert PJR, Sylvester G, Min H, Liu G, et al. miR-181a is an intrinsic modulator of T cell sensitivity and selection. Cell. 2007;129(1):147–61.
Schaffert SA, Loh C, Wang S, Arnold CP, Axtell RC, Newell EW, et al. mir-181a-1/b-1 modulates tolerance through opposing activities in selection and peripheral T cell function. J Immunol. 2015;195(4):1470–9.
Murata K, Furu M, Yoshitomi H, Ishikawa M, Shibuya H, Hashimoto M, et al. Comprehensive microRNA analysis identifies miR-24 and miR-125a-5p as plasma biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7): e69118.
Sun CM, Wu J, Zhang H, Shi G, Chen ZT. Circulating miR-125a but not miR-125b is decreased in active disease status and negatively correlates with disease severity as well as inflammatory cytokines in patients with Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(44):7888–98.
Hennessy EJ, Sheedy FJ, Santamaria D, Barbacid M, O’Neill LAJ. Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) down-regulates microRNA-107, increasing macrophage adhesion via cyclin-dependent kinase 6. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(29):25531–9.
Zhang FM, Zheng WH, Wang HJ. MiR-34a-5p inhibition attenuates LPS-induced endothelial cell injury by targeting FOXM1. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(20):10829–38.
Chen PH, Chang CK, Shih CM, Cheng CH, Lin CW, Lee CC, et al. The miR-204-3p-targeted IGFBP2 pathway is involved in xanthohumol-induced glioma cell apoptotic death. Neuropharmacology. 2016;1(110):362–75.
Philippe L, Alsaleh G, Pichot A, Ostermann E, Zuber G, Frisch B, et al. MiR-20a regulates ASK1 expression and TLR4-dependent cytokine release in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(6):1071–9.
Zhu D, Pan C, Li L, Bian Z, Lv Z, Shi L, et al. MicroRNA-17/20a/106a modulate macrophage inflammatory responses through targeting signal-regulatory protein α. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(2):426.
Chen L, Li C, Peng Z, Zhao J, Gong G, Tan D. miR-197 Expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hepatitis B virus-infected patients. Gut Liver. 2013;7(3):335–42.
Wang H, Su X, Yang M, Chen T, Hou J, Li N, et al. Reciprocal control of miR-197 and IL-6/STAT3 pathway reveals miR-197 as potential therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(10): e1031440.
Murata K, Yoshitomi H, Tanida S, Ishikawa M, Nishitani K, Ito H, et al. Plasma and synovial fluid microRNAs as potential biomarkers of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(3):R86.
Wang X, Li Z, Bai J, Song W, Zhang F. miR-17-5p regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of human trabecular meshwork cells by targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(4):3132–8.
Ning L, Zhang M, Zhu Q, Hao F, Shen W, Chen D. miR-25-3p inhibition impairs tumorigenesis and invasion in gastric cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):81–90.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC and ZS drafted the original version of the manuscript. LK reviewed the content of the manuscript. JNI and PHK conceived and designed the research and helped in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Chaaban, A., Salman, Z., Karam, L. et al. Updates on the role of epigenetics in familial mediterranean fever (FMF). Orphanet J Rare Dis 19, 90 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03098-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03098-w