Abstract
Soil erosion is the major prominent ecological risk threatening agricultural sustainability in the coastal region of western Syria. The ongoing war conditions in Syria has led to a lack of field data and measurements related to the spatial evolution of soil loss. Estimating the spatial distribution of potential soil loss is a fundamental procedure in applying the soil conservations measures within the river catchments. The current paper goals to conduct a comprehensive assessment of soil loss risk utilizing revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and remote sensing (RS) data in geographic information system (GIS) environment across the entire Wadi-Qandeel river basin. Results indicate that the annual rate of soil loss in the study area was 93.02 t ha−1 ya−1 with a spatial average reaching 58.22 t ha−1 ya−1. Additionally, the soil loss risk map was generated with classification into five susceptible zones: very low (56.44%), low (24.69%), moderate (20.80%), high (2.98%), and very high (2.22%). The present assessment showed a reliable approach to soil erosion rates and categorization of erosion-sensitive zones within the study area. These outcomes can be relied upon to create mitigation procedures for maintaining zones with high and very high soil loss susceptibility under the ongoing war conditions in Syria.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil is an essential and pivotal non-renewable resource that presents a broad group of environmental services and goods, especially for human sustainability (Ferrara et al. 2015; Pal 2016; Brevik et al. 2017; Testi et al. 2010; Riccardi et al. 2020; Abd El-Ghani et al. 2012; Hateffard et al. 2021). However, a growing body of literature has indicated that soil loss is responsible for about 85% of the degradation of the global agro-ecosystems, and therefore a reduction in nourishment productivity by 17% (Wijesundara et al. 2018; Nyesheja et al. 2019; Bahir et al. 2021; Mountassir et al. 2021a, b). Soil erosion by water (SEW) is one of the most severe environmental problems affecting life sustainability and welfare worldwide (Zika and Erb 2009). SEW is dynamically generated as a result of spatial integration between physical and human factors, produced a total reduction in the quality of soil health and water resources, therefore a decrease in ecosystem quality and productivity (García-Ruiz 2010; Göl 2017; Cutini et al. 2015; Balasubramani et al. 2015; Mokhtar et al. 2021; Tang et al. 2015; El Mountassir et al. 2021a, b).
In this regard, Syrian soils are characterized by high susceptibility of water soil erosion risk due to lithology, high rainfall intensities, rough relief, topsoil fertility, degraded vegetation, edaphic, and accelerated human activity, especially in the coastal region of Syria (Mohammed et al. 2020a; Abdo 2021). Further, about 18% of the agricultural land in Syria is prone to soil loss hazard that exceeds 100 t ha−1 year−1 in many western mountainous areas (ACSAD 2007; Husein and Kalkha 2019; Abdo 2019). Particularly, SEW in Wadi-Qandeel river basin is the basic environmental hazard that threatens farming, feeding, and secure sustainability. The intensive pattern of rainfall, high runoff peaks, flood, rugged terrain, steep slopes, shallow soil profiles, and sparse vegetation are the major physical criteria that motivate the water erosion in Wadi-Qandeel river basin. At the same time, SEW can be accelerated by the growth of anthropogenic activities such as deforestation, overgrazing, urbanization, landuse/landcover change (LULC), intensive cultivation on steep slopes, excessive soil plowing, land abandonment, poor maintenance procedures, military infrastructure, and armed conflicts (Emadodin and Bork 2012; Jafari and Bakhshandehmehr 2016; Nabiollahi et al. 2017; Abdo 2018; Mohammed et al. 2021).
The matter of SEW simulating was the pivot of many spatial evaluations in the coastal area of Syria. Barakat et al. (2014) and Husein and Kalkha (2019) utilized the Coordination of Information on the Environment (CORINE) approach to map the risk of SWE across many coastal watersheds. Mohammed et al. (2016) predicted SEW by utilizing the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model for Lattakia governorate. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) method was applied in the GIS environment to evaluate the SEW in many basins in Syrian coastal region (Abdo and Salloum 2017a, b; Almohamad 2020).
Assessing the annual spatial distribution of SEW rates is an urgent need for maintaining soil and water resources at the basins scales. However, utilizing the experimental methods is the most global manners of SEW modeling, particularly in regions with limited information and data. In other words, the integration of remote sensing (RS) data, geographic information system (GIS) environment and RUSLE model is a useful, reliable and accurate method in producing the spatial distribution of SEW map. For the prior matter discussed, the current research will explore the quantities and spatial distribution of SEW in Wadi-Qandeel river basin by using the RS data in calculating RUSLE factors in GIS software, therefore suggesting constructive spatial preservation strategies with suitable applications.
Materials and methods
Study area
Wadi-Qandeel watershed is one of the coastal river watersheds in Lattakia governorate in the west of Syria (Fig. 1). The study basin covers about 152.23 km2, and the highest elevation of 809 m above mean sea level (m a.m.s.l.) (elevation range of 0–809 m a.m.s.l.). This basin bordered Al-Kabeer alshamali river basin to the east, the Mediterranean to the west, Al-arab river basin to the south, Al-Qshish river basin to the north. The study area includes various geological formations, starting from the Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Cretaceous formations composed of Albian, Lower Cenomanian, and Upper Cenomanian with lithological structures of limestone, dolomite, marls, ophiolites, limy marl, and sandy limestone. The basin mainly subjects to the Mediterranean climate pattern: mild and rainy winter and long, dry, and hot summer (Khallouf et al. 2021). The average annual precipitation in the catchment varies from 847 to 1301 mm (Fig. 2), and most rainfall is concentrated in the winter months (68%). Further, the annual mean in summer temperature is 26° and in winter 15°. The warmest month is August (28.6°) and the coldest is January (13.8°). High relative humidity prevails throughout the year due to the effects of the Mediterranean water mass. The annual average of humidity is 72%. Study area is characterized by the density of the streams network, mainly reflecting the spatial integration between geological, tectonic and climatic characteristics. Wadi-Qandeel drainage network originates at Ballouran village in the Al-shrashir area at an altitude of 802 m above sea level, and flows westward down to its concentration point with the Mediterranean (Abdo 2020). Agriculture and tourism are the basic economic activities of the population. Olives, citrus and agricultural crops are among the most important crops in the basin.
RUSLE model parameters
The universal equation of soil loss RUSLE (Wischmeier and Smith 1978; Renard et al. 1997) has been commonly used to evaluate the spatial dimension of soil erosion rates in order to generate the conservation goals, with a reasonable scale of validity (Balasubramani et al. 2015; Djoukbala et al. 2019). RUSLE is a well-established soil erosion empirical model and most of its parameters have undergone profound modifications since its introduction. RUSLE composes of five geo-parameters that represent the following inputs: rainfall erosivitity (R), soil susceptibility to erosion based on its physical–chemical properties (K), terrain (LS), vegetation(C), and maintenance (P), respectively. Meanwhile, RUSLE model has been applied in areas with different cases worldwide generally and in the Mediterranean basin environment particularly: Kefi et al. (2012), in Tunisia; Demirci and Karaburun (2012), in Turkey; Chadli (2016), in Morocco; Fagnano et al. (2012), in Italy; in Algeria; Benkadja et al. (2015), in Algeria, etc. The average annual soil erosion per unit area is given by the following equation (Eq. 1) of RUSLE (Wischmeier and Smith 1978):
where A is the average annual soil erosion (t ha−1 year−1), R is the rainfall erosivity, K is the soil erodibility, LS is the hill slope length and steepness, C is the vegetation factor, and P is the support practice. In order to standardize pixel resolution DEM and Landsat imageries resolution, all inputs and outputs for the calculation of erosion risks is in 30-pixel resolution for each sub-factors of RUSLE model. In this regard, RUSLE model was used to estimate SEW as a result of achieving accurate and reliable spatial outcomes for the river basins in the eastern Mediterranean region, the flexibility of its application in areas with limited data, and the possibility of relying on its outputs in formulating strategies for water and soil resources mitigation and conservation measures.
Rainfall erosivity factor (R)
The rainfall erosivity (R) factor considers the influence of rainfall kinetic energy and generated runoff on the erosion (Wischmeier and Smith 1978; Demirci and Karaburun 2012; Salloum and Abdo 2015; Djoukbala et al. 2018; Abdo and Hassan 2018). R factor, moreover, is importantly affected by the patterns, spatial–temporal distribution, intensities, momentums, and kinetic energy, raindrops size (Farhan et al. 2013; Carollo et al. 2018; Serio et al. 2019). According to available monthly rainfall data (1989–2019) of five climatic stations established in and around the study basin the map of R value was prepared by using Eq. (2) developed by Wischmeier and Smith (1978):
where R is a rainfall erositivity factor (MJ mm ha−1 h−1 per year); Pi is monthly rainfall (mm); P is an annual rainfall (mm). Figure 3 illustrates the spatial distribution of precipitation erosivity. On value, R factor values ranged from 621.78 to 1234.55 MJ mm ha−1 h−1 year−1.
Soil erodibility factor (K)
K factor describes the strong linking of topsoil particles against the rainstorms events, which is commonly acquired by evaluating the physical–chemical topsoil properties of a specific plot (Wischmeier et al. 1971; Das et al. 2018; Saïdi et al. 2014). K factor is an assessment of the susceptibility of topsoil to detachment and transport by rainfall and runoff. It reflects the soil erosion rate caused by rainfall erosivity factor (R) in each point of the study area (Koirala et al. 2019). In the present assessment, soil features were evaluated based on the analysis of soil samples conducted by the National Center for Agricultural Research in Al-Hanadi region. K factor map was delineated by utilizing the following equation presented by Wischmeier and Smith (1978), Renard et al. (1997) and Panagopoulos and Ferreira (2010):
where OM is the organic matter (%), s is soil structure class, p is permeability class, and M is aggregated variable derived from the granular soil texture: M = (%Msilt) × (%silt + %sand), and the modified silt (Msilt) is a percentage of grain size between 0.002 and 0.1 mm. Figure 4 indicates the spatial distribution of the K values, which ranged from 0.021 to 0.032 ton ha MJ−1 mm−1.
Slope length and steepness factor (LS)
Slope Length and Steepness Factors (LS) approach the impact of the relief on the acceleration of soil erosion (Lu et al. 2004). LS factor was generated from two sub-factors: a slope degree parameter (S) and a slope–length parameter (L); which are extracted from the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) (Hickey 2000; Boggs et al. 2001). In this context, the LS factor is the most essential causative parameter of overland flow that considers the major reason to soil loss. The relation of soil erosion to slope degrees of hill and mountains area is influenced by the flora density and soil properties (Koirala et al. 2019). The terrain of the study basin is featured by steep slopes which reach more than 45 degrees, as Fig. 5 shows. By using the digital elevation model (DEM) with 30 m resolution (ASTER GDEM Validation Team 2009) LS factor map was created according to Eq. (4)
where FlowAccumulation is the grid layer of flow accumulation expressed as the number of grid cells, and CellSize is the length of a cell side. LS values of the study area are in the range of 0–37.58 as illustrated Fig. 6.
Vegetation factor (C)
Vegetation cover is a complex criterion in soil loss control, because of dissipating the kinetic energy of raindrops, delaying the surface runoff, and enhancing the infiltration capacity (Hu et al. 2015; Salloum and Abdo 2016; Sujatha and Sridhar 2018; Acar et al. 2014). In this context, C factor reflects the vegetation condition that can be rapidly varied than other RUSLE parameters (Beskow et al. 2009). Landuse/landcover and Normal Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are two methods that soil erosion modelling scholars use in calculating C values. In the current assessment, the C factor values were calculated using the NDVI index which is given by Eq. 5
where NIR is the near-infrared band (band 4, 0.76–0.90 µm), and RED is the red band (band 3, 0.63–0.69 µm). Landsat 8 OLI image taken in March 2020 was considered in calculating NDVI values which ranged between − 0.3 and 0.83 (Fig. 7). The values of C factor was calculated using the Eq. 6
where α and β parameters determine the shape of the NDVI curve. Reasonable results are produced using values of α = 2 and β = 1. C factor values ranged between 0.02 and 1 (Fig. 8).
Conservation support practice factor (P)
Maintenance practice factor (P) is the ratio of soil loss after a selective support exercise to the corresponding soil loss after up and down farming (Samanta et al 2016). However, P factor basically influences soil erosion by modifying the streaming pattern, degree or orientation of overland flow, and by decreasing the runoff potentials (Ozsoy and Aksoy 2015). For cultivated land, the conservation practices included contouring, terracing, strip cropping, and subsurface drainage (Renard et al. 1997). P factor values range from 0 to 1, the value 0 suggests good conservation support practices and the value 1 suggests poor conservation support practices (Wischmeier and Smith 1978; Das et al. 2018). Field monitoring indicates the loss of prevention support procedures in the study area. Consequently, P factor value for the entire study basin is 1 as proposed by Wischmeier and Smith (1978).
Result and discussion
Based on the initial information and data entered into the GIS software (ArcGIS 10.2.3), four thematic raster maps were precisely generated representing the spatial factors of RUSLE. R, K, LS, and C raster parameters were spatially multiplied in order to map the spatial distribution of potential soil loss per hectare per year at cell level as Fig. 9 illustrates. In the context of current results, the annual rate of soil loss in the study area ranged from 0 to 93.02 ton ha−1 year−1, with a spatial average reached 58.22 ton ha−1 year−1. Utilizing the Natural Breaks method, the output soil erosion map was classified into five risk classes: very low (56.44%), low (24.69%), moderate (20.80%), high (2.98%), and very high (2.22%) as Table 1 shows.
The finding soil loss rate is spatially consistent with the assessments provided by scholars in river basins environment in the eastern Mediterranean as Table. 2 illustrates. In addition, the outputs of prior literature give the resulting soil erosion rate sufficient validity to be utilized in suggesting practices for spatial conservation of areas with boundaries and critical soil erosion. Meanwhile, Nearing et al. (1990), Irvem et al. (2007), Trabucchi et al. (2012), and Farhan and Nawaiseh (2015) suggested that 2 to 12 ton ha−1 year−1 is the acceptable soil loss tolerances limits for the aims of agricultural and economic sustainability in the Mediterranean environment. Further, Ibrahiem (1986) and Kbibo and Nesafi (1997) reported that the tolerable limit of soil loss ranged between 1 to 2.5 t h−1 year−1 for the coastal region of Syria, owing to the many geo-factors that influences the soil formation. Therefore, in light of these limits, it can be confirmed that most of the study basin lands need integrated spatial management of soil loss.
The spatial distributions of high and very high soil loss hazards are mostly concentrated in the northeast and central regions slopes of the study area. Further, these zones are susceptible to the high risk of soil loss as a result of the spatial integration between the kinetic energy of rainfall intensities, runoff and steep slopes. The field checking disclosed that classes with high and very high values of soil erosion are sloping lands. Importantly, vegetation did not reduce the soil loss quantities in those areas as generated erosion map indicated. This result can be demonstrated by the great spatial competition between slope and vegetation factors in favour of the slope factor. Meanwhile, the slope degrees in these areas reaches more than 45 degrees as Fig. 5 shown. These findings are consistent with many studies that have pointed out the influence of slopes on topsoil mobilization (Thomas et al. 2018; Kayet et al. 2018). Therefore, it can be reported that the slope is a pivotal factor in the acceleration of soil loss in the study area.
The current outputs, that targeted the spatial susceptibility of soil loss in the study area, are spatial predictions, and thereby are still questionable. Meanwhile, the absence of adequate data, information and field measurements across the basin due to different affecting reasons, particularly the consequences of the ongoing war, a RUSLE model presented constructive statistical-spatial estimates of potential soil loss risk. These delineated estimates can be useful for decision-makers in generating strategies for maintaining soils and mitigating areas with high and very high sensitivity to erosion. In this context, among the most important measures that can be proposed in the framework of the erosion mitigation process: (1) adjusting the slopes in areas of high and very high sensitivity by building terraces, (2) enhancing wild vegetation coverage, especially in areas with frequent fires and indiscriminate cutting, (3) investigating the root system efficiency (RSE) of agricultural crops for the proportionality and severity of cultivated slope, (4) developing agricultural techniques, especially ploughing process. The RUSLE application could also be expanded at the regional and national levels as part of the spatial management plans for river basins.
Conclusions
Soil loss represents the most geo-ecological problem threats to food security in the coastal region of Syria. In light of the paucity of spatial data related to soil loss, current research presented a reasonable assessment of the spatial distribution of soil erosion severity in one of the coastal river basins most prone to soil erosion. The goal of this study was fulfilled by feeding the GIS environment with multi-source information and data, especially RS data, in the calculation of RUSLE factors. In regard to the present findings, the generated soil erosion map shows a maximum rate of erosion 93.02 t h−1 year−1. Moreover, the soil erosion amount exceeded the tolerable threshold of soil erosion for the coastal region of Syria (1 to 2.5 t h−1 year−1). These predictions are closely related to the estimates computed in Syria and the Mediterranean countries using the RUSLE model. Also, it was concluded the high influence of the slope factor in enhancing soil erosion. The spatial integration process between GIS and RS data presented a promising tool for assessing annual rates of soil erosion in the study basin, especially in light of the ongoing war conditions in Syria. Therefore, the results of this study are necessary to manage the risk of soil erosion by taking mitigation and conservation measures. The application of this study’s approach at the national level also provides an objective solution for managing areas of the high and very high soil erosion risk, especially in this period which Syria is living the consequences of the ongoing war since 2011.
Data availability
The spatial data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Abd El-Ghani, M., Shehata, M.N., Mobarak, A., Bakr, R.: Factors affecting the diversity and distribution of synanthropic vegetation in urban habitats of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Rendiconti Lincei 23(4), 327–337 (2012)
Abdo, H.G.: Impacts of war in Syria on vegetation dynamics and erosion risks in Safita area, Tartous, Syria. Reg. Environ. Change 18(6), 1707–1719 (2018)
Abdo, H.G.: Geo-modeling approach to predicting of erosion risks utilizing RS and GIS data: a case study of Al-Hussain Basin, Tartous, Syria. J. Environ. Geol. 1(1), 1–4 (2019)
Abdo, H.G.: Evolving a total-evaluation map of flash flood hazard for hydro-prioritization based on geohydromorphometric parameters and GIS–RS manner in Al-Hussain river basin, Tartous, Syria. Nat. Hazards 104(1), 681–703 (2020)
Abdo, H.G.: Assessment of landslide susceptibility zonation using frequency ratio and statistical index: a case study of Al-Fawar basin, Tartous, Syria. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03322-1
Abdo, H.G., Hassan, R.M.: Tartous, Syria. J. Environ. Geol. 2(2), 68–74 (2018)
Abdo, H., Salloum, J.: Mapping the soil loss in Marqya basin: Syria using RUSLE model in GIS and RS techniques. Environ. Earth Sci. 76(3), 114 (2017a)
Abdo, H., Salloum, J.: Spatial assessment of soil erosion in Alqerdaha basin (Syria). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 3(1), 26 (2017b)
Acar, C., Kahveci, H., Uzun, S.P.: The analysis and assessment of the vegetation on coastal revetments: the case of Trabzon (Turkey). Rendiconti Lincei 25(2), 141–153 (2014)
ACSAD: Soil Degradation in Syria. ACSAD, Damascus (2007)
Almohamad, H.: Impact of land cover change due to armed conflicts on soil erosion in the basin of the northern Al-Kabeer River in Syria using the RUSLE model. Water 12(12), 3323 (2020)
Aster GDEM, Validation Team: ASTER global DEM validation summary report. METI/ERSDAC, NASA/LPDAAC, USGS/EROS (2009)
Bahir, M., Ouhamdouch, S., Ouazar, D., Chehbouni, A., Ouarani, M., El Mountassir, O.: Groundwater quality of the alluvial and carbonate aquifers of Essaouira basin (Morocco). Carbon. Evapor. 36(2), 1–13 (2021)
Balasubramani, K., Veena, M., Kumaraswamy, K., Saravanabavan, V.: Estimation of soil erosion in a semi-arid watershed of Tamil Nadu (India) using revised universal soil loss equation (rusle) model through GIS. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 1, 10 (2015)
Barakat, M., Mahfoud, I., Kwyes, A.A.: Study of soil erosion risk in the basin of Northern Al-Kabeer river at Lattakia-Syria using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Mesopot. J. Mar. Sci. 29(1), 29–44 (2014)
Benchettouh, A., Kouri, L., Jebari, S.: Spatial estimation of soil erosion risk using RUSLE/GIS techniques and practices conservation suggested for reducing soil erosion in Wadi Mina watershed (northwest, Algeria). Arab. J. Geosci. 10(4), 79 (2017)
Benkadja, R., Boussag, F., Benkadja, A.: Identification et évaluation du risque d’érosion sur le bassin versant du K’sob (Est Algérien). Identification and assessment of the erosion risk on the K'sob watershed (eastern Algeria). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 74(1), 91–102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0611-y
Beskow, S., Mello, C.R., Norton, L.D., Curi, N., Viola, M.R., Avanzi, J.C.: Soil erosion prediction in the Grande River Basin, Brazil using distributed modeling. CATENA 79(1), 49–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.05.010
Boggs, G., Devonport, C., Evans, K., Puig, P.: GIS-based rapid assessment of erosion risk in a small catchment in the wet/dry tropics of Australia. Land Degrad. Dev. 12(5), 417–434 (2001)
Brevik, E.C., Steffan, J.J., Burgess, L.C., Cerdà, A.: Links between soil security and the influence of soil on human health. In: Global Soil Security, pp. 26-–274. Springer, Cham (2017)
Carollo, F.G., Ferro, V., Serio, M.A.: Predicting rainfall erosivity by momentum and kinetic energy in Mediterranean environment. J. Hydrol. 560, 173–183 (2018)
Chadli, K.: Estimation of soil loss using RUSLE model for Sebou watershed (Morocco). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2, 1–10 (2016)
Cutini, A., Manetti, M.C., Mazza, G., Moretti, V., Salvati, L.: Climate variability, soil aridity, and growth rate of Pinus pinea L. in Castelporziano forest: an exploratory data analysis. Rendiconti Lincei 26(3), 413–420 (2015)
Das, B., Paul, A., Bordoloi, R., Tripathi, O.P., Pandey, P.K.: Soil erosion risk assessment of hilly terrain through integrated approach of RUSLE and geospatial technology: a case study of Tirap District, Arunachal Pradesh. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 4(1), 373–381 (2018)
Demirci, A., Karaburun, A.: Estimation of soil erosion using RUSLE in a GIS framework: a case study in the Buyukcekmece Lake watershed, northwest Turkey. Environ. Earth Sci. 66(3), 903–913 (2012)
Djoukbala, O., Mazour, M., Hasbaia, M., Benselama, O.: Estimating of water erosion in semiarid regions using RUSLE equation under GIS environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 77(9), 1–13 (2018)
Djoukbala, O., Hasbaia, M., Benselama, O., Mazour, M.: Comparison of the erosion prediction models from USLE, MUSLE and RUSLE in a Mediterranean watershed, case of Wadi Gazouana (NW of Algeria). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 5(2), 725–743 (2019)
El Mountassir, O., Ouazar, D., Bahir, M., Chehbouni, A., Carreira, P.M.: GIS-based assessment of aquifer vulnerability using DRASTIC model and stable isotope: a case study on Essaouira basin. Arab. J. Geosci. 14(4), 1–21 (2021a)
Emadodin, I., Bork, H.R.: Degradation of soils as a result of long-term human-induced transformation of the environment in Iran: an overview. J. Land Use Sci. 7(2), 203–219 (2012)
Fagnano, M., Diodato, N., Alberico, I., Fiorentino, N.: An overview of soil erosion modelling compatible with RUSLE approach. Rendiconti Lincei 23(1), 69–80 (2012)
Farhan, Y., Zregat, D., Farhan, I.: Spatial estimation of soil erosion risk using RUSLE approach, RS, and GIS techniques: a case study of Kufranja watershed, Northern Jordan. J. Water Resour. Protect. 05(12), 1247–1261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.512134
Farhan, Y., Nawaiseh, S.: Spatial assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE and GIS techniques. Environ. Earth Sci. 74(6), 4649–4669 (2015)
Ferrara, C., Moretti, V., Serra, P., Salvati, L.: Towards a sustainable agro-forest landscape? assessing land degradation (1950–2010) and soil quality in Castelporziano forest and peri-urban Rome, Italy. Rendiconti Lincei 26(3), 597–604 (2015)
García-Ruiz, J.M.: The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: a review. CATENA 81(1), 1–11 (2010)
Gaubi, I., Chaabani, A., Ben Mammou, A., Hamza, M.H.: A GIS-based soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) (Lebna watershed, Cap Bon, Tunisia). Nat. Hazards 86(1), 219–239 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2684-3
Göl, C.: Effects of aspect and changes in land use on organic carbon and soil properties in Uludere catchment, semi-arid region: Turkey. Rendiconti Lincei 28(3), 463–469 (2017)
Hateffard, F., Mohammed, S., Alsafadi, K., Enaruvbe, G.O., Heidari, A., Abdo, H.G., Rodrigo-Comino, J.: CMIP5 climate projections and RUSLE-based soil erosion assessment in the central part of Iran. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–17 (2021)
Hickey, R.: Slope angle and slope length solutions for GIS. Cartography 29(1), 1–8 (2000)
Hu, Y., Tian, G., Mayer, A., Ruiahen, He.: Risk assessment of soil erosion by application of remote sensing and GIS in Yanshan Reservoir catchment, China. Nat Hazards 79(1), 277–289 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1841-4
Husein, H.H., Kalkha, M.: Soil erosion risk in the rainy mountainous area of eastern Mediterranean. In: Global Symposium on Soil Erosion, p. 260 (2019)
Ibrahiem, N.: Soil water erosion and soil conservation in Syrian Arab Republic. Univ. Aleppo J. 6(1), 79–110 (1986). ((in Arabic))
Imamoglu, A., Dengiz, O.: Determination of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model and soil organic carbon loss in Alaca catchment (Central Black Sea region, Turkey). Rendiconti Lincei 28(1), 11–23 (2017)
Irvem, A., Topaloğlu, F., Uygur, V.: Estimating spatial distribution of soil loss over Seyhan River Basin in Turkey. J Hydrol. 336(1-2), 30–37 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.12.009
Jafari, R., Bakhshandehmehr, L.: Quantitative mapping and assessment of environmentally sensitive areas to desertification in central Iran: mapping ESAs to desertification. Land Degrad. Dev. 27(2), 108–119 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2227
Kayet, N., Pathak, K., Chakrabarty, A., Sahoo, S.: Evaluation of soil loss estimation using the RUSLE model and SCS-CN method in hillslope mining areas. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 6(1), 31–42 (2018)
Kbibo, I., Nesafi, I.: Water erosion and impacts on the coastal area in the Syrian Arab Republic. Tishreen Univ. J. Stud. Sci. Res. 18, 59–76 (1997). ((in Arabic))
Kefi, M., Yoshino, K., Setiawan, Y.: Assessment and mapping of soil erosion risk by water in Tunisia using time series MODIS data. Paddy Water Environ. 10(1), 59–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0265-3
Khallouf, A., Talukdar, S., Harsányi, E., Abdo, H.G., Mohammed, S.: Risk assessment of soil erosion by using CORINE model in the western part of Syrian Arab Republic. Agri. Food Security 10(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00295-9
Koirala, P., Thakuri, S., Joshi, S., Chauhan, R.: Estimation of soil erosion in Nepal using a RUSLE modeling and geospatial tool. Geosciences 9(4), 147 (2019)
Lu, D., Li, G., Valladares, G.S., Batistella, M.: Mapping soil erosion risk in Rondonia, Brazilian Amazonia: using RUSLE, remote sensing and GIS. Land Degrad. Dev. 15(5), 499–512 (2004)
Meliho, M., Khattabi, A., Mhammdi, N.: Spatial assessment of soil erosion risk by integrating remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case of Tensift watershed in Morocco. Environ. Earth Sci. 79(10), 1–19 (2020)
Mohammed, S., Kbibo, I., Alshihabi, O., Mahfoud, E.: Studying rainfall changes and water erosion of soil by using the WEPP model in Lattakia, Syria. J. Agric. Sci. Belgrade 61(4), 375–386 (2016)
Mohammed, S., Abdo, H.G., Szabo, S., Pham, Q.B., Holb, I.J., Linh, N.T.T., Anh, D.T., Alsafadi, K., Mokhtar, A., Kbibo, I., Ibrahim, J., Rodrigo-Comino, J.: Estimating human impacts on soil erosion considering different hillslope inclinations and land uses in the coastal region of Syria. Water 12(10), 2786 (2020a)
Mohammed, S., Alsafadi, K., Talukdar, S., Kiwan, S., Hennawi, S., Alshihabi, O., Sharaf, M., Harsanyie, E.: Estimation of soil erosion risk in southern part of Syria by using RUSLE integrating geo informatics approach. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 20, 100375 (2020b)
Mohammed, S., Hassan, E., Abdo, H.G., Szabo, S., Mokhtar, A., Alsafadi, K., Al-Khouri, I., Rodrigo-Comino, J.: Impacts of rainstorms on soil erosion and organic matter for different cover crop systems in the western coast agricultural region of Syria. Soil Use Manag. 37(1), 196–213 (2021)
Mokhtar, A., Jalali, M., He, H., Al-Ansari, N., Elbeltagi, A., Alsafadi, K., Abdo, H.G., Sammen, S.S., Gyasi-Agyei, Y., Rodrigo-Comino, J.: Estimation of SPEI meteorological drought using machine learning algorithms. IEEE Access 9, 65503–65523 (2021)
Mountassir, O.E., Bahir, M., Ouazar, D., Chehbouni, A., Carreira, P.M.: Geochemical and isotopic evidence of groundwater salinization processes in the Essaouira region, north-west coast, Morocco. SN Appl. Sci. 3(7), 1–16 (2021b)
Nabiollahi, K., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Kerry, R., Moradian, S.: Assessment of soil quality indices for salt-affected agricultural land in Kurdistan Province, Iran. Ecol. Indicators 83, 482–494 (2017)
Nearing, M. A., Deer-Ascough, L., Laflen, J. M.: Sensitivity analysis of the WEPP hillslope profile erosion model. Transact ASAE 33(3), 0839–0849 (1990). https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31409
Nyesheja, E.M., Chen, X., El-Tantawi, A.M., Karamage, F., Mupenzi, C., Nsengiyumva, J.B.: Soil erosion assessment using RUSLE model in the Congo Nile Ridge region of Rwanda. Phys. Geogr. 40(4), 339–360 (2019)
Ozsoy, G., Aksoy, E.: Estimation of soil erosion risk within an important agricultural sub-watershed in Bursa, Turkey, in relation to rapid urbanization. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187(7), 419 (2015)
Pal, S.: Identification of soil erosion vulnerable areas in Chandrabhaga river basin: a multi-criteria decision approach. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2(1), 5 (2016)
Panagopoulos, T., Ferreira, V.: Erosion risk map of a Foupana river watershed in Algarve, Portugal. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 6(9), 635–644 (2010)
Rellini, I., Scopesi, C., Olivari, S., Firpo, M., Maerker, M.: Assessment of soil erosion risk in a typical Mediterranean environment using a high resolution RUSLE approach (Portofino promontory, NW-Italy). J. Maps 15(2), 356–362 (2019)
Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., Yoder, D.C.: Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). U.S. Department of Agriculture Agriculture Handbook No. 703, p 404 (1997)
Riccardi, T., Malatesta, L., Van Damme, K., Suleiman, A.S., Farcomeni, A., Rezende, M., Vahalík, P., Attorre, F.: Environmental factors and human activity as drivers of tree cover and density on the Island of Socotra, Yemen. Rendiconti Lincei Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 31(3), 703–718 (2020)
Saïdi, H., Souissi, R., Louati, M., Zargouni, F.: Morphologic changes and sedimentary budgets along a Mediterranean coastline with a sand spit: case of the littoral fringe Sidi Ali El Mekki-Gammarth (NE Tunisia). Rendiconti Lincei 25(3), 393–401 (2014)
Salloum, J., Abdo, H.: The effectiveness of using digital elevation model in morphometric analysis of the network RiverAl-Mentar Basin. Tishreen Univ. J. Res. Sci. Stud. Arts Hum. Ser. 37(4), 421–439 (2015)
Salloum, J., Abdo, H.: Statistical modeling of conservation the vegetation of the land in Alqadmous area from rainfall erosion. Tishreen Univ. J. Res. Sci. Stud. Arts Hum. Ser. 38(3), 667–683 (2016)
Samanta, S., Koloa, C., Pal, D.K., Palsamanta, B.: Estimation of potential soil erosion rate using RUSLE and E30 model. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2(3), 149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0206-7
Serio, M.A., Carollo, F.G., Ferro, V.: Raindrop size distribution and terminal velocity for rainfall erosivity studies: a review. J. Hydrol. 576, 210–228 (2019)
Sujatha, E., Sridhar, V.: Spatial prediction of erosion risk of a small mountainous watershed using RUSLE: a case-study of the Palar sub-watershed in Kodaikanal, South India. Water 10(11), 1608 (2018)
Tang, Q., Xu, Y., Bennett, S.J., Li, Y.: Assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS: a case study of the Yangou watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 73(4), 1715–1724 (2015)
Testi, A., De Nicola, C., Dowgiallo, G., Fanelli, G.: Correspondences between plants and soil/environmental factors in beech forests of Central Apennines: from homogeneity to complexity. Rendiconti Lincei 21(1), 27–43 (2010)
Thomas, J., Joseph, S., Thrivikramji, K.P.: Assessment of soil erosion in a tropical mountain river basin of the southern Western Ghats, India using RUSLE and GIS. Geosci. Front. 9(3), 893–906 (2018)
Trabucchi, M., Puente, C., Comin, F. A., Olague, G., Smith, S. V.: Mapping erosion risk at the basin scale in a Mediterranean environment with opencast coal mines to target restoration actions. Reg Environ. Change 12(4), 675–687 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0278-5
Wijesundara, N.C., Abeysingha, N.S., Dissanayake, D.M.S.L.B.: GIS-based soil loss estimation using RUSLE model: A case of Kirindi Oya river basin, Sri Lanka. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 4(1), 251–262 (2018)
Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D.: Predicting rainfall erosion losses, a guide to conservation planning. USDA Handbook No. 537. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1978)
Wischmeier, W.H., Johnson, C.B., Cross, B.V.: A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J. Soil Water Conserv. 26, 189–192 (1971)
Zika, M., Erb, K.H.: The global loss of net primary production resulting from human-induced soil degradation in drylands. Ecol. Econ. 69(2), 310–318 (2009)
Funding
This manuscript has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdo, H.G. Estimating water erosion using RUSLE, GIS and remote sensing in Wadi-Qandeel river basin, Lattakia, Syria. Proc.Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 87, 514–523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-021-00047-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43538-021-00047-0