1 Introduction

Nanosilica (NS) and nanoferrite (NF) have elicited the most interest amongst all nanomaterials used to improve the properties of concrete [1]. This interest may be due to their higher reactivity compared to other nanomaterials [2, 3]. NS and NF serve as a nanofiller material stuffing the pores between calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) gel particles and refining the microstructure [4,5,6,7]. NS has a high pozzolanic activity and reacts with calcium hydroxide (CH), thus generating abundant CSH, resulting in a condensed cement matrix and increasing concrete strength and durability [8]. On the other hand, NF has a physical effect, and it operates as nuclei to speed up the hydration process of the cementitious material to produce CSH; it also reacts with CH and forms calcium ferric hydrate (CFH) gel [9]. The addition of a small amount (up to 3%) of either NS or NF enhances the bonding between the hardened cement paste (CP) matrix and aggregates in the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) [10]. Many researchers have comprehensively investigated their influence on the hardening properties of concrete. Sumesh et al. [11] examined the effects of nanoparticles on the hardening, durability and bonding properties of cement mortar and geopolymer paste and reported that the use of nanomaterials with effective particle sizes increases the efficiency and strength of cement mortar. Li et al. [12] reported that the addition of nanoparticles can improve the mechanical characteristics of concrete. Furthermore, concrete containing nano-TiO2 has better abrasion resistance compared with concrete with an equivalent amount of nano-SiO2 [13]. With the advancement of nanotechnology, SiO2 can now be produced in nano-sized particles with predictable size ranges. The effect of the size of SiO2 elements on concrete strength was investigated by Schoepfer and Maji [14]. Compressive strength tests revealed a significant increase in strength when particle size of SiO2 is reduced to 12 nm. Researchers have been working to enhance the durability and long-term sustainability of concrete, and considerable improvement in the mechanical characteristics of cementitious materials has been achieved through the integration of nanoparticles [15, 16]. Nano-modification may be used to develop a cementitious material that is highly durable, strong and environmentally friendly [17]. Nanoparticles can reduce cement use and convert cement-based goods into electric/thermal sensors or crack-repairing materials because of their reinforcing action [18, 19]. The addition of ultrafine nano-elements aids in the reduction of cement content by moderately substituting cement by weight ground to increase the binding impact [7, 17, 20]. Ultrafine nanomaterial particles also help reduce micropore development by serving as a filler agent, resulting in highly dense concrete that automatically limits micropore growth in ultrahigh-strength concrete (UHSC) structures [21, 22]. Previous studies demonstrate that nano-silica can improve concrete’s resistance to high temperatures, along with increase in the mechanical properties of high-strength concrete at high temperatures [23, 24]. The presence of nanosilica in mixtures increases resistance to elevated temperatures that is evident as the concrete, after exposure to elevated temperatures maintain most of its compressive strength (fc). Inclusion of Nano silica also helps reduce crack length compared with plain or even blended mixtures containing other supplementary materials [25, 26]. At temperatures of 200 °C to 400 °C, abundant CSH is produced as a result of the high pozzolanic activity of nanosilica, and anhydrous cement grains are hydrated during the internal autoclaving process [27, 28]. Moreover, the pore size distribution in the matrix at high temperatures is reduced by increasing the nanosilica content [29]. The resistance of concrete to elevated temperatures of up to 400 °C can be enhanced by increasing the nanosilica content, but an opposite effect occurs at temperatures exceeding 400 °C [30, 31]. Furthermore, the incorporation of NS delays the deterioration of fired concrete by reducing the thermal conductivity of concrete [32]. This condition implies that long exposure to fire is essential to attain the required temperature at the core of the concrete members. Thus, the thermal degradation of blended concrete members is delayed [33]. Spinel ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles formulated via the sol–gel process (17.5 nm) have also been added with different doses of up to 2% to boost the physico-mechanical and fire resistivity of hardened cement pastes. The optimum addition is 1% ZnFe2O4 [34].

The previous studies focused only on studying the effects of elevated temperature without analysing real fire situations. Moreover, the literature didn’t provide any design and relative cost estimation for a concrete structure incorporating nanoparticles. For the previous issues, the recent study aims to achieve three objectives. The first is to examine the effect of elevated temperature of silica fume (SF) on high-strength concrete incorporated with NS or NF under elevated temperatures up to 800 °C. The second aim is to investigate the fire resistance of specimens subjected to 600 °C heat under an initial cracking load of control mix for one hour. The third is to make a cost estimation for designing reinforced concrete columns using every mix. Nine mixes were prepared to study the effect of adding different percentages of NS and NF. Their results were compared with those of common and SF concrete mixes. Moreover, the effect of increasing the cement content of 3% NS concrete to 450 kg/m3 was studied for comparison. Compressive strength (fc), splitting tensile strength (ft) and modulus of elasticity (Ec) were investigated at room temperature. The SEM analysis of the specimens was performed to explain the obtained results and compare it with works of El-Enein et al. and Nili et al. [35, 36]

2 Experimental work

2.1 Materials and mix proportion

Nanosilica (NS) was prepared from rice husk by using hot hydrochloric acid via chemical treatment and burning [37]. After this treatment, an amorphous powder with 100% purity and an average particle size of 6.25 nm was obtained. CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NF) were prepared through the citrate-gel method [9] with average particle size 29.62 nm and 100% purity. Physical and chemical characterisations of the used nanofillers were performed. Type I ordinary Portland cement (OPC type I 52.5 N) and SF were utilised as binders in the mixes, as shown in Table 1. The main characteristics of the NS sample were measured using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) apparatus, an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy device and a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) instrument, as shown in Fig. 1. Cement was tested in accordance with ASTM C143M-15a [38]. Natural sand and dolomite were used as fine and coarse aggregates with specific gravities of 2.67and 2.75 and volume weights of 1.66 and 1.78 t/m3, respectively. The fineness modulus of sand was 2.82, and the NMZ and water absorption of dolomite were 12.5 mm and 1.1%, respectively. The aggregate tests were performed in accordance with ASTM C33/C33M–18 [39]. In order to achieve good workability of mixes and even distribution of NS in the concrete mix, Sika Visco-Crete 5–930 with a density of 1.08 kg/m3 was used as the super-plasticizer (SP) in accordance with ASTM-C-494 types G and F.

Table 1 Chemical composition and physical properties of OPC, SF, NS and NF
Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterisation of the NS sample [37]

Table 2 shows the preparation of the nine concrete mixes. The binder (B) involved cement content (C), SF, NS and NF. The cement content and the percentages of sand (S), aggregates (Agg), water (W) and super-plasticizer (SP) “S/Agg, W/B and SP/B” were kept constant in all the mixes at 400 kg/m3 and 40%, 30% and 4%, respectively. Uniform dispersion of NS and NF in the mixes was not easy because of their high surface energy and low content in the mixture. All these mixes containing NS (1–4%) and NF (1–2%) were prepared according to the following procedure. First, the Nanoparticles were stirred in water separately in a small mixer at a speed of 120 rpm for 2 min. Next, cement, silica fume, sand and dolomite were dry mixed at medium speed of 80 rpm for 1 min. Afterwards, keeping the mixer at medium speed, about two thirds of water with nanoparticle was added gradually to the dry constituents for about 30 s. SP was added to the rest of the third mixing water and added gradually while mixing for another 30 s. Finally, the mixture was rested for 30 s and then remixed for 1 min [37]. The specimens were demoulded after 24 h of casting and alleviated in a water tank at ambient temperature until the test dates.

Table 2 Proportions of the designed mixes and their cost ratio with respect to the MO mix

2.2 Specimens and testing

2.2.1 Specimens

Nine mixes were designed as illustrated in Table 2. For each mix, three cubes of dimensions 100 × 100 × 100 mm were prepared for each of the six curing ages to test for compressive strength. Three cylindrical specimens of height 300 mm and diameter of 150 mm were cast for each mix to test modulus of elasticity and tensile strength. For water permeability test, three cylindrical specimens of height 150 mm and diameter of 150 mm for each mix.

2.2.2 Mechanical and physical testing

A compression test was performed after 7–180 days of aging by using 100 × 100 × 100 mm cubes. The test was carried out in accordance with BS 1881–116: 1983. A splitting tensile test was performed on the 28th day by using 150 × 300 mm cylinders and carried out in accordance with BS 1881–117: 1983. Static modulus of elasticity (E) compression was applied on the 28th day by using 150 × 300 mm cylinders and carried out in accordance with ASTM C469-65 (1975). A water permeability test was conducted on the 28th day. For a five-hour period, the concrete specimens were subjected to a hydrostatic water flow of 30 bars. The permeability coefficient (K) was calculated based on Darcy’s law.

2.2.3 Durability testing

The durability of concrete mixes was investigated through high elevated temperature testing and actual fire exposure. For elevated temperature, the specimens were heated in an electric furnace at fixed temperatures with exposure time of for 2 h. The volume of electrical furnace was of (250 × 400 × 350) mm with heating rate of 20 °C /min and maximum achievable temperature of 1200 °C. The heated specimens were left to cool down at ambient temperature until it reaches room temperature as shown in Fig. 2 [23]. A fire test was carried out using 100 × 100 × 100 mm cubes. Two German thermocouples (type J) were fixed during the casting of the cubes. The first was imbedded in the middle of a cube to measure the inner temperature, and the other was fixed on the surface of the cube to measure the surface temperature. The cubes were cured for 28 days, removed from the curing tank and allowed to dry at ambient temperature for about 7 days before testing. The fire test was conducted whenever the specimens were loaded with the initial cracking load in accordance with ASTM E119 [40]. The firing tool was designed according to the standard fire test curves of ASTM-E119, and its time–temperature relation was compatible with ISO 834–11. All specimens were loaded with a constant load of 70 KN representing the initial crack load of the control mix. Each specimen was loaded using a hydraulic jack machine with a capacity 10,000 psi, an accuracy of 100 psi and a radius of 98 mm. Each specimen was inserted inside the firing tool. The thermocouples were connected to a voltmeter to measure the output voltage, which was converted into temperature in Celsius throughout the thermocouple curve. Firstly, each specimen was loaded with the predetermined load (70 KN) and kept constant during firing. Secondly, the temperature was raised to 600 °C on the surface of the cube at a rate of 50 °C/min then maintained at 600 °C for an hour under loading. Lastly, the fire was extinguished, and the load on the specimen was gradually increased until failure occurred. The fc value was recorded, as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heating period of specimens per min

Fig. 3
figure 3

Firing of a loaded specimen

2.2.4 SEM analysis

Samples for SEM analysis were taken from the centre of cubes, grinded and adhered on aluminium stub using adhesive carbon tape. Samples were sputter coated with gold for 1 min. Then, examination was performed using SEM (JEOL, JSM IT-100) at 20 kv.

The heated specimens were exposed to various temperatures (100 °C—800 °C) for all mixes after curing for 28 days.

2.2.5 Cost estimation of concrete column

An economic assessment of one cubic meter of the concrete mixes was performed and the cost of the materials was obtained from the seller’s reports. The following formula was used based on the seller’s reports.

$${\text{Cost}}_{i} = \left( {1 \times {\text{C}}_{i} } \right) + \left( {5 \times SF_{i} } \right) + \left( {200 \times NS_{i} } \right) + \left( {1000 \times NF_{i} } \right) + \left( {0.00225 \times W_{i} } \right) + \left( {0.051 \times S_{i} } \right) + \left( {0.093 \times D_{i} } \right) + (75 \times SP_{i} )$$
(1)

where Costi is the cost of 1 m3 of produced concrete blend i, Ci is the cement content of blend i, SFi is the SF content, NSi is the NS content, NFi is the NF content, Wi is the water content, Si is the sand content, Di is the dolomite content and SPi is the SP content. All of the components of concrete mix i were measured in kg/m3.

Moreover, an economic assessment of the designed column of concrete mixes was performed. The cost of the reinforced column of mix i was evaluated by assuming a load of 10,000 KN. The quality control of nanoparticle concrete mixes must be excellent. Thus, the confidence percentage and coefficient of variance (V %) were assumed to be 95% and 5%, respectively. The designed compressive strength (fcu) of mix i at 28 days of age was calculated with Eq. 2 and designed area of the concrete and the area of the steel column were calculated with Eq. 3 where \({\alpha }_{i}\) was derived from Eq. 4. The \({\beta }_{i}\) and the factor of safety of concrete (\({\gamma }_{c}\)) and steel (\({\gamma }_{c}\)) were taken as 0.67, 1.75 and 1.36. The yield strength of steel (fy) and the density of steel \(D\) st) were 400 MPa and 7.8 ton/ m3, respectively. The variable parameters in Eqs. (2)–(5) are tabulated in Table 3.

$$(f_{cu} )_{{i = { }}} (f_{m} )_{i} *\left( {1 - 1.67*V} \right)$$
(2)
$$P_{u} { } = { }0.9{*}\left( {\alpha_{i} \beta_{i} { }\frac{{(f_{cu} )_{{i { }}} }}{{\gamma_{c} }}{\text{A}}_{ci} + \frac{{f_{y} }}{{\gamma_{s} }}{\text{ A}}_{si} } \right)$$
(3)
Table 3 Analysis of studied axially loaded short column

where

$$\left[ {\alpha_{i} = 0.85 - 0.0033\left( {f_{cu} - 60} \right)} \right] \ge 0.67$$
(4)
$$Cost_{col \, i} = \, (cost_{i} *A_{ci} + A_{si} *_{st} * \, 10^{3} *cost_{st} )* \, h_{col*10}^{ - 6}$$
(5)

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Fresh properties

Figure 4 shows the fresh and hard densities of the SF concrete mixes prepared with the incorporation of nanoparticles particles in comparison with the density of the control mix. The figure indicates that the fresh density of the SF concrete mixes incorporated with nanoparticles was less than that of the control mix due to their lesser specific gravity. Meanwhile, the dry density of all the mixes was greater than that of the control mix due to the high density of the matrix resulting from the highly pozzolanic reaction of NS and the physical role of NF. Both, NS and NF worked as a catalyst for cement hydration and SF pozzolanic manner, thereby producing highly dense concrete [9].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Fresh and dry density of concrete mixes

3.2 Water permeability

Figure 5 shows that the water permeability coefficients (K) of Mo and MSF mixes were 4.04 × 10–11 and 1.65 × 10–11 cm/sec, respectively. Permeability when the NS content was increased up to 4% was found to be 0.458 × 10–11 cm/sec. The K of M450 was greater than that of MNS4, which means that there is no need to increase the cement content of NS mixes over 400 kg/m3. The compressive strength of the MNS4 mix was better than that of the M450 mix, consequently, confirming the previous result that 4% NS is the best percentage. In addition, the K of 1% NF was larger than that of 1% NS while the K of 2% NF was smaller than that of 2% NS.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Water permeability coefficient (K) (cm/sec) at 28 days of age

3.3 Mechanical properties

3.3.1 Compressive strength

Figure 6 illustrates the fc of the nine mixes at various ages between 7 and 180 days. Adding SF improved fc up to 35%. Adding NS improved fc by up to 4%. This result may be due to the tiny particle size, large surface area, high purity and high pozzolanic reaction of NS. For example, inclusion of NS resulted in enhancement of compressive strength by up to 89% and 73% at 28 and 180 days of age, respectively. Increasing of the cement content of the MNS3 mix from 400 kg/m3 to 450 kg/m3 required a proportional increment in SF, NS and SP. Hence, the cost of concrete increased by 11.1%. This increment in cement content improved the strength of MNS3 to 84% and 71% at 28 and 180 days of age, respectively. The improvement in strength is very small compared with the increase in cost. Moreover, increasing NS to up to 4% in MNS4 achieved better improvement with a very small increase in cost compared to the M450 mix. Meanwhile, adding 1% and 2% NF increased the improvement to 44.2% and 72.3% at 28 days of age and to 30.12% and 49.5% at 180 days of age, respectively. However, the fc of MNF1 was smaller than that of MNS1 at all ages. The fc of MNF2 was better than that of MNS2 at early ages up to 56 days of age. On the contrary, the fc of MNF2 was smaller than that of MNS2 at late ages up to 180 days of age.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Compressive strength of NS and NF mixes at 7–180 days of age at room temperature

3.3.2 Splitting tensile and modulus of elasticity

Figures 7 and 8 show the splitting tensile strength (ft) and modulus of elasticity (Ec) of the NS mixes at 28 days of age. Adding NS has enhanced the ft and Ec by up to 81.3% and 60.8% respectively. Meanwhile, the incorporation of 1% and 2% NF improved ft and Ec to 37.6% and 59.5%, respectively. Finally, increasing the cement content with 3% NS (M450) has enhanced the ft and Ec by 74.6% and 59.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the results of MNF1 were smaller than those of MNS1. On the contrary, the results of MNF2 were better than those of MNS2, which agrees with the fc results.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Splitting tensile strength at 28 days of age

Fig. 8
figure 8

Modulus of elasticity at 28 days of age

3.4 SEM of nano-specimens at room temperature

Figure 9 shows the SEM of the cement paste matrix (CP) and interfacial transition zone (ITZ) with the aggregate of the mixes at 28 days of age. Hydration outputs, such as CSH, ettringite and CH, were observed in the SF mix. Adding 2% NS produced a thick microstructure with extra-dense hydration products due to the highly pozzolanic reaction of NS with high distribution that formed an additional CSH gel. The microstructure improvement increased with increasing NS percentages of up to 4%. These results are in concurrence with the results of Abo El-Enein and Nili [35, 36] which in turn are also consistent with the other recent results. The SEM analysis revealed that the MNS4 mix had the densest ITZ and contained the largest content of CSH gel combined with the lowest content of calcium aluminate hydrate (CAH) and traces of calcium hydroxide (CH).

Fig. 9
figure 9

SEM of ITZ and CP of the mixes at room temperature [9]

The SEM CP and ITZ of MNF2 were better than those of MNS2 possibly because of the physical effect of NF, which acted as nuclei that accelerated the hydration process at the early ages [9].

3.5 Relative economic index

Figure 10 displays the relative economic index ratio (REI) of the mixes incorporated with nanoparticles with respect to the control mix. Clear increments were observed in 1 m3 of NS mixes from 1.73 up to 3.12. Furthermore, increasing the cement content to 450 kg/m3 has raised the REI to 3.26 without a significant increase in the mechanical properties or durability. And finally, the REI of NF mixes has increased up to 3.12. On the contrary, REI of the columns samples was reduced when compared to the 1 m3 ones (Fig. 10), which is due to the improvements in the compressive strengths of nano-particles mixes. For instance, the REI of the MNS4 column was 0.85, which improved fc to 1.885% at 28 days of age and reduced the area of the column to 0.65. Furthermore, the mechanical properties and REI of MNS4 mix were better than those of MNF2 mix. In conclusion, the MNS4 mix can be considered the most economical mix with the smallest relative area reduction amongst the other mixes.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Cross sec-area ratio and cost ratio of both of 1 m3 and designed column relative to MO

3.6 Influence of temperature on compressive strength

Figure 11 shows the compressive strengths of the mixes with nano-particles subjected to different elevated temperatures (100 °C–800 °C) at 28 days. They were measured and compared with the fc of Mo at the same temperatures. At 100 °C, the fc of Mo and MSF mixes has increased to 65 and 77.5 MPa, respectively. For instance, adding 4% NS has improved the fc by up to 61.7%. These increments in strength were due to the accelerated hydration of the highly pozzolanic reaction of NS and cementitious materials. At 200° C, the strengths of MO and MSF have decreased to 60 and 69 MPa, respectively. The compressive strengths of the nano- particle mixes were also reduced but were still greater than the SF mix. For instance, adding 4% NS has improved the strength by up to 59.2%. At 400 °C, considerable reductions in the strengths of MO and MSF occurred and reached 40 and 36 MPa, respectively. Although the difference in strength between MNS3 and MNS4 mixes was small, the strength of mix MNS4 was still the highest up to exposure temperature of 400 °C, with the improvement reaching up to 104.3%. Moreover, at 600 °C, the strengths of Mo and MSF became 20 and 16 MPa, respectively. The strength of the MNS3 mix was the highest, with the improvement reaching 232%. At 800 °C, the strength of the MNS3 mix was still the highest, with the improvement reaching 190%. Thus, the compressive strength values of MNS3 were the largest at 500 °C up to 800 °C. The fc of M450 was smaller than that of MNS3 at all temperatures, and the difference between them increased with increasing temperature. Hence, increasing the cement content of SF concrete incorporated with NS had reverse effect on the concrete’s resistance under high temperatures. The fc of MNF2 was still better than that of MNS2 at all temperatures up to 800 °C. At 300 °C, the fc of MNF2 was the best amongst all the MNS mixes, except for MNS3 that had the best fc up to 800 °C.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Compressive strength of concrete mixes at high temperatures up to 800 °C for 2 h

3.7 SEM analysis of elevated temperature specimens

Figures 12, 13, 14, 15 show SEM images of ITZ between aggregate and CP matrix of MSF, MNS2, MNF2 and MNS3 mixes at various temperatures (200 °C–800 °C). At 200 °C, SEM image of MSF specimen shows shrinkage of cement paste, emergence of micro-cracks and weakened ITZ due to the chemical and physical loss of water and the decomposition of ettringite. On the contrary, SEM images from specimens of all mixes with nanoparticles show that the cement paste has become denser than before due to the accelerated rate of hydration that formed additional hydration products, especially CAH [41]. This may be due to low thermal conductivity of nanoparticles that delayed the heat transfer of concrete incorporating nanoparticles compared with the heat transfer of normal concrete [42].

Fig. 12
figure 12

SEM of ITZ and CP of the mixes at 200 °C

Fig. 13
figure 13

SEM of ITZ and CP of the mixes at 400 °C

Fig. 14
figure 14

SEM of ITZ and CP of the mixes at 600 °C

Fig. 15
figure 15

SEM of ITZ and CP of the mixes at 800 °C

At 400 °C, SEM of MSF shows that CH and CSH gel starts to decamp and completely lose water leaving some pores in ITZ and a significant increase in micro-cracks are also observed. Extra CAH (as a result of the hydration process) appears in the nanoparticles mix specimens and increases with the increase in nano-particles percentage. At 600 °C, more decomposition of CSH and complete decomposition of CH occur in MSF specimen along with widening of micro-cracks and pores. Micro-cracks begin to appear in MNS2 specimen, but no cracks or pores emerge in MNF2 and MNS3 specimens. Extra CAH is also observed in their specimens. At 800 °C, MSF specimen shows fragmentation, severe cracking, ITZ cracks and loss of bonding due to the disappearance of CSH in the specimen. The number of cracks increase in MNS2 specimen but MNF2 and MNS3 specimens have no cracks up to 800 °C, but their porosity increases slightly.

The fraction surface of the nano-particles mixes is smooth and passed through the aggregate at all temperatures up to 600 °C. SEM images at all temperatures of MNS3 and MNF2 specimens show that they still have dense matrix without significant cracks due the increment of CSH and CAH and getting rid of CH [23].

3.8 Fire in the presence of initial cracking load

Figure 16 shows the failure compressive strengths of the NS and NF mixes exposed to fire at 600 °C under an initial cracking load of Mo. The strengths were tested at 28 days of age. They were compared with strength of Mo under the same conditions. The results showed that the strengths of the Mo and MSF mixes were 36 and 37.3 MPa, respectively. The addition of SF did not improve the residual strength. Residual strength losses were even observed for the same compositions. These results agree with those of Lubloy et al., where the fire-under-load results of NS and NF were almost similar to that of high-temperature exposure results at 600 °C. [43]. For instance, adding NS has improved the fired strength progressively by up to 117% at 3% NS. However, further increasing the NS percentage (MNS4) or the cement content (M450) has reduced the strength improvement to 101.4% and 85% respectively. Thus, MNS3 was the best fire resistance mix because it could enhance the mechanical and durability properties of concrete, similar to the conclusions and the fire test results matched with those of Abhilash et al. [44] on exposure to a high temperature of 600 °C.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Compressive strengths of the concrete mixes after fire at 600 °C for 1 h

4 Conclusions

This study analysed the compressive strength of SF mixes with a small content of nanomaterials under exposure to high temperatures and fire in the presence of an initial cracking load. The results of all tested mixes were compared to control mix, MO. The following conclusions were obtained.

  1. 1.

    At room temperature, the addition of NS can improve the fc by up to 45.5%.

  2. 2.

    Increasing the cement content of the concrete with 3% NS does not enhance the resistance to high temperatures and fire.

  3. 3.

    The concrete mix with MNS4 has demonstrated the lowest relative economic index of the column area, and M450 is the largest relative area reduction with respect to the control mix column area.

  4. 4.

    The addition of 4% NS can enhance the compressive strength by approximately 104% under elevated temperature up to 400 °C.

  5. 5.

    Using 3% NS has demonstrated the best results since the compressive strength under elevated temperatures has improved by up to 230%.

  6. 6.

    The mixes with nanomaterials have demonstrated the best compressive strengths which correspond of the SEM image results.

  7. 7.

    The water permeability of 4% NS has the best reduction percentage reaching to 72%. The K of 2% NF was smaller than that of 2% NS that reached 55.5% and 54.1%, respectively.

  8. 8.

    MNS3 had the largest fc amongst the fired concrete specimens in the presence of initial cracking load at 600 °C. Its addition improved the strength of the Mo mix by 117%.