Abstract
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) has gained huge attention recently due to its high workability which eliminates the need for vibration and makes its placement easier compared to conventional concrete. However, the production of Portland cement (PC) which is the main binder in SCC is energy-intensive and one of the major contributors to the world’s carbon dioxide emission. On the other hand, the use of alkali-activated binders (AABs) in concrete has been reported to reduce the energy consumption and carbon emission of concrete by more than 50%. Therefore, the use of AAB as a binder in SCC can help to achieve an eco-friendlier concrete. This paper gives a short overview of the performance of SCC made with AABs. The effect of various factors on the performance of alkali-activated self-compacting concrete (AASCC) was discussed and a simplified sustainability assessment of AASCC was carried out. Discussions from this paper showed that AASCC with acceptable fresh and hardened properties can be achieved with the proper selection of materials. In addition, the evaluation of the embodied energy and carbon of different types of concrete showed that AASCC is more sustainable. However, more research in this field is required to encourage its universal acceptance and large-scale application.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The last decade has seen increasing research and use of alkali-activated binders (AAB) as a sustainable alternative to the conventional Portland cement. AABs are sustainable compared to PC as the high-energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission from the production of the PC is eliminated [1, 2]. AABs are made up of aluminosilicate precursors, mostly waste materials, and activated with an alkali media to produce alkali-activated concrete (AAC) [3,4,5]. In general, AAC has been found to have excellent mechanical and durability performance compared to Portland cement concrete (PCC) [6,7,8]. The advancement in concrete technology has also led to the development of a special type of concrete called self-compacting concrete (SCC). As the name implies, SCCs are very flowable and able to consolidate under their weight [9]. In addition, to their self-compacting ability, they possess high passing and filling ability coupled with outstanding segregation resistance which makes them suitable for various applications. However, the presence of PC as a binder in SCC is still a major concern due to the high embodied energy and carbon of PC [10, 11]. Despite the extensive use of AAB to produce AAC, its use as a binder is very limited. To create more awareness about this clean material and technology, this study was undertaken as part of an extensive study to improve the sustainability of SCC. This paper presents a short overview of the performance of AASCC in terms of its fresh and hardened properties. A simplified sustainability comparison of different types was concrete was also carried out. It is anticipated that this paper will create more awareness about ways to improve the sustainability of building materials and technologies. It is also anticipated that this review will be a useful resource to researchers and scientists working on ways to incorporate clean technologies into building materials.
Self-compacting concrete (SCC)
As mentioned earlier, SCC is a special type of concrete that can be placed and compacted under its weight in contrast to the conventional SCC where vibration or compaction is needed. The compaction of conventional concrete is energy-intensive, expensive, takes time, and emits carbon dioxide into the environment. In addition to the self-compacting ability of these types of concrete, they are capable of free-flowing around reinforcement and do not exhibit any segregation. Therefore, compared to the use of PCC for construction applications, SCCs are more sustainable and cheaper. The use of SCC has also been found to result in time-saving and results in a reduction in noise pollution due to the elimination of the vibration process. The use of AABs as a binder has also been explored recently to improve the sustainability of SCC. SCCs made with AAB are further referred herein as alkali-activated self-compacting concrete (AASCC).
Alkali activated self-compacting concrete (AASCC)
As the name implies, alkali-activated self-compacting concrete is SCCs made with AABs. As AASCC differs from the conventional AAC due to its high workability and self-compacting properties, it is essential to have a good understanding of how its components affect its performance. Table 1 presents the precursor, activator, and composition of various SCCs from the literature. It can be seen from Table 1 that the most used precursor for AASCC is SL in various forms. The preferred choice of SL compared to other precursors can be associated with its higher hydraulic reactivity and calcium content which makes it possible to cure in ambient conditions compared to those made with FA which requires elevated temperature curing. In terms of the alkali activators used, it can be seen from Table 1 that the most used activator is sodium hydroxide (NH) and sodium silicate (NS). These activators are preferred due to their outstanding performance as exhibited in AAC [12,13,14,15]. However, the use of these conventional activators (i.e. NH and NS) results in various issues that can be resolved with the use of alternative activators [3, 16, 17]. It is worth to mention that the types of products formed in these composites differ from the type of precursor and activator used. The product from the alkali activation of slag is hydrated calcium silicate but less crystalline when compared to the calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) formed during PC hydration. Also, in contrast to the CSH gel formed when PC is used, the calcium-to-silicate ratio is lower but possesses higher aluminate content [18]. The alkali activation of fly ash is different compared to that of slag and the temperature is very critical to the activation process. Typically, the rate of activation of fly ash particles is very low at ambient conditions. Therefore, an elevated temperature is always required to increase the alkali activation process when FAs are used as precursors. The alkali activation of FA produces amorphous 3D structures composed of aluminosilicate hydrates [19,20,21]. The negative charges in these hydrates are balanced by the alkaline ions. The ambient curing conditions stated in Table 1 imply temperature of 23 °C ± 3 °C and relative humidity 55% ± 10%.
Performance of AASCC
Slump
The slump of SCC is one of the major properties that determine its classification and application. Following the requirements of EFNARC [39], SCC must possess a slump in the range of 650–800 mm to be used for various applications. Similar to the conventional AAC, the increase in the concentration of the alkali activators used in AASCC is expected to result in a decrease in the workability of the AASCC mixtures. This decrease in the slump with a higher concentration of the alkali can be associated with the higher dissolution of the aluminate and silicate monomers with higher concentration. Saini and Vattipalli [23] reported a decrease in the workability of AASCC mixtures when the concentration of the NH increased from 10 to 16 M. The decrease in the workability of the mixtures with a higher concentration of NH was attributed to the quicker polymeric reaction rate coupled with the quick setting of the SL. Nonetheless, the higher dosage of HRWRA (i.e. 1.2% the SL content) used in the study resulted in all the mixtures satisfying the workability requirements of SCC (i.e. 650–800 mm). These observations are similar to that of Nagaraj and Babu [26] where the concentration of NH was increased from 2 to 12 M as shown in Fig. 1.
Most studies on AASCC used a binary combination of NH and NS as an activator in the range of 0.5–2.5. The study by Nagaraj and Babu [26] showed that despite the reduction in the workability of the mixtures with a higher concentration of NH, the workability of the mixtures improved when the content of NS was increased. The effect of NS-to-NH ratio on the slump of AASCC mixtures activated with 8 M of NH alongside NS is presented in Fig. 2. The improved workability with the introduction of the higher content of NS was attributed to its higher water content in comparison to that of NS.
A study by Huseien and Shah [40] where SL and FA were used as a precursor and activated with NH and NS indicates the slump of the AASCC increased with the higher replacement of SL with FA in the mixtures. The replacement of the SL with FA up to 70% resulted in an approximately 70 mm increase in the slump. This study indicated that only SL cannot be used as a precursor when activated with NS and NH in AASCC due to the lower slump obtained (i.e. 560 mm). To satisfy the EFNARC slump requirement, the SL content needs to be replaced with FA in the range of 20–60% as shown in Fig. 3. A similar increase in workability was observed when other methods, such as v-funnel, L-box, and J-ring, were used for the workability evaluation. The lower workability of mixtures incorporating higher content of SL can be attributed to its faster setting time which inhibits the ease at which the mixture flows. While the increase in the workability with the incorporation of FA can be associated with the ability of the FA to reduce the rate of water absorption of the mixture. These observations corresponded to other studies where the incorporation of FA into conventional SCC mixtures resulted in higher workability [9, 41, 42]. Patel and Shah [31] observed a significant decrease in the workability when RHA was incorporated as partial replacement of the FA up to 25% in AASCC mixtures. The reduction in the workability was attributed to the higher specific area and water absorption of the RHA which result in a higher loss in workability due to the increase in the water requirement. Huseien et al. [33] reported an improvement in the workability of AASCC when ceramic tile powder (CP) was used to replace SL up to 80%. The slump of the AASCC incorporation CP as 80% replacement of SL is 43.6% higher than that with only SL as the precursor. The enhancement in the workability of the mixtures with the incorporation of CP was attributed to its lower water demand which results in more available water in the mixture. The larger particle size of CP can also responsible for the higher workability due to its lower specific surface area when compared to that of SL [33]. Similar to the effect of high-range water-reducing admixtures (HRWRA) in PCC, its incorporation into AASCC was found to increase the slump of the mixtures. The slump of AASCC was increased by 14% when the HRWRA content was increased from 12 to 28 kg/m3 [35].
Setting time
Setting time is one of the critical properties required for the practical application of concrete. The use of alkali-activated slag as a binder has been plagued with the quicker setting time of the binder due to the high reactivity of the SL [43]. However, this issue can be eliminated or reduced with the incorporation of FA as a replacement due to its spherical shape and lower reactivity [44]. Huesein and Shah [40] were able to increase the initial and final setting times of AASCC by approximately 680% and 625%, respectively, when 70% of SL was replaced with FA as shown in Fig. 4. These results indicate that depending on the designated application and required setting times, the content of FA and SL can be varied to achieve the desired setting times when sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide are used as an activator. Similar to the effect of CP on the workability of AASCC, its incorporation was also found to increase the initial and final setting times [33]. The higher setting time of AASCC incorporating CP was attributed to the lower reactivity of the CP in comparison to the SL which results in lower product formation and a consequential delay in the setting times. Therefore, in applications where extended setting times are desired, CP can be incorporated as a partial replacement of SL to delay the setting of the composite.
Compressive strength
Generally, the compressive strength of alkali-activated composites has been strongly associated with the ratio of the calcium to the aluminate which is dependent on the type of aluminosilicate precursor used [45,46,47]. The higher this ratio, the higher the resulting compressive strength of the composite. In contrast to the negative effect of higher concentration of alkali activator on the workability properties, there is a positive influence on the compressive strength. The higher strength of AAC made with a higher concentration of the alkali activator can be attributed to higher dissolution of silicate and aluminate monomers which results in more gel formation and a corresponding increase in strength. An increase in the compressive strength of AASCC mixtures made with NS and NH activated SL was observed when the concentration of NH was increased from 10 to 16 M [23]. This observation corresponds to that of Nagaraj and Babu [26] where the concentration of NH was used in the range between 2 M and 12 M as shown in Fig. 5. However, for mixtures in which the concentration of NH was 4 M and less, the compressive was less than 20 MPa at 90 days. Nagaraj and Babu [26] also reported that the increase in the NS-to-NH resulted in lower compressive strength of AASCC mixtures as shown in Fig. 6. The decrease in the compressive strength with the higher ratio of NS-to-NH was attributed to the introduction of surplus silicate monomers into the matrix coupled with an increase in the water content which results in more polymerization product formation [48].
The replacement of SL with FA in AASCC using NS and NH was found to result in a decrease in the compressive strength as shown in Fig. 7 [40]. This observation was also reported to be consistent at all ages when the compressive strengths of the AASCC were evaluated at 1, 3, 7, 28, 56, and 90 days. The reduction in the compressive strength can be attributed to the lower reactivity of the FA as a result of its low calcium-to-silicate and aluminate. Patel and Shah [31] reported a decrease in the compressive strength when RHA was used as FA replacement in AASCC cured at ambient conditions. The reduction in the compressive strength was associated with the increase in the amount of unreacted silica in the system which results in a corresponding increase in the silicate-to-aluminate ratio. However, when heat curing was employed in the first 24 h of casting, there is a significant increase in the compressive strength of the AASCC with increasing content of RHA up to 15%. This increase in the compressive strength of AASCC cured at elevated temperatures can be associated with an increase in the reactivity and activation of the RHA at higher temperatures. Despite the beneficial benefit of CP on the workability of AASCC, it has a consequential effect on the compressive strength [33]. The compressive strength of AASCC was found to reduce with a higher content of CP as partial replacement of SL. Nonetheless, AASCC mixtures incorporating CP as replacement of up to 80% replacement of SL still exhibited a compressive strength higher than 25 MPa at 28 days showing the viability of using the mixture for structural applications. The reduction in the compressive strength with the incorporation of CP can be attributed to the lower calcium oxide in the CP which results in lower strength gain. The lower reactivity of the CP in comparison to that of the SL could also be responsible for the reduction in strength of the AASCC. Saini and Vattipalli [23] explored the effect of nano-silica on the performance of AASCC. Their study showed that the incorporation of 2% nano-silica resulted in a significant increase in the compressive strength. The increase in the strength of the AASCC mixtures with the incorporation of nano-silica was attributed to the nano-silica densifying the tetrahedral aluminosilicate matrix structure [49]. The incorporation of nanomaterials has been found to enhance the performance of cementitious composites [50, 51].
Tensile strength
Similar to the trend observed for compressive strength, an increase in the split tensile strength of AASCC mixtures was found to increase with the concentration of the alkali activator [23]. Also, the use of RHA as a replacement of FA in AASCC cured at ambient temperature was found to result in lower tensile strength [31]. However, samples cured at elevated temperatures exhibited higher tensile strength. The higher tensile strength at elevated temperatures can be associated with the increase in the dissolution of the silicate and aluminate monomers at higher temperatures. In contrast, the incorporation of CP as partial replacement of SL was found to result in a reduction in the split tensile strength of the AASCC [33]. The tensile strength of AASCC mixtures incorporating CP as 80% replacement of SL is 53.1% lower than that with only SL as a precursor. The decrease in the split tensile strength with the incorporation of the CP was attributed to its lower reactivity and low calcium content.
Water absorption and permeability
The water absorption of concrete is a good indication of its overall durability. Huseien and Shah [40] explored the effect of replacing slag with FA in AASCC activated with NH and NS. The study showed that the incorporation of FA as a replacement of the SL increased the water absorption of the composite. The increase in the absorption was attributed to the slower reactivity of the FA when compared to that of SL which results in less densified microstructure and a consequential higher absorption. Similar observations were made when CP was used to partially replace SL up to 80% in AASCC mixtures [33]. An approximately 100% increase in the water absorption of AASCC was observed when CP was used to replace 80% of SL. The increase in the water absorption of the mixtures with the incorporation of CP can be associated with the lower reactivity of the CP which results in less product formation and a consequential porous microstructure. A study by Nagaraj and Babu [26] on the evaluation of AASCC made with SL activated by NH and NS showed that increasing the concentration of the NH resulted in less water absorption of the composites. The reduction with a higher concentration of NH was attributed to the dissolution of more monomers at higher concentrations of NH which results in more product formation and the densification of the microstructure. However, an increase in the ratio of NS-to-NH was found to be detrimental to the water absorption properties due to the increase in the silicate and water content in the mixture. The effect of NH concentration and the ratio of NS-to-NH on the water absorption of the AASCC is presented in Fig. 8.
Sulphate resistance
Nagaraj and Babu [26] reported a higher resistance in AASCC activated with a higher concentration of NH when samples are immersed in a 5% magnesium sulfate solution for 90 days. Whereas, increasing the NS-to-NH ratio resulted in opposite effects. However, a study by Shaiq et al. [36] showed that AASCC has a higher resistance to sulfate attack compared to the conventional SCC. Despite the negative effect of CP on the water absorption of AASCC, its incorporation was found to increase the resistance of the AASCC to sulfate attack [33]. AASCC mixtures incorporating CP up to a dosage of 80% as replacement of SL exhibited a lower strength loss and weight loss compared to that with only SL as precursor when subjected to the sulfuric environment. The enhancement of the resistance of the AASCC mixtures with the incorporation of CP can be attributed to its lower calcium content.
Acid attack
Acid attack is one of the major durability threat concrete structures subjected to a constant supply of moisture and soil. Huseien and Shah [40] reported that there was an increase in the loss of strength due to acid attack in AASCC mixtures that incorporated FA as a replacement of the SL. Nonetheless, it was observed that mixtures incorporating only SL also exhibited a loss in mass when exposed to a sulphuric acid attack. However, the loss in mass was lower compared to those incorporating FA. This observation is similar to that of Nagaraj and Babu [26] where the binder component of the AASCC is made up of SL activated with NS and NH. The study showed that the loss in mass of samples subjected to acid attack reduces with the concentration of NH. When 12 M NH was used alongside NS as an alkali activator, there was no significant loss in mass nor deterioration observed on the samples. However, at a lower concentration of NH (i.e. less than 12 M), the loss in mass of the samples increases with higher NS-to-NH ratios as shown in Fig. 9. These observations are strongly correlated to the compressive strength results where the increase in the ratio of NS-to-NH was found to be detrimental to the performance of the AASCC.
Drying shrinkage
One of the major issues associated with the use of SL in AAC is its high-drying shrinkage [3, 8, 17, 52, 53]. To reduce this detrimental impact, FA can be used to replace a proportion of SL [52]. A significant reduction in the drying shrinkage of AASCC was observed when FA was used to replace SL up to 70% [40]. The reduction in the drying shrinkage with the incorporation of FA was attributed to the lower calcium content in the FA which results in a slower rate of hydration. On the contrary, a study by Nagaraj and Babu [26] showed that increasing the concentration of NH will result in higher shrinkage in AASCC made with the only slag as a precursor. This is anticipated as the higher dissolution of monomers at higher concentrations of the NH will result in a quick setting and loss of moisture from the composites coupled with higher contraction. Nevertheless, it was found out increasing the NH concentration form 2 to 6 M does not result in any significant effect on the drying shrinkage of AASCC. As drying shrinkage is also dependent on the amount of water present in the fresh mixture, the increase in the drying shrinkage with a higher concentration of NH can be attributed to the lower water content due to the replacement of water with NH pellets to achieve higher concentration. Nonetheless, the increase in the ratio of NS-to-NH was found to reduce the drying shrinkage of the AASCC mixtures due to the introduction of more water into the mixtures [26].
Carbonation
Similar to the chloride ion penetration of AASCC, there is only one study on the carbonation properties of AASCC. Despite the benefit of the incorporation of FA as replacement of SL in AASCC activated by sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide, its incorporation resulted in a detrimental effect on the carbon depth [40]. This observation was attributed to the higher porosity of AASCC incorporating FA due to the slower reactivity of the FA which results in a less dense matrix. This observation can be correlated to the water absorption results where the incorporation of FA was found to increase the absorption of water into the composite [40, 44].
Abrasion resistance
For applications where AASCC is to be used in the construction or rehabilitation of structures, such as pavements and flooring, it is essential to ensure that this composite is capable of resisting the effects of moving loads on its surface. Generally, the study on the abrasion in SCC, AAC, and AASCC is very limited. Nonetheless, an extensive study carried out by Nagaraj and Babu [26] on the evaluation of AASCC indicated that the abrasion resistance increases with a higher concentration of NH. This increase in abrasion resistance with higher concentration can be associated with the enhanced strength and densified microstructure with increasing NH concentration which results in a corresponding resistance against the moving loads. However, in contrary to the other performance evaluated, there was no significant effect of the NS-to-NH ratio in the range of 2–3.5.
Sustainability of AASCC
A simplified sustainability analysis was used to assess the embodied carbon and energy of the PCC, SCC, AAC, and AASCC. The embodied energy and carbon of the materials used for the calculations were obtained from literature and presented in Table 2. Equations 1 and 2 were used to calculate the embodied carbon and energy, respectively, of the different types of concrete. Table 3 presents the composition of the concrete mixtures that were used for the sustainability assessment. Based on Eqs. 1 and 2, the corresponding embodied carbon and energy of the mixtures presented in Table 3 are presented in Table 4. It can be seen from Table 4 that the embodied carbon and energy of AASCC is lower compared to other types of concrete. The embodied energy and carbon of AASCC are 56% and 83% lower than that of PCC. These results further confirmed the sustainability advantage associated with the use of AASCC as a construction material. The lower carbon footprint and energy consumption of AASCC can be associated with the use of AABs as a binder and the elimination of the compaction process. The embodied energy and carbon of each material for each type of concrete are presented in Figs. 10 and 11, respectively. It can be seen from the figures that the elimination of PC as binder resulted in a significant reduction in the embodied energy and carbon of concrete. It is also evident that the elimination of compaction in AASCC also resulted in more reduction in the embodied and energy of carbon. However, as the aggregates contribute significantly to the embodied carbon and energy of different types of concrete, the possible use of recycled material as aggregates will result in more reduction in the energy carbon and energy of concrete [54,55,56].
Conclusions
The paper presents a short overview of the performance of AASCC. The performances of the AASCC were explored in terms of its fresh and hardened properties. A sustainability comparison was also made to evaluate the sustainability advantage of AASCC. Results from this study shows that AASCC has a lower embodied energy and carbon due to the elimination of PC as a binder and being placed without compaction. The use of a higher concentration of sodium hydroxide was also found to improve the performance of AASCC. However, there is a more detrimental effect on the workability of the mixtures. The sustainability of AASCC can be improved with the use of alternative activators with lower embodied energy and carbon. Also, the use of alkali activators with lower concentrations is expected to improve the workability of the mixtures. In general, more studies on the durability performance of AASCC should be carried out as the limited studies available so far only focused on the mechanical properties. The influence of less corrosive activators on the performance of AASCC should also be explored.
Abbreviations
- AAB:
-
Alkali activated binders
- AAC:
-
Alkali activated concrete
- AASCC:
-
Alkali activated self-compacting concrete
- CP:
-
Ceramic powder
- FA:
-
Fly ash
- HRWRA:
-
High-range water-reducing admixture
- MK:
-
Metakaolin
- NH:
-
Sodium hydroxide
- NS:
-
Sodium silicate
- PC:
-
Portland cement
- PCC:
-
Portland cement concrete
- RHA:
-
Rice husk ash
- SL:
-
Slag
- QP:
-
Quartz powder
References
Sivakrishna A, Adesina A, Awoyera PO, et al. Green concrete: a review of recent developments. Mater Today Proc. 2020;27:54–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.202.
Adesina A. Concrete sustainability issues. In: 38th Cement and Concrete Science Conference, UK, London, 2018.
Awoyera PO, Adesina A, Sivakrishna A, et al. Alkali activated binders: challenges and opportunities. Mater Today Proc. 2020;27:40–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.199.
Adesina A. Performance of fibre reinforced alkali-activated composites—a review. Materialia. 2020;12:100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100782.
Bilek V. Freezing and thawing resistance of alkali-activated concretes for the production of building elements. In: International conference on alkali activated materials and geopolymers: versatile materials offering high performance and low emissions. Ostrava, Czech Republic. May 27–June 1, 2018.
Juenger MCG, Winnefeld F, Provis JL, et al. Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41:1232–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012.
Hua X, Provis JL, Van Deventer JSJ, et al. Characterization of aged slag concretes. ACI Mater J. 2008;105:131–9. https://doi.org/10.14359/19753.
Awoyera P, Adesina A. Durability properties of alkali activated slag composites: short overview. Silicon. 2020;12:987–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00199-1.
Adesina A, Awoyera P. Overview of trends in the application of waste materials in self-compacting concrete production. SN Appl Sci. 2019;1:962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1012-4.
Hammond GP, Jones CI. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proc Inst Civ Eng Energy. 2008;161:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87.
Purnell P. The carbon footprint of reinforced concrete. Adv Cem Res. 2013;25:362–8. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.13.00013.
Patel YJ, Shah N. Enhancement of the properties of ground granulated blast furnace slag based self compacting geopolymer concrete by incorporating rice husk ash. Constr Build Mater. 2018;171:654–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.166.
García-Lodeiro I, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A, et al. Effect of calcium additions on N-A-S-H cementitious gels. J Am Ceram Soc. 2010;93(7):1934–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03668.x.
Xiao R, Ma Y, Jiang X, et al. Strength, microstructure, efflorescence behavior and environmental impacts of waste glass geopolymers cured at ambient temperature. J Clean Prod. 2020;252:119610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119610.
Ikponmwosa EE, Ehikhuenmen S, Emeshie J, et al. Performance of coconut shell alkali-activated concrete: experimental investigation and statistical modelling. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00435-z
Adesina A. Effect of green activators on the properties of alkali activated materials: review. In: SynerCrete’18 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches for Cement-based Materials and Structural Concrete, Funchal, Portugal, 24–26 October 2018.
Adesina A. Alkali activated materials: review of current problems and possible solutions. In: SynerCrete’18 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches for Cement-based Materials and Structural Concrete, Funchal, Portugal, 24–26 October 2018.
Fernández-Jiménez AM. Cementos de Escorias Activadas Alcalinamente: Influencia de Las Variables y Modelizacion Del Proceso, Tesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. doctoral, 2000.
Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ. Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38:3932–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980804b.
Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT. Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cem Concr Res. 1999;29(8):1323–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9.
Garcia-Lodeiro I, Palomo A, Fernández-Jiménez A, et al. Compatibility studies between N-A-S-H and C-A-S-H gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(9):923–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.006.
Sasanipour H, Aslani F. Durability properties evaluation of self-compacting concrete prepared with waste fine and coarse recycled concrete aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2020;236:117540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117540.
Saini G, Vattipalli U. Assessing properties of alkali activated GGBS based self-compacting geopolymer concrete using nano-silica. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2020;12:e00352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00352.
Manjunath R, Narasimhan MC. An experimental investigation on self-compacting alkali activated slag concrete mixes. J Build Eng. 2018;17(5):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.009.
Manjunath R, Narasimhan MC, Umesh KM, et al. Studies on development of high performance, self-compacting alkali activated slag concrete mixes using industrial wastes. Constr Build Mater. 2019;198(2):133–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.242.
Nagaraj VK, Babu DLV. Assessing the performance of molarity and alkaline activator ratio on engineering properties of self-compacting alkaline activated concrete at ambient temperature. J. Build. Eng. 2018;20(11):137–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.005.
Gülşan ME, Alzeebaree R, Rasheed AA, et al. Development of fly ash/slag based self-compacting geopolymer concrete using nano-silica and steel fiber. Constr Build Mater. 2019;211(6):271–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.228.
Fareed Ahmed M, Fadhil Nuruddin M, Shafiq N. Compressive strength and workability characteristics of low-calcium fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2011;5(2):64–70.
Valizadeh A, Aslani F, Asif Z, et al. Development of heavyweight self-compacting concrete and ambient-cured heavyweight geopolymer concrete using magnetite aggregates. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(7):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071035.
Abdollahnejad Z, Mastali M, Mastali M, et al. Comparative study on the effects of recycled glass-fiber on drying shrinkage rate and mechanical properties of the self-compacting mortar and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar. J Mater Civ Eng. 2017;29(8):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001918.
Patel YJ, Shah N. Development of self-compacting geopolymer concrete as a sustainable construction material. Sustain Environ Res. 2018;28(6):412–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2018.08.004.
Santana HA, Andrade Neto JS, Amorim Júnior NS, et al. Self-compacting geopolymer mixture: dosing based on statistical mixture design and simultaneous optimization. Constr Build Mater. 2020;249(7):118677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118677.
Huseien GF, Sam ARM, Shah KW, et al. Effects of ceramic tile powder waste on properties of self-compacted alkali-activated concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2020;236(3):117574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117574.
Ushaa TG, Anuradha R, Venkatasubramani GS. Performance of self-compacting geopolymer concrete containing different mineral admixtures. Sci Indian J Eng Mater. 2015;22(4):473–81.
Demie S, Nuruddin MF, Shafiq N. Effects of micro-structure characteristics of interfacial transition zone on the compressive strength of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;22(4):473–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.067.
Shafiq I, Azreen M, Hussin MW. Sulphuric acid resistant of self compacted geopolymer concrete containing slag and ceramic waste. In: MATEC Web Conf. 2017; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, August 5–6, 2016 97(1):01102. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20179701102.
Henigal AM, Sherif MA, Hassan HH. Study on properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng. 2017;14(2):52–66. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1402075266.
Kamseu E, Ponzoni C, Tippayasam C, et al. Self-compacting geopolymer concretes: effects of addition of aluminosilicate-rich fines. J Build Eng. 2016;5(3):211–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.01.004.
EFNARC. The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete: specification, the European guidelines for self-compacting concrete: specification, production and use. EFNARC 2005, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Huseien GF, Shah KW. Durability and life cycle evaluation of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash as GBFS replacement with alkali activation. Constr Build Mater. 2020;235(2):117458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117458.
Güneyisi E, Atewi YR, Hasan MF. Fresh and rheological properties of glass fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete with nanosilica and fly ash blended. Constr Build Mater. 2019;211(6):349–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.087.
Collepardi M, Ogoumah-Olagot JJ, Skarp U, et al. Influence of amorphous colloidal silica on the properties of self-compacting concretes. In: International Conference. Challenges in Concrete Construction—Innovations and Developments in Concrete Materials Construction, Dundee, Scotland. 9–11 September, pp. 473–483.
Bilek V, Opravil T, Soukal F. Searching for practically applicable alkali-activated concretes. In: RILEM First International Conference on Advances in Chemically Activated Materials. Jinan, China. 9th May 2010.
Awoyera PO, Adesina A, Gobinath R. Role of recycling fine materials as filler for improving performance of concrete—a review. Aust J Civ Eng. 2019;17(2):85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2019.1626692.
Shi C, Krivenko PV, Roy D. Alkali-activated cements and concretes. Oxford: CRC Press; 2006.
Roy DM, Silsbee MR. Alkali activated cementitious materials: an overview. MRS Proc. 1991;245(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-245-153.
Wang SD, Scrivener KL. Hydration products of alkali activated slag cement. Cem Concr Res. 1995;25(3):561–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00045-E.
Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, et al. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments. Constr Build Mater. 2015;85(6):78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036.
Nazari A, Riahi S. The role of SiO2 nanoparticles and ground granulated blast furnace slag admixtures on physical, thermal and mechanical properties of self compacting concrete. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(4):2149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.064.
Adesina A. Durability enhancement of concrete using nanomaterials: an overview. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2019;967(8):221–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.967.221.
Adesina A. Nanomaterials in cementitious composites: review of durability performance. J Build Pathol Rehabil. 2020;5:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-020-00089-9.
Chi M, Huang R. Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2013;40(3):291–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.003.
Jin F, Al-Tabbaa A. Strength and drying shrinkage of slag paste activated by sodium carbonate and reactive MgO. Constr Build Mater. 2015;81:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.082.
Adesina A, Atoyebi OD. Effect of crumb rubber aggregate on the performance of cementitious composites: a review. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;445(1):012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/445/1/012032.
Awoyera PO, Adesina A. Plastic wastes to construction products: status, limitations and future perspective. Case Stud Constr. Mater. 2020;12:e00330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00330.
Adesina A. Properties of alkali activated slag concrete incorporating waste materials as aggregate: a review. Mater Sci Forum. 2019;967(4):214–20. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.967.214.
Marceau ML, Nisbet MA, Vangeem MG. Life cycle inventory of Portland cement concrete, SN3011. Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture, SN2095b, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, USA, 2006, pp. 1–69.
EcoProfile—Eurochlor. https://www.eurochlor.org/topics/sustainability/ecoprofile/. Accessed 5 Apr 2020.
Fawer M, Concannon M, Rieber W. Life cycle inventories for the production of sodium silicates. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 1999;4(4):207–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979498.
EFCA—European Federation of Concrete Admixtures Assoc’s. http://www.efca.info/. Accessed 14 Apr 2020.
Jones R, Mccarthy M, Newlands M. Fly ash route to low embodied CO2 and implications for concrete construction. In: World Coal Ash Conference. Denver, United States. 9–12 May 2011.
Ranade R. Advanced cementitious composite development for resilient and sustainable infrastructure. University of Michigan, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2014. 3619670. http://search.proquest.com/openview/92171926866f1aa87249a83a52f85afd/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y&casa_token=oj3L4n3eyCkAAAAA:eZqor4-3hg97VVm3LOFu6Zm0i24uFTstNn2rhIx6VF7p68YZxT6Jrd9zsfbWYCq9MGVzogX6crY. Accessed 5 Apr 2020.
Nisbet MA, Marceau ML, Vangeem MG. Environmental life cycle inventory of Portland cement concrete, 2137a, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, USA, 2002.
Turner LK, Collins FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;43(6):125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023.
Law DW, Adam AA, Molyneaux TK, et al. Durability assessment of alkali activated slag (AAS) concrete. Mater Struct Constr. 2012;45(2):1425–37. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9842-1.
Khatib JM. Performance of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22(9):1963–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.011.
Guerrieri M, Sanjayan J, Collins F. Residual compressive behavior of alkali-activated concrete exposed to elevated temperatures. Fire Mater. 2009;33(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.983.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The author declares that there is no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adesina, A. Performance and sustainability overview of alkali-activated self-compacting concrete. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2, 165–175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00045-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-020-00045-w