Abstract
Orange (Citrus sinensis) is a popular fruit in west Africa that generates residues such as peels (OP) and albedo (OA) from its consumption. In this study, the biochar obtained from the char-optimised thermochemical conversion of orange peels and albedo were evaluated. The products obtained was characterised using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) and Branueur–Emmett–Teller (BET) Analyses and potential applications were discussed. FTIR analysis revealed similar spectra for both samples and possessing polar groups such as alcohol, esters, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether and phenols which are characteristic of low-temperature biochar. The EDS analysis showed that OP biochar possess higher carbon content than OA biochar whilst the latter contains more inorganic elements. SEM analysis revealed that OP biochar possess a smooth surface as compared to the highly convoluted surface of the OA biochar. BET analysis revealed that the surface area was 352.5 m2 g−1 and 356.3 m2 g−1 for OP and OA biochar, respectively. Several key conclusions on the potential applications were proposed based on the analytical findings and these include soil amendment, adsorbents and as catalysts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In light of the global research drive towards energy and environmental sustainability, numerous investigations on thermochemical processing of biomass has been conducted. Plant derived feedstock tends to give good yield of biochar due to their high carbon content and these includes forest residues, grasses, agricultural residues and algae [1]. Plant derived feedstock considered for biochar production over the years includes cocoa pod husk [2], cassava rhizome [3], sugar cane bagasse [4, 5], wood chips [6,7,8,9,10,11], coconut fibers [12], rubber wood sawdust [13], rice hulls/husks [7, 8, 14], eucalyptus leaves [12], hazelnut shells [10, 15], rice straw [8, 14], switch grass [16], elephant grass [17], bamboo [5, 18], hickory wood [5], furniture wood [11], rapeseed cake [19], apricot stone [15], pine sawdust [20], grape seed [15], chestnut shell [15] amongst others.
Orange (Citrus sinensis) is also a popular fruit in west Africa that generates residues such as peels and albedo from its consumption. Orange peels have been known to contain essential oils possessing antioxidant, anti-carcinogen and germicidal properties [21, 22]. Orange peels can be used as animal feeds, fertilizers, feedstock for the growth of single cell protein [23] and others [24, 25]. Alternatively, it has been shown that citrus peels can be used as feedstock for thermochemical processes too [26]. Biochar is solid residue of biomass thermochemical processing that is rich in carbon (65–90%) and possesses a porous structure [27]. The physico-chemical properties of the biochar-determines its potential application [8]. These properties are affected by the type of feedstock and the conditions of pyrolysis or gasification [5].
Biochar can be used as an adsorbent in separating some chemical species from aqueous solutions [4, 28], as a bio-composite [20], as a solid fuel [9, 12], and for agricultural purposes as a sequestrate and soil conditioner [29, 30]. Biochar from orange peels have been utilised in a variety of environmental applications in recent times. It has been used in the adsorption of ammonium [31], lead [32] and other ionic contaminants [33], as catalyst in syn-gas production [34] and for the conditioning of loess soil [35]. The thermochemical conversion biochar of orange residues in a top-lit updraft biomass conversion reactor have not been evaluated in open literature (within the scope of the authors’ search). Besides, a comparative study of this nature considering the potential applications of both residues is not reported. The interest in biochar from orange peels and albedo is its relatively relative abundance in this part of the world and lack of a major competitive use. The goals are in solid waste management and biomass valorisation.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the nature, properties and characteristics of biochar obtained from the low-temperature thermochemical conversion of orange peels and albedo in a top-lit updraft biomass conversion reactor with a view of determining the suitability of the product in a variety of potential applications. The potential applications of the char were discussed based on the observations from the analytical findings. The chars were characterised using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) and Branueur–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyses.
2 Methodology
2.1 Product Development
The orange (Citrus sinensis) peels and albedo were sourced from the market in Ilorin, Nigeria. The orange peels are referred to as OP and orange albedo as OA, respectively. Both feedstock was sundried to remove all moisture until crisp. The biochar was produced using an updraft biomass conversion reactor with retort heating. Details of reactor design, configuration and operation are discussed elsewhere [17]. The peak temperature of the process was 300 °C and it lasted for 2 h for both samples. Low temperatures for thermochemical processes lead to more solid phase products. Since the reactor operates by retort heating, the thermal energy for the process is the recycled heat from the outer combustion region hence the achieved temperature [36].
2.2 Product Characterisation
The products obtained were characterised using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDS) and Branueur–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyses. FTIR (Shimadzu, FTIR-8400S, Japan) was used to determine the functional groups and complexes present in both biochar samples. The spectra were recorded using transmittance method in the 4000–650 cm−1 region with 30 sample scans. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, Phenom proX, Phenom-World BV, The Netherlands) was used to study the surface morphology of the particles of the biochar. The acceleration voltage of the microscope was set to 15 kV and magnification of 500–1000 times. Branueur–Emmet–Teller (BET) analysis was used to study the particle and pore dimensional characteristics of the bio-char. The micropore volume, surface area and pore width of the biochar were measured using a BET analyser (Quantachrome NovaWin ©1994–2013, Quantachrome Instruments v11.03). The surface area and micropore volume of the biochar samples were calculated based on the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm obtained using the multipoint BET and the Dubinin–Radushkevic (DR) methods, respectively whereas the total pore volume and pore diameter were estimated using the Barette, Jovner & Halenda (BJH) method.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Visual Inspection
Figure 1a, b show the visual images of the biochar obtained after the low temperature thermochemical conversion of orange peels and albedo in a top-lit updraft biomass reactor. The char from the peels had a noticeable and distinctive glossy appearance which was not observed for the albedo chars. To gain more insight into the nature of the biochar obtained and their potential applications will be elucidated in further sub-sections.
3.2 Functional Group Analysis
The chemical and structural characteristics of agricultural waste products wastes such as surface area, porous structure and functional groups are highly significant in assessing their suitability in removing water pollutants [37]. The functional groups present in the biochar obtained from orange peels and orange albedo (pith) is presented Table 1 based on the spectra obtained by FTIR analysis (Fig. 2). The tiny peaks ranging from 3942 to 3217 cm−1 correspond to the OH bond stretch of alcohols, carboxylic and phenolic groups [17, 38]. It may also correspond to the amino group NH associated with proteins present in the biomass cell wall [39, 40]. The peaks at approximately 2900 cm−1 correspond to the aliphatic C–H groups [41]. The peak 1681 cm−1 correspond to the C=O (carbonyl) stretch of ketones aldehydes probably with a small quantity of amides [42,43,44]. The presence of a peak at 1527 cm−1 strongly suggests the presence of a nitro-compound characterised by the N–O asymmetric stretch [45, 46]. The peak at 1411 cm−1 may also correspond to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of the carboxylate (COO–) group [47,48,49]. The peaks at 1026 cm−1 can be attributed to the C–O stretch of carboxylic acids and esters of carbohydrates [50, 51] while the peak at 779 cm−1 correspond to the vibrational stretch of the C–H methyl group [30, 52].
The spectra obtained for both samples were relatively similar with little differences in peak intensity especially the peak observed at 1026 cm−1. The presence of polar groups such as alcohol (OH), esters, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether and phenols suggests that the biochar samples has the potential to be used as adsorbent for aqueous pollutants [53] and as soil amendment for improving cation exchange [54]. These important functional groups are present because the thermochemical conversion was a low temperature (300 °C) and char-optimised one. Biomass degradation beyond 400 °C would however cause a loss of these groups via dehydration thereby forming larger number of aromatic C–C structure.
3.3 Biochar Composition
The inorganic elements present in the biochar samples with their respective weight concentrations as analysed by EDS are presented in Table 2. The corresponding EDS spectrums for OA and OP biochar are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The data presented in the table showed that OP biochar possess higher carbon content than OA biochar whilst the latter contains more inorganic elements than OP. Since the thermochemical conversion of both biomasses was done under the same condition, it can be inferred that orange peel would give quality carbon rich biochar than orange albedo making the OA biochar more effective in pollutant adsorption both from water and soil [41]. However, the presence of other elements such as Calcium, Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in OA biochar enhances its soil nutritional value and application in the production of fertilizer [17, 55]. Apart from its capacity to remediate pollutants in water [53], carbon rich bio-chars also has applications in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [1] and carbon sequestration [56] in soils. Both biochar had higher carbon content than some of the agricultural residues studied in literature [55,56,57,58] confirming their use a proper feedstock for biochar production.
3.4 Biochar Morphology
SEM analysis was used to further understand the porous structure of the biochar. Images showing the morphological structure of OP and OA biochar are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. The surface morphology of both samples was different in despite being from the same fruit source. OP biochar possess a smooth surface as compared to the highly convoluted surface of the OA biochar. Biochar from OA has a spongy-like surface, with lots of crevices and interstices with relatively higher porosity which could provide adequate surface area for catalytic adsorption, nutrient retention (soluble organic and inorganic) and water holding capacity when incorporated in soil [55,56,57, 59]. The OA biochar can be said to have a relatively lower pore volume compared to the OP biochar due to the nature of the surface as can also be seen from the BET analysis (Table 3). The smooth surfaces reduce porous characteristics and hence lower the adsorptive potential of the biochar [60].
3.5 Porous Characteristics
The surface area and micropore volume of the biochar samples were calculated based on the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm obtained using the multipoint BET and the Dubinn–Radushkevic (DR) methods respectively whereas the total pore volume and pore diameter were estimated using the Barette, Jovner & Halenda (BJH) method. The data obtained from these methods are presented in Table 3. Although the surface area of OP biochar was slightly lower than that of the OA biochar, it was found to be more porous. However, the pores in the OA biochar was found to be larger than that of OP biochar as it can also be seen in the structural images (Figs. 5, 6). The surface characteristics of the biochar samples would enable them function as adsorbents as well as in the enhancement of soil quality. Biochar porosity is is highly advantageous in gasification and combustion applications as well as soil quality enhancement [17]. The surface functionality coupled with the porosity of biochars has a large effect on its capability to retain water in soil [61].
The BET analysis was carried out using Nitrogen physisorption at 77 K. More details on the results are shown in the supplementary material. The pore size distribution for biochar samples of OA and OP are shown in Fig. 7a, b, respectively. It can be observed that they are quite similar. Both biochar revealed occurrence of pores around 2.8 nm with a broad size distribution of pores up to 6 nm. The biochar can be considered to be mesoporous as the pore diameter is > 2 nm but < 50 nm. Examination of the pore size distributions and adsorption isotherms help to not only provide useful knowledge on the porous characteristics of the char but also evaluate their potential performance in adsorptive systems [62, 63].
3.6 Practical Implications of the Study
In this approach involving the co-carbonisation of orange (Citrus sinensis) peels and albedo, the first significant implication is in solid waste management. Haven previously examined perennial grasses [17] and an agricultural residue [36], a biomass waste generated from fruit consumption was successfully converted in this study. Besides the Size reduction of the waste stream, the development of quality biochar for a variety of applications was achieved. Waste-to-wealth is achieved in a relatively simple process that is easy to understand and use. Furthermore, the study utilises energy from the controlled combustion of biomass for the co-carbonisation process in a retort heating system. A key advantage in such a design is the lack of dependence on electricity. In some developing countries in Africa with issues with electricity supply (Nigeria as a case study), such a technology will gain ready acceptability. No electrical power requirement also signifies less cost and usability in remote locations. These considerations make this study an important one in the race for energy and environmental sustainability in developing African countries.
4 Conclusion
The albedo (OA) and peels (OP) of orange were converted in a top-lit updraft biomass reactor with retort heating at a peak temperature of the process was 300 °C and process time of 2 h. FTIR analysis showed that the spectra obtained for both samples were relatively similar with little differences in peak intensity. The presence of polar groups such as alcohol (OH), esters, ketones, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether and phenols suggests that the biochar samples has the potential to be used as adsorbent for aquatic pollutants and as soil amendment for improving cation exchange. The EDS analysis showed that OP biochar possess higher carbon content than OA biochar whilst the latter contains more inorganic elements. This suggest that OA bio-chars would be more effective in pollutant adsorption both from water and soil while OA bio-chars would be more effective in GHG emissions and carbon sequestration applications. SEM analysis revealed that OP biochar possess a smooth surface as compared to the highly convoluted surface of the OA biochar. The OP biochar would possess a better catalytic activity, water retention capacity and adsorption capacity due to it having a larger surface area and possibly more active sites. BET analysis revealed that though the surface area of OP biochar was slightly lower than that of the OA biochar, it was more porous. The paper has been able to evaluate the characteristics of bio-chars obtained from the thermochemical conversion of orange residues. It can be clearly seen that the product if of high quality and can be used in a variety of important application.
References
Duku MH, Gu S, Hagan EB (2011) Biochar production potential in Ghana—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(8):3539–3551
Odesola IF, Owoseni AT (2010) Development of local technology for a small-scale biochar production processes from agricultural wastes. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci 1(2):205–208
Tippayawong N, Rerkkriangkrai P, Aggarangsi P, Pattiya A (2017) Biochar production from cassava rhizome in a semi-continuous carbonisation system. Energy Proced 141:109–113
Carrier M, Hardie AG, Uras Ü, Görgens J, Knoetze JH (2012) Production of char from vacuum pyrolysis of South-African sugar cane bagasse and its characterization as activated carbon and biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrol 96:24–32
Sun Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Chen H, Yang L (2014) Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem Eng J 240:574–578
Chee CS (1987) The air gasification of wood chips in a downdraft gasifier, in Department of Chemical Engineering. Kansas State University
James AM, Yuan W, Boyette MD, Wang D (2017) Airflow and insulation effects on simultaneous syngas and biochar production in a top-lit updraft biomass gasifier. Renew Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.034
Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11(23):6613–6621
Kang S, Li X, Fan J, Chang J (2012) Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, d-xylose, and wood meal. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(26):9023–9031
Olgun H, Ozdogan S, Yinesor G (2011) Results with a bench scale downdraft biomass gasifier for agricultural and forestry residues. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1):572–580
Zainal Z, Rifau A, Quadir G, Seetharamu K (2002) Experimental investigation of a downdraft biomass gasifier. Biomass Bioenerg 23(4):283–289
Liu Z, Quek A, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R (2013) Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel 103:943–949
Ghani WAWAK, Mohd A, da Silva G, Bachmann RT, Taufiq-Yap YH, Rashid U, Alaa H (2013) Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization. Ind Crops Prod 44:18–24
Zolue GM (2013) Characterization of biochar prepared from three different feed stocks. University of Ghana
Özçimen D, Ersoy-Meriçboyu A (2010) Characterization of biochar and bio-oil samples obtained from carbonization of various biomass materials. Renew Energy 35(6):1319–1324
Sadaka S, Sharara MA, Ashworth A, Keyser P, Allen F, Wright A (2014) Characterization of biochar from switchgrass carbonization. Energies 7(2):548–567
Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Onifade DV (2019) Production of biochar from elephant grass (Pernisetum purpureum) using an updraft biomass gasifier with retort heating. Biofuels. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1554949
Schneider D, Escala M, Supawittayayothin K, Tippayawong N (2011) Characterization of biochar from hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo. Int J Energy Environ 2(4):647–652
Özçimen D, Karaosmanoğlu F (2004) Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake. Renew Energy 29(5):779–787
Srinivasan P, Sarmah AK, Smernik R, Das O, Farid M, Gao W (2015) A feasibility study of agricultural and sewage biomass as biochar, bioenergy and biocomposite feedstock: production, characterization and potential applications. Sci Total Environ 512:495–505
Pathak PD, Mandavgane SA, Kulkarni BD (2017) Fruit peel waste: characterization and its potential uses. Curr Sci 113:1–11
Lagha-Benamrouche S, Madani K (2013) Phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of orange varieties (Citrus sinensis L. and Citrus aurantium L.) cultivated in Algeria: peels and leaves. Ind Crops Prod 50:723–730
Ángel Siles López J, Li Q, Thompson IP (2010) Biorefinery of waste orange peel. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30(1):63–69
Parmar HS, Kar A (2007) Protective role of Citrus sinensis, Musa paradisiaca, and Punica granatum peels against diet-induced atherosclerosis and thyroid dysfunctions in rats. Nutr Res 27(11):710–718
Santos CM, Dweck J, Viotto RS, Rosa AH, Morais LCD (2015) Application of orange peel waste in the production of solid biofuels and biosorbents. Bioresour Technol 20:20
Miranda R, Bustos-Martinez D, Blanco CS, Villarreal MHGR, Cantu MER (2009) Pyrolysis of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) dry peel. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 86:234–251
Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, Shim S, Ra C (2017) Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:255–273
El-Nahas S, Salman HM, Seleeme WA (2019) Aluminum building scrap wire, take-out food container, potato peels and bagasse as valueless waste materials for nitrate removal from water supplies. Chem Afr 2(1):143–162
Canlas JJ, Go JC, Mendoza AC, Dimaano MN (2019) Talisay (Terminalia catappa) seed husk biochar for adsorption of lead (II) ions in artificially contaminated soil. In: MATEC web of conferences. EDP Sciences
Salam A, Bashir S, Khan I, Shahid Rizwan M, Afzal Chhajro M, Feng X, Zhu J, Hu H (2018) Biochars immobilize lead and copper in naturally contaminated soil. Environ Eng Sci 35(12):1349–1360
Hu X, Zhang X, Ngo HH, Guo W, Wen H, Li C, Zhang Y, Ma C (2019) Comparison study on the ammonium adsorption of the biochars derived from different kinds of fruit peel. Sci Total Environ 20:135544
Mireles S, Parsons J, Trad T, Cheng C-L, Kang J (2019) Lead removal from aqueous solutions using biochars derived from corn stover, orange peel, and pistachio shell. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2019:1–10
Li X, Zhao C, Zhang M (2019) Biochar for anionic contaminants removal from water. Biochar from biomass and waste. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 143–160
Yoon K, Lee SS, Ok YS, Kwon EE, Song H (2019) Enhancement of syngas for H2 production via catalytic pyrolysis of orange peel using CO2 and bauxite residue. Appl Energy 254:113803
Sial TA, Lan Z, Khan MN, Zhao Y, Kumbhar F, Liu J, Zhang A, Hill RL, Lahori AH, Memon M (2019) Evaluation of orange peel waste and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil biochemical properties within a loess soil. Waste Manag 87:125–134
Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Onifade DV (2019) Production of bio-char from plantain (Musa paradisiaca) fibers using an Updraft biomass gasifier with retort heating. Combust Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2019.1650269
Abdelhafez AA, Li J (2016) Removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by using biochars derived from sugar cane bagasse and orange peel. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 61:367–375
Xie Z, Guan W, Ji F, Song Z, Zhao Y (2014) Production of biologically activated carbon from orange peel and landfill leachate subsequent treatment technology. J Chem 2014:20
Nascimento GED, Duarte MMMB, Campos NF, Rocha ORSD, Silva VLD (2014) Adsorption of azo dyes using peanut hull and orange peel: a comparative study. Environ Technol 35(11):1436–1453
Puccini M, Licursi D, Stefanelli E, Vitolo S, Raspolli Galletti A, Heeres HJ (2016) Levulinic acid from orange peel waste by hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)
Khaskheli MI, Memon SQ, Siyal AN, Khuhawar M (2011) Use of orange peel waste for arsenic remediation of drinking water. Waste Biomass Valor 2(4):423
Zhang X, Fu W, Yin Y, Chen Z, Qiu R, Simonnot M-O, Wang X (2018) Adsorption-reduction removal of Cr(VI) by tobacco petiole pyrolytic biochar: batch experiment, kinetic and mechanism studies. Biores Technol 268:149–157
Basaleh AA, Al-Malack MH, Saleh TA (2019) Methylene blue removal using polyamide-vermiculite nanocomposites: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. J Environ Chem Eng 7(3):103107
Chomto P, Nunthanid J (2017) Physicochemical and powder characteristics of various citrus pectins and their application for oral pharmaceutical tablets. Carbohyd Polym 174:25–31
Janakiraman N, Johnson M (2015) Functional groups of tree ferns (Cyathea) using FTIR: chemotaxonomic implications. Rom J Biophys 25(2):131–141
Grube M, Muter O, Strikauska S, Gavare M, Limane B (2008) Application of FT-IR spectroscopy for control of the medium composition during the biodegradation of nitro aromatic compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35(11):1545–1549
Xu J, Wang W, Gao J, Wang A (2017) Fabrication of stable glycine/palygorskite nanohybrid via high-pressure homogenization as high-efficient adsorbent for Cs (I) and methyl violet. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 80:997–1005
Dai H, Ou S, Huang Y, Huang H (2018) Utilization of pineapple peel for production of nanocellulose and film application. Cellulose 25(3):1743–1756
Li P-J, Xia J-L, Nie Z-Y, Shan Y (2016) Pectic oligosaccharides hydrolyzed from orange peel by fungal multi-enzyme complexes and their prebiotic and antibacterial potentials. LWT Food Sci Technol 69:203–210
Cybulak M, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P, Tomczyk A (2019) Influence of pH and grain size on physicochemical properties of biochar and released humic substances. Fuel 240:334–338
Vaughn SF, Kenar JA, Eller FJ, Moser BR, Jackson MA, Peterson SC (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars produced from coppiced wood of thirteen tree species for use in horticultural substrates. Ind Crops Prod 66:44–51
Li Y, Liu X, Cai W, Cao Y, Sun Y, Tan F (2018) Preparation of corn straw based spongy aerogel for spillage oil capture. Korean J Chem Eng 35(5):1119–1127
Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M, Witek-Krowiak A (2015) Agricultural waste peels as versatile biomass for water purification—a review. Chem Eng J 270:244–271
Mary GS, Sugumaran P, Niveditha S, Ramalakshmi B, Ravichandran P, Seshadri S (2016) Production, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod (Pisum sativum), leaf (Brassica oleracea) and peel (Citrus sinensis) wastes. Int J Recycl Organ Waste Agric 5(1):43–53
Piash MI, Hossain MF, Parveen Z (2016) Physico-chemical properties and nutrient content of some slow pyrolysis biochars produced from different feedstocks. Bangl J Sci Res 29(2):111–122
Vidhya L, Dhandapani M, Shanthi K (2017) Sequestering divalent nickel ions from aqueous solution using activated carbon of citrus Limetta peel: isothermic and kinetic studies. Pol J Environ Stud 26:4
Taek-Keun O, Bongsu C, Yoshiyuki S, Jiro C (2012) Characterization of biochar derived from three types of biomass. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 57:61–66
Lam SS, Liew RK, Wong YM, Yek PNY, Ma NL, Lee CL, Chase HA (2017) Microwave-assisted pyrolysis with chemical activation, an innovative method to convert orange peel into activated carbon with improved properties as dye adsorbent. J Clean Prod 162:1376–1387
Taghavi F, Gholizadeh M, Saljooghi AS, Ramezani M (2016) Metal free synthesis of tetrahydrobenzo [a] xanthenes using orange peel as a natural and low cost efficient heterogeneous catalyst. RSC Adv 6(90):87082–87087
Raj K, Viswanathan B (2009) Effect of surface area, pore volume and particle size of P25 titania on the phase transformation of anatase to rutile
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna A-M, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Pérez M (2017) The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ 574:139–147
Saad A, Snoussi Y, Abderrabba M, Chehimi MM (2016) Ligand-modified mesoporous silica SBA-15/silver hybrids for the catalyzed reduction of methylene blue. Rsc Adv 6(62):57672–57682
Snoussi Y, Abderrabba M, Sayari A (2016) Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto polyethylenimine-functionalized mesocellular silica foam: equilibrium properties. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 66:372–378
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies involving human or animal subjects.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adeniyi, A.G., Ighalo, J.O. & Onifade, D.V. Biochar from the Thermochemical Conversion of Orange (Citrus sinensis) Peel and Albedo: Product Quality and Potential Applications. Chemistry Africa 3, 439–448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-020-00119-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-020-00119-6