Abstract
Atmospheric reactive nitrogen (N) has induced large impacts on air pollution and ecosystem health worldwide. Atmospheric reactive N emission and deposition have largely increased in China since 1980 due to rapid agricultural, industrial, and urban development. But scientific gaps still remain in the regional and temporal variability in atmospheric N emissions and deposition. Meanwhile, the environmental impacts of N pollution and deposition are of great concern in China. This paper overviews the status of anthropogenic N emissions and deposition and their linkages to air pollution in China. The major findings include two aspects: (1) anthropogenic reactive N (e.g., NH3 and NOx) emissions contribute greatly to secondary inorganic aerosol formation and haze pollution and (2) dry N deposition is comparable in importance to wet N deposition, suggesting that both dry and wet deposition should be quantified simultaneously. Future research challenges on atmospheric N emission and deposition are discussed as well. China needs to (1) reduce the uncertainties of national emission inventory of various N species, especially organic N compounds; (2) establish national networks for atmospheric N concentration and deposition monitoring; and (3) evaluate ecological and environmental impacts of N pollution and deposition in typical ecosystems. Last but not least, N deposition modeling tools should be improved based on localized parameters and further used in future N regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition is not only an important component in the human-accelerated global N cycle [1] but also an indicator of atmospheric N pollution [2••]. Excess N deposition has aroused ecological concerns about negative impacts on ecosystem health and services such as loss of biodiversity, forest soil acidification, and increased greenhouse gas emission [3•, 4, 5]. Rates of N deposition, especially oxidized N deposition, have leveled off or decreased in Europe and the USA since the 1980s or early 1990s with the implementation of stricter legislation to limit atmospheric pollution [6–8]. In contrast, emissions of both NH3 and NOx in China have been increasing continuously since the 1980s mainly due to growing agricultural and industrial activities [2••]. These increased reactive N emissions to the atmosphere have aroused widespread concerns on air pollution and their relationship with atmospheric N deposition in China [9, 10]. Wet/bulk and dry N deposition monitoring programs have been conducted since the 2000s [11•, 12, 13]. The impacts of N deposition on terrestrial ecosystems have been previously overviewed globally [3•, 14] and in China [15]. Also, latest modeling results have shown the spatial distribution of N deposition and N critical load exceedance in China based on eutrophication [16]. There are, however, still large gaps in knowledge of the magnitude of N deposition fluxes and impacts of atmospheric N on air pollution [2••, 17].
In this review, we summarize recent (especially after 2010) progress on N deposition studies in order to identify: (1) the spatio-temporal variability of N deposition fluxes, (2) the major impacts of atmospheric N on air quality, and (3) some future research recommendations and regulatory strategies for mitigation of atmospheric N pollution in China.
Atmospheric Reactive N Emissions
NH3 Emission
NH3 is certainly among the most important pollutants in terms of contributing to N deposition and particulate matter (PM) formation [2••, 18]. As one of the world’s most populated countries, China’s national NH3 emissions have surged from 5 to 7 Tg year−1 in the late 1970s to 10–16 Tg year−1 in 2000s, accounting for 30–55% of total Asia emissions [19]. Such large quantity of NH3 released into the atmosphere have enhanced ambient NH3 concentrations over China, as confirmed by a number of field measurements [11•, 15] as well as satellite observations [20•, 21]. Meanwhile, modeling studies reveal that NH3 emission control is the most cost-effective strategy to reduce N deposition and PM pollution [17, 22]. Unlike SO2 and NOx, NH3 emissions have not been regulated in China.
Agricultural activities dominate China’s NH3 emissions despite the highly variable emission factors adopted in different studies [23–25]. This is particularly true in intensive agricultural areas of the North China Plain (NCP) [26], Sichuan Basin [27], and Guanzhong Plain [28]. Agricultural NH3 emissions in NCP were estimated to be 3.1 Tg N year−1 in 2004; 54% of them were derived from fertilizer application, followed by emissions from livestock operations involving pigs (27%), cattle (7%), sheep/goats (7%), and poultry (5%) [26]. Recent work indicates that NH3 emissions in China have decreased due to a phenomenal shrinkage of livestock production since 2007 [23]. Using the heat balance method, Xu et al. [24] also reported an annual emission factor of 1.4 kg NH3 pig−1 year−1 from a typical pig farm in China, only half of that in northern Europe [29]. But whether or not China has experienced a turning point of NH3 emissions is still an open question to date [30].
Although the overall magnitude of non-agricultural sources of NH3 might be thought to be small in China, gathering evidence reveals that non-agricultural NH3 emissions accumulating in urban SO2- and NOx-rich atmospheres will contribute disproportionately to city-scale NH3 budget and subsequent haze pollution caused by fine particle formation [31, 32]. Therefore, there is an on-going hot debate regarding the origins of ambient NH3 in Chinese megacities like Shanghai and Beijing. Recent research on stable N isotope measurements has helped quantify sources of NH3/NH4 + in China [33–35]. Controversy remains and further research is greatly needed, but there is growing evidence that on-road traffic is also an important source of NH3 in urban areas [32, 36, 37].
NOx Emission
Derived mainly from fossil fuel combustion processes including power plants, transportation, and industrial activities [38•], anthropogenic NOx emissions in China have increased from 1.3 Tg N year−1 in 1980 to more than 6.0 Tg N year−1 in 2010 [2••]. The contribution of nitric acid to acid rain is thus growing in importance due to the stricter control of SO2 emissions, similar to the trend observed in Europe and the USA in the early 1980s [39]. The government recently set goals to reduce NOx emissions by 10% in 2015 relative to 2010 levels (12th Five-year Plan) (http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2011-03/16/c_121193916.htm). As evidenced by a decline of nitrate deposition [7, 40, 41], NOx emissions in Europe and the USA have been reduced substantially during past decades. These successful implementations of the NOx emission regulations provide insight into potential strategies and technologies for China, which is currently an enormous NOx emitter. In the near future, NOx emissions in China are expected to be progressively curbed by stricter national ambient air quality standards (http://bz.mep.gov.cn/), following the trend in Europe and the USA.
Organic N Emission
As indicated by global and regional assessments based on limited monitoring results [42•, 43, 44], organic N contributes substantially to the atmospheric N cycling. Jickells et al. [42•] suggested that on a global basis, dissolved organic N (DON) deposition accounts for approximately 25% of total N deposition. Similarly, Zhang et al. [43] and Du and Liu [44] estimated that DON is approximately 25% of bulk deposition in China. Atmospheric N has been supposed to be resulted from direct emissions, adsorption of gases to pre-existing aerosol particles, and the formation of new particles within the atmosphere [42•]. The evaluation of the diverse sources of atmospheric organic N (including urea, peroxyacyl nitrates (PAN), amino acids, etc.) is challenging. Kanakidou et al. [45] have adapted an organic carbon model to create the first global model of atmospheric organic N. According to their model, in spite of uncertainties, the total emission of organic N (including that formed indirectly in the atmosphere) is 27.4 Tg N year−1, with major contribution from combustion sources (45%), primary biogenic particles (32%), and ocean particulate emissions (20%). However, there is still a lack of national emission inventory of organic N species in China. The research gaps of organic N emissions require further research efforts.
Monitoring Networks for Atmospheric Reactive N
Ground-Level Monitoring Networks
Measurements of N deposition in China have been conducted since the early 1980s when the Chinese National Environment Bureau organized a nationwide campaign for acid rain measurement [46]. Currently, the Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection and the National Meteorological Bureau have been running two independent precipitation chemistry (also covering ammonium and nitrate) monitoring networks since the late 1990s [47, 48]. Moreover, four Chinese cities (Xi’an, Xiamen, Chongqing, and Zhuhai) have joined the Acid Deposition Network in East Asia (EANET) (http://www.eanet.asia/site/index.html). Since 2004, China Agricultural University has organized a Nationwide Nitrogen Deposition Monitoring Network (NNDMN) [11•, 15]. The Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN) has also included measurements of wet N deposition [12]. Both networks contain more than 40 monitoring sites across China, covering forest, grassland, desert, lake, cropland, and urban ecosystems. However, most existing monitoring networks measure only bulk or wet deposition, leaving large gaps in the estimate of dry deposition in China. The NNDMN has recently started to include estimation of dry N deposition based on measured atmospheric N concentrations and simulated deposition velocities (V d) [11•].
Satellite Monitoring Networks
The ground-based measurements can accurately grasp changes of NOx and NH3, while the in situ observation is largely constrained by the limited number and uneven spatial distribution of measurement sites. Satellite products facilitate the acquisition of continuous NO2 and NH3 concentrations in the atmosphere from regional to global coverage.
At present, column NO2 concentrations are measured by multiple space-based instruments, including the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME), SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY), Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) [49, 50]. These space-borne sensors provide a long period (from 1996 to present) of column NO2 concentrations on a global scale, with high spatial and temporal resolutions (Table 1). In recent years, the NO2 columns also have been used to estimate the total N deposition based on statistical models [51, 52] and gaseous NO2 deposition from an inferred model [53]. However, there were still gaps in estimating N deposition with a high prediction accuracy based on a statistical method.
Compared with NO2 measurements (since 1996), satellite NH3 measurements have been conducted much later by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS, 2002-, resolution 13.5 × 13.5 km2), the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI, 2008-, resolution 12 × 12 km2), and the Tropospheric Emissions Spectrometer (TES, 2004-, resolution 5 × 8 km2) [54]. The IASI NH3 product has been widely validated by ground-based measurements [20•], while the AIRS datasets were first reported by Warner et al. [55] and need to be validated by more measurements in the future. Van Damme et al. [21] provided a comprehensive work on the validation of the IASI NH3 measurements. In their work, the IASI NH3 columns have been converted to surface concentrations by using model profiles. Over China, the analysis between the monthly NH3 concentrations from IASI and those in NNDMN gave a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.39 and a slope of the regression of 0.21 (n = 1149) [21], suggesting further investigation is needed to consider the performance of IASI NH3 measurements, especially as translated to surface concentration estimates. When the satellite NH3 and NO2 columns are converted to surface concentrations, dry deposition fluxes of NH3 and NO2 can be estimated according to atmospheric concentrations and simulated V d of both N species.
Uncertainty Analysis of Various Monitoring Approaches
To generate a total N deposition flux, one must keep in mind that atmospheric N is deposited via precipitation (wet deposition) and as gases and particles (dry deposition). Besides the pathways, it is critically important to consider various N species (NOy and NHx). Therefore, it is important to quantify both wet and dry deposition of NOy and NHx; otherwise, an extrapolation of total N deposition flux could yield a high underestimation [56].
The clarification of the terminology for N deposition, especially for wet deposition, bulk deposition, dry deposition, or total deposition of inorganic and organic N, is therefore crucial, when investigating and estimating the effects of N deposition on ecosystems [57]. Especially, we must clarify two concepts about wet and bulk deposition. The former refers strictly to wet-only deposition collected only during rainfall and snowfall events. The latter refers to rainfall and snowfall samples collected using traditional rain gauges which are open permanently. This gives bulk deposition containing wet plus unquantifiable dry deposition of gases and particles and therefore it should be higher than wet deposition but much lower than total deposition.
For example, wet deposition only contributed 40% (28–57%) to total inorganic N deposition in northern China [17]. Annual difference between bulk and wet deposition was 1.3–9.6 kg N ha−1 in northern Chinese agroecosystems, equivalent to 5–32% of bulk deposition [58]. This contribution increased to 39% in urban regions [59]. Total N deposition to ecosystems will often be several times larger than bulk deposition data. We therefore suggest the clarification of the terminology regarding N deposition, especially for wet deposition, bulk deposition, gaseous and particulate dry deposition, or total deposition when investigating the ecological impacts of N deposition.
Quantification of Atmospheric N Deposition
Inorganic N Deposition
Due to the difficulty in measuring dry N deposition, earlier studies focus on wet or bulk N deposition, calculated as a product of precipitation-weighted mean N concentration and annual precipitation [60, 61]. Based on the NNDMN and published data, Liu et al. [2••] showed annual bulk N deposition in China increased from 13.2 kg N ha−1 in the 1980s to 21.1 kg N ha−1 in the 2000s, with an annual increase of approx. 0.4 kg N ha−1. Jia et al. [62] and Lü and Tian [63•] reported a similar increasing trend in N deposition in China. Different from Europe and the USA [6, 8], China’s wet/bulk N deposition was still at high level and showed increasing trend [2••, 30]. Compared with NO3 −-N, NH4 +-N was the dominant form in most reported wet/bulk deposition results in China [2••, 7•, 12], although the ratio of NH4 +-N/NO3 −-N in precipitation decreased since the 1980s [2••]. The main reasons for the enhanced wet/bulk deposition are the increased energy consumption and N fertilizer use [2••, 30, 62]. Although the methods for estimation of the relevant deposition are different to some extent among the above mentioned studies, their results are highly comparable, and thus can represent the magnitudes of current wet/bulk deposition in China.
Dry N deposition can be measured directly using micrometeorological methods [64] or estimated by employing inferential models that require measurements of deposition velocity (V d, from standard surface meteorological and biological parameters) and ambient concentrations of gaseous- or aerosol-N compounds [65•]. However, the application of micrometeorological techniques to flux measurements of N species are limited to short-term or a few species [66, 67], and thus are hard to give reliable annual dry N deposition fluxes. For these reasons, the most extensively used method worldwide remains the inferential method, albeit with considerable uncertainty [65•].
Over the last decade, many studies have successfully quantified dry N deposition at a local scale [68, 69], or at a regional scale [12, 70] in China using the inferential method. More recently, Xu et al. [11•] systematically reported average wet/bulk and dry N deposition to be 19.3 and 20.6 kg N ha−1 year−1 respectively from 43 in situ monitoring sites in the NNDMN during 2010–2014. The spatial variability of wet and dry N deposition by regions showed: North China>Southern China>Northeast China>Northwest China>the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 1), consistent with the national atmospheric N emission intensities [23] as well as the differences in N fertilizer use and energy consumption [12, 30]. A similar study by Jia et al. [13] showed that dry N deposition averaged 7.5 Tg N year−1 during 2005–2014 in China and exhibited an increasing trend. It seems clear that dry N deposition (comparable to wet deposition) contributes to a significant fraction of total N deposition and thus should be considered when assessing N deposition-induced ecological risks. However, there are still some unresolved issues, especially related to quantification of NH3 bi-directional exchange between atmosphere and biosphere [71, 72]. Incorporation of bi-directional exchange into NH3 dry deposition modeling frameworks typically reduces net deposition to the surface.
Organic N Deposition
Organic N deposition, which accounted for about 20–30% of total N compounds in wet and dry deposition [73], has received much less attention than inorganic N compounds due to in part to the more critical requirements of sampling, storage, transport, and analysis [42•]. Early research mostly concentrated on wet deposition in remote marine and coastal areas [74•], while recent research has expanded to different ecosystems including organic N not only from precipitation but also from aerosols [75, 76].
Concentrations of DON concentrations in precipitation in China ranged from 13.2 to 190.3 μmol L−1, with averaged value of 70.5 μmol L−1, while DON concentrations in other regions ranged from 0.01 to 69.3 μmol L−1, with average value of 15.6 μmol L−1 (Fig. 2a). Fractions of DON in total dissolved N (TDN) (DON/TDN value) from precipitation in China ranged 0.07 to 0.67, with an average value of 0.28, while DON/TDN values in other regions ranged from 0.02 to 0.58, with an average value of 0.19 (Fig. 2b). DON concentrations from aerosols were also measured worldwide, with higher concentrations (65 to 204 nmol m−3) in China [77] than in other regions (1.3 to 15.8 nmol m−3) in other regions [78, 79]. Although available data of DON deposition in China were mainly collected in agricultural ecosystems (only few data from other ecosystems) [43, 80], they were substantially higher than the values in other regions [42•], which could be explained by the widespread heavy nitrogenous species emission and deposition over China [2••, 15]. DON/TDN values from precipitations in China were also significantly higher than that in other regions, but both the two group values were located in reasonable range [81], and the relationship between higher DON concentration and higher DON/TDN was poorly understood. Taking the annual precipitation amount into account, organic N from wet deposition in China averaged 7 kg N ha−1 year−1 [43].
Source Analysis of N Deposition
The analysis of N sources in deposition has long been critical for constructing emission-deposition relationships. Compared with modeling methods, stable isotopes of reactive N in deposition can provide fingerprint information on major sources and transportation of different N species in deposition [82]. Particularly, new methods such as the conversion of nitrate to nitrous oxide for N and oxygen isotope analysis [83] have greatly improved the sample stability and reduced the requirements of sample sizes. Based on the sensitive denitrifier methods, the δ15N techniques were developed for source analysis on NH4 +, NO3 −, and DON in wet deposition [84, 85]. However, it remains challenging to achieve accurate and quantitative apportionment of N deposition only by the δ15N technique.
Atmospheric δ15N studies in China have mostly concentrated on NH4 + and NO3 − in precipitation [86, 87], with very few studies on aerosols [34•] and gaseous N species [88]. Due to the difficulties in direct δ15N analysis of DON [89], its origins remain very uncertain, although the variable δ15N values reported for marine-to-terrestrial precipitation DON suggested the potential of δ15N in DON source differentiation [90•]. Moreover, complex N emissions and gas-to-particulate transformation or precipitation washout may produce more variable and overlapped δ15N values in N deposition, which requires more lab and field evidence on isotopic fractionations of N before deposition because substantial isotope effects could confound δ15N signals between dry and wet deposition [91], between terrestrial and marine N sources [92]. Future efforts on these questions would allow us to better quantify contributions from multiple sources and to achieve regional δ15N observations of N deposition in China.
Modeling Wet and Dry N Deposition
Recent Development of Atmospheric Deposition Simulation
Global and regional chemical transport models (CTMs), which are capable of modeling the physical and chemical processes of atmospheric N pollution, have been applied to simulate the dry and wet N deposition over China [93, 94]. Simple statistical models (e.g., Gu et al. [95]) are also established to calculate N deposition as a function of energy consumption, fertilizer use, and precipitation amount, although they may be subject to great uncertainties by not considering various N emission sources and atmospheric processes. CTMs generally parameterize wet deposition as a function of precipitation activity and scavenging efficiency for different air pollutant species, and deploy the Wesley standard resistance-in-serious scheme [96] to derive V d for gaseous pollutants. Wu et al. [97] developed a new gaseous dry deposition parameterization, namely Naoh-GEM, and showed that Naoh-GEM model calculated V d for ozone, PAN, and NOy agreed well with the field measurements [98].
Modeling N Deposition in China
Simulations of N deposition at the global scale indicated that China has become one of the hotspots of N deposition in the world [99]. Regional CTMs at higher resolutions (5–36 km) now better characterize the spatial and temporal patterns and the budgets of N deposition in China [93, 94]. Zheng et al. [93] modeled the N deposition in China for the year of 2010 using the WRF/CMAQ modeling system. Their modeling results showed that national averaged total N deposition flux was estimated to be only 7.9 kg N ha−1 year−1, with the higher deposition occurring in the east region than the west. Dry deposition (mainly via NH3 and HNO3) was the dominant form, contributing 62% to the total deposition. The reduced N deposition was about twice of the oxidized N deposition. Combining site-level monitoring gridded precipitation data and atmospheric transport modeling results, Lu and Tian [63•] reported China’s bulk N deposition increased from 12.64 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the 1960s, to 15.89 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the 1980s and further to 20.07 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the 2000s, similar to summarized monitoring results across China [2••]. More recently, total inorganic N deposition fluxes were simulated to be 16.4 kg N ha−1 year−1 on average of 2008–2012 over China, with 62% (10.2 Tg N year−1) from reduced N (NHx) and 38% (6.2 Tg N year−1) from oxidized N (NOy) [16]. The modeled N deposition results showed substantially higher in intensively agricultural or economically developed areas than in the national average. For example, the regional averaged deposition was estimated to be 47 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the NCP in 2008 by [100] and 31 kg N ha−1 year−1 in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of Southern China in 2006 by Huang et al. [94]. In both NCP and PRD, reduced N compounds were the major deposited N components, comprising 63 and 77% of the total N deposition, respectively [94, 100]. Zhao et al. [101] found that N deposition will increase across most of China from 2005 to 2020, with more than 40% rise in south-central and eastern China under the projection of a business-as-usual scenario.
The increasing N deposition input to the marginal seas nearby the mainland of China has also been paid much attention recently [102]. Using the GEOS-Chem nested model over Asia, Zhao et al. [103] showed that atmospheric N deposition to the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea ranged from 0.8–20 kg N ha−1 year−1, which declines quickly downwind of the Asian continent. Present atmospheric N deposition is comparable to riverine N inputs, and thus has become an important contributor to the total N inputs to the marginal seas of China [104]. Total deposited N over the eastern China seas, including the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea, corresponds to about 3% of the N emission in China and would result in up to 4% increase of new productivity over that sea area [105]. The source attribution analysis using an adjoint model indicated that N emission over mainland China contributed about 90 and 70% of N deposition to the Yellow Sea and South China Sea, respectively [103].
Contribution of Atmospheric Reactive N to Air Pollution
Contribution to PM2.5 Pollution
NOx and NH3 are important precursors for the formation fine particles in the atmosphere. As a dominant alkaline gas, ammonia (NH3) can react with acidic compounds such as sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and nitric acid (HNO3) to form particulate ammonium (NH4 +) [106]. Due to the high emission intensities of NOx and NH3 in China [2••], the emissions of NOx and NH3 have been found to contribute to the formation of a large quantity of secondary inorganic aerosols (SIA, such as NH4NO3, NH4HSO4, and (NH4)2SO4), which account for ~20–60% of PM2.5 mass concentration [107]. For example, Huang et al. [108••] found that total mass concentrations of SIA during the high pollution events in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Xi’an ranged from 28.5 to 66.9 μg m−3, which accounted for 19.4–41.3% of the total PM2.5 mass concentration. Xu et al. [37] also found high annual mean concentrations of SIA (35.9 to 49.6 μg m−3) in PM2.5 at four rural and urban sites in the North China Plain, accounting for 29–39% of the total PM2.5 mass concentration.
In many urban areas of China, such as Beijing, a higher proportion of SIA relative to SOA (secondary organic aerosols) has been observed during haze episodes, suggesting a greater importance of SIA in haze pollution chemistry [36]. From an extreme haze pollution event during early 2013, NH4 + and related SIA (including NO3 −) contributed 7.2 and 22.2% of PM2.5 on clean days. These numbers increased to 10.4 and 36.2% at heavy polluted days [109]. On an annual basis, NH4 + and SIA contributed 9.2 and 35.0% of PM2.5, respectively. The percentages of NH 4 + in PM2.5 mass ranged from 7.4–12.4%, with highest values in spring and the lowest in autumn. Contributions of SIA to PM2.5 mass decreased as follows: spring (42.6%) > winter (33.7%) > autumn (32.8%) > summer (31.1%) [110]. On the national scale, the percentages of NH4 + and SIA in PM2.5 mass ranged from 1.1–10.6% and 7.1–57%, respectively. At both urban and rural sites in the eastern region, the NH4 + and SIA typically constituted much higher fractions (6.5–10.6% and 40–57%) of PM2.5 mass, indicating more local formation/production and regional transport of SIA [110, 111].
Field and laboratory studies have shown that NOx acts as a catalyst and can promote the conversion of SO2 to sulfate on the surfaces of mineral oxides [112, 113]. Moreover, the formed nitrate species can enhance the hygroscopicity of mineral oxides [114] and the uptake of liquid water, which accelerates SO2 and NO x gas–liquid–solid reactions and further increases the hygroscopicity of the particles [113]. In a recent study, measured nitrate to sulfate ratios in Beijing are higher than those reported a decade ago, coinciding with the increasing trend in NOx emissions [115]. Thus, an effective strategy to control PM2.5 and haze pollution over North China should emphasize the future control of NO x emissions. Based on these findings, Pan et al. [34•] proposed “the NO x hypothesis” that NOx mitigation will not only reduce nitrate itself but also decrease secondary inorganic and organic aerosol formation [37, 112]. Wang et al. [116] found that nitrate aerosol concentration was more sensitive to NOx emissions in the NCP and YRD, but it is equally or even more sensitive to NH3 emissions in the PRD. Meanwhile, organic nitrate (e.g., PAN) also contributes to aerosol mass concentration in China [108••]. The reduction in NOx emissions should also mitigate organic nitrate-induced secondary aerosols.
Recent work in the USA also reveals the importance of NH3 in influencing the success of sulfate reduction strategies [117]. Especially in winter when oxidant concentrations are limited, enhanced levels of NH3 which raise the pH of atmospheric condensed water can increase aqueous phase sulfate production by enhancing the importance of ozone as an oxidant. One consequence of this chemistry is that wintertime efforts to reduce sulfate pollution can be thwarted by abundant NH3, since increases in sulfate conversion efficiency increase while SO2 emission are reduced, due to increases in pH. This is an important lesson for China to consider as it moves to reduce SO2 emissions with the goal of reducing haze and its associated health and visibility impacts. In terms of the impact on PM2.5 pollution, NOx and NH3 influence aerosol acidity in different ways. NOx that eventually formed nitrate increases aerosol acidity, but NH3 actually decreases the aerosol acidity. NOx might enhance the aqueous oxidation of dissolved SO2 if atmospheric NH3 elevates pH value of liquid water content in aerosol/cloud to a large extent [118].
Based on on-line and off-line aerosol measurements in urban Beijing for both clean and haze conditions, Pan et al. [34•] demonstrate that the absolute and relative concentrations of nitrate increased with visibility degradation (relative humidity), whereas the variations of organics tracked the patterns of mixing-layer height and temperature. The increasing trend of nitrate (and also sulfate) but decreasing trends of organics during haze development, together with the increase of the NO2/SO2 molar ratio with increasing proximity to downtown Beijing and with visibility degradation, provide regional features of NO x -induced haze pollution in China. Such studies may provide insight into the formation of critical nuclei or the subsequent growth of freshly nucleated particles and advance our understanding of the role of nitrate in new particle formation and PM2.5 pollution.
Contribution to O3 Pollution
Reactive N is also an important driver for ozone (O3) formation, since O3 is a secondary air pollutant that is formed in the troposphere via photochemical oxidation of NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. At a global scale, significant increasing trends of tropospheric O3 have been derived from a synthesis of in situ observation and remote sensing [119]. Also, elevated surface O3 concentrations from local to regional scales, induced by large and widespread emission sources of O3 precursors (i.e., NOx and VOC), have been reported in China [120, 121]. In general, photochemical O3 can be reduced by controlling emissions of its precursors, but NOx and VOC have a non-linear relationship with O3 formation. Namely, there are NOx- or VOC-limited O3 formation. The regimes are dominated by VOC/NOx ratios, VOC reactivity, biogenic emissions, photochemical aging, and meteorological conditions. For example, VOC relative to NOx appears to dominate the O3 production efficiency in Central Eastern China and the Pearl River Region, whereas summer O3 formation in the plains and mountainous areas in Northern China was sensitive to VOC and NOx, respectively [122]. Recent research showed that O3 formation is VOC limited in most city clusters in the NCP, YRD, and PRD regions [123, 124]. In other words, atmospheric NOx in China’s megacities exerted a titration effect on ozone formation. Unfortunately, such valuable information is still scarce, which limits our understanding of O3 formation at a broad perspective. Therefore, O3-VOC-NOx chemistry over China needs to be improved through more observational and modeling studies, which is undoubtedly benefit to develop effective policies for O3 pollution control.
Implications of N Emission Mitigation for Air Quality Improvement
Air pollution, especially PM2.5 pollution, has captured the interest of scientists and the public alike since the worst photochemical smog in history occurred in China [108••]. As important components of PM2.5, NH4 +, and NO3 − concentrations in PM2.5 (precursors of NH3 and NOx) depend mainly on emission reduction.
During the Beijing Olympic Games, the daily emission of NOx was 47% lower the emission level on June 2008 [125]. By reducing the emissions of NOx and SO2 from vehicles as well as coal combustion, a 69% reduction of PM2.5 concentration and a 53% reduction of SIA (sum of SO4 2−, NO3 −, and NH4 +) concentrations had been witnessed in Beijing during the 2008 Beijing Olympic period [126]. Also, by strict emission controls, SIA concentrations decreased significantly at the ground site and 260 m height during the first APEC episode [32]. To memorize the end of World War II and the Sino-Japanese War, a 70th anniversary victory parade was held in Beijing on 3 September 2015. During the Parade Blue period (from 20 August to 3 September 2015, with strict pollutant emission controls in Beijing and surrounding areas), reductions of 12–35% for NH3 and 33–59% for NO2 in different areas of Beijing city during the emission control period were observed compared with measurements in the pre- and post-Parade Blue periods without emission controls [37]. As a result of reduction of NH3 and NO2, NH4 + and NO3 − concentrations in PM2.5 were also significantly decreased during the emission control period. However, these short-term emission control effects on air quality improvement disappeared shortly after cancelation of those emission control measures [37, 127].
“Shifting from coal to natural gas” at Urumqi in Xinjiang provided an opportunity to examine the long-term emission reduction effects. PM2.5 and its NH4 + and NO3 − concentrations decreased by more than 60% (p < 0.01) in January 2013 and 2014 (heating with natural gas) compared with those in January 2011 and 2012 (heating with coal) [124]. The change of energy consumption structure at Urumqi suggests that air quality improvement needs long-term pollutant emission control measures, including the co-mitigation of NH3, NOx, SO2, and VOC emissions.
Conclusions and Outlook
In general, we have tried our best to overview progress on N emissions, deposition, and air quality impacts in China, based on relevant publications especially after 2010. China’s national atmospheric N emissions, mainly from agricultural activities and fossil fuel combustion, are very high and likely to further increase in the future in order to meet the requirement by the increased population. Meanwhile, the Chinese government has been making a great effort to protect the environment through the adjustment of the energy structure in urban regions and/or releasing new policies in rural regions such as zero increase plan for chemical fertilizer use by 2020 [30]. With stricter control measures of atmospheric N emissions by the government, we expect the turning point of N emissions and deposition will come soon in the near future, similar to that of North America and Europe. In conclusion, dry and wet N deposition fluxes are comparable and show equal importance in China. Atmospheric N deposition has to some extent become an important indicator of anthropogenic N emissions induced by the expanding Chinese economy. Both monitoring and modeling results reveal that the central-eastern regions of China (e.g., northern, southeast, and southwest China) are N deposition hotspots worldwide. Elevated N deposition has produced detrimental effects on the environment especially air quality (e.g., PM2.5 and O3 pollution) over China.
In the future, strong research needs are required to reduce the uncertainties of N emission inventories and the N emission-deposition relationship, using combined monitoring and modeling approaches. Studies on revealing condition-dependent and localized emission factors of NH3, NOx as well as atmospheric organic N species would significantly reduce the uncertainties in N emission inventories in China. It is crucial to reduce knowledge gaps between modeled and measured results by improving the understanding of atmospheric N emission, transport, and deposition processes (e.g., by optimizing model parameters), based on considering main factors (such as meteorological factors and landuse types) that control those processes. It is also important for China to establish open-accessed national N deposition monitoring networks covering both wet and dry deposition using uniform monitoring methods, similar to the National Atmospheric Deposition Program of the United States (http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu) or the Acid Deposition Network in East Asia (http://www.eanet.asia/site/index.html). Cross-site N addition experiments along with various forests, grasslands, deserts, and aquatic ecosystems are required in order to provide systematic information on the impact of elevated N deposition on both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems against the background of climate change. The negative impacts of atmospheric N pollution on human health should be paid increasingly more attention in the future with increased premature deaths due to air pollution in China and globally. We appeal for wider international collaboration on N deposition measurements, modeling, and environmental effect evaluation. Nitrogen regulation tools and strategies should be recommended and taken into account when policy-makers consider the mitigation of anthropogenic Nr emissions and the benefits of human and ecosystem health from the mitigation.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, et al. Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochem. 2004;70(2):153–226.
•• Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Han WX, Tang A, Shen JL, Cui ZL, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature. 2013;494(7438):459–62. This article systematically evaluates long-term trends of bulk N deposition across China between 1980 and 2010 using nationwide data sets on bulk N deposition, plant foliar N and crop N uptake (from long-term unfertilized soils). The results provide strong evidence that average annual bulk N deposition increased between the 1980s and 2000s .
• Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol App. 2010;20(1):30–59. This article overviews N deposition effects on global terrestrial plant diversity and reviews that N accumulation is the main driver of changes to species composition across the whole range of different ecosystem types .
Li KH, Gong YM, Song W, Lv JL, Chang YH, Hu YK, et al. No significant nitrous oxide emissions during spring thaw under grazing and nitrogen addition in an alpine grassland. Glob Chang Biol. 2012;18(8):2546–54.
Yang YH, Li P, He HL, Zhao X, Datta A, Ma WH, et al. Long-term changes in soil pH across major forest ecosystems in China. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42(3):933–40.
Holland EA, Braswell BH, Sulzman J, Lamarque JF. Nitrogen deposition onto the United States and Western Europe: synthesis of observations and models. Ecol Appl. 2005;15(1):38–57.
• Du EZ, de Vries W, Galloway JN, Hu X, Fang J. Changes in wet nitrogen deposition in the United States between 1985 and 2012. Environ Res Lett. 2014;9(9):095004. This article analyzes changes in observed wet deposition of dissolved inorganic N (ammonium + nitrate) in the US between 1985 and 2012. The results suggest the needs to control N emissions by species and regions to avoid negative effects of N deposition on ecosystem health and function in the US.
Li Y, Schichtel BA, Walker JT, Schwede DB, Chen X, Lehmann CMB, et al. Increasing importance of deposition of reduced nitrogen in the United States. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(21):5874–9.
Xing J, Wang SX, Chatani S, Zhang CY, Wei W, Hao JM, et al. Projections of air pollutant emissions and its impacts on regional air quality in China in 2020. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11(7):3119–36.
Wu Y, Gu B, Erisman JW, Reis S, Fang Y, Lu X, et al. PM2.5 pollution is substantially affected by ammonia emissions in China. Environ Pollut. 2016;216:86–94.
• Xu W, Luo XS, Pan YP, Zhang L, Tang AH, Shen JL, et al. Quantifying atmospheric nitrogen deposition through a nationwide monitoring network across China. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15(13):12345–60. The paper reports wet/bulk and dry deposition of inorganic N fluxes simultaneously based on a nationwide monitoring network containing 43 sites across China and proved the equal importance of dry deposition and wet/bulk deposition.
Zhu J, He NP, Wang QF, Yuan GF, Wen D, Yu GR, et al. The composition, spatial patterns, and influencing factors of atmospheric wet nitrogen deposition in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2015;511(4):777–85.
Jia YL, Yu GR, Gao YN, He NP, Wang QF, Jiao CC, et al. Global inorganic nitrogen dry deposition inferred from ground and space-based measurements. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19810.
Matson P, Lohse KA, Hall SJ. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio. 2002;31(2):113–9.
Liu XJ, Duan L, Mo JM, Du EZ, Shen JL, Lu XK, et al. Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(10):2251–64.
Zhao YH, Zhang L, Chen YF, Liu XJ, Xu W, Pan YP, et al. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to China: a model analysis on nitrogen budget and critical load exceedance. Atmos Environ. 2017;153:32–40.
Pan YP, Wang YS, Tang GQ, Wu D. Wet and dry deposition of atmospheric nitrogen at ten sites in Northern China. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(14):6515–35.
Wang Y, Zhang QQ, He K, Zhang Q, Chai L. Sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols over China: response to 2000–2015 emission changes of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ammonia. Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13(5):2635–52.
Streets DG, Bond TC, Carmichael GR, Fernandes SD, Fu Q, He D, et al. An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000. J Geophy Res-Atmos. 2003;108:8809.
• Clarisse L, Clerbaux C, Dentener F, Hurtmans D, Coheur PF. Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations. Nat Geosci. 2009;2:479–83. This article concludes that ammonia emissions could have been underestimated, and satellite monitoring of ammonia from space will improve the understanding of global N cycle.
Van Damme M, Clarisse L, Dammers E, Liu X, Nowak JB, Clerbaux C, et al. Towards validation of ammonia (NH3) measurements from the IASI satellite. Atmos Meas Tech. 2015;8(12):1575–91.
Pinder RW, Adams PJ, Pandis SN. Ammonia emission controls as a cost-effective strategy for reducing atmospheric particulate matter in the eastern United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41(2):380–6.
Kang Y, Liu M, Song Y, Huang X, Yao H, Cai X, et al. High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(4):2043–58.
Xu W, Zheng K, Liu XJ, Meng LM, Huaitalla RM, Shen JL, Hartung E, Gallmann E, Roelcke M, Zhang FS. Atmospheric NH3 dynamics at a typical pig farm in China and their implications. Atmos Pollut Res. 2014;5(3):455–63.
Gu BJ, Ju XT, Chang J, Ge Y, Vitousek PM. Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(28):8792–7.
Zhang Y, Dore AJ, Ma L, Liu XJ, Ma WQ, Cape JN, et al. Agricultural ammonia emissions inventory and spatial distribution in the North China Plain. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(2):490–501.
Wang H, Yang F, Shi G, Tian M, Zhang L, Zhang L, et al. Ambient concentration and dry deposition of major inorganic nitrogen species at two urban sites in Sichuan Basin, China. Environ Pollut. 2016;219:235–44.
Cao JJ, Zhang T, Chow JC, Watson JG, Wu F, Li H. Characterization of atmospheric ammonia over Xi’an, China. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2009;9(2):277–89.
Koerkamp PWGG, Metz JHM, Uenk GH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, et al. Concentrations and emissions of ammonia in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res. 1998;70(1):79–95.
Liu XJ, Vitousek PM, Chang YH, Zhang WF, Matson P, Zhang FS. Evidence for a historic change occurring in China. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(2):505–6.
Chang YH, Liu XJ, Dore A, Li KH. Stemming PM2.5 pollution in China: re-evaluating the role of ammonia, aviation and non-exhaust road traffic emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(24):13035–6.
Sun K, Tao L, Miller DJ, Pan D, Golston LM, Zondlo MA, et al. Vehicle emissions as an important urban ammonia source in the United States and China. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; in press doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02805.
Chang YH, Liu XJ, Deng C, Zhuang GS. Source apportionment of atmospheric ammonia before, during, and after the 2014 APEC summit in Beijing using stable nitrogen isotope signatures. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(18):11635–47.
• Pan YP, Pan YP, Tian SL, Liu DW, Fang YT, Zhu FF, Zhang Q, et al. Fossil fuel combustion-related emissions dominate atmospheric ammonia sources during severe haze episodes: evidence from 15N-stable isotope in size-resolved aerosol ammonium. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(15):8049–56. This article describes a promising new tool for partitioning atmospheric NH 3 sources using the analysis of δ 15 N values of aerosol NH 4 +.
Wang YL, Liu XY, Song W, Yang W, Han B, Dou XY, et al. Isotopic partitioning of nitrogen in PM2.5 at Beijing and a background site of China. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss. 2016;16:1–33.
Sun YL, Jiang Q, Wang ZF, Fu P, Li J, Yang T, et al. Investigation of the sources and evolution processes of severe haze pollution in Beijing in January 2013. J Geophyl Res. 2014;119(7):4380–98.
Xu W, Song W, Zhang YY, Liu XJ, Zhang L, Zhao YH, et al. Air quality improvement in a megacity: implications from 2015 Beijing parade blue pollution-control actions. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;17(1):31–46.
• Gu BJ, Ge Y, Ren Y, Xu B, Luo WD, Jiang H, et al. Atmospheric reactive nitrogen in China: sources, recent trends, and damage costs. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(17):9420–7. This article assesses ammonia, nitrogen oxides, and nitrous oxide emissions in China based on a full life cycle analysis. The results provide an integrated view of Nr sources and health damage .
Galloway JN. Acid deposition: perspectives in time and space. Water Air Soil Poll. 1995;85(1):15–24.
Waldner P, Marchetto A, Thimonier A, Schmitt M, Rogora M, Granke O, et al. Detection of temporal trends in atmospheric deposition of inorganic nitrogen and sulphate to forests in Europe. Atmos Environ. 2014;95(1):363–74.
Du EZ. Rise and fall of nitrogen deposition in the United States. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(26):E3594–5.
• Jickells T, Baker AR, Cape JN, Cornell SE, Nemitz E. The cycling of organic nitrogen through the atmosphere. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2013;368(1621):20130115. This article systematically reviews the sources, concentration, deposition and potential impacts of atmospheric organic N in precipitation and aerosols according to publications up to 2012.
Zhang Y, Song L, Liu XJ, Li WQ, Lü SH, Zheng LX, Bai ZC, Cai GY, Zhang FS. Atmospheric organic nitrogen deposition in China. Atmos Environ. 2012;46:195–204.
Du EZ, Liu XJ. High rates of wet nitrogen deposition in China: a synthesis. In: Sutton MA, Mason KE, Sheppard LJ, Sverdrup H, Haeuber R, Hicks WK, editors. Nitrogen deposition, critical loads and biodiversity. Amsterdam: Springer; 2014. p. 49–56.
Kanakidou M, Duce RA, Prospero JM, Baker AR, Claudia B, Dentener FJ, Hunter KA, Liss PS, Natalie M, Okin GS, Sarin M, Tsigaridis K, Uematsu M, Zamora LM, Zhu T. Atmospheric fluxes of organic N and P to the global ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2012;26(3):GB2022.
Zhao D, Sun B. Air-pollution and acid-rain in China. Ambio. 1986;15(1):2–5.
Ding GA, Xu XB, Wang SF, Yu XL, Cheng HB. Database from the acid rain network of China meteorological administration and its preliminary analyses. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology. 2004;15(1):85–94.
Lü CQ, Tian HQ. Spatial and temporal patterns of nitrogen deposition in China: synthesis of observational data. J Geophys Res. 2007;112(D22):229–38.
Boersma KF, Eskes HJ, Brinksma EJ. Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space. J Geophys Res. 2004;109(D4):385–9.
Boersma KF, Eskes HJ, Dirksen RJ, van der ARJ, Veefkind JP, Stammes P, et al. An improved tropospheric NO2 column retrieval algorithm for the ozone monitoring instrument. Atmos Meas Tech. 2011;4(9):1905–28.
Cheng MM, Jiang H, Guo Z, Zhang XY, Lu XH. Estimating NO2 dry deposition using satellite data in eastern China. Int J Remote Sens. 2013;34(7):2548–65.
Lu XH, Jiang H, Zhang XY, Liu JX, Zhang Z, Jin JX, et al. Estimated global nitrogen deposition using NO2 column density. Int J Remote Sens. 2013;34(24):8893–906.
Nowlan CR, Martin RV, Philip S, Lamsal LN, Krotkov NA, Marais EA, et al. Global dry deposition of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide inferred from space-based measurements. Global Biogeochem Cy. 2014;28(10):1025–43.
Shephard MW, Cady-Pereira KE, Luo M, Henze DK, Pinder RW, Walker JT, et al. TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11(20):10743–63.
Warner JX, Wei ZG, Strow LL, Dickerson RR, Nowak JB. The global tropospheric ammonia distribution as seen in the 13-year AIRS measurement record. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(8):5467–79.
Pan Y, Li Y, Wang Y. Comments on “Half-century nitrogen deposition increase across China: A gridded time-series dataset for regional environmental assessments” by Chaoqun Lu and Hanqin Tian. Atmos Environ. 2014;97:68–74.
Pan Y, Liu Y, Wentworth GR, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Li Y, et al. Letter to the editor: critical assessments of the current state of scientific knowledge, terminology, and research needs concerning the ecological effects of elevated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China. Atmos Environ. 2017;153:109–16.
Liu XJ, Xu W, Pan Y, Du E. Liu et al. suspect that Zhu et al. (2015) may have underestimated dissolved organic nitrogen (N) but overestimated total particulate N in wet deposition in China. Sci Total Environ. 2015;520:300–1.
Zhang G, Pan Y, Tian S, Cheng M, Xie Y, Wang H, et al. Limitations of passive sampling technique of rainfall chemistry and wet deposition flux characterization. Res Environ Sci. 2015;28(5):684–90.
Goulding KWT. Nitrogen deposition to land from the atmosphere. Soil Use Manage. 1990;6(2):61–3.
Liu XJ, Ju XT, Zhang Y, He CE, Kopsch J, Zhang FS. Nitrogen deposition in agroecosystems in the Beijing area. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006;113(1):370–7.
Jia YL, Yu GR, He NP, Zhan XY, Fang HJ, Sheng WP, et al. Spatial and decadal variations in inorganic nitrogen wet deposition in China induced by human activity. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):3763.
• Lü CQ, Tian HQ. Half-century nitrogen deposition increase across China: a gridded time-series data set for regional environmental assessments. Atmos Environ. 2014;97:68–74. The authors combined site-level monitoring gridded precipitation data and atmospheric transport modeling results to generate annual N bulk deposition in China from 1961 to 2008 (10 km × 10 km spatial resolution) and reported 59% increase in N deposition from the 1960s.
Fowler D, Coyle M, Flechard C, Hargreaves K, Nemitz E, Storeton-West R, et al. Advances in micrometeorological methods for the measurement and interpretation of gas and particle nitrogen fluxes. Plant Soil. 2001;228(1):117–29.
• Flechard CR, Nemitz E, Smith RI, Fowler D, Vermeulen AT, Bleeker A, et al. Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen to European ecosystems: a comparison of inferential models across the NitroEurope network. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11(6):2703–28. This article compares inferential models on European atmospheric reactive nitrogen (Nr) based on the inferential network. Results suggest the validation of inferential models at the ecosystem scale is best achieved by comparison with direct long-term micrometeorological Nr flux measurements.
Rummel U, Ammann C, Gut A, Meixner FX, Andreae MO. Eddy covariance measurements of nitric oxide flux within an Amazonian rain forest. J Geophys Res. 2002;107(D20):8050.
Trebs I, Lara LL, Zeri LMM, Gatti LV, Artaxo P, Dlugi R, et al. Dry and wet deposition of inorganic nitrogen compounds to a tropical pasture site (Rondonia, Brazil). Atmos Chem Phys. 2006;6(2):447–69.
Shen JL, Tang AH, Liu XJ, Fangmeier A, Goulding KT, Zhang FS. High concentrations and dry deposition of reactive nitrogen species at two sites in the North China Plain. Environ Pollut. 2009;157(11):3106–13.
Qi JH, Shi JH, Gao HW, Sun Z. Atmospheric dry and wet deposition of nitrogen species and its implication for primary productivity in coastal region of the Yellow Sea, China. Atmos Environ. 2013;81(2):600–8.
Shen JL, Li Y, Liu XJ, Luo XS, Tang H, Zhang YZ, et al. Atmospheric dry and wet nitrogen deposition on three contrasting land use types of an agricultural catchment in subtropical central China. Atmos Environ. 2013;67(2):415–24.
Flechard CR, Massad RS, Loubet B, Personne E, Simpson D, Bash JO, et al. Advances in understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia exchange. Biogeosciences. 2013;10(7):5183–225.
Sutton MA, Reis S, Riddick SN, Dragosits U, Nemitz E, Theobald MR, et al. Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2013;368:20130166.
Duce RA, LaRoche J, Altieri K, Arrigo KR, Baker AR, Capone DG, et al. Impacts of atmospheric anthropogenic nitrogen on the open ocean. Science. 2008;320(5878):893–7.
• Cape JN, Tang SM, González-Benitez JM, Mitošinková M, Makkonen U, Jocher M, et al. Organic nitrogen in precipitation across Europe. Biogeosci. 2012;9(11):4401–9. This article presents the absolute and relative contributions of organic N to wet N deposition across Europe, and examines seasonal trends of wet deposition of organic N.
Benítez JMG, Cape JN, Heal MR, van Dijk N, Díez AV. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition in south-east Scotland: quantification of the organic nitrogen fraction in wet, dry and bulk deposition. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(26):4087–94.
Benedict KB, Kreidenweis SM, Schichtel B, Malm WC, Carrico C, Collett Jr JL. A seasonal nitrogen deposition budget for Rocky Mountain National Park. Ecol Appl. 2013;23(5):1156–69.
Shi J, Gao H, Qi J, Zhang J, Yao X. Sources, compositions, and distributions of water-soluble organic nitrogen in aerosols over the China Sea. J Geophys Res. 2010;115(D17):1383–92.
Lin M, Walker J, Geron C, Khlystov A. Organic nitrogen in PM2.5 aerosol at a forest site in the southeast US. Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10(5):2145–57.
Matsumoto K, Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi H, Kaneyasu N, Nakano T. Water-soluble organic nitrogen in the ambient aerosols and its contribution to the dry deposition of fixed nitrogen species in Japan. Atmos Environ. 2014;95:334–43.
Chen YX, Chen HY, Wang W, Yeh JX, Chou WC, Gong GC, et al. Dissolved organic nitrogen in wet deposition in a coastal city (Keelung) of the southern East China Sea: origin, molecular composition and flux. Atmos Environ. 2015;112:20–31.
Zhang Y, Zheng L, Liu X, Jickells T, Cape JN, Goulding K, et al. Evidence for organic N deposition and its anthropogenic sources in China. Atmos Environ. 2008;42(5):1035–41.
Altieri KE, Hastings MG, Gobel AR, Peters AJ, Sigman DM. Isotopic composition of rainwater nitrate at Bermuda: the influence of air mass source and chemistry in the marine boundary layer. J Geophys Res. 2013;118(19):11304–16.
Sigman DM, Casciotti KL, Andreani M, Barford C, Galanter M, Bohlke JK. A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater. Anal Chem. 2011;73(17):4145–53.
Fang YT, Koba K, Wang XM, Wen DZ, Li J, Takebayashi Y. Anthropogenic imprints on nitrogen and oxygen isotopic composition of precipitation nitrate in a nitrogen-polluted city in southern China. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11(3):1313–25.
Liu XY, Koba K, Makabe A, Li XD, Yoh M, Liu CQ. Ammonium first: natural mosses prefer atmospheric ammonium but vary utilization of dissolved organic nitrogen depending on habitat and nitrogen deposition. New Phytol. 2013;199(2):407–19.
Zhang Y, Liu XJ, Fangmeier A, Goulding KTW, Zhang FS. Nitrogen inputs and isotopes in precipitation in the North China Plain. Atmos Environ. 2008;42(7):1436–48.
Xiao HW, Xiao HY, Long AM, Wang YL. Who controls the monthly variations of NH4 + nitrogen isotope composition in precipitation? Atmos Environ. 2012;54(5):201–6.
Liu JY, Zhang Y, Liu XJ, Tang AH, Qiu HS, Zhang FS. Concentrations and isotopic characteristics of atmospheric reactive nitrogen around typical sources in Beijing, China. J Arid Land. 2016;8(6):910–20.
Knapp AN, Hastings MG, Sigman DM, Lipschultz F, Galloway JN. The flux and isotopic composition of reduced and total nitrogen in Bermuda rain. Mar Chem. 2010;120(1–4):83–9.
• Altieri KE, Fawcett SE, Peters AJ, Sigman DM, Hastings MG. Marine biogenic source of atmospheric organic nitrogen in the subtropical North Atlantic. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(4):925–30. This article indicates the major source of the organic nitrogen in marine aerosols. The findings imply that the contribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to ocean fertility, oceanic CO 2 removal, and nitrous oxide emissions may have been overestimated.
Elliott EM, Kendall C, Boyer EW, Burns DA, Lear GG, Golden HE, et al. Dual nitrate isotopes in dry deposition: utility for partitioning NOx source contributions to landscape nitrogen deposition. J Geophys Res. 2009;114(G4):425–53.
Koba K, Fang YT, Mo JM, Zhang W, Lu XK, Liu L, et al. The 15N natural abundance of the N lost from an N-saturated subtropical forest in southern China. J Geophys Res. 2012;117(G2):1–8.
Zheng D, Wang X, Xie S, Duan L, Chen D. Simulation of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China in 2010. China Environ Sci. 2014;34(5):1089–97.
Huang Z, Wang S, Zheng J, Yuan Z, Ye S, Kang D. Modeling inorganic nitrogen deposition in Guangdong province, China. Atmos Environ. 2015;109:147–60.
Gu F, Huang M, Zhang Y, Yan H, Li J, Guo R, et al. Modeling the temporal-spatial patterns of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China during 1961-2010. Acta Ecol Sin. 2016;36(12):3591–600.
Wesely ML. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos Environ. 1989;23(6):1293–304.
Wu ZY, Wang XM, Chen F, Turnipseed AA, Guenther AB, Niyogi D, et al. Evaluating the calculated dry deposition velocities of reactive nitrogen oxides and ozone from two community models over a temperate deciduous forest. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(16):2663–74.
Wu ZY, Wang XM, Turnipseed AA, Chen F, Zhang LM, Guenther AB, et al. Evaluation and improvements of two community models in simulating dry deposition velocities for peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) over a coniferous forest. J Geophys Res. 2012;117(D04):183–204.
Dentener F, Drevet J, Lamarque JF, Bey I, Eickhaut B, Fiore AM, et al. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Global Biogeochem Cy. 2006;20(4):GB4003.
Zhang Y, Dore AJ, Liu XJ, Zhang FS. Simulation of nitrogen deposition in the North China Plain by the FRAME model. Biogeosci. 2011;8(11):3319–29.
Zhao Y, Duan L, Xing J, Larssen T, Nielsen CP, Hao J. Soil acidification in China: is controlling SO2 emissions enough? Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(21):8021–6.
Yan H, Gao H, Yao X, Wang Z. Simulating dry deposition fluxes of PM10 and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the eastern China seas during a severe Asian dust event using WRF-Chem model. J Ocean Univ China. 2012;11(3):301–14.
Zhao Y, Zhang L, Pan Y, Wang Y, Paulot F, Henze DK. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the northwestern Pacific: seasonal variation and source attribution. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15(18):10905–24.
Luo XS, Tang AH, Shi K, Wu LH, Li WQ, Shi WQ. Chinese coastal seas are facing heavy atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Environ Res Lett. 2014;9(9):095007.
Zhang Y, Yu Q, Ma WC, Chen LM. Atmospheric deposition of inorganic nitrogen to the eastern China seas and its implications to marine biogeochemistry. J Geophys Res. 2010;115:D00K10.
Griffith SM, Huang XH, Louie PK, Yu JZ. Characterizing the thermodynamic and chemical composition factors controlling PM2.5 nitrate: insights gained from two years of online measurements in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ. 2015;122:864–75.
Qin MM, Wang XS, Hu YT, Huang XF, He LY, Zhong LJ, et al. Formation of particulate sulfate and nitrate over the Pearl River Delta in the fall: diagnostic analysis using the Community Multiscale Air Quality model. Atmos Environ. 2015;112:81–9.
•• Huang RJ, Zhang YL, Bozzetti C, Ho KF, Cao JJ, Han YM, et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature. 2014;514(7521):218–22. This article investigates the chemical nature and sources of PM 2.5 in four big cities in China during the haze episodes on January 2013 by a comprehensive set of novel and state-of-the-art offline analytical approaches and statistical techniques. The research indicates the importance of secondary aerosol precursors in serious PM 2.5 pollution over China.
Tian SL, Pan YP, Liu Z, Wen T, Wang Y. Size-resolved aerosol chemical analysis of extreme haze pollution events during early 2013 in urban Beijing, China. J Hazard Mater. 2014;279:452–60.
Tian SL, Pan YP, Wang YS. Size-resolved source apportionment of particulate matter in urban Beijing during haze and non-haze episodes. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016;16(1):1–19.
Yang F, Tan J, Zhao Q, Du Z, He K, Ma Y, et al. Characteristics of PM2.5 speciation in representative megacities and across China. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11(11):5207–19.
Felix JD, Elliott EM, Gish T, Maghirang R, Cambal L, Clougherty J. Examining the transport of ammonia emissions across landscapes using nitrogen isotope ratios. Atmos Environ. 2014;95:563–70.
Wang Y, Yao L, Wang L, Liu Z, Ji D, Tang G, et al. Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China. Sci China Earth Sci. 2014;57(1):14–25.
Ma Q, He H, Liu Y. In situ DRIFTS study of hygroscopic behavior of mineral aerosol. J Environ Sci. 2010;22(4):555–60.
Cheng Y, He KB, Du ZY, Zheng M, Duan FK, Ma YL. Humidity plays an important role in the PM2.5 pollution in Beijing. Environ Pollut. 2015;197:68–75.
Wang SX, Xing J, Jang C, Zhu Y, Fu JS, Hao JM. Impact assessment of ammonia emissions on inorganic aerosols in East China using response surface modeling technique. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(21):9293–300.
Paulot F, Fan S, Horowitz LW. Contrasting seasonal responses of sulfate aerosols to declining SO2 emissions in the Eastern US: implications for the efficacy of SO2 emission controls. Geophy Res Lett. 2016; in press doi:10.1002/2016GL070695.
Cheng Y, Zheng G, Wei C, et al. Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China. Science Adv. 2016;2(12):e1601530.
Copper OR, Parrish DD, Ziemke J. Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: an observation-based review. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene. 2014;2:000029.
Zhang Q, Yuan B, Shao M, Wang X, Lu S, Lu K, et al. Variations of ground-level O3 and its precursors in Beijing in summertime between 2005 and 2011. Atmos Chem Phys. 2014;14(12):6089–101.
Sun YL, Wang ZF, Wild O, Xu WQ, Chen C, Fu PQ, et al. “APEC Blue”: secondary aerosol reductions from emission controls in Beijing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20668.
Tang G, Wang Y, Li X, Ji D, Hsu S, Gao X. Spatial-temporal variations in surface ozone in Northern China as observed during 2009-2010 and possible implications for future air quality control strategies. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(5):2757–76.
Tie X, Geng F, Guenther A, et al. Megacity impacts on regional ozone formation: observations and WRF-Chem modeling for the MIRAGE-Shanghai field campaign. Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13(11):5655–69.
Xue LK, Wang T, Gao J, et al. Ground-level ozone in four Chinese cities: precursors, regional transport and heterogeneous processes. Atmos Chem Phys. 2014;14(23):13175–88.
Wang S, Zhao M, Xing J, Wu Y, Zhou Y, Lei Y, et al. Quantifying the air pollutants emission reduction during the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(7):2490–6.
Shen JL, Liu JY, Li Y, Li YY, Wang Y, Liu XJ, et al. Contribution of atmospheric nitrogen deposition to diffuse pollution in a typical hilly red soil catchment in southern China. J Environ Sci. 2014;26(9):1797–805.
Song W, Chang YH, Liu XJ, Li KH, Gong YM, He GX, et al. A multiyear assessment of air quality benefits from China's emerging shale gas revolution: Urumqi as a case study. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(4):2066–72.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41425007) and the State Basic Research Program (2014CB954200).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
All authors contributed equally to this work.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Air Pollution
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0056-6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Xu, W., Duan, L. et al. Atmospheric Nitrogen Emission, Deposition, and Air Quality Impacts in China: an Overview. Curr Pollution Rep 3, 65–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0053-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0053-9