Abstract
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) present potential to be used in agriculture supporting plant growth and improving physiological responses even in N-fertilized soils. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate PGPB inoculation, combined or not with N-fertilizer, on growth and N metabolism of maize and sorghum. A total of thirteen PGPB, with high variability in producing indole-3-acetic acid and nitrogenase activity were inoculated in maize and sorghum grown with and without N fertilization. The growth and physiological responses of plants were assessed 50 d after plant emergence. In general, PGPB increased maize and sorghum growth, N fixation efficiency and N metabolites as compared to non-inoculated plants. Particularly, IPACC55 and IPACC10 increased leaf area, chlorophyll, shoot dry mass, total N and symbiotic efficiency. The majority of PGPB increased the relative and N use efficiencies in maize. In addition, PGPB reduced free ammonia, while increased nitrate and soluble protein in maize and sorghum. The results also showed that inoculated maize and sorghum grown without N fertilization displayed higher plant biomass and relative and N use efficiencies, while that, in plants grown with N fertilization, the inoculation improved shoot dry mass, and symbiotic and N use efficiencies. As conclusion, PGPB positively influence N fixation and metabolism in maize and sorghum, even in N-fertilized soil. This indicates that PGPB can provide N to maize and sorghum and stimulate plant growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Chemical fertilizers have contributed to support crop yield (Lu and Tian 2017). Particularly, N-fertilizers are the most important chemical input used in agriculture as the N is highly required by plants, affecting their growth and yield, and also increasing their photosynthetic rates (Sun et al. 2016; Bassi et al. 2018). Plants absorb N from the soil as nitrate or ammonium; nitrate is more available and absorbed by plants due to the adsorption of ammonium by soil cation exchange matrix or microorganisms (Bloom 2015). Since N requirement by plants is high, this nutrient is applied at high rates to avoid significant losses of yield (Bloch et al. 2020). However, application of high rates of N-fertilizers could promote soil, air and water pollution (Good and Beaty 2011). Particularly to soils, the intensive use of N-fertilizers has promoted acidification and degradation and consequently, these processes can decrease plant growth (Lu and Tian 2013; Tian and Niu 2015).
Some ecological and sustainable alternatives to support plant growth and decrease the dependence on N-fertilizers have been proposed in the last decade, such as the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) (Souza et al. 2015; da Silva et al., 2020). PGPB colonize plants rhizosphere, endosphere and phyllosphere, and can enhance their growth (Dong et al. 2019). These bacteria present direct strategies to promote plant growth, such as production of phytohormones and siderophores or N-fixing capacity (De La Torre-Ruiz et al. 2016; Compant et al. 2019). Indeed, previous studies have reported positive effects of PGPB on growth of important crops such as sugarcane, maize and soybean (Antunes et al. 2017; Breedt et al. 2017; Di Salvo et al. 2018; Santos et al. 2018; Aquino et al. 2019; Bavaresco et al., 2020). For instance, Breedt et al. (2017) reported increased maize growth varying from 24 to 34% after inoculation of Paenibacillus, Bacilus, and Brevundimonas. Recently, Di Salvo et al. (2018) inoculated some cereal crops with PGPB and observed improvement of plant growth. In sugarcane, Santos et al. (2018) found Bacillus subtilis improving its growth and yield. In addition, some PGPB are also recognized as a biological alternative to fix atmospheric N in cereals crops (Kuan et al. 2016; Ladha et al. 2016; Antunes et al. 2019). In maize, Kuan et al. (2016) found PGPB providing N from the atmosphere to plants and increasing their growth with a reduction of 30% in N-fertilizers.
PGPB also affect N metabolism in plants (Zeffa et al. 2019) such as the biosynthesis of important N compounds, i.e., chlorophylls, amino acids, nucleotides and proteins (Bloom 2015). For example, Bacillus sp. increased chlorophyll content in lima bean (Lima et al. 2016). In maize, Azospirillum brasilense increased leaf nitrate and ammonium, while Bacillus sp. decreased leaf amino acids and proteins (Calzavara et al. 2019). Therefore, these bacteria, especially those with capability on biological N fixation (BNF), exhibit potential to improve N nutrition in cereals (Ladha et al. 2016).
Maize and sorghum are important cereals cropped in several countries, being used as human food and animal feeding (Ribeiro et al. 2019). Maize is recognized as one of the most important crop species worldwide providing a source of energy to almost the total of population in Africa and the Americas (FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets 2020). Sorghum is important for millions of people living in the subtropical and semi-arid regions of Africa, South America and Asia, being a source of food and fodder, mostly in the traditional, smallholder farming sector (Hariprasanna and Rakshit 2016). Therefore, the demand for maize and sorghum in response to growing populations will require high productivity with consequent increase on demand of chemical fertilizers, notably for N-fertilizers resulting in both an increase in costs and potential negative impact on the environment.
On the other hand, PGPB could be a sustainable and ecological alternative to support maize and sorghum growth, decreasing their demand to N-fertilizers. In addition, PGPB can improve some plants physiological traits such as chlorophyll content (Rojas-Tapias et al., 2012), amino acids, and proteins (Souza et al. 2015). Thus, it is necessary to evaluate potential PGPB to be used as inoculants to maize and sorghum, increasing their growth. In this study, we hypothesized that PGPB, combined with N-fertilizer, would be able to promote maize and sorghum growth, improving the N metabolism and efficiency related to plant growth. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate potential PGPB on the growth and N metabolism in maize and sorghum.
2 Material and methods
2.1 PGPB isolates
In this study, thirteen PGPB isolated by Antunes et al. (2017) from sugarcane tissues were selected according to their contrasting biochemical potential (Aquino et al. 2019) (Table 1). Particularly, these PGPB present high variability in producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and reducing acetylene (a measurement of nitrogenase activity). Each PGPB were grown under orbital shaking (200 rpm; 25 °C; 72 h) in Erlenmeyer containing Tryptic Soy Broth liquid culture medium. The optimum growth was verified by measuring the optical density using a spectrophotometer at 540 nm, and a final concentration of 109 CFU mL−1 was considered for inoculation.
2.2 Experimental design
All PGPB were evaluated on maize and sorghum in a pot-experiment under greenhouse conditions. Two individual experiments were carried out to compare the responses of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. AG-1051, and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cv. Palo Alto N52K1009, to inoculation of PGPB. For each plant species, the treatments consisted of thirteen PGPB and one control without inoculation. These treatments were tested in two N levels (0% and 50% of total N required by plants). Both experiments were performed under a completely randomized blocks design in a factorial scheme (14 treatments × 2 levels of N) with five replications.
2.3 Experimental setup
The experiments were carried out in plastic pots containing 18 dm3 of soil (83% sand, 11% silt, and 6% clay) (Table 2). Before sowing, the seeds were disinfected with 70% alcohol (30 s) followed by 2% sodium hypochlorite (60 s), and then washed with sterile distilled water. Seeds were inoculated with 1.0 mL of the cell suspensions containing PGPB. Ten days after sowing, one plant was left in each pot. All pots received the application of P2O5 (2.5 and 2.1 g per pot to maize and sorghum, respectively) and K2O (2.1 and 2.4 g per pot to maize and sorghum, respectively). For treatments with 50% of N required by plants, it was applied ammonium sulfate (3.37 and 2.47 g per pot to maize and sorghum, respectively) at the sowing.
2.4 Plant measurements
The plants were collected 50 d after germination. Leaf area was measured using an automatic leaf area meter (Model LiCor LI-3000). Shoots were separated from roots, and both were oven-dried at 65 °C to determine shoot and root dry mass. Fresh leaves were collected for biochemical analysis. Total chlorophyll was quantified according to Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983). Free ammonia, nitrate, total free amino acids and soluble protein were quantified using aliquots of supernatant (extract) obtained in water bath at 100 °C (60 min). Free ammonia was measured by the phenol-hypochlorite method (Weatherburn 1967), while nitrate concentration was measured by the nitration of salicylic acid (Cataldo et al. 1975). Total free amino acids were quantified by ninhydrin (Yemm and Cocking 1955), while soluble protein was measured according to Bradford (1976). The N content in shoot was measured according to the semi-micro Kjeldahl method (Bremner and Mulvaney 1982).
Based on the aforementioned data, the relative, symbiotic and N use efficiencies were calculated. The relative efficiency was calculated according to Bergensen et al. (1971) using non-inoculated plants fertilized with 50% of N. The interaction efficiency (inoculated plants) was quantified according to the formula: (total N in inoculated plants)—(total N in N-fertilized plants)/(total N in N-fertilized plants—total N in non-fertilized plants) × 100 (Brockwell et al. 1966). The N use efficiency for each treatment was calculated according to Siddiqi and Glass (1981).
2.5 Data analysis
All statistical analyses were carried out separately for maize and sorghum. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), preceded by an F test, and means were compared by the Scott-Knott's test (p ≤ 0.05). These statistical analyses (univariate tests) were performed using the statistical software R Studio (version 3.5.2). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with all standardized data, in order to identify the effects of PGPB on maize and sorghum. This analysis was performed using Past (v.4.02) (https://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/).
3 Results
The analysis of variance showed individual and interactive effects by the inoculation and N-fertilization on the majority of variables determined in maize and sorghum (Table 3). In maize, the exceptions were free ammonia and N use efficiency, in N-fertilization, and total chlorophyll, in the interaction. Total free amino acids did not present significant differences for inoculation and N-fertilization. In sorghum, the exceptions were total chlorophyll, root dry mass, nitrate, total free amino acids and soluble proteins, in N-fertilization, while that total free amino acids did not vary significantly in the interaction. Interestingly, except for total free amino acids in maize (Scott–Knott's test; p = 0.07), PGPB influenced significantly all variables in maize and sorghum.
In general, PGPB promoted higher leaf area, chlorophyll and dry biomass (shoot and roots) in maize and sorghum as compared to non-inoculated plants (Figs. 1 and 2). Interestingly, some PGPB improved the plants performance without N fertilization when compared with those N-fertilized plants. Thus, IPACC55 promoted the highest leaf area in maize and sorghum grown without N fertilization as compared to N-fertilized plants (Fig. 1a). By the way, IPACC55 exhibited higher total chlorophyll (Fig. 1b) and shoot dry mass (Fig. 2a) in sorghum. In maize, IPACC10 promoted the highest leaf area and chlorophyll in plants grown without and with N fertilization, respectively.
In both plants, PGPB increased shoot and roots biomass than non-inoculated plants (Fig. 2). In maize grown without N fertilization, IPACC01, IPACC08, IPACC26, IPACC29, IPACC38, IPACC55 and IPACC58 increased the shoot dry mass; while IPACC07, IPACC10, IPACC38, IPACC53, and IPACF40 increased the root dry mass. In N-fertilized maize, IPACC29, IPACC53, IPACC55, and IPACC59 increased the plant biomass. In sorghum grown without N fertilization, IPACC07, IPACC26, IPACC38, and IPACC55 increased the roots biomass as compared to non-inoculated plants. Interestingly, IPACC55, in sorghum, and IPACC38, in both plants, promoted the highest roots growth when they were grown without N fertilization (Fig. 2).
In maize, IPACC55 and IPACC10 increased the total N and symbiotic efficiency in maize grown with and without N fertilization, respectively (Fig. 3a and b). In sorghum, IPACC29 and IPACC38 increased the total N and interaction efficiency in N-fertilized plants. Interestingly, IPACC07 increased the total N and interaction efficiency in plants grown without N fertilization. The majority of PGPB increased the relative and N use efficiencies in maize (Fig. 3c and d). Plants grown without N fertilization increased their relative efficiency by inoculation of IPACC01, IPACC08, IPACC10, IPACC26, IPACC29, IPACC38, IPACC55 and IPACF40. In N-fertilized maize, IPACC26 or IPACC29 promoted the highest values of relative efficiency (Fig. 3c). Regarding to N use efficiency, IPACC01, IPACC07, IPACC10, IPACC29, IPACC38, and IPACF40 promoted better performance in plants grown without N fertilization. However, in N-fertilized plants, IPACC26, IPACC29, and IPACC59 were most effective. IPACC55 promoted the highest values of relative efficiency and N use efficiency in both plants grown with and without N fertilization; while IPACC07 increased these parameters in N-fertilized plants.
The content of N compounds varied between inoculated maize and sorghum grown (Fig. 4). In general, PGPB reduced free ammonia in maize (Fig. 4a). In sorghum, lowest values of free ammonia were found in N-fertilized plants and inoculated with IPACC01, IPACC07, IPACC26, IPACC29 and IPACF40. Plants grown without N fertilization and inoculated with IPACC04, IPACC26, IPACC59 and IPACF40 showed lowest values of free ammonia (Fig. 4a). In N-fertilized maize, IPACC01, IPACC08, IPACC10, IPACC26, IPACC59 or IPACF40 increased the content of nitrate (Fig. 4b). In sorghum, IPACC01 and IPACC07 increased the content of nitrate in plants grown without and with N fertilization, respectively (Fig. 4b).
The values of total free amino acids varied between maize and sorghum (Fig. 4c). In N-fertilized maize and inoculated with PGPB, no differences were found in total free amino acids as compared to non-inoculated ones; however, plants grown without N fertilization and inoculated with IPACC07, IPACC10, IPACC29 and IPACC38 displayed higher values of total free amino acids (Fig. 4c). In sorghum grown with and without N fertilization, IPACC29 and IPACC55 increased the total free amino acids, respectively (Fig. 4c). IPACC07 or IPACC55 promoted higher soluble proteins in maize, while IPACC29 or IPACC38 increased the soluble protein in sorghum (Fig. 4d). Non-inoculated plants displayed lower content of soluble protein in maize and sorghum grown with or without N fertilization (Fig. 4d).
Through the PCA both inoculated and non-inoculated plants were clustered separately, showing that all PGPB promoted distinct effect those found in non-inoculated plants, mainly in plants grown without N fertilization (Fig. 5). The two principal axes explained 66.1% and 73.9% of the total variation in maize and sorghum grown without N fertilization, respectively (Fig. 5a and 5c). In N-fertilized plants, the two principal axes explained 57.8% and 69.5% of the total variation in maize and sorghum, respectively (Fig. 5b and d). Inoculated maize and sorghum grown without N fertilization displayed higher plant biomass and relative and N use efficiencies (loadings > 0.4). In N-fertilized plants, the inoculation improved the shoot dry mass and symbiotic and N use efficiencies (loadings > 0.5) (Fig. 5d).
4 Discussion
In this study, potential PGPB were inoculated in maize and sorghum that were grown with and without N fertilization. In line with the hypothesis, PGPB were able to promote plant growth and improve N metabolism and efficiency in maize and sorghum. It is an interesting finding since N is the most required nutrient by maize and sorghum and can confirm that these selected PGPB could be used as potential inoculant to these crops. In addition, the inoculation of PGPB is an ecological and sustainable strategy to increase plant performance and, at the same time, reduce the dependence on N-fertilizers. Interestingly, all PGPB used in this study were previously inoculated in sugarcane and showed high potential for increasing the growth and N fixation (Antunes et al. 2017). Therefore, this study presents potential PGPB to be indicated in further field studies to find a potential inoculant to be recommended to maize and sorghum.
In general, all PGPB increased the growth and N metabolism in maize and sorghum. However, there were differences between PGPB on the responses of plants, even when the plants were grown without N fertilization as compared to those fertilized ones. Therefore, IPACC55 can be highlighted as a potential PGPB by increasing leaf area in both plants, while promoted higher chlorophyll content and shoot dry mass in sorghum. On the other hand, IPACC10 has promoted higher leaf area and chlorophyll content in maize. Leaf area and chlorophyll are important parameters related to photosynthesis and plant growth, and previous studies have reported high leaf area associated with chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rates, and growth of maize (Li et al. 2015) and sorghum (Silva et al. 2019). Leaf growth, chlorophyll content, and CO2 assimilated by plants are severely reduced under N deficiency (Sun et al. 2016; Silva et al. 2019). Although in this study we did not estimate the CO2 assimilation rate, our results suggest IPACC55 and IPACC10 as potential to promote maize and sorghum growth, since they could induce higher CO2 assimilation rates. Interestingly, IPACC55 also contributed for increasing the root growth in maize, while IPACC38 stimulated more roots in both plants.
All PGPB used in this study were selected according to their biochemical capabilities (Antunes et al. 2017). Particularly, IPACC10 (Burkholderia sp.) presents high capability to produce IAA, while IPACC55 and IPACC38 (Paenibacillus sp.) have high acetylene-reduction activity, i.e., nitrogenase activity. These features could explain the higher maize growth after inoculation of IPACC10, and the values of total N and symbiotic efficiency in maize and sorghum after inoculation of IPACC55 and IPACC38, respectively, even when plants were grown with N fertilization. Burkholderia and Paenibacillus are well recognized plant growth promoters with high performance on N fixation. Particularly, Burkholderia presents high efficiency on nitrogenase activity and N fixation in non-legumes plants, being identified as plant growth promoter in maize and sorghum (Perin et al. 2006; Aquino et al. 2019). Paenibacillus presents nifH gene encoding Fe protein of nitrogenase and shows nitrogenase activity (Liu et al. 2019), being potentially suggested to be used as biofertilizer to some crops such as maize, wheat and sugarcane (Hao and Chen 2017; Aquino et al. 2019).
This study also highlights IPACC07 and IPACC08, identified as Herbaspirilum seropedicae, in contributing with N to plants. H. seropedicae is a N-fixing bacterium associated to maize, sugarcane and sorghum (Monteiro et al. 2008). Previous studies have reported increases on the growth and N fixation in maize and sorghum after inoculation of H. seropedicae (Ribaudo et al. 2006), Paenibacillus sp. (Aquino et al. 2019) and Burkholderia sp. (Schlemper et al. 2018). Since plant development is influenced by N availability, these bacteria presented high efficiency in fixing N and, thus, provided adequate N levels when this nutrient is absent or poorly available (Carvalho et al. 2014). On the other hand, maize inoculated with IPACC10, IPACC26 and IPACC29 decrease their free ammonium content (~ 70%) when compared to uninoculated plants. It also occurred to N-fertilized maize which presented a decrease in free ammonium content. These isolates were identified as Burkholderia sp. (IPACC10) and B. subtilis (IPACC26 and IPACC29). Ammonium or nitrate are the major inorganic N forms metabolized in plant cells (Nacry et al. 2013) and the inoculation with these bacteria increased the growth and N fixation in maize and sorghum, while presented the ability to convert nitrate or ammonium in other metabolites necessary to plant development (Lee et al. 2020). Considering that these isolates presented the ability to fix N, adequate levels of ammonia in these plants can reflect the higher N-fixation rate, greater activity of ammonium assimilation pathway, and other metabolic reactions involving ammonium that have been stimulated with symbiosis (Carvalho et al. 2014). These results are corroborated by increased leaf area, biomass, chlorophyll, and concentration of amino acids and proteins, and greater nitrogen use efficiency. Therefore, these results indicate that there was a greater flow of C and N in these plants, i.e., free ammonia was efficiently incorporated into organic molecules or structures.
Interestingly, N-fertilized plants inoculated with PGPB showed lower concentration of free ammonia, while increased their content of nitrate. It suggests higher availability of nitrate in rhizosphere, and an unbalance between uptake and reduction of this compound (Liu et al. 2014; Bloom 2015). PGPB can induce an increase in lateral root development and therefore improve the nitrate uptake and plant’s N status. In fact, inoculated plants exhibited a larger root system. Previously, Azospirillum brasilense increased the concentration of nitrate in plants grown with N (Calzavara et al. 2019). The results have shown that PGPB increased plant biomass, chlorophyll and total N, and it suggests positive influence on photosynthesis and N uptake by roots. In addition, the reduction in nitrate assimilation is associated to the translocation and accumulation of this compound in vacuoles. This plant strategy is important to maintain a favorable water status in its tissues (Wang et al. 2014).
Finally, this study has shown that these selected PGPB present potential in promoting maize and sorghum growth with the possibility to reduce the dependence on N-fertilizers used in both crops. It is particularly interesting since these crops are important to smallholders that, usually, do not use chemical fertilizers. These results reinforce the positive benefit to maize and sorghum by inoculation with these potential PGPB. As a technology with low economic cost, easy application, environmentally friendly, and potentially responsive by maize and sorghum, the further recommendation of these PGPB could be a strategy to be used for farmers.
5 Conclusion
In this study, PGPB positively influenced the plant growth and N metabolism in maize and sorghum, even when plants were grown with N. This indicates that these PGPB can provide N to maize and sorghum and stimulate the plant growth. Positively, IPACC07, IPACC08, IPACC10, IPACC38 and IPACC55 presented potential to be indicated as PGPB in maize and sorghum. This study suggests that these PGPB may be useful to improve N nutrition, biomass and yield in maize and sorghum, and further studies should be done under field conditions. In addition, further studies could explore the possible use of these PGPB in combination to find some additive or synergistic responses.
References
Antunes JEL, Lyra MCCP, Márquez FJO, Freitas ADS, Oliveira LMS, Araújo ASF, Figueiredo MVB (2017) Diversity of plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with sugarcane. Genet Mol Res 16(2):gmr16029662. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029662
Antunes JEL, Freitas ADS, Oliveira LMS, Lyra MCCP, Fonseca MAC, Santos CERS, Oliveira JP, Araújo ASF, Figueiredo MVB (2019) Sugarcane inoculated with endophytic diazotrophic bacteria: effects on yield, biological nitrogen fixation and industrial characteristics. An Acad Bras Ciênc 91(4):e20180990. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920180990
Aquino JPA, Macedo Junior FB, Antunes JEL, Figueiredo MVB, Alcântara Neto F, Araujo ASF (2019) Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria on maize and sorghum. Agricul Res Tropics 49:e56241–e56241
Bassi D, Menossi M, Mattiello L (2018) Nitrogen supply influences photosynthesis establishment along the sugarcane leaf. Sci Rep 8(1):1–13
Bavaresco LG, Osco LP, Araujo ASF, Mendes LW, Bonifacio A, Araujo ASF (2020) Bacillus subtilis can modulate the growth and root architecture in soybean through volatile organic compounds. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 32:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00173-y
Bergensen FJ, Brockwell J, Gibson AH, Schwinghamer EA (1971) Studies of natural populations and mutants of Rhizobium in the improvement of legume inoculants. Plant Soil 35(1):3–16
Bloch SE, Clark R, Gottlieb SS, Wood LK, Shah N, Mak SM, Lorigan JG, Johnson J, Davis-Richardson AG, Williams L, McKellar M, Soriano D, Petersen M, Horton A, Smith O, Wu L, Tung E, Broglie R, Tamsir A, Temme K (2020) Biological nitrogen fixation in maize: optimizing nitrogenase expression in a root-associated diazotroph. J Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa176
Bloom AJ (2015) The increasing importance of distinguishing among plant nitrogen sources. Curr Opin Plant Biol 25:10–16
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 722(1–2):248–254
Breedt G, Labuschagne N, Coutinho TA (2017) Seed treatment with selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases maize yield in the field. Ann Appl Biol 171:229–236
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Salicylic acid-thiosulphate modification of Kjeldahl method to include nitrate and nitrite. Agronomy 9:621–622
Brockwell J, Hely FW, Neal-Smith CA (1966) Some symbiotic characteristics of rhizobia responsible for spontaneous, effective field nodulation of Lotus hispidus. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Hus 6(23):365–370
Calzavara AK, Bianchini E, Pimenta JA, Oliveira HC, Stolf-Moreira R (2019) Photosynthetic light-response curves of light-demanding and shade-tolerant seedlings of neotropical tree species. Photosynthetica 57:470–474. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2019.061
Carvalho TLG, Balsemão-Pires E, Saraiva RM, Ferreira PCG, Hemerly AS (2014) Nitrogen signalling in plant interactions with associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria. J Exp Bot 65:5631–5642
Cataldo JM, Haroom M, Schrader LE, Youngs VL (1975) Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Commun Soll Sci Plant Anal 6(1):71–80
Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A (2019) A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res 19:29–37
da Silva JR, Netto AT, de Medeiros BP, de Deus BCS, Silva MVS, Ferraz TM, Campostrini E, Olivares FL (2020) Endophytic diazotrophic bacteria mitigate water deprivation effects in pineapple explants during acclimatization. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 32:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00168-9
De La Torre-Ruiz N, Ruiz-Valdiviezo VM, Rincón-Molina CI, Rodríguez-Mendiola M, Arias-Castro C, Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Palomeque-Dominguez H, Rincón-Rosales R (2016) Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the growth and fructan production of Agave americana L. Braz J Microbiol 47(3):587–596
Di Salvo LP, Cellucci GC, Carlino ME, de Salamone IEG (2018) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation and nitrogen fertilization increase maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield and modified rhizosphere microbial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 126:113–120
Dong CJ, Wang LL, Li Q, Shang QM (2019) Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere of tomato plants. PLoS ONE 14(11):e0223847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223847
FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets (2020). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. Accessed 24 April 2020.
Good AG, Beatty PH (2011) Fertilizing nature: a tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biol 9(8):e1001124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001124
Hao T, Chen S (2017) Colonization of wheat, maize and cucumber by Paenibacillus polymyxa WLY78. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0169980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169980
Hariprasanna K, Rakshit S (2016) Economic importance of sorghum. In: Rakshit S, Wang YH (eds) The sorghum genome. Compendium of plant genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47789-3_1
Kuan KB, Othman R, Rahim KA, Shamsuddin ZH (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilisation of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS One 11:19
Ladha JK, Tirol-Padre A, Reddy CK, Cassman KG, Verma S, Powlson DS, van Kessel C, Richter DB, Chakraborty D, Pathak H (2016) Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice, and wheat production systems. Sci Rep 6(1):1–9
Lee S, Trinh CS, Lee WJ, Jeong CY, Truong HA, Chung N, Kang CS, Lee H (2020) Bacillus subtilis strain L1 promotes nitrate reductase activity in Arabidopsis and elicits enhanced growth performance in Arabidopsis, lettuce, and wheat. J Plant Res 133:231–244
Li CF, Tao ZQ, Liu P, Zhang JW, Zhuang KZ, Dong ST, Zhao M (2015) Increased grain yield with improved photosynthetic characters in modern maize parental lines. J Integr Agric 14(9):1735–1744
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11:591–592
Lima EF, Costa Neto VP, Araujo JM, Alcântara Neto F, Bonifacio A, Rodrigues AC (2016) Varieties of lima bean shows different growth responses when inoculated with Bacillus sp., a plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biosci J 32(5):1221–1233
Liu XY, Koba K, Makabe A, Liu CQ (2014) Nitrate dynamics in natural plants: insights based on the concentration and natural isotope abundances of tissue nitrate. Front Plant Sci 5:355
Liu X, Li Q, Li Y, Guan G, Chen S (2019) Paenibacillus strains with nitrogen fixation and multiple beneficial properties for promoting plant growth. PeerJ 23(7):e7445. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7445
Lu CC, Tian H (2013) Net greenhouse gas balance in response to nitrogen enrichment: perspectives from a coupled biogeochemical model. Glob Change Biol 19(2):571–588
Lu CC, Tian H (2017) Global nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use for agriculture production in the past half century: shifted hot spots and nutrient imbalance. Earth System Science Data 9:181
Monteiro RA, Schmidt MA, Baura VA, Balsanelli E, Wassem R, Yates MG, Randi MAF, Pedrosa FO, Souza EM (2008) Early colonization pattern of maize (Zea mays L. Poales, Poaceae) roots by Herbaspirillum seropedicae (Burkholderiales, Oxalobacteraceae). Genet Mol Biol 31(4):932–937
Nacry P, Bouguyon E, Gojon A (2013) Nitrogen acquisition by roots: physiological and developmental mechanisms ensuring plant adaptation to a fluctuating resource. Plant Soil 370:1–29
Perin L, Martínez-Aguilar L, Castro-González R, Estrada-de Los Santos P, Cabellos-Avelar T, Guedes HV, Reis VM, Caballero-Mellado J (2006) Diazotrophic burkholderia species associated with field-grown maize and sugarcane. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(5):3103–3110
Ribaudo CM, Rondanini DP, Trinchero GD, Curá JA (2006) Effect of Herbaspirillum seropedicae inoculation on maize nitrogen metabolism. Maydica 51:481–485
Ribeiro KO, Garcia MC, Oliveira AR, Soares Júnior MS, Caliri M (2019) Characterization and proposal of potential use in foods of coproducts from waxy maize wet milling. Food Sci Technol 39(2):315–320
Rojas-Tapias D, Moreno-Galván A, Pardo-Díaz S, Obando M, Rivera D, Bonilla R (2012) Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl Soil Ecol 61:264–272
Santos RM, Kandasamy S, Rigobelo EC (2018) Sugarcane growth and nutrition levels are differentially affected by the application of PGPR and cane waste. Microbiology Open 7:e00617
Schlemper TR, Dimitrov MR, Gutierrez FS, van Veen JA, Silveira A, Kuramae EE (2018) Effect of Burkholderia tropica and Herbaspirillum frisingense strains on sorghum growth is plant genotype dependent. PeerJ 6:e5346. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5346
Siddiqi MY, Glass AD (1981) Utilization index: a modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants. J Plant Nutr 4(3):289–302
Silva MLS, Sousa HG, Silva MLS, Lacerda CF, Gomes-Filho E (2019) Growth and photosynthetic parameters of saccharine sorghum plants subjected to salinity. Acta Sci Agron 41:e42607. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42607
Souza RD, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38(4):401–419
Sun J, Ye M, Peng S, Li Y (2016) Nitrogen can improve the rapid response of photosynthesis to changing irradiance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Sci Rep 6(1):1–10
Tian D, Niu S (2015) A global analysis of soil acidification caused by nitrogen addition. Environ Res Lett 10(2):e024019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024019
Wang M, Shen Q, Xu G, Guo S (2014) New insight into the strategy for nitrogen metabolism in plant cells. In: Kwang WJ (Ed) International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, New York: Academic Press, 310:1–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800180-6.00001-3
Weatherburn MW (1967) Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 39(8):971–974
Yemm EW, Cocking EF (1955) The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst 80(948):209–214
Zeffa DM, Perini LJ, Silva MB, de Sousa NV, Scapim CA, Oliveira ALM, Amaral Junior AT, Goncalves LSA (2019) Azospirillum brasilense promotes increases in growth and nitrogen use efficiency of maize genotypes. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215332
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education—CAPES for providing scholarship to João P.A. Aquino. Sandra M. B. Rocha is supported by CAPES/FAPEPI. Ademir S. F. Araujo thanks to National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq for providing a fellowship of research (Grant 305069/2018-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JPAA, SMBR, and MRA carried out the experiments; JELA and ASFA designed the experiments; JELA, ASFA, AB, FAN analyzed data, discussed results and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aquino, J.P.A., Antunes, J.E.L., Bonifácio, A. et al. Plant growth-promoting bacteria improve growth and nitrogen metabolism in maize and sorghum. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 33, 249–260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00209-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00209-x