Introduction

Hypothyroidism is a widespread chronic disorder, with prevalence rates in up to 2% of the population [1,2,3]. Therapeutic mainstay is represented by levothyroxine (LT4) administration to maintain serum thyrotropin (TSH) concentration within a narrow range, which itself depicts a successful treatment [4, 5]. However, some patients may still feel “continuously tired” and, more generally “dissatisfied” with an appropriate L-T4 replacement. Even if the routine use of LT4 + LT3 combination therapy is not recommended in adult hypothyroid patients, it may be considered in few selected subjects with autoimmune hypothyroidism and persistent non-specific symptoms during LT4 monotherapy [6].

Even if the management of hypothyroidism is generally considered straightforward, several cross-sectional surveys of patients receiving levothyroxine (LT4) showed that a large percentage of the aforementioned patients (40–48%) are either over- or undertreated [2, 7].

In addition, given that many factors may affect LT4 intestinal absorption (such as food ingestion, dietary fiber, coffee, drugs, gastric or intestinal resection, and diseases), the current guidelines recommend LT4 to be administered in a fasting state [4, 8].

Conversely, compliance to medical recommendations has been identified as one of the most challenging tasks in the field of drug therapies [9], and a significant number of patients showed sub-optimal adherence to LT4 therapy, as they had to postpone their breakfast of at least 30 min [10]. Thus, despite fasting state assumption is recommended by the current guidelines, this prescription often leads to poor therapeutic compliance.

Over the last few years, pharmaceutical companies have introduced, in a few countries, new non-tablet LT4 formulations, such as liquid and soft gel capsules. These “alternative” formulations have shown to be more efficacious in many cases of refractory hypothyroidism, such as many gastrointestinal diseases including Helicobacter pylori infection, celiac disease, atrophic body gastritis, but also some medications (i.e. proton-pump inhibitors, sucralfate) [11].

Randomized, placebo-controlled trials, such as our previous TICO Study [12], demonstrated that hypothyroid patients easily maintained euthyroidism despite taking liquid LT4 at breakfast; this shows that the administration of the same dose of oral liquid LT4 either at breakfast or in a fasting state—a condition that potentially improves therapeutic compliance—has indistinguishable effects on the thyroid hormonal profile.

The purpose of this study was to verify, in a large cohort of patients, any difference in serum TSH levels when ingesting liquid LT4 at breakfast compared to when ingested 30 min earlier (fasting state).

Materials and methods

The study was approved by an independent Institutional Review Board and conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonisation. All participants provided prior written informed consent.

Patients and Design

Individuals, aged 18–75 years old, were eligible if they had hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, or after thyroidectomy for proven benign goiter. Subjects with elevated plasma thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin antibody with thyroid parenchyma heterogeneity associated with reduced echogenicity, were considered as HT patients [13]. Subjects with congestive heart failure (NYHA III–IV), coronary heart disease, severe hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol), or untreated dyslipidemia were excluded. Pregnant or lactating women or women who could possibly become pregnant at any time during the entire study were also excluded.

The starting dose of LT4 was determined through clinical judgment, taking into account TSH levels, estimated residual thyroid function, age, body weight and comorbidities [4]. All patients underwent TSH, fT4, and fT3 evaluation to verify achievement of euthyroidism (0.2 ≤ TSH ≤ 4.2 mIU/L) with their initial fasting state assumption of LT4 after 8 weeks of therapy. If euthyroidism was not achieved, an appropriately adjusted LT4 dose was administered for 8 weeks, after which thyroid function parameters were checked again. If euthyroidism was achieved, the patients were asked to take LT4 at breakfast and hormone levels were checked again after 6 months.

All participants were required to maintain the same breakfast habits throughout the study. The introduction of any additional drugs had to be reported to the researchers.

Adherence to protocol requirements—regularity and timing of administration, unchanged eating habits at breakfast—was assessed by a physician via personal interviews at the end of each regimen period. At the end of the study, all patients were formally asked whether they would prefer their daily LT4 treatment directly at breakfast or 30–60 min before.

Hormone assays

Serum concentrations of fT4 (normal range 8.0 ± 19.0 pg/mL, analytical sensitivity 1 pg/mL), fT3 (normal range 2.4 ± 4.7 pg/mL; analytical sensitivity 0.35 pg/mL), and TSH (normal range 0.4 ± 4.5 mIU/L, analytical sensitivity 0.004 mIU/L) were measured using a fully automated Architect i2000 analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA) using chemiluminescent magnetic immunoassays.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviations for parameters with normal distribution. Normal distribution was checked via Shapiro–Wilk test; when normality was rejected, data are presented as medians and 95% confidence interval (CI). Comparisons between continuous variables were performed by paired samples t test or related samples via Wilcoxon signed-rank test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. In addition, a multiple variable regression model was built in order to assess independent correlation of covariates with TSH variation, which was defined as: [TSH levels after “at breakfast assumption”] − [TSH levels after “fasting state assumption”]. Two-tailed p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows v17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Out of 798 patients, 37 withdrew from the study: 31 due to the introduction of metformin during the study spam, whilst the remaining 6 for unspecified personal reasons. A total of 761 patients (mean age 46.2 ± 10.8 years; 72.9% being female) completed the study. Of those, 498 patients (65.4%) were in replacement therapy for Hashimoto thyroiditis, whilst 263 (34.6%) after thyroidectomy for the removal of histologically proven benign goiter. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population

The median dose of LT4 ingested by the 761 patients at the end of the first regimen sequence (i.e. in fasting state) was 75 μg daily (95% CI 75–100 μg; range 25–200 μg), and not changed when assumed at breakfast as foreseen by the protocol study.

At the end of the study period, no significant differences in serum TSH level were observed whether LT4 was ingested at breakfast or 30 min before in a fasting state: 2.61 ± 1.79 vs. 2.54 ± 1.86 mIU/L, respectively (p = 0.455; Fig. 1). In addition, even cumulative frequency distributions of the two groups did not result significantly different (p = 0.531; Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Median (with 95% CI) TSH levels after 6-month treatment stratified for “at” or “before” breakfast administration (n = 761)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative frequency distribution of TSH levels after 6-month treatment stratified for “at” or “before” breakfast administration

A sub-analysis was performed on 202 patients assuming a concomitant drug (such as proton pump inhibitors, calcium or iron supplements) or using fiber and soy milk products at breakfast. Again, no difference in TSH levels was observed: 2.69 ± 1.96 vs. 2.63 ± 1.53 mIU/L; p = 0.732 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Median (with 95% CI) TSH levels after 6-month treatment stratified for “at” or “before” breakfast administration in the subgroups of patients (n = 202) assuming a concomitant drug treatment or using fiber and soy milk products at breakfast

In conclusion, median TSH variation (defined as: TSH levels after “at breakfast assumption” − TSH levels after “fasting state assumption”) was + 0.06 mIU/L (95% CI -0.03 to +0.17 mIU/L), and ranged from − 3.53 to + 3.78 mIU/L. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors independently correlated with such variation (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariable regression analysis with TSH variation as dependent variable

The regression model showed acceptable goodness of fit (R2 0.45), and significance level (p = 0.046); and resulted that only age (p = 0.0007) and LT4 dosage (p = 0.047) were significantly correlated with the magnitude of TSH variation.

No specific complaints were reported by the patients. In addition, no adverse events were observed by the investigators; none of the patients noticed changes in the taste of their breakfast, and almost all patients said they would prefer to take their daily LT4 treatment directly at breakfast.

Discussion

This study extends the results from those of TICO’s [10] in a large cohort of hypothyroid patients confirming that liquid LT4 can be easily assumed at breakfast.

As known, the guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) clearly indicated that LT4 should be ingested in fasting state at least 30 min before breakfast, or at bedtime, at least three hours after the evening meal in order to simplify optimal and consistent absorption [4]. This because the concomitant ingestion of LT4 with food [14,15,16,17], coffee [15], or fiber and soy products [18, 19] is associated to a lower absorption of levothyroxine.

The new LT4 formulations—either liquid or soft gel—apparently almost if not completely circumvent this problem [20]. Vita et al. [10], have in fact showed that treatment with a soft gel preparation of LT4 (Tiche capsules, IBSA Switzerland) is not associated with a reduced absorption of the drug by coffee [15] and proton pump inhibitors [20]. Recently, our group previously reported important data from a randomized trial investigating TSH differences when a liquid LT4 formulation (Tirosint, IBSA Italy) was administered “at” or “before” breakfast [12]. The latter, named TICO Study, demonstrated the absence of any significant difference in terms of hormone levels when liquid LT4 ingestion was either at breakfast or 30 min before breakfast, in a fasting state [12].

The results of this study, performed on a very large cohort of patients, are consistent with those of TICO’s [12], and clearly indicate that the administration of the same dose of oral liquid LT4 either at breakfast or in a fasting state, 30 min before breakfast, has indistinguishable effects on the thyroid hormonal profile. One important feature of this study is its real-life approach in which patients’ breakfast habits and intake of drugs and supplements are completely respected. In fact, we did not exclude any patient on concomitant drug treatment (including proton pump inhibitors, sucralfate, calcium or iron supplements) or patients taking fibre and soy-milk products at breakfast as foreseen by the protocol of the study. The only subjects excluded were those that introduced metformin during the study spam in view of the TSH-lowering effect of metformin [21, 22]. For this reason, the lack of influence exerted by breakfast composition or morning co-treatment (including proton pump inhibitors) on TSH levels was another important result. The last data confirm the results of a recent prospective study obtained by Vita et al. [23]. The authors showed that liquid LT4 overcomes the concurrent interference exerted by the ingestion of multiple interfering drugs, thus it allows targeting TSH in few weeks after switching from tablets [23]. In addiction, a recent retrospective Italian survey showed that the use of oral liquid LT4 is not associated with increased in prescribed daily dosages, compared to tablets formulation, during exposure to potential drug–drug interactions [24].

This finding, as well as the unanimous preference expressed by patients for taking the medication directly at breakfast, may represent a significant advantage for the liquid LT4 formulation (compared to traditional LT4 tablets) in order to maximize patients’ therapeutic compliance.

A critical issue that has not been directly addressed by this study is whether liquid LT4 may have distinct advantages over tablet preparations in terms of clinical outcomes, beyond timing of treatment. Indeed, two previous studies showed a significant reduction in the variability of TSH values both in adult and in elderly subjects [25, 26]. This is interesting due to the well-recognized increased risk of heart disease, osteoporosis, bone fracture, and cognitive impairment among subclinical hyperthyroid elderly subjects [26].

The main limitation of this study is that, as the liquid formulation is currently available only in Italy, all clinical studies have been conducted on an homogeneous ethnic group with similar breakfast habits. Indeed, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved liquid oral solution (Tirosint-SOL, IBSA Switzerland) for replacement therapy in primary (thyroidal), secondary (pituitary), tertiary (hypothalamic), congenital or acquired hypothyroidism, and pituitary thyrotropin suppression in thyroid cancer (https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2016/206977Orig1s000TOC.cfm 2017/6/28).

Therefore, we hope that we will soon have data on liquid levothyroxine therapy assumed at breakfast even in different populations with different breakfast habits.

In conclusion, this study confirms, in a large set of patients, that a liquid LT4 formulation can be ingested directly at breakfast and thus potentially improve therapeutic compliance. This observation is of considerable clinical relevance as the fasting state administration is the leading cause of therapeutic non-adherence, and because subjects who do not comply with LT4 therapy requirements are more likely to show variability in their TSH concentrations.