Abstract
In this paper, we introduce Szász-Mirakyan Kantorovich type of operators based on (p, q)-calculus. Using Krovokin’s type theorem, we show that operator converges uniformly. In second section, we study rate of convergence of operator using modulus of continuity and Peetre’s K-functional. In last section, we give Voronovskaya type results for operator.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In 1987, Lupaş [1] introduced the first q-analogue of the classical Bernstein polynomials. After that, with rapid development of q-calculus, new q-analogue of various positive linear operators are introduced by many researchers (for details see [2]). For detail study of q-calculus one can refer to [3, 4].
We begin by recalling certain notations of (p, q)-calculus (for detail see [5–7]). Let \(0 < q < p \le 1 \). The (p, q)-integer \([n]_{p,q}\) and (p, q)-factorial \([n]_{p,q} !\) are defined by
For integers \(0\le k\le n\), (p, q)-binomial is defined as
The (p, q)-polynomials expansion is
Let \(f : R\rightarrow R\), then the (p, q)-derivative of function f is:
provided that f is differentiable at 0.
Let \(f : C[0,a]\rightarrow R\), then the (p, q)-integration of a function f is defined by,
and
Two (p, q)-analogues of the exponential function (see [8]) are as:
which satisfy the equality \(e_{p, q}(x)E_{p, q}(-x)=1.\) For \(p = 1\), all the notations of (p, q)-calculus are reduced to q-calculus.
Recently, Tuncer Acar [9] introduced a (p, q)-analogue of Szász-Mirakyan operators as: For \( 0<q<p\le 1\), \(n \in \mathbb {N}\) and \(f:[0,\infty )\rightarrow R\):
where
Lemma 1
[9, Lemma 2] Let \( 0<q<p\le 1\) and \(n \in \mathbb {N}\). We have
2 Construction of (p, q)-Szász-Mirakyan Kantorovich operators
Motivated by Tuncer Acar, we set (p, q)-Szász-Mirakyan Kantorovich operators for \( 0<q<p\le 1\), \(n \in \mathbb {N}\) and \(f:[0,\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) as:
Lemma 2
Let \( 0<q<p\le 1\) and \(n \in \mathbb {N}\), we have
Proof
Using the identity \([k+1]_{p,q} = p^k + q[k]_{p,q}\) and Eq. (1.1), lemma can be proved.
\(\square \)
Lemma 3
Let \( 0<q<p\le 1\) and \(n \in N.\) We have
Proof
Using definition of operator, Lemmas 1 and 2, moments can be obtained as follows:
And using identity \([k+1]_{p,q}=q^k+p[k]_{p,q}\), we get
Finally,
\(\square \)
Corollary 1
Central moments \( \Phi _m^{(p, q)}(x) = K_n^{(p, q)}((t-x)^m;x)\) for \(m=1,2\) are:
Proof
Using Lemma 3, central moments can be obtained directly. \(\square \)
Remark 1
For \(q\in (0,1)\) and \(p \in (q,1]\), by simple computations \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } [n]_{p,q}=1/(p-q)\). In order to obtain results for order of convergence of the operator, we take \(q_n\in (0,1)\), \(p_n \in (q_n,1]\) such that \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } p_n=1\) and \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } q_n=1\), so that \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } \frac{1}{[n]_{p_n,q_n}}=0\). Such a sequence can always be constructed for example, we can take \(q_n=1-1/n\) and \(p_n=1-1/2n\), clearly \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }p_n^n=e^{-1/2}\), \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }q_n^n=e^{-1}\) and \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } \frac{1}{[n]_{p_n,q_n}}=0\).
Theorem 2
Let \((p_n)_n\) and \((q_n)_n\) be the sequence as defined in Remark 1. Then for each \(f \in C[0,\infty )\), \(K_{n}^{(p_{n}, q_{n})} (f;x)\) converges uniformly to f.
Proof
By Korovkin theorem, it is sufficient to show that \(\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty } \Vert K_{n}^{(p_n,q_n)} (t^m;x) -x^m\Vert _{C[0,\infty )} = 0 \) for \( m=0,1,2\).
Using Eq. 2.2, result for \(m=0\) is trivial. For \(m=1\), result can be obtained using Eq. (2.3), as follows:
Finally, using Eq. (2.4), we get
\(\square \)
3 Direct results
In this section, we give some local result for the operator. Let \(C_B[0,\infty )\) be the space of all real valued continuous bounded functions defined on \([0,\infty )\). The norm on the space \(C_B[0,\infty )\) is the supremum norm \(\Vert f\Vert =\sup _{x\in [0,\infty )} f(x)\). Further, Peetre’s K-functional is defined by
here \(W^2 = \{ g \in C_B[0,\infty ) : g', g'' \in C_B[0,\infty )\}\). By [10, p. 177, Theorem 2.4], there exists a positive constant \(C > 0\) such that \( K_2(f, \delta )\le C\omega _2(f, \delta ^\frac{1}{2}), \delta > 0\), where
is the second order modulus of continuity of function \(f \in C_B[0,\infty )\). Also, for \(f \in C_B[0,\infty )\) the usual modulus of continuity is given by
Theorem 3
Let \((p_n)_n\) and \((q_n)_n\) be the sequence as defined in Remark 1. Let \(f\in C_B[0,\infty )\). Then for all \(n \in \mathbb {N}\), there exists an absolute constant \(C>0\) such that
where
and
Proof
For \(x\in [0,\infty )\), we consider the auxiliary operators \(K_n^*(f;x)\) defined by
Using above operator and Eq. (2.3), we have
Let \(x\in [0,\infty )\) and \( g\in W^2\). Using the Taylor’s formula
Applying \(K_n^*\) to both sides of the above equation, we have
On the other hand,
and
Therefore, we can conclude that
Also, we have
Therefore,
Hence, taking the infimum on the right-hand side over all \(g\in W^2\), we get
By using property of K-functional, we get
Hence the theorem. \(\square \)
We consider following class of functions: \(H_{x^2}[0,\infty )=\{f:[0,\infty )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}:|f(x)|\le M_f(1+x^2) \text{ here } M_f \text{ is } \text{ constant } \text{ depending } \text{ on } \text{ the } \text{ function } f\}\),
\(C_{x^2}[0,\infty )=\left\{ f \in H_{x^2}[0,\infty ):f \text { is continuous}\right\} ,\)
\(C^*_{x^2}[0,\infty )=\left\{ f \in C_{x^2}[0,\infty ):\lim _{|x|\rightarrow \infty }\frac{f(x)}{1+x^2} \text { is finite}\right\} .\) The norm on the space \(C^*_{x^2}[0,\infty )\) is defined as \(\Vert f\Vert _{x^2}=\sup _{x\in [0,\infty )}\frac{f(x)}{1+x^2}\). We denote the modulus of continuity of f on closed interval [0, a], \(a > 0\) as:
Theorem 4
Let \((p_n)_n\) and \((q_n)_n\) be the sequence as defined in Remark 1. Then for \(f \in C_{x^2}[0,\infty )\), \(\omega _{a+1}(f;\delta )\) be its modulus of continuity on the interval \([0, a+1] \subset [0,\infty )\), \(a>0\) and for every \(n> 1\),
here,
Proof
For \(x\in [0,a]\) and \(t\ge 0\), we have (see [11, Equation 3.3])
By using above inequality and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have
For \(x \in [0,a]\), using Corollary 1,
Taking \(\delta _n=\sqrt{\lambda _n}\), we will get the theorem. \(\square \)
4 Voronovskaya type theorem
Theorem 5
Let \(0<q_n<p_n\le 1\), such that \(p_n\rightarrow 1\), \(p_n\rightarrow 1\), \(p^n_n\rightarrow a\) and \(q^n_n\rightarrow b\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). For any \(f \in C^*_{x^2}[0,\infty )\), such that \(f',f'' \in C^*_{x^2}[0,\infty )\), we have
uniformly on [0, A] for any \(A>0\). Here \(\alpha =\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }[n]_{p_{n},q_{n}}(q_n-1)\) and \(\gamma =[n]_{p_{n},q_{n}}\lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }(p_nq_n-2q_n+1)\).
Proof
By the Taylor’s formula, we have
here r(t, x) is reminder term and \(\lim _{t\rightarrow x} r(t,x)=0\). Therefore,
By the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, we have
As \(r(t,x) \in C^*_{x^2}[0,\infty )\), therefore by Theorem 2 and fact that \(\lim _{t\rightarrow x} r(t,x)=0\), we get
uniformly for any \(x \in [0, A]\). Hence, by using above equality and positivity of linear operator, we have
Therefore,
Consider,
and
Hence, by using Eqs. (4.1), (4.2) and (4.3), we get the theorem. \(\square \)
References
Lupaş, A.: A \(q-\)analogue of the Bernstein operator. University of Cluj-Napoca, Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus 9, 85–92 (1987)
Aral, A., Gupta, V., Agarwal, R.P.: Applications of \(q-\)calculus in operator theory. Springer (2013)
Ernst, T.: The history of \(q\)-calculus and a new method. U.U.D.M. Report 16, Uppsala, Departament of Mathematics, Uppsala University (2000)
Kac, V., Cheung, P.: Quantum calculus. Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York (2002)
Sadjang, P.N.: On the fundamental theorem of \((p, q)-\)Taylor formulas. arXiv:1309.3934 [math.QA]
Chakrabarti, R., Jagannathan, R.: A \((p, q)\)-oscillator realization of two parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 24, 711–718 (1991)
Sahai, V., Yadav, S.: Representations of two parameter quantum algebras and \((p, q)\)-special functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335, 268–279 (2007)
Jagannathan, R., Rao, K.S., Two-parameter quantum algebras, twin-basic numbers and associated generalized hypergeometric series. In: Proceedings of the international conference on number theory and mathematical physics, pp. 20–21 (2005)
Acar, T.: \((p, q)\)-genralization of Sźasz-Mirakyan operators. arXiv:1505.06839 [math.CA]
DeVore, R.A., Lorentz, G.G.: Construtive approximation. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Gupta, V., Aral, A.: Convergence of the \(q\)-analogue of Szász-Beta operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 216, 374–380 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, H., Gupta, C. On (p, q)-generalization of Szász-Mirakyan Kantorovich operators. Boll Unione Mat Ital 8, 213–222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-015-0038-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-015-0038-9
Keywords
- q-Calculus
- \((p , q)\)-Calculus
- \((p , q)\)-Szász-Mirakyan operator
- Modulus of continuity
- Peetre K-functional